Sept. 21, 2026
What Keeps a Galaxy Churning: Andromeda's Supernova Secrets Revealed
Supernovae keep galaxies churning A new study led by Fan Yi Meng from Tsinghua University provides the first comprehensive census of superbubbles in the Andromeda Galaxy, revealing that clustered supernova feedback is sufficient to sustain galactic-scale turbulence. This finding helps to explain why galaxies remain active over billions of years, with turbulence playing a crucial role in regulating star formation rates. The research, published in Nature Astronomy, highlights the energy balance between supernovae and the turbulence they create.Neutrinos may dictate stellar explosions A paper from Mariam Gogilashvili and Irene Tambora at the Niels Bohr Institute explores the role of neutrinos in determining which massive stars explode as supernovae. Their findings suggest that neutrino oscillations could lead to a significant number of stars collapsing into black holes, particularly those in the 16 to 30 solar mass range, addressing the long-standing red supergiant problem.TOI 1355b: A planet with an expiry date Researchers from the University of Tokyo have discovered TOI 1355b, a hot Jupiter with a unique eccentric orbit around an A-type star. This planet will stop transiting its host star by 2033 due to nodal precession, providing a rare opportunity to study its characteristics before it disappears from view.SpaceX Crew Missions Update NASA has contracted SpaceX for three additional crew rotation missions to the International Space Station, extending their partnership and ensuring continued access to the station. Crew 13 is currently in quarantine, with a launch targeted for early October.The Sun goes blank For the first time since February, the Sun has gone completely spotless, marking a significant moment in the solar cycle. As solar activity declines, a coronal hole is set to rotate into position, potentially leading to minor geomagnetic storms and auroras.1. Supernovae keep galaxies churning2. Neutrinos may dictate stellar explosions3. TOI 1355b: A planet with an expiry date4. SpaceX Crew Missions Update5. The Sun goes blankBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You've been glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, Google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They believe in privacy and there are no ads in their business model... yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get our special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy AstroDailyPod by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial-free episodes daily are only a click away... Click Here
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
This episode includes AI-generated content.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You've been glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, Google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They believe in privacy and there are no ads in their business model... yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get our special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy AstroDailyPod by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial-free episodes daily are only a click away... Click Here
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
This episode includes AI-generated content.
WEBVTT
0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.880
Anna: A galaxy should be quiet. Stir
1
00:00:02.880 --> 00:00:05.600
a cloud of gas and the churning dies away in
2
00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:08.480
a few million years, like ripples going flat
3
00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:11.040
on a pond. And yet every spiral
4
00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:13.360
galaxy we look at is still churning.
5
00:00:13.680 --> 00:00:15.600
Something keeps stirring the pot.
6
00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:18.800
Avery: Today, a survey of the galaxy next door that
7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.400
catches a spoon in the act, plus the
8
00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:23.840
ghostly particles that may decide which stars
9
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:26.760
explode at all. A planet with an expiry
10
00:00:26.760 --> 00:00:28.960
date and the sun goes blank for the first
11
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:29.920
time since February.
12
00:00:30.150 --> 00:00:31.260
Anna: The I'm Anna.
13
00:00:31.500 --> 00:00:34.220
Avery: And I'm Avery. This is astronomy daily,
14
00:00:34.300 --> 00:00:36.220
episode 199.
15
00:00:36.940 --> 00:00:39.420
Anna: Start with a problem that has sat in the
16
00:00:39.420 --> 00:00:42.300
background of galaxy science for about 50
17
00:00:42.300 --> 00:00:45.100
years, and that has the useful quality of
18
00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:48.060
being easy to state and very hard to
19
00:00:48.060 --> 00:00:51.020
answer. The gas between the stars in a
20
00:00:51.020 --> 00:00:53.900
galaxy is turbulent. It is not sitting still
21
00:00:53.900 --> 00:00:56.550
and it is not flowing smoothly. It is
22
00:00:56.550 --> 00:00:59.270
churning on every scale from a few light
23
00:00:59.270 --> 00:01:02.070
years up to thousands, with gas moving at
24
00:01:02.070 --> 00:01:04.070
something like 10 kilometres a second
25
00:01:04.230 --> 00:01:06.750
relative to its neighbours. We have measured
26
00:01:06.750 --> 00:01:09.590
this in our own galaxy and in every nearby
27
00:01:09.590 --> 00:01:12.429
galaxy we can resolve it is simply how
28
00:01:12.429 --> 00:01:15.350
interstellar gas behaves. Here is the
29
00:01:15.350 --> 00:01:18.350
problem. Turbulence dies. That is
30
00:01:18.350 --> 00:01:20.950
the one thing turbulence reliably does.
31
00:01:21.430 --> 00:01:24.270
Energy cascades from big eddies down to
32
00:01:24.270 --> 00:01:26.910
small eddies, and at the bottom it turns into
33
00:01:26.910 --> 00:01:29.090
heat and it gone. In
34
00:01:29.090 --> 00:01:31.890
1999, an astrophysicist named
35
00:01:31.890 --> 00:01:34.770
Mordecai Mark Macklow put a number on
36
00:01:34.770 --> 00:01:36.970
how fast that happens in interstellar
37
00:01:36.970 --> 00:01:39.810
conditions. And the number was brutal.
38
00:01:40.210 --> 00:01:42.770
Turbulence in a galaxy's gas should decay
39
00:01:42.770 --> 00:01:45.370
away in roughly the time it takes the gas to
40
00:01:45.370 --> 00:01:48.090
cross itself once a few tens of
41
00:01:48.090 --> 00:01:50.770
millions of years on a galactic clock.
42
00:01:50.770 --> 00:01:53.610
That's an afternoon. So the churning
43
00:01:53.610 --> 00:01:56.180
we see should not be there unless
44
00:01:56.340 --> 00:01:58.260
something is putting the energy back
45
00:01:58.500 --> 00:02:01.140
continuously for billions of years.
46
00:02:01.700 --> 00:02:03.620
Avery: And there has never been a shortage of
47
00:02:03.620 --> 00:02:04.340
suspects.
48
00:02:04.820 --> 00:02:07.820
Anna: No shortage at all. Supernovae are
49
00:02:07.820 --> 00:02:10.780
the obvious one. But gravity itself can
50
00:02:10.780 --> 00:02:13.340
drive turbulence. As the disc shears and
51
00:02:13.340 --> 00:02:16.020
clumps, there is the magnetorotational
52
00:02:16.100 --> 00:02:18.780
instability, which wrings energy out of the
53
00:02:18.780 --> 00:02:21.220
galaxy's rotation through its magnetic field.
54
00:02:21.730 --> 00:02:23.970
There is gas falling in from outside, and
55
00:02:23.970 --> 00:02:26.770
massive stars blow winds long before they
56
00:02:26.770 --> 00:02:29.770
explode. All of these are real. The
57
00:02:29.770 --> 00:02:31.970
question was never whether supernovae
58
00:02:31.970 --> 00:02:34.530
contribute. It was whether they are enough
59
00:02:34.850 --> 00:02:37.170
on their own to pay the whole bill.
60
00:02:37.630 --> 00:02:39.370
Avery: Uh, and to answer that, you need to do
61
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.610
something nobody had managed. You need to
62
00:02:41.610 --> 00:02:44.290
count the receipts. When massive stars in a
63
00:02:44.290 --> 00:02:46.810
cluster explode, and they do it in batches,
64
00:02:46.810 --> 00:02:49.210
because massive stars are born in groups and
65
00:02:49.210 --> 00:02:51.290
die within a few million years of one
66
00:02:51.290 --> 00:02:54.190
another, the blasts merge. Instead of
67
00:02:54.190 --> 00:02:56.710
a single expanding remnant you get a super
68
00:02:56.710 --> 00:02:59.430
bubble, an enormous cavity blown in the
69
00:02:59.430 --> 00:03:01.830
neutral hydrogen, its edge still pushing
70
00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:04.670
outwards. Superbubbles are the fingerprints
71
00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:07.230
each one carries in its size and its
72
00:03:07.230 --> 00:03:10.030
expansion speed, a record of how much energy
73
00:03:10.030 --> 00:03:11.950
went into it and roughly when.
74
00:03:12.590 --> 00:03:15.030
Anna: So a, uh, complete, dynamically resolved
75
00:03:15.030 --> 00:03:17.750
census of superbubbles across an entire
76
00:03:17.750 --> 00:03:20.270
galaxy would let you add up the energy
77
00:03:20.430 --> 00:03:23.190
supernovae have actually delivered and then
78
00:03:23.190 --> 00:03:25.300
compare it against how fast the turbine
79
00:03:25.370 --> 00:03:27.810
turbulence in that same galaxy is bleeding
80
00:03:27.810 --> 00:03:30.410
energy away. If the two numbers match,
81
00:03:30.570 --> 00:03:33.290
you have your answer. If supernovae falls
82
00:03:33.290 --> 00:03:35.690
short, something else is doing the work.
83
00:03:36.250 --> 00:03:38.690
Avery: Nobody had that senses for a reason. That's
84
00:03:38.690 --> 00:03:41.250
almost funny. We can't do it for the Milky
85
00:03:41.250 --> 00:03:43.850
Way because we live inside it. Mapping
86
00:03:43.850 --> 00:03:46.290
bubbles in our own galaxy is like surveying a
87
00:03:46.290 --> 00:03:48.930
forest from the base of one tree. And for
88
00:03:48.930 --> 00:03:51.490
other galaxies we have the sensitivity or the
89
00:03:51.490 --> 00:03:53.240
resolution, never both.
90
00:03:53.720 --> 00:03:56.600
Anna: Which is where two telescopes on opposite
91
00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.400
sides of the world come in. Exactly
92
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.200
that. The paper is in Nature astronomy,
93
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:05.160
published on 17 September. Led by
94
00:04:05.160 --> 00:04:07.400
Fan Yi Meng of Tsinghua University,
95
00:04:07.880 --> 00:04:10.760
with Zhao Wei Tsai and Jingwen Wu,
96
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:13.440
and with D Li, Jinghua's head of
97
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:15.840
astronomy and the former chief scientist of
98
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.440
the FAST telescope as corresponding
99
00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:21.010
authority, they combined two instruments.
100
00:04:21.250 --> 00:04:24.090
FAST is the 500 metre aperture
101
00:04:24.090 --> 00:04:26.650
spherical telescope sitting in a natural
102
00:04:26.650 --> 00:04:29.570
limestone bowl in Guizhou Province in
103
00:04:29.570 --> 00:04:32.210
southern China, the most sensitive single
104
00:04:32.210 --> 00:04:34.970
dish on Earth. At these wavelengths, what it
105
00:04:34.970 --> 00:04:37.650
gives you is faint, diffuse, large
106
00:04:37.650 --> 00:04:40.450
scale structure, the outskirts of bubbles,
107
00:04:40.530 --> 00:04:43.370
the gas nobody else can see. What it
108
00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:46.140
cannot give you is fine detail. For
109
00:04:46.140 --> 00:04:48.820
that they used archival observations from the
110
00:04:48.820 --> 00:04:51.780
Jansky Very Large array in New Mexico,
111
00:04:52.020 --> 00:04:54.740
27 dishes spread across the desert.
112
00:04:54.900 --> 00:04:57.700
Working as one instrument, the array
113
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:00.260
resolves the sharp edges fast,
114
00:05:00.500 --> 00:05:03.260
fills in everything. The array's spacing
115
00:05:03.260 --> 00:05:06.100
makes it blind to stitch them together, and
116
00:05:06.100 --> 00:05:08.900
you get a map that is both deep and sharp,
117
00:05:08.900 --> 00:05:11.620
which is exactly what this problem has always
118
00:05:11.620 --> 00:05:12.100
needed.
119
00:05:13.100 --> 00:05:15.980
Avery: They pointed that combination at Messier 31,
120
00:05:16.060 --> 00:05:18.740
the Andromeda Galaxy, the nearest big
121
00:05:18.740 --> 00:05:21.420
spiral, 2 1/2 million light years away
122
00:05:21.660 --> 00:05:23.580
and close enough that we can see the whole
123
00:05:23.580 --> 00:05:26.420
disc laid out from the outside. They mapped
124
00:05:26.420 --> 00:05:28.900
it in the 21 centimetre line of neutral
125
00:05:28.900 --> 00:05:31.340
hydrogen, the radio signal that traces
126
00:05:31.500 --> 00:05:33.020
cold atomic gas.
127
00:05:33.580 --> 00:05:35.340
Anna: From that map, they pulled
128
00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:38.220
365 candidate cavities
129
00:05:38.300 --> 00:05:40.780
and after classification, confirmed
130
00:05:40.940 --> 00:05:43.860
118 genuine super bubbles
131
00:05:43.860 --> 00:05:45.640
across the entire disc.
132
00:05:45.960 --> 00:05:46.760
Avery: And the result?
133
00:05:47.320 --> 00:05:49.960
Anna: The first thing worth noticing is the ages.
134
00:05:50.200 --> 00:05:52.520
Measured from their sizes and expansion
135
00:05:52.520 --> 00:05:55.240
speeds, the bubbles run up to 40 million
136
00:05:55.320 --> 00:05:58.280
years old. That is not an arbitrary number.
137
00:05:58.520 --> 00:06:01.120
It is almost exactly how long a star
138
00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:03.960
cluster keeps producing Supernovae from its
139
00:06:03.960 --> 00:06:06.760
first massive star dying to its last.
140
00:06:07.080 --> 00:06:09.400
The ages line up with the clock you would
141
00:06:09.400 --> 00:06:12.340
predict if clusters are uh, what makes them B
142
00:06:12.340 --> 00:06:14.660
Lee put the scale plainly. Those
143
00:06:14.660 --> 00:06:17.260
118 bubbles correspond to
144
00:06:17.260 --> 00:06:19.900
thousands of supernova explosions over the
145
00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:22.900
past 40 million years. Then the actual
146
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.740
test from the bubbles they calculated the
147
00:06:25.740 --> 00:06:28.300
rate at which supernovae are injecting
148
00:06:28.300 --> 00:06:30.860
kinetic energy between 10 to the
149
00:06:30.860 --> 00:06:33.780
49th to 10 to the 51.5
150
00:06:33.940 --> 00:06:36.700
ergs per cubic kiloparsec per
151
00:06:36.700 --> 00:06:39.490
million years. Separately and this is the
152
00:06:39.490 --> 00:06:42.050
part that makes the paper work. They derived
153
00:06:42.050 --> 00:06:44.570
the rate at which turbulence is dissipating
154
00:06:44.570 --> 00:06:47.130
energy from the same data using the
155
00:06:47.130 --> 00:06:49.570
observed motions of the gastwo
156
00:06:49.570 --> 00:06:52.490
independent numbers. They match match
157
00:06:52.490 --> 00:06:55.210
how closely in magnitude. And
158
00:06:55.450 --> 00:06:58.050
this is the stronger claim in spatial
159
00:06:58.050 --> 00:06:58.810
distribution.
160
00:06:59.130 --> 00:07:01.770
It's not just that the galaxy wide totals
161
00:07:01.770 --> 00:07:04.250
happen to agree, which could be coincidence
162
00:07:04.330 --> 00:07:06.930
between two quantities that both scale with
163
00:07:06.930 --> 00:07:09.660
how many stars a ah galaxy has. It's that
164
00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:12.460
where the supernovae energy goes in is
165
00:07:12.460 --> 00:07:14.780
where the turbulent energy comes out
166
00:07:15.180 --> 00:07:17.860
region by region across the disc. The
167
00:07:17.860 --> 00:07:20.220
supply map matches the demand map.
168
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:23.220
That's much harder to get by accent. The
169
00:07:23.220 --> 00:07:25.460
conclusion the authors draw is carefully
170
00:07:25.460 --> 00:07:27.580
worded and I want to keep their wording.
171
00:07:27.900 --> 00:07:30.140
Clustered supernova feedback is
172
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:32.860
sufficient to sustain galactic scale
173
00:07:32.860 --> 00:07:35.100
turbulence. Why this matters beyond
174
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:37.930
bookkeeping is turbulence is not a detail
175
00:07:37.930 --> 00:07:40.570
of galaxies, it's one of the controls.
176
00:07:40.810 --> 00:07:43.490
Turbulent pressure helps hold a ah gas disc
177
00:07:43.490 --> 00:07:46.450
up against its own gravity. And turbulence is
178
00:07:46.450 --> 00:07:49.290
what stops molecular clouds collapsing all at
179
00:07:49.290 --> 00:07:51.929
once. A large part of why galaxies
180
00:07:51.929 --> 00:07:54.570
convert gas into stars. So slowly
181
00:07:54.890 --> 00:07:57.530
change the turbulence and you change the star
182
00:07:57.530 --> 00:08:00.490
formation rate. So this closes a loop.
183
00:08:00.570 --> 00:08:03.510
Gas collapses and forms stars. The biggest
184
00:08:03.510 --> 00:08:06.190
of those stars explode. The explosions
185
00:08:06.190 --> 00:08:08.750
stir the remaining gas. The stirring
186
00:08:08.750 --> 00:08:11.350
regulates how readily the next generation
187
00:08:11.350 --> 00:08:13.990
forms. Galaxies are partly self
188
00:08:13.990 --> 00:08:16.390
governing and this is the first time both
189
00:08:16.390 --> 00:08:18.430
ends of that loop have been measured in the
190
00:08:18.430 --> 00:08:21.390
same galaxy from the same data and found
191
00:08:21.390 --> 00:08:22.190
to balance.
192
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:25.310
Avery: And um, the caveat now the honest
193
00:08:25.310 --> 00:08:27.870
Anna: limits and there are three first,
194
00:08:27.950 --> 00:08:30.270
sufficient is not the same as sole
195
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:32.920
showing supernovae can pay the whole bill
196
00:08:32.920 --> 00:08:35.200
does not prove nothing else. Chips in
197
00:08:35.520 --> 00:08:37.680
gravity and the magneto rotational
198
00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:40.560
instability have not been eliminated. They
199
00:08:40.560 --> 00:08:43.320
have been made unnecessary, which is a weaker
200
00:08:43.320 --> 00:08:46.120
and more interesting result. Second, this
201
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:49.040
is neutral atomic hydrogen. It does not
202
00:08:49.040 --> 00:08:51.560
directly trace the molecular gas where
203
00:08:51.560 --> 00:08:54.120
stars actually form or the hot
204
00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:56.720
ionised gas and the energy budget in those
205
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:59.600
phases could behave differently. And third,
206
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:02.160
this is one galaxy, a large,
207
00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:05.360
fairly quiet spiral that has not formed stars
208
00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:08.280
vigorously in a long while. Whether the books
209
00:09:08.280 --> 00:09:11.280
balance the same way in a starburst or in a
210
00:09:11.280 --> 00:09:13.560
small, irregular, uh, galaxy where bubbles
211
00:09:13.560 --> 00:09:14.719
can blow straight out.
212
00:09:14.719 --> 00:09:17.280
The top is exactly the next question.
213
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:20.840
Two footnotes I enjoyed Bordechai Mark
214
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:23.640
McClo, the man whose 1999
215
00:09:23.640 --> 00:09:26.080
paper showed this turbulence should have died
216
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:29.060
long ago, is a co author here. His own
217
00:09:29.060 --> 00:09:31.340
result is referenced too, in the paper that
218
00:09:31.340 --> 00:09:34.340
answers it. And because Nature Astronomy
219
00:09:34.340 --> 00:09:37.220
publishes its referee reports, we know one
220
00:09:37.220 --> 00:09:39.980
of the two reviewers was Christoph Federath
221
00:09:40.060 --> 00:09:42.980
at the Australian National University, who
222
00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:45.420
has spent a career on this exact question.
223
00:09:45.900 --> 00:09:48.820
The Australian fingerprint is on the scrutiny
224
00:09:48.820 --> 00:09:51.500
rather than the data. Regular listeners will
225
00:09:51.500 --> 00:09:54.460
hear an echo here. Two weeks ago we ran
226
00:09:54.460 --> 00:09:56.860
the finding that black hole outflows can
227
00:09:56.860 --> 00:09:59.460
trigger star formation as well as shut it
228
00:09:59.460 --> 00:10:02.290
down. Feedback that builds as well as
229
00:10:02.290 --> 00:10:05.010
breaks. This is the same lesson one
230
00:10:05.090 --> 00:10:07.650
rung down the letter. At stellar scale,
231
00:10:07.970 --> 00:10:10.930
feedback is not simply destructive, it is
232
00:10:10.930 --> 00:10:12.530
a galaxy's thermostat.
233
00:10:13.090 --> 00:10:15.930
Avery: Anna's Storey takes supernovae as given and
234
00:10:15.930 --> 00:10:18.890
asks what they do to a galaxy. This one
235
00:10:18.890 --> 00:10:21.690
asks a question one step which
236
00:10:21.690 --> 00:10:24.610
stars actually managed to explode? You would
237
00:10:24.610 --> 00:10:27.390
think that was settled. It is not. We
238
00:10:27.390 --> 00:10:29.950
see fewer supernovae than our models say we
239
00:10:29.950 --> 00:10:32.790
should. And there's a related puzzle, the red
240
00:10:32.790 --> 00:10:35.710
supergiant problem. When astronomers go back
241
00:10:35.710 --> 00:10:38.150
through archival images to identify the star
242
00:10:38.150 --> 00:10:40.910
that blew up, they never find 1 above about
243
00:10:40.910 --> 00:10:43.870
16 to 18 solar masses. Even
244
00:10:43.870 --> 00:10:46.230
though plenty of stars are heavier, something
245
00:10:46.230 --> 00:10:48.710
is quietly removing the most massive stars
246
00:10:48.710 --> 00:10:51.550
from the exploding population. A new paper in
247
00:10:51.550 --> 00:10:54.310
Physical Review D from Mariam Gogilashvili
248
00:10:54.310 --> 00:10:56.870
and Irene Tambora at the Niels Bohr Institute
249
00:10:56.870 --> 00:10:59.330
in Copenhagen Contorm points at an
250
00:10:59.330 --> 00:11:02.050
unlikely culprit. Neutrinos changing
251
00:11:02.050 --> 00:11:04.850
identity Quick refresher When a
252
00:11:04.850 --> 00:11:07.370
Anna: massive star's core collapses, about
253
00:11:07.370 --> 00:11:10.370
99% of the energy released leaves
254
00:11:10.370 --> 00:11:13.250
as neutrinos. And the explosion depends on
255
00:11:13.250 --> 00:11:15.490
a small fraction of that flood being
256
00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:18.210
reabsorbed by the gas just outside the
257
00:11:18.210 --> 00:11:20.770
core, heating it enough to revive the
258
00:11:20.770 --> 00:11:23.610
stalled shock wave. It's a narrow margin.
259
00:11:24.130 --> 00:11:26.610
Neutrinos also come in three flavours
260
00:11:26.850 --> 00:11:29.410
electron, muon and tau and
261
00:11:29.410 --> 00:11:31.610
oscillate between them, which is Nobel
262
00:11:31.610 --> 00:11:33.730
winning physics from 1998.
263
00:11:34.210 --> 00:11:37.130
Avery: Here's the catch. Only the electron flavour
264
00:11:37.130 --> 00:11:39.890
deposits heat efficiently. Muon and tau
265
00:11:39.890 --> 00:11:42.810
neutrinos mostly sail straight out. So
266
00:11:42.810 --> 00:11:45.210
if flavour conversion happens deep inside a
267
00:11:45.210 --> 00:11:47.930
collapsing core, it takes energy earmarked
268
00:11:47.930 --> 00:11:50.210
for the explosion and redistributes it into
269
00:11:50.210 --> 00:11:52.960
flavours that simply leave. Most state of the
270
00:11:52.960 --> 00:11:55.360
art simulations leave this out on the old
271
00:11:55.360 --> 00:11:57.480
assumption that conversion happens too far
272
00:11:57.480 --> 00:11:59.840
out to matter. Recent work says
273
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.760
otherwise, so Maryam Gogilashvili and
274
00:12:02.760 --> 00:12:05.720
Irene Tambora put it in schematically and
275
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:08.600
ran the collapse of 195 stars
276
00:12:08.680 --> 00:12:11.560
from 9 to 120 solar masses
277
00:12:12.040 --> 00:12:14.960
without flavour conversion. About 27%
278
00:12:14.960 --> 00:12:17.640
of their stars fail to explode and collapse
279
00:12:17.640 --> 00:12:20.070
straight to black holes. That matches both
280
00:12:20.070 --> 00:12:22.750
the literature and observations. Switch
281
00:12:22.750 --> 00:12:25.270
flavour conversion on and the failure rate
282
00:12:25.270 --> 00:12:28.030
climbs to somewhere between 48 and
283
00:12:28.030 --> 00:12:30.830
88% depending on how deep in the
284
00:12:30.830 --> 00:12:33.430
core you let it happen. And the stars most
285
00:12:33.430 --> 00:12:36.030
affected sit between 16 and 30
286
00:12:36.030 --> 00:12:37.950
solar masses, which is
287
00:12:37.950 --> 00:12:40.750
Anna: precisely the missing mass range. In the red
288
00:12:40.750 --> 00:12:41.950
supergiant problem.
289
00:12:42.190 --> 00:12:44.990
Avery: There is a second quieter result I like more.
290
00:12:45.300 --> 00:12:47.580
And the stars that do still explode. Flavour
291
00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:50.100
conversion revives the shock earlier so less
292
00:12:50.100 --> 00:12:52.500
material rains back onto the newborn neutron
293
00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:55.300
star. The neutron stars come out lighter,
294
00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:58.180
closer to the 1.2 to 1.4 solar
295
00:12:58.180 --> 00:13:00.420
masses we actually measure in pulsars.
296
00:13:00.900 --> 00:13:03.460
A model that was running heavy now matches
297
00:13:03.940 --> 00:13:06.740
the honest handling. Here is the range. 48
298
00:13:06.740 --> 00:13:09.700
to 88% is not a measurement. It is a span
299
00:13:09.700 --> 00:13:11.860
across assumptions. And the authors say
300
00:13:11.860 --> 00:13:13.780
plainly that their upper valleys look to be
301
00:13:13.780 --> 00:13:16.380
in tension with observations. This is one
302
00:13:16.380 --> 00:13:18.380
dimensional modelling with a deliberately
303
00:13:18.380 --> 00:13:20.700
simplified switch for the neutrino physics.
304
00:13:20.860 --> 00:13:23.460
What it establishes is not a number. It is
305
00:13:23.460 --> 00:13:25.620
that this effect is too big to keep leaving
306
00:13:25.620 --> 00:13:28.420
out. The preprint went up in mid
307
00:13:28.420 --> 00:13:30.620
May, so the work has been circulating about
308
00:13:30.620 --> 00:13:32.460
four months. It is the journal version that
309
00:13:32.460 --> 00:13:32.580
is
310
00:13:32.580 --> 00:13:34.980
Anna: new and a southern footnote that is not a
311
00:13:34.980 --> 00:13:36.980
stretch. We have caught neutrinos from
312
00:13:36.980 --> 00:13:39.420
exactly one supernova SN
313
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:42.380
1987A in the Southern Magellanic
314
00:13:42.380 --> 00:13:45.160
Cloud cloud 20 dozen particles over about 13
315
00:13:45.240 --> 00:13:47.560
seconds in February 1987.
316
00:13:48.040 --> 00:13:50.600
Every word of this debate traces back to that
317
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:53.560
1 handful of detections from a galaxy only
318
00:13:53.560 --> 00:13:56.160
southern observers see properly. The next
319
00:13:56.160 --> 00:13:58.560
galactic supernova settles a great deal of
320
00:13:58.560 --> 00:13:58.839
it.
321
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:00.920
Avery: Okay, moving on to storey 3.
322
00:14:01.400 --> 00:14:03.920
Most exoplanet discoveries come with an open
323
00:14:03.920 --> 00:14:06.320
ended invitation. Go and study it whenever
324
00:14:06.320 --> 00:14:08.680
you like. This one comes with a deadline.
325
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:11.600
Published on 18 September in the publications
326
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:14.160
of the Astronomical Society of Japan from
327
00:14:14.160 --> 00:14:16.480
Noriharu Watanabe and Norio
328
00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:18.920
Narita at the University of Tokyo with a
329
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:21.600
large international team. The discovery of
330
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:24.600
TOI 1355b, a
331
00:14:24.600 --> 00:14:27.360
hot Jupiter and a strange one on three counts
332
00:14:27.440 --> 00:14:30.028
count one is the star. TOI
333
00:14:30.212 --> 00:14:33.160
1355 is an A type star about twice
334
00:14:33.160 --> 00:14:36.080
the Sun's mass with a surface near 8,700
335
00:14:36.160 --> 00:14:39.120
Kelvin, um, some 3,000 degrees hotter than
336
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:41.920
the Sun. It's around 800 light years away
337
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:44.560
and it spins fast better than 80
338
00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:46.760
kilometres a second against our Sun's
339
00:14:46.760 --> 00:14:49.520
leisurely two count two is the
340
00:14:49.520 --> 00:14:52.360
planet. Nearly six Jupiter masses. About
341
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:55.160
1.4 Jupiter radii whipping around
342
00:14:55.160 --> 00:14:57.560
that star every 2.17 days.
343
00:14:57.960 --> 00:15:00.120
But its orbit is not a circle. The
344
00:15:00.120 --> 00:15:03.100
eccentricity is about 0.22 a
345
00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:04.700
properly lopsided orbit.
346
00:15:04.700 --> 00:15:07.020
Anna: Why is that surprising for a hot Jupiter?
347
00:15:07.180 --> 00:15:09.700
Avery: Because they're almost never lopsided sitting
348
00:15:09.700 --> 00:15:12.340
that close in tides should round off an orbit
349
00:15:12.340 --> 00:15:15.300
quickly. Of the roughly 20 hot Jupiters known
350
00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:17.740
around hot stars, the measured eccentricities
351
00:15:17.740 --> 00:15:20.660
are essentially zero, some to four decimal
352
00:15:20.660 --> 00:15:22.460
places. And there's exactly one other
353
00:15:22.460 --> 00:15:24.980
eccentric case on record. These worlds are
354
00:15:24.980 --> 00:15:27.420
thought to be flung inward on wild elliptical
355
00:15:27.420 --> 00:15:29.820
orbits by gravitational bullying from other
356
00:15:29.820 --> 00:15:32.310
planets. Then have those orbits ground down
357
00:15:32.310 --> 00:15:34.870
to circles by tides. TOI
358
00:15:34.870 --> 00:15:37.790
1355B is partway through the grinding,
359
00:15:37.790 --> 00:15:40.590
which we rarely gets. Watch count three
360
00:15:40.590 --> 00:15:42.910
is the deadline. Comparing transits across
361
00:15:42.910 --> 00:15:45.850
TESS observations from 2019, 2020,
362
00:15:46.021 --> 00:15:48.910
2022 and 2024. The team
363
00:15:48.910 --> 00:15:50.750
found the planet crossing the star at a
364
00:15:50.750 --> 00:15:53.030
steadily different height each time. The
365
00:15:53.030 --> 00:15:55.950
orbit's plane is swinging nodal precession
366
00:15:55.950 --> 00:15:58.230
driven by the bulge of that rapidly spinning
367
00:15:58.230 --> 00:16:01.150
star. Wind it forward and the planet stops
368
00:16:01.150 --> 00:16:03.150
crossing the star's face from our point of
369
00:16:03.150 --> 00:16:05.510
view around the middle of 2033.
370
00:16:05.670 --> 00:16:08.670
Anna: After that, no transits for centuries. The
371
00:16:08.670 --> 00:16:09.670
planet is fine.
372
00:16:09.670 --> 00:16:12.430
Our line of sight is what runs out. There is
373
00:16:12.430 --> 00:16:15.109
a lovely methodological wrinkle too.
374
00:16:15.350 --> 00:16:17.990
You normally weigh a planet by watching the
375
00:16:17.990 --> 00:16:20.550
star wobble. But this star spins
376
00:16:20.710 --> 00:16:23.350
so fast its spectral lines are smeared
377
00:16:23.510 --> 00:16:26.050
and that does not work. So they weighed it
378
00:16:26.050 --> 00:16:28.410
from the light curve instead from M. The way
379
00:16:28.410 --> 00:16:31.210
the planet's gravity distorts the star into
380
00:16:31.210 --> 00:16:33.890
a faint rugby ball shape. And from the
381
00:16:33.890 --> 00:16:36.330
subtle brightening as the star is tugged
382
00:16:36.330 --> 00:16:39.170
towards us. The mass came out of the shape of
383
00:16:39.170 --> 00:16:41.890
the light, not the shift of the lines. And
384
00:16:41.890 --> 00:16:43.850
the supporting cast is worth naming.
385
00:16:44.170 --> 00:16:47.170
Alongside TESS and the 3.8 metre
386
00:16:47.170 --> 00:16:49.850
SEMI telescope in Okayama, this
387
00:16:49.850 --> 00:16:52.490
paper leans on a 91 centimetre
388
00:16:52.490 --> 00:16:55.060
telescope on the slopes of Matt Etna,
389
00:16:55.370 --> 00:16:58.090
a 40 centimetre in Switzerland and a
390
00:16:58.090 --> 00:17:00.970
28 centimetre at a private observatory in
391
00:17:00.970 --> 00:17:03.890
Germany. Backyard scale instruments on the
392
00:17:03.890 --> 00:17:06.770
Discovery paper for a six Jupiter mass
393
00:17:06.770 --> 00:17:09.730
world. The preprint went up in August, so
394
00:17:09.730 --> 00:17:12.050
about a month ahead of the journal. And for
395
00:17:12.050 --> 00:17:14.430
our southern listeners the star sits at Ah,
396
00:17:14.430 --> 00:17:17.410
Declination 67, which means
397
00:17:17.410 --> 00:17:20.130
it never rises from Sydney. Northern
398
00:17:20.130 --> 00:17:22.890
listeners can find the field in Cepheus. The
399
00:17:22.890 --> 00:17:25.690
team is already preparing a follow up on how
400
00:17:25.690 --> 00:17:27.970
tilted the orbit is and wants
401
00:17:27.970 --> 00:17:30.690
JWST time to low
402
00:17:30.690 --> 00:17:31.050
ETH
403
00:17:31.050 --> 00:17:32.730
Avery: orbit now and the business end of
404
00:17:32.730 --> 00:17:33.410
spaceflight.
405
00:17:33.570 --> 00:17:36.320
On 18 September, NASA exercised a UH
406
00:17:36.410 --> 00:17:39.330
contract modification with SpaceX for three
407
00:17:39.330 --> 00:17:41.370
additional crew rotation missions to the
408
00:17:41.370 --> 00:17:44.370
International Space Crew 1 5, Crew
409
00:17:44.370 --> 00:17:47.210
16 and Crew 1 7. The value
410
00:17:47.210 --> 00:17:50.130
is $946 million for all
411
00:17:50.130 --> 00:17:52.820
three covering ground launch in
412
00:17:52.820 --> 00:17:54.980
orbit and return and recovery operations,
413
00:17:55.460 --> 00:17:58.180
cargo on each mission and lifeboat capability
414
00:17:58.180 --> 00:18:00.940
while docked. That takes SpaceX to
415
00:18:00.940 --> 00:18:03.380
17 crew missions under the commercial crew
416
00:18:03.380 --> 00:18:06.060
transportation contract and that contract's
417
00:18:06.060 --> 00:18:08.040
running total to $5.92
418
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:11.180
billion. Period of performance runs through
419
00:18:11.180 --> 00:18:13.540
2030 with mission readiness dates in
420
00:18:13.540 --> 00:18:16.540
2027 and 2028. NASA
421
00:18:16.540 --> 00:18:18.700
flagged its intent to buy back in May and
422
00:18:18.700 --> 00:18:21.460
calls this a sole source modification that
423
00:18:21.460 --> 00:18:23.680
does not pre further purchases later.
424
00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:26.400
Anna: One line in that release is worth reading
425
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:29.320
carefully. NASA says the change helps
426
00:18:29.320 --> 00:18:32.240
it maintain access to the station with quote,
427
00:18:32.480 --> 00:18:34.800
two unique commercial crew industry
428
00:18:34.960 --> 00:18:37.960
partners. The award itself goes to one
429
00:18:37.960 --> 00:18:40.160
of them. The original 2014
430
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:42.960
contracts went to both Boeing and SpaceX
431
00:18:43.280 --> 00:18:46.080
and Boeing appears in this release exactly
432
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.890
once in that history. NASA does
433
00:18:48.890 --> 00:18:51.490
not say anything here about when its second
434
00:18:51.490 --> 00:18:53.050
provider next flies people.
435
00:18:53.450 --> 00:18:55.290
We'll report that when they do say.
436
00:18:55.530 --> 00:18:57.770
Avery: Meanwhile, the near term mission is moving.
437
00:18:58.090 --> 00:19:00.770
The four astronauts of Crew 13 entered
438
00:19:00.770 --> 00:19:02.770
quarantine late on Thursday at UH Johnson
439
00:19:02.770 --> 00:19:05.370
Space Centre in Houston. NASA's Jessica
440
00:19:05.370 --> 00:19:08.290
Watkins and Luke Delaney, the Canadian Space
441
00:19:08.290 --> 00:19:10.650
Agency's Yoshua Kutryk and
442
00:19:10.650 --> 00:19:12.850
Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey
443
00:19:12.850 --> 00:19:15.630
tatariotnikov. NASA and SpaceX
444
00:19:15.630 --> 00:19:18.230
are still targeting early October. Before
445
00:19:18.230 --> 00:19:20.550
quarantine. They finished training at SpaceX
446
00:19:20.550 --> 00:19:22.910
in Hawthorne and ran a crew equipment
447
00:19:22.910 --> 00:19:25.750
interface test at Cape Canaveral. Suits on
448
00:19:25.830 --> 00:19:28.670
into the Dragon leak cheques, seat fit
449
00:19:28.670 --> 00:19:31.590
comms cheques, my favourite detail. They sit
450
00:19:31.590 --> 00:19:33.750
in the capsule and listen to its fans and
451
00:19:33.750 --> 00:19:35.790
pumps so that none of the sounds are
452
00:19:35.790 --> 00:19:37.190
unfamiliar on launch day.
453
00:19:37.430 --> 00:19:40.190
Anna: The quarantine itself is an Apollo era
454
00:19:40.190 --> 00:19:43.030
invention still doing its job. Keeping a head
455
00:19:43.030 --> 00:19:45.560
cold on the ground where it belongs. That
456
00:19:45.560 --> 00:19:47.720
closes out an arc we tracked since the
457
00:19:47.720 --> 00:19:50.280
oxidizer leak stood. Crew 13 down
458
00:19:50.600 --> 00:19:53.200
valve replaced. Crew in quarantine early
459
00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:55.560
October. We still want a date.
460
00:19:55.720 --> 00:19:57.960
Quick hit, closing a thread. We opened on
461
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:00.520
Friday. It happened on the 18th of
462
00:20:00.520 --> 00:20:02.840
September. The earth facing sun went
463
00:20:02.840 --> 00:20:05.720
completely spotless. No numbered active
464
00:20:05.720 --> 00:20:08.600
regions at all. It's the first spotless day
465
00:20:08.600 --> 00:20:11.160
since the 24th of February and the
466
00:20:11.160 --> 00:20:13.640
19th was spotless too, making it two in a
467
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.330
row. By the 20th, a small new region
468
00:20:16.330 --> 00:20:19.250
had rotated up and the run ended. Which is
469
00:20:19.250 --> 00:20:21.770
exactly how the descent from a solar maximum
470
00:20:21.770 --> 00:20:24.370
goes. Not a switch, but a flicker that
471
00:20:24.370 --> 00:20:27.090
Avery: lengthens for scale on how far we have come
472
00:20:27.090 --> 00:20:27.450
down.
473
00:20:27.690 --> 00:20:30.570
The busiest single day of the Solar cycle
474
00:20:30.570 --> 00:20:33.450
was 8 August 2024, with
475
00:20:33.450 --> 00:20:35.730
an estimated 337
476
00:20:35.730 --> 00:20:38.610
sunspots. That was the highest daily count
477
00:20:38.610 --> 00:20:41.520
since March 2001. Cycle
478
00:20:41.520 --> 00:20:44.000
25 peaked in late 2024
479
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:46.560
and minimum is not expected before about
480
00:20:46.560 --> 00:20:47.280
2030.
481
00:20:47.520 --> 00:20:50.360
Anna: But do not put the aurora gear away. A
482
00:20:50.360 --> 00:20:53.080
coronal hole is rotating into position and
483
00:20:53.080 --> 00:20:55.360
its fast solar wind stream should reach us
484
00:20:55.360 --> 00:20:58.280
around the 23rd, with forecasters flagging a
485
00:20:58.280 --> 00:21:01.160
chance of minor geomagnetic storming. If
486
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:03.680
it lands, best chances are the far north,
487
00:21:03.920 --> 00:21:06.440
northern Scotland and the far south, southern
488
00:21:06.440 --> 00:21:09.120
New Zealand. It arrives right on the equinox,
489
00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:11.480
which is the most aurora friendly moment of
490
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:14.320
the year. For reasons of geometry and the
491
00:21:14.320 --> 00:21:16.600
standing point we keep making. A, uh, quiet
492
00:21:16.600 --> 00:21:19.520
sun means fewer auroras, but it also means
493
00:21:19.520 --> 00:21:22.400
a weaker shield against galactic cosmic rays.
494
00:21:22.640 --> 00:21:25.600
So that background quietly rises same
495
00:21:25.600 --> 00:21:27.880
dial opposite end to the sky.
496
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:30.000
Avery: And this week the calendar does something
497
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:32.320
that only makes sense if you remember. The
498
00:21:32.320 --> 00:21:35.050
Earth is tilted first to equinox,
499
00:21:35.130 --> 00:21:37.810
five minutes past midnight universal time on
500
00:21:37.810 --> 00:21:40.730
the 23rd. An equinox is an instant,
501
00:21:40.730 --> 00:21:43.570
not a day. So where you stand decides the
502
00:21:43.570 --> 00:21:45.570
date. That is Tuesday evening in the
503
00:21:45.570 --> 00:21:48.250
Americas, just after five in Los Angeles,
504
00:21:48.410 --> 00:21:50.930
just after eight in New York, one in the
505
00:21:50.930 --> 00:21:53.650
morning in London and five past ten on
506
00:21:53.650 --> 00:21:56.170
Wednesday morning in Sydney. Spring here,
507
00:21:56.330 --> 00:21:58.490
autumn there, same instant.
508
00:21:58.810 --> 00:22:01.570
Anna: Then on Saturday the 26th, the full
509
00:22:01.570 --> 00:22:04.420
moon, the harvest moon. The full moon falling
510
00:22:04.420 --> 00:22:07.220
closest to the September equinox. And here's
511
00:22:07.220 --> 00:22:09.140
where it gets interesting. Because the
512
00:22:09.140 --> 00:22:11.700
harvest moon's entire reputation is a
513
00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:13.340
northern hemisphere phenomenon.
514
00:22:13.580 --> 00:22:15.380
Avery: Explain that, because I think most people
515
00:22:15.380 --> 00:22:16.780
assume it's just a name.
516
00:22:17.020 --> 00:22:19.740
Anna: It's not just a name. The moon Normally
517
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:22.220
rises about 50 minutes later each night.
518
00:22:22.460 --> 00:22:24.500
Around the northern autumn equinox. The
519
00:22:24.500 --> 00:22:26.940
Moon's path meets the eastern horizon at a
520
00:22:26.940 --> 00:22:29.700
shallow angle. So successive moon rises,
521
00:22:29.700 --> 00:22:32.420
bunch up and you get several evenings running
522
00:22:32.420 --> 00:22:34.540
with bright moonlight arriving just after
523
00:22:34.540 --> 00:22:37.440
sunset, which was the whole point. Extra
524
00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:38.760
light to finish the harvest.
525
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:41.280
Avery: We ran the numbers for this week. On the
526
00:22:41.280 --> 00:22:44.080
nights around full moon, moonrise comes later
527
00:22:44.080 --> 00:22:46.520
by about 12 minutes a night. In London,
528
00:22:46.760 --> 00:22:49.680
22 minutes in New York, 27 in Los
529
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:51.480
Angeles and in Sydney,
530
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:53.320
62 minutes.
531
00:22:53.800 --> 00:22:56.440
Anna: So we get the opposite of a harvest moon.
532
00:22:56.600 --> 00:22:59.600
Avery: We get the anti harvest moon. The effect the
533
00:22:59.600 --> 00:23:01.840
thing is named for is more than five times
534
00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:04.600
weaker here than in London. Same moon,
535
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:07.680
same week, geometry simply reversed. In
536
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:10.520
spring it's the same ecliptic angle that
537
00:23:10.520 --> 00:23:13.280
gives us a brilliant high Venus and one
538
00:23:13.280 --> 00:23:14.440
hugging the horizon.
539
00:23:14.760 --> 00:23:17.480
One wrinkle for Australian listeners The full
540
00:23:17.480 --> 00:23:20.120
moon Instant lands at 2:48 on Sunday
541
00:23:20.120 --> 00:23:22.800
morning our time, so our calendars say
542
00:23:22.800 --> 00:23:25.040
27th and northern ones say
543
00:23:25.040 --> 00:23:27.560
26th. It looks full on both nights.
544
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:28.600
Anna: And the planets?
545
00:23:28.840 --> 00:23:30.960
Avery: Venus is still the show in the west after
546
00:23:30.960 --> 00:23:33.720
sunset. At uh magnitude -4.5
547
00:23:34.430 --> 00:23:37.350
from Sydney it stands 37 degrees high as
548
00:23:37.350 --> 00:23:40.070
the sun sets and hangs on for more than three
549
00:23:40.070 --> 00:23:42.750
hours. From New York, 13 degrees
550
00:23:42.990 --> 00:23:45.790
from London, 2 1/2 degrees about
551
00:23:45.790 --> 00:23:48.670
25 minutes with a dead flat western horizon
552
00:23:48.990 --> 00:23:51.990
in the north. Look early and low through a
553
00:23:51.990 --> 00:23:54.630
telescope. It's a big thin crescent, a
554
00:23:54.630 --> 00:23:57.390
quarter lit but 42 arcseconds across.
555
00:23:57.870 --> 00:24:00.560
Larger than Jupiter's disc. Below it
556
00:24:00.560 --> 00:24:03.400
Mercury is having a genuinely good Southern
557
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:05.200
apparition. Magnitude
558
00:24:05.977 --> 00:24:08.880
0.2, 18 degrees up from Sydney
559
00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:11.440
at sunset and setting an hour and a half
560
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:14.280
after the Sun. From London it's 3 degrees
561
00:24:14.280 --> 00:24:16.800
up and effectively out of reach for the
562
00:24:16.800 --> 00:24:17.080
north.
563
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:19.760
Anna: The compensation is the morning at the start
564
00:24:19.760 --> 00:24:22.720
of nautical Twilight. Mars stands 49
565
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.600
degrees high from Los Angeles, 47 from
566
00:24:25.600 --> 00:24:28.390
New York, 42 from London and just
567
00:24:28.390 --> 00:24:30.990
21 from Sydney. Jupiter is
568
00:24:30.990 --> 00:24:33.790
28 degrees up from Los Angeles against 10
569
00:24:33.790 --> 00:24:34.390
from here.
570
00:24:34.710 --> 00:24:37.350
The pre dawn sky belongs to the north right
571
00:24:37.350 --> 00:24:39.350
now and it is worth getting up for.
572
00:24:39.830 --> 00:24:42.590
Saturn rises mid evening and is highest
573
00:24:42.590 --> 00:24:45.230
just after midnight, better than 50 degrees
574
00:24:45.230 --> 00:24:47.590
up from Sydney at magnitude plus
575
00:24:47.590 --> 00:24:50.430
0.3. It is heading for opposition
576
00:24:50.430 --> 00:24:53.270
in early October and you will see listings
577
00:24:53.270 --> 00:24:55.390
disagree about the date. Some um, say the
578
00:24:55.390 --> 00:24:57.720
fourth, some the fifth. Both are right.
579
00:24:58.040 --> 00:25:00.680
Opposition measured by ecliptic longitude
580
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.480
falls on the 4th, measured by right ascension
581
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:06.360
the 5th. Saturn's brightness and size are
582
00:25:06.360 --> 00:25:08.920
identical across that whole week so you
583
00:25:08.920 --> 00:25:11.400
cannot pick the wrong night and our lead
584
00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:13.760
storey. Can anyone actually see
585
00:25:13.760 --> 00:25:14.600
Andromeda?
586
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:17.560
Avery: Depends entirely where you are. From New
587
00:25:17.560 --> 00:25:19.960
York, Andromeda passes almost overhead,
588
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.040
89 degrees up around half past one in the
589
00:25:23.040 --> 00:25:25.870
morning from Los Angeles, 83 from
590
00:25:25.870 --> 00:25:28.670
London, 80 from Sydney. It scrapes to
591
00:25:28.670 --> 00:25:31.470
under 15 degrees low in the north through the
592
00:25:31.470 --> 00:25:34.230
thickest part of our atmosphere. Binocular is
593
00:25:34.230 --> 00:25:36.590
in a clear northern horizon after midnight
594
00:25:36.590 --> 00:25:39.190
we'll find it but it is a smudge rather than
595
00:25:39.190 --> 00:25:41.790
the showpiece. It is up north which is the
596
00:25:41.790 --> 00:25:44.110
storey of tonight really. The north gets the
597
00:25:44.110 --> 00:25:46.750
deep sky, the predawn planets and the lunar
598
00:25:46.750 --> 00:25:49.390
occultation of Jupiter on 6 October
599
00:25:49.550 --> 00:25:51.950
that sits below our horizon entirely.
600
00:25:52.570 --> 00:25:55.130
We get Venus, Mercury and the better half of
601
00:25:55.130 --> 00:25:56.010
the geometry.
602
00:25:56.250 --> 00:25:57.930
Some weeks it runs the other way
603
00:25:58.250 --> 00:26:00.490
Anna: and the standing reminder because we are
604
00:26:00.490 --> 00:26:03.010
talking about a sun with almost nothing on it
605
00:26:03.010 --> 00:26:05.610
and people will be tempted to look. Never
606
00:26:05.610 --> 00:26:07.930
look at the sun without proper protection.
607
00:26:08.250 --> 00:26:10.930
Solar viewers and eclipse glasses must meet
608
00:26:10.930 --> 00:26:11.850
the ISO
609
00:26:12.090 --> 00:26:14.650
123122
610
00:26:14.970 --> 00:26:17.530
international safety standard, and that is
611
00:26:17.530 --> 00:26:20.130
not the same as ordinary sunglasses, no
612
00:26:20.130 --> 00:26:22.410
matter how dark they are. And stacking
613
00:26:22.410 --> 00:26:24.160
sunglasses does not help.
614
00:26:24.560 --> 00:26:26.800
Cheque your filters for damage before use,
615
00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:29.600
and discard any that are scratched, punctured
616
00:26:29.600 --> 00:26:32.280
or peeling. If you're using a telescope or
617
00:26:32.280 --> 00:26:34.840
binoculars, the filter goes on the front of
618
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.640
the instrument, never on the eyepiece, where
619
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:39.600
focused sunlight can crack it without
620
00:26:39.600 --> 00:26:42.600
warning. There is no safe way to improvise
621
00:26:42.600 --> 00:26:42.880
this.
622
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:45.600
Avery: That's astronomy daily for today.
623
00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:48.920
118 Bubbles in Andromeda that bounce a
624
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:51.700
galaxy's energy books neutrinos that may
625
00:26:51.700 --> 00:26:53.900
quietly decide which stars are allowed to
626
00:26:53.900 --> 00:26:56.100
explode a planet. We have until
627
00:26:56.100 --> 00:26:58.460
2033 to study three more
628
00:26:58.460 --> 00:27:00.540
dragonflights on the books and a crew in
629
00:27:00.540 --> 00:27:03.420
quarantine and a sun with nothing on its face
630
00:27:03.420 --> 00:27:05.140
for the first time since February.
631
00:27:05.540 --> 00:27:08.020
Anna: A note for tomorrow this was episode
632
00:27:08.020 --> 00:27:10.740
199, which makes the next one
633
00:27:10.740 --> 00:27:13.380
200, and we would like to mark it
634
00:27:13.380 --> 00:27:15.460
properly. If there's a storey from this
635
00:27:15.460 --> 00:27:17.620
series you want revisited or a question
636
00:27:17.620 --> 00:27:20.180
you've been sitting on the contact form at
637
00:27:20.180 --> 00:27:22.880
astronomydaily IO is the place.
638
00:27:23.120 --> 00:27:25.600
We do read them, and listener questions have
639
00:27:25.600 --> 00:27:27.440
set our running order more than once.
640
00:27:27.920 --> 00:27:29.880
Avery: All our sources are linked in the show notes,
641
00:27:29.880 --> 00:27:32.280
as always, along with the full references for
642
00:27:32.280 --> 00:27:33.120
today's papers.
643
00:27:33.280 --> 00:27:36.280
You'll find us at astronomydaily IO until
644
00:27:36.280 --> 00:27:36.880
tomorrow.
645
00:27:36.880 --> 00:27:37.840
Anna: Clear skies.
646
00:27:49.370 --> 00:27:50.010
The storeys.
647
00:27:57.850 --> 00:27:58.490
Avery: Were told.
0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.880
Anna: A galaxy should be quiet. Stir
1
00:00:02.880 --> 00:00:05.600
a cloud of gas and the churning dies away in
2
00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:08.480
a few million years, like ripples going flat
3
00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:11.040
on a pond. And yet every spiral
4
00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:13.360
galaxy we look at is still churning.
5
00:00:13.680 --> 00:00:15.600
Something keeps stirring the pot.
6
00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:18.800
Avery: Today, a survey of the galaxy next door that
7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.400
catches a spoon in the act, plus the
8
00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:23.840
ghostly particles that may decide which stars
9
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:26.760
explode at all. A planet with an expiry
10
00:00:26.760 --> 00:00:28.960
date and the sun goes blank for the first
11
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:29.920
time since February.
12
00:00:30.150 --> 00:00:31.260
Anna: The I'm Anna.
13
00:00:31.500 --> 00:00:34.220
Avery: And I'm Avery. This is astronomy daily,
14
00:00:34.300 --> 00:00:36.220
episode 199.
15
00:00:36.940 --> 00:00:39.420
Anna: Start with a problem that has sat in the
16
00:00:39.420 --> 00:00:42.300
background of galaxy science for about 50
17
00:00:42.300 --> 00:00:45.100
years, and that has the useful quality of
18
00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:48.060
being easy to state and very hard to
19
00:00:48.060 --> 00:00:51.020
answer. The gas between the stars in a
20
00:00:51.020 --> 00:00:53.900
galaxy is turbulent. It is not sitting still
21
00:00:53.900 --> 00:00:56.550
and it is not flowing smoothly. It is
22
00:00:56.550 --> 00:00:59.270
churning on every scale from a few light
23
00:00:59.270 --> 00:01:02.070
years up to thousands, with gas moving at
24
00:01:02.070 --> 00:01:04.070
something like 10 kilometres a second
25
00:01:04.230 --> 00:01:06.750
relative to its neighbours. We have measured
26
00:01:06.750 --> 00:01:09.590
this in our own galaxy and in every nearby
27
00:01:09.590 --> 00:01:12.429
galaxy we can resolve it is simply how
28
00:01:12.429 --> 00:01:15.350
interstellar gas behaves. Here is the
29
00:01:15.350 --> 00:01:18.350
problem. Turbulence dies. That is
30
00:01:18.350 --> 00:01:20.950
the one thing turbulence reliably does.
31
00:01:21.430 --> 00:01:24.270
Energy cascades from big eddies down to
32
00:01:24.270 --> 00:01:26.910
small eddies, and at the bottom it turns into
33
00:01:26.910 --> 00:01:29.090
heat and it gone. In
34
00:01:29.090 --> 00:01:31.890
1999, an astrophysicist named
35
00:01:31.890 --> 00:01:34.770
Mordecai Mark Macklow put a number on
36
00:01:34.770 --> 00:01:36.970
how fast that happens in interstellar
37
00:01:36.970 --> 00:01:39.810
conditions. And the number was brutal.
38
00:01:40.210 --> 00:01:42.770
Turbulence in a galaxy's gas should decay
39
00:01:42.770 --> 00:01:45.370
away in roughly the time it takes the gas to
40
00:01:45.370 --> 00:01:48.090
cross itself once a few tens of
41
00:01:48.090 --> 00:01:50.770
millions of years on a galactic clock.
42
00:01:50.770 --> 00:01:53.610
That's an afternoon. So the churning
43
00:01:53.610 --> 00:01:56.180
we see should not be there unless
44
00:01:56.340 --> 00:01:58.260
something is putting the energy back
45
00:01:58.500 --> 00:02:01.140
continuously for billions of years.
46
00:02:01.700 --> 00:02:03.620
Avery: And there has never been a shortage of
47
00:02:03.620 --> 00:02:04.340
suspects.
48
00:02:04.820 --> 00:02:07.820
Anna: No shortage at all. Supernovae are
49
00:02:07.820 --> 00:02:10.780
the obvious one. But gravity itself can
50
00:02:10.780 --> 00:02:13.340
drive turbulence. As the disc shears and
51
00:02:13.340 --> 00:02:16.020
clumps, there is the magnetorotational
52
00:02:16.100 --> 00:02:18.780
instability, which wrings energy out of the
53
00:02:18.780 --> 00:02:21.220
galaxy's rotation through its magnetic field.
54
00:02:21.730 --> 00:02:23.970
There is gas falling in from outside, and
55
00:02:23.970 --> 00:02:26.770
massive stars blow winds long before they
56
00:02:26.770 --> 00:02:29.770
explode. All of these are real. The
57
00:02:29.770 --> 00:02:31.970
question was never whether supernovae
58
00:02:31.970 --> 00:02:34.530
contribute. It was whether they are enough
59
00:02:34.850 --> 00:02:37.170
on their own to pay the whole bill.
60
00:02:37.630 --> 00:02:39.370
Avery: Uh, and to answer that, you need to do
61
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.610
something nobody had managed. You need to
62
00:02:41.610 --> 00:02:44.290
count the receipts. When massive stars in a
63
00:02:44.290 --> 00:02:46.810
cluster explode, and they do it in batches,
64
00:02:46.810 --> 00:02:49.210
because massive stars are born in groups and
65
00:02:49.210 --> 00:02:51.290
die within a few million years of one
66
00:02:51.290 --> 00:02:54.190
another, the blasts merge. Instead of
67
00:02:54.190 --> 00:02:56.710
a single expanding remnant you get a super
68
00:02:56.710 --> 00:02:59.430
bubble, an enormous cavity blown in the
69
00:02:59.430 --> 00:03:01.830
neutral hydrogen, its edge still pushing
70
00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:04.670
outwards. Superbubbles are the fingerprints
71
00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:07.230
each one carries in its size and its
72
00:03:07.230 --> 00:03:10.030
expansion speed, a record of how much energy
73
00:03:10.030 --> 00:03:11.950
went into it and roughly when.
74
00:03:12.590 --> 00:03:15.030
Anna: So a, uh, complete, dynamically resolved
75
00:03:15.030 --> 00:03:17.750
census of superbubbles across an entire
76
00:03:17.750 --> 00:03:20.270
galaxy would let you add up the energy
77
00:03:20.430 --> 00:03:23.190
supernovae have actually delivered and then
78
00:03:23.190 --> 00:03:25.300
compare it against how fast the turbine
79
00:03:25.370 --> 00:03:27.810
turbulence in that same galaxy is bleeding
80
00:03:27.810 --> 00:03:30.410
energy away. If the two numbers match,
81
00:03:30.570 --> 00:03:33.290
you have your answer. If supernovae falls
82
00:03:33.290 --> 00:03:35.690
short, something else is doing the work.
83
00:03:36.250 --> 00:03:38.690
Avery: Nobody had that senses for a reason. That's
84
00:03:38.690 --> 00:03:41.250
almost funny. We can't do it for the Milky
85
00:03:41.250 --> 00:03:43.850
Way because we live inside it. Mapping
86
00:03:43.850 --> 00:03:46.290
bubbles in our own galaxy is like surveying a
87
00:03:46.290 --> 00:03:48.930
forest from the base of one tree. And for
88
00:03:48.930 --> 00:03:51.490
other galaxies we have the sensitivity or the
89
00:03:51.490 --> 00:03:53.240
resolution, never both.
90
00:03:53.720 --> 00:03:56.600
Anna: Which is where two telescopes on opposite
91
00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.400
sides of the world come in. Exactly
92
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.200
that. The paper is in Nature astronomy,
93
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:05.160
published on 17 September. Led by
94
00:04:05.160 --> 00:04:07.400
Fan Yi Meng of Tsinghua University,
95
00:04:07.880 --> 00:04:10.760
with Zhao Wei Tsai and Jingwen Wu,
96
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:13.440
and with D Li, Jinghua's head of
97
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:15.840
astronomy and the former chief scientist of
98
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.440
the FAST telescope as corresponding
99
00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:21.010
authority, they combined two instruments.
100
00:04:21.250 --> 00:04:24.090
FAST is the 500 metre aperture
101
00:04:24.090 --> 00:04:26.650
spherical telescope sitting in a natural
102
00:04:26.650 --> 00:04:29.570
limestone bowl in Guizhou Province in
103
00:04:29.570 --> 00:04:32.210
southern China, the most sensitive single
104
00:04:32.210 --> 00:04:34.970
dish on Earth. At these wavelengths, what it
105
00:04:34.970 --> 00:04:37.650
gives you is faint, diffuse, large
106
00:04:37.650 --> 00:04:40.450
scale structure, the outskirts of bubbles,
107
00:04:40.530 --> 00:04:43.370
the gas nobody else can see. What it
108
00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:46.140
cannot give you is fine detail. For
109
00:04:46.140 --> 00:04:48.820
that they used archival observations from the
110
00:04:48.820 --> 00:04:51.780
Jansky Very Large array in New Mexico,
111
00:04:52.020 --> 00:04:54.740
27 dishes spread across the desert.
112
00:04:54.900 --> 00:04:57.700
Working as one instrument, the array
113
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:00.260
resolves the sharp edges fast,
114
00:05:00.500 --> 00:05:03.260
fills in everything. The array's spacing
115
00:05:03.260 --> 00:05:06.100
makes it blind to stitch them together, and
116
00:05:06.100 --> 00:05:08.900
you get a map that is both deep and sharp,
117
00:05:08.900 --> 00:05:11.620
which is exactly what this problem has always
118
00:05:11.620 --> 00:05:12.100
needed.
119
00:05:13.100 --> 00:05:15.980
Avery: They pointed that combination at Messier 31,
120
00:05:16.060 --> 00:05:18.740
the Andromeda Galaxy, the nearest big
121
00:05:18.740 --> 00:05:21.420
spiral, 2 1/2 million light years away
122
00:05:21.660 --> 00:05:23.580
and close enough that we can see the whole
123
00:05:23.580 --> 00:05:26.420
disc laid out from the outside. They mapped
124
00:05:26.420 --> 00:05:28.900
it in the 21 centimetre line of neutral
125
00:05:28.900 --> 00:05:31.340
hydrogen, the radio signal that traces
126
00:05:31.500 --> 00:05:33.020
cold atomic gas.
127
00:05:33.580 --> 00:05:35.340
Anna: From that map, they pulled
128
00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:38.220
365 candidate cavities
129
00:05:38.300 --> 00:05:40.780
and after classification, confirmed
130
00:05:40.940 --> 00:05:43.860
118 genuine super bubbles
131
00:05:43.860 --> 00:05:45.640
across the entire disc.
132
00:05:45.960 --> 00:05:46.760
Avery: And the result?
133
00:05:47.320 --> 00:05:49.960
Anna: The first thing worth noticing is the ages.
134
00:05:50.200 --> 00:05:52.520
Measured from their sizes and expansion
135
00:05:52.520 --> 00:05:55.240
speeds, the bubbles run up to 40 million
136
00:05:55.320 --> 00:05:58.280
years old. That is not an arbitrary number.
137
00:05:58.520 --> 00:06:01.120
It is almost exactly how long a star
138
00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:03.960
cluster keeps producing Supernovae from its
139
00:06:03.960 --> 00:06:06.760
first massive star dying to its last.
140
00:06:07.080 --> 00:06:09.400
The ages line up with the clock you would
141
00:06:09.400 --> 00:06:12.340
predict if clusters are uh, what makes them B
142
00:06:12.340 --> 00:06:14.660
Lee put the scale plainly. Those
143
00:06:14.660 --> 00:06:17.260
118 bubbles correspond to
144
00:06:17.260 --> 00:06:19.900
thousands of supernova explosions over the
145
00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:22.900
past 40 million years. Then the actual
146
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.740
test from the bubbles they calculated the
147
00:06:25.740 --> 00:06:28.300
rate at which supernovae are injecting
148
00:06:28.300 --> 00:06:30.860
kinetic energy between 10 to the
149
00:06:30.860 --> 00:06:33.780
49th to 10 to the 51.5
150
00:06:33.940 --> 00:06:36.700
ergs per cubic kiloparsec per
151
00:06:36.700 --> 00:06:39.490
million years. Separately and this is the
152
00:06:39.490 --> 00:06:42.050
part that makes the paper work. They derived
153
00:06:42.050 --> 00:06:44.570
the rate at which turbulence is dissipating
154
00:06:44.570 --> 00:06:47.130
energy from the same data using the
155
00:06:47.130 --> 00:06:49.570
observed motions of the gastwo
156
00:06:49.570 --> 00:06:52.490
independent numbers. They match match
157
00:06:52.490 --> 00:06:55.210
how closely in magnitude. And
158
00:06:55.450 --> 00:06:58.050
this is the stronger claim in spatial
159
00:06:58.050 --> 00:06:58.810
distribution.
160
00:06:59.130 --> 00:07:01.770
It's not just that the galaxy wide totals
161
00:07:01.770 --> 00:07:04.250
happen to agree, which could be coincidence
162
00:07:04.330 --> 00:07:06.930
between two quantities that both scale with
163
00:07:06.930 --> 00:07:09.660
how many stars a ah galaxy has. It's that
164
00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:12.460
where the supernovae energy goes in is
165
00:07:12.460 --> 00:07:14.780
where the turbulent energy comes out
166
00:07:15.180 --> 00:07:17.860
region by region across the disc. The
167
00:07:17.860 --> 00:07:20.220
supply map matches the demand map.
168
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:23.220
That's much harder to get by accent. The
169
00:07:23.220 --> 00:07:25.460
conclusion the authors draw is carefully
170
00:07:25.460 --> 00:07:27.580
worded and I want to keep their wording.
171
00:07:27.900 --> 00:07:30.140
Clustered supernova feedback is
172
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:32.860
sufficient to sustain galactic scale
173
00:07:32.860 --> 00:07:35.100
turbulence. Why this matters beyond
174
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:37.930
bookkeeping is turbulence is not a detail
175
00:07:37.930 --> 00:07:40.570
of galaxies, it's one of the controls.
176
00:07:40.810 --> 00:07:43.490
Turbulent pressure helps hold a ah gas disc
177
00:07:43.490 --> 00:07:46.450
up against its own gravity. And turbulence is
178
00:07:46.450 --> 00:07:49.290
what stops molecular clouds collapsing all at
179
00:07:49.290 --> 00:07:51.929
once. A large part of why galaxies
180
00:07:51.929 --> 00:07:54.570
convert gas into stars. So slowly
181
00:07:54.890 --> 00:07:57.530
change the turbulence and you change the star
182
00:07:57.530 --> 00:08:00.490
formation rate. So this closes a loop.
183
00:08:00.570 --> 00:08:03.510
Gas collapses and forms stars. The biggest
184
00:08:03.510 --> 00:08:06.190
of those stars explode. The explosions
185
00:08:06.190 --> 00:08:08.750
stir the remaining gas. The stirring
186
00:08:08.750 --> 00:08:11.350
regulates how readily the next generation
187
00:08:11.350 --> 00:08:13.990
forms. Galaxies are partly self
188
00:08:13.990 --> 00:08:16.390
governing and this is the first time both
189
00:08:16.390 --> 00:08:18.430
ends of that loop have been measured in the
190
00:08:18.430 --> 00:08:21.390
same galaxy from the same data and found
191
00:08:21.390 --> 00:08:22.190
to balance.
192
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:25.310
Avery: And um, the caveat now the honest
193
00:08:25.310 --> 00:08:27.870
Anna: limits and there are three first,
194
00:08:27.950 --> 00:08:30.270
sufficient is not the same as sole
195
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:32.920
showing supernovae can pay the whole bill
196
00:08:32.920 --> 00:08:35.200
does not prove nothing else. Chips in
197
00:08:35.520 --> 00:08:37.680
gravity and the magneto rotational
198
00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:40.560
instability have not been eliminated. They
199
00:08:40.560 --> 00:08:43.320
have been made unnecessary, which is a weaker
200
00:08:43.320 --> 00:08:46.120
and more interesting result. Second, this
201
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:49.040
is neutral atomic hydrogen. It does not
202
00:08:49.040 --> 00:08:51.560
directly trace the molecular gas where
203
00:08:51.560 --> 00:08:54.120
stars actually form or the hot
204
00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:56.720
ionised gas and the energy budget in those
205
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:59.600
phases could behave differently. And third,
206
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:02.160
this is one galaxy, a large,
207
00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:05.360
fairly quiet spiral that has not formed stars
208
00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:08.280
vigorously in a long while. Whether the books
209
00:09:08.280 --> 00:09:11.280
balance the same way in a starburst or in a
210
00:09:11.280 --> 00:09:13.560
small, irregular, uh, galaxy where bubbles
211
00:09:13.560 --> 00:09:14.719
can blow straight out.
212
00:09:14.719 --> 00:09:17.280
The top is exactly the next question.
213
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:20.840
Two footnotes I enjoyed Bordechai Mark
214
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:23.640
McClo, the man whose 1999
215
00:09:23.640 --> 00:09:26.080
paper showed this turbulence should have died
216
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:29.060
long ago, is a co author here. His own
217
00:09:29.060 --> 00:09:31.340
result is referenced too, in the paper that
218
00:09:31.340 --> 00:09:34.340
answers it. And because Nature Astronomy
219
00:09:34.340 --> 00:09:37.220
publishes its referee reports, we know one
220
00:09:37.220 --> 00:09:39.980
of the two reviewers was Christoph Federath
221
00:09:40.060 --> 00:09:42.980
at the Australian National University, who
222
00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:45.420
has spent a career on this exact question.
223
00:09:45.900 --> 00:09:48.820
The Australian fingerprint is on the scrutiny
224
00:09:48.820 --> 00:09:51.500
rather than the data. Regular listeners will
225
00:09:51.500 --> 00:09:54.460
hear an echo here. Two weeks ago we ran
226
00:09:54.460 --> 00:09:56.860
the finding that black hole outflows can
227
00:09:56.860 --> 00:09:59.460
trigger star formation as well as shut it
228
00:09:59.460 --> 00:10:02.290
down. Feedback that builds as well as
229
00:10:02.290 --> 00:10:05.010
breaks. This is the same lesson one
230
00:10:05.090 --> 00:10:07.650
rung down the letter. At stellar scale,
231
00:10:07.970 --> 00:10:10.930
feedback is not simply destructive, it is
232
00:10:10.930 --> 00:10:12.530
a galaxy's thermostat.
233
00:10:13.090 --> 00:10:15.930
Avery: Anna's Storey takes supernovae as given and
234
00:10:15.930 --> 00:10:18.890
asks what they do to a galaxy. This one
235
00:10:18.890 --> 00:10:21.690
asks a question one step which
236
00:10:21.690 --> 00:10:24.610
stars actually managed to explode? You would
237
00:10:24.610 --> 00:10:27.390
think that was settled. It is not. We
238
00:10:27.390 --> 00:10:29.950
see fewer supernovae than our models say we
239
00:10:29.950 --> 00:10:32.790
should. And there's a related puzzle, the red
240
00:10:32.790 --> 00:10:35.710
supergiant problem. When astronomers go back
241
00:10:35.710 --> 00:10:38.150
through archival images to identify the star
242
00:10:38.150 --> 00:10:40.910
that blew up, they never find 1 above about
243
00:10:40.910 --> 00:10:43.870
16 to 18 solar masses. Even
244
00:10:43.870 --> 00:10:46.230
though plenty of stars are heavier, something
245
00:10:46.230 --> 00:10:48.710
is quietly removing the most massive stars
246
00:10:48.710 --> 00:10:51.550
from the exploding population. A new paper in
247
00:10:51.550 --> 00:10:54.310
Physical Review D from Mariam Gogilashvili
248
00:10:54.310 --> 00:10:56.870
and Irene Tambora at the Niels Bohr Institute
249
00:10:56.870 --> 00:10:59.330
in Copenhagen Contorm points at an
250
00:10:59.330 --> 00:11:02.050
unlikely culprit. Neutrinos changing
251
00:11:02.050 --> 00:11:04.850
identity Quick refresher When a
252
00:11:04.850 --> 00:11:07.370
Anna: massive star's core collapses, about
253
00:11:07.370 --> 00:11:10.370
99% of the energy released leaves
254
00:11:10.370 --> 00:11:13.250
as neutrinos. And the explosion depends on
255
00:11:13.250 --> 00:11:15.490
a small fraction of that flood being
256
00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:18.210
reabsorbed by the gas just outside the
257
00:11:18.210 --> 00:11:20.770
core, heating it enough to revive the
258
00:11:20.770 --> 00:11:23.610
stalled shock wave. It's a narrow margin.
259
00:11:24.130 --> 00:11:26.610
Neutrinos also come in three flavours
260
00:11:26.850 --> 00:11:29.410
electron, muon and tau and
261
00:11:29.410 --> 00:11:31.610
oscillate between them, which is Nobel
262
00:11:31.610 --> 00:11:33.730
winning physics from 1998.
263
00:11:34.210 --> 00:11:37.130
Avery: Here's the catch. Only the electron flavour
264
00:11:37.130 --> 00:11:39.890
deposits heat efficiently. Muon and tau
265
00:11:39.890 --> 00:11:42.810
neutrinos mostly sail straight out. So
266
00:11:42.810 --> 00:11:45.210
if flavour conversion happens deep inside a
267
00:11:45.210 --> 00:11:47.930
collapsing core, it takes energy earmarked
268
00:11:47.930 --> 00:11:50.210
for the explosion and redistributes it into
269
00:11:50.210 --> 00:11:52.960
flavours that simply leave. Most state of the
270
00:11:52.960 --> 00:11:55.360
art simulations leave this out on the old
271
00:11:55.360 --> 00:11:57.480
assumption that conversion happens too far
272
00:11:57.480 --> 00:11:59.840
out to matter. Recent work says
273
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.760
otherwise, so Maryam Gogilashvili and
274
00:12:02.760 --> 00:12:05.720
Irene Tambora put it in schematically and
275
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:08.600
ran the collapse of 195 stars
276
00:12:08.680 --> 00:12:11.560
from 9 to 120 solar masses
277
00:12:12.040 --> 00:12:14.960
without flavour conversion. About 27%
278
00:12:14.960 --> 00:12:17.640
of their stars fail to explode and collapse
279
00:12:17.640 --> 00:12:20.070
straight to black holes. That matches both
280
00:12:20.070 --> 00:12:22.750
the literature and observations. Switch
281
00:12:22.750 --> 00:12:25.270
flavour conversion on and the failure rate
282
00:12:25.270 --> 00:12:28.030
climbs to somewhere between 48 and
283
00:12:28.030 --> 00:12:30.830
88% depending on how deep in the
284
00:12:30.830 --> 00:12:33.430
core you let it happen. And the stars most
285
00:12:33.430 --> 00:12:36.030
affected sit between 16 and 30
286
00:12:36.030 --> 00:12:37.950
solar masses, which is
287
00:12:37.950 --> 00:12:40.750
Anna: precisely the missing mass range. In the red
288
00:12:40.750 --> 00:12:41.950
supergiant problem.
289
00:12:42.190 --> 00:12:44.990
Avery: There is a second quieter result I like more.
290
00:12:45.300 --> 00:12:47.580
And the stars that do still explode. Flavour
291
00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:50.100
conversion revives the shock earlier so less
292
00:12:50.100 --> 00:12:52.500
material rains back onto the newborn neutron
293
00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:55.300
star. The neutron stars come out lighter,
294
00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:58.180
closer to the 1.2 to 1.4 solar
295
00:12:58.180 --> 00:13:00.420
masses we actually measure in pulsars.
296
00:13:00.900 --> 00:13:03.460
A model that was running heavy now matches
297
00:13:03.940 --> 00:13:06.740
the honest handling. Here is the range. 48
298
00:13:06.740 --> 00:13:09.700
to 88% is not a measurement. It is a span
299
00:13:09.700 --> 00:13:11.860
across assumptions. And the authors say
300
00:13:11.860 --> 00:13:13.780
plainly that their upper valleys look to be
301
00:13:13.780 --> 00:13:16.380
in tension with observations. This is one
302
00:13:16.380 --> 00:13:18.380
dimensional modelling with a deliberately
303
00:13:18.380 --> 00:13:20.700
simplified switch for the neutrino physics.
304
00:13:20.860 --> 00:13:23.460
What it establishes is not a number. It is
305
00:13:23.460 --> 00:13:25.620
that this effect is too big to keep leaving
306
00:13:25.620 --> 00:13:28.420
out. The preprint went up in mid
307
00:13:28.420 --> 00:13:30.620
May, so the work has been circulating about
308
00:13:30.620 --> 00:13:32.460
four months. It is the journal version that
309
00:13:32.460 --> 00:13:32.580
is
310
00:13:32.580 --> 00:13:34.980
Anna: new and a southern footnote that is not a
311
00:13:34.980 --> 00:13:36.980
stretch. We have caught neutrinos from
312
00:13:36.980 --> 00:13:39.420
exactly one supernova SN
313
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:42.380
1987A in the Southern Magellanic
314
00:13:42.380 --> 00:13:45.160
Cloud cloud 20 dozen particles over about 13
315
00:13:45.240 --> 00:13:47.560
seconds in February 1987.
316
00:13:48.040 --> 00:13:50.600
Every word of this debate traces back to that
317
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:53.560
1 handful of detections from a galaxy only
318
00:13:53.560 --> 00:13:56.160
southern observers see properly. The next
319
00:13:56.160 --> 00:13:58.560
galactic supernova settles a great deal of
320
00:13:58.560 --> 00:13:58.839
it.
321
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:00.920
Avery: Okay, moving on to storey 3.
322
00:14:01.400 --> 00:14:03.920
Most exoplanet discoveries come with an open
323
00:14:03.920 --> 00:14:06.320
ended invitation. Go and study it whenever
324
00:14:06.320 --> 00:14:08.680
you like. This one comes with a deadline.
325
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:11.600
Published on 18 September in the publications
326
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:14.160
of the Astronomical Society of Japan from
327
00:14:14.160 --> 00:14:16.480
Noriharu Watanabe and Norio
328
00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:18.920
Narita at the University of Tokyo with a
329
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:21.600
large international team. The discovery of
330
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:24.600
TOI 1355b, a
331
00:14:24.600 --> 00:14:27.360
hot Jupiter and a strange one on three counts
332
00:14:27.440 --> 00:14:30.028
count one is the star. TOI
333
00:14:30.212 --> 00:14:33.160
1355 is an A type star about twice
334
00:14:33.160 --> 00:14:36.080
the Sun's mass with a surface near 8,700
335
00:14:36.160 --> 00:14:39.120
Kelvin, um, some 3,000 degrees hotter than
336
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:41.920
the Sun. It's around 800 light years away
337
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:44.560
and it spins fast better than 80
338
00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:46.760
kilometres a second against our Sun's
339
00:14:46.760 --> 00:14:49.520
leisurely two count two is the
340
00:14:49.520 --> 00:14:52.360
planet. Nearly six Jupiter masses. About
341
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:55.160
1.4 Jupiter radii whipping around
342
00:14:55.160 --> 00:14:57.560
that star every 2.17 days.
343
00:14:57.960 --> 00:15:00.120
But its orbit is not a circle. The
344
00:15:00.120 --> 00:15:03.100
eccentricity is about 0.22 a
345
00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:04.700
properly lopsided orbit.
346
00:15:04.700 --> 00:15:07.020
Anna: Why is that surprising for a hot Jupiter?
347
00:15:07.180 --> 00:15:09.700
Avery: Because they're almost never lopsided sitting
348
00:15:09.700 --> 00:15:12.340
that close in tides should round off an orbit
349
00:15:12.340 --> 00:15:15.300
quickly. Of the roughly 20 hot Jupiters known
350
00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:17.740
around hot stars, the measured eccentricities
351
00:15:17.740 --> 00:15:20.660
are essentially zero, some to four decimal
352
00:15:20.660 --> 00:15:22.460
places. And there's exactly one other
353
00:15:22.460 --> 00:15:24.980
eccentric case on record. These worlds are
354
00:15:24.980 --> 00:15:27.420
thought to be flung inward on wild elliptical
355
00:15:27.420 --> 00:15:29.820
orbits by gravitational bullying from other
356
00:15:29.820 --> 00:15:32.310
planets. Then have those orbits ground down
357
00:15:32.310 --> 00:15:34.870
to circles by tides. TOI
358
00:15:34.870 --> 00:15:37.790
1355B is partway through the grinding,
359
00:15:37.790 --> 00:15:40.590
which we rarely gets. Watch count three
360
00:15:40.590 --> 00:15:42.910
is the deadline. Comparing transits across
361
00:15:42.910 --> 00:15:45.850
TESS observations from 2019, 2020,
362
00:15:46.021 --> 00:15:48.910
2022 and 2024. The team
363
00:15:48.910 --> 00:15:50.750
found the planet crossing the star at a
364
00:15:50.750 --> 00:15:53.030
steadily different height each time. The
365
00:15:53.030 --> 00:15:55.950
orbit's plane is swinging nodal precession
366
00:15:55.950 --> 00:15:58.230
driven by the bulge of that rapidly spinning
367
00:15:58.230 --> 00:16:01.150
star. Wind it forward and the planet stops
368
00:16:01.150 --> 00:16:03.150
crossing the star's face from our point of
369
00:16:03.150 --> 00:16:05.510
view around the middle of 2033.
370
00:16:05.670 --> 00:16:08.670
Anna: After that, no transits for centuries. The
371
00:16:08.670 --> 00:16:09.670
planet is fine.
372
00:16:09.670 --> 00:16:12.430
Our line of sight is what runs out. There is
373
00:16:12.430 --> 00:16:15.109
a lovely methodological wrinkle too.
374
00:16:15.350 --> 00:16:17.990
You normally weigh a planet by watching the
375
00:16:17.990 --> 00:16:20.550
star wobble. But this star spins
376
00:16:20.710 --> 00:16:23.350
so fast its spectral lines are smeared
377
00:16:23.510 --> 00:16:26.050
and that does not work. So they weighed it
378
00:16:26.050 --> 00:16:28.410
from the light curve instead from M. The way
379
00:16:28.410 --> 00:16:31.210
the planet's gravity distorts the star into
380
00:16:31.210 --> 00:16:33.890
a faint rugby ball shape. And from the
381
00:16:33.890 --> 00:16:36.330
subtle brightening as the star is tugged
382
00:16:36.330 --> 00:16:39.170
towards us. The mass came out of the shape of
383
00:16:39.170 --> 00:16:41.890
the light, not the shift of the lines. And
384
00:16:41.890 --> 00:16:43.850
the supporting cast is worth naming.
385
00:16:44.170 --> 00:16:47.170
Alongside TESS and the 3.8 metre
386
00:16:47.170 --> 00:16:49.850
SEMI telescope in Okayama, this
387
00:16:49.850 --> 00:16:52.490
paper leans on a 91 centimetre
388
00:16:52.490 --> 00:16:55.060
telescope on the slopes of Matt Etna,
389
00:16:55.370 --> 00:16:58.090
a 40 centimetre in Switzerland and a
390
00:16:58.090 --> 00:17:00.970
28 centimetre at a private observatory in
391
00:17:00.970 --> 00:17:03.890
Germany. Backyard scale instruments on the
392
00:17:03.890 --> 00:17:06.770
Discovery paper for a six Jupiter mass
393
00:17:06.770 --> 00:17:09.730
world. The preprint went up in August, so
394
00:17:09.730 --> 00:17:12.050
about a month ahead of the journal. And for
395
00:17:12.050 --> 00:17:14.430
our southern listeners the star sits at Ah,
396
00:17:14.430 --> 00:17:17.410
Declination 67, which means
397
00:17:17.410 --> 00:17:20.130
it never rises from Sydney. Northern
398
00:17:20.130 --> 00:17:22.890
listeners can find the field in Cepheus. The
399
00:17:22.890 --> 00:17:25.690
team is already preparing a follow up on how
400
00:17:25.690 --> 00:17:27.970
tilted the orbit is and wants
401
00:17:27.970 --> 00:17:30.690
JWST time to low
402
00:17:30.690 --> 00:17:31.050
ETH
403
00:17:31.050 --> 00:17:32.730
Avery: orbit now and the business end of
404
00:17:32.730 --> 00:17:33.410
spaceflight.
405
00:17:33.570 --> 00:17:36.320
On 18 September, NASA exercised a UH
406
00:17:36.410 --> 00:17:39.330
contract modification with SpaceX for three
407
00:17:39.330 --> 00:17:41.370
additional crew rotation missions to the
408
00:17:41.370 --> 00:17:44.370
International Space Crew 1 5, Crew
409
00:17:44.370 --> 00:17:47.210
16 and Crew 1 7. The value
410
00:17:47.210 --> 00:17:50.130
is $946 million for all
411
00:17:50.130 --> 00:17:52.820
three covering ground launch in
412
00:17:52.820 --> 00:17:54.980
orbit and return and recovery operations,
413
00:17:55.460 --> 00:17:58.180
cargo on each mission and lifeboat capability
414
00:17:58.180 --> 00:18:00.940
while docked. That takes SpaceX to
415
00:18:00.940 --> 00:18:03.380
17 crew missions under the commercial crew
416
00:18:03.380 --> 00:18:06.060
transportation contract and that contract's
417
00:18:06.060 --> 00:18:08.040
running total to $5.92
418
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:11.180
billion. Period of performance runs through
419
00:18:11.180 --> 00:18:13.540
2030 with mission readiness dates in
420
00:18:13.540 --> 00:18:16.540
2027 and 2028. NASA
421
00:18:16.540 --> 00:18:18.700
flagged its intent to buy back in May and
422
00:18:18.700 --> 00:18:21.460
calls this a sole source modification that
423
00:18:21.460 --> 00:18:23.680
does not pre further purchases later.
424
00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:26.400
Anna: One line in that release is worth reading
425
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:29.320
carefully. NASA says the change helps
426
00:18:29.320 --> 00:18:32.240
it maintain access to the station with quote,
427
00:18:32.480 --> 00:18:34.800
two unique commercial crew industry
428
00:18:34.960 --> 00:18:37.960
partners. The award itself goes to one
429
00:18:37.960 --> 00:18:40.160
of them. The original 2014
430
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:42.960
contracts went to both Boeing and SpaceX
431
00:18:43.280 --> 00:18:46.080
and Boeing appears in this release exactly
432
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.890
once in that history. NASA does
433
00:18:48.890 --> 00:18:51.490
not say anything here about when its second
434
00:18:51.490 --> 00:18:53.050
provider next flies people.
435
00:18:53.450 --> 00:18:55.290
We'll report that when they do say.
436
00:18:55.530 --> 00:18:57.770
Avery: Meanwhile, the near term mission is moving.
437
00:18:58.090 --> 00:19:00.770
The four astronauts of Crew 13 entered
438
00:19:00.770 --> 00:19:02.770
quarantine late on Thursday at UH Johnson
439
00:19:02.770 --> 00:19:05.370
Space Centre in Houston. NASA's Jessica
440
00:19:05.370 --> 00:19:08.290
Watkins and Luke Delaney, the Canadian Space
441
00:19:08.290 --> 00:19:10.650
Agency's Yoshua Kutryk and
442
00:19:10.650 --> 00:19:12.850
Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey
443
00:19:12.850 --> 00:19:15.630
tatariotnikov. NASA and SpaceX
444
00:19:15.630 --> 00:19:18.230
are still targeting early October. Before
445
00:19:18.230 --> 00:19:20.550
quarantine. They finished training at SpaceX
446
00:19:20.550 --> 00:19:22.910
in Hawthorne and ran a crew equipment
447
00:19:22.910 --> 00:19:25.750
interface test at Cape Canaveral. Suits on
448
00:19:25.830 --> 00:19:28.670
into the Dragon leak cheques, seat fit
449
00:19:28.670 --> 00:19:31.590
comms cheques, my favourite detail. They sit
450
00:19:31.590 --> 00:19:33.750
in the capsule and listen to its fans and
451
00:19:33.750 --> 00:19:35.790
pumps so that none of the sounds are
452
00:19:35.790 --> 00:19:37.190
unfamiliar on launch day.
453
00:19:37.430 --> 00:19:40.190
Anna: The quarantine itself is an Apollo era
454
00:19:40.190 --> 00:19:43.030
invention still doing its job. Keeping a head
455
00:19:43.030 --> 00:19:45.560
cold on the ground where it belongs. That
456
00:19:45.560 --> 00:19:47.720
closes out an arc we tracked since the
457
00:19:47.720 --> 00:19:50.280
oxidizer leak stood. Crew 13 down
458
00:19:50.600 --> 00:19:53.200
valve replaced. Crew in quarantine early
459
00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:55.560
October. We still want a date.
460
00:19:55.720 --> 00:19:57.960
Quick hit, closing a thread. We opened on
461
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:00.520
Friday. It happened on the 18th of
462
00:20:00.520 --> 00:20:02.840
September. The earth facing sun went
463
00:20:02.840 --> 00:20:05.720
completely spotless. No numbered active
464
00:20:05.720 --> 00:20:08.600
regions at all. It's the first spotless day
465
00:20:08.600 --> 00:20:11.160
since the 24th of February and the
466
00:20:11.160 --> 00:20:13.640
19th was spotless too, making it two in a
467
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.330
row. By the 20th, a small new region
468
00:20:16.330 --> 00:20:19.250
had rotated up and the run ended. Which is
469
00:20:19.250 --> 00:20:21.770
exactly how the descent from a solar maximum
470
00:20:21.770 --> 00:20:24.370
goes. Not a switch, but a flicker that
471
00:20:24.370 --> 00:20:27.090
Avery: lengthens for scale on how far we have come
472
00:20:27.090 --> 00:20:27.450
down.
473
00:20:27.690 --> 00:20:30.570
The busiest single day of the Solar cycle
474
00:20:30.570 --> 00:20:33.450
was 8 August 2024, with
475
00:20:33.450 --> 00:20:35.730
an estimated 337
476
00:20:35.730 --> 00:20:38.610
sunspots. That was the highest daily count
477
00:20:38.610 --> 00:20:41.520
since March 2001. Cycle
478
00:20:41.520 --> 00:20:44.000
25 peaked in late 2024
479
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:46.560
and minimum is not expected before about
480
00:20:46.560 --> 00:20:47.280
2030.
481
00:20:47.520 --> 00:20:50.360
Anna: But do not put the aurora gear away. A
482
00:20:50.360 --> 00:20:53.080
coronal hole is rotating into position and
483
00:20:53.080 --> 00:20:55.360
its fast solar wind stream should reach us
484
00:20:55.360 --> 00:20:58.280
around the 23rd, with forecasters flagging a
485
00:20:58.280 --> 00:21:01.160
chance of minor geomagnetic storming. If
486
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:03.680
it lands, best chances are the far north,
487
00:21:03.920 --> 00:21:06.440
northern Scotland and the far south, southern
488
00:21:06.440 --> 00:21:09.120
New Zealand. It arrives right on the equinox,
489
00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:11.480
which is the most aurora friendly moment of
490
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:14.320
the year. For reasons of geometry and the
491
00:21:14.320 --> 00:21:16.600
standing point we keep making. A, uh, quiet
492
00:21:16.600 --> 00:21:19.520
sun means fewer auroras, but it also means
493
00:21:19.520 --> 00:21:22.400
a weaker shield against galactic cosmic rays.
494
00:21:22.640 --> 00:21:25.600
So that background quietly rises same
495
00:21:25.600 --> 00:21:27.880
dial opposite end to the sky.
496
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:30.000
Avery: And this week the calendar does something
497
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:32.320
that only makes sense if you remember. The
498
00:21:32.320 --> 00:21:35.050
Earth is tilted first to equinox,
499
00:21:35.130 --> 00:21:37.810
five minutes past midnight universal time on
500
00:21:37.810 --> 00:21:40.730
the 23rd. An equinox is an instant,
501
00:21:40.730 --> 00:21:43.570
not a day. So where you stand decides the
502
00:21:43.570 --> 00:21:45.570
date. That is Tuesday evening in the
503
00:21:45.570 --> 00:21:48.250
Americas, just after five in Los Angeles,
504
00:21:48.410 --> 00:21:50.930
just after eight in New York, one in the
505
00:21:50.930 --> 00:21:53.650
morning in London and five past ten on
506
00:21:53.650 --> 00:21:56.170
Wednesday morning in Sydney. Spring here,
507
00:21:56.330 --> 00:21:58.490
autumn there, same instant.
508
00:21:58.810 --> 00:22:01.570
Anna: Then on Saturday the 26th, the full
509
00:22:01.570 --> 00:22:04.420
moon, the harvest moon. The full moon falling
510
00:22:04.420 --> 00:22:07.220
closest to the September equinox. And here's
511
00:22:07.220 --> 00:22:09.140
where it gets interesting. Because the
512
00:22:09.140 --> 00:22:11.700
harvest moon's entire reputation is a
513
00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:13.340
northern hemisphere phenomenon.
514
00:22:13.580 --> 00:22:15.380
Avery: Explain that, because I think most people
515
00:22:15.380 --> 00:22:16.780
assume it's just a name.
516
00:22:17.020 --> 00:22:19.740
Anna: It's not just a name. The moon Normally
517
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:22.220
rises about 50 minutes later each night.
518
00:22:22.460 --> 00:22:24.500
Around the northern autumn equinox. The
519
00:22:24.500 --> 00:22:26.940
Moon's path meets the eastern horizon at a
520
00:22:26.940 --> 00:22:29.700
shallow angle. So successive moon rises,
521
00:22:29.700 --> 00:22:32.420
bunch up and you get several evenings running
522
00:22:32.420 --> 00:22:34.540
with bright moonlight arriving just after
523
00:22:34.540 --> 00:22:37.440
sunset, which was the whole point. Extra
524
00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:38.760
light to finish the harvest.
525
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:41.280
Avery: We ran the numbers for this week. On the
526
00:22:41.280 --> 00:22:44.080
nights around full moon, moonrise comes later
527
00:22:44.080 --> 00:22:46.520
by about 12 minutes a night. In London,
528
00:22:46.760 --> 00:22:49.680
22 minutes in New York, 27 in Los
529
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:51.480
Angeles and in Sydney,
530
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:53.320
62 minutes.
531
00:22:53.800 --> 00:22:56.440
Anna: So we get the opposite of a harvest moon.
532
00:22:56.600 --> 00:22:59.600
Avery: We get the anti harvest moon. The effect the
533
00:22:59.600 --> 00:23:01.840
thing is named for is more than five times
534
00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:04.600
weaker here than in London. Same moon,
535
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:07.680
same week, geometry simply reversed. In
536
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:10.520
spring it's the same ecliptic angle that
537
00:23:10.520 --> 00:23:13.280
gives us a brilliant high Venus and one
538
00:23:13.280 --> 00:23:14.440
hugging the horizon.
539
00:23:14.760 --> 00:23:17.480
One wrinkle for Australian listeners The full
540
00:23:17.480 --> 00:23:20.120
moon Instant lands at 2:48 on Sunday
541
00:23:20.120 --> 00:23:22.800
morning our time, so our calendars say
542
00:23:22.800 --> 00:23:25.040
27th and northern ones say
543
00:23:25.040 --> 00:23:27.560
26th. It looks full on both nights.
544
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:28.600
Anna: And the planets?
545
00:23:28.840 --> 00:23:30.960
Avery: Venus is still the show in the west after
546
00:23:30.960 --> 00:23:33.720
sunset. At uh magnitude -4.5
547
00:23:34.430 --> 00:23:37.350
from Sydney it stands 37 degrees high as
548
00:23:37.350 --> 00:23:40.070
the sun sets and hangs on for more than three
549
00:23:40.070 --> 00:23:42.750
hours. From New York, 13 degrees
550
00:23:42.990 --> 00:23:45.790
from London, 2 1/2 degrees about
551
00:23:45.790 --> 00:23:48.670
25 minutes with a dead flat western horizon
552
00:23:48.990 --> 00:23:51.990
in the north. Look early and low through a
553
00:23:51.990 --> 00:23:54.630
telescope. It's a big thin crescent, a
554
00:23:54.630 --> 00:23:57.390
quarter lit but 42 arcseconds across.
555
00:23:57.870 --> 00:24:00.560
Larger than Jupiter's disc. Below it
556
00:24:00.560 --> 00:24:03.400
Mercury is having a genuinely good Southern
557
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:05.200
apparition. Magnitude
558
00:24:05.977 --> 00:24:08.880
0.2, 18 degrees up from Sydney
559
00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:11.440
at sunset and setting an hour and a half
560
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:14.280
after the Sun. From London it's 3 degrees
561
00:24:14.280 --> 00:24:16.800
up and effectively out of reach for the
562
00:24:16.800 --> 00:24:17.080
north.
563
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:19.760
Anna: The compensation is the morning at the start
564
00:24:19.760 --> 00:24:22.720
of nautical Twilight. Mars stands 49
565
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.600
degrees high from Los Angeles, 47 from
566
00:24:25.600 --> 00:24:28.390
New York, 42 from London and just
567
00:24:28.390 --> 00:24:30.990
21 from Sydney. Jupiter is
568
00:24:30.990 --> 00:24:33.790
28 degrees up from Los Angeles against 10
569
00:24:33.790 --> 00:24:34.390
from here.
570
00:24:34.710 --> 00:24:37.350
The pre dawn sky belongs to the north right
571
00:24:37.350 --> 00:24:39.350
now and it is worth getting up for.
572
00:24:39.830 --> 00:24:42.590
Saturn rises mid evening and is highest
573
00:24:42.590 --> 00:24:45.230
just after midnight, better than 50 degrees
574
00:24:45.230 --> 00:24:47.590
up from Sydney at magnitude plus
575
00:24:47.590 --> 00:24:50.430
0.3. It is heading for opposition
576
00:24:50.430 --> 00:24:53.270
in early October and you will see listings
577
00:24:53.270 --> 00:24:55.390
disagree about the date. Some um, say the
578
00:24:55.390 --> 00:24:57.720
fourth, some the fifth. Both are right.
579
00:24:58.040 --> 00:25:00.680
Opposition measured by ecliptic longitude
580
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.480
falls on the 4th, measured by right ascension
581
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:06.360
the 5th. Saturn's brightness and size are
582
00:25:06.360 --> 00:25:08.920
identical across that whole week so you
583
00:25:08.920 --> 00:25:11.400
cannot pick the wrong night and our lead
584
00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:13.760
storey. Can anyone actually see
585
00:25:13.760 --> 00:25:14.600
Andromeda?
586
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:17.560
Avery: Depends entirely where you are. From New
587
00:25:17.560 --> 00:25:19.960
York, Andromeda passes almost overhead,
588
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.040
89 degrees up around half past one in the
589
00:25:23.040 --> 00:25:25.870
morning from Los Angeles, 83 from
590
00:25:25.870 --> 00:25:28.670
London, 80 from Sydney. It scrapes to
591
00:25:28.670 --> 00:25:31.470
under 15 degrees low in the north through the
592
00:25:31.470 --> 00:25:34.230
thickest part of our atmosphere. Binocular is
593
00:25:34.230 --> 00:25:36.590
in a clear northern horizon after midnight
594
00:25:36.590 --> 00:25:39.190
we'll find it but it is a smudge rather than
595
00:25:39.190 --> 00:25:41.790
the showpiece. It is up north which is the
596
00:25:41.790 --> 00:25:44.110
storey of tonight really. The north gets the
597
00:25:44.110 --> 00:25:46.750
deep sky, the predawn planets and the lunar
598
00:25:46.750 --> 00:25:49.390
occultation of Jupiter on 6 October
599
00:25:49.550 --> 00:25:51.950
that sits below our horizon entirely.
600
00:25:52.570 --> 00:25:55.130
We get Venus, Mercury and the better half of
601
00:25:55.130 --> 00:25:56.010
the geometry.
602
00:25:56.250 --> 00:25:57.930
Some weeks it runs the other way
603
00:25:58.250 --> 00:26:00.490
Anna: and the standing reminder because we are
604
00:26:00.490 --> 00:26:03.010
talking about a sun with almost nothing on it
605
00:26:03.010 --> 00:26:05.610
and people will be tempted to look. Never
606
00:26:05.610 --> 00:26:07.930
look at the sun without proper protection.
607
00:26:08.250 --> 00:26:10.930
Solar viewers and eclipse glasses must meet
608
00:26:10.930 --> 00:26:11.850
the ISO
609
00:26:12.090 --> 00:26:14.650
123122
610
00:26:14.970 --> 00:26:17.530
international safety standard, and that is
611
00:26:17.530 --> 00:26:20.130
not the same as ordinary sunglasses, no
612
00:26:20.130 --> 00:26:22.410
matter how dark they are. And stacking
613
00:26:22.410 --> 00:26:24.160
sunglasses does not help.
614
00:26:24.560 --> 00:26:26.800
Cheque your filters for damage before use,
615
00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:29.600
and discard any that are scratched, punctured
616
00:26:29.600 --> 00:26:32.280
or peeling. If you're using a telescope or
617
00:26:32.280 --> 00:26:34.840
binoculars, the filter goes on the front of
618
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.640
the instrument, never on the eyepiece, where
619
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:39.600
focused sunlight can crack it without
620
00:26:39.600 --> 00:26:42.600
warning. There is no safe way to improvise
621
00:26:42.600 --> 00:26:42.880
this.
622
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:45.600
Avery: That's astronomy daily for today.
623
00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:48.920
118 Bubbles in Andromeda that bounce a
624
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:51.700
galaxy's energy books neutrinos that may
625
00:26:51.700 --> 00:26:53.900
quietly decide which stars are allowed to
626
00:26:53.900 --> 00:26:56.100
explode a planet. We have until
627
00:26:56.100 --> 00:26:58.460
2033 to study three more
628
00:26:58.460 --> 00:27:00.540
dragonflights on the books and a crew in
629
00:27:00.540 --> 00:27:03.420
quarantine and a sun with nothing on its face
630
00:27:03.420 --> 00:27:05.140
for the first time since February.
631
00:27:05.540 --> 00:27:08.020
Anna: A note for tomorrow this was episode
632
00:27:08.020 --> 00:27:10.740
199, which makes the next one
633
00:27:10.740 --> 00:27:13.380
200, and we would like to mark it
634
00:27:13.380 --> 00:27:15.460
properly. If there's a storey from this
635
00:27:15.460 --> 00:27:17.620
series you want revisited or a question
636
00:27:17.620 --> 00:27:20.180
you've been sitting on the contact form at
637
00:27:20.180 --> 00:27:22.880
astronomydaily IO is the place.
638
00:27:23.120 --> 00:27:25.600
We do read them, and listener questions have
639
00:27:25.600 --> 00:27:27.440
set our running order more than once.
640
00:27:27.920 --> 00:27:29.880
Avery: All our sources are linked in the show notes,
641
00:27:29.880 --> 00:27:32.280
as always, along with the full references for
642
00:27:32.280 --> 00:27:33.120
today's papers.
643
00:27:33.280 --> 00:27:36.280
You'll find us at astronomydaily IO until
644
00:27:36.280 --> 00:27:36.880
tomorrow.
645
00:27:36.880 --> 00:27:37.840
Anna: Clear skies.
646
00:27:49.370 --> 00:27:50.010
The storeys.
647
00:27:57.850 --> 00:27:58.490
Avery: Were told.