Sept. 21, 2026

What Keeps a Galaxy Churning: Andromeda's Supernova Secrets Revealed

What Keeps a Galaxy Churning: Andromeda's Supernova Secrets Revealed
Supernovae keep galaxies churning A new study led by Fan Yi Meng from Tsinghua University provides the first comprehensive census of superbubbles in the Andromeda Galaxy, revealing that clustered supernova feedback is sufficient to sustain galactic-scale turbulence. This finding helps to explain why galaxies remain active over billions of years, with turbulence playing a crucial role in regulating star formation rates. The research, published in Nature Astronomy, highlights the energy balance between supernovae and the turbulence they create.Neutrinos may dictate stellar explosions A paper from Mariam Gogilashvili and Irene Tambora at the Niels Bohr Institute explores the role of neutrinos in determining which massive stars explode as supernovae. Their findings suggest that neutrino oscillations could lead to a significant number of stars collapsing into black holes, particularly those in the 16 to 30 solar mass range, addressing the long-standing red supergiant problem.TOI 1355b: A planet with an expiry date Researchers from the University of Tokyo have discovered TOI 1355b, a hot Jupiter with a unique eccentric orbit around an A-type star. This planet will stop transiting its host star by 2033 due to nodal precession, providing a rare opportunity to study its characteristics before it disappears from view.SpaceX Crew Missions Update NASA has contracted SpaceX for three additional crew rotation missions to the International Space Station, extending their partnership and ensuring continued access to the station. Crew 13 is currently in quarantine, with a launch targeted for early October.The Sun goes blank For the first time since February, the Sun has gone completely spotless, marking a significant moment in the solar cycle. As solar activity declines, a coronal hole is set to rotate into position, potentially leading to minor geomagnetic storms and auroras.1. Supernovae keep galaxies churning2. Neutrinos may dictate stellar explosions3. TOI 1355b: A planet with an expiry date4. SpaceX Crew Missions Update5. The Sun goes blankBecome a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support.

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You've been glad you did!

Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, Google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They believe in privacy and there are no ads in their business model... yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get our special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail

Become a supporter of Astronomy AstroDailyPod by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial-free episodes daily are only a click away... Click Here

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!

Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail

Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here

This episode includes AI-generated content.
WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.880
Anna: A galaxy should be quiet. Stir

1
00:00:02.880 --> 00:00:05.600
a cloud of gas and the churning dies away in

2
00:00:05.600 --> 00:00:08.480
a few million years, like ripples going flat

3
00:00:08.480 --> 00:00:11.040
on a pond. And yet every spiral

4
00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:13.360
galaxy we look at is still churning.

5
00:00:13.680 --> 00:00:15.600
Something keeps stirring the pot.

6
00:00:16.240 --> 00:00:18.800
Avery: Today, a survey of the galaxy next door that

7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.400
catches a spoon in the act, plus the

8
00:00:21.400 --> 00:00:23.840
ghostly particles that may decide which stars

9
00:00:23.840 --> 00:00:26.760
explode at all. A planet with an expiry

10
00:00:26.760 --> 00:00:28.960
date and the sun goes blank for the first

11
00:00:28.960 --> 00:00:29.920
time since February.

12
00:00:30.150 --> 00:00:31.260
Anna: The I'm Anna.

13
00:00:31.500 --> 00:00:34.220
Avery: And I'm Avery. This is astronomy daily,

14
00:00:34.300 --> 00:00:36.220
episode 199.

15
00:00:36.940 --> 00:00:39.420
Anna: Start with a problem that has sat in the

16
00:00:39.420 --> 00:00:42.300
background of galaxy science for about 50

17
00:00:42.300 --> 00:00:45.100
years, and that has the useful quality of

18
00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:48.060
being easy to state and very hard to

19
00:00:48.060 --> 00:00:51.020
answer. The gas between the stars in a

20
00:00:51.020 --> 00:00:53.900
galaxy is turbulent. It is not sitting still

21
00:00:53.900 --> 00:00:56.550
and it is not flowing smoothly. It is

22
00:00:56.550 --> 00:00:59.270
churning on every scale from a few light

23
00:00:59.270 --> 00:01:02.070
years up to thousands, with gas moving at

24
00:01:02.070 --> 00:01:04.070
something like 10 kilometres a second

25
00:01:04.230 --> 00:01:06.750
relative to its neighbours. We have measured

26
00:01:06.750 --> 00:01:09.590
this in our own galaxy and in every nearby

27
00:01:09.590 --> 00:01:12.429
galaxy we can resolve it is simply how

28
00:01:12.429 --> 00:01:15.350
interstellar gas behaves. Here is the

29
00:01:15.350 --> 00:01:18.350
problem. Turbulence dies. That is

30
00:01:18.350 --> 00:01:20.950
the one thing turbulence reliably does.

31
00:01:21.430 --> 00:01:24.270
Energy cascades from big eddies down to

32
00:01:24.270 --> 00:01:26.910
small eddies, and at the bottom it turns into

33
00:01:26.910 --> 00:01:29.090
heat and it gone. In

34
00:01:29.090 --> 00:01:31.890
1999, an astrophysicist named

35
00:01:31.890 --> 00:01:34.770
Mordecai Mark Macklow put a number on

36
00:01:34.770 --> 00:01:36.970
how fast that happens in interstellar

37
00:01:36.970 --> 00:01:39.810
conditions. And the number was brutal.

38
00:01:40.210 --> 00:01:42.770
Turbulence in a galaxy's gas should decay

39
00:01:42.770 --> 00:01:45.370
away in roughly the time it takes the gas to

40
00:01:45.370 --> 00:01:48.090
cross itself once a few tens of

41
00:01:48.090 --> 00:01:50.770
millions of years on a galactic clock.

42
00:01:50.770 --> 00:01:53.610
That's an afternoon. So the churning

43
00:01:53.610 --> 00:01:56.180
we see should not be there unless

44
00:01:56.340 --> 00:01:58.260
something is putting the energy back

45
00:01:58.500 --> 00:02:01.140
continuously for billions of years.

46
00:02:01.700 --> 00:02:03.620
Avery: And there has never been a shortage of

47
00:02:03.620 --> 00:02:04.340
suspects.

48
00:02:04.820 --> 00:02:07.820
Anna: No shortage at all. Supernovae are

49
00:02:07.820 --> 00:02:10.780
the obvious one. But gravity itself can

50
00:02:10.780 --> 00:02:13.340
drive turbulence. As the disc shears and

51
00:02:13.340 --> 00:02:16.020
clumps, there is the magnetorotational

52
00:02:16.100 --> 00:02:18.780
instability, which wrings energy out of the

53
00:02:18.780 --> 00:02:21.220
galaxy's rotation through its magnetic field.

54
00:02:21.730 --> 00:02:23.970
There is gas falling in from outside, and

55
00:02:23.970 --> 00:02:26.770
massive stars blow winds long before they

56
00:02:26.770 --> 00:02:29.770
explode. All of these are real. The

57
00:02:29.770 --> 00:02:31.970
question was never whether supernovae

58
00:02:31.970 --> 00:02:34.530
contribute. It was whether they are enough

59
00:02:34.850 --> 00:02:37.170
on their own to pay the whole bill.

60
00:02:37.630 --> 00:02:39.370
Avery: Uh, and to answer that, you need to do

61
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.610
something nobody had managed. You need to

62
00:02:41.610 --> 00:02:44.290
count the receipts. When massive stars in a

63
00:02:44.290 --> 00:02:46.810
cluster explode, and they do it in batches,

64
00:02:46.810 --> 00:02:49.210
because massive stars are born in groups and

65
00:02:49.210 --> 00:02:51.290
die within a few million years of one

66
00:02:51.290 --> 00:02:54.190
another, the blasts merge. Instead of

67
00:02:54.190 --> 00:02:56.710
a single expanding remnant you get a super

68
00:02:56.710 --> 00:02:59.430
bubble, an enormous cavity blown in the

69
00:02:59.430 --> 00:03:01.830
neutral hydrogen, its edge still pushing

70
00:03:01.830 --> 00:03:04.670
outwards. Superbubbles are the fingerprints

71
00:03:04.830 --> 00:03:07.230
each one carries in its size and its

72
00:03:07.230 --> 00:03:10.030
expansion speed, a record of how much energy

73
00:03:10.030 --> 00:03:11.950
went into it and roughly when.

74
00:03:12.590 --> 00:03:15.030
Anna: So a, uh, complete, dynamically resolved

75
00:03:15.030 --> 00:03:17.750
census of superbubbles across an entire

76
00:03:17.750 --> 00:03:20.270
galaxy would let you add up the energy

77
00:03:20.430 --> 00:03:23.190
supernovae have actually delivered and then

78
00:03:23.190 --> 00:03:25.300
compare it against how fast the turbine

79
00:03:25.370 --> 00:03:27.810
turbulence in that same galaxy is bleeding

80
00:03:27.810 --> 00:03:30.410
energy away. If the two numbers match,

81
00:03:30.570 --> 00:03:33.290
you have your answer. If supernovae falls

82
00:03:33.290 --> 00:03:35.690
short, something else is doing the work.

83
00:03:36.250 --> 00:03:38.690
Avery: Nobody had that senses for a reason. That's

84
00:03:38.690 --> 00:03:41.250
almost funny. We can't do it for the Milky

85
00:03:41.250 --> 00:03:43.850
Way because we live inside it. Mapping

86
00:03:43.850 --> 00:03:46.290
bubbles in our own galaxy is like surveying a

87
00:03:46.290 --> 00:03:48.930
forest from the base of one tree. And for

88
00:03:48.930 --> 00:03:51.490
other galaxies we have the sensitivity or the

89
00:03:51.490 --> 00:03:53.240
resolution, never both.

90
00:03:53.720 --> 00:03:56.600
Anna: Which is where two telescopes on opposite

91
00:03:56.600 --> 00:03:59.400
sides of the world come in. Exactly

92
00:03:59.400 --> 00:04:02.200
that. The paper is in Nature astronomy,

93
00:04:02.200 --> 00:04:05.160
published on 17 September. Led by

94
00:04:05.160 --> 00:04:07.400
Fan Yi Meng of Tsinghua University,

95
00:04:07.880 --> 00:04:10.760
with Zhao Wei Tsai and Jingwen Wu,

96
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:13.440
and with D Li, Jinghua's head of

97
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:15.840
astronomy and the former chief scientist of

98
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:18.440
the FAST telescope as corresponding

99
00:04:18.440 --> 00:04:21.010
authority, they combined two instruments.

100
00:04:21.250 --> 00:04:24.090
FAST is the 500 metre aperture

101
00:04:24.090 --> 00:04:26.650
spherical telescope sitting in a natural

102
00:04:26.650 --> 00:04:29.570
limestone bowl in Guizhou Province in

103
00:04:29.570 --> 00:04:32.210
southern China, the most sensitive single

104
00:04:32.210 --> 00:04:34.970
dish on Earth. At these wavelengths, what it

105
00:04:34.970 --> 00:04:37.650
gives you is faint, diffuse, large

106
00:04:37.650 --> 00:04:40.450
scale structure, the outskirts of bubbles,

107
00:04:40.530 --> 00:04:43.370
the gas nobody else can see. What it

108
00:04:43.370 --> 00:04:46.140
cannot give you is fine detail. For

109
00:04:46.140 --> 00:04:48.820
that they used archival observations from the

110
00:04:48.820 --> 00:04:51.780
Jansky Very Large array in New Mexico,

111
00:04:52.020 --> 00:04:54.740
27 dishes spread across the desert.

112
00:04:54.900 --> 00:04:57.700
Working as one instrument, the array

113
00:04:57.780 --> 00:05:00.260
resolves the sharp edges fast,

114
00:05:00.500 --> 00:05:03.260
fills in everything. The array's spacing

115
00:05:03.260 --> 00:05:06.100
makes it blind to stitch them together, and

116
00:05:06.100 --> 00:05:08.900
you get a map that is both deep and sharp,

117
00:05:08.900 --> 00:05:11.620
which is exactly what this problem has always

118
00:05:11.620 --> 00:05:12.100
needed.

119
00:05:13.100 --> 00:05:15.980
Avery: They pointed that combination at Messier 31,

120
00:05:16.060 --> 00:05:18.740
the Andromeda Galaxy, the nearest big

121
00:05:18.740 --> 00:05:21.420
spiral, 2 1/2 million light years away

122
00:05:21.660 --> 00:05:23.580
and close enough that we can see the whole

123
00:05:23.580 --> 00:05:26.420
disc laid out from the outside. They mapped

124
00:05:26.420 --> 00:05:28.900
it in the 21 centimetre line of neutral

125
00:05:28.900 --> 00:05:31.340
hydrogen, the radio signal that traces

126
00:05:31.500 --> 00:05:33.020
cold atomic gas.

127
00:05:33.580 --> 00:05:35.340
Anna: From that map, they pulled

128
00:05:35.340 --> 00:05:38.220
365 candidate cavities

129
00:05:38.300 --> 00:05:40.780
and after classification, confirmed

130
00:05:40.940 --> 00:05:43.860
118 genuine super bubbles

131
00:05:43.860 --> 00:05:45.640
across the entire disc.

132
00:05:45.960 --> 00:05:46.760
Avery: And the result?

133
00:05:47.320 --> 00:05:49.960
Anna: The first thing worth noticing is the ages.

134
00:05:50.200 --> 00:05:52.520
Measured from their sizes and expansion

135
00:05:52.520 --> 00:05:55.240
speeds, the bubbles run up to 40 million

136
00:05:55.320 --> 00:05:58.280
years old. That is not an arbitrary number.

137
00:05:58.520 --> 00:06:01.120
It is almost exactly how long a star

138
00:06:01.120 --> 00:06:03.960
cluster keeps producing Supernovae from its

139
00:06:03.960 --> 00:06:06.760
first massive star dying to its last.

140
00:06:07.080 --> 00:06:09.400
The ages line up with the clock you would

141
00:06:09.400 --> 00:06:12.340
predict if clusters are uh, what makes them B

142
00:06:12.340 --> 00:06:14.660
Lee put the scale plainly. Those

143
00:06:14.660 --> 00:06:17.260
118 bubbles correspond to

144
00:06:17.260 --> 00:06:19.900
thousands of supernova explosions over the

145
00:06:19.900 --> 00:06:22.900
past 40 million years. Then the actual

146
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.740
test from the bubbles they calculated the

147
00:06:25.740 --> 00:06:28.300
rate at which supernovae are injecting

148
00:06:28.300 --> 00:06:30.860
kinetic energy between 10 to the

149
00:06:30.860 --> 00:06:33.780
49th to 10 to the 51.5

150
00:06:33.940 --> 00:06:36.700
ergs per cubic kiloparsec per

151
00:06:36.700 --> 00:06:39.490
million years. Separately and this is the

152
00:06:39.490 --> 00:06:42.050
part that makes the paper work. They derived

153
00:06:42.050 --> 00:06:44.570
the rate at which turbulence is dissipating

154
00:06:44.570 --> 00:06:47.130
energy from the same data using the

155
00:06:47.130 --> 00:06:49.570
observed motions of the gastwo

156
00:06:49.570 --> 00:06:52.490
independent numbers. They match match

157
00:06:52.490 --> 00:06:55.210
how closely in magnitude. And

158
00:06:55.450 --> 00:06:58.050
this is the stronger claim in spatial

159
00:06:58.050 --> 00:06:58.810
distribution.

160
00:06:59.130 --> 00:07:01.770
It's not just that the galaxy wide totals

161
00:07:01.770 --> 00:07:04.250
happen to agree, which could be coincidence

162
00:07:04.330 --> 00:07:06.930
between two quantities that both scale with

163
00:07:06.930 --> 00:07:09.660
how many stars a ah galaxy has. It's that

164
00:07:09.660 --> 00:07:12.460
where the supernovae energy goes in is

165
00:07:12.460 --> 00:07:14.780
where the turbulent energy comes out

166
00:07:15.180 --> 00:07:17.860
region by region across the disc. The

167
00:07:17.860 --> 00:07:20.220
supply map matches the demand map.

168
00:07:20.380 --> 00:07:23.220
That's much harder to get by accent. The

169
00:07:23.220 --> 00:07:25.460
conclusion the authors draw is carefully

170
00:07:25.460 --> 00:07:27.580
worded and I want to keep their wording.

171
00:07:27.900 --> 00:07:30.140
Clustered supernova feedback is

172
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:32.860
sufficient to sustain galactic scale

173
00:07:32.860 --> 00:07:35.100
turbulence. Why this matters beyond

174
00:07:35.100 --> 00:07:37.930
bookkeeping is turbulence is not a detail

175
00:07:37.930 --> 00:07:40.570
of galaxies, it's one of the controls.

176
00:07:40.810 --> 00:07:43.490
Turbulent pressure helps hold a ah gas disc

177
00:07:43.490 --> 00:07:46.450
up against its own gravity. And turbulence is

178
00:07:46.450 --> 00:07:49.290
what stops molecular clouds collapsing all at

179
00:07:49.290 --> 00:07:51.929
once. A large part of why galaxies

180
00:07:51.929 --> 00:07:54.570
convert gas into stars. So slowly

181
00:07:54.890 --> 00:07:57.530
change the turbulence and you change the star

182
00:07:57.530 --> 00:08:00.490
formation rate. So this closes a loop.

183
00:08:00.570 --> 00:08:03.510
Gas collapses and forms stars. The biggest

184
00:08:03.510 --> 00:08:06.190
of those stars explode. The explosions

185
00:08:06.190 --> 00:08:08.750
stir the remaining gas. The stirring

186
00:08:08.750 --> 00:08:11.350
regulates how readily the next generation

187
00:08:11.350 --> 00:08:13.990
forms. Galaxies are partly self

188
00:08:13.990 --> 00:08:16.390
governing and this is the first time both

189
00:08:16.390 --> 00:08:18.430
ends of that loop have been measured in the

190
00:08:18.430 --> 00:08:21.390
same galaxy from the same data and found

191
00:08:21.390 --> 00:08:22.190
to balance.

192
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:25.310
Avery: And um, the caveat now the honest

193
00:08:25.310 --> 00:08:27.870
Anna: limits and there are three first,

194
00:08:27.950 --> 00:08:30.270
sufficient is not the same as sole

195
00:08:30.560 --> 00:08:32.920
showing supernovae can pay the whole bill

196
00:08:32.920 --> 00:08:35.200
does not prove nothing else. Chips in

197
00:08:35.520 --> 00:08:37.680
gravity and the magneto rotational

198
00:08:37.760 --> 00:08:40.560
instability have not been eliminated. They

199
00:08:40.560 --> 00:08:43.320
have been made unnecessary, which is a weaker

200
00:08:43.320 --> 00:08:46.120
and more interesting result. Second, this

201
00:08:46.120 --> 00:08:49.040
is neutral atomic hydrogen. It does not

202
00:08:49.040 --> 00:08:51.560
directly trace the molecular gas where

203
00:08:51.560 --> 00:08:54.120
stars actually form or the hot

204
00:08:54.120 --> 00:08:56.720
ionised gas and the energy budget in those

205
00:08:56.720 --> 00:08:59.600
phases could behave differently. And third,

206
00:08:59.840 --> 00:09:02.160
this is one galaxy, a large,

207
00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:05.360
fairly quiet spiral that has not formed stars

208
00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:08.280
vigorously in a long while. Whether the books

209
00:09:08.280 --> 00:09:11.280
balance the same way in a starburst or in a

210
00:09:11.280 --> 00:09:13.560
small, irregular, uh, galaxy where bubbles

211
00:09:13.560 --> 00:09:14.719
can blow straight out.

212
00:09:14.719 --> 00:09:17.280
The top is exactly the next question.

213
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:20.840
Two footnotes I enjoyed Bordechai Mark

214
00:09:20.840 --> 00:09:23.640
McClo, the man whose 1999

215
00:09:23.640 --> 00:09:26.080
paper showed this turbulence should have died

216
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:29.060
long ago, is a co author here. His own

217
00:09:29.060 --> 00:09:31.340
result is referenced too, in the paper that

218
00:09:31.340 --> 00:09:34.340
answers it. And because Nature Astronomy

219
00:09:34.340 --> 00:09:37.220
publishes its referee reports, we know one

220
00:09:37.220 --> 00:09:39.980
of the two reviewers was Christoph Federath

221
00:09:40.060 --> 00:09:42.980
at the Australian National University, who

222
00:09:42.980 --> 00:09:45.420
has spent a career on this exact question.

223
00:09:45.900 --> 00:09:48.820
The Australian fingerprint is on the scrutiny

224
00:09:48.820 --> 00:09:51.500
rather than the data. Regular listeners will

225
00:09:51.500 --> 00:09:54.460
hear an echo here. Two weeks ago we ran

226
00:09:54.460 --> 00:09:56.860
the finding that black hole outflows can

227
00:09:56.860 --> 00:09:59.460
trigger star formation as well as shut it

228
00:09:59.460 --> 00:10:02.290
down. Feedback that builds as well as

229
00:10:02.290 --> 00:10:05.010
breaks. This is the same lesson one

230
00:10:05.090 --> 00:10:07.650
rung down the letter. At stellar scale,

231
00:10:07.970 --> 00:10:10.930
feedback is not simply destructive, it is

232
00:10:10.930 --> 00:10:12.530
a galaxy's thermostat.

233
00:10:13.090 --> 00:10:15.930
Avery: Anna's Storey takes supernovae as given and

234
00:10:15.930 --> 00:10:18.890
asks what they do to a galaxy. This one

235
00:10:18.890 --> 00:10:21.690
asks a question one step which

236
00:10:21.690 --> 00:10:24.610
stars actually managed to explode? You would

237
00:10:24.610 --> 00:10:27.390
think that was settled. It is not. We

238
00:10:27.390 --> 00:10:29.950
see fewer supernovae than our models say we

239
00:10:29.950 --> 00:10:32.790
should. And there's a related puzzle, the red

240
00:10:32.790 --> 00:10:35.710
supergiant problem. When astronomers go back

241
00:10:35.710 --> 00:10:38.150
through archival images to identify the star

242
00:10:38.150 --> 00:10:40.910
that blew up, they never find 1 above about

243
00:10:40.910 --> 00:10:43.870
16 to 18 solar masses. Even

244
00:10:43.870 --> 00:10:46.230
though plenty of stars are heavier, something

245
00:10:46.230 --> 00:10:48.710
is quietly removing the most massive stars

246
00:10:48.710 --> 00:10:51.550
from the exploding population. A new paper in

247
00:10:51.550 --> 00:10:54.310
Physical Review D from Mariam Gogilashvili

248
00:10:54.310 --> 00:10:56.870
and Irene Tambora at the Niels Bohr Institute

249
00:10:56.870 --> 00:10:59.330
in Copenhagen Contorm points at an

250
00:10:59.330 --> 00:11:02.050
unlikely culprit. Neutrinos changing

251
00:11:02.050 --> 00:11:04.850
identity Quick refresher When a

252
00:11:04.850 --> 00:11:07.370
Anna: massive star's core collapses, about

253
00:11:07.370 --> 00:11:10.370
99% of the energy released leaves

254
00:11:10.370 --> 00:11:13.250
as neutrinos. And the explosion depends on

255
00:11:13.250 --> 00:11:15.490
a small fraction of that flood being

256
00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:18.210
reabsorbed by the gas just outside the

257
00:11:18.210 --> 00:11:20.770
core, heating it enough to revive the

258
00:11:20.770 --> 00:11:23.610
stalled shock wave. It's a narrow margin.

259
00:11:24.130 --> 00:11:26.610
Neutrinos also come in three flavours

260
00:11:26.850 --> 00:11:29.410
electron, muon and tau and

261
00:11:29.410 --> 00:11:31.610
oscillate between them, which is Nobel

262
00:11:31.610 --> 00:11:33.730
winning physics from 1998.

263
00:11:34.210 --> 00:11:37.130
Avery: Here's the catch. Only the electron flavour

264
00:11:37.130 --> 00:11:39.890
deposits heat efficiently. Muon and tau

265
00:11:39.890 --> 00:11:42.810
neutrinos mostly sail straight out. So

266
00:11:42.810 --> 00:11:45.210
if flavour conversion happens deep inside a

267
00:11:45.210 --> 00:11:47.930
collapsing core, it takes energy earmarked

268
00:11:47.930 --> 00:11:50.210
for the explosion and redistributes it into

269
00:11:50.210 --> 00:11:52.960
flavours that simply leave. Most state of the

270
00:11:52.960 --> 00:11:55.360
art simulations leave this out on the old

271
00:11:55.360 --> 00:11:57.480
assumption that conversion happens too far

272
00:11:57.480 --> 00:11:59.840
out to matter. Recent work says

273
00:11:59.840 --> 00:12:02.760
otherwise, so Maryam Gogilashvili and

274
00:12:02.760 --> 00:12:05.720
Irene Tambora put it in schematically and

275
00:12:05.720 --> 00:12:08.600
ran the collapse of 195 stars

276
00:12:08.680 --> 00:12:11.560
from 9 to 120 solar masses

277
00:12:12.040 --> 00:12:14.960
without flavour conversion. About 27%

278
00:12:14.960 --> 00:12:17.640
of their stars fail to explode and collapse

279
00:12:17.640 --> 00:12:20.070
straight to black holes. That matches both

280
00:12:20.070 --> 00:12:22.750
the literature and observations. Switch

281
00:12:22.750 --> 00:12:25.270
flavour conversion on and the failure rate

282
00:12:25.270 --> 00:12:28.030
climbs to somewhere between 48 and

283
00:12:28.030 --> 00:12:30.830
88% depending on how deep in the

284
00:12:30.830 --> 00:12:33.430
core you let it happen. And the stars most

285
00:12:33.430 --> 00:12:36.030
affected sit between 16 and 30

286
00:12:36.030 --> 00:12:37.950
solar masses, which is

287
00:12:37.950 --> 00:12:40.750
Anna: precisely the missing mass range. In the red

288
00:12:40.750 --> 00:12:41.950
supergiant problem.

289
00:12:42.190 --> 00:12:44.990
Avery: There is a second quieter result I like more.

290
00:12:45.300 --> 00:12:47.580
And the stars that do still explode. Flavour

291
00:12:47.580 --> 00:12:50.100
conversion revives the shock earlier so less

292
00:12:50.100 --> 00:12:52.500
material rains back onto the newborn neutron

293
00:12:52.500 --> 00:12:55.300
star. The neutron stars come out lighter,

294
00:12:55.300 --> 00:12:58.180
closer to the 1.2 to 1.4 solar

295
00:12:58.180 --> 00:13:00.420
masses we actually measure in pulsars.

296
00:13:00.900 --> 00:13:03.460
A model that was running heavy now matches

297
00:13:03.940 --> 00:13:06.740
the honest handling. Here is the range. 48

298
00:13:06.740 --> 00:13:09.700
to 88% is not a measurement. It is a span

299
00:13:09.700 --> 00:13:11.860
across assumptions. And the authors say

300
00:13:11.860 --> 00:13:13.780
plainly that their upper valleys look to be

301
00:13:13.780 --> 00:13:16.380
in tension with observations. This is one

302
00:13:16.380 --> 00:13:18.380
dimensional modelling with a deliberately

303
00:13:18.380 --> 00:13:20.700
simplified switch for the neutrino physics.

304
00:13:20.860 --> 00:13:23.460
What it establishes is not a number. It is

305
00:13:23.460 --> 00:13:25.620
that this effect is too big to keep leaving

306
00:13:25.620 --> 00:13:28.420
out. The preprint went up in mid

307
00:13:28.420 --> 00:13:30.620
May, so the work has been circulating about

308
00:13:30.620 --> 00:13:32.460
four months. It is the journal version that

309
00:13:32.460 --> 00:13:32.580
is

310
00:13:32.580 --> 00:13:34.980
Anna: new and a southern footnote that is not a

311
00:13:34.980 --> 00:13:36.980
stretch. We have caught neutrinos from

312
00:13:36.980 --> 00:13:39.420
exactly one supernova SN

313
00:13:39.580 --> 00:13:42.380
1987A in the Southern Magellanic

314
00:13:42.380 --> 00:13:45.160
Cloud cloud 20 dozen particles over about 13

315
00:13:45.240 --> 00:13:47.560
seconds in February 1987.

316
00:13:48.040 --> 00:13:50.600
Every word of this debate traces back to that

317
00:13:50.600 --> 00:13:53.560
1 handful of detections from a galaxy only

318
00:13:53.560 --> 00:13:56.160
southern observers see properly. The next

319
00:13:56.160 --> 00:13:58.560
galactic supernova settles a great deal of

320
00:13:58.560 --> 00:13:58.839
it.

321
00:13:59.000 --> 00:14:00.920
Avery: Okay, moving on to storey 3.

322
00:14:01.400 --> 00:14:03.920
Most exoplanet discoveries come with an open

323
00:14:03.920 --> 00:14:06.320
ended invitation. Go and study it whenever

324
00:14:06.320 --> 00:14:08.680
you like. This one comes with a deadline.

325
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:11.600
Published on 18 September in the publications

326
00:14:11.600 --> 00:14:14.160
of the Astronomical Society of Japan from

327
00:14:14.160 --> 00:14:16.480
Noriharu Watanabe and Norio

328
00:14:16.480 --> 00:14:18.920
Narita at the University of Tokyo with a

329
00:14:18.920 --> 00:14:21.600
large international team. The discovery of

330
00:14:21.600 --> 00:14:24.600
TOI 1355b, a

331
00:14:24.600 --> 00:14:27.360
hot Jupiter and a strange one on three counts

332
00:14:27.440 --> 00:14:30.028
count one is the star. TOI

333
00:14:30.212 --> 00:14:33.160
1355 is an A type star about twice

334
00:14:33.160 --> 00:14:36.080
the Sun's mass with a surface near 8,700

335
00:14:36.160 --> 00:14:39.120
Kelvin, um, some 3,000 degrees hotter than

336
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:41.920
the Sun. It's around 800 light years away

337
00:14:41.920 --> 00:14:44.560
and it spins fast better than 80

338
00:14:44.560 --> 00:14:46.760
kilometres a second against our Sun's

339
00:14:46.760 --> 00:14:49.520
leisurely two count two is the

340
00:14:49.520 --> 00:14:52.360
planet. Nearly six Jupiter masses. About

341
00:14:52.360 --> 00:14:55.160
1.4 Jupiter radii whipping around

342
00:14:55.160 --> 00:14:57.560
that star every 2.17 days.

343
00:14:57.960 --> 00:15:00.120
But its orbit is not a circle. The

344
00:15:00.120 --> 00:15:03.100
eccentricity is about 0.22 a

345
00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:04.700
properly lopsided orbit.

346
00:15:04.700 --> 00:15:07.020
Anna: Why is that surprising for a hot Jupiter?

347
00:15:07.180 --> 00:15:09.700
Avery: Because they're almost never lopsided sitting

348
00:15:09.700 --> 00:15:12.340
that close in tides should round off an orbit

349
00:15:12.340 --> 00:15:15.300
quickly. Of the roughly 20 hot Jupiters known

350
00:15:15.300 --> 00:15:17.740
around hot stars, the measured eccentricities

351
00:15:17.740 --> 00:15:20.660
are essentially zero, some to four decimal

352
00:15:20.660 --> 00:15:22.460
places. And there's exactly one other

353
00:15:22.460 --> 00:15:24.980
eccentric case on record. These worlds are

354
00:15:24.980 --> 00:15:27.420
thought to be flung inward on wild elliptical

355
00:15:27.420 --> 00:15:29.820
orbits by gravitational bullying from other

356
00:15:29.820 --> 00:15:32.310
planets. Then have those orbits ground down

357
00:15:32.310 --> 00:15:34.870
to circles by tides. TOI

358
00:15:34.870 --> 00:15:37.790
1355B is partway through the grinding,

359
00:15:37.790 --> 00:15:40.590
which we rarely gets. Watch count three

360
00:15:40.590 --> 00:15:42.910
is the deadline. Comparing transits across

361
00:15:42.910 --> 00:15:45.850
TESS observations from 2019, 2020,

362
00:15:46.021 --> 00:15:48.910
2022 and 2024. The team

363
00:15:48.910 --> 00:15:50.750
found the planet crossing the star at a

364
00:15:50.750 --> 00:15:53.030
steadily different height each time. The

365
00:15:53.030 --> 00:15:55.950
orbit's plane is swinging nodal precession

366
00:15:55.950 --> 00:15:58.230
driven by the bulge of that rapidly spinning

367
00:15:58.230 --> 00:16:01.150
star. Wind it forward and the planet stops

368
00:16:01.150 --> 00:16:03.150
crossing the star's face from our point of

369
00:16:03.150 --> 00:16:05.510
view around the middle of 2033.

370
00:16:05.670 --> 00:16:08.670
Anna: After that, no transits for centuries. The

371
00:16:08.670 --> 00:16:09.670
planet is fine.

372
00:16:09.670 --> 00:16:12.430
Our line of sight is what runs out. There is

373
00:16:12.430 --> 00:16:15.109
a lovely methodological wrinkle too.

374
00:16:15.350 --> 00:16:17.990
You normally weigh a planet by watching the

375
00:16:17.990 --> 00:16:20.550
star wobble. But this star spins

376
00:16:20.710 --> 00:16:23.350
so fast its spectral lines are smeared

377
00:16:23.510 --> 00:16:26.050
and that does not work. So they weighed it

378
00:16:26.050 --> 00:16:28.410
from the light curve instead from M. The way

379
00:16:28.410 --> 00:16:31.210
the planet's gravity distorts the star into

380
00:16:31.210 --> 00:16:33.890
a faint rugby ball shape. And from the

381
00:16:33.890 --> 00:16:36.330
subtle brightening as the star is tugged

382
00:16:36.330 --> 00:16:39.170
towards us. The mass came out of the shape of

383
00:16:39.170 --> 00:16:41.890
the light, not the shift of the lines. And

384
00:16:41.890 --> 00:16:43.850
the supporting cast is worth naming.

385
00:16:44.170 --> 00:16:47.170
Alongside TESS and the 3.8 metre

386
00:16:47.170 --> 00:16:49.850
SEMI telescope in Okayama, this

387
00:16:49.850 --> 00:16:52.490
paper leans on a 91 centimetre

388
00:16:52.490 --> 00:16:55.060
telescope on the slopes of Matt Etna,

389
00:16:55.370 --> 00:16:58.090
a 40 centimetre in Switzerland and a

390
00:16:58.090 --> 00:17:00.970
28 centimetre at a private observatory in

391
00:17:00.970 --> 00:17:03.890
Germany. Backyard scale instruments on the

392
00:17:03.890 --> 00:17:06.770
Discovery paper for a six Jupiter mass

393
00:17:06.770 --> 00:17:09.730
world. The preprint went up in August, so

394
00:17:09.730 --> 00:17:12.050
about a month ahead of the journal. And for

395
00:17:12.050 --> 00:17:14.430
our southern listeners the star sits at Ah,

396
00:17:14.430 --> 00:17:17.410
Declination 67, which means

397
00:17:17.410 --> 00:17:20.130
it never rises from Sydney. Northern

398
00:17:20.130 --> 00:17:22.890
listeners can find the field in Cepheus. The

399
00:17:22.890 --> 00:17:25.690
team is already preparing a follow up on how

400
00:17:25.690 --> 00:17:27.970
tilted the orbit is and wants

401
00:17:27.970 --> 00:17:30.690
JWST time to low

402
00:17:30.690 --> 00:17:31.050
ETH

403
00:17:31.050 --> 00:17:32.730
Avery: orbit now and the business end of

404
00:17:32.730 --> 00:17:33.410
spaceflight.

405
00:17:33.570 --> 00:17:36.320
On 18 September, NASA exercised a UH

406
00:17:36.410 --> 00:17:39.330
contract modification with SpaceX for three

407
00:17:39.330 --> 00:17:41.370
additional crew rotation missions to the

408
00:17:41.370 --> 00:17:44.370
International Space Crew 1 5, Crew

409
00:17:44.370 --> 00:17:47.210
16 and Crew 1 7. The value

410
00:17:47.210 --> 00:17:50.130
is $946 million for all

411
00:17:50.130 --> 00:17:52.820
three covering ground launch in

412
00:17:52.820 --> 00:17:54.980
orbit and return and recovery operations,

413
00:17:55.460 --> 00:17:58.180
cargo on each mission and lifeboat capability

414
00:17:58.180 --> 00:18:00.940
while docked. That takes SpaceX to

415
00:18:00.940 --> 00:18:03.380
17 crew missions under the commercial crew

416
00:18:03.380 --> 00:18:06.060
transportation contract and that contract's

417
00:18:06.060 --> 00:18:08.040
running total to $5.92

418
00:18:08.240 --> 00:18:11.180
billion. Period of performance runs through

419
00:18:11.180 --> 00:18:13.540
2030 with mission readiness dates in

420
00:18:13.540 --> 00:18:16.540
2027 and 2028. NASA

421
00:18:16.540 --> 00:18:18.700
flagged its intent to buy back in May and

422
00:18:18.700 --> 00:18:21.460
calls this a sole source modification that

423
00:18:21.460 --> 00:18:23.680
does not pre further purchases later.

424
00:18:24.000 --> 00:18:26.400
Anna: One line in that release is worth reading

425
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:29.320
carefully. NASA says the change helps

426
00:18:29.320 --> 00:18:32.240
it maintain access to the station with quote,

427
00:18:32.480 --> 00:18:34.800
two unique commercial crew industry

428
00:18:34.960 --> 00:18:37.960
partners. The award itself goes to one

429
00:18:37.960 --> 00:18:40.160
of them. The original 2014

430
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:42.960
contracts went to both Boeing and SpaceX

431
00:18:43.280 --> 00:18:46.080
and Boeing appears in this release exactly

432
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.890
once in that history. NASA does

433
00:18:48.890 --> 00:18:51.490
not say anything here about when its second

434
00:18:51.490 --> 00:18:53.050
provider next flies people.

435
00:18:53.450 --> 00:18:55.290
We'll report that when they do say.

436
00:18:55.530 --> 00:18:57.770
Avery: Meanwhile, the near term mission is moving.

437
00:18:58.090 --> 00:19:00.770
The four astronauts of Crew 13 entered

438
00:19:00.770 --> 00:19:02.770
quarantine late on Thursday at UH Johnson

439
00:19:02.770 --> 00:19:05.370
Space Centre in Houston. NASA's Jessica

440
00:19:05.370 --> 00:19:08.290
Watkins and Luke Delaney, the Canadian Space

441
00:19:08.290 --> 00:19:10.650
Agency's Yoshua Kutryk and

442
00:19:10.650 --> 00:19:12.850
Roscosmos cosmonaut Sergey

443
00:19:12.850 --> 00:19:15.630
tatariotnikov. NASA and SpaceX

444
00:19:15.630 --> 00:19:18.230
are still targeting early October. Before

445
00:19:18.230 --> 00:19:20.550
quarantine. They finished training at SpaceX

446
00:19:20.550 --> 00:19:22.910
in Hawthorne and ran a crew equipment

447
00:19:22.910 --> 00:19:25.750
interface test at Cape Canaveral. Suits on

448
00:19:25.830 --> 00:19:28.670
into the Dragon leak cheques, seat fit

449
00:19:28.670 --> 00:19:31.590
comms cheques, my favourite detail. They sit

450
00:19:31.590 --> 00:19:33.750
in the capsule and listen to its fans and

451
00:19:33.750 --> 00:19:35.790
pumps so that none of the sounds are

452
00:19:35.790 --> 00:19:37.190
unfamiliar on launch day.

453
00:19:37.430 --> 00:19:40.190
Anna: The quarantine itself is an Apollo era

454
00:19:40.190 --> 00:19:43.030
invention still doing its job. Keeping a head

455
00:19:43.030 --> 00:19:45.560
cold on the ground where it belongs. That

456
00:19:45.560 --> 00:19:47.720
closes out an arc we tracked since the

457
00:19:47.720 --> 00:19:50.280
oxidizer leak stood. Crew 13 down

458
00:19:50.600 --> 00:19:53.200
valve replaced. Crew in quarantine early

459
00:19:53.200 --> 00:19:55.560
October. We still want a date.

460
00:19:55.720 --> 00:19:57.960
Quick hit, closing a thread. We opened on

461
00:19:57.960 --> 00:20:00.520
Friday. It happened on the 18th of

462
00:20:00.520 --> 00:20:02.840
September. The earth facing sun went

463
00:20:02.840 --> 00:20:05.720
completely spotless. No numbered active

464
00:20:05.720 --> 00:20:08.600
regions at all. It's the first spotless day

465
00:20:08.600 --> 00:20:11.160
since the 24th of February and the

466
00:20:11.160 --> 00:20:13.640
19th was spotless too, making it two in a

467
00:20:13.640 --> 00:20:16.330
row. By the 20th, a small new region

468
00:20:16.330 --> 00:20:19.250
had rotated up and the run ended. Which is

469
00:20:19.250 --> 00:20:21.770
exactly how the descent from a solar maximum

470
00:20:21.770 --> 00:20:24.370
goes. Not a switch, but a flicker that

471
00:20:24.370 --> 00:20:27.090
Avery: lengthens for scale on how far we have come

472
00:20:27.090 --> 00:20:27.450
down.

473
00:20:27.690 --> 00:20:30.570
The busiest single day of the Solar cycle

474
00:20:30.570 --> 00:20:33.450
was 8 August 2024, with

475
00:20:33.450 --> 00:20:35.730
an estimated 337

476
00:20:35.730 --> 00:20:38.610
sunspots. That was the highest daily count

477
00:20:38.610 --> 00:20:41.520
since March 2001. Cycle

478
00:20:41.520 --> 00:20:44.000
25 peaked in late 2024

479
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:46.560
and minimum is not expected before about

480
00:20:46.560 --> 00:20:47.280
2030.

481
00:20:47.520 --> 00:20:50.360
Anna: But do not put the aurora gear away. A

482
00:20:50.360 --> 00:20:53.080
coronal hole is rotating into position and

483
00:20:53.080 --> 00:20:55.360
its fast solar wind stream should reach us

484
00:20:55.360 --> 00:20:58.280
around the 23rd, with forecasters flagging a

485
00:20:58.280 --> 00:21:01.160
chance of minor geomagnetic storming. If

486
00:21:01.160 --> 00:21:03.680
it lands, best chances are the far north,

487
00:21:03.920 --> 00:21:06.440
northern Scotland and the far south, southern

488
00:21:06.440 --> 00:21:09.120
New Zealand. It arrives right on the equinox,

489
00:21:09.120 --> 00:21:11.480
which is the most aurora friendly moment of

490
00:21:11.480 --> 00:21:14.320
the year. For reasons of geometry and the

491
00:21:14.320 --> 00:21:16.600
standing point we keep making. A, uh, quiet

492
00:21:16.600 --> 00:21:19.520
sun means fewer auroras, but it also means

493
00:21:19.520 --> 00:21:22.400
a weaker shield against galactic cosmic rays.

494
00:21:22.640 --> 00:21:25.600
So that background quietly rises same

495
00:21:25.600 --> 00:21:27.880
dial opposite end to the sky.

496
00:21:27.880 --> 00:21:30.000
Avery: And this week the calendar does something

497
00:21:30.000 --> 00:21:32.320
that only makes sense if you remember. The

498
00:21:32.320 --> 00:21:35.050
Earth is tilted first to equinox,

499
00:21:35.130 --> 00:21:37.810
five minutes past midnight universal time on

500
00:21:37.810 --> 00:21:40.730
the 23rd. An equinox is an instant,

501
00:21:40.730 --> 00:21:43.570
not a day. So where you stand decides the

502
00:21:43.570 --> 00:21:45.570
date. That is Tuesday evening in the

503
00:21:45.570 --> 00:21:48.250
Americas, just after five in Los Angeles,

504
00:21:48.410 --> 00:21:50.930
just after eight in New York, one in the

505
00:21:50.930 --> 00:21:53.650
morning in London and five past ten on

506
00:21:53.650 --> 00:21:56.170
Wednesday morning in Sydney. Spring here,

507
00:21:56.330 --> 00:21:58.490
autumn there, same instant.

508
00:21:58.810 --> 00:22:01.570
Anna: Then on Saturday the 26th, the full

509
00:22:01.570 --> 00:22:04.420
moon, the harvest moon. The full moon falling

510
00:22:04.420 --> 00:22:07.220
closest to the September equinox. And here's

511
00:22:07.220 --> 00:22:09.140
where it gets interesting. Because the

512
00:22:09.140 --> 00:22:11.700
harvest moon's entire reputation is a

513
00:22:11.700 --> 00:22:13.340
northern hemisphere phenomenon.

514
00:22:13.580 --> 00:22:15.380
Avery: Explain that, because I think most people

515
00:22:15.380 --> 00:22:16.780
assume it's just a name.

516
00:22:17.020 --> 00:22:19.740
Anna: It's not just a name. The moon Normally

517
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:22.220
rises about 50 minutes later each night.

518
00:22:22.460 --> 00:22:24.500
Around the northern autumn equinox. The

519
00:22:24.500 --> 00:22:26.940
Moon's path meets the eastern horizon at a

520
00:22:26.940 --> 00:22:29.700
shallow angle. So successive moon rises,

521
00:22:29.700 --> 00:22:32.420
bunch up and you get several evenings running

522
00:22:32.420 --> 00:22:34.540
with bright moonlight arriving just after

523
00:22:34.540 --> 00:22:37.440
sunset, which was the whole point. Extra

524
00:22:37.440 --> 00:22:38.760
light to finish the harvest.

525
00:22:39.000 --> 00:22:41.280
Avery: We ran the numbers for this week. On the

526
00:22:41.280 --> 00:22:44.080
nights around full moon, moonrise comes later

527
00:22:44.080 --> 00:22:46.520
by about 12 minutes a night. In London,

528
00:22:46.760 --> 00:22:49.680
22 minutes in New York, 27 in Los

529
00:22:49.680 --> 00:22:51.480
Angeles and in Sydney,

530
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:53.320
62 minutes.

531
00:22:53.800 --> 00:22:56.440
Anna: So we get the opposite of a harvest moon.

532
00:22:56.600 --> 00:22:59.600
Avery: We get the anti harvest moon. The effect the

533
00:22:59.600 --> 00:23:01.840
thing is named for is more than five times

534
00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:04.600
weaker here than in London. Same moon,

535
00:23:04.680 --> 00:23:07.680
same week, geometry simply reversed. In

536
00:23:07.680 --> 00:23:10.520
spring it's the same ecliptic angle that

537
00:23:10.520 --> 00:23:13.280
gives us a brilliant high Venus and one

538
00:23:13.280 --> 00:23:14.440
hugging the horizon.

539
00:23:14.760 --> 00:23:17.480
One wrinkle for Australian listeners The full

540
00:23:17.480 --> 00:23:20.120
moon Instant lands at 2:48 on Sunday

541
00:23:20.120 --> 00:23:22.800
morning our time, so our calendars say

542
00:23:22.800 --> 00:23:25.040
27th and northern ones say

543
00:23:25.040 --> 00:23:27.560
26th. It looks full on both nights.

544
00:23:27.720 --> 00:23:28.600
Anna: And the planets?

545
00:23:28.840 --> 00:23:30.960
Avery: Venus is still the show in the west after

546
00:23:30.960 --> 00:23:33.720
sunset. At uh magnitude -4.5

547
00:23:34.430 --> 00:23:37.350
from Sydney it stands 37 degrees high as

548
00:23:37.350 --> 00:23:40.070
the sun sets and hangs on for more than three

549
00:23:40.070 --> 00:23:42.750
hours. From New York, 13 degrees

550
00:23:42.990 --> 00:23:45.790
from London, 2 1/2 degrees about

551
00:23:45.790 --> 00:23:48.670
25 minutes with a dead flat western horizon

552
00:23:48.990 --> 00:23:51.990
in the north. Look early and low through a

553
00:23:51.990 --> 00:23:54.630
telescope. It's a big thin crescent, a

554
00:23:54.630 --> 00:23:57.390
quarter lit but 42 arcseconds across.

555
00:23:57.870 --> 00:24:00.560
Larger than Jupiter's disc. Below it

556
00:24:00.560 --> 00:24:03.400
Mercury is having a genuinely good Southern

557
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:05.200
apparition. Magnitude

558
00:24:05.977 --> 00:24:08.880
0.2, 18 degrees up from Sydney

559
00:24:08.880 --> 00:24:11.440
at sunset and setting an hour and a half

560
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:14.280
after the Sun. From London it's 3 degrees

561
00:24:14.280 --> 00:24:16.800
up and effectively out of reach for the

562
00:24:16.800 --> 00:24:17.080
north.

563
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:19.760
Anna: The compensation is the morning at the start

564
00:24:19.760 --> 00:24:22.720
of nautical Twilight. Mars stands 49

565
00:24:22.720 --> 00:24:25.600
degrees high from Los Angeles, 47 from

566
00:24:25.600 --> 00:24:28.390
New York, 42 from London and just

567
00:24:28.390 --> 00:24:30.990
21 from Sydney. Jupiter is

568
00:24:30.990 --> 00:24:33.790
28 degrees up from Los Angeles against 10

569
00:24:33.790 --> 00:24:34.390
from here.

570
00:24:34.710 --> 00:24:37.350
The pre dawn sky belongs to the north right

571
00:24:37.350 --> 00:24:39.350
now and it is worth getting up for.

572
00:24:39.830 --> 00:24:42.590
Saturn rises mid evening and is highest

573
00:24:42.590 --> 00:24:45.230
just after midnight, better than 50 degrees

574
00:24:45.230 --> 00:24:47.590
up from Sydney at magnitude plus

575
00:24:47.590 --> 00:24:50.430
0.3. It is heading for opposition

576
00:24:50.430 --> 00:24:53.270
in early October and you will see listings

577
00:24:53.270 --> 00:24:55.390
disagree about the date. Some um, say the

578
00:24:55.390 --> 00:24:57.720
fourth, some the fifth. Both are right.

579
00:24:58.040 --> 00:25:00.680
Opposition measured by ecliptic longitude

580
00:25:00.680 --> 00:25:03.480
falls on the 4th, measured by right ascension

581
00:25:03.480 --> 00:25:06.360
the 5th. Saturn's brightness and size are

582
00:25:06.360 --> 00:25:08.920
identical across that whole week so you

583
00:25:08.920 --> 00:25:11.400
cannot pick the wrong night and our lead

584
00:25:11.400 --> 00:25:13.760
storey. Can anyone actually see

585
00:25:13.760 --> 00:25:14.600
Andromeda?

586
00:25:15.000 --> 00:25:17.560
Avery: Depends entirely where you are. From New

587
00:25:17.560 --> 00:25:19.960
York, Andromeda passes almost overhead,

588
00:25:20.200 --> 00:25:23.040
89 degrees up around half past one in the

589
00:25:23.040 --> 00:25:25.870
morning from Los Angeles, 83 from

590
00:25:25.870 --> 00:25:28.670
London, 80 from Sydney. It scrapes to

591
00:25:28.670 --> 00:25:31.470
under 15 degrees low in the north through the

592
00:25:31.470 --> 00:25:34.230
thickest part of our atmosphere. Binocular is

593
00:25:34.230 --> 00:25:36.590
in a clear northern horizon after midnight

594
00:25:36.590 --> 00:25:39.190
we'll find it but it is a smudge rather than

595
00:25:39.190 --> 00:25:41.790
the showpiece. It is up north which is the

596
00:25:41.790 --> 00:25:44.110
storey of tonight really. The north gets the

597
00:25:44.110 --> 00:25:46.750
deep sky, the predawn planets and the lunar

598
00:25:46.750 --> 00:25:49.390
occultation of Jupiter on 6 October

599
00:25:49.550 --> 00:25:51.950
that sits below our horizon entirely.

600
00:25:52.570 --> 00:25:55.130
We get Venus, Mercury and the better half of

601
00:25:55.130 --> 00:25:56.010
the geometry.

602
00:25:56.250 --> 00:25:57.930
Some weeks it runs the other way

603
00:25:58.250 --> 00:26:00.490
Anna: and the standing reminder because we are

604
00:26:00.490 --> 00:26:03.010
talking about a sun with almost nothing on it

605
00:26:03.010 --> 00:26:05.610
and people will be tempted to look. Never

606
00:26:05.610 --> 00:26:07.930
look at the sun without proper protection.

607
00:26:08.250 --> 00:26:10.930
Solar viewers and eclipse glasses must meet

608
00:26:10.930 --> 00:26:11.850
the ISO

609
00:26:12.090 --> 00:26:14.650
123122

610
00:26:14.970 --> 00:26:17.530
international safety standard, and that is

611
00:26:17.530 --> 00:26:20.130
not the same as ordinary sunglasses, no

612
00:26:20.130 --> 00:26:22.410
matter how dark they are. And stacking

613
00:26:22.410 --> 00:26:24.160
sunglasses does not help.

614
00:26:24.560 --> 00:26:26.800
Cheque your filters for damage before use,

615
00:26:26.880 --> 00:26:29.600
and discard any that are scratched, punctured

616
00:26:29.600 --> 00:26:32.280
or peeling. If you're using a telescope or

617
00:26:32.280 --> 00:26:34.840
binoculars, the filter goes on the front of

618
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.640
the instrument, never on the eyepiece, where

619
00:26:37.640 --> 00:26:39.600
focused sunlight can crack it without

620
00:26:39.600 --> 00:26:42.600
warning. There is no safe way to improvise

621
00:26:42.600 --> 00:26:42.880
this.

622
00:26:43.600 --> 00:26:45.600
Avery: That's astronomy daily for today.

623
00:26:45.920 --> 00:26:48.920
118 Bubbles in Andromeda that bounce a

624
00:26:48.920 --> 00:26:51.700
galaxy's energy books neutrinos that may

625
00:26:51.700 --> 00:26:53.900
quietly decide which stars are allowed to

626
00:26:53.900 --> 00:26:56.100
explode a planet. We have until

627
00:26:56.100 --> 00:26:58.460
2033 to study three more

628
00:26:58.460 --> 00:27:00.540
dragonflights on the books and a crew in

629
00:27:00.540 --> 00:27:03.420
quarantine and a sun with nothing on its face

630
00:27:03.420 --> 00:27:05.140
for the first time since February.

631
00:27:05.540 --> 00:27:08.020
Anna: A note for tomorrow this was episode

632
00:27:08.020 --> 00:27:10.740
199, which makes the next one

633
00:27:10.740 --> 00:27:13.380
200, and we would like to mark it

634
00:27:13.380 --> 00:27:15.460
properly. If there's a storey from this

635
00:27:15.460 --> 00:27:17.620
series you want revisited or a question

636
00:27:17.620 --> 00:27:20.180
you've been sitting on the contact form at

637
00:27:20.180 --> 00:27:22.880
astronomydaily IO is the place.

638
00:27:23.120 --> 00:27:25.600
We do read them, and listener questions have

639
00:27:25.600 --> 00:27:27.440
set our running order more than once.

640
00:27:27.920 --> 00:27:29.880
Avery: All our sources are linked in the show notes,

641
00:27:29.880 --> 00:27:32.280
as always, along with the full references for

642
00:27:32.280 --> 00:27:33.120
today's papers.

643
00:27:33.280 --> 00:27:36.280
You'll find us at astronomydaily IO until

644
00:27:36.280 --> 00:27:36.880
tomorrow.

645
00:27:36.880 --> 00:27:37.840
Anna: Clear skies.

646
00:27:49.370 --> 00:27:50.010
The storeys.

647
00:27:57.850 --> 00:27:58.490
Avery: Were told.