The Evolving Enigma of Dark Energy and the Sun's Mysterious Past
An Australian-led team has rebuilt thirty years of supernova observations into one consistent catalogue — and it adds fresh weight to the idea that dark energy is not constant. We also ask whether the young Sun swallowed a super-Earth, find out why a quiet Sun is bad news at thirty-five thousand feet, and watch JWST run the most sensitive exomoon search ever attempted. Plus a Crew-13 update and a skywatch with a live aurora alert for both hemispheres. In this episode · Two thousand, eight hundred and eighty-four Type Ia supernovae, rebuilt from Pantheon+ and the Dark Energy Survey's full five-year sample into a single internally consistent catalogue by Ryan Camilleri and Professor Tamara Davis at the University of Queensland, with ANU, Swinburne and international colleagues. · On their own the supernovae give a matter density of 0.310 for flat ΛCDM. Combined with the CMB and baryon acoustic oscillations, a tension appears under constant dark energy — and eases when dark energy is allowed to evolve. Preference: 2.5–3.1 sigma. · Why that is interesting but not a discovery, and why a second independent line of evidence pointing the same way as DESI changes the shape of the argument. · Professor Mutlu Yildiz (Ege University) on whether the young Sun engulfed a planet of 5–10 Earth masses — and whether that single event explains both the solar sound-speed discrepancy and the Sun's missing lithium. · Yaniv, Yair and Price on six balloon flights to 35 km: cosmic radiation at cruising altitude runs 40–60% higher at solar minimum, with an anticorrelation of r = −0.71 against solar activity. · David Kipping stacks twelve JWST transits of LP 890-9c and excludes moons down to 0.1 Earth radii across the entire Hill region — the most sensitive exomoon search on record. · Crew-13 now targeting no earlier than late September after an oxidiser leak in Dragon's propulsion system. · Skywatch: a coronal-hole stream arriving today with aurora chances at both ends of the planet, Venus at greatest brilliancy on 18 September, Mars past Pollux, Saturn towards opposition, International Observe the Moon Night on the 19th, and the equinox on the 22nd. Sources · University of Queensland — 'Big supernova dataset challenges dark energy theory', 8 September 2026 · Camilleri, Lee, Davis, Rubin, Shah, Scolnic, Lidman et al., 'Supernovae Unite: Combining Pantheon+ and DES-SN5YR', Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia — arXiv:2609.05053; companion host-mass paper arXiv:2609.05321 · Royal Astronomical Society — ''Fingerprints' inside the Sun could reveal if it once swallowed a planet', 10 September 2026. Yildiz, MNRAS, DOI 10.1093/mnras/stag1527 · Yaniv, Yair & Price, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, September 2026 — cosmic radiation at aviation altitudes across the solar cycle · Kipping, 'JWST Excludes Exomoons Down to 0.1 Earth Radii Around a Rocky, Temperate Exoplanet', arXiv:2609.05301, 4 September 2026 · NASA Space Station blog — 'NASA, SpaceX Adjust Crew-13 Launch Date', 29 August 2026; Canadian Space Agency update, September 2026 · EarthSky sun news and NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center outlooks, 12–14 September 2026 · NASA Science — 'What's Up: September 2026 Skywatching Tips'
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-latest-space-news--5648921/support.
Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.astronomydaily.io/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!
Get the best secure and private email on the planet. Stop your Government, google and who knows who else spying on every email you write. Do what we did and use ProtonMail. They beleive in privacy and there are no ads in their business model...yet they still provide a free forever service. Check them out and get out special deal at www.astronomydaily.io/protonmail
Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
This episode includes AI-generated content.
0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.320
Anna: Three decades of exploding stars
1
00:00:02.640 --> 00:00:04.880
pulled apart and rebuilt from the ground up
2
00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:07.040
into a single consistent picture,
3
00:00:07.520 --> 00:00:10.400
2,884 of them.
4
00:00:10.880 --> 00:00:13.160
And when an Australian led team stepped back
5
00:00:13.160 --> 00:00:14.880
to look at what that picture was saying about
6
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:17.200
dark energy, it wasn't saying what the
7
00:00:17.200 --> 00:00:18.080
textbook says.
8
00:00:18.640 --> 00:00:20.980
Avery: We've also got a study asking whether our,
9
00:00:20.980 --> 00:00:23.400
uh, own sun once swallowed a planet and
10
00:00:23.400 --> 00:00:25.680
whether the evidence for it is still sitting
11
00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:28.640
inside the star right now, waiting to be
12
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:29.140
ready.
13
00:00:29.530 --> 00:00:31.770
Anna: Plus why the quietest stretch of the solar
14
00:00:31.770 --> 00:00:34.250
cycle is the one that matters most.
15
00:00:34.490 --> 00:00:36.330
If you spend your working life at
16
00:00:36.330 --> 00:00:39.290
Avery: 35,000ft, and the James Webb
17
00:00:39.290 --> 00:00:41.290
Space Telescope has just run the most
18
00:00:41.290 --> 00:00:43.530
sensitive search for a moon around another
19
00:00:43.530 --> 00:00:46.170
planet that anyone has ever attempted,
20
00:00:46.490 --> 00:00:49.370
it found nothing at all. That is the good
21
00:00:49.370 --> 00:00:49.690
news.
22
00:00:50.170 --> 00:00:52.570
Anna: This is Astronomy AstroDailyPod. I'm Anna.
23
00:00:52.810 --> 00:00:54.090
Avery: And I'm avery.
24
00:00:54.330 --> 00:00:56.707
It's Monday 14th September
25
00:00:56.886 --> 00:00:59.690
2026 and we're coming to you as always,
26
00:00:59.770 --> 00:01:02.630
from Syd. You, let's get into it.
27
00:01:02.950 --> 00:01:04.830
Anna: We're starting today with a result that has
28
00:01:04.830 --> 00:01:06.910
been quietly sitting in the open for about a
29
00:01:06.910 --> 00:01:09.430
week and I think it deserves a great deal
30
00:01:09.430 --> 00:01:11.670
more attention than it has had. An
31
00:01:11.670 --> 00:01:13.430
international team led out of the University
32
00:01:13.430 --> 00:01:16.150
of Queensland has published what is now the
33
00:01:16.150 --> 00:01:18.550
largest and most internally consistent
34
00:01:18.550 --> 00:01:21.550
catalogue of type 1A supernovae ever
35
00:01:21.550 --> 00:01:22.230
assembled,
36
00:01:22.710 --> 00:01:25.510
2,884 of them.
37
00:01:25.750 --> 00:01:28.190
And it adds fresh weight to a very awkward
38
00:01:28.190 --> 00:01:30.950
idea that dark energy might not be
39
00:01:30.950 --> 00:01:32.910
constant, which would be a
40
00:01:32.910 --> 00:01:35.390
Avery: problem because the word constant is doing
41
00:01:35.390 --> 00:01:36.790
enormous structural work.
42
00:01:36.870 --> 00:01:39.870
Anna: In modern cosmology, it is the load bearing
43
00:01:39.870 --> 00:01:42.390
wall. So let's build this up properly because
44
00:01:42.390 --> 00:01:44.190
the method here matters as much as the
45
00:01:44.190 --> 00:01:47.150
answer. A, uh, type 1A supernova is what
46
00:01:47.150 --> 00:01:50.070
happens when a white dwarf star, the dense,
47
00:01:50.070 --> 00:01:52.590
burnt out core left behind by a star like our
48
00:01:52.590 --> 00:01:55.590
sun, gathers too much material and detonates.
49
00:01:56.300 --> 00:01:58.220
The crucial thing is that these explosions
50
00:01:58.220 --> 00:02:00.660
are close to identical. They go off at
51
00:02:00.660 --> 00:02:03.260
roughly the same intrinsic brightness every
52
00:02:03.260 --> 00:02:05.860
time. So if you measure how bright one looks
53
00:02:05.860 --> 00:02:08.180
from here, you can work out how far away it
54
00:02:08.180 --> 00:02:10.740
is. Astronomers call them standard
55
00:02:10.740 --> 00:02:11.260
candles.
56
00:02:11.820 --> 00:02:14.060
Avery: And that's the technique that won the Nobel
57
00:02:14.060 --> 00:02:15.260
Prize in 2011.
58
00:02:15.740 --> 00:02:18.500
Anna: It is. And this is where Australia enters the
59
00:02:18.500 --> 00:02:20.780
storey early, because one of the three
60
00:02:20.780 --> 00:02:23.500
laureates, Brian Schmidt, was working at the
61
00:02:23.500 --> 00:02:25.500
Australian National University when that
62
00:02:25.500 --> 00:02:28.020
discovery was made. Two teams in
63
00:02:28.020 --> 00:02:30.860
1998 independently found that distant
64
00:02:30.860 --> 00:02:32.820
supernovae were fainter than they should have
65
00:02:32.820 --> 00:02:35.340
been, which meant they were further away than
66
00:02:35.340 --> 00:02:37.940
expected, which meant the expansion of the
67
00:02:37.940 --> 00:02:40.220
universe is not slowing down under gravity,
68
00:02:40.220 --> 00:02:42.700
as everyone assumed, it's speeding up.
69
00:02:43.020 --> 00:02:45.140
And the thing doing the Speeding up, got the
70
00:02:45.140 --> 00:02:48.120
placeholder name dark Energy, because nobody
71
00:02:48.120 --> 00:02:50.720
knew, and to be completely honest, nobody
72
00:02:50.720 --> 00:02:52.640
still knows what it actually is.
73
00:02:53.520 --> 00:02:55.280
Avery: So where does the new work come in?
74
00:02:55.280 --> 00:02:56.560
Anna: Here's the difficulty.
75
00:02:56.640 --> 00:02:59.480
In the 28 years since, we have collected
76
00:02:59.480 --> 00:03:02.400
supernovae from dozens of different surveys
77
00:03:02.720 --> 00:03:05.440
on dozens of different telescopes with
78
00:03:05.440 --> 00:03:07.920
different detectors, different filters,
79
00:03:08.160 --> 00:03:10.720
different calibrations observed across
80
00:03:10.720 --> 00:03:12.800
decades, in which our understanding of these
81
00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:15.310
explosions changed substantially.
82
00:03:15.710 --> 00:03:18.230
You cannot simply pour all of that into one
83
00:03:18.230 --> 00:03:20.990
bucket and start doing cosmology with it.
84
00:03:21.230 --> 00:03:23.550
The systematic errors will eat you alive.
85
00:03:24.270 --> 00:03:27.150
Avery: So somebody had to do the unglamorous work.
86
00:03:27.630 --> 00:03:30.070
Anna: Somebody had to do the unglamorous work. And
87
00:03:30.070 --> 00:03:32.710
that somebody is ryan Camilleri, a
88
00:03:32.710 --> 00:03:34.710
PhD candidate at the University of
89
00:03:34.710 --> 00:03:36.910
Queensland's School of Mathematics and
90
00:03:36.910 --> 00:03:39.030
Physics, working with Professor Tamara M.
91
00:03:39.310 --> 00:03:42.170
Davis and a long list of collaborators across
92
00:03:42.170 --> 00:03:45.050
Australia, the United States, the United
93
00:03:45.050 --> 00:03:47.850
Kingdom, South Africa, Spain and
94
00:03:47.930 --> 00:03:50.770
France. What they've done is take Pantheon
95
00:03:50.770 --> 00:03:53.330
plus, which is the big historical compilation
96
00:03:53.330 --> 00:03:55.850
of supernovae going back roughly 30 years,
97
00:03:56.410 --> 00:03:58.810
and combine it with the Dark energy survey's
98
00:03:58.810 --> 00:04:01.450
full five year sample, which added around
99
00:04:01.450 --> 00:04:04.330
1500 new high redshift supernovae
100
00:04:04.330 --> 00:04:07.060
of its own. And rather than stapling the two
101
00:04:07.060 --> 00:04:09.540
together, they rebuilt both from the same
102
00:04:09.540 --> 00:04:12.180
starting assumptions in one framework
103
00:04:12.420 --> 00:04:14.180
with one set of calibrations.
104
00:04:14.580 --> 00:04:17.100
Avery: Camilleri's own description of it is the
105
00:04:17.100 --> 00:04:19.620
cleanest summary I've read. Quote,
106
00:04:19.940 --> 00:04:22.940
we've rebuilt three decades of astronomical
107
00:04:22.940 --> 00:04:25.660
observations into a single consistent
108
00:04:25.660 --> 00:04:26.260
framework.
109
00:04:26.660 --> 00:04:28.980
And he makes the point that this isn't just
110
00:04:28.980 --> 00:04:31.460
tidying up, it's reanalysis.
111
00:04:32.940 --> 00:04:34.860
Over the years, we've learned a lot more
112
00:04:34.860 --> 00:04:37.860
about how supernovae behave. So we've
113
00:04:37.860 --> 00:04:40.380
been able to go back and apply that improved
114
00:04:40.380 --> 00:04:42.140
understanding to older data.
115
00:04:42.620 --> 00:04:44.780
Anna: That improved understanding is doing real
116
00:04:44.780 --> 00:04:47.220
work here. Two of the biggest headaches in
117
00:04:47.220 --> 00:04:50.180
supernova cosmology are, uh, dust, cosmic
118
00:04:50.180 --> 00:04:53.020
dust between us and the explosion reddens and
119
00:04:53.020 --> 00:04:55.260
dims the light in ways that mimic distance
120
00:04:55.660 --> 00:04:57.940
and the mass of the galaxy. The supernova
121
00:04:57.940 --> 00:05:00.440
went off in which turns out to correlate with
122
00:05:00.440 --> 00:05:02.640
the supernova's brightness in a way we still
123
00:05:02.640 --> 00:05:05.240
don't fully understand. Both had to be
124
00:05:05.240 --> 00:05:07.600
handled consistently across the whole sample.
125
00:05:08.000 --> 00:05:09.880
The team cared about that second problem
126
00:05:09.880 --> 00:05:12.320
enough that they published a companion paper
127
00:05:12.320 --> 00:05:15.280
on host galaxy masses alongside the main
128
00:05:15.280 --> 00:05:15.600
one.
129
00:05:16.000 --> 00:05:18.920
Avery: Alright, so what does the rebuilt catalogue
130
00:05:18.920 --> 00:05:19.840
actually say?
131
00:05:20.320 --> 00:05:22.640
Anna: Two things, and the first one is reassuring.
132
00:05:23.120 --> 00:05:25.280
If you take the supernovae on their own and
133
00:05:25.280 --> 00:05:28.040
assume the standard model, a flat universe
134
00:05:28.040 --> 00:05:31.000
with a genuinely constant dark energy, you
135
00:05:31.000 --> 00:05:33.920
get a matter density of 0.310
136
00:05:34.640 --> 00:05:36.840
that is bang in line with everything else we
137
00:05:36.840 --> 00:05:39.480
Know, the catalogue is not broken, it's
138
00:05:39.480 --> 00:05:40.000
behaving.
139
00:05:40.480 --> 00:05:42.640
Avery: And the second thing is the interesting one.
140
00:05:42.640 --> 00:05:44.640
Anna: The second thing is what happens when you
141
00:05:44.640 --> 00:05:47.040
fold in the other two great pillars of
142
00:05:47.040 --> 00:05:49.720
cosmology. The cosmic microwave
143
00:05:49.720 --> 00:05:52.160
background, the leftover glow of the Big
144
00:05:52.160 --> 00:05:54.630
Bang, and baryon acoustic
145
00:05:54.630 --> 00:05:57.310
oscillations, which are frozen sound waves
146
00:05:57.310 --> 00:05:59.790
from the early universe that act as a cosmic
147
00:05:59.790 --> 00:06:02.630
ruler. Do that, and under the standard
148
00:06:02.630 --> 00:06:04.830
constant dark energy model, the three
149
00:06:04.830 --> 00:06:07.070
datasets start pulling against each other.
150
00:06:07.470 --> 00:06:09.870
There's a tension, and here's the pointed
151
00:06:09.870 --> 00:06:12.750
bit, that tension eases if you allow
152
00:06:12.750 --> 00:06:15.710
dark energy to change with time. The team
153
00:06:15.710 --> 00:06:17.950
find a preference for evolving dark energy
154
00:06:18.030 --> 00:06:20.240
over the standard model at between
155
00:06:20.240 --> 00:06:22.480
2.5 and 3.1-sigma,
156
00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:24.960
depending on exactly which combination you
157
00:06:24.960 --> 00:06:25.280
use.
158
00:06:25.920 --> 00:06:28.360
Avery: Let's be careful with sigma, because we've
159
00:06:28.360 --> 00:06:30.560
had this conversation before on this show.
160
00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:33.640
Anna: We have, and we should be careful. Back when
161
00:06:33.640 --> 00:06:36.480
we covered the LZ dark matter flash, we
162
00:06:36.480 --> 00:06:37.520
spent a while on this.
163
00:06:37.920 --> 00:06:40.920
Three Sigma is roughly a, uh, 1 in 700 chance
164
00:06:40.920 --> 00:06:43.000
of the data looking like this. If the
165
00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:45.280
standard model is right, that is interesting.
166
00:06:45.650 --> 00:06:48.370
That is worth chasing. It is emphatically
167
00:06:48.370 --> 00:06:51.330
not a discovery. Particle physics won't call
168
00:06:51.330 --> 00:06:54.050
anything discovered below five sigma. And
169
00:06:54.050 --> 00:06:56.450
cosmology has been burned by three sigma
170
00:06:56.450 --> 00:06:59.250
results before. Nobody on this paper is
171
00:06:59.250 --> 00:07:00.210
claiming otherwise.
172
00:07:00.610 --> 00:07:02.810
Avery: But it's the second independent line of
173
00:07:02.810 --> 00:07:05.290
evidence pointing the same way, which is a
174
00:07:05.290 --> 00:07:06.610
different kind of argument.
175
00:07:07.090 --> 00:07:09.290
Anna: That's exactly the argument Professor Davis
176
00:07:09.290 --> 00:07:11.330
makes, and it's the heart of why this
177
00:07:11.330 --> 00:07:13.870
matters. Her words quote
178
00:07:14.190 --> 00:07:16.590
our Supernova data from DES in
179
00:07:16.590 --> 00:07:19.430
2024 first showed hints that dark energy
180
00:07:19.430 --> 00:07:22.310
may be time varying. And this new compilation
181
00:07:22.310 --> 00:07:24.350
also sees a deviation from the standard
182
00:07:24.350 --> 00:07:26.990
model. And then. So
183
00:07:27.230 --> 00:07:29.950
two completely independent measurements have
184
00:07:29.950 --> 00:07:32.590
found hints of time variation in dark energy
185
00:07:33.150 --> 00:07:35.190
challenging the standard model. That dark
186
00:07:35.190 --> 00:07:36.350
energy doesn't change.
187
00:07:36.910 --> 00:07:39.740
Avery: And this sits alongside what DESSI the,
188
00:07:39.810 --> 00:07:42.290
the Dark Energy Spectroscopic instrument
189
00:07:42.690 --> 00:07:45.090
has been reporting from an entirely different
190
00:07:45.090 --> 00:07:47.610
direction, using those baryon
191
00:07:47.610 --> 00:07:50.010
acoustic oscillations rather than
192
00:07:50.010 --> 00:07:51.010
supernovae.
193
00:07:51.330 --> 00:07:54.050
Anna: Right. Three separate methodologies with
194
00:07:54.050 --> 00:07:56.730
separate systematics, separate failure modes
195
00:07:56.730 --> 00:07:59.370
and separate teams. And they keep producing
196
00:07:59.370 --> 00:08:01.970
the same faint smell of something wrong.
197
00:08:02.450 --> 00:08:04.850
The other number worth flagging is precision.
198
00:08:05.500 --> 00:08:07.500
This compilation tightens the uncertainties
199
00:08:07.500 --> 00:08:09.940
on the dark energy parameters by about
200
00:08:09.940 --> 00:08:11.980
30% compared with what came before.
201
00:08:12.380 --> 00:08:14.540
Which means the next round of data won't just
202
00:08:14.540 --> 00:08:17.140
add noise. It'll actually be able to settle
203
00:08:17.140 --> 00:08:17.420
this.
204
00:08:17.980 --> 00:08:20.700
Avery: So spell out the stakes. What changes if
205
00:08:20.700 --> 00:08:22.260
dark energy really is
206
00:08:22.260 --> 00:08:25.020
Anna: evolving almost everything downstream?
207
00:08:25.420 --> 00:08:28.060
A constant dark energy is the simplest
208
00:08:28.060 --> 00:08:30.980
possible thing. Einstein's cosmological
209
00:08:30.980 --> 00:08:33.950
constant, a fixed energy density baked into
210
00:08:33.950 --> 00:08:36.830
empty space itself. If instead it's a field
211
00:08:36.830 --> 00:08:39.350
that changes strength over cosmic time, then
212
00:08:39.350 --> 00:08:41.750
it's not a constant. It's a dynamic thing
213
00:08:41.750 --> 00:08:43.950
with a history and possibly a future.
214
00:08:44.510 --> 00:08:46.430
It changes how the universe ends.
215
00:08:46.590 --> 00:08:48.590
And Professor Davis takes it further than
216
00:08:48.590 --> 00:08:51.230
that. Her line is that all of this quote
217
00:08:51.470 --> 00:08:53.910
may also hold the clue to explain how gravity
218
00:08:53.910 --> 00:08:56.630
and quantum physics fit together. That's the
219
00:08:56.630 --> 00:08:58.920
biggest unfinished problem in physics. And
220
00:08:58.920 --> 00:09:01.240
dark energy is one of the very few places
221
00:09:01.240 --> 00:09:03.360
where the two are forced into the same room.
222
00:09:04.160 --> 00:09:06.800
Avery: Now, I want to note where this was published
223
00:09:06.880 --> 00:09:08.560
because it's not incidental.
224
00:09:08.960 --> 00:09:11.960
Anna: No, it isn't. This is in publications of
225
00:09:11.960 --> 00:09:13.840
the Astronomical Society of Australia,
226
00:09:14.559 --> 00:09:17.000
Australia's own journal, led from the
227
00:09:17.000 --> 00:09:19.320
University of Queensland with the Australian
228
00:09:19.320 --> 00:09:21.640
National University and Swinburne on the
229
00:09:21.640 --> 00:09:24.080
author list and South African colleagues
230
00:09:24.080 --> 00:09:27.070
alongside. And the Dark energy survey data at
231
00:09:27.070 --> 00:09:29.750
the core of it came off the Blanco 4 metre
232
00:09:29.750 --> 00:09:32.470
telescope at Cerro Tololo in Chile. A
233
00:09:32.470 --> 00:09:34.590
southern telescope looking at a southern sky.
234
00:09:34.990 --> 00:09:37.190
From the Nobel winning work at Matt Stromlo
235
00:09:37.190 --> 00:09:39.550
through to this, the question of what dark
236
00:09:39.550 --> 00:09:42.030
energy is has been a southern hemisphere
237
00:09:42.030 --> 00:09:43.630
argument for a very long time.
238
00:09:44.110 --> 00:09:46.390
Avery: And there's a lovely thread back through our
239
00:09:46.390 --> 00:09:47.950
own recent episodes here.
240
00:09:48.350 --> 00:09:51.230
Anna: There really is. Back in episode 181,
241
00:09:51.230 --> 00:09:53.310
we covered a rebuttal from Nobel laureates,
242
00:09:53.310 --> 00:09:55.900
including Schmidt and Adam Reese, pushing
243
00:09:55.900 --> 00:09:57.980
back hard on a claim that the universe's
244
00:09:57.980 --> 00:10:00.660
acceleration was slowing and confirming the
245
00:10:00.660 --> 00:10:03.260
acceleration is real. That still stands.
246
00:10:03.660 --> 00:10:05.740
This is a different question, not whether
247
00:10:05.740 --> 00:10:08.300
dark energy exists, but whether it holds
248
00:10:08.300 --> 00:10:11.020
still. On Thursday of last week, we talked
249
00:10:11.020 --> 00:10:13.420
about fast radio bursts being used to weigh
250
00:10:13.420 --> 00:10:16.100
the missing gas in the cosmic web, and how
251
00:10:16.100 --> 00:10:18.900
that bears on the S8 tension. And on
252
00:10:18.900 --> 00:10:20.580
Saturday, our Skywatch feature was
253
00:10:20.580 --> 00:10:23.100
SN2026AAIV,
254
00:10:23.630 --> 00:10:25.970
uh, a type 1A going off in NGC
255
00:10:26.050 --> 00:10:29.010
7331. One single example
256
00:10:29.010 --> 00:10:31.050
of exactly the kind of explosion that fills
257
00:10:31.050 --> 00:10:33.490
this catalogue. Bright enough to chase with a
258
00:10:33.490 --> 00:10:34.690
backyard telescope.
259
00:10:35.250 --> 00:10:38.010
Avery: 2,883 more of
260
00:10:38.010 --> 00:10:40.130
those and you've got a cosmology
261
00:10:40.770 --> 00:10:41.890
that's the whole trick.
262
00:10:42.290 --> 00:10:44.690
Anna: And what happens next is that the sample size
263
00:10:44.690 --> 00:10:47.490
goes up by an order of magnitude. The Vera
264
00:10:47.490 --> 00:10:49.930
Rubin Observatory in Chile is about to start
265
00:10:49.930 --> 00:10:51.530
finding these things in industrial
266
00:10:51.530 --> 00:10:54.220
quantities. And the Nancy Grace Roman Space
267
00:10:54.220 --> 00:10:56.460
Telescope, which we watched launch a
268
00:10:56.460 --> 00:10:58.580
fortnight ago and which powered up its
269
00:10:58.580 --> 00:11:01.260
coronagraph earlier this month, was designed
270
00:11:01.260 --> 00:11:03.220
in large part to nail exactly this
271
00:11:03.220 --> 00:11:05.860
measurement. If dark energy is changing,
272
00:11:06.020 --> 00:11:08.459
we are going to know within a few years. If
273
00:11:08.459 --> 00:11:11.100
it isn't, we'll know that too. And this will
274
00:11:11.100 --> 00:11:13.420
go down as A very well built catalogue that
275
00:11:13.420 --> 00:11:14.900
briefly made everybody nervous.
276
00:11:15.460 --> 00:11:18.420
Avery: Either way, somebody had to do 30 years
277
00:11:18.420 --> 00:11:19.540
of homework first.
278
00:11:20.450 --> 00:11:23.010
Anna: Somebody did. His name's on the paper.
279
00:11:23.410 --> 00:11:25.970
Avery: Here's a question you don't often hear asked
280
00:11:25.970 --> 00:11:27.010
of our own star.
281
00:11:27.490 --> 00:11:29.170
Did the sun eat a planet?
282
00:11:29.490 --> 00:11:31.650
Anna: We ask that about other stars all the time,
283
00:11:32.130 --> 00:11:33.010
Constantly.
284
00:11:33.410 --> 00:11:36.370
Avery: It's one of the standard results in exoplanet
285
00:11:36.370 --> 00:11:39.290
science. You find a star with an oddly high
286
00:11:39.290 --> 00:11:42.050
abundance of the heavy rock forming elements.
287
00:11:42.130 --> 00:11:44.970
And the neat explanation is that it swallowed
288
00:11:44.970 --> 00:11:47.460
one of its own planets and and the debris is
289
00:11:47.460 --> 00:11:50.180
still floating in its outer layers. New
290
00:11:50.180 --> 00:11:52.780
work published in Monthly Notices of the
291
00:11:52.780 --> 00:11:55.540
Royal Astronomical Society turns that
292
00:11:55.540 --> 00:11:58.420
telescope around and points it at us. It's
293
00:11:58.420 --> 00:12:01.220
by Professor Mutlu Yildiz at Egg University
294
00:12:01.460 --> 00:12:04.300
in Turkey. And the Royal Astronomical
295
00:12:04.300 --> 00:12:06.900
Society put it out on the 10th of September.
296
00:12:07.300 --> 00:12:10.180
Anna: And the argument is that the sun has form.
297
00:12:10.740 --> 00:12:13.420
Avery: The argument is that the sun has two long
298
00:12:13.420 --> 00:12:15.460
standing unexplained quirks.
299
00:12:15.460 --> 00:12:15.770
Anna: And.
300
00:12:15.840 --> 00:12:18.800
Avery: And one event could account for both. Quirk
301
00:12:18.800 --> 00:12:21.520
1 is a genuine embarrassment in solar
302
00:12:21.520 --> 00:12:24.320
physics. We can measure the inside of the
303
00:12:24.320 --> 00:12:27.200
sun, not model it. Measure it using
304
00:12:27.200 --> 00:12:29.880
helioseismology. Sound waves
305
00:12:29.880 --> 00:12:32.680
ring through the solar interior. We watch the
306
00:12:32.680 --> 00:12:35.200
surface vibrate and from that we can
307
00:12:35.200 --> 00:12:37.440
reconstruct the speed of sound at different
308
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.080
depths with real precision. And the
309
00:12:40.080 --> 00:12:42.440
standard solar models don't quite match what
310
00:12:42.440 --> 00:12:45.090
we measure. They've never quite matched.
311
00:12:45.490 --> 00:12:47.530
Anna: That's been an open soar for a couple of
312
00:12:47.530 --> 00:12:48.130
decades.
313
00:12:48.770 --> 00:12:51.730
Avery: It has. Quirk two is lithium.
314
00:12:52.130 --> 00:12:54.730
The sun has far less lithium than it ought
315
00:12:54.730 --> 00:12:57.610
to. It's depleted by a factor of well over
316
00:12:57.610 --> 00:12:59.890
a hundred compared with the material it
317
00:12:59.890 --> 00:13:02.810
formed from. And Yildiz's proposal is that
318
00:13:02.810 --> 00:13:05.250
if the young sun swallowed a super Earth,
319
00:13:05.650 --> 00:13:08.290
something in the range of 5 to 10 times the
320
00:13:08.290 --> 00:13:10.490
mass of our planet, the chemical
321
00:13:10.490 --> 00:13:12.730
rearrangement that follows can push the
322
00:13:12.730 --> 00:13:14.970
models toward the measurements and take the
323
00:13:14.970 --> 00:13:16.850
lithium down at the same time.
324
00:13:17.410 --> 00:13:19.730
Anna: How does eating a planet lower your lithium?
325
00:13:20.290 --> 00:13:22.970
Avery: Broadly by changing the structure and the
326
00:13:22.970 --> 00:13:25.490
mixing near the base of the convective zone,
327
00:13:25.890 --> 00:13:28.250
the boundary where the churning outer layers
328
00:13:28.250 --> 00:13:31.210
meet the still interior. That boundary is
329
00:13:31.210 --> 00:13:33.410
where lithium gets dragged down deep enough
330
00:13:33.490 --> 00:13:35.730
to be destroyed by nuclear reactions.
331
00:13:36.450 --> 00:13:38.650
Adjust the composition and the temperature
332
00:13:38.650 --> 00:13:41.450
gradient there and you change how efficiently
333
00:13:41.450 --> 00:13:43.570
the sun burns its own lithium away.
334
00:13:44.050 --> 00:13:46.130
Yildiz's framing is careful.
335
00:13:47.410 --> 00:13:50.050
A planet several times more massive than
336
00:13:50.050 --> 00:13:52.970
Earth may have fallen into the young sun and
337
00:13:52.970 --> 00:13:55.290
left a uh, lasting chemical imprint deep
338
00:13:55.290 --> 00:13:58.050
inside it. And the
339
00:13:58.050 --> 00:14:00.730
ingestion of a super Earth could help explain
340
00:14:00.730 --> 00:14:03.170
long standing differences between standard
341
00:14:03.170 --> 00:14:05.010
solar models and observations.
342
00:14:05.910 --> 00:14:08.750
Anna: May could. Those are Load bearing
343
00:14:08.750 --> 00:14:10.470
words they are,
344
00:14:10.550 --> 00:14:13.350
Avery: and I want to keep them. This is a
345
00:14:13.350 --> 00:14:15.510
modelling result offering a candidate
346
00:14:15.510 --> 00:14:18.510
solution to a modelling discrepancy. It
347
00:14:18.510 --> 00:14:21.309
is not a fossil. Nobody has dug up the
348
00:14:21.309 --> 00:14:23.430
planet. And there are other live
349
00:14:23.510 --> 00:14:26.230
explanations for the solar abundance problem.
350
00:14:26.710 --> 00:14:29.310
Revisions to the measured composition of the
351
00:14:29.310 --> 00:14:32.090
solar photosphere. For one that don't
352
00:14:32.090 --> 00:14:34.970
require eating anything. What makes this
353
00:14:34.970 --> 00:14:37.930
one attractive is economy. One event,
354
00:14:38.250 --> 00:14:39.290
two problems.
355
00:14:40.090 --> 00:14:41.850
Anna: And there's something faintly unsettling
356
00:14:41.850 --> 00:14:44.210
about it, given what it implies about the
357
00:14:44.210 --> 00:14:45.530
early inner solar system.
358
00:14:46.330 --> 00:14:48.090
Avery: That's the part that stays with me.
359
00:14:48.490 --> 00:14:51.330
Super Earths are the single most common class
360
00:14:51.330 --> 00:14:54.010
of planet we find around other stars.
361
00:14:54.250 --> 00:14:57.130
And our solar system conspicuously lacks
362
00:14:57.130 --> 00:14:59.950
one. If the answer is that we had one
363
00:14:59.950 --> 00:15:02.910
and the sun ate it, that makes us a lot
364
00:15:02.910 --> 00:15:05.590
less unusual and makes the ground under
365
00:15:05.670 --> 00:15:08.590
Mercury's orbit feel a good deal less stable
366
00:15:08.590 --> 00:15:10.710
than it looks now.
367
00:15:11.030 --> 00:15:12.910
Anna: A storey about the sun from the opposite
368
00:15:12.910 --> 00:15:15.710
direction and one with a very practical
369
00:15:15.710 --> 00:15:18.510
edge, particularly for anyone listening from
370
00:15:18.510 --> 00:15:21.310
a crew rest seat. New research in the Journal
371
00:15:21.310 --> 00:15:23.670
of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
372
00:15:24.220 --> 00:15:26.340
finds that cosmic radiation at cruising
373
00:15:26.340 --> 00:15:29.020
altitude gets worse when the sun goes
374
00:15:29.020 --> 00:15:29.420
quiet.
375
00:15:29.900 --> 00:15:32.260
Avery: Which is backwards from how most people would
376
00:15:32.260 --> 00:15:32.780
guess it.
377
00:15:33.260 --> 00:15:35.940
Anna: Completely backwards. And the logic is worth
378
00:15:35.940 --> 00:15:38.860
a minute. The work is by Dr. Roy Yaniv
379
00:15:38.860 --> 00:15:41.660
with Professor Yoav Yair and Professor
380
00:15:41.660 --> 00:15:44.500
Colin Price across the Hebrew University of
381
00:15:44.500 --> 00:15:47.340
Jerusalem, Reichman University and Tel
382
00:15:47.340 --> 00:15:49.740
Aviv University. They flew six
383
00:15:49.740 --> 00:15:51.900
instrumented balloons from southern Israel,
384
00:15:52.400 --> 00:15:55.240
each climbing to around 35 kilometres and
385
00:15:55.240 --> 00:15:57.320
measured the radiation environment the whole
386
00:15:57.320 --> 00:15:57.840
way up.
387
00:15:58.480 --> 00:16:00.400
Avery: So what's the profile look like?
388
00:16:00.720 --> 00:16:03.600
Anna: It peaks higher than you fly. The maximum
389
00:16:03.600 --> 00:16:06.000
sits between 17 and 20 kilometres.
390
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:08.360
That's a known feature called the Regener
391
00:16:08.360 --> 00:16:11.320
Fotzer maximum, where incoming cosmic rays
392
00:16:11.320 --> 00:16:13.680
have smashed into enough atmosphere to
393
00:16:13.680 --> 00:16:16.080
produce a full shower of secondary particles.
394
00:16:16.480 --> 00:16:18.640
But the shower hasn't yet been absorbed.
395
00:16:19.430 --> 00:16:22.390
Below that, it tails off at a typical
396
00:16:22.390 --> 00:16:24.510
airliner cruising altitude of around 10
397
00:16:24.510 --> 00:16:27.390
kilometres. They measure roughly 0.9
398
00:16:27.390 --> 00:16:29.830
to 1.3 microsieverts per hour.
399
00:16:30.310 --> 00:16:32.750
Avery: And um, the solar connection, the sun's
400
00:16:32.750 --> 00:16:35.350
Anna: magnetic field carried out on the solar wind,
401
00:16:35.750 --> 00:16:38.310
acts as a shield for the entire solar system.
402
00:16:38.790 --> 00:16:41.710
It deflects galactic cosmic rays, the
403
00:16:41.710 --> 00:16:43.590
high energy particles arriving from
404
00:16:43.590 --> 00:16:45.710
supernovae and other violence out in the
405
00:16:45.710 --> 00:16:46.230
galaxy.
406
00:16:46.840 --> 00:16:49.400
When the sun is active, that shield is strong
407
00:16:49.400 --> 00:16:51.480
and fewer of those particles get through.
408
00:16:51.800 --> 00:16:54.440
When the sun goes quiet, the shield weakens
409
00:16:54.440 --> 00:16:57.040
and more of them arrive. The team measure
410
00:16:57.040 --> 00:16:59.800
that anti correlation directly at minus
411
00:16:59.800 --> 00:17:02.800
0.71 and the size of the swing is the
412
00:17:02.800 --> 00:17:05.800
headline. At solar minimum, the dose rate
413
00:17:05.800 --> 00:17:08.520
runs something like 40 to 60% higher
414
00:17:08.760 --> 00:17:09.040
than
415
00:17:09.040 --> 00:17:12.040
Avery: at solar maximum 40 to 60%
416
00:17:12.200 --> 00:17:14.520
is not a rounding error. It isn't.
417
00:17:14.760 --> 00:17:16.640
Anna: They also break down what's actually hitting
418
00:17:16.640 --> 00:17:19.080
you. Neutrons are about 40 to
419
00:17:19.080 --> 00:17:22.080
45% of the dose. With electromagnetic
420
00:17:22.080 --> 00:17:24.520
radiation, another 35 to 40
421
00:17:25.160 --> 00:17:27.280
neutrons matter because they're difficult to
422
00:17:27.280 --> 00:17:29.120
shield against and they're weighted heavily
423
00:17:29.120 --> 00:17:30.440
for biological damage.
424
00:17:31.400 --> 00:17:34.160
Avery: Now, proportion before anyone cancels a
425
00:17:34.160 --> 00:17:34.600
holiday.
426
00:17:35.160 --> 00:17:37.960
Anna: Yes, proportion. A, uh, micro sievert
427
00:17:37.960 --> 00:17:40.890
is a millionth of a sievert. A a long haul
428
00:17:40.890 --> 00:17:43.290
flight puts a few tens of micro sieverts on
429
00:17:43.290 --> 00:17:45.690
you, which is in the same broad territory as
430
00:17:45.690 --> 00:17:48.490
a chest X ray for a passenger. This is not
431
00:17:48.490 --> 00:17:51.210
something to lose sleep over for aircrew who
432
00:17:51.210 --> 00:17:53.690
are occupationally exposed and monitored as
433
00:17:53.690 --> 00:17:56.610
radiation workers in many jurisdictions and
434
00:17:56.610 --> 00:17:59.170
for frequent flyers on the very long, very
435
00:17:59.170 --> 00:18:01.890
high, high latitude routes. And
436
00:18:01.890 --> 00:18:03.850
Australia runs some of the longest sectors on
437
00:18:03.850 --> 00:18:06.530
the planet. A, uh, 40 to 60%
438
00:18:06.610 --> 00:18:09.390
seasonal swing driven by where we sit in the
439
00:18:09.390 --> 00:18:12.310
solar cycle is a real input into how you
440
00:18:12.310 --> 00:18:13.590
calculate annual dose.
441
00:18:14.310 --> 00:18:16.710
Avery: And it dovetails with what we talked about on
442
00:18:16.710 --> 00:18:18.470
Saturday from the other end.
443
00:18:18.950 --> 00:18:21.670
Anna: It's the same dial on the weekend we covered
444
00:18:21.670 --> 00:18:24.110
the Max Planck work on the sun's capacity for
445
00:18:24.110 --> 00:18:27.030
a superflare. The danger of the sun at its
446
00:18:27.030 --> 00:18:29.870
loudest, this is the danger of the sun at
447
00:18:29.870 --> 00:18:32.790
its quietest. An active sun can fire
448
00:18:32.790 --> 00:18:35.690
a particle storm at you. A quiet sun simply
449
00:18:35.690 --> 00:18:37.770
stops holding the galaxy's particles at the
450
00:18:37.770 --> 00:18:40.770
door. Two different risks, opposite ends
451
00:18:40.770 --> 00:18:43.090
of the same cycle. And both of them show up
452
00:18:43.090 --> 00:18:44.130
at altitude first.
453
00:18:44.850 --> 00:18:47.090
Avery: Our last storey before we look up is a, uh,
454
00:18:47.130 --> 00:18:49.770
null result. And I want to argue that it's
455
00:18:49.770 --> 00:18:51.810
one of the better pieces of news this week.
456
00:18:52.130 --> 00:18:54.690
The James Webb Space Telescope has just
457
00:18:54.690 --> 00:18:56.890
carried out the most sensitive search for a
458
00:18:56.890 --> 00:18:59.570
moon around another planet ever attempted.
459
00:18:59.980 --> 00:19:02.500
It didn't find one. What matters is how
460
00:19:02.500 --> 00:19:04.220
thoroughly it didn't find one.
461
00:19:04.700 --> 00:19:06.900
Anna: Exomoons have been the great near miss
462
00:19:06.900 --> 00:19:09.420
Avery: of the field for 15 years.
463
00:19:09.900 --> 00:19:12.620
We have close to 6,000 confirmed planets
464
00:19:12.620 --> 00:19:15.380
around other stars and not one confirmed
465
00:19:15.380 --> 00:19:18.260
moon, which is faintly ridiculous given that
466
00:19:18.260 --> 00:19:21.260
our own solar system has hundreds. The new
467
00:19:21.260 --> 00:19:23.820
work is by David Kipping, who has effectively
468
00:19:23.900 --> 00:19:26.790
made exomoon hunting his life's work. And
469
00:19:26.790 --> 00:19:29.228
it went up on the preprint server on 4
470
00:19:29.352 --> 00:19:29.910
September.
471
00:19:30.390 --> 00:19:31.990
Anna: Which planet did he point it at?
472
00:19:32.390 --> 00:19:35.030
Avery: LP899C,
473
00:19:35.430 --> 00:19:37.870
a rocky planet in the temperate zone of a
474
00:19:37.870 --> 00:19:39.910
very cool, very faint star.
475
00:19:40.310 --> 00:19:43.110
Kipping used 12 separate JWST
476
00:19:43.350 --> 00:19:46.270
transits, 12 passes of the planet in front
477
00:19:46.270 --> 00:19:48.910
of its star and stacked them. And the
478
00:19:48.910 --> 00:19:51.350
sensitivity he gets out of that is the storey
479
00:19:51.750 --> 00:19:54.510
he can exclude Moons down to one tenth of
480
00:19:54.510 --> 00:19:57.120
Earth's radius and at 95%
481
00:19:57.200 --> 00:19:59.960
confidence across the planet's entire hill
482
00:19:59.960 --> 00:20:02.800
sphere. That's the whole region where a moon
483
00:20:02.800 --> 00:20:04.640
could gravitationally hang on.
484
00:20:05.200 --> 00:20:07.960
Anna: One tenth of Earth's Radius is about 650
485
00:20:07.960 --> 00:20:10.880
kilometres which rules out the entire
486
00:20:10.880 --> 00:20:13.600
Avery: mid tier of our own solar system's moons.
487
00:20:14.000 --> 00:20:16.560
Europa's gone. Rhea's gone.
488
00:20:16.800 --> 00:20:18.640
Umbriel's gone. If
489
00:20:18.640 --> 00:20:21.280
LP899C
490
00:20:21.520 --> 00:20:23.980
had anything like those or Webb would have
491
00:20:23.980 --> 00:20:24.420
seen it.
492
00:20:24.580 --> 00:20:26.580
Anna: So why is the absence good news?
493
00:20:27.300 --> 00:20:30.180
Avery: Two reasons. First, because it was always
494
00:20:30.260 --> 00:20:32.900
possible that we'd found no exomoons,
495
00:20:32.900 --> 00:20:35.700
simply because we can't see them. That the
496
00:20:35.700 --> 00:20:38.300
whole search was hopeless and we were wasting
497
00:20:38.300 --> 00:20:40.900
our time. This demonstrates the
498
00:20:40.900 --> 00:20:43.780
opposite. Webb can find astonishingly
499
00:20:43.780 --> 00:20:46.700
small moons and stacking transits buys
500
00:20:46.700 --> 00:20:49.220
you far more sensitivity than a single one.
501
00:20:49.950 --> 00:20:52.950
That's a capability result and it applies to
502
00:20:52.950 --> 00:20:55.910
every other target. Second, this
503
00:20:55.910 --> 00:20:58.270
particular non detection is physically
504
00:20:58.270 --> 00:21:00.870
expected. The planet orbits at Ah, just
505
00:21:00.870 --> 00:21:03.790
0.04 astronomical units,
506
00:21:04.030 --> 00:21:07.030
extremely close in and at that distance
507
00:21:07.030 --> 00:21:09.710
tidal forces would strip a large moon away
508
00:21:09.790 --> 00:21:12.390
over time anyway. So the theory
509
00:21:12.390 --> 00:21:15.150
predicted an empty hill sphere and the
510
00:21:15.150 --> 00:21:16.990
observation delivered an empty
511
00:21:16.990 --> 00:21:19.650
Anna: hill sphere Theory and observation
512
00:21:19.650 --> 00:21:22.170
agreeing is not the most thrilling headline
513
00:21:22.490 --> 00:21:24.650
but it's how you know the instrument is
514
00:21:24.650 --> 00:21:25.210
honest.
515
00:21:25.930 --> 00:21:28.610
Avery: Exactly right. And a small Southern
516
00:21:28.610 --> 00:21:29.650
footnote. The
517
00:21:29.650 --> 00:21:32.650
LP899 system was
518
00:21:32.650 --> 00:21:35.330
found by Speculus, a survey hunting
519
00:21:35.330 --> 00:21:37.890
planets around the coolest stars whose
520
00:21:37.890 --> 00:21:40.410
southern station sits at Paranal in Chile
521
00:21:40.730 --> 00:21:43.330
under the same skies as the telescopes that
522
00:21:43.330 --> 00:21:44.970
keep turning up in this programme.
523
00:21:45.130 --> 00:21:47.920
Anna: Quick update before the skywatch on a storey
524
00:21:47.920 --> 00:21:49.840
we left open a couple of weeks back.
525
00:21:50.400 --> 00:21:52.800
NASA's Crew 13 mission to the International
526
00:21:52.960 --> 00:21:55.920
Space Station is now targeting no earlier
527
00:21:55.920 --> 00:21:57.120
than late September.
528
00:21:57.520 --> 00:21:59.600
Avery: That's the flight that was supposed to go on
529
00:21:59.600 --> 00:22:00.160
the 12th.
530
00:22:00.320 --> 00:22:02.720
Anna: It was on the 29th of August.
531
00:22:02.720 --> 00:22:05.560
NASA and SpaceX stood the mission down after
532
00:22:05.560 --> 00:22:07.920
teams found an oxidizer leak in the Dragon
533
00:22:07.920 --> 00:22:10.200
spacecraft's propulsion system during
534
00:22:10.200 --> 00:22:13.080
standard pre launch processing. At the time
535
00:22:13.080 --> 00:22:14.800
the statement was simply that a new target
536
00:22:14.800 --> 00:22:17.300
date would be announced once available and
537
00:22:17.300 --> 00:22:19.740
that joint teams would complete any necessary
538
00:22:19.740 --> 00:22:22.420
rework before flight. The Canadian Space
539
00:22:22.420 --> 00:22:24.340
Agency has now confirmed the mission is
540
00:22:24.340 --> 00:22:26.460
aiming for no earlier than late September.
541
00:22:26.860 --> 00:22:29.580
Though as we record, NASA hasn't published
542
00:22:29.580 --> 00:22:31.700
Avery: a specific date and the crew is an
543
00:22:31.700 --> 00:22:32.460
interesting one.
544
00:22:32.540 --> 00:22:35.420
Anna: It is Commander Jessica Watkins and
545
00:22:35.420 --> 00:22:38.300
pilot Luke Delaney for NASA with mission
546
00:22:38.300 --> 00:22:40.820
specialist Joshua Kutryk of the Canadian
547
00:22:40.820 --> 00:22:42.910
Space Agency and and Sergey
548
00:22:42.910 --> 00:22:45.870
Teteryatnikov of Roscosmos. They'll
549
00:22:45.870 --> 00:22:48.310
fly on a Falcon 9 from Space Launch Complex
550
00:22:48.310 --> 00:22:51.150
40 at Cape Canaveral. The same pad that
551
00:22:51.150 --> 00:22:53.550
quietly notched its 400th orbital flight
552
00:22:53.550 --> 00:22:54.070
yesterday.
553
00:22:54.710 --> 00:22:56.350
We'll bring you the date the moment it's
554
00:22:56.350 --> 00:22:56.710
firm.
555
00:22:56.710 --> 00:22:59.230
Avery: Right, let's get you outside. And there's
556
00:22:59.230 --> 00:23:02.110
something live happening tonight. A large
557
00:23:02.110 --> 00:23:05.030
coronal hole on the sun has rotated around
558
00:23:05.030 --> 00:23:07.590
into a geo effective position and
559
00:23:07.670 --> 00:23:10.310
forecasters expect the fast solar wind
560
00:23:10.390 --> 00:23:12.950
streaming out of it to to reach Earth today.
561
00:23:13.510 --> 00:23:16.150
That means active geomagnetic conditions,
562
00:23:16.630 --> 00:23:17.150
which means
563
00:23:17.150 --> 00:23:19.950
Anna: aurora watching is on at both ends of the
564
00:23:19.950 --> 00:23:20.390
planet.
565
00:23:20.470 --> 00:23:22.790
Avery: It does for our southern hemisphere
566
00:23:22.790 --> 00:23:25.310
listeners. That's Aurora australis
567
00:23:25.310 --> 00:23:28.310
territory Tasmania first and best,
568
00:23:28.470 --> 00:23:31.230
with a genuine chance from southern Victoria
569
00:23:31.230 --> 00:23:33.950
and the far south of New Zealand. If it holds
570
00:23:33.950 --> 00:23:36.790
up, look south, get away from town
571
00:23:36.790 --> 00:23:39.740
lights and be patient. Keep cameras will pick
572
00:23:39.740 --> 00:23:42.580
up colour your eyes won't. For, uh, our
573
00:23:42.580 --> 00:23:44.660
North American listeners, you're looking
574
00:23:44.660 --> 00:23:47.300
north and the northern tier states and
575
00:23:47.300 --> 00:23:50.020
Canada are in play. This is a
576
00:23:50.020 --> 00:23:52.940
coronal hole stream rather than a big flare
577
00:23:52.940 --> 00:23:55.780
event. So think a steady moderate
578
00:23:55.780 --> 00:23:58.460
glow rather than a spectacular overhead
579
00:23:58.460 --> 00:24:01.020
display. But it's free and it's
580
00:24:01.020 --> 00:24:02.380
tonight and
581
00:24:02.380 --> 00:24:04.500
Anna: the moon is out of the way for it.
582
00:24:05.280 --> 00:24:08.120
Avery: Beautifully out of the way. New Moon was last
583
00:24:08.120 --> 00:24:10.920
Friday, so we're in a young crescent evening
584
00:24:10.920 --> 00:24:13.680
sky and the deep sky is still yours.
585
00:24:14.080 --> 00:24:16.920
Over the next week, the Moon climbs back into
586
00:24:16.920 --> 00:24:19.760
the evening and walks past two landmarks
587
00:24:19.760 --> 00:24:22.600
worth Antares, the Red
588
00:24:22.600 --> 00:24:25.320
Heart of Scorpius and the Teapot of
589
00:24:25.320 --> 00:24:28.200
Sagittarius. Use the Moon to find
590
00:24:28.200 --> 00:24:31.160
them between now and the 20th. And from
591
00:24:31.160 --> 00:24:34.000
Sydney, the centre of the Milky Way is still
592
00:24:34.000 --> 00:24:36.280
riding high overhead after dark.
593
00:24:36.760 --> 00:24:39.120
That dense textured band through the
594
00:24:39.120 --> 00:24:42.000
teapot is the galactic core and
595
00:24:42.000 --> 00:24:44.480
it is one of the genuine privileges of
596
00:24:44.480 --> 00:24:47.400
southern observing. From mid northern
597
00:24:47.400 --> 00:24:50.400
latitudes, it's much lower in the south, so
598
00:24:50.400 --> 00:24:52.520
northern listeners should hunt for a clear
599
00:24:52.600 --> 00:24:55.320
southern horizon while the season lasts.
600
00:24:56.210 --> 00:24:58.850
Anna: Planets. Venus is the headline.
601
00:24:59.490 --> 00:25:02.330
Avery: Venus is the headline and Thursday is the
602
00:25:02.330 --> 00:25:02.690
date.
603
00:25:03.090 --> 00:25:06.050
On the 18th of September, Venus reaches
604
00:25:06.050 --> 00:25:07.970
greatest brilliancy for this evening
605
00:25:07.970 --> 00:25:10.210
apparition. At magnitude
606
00:25:10.210 --> 00:25:12.850
-4.8. That is
607
00:25:12.850 --> 00:25:15.770
spectacularly bright. Bright enough to cast
608
00:25:15.770 --> 00:25:18.490
a shadow from a dark sight. Bright enough
609
00:25:18.490 --> 00:25:21.370
that you'll field phone calls about it. Look
610
00:25:21.370 --> 00:25:24.200
west shortly after sunset. You'll notice
611
00:25:24.200 --> 00:25:26.360
some listings give a different date for this.
612
00:25:26.840 --> 00:25:29.200
We're going with the 18th, which is the
613
00:25:29.200 --> 00:25:32.080
correct one for the standard definition. And
614
00:25:32.080 --> 00:25:35.080
this apparition favours the south. From
615
00:25:35.080 --> 00:25:38.000
Sydney, Venus sits higher and lingers
616
00:25:38.000 --> 00:25:40.800
longer in a darker sky than it does from most
617
00:25:40.800 --> 00:25:43.320
of the United States, where it's a lower,
618
00:25:43.320 --> 00:25:45.320
briefer object in the twilight.
619
00:25:45.720 --> 00:25:48.680
Anna: Take the win m. Anything else worth chasing?
620
00:25:49.560 --> 00:25:52.240
Avery: Three things Mercury is low in the
621
00:25:52.240 --> 00:25:55.080
western twilight, tricky but doable with
622
00:25:55.080 --> 00:25:58.040
a clear horizon. Mars is in the
623
00:25:58.040 --> 00:26:00.960
morning sky and passes about 6 degrees
624
00:26:00.960 --> 00:26:03.800
south of Pollux, the brighter of the Gemini
625
00:26:03.800 --> 00:26:06.040
twins, also on the 18th.
626
00:26:06.600 --> 00:26:09.480
That one's a northern favourite view. And
627
00:26:09.560 --> 00:26:12.160
Saturn is building towards opposition on the
628
00:26:12.160 --> 00:26:15.000
4th of October, with the rings about 7
629
00:26:15.000 --> 00:26:17.850
degree open. So it is well placed
630
00:26:17.850 --> 00:26:20.730
all night and getting better. The Harvest
631
00:26:20.730 --> 00:26:23.690
Moon rides past it on the 26th with
632
00:26:23.690 --> 00:26:25.930
Neptune nearby. For anyone with
633
00:26:25.930 --> 00:26:27.610
binoculars or a scope,
634
00:26:28.090 --> 00:26:30.010
Anna: there's also a date for the diary. Next
635
00:26:30.010 --> 00:26:31.770
Saturday there is.
636
00:26:32.090 --> 00:26:34.330
Avery: 19th September is international
637
00:26:34.810 --> 00:26:37.250
observe the Moon night, which is one of the
638
00:26:37.250 --> 00:26:39.730
few global astronomy events that works
639
00:26:39.730 --> 00:26:42.170
equally well from either hemisphere. With no
640
00:26:42.170 --> 00:26:45.000
equipment at all, the Moon will be a fat
641
00:26:45.000 --> 00:26:47.520
crescent in the evening sky, which is
642
00:26:47.520 --> 00:26:50.200
genuinely the best phase for it because the
643
00:26:50.200 --> 00:26:52.360
shadows along the terminator throw the
644
00:26:52.360 --> 00:26:55.320
craters and mountains into relief. If you've
645
00:26:55.320 --> 00:26:57.600
got a pair of binoculars, that's all you
646
00:26:57.600 --> 00:26:59.880
need. If you've got a telescope and a
647
00:26:59.880 --> 00:27:01.360
neighbour, that's even better.
648
00:27:02.000 --> 00:27:04.480
Anna: And the equinox is coming, the
649
00:27:04.480 --> 00:27:05.120
22nd
650
00:27:05.600 --> 00:27:08.040
Avery: spring here, autumn for our northern
651
00:27:08.040 --> 00:27:10.560
listeners. And it brings the zodiacal light
652
00:27:10.560 --> 00:27:13.260
with it. That's sunlight scattering off
653
00:27:13.260 --> 00:27:15.940
dust in the plane of the solar system and
654
00:27:15.940 --> 00:27:18.500
around the equinox. It's an evening object
655
00:27:18.580 --> 00:27:21.060
low in the west from the southern hemisphere,
656
00:27:21.380 --> 00:27:24.380
a false dusk and a pre dawn object
657
00:27:24.380 --> 00:27:27.139
in the east from the northern hemisphere. A
658
00:27:27.139 --> 00:27:30.060
faint tapering cone of light, dark
659
00:27:30.060 --> 00:27:32.580
skies, no moon and patience.
660
00:27:33.220 --> 00:27:35.660
Anna: And the safety note, which is not optional on
661
00:27:35.660 --> 00:27:36.180
this programme.
662
00:27:36.990 --> 00:27:39.670
Avery: Never optional. With Venus at its most
663
00:27:39.670 --> 00:27:41.990
brilliant, some of you will be tempted to
664
00:27:41.990 --> 00:27:44.790
hunt it in daylight and it is genuinely
665
00:27:44.790 --> 00:27:47.590
findable. But that means aiming optics
666
00:27:47.590 --> 00:27:49.790
near the sun and that is how people
667
00:27:49.870 --> 00:27:52.590
permanently damage their eyes. If you are
668
00:27:52.590 --> 00:27:55.350
going to look anywhere near the sun, use a
669
00:27:55.350 --> 00:27:57.430
filter Certified to the ISO
670
00:27:57.430 --> 00:28:00.350
123122 standard
671
00:28:00.590 --> 00:28:02.430
fitted over the front of the instrument,
672
00:28:03.000 --> 00:28:04.280
never at the eyepiece.
673
00:28:04.520 --> 00:28:06.920
Cheque it for scratches and pinholes before
674
00:28:06.920 --> 00:28:09.160
every use. Sunglasses,
675
00:28:09.320 --> 00:28:11.840
exposed film, smoked glass and
676
00:28:11.840 --> 00:28:14.840
welding glass below shade 14 are
677
00:28:14.840 --> 00:28:17.400
not safe and never were. And
678
00:28:17.400 --> 00:28:19.640
supervise children the entire time.
679
00:28:20.280 --> 00:28:22.080
Anna: And that's Astronomy daily for Monday
680
00:28:22.080 --> 00:28:24.816
14th September
681
00:28:25.104 --> 00:28:27.320
2884. Supernovae
682
00:28:27.560 --> 00:28:30.080
rebuilt from three decades of observations by
683
00:28:30.080 --> 00:28:33.050
an Australian led team quietly making the
684
00:28:33.050 --> 00:28:35.410
case that dark energy might not hold still.
685
00:28:35.890 --> 00:28:38.690
Avery: A sun that may have eaten a super earth and
686
00:28:38.690 --> 00:28:41.530
still carries the receipt. A reminder that
687
00:28:41.530 --> 00:28:44.010
the sun's quiet years are the ones that let
688
00:28:44.010 --> 00:28:46.770
the galaxy's particles through. And the most
689
00:28:46.770 --> 00:28:49.330
sensitive exomoon search ever attempted,
690
00:28:49.650 --> 00:28:52.210
finding precisely nothing in the most
691
00:28:52.210 --> 00:28:53.730
useful possible way.
692
00:28:54.290 --> 00:28:56.650
Anna: All of Today's storeys with links to the
693
00:28:56.650 --> 00:28:58.910
papers and the press releases are are at
694
00:28:58.910 --> 00:29:01.830
astronomydaily IO you'll find the
695
00:29:01.830 --> 00:29:04.390
full back catalogue there too, along with our
696
00:29:04.390 --> 00:29:06.230
news feed and the newsletter. If you'd like
697
00:29:06.230 --> 00:29:07.230
this in your inbox
698
00:29:07.630 --> 00:29:09.710
Avery: and we do read the contact form.
699
00:29:10.030 --> 00:29:12.990
Questions, corrections and storey tips all
700
00:29:12.990 --> 00:29:15.430
land with us, and they have shaped more than
701
00:29:15.430 --> 00:29:18.190
one segment lately. You can also find us
702
00:29:18.190 --> 00:29:19.070
on socials.
703
00:29:19.150 --> 00:29:22.030
Anna: Astrodaily pod astronomy daily
704
00:29:22.030 --> 00:29:24.430
is part of the bytes.com podcast network.
705
00:29:24.920 --> 00:29:25.560
I'm Anna.
706
00:29:25.640 --> 00:29:28.280
Avery: And I'm Avery. Clear skies
707
00:29:28.280 --> 00:29:29.560
wherever you're standing.