Festive Lights and Napoleon's Plight | S02E24
Should Christmas lights go up before December? Do Hanukkah and Christmas lights overlap? Peter and Alex debate festive decoration etiquette before reviewing new films like Joaquin Phoenix's Napoleon and the outback thriller The Royal Hotel. But the...
Should Christmas lights go up before December? Do Hanukkah and Christmas lights overlap? Peter and Alex debate festive decoration etiquette before reviewing new films like Joaquin Phoenix's Napoleon and the outback thriller The Royal Hotel. But the cat has their tongues with the new but dull Cat Person.
This show is part of the Spreaker Prime Network, if you are interested in advertising on this podcast, contact us at https://www.spreaker.com/show/5645288/advertisement
1
00:00:00.640 --> 00:00:05.400
First on Film and Entertainment, Alex
first with You and I am joined by
2
00:00:05.559 --> 00:00:10.640
Peter Kraus. It is getting closer
to the festive season. The babulls are
3
00:00:10.839 --> 00:00:15.119
starting to show in the city.
Are you noticing, Beta, I don't
4
00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:20.120
always look at the baubles, but
maybe the bangles and beads. Well exactly,
5
00:00:20.199 --> 00:00:24.120
no, no, no, I'm
well it's a question that has I
6
00:00:24.160 --> 00:00:28.359
mean, there are many more important
things in life, but the question has
7
00:00:28.519 --> 00:00:32.679
been raised many a time. When
is the right time, if you are
8
00:00:32.840 --> 00:00:37.399
of that persuasion to put up Christmas
lights? What do you reckon? Is
9
00:00:37.439 --> 00:00:40.799
it the first of December? Is
there such a thing? Well, it's
10
00:00:40.880 --> 00:00:45.159
kind of like when hot cross buns
appear, right, I mean they fear
11
00:00:45.240 --> 00:00:48.079
right after Christmas and people are saying
no, no, no, no,
12
00:00:48.119 --> 00:00:52.679
you can't do that. So things
have changed over the years. Is there
13
00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:57.560
an appropriate time to well, not
only put them up, but tear them
14
00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:03.079
down? You don't think there's any
hard and fast rules, but some people
15
00:01:03.240 --> 00:01:10.319
like to put up their Christmas festivities
very early because they need a little Christmas.
16
00:01:10.359 --> 00:01:18.319
I suppose lights the airs now.
Again, obviously, they are dictated
17
00:01:18.359 --> 00:01:23.239
in a sense by the fact that
there are eight candles, plus the central
18
00:01:23.280 --> 00:01:26.359
one for those people who are not
Jewish, which is sort of lighting the
19
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:30.200
other eight. So you know you've
got the eight days, but you don't
20
00:01:30.239 --> 00:01:36.359
put them up before right. First
night is first night with Christmas lights.
21
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:42.439
Though it's quite the thing, mind
you. I read with the sort of
22
00:01:42.439 --> 00:01:48.879
scrooge like approach to Christmas, if
you spread far and wide beyond your home,
23
00:01:49.480 --> 00:01:57.400
you can incur the eyre of local
government and as such they continue to
24
00:01:57.439 --> 00:02:01.040
cease and desist. In other words, you can't spread onto the nature strip.
25
00:02:01.599 --> 00:02:07.439
That's what. I'm not sure that's
true in every state in Australia,
26
00:02:07.760 --> 00:02:10.520
but I read an alarming story where
somebody basically said, well that's it.
27
00:02:12.000 --> 00:02:14.719
If I'm not allowed my own territory, I'm not going to do it anymore.
28
00:02:14.719 --> 00:02:16.800
And locals are very very peeved by
that. But I understand from a
29
00:02:16.840 --> 00:02:20.919
safety point of view. It's about
the balance, is it. And some
30
00:02:20.960 --> 00:02:25.080
people really revel in the Christmas chair, which I must admit, it really
31
00:02:25.479 --> 00:02:29.680
lifts and able, doesn't it when
you're driving around or walking around, and
32
00:02:29.919 --> 00:02:34.639
lots of youngsters I noticed a lot
during Halloween as well. Were you around?
33
00:02:34.680 --> 00:02:36.960
I mean, you've got paper thin
walls, so you can just look
34
00:02:36.960 --> 00:02:40.360
through the walls. But new I'm
yes, that's the traffic and the noise.
35
00:02:40.960 --> 00:02:44.319
But yeah, but it's great to
see. Yes, a number of
36
00:02:44.400 --> 00:02:52.039
houses were currently lis up or really
yeah. Yeah, Look it's one of
37
00:02:52.080 --> 00:02:58.360
those things Halloween like Christmas. It
hasn't been there for thousands of years.
38
00:02:58.759 --> 00:03:02.159
I mean it wasn't it a coca
or invention? Is that not the basis
39
00:03:02.159 --> 00:03:07.560
of Christmas? I read somewhere?
No, true, I'm not sure about
40
00:03:07.560 --> 00:03:10.560
that. I would have thought it
goes back to christ days. No,
41
00:03:10.560 --> 00:03:15.360
no, no, apparently not.
Anyway, let us talk about it talking
42
00:03:15.400 --> 00:03:21.479
about people who are prominent. I
wonder, in terms of historic figures,
43
00:03:22.199 --> 00:03:30.280
how many more are prominent in a
more sizable manner than Napoleon Bonaparte. There
44
00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:34.000
wouldn't be too many historic figures that
I can think of. Can you think
45
00:03:34.039 --> 00:03:37.719
of any other sort of I mean, was he a warmonger? I suppose
46
00:03:37.800 --> 00:03:40.400
is the first question that has to
be asked, because the film basically shows
47
00:03:40.439 --> 00:03:46.120
a lot of his military endeavors,
and it says that he fought in sixty
48
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:51.680
one battles. That was astounding to
me. Were you aware of that before
49
00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:55.599
he saw the movie? No?
No, I knew he loved to celebrate
50
00:03:55.680 --> 00:04:02.919
war and to invade other countries and
to be personally I suppose successful all the
51
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:06.000
time as well well, but he
was successful because all the time he was
52
00:04:06.039 --> 00:04:12.879
in the early days, and then
he was exiled twice. So the other
53
00:04:12.919 --> 00:04:18.399
thing that is incredibly alarming is three
million people apparently died under his watch.
54
00:04:19.160 --> 00:04:26.079
That is extraordinary, extraordinary and horrible
to even contemplate. And well, war
55
00:04:26.160 --> 00:04:29.360
creates death, it does well.
I mean, you know, we talk
56
00:04:29.399 --> 00:04:32.800
about war, it's very difficult to
go past the Holocaust and the six million
57
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:39.040
Jews that were killed and so many
others, Gypsies and I mean, you
58
00:04:39.040 --> 00:04:45.439
know, homosexuals, And we look
at what's going on now in Gaza and
59
00:04:45.639 --> 00:04:51.160
Israel and October seven and horrible,
horrible, you know, the Hummas invasion
60
00:04:51.519 --> 00:04:58.199
that killed twelve hundred to begin and
now the thousands of deaths that have taken
61
00:04:58.240 --> 00:05:02.759
place. I mean, it's I
just hope that there is a long term
62
00:05:02.759 --> 00:05:06.720
solution, but I fear there isn't, notwithstanding the fact that we've got a
63
00:05:08.800 --> 00:05:14.120
cease fire and the exchange of hostages
as we speak. It's war is a
64
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:17.240
horrible thing that we should be learning
from and not repeating. But it doesn't
65
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:21.279
seem to be that way. Man's
in humanity demand seems to know no bounds.
66
00:05:21.279 --> 00:05:28.720
That I'm not to say that as
an expression. It's just the damage,
67
00:05:28.759 --> 00:05:32.360
the long term damage, the mental
scarring as well that as the physical
68
00:05:32.399 --> 00:05:38.319
wounds. Just it's hard to contemplate
later, isn't it. It is And
69
00:05:38.399 --> 00:05:41.959
we should also think about some of
the other conflicts that are still ongoing,
70
00:05:42.040 --> 00:05:46.040
like in Africa, in Sudan and
add places like that. Well, but
71
00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:53.959
the Russian, yes, in ukrain
yeah, absolutely right, And there are
72
00:05:54.040 --> 00:05:58.519
conflicts all the time, the idea
that someone has to be victorious, someone
73
00:05:58.600 --> 00:06:02.800
has to be a loser, and
losers die well, but but winners also
74
00:06:02.920 --> 00:06:08.959
die. That's the thing that winners
lose lots of lives as well, right,
75
00:06:09.040 --> 00:06:12.600
so I mean any loss of life. And that's so it's a pity
76
00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:15.920
that you can't come to some sort
of agreement. And often it's about power
77
00:06:15.920 --> 00:06:19.279
and control, which is what it
was Fornobolion, right, So you know
78
00:06:19.360 --> 00:06:26.000
that's that that's the fundamental undercurrent to
all of is and wanting more and more
79
00:06:26.040 --> 00:06:29.000
and more, you know, that's
what Hitler wanted of course as well,
80
00:06:29.319 --> 00:06:34.000
and the other the other aspect about
this is the ugliness that it pervades in
81
00:06:34.079 --> 00:06:38.720
countries that are not involved in the
war. You look at what Australia is
82
00:06:38.800 --> 00:06:44.160
like today, Peter, it's not
a nice place. The protests, you
83
00:06:44.199 --> 00:06:48.160
know, as long as they are
sort of done in a manner that doesn't
84
00:06:48.199 --> 00:06:54.519
cause violence. But the hatred is
what what I fear, and it just
85
00:06:54.600 --> 00:07:00.519
seems to and I was really uncomfortable
with the children on was a weendsday of
86
00:07:00.600 --> 00:07:05.399
this week. How did you feel
about that as somebody who provides guidance and
87
00:07:05.439 --> 00:07:12.399
counseling. Yes, absolutely, they're
obviously being convinced through social media and by
88
00:07:12.519 --> 00:07:17.160
other groups about going out and demonstrating. And yet they many of them,
89
00:07:17.160 --> 00:07:21.600
would have no understanding really of what
they're demonstrating about and what the background of
90
00:07:21.639 --> 00:07:25.959
all of this is. But yeah, I mean, it's very easy for
91
00:07:26.000 --> 00:07:30.439
somebody to say it didn't start on
October seven, but there was a what
92
00:07:30.480 --> 00:07:38.399
do we call it, an uncomfortable
not peace, But there wasn't the situation
93
00:07:38.480 --> 00:07:42.399
of people being killed in the numbers
that are being killed now. If October
94
00:07:42.480 --> 00:07:47.000
seven hadn't happened, then you could
argue that the twelve hundred Israeli lives and
95
00:07:47.040 --> 00:07:53.279
the what eleven twelve thousand now on
the Palestinian side would not have been lost.
96
00:07:53.759 --> 00:07:57.240
So I mean, it's a very
it's very easy to sort of say,
97
00:07:57.240 --> 00:07:59.839
oh, this goes back centuries,
et cetera. I don't in any
98
00:07:59.839 --> 00:08:03.279
way question that. But what I
do question is people who don't say that
99
00:08:03.600 --> 00:08:09.279
it was prompted by this latest war. It was not hamas it was.
100
00:08:09.639 --> 00:08:11.959
I mean, of course it was, yes, you know. And to
101
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:16.360
dismiss that and the other aspect about
all of this, the fake the fake
102
00:08:16.959 --> 00:08:24.120
news that is being imparted, which
obviously, in any situation, sides are
103
00:08:24.120 --> 00:08:26.279
going to put their their perspective.
We get that, but the fake news,
104
00:08:26.759 --> 00:08:31.240
I mean, Donald Trump started all
of this with his presidency right and
105
00:08:31.399 --> 00:08:37.159
against because I don't believe that that
was in the lexicon the way it has
106
00:08:37.279 --> 00:08:41.360
been since and now anybody can say
anything. And social media has a lot
107
00:08:41.399 --> 00:08:48.600
to answer for because so much falsehood
is perpetrated in that medium and people read
108
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:56.440
it and believe it because it looks
so real as recently as Friday, I
109
00:08:56.480 --> 00:09:03.039
and this this has been going on
for a while, but they artificially created
110
00:09:03.559 --> 00:09:09.519
what the Royal family, the General
the generation that will at this stage a
111
00:09:09.639 --> 00:09:13.919
young children, what they will look
like as adults. And for all intents
112
00:09:13.960 --> 00:09:18.039
and purposes, they were real.
Now anything can be created and recorded and
113
00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:20.960
whatever, and so how do you
believe? I mean, I have no
114
00:09:22.120 --> 00:09:28.399
doubt that the strategic position of Hamas
from a pr point of view has been
115
00:09:28.840 --> 00:09:35.240
effective because they they utilize that to
win hearts and minds, and that that's
116
00:09:35.240 --> 00:09:39.759
what creates a lot of the Mayhem. So you know, what do you
117
00:09:39.799 --> 00:09:43.279
do? How do you address that? So if somebody shows you the tunnels,
118
00:09:43.279 --> 00:09:48.759
if somebody shows you that the hospitals
underneath the hospitals used as a safe
119
00:09:48.840 --> 00:09:56.320
house, you know, or the
starting point for military might buy hummas,
120
00:09:56.480 --> 00:10:00.960
how do you how do you prove
that you get knows through there? But
121
00:10:01.000 --> 00:10:05.279
then people don't believe the journos and
unfortunately, so many of the United Nations
122
00:10:05.279 --> 00:10:09.240
officials who are overseeing this, I
mean, they've been killed as well.
123
00:10:09.879 --> 00:10:16.600
So nobody wins, as we've said
right along, and it's deeply distressing for
124
00:10:16.240 --> 00:10:20.799
the Jewish community, it's deeply distressing
for the world at large, and obviously
125
00:10:20.840 --> 00:10:28.279
deeply dispressing for Amas and the Palestinians. But the problem is that Humas is.
126
00:10:28.519 --> 00:10:31.919
There's no other way I can see
Hamas other than as a terrorist organization.
127
00:10:33.159 --> 00:10:39.720
That's what they represent, and it
appears to be that they don't care
128
00:10:39.159 --> 00:10:43.320
if there are casualties on their own
side, and yet they then use that
129
00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:50.360
as a as a pr tool.
So how do you counter that? Pta
130
00:10:50.519 --> 00:10:56.399
Is there an answer? There is
really no answer because who is in control?
131
00:10:56.559 --> 00:11:01.679
Is the United Nations in control?
Can anyone really stop things like this
132
00:11:01.720 --> 00:11:05.759
from happening or control them? And
the answer is not really, I mean,
133
00:11:05.840 --> 00:11:11.600
how can it be done without further
bloodshed or without all sorts of other
134
00:11:11.200 --> 00:11:18.799
implications of control of people's lives,
which also people automatically object to. Look,
135
00:11:18.919 --> 00:11:24.399
I have no problem with finding a
solution where there is land for both
136
00:11:24.480 --> 00:11:28.039
sides, as long as it's peaceful
and as long as it's possible, and
137
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:35.679
that may require some overtures from neighboring
countries so that there is enough land for
138
00:11:35.720 --> 00:11:39.480
this to happen. I mean,
would that be a possible you know,
139
00:11:39.480 --> 00:11:43.519
without the possibility, I can't see
that it couldn't be. But there's got
140
00:11:43.559 --> 00:11:48.320
to be good will on both sides, and that's the hardest part to achieve,
141
00:11:48.559 --> 00:11:54.120
and all of this conversation, not
just because of what happened on October
142
00:11:54.159 --> 00:11:58.879
seven, but because we're talking about
Napoleon, and I pose the question was
143
00:11:58.879 --> 00:12:03.080
he warmonger? I think the answer
to that is pretty obvious. But was
144
00:12:03.120 --> 00:12:07.720
he also a jealous and hasty lover? Because the film presents him so,
145
00:12:07.919 --> 00:12:11.159
does it not? Right? I
mean, I found that rather interesting.
146
00:12:11.600 --> 00:12:16.679
Obviously that was a choice. Now
I've got no idea whether there is any
147
00:12:16.759 --> 00:12:20.320
evidence to support that, because that's
one of the questions asked about Napoleon.
148
00:12:20.519 --> 00:12:24.519
How accurate it is it? Well, any movie is a movie, it's
149
00:12:24.559 --> 00:12:30.759
not a documentary. Doesn't purport to
be a documentary. There are dramatic that's
150
00:12:30.759 --> 00:12:35.679
a dramatization, clearly. Now I
don't doubt that it's based on reference books
151
00:12:35.679 --> 00:12:43.159
and so on. But the movie
shows that Bonaparte was somebody who was very
152
00:12:43.200 --> 00:12:48.000
strategic on the battlefield and had lots
of victories in the early days, and
153
00:12:48.039 --> 00:12:50.840
then his bravado got the better of
him and he took on more than he
154
00:12:50.840 --> 00:12:56.720
should have, and thereafter things went
downhill quickly. And the consequence, as
155
00:12:56.960 --> 00:13:01.240
I referenced earlier on, was that
Bonaparte was exiled not once but twice,
156
00:13:01.480 --> 00:13:05.159
and of course, the second time
he died where he was exiled six years
157
00:13:05.200 --> 00:13:09.080
after that. So the cost of
media that took es under him was their
158
00:13:09.159 --> 00:13:13.240
lives. And as for the love
of his life, it was Josephine.
159
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:20.519
Her inability to bear an air proved
particularly costly, and while Napoleon eventually chose
160
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:26.200
country over continuity of his marriage to
Josephine, that didn't mean his feelings for
161
00:13:26.240 --> 00:13:31.320
her diminished. She may actually have
been quite an unlikely match, and she
162
00:13:31.559 --> 00:13:35.879
was because she was a widow with
two children and six years older than him,
163
00:13:37.600 --> 00:13:43.320
But she still captivated him, and
basically that continued until her passing.
164
00:13:43.440 --> 00:13:46.360
And in the end, of course, like medi that flied too close to
165
00:13:46.399 --> 00:13:52.600
the sun, Napoleon's demise was inevitable. He was a Corsican. He led
166
00:13:52.639 --> 00:13:58.000
the French Revolution as the French Republic
rather as the First Consul from seventeen ninety
167
00:13:58.080 --> 00:14:01.559
nine to eighteen o four, and
then he was Emperor of France from eighteen
168
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:07.919
oh four to eighteen fourteen, then
again briefly in eighteen fifteen. It's his
169
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:13.080
story, It's the belligerents, it's
the bombast it's the vanity, the vulnerability
170
00:14:13.480 --> 00:14:16.720
through the eyes of the director Ridley
Scott, and it's been written by David
171
00:14:16.759 --> 00:14:20.200
Scarpa, who did all the money
in the world. No doubting that Scott
172
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:26.480
makes powerful and impactful films. I
was sort of going back through his CV
173
00:14:26.600 --> 00:14:31.480
and might impressive. I mean Thilmon
and Luise, Gladiator blackhowt Down, American
174
00:14:31.559 --> 00:14:35.960
gangster, Prometheus, the Martian,
that's just for starters. I thought that
175
00:14:37.039 --> 00:14:41.559
this one, Napoleon rated MA runs
for two hours and thirty eight minutes,
176
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:46.240
is a spectacle. The war scenes
particularly evocative, the costuming, the interiors
177
00:14:46.519 --> 00:14:52.000
are lavish. As Bonaparte wack in
Phoenix, it comes across as determined,
178
00:14:52.320 --> 00:14:58.320
as resolute, caught up as well
in his own sense of self worth to
179
00:14:58.600 --> 00:15:05.519
others detriment. He's depicted here as
cruel and needy. Vanessa Kirby plays Josephine,
180
00:15:05.960 --> 00:15:11.039
and she displays this unique hold over
him and she knows it too.
181
00:15:11.480 --> 00:15:16.799
There's a resilience about Vanessa Kirby's characterization. Rupert Everett displays a stiff upper lip
182
00:15:16.799 --> 00:15:22.000
as the Duke of Wellington who has
Napoleon's measure in the Battle of Waterloop.
183
00:15:22.799 --> 00:15:28.639
It is one of the most powerful
sequences in the film. Ultimately, it
184
00:15:28.720 --> 00:15:33.440
is the Duke that dispatches Bonaparte to
what would be his final destination, which
185
00:15:33.559 --> 00:15:37.080
is the island of Saint Helena,
which is the Atlantic Ocean, nearly two
186
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:43.639
thousand k's from the west coast of
Africa. And this picture switches from the
187
00:15:43.679 --> 00:15:48.720
political upheaval and the plotting to the
wars being waged, and Bonaparte's personal life
188
00:15:48.919 --> 00:15:54.120
starts in seventeen eighty ninety, was
born in seventeen sixty nine, charts his
189
00:15:54.200 --> 00:16:00.559
path until his death in eighteen twenty
one. So that makes it about fifty
190
00:16:00.559 --> 00:16:04.559
one, doesn't it? Something like
that when he passed away. So there
191
00:16:04.600 --> 00:16:10.840
still appears to be wholesale jumps,
is that right? So seventeen sixty nine,
192
00:16:10.919 --> 00:16:14.320
yeah, two, right, Yeah, that's fifty one. There appeared
193
00:16:14.320 --> 00:16:18.919
to be wholesale jumps in time as
the highs and lows of his relationship with
194
00:16:18.000 --> 00:16:22.200
Josephina applotted. Look, you get
a bit of a feel for the man
195
00:16:22.240 --> 00:16:27.799
and his motivations. But I didn't
find Napoleon the easiest film to follow.
196
00:16:27.960 --> 00:16:30.799
While Ridley Scott tried to cram a
lot in the two and a half hour
197
00:16:32.080 --> 00:16:37.320
plus running time, I thought that
the story development was bitsy and in fact,
198
00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:41.279
I'd argue there's enough source material,
so much of it, to have
199
00:16:41.320 --> 00:16:45.600
readily developed the plot further and turned
the offering into a two parter, because
200
00:16:45.600 --> 00:16:51.919
as it stands, I didn't regard
Napoleon as must see material, Peter,
201
00:16:52.639 --> 00:16:56.720
It's not in the same league as
Oppenheimer, which I consider a much more
202
00:16:56.759 --> 00:17:02.679
complete film. Nevertheless, notwithstanding debates
about it's historical accuracy, which we referenced
203
00:17:02.679 --> 00:17:07.920
earlier, Napoleon the movie is often
hard hitting, so that they were my
204
00:17:07.319 --> 00:17:12.039
thoughts about it, did you think
it was the complete film? Look,
205
00:17:12.240 --> 00:17:17.480
I want to approach this from a
number of different perspectives. First of all,
206
00:17:17.759 --> 00:17:23.799
I've had a look at two reputable
historic websites that have analyzed Ridley Scott's
207
00:17:23.799 --> 00:17:30.799
film, and they have both agreed
that there are a number of inaccuracies in
208
00:17:30.839 --> 00:17:37.480
the film, including that what for
other than dramatic reasons? Correct, I
209
00:17:37.480 --> 00:17:45.640
mean, for example, Napoleon was
never at the French Revolution, gillotining of
210
00:17:47.880 --> 00:17:52.119
you know, it just didn't happen. Also, they never he never met
211
00:17:52.440 --> 00:17:56.880
the Duke of Wellington, even though
in the film they do. So that's
212
00:17:56.960 --> 00:18:02.880
just a few perspectives. And really
God has already said that he did take
213
00:18:02.920 --> 00:18:07.839
advice from historians, but he ignored
most of them because he wanted to make
214
00:18:07.880 --> 00:18:11.079
a dramatically powerful film. And as
you said, and as we all know,
215
00:18:11.559 --> 00:18:18.440
this is a narrative film, not
a documentary. However, people will
216
00:18:18.480 --> 00:18:22.759
have this idea that some of the
aspects of the film were true, when
217
00:18:22.799 --> 00:18:26.599
in fact they didn't happen. Okay, that's one perspective, and we have
218
00:18:26.640 --> 00:18:33.240
to deal with that. Secondly,
there is a four hour version of the
219
00:18:33.240 --> 00:18:40.559
film that Ridley Scott will be releasing
to Apple TV, because it's an Apple
220
00:18:40.599 --> 00:18:45.160
TV production to begin with, and
he's already said he's releasing a four hour
221
00:18:45.240 --> 00:18:52.200
version, and that may address some
of the plot holds or the plot the
222
00:18:52.240 --> 00:18:56.440
way it develops in this two and
a half hour cut of the film.
223
00:18:56.519 --> 00:18:59.240
For cinematic reasons, Oh there you
go, There you go better. I
224
00:18:59.240 --> 00:19:03.279
mean that four hour version, if
it was part one and part two,
225
00:19:03.880 --> 00:19:07.839
that could have been played in cinemas
as well, possibly possibly, And that
226
00:19:07.920 --> 00:19:11.680
also goes to an argument about where
there should be intermissions in cinema. And
227
00:19:12.279 --> 00:19:18.680
I know that some cinema owners are
really looking into this in some detail for
228
00:19:18.799 --> 00:19:22.640
any films that are over a half
hours. Yeah, but The tyficulty here
229
00:19:22.799 --> 00:19:26.920
is that the I mean this was
this was one? Was it on Oppenheimer
230
00:19:27.039 --> 00:19:33.240
or was it another film that basically
a number of cinemas were called out for
231
00:19:33.359 --> 00:19:38.759
their Some of them inserted a break
and they were called out because the director
232
00:19:38.839 --> 00:19:45.400
did not want that to occur.
Yes, yeah, I mean where where
233
00:19:45.400 --> 00:19:51.960
does this is a really important issue. Where does the control of a director
234
00:19:52.079 --> 00:19:56.599
start and end? Right the moment
the movie is out there? Can he
235
00:19:56.720 --> 00:20:02.920
or she or they did German a, oh well, it should only be
236
00:20:02.960 --> 00:20:06.440
seen in Imax, right because it
was shot on Imax? Should there be
237
00:20:06.920 --> 00:20:10.160
any interval? Should there not be
an interval? I mean, is that
238
00:20:10.319 --> 00:20:15.079
is that under How is that fair? Is that? I understand that's their
239
00:20:15.119 --> 00:20:18.799
preference, But preference is different from
dictating to somebody that you can't put in
240
00:20:18.799 --> 00:20:25.079
an interval. That well, that's
true, but don't forget most directors don't
241
00:20:25.119 --> 00:20:30.359
have total control of their film.
It's usually under the control of producers and
242
00:20:30.440 --> 00:20:34.759
distributors who make decisions about how a
film will be released and in what sort
243
00:20:34.799 --> 00:20:40.759
of format. And it wasn't actually
Oppenheimer. I I misspoke. Then the
244
00:20:40.759 --> 00:20:45.359
film that I was thinking of was
the one that came out the one about
245
00:20:45.480 --> 00:20:49.759
the Killers of the Flower Moon,
thank you, that's the one. Yeah,
246
00:20:49.799 --> 00:20:56.839
with the director there, Mars Masese
calling people out on that. Yeah,
247
00:20:57.079 --> 00:21:03.440
yeah, that I understand why.
But I'm also somewhat concerned about it
248
00:21:03.480 --> 00:21:07.920
because I mean, look, many
people can't hold their bladder, and then
249
00:21:07.839 --> 00:21:11.400
is it better than miss I know, I mean there's no sugar coating.
250
00:21:12.319 --> 00:21:17.440
No, it's true, true,
and that is that fair? Then that
251
00:21:17.799 --> 00:21:22.119
he'd rather people miss out on five
minutes of the movie, you know,
252
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:26.119
or would have a break that allows
them to seed in comfort. I mean,
253
00:21:26.119 --> 00:21:30.640
if you're if you're in your seat
feeling discomfort while you're watching a movie,
254
00:21:30.720 --> 00:21:33.440
surely that's not a desirable thing either. No, look, I agree,
255
00:21:33.519 --> 00:21:37.640
and I think what should happen,
and it's already happening with some films
256
00:21:37.640 --> 00:21:42.680
that are released like Japanese Animation,
which is released either in a dubbed format
257
00:21:42.960 --> 00:21:49.880
or in its original format, that
cinemas should be able to screen the film
258
00:21:51.119 --> 00:21:56.720
two ways, with and without an
intermission and people can make their own decisions.
259
00:21:56.039 --> 00:21:59.839
Yeah, which is great. So
it gives people choice and you can
260
00:21:59.839 --> 00:22:02.799
get to a session that is or
isn't. Yeah, I think that's a
261
00:22:02.839 --> 00:22:06.480
wonderful solution. And again, I
don't know whether you need to put this
262
00:22:06.599 --> 00:22:10.960
into agreements. There's been strikes enough
in the United States, but I think
263
00:22:10.960 --> 00:22:14.000
it should be put in there that
they don't they don't their producers don't have
264
00:22:14.039 --> 00:22:18.359
that control or whatever. I mean, at some point, the cinema chains
265
00:22:18.400 --> 00:22:21.759
need to make money as well,
right, and if people and if people
266
00:22:21.759 --> 00:22:26.200
are going to be unhappy with what
the format and winging et cetera, et
267
00:22:26.240 --> 00:22:29.880
cetera some have, that's just not
appropriate either. So all right, let's
268
00:22:29.880 --> 00:22:34.079
get back to your thoughts about the
copy. Okay, Look, overall,
269
00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:38.359
it's a well cast film, and
the battle sequences, which were largely shot
270
00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:42.880
in Malta, are really well handled, and I mean the staging of the
271
00:22:42.920 --> 00:22:48.839
film is very good. Indeed,
I had a small objection to Arkam Phoenix's
272
00:22:49.480 --> 00:22:56.119
depiction of Napoleon. He came across
more as whining rather than as as someone
273
00:22:56.200 --> 00:23:00.680
who was really powerful wanted control,
et cetera. I also, I think
274
00:23:00.680 --> 00:23:03.240
there's both, and that's the thing
that really I think it depends on the
275
00:23:03.279 --> 00:23:08.599
scene that he's in. There's certainly
an arrogance there and puffing out his chest
276
00:23:08.680 --> 00:23:12.319
et cetera. And then there is
it's almost like he's a puppy dog at
277
00:23:12.359 --> 00:23:17.200
times, and you know, like
he rushes back from war when he finds
278
00:23:17.240 --> 00:23:21.359
out something about Josephine and things of
that nature, and it sort of it
279
00:23:21.440 --> 00:23:26.279
almost belittles him in some respect.
Now, perhaps that was him, Perhaps
280
00:23:26.319 --> 00:23:30.599
that's the dramatization, but yeah,
I found that rather. Yeah, that
281
00:23:30.720 --> 00:23:37.519
dichotomy that's presented more than a dichotomy
and a bit hard to swallow. I
282
00:23:37.559 --> 00:23:41.680
guess. Look, I agree now
it may be psychologically part of his character,
283
00:23:42.119 --> 00:23:48.240
but I haven't read enough analysis of
the psychology of Napoleon in the eighteenth
284
00:23:48.279 --> 00:23:52.920
century to be able to make that
comment. Also, Vanessa Herby, I
285
00:23:52.960 --> 00:24:00.279
think her role as Josephine is not
very well written, and she struggles to
286
00:24:00.400 --> 00:24:03.960
really come to grips with whether she
is someone who is a more powerful sort
287
00:24:04.000 --> 00:24:10.759
of influence on Napoleon or whether she
is subservient to him and is just,
288
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:15.279
you know, at his will.
Again, I think that she basically knew
289
00:24:15.319 --> 00:24:21.440
that she used sex as a control
mechanism, but she also knew when she
290
00:24:21.519 --> 00:24:25.920
went too far. And I wasn't
as troubled by that as perhaps you were.
291
00:24:26.160 --> 00:24:30.599
However, I was troubled by the
fact that the time span suddenly you
292
00:24:30.640 --> 00:24:36.000
see her in one shot one scene, and then you see her in another,
293
00:24:36.599 --> 00:24:40.880
and time has elapsed, but you're
not aware the time has elapsed until
294
00:24:41.319 --> 00:24:45.440
a scene at the end, towards
the end where the reference or sort of
295
00:24:45.640 --> 00:24:48.920
in the second half, shall we
say, where there was a reference to
296
00:24:48.960 --> 00:24:56.799
fifteen years had gone by. It
was really with a feather at I mean,
297
00:24:56.079 --> 00:24:59.720
normally, you know what. I
thought. It was almost a jump
298
00:24:59.759 --> 00:25:04.799
cut. So in other words,
I don't know whether they edited a four
299
00:25:04.799 --> 00:25:07.720
hour version then edited it down to
two and a half, or whether they
300
00:25:07.720 --> 00:25:11.480
just did the two and a half
hour version and they're going to extend it.
301
00:25:11.960 --> 00:25:14.400
I hope they did the two and
a half hour version, but at
302
00:25:14.400 --> 00:25:17.160
times I got the feeling they did
the four hour version. Oh yeah,
303
00:25:17.200 --> 00:25:18.079
we'll cut this, we'll cut this, we'll cut this. That's what it
304
00:25:18.119 --> 00:25:22.440
felt like to me. Well,
according to Scott, he filmed it as
305
00:25:22.480 --> 00:25:26.519
a four hour film, but he
was asked to cut it back to two
306
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:32.480
and a half hours for cinema release
purposes. But anyway, we'll see about
307
00:25:32.480 --> 00:25:37.519
that. I also, I'm also
disappointed that tahar Rahim, who plays an
308
00:25:37.559 --> 00:25:47.279
important French aristocrat is dismissed very much
in the film. His role is not
309
00:25:47.319 --> 00:25:52.519
regarded as particularly important or interesting,
even though his third build in the film.
310
00:25:52.599 --> 00:25:56.640
So I did note that. Yeah, and look, there are a
311
00:25:56.720 --> 00:26:03.440
number of these aspects occasionally. I
liked it in terms of characterization, even
312
00:26:03.599 --> 00:26:11.319
very much. Napoleon front and center
and Joseph that that love story between them
313
00:26:11.359 --> 00:26:15.960
and the relationship. I mean that. And it's almost like the other characters
314
00:26:15.440 --> 00:26:21.079
wafted it out at times, some
of them, but none of them commanded
315
00:26:21.480 --> 00:26:25.440
a lot of attention. I mean, that was exactly that was obviously a
316
00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:30.039
deliberate ployee on the part of the
director. Well maybe, but again,
317
00:26:30.279 --> 00:26:33.000
the four hour version might be fleshing
out some of those characters in a bit
318
00:26:33.039 --> 00:26:37.680
more detail. So we'll see about
that. And I do want to make
319
00:26:37.759 --> 00:26:45.519
reference to Abel Gancer's superb and restored
nineteen twenty seven epic of Napoleon, which
320
00:26:45.519 --> 00:26:52.480
has been restored on Blu Ray by
Francis Ford Coppler. It's an incredible I've
321
00:26:52.519 --> 00:26:56.559
seen it. It's an incredible experience
of five and a half hour production.
322
00:26:56.759 --> 00:27:00.480
Oh oh my god. Yeah,
did you sit there? Did you see
323
00:27:00.480 --> 00:27:03.680
it in a cinema or did you
see it online. Oh, online,
324
00:27:04.119 --> 00:27:10.000
obviously not in cinema, especially because
the last twenty minutes of the film is
325
00:27:10.319 --> 00:27:15.839
remarkable because it's shot in triptich.
There are three screens that are melded together,
326
00:27:17.039 --> 00:27:19.200
or three predictors that go together.
If it's seen in a cinema and
327
00:27:19.240 --> 00:27:25.799
it's presented that way on not three
separate shots. There's one shot or the
328
00:27:25.839 --> 00:27:30.160
three. There are three separate shots
that are sort of presented like a huge
329
00:27:30.160 --> 00:27:36.440
CinemaScope production. The last twenty minutes, which is the I think the Battle
330
00:27:36.480 --> 00:27:41.240
of Waterloo. It only goes up
to a certain date, but it is
331
00:27:41.359 --> 00:27:48.920
remarkable the way it's filmed, progressive
filmmaking, just before sound came in,
332
00:27:48.960 --> 00:27:52.599
and it's just an incredible So if
anyone wants to catch up on I think
333
00:27:52.720 --> 00:27:56.680
the best version of Napoleon, have
a look at that on Blu Ray.
334
00:27:56.960 --> 00:28:03.759
Look. I didn't mind Ridley Scott's
film. I didn't think it needed to
335
00:28:03.799 --> 00:28:07.359
be shown at Imax because it was
not shot at Imax. I know both
336
00:28:07.359 --> 00:28:11.880
of us saw it. Yeah,
but I'm understand. I love the Imax,
337
00:28:11.440 --> 00:28:18.359
that sense of wow that the battle
scenes have, as disturbing as they
338
00:28:18.359 --> 00:28:22.359
are, you've got the best biggest
screen possible to see it on that.
339
00:28:22.839 --> 00:28:26.519
I'm a big rap for Imax,
to be honest, and so am I,
340
00:28:26.240 --> 00:28:32.640
but I always prefer Imax for films
that are shot in Imax, not
341
00:28:32.839 --> 00:28:38.359
that are projected in the Imax cinema
but really are not. I don't in
342
00:28:38.440 --> 00:28:41.920
the way. I definitely want to
see Imax films that have been shot in
343
00:28:41.920 --> 00:28:47.720
Imax. But if they could screen
every film at Imax, I would be
344
00:28:47.759 --> 00:28:52.319
delighted. I just think we are
so privileged in Victoria. We've had this
345
00:28:52.440 --> 00:28:56.839
right through. Sydney's just got theirs
back up again after many, many years.
346
00:28:56.200 --> 00:29:00.839
But it's quite an experience is if
people hadn't been. It's not cheap,
347
00:29:02.279 --> 00:29:06.920
but as a treat absolutely, and
I agree with you in that regard
348
00:29:07.000 --> 00:29:11.319
if you haven't been, probably the
first film to see it is in there
349
00:29:11.680 --> 00:29:15.319
is one that's been shot on Imax
format. So yeah, all right,
350
00:29:15.759 --> 00:29:21.000
I guess let's get to the score. Npolem rated one hundred and fifty eight
351
00:29:21.039 --> 00:29:27.200
minutes. Peter Okay. In summary, I think it's a film worth seeing,
352
00:29:27.440 --> 00:29:32.880
but has lots of difficulties attached to
it, so I give it six
353
00:29:33.000 --> 00:29:37.359
out of ten. Well, I
struggled as well to find the right mark
354
00:29:37.440 --> 00:29:42.079
with regards to a score. But
I still thought as a spectacle, even
355
00:29:42.079 --> 00:29:48.160
though it didn't always hang together,
it was worthwhile and I'm giving it a
356
00:29:48.200 --> 00:29:52.519
seven and a half for that reason. But yeah, with a few butts
357
00:29:52.559 --> 00:29:59.000
as well. Let us move on. Jay eighty eight FM two talking about
358
00:29:59.119 --> 00:30:03.400
The Royal hote Hell, which is
an Australian movie. And did you see
359
00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:08.799
the documentary in twenty seventeen called Hotel
GULGARDI? I certainly did, and even
360
00:30:08.839 --> 00:30:14.519
interviewed the filmmaker responsible for it,
which I thought was a really powerful film.
361
00:30:14.960 --> 00:30:19.839
Yeah, so there's two lead if
somebody's just driven through a front wall,
362
00:30:22.240 --> 00:30:26.559
my dol oh, these demonstrators aren't
it. But look it sounds like
363
00:30:26.640 --> 00:30:32.799
there's a rally, a motorbike and
feral chats going through the wall. Okay,
364
00:30:32.960 --> 00:30:37.640
So I think Pieter lives in a
home that has the thinnessles I've ever
365
00:30:37.799 --> 00:30:42.000
experienced, Right, I think Mason. They're not even Mason night sheets are.
366
00:30:42.000 --> 00:30:47.200
They're little little paper that get get
wet and then you get wet.
367
00:30:47.319 --> 00:30:52.200
Anyway, The Royal Hotel am I
rated ninety one minutes. Men behaving very
368
00:30:52.240 --> 00:30:57.640
badly towards women and drinking to excess
with consequences. They are the two scenes,
369
00:30:59.200 --> 00:31:03.359
and the director and co writer alongside
Oscar Reading is Kitty Green. First
370
00:31:03.359 --> 00:31:10.200
saw the documentary Hotel Gurgardi as an
Australian Film Festival jury member, and that
371
00:31:10.559 --> 00:31:15.160
was her inspiration. She was taken
by the story of two young Scandinavian women,
372
00:31:15.200 --> 00:31:21.519
as the doco showed trapped in an
Australian mining town. And while she
373
00:31:21.720 --> 00:31:26.480
had seen movies set in ossie pubs
before, many of them in remote communities,
374
00:31:26.160 --> 00:31:30.720
never threw a female lens. And
in the Royal Hotel, twenty five
375
00:31:30.799 --> 00:31:37.160
year old Hannah played by Julia Garner
and live Jessica Henwick, who's twenty four,
376
00:31:37.599 --> 00:31:42.599
are Canadians, right, So they've
changed nationalities from the documentary. They've
377
00:31:42.680 --> 00:31:47.880
chosen the furthest place from home to
travel to and enjoy, and they're running
378
00:31:47.920 --> 00:31:51.720
short of cash, so they take
the only jobs available at short notice,
379
00:31:52.039 --> 00:31:56.519
being at a pub in an isolated
mining town. And what greets them,
380
00:31:56.680 --> 00:32:00.720
well, it's hardly enticing peta no
wi fi, oh golly, how can
381
00:32:00.759 --> 00:32:04.880
they survive you know, their twenties? Oh my golly, and limited hot
382
00:32:04.920 --> 00:32:07.119
water. Yeah, that is an
issue, Okay, let alone. The
383
00:32:07.160 --> 00:32:13.279
extremely curt pub owner whose name is
Billy played by Hugo Weaving, who lays
384
00:32:13.319 --> 00:32:15.440
down the ground rules. He's quite
a piece of work, that man.
385
00:32:15.599 --> 00:32:19.799
Anyway. He lives in a caravan
out the front of the watering hole with
386
00:32:19.880 --> 00:32:24.440
his indigenous girlfriend Carol played by Ursula
Yovich, and she helps him out in
387
00:32:24.480 --> 00:32:30.599
the kitchen. Now, while one
of the two young ladies live embraces their
388
00:32:30.640 --> 00:32:36.559
new environment, Hannah is less than
impressed. Is the patrons, while they're
389
00:32:36.559 --> 00:32:40.440
a wild and rowdy bunch who come
on strong. While Billy, who's the
390
00:32:40.599 --> 00:32:47.319
pub owner, frequently falls dead drunk
and he doesn't pay his bills. The
391
00:32:47.400 --> 00:32:52.519
other of the two young ladies,
Hannah, who's given a crude nickname,
392
00:32:52.279 --> 00:32:57.480
is fearful. She wands out,
but Live convinces her to stay on for
393
00:32:57.480 --> 00:33:04.440
a few more weeks. It's a
move that backfires badly so. The Royal
394
00:33:04.440 --> 00:33:09.519
Hotel shows Australians at a very negative
light as misogynistic boozes and reprobates. Really
395
00:33:09.599 --> 00:33:14.400
ugly picture, hard to watch,
but that, of course is the whole
396
00:33:14.440 --> 00:33:17.240
point. You can have a great
time without stepping over the mark, but
397
00:33:17.240 --> 00:33:22.680
apparently not in this remote corner of
the country. There is an edginess about
398
00:33:22.680 --> 00:33:25.240
the Royal Hotel from the get go
that does not let up, and the
399
00:33:25.279 --> 00:33:30.640
film's all the better for it.
I really like the contrasting characterizations of the
400
00:33:30.680 --> 00:33:35.759
two women. Julia Ganner presents Hannah
as wary will guard it, while Jessica
401
00:33:35.839 --> 00:33:39.079
Henwicks Live appears to be up for
anything. We sit back and wait,
402
00:33:39.640 --> 00:33:45.559
frustrated that we can't do anything to
influence the behavior of the town's inhabitants,
403
00:33:45.039 --> 00:33:50.759
which presents as an ever present threat. Thought Hugo Weaving was very powerful,
404
00:33:50.960 --> 00:33:54.599
quite pervasive as the rough and tumble
publican on a slippery slope, and as
405
00:33:54.680 --> 00:34:00.599
Karl LUs Lyyovich appears resigned to her
fate. Tough on the outside, she
406
00:34:00.680 --> 00:34:04.880
has a strong moral compass. Mattie, played by Toby Wallace, is perhaps
407
00:34:04.960 --> 00:34:07.639
the most interesting of the men folk
in town. The twenty five year old
408
00:34:07.639 --> 00:34:12.760
seems like a good guy, but
when tanked up, goes too far and
409
00:34:12.880 --> 00:34:19.039
teeth. James Fresherville is desperate for
some romantic action, but booze again affects
410
00:34:19.079 --> 00:34:24.440
him badly. But the most sinister
of the townsfolk is Dolly Daniel Henshell,
411
00:34:24.800 --> 00:34:31.519
who's positively sinister, right, most
sinister and positively sinister. Absolutely, Kitty
412
00:34:31.559 --> 00:34:37.400
Green has waven a taught psychological thriller. Anything but a tourism Australia. Add
413
00:34:37.679 --> 00:34:40.440
it's a warts and all portrait that
hardly paints a pretty picture of the outback
414
00:34:40.960 --> 00:34:46.880
save for a star infested skyline and
a few arresting landscapes during the day.
415
00:34:47.199 --> 00:34:52.960
Nevertheless, their Royal Hotel stays with
you long after you exit the cinema.
416
00:34:52.840 --> 00:34:58.039
It's a really strong imprint and it's
a very strong movie. It is called
417
00:34:58.639 --> 00:35:05.320
The Royal Hotel Peter your Thoughts certainly
is and it certainly reveals the ugly side
418
00:35:05.360 --> 00:35:09.400
of living in the outback community where
there isn't much to do apart from drinking.
419
00:35:10.320 --> 00:35:16.079
And certainly the various men involved,
including Hugo Weaving and Toby Wallace and
420
00:35:16.079 --> 00:35:23.440
so Daniel Henchel, all very interesting
perspectives on what men do when they're in
421
00:35:23.480 --> 00:35:28.960
that sort of environment and especially when
they encounter women. So it is a
422
00:35:29.039 --> 00:35:31.760
very disturbing film in many respects.
It's interesting how the film was shot in
423
00:35:31.920 --> 00:35:37.880
South Australia in a place called Yatina, which is about half an hour from
424
00:35:37.920 --> 00:35:43.480
Adelaide, and they found this old
pub which had been closed and they were
425
00:35:43.519 --> 00:35:47.760
able to restore it for filming purposes, and they've done an excellent job.
426
00:35:49.239 --> 00:35:55.199
They're micking to some extent Wake in
Fright, which is best comparison. And
427
00:35:55.280 --> 00:36:00.360
so this notion that there are some
evil things happening in the outback of Australia,
428
00:36:01.199 --> 00:36:06.039
I mean, Wolf Creek is probably
another example, but the best example
429
00:36:06.199 --> 00:36:12.880
is Waken From It probably demonstrates that
there are darker aspects to Australian character that
430
00:36:12.920 --> 00:36:17.360
we don't often want to talk about, and this film certainly does reveal that.
431
00:36:19.159 --> 00:36:22.039
It's so interesting how the two women, the backpackers who were hoping just
432
00:36:22.079 --> 00:36:28.440
to make money and to have a
reasonable time, were referred to as fresh
433
00:36:28.639 --> 00:36:35.679
meat on board outside the pub,
and that just indicates where this film is
434
00:36:35.760 --> 00:36:40.199
heading. Look, it's a very
impressive film. Kitty Green worked also with
435
00:36:40.320 --> 00:36:46.199
Julia Ghana on their previous film The
Assistant, which was such an impressive film
436
00:36:46.239 --> 00:36:52.079
about a woman who works for I
think it's for a film production company and
437
00:36:52.880 --> 00:37:01.079
it's given difficult circumstances being somewhat isolated. Has done a great job in continuing
438
00:37:01.119 --> 00:37:08.000
that theme in very much The Royal
Hotel look an excellent Australian film. I
439
00:37:08.119 --> 00:37:13.639
was quite impressed by it and I
was getting very worried at one stage about
440
00:37:13.639 --> 00:37:15.960
where this was heading. But without
any spoilers, I won't spoil it for
441
00:37:16.000 --> 00:37:21.679
anyone. It is certainly a disturbing
film worth seeing. Eight out of ten
442
00:37:22.039 --> 00:37:25.760
from me. For the Royal Hotel
M I rated ninety one minutes. Nothing
443
00:37:25.800 --> 00:37:30.480
wrong with a ninety minute movie,
Peter. It depends on the story,
444
00:37:30.639 --> 00:37:36.719
that's right. Yeah, what do
you would you believe? I absolutely agree
445
00:37:36.760 --> 00:37:40.280
with your score eight out of ten. You were looking over my shoulder when
446
00:37:40.320 --> 00:37:45.039
I wrote it. I'll tell you
what, looking over my paper thin walls.
447
00:37:45.239 --> 00:37:50.559
Yes, exactly. You are on
j AD eightmm. And folks,
448
00:37:50.840 --> 00:37:53.639
if you want to participate in our
programming and you want to spend a little
449
00:37:53.639 --> 00:37:58.719
bit of money to become a member
of JAM, please do so. Fifty
450
00:37:58.760 --> 00:38:02.599
four bucks go through jh air dot
com dot AU. And that's what community
451
00:38:02.679 --> 00:38:07.239
radio is all about. Yeah,
community folks, get on board. Please.
452
00:38:07.480 --> 00:38:12.760
If you feel so inclined, cat
person, are you, Peter?
453
00:38:13.960 --> 00:38:16.079
You couldn't keep a cat? A
cat did literally break through your walls?
454
00:38:16.079 --> 00:38:20.639
Correct? Well, exactly right?
Is it? Eat? The scenery?
455
00:38:21.079 --> 00:38:25.440
Have you ever had any any animal
at all in your possession as a pet.
456
00:38:27.079 --> 00:38:31.000
No, not even a sea slug, Peter. Now, if you
457
00:38:31.039 --> 00:38:34.760
see a sluck, what do you
do with it? Exactly? You do
458
00:38:35.159 --> 00:38:38.639
so you hang on. Growing up, you didn't have any pets at home?
459
00:38:39.079 --> 00:38:44.480
No, no, not at all. Well, don't you feel you've
460
00:38:44.519 --> 00:38:47.960
missed out? Because dogs can be
very loving, cats can be very purring.
461
00:38:50.119 --> 00:38:54.400
I've think, Well, I feeling
good about that. Yeah, my
462
00:38:54.599 --> 00:39:00.519
first pet, I was a crazy
mixed up kid. My first pet,
463
00:39:00.840 --> 00:39:02.840
well, I grew up with and
you would have as well. No,
464
00:39:02.840 --> 00:39:07.840
no, sorry you were born in
seventeen thirty three, but no, yeah,
465
00:39:08.559 --> 00:39:15.760
I grew up with Charles Schultz and
Peanuts. So we had a cat.
466
00:39:15.960 --> 00:39:20.360
And what do you think the cat
was named crazy, right, Charles
467
00:39:20.360 --> 00:39:24.239
Souls? No, it was named
Snoopy, which is a dog. Yes,
468
00:39:24.320 --> 00:39:29.280
and so yeah, I mean it
really it scarred me for life anyway,
469
00:39:29.800 --> 00:39:31.440
and I think I think I was
the one who named it. So
470
00:39:31.519 --> 00:39:37.039
there you go, hopefully, Well, mind you I did name. I
471
00:39:37.079 --> 00:39:40.280
gave my daughter a unisex name.
And I'm not sure that that's a good
472
00:39:40.320 --> 00:39:45.400
thing to do because I told you
this story, did I not about she
473
00:39:45.559 --> 00:39:51.639
was at school and she'd been in
that class for the entire year, and
474
00:39:52.239 --> 00:39:57.880
we received a written report from the
teacher and the teacher said that my daughter,
475
00:39:59.519 --> 00:40:01.880
he has done a wonderful job.
And I'm thinking, well, that's
476
00:40:01.920 --> 00:40:06.119
wonderful. You've been with my daughter
for a year and you don't know that
477
00:40:06.199 --> 00:40:10.000
she's a girl. That was a
bit of a worry, and that stuck
478
00:40:10.000 --> 00:40:13.960
with me all these years. You
would have thought that. I understand it
479
00:40:14.000 --> 00:40:16.480
takes time to write reports, but
you know the sex of the person you're
480
00:40:16.480 --> 00:40:21.159
writing about, don't you. Although
this age, I shouldn't presume that.
481
00:40:21.519 --> 00:40:24.519
No, No, back in the
day, back in the day, right,
482
00:40:27.840 --> 00:40:31.480
oh my goodness me. So just
referring to your dog Snoopy, how
483
00:40:31.559 --> 00:40:38.039
animated was it? No, as
a Snoopy slept a lot ah, But
484
00:40:38.480 --> 00:40:45.480
there was very good chasing vermin,
right, so that's what cats are good?
485
00:40:45.559 --> 00:40:47.320
Yeah? Right, I mean,
if it sees vermin, it goes.
486
00:40:47.519 --> 00:40:51.159
But I can't say there was a
lot of vermin around our neighborhood.
487
00:40:51.199 --> 00:40:53.880
Nevertheless, they were the days,
though Peter, where cats could actually go
488
00:40:53.920 --> 00:40:59.119
outside and come back in and you
know all of that. It's a lot
489
00:40:59.159 --> 00:41:02.280
different now. We had Clydesdale horses. You might remember those. You were
490
00:41:02.320 --> 00:41:08.519
about two hundred and three at the
time. But yeah, they Oh my
491
00:41:08.559 --> 00:41:12.840
goodness, what kind of fool am
I? Yes, exactly. And you
492
00:41:12.840 --> 00:41:15.039
know we used to race out and
there was the milk bottles. Remember the
493
00:41:15.039 --> 00:41:19.679
milk bottles? I do, Yes, they were. It was great.
494
00:41:19.880 --> 00:41:23.360
So it was six am. I
used to love the clip clopping sound of
495
00:41:23.360 --> 00:41:28.320
the horses far better than Yahoo's sort
of heard tooting the ear ones at six
496
00:41:28.360 --> 00:41:30.599
in the morning. I thought that
was that was great. And you know,
497
00:41:30.679 --> 00:41:34.440
collecting the milk, and we didn't
worry too much about the fact that
498
00:41:34.559 --> 00:41:38.119
was left out in the sun,
mostly tootling as we speed. Most of
499
00:41:38.199 --> 00:41:42.360
us survived, you know, just
but we we you don't, right,
500
00:41:42.760 --> 00:41:45.159
And I remember I remember getting a
bottle of milk at school every day.
501
00:41:45.719 --> 00:41:49.679
Yes, there you go. Oh
sorry, you went too? Did they
502
00:41:49.679 --> 00:41:54.920
have school and you know well and
just didn't get along? No, I
503
00:41:54.960 --> 00:41:58.199
mean, hang on, there were
there were there were rocks, won't they.
504
00:41:58.239 --> 00:42:01.880
I mean you didn't actually have a
chure board, right, I suppose
505
00:42:01.920 --> 00:42:06.880
it was the brown dirt around you
you use that, you know. Did
506
00:42:06.920 --> 00:42:09.000
you actually have cutlery? No,
you wouldn't have got Look, it's not
507
00:42:09.119 --> 00:42:14.760
easy milking rocks. No, this
isn't I like the I like to think
508
00:42:14.800 --> 00:42:16.920
that you could pull the bottle top
off and there was that pop of the
509
00:42:16.920 --> 00:42:22.480
bottle top. That was element.
That was very nice. Yeah. And
510
00:42:22.719 --> 00:42:27.079
it was of the good old days
where health wasn't well when when what wasn't
511
00:42:27.079 --> 00:42:30.719
an issue? Health? Health?
Yes? Yes, yes, well,
512
00:42:30.559 --> 00:42:34.199
yes and no. I mean one
of the things that I would say is
513
00:42:34.239 --> 00:42:38.760
that these days there needs to be
a bit of play in the dirt to
514
00:42:38.800 --> 00:42:44.119
build resilience. Does there not?
Right, you can't be too clean,
515
00:42:45.480 --> 00:42:50.639
yeah, So I mean it's it's
the balance between the two. This leads
516
00:42:50.679 --> 00:42:53.800
us into Cat Person, which is
a very long film for what it is.
517
00:42:53.840 --> 00:42:58.719
Peter, it's one hundred and nineteen
minutes. It's a rated This could
518
00:42:58.760 --> 00:43:01.320
have been a ninety minute. Do
you agree. Well, it's based on
519
00:43:01.360 --> 00:43:05.920
a sort of story to begin with. So the answer to that is yes,
520
00:43:06.440 --> 00:43:10.320
yes, very good. Okay,
you're very pliable today. I like
521
00:43:10.400 --> 00:43:17.119
that. Okay. So there's This
is a quirky psychological drama. It does
522
00:43:17.159 --> 00:43:22.119
take its sweet time to ignite.
It comes into its own in the third
523
00:43:22.159 --> 00:43:25.719
act. You've got Margo played by
Amelia Jones. She's this diligent twenty year
524
00:43:25.719 --> 00:43:32.440
old university student specializing in anthropology.
She's got a vivid imagination and she works
525
00:43:32.480 --> 00:43:37.880
part time in the popcorn and candy
bar in an old style movie theater.
526
00:43:37.800 --> 00:43:43.960
Into this cinema walks tall, dark, awkward stranger Robert played by Nicholas Braun,
527
00:43:44.280 --> 00:43:49.440
who's a thirty three year old not
good at small talk. Margo has
528
00:43:49.480 --> 00:43:55.280
an ultra feminist roommate called Taylor.
Taylor is played by Geraldine. I'll get
529
00:43:55.280 --> 00:44:02.039
this wrong. This one a fan
right. She cannot understand why the attraction
530
00:44:02.280 --> 00:44:07.920
is there for Margo to Robert in
the first instance, and she tries to
531
00:44:07.960 --> 00:44:13.519
wound her off as a good friend
does, but there remains something about Robert
532
00:44:13.519 --> 00:44:16.000
that interests Margo. When he turns
up with the movies a second time,
533
00:44:16.400 --> 00:44:22.719
Margo seizes her opportunity. Carp adm
sees that I she fantasizes about what could
534
00:44:22.760 --> 00:44:28.440
be. That's notwithstanding the fact that
she's left to fill the inevitable silences between
535
00:44:28.480 --> 00:44:32.800
them, and a relationship of sorts
developed starting with text messages, but there's
536
00:44:32.840 --> 00:44:37.840
still an uncomfortable, unnatural feel to
it, and as things get physical,
537
00:44:38.199 --> 00:44:44.360
Margo struggles to get over her feelings
of ike. Are you familiar with that
538
00:44:44.480 --> 00:44:51.920
term, Peter H No, Okay. Ike is a modern use of the
539
00:44:51.960 --> 00:44:55.360
word. Yeah, it just doesn't
feel right, but it's quite It's an
540
00:44:55.400 --> 00:44:59.760
automatic, pa, really, ike? Don't you think it's I like the
541
00:44:59.760 --> 00:45:02.480
words anyway, it is. It's
one of these. It should be.
542
00:45:02.559 --> 00:45:06.800
If it's not, it should be
in the dictionary. Anyway. This comfort
543
00:45:06.800 --> 00:45:09.679
turns to fear for Margo, as
she doesn't know how to break things off
544
00:45:10.320 --> 00:45:19.000
and believes that he is stalking her. Susanna Susanna Fogel directs this story,
545
00:45:19.000 --> 00:45:25.039
adapted by Michelle Ashford from a twenty
seventeen New Yorker short story by Kristin Rupinian.
546
00:45:25.719 --> 00:45:30.559
And while I appreciated the eccentric characterizations, I did that the pacing of
547
00:45:30.639 --> 00:45:36.639
much of the film can best be
described as languid, and I would have
548
00:45:36.719 --> 00:45:39.280
liked it to move along more readily. Amelia Jones does have an X factor
549
00:45:39.639 --> 00:45:45.079
particularly appealing actually, she brings emotional
intelligence to the role. Among the best
550
00:45:45.119 --> 00:45:50.800
scenes in the film of Margo's nightmares
and thought bubbles, Geraldine vis Fan is
551
00:45:50.920 --> 00:45:55.119
a scene stealer with her fourth right
take no prisoner's attitude. Nicholas Braun has
552
00:45:55.280 --> 00:46:00.039
arguably the hardest persona to fill because
he could hardly call Robert laikable. He's
553
00:46:00.079 --> 00:46:05.159
often distant, He's a fish out
of water. In fact, I was
554
00:46:05.199 --> 00:46:09.119
left wondering what qualities Margo actually sees
in him that she actually appreciates. And
555
00:46:09.199 --> 00:46:13.280
it appears to me that she merely
loves the thought of having someone special.
556
00:46:14.280 --> 00:46:19.960
Margo and Taylor's musical theater obsessed buddies
add a little bit of fun. Some
557
00:46:20.039 --> 00:46:22.920
may read that to mean cringe value
to this offering. Also, don't be
558
00:46:22.960 --> 00:46:29.719
fooled by the title cat person.
A dog has more screen pime than a
559
00:46:29.719 --> 00:46:34.519
feline. Now that is really a
dichotomy anyway you might explain that to me.
560
00:46:34.599 --> 00:46:37.639
But the film has some delightful moments. It does show promise, but
561
00:46:37.719 --> 00:46:43.960
it doesn't realize it's full potential.
And two hours is too indulgent be done.
562
00:46:44.239 --> 00:46:50.760
Yes, yes, yeah, Look. What disappointed me greatly about this
563
00:46:50.840 --> 00:46:54.559
film is that it was set up
from a short story as a warning to
564
00:46:54.679 --> 00:47:04.400
women about online dating and especially about
male predators, and a problem that it
565
00:47:04.480 --> 00:47:07.280
was set up that way. I
it wasn't a problem was set up that
566
00:47:07.320 --> 00:47:09.920
way, but it was the way
it was done. Is that correct?
567
00:47:10.239 --> 00:47:16.400
Correct? The screenplay I think compromises
the story badly, And I actually I
568
00:47:16.440 --> 00:47:22.519
think even though the setup lives reasonably
well for me and the relationship between the
569
00:47:22.559 --> 00:47:30.079
two people starts off in an interesting
way, it is quite obvious that it's
570
00:47:30.119 --> 00:47:34.800
going to develop in a very predictable
sort of way. And I just didn't
571
00:47:35.760 --> 00:47:40.760
I found the final third of the
film ridiculous. I really did feel that
572
00:47:40.800 --> 00:47:45.639
it was not set up properly for
the way the story develops, and it
573
00:47:45.719 --> 00:47:50.159
just goes completely out of control.
Well, look, I suppose finally something
574
00:47:50.199 --> 00:47:52.239
happens, but it's not in keeping, as you rightly say, with what
575
00:47:52.719 --> 00:47:59.199
happened beforehand. And I mean,
seriously, why would you pursue that relationship?
576
00:47:59.199 --> 00:48:02.480
I still struggle of that. Do
you understand why you would? Is
577
00:48:02.519 --> 00:48:08.599
it quite said that they they're thought
of having someone special? Yes, look,
578
00:48:08.639 --> 00:48:13.480
I agree with you about that.
She was a very downtrodden sort of
579
00:48:13.480 --> 00:48:17.199
cinema worker and she just found this
guy so appealing because he would keep on
580
00:48:17.440 --> 00:48:22.079
ordering popcorn and red vines, which
is something we don't have in Australia,
581
00:48:22.119 --> 00:48:27.599
I don't think. Which is is
that anything like red snakes or red lollies?
582
00:48:27.639 --> 00:48:30.239
Or something. I do not think
we need it. Yeah, very
583
00:48:30.280 --> 00:48:34.440
bad. Anyway, No, I
wasn't going to make any allusions to anything
584
00:48:35.239 --> 00:48:37.559
anything like that, but anyway,
No, the point is that she was
585
00:48:37.599 --> 00:48:42.519
looking for someone in her life.
She felt that this guy was quirky enough
586
00:48:42.559 --> 00:48:49.360
and interesting enough to have a relationship
with, and online they would have this
587
00:48:49.679 --> 00:48:57.159
constant text messaging and I think the
cat person reference comes into their into their
588
00:48:57.159 --> 00:49:00.400
messaging about are you the type of
person wants a cat or wants a dog?
589
00:49:00.760 --> 00:49:05.599
All that sort of thing. So
I think it's that sort of reference.
590
00:49:06.599 --> 00:49:10.559
Look, I really wanted this film
to be much better than it was.
591
00:49:10.679 --> 00:49:15.199
I mean, Susanna Fogel does her
best with a screenplay she's saddled with,
592
00:49:15.559 --> 00:49:20.639
which I don't think is particularly useful
at all. So for me,
593
00:49:20.840 --> 00:49:24.039
it was disappointing. Although I have
to say it was great to see Isabella
594
00:49:24.159 --> 00:49:29.800
Rossellini in the film. It was
great, But I kind of thought,
595
00:49:30.039 --> 00:49:35.320
hmm, now it's a terrible thing
to say, but she is such a
596
00:49:35.360 --> 00:49:39.639
grand actor and this is not This
is not a grand film. Now,
597
00:49:40.400 --> 00:49:44.159
she wouldn't have known that because well, she would act, because you could
598
00:49:44.159 --> 00:49:49.320
have read the script. But I
can't. I want to see her in
599
00:49:49.360 --> 00:49:52.239
grand movies, This is my answer, but I understand that you've got to
600
00:49:52.239 --> 00:49:58.440
work right. So she's been appearing
of late in a number of smaller independent
601
00:49:58.480 --> 00:50:02.159
productions. I saw one of the
film Festival, So I think she's looking
602
00:50:02.199 --> 00:50:08.960
for different, quirky and female lead
films. There aren't roles for older women
603
00:50:09.360 --> 00:50:14.760
enough, yes, exactly, and
so Hope Davis is also in the film
604
00:50:15.039 --> 00:50:19.679
in a small but key role.
So the casting is interesting, is pretty
605
00:50:19.719 --> 00:50:24.000
good. It's the screenplay that lets
the film down considerably. Yeah, I
606
00:50:24.559 --> 00:50:31.519
kind of I'm wondering because in terms
of female roles, older female roles,
607
00:50:31.559 --> 00:50:38.960
the British do it better, but
you typically get the same noteworthy female actors
608
00:50:39.000 --> 00:50:43.599
in them, but you at least
get them. The Americans don't seem to
609
00:50:43.639 --> 00:50:45.039
do a lot of that, do
they, when you think about it.
610
00:50:46.119 --> 00:50:52.519
Or they belittle older people in terms
of you're pandering to them, and I
611
00:50:52.519 --> 00:50:57.800
don't like that either, right,
they feel formulaic. That's a gross generalization,
612
00:50:57.920 --> 00:51:01.639
But I mean, can you think
of too many meaty roles for women
613
00:51:01.679 --> 00:51:07.000
who are let's say sixty five plus? Well known? Lit Old Streep is
614
00:51:07.039 --> 00:51:10.960
now in her early sixties, so
she would be getting more of those meaty
615
00:51:12.079 --> 00:51:15.960
sort of roles, I'm sure,
but European cinema does it much better.
616
00:51:16.800 --> 00:51:21.719
Yeah. I mean again, I
know it's a generalization, but that's that's
617
00:51:21.840 --> 00:51:23.679
that's a it's a real pity,
to be honest, but yeah, I
618
00:51:24.119 --> 00:51:28.960
agree with those words. I wanted
this to be better, and when it
619
00:51:29.039 --> 00:51:30.480
started, I actually thought, oh, oh, this is great. You
620
00:51:30.519 --> 00:51:35.519
know, Amelia Jones I really like
as an actor, and I like the
621
00:51:36.280 --> 00:51:39.159
portrait of her, the character,
her character, et cetera. I like
622
00:51:39.239 --> 00:51:44.639
that, and I thought, okay, and then this sort of guy walks
623
00:51:44.679 --> 00:51:49.480
into a life who just doesn't have
a lot going going for him, and
624
00:51:49.480 --> 00:51:54.760
and I mean it seemed like they
were pushing he suddenly turned, and then
625
00:51:54.840 --> 00:51:58.920
then you meant to question whether he
turned or you know, whether it was
626
00:51:58.960 --> 00:52:01.559
really him or not. Yeah,
let's get a score. Camp person M
627
00:52:01.840 --> 00:52:05.639
rate at one hundred and nineteen minutes, Peter, what do you reckon?
628
00:52:06.000 --> 00:52:08.519
Okay? As a psychological thriller?
I don't think it's particularly effective, but
629
00:52:08.559 --> 00:52:14.320
it is quite predictable. Unfortunately,
should have been a more nuanced film.
630
00:52:14.599 --> 00:52:16.480
I can only give it five out
of ten. Yeah, look, I
631
00:52:16.519 --> 00:52:22.519
think it was better than that,
but I don't think it's Yeah, it's
632
00:52:22.559 --> 00:52:24.719
disappointing, so I'll give it six
and a half. I will give it
633
00:52:24.719 --> 00:52:29.119
six and a half. I like
quirky, but yeah, I wanted to
634
00:52:29.159 --> 00:52:30.719
hang together more than it did.
Peter, thank you very much mate.
635
00:52:30.760 --> 00:52:36.079
We will do it all again very
very soon and be good to one another
636
00:52:36.119 --> 00:52:39.039
and we'll catch up next week on
First On Film and Entertainment.
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
YouTube
iHeartRadio
PocketCasts
Deezer
Spreaker
Podcast Addict
Podchaser
JioSaavn
RSS Feed