April 28, 2023

S26E51: Deep Space Mysteries and Earthly Explosions: Latest Astronomy and Space News

S26E51: Deep Space Mysteries and Earthly Explosions: Latest Astronomy and Space News

In this episode, we explore some of the latest developments in astronomy and space news: Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) from deep space continue to mystify astronomers with their sudden bursts of energy. Last year's Tongan volcanic explosion was confirmed...

In this episode, we explore some of the latest developments in astronomy and space news: Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) from deep space continue to mystify astronomers with their sudden bursts of energy. Last year's Tongan volcanic explosion was confirmed to be the largest natural explosion on Earth in over a century. China has launched a new constellation of spy satellites for Earth observation purposes. The Science Report covers new research linking Vitamin D deficiency to premature death, warnings about the health risks of artificial sweeteners, and a study showing that boys are more likely to report being victims of violence than girls. Listeners can tune into the SpaceTime podcast via the universal listen link https://spacetimewithstuartgary.com/listen and access show links via https://linktr.ee/biteszHQ Additionally, listeners can support the podcast and gain access to bonus content by becoming a SpaceTime crew member through www.bitesz.supercast.com or through premium versions on Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Details on our website at https://spacetimewithstuartgary.com

The Astronomy, Space, Technology & Science News Podcast.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:04.799
This is Spacetime Series twenty six,
episode fifty one, for broadcast on the

2
00:00:04.879 --> 00:00:10.240
twenty eighth of April twenty twenty three. Coming up on Spacetime, the mystery

3
00:00:10.240 --> 00:00:15.720
of fast radio bursts deepen, the
Tongue and volcanic explosion, now regarded as

4
00:00:15.759 --> 00:00:21.920
the biggest in over a century,
and China launches more spy satellites. All

5
00:00:22.000 --> 00:00:32.200
that and more coming up on Spacetime. Welcome to Spacetime with Stewart Gary.

6
00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:51.520
A mysterious blast of energy from the
dark riches a deep space as astronomers scratching

7
00:00:51.560 --> 00:00:56.000
their heads. The blast was a
fast radio burst that seemed to be coming

8
00:00:56.079 --> 00:01:00.960
from a dynamic binary star system,
but the data doesn't add up. Fast

9
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:04.799
radio bursts a sudden, ephemeral blasts
of radio energy, usually lasting just a

10
00:01:04.920 --> 00:01:10.239
nanosecond or so, but releasing more
power in that time than our Sun does

11
00:01:10.319 --> 00:01:15.920
in an entire year. The explosions
occur at very specific wavelength, usually at

12
00:01:15.959 --> 00:01:19.959
cosmic distances in the spiral arms of
galaxies, often beings of light years away.

13
00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:25.319
The first was detected back in two
thousand and seven in data from the

14
00:01:25.359 --> 00:01:30.239
Park's radio telescope in the central west
of New South Wales. Since then,

15
00:01:30.439 --> 00:01:36.040
hundreds more of being detected ultra bright
flashes of radio energy all over the sky,

16
00:01:36.480 --> 00:01:41.480
hundreds of times a day. Some
flashes last just milliseconds, others over

17
00:01:41.519 --> 00:01:46.400
a second, and they can span
a wide range of radio luminosities. The

18
00:01:46.519 --> 00:01:52.239
first bursts were all singular events,
occurring just once at a specific location and

19
00:01:52.319 --> 00:01:56.319
then never again. That suggists they
may have been caused by some sort of

20
00:01:56.359 --> 00:02:01.200
cataclysmic event, such as a supernov
exploding star, But astronomers and a detecting

21
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:07.439
many fast radio bursts that are repeating
from the same location and that suggest a

22
00:02:07.519 --> 00:02:13.000
very different origin. The leading contender
is a highly magnetized neutron star called a

23
00:02:13.080 --> 00:02:17.800
magnetar, but feeding black holes and
glitching neutron stars haven't yet been ruled out.

24
00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:23.039
The different types of FRBs or fast
radio bursts means there could be two

25
00:02:23.159 --> 00:02:29.319
separate sources for these mysterious deep space
blasts, or it could simply be that

26
00:02:29.400 --> 00:02:34.439
all fast radio bursts are repeaters,
with some simply repeating a lot more often

27
00:02:34.439 --> 00:02:38.960
than others. The truth is astronomers
are still struggling to try and make sense

28
00:02:39.000 --> 00:02:44.159
out of it all, But now
a new study in the journal Nature's cast

29
00:02:44.199 --> 00:02:47.520
a new light onto the debate by
providing a treasure trail of data for one

30
00:02:47.599 --> 00:02:53.360
specific repeating fast radio burst, known
as FRB twenty twenty eleven twenty four A.

31
00:02:54.319 --> 00:03:00.599
Meanwhile, separate study the journal Nature
Communications suggest a possible cause for this

32
00:03:00.680 --> 00:03:06.199
repeating burst's behavior. The problem is
the two studies aren't matching up, and

33
00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:10.800
so the debate continues. The monoble
bursts coming from FRB twenty twenty eleven twenty

34
00:03:10.800 --> 00:03:16.879
four A were first detected by CHIME, the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment back

35
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:23.039
in twenty twenty ninety one. Hours
of fin up observations were then made using

36
00:03:23.159 --> 00:03:30.039
China's massive fast or five hundred meter
aperture spherical radio telescope. The authors detected

37
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:35.400
some one eight hundred and sixty three
bursts over fifty four days, and that

38
00:03:35.479 --> 00:03:40.039
represents the largest sample of fast radio
burst observations ever recorded from a single source

39
00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:46.240
that included polarization data. The polarization
data is important because that allows astronomers to

40
00:03:46.319 --> 00:03:51.319
determine the strength of the magnetic field
and the density of the plasma near the

41
00:03:51.360 --> 00:03:57.000
source. But surprisingly they found that
either the magnetic field or the density near

42
00:03:57.000 --> 00:04:00.800
the fast radio burst source kept changing, and the changes were occurring within time

43
00:04:00.800 --> 00:04:06.439
scales of just a few days.
To explain these strange observations, the team

44
00:04:06.520 --> 00:04:11.439
writing in the journal Nature Communications,
which included two of the authors from the

45
00:04:11.560 --> 00:04:15.719
Nature paper, suggested that the fast
radio bursts were being generated in the region

46
00:04:15.759 --> 00:04:19.759
around the magneta, where a strong
magnetic field dominates. But they also say

47
00:04:19.800 --> 00:04:26.000
the magneta must be in a binary
system with a massive spectro type ob bluestar

48
00:04:26.120 --> 00:04:30.560
companion a very specific type of extremely
luminous blue star, which is a circumstanllar

49
00:04:30.680 --> 00:04:36.040
disc of gas, making it a
bee star. They suggested the magneti's violence

50
00:04:36.120 --> 00:04:42.040
supernerva birth probably caused the kick,
sending the orbital plane and the disc plane

51
00:04:42.040 --> 00:04:46.680
into misalignment, and so as the
pair orbit each other, radio bursts from

52
00:04:46.680 --> 00:04:50.959
the magnetar sometimes passed through different parts
of the blue stars disc, thereby creating

53
00:04:50.959 --> 00:04:56.879
the fast changes being observed, and
it all sounds very plausible. The same

54
00:04:56.920 --> 00:05:00.160
sort of thing had been seen before
in another system contain a bee blue star,

55
00:05:00.319 --> 00:05:03.639
this time with a different type of
a neutron star quarter pulsar, and

56
00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:09.800
yet another fast radio burst with similar
properties could also be explained by a system

57
00:05:09.800 --> 00:05:15.000
with a bee blue star companion.
The problem is FB twenty eleven twenty four

58
00:05:15.040 --> 00:05:19.839
A doesn't appear to repeat regularly as
would be expected in the binary system.

59
00:05:20.439 --> 00:05:26.120
So the team decided to observe the
fast radio burst host galaxy using the giant

60
00:05:26.160 --> 00:05:30.040
ten meter Kick telescopes upon Mona k
in Hawaii, and they discovered a metal

61
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:35.079
rich, barred spiral galaxy very similar
to our own Milky Way. The fast

62
00:05:35.199 --> 00:05:40.120
radio burst was spotted erupting in one
of the outer arms, a long way

63
00:05:40.199 --> 00:05:45.360
from the galactic core and not usually
an area known for young stars such as

64
00:05:45.399 --> 00:05:50.000
ob blue stars. Jonathanali, the
editor of Australian Sky and Telescope magazine,

65
00:05:50.319 --> 00:05:55.160
is the best way to make headway
in solving this puzzle is to capture more

66
00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:59.800
data on the fast radio burst,
including a multi wavelength, multi messenger and

67
00:06:00.040 --> 00:06:04.639
multinational approach where scientists can bring together
the observations of many different teams and telescopes

68
00:06:04.800 --> 00:06:09.759
in order to challenge the theory.
So it's been a topic that's been around

69
00:06:09.800 --> 00:06:13.000
for quite a while now because scientist
couldn't figure out what these fast radio bursts

70
00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:15.439
were. A fast radio burst is
something I think it's between anything that last

71
00:06:15.480 --> 00:06:19.399
between three million seconds up to three
seconds, just a burst of radio waves

72
00:06:19.399 --> 00:06:23.959
from something somewhere out in space.
And because they're so brief, you know,

73
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:26.800
you have to be looking in the
right direction at the right time with

74
00:06:26.839 --> 00:06:30.319
a radio telescope order about to pick
it up. So they're actually designed systems

75
00:06:30.319 --> 00:06:31.959
now that are always on the look
for these things so that they can pick

76
00:06:31.959 --> 00:06:35.759
them up and try and then identify
where it's coming from exactly in space.

77
00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:39.560
So they've been trying to pin down
the origin of this phenomenon, and for

78
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:42.639
a long time no one really knew
what produced them. Then some observations,

79
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:45.519
as you said, seem to show
that a kind of star called a magnetar

80
00:06:46.399 --> 00:06:50.279
was the culprit. A magnetar is
a neutron star was a particularly intense magnetic

81
00:06:50.360 --> 00:06:55.120
field. Not all neutron stars are
like this, but Magnetar's arts neutron star

82
00:06:55.199 --> 00:06:59.519
with a really intense magnetic field,
and a neutron star itself is just the

83
00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:02.240
square core of a star that has
exploded. It's sort of one step removed

84
00:07:02.279 --> 00:07:08.040
from forming a black hole. But
now some scientists are not so sure that

85
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:11.399
the magnetire idea is the complete picture, or even whether it's right at all.

86
00:07:11.959 --> 00:07:16.480
That's because some Chinese scientists have started
a particular magnetarre from which fast radio

87
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:25.439
versts have been seen and found that
the magnetic polarization of the radio versts varied

88
00:07:25.560 --> 00:07:29.279
on very short time scales, on
the order of days. And what they've

89
00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:31.439
come up with to explain this is
that as they think there might be another

90
00:07:31.480 --> 00:07:38.399
star, young star orbiting around the
magnetar, and the versts of radio waves

91
00:07:38.399 --> 00:07:42.720
that are coming out of the magneti
a sort of passing through some of this

92
00:07:42.759 --> 00:07:46.560
other star going straight through it,
and thereby end up getting changed the polarization

93
00:07:46.680 --> 00:07:51.480
changes as the radio waves goes through
this companion star. Sounds pretty good.

94
00:07:51.519 --> 00:07:57.160
Scientists think that the reasonable scientific explanation, but other astronomers are not so short.

95
00:07:57.399 --> 00:08:01.839
As you see, this particular source
of fast radio verse is located in

96
00:08:01.879 --> 00:08:07.360
a somewhat emptier area between two spiral
arms in its host galaxy, sort of

97
00:08:07.399 --> 00:08:11.720
like the backblocks of this particular spiral
galaxy, and these astronomers say that this

98
00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:18.879
is not the kind of galactic neighborhood
where you would actually find either magnetars or

99
00:08:18.000 --> 00:08:22.759
this proposed young companion star going around
it. You would think that you would

100
00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:28.040
find a magnetar and young stars in
parts of the galaxy where there's more star

101
00:08:28.079 --> 00:08:31.120
against more stuff going on, rather
than sort of the outskirts of the backblocks.

102
00:08:31.600 --> 00:08:35.919
So if that is the case,
then this thing that they're getting these

103
00:08:35.000 --> 00:08:39.759
radio ways from is not a magnetar, and then perhaps magnetars are not the

104
00:08:39.799 --> 00:08:41.600
answer for these fast radio bursts,
or maybe not for all of them.

105
00:08:41.679 --> 00:08:48.039
And so it seems that it's back
to the drawing board again. And having

106
00:08:48.039 --> 00:08:50.279
said that, I mean, there's
no agreement on this. So some people

107
00:08:50.320 --> 00:08:54.480
say this and some people say that, So we don't know which is right

108
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:58.840
or whether both are wrong or whatever. So it looks like fast radio bursts

109
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:01.480
are going to hold theirs a little
while yet. That's Jonathan Ally, the

110
00:09:01.639 --> 00:09:07.879
editor of Australian Sky and Telescope magazine. And this space time still to come,

111
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:13.080
the tongue and volcanic eruption now believed
to be the biggest volcanic explosion in

112
00:09:13.120 --> 00:09:18.840
a century, and China launching more
spy satellites. All that and more still

113
00:09:18.879 --> 00:09:41.320
to come on spacetime. Scientists have
now confirmed that last year's tongue and volcanic

114
00:09:41.480 --> 00:09:46.919
eruption was the largest natural explosion on
the planet in over a century. In

115
00:09:46.000 --> 00:09:52.399
December twenty twenty one, a series
of eruptions began on Hua Tongue, a

116
00:09:52.519 --> 00:10:00.360
submarine volcano and the Tonguan Archipelago in
the Southern Pacific Ocean. Hunga tong five

117
00:10:00.440 --> 00:10:03.759
kilometers north of Tonga Tapoo, Tonga's
main island, and is part of a

118
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:11.120
highly active specific ring of fire.
The eruption finally reached its massive climax nearly

119
00:10:11.120 --> 00:10:15.240
four weeks later, on the fifteenth
of January twenty twenty two, with a

120
00:10:15.399 --> 00:10:20.039
mega explosion so powerful it could be
heard thousands of kilometers a way in New

121
00:10:20.120 --> 00:10:24.720
Zealand, Fiji. It generated chalk
waves that could be detected five hundred kilometers

122
00:10:24.759 --> 00:10:30.600
out in space that's higher than the
orbit of the International Space Station. The

123
00:10:30.759 --> 00:10:35.720
explosion had a volcanic explosivity in dex
or veei of at least five and was

124
00:10:35.759 --> 00:10:41.799
described by a scientist as a mega
hammer, resulting in the largest volcanic eruption

125
00:10:41.879 --> 00:10:46.000
since the nineteen ninety one eruption of
Mount Pinatubo and the most powerful eruption since

126
00:10:46.000 --> 00:10:52.440
the eighteen eighty three eruption of Kracketza. At its height, the volcano produced

127
00:10:52.440 --> 00:10:58.120
a series of four underwater thrusts,
displacing ten cubic kilometers of rock, ash

128
00:10:58.159 --> 00:11:05.000
and sentiment and generating the largest atmospheric
explosion ever recorded by modern instrumentation. The

129
00:11:05.120 --> 00:11:09.639
eruption also caused megasunamis, with waves
up to forty five meters high along the

130
00:11:09.679 --> 00:11:15.679
coast of Tonga's Taufu Island and waves
up to seventeen meters on the main island

131
00:11:15.679 --> 00:11:20.840
of Tonga Taupu. Tsunamis also struck
Fiji, American Samoa, Vanawatu, and

132
00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:26.559
right along the Pacific rim, including
New Zealand, Japan, the United States,

133
00:11:26.600 --> 00:11:31.440
the Russian Far East, Chile in
Peru. The new analysis, reported

134
00:11:31.440 --> 00:11:35.480
in the journal Science Advances, uses
a combination of before and after satellite imagery,

135
00:11:35.639 --> 00:11:41.240
drone mapping, and field observations collected
by scientists to produce a tsunami simulation

136
00:11:41.399 --> 00:11:46.480
of the Tongan Archipelago. The results
showed that the complex shallow berthemetry of the

137
00:11:46.559 --> 00:11:50.720
region acted as a sort of low
velocity wave track, capturing a more than

138
00:11:50.840 --> 00:11:56.840
hour long tsunami with waves up to
eighty five meters high one minute after the

139
00:11:56.879 --> 00:12:01.159
initial explosion. The studies lead off
at sam Perkis from the University of Miami's

140
00:12:01.279 --> 00:12:07.879
Rosenstiel's School of Marine, Atmospheric and
Earth Sciences says while the eruption rivaled the

141
00:12:07.960 --> 00:12:11.440
eighteen eighty three eruption of Krakatoa,
which killed more than thirty six thousand people,

142
00:12:11.679 --> 00:12:18.600
it claimed far fewer lives despite its
size and long duration. The megasunami

143
00:12:18.679 --> 00:12:22.200
that resulted from Hunga, Tonga,
claimed just four lives. Because of its

144
00:12:22.240 --> 00:12:28.440
location, the COVID nineteen pandemic,
which was keeping people indoors, and increased

145
00:12:28.440 --> 00:12:33.200
evacuation drills carried up by Tongan authorities
in the years prior to the eruption,

146
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:39.840
The study horses suggested that the eruptions
location relative to urban centers saved Tongue from

147
00:12:39.919 --> 00:12:43.480
a worse outcome, But Perkis warns
that while twenty twenty two may have been

148
00:12:43.519 --> 00:12:48.679
a lucky escape, there are lots
of other submarine volcanoes which pose the capacity

149
00:12:48.759 --> 00:12:54.960
to spawn future tsunamis on a similar
scale. He says this eruption holds important

150
00:12:56.039 --> 00:13:03.559
lessons for both past and future tsunamis
in Tonga and beyond this spacetime still to

151
00:13:03.600 --> 00:13:09.360
come. China launches more spy satellites
as it continues it's preparations for war,

152
00:13:09.960 --> 00:13:15.759
and later in the science report new
warnings about the dangers of artificial sweeteners.

153
00:13:16.440 --> 00:13:37.240
All that and more still to come
of spacetime, China has launched a new

154
00:13:37.279 --> 00:13:41.799
constellation of Earth observing satellites. Abought
a long March two D rocket from the

155
00:13:41.879 --> 00:13:48.159
Taiyuan Satellite Launch Center in Juanxi Province. This new constellation is different. It

156
00:13:48.240 --> 00:13:54.039
consist of a central three hundred twenty
kilogram pivot satellite and three two seventy kilogram

157
00:13:54.080 --> 00:13:58.840
assistant satellites. All are equipped with
interferometric synthetic aperture radars, and they can

158
00:14:00.320 --> 00:14:05.639
network is sensitive enough to detect geological
changes at millimeter levels. The mission came

159
00:14:05.679 --> 00:14:09.879
just over a week after the launch
of Acquaiju one, a solid fueled rocket

160
00:14:11.000 --> 00:14:15.720
from the Gaikuan Satellite Launch Center in
the Gobi Desert, carrying four weather satellites

161
00:14:15.720 --> 00:14:20.279
into orbit. Two days earlier,
a four stage long March eleven solid fueled

162
00:14:20.360 --> 00:14:24.480
rocket was also launched from Jaiquan,
this one carrying the classified Chian nineteen spy

163
00:14:24.559 --> 00:14:30.720
satellite into space. The clandestine spacecraft
was placed in a five hundred and eighty

164
00:14:30.759 --> 00:14:35.000
kilometer high orbit. Meanwhile, China
has just launched a long match for b

165
00:14:35.240 --> 00:14:39.440
rocket carrying another weather satellite, the
feng Yu and three Z seven, also

166
00:14:39.519 --> 00:14:45.559
from Jaiquan. Beijing now has an
estimated six hundred and twenty four satellites orbiting

167
00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:50.000
the Earth, including over two hundred
and sixty six Earth Observations, surveillance and

168
00:14:50.039 --> 00:14:54.080
reconnaissance satellites, including at least forty
seven GO thing and some one hundred and

169
00:14:54.080 --> 00:15:16.000
twelve YEAH gangs by satellites. This
is spacetime and time that to take another

170
00:15:16.039 --> 00:15:20.360
brief look at some of the other
stories making using science this week, where

171
00:15:20.399 --> 00:15:24.720
the Science report a new study using
data for more than three hundred thousand people

172
00:15:24.919 --> 00:15:31.159
has found that vitamin DT efficiency may
be causing premature death. The study involved

173
00:15:31.159 --> 00:15:37.919
a technique called Mendelian randomization, which
uses genetics to allow scientists to determine whether

174
00:15:37.039 --> 00:15:41.840
one thing causes another, rather than
the two just being linked. Research is

175
00:15:41.840 --> 00:15:46.480
from the University of South Australia found
that the risk of death decreased steeply with

176
00:15:46.679 --> 00:15:52.759
increasing vitamin D levels up to recommended
levels, and the biggest effect was in

177
00:15:52.840 --> 00:15:58.000
people with severe efficiency. The authors
say more research is needed in order to

178
00:15:58.080 --> 00:16:03.519
identify strategies that will reduced premature risk
of death associated with low vitamin D levels.

179
00:16:06.240 --> 00:16:11.200
A new study warns that artificial sweeteners
should no longer be considered as a

180
00:16:11.200 --> 00:16:15.080
healthy and safe alternative to sugar.
The findings are reported in the British Medical

181
00:16:15.200 --> 00:16:19.720
Journal. Based on a large study
looking at artificial sweetener intake and health,

182
00:16:21.399 --> 00:16:26.080
Scientist looked at dietary intakes and consumption
of artificial sweeteners, as well as other

183
00:16:26.159 --> 00:16:30.360
health and lifestyle factors for over a
hundred thousand French adults. They found that

184
00:16:30.440 --> 00:16:37.960
total artificial sweetener intake was associated with
an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. A

185
00:16:38.080 --> 00:16:42.360
new study shows when it comes to
teen dating violence, boys are more likely

186
00:16:42.399 --> 00:16:48.519
than girls to report being the victim
of violence, either being hit, slapped,

187
00:16:48.600 --> 00:16:52.679
or pushed. That's the surprising finding
of new research reported in the Journal

188
00:16:52.679 --> 00:17:00.399
of Interpersonal Violence. Scientist analyzed data
from three British Columbia adolysts and health these

189
00:17:00.519 --> 00:17:04.920
involving thirty five thousand youth at grade
seven to twelve who were in dating relationships.

190
00:17:06.519 --> 00:17:11.279
They found that overall, fewer teens
are experiencing physical abuse from their dating

191
00:17:11.319 --> 00:17:15.319
partners, with five percent of teens
reporting dating violence, down from six percent

192
00:17:15.440 --> 00:17:19.599
a decade ago. How Whether,
the researchers found five point eight percent of

193
00:17:19.640 --> 00:17:23.480
boys, as opposed to just four
point two percent of girls, said they

194
00:17:23.559 --> 00:17:29.640
had experienced violence during a date in
the past year. The researchers now need

195
00:17:29.720 --> 00:17:36.319
to understand why boys are reporting more
dating violence than girls. If you're a

196
00:17:36.319 --> 00:17:41.119
police detective or investigative journalist, then
you already have a wealth of experience and

197
00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:45.680
resources and background knowledge to help you
separate fact from fiction. And if you

198
00:17:45.759 --> 00:17:51.359
still support the fiction after that,
then you're either stupid or corrupt. But

199
00:17:51.599 --> 00:17:56.880
how does the average person separate fact
from fiction or whether a conspiracy theory has

200
00:17:56.920 --> 00:18:03.680
any validity or it's just propaganda to
push particular viewpoint. Temendum from Australian Skeptics

201
00:18:03.720 --> 00:18:07.559
says they've been lots of studies and
guides on the subject, and now a

202
00:18:07.640 --> 00:18:11.119
new one presents a sivil ten point
plan. Conspiracies pop up all the time.

203
00:18:11.240 --> 00:18:15.079
Sometimes they're justified a lot of signs, they're not a lot of the

204
00:18:15.119 --> 00:18:18.480
times. They're just there to explain
why horrible things happen to you. So

205
00:18:18.599 --> 00:18:21.200
naturally no one can say, oh, that's just bad luck. They have

206
00:18:21.319 --> 00:18:22.880
to say it for them that did
it to me, or them that are

207
00:18:22.920 --> 00:18:26.039
doing it to society, whatever.
So a lot of conspiracies fly around.

208
00:18:26.039 --> 00:18:30.319
They have four hundreds of years.
They're flying around better these days because they've

209
00:18:30.319 --> 00:18:33.079
got social media to spread through it, where they're much the same nature of

210
00:18:33.160 --> 00:18:37.759
things. You know, a group
or a industrial military complex, or a

211
00:18:37.920 --> 00:18:41.680
group of politicians or what everyone and
that have been plotting to rule us and

212
00:18:41.759 --> 00:18:42.960
around the world. And one of
the things that crops up a lot is

213
00:18:42.960 --> 00:18:48.880
acause the secret information about vaccines,
COVID vaccines actually hurting people. Someone wrote

214
00:18:48.880 --> 00:18:53.640
an article fairly recently called the ten
Step Guide to Sense checking conspiracy theory claims

215
00:18:53.920 --> 00:19:00.680
using the recent example of thirty two
Canadian doctors who've died at an early age.

216
00:19:00.039 --> 00:19:03.279
I'm asking, is this proof of
a problem with vaccines? Now?

217
00:19:03.319 --> 00:19:07.079
Presumably because they're doctors, they have
had vaccines, and presumably they've had more

218
00:19:07.119 --> 00:19:11.759
than one. So he gives these
rules for what you should look at using

219
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:15.279
this example, but more broadly applicable, so one you evaluate the reliability of

220
00:19:15.319 --> 00:19:18.880
the source, if it's coming from
the net, if it's coming from some

221
00:19:18.319 --> 00:19:22.720
person who's a rat bag, or
something continual campaign or against vaccines you assume

222
00:19:22.839 --> 00:19:26.079
they've got that particular for the line
of approach, line of an argument.

223
00:19:26.160 --> 00:19:30.279
You look for other sources. If
you see the same wording, repeat the

224
00:19:30.359 --> 00:19:33.359
repeat the repeater, that just means
their copy and pasting. So you look

225
00:19:33.400 --> 00:19:36.960
for something that's independent. The third
aspect is looking for ground zero, which

226
00:19:37.000 --> 00:19:38.160
is what's the basis of the claim? Do you try and find where it

227
00:19:38.160 --> 00:19:41.400
originally came from? All right,
then you might medical journal or whatever.

228
00:19:41.480 --> 00:19:45.519
Yeah, medical journal be one thing. Someone on the net, on their

229
00:19:45.599 --> 00:19:48.599
podcasts or on their website, et
cetera, is probably not necessarily the best

230
00:19:48.680 --> 00:19:49.640
sort of source to go to it. Now, thiss is you, of

231
00:19:49.640 --> 00:19:55.039
course space your thing is definitely on
the good side of things, but someone

232
00:19:55.079 --> 00:19:57.319
who has a particular acts to grind
might not be the best person to take

233
00:19:57.359 --> 00:20:00.680
evidence from. Okay, Then you
look at the mote is why are people

234
00:20:00.720 --> 00:20:03.400
doing it? Obviously, conspiracy theories
are to explain things that they're doing to

235
00:20:03.519 --> 00:20:07.559
me, and it wasn't my fault, it was them, And therefore you

236
00:20:07.559 --> 00:20:11.000
look at sort of why they're sort
of saying these things. Then you evaluate

237
00:20:11.039 --> 00:20:14.079
the claims individually. You look at
them and say, is this correct?

238
00:20:14.279 --> 00:20:18.480
Dis these things actually happen and truth
of statements made in the conspiracy theory?

239
00:20:18.559 --> 00:20:22.000
Are they just generalizations or do they
actually have some basis in fact? And

240
00:20:22.119 --> 00:20:26.119
that means you look at a sixth
element, which is contextualizing the claims,

241
00:20:26.240 --> 00:20:30.440
seeing how they fit in with these
thirty two Canadian doctors. How many doctors

242
00:20:30.480 --> 00:20:33.000
would die at a young age in
Canada, And they're close to one hundred

243
00:20:33.079 --> 00:20:37.920
thousand doctors in Canada, so a
fair number of them will die early and

244
00:20:37.000 --> 00:20:41.240
die young. In fact, this
article points out that they probably didn't die

245
00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:44.920
of vaccine poising, which is what
the conspiracy theory is saying. In fact,

246
00:20:44.960 --> 00:20:48.160
there should be more than thirty two
who have died. Have you just

247
00:20:48.279 --> 00:20:51.880
chosen out these thirty two because they
sort of fit your preconception? People die

248
00:20:51.880 --> 00:20:55.160
all the time, Unfortunately a lot
of people die young. But these ones

249
00:20:55.200 --> 00:20:56.440
they talk about, some of them
were up in their sixties, so they

250
00:20:56.440 --> 00:21:02.359
stop that young. So therefore it's
cherry picking evidence. It's not giving enough

251
00:21:02.480 --> 00:21:07.039
context to what these claims are.
I've heard other things theories performed about these

252
00:21:07.079 --> 00:21:10.839
persons died young because they had a
vaccine and a vaccine injury, et cetera

253
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:12.640
cause them to die for she COVID
vaccines, they're saying, and some of

254
00:21:12.640 --> 00:21:15.880
the examples they use are so far
out. Now the least one case where

255
00:21:15.880 --> 00:21:18.599
someone died in a car crash,
their death at a young age, you're

256
00:21:18.640 --> 00:21:22.319
cited as being a vaccine death.
Then again, you hear people who die

257
00:21:22.359 --> 00:21:23.519
in their eighties or nineties, and
they also say, well, that's a

258
00:21:23.599 --> 00:21:27.359
vaccine injuries, and excuse me,
they're old people die. Seventh point,

259
00:21:27.400 --> 00:21:32.400
You look at the consistency of the
darker set, and that doesn't apply over

260
00:21:32.440 --> 00:21:34.359
a whole period of time. Look
at the bigger picture, in other words,

261
00:21:34.480 --> 00:21:37.200
and see if there is a theme
running through this or if there is

262
00:21:37.279 --> 00:21:41.240
not. You look for questionable assertions
the only word sort of outrageous claims at

263
00:21:41.400 --> 00:21:45.839
rageous phraseology. You come down to
do a what this article caused? A

264
00:21:45.880 --> 00:21:49.960
plausibility smell test. If it smells
off, it probably is off. If

265
00:21:49.960 --> 00:21:53.359
it seems dodgy, it probably is
dodgy. A claim that is too good

266
00:21:53.359 --> 00:21:56.279
to be true, it probably is
not true. So you just look at

267
00:21:56.279 --> 00:22:00.440
it from you stand back. You
think, does this make sense but doesn't

268
00:22:00.480 --> 00:22:03.000
sound a bit dodgy? Who's the
person telling me? Etc? And then

269
00:22:03.039 --> 00:22:04.759
you ask an expert. If you
can, you ask someone who actually knows

270
00:22:04.759 --> 00:22:08.039
what they're talking about and doesn't have
a particular act to grind and see where

271
00:22:08.079 --> 00:22:12.359
they think. So there's ten steps
to going through conspiracy theories, from looking

272
00:22:12.400 --> 00:22:17.039
at the source, looking at the
data, the evidence being put forward,

273
00:22:17.119 --> 00:22:19.319
how is it phrased, does it
make sense, what is the truth of

274
00:22:19.319 --> 00:22:22.440
it within a context? Are they
just cherry picking out a particular bit of

275
00:22:22.519 --> 00:22:26.119
data, does it smell off?
And what do the experts think rather than

276
00:22:26.200 --> 00:22:30.799
the person on their blog. I'm
an anti baccer dot blogs, you know

277
00:22:30.880 --> 00:22:33.400
sort of thing. And that's the
philosophy for life when you think about it,

278
00:22:33.480 --> 00:22:37.880
is it is? I mean it's
basically critical thinking, critical thinking sis.

279
00:22:37.920 --> 00:22:40.480
I want to look at the evidence
before I make a decision. I'm

280
00:22:40.480 --> 00:23:00.200
not going to just leap in.
That's timendum from Australian Skeptics and that's the

281
00:23:00.279 --> 00:23:06.440
show for now. Spacetime is available
every Monday, Wednesday and Friday through Apple

282
00:23:06.519 --> 00:23:11.400
Podcasts, iTunes, Stitcher, Google
podcast pocket Casts, Spotify, Acast,

283
00:23:11.599 --> 00:23:18.240
Amazon Music, bytes dot Com,
SoundCloud, YouTube, your favorite podcast download

284
00:23:18.279 --> 00:23:22.960
provider, and from Spacetime with Stewart
Gary dot Com. Spacetime's also broadcast through

285
00:23:22.960 --> 00:23:29.240
the National Science Foundation, on Science
Zone Radio and on both iHeartRadio and tune

286
00:23:29.240 --> 00:23:33.440
In Radio. And you can help
to support our show by visiting the Spacetime

287
00:23:33.480 --> 00:23:37.880
Store for a range of promotional merchandising
goodies, or by becoming a Spacetime Patron,

288
00:23:37.960 --> 00:23:41.640
which gives you access to triple episode
commercial free versions of the show,

289
00:23:41.839 --> 00:23:45.599
as well as lots of burnus audio
content which doesn't go to war, access

290
00:23:45.640 --> 00:23:51.319
to our exclusive Facebook group, and
other rewards. Just go to Spacetime with

291
00:23:51.400 --> 00:23:56.079
Stewart Gary dot com for full details, and if you want more Spacetime please

292
00:23:56.160 --> 00:23:59.039
check out our blog where you'll find
all the stuff we couldn't fit in the

293
00:23:59.079 --> 00:24:03.359
show, as well heaps of images, news stories, loads of videos and

294
00:24:03.480 --> 00:24:07.799
things on the whereby find interesting or
amusing. Just go to Spacetime with Stewart

295
00:24:07.839 --> 00:24:11.839
Gary dot Tumbler dot com. That's
all one word, and that's Tumbler without

296
00:24:11.839 --> 00:24:15.519
the E. You can also follow
us through at Stewart Garry on Twitter,

297
00:24:15.920 --> 00:24:21.720
at Spacetime with Stewart Garry, on
Instagram, through our Spacetime YouTube channel,

298
00:24:21.920 --> 00:24:26.119
and on Facebook. Just go to
Facebook dot com, forward slash, Spacetime

299
00:24:26.160 --> 00:24:30.839
with Stewart Gary and Spacetime is brought
to you in collaboration with Australian Sky and

300
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:36.200
Telescope magazine, Your window on the
universe. You've been listening to Spacetime with

301
00:24:36.319 --> 00:24:42.640
Stewart Gary. This has been another
quality podcast production from bytes dot com.