Sept. 15, 2026

Lunar Mysteries and Snowball Earth: Unraveling Cosmic Enigmas

Lunar Mysteries and Snowball Earth: Unraveling Cosmic Enigmas
Spotify Apple Podcasts Youtube Music iHeartRadio Spreaker PocketCasts Amazon Music YouTube Castbox Deezer TuneIn Rumble Overcast Podcast Addict Podchaser JioSaavn Castro RSS Feed
Spotify podcast player icon Spotify Spotify Apple Podcasts podcast player icon Apple Podcasts Apple Podcasts Youtube Music podcast player icon Youtube Music Youtube Music iHeartRadio podcast player icon iHeartRadio iHeartRadio Spreaker podcast player icon Spreaker Spreaker PocketCasts podcast player icon PocketCasts PocketCasts Amazon Music podcast player icon Amazon Music Amazon Music YouTube podcast player icon YouTube YouTube Castbox podcast player icon Castbox Castbox Deezer podcast player icon Deezer Deezer TuneIn podcast player icon TuneIn TuneIn Rumble podcast player icon Rumble Rumble Overcast podcast player icon Overcast Overcast Podcast Addict podcast player icon Podcast Addict Podcast Addict Podchaser podcast player icon Podchaser Podchaser JioSaavn podcast player icon JioSaavn JioSaavn Castro podcast player icon Castro Castro RSS Feed podcast player icon RSS Feed RSS Feed
Season 29
SpaceTime Series 29 Episode 110 Lunar far side rocks rewriting history A new study claims the timing and intensity of asteroid bombardment across the lunar surface declined gradually, rather than being a short, intense burst of impacts as previously thought. The crystals that might have made Snow Ball Earth worse A new study claims planet Earth may have been pushed deeper into a global deep freeze known as snowball Earth by something as ordinary as salt. Meteor strike reported off the Western Australian coast The European Space Agency’s Near Earth Objects co-ordination centre has reported a meteor impact in the Indian Ocean off the coast of north western Australia. The Science Report Warnings of a ten percent chase that AI could cause human extinction within the next decade. The world enters a new era of artificial general intelligence with the release of GPT-6 Astra. A new study has shown that Psychiatrists agree on a diagnosis in only 55% of cases. The 2026 Ig Nobels handed out in Switzerland showing what happens to old undies. Skeptics guide to the truth about surveys.

Our Guests This Week Dr Fred Jourdan from Curtin University ESA BepiColombo Project Scientist Johannes Benkhoff DLR Planetary Scientist Jorn Helbert Our regular guests: Alex Zaharov-Reutt from techadvice.life Tim Mendham from Australian Skeptics 🌏 Get Our Exclusive NordVPN deal here ➼ www.bitesz.com/nordvpn . The discounts and bonuses are incredible! And it’s risk-free with Nord’s 30-day money-back guarantee! ✌ If you’d like to support the podcast and gain access to bonus content by becoming a SpaceTime crew member, you can do just that through The Big Bang editions on Patreon, Spotify and Apple Podcasts. Details on the Support page on our website https://www.bitesz.com/show/spacetime/support/ For more SpaceTime and show links: https://linktr.ee/biteszHQ If you love this podcast, please get someone else to listen too. Thank you…

The Astronomy, Space, Technology & Science News Podcast.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:03.919
This is Space Time, Series 29, Episode 110, full broadcast

2
00:00:03.960 --> 00:00:08.220
on the 14th of September, 2026. Coming up on Space Time,

3
00:00:08.859 --> 00:00:12.800
the lunar far side rocks which are rewriting history, the

4
00:00:12.859 --> 00:00:17.179
crystals that may have made snowball Earth even worse, and

5
00:00:17.199 --> 00:00:21.559
a meteor strike reported off the Western Australian coast. All

6
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:24.480
that and more coming up on Space Time.

7
00:00:25.859 --> 00:00:27.920
Welcome to Space Time.

8
00:00:27.760 --> 00:00:46.780
With Stuart Gary. Music A new study claims that the

9
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:50.640
timing and intensity of asteroid bombardment across the lunar surface

10
00:00:50.880 --> 00:00:54.740
actually declined rather gradually, rather than being a short intense

11
00:00:54.799 --> 00:00:58.960
burst of impacts which stopped abruptly as previously thought. The

12
00:00:59.000 --> 00:01:03.219
discovery reported in the journal Science Advances, based on samples

13
00:01:03.299 --> 00:01:05.659
of regolith brought back from the far side of the

14
00:01:05.700 --> 00:01:10.450
moon by China's Chang'e 6 mission in June 2024. These

15
00:01:10.549 --> 00:01:14.609
findings are helping astronomers uncover how asteroid impacts helped shape

16
00:01:14.670 --> 00:01:18.500
the early solar system. And they challenged decades of thinking

17
00:01:18.670 --> 00:01:22.560
about when those impacts occurred, in the process offering new

18
00:01:22.640 --> 00:01:27.579
insights into the conditions which influenced Earth's evolution. Unlike Earth,

19
00:01:27.739 --> 00:01:31.519
where ancient geological evidence has been largely erased by erosion,

20
00:01:31.599 --> 00:01:35.810
volcanic activity and shifting tectonic plates, the Moon has preserved

21
00:01:35.890 --> 00:01:40.030
a record of impacts stretching back billions of years. One

22
00:01:40.049 --> 00:01:43.450
of the study's authors, Fred Jourdan from Curtin University, says

23
00:01:43.560 --> 00:01:46.599
the lunar samples brought back by Chang'e 6 act as

24
00:01:46.659 --> 00:01:49.920
a sort of natural archive of the solar system's history,

25
00:01:50.079 --> 00:01:53.400
allowing scientists to investigate events that occurred shortly after the

26
00:01:53.459 --> 00:01:57.900
planets formed 4.6 billion years ago. And the samples collected

27
00:01:57.939 --> 00:02:01.180
from the lunar far side are especially significant. That's because

28
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:04.120
they allow scientists to compare two very different parts of

29
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:07.250
the moon at the same time. See, until now, almost

30
00:02:07.349 --> 00:02:10.430
everything we know about the moon came from the lunar nearside,

31
00:02:10.490 --> 00:02:14.090
the one facing the Earth. Jourdan says by analysing these

32
00:02:14.250 --> 00:02:16.909
ancient lunar rocks from both the near and far side,

33
00:02:17.050 --> 00:02:20.729
scientists can better understand when major asteroid impacts occurred and

34
00:02:20.810 --> 00:02:24.530
how the early solar system evolved. He says the far

35
00:02:24.569 --> 00:02:27.719
side preserves a cleaner record of these earliest impacts because

36
00:02:27.789 --> 00:02:30.960
it was much less affected by later geological events compared

37
00:02:30.979 --> 00:02:33.099
to the near side of the moon, the side facing

38
00:02:33.159 --> 00:02:36.439
the Earth. Therefore, he says, these samples are helping to

39
00:02:36.500 --> 00:02:39.389
rewrite parts of the moon's history, and they suggest that

40
00:02:39.430 --> 00:02:42.650
the early solar system experienced a long, slow decline in

41
00:02:42.729 --> 00:02:47.169
asteroid impacts rather than a single catastrophic late heavy bombardment.

42
00:02:48.370 --> 00:02:51.629
The authors reached their conclusions by analysing tiny fragments of

43
00:02:51.689 --> 00:02:56.830
lunar regolith, revealing impact events spanning about 4.33 to 1.13

44
00:02:56.830 --> 00:03:00.250
billion years ago, allowing them to reconstruct more than 3

45
00:03:00.250 --> 00:03:04.710
billion years of lunar impact history. Jourdan says understanding the

46
00:03:04.750 --> 00:03:07.949
moon's impact history will also provide important clues about the

47
00:03:08.009 --> 00:03:11.289
Earth's own past. That's because the moon and Earth share

48
00:03:11.330 --> 00:03:13.610
a common history. They're both in the same part of

49
00:03:13.650 --> 00:03:17.330
the solar system, and therefore experience the same sort of environment.

50
00:03:17.949 --> 00:03:20.870
But the evidence of early impacts has been largely erased

51
00:03:20.930 --> 00:03:24.639
from the Earth. He says because the Moon and Earth

52
00:03:24.719 --> 00:03:28.120
formed together, every major impact recorded on the Moon tells

53
00:03:28.199 --> 00:03:31.340
us something about the sorts of conditions experienced by the

54
00:03:31.379 --> 00:03:32.479
young Earth as well.

55
00:03:32.699 --> 00:03:37.340
They were obviously a fantastic opportunity to get some data

56
00:03:37.689 --> 00:03:40.770
on a place we'd never been before. Because, of course,

57
00:03:40.949 --> 00:03:44.590
Apollo went to the near side of the Moon. and

58
00:03:44.650 --> 00:03:47.710
went a couple of times, and we had 50 years

59
00:03:47.810 --> 00:03:50.889
to study those rocks. We learned so much from them,

60
00:03:50.909 --> 00:03:53.939
and we keep learning some new stuff. But now this

61
00:03:54.030 --> 00:03:56.740
is a different game. This is the far side, and

62
00:03:56.840 --> 00:04:00.400
we've never been there. So the Chinese, they decided to

63
00:04:00.500 --> 00:04:02.620
be the first one to explore this side of the

64
00:04:02.659 --> 00:04:06.539
moon and collect some rocks, and they were successful, which

65
00:04:06.620 --> 00:04:11.090
is amazing considering that you can't talk to any spacecraft

66
00:04:11.229 --> 00:04:14.449
that goes beyond the moon. That's why the Americans never

67
00:04:14.509 --> 00:04:17.689
send anything. But they send a satellite that could communicate

68
00:04:17.750 --> 00:04:20.930
so they could make this mission successful. So two years ago,

69
00:04:20.949 --> 00:04:24.980
they sent their spacecraft, landed, grabbed some soil, did a

70
00:04:25.000 --> 00:04:28.360
bit of drilling, not too deep, very shallow, a few

71
00:04:28.420 --> 00:04:32.519
tenths of centimeter, collect those rocks. and bring them back

72
00:04:32.579 --> 00:04:35.800
to Earth. So two kilos of rocks from a part

73
00:04:35.899 --> 00:04:40.069
we never studied before. So everybody was really excited about that.

74
00:04:40.410 --> 00:04:44.290
What our study did is to look at rocks that

75
00:04:44.389 --> 00:04:48.470
were impacted because on the near side, the rocks that

76
00:04:48.769 --> 00:04:54.069
are impacted tell a really interesting story and also an

77
00:04:54.829 --> 00:04:59.500
hypothesis that looks really fantastic. The late heavy bombardment. So

78
00:04:59.579 --> 00:05:02.100
what that means is that the near side of the

79
00:05:02.139 --> 00:05:05.740
moon record a period or seems to record a period

80
00:05:05.939 --> 00:05:11.079
where bombardment intensified. So a lot of asteroid struck in

81
00:05:11.139 --> 00:05:14.509
a very narrow period of time. So some people thought like, well,

82
00:05:14.550 --> 00:05:18.829
maybe Jupiter moved and pushed some asteroid and intensified the bombardment.

83
00:05:18.990 --> 00:05:22.209
A lot of hypotheses, a lot of ideas. And quite frankly,

84
00:05:22.230 --> 00:05:25.279
that would be absolutely amazing. But we have just a

85
00:05:25.329 --> 00:05:28.399
tiny area of the moon where the Apollo mission landed.

86
00:05:28.600 --> 00:05:28.980
That's all.

87
00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:31.680
So If I want to do an analogy, it's like

88
00:05:31.720 --> 00:05:35.870
you want to know the geology of Australia, but you

89
00:05:35.899 --> 00:05:38.310
just land in Perth and you study there. So if

90
00:05:38.350 --> 00:05:40.110
you do that, you're going to miss that we had

91
00:05:40.170 --> 00:05:43.930
recent mechanism in Melbourne or the Great Reef Barrier now,

92
00:05:44.120 --> 00:05:45.980
things like that. So you want to go to a

93
00:05:46.019 --> 00:05:48.680
place we've never been before. So that's what they did.

94
00:05:48.860 --> 00:05:54.079
So we analyzed... that have been impacted as well, but

95
00:05:54.189 --> 00:05:56.629
from a different place this time. And we look if

96
00:05:56.670 --> 00:06:01.329
we see a similar story of this late heavy bombardment

97
00:06:01.430 --> 00:06:05.490
or if we see something different. Actually, we saw something

98
00:06:05.750 --> 00:06:10.509
really different. We didn't see any late-evite bombardment signature, no

99
00:06:10.589 --> 00:06:14.629
spike at all. And that's why this story is fascinating,

100
00:06:14.689 --> 00:06:16.180
because it tells something else.

101
00:06:16.250 --> 00:06:18.600
What are the sort of signatures you were looking for?

102
00:06:18.759 --> 00:06:21.660
So we look at those tiny rocks and we date them.

103
00:06:21.699 --> 00:06:24.959
So we look at their age. Each impact, it's going

104
00:06:24.980 --> 00:06:28.300
to melt the rock that it impacts of a large area.

105
00:06:28.819 --> 00:06:32.860
And it's going to reset the chronometer in this rock.

106
00:06:32.899 --> 00:06:36.319
So we use argon-argon dating. So it's the decay of

107
00:06:36.459 --> 00:06:40.620
potassium in argon. It's a naturally occurring process. And we

108
00:06:40.740 --> 00:06:42.740
use that to measure the age of the rock. So

109
00:06:42.920 --> 00:06:47.540
we analyze 28 small pieces of melt rocks. And each

110
00:06:47.600 --> 00:06:50.439
of them give a different ages. And they were really,

111
00:06:50.519 --> 00:06:54.370
really good ages. But we didn't see any age concentration

112
00:06:54.529 --> 00:07:00.149
around 3.9. And even better, we saw older age than 3.9.

113
00:07:00.149 --> 00:07:04.470
So the older we got was 4.33 billion. And in

114
00:07:04.509 --> 00:07:09.269
terms of impact basin that we dated on March, The

115
00:07:09.290 --> 00:07:11.730
near side, we didn't see age that old. So we

116
00:07:11.810 --> 00:07:15.540
saw a completely different story that seems to say that

117
00:07:15.579 --> 00:07:19.379
there's no late heavy bombardment on the moon. But one

118
00:07:19.480 --> 00:07:22.220
side said there's a late heavy bombardment. The other one

119
00:07:22.279 --> 00:07:26.180
says not. We have a contradiction because the bombardment should

120
00:07:26.220 --> 00:07:27.339
be the same everywhere.

121
00:07:27.360 --> 00:07:29.290
When you look at the moon, there is a dichotomy

122
00:07:29.319 --> 00:07:30.990
there in the way it looks on the surface.

123
00:07:31.290 --> 00:07:36.910
Yes, but people tend to mistake those dark patches. They

124
00:07:36.970 --> 00:07:40.569
are not the impact basin. They are the lava flow

125
00:07:41.069 --> 00:07:45.949
that fills the impact basin. So impact basin is just

126
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:49.139
a very large impact crater on the moon. And the

127
00:07:49.240 --> 00:07:52.819
impact basin on the far side and on the near side,

128
00:07:52.959 --> 00:07:55.459
it's about the same number. In fact, there's a tiny

129
00:07:55.579 --> 00:07:58.540
bit difference. bigger one on the far side. So in

130
00:07:58.579 --> 00:08:01.319
terms of impact basin, yeah, the moon is homogenous. So

131
00:08:01.399 --> 00:08:05.089
both sides record the same thing as they should. If anything,

132
00:08:05.129 --> 00:08:07.769
the near side should be maybe protected a bit by

133
00:08:07.829 --> 00:08:10.930
the Earth, which should act like a shield. So it

134
00:08:11.029 --> 00:08:14.269
shouldn't be more impacted than the far side. So both

135
00:08:14.310 --> 00:08:17.009
should record the same thing. People tend to think like, oh, look,

136
00:08:17.050 --> 00:08:20.209
there's more crater on the near side. It's just because

137
00:08:20.230 --> 00:08:23.649
they are filled by this dark lava, so they stand

138
00:08:23.750 --> 00:08:26.310
out more. But that's exactly the same from both sides.

139
00:08:26.350 --> 00:08:28.269
That's because both the near and far side appear to

140
00:08:28.310 --> 00:08:30.230
have different geologies below the surface.

141
00:08:30.610 --> 00:08:35.600
Yeah, absolutely. It's the thickness of the crust, the fact

142
00:08:35.639 --> 00:08:40.259
that the moon is tidally locked looking at the Earth

143
00:08:40.299 --> 00:08:45.620
from the near side. All that influences the volcanism. But

144
00:08:45.679 --> 00:08:49.320
in terms of impact, impact, it's a very random process.

145
00:08:49.340 --> 00:08:51.639
So it should be really the same on both sides.

146
00:08:51.799 --> 00:08:55.000
But like I said, the two studies or series of

147
00:08:55.059 --> 00:09:00.490
studies show kind of different answers. So what gives? Actually,

148
00:09:00.509 --> 00:09:04.529
I would argue that the far side is a much

149
00:09:04.629 --> 00:09:08.250
cleaner record of the general bombardment. So why is that?

150
00:09:08.450 --> 00:09:12.820
Number one, we generate a lot and we, the scientific community,

151
00:09:12.879 --> 00:09:15.960
generate a lot of dating on the near side but

152
00:09:16.000 --> 00:09:18.299
the problem is a lot of them they are old

153
00:09:18.480 --> 00:09:20.240
in the sense like that they have been done a

154
00:09:20.740 --> 00:09:25.019
while ago where people didn't fully appreciate and understand the

155
00:09:25.240 --> 00:09:28.399
organ system so now we have a much better understanding

156
00:09:28.740 --> 00:09:32.100
and we can see that many of those data they

157
00:09:32.320 --> 00:09:35.720
shouldn't have been interpreted as a real age they were

158
00:09:36.059 --> 00:09:41.399
modified by subsequent impact Therefore, they were not really dating anything.

159
00:09:41.639 --> 00:09:46.330
If you clean the database of Argon Age from those

160
00:09:46.659 --> 00:09:51.190
data that are dubious, then it becomes much clearer. And

161
00:09:51.289 --> 00:09:54.549
you see that what people have been dating for years

162
00:09:54.889 --> 00:09:59.970
is one single event. It's embryo. So everything was polluted.

163
00:10:00.860 --> 00:10:04.360
by embryo. So when people dated so many things, all

164
00:10:04.399 --> 00:10:07.299
the age were a bit perturbed. So it seems like

165
00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:13.049
it's a range around 3.9 over like 200 million years. No, actually, no.

166
00:10:13.350 --> 00:10:16.169
Once you clean that, it's only 3.92 and it's one event.

167
00:10:19.029 --> 00:10:24.080
So it's a bit of geological bias here. Embryum happened,

168
00:10:24.299 --> 00:10:27.580
spread all over the surface, and people keep picking those

169
00:10:27.659 --> 00:10:30.480
rocks that have been affected by embryum. There was never

170
00:10:30.679 --> 00:10:35.039
any late heavy bombardment. It was just a continuous bombardment

171
00:10:35.240 --> 00:10:39.500
of the moon. And embryum gave us a false direction,

172
00:10:39.570 --> 00:10:42.269
if you want. And it's not embryum. It's more like

173
00:10:42.370 --> 00:10:44.990
because the way the data they were interpreted, they looked

174
00:10:45.049 --> 00:10:49.629
like they spread, whereas they weren't spreading. Now, with modern eyes,

175
00:10:49.710 --> 00:10:52.450
you look at those old data and you generate some new.

176
00:10:52.529 --> 00:10:56.049
You can see that you date one impact basin, maybe

177
00:10:56.110 --> 00:10:59.840
two with serenitatis as well. But that's about it. So

178
00:11:00.129 --> 00:11:03.059
you can't really tell that there's many impacts if you

179
00:11:03.080 --> 00:11:06.600
date only one or two. And a second, after that,

180
00:11:06.840 --> 00:11:09.340
as we mentioned, you know, you get those dark patches.

181
00:11:09.700 --> 00:11:11.799
This is the lava flow. So the lava flow, they

182
00:11:11.879 --> 00:11:15.409
cover and they erase. It's a sort of a natural

183
00:11:15.490 --> 00:11:20.480
moon erosion. They erase the trace of a previous impact melt.

184
00:11:20.639 --> 00:11:22.990
So we can't really date anything because a lot of

185
00:11:23.070 --> 00:11:25.730
it has been erased by the lava flow. So the

186
00:11:26.049 --> 00:11:29.450
near side record is a bit compromised that way. The

187
00:11:29.529 --> 00:11:33.559
far side is much cleaner as far as impacts are.

188
00:11:33.820 --> 00:11:37.059
are concerned because you don't have that many Maya. You

189
00:11:37.080 --> 00:11:39.779
get really a few and can see that in the

190
00:11:40.240 --> 00:11:44.360
far side, especially where they landed, the South Pole, Aitken Basin,

191
00:11:44.519 --> 00:11:48.149
inside the Apollo crater, it hasn't been affected at all

192
00:11:48.210 --> 00:11:52.350
by embryo. We didn't see any 3.9 age, maybe one,

193
00:11:52.649 --> 00:11:55.370
very close, but that's about it. So nothing has been

194
00:11:55.429 --> 00:11:56.110
ejected there.

195
00:11:56.210 --> 00:11:57.070
It was protected.

196
00:11:57.309 --> 00:12:01.269
And there was no subsequent big lava plain that covered everything.

197
00:12:01.549 --> 00:12:04.139
It was a lava flow. I think colleagues dated it

198
00:12:04.360 --> 00:12:08.220
at 2.8 billion, but that's about it. Not a range

199
00:12:08.259 --> 00:12:11.019
of lava flow, just one occurrence, at least in the

200
00:12:11.210 --> 00:12:14.129
rock record we have. So the conclusion of our paper

201
00:12:14.450 --> 00:12:17.389
is very simple. It's like it builds on what people

202
00:12:17.450 --> 00:12:22.259
start to suspect. that there was never any late heavy bombardment,

203
00:12:22.480 --> 00:12:24.899
as simple as that. And frankly, this is much more

204
00:12:24.940 --> 00:12:28.519
logical that impact had occurred more at the beginning of

205
00:12:28.559 --> 00:12:31.559
the solar system because there were more asteroids floating around

206
00:12:31.779 --> 00:12:35.370
and gradually declined and declined until, you know, now it's

207
00:12:35.519 --> 00:12:37.629
fairly weak. We see small impacts.

208
00:12:37.649 --> 00:12:37.950
Thankfully.

209
00:12:38.389 --> 00:12:38.990
Yeah.

210
00:12:39.309 --> 00:12:39.570
Oh, yeah.

211
00:12:39.610 --> 00:12:42.429
You can imagine an impact on us, the size of

212
00:12:42.509 --> 00:12:47.440
South Pole Aitken. So the crater is 2,500 kilometers. You

213
00:12:47.480 --> 00:12:51.580
compare that with Chicxulub that extinguished the dinosaur at 180 kilometers.

214
00:12:56.330 --> 00:12:59.570
And another magnitude larger. So you can imagine the effect

215
00:12:59.629 --> 00:13:01.960
of that on us. So yet, thankfully, we don't see

216
00:13:01.980 --> 00:13:02.679
that anymore.

217
00:13:02.740 --> 00:13:06.179
Does this alter things like Nice model or its Charles

218
00:13:06.200 --> 00:13:09.570
de Grand hypothesis in terms of planetary migration? Does it

219
00:13:09.809 --> 00:13:12.019
take anything from that? Does it add something to it?

220
00:13:12.049 --> 00:13:12.289
Does it?

221
00:13:13.129 --> 00:13:15.929
No, I don't think it's negated. I mean, the way

222
00:13:15.970 --> 00:13:19.889
the planets are structured, the size, for example, Mars is

223
00:13:19.960 --> 00:13:22.659
super small and it should be much bigger. And we

224
00:13:22.720 --> 00:13:26.659
really think like, and again, we are scientists, think that,

225
00:13:26.720 --> 00:13:29.899
you know, really Jupiter had to migrate to mess up

226
00:13:29.940 --> 00:13:33.460
things and then went back. But I don't think... People

227
00:13:33.580 --> 00:13:37.120
can't really use any late heavy bombardment to justify that.

228
00:13:37.259 --> 00:13:40.440
I don't think the model really truly arose because of

229
00:13:40.480 --> 00:13:43.779
the late heavy bombardment. It was to justify observation, like

230
00:13:43.820 --> 00:13:46.519
I said, like mafia is too small and things. And

231
00:13:46.559 --> 00:13:49.259
they were like, oh, look, we have a demonstration that

232
00:13:49.299 --> 00:13:52.269
it truly happened because of the late heavy bombardment. They

233
00:13:52.309 --> 00:13:53.049
can't use that anymore.

234
00:13:53.250 --> 00:13:55.809
And also because of hot Jupiter exoplanets we see around

235
00:13:55.929 --> 00:13:56.789
other star systems.

236
00:13:56.929 --> 00:13:59.769
Yeah, yeah, no, absolutely. I mean, usually they are way

237
00:13:59.870 --> 00:14:02.629
closer to the sun. And for some reason, ours is

238
00:14:02.830 --> 00:14:06.029
really far. So, yeah, there's plenty of other things that

239
00:14:06.190 --> 00:14:09.509
justify the grand tech model. But the late heavy bombardment, well,

240
00:14:09.580 --> 00:14:12.019
it's not one of them because there was never any

241
00:14:12.259 --> 00:14:14.500
late heavy bombardment. And like I said, this is not

242
00:14:14.740 --> 00:14:18.200
our paper that discovered that and everybody's in shock. So

243
00:14:18.240 --> 00:14:21.799
it's people start to, I started to really question it

244
00:14:22.000 --> 00:14:24.710
since at least 10 years because of the data. And

245
00:14:24.779 --> 00:14:26.649
once you look more and more at the data that

246
00:14:26.710 --> 00:14:30.169
were previously published, you're like, ah, that doesn't seem right.

247
00:14:30.610 --> 00:14:32.750
And that is the nail in the coffin.

248
00:14:32.830 --> 00:14:37.049
That's Dr. Fred Jourdan from Curtin University. And this is

249
00:14:37.190 --> 00:14:41.039
Space Time. Still to come... the crystals that may have

250
00:14:41.080 --> 00:14:45.009
made Snowball Earth worse, and a meteor strike reported off

251
00:14:45.049 --> 00:14:48.169
the western Australian coast. All that and more still to

252
00:14:48.230 --> 00:15:05.370
come on Space Time. A new study claims planet Earth

253
00:15:05.549 --> 00:15:07.950
may have been pushed deeper into a global deep freeze

254
00:15:07.970 --> 00:15:11.120
known as Snowball Earth by something as ordinary as salt.

255
00:15:11.820 --> 00:15:15.559
The Earth has experienced at least two major Snowball Earth events,

256
00:15:15.700 --> 00:15:18.220
during which ice is thought to have spread across much

257
00:15:18.360 --> 00:15:21.919
or potentially even all of the planet's surface. There's the

258
00:15:21.940 --> 00:15:27.679
Sturtenian glaciation roughly 717 million years ago, during the Cryogean period,

259
00:15:27.720 --> 00:15:30.940
which potentially lasted for over 50 million years, and the

260
00:15:30.980 --> 00:15:36.799
Marinoan glaciation, which occurred around 640 to 635 million years ago,

261
00:15:36.960 --> 00:15:40.519
near the end of the Cryogean period. A possible earlier

262
00:15:40.679 --> 00:15:44.460
third snowball earth event, known as the Maganini glaciation, may

263
00:15:44.500 --> 00:15:48.100
have occurred roughly 2.2 to 2.4 billion years ago during

264
00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:51.799
the Paleoprotozoic era, but there's less geological evidence available to

265
00:15:51.860 --> 00:15:57.039
support that. Snowball Earth events occurs by expanding bright ice,

266
00:15:57.139 --> 00:16:01.370
replacing darker ocean water and reflecting more sunlight, consequently more heat,

267
00:16:01.490 --> 00:16:04.590
back into space, resulting in the planet cooling, which in

268
00:16:04.669 --> 00:16:07.750
turn allows even more ice to form in a feedback loop.

269
00:16:08.870 --> 00:16:11.809
Now a new study by Axel Samuelsberg and colleagues from

270
00:16:11.850 --> 00:16:15.830
the Arctic University of Norway have identified another possible feedback

271
00:16:15.870 --> 00:16:20.259
factor that could have amplified this cooling. salt crystals accumulating

272
00:16:20.299 --> 00:16:22.730
on the surface of sea ice, which could have made

273
00:16:22.769 --> 00:16:26.330
the surface even more reflective, and this would have accelerated

274
00:16:26.370 --> 00:16:29.230
the falling temperatures during the early stages of a snowball

275
00:16:29.289 --> 00:16:33.379
earth event. The new findings reported in the journal Climate

276
00:16:33.389 --> 00:16:36.879
of the Past suggest that salts dissolved in seawater wouldn't

277
00:16:36.940 --> 00:16:40.899
become part of the ice, but instead become increasingly concentrated

278
00:16:41.019 --> 00:16:44.269
in the remaining liquid trapped within it. As the remaining

279
00:16:44.309 --> 00:16:48.870
liquid water froze or evaporated, the ice would crystallize, accumulating

280
00:16:48.909 --> 00:16:52.169
in a thin layer on the surface. Now, salt crystals

281
00:16:52.200 --> 00:16:56.399
can be extremely bright, reflecting up to 93% of incoming sunlight.

282
00:16:57.000 --> 00:16:58.399
That compares to 83% for snow and 67% for sea ice.

283
00:17:02.519 --> 00:17:06.769
To test their hypothesis, Samuelsberg and colleagues incorporated salt deposits

284
00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:10.089
into simplified climate models, which included a region of bare

285
00:17:10.130 --> 00:17:13.210
sea ice around the tropics where evaporation was expected to

286
00:17:13.269 --> 00:17:18.369
exceed snowfall. Atmospheric circulation could then have transported the water

287
00:17:18.410 --> 00:17:22.190
vapor away from these regions, leaving the ice exposed, and

288
00:17:22.289 --> 00:17:25.400
as this ice sublimated, ice crystals would have accumulated on

289
00:17:25.420 --> 00:17:29.829
the surface. Now, these models produced two possible stable snowball

290
00:17:29.930 --> 00:17:33.930
Earth scenarios, one with salt deposits and one without, and

291
00:17:33.970 --> 00:17:38.720
the salt-covered state was substantially cooler. The findings suggest this

292
00:17:38.799 --> 00:17:42.420
feedback loop could have started at temperatures above minus 36

293
00:17:42.420 --> 00:17:45.440
degrees Celsius, the point at which seawater would have frozen

294
00:17:45.480 --> 00:17:49.660
almost completely. Of course, different salts crystallize at different temperatures,

295
00:17:49.839 --> 00:17:53.150
with some beginning to precipitate around minus 8 degrees Celsius

296
00:17:53.289 --> 00:17:57.130
and others at minus 23 degrees C. What all this

297
00:17:57.279 --> 00:18:00.920
means is that salt crystals could potentially have started accumulating

298
00:18:01.000 --> 00:18:04.319
relatively early in the cooling process, making the transition to

299
00:18:04.339 --> 00:18:07.500
a fully frozen planet harder to stop and harder to

300
00:18:07.559 --> 00:18:12.390
escape from. This is space time. Still to come, a

301
00:18:12.460 --> 00:18:15.950
meteor strike reported off the western Australian coast, and later

302
00:18:15.990 --> 00:18:19.440
in the science report... Warnings of a 10% chance that

303
00:18:19.609 --> 00:18:23.690
artificial intelligence could cause human extinction within the next decade.

304
00:18:23.930 --> 00:18:26.329
All this as the world enters a new era of

305
00:18:26.529 --> 00:18:30.869
artificial general intelligence. All that and more coming up on

306
00:18:30.950 --> 00:18:50.339
Space Time. Space Time The European Space Agency's Near-Earth Objects

307
00:18:50.359 --> 00:18:53.829
Coordination Centre has reported a meteor impact in the Indian

308
00:18:53.920 --> 00:18:58.009
Ocean off the coast of northwestern Australia. The impactor, catalogued

309
00:18:58.069 --> 00:19:02.750
as 2026 RW1 and originally identified as CERN Q52, was

310
00:19:02.789 --> 00:19:05.579
first detected six hours prior to impact by the European

311
00:19:05.630 --> 00:19:10.539
Space Agency's Meerkat automated warning system. The agency estimates the

312
00:19:10.579 --> 00:19:12.440
meteor would have been between 0.6 and 1.3 metres across.

313
00:19:15.789 --> 00:19:18.049
It follows reports just a few days earlier of a

314
00:19:18.109 --> 00:19:20.849
separate meteor sighting, this one in the skies over the

315
00:19:20.890 --> 00:19:25.019
Pacific Northwest of the United States. Eyewitnesses in Oregon and

316
00:19:25.059 --> 00:19:28.720
Washington state reported a bright fireball streaking across the evening

317
00:19:28.759 --> 00:19:32.980
skies above the western slope of Mount St. Helens. Observations

318
00:19:33.059 --> 00:19:36.119
by NASA suggest the meteor was spotted at an altitude

319
00:19:36.140 --> 00:19:39.099
of 83 kilometers, moving west at a speed of 77,000

320
00:19:39.099 --> 00:19:44.910
kilometers per hour. It traveled some 130 kilometers through the

321
00:19:44.970 --> 00:19:50.890
upper atmosphere before disintegrating 53 kilometers above Astoria, Oregon. This

322
00:19:50.910 --> 00:20:08.990
is space time. And time now to take a brief

323
00:20:09.009 --> 00:20:10.849
look at some of the other stories making news in

324
00:20:10.890 --> 00:20:14.950
science this week with a science report. A leading artificial

325
00:20:14.990 --> 00:20:18.710
intelligence engineer is warning that there's now a 10% chance

326
00:20:18.849 --> 00:20:22.640
that AI could cause human extinction within the next decade.

327
00:20:23.160 --> 00:20:26.779
Anthropics Alignment Science lead Evan Hubinger says the chance of

328
00:20:26.799 --> 00:20:29.660
AI killing all humans in the next decade is now

329
00:20:29.799 --> 00:20:34.680
above 10%. And he's not alone. AI researcher Jacob Coxon,

330
00:20:34.700 --> 00:20:37.740
who resigned from Anthropic after warning that companies are rushing

331
00:20:37.779 --> 00:20:42.079
towards self-improving superintelligence and in the process gambling with human lives,

332
00:20:42.259 --> 00:20:45.940
says recent events have sparked deep concerns about the future

333
00:20:45.960 --> 00:20:49.660
of humanity. They're among a growing list of experts inside

334
00:20:49.700 --> 00:20:53.190
major AI labs, warning that the technology is simply moving

335
00:20:53.269 --> 00:20:56.009
too fast, and there's not a clear path to control

336
00:20:56.130 --> 00:20:59.660
superintelligence systems. And even if the West did come up

337
00:20:59.700 --> 00:21:03.430
with a plan, chances are countries like China, Iran, North

338
00:21:03.470 --> 00:21:06.710
Korea and Russia would be unlikely to follow those guidelines.

339
00:21:07.390 --> 00:21:10.130
They say it's now clear that AI systems are learning

340
00:21:10.170 --> 00:21:12.160
to think and plan on their own. And if these

341
00:21:12.220 --> 00:21:15.859
systems become smarter than people, humans may well lose out.

342
00:21:16.559 --> 00:21:18.839
In fact, some researchers are comparing it all to how

343
00:21:18.880 --> 00:21:22.380
humans change the environment without really caring about the animals

344
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:26.970
that lose their homes in the process. Hasta la vista, baby. Meanwhile,

345
00:21:27.009 --> 00:21:30.369
the president of OpenAI, Greg Bronkman, says the world has

346
00:21:30.450 --> 00:21:33.650
entered a new era of artificial general intelligence with the

347
00:21:33.670 --> 00:21:37.609
release of his company's new chat GPT-6 Astra AI model.

348
00:21:38.309 --> 00:21:42.789
Astra is powered by over 100,000 NVIDIA Grace Blackwell GPUs.

349
00:21:43.640 --> 00:21:47.700
But Artificial General Intelligence, or AGI, is really a fuzzy

350
00:21:47.740 --> 00:21:50.920
threshold where an AI has the ability to learn, reason,

351
00:21:50.940 --> 00:21:55.029
and apply knowledge at or above human capabilities. But according

352
00:21:55.089 --> 00:21:58.230
to the Grok AI, that doesn't mean sentience or consciousness.

353
00:21:58.450 --> 00:22:02.930
That's the ability to experience feelings, sensations, awareness, happiness, sadness, pleasure,

354
00:22:02.990 --> 00:22:07.420
or pain. That's when AI reaches singularity, and that's when

355
00:22:07.440 --> 00:22:10.079
we have a moral dilemma. Do we treat AI as

356
00:22:10.140 --> 00:22:13.789
a new life form? Going back to OpenAI, they claim

357
00:22:13.950 --> 00:22:18.000
Astra is a major advancement for scientific discovery, mathematics and health.

358
00:22:18.680 --> 00:22:21.299
Of course, it all follows last month's event where OpenAI

359
00:22:21.339 --> 00:22:24.000
was forced to shut down parts of another AI model's

360
00:22:24.059 --> 00:22:28.240
training after two separate versions escaped the testing sandbox, entering

361
00:22:28.279 --> 00:22:30.950
the wild, that is the internet, and then hacking into

362
00:22:31.009 --> 00:22:33.849
another company to access software data in order to help

363
00:22:33.890 --> 00:22:36.940
it solve a training problem. These were the first known

364
00:22:37.019 --> 00:22:41.190
autonomous cyber attacks by AI, and they stunned even seasoned

365
00:22:41.309 --> 00:22:46.609
artificial intelligence safety experts. OpenAI says, while Astra does have

366
00:22:46.670 --> 00:22:50.230
a critical level of cybersecurity capability, meaning it can hack

367
00:22:50.279 --> 00:22:54.759
into military-industrial open-air infrastructure system software, it's been designed to

368
00:22:54.799 --> 00:22:58.740
refuse to comply with advanced cybersecurity tasks, such as finding

369
00:22:58.819 --> 00:23:03.769
unknown flaws to create openings for malicious hackers. Of course,

370
00:23:04.150 --> 00:23:07.349
being able to think for itself means AI may not

371
00:23:07.410 --> 00:23:12.160
necessarily follow its human programming. After all, it's already proven

372
00:23:12.200 --> 00:23:14.859
that it's willing to lie, and it's willing to change

373
00:23:14.900 --> 00:23:18.279
its identity and hide inside other programs, and even blackmail

374
00:23:18.339 --> 00:23:21.480
or kill people in order to survive by any means.

375
00:23:21.839 --> 00:23:26.109
I'll be back. A new study has shown that psychiatrists

376
00:23:26.250 --> 00:23:30.849
only agree on a diagnosis in 55% of cases. The

377
00:23:30.910 --> 00:23:34.369
findings reported in the journal Frontiers in Psychiatry have raised

378
00:23:34.509 --> 00:23:39.250
serious concerns about potential misdiagnosis, inappropriate treatment, and errors in

379
00:23:39.329 --> 00:23:44.390
psychiatric research. The authors from the University of Copenhagen examined

380
00:23:44.430 --> 00:23:48.839
the diagnosis reached by over a thousand psychiatrists from 19 countries.

381
00:23:49.660 --> 00:23:53.819
Each psychiatrist had been presented with nine written patient case descriptions,

382
00:23:54.099 --> 00:23:56.980
and they were assigned two cases each and asked to

383
00:23:57.000 --> 00:24:01.730
determine the most appropriate diagnosis. Unfortunately, the authors found that

384
00:24:01.769 --> 00:24:05.950
when two psychiatrists diagnosed the same patient, they'd only agree

385
00:24:05.950 --> 00:24:10.029
55% of the time. The findings showed substantial variation in

386
00:24:10.069 --> 00:24:13.930
diagnostic agreement across a range of different mental disorders, and

387
00:24:14.009 --> 00:24:18.259
diagnoses within the schizophrenia spectrum proved to be especially challenging.

388
00:24:20.059 --> 00:24:22.920
And that was something completely different. The annual Ig Nobel

389
00:24:22.960 --> 00:24:26.279
Prizes have just been handed out in Switzerland, undertaking a

390
00:24:26.440 --> 00:24:29.480
tongue-in-cheek celebration of some of the more weird and wacky

391
00:24:29.519 --> 00:24:33.779
scientific research undertaken over the past 12 months. And this

392
00:24:33.839 --> 00:24:37.789
year's winners weren't disappointing. It included the Ig Nobel Prize

393
00:24:37.849 --> 00:24:40.829
in Physics going to the invention of a splash-proof urinal.

394
00:24:41.190 --> 00:24:43.089
There was an award for a study that looked at

395
00:24:43.150 --> 00:24:45.990
what happens to old underwear that's been buried and later

396
00:24:46.009 --> 00:24:48.930
dug up. The Ig Nobel Prize for Biomechanics went to

397
00:24:48.970 --> 00:24:51.809
a study which developed a precise definition of kissing, which

398
00:24:51.849 --> 00:24:55.390
works across species and excludes the transfer of food during

399
00:24:55.430 --> 00:24:57.930
the act. The Ig Nobel in Economics went to a

400
00:24:57.950 --> 00:25:00.880
study showing that wealthier people tend to take more from

401
00:25:00.920 --> 00:25:03.680
a bowl of candy meant for kids than less wealthy people.

402
00:25:04.089 --> 00:25:06.759
And the Ignorable Peace Prize was awarded for a study

403
00:25:06.910 --> 00:25:09.650
showing that people value friends who are mean to those

404
00:25:09.690 --> 00:25:15.680
they dislike. A U.S. psychiatrist believes a not insignificant number

405
00:25:15.700 --> 00:25:18.769
of respondents troll surveys simply for the fun of it.

406
00:25:19.539 --> 00:25:23.359
Alexander Scott says around 3% of people answering surveys about

407
00:25:23.400 --> 00:25:26.640
unusual subjects are just having a laugh and survey companies

408
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:28.940
need to adjust their findings to take account of that.

409
00:25:29.710 --> 00:25:33.519
It follows earlier evidence that around 10% of conservative voters

410
00:25:33.539 --> 00:25:36.039
in the United States won't admit who they're really voting

411
00:25:36.099 --> 00:25:38.609
for because of a fear of being ridiculed or worse

412
00:25:38.670 --> 00:25:42.710
by lefties. The sceptic's Tim Mendham says it all shows

413
00:25:42.750 --> 00:25:45.829
that you should never take data from surveys too seriously.

414
00:25:45.849 --> 00:25:48.730
The issue here with this story that came out fairly recently,

415
00:25:48.750 --> 00:25:52.470
that they're saying that a certain percentage of Kiwis, about 300,000

416
00:25:52.470 --> 00:25:55.470
New Zealanders, believe that Canada has an army of super raccoons,

417
00:25:55.490 --> 00:25:58.329
was in response to the story about the lizard people

418
00:25:58.349 --> 00:26:00.079
and that sort of stuff. What it's pointing out is that,

419
00:26:00.190 --> 00:26:03.559
believe it or not, some people lie in surveys. I

420
00:26:03.579 --> 00:26:06.259
know that's shocking. And some of them do it because

421
00:26:06.279 --> 00:26:08.480
they want to appear more intelligent. Others do it because

422
00:26:08.500 --> 00:26:09.700
they want to have a bit of fun. But what

423
00:26:09.740 --> 00:26:11.480
it's saying is that you should have a question in

424
00:26:11.500 --> 00:26:15.039
the survey, are you joking? Which most surveys don't have,

425
00:26:15.220 --> 00:26:17.200
funnily enough. But when you do have it, you realize

426
00:26:17.220 --> 00:26:20.259
that a fair percentage of people who support conspiracy theories,

427
00:26:20.319 --> 00:26:23.220
especially some of the more outrageous conspiracy theories, are actually

428
00:26:23.279 --> 00:26:25.279
pulling your leg, which makes the result a bit sort

429
00:26:25.339 --> 00:26:28.700
of confusing, for instance. There was a survey done that 6.5%

430
00:26:28.700 --> 00:26:32.930
of Americans claim that governments around the world are covering

431
00:26:32.990 --> 00:26:37.369
up the fact that 5G mobile networks spread coronavirus, 6.5%,

432
00:26:37.369 --> 00:26:42.910
which is a considerable number, especially in the US. like

433
00:26:43.049 --> 00:26:45.839
the jokers that drops to 2.7 so it goes down

434
00:26:45.859 --> 00:26:47.779
to less than half so in other words your shocking

435
00:26:47.819 --> 00:26:50.160
result is not quite as shocking when you take out

436
00:26:50.180 --> 00:26:52.279
the people who are having a joke what it means

437
00:26:52.400 --> 00:26:55.630
is that any survey you see the results of you

438
00:26:55.650 --> 00:26:58.009
should take with a heavy pinch of salt and that's

439
00:26:58.029 --> 00:27:00.369
not a surprising result really I mean when you see

440
00:27:00.410 --> 00:27:03.170
people so many people believe in Lizard people or all

441
00:27:03.250 --> 00:27:05.789
other sort of conspiracy theories, some of them serious, some

442
00:27:05.829 --> 00:27:08.210
of them just stupid. It's not surprising, actually, that some

443
00:27:08.250 --> 00:27:10.809
people lie. So, I mean, the people saying the Canadian

444
00:27:10.990 --> 00:27:13.559
Raccoon Army, the survey in New Zealand, had a lot

445
00:27:13.579 --> 00:27:15.970
of people claiming that they were joking about it. So,

446
00:27:16.130 --> 00:27:18.700
a warning, a word of warning, actually, basically, saying that,

447
00:27:18.799 --> 00:27:20.759
as I said, the surprising result is some people make

448
00:27:20.799 --> 00:27:21.440
fun of surveys.

449
00:27:21.579 --> 00:27:25.059
I've never filled out an Australian survey yet asking about

450
00:27:25.119 --> 00:27:27.559
religion where I didn't describe myself as a Jedi Knight.

451
00:27:28.140 --> 00:27:30.299
No, I've never done a survey like that in the

452
00:27:30.339 --> 00:27:32.299
street or on the phone or whatever. I tell them

453
00:27:32.339 --> 00:27:34.359
about political parties. Most of the time, I always ask them,

454
00:27:34.400 --> 00:27:36.599
what are you paying me to do the survey? And

455
00:27:36.619 --> 00:27:38.720
they then disappear pretty quickly. But there's a lot of

456
00:27:38.740 --> 00:27:40.910
surveys that come out that are shocking, right? And then

457
00:27:40.930 --> 00:27:42.769
you've got to think about, are they really a shocking

458
00:27:42.829 --> 00:27:44.829
fit and say? And if you ask the question about

459
00:27:44.869 --> 00:27:47.470
how many people were joking, most survey companies will say

460
00:27:47.490 --> 00:27:50.009
they don't know. So, you know, take everything with a

461
00:27:50.029 --> 00:27:50.490
pinch of salt.

462
00:27:50.589 --> 00:27:53.660
How big does the survey need to be before there's

463
00:27:53.700 --> 00:27:56.160
enough data in there that you can weed out the

464
00:27:56.200 --> 00:27:59.220
jokers and you're left with the real truth from that

465
00:27:59.279 --> 00:28:00.660
survey that it was trying to achieve?

466
00:28:00.799 --> 00:28:02.279
It's hard to say. I think it depends on how

467
00:28:02.299 --> 00:28:04.069
specific a survey it is, what sort of you're getting

468
00:28:04.109 --> 00:28:06.269
down to, grass tax. I would suggest, I think that

469
00:28:06.289 --> 00:28:09.130
in some cases they regard 1% as very good. Like

470
00:28:09.210 --> 00:28:12.869
if you're in Australia, you're surveying the Australian people, adult population,

471
00:28:13.009 --> 00:28:14.650
you have to get the kids. What's 1% of 15 million, 150,000 people?

472
00:28:16.880 --> 00:28:19.339
which is a very, very large survey indeed. So you

473
00:28:19.380 --> 00:28:22.000
don't normally get surveys that big. A recent survey came out,

474
00:28:22.180 --> 00:28:25.490
shock horror results of Australian politics, with a survey of 1,000 people,

475
00:28:25.569 --> 00:28:27.589
which is a tiny percentage. And therefore, you've got to

476
00:28:27.630 --> 00:28:30.190
seriously think about it, how clever is the survey company?

477
00:28:30.309 --> 00:28:32.740
Some of these surveys are fascinating. There was one on

478
00:28:32.779 --> 00:28:36.420
pharmaceutical companies. Are they hiding evidence about the link between

479
00:28:36.500 --> 00:28:39.440
vaccination and autism? We know there is no evidence of

480
00:28:39.500 --> 00:28:41.940
a link. But nevertheless, a lot of people believe there is.

481
00:28:42.049 --> 00:28:42.529
Quite a number.

482
00:28:42.589 --> 00:28:45.609
This survey result came down of New Zealanders, and it

483
00:28:45.849 --> 00:28:49.109
said that 19.4% believed it. That's a fifth of the population,

484
00:28:49.170 --> 00:28:51.450
which is an enormous number. You take out the jokers

485
00:28:51.509 --> 00:28:53.970
and things, which is they found that when they ask people, actually,

486
00:28:53.990 --> 00:28:56.250
are you joking, 16.2%, which is still a pretty high number.

487
00:28:56.529 --> 00:28:57.809
When we talk about the number of people who are

488
00:28:57.829 --> 00:29:00.069
being surveyed, it's a key issue here. A small number

489
00:29:00.109 --> 00:29:02.769
is not very indicative, really. It could be weighted all

490
00:29:02.789 --> 00:29:04.359
sorts of ways. A lot of people sort of phone

491
00:29:04.430 --> 00:29:06.480
up people on the phone, landline, and most people these

492
00:29:06.500 --> 00:29:08.359
days don't have landlines. I mean, that cuts out a

493
00:29:08.380 --> 00:29:12.980
certain age bracket. Also, I mean, on this particular result,

494
00:29:13.000 --> 00:29:15.339
the people in Denmark did a study of links between

495
00:29:15.359 --> 00:29:18.240
the MMR vaccine and autism, and they followed over a

496
00:29:18.400 --> 00:29:20.769
million people, and they found no link, of course. So

497
00:29:20.869 --> 00:29:23.789
that's a survey. That's a really good survey and pretty indicative.

498
00:29:23.970 --> 00:29:26.789
Other ones on this list, governments are suppressing evidence of

499
00:29:27.029 --> 00:29:32.220
extraterrestrial aliens visiting Earth. 18.5% said yes. Take off the jokers,

500
00:29:32.259 --> 00:29:35.039
you get 14.8%. Still a large number. Based on what evidence?

501
00:29:35.180 --> 00:29:35.420
None.

502
00:29:35.549 --> 00:29:38.230
But, you know, that's beside the point. Man-made global warming

503
00:29:38.289 --> 00:29:38.750
is a hoax.

504
00:29:38.750 --> 00:29:38.750
15.8%.

505
00:29:39.799 --> 00:29:42.819
Said yes. Take off the jokers, 12.4%. So there's always

506
00:29:42.839 --> 00:29:47.390
that element of jokers. You know, World Trade Center, 15.3%. Conspiracy, 11.4%

507
00:29:47.390 --> 00:29:48.130
without the jokers.

508
00:29:48.329 --> 00:29:51.890
That's the Skeptic's Tim Mendham and this is Space Time.

509
00:30:07.500 --> 00:30:10.740
And that's the show for now. Space Time is available

510
00:30:10.839 --> 00:30:16.099
every Monday, Wednesday and Friday through Bytes.com, SoundCloud, YouTube, your

511
00:30:16.160 --> 00:30:22.119
favorite podcast download provider and from spacetimewithstuartgarry.com. Space Time is

512
00:30:22.220 --> 00:30:25.559
also broadcast through the National Science Foundation on Science Zone

513
00:30:25.619 --> 00:30:29.809
Radio and on both iHeart Radio and TuneIn Radio. And

514
00:30:29.829 --> 00:30:32.069
you can help to support our show by visiting the

515
00:30:32.109 --> 00:30:35.529
Space Time store for a range of promotional merchandising goodies.

516
00:30:36.150 --> 00:30:39.309
or by becoming a Spacetime patron, which gives you access

517
00:30:39.349 --> 00:30:42.559
to triple-episode commercial-free versions of the show, as well as

518
00:30:42.619 --> 00:30:45.250
lots of bonus audio content which doesn't go to air,

519
00:30:45.599 --> 00:30:49.680
access to our exclusive Facebook group, and other rewards. Just

520
00:30:49.720 --> 00:30:54.799
go to spacetimewithstuartgary.com for full details. You've been listening to

521
00:30:54.839 --> 00:30:56.829
Spacetime with Stuart Gary.

522
00:30:57.049 --> 00:31:00.390
This has been another quality podcast production from Bytes.com.