Caloroga Shark Media
Sept. 22, 2026

Prince Harry’s Verdict on Earl Spencer’s Explosive Diana Memoir

Prince Harry’s Verdict on Earl Spencer’s Explosive Diana Memoir

What does Prince Harry think of Earl Spencer’s new Princess Diana memoir, and how did Prince William and Diana’s sisters react? Charles Spencer says Harry is “completely fine” with Swan Song: Diana, My Sister, but admits Lady Sarah McCorquodale and Lady Jane Fellowes were hurt that he kept the book secret. He also addresses William’s privacy, his estrangement from King Charles, Diana’s funeral, Mohamed Al Fayed, conspiracy theories about her death and the claim that Charles had an unusually close relationship with his former aide Michael Fawcett.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/palace-intrigue-harry-meghan-the-crown-royal-family-news-and-gossip--4522904/support.

Palace Intrigue is a daily British royal family podcast covering King Charles, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, Kate Middleton and the House of Windsor. New episodes every day. Follow on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. Part of the Caloroga Shark Media network.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.250 --> 00:00:11.949
Hello and welcome to Palace Intrigue. I am your host,

2
00:00:12.050 --> 00:00:15.650
Mark Francis. Charles Spencer says Harry is completely fine with

3
00:00:15.689 --> 00:00:18.649
his book about Diana, but admits his two older sisters,

4
00:00:18.949 --> 00:00:23.519
Lady Sarah McCorkadale and Lady Jane Fellows, were hurt to

5
00:00:23.559 --> 00:00:27.160
discover he had written it without telling them. In a

6
00:00:27.179 --> 00:00:30.100
lengthy interview with People magazine, Spencer describes how he broke

7
00:00:30.120 --> 00:00:32.060
the news to William, Harry, Sarah and Jane at the

8
00:00:32.100 --> 00:00:34.600
same time, Until then, he says, only his wife and

9
00:00:34.619 --> 00:00:38.280
those involved in publishing knew what he was doing. I

10
00:00:38.299 --> 00:00:40.100
think they were hurt, but I hadn't told them, to

11
00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:42.200
be honest. I said, I was going to hurt you

12
00:00:42.299 --> 00:00:44.479
either way because I was either going to tell you

13
00:00:44.539 --> 00:00:46.740
and still write it how I wanted it. It wasn't

14
00:00:46.780 --> 00:00:50.259
going to be a committee effort. Spencer says he also

15
00:00:50.320 --> 00:00:54.320
wanted them to be able to distance themselves from any controversy.

16
00:00:55.189 --> 00:00:57.770
They are totally innocent parties in this. This is very

17
00:00:57.810 --> 00:01:00.929
much a brother's view. On his nephews, he was more

18
00:01:01.070 --> 00:01:04.109
forthcoming about Harry's reaction than William's I can say that

19
00:01:04.150 --> 00:01:06.549
Harry is completely fine about it. He said, I hope

20
00:01:06.569 --> 00:01:09.750
there's nothing embarrassing about him in it. I said, there isn't.

21
00:01:10.989 --> 00:01:13.459
Spencer said he reassured both brothers that the account largely

22
00:01:13.560 --> 00:01:16.060
ends with Diana's death and does not expose their private

23
00:01:16.079 --> 00:01:19.700
lives as adults. Asked whether he worried about their response

24
00:01:19.780 --> 00:01:23.219
to his portrayal of their father. However, he acknowledged that

25
00:01:23.260 --> 00:01:25.620
he did. Yeah, that was a concern. I mean, I

26
00:01:25.659 --> 00:01:27.359
don't want this to sound loaded, but there was an

27
00:01:27.480 --> 00:01:29.890
awful lot I could have put in and I didn't.

28
00:01:31.209 --> 00:01:34.030
His relationship with the king, he says, is now almost non-existent.

29
00:01:34.640 --> 00:01:37.260
I see him as an ex-brother-in-law, and I'm sure anyone

30
00:01:37.319 --> 00:01:39.439
who has had divorce in the family will understand that

31
00:01:39.480 --> 00:01:41.659
people who are closer in your life when the parties

32
00:01:41.700 --> 00:01:45.640
were married are less close. Away from that dispute, Spencer

33
00:01:45.659 --> 00:01:49.459
firmly rejects conspiracy theories about Diana's death. I've never believed

34
00:01:49.680 --> 00:01:52.469
in the conspiracy theory because if somebody was conspiring to

35
00:01:52.510 --> 00:01:55.409
kill somebody very high profile like that, I don't think

36
00:01:55.450 --> 00:01:57.420
that would be the manner that it would happen in.

37
00:01:58.269 --> 00:02:00.109
By the way, if I thought otherwise, I would say so.

38
00:02:00.189 --> 00:02:02.879
I just don't see it. The interview also returns to

39
00:02:03.019 --> 00:02:06.510
a criticism that has followed Spencer for years, that he

40
00:02:06.569 --> 00:02:10.550
refused to provide Diana with a home at Althorp. Spencer

41
00:02:10.569 --> 00:02:13.430
says Diana wanted the garden house where their sister Jane

42
00:02:13.469 --> 00:02:16.250
had previously lived with her children, but he says police

43
00:02:16.289 --> 00:02:18.770
inspected the property with him and concluded that William and

44
00:02:18.810 --> 00:02:21.919
Harry could not be adequately protected there. She could not

45
00:02:21.960 --> 00:02:23.599
have lived at the garden house. It was not a

46
00:02:23.639 --> 00:02:27.620
viable option. He also revisits his account of the Queen

47
00:02:27.699 --> 00:02:31.740
offering to restore Diana's HRH title after her death, At

48
00:02:31.759 --> 00:02:33.960
the time, he says, he rejected the offer because it

49
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:37.539
had come too late. Now, he sometimes wonders whether accepting

50
00:02:37.939 --> 00:02:41.039
might have meant something to her sons. I do sometimes think,

51
00:02:41.259 --> 00:02:43.030
should I have just said yes, because maybe it would

52
00:02:43.069 --> 00:02:46.729
have been nice for her sons. Spencer has widened his

53
00:02:46.830 --> 00:02:48.949
criticism to the care Harry received on the day of

54
00:02:48.990 --> 00:02:52.009
Diana's funeral. In an extract published by the Daily Mail,

55
00:02:52.050 --> 00:02:55.050
he wrote, My chief memory of that train journey is

56
00:02:55.110 --> 00:02:57.530
of being concerned at the lack of obvious care for

57
00:02:57.590 --> 00:03:00.949
Harry as he decompressed from the ghastliness of the morning,

58
00:03:01.469 --> 00:03:04.139
He needed Diana's hugs, of course, and they would forever

59
00:03:04.180 --> 00:03:07.060
be denied him. But instead of calm and nurture, he

60
00:03:07.080 --> 00:03:10.360
was allowed to spin out of control. Other passages offer

61
00:03:10.379 --> 00:03:14.560
Spencer's account of disagreements over the funeral arrangements. He claims

62
00:03:14.879 --> 00:03:18.009
Prince Philip overruled Charles about where the men should stand

63
00:03:18.069 --> 00:03:20.810
behind the coffin, placing Spencer in the middle with William

64
00:03:20.830 --> 00:03:24.009
and Harry on either side. He also claims the Queen

65
00:03:24.050 --> 00:03:27.419
initially responded to news of Diana's accident by asking, what

66
00:03:27.460 --> 00:03:30.129
is she up to now? Spencer specifies that this was

67
00:03:30.169 --> 00:03:33.069
before the seriousness of the crash became clear. He says

68
00:03:33.189 --> 00:03:36.310
she later offered to restore Diana's HRH title after her

69
00:03:36.370 --> 00:03:40.610
death and offer he declined. Spencer says Diana told him

70
00:03:40.729 --> 00:03:44.210
Mohamed Al-Fayed had groped her during the early weeks of

71
00:03:44.289 --> 00:03:47.909
her relationship with his son Dodi. The Express reports that

72
00:03:47.949 --> 00:03:51.409
Spencer recounts the alleged incident in his memoir writing, Diana

73
00:03:51.469 --> 00:03:54.939
told me with revulsion how early in her romance with Dodi,

74
00:03:55.240 --> 00:03:57.599
Mohamed had come up to her dropped a hand onto

75
00:03:57.659 --> 00:04:00.319
her buttocks and squeezed them while saying in a leery,

76
00:04:00.360 --> 00:04:03.919
suggestive tone, and in Egypt the father-in-law gets first go.

77
00:04:03.939 --> 00:04:09.460
Mohamed Al-Fayed later commissioned the statue of Diana and Dodi

78
00:04:09.500 --> 00:04:14.050
displayed at Harrods under the title Innocent Victims. Spencer also

79
00:04:14.090 --> 00:04:16.870
reveals that an earlier draft of his funeral tribute included

80
00:04:16.910 --> 00:04:19.430
a thank you to Dodi for making Diana happy in

81
00:04:19.470 --> 00:04:23.209
her last few weeks. He removed those words before delivering

82
00:04:23.350 --> 00:04:30.100
the speech. More palace in just a moment. The Spencer

83
00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:33.379
controversy has reached the comedy stage with Saturday Night Live

84
00:04:33.500 --> 00:04:37.560
UK imagining King Charles confronted by an artificial intelligence assistant

85
00:04:38.120 --> 00:04:41.709
modelled on Princess Diana. The sketch opened with Charles, played

86
00:04:41.730 --> 00:04:45.329
by Larry Dean, meeting technology executives to discuss the dangers

87
00:04:45.370 --> 00:04:48.949
of AI. Their answer was to unveil a creation called

88
00:04:48.970 --> 00:04:55.389
the Deeply Intelligent Autonomous Neurokinetic Android, or Diana. Jack Shep

89
00:04:55.420 --> 00:04:57.980
then appeared as Diana, complete with her familiar blonde hairstyle

90
00:04:58.019 --> 00:05:01.649
and black revenge dress. Hello, Charles, the character said. Would

91
00:05:01.670 --> 00:05:04.129
you like help with a five-step business plan, or perhaps

92
00:05:04.170 --> 00:05:07.350
I can help you find the nearest petrol station? The

93
00:05:07.389 --> 00:05:10.800
fictional king initially failed to recognize her before announcing, Hold

94
00:05:10.829 --> 00:05:13.800
on a second, is that woman from the 90s? Then

95
00:05:13.839 --> 00:05:16.500
came the direct reference to Spencer's disputed account of their

96
00:05:16.540 --> 00:05:19.959
conversation after Diana's death. As I allegedly said, she was

97
00:05:19.980 --> 00:05:23.839
soon forgotten. The joke quickly shifted from recognition to control.

98
00:05:24.319 --> 00:05:27.220
The AI Diana announced, I shan't be taking orders anymore.

99
00:05:28.379 --> 00:05:31.089
When the alarmed executives admitted that they had lost control

100
00:05:31.129 --> 00:05:34.410
of the Diana, Charles replied, that was the problem last time.

101
00:05:36.310 --> 00:05:39.709
In the news.com.au, Daniela Elsa gets right to it, writing,

102
00:05:40.329 --> 00:05:42.170
In a matter of eight words, writing in his new

103
00:05:42.209 --> 00:05:45.300
book about his tragic sister's swan song, the Earl has

104
00:05:45.459 --> 00:05:48.819
dusted off and reignited a decades-old rumour that King Charles

105
00:05:49.199 --> 00:05:52.259
had what amounts to a gay affair. Shall I give

106
00:05:52.300 --> 00:05:56.279
you a minute to just digest that? Diana, Princess of Wales,

107
00:05:56.319 --> 00:05:58.709
famously said, There were three of us in the marriage,

108
00:05:59.100 --> 00:06:01.500
but now her brother Earl Spencer has suggested there might

109
00:06:01.620 --> 00:06:05.100
have been four. In a matter of eight words, writing

110
00:06:05.120 --> 00:06:07.540
in his new book about his tragic sister, Swan Song,

111
00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:11.279
the Earl has dusted off and reignited a decades-old rumour

112
00:06:11.579 --> 00:06:14.019
that King Charles had what amounts to a gay affair.

113
00:06:14.720 --> 00:06:18.579
Speculation is the valet in the book refers to Charles'

114
00:06:18.779 --> 00:06:24.110
long-term aide, Michael Fawcett. Elsa shares, Mr. Fawcett for decades

115
00:06:24.129 --> 00:06:26.750
was a key part of Charles' world. Mr. Fawcett held

116
00:06:26.790 --> 00:06:29.259
the specimen bottle when Charles broke his arm and had

117
00:06:29.300 --> 00:06:31.980
to provide a urine sample. He would lay out Charles'

118
00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:34.980
favorite towel for him after his baths, and he squeezed

119
00:06:35.019 --> 00:06:38.779
his boss's toothpaste onto his brush. I can manage without

120
00:06:38.959 --> 00:06:43.439
just about anyone except for Michael, Charles reported to have said. However,

121
00:06:43.519 --> 00:06:45.389
the question of whether their relationship might have been of

122
00:06:45.430 --> 00:06:49.129
a more personal nature has haunted Charles for years. During

123
00:06:49.170 --> 00:06:52.019
their marriage, the princess had begun to feel that Fawcett

124
00:06:52.120 --> 00:06:55.980
had an unnatural hold over her husband, becoming increasingly concerned

125
00:06:56.019 --> 00:06:59.199
about the intimacy of their relationship. Andrew Morton writes in

126
00:06:59.370 --> 00:07:02.209
Diana in Pursuit of Love, Diana couldn't work out what

127
00:07:02.230 --> 00:07:05.990
this relationship was between Michael Fawcett and her husband. Ken Wharf,

128
00:07:06.009 --> 00:07:09.569
Diana's former bodyguard, told Morton, She thought it was unhealthy.

129
00:07:09.769 --> 00:07:13.579
I think she firmly believed that. It also continues dusting

130
00:07:13.740 --> 00:07:17.439
off that. In 2002, George Smith, a former assistant valet,

131
00:07:17.519 --> 00:07:19.579
told the Mail on Sunday that he had witnessed a

132
00:07:19.720 --> 00:07:23.379
sexual incident involving Charles and a servant the piece did

133
00:07:23.399 --> 00:07:27.600
not name, Mr. Fawcett. Mr. Fawcett had sought an injunction

134
00:07:27.660 --> 00:07:30.959
against the story prior to its publication. Before he was named,

135
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:34.459
he denied the allegation and described Mr. Smith as an

136
00:07:34.610 --> 00:07:37.810
unreliable alcoholic. The Guardian later went to court to reveal

137
00:07:37.829 --> 00:07:40.550
that it was Mr. Fawcett who had sought the injunction.

138
00:07:42.449 --> 00:07:45.810
Piers Morgan is challenging Charles Spencer's insistence that his criticism

139
00:07:45.990 --> 00:07:48.310
of the King has nothing to do with revenge. Speaking

140
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:51.279
to Mark Phillips on CBS Sunday Morning, Spencer said, I

141
00:07:51.319 --> 00:07:54.160
don't hold resentments. I'm not a vengeful, resentful person. I'm

142
00:07:54.180 --> 00:07:57.839
just an eyewitness to history. Morgan's response was blunt. Writing

143
00:07:57.860 --> 00:08:00.779
on social media, he said, he says, having waited 30

144
00:08:00.779 --> 00:08:04.279
years to launch a vengeful, resentful attack on King Charles.

145
00:08:05.079 --> 00:08:08.779
Friends of the King are also questioning Spencer's motives. One

146
00:08:08.899 --> 00:08:13.720
particularly sharp response reportedly compared Spencer to an arsonist trying

147
00:08:13.759 --> 00:08:16.860
to sell you a fire hose before asking, why couldn't

148
00:08:16.899 --> 00:08:18.699
they all have just let her rest in peace? That

149
00:08:18.730 --> 00:08:21.579
would have been the decent thing to have done. Another

150
00:08:21.660 --> 00:08:25.000
unnamed aide suggested resentment of Charles and Camilla's position might

151
00:08:25.050 --> 00:08:27.810
have been driving the criticism. If I were to hazard

152
00:08:27.829 --> 00:08:29.810
a guess, I'd say it's more than that. Contrary to

153
00:08:29.850 --> 00:08:32.909
some public expectations and perhaps a few private hopes, the

154
00:08:32.929 --> 00:08:35.490
King and Queen have proved rather adept and popular in

155
00:08:35.509 --> 00:08:39.480
their new roles. Spencer, meanwhile, told the BBC, it's not

156
00:08:39.509 --> 00:08:41.779
every day you wake up to find you've been gaslit

157
00:08:42.059 --> 00:08:44.740
by the King. And there you have it. If you'd

158
00:08:44.759 --> 00:08:47.539
like to email us or address us at thepalaceintrigue at gmail.com.

159
00:08:47.700 --> 00:08:50.309
If you're on Spotify, leave us a comment. If you're

160
00:08:50.330 --> 00:08:52.470
on Apple, hit that button up there that says listen uninterrupted.

161
00:08:52.549 --> 00:08:54.940
Get the show commercial free for five bucks a month.

162
00:08:55.000 --> 00:08:58.159
We appreciate your support. I'm Mark Francis. My thanks to

163
00:08:58.279 --> 00:09:00.830
John McDermott. This is Palace Entry. Good times.