Nov. 12, 2024

Say What They Can't Unhear - Tamsen Webster

Say What They Can't Unhear - Tamsen Webster

Say What They Can't Unhear with Tamsen Webster

In this episode, host Nola Simon interviews Tamsen Webster about her new book "Say What They Can't Unhear" and discusses effective messaging strategies for driving change.

Key topics covered:

  • Tamsen's background as a message designer and "English to English translator"
  • The importance of understanding deep beliefs when trying to inspire change
  • How to find common ground and build on existing beliefs rather than challenging them
  • The "smart, capable, and good" approach to empathy in communication
  • Why the "deepest beliefs are hardest to shift" and how to work with that principle
  • Challenges with return-to-office mandates and aligning messaging with employee experiences
  • The concept of "recognizable truths" that resonate with audiences
  • How to present change in a way that doesn't conflict with people's existing worldviews
  • The role of cognitive empathy in understanding others' perspectives
  • Why messages need to pass both logical and emotional checks to be effective

Tamsen shares insights from her experience as a Weight Watchers leader and how those lessons apply to organizational change. She emphasizes the importance of starting with where people already are and finding ways to align change with their existing goals and beliefs.

The conversation explores why many change initiatives fail and how leaders can improve their approach by truly understanding their audience's perspective. Tamsen's book "Say What They Can't Unhear" provides a framework for creating more effective and resonant messaging.

Learn more about Tamsen Webster:

Part message designer, part English-to-English translator, part magpie, Tamsen Webster helps leaders craft their case for large-scale change. In addition to her work in and for major organizations such as Harvard Medical School, Fidelity Investments, and Klaviyo, she's a judge and mentor for the Harvard Innovation Labs, a professional advisor at the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship, and has spent over 10 years as the Idea Strategist for one of only nine legacy-level TEDx events in the world. She was named to the Thinkers50 Radar in 2022 and is the author of two books, Find Your Red Thread: Make Your Big Ideas Irresistible and Say What They Can't Unhear: The 9 Principles of Lasting Change. She lives in Boston with her husband, two sons, and two brindle Greyhounds, Hazel and Walnut.

Tamsen Webster - Message Designer, Author, Keynote Business Speaker

www.messagedesigninstitute.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamsenwebster

1
00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:01,826
You can't breathe.

2
00:00:01,826 --> 00:00:06,176
One, two, three, four, five, six,
seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven,

3
00:00:06,176 --> 00:00:09,340
twelve, thirteen, fourteen, fifteen,
sixteen, eighteen, nineteen, twenty.

4
00:00:09,340 --> 00:00:13,294
Twenty seven, eighteen, nineteen,
twenty one, twenty two, twenty three,

5
00:00:13,294 --> 00:00:17,249
twenty four, twenty five, twenty
six, twenty seven, twenty eight.

6
00:00:17,249 --> 00:00:18,039
in orbit.

7
00:00:22,104 --> 00:00:23,534
Nola Simon: Thank you
so much for joining me.

8
00:00:23,534 --> 00:00:24,413
I'm Nola Simon.

9
00:00:24,413 --> 00:00:27,034
I'm the host of the Hybrid Remote
Center of Excellence and joining

10
00:00:27,034 --> 00:00:28,734
me today is Tamsen Webster.

11
00:00:28,744 --> 00:00:35,034
She is a prime example of somebody that
I've built a relationship with over time.

12
00:00:35,104 --> 00:00:37,663
I've actually followed
Tamsen probably for years.

13
00:00:37,683 --> 00:00:39,013
When did the red thread come out?

14
00:00:39,513 --> 00:00:40,553
That came out in

15
00:00:40,583 --> 00:00:42,453
Tamsen Webster: 2021,

16
00:00:42,454 --> 00:00:43,473
Nola Simon: but I've been

17
00:00:43,473 --> 00:00:46,173
Tamsen Webster: talking about the
red thread for eight years now.

18
00:00:46,173 --> 00:00:48,443
Nola Simon: So my role was
actually my corporate role was

19
00:00:48,443 --> 00:00:49,913
actually restructured in 2020.

20
00:00:49,933 --> 00:00:52,383
So I started paying attention to LinkedIn.

21
00:00:52,603 --> 00:00:54,553
I wasn't writing, but
I was consuming a lot.

22
00:00:54,553 --> 00:00:56,543
And so I think I started
noticing you around there.

23
00:00:56,773 --> 00:00:59,753
So I've honestly been following
you probably since then, but

24
00:00:59,753 --> 00:01:00,883
I just connected this year.

25
00:01:01,173 --> 00:01:04,803
And I had attended one of your workshops
that one of my other podcast guests

26
00:01:04,823 --> 00:01:06,233
Marty Constant had made available.

27
00:01:06,253 --> 00:01:07,883
And then I connected after that.

28
00:01:07,903 --> 00:01:11,223
So I always tell people I, I don't
accept pitches from my podcast.

29
00:01:11,613 --> 00:01:14,433
I like to invite people that
I've got to know online.

30
00:01:14,433 --> 00:01:18,743
So I know your work, and Tansyn's work
has been instrumental to helping me

31
00:01:18,743 --> 00:01:20,683
develop the messaging for my business.

32
00:01:21,093 --> 00:01:23,353
And I'm really excited that she's
come out now with a new book,

33
00:01:23,413 --> 00:01:26,083
another new book, which is called
Say What They Can't Unhear.

34
00:01:26,653 --> 00:01:31,273
And I gotta tell you, the ding is
something that we really have to talk

35
00:01:31,283 --> 00:01:35,703
about because I know that although it
manifests differently for me as well.

36
00:01:36,073 --> 00:01:38,493
Tamsen, how do you
describe your profession?

37
00:01:38,513 --> 00:01:41,333
Obviously you're an author,
you're a keynote speaker you're

38
00:01:41,383 --> 00:01:44,813
deeply involved with TED Talks
How do you describe yourself?

39
00:01:44,813 --> 00:01:47,363
Like what's your perfect
message to deliver who you are?

40
00:01:48,583 --> 00:01:52,613
Tamsen Webster: So I, for folks that
would understand at least somewhat

41
00:01:52,633 --> 00:01:57,893
intuitively I say that I'm message
designer, so I have, after a lot of

42
00:01:57,893 --> 00:02:01,863
trial and error, that seems to be
something where most people generally.

43
00:02:02,123 --> 00:02:04,693
Yes, correctly what that probably means.

44
00:02:04,703 --> 00:02:07,493
So meaning you've got something
you want to say and you're trying

45
00:02:07,493 --> 00:02:08,623
to figure out how to say it.

46
00:02:09,133 --> 00:02:10,123
I help you do that.

47
00:02:10,333 --> 00:02:15,843
My more my like sassier answer, my
cheekier answer, which is also correct is

48
00:02:15,843 --> 00:02:17,993
that I'm an English to English translator.

49
00:02:18,053 --> 00:02:20,333
Because I think that's
what I'm I help people do.

50
00:02:20,333 --> 00:02:26,933
But fundamentally, I feel like that
my I don't even feel, I know that

51
00:02:26,933 --> 00:02:31,063
my deep passion is helping people
help other people create change.

52
00:02:31,473 --> 00:02:39,693
And so whatever I can put together,
learn, process, size, tams and eyes,

53
00:02:39,693 --> 00:02:44,593
whatever, to help people really get what
their, their difference of perspective,

54
00:02:44,963 --> 00:02:48,563
their approaches, their offerings,
their ideas, their initiatives, all of

55
00:02:48,563 --> 00:02:53,748
these things that they're, investing
time and money in to make a change for

56
00:02:53,748 --> 00:02:56,998
themselves, for the world, for clients,
customers, whatever it might be.

57
00:02:57,838 --> 00:03:03,758
I want to make sure that they have as
much opportunity for success as possible.

58
00:03:03,878 --> 00:03:10,578
And so that's where I come in because I've
somehow cobbled together this deep and

59
00:03:10,588 --> 00:03:15,738
long interest, both in transformational
change and in communications.

60
00:03:15,778 --> 00:03:17,688
And so I've put those together.

61
00:03:17,978 --> 00:03:19,378
To create message design.

62
00:03:19,878 --> 00:03:20,308
Awesome.

63
00:03:20,448 --> 00:03:20,928
Nola Simon: Perfect.

64
00:03:21,168 --> 00:03:21,338
Yeah.

65
00:03:21,338 --> 00:03:25,048
I was always fascinated that part of your
origin story really is Weight Watchers.

66
00:03:26,058 --> 00:03:29,469
And a lot of that, when you're trying
to lose weight is cause I remember my

67
00:03:29,469 --> 00:03:32,219
mom did this probably in the eighties.

68
00:03:32,619 --> 00:03:33,259
A lot of it is,

69
00:03:36,929 --> 00:03:38,779
She did manage to lose a lot of weight.

70
00:03:38,819 --> 00:03:41,829
She came back, but that, that was always
something that caught my attention

71
00:03:41,829 --> 00:03:45,519
because I remember her experience
with that, but a lot of times it's the

72
00:03:45,519 --> 00:03:48,639
stories that you tell yourself, right?

73
00:03:48,769 --> 00:03:49,859
Tamsen Webster: Yes, absolutely.

74
00:03:49,868 --> 00:03:52,919
And yes, it is a hundred percent.

75
00:03:53,284 --> 00:03:58,614
I think it's to quote one of my members
she always said that it's 99 percent

76
00:03:58,624 --> 00:04:00,554
mental and the rest is just food.

77
00:04:01,104 --> 00:04:06,933
And that's, that is, we know now
that's, it's not quite as pure as that.

78
00:04:06,943 --> 00:04:09,923
I think that's one of the things I'm
delighted that science has caught up

79
00:04:09,953 --> 00:04:15,283
with what was observable in the 13 years
that I was a Weight Watchers leader.

80
00:04:15,313 --> 00:04:16,933
And that is, is that.

81
00:04:17,853 --> 00:04:24,293
There are fundamental physiological
differences between people that

82
00:04:24,493 --> 00:04:30,404
no amount of retraining your
thoughts or positive self talk

83
00:04:30,414 --> 00:04:34,484
or willpower will, will overcome.

84
00:04:34,484 --> 00:04:36,904
And so it's not that it's not possible.

85
00:04:37,134 --> 00:04:42,164
It's just that it was one of the of so
many lessons I learned in the years that

86
00:04:42,164 --> 00:04:44,154
I moonlighted as a Weight Watchers leader.

87
00:04:44,374 --> 00:04:52,284
One of them is that to be very
wary of one size fits all.

88
00:04:52,669 --> 00:04:53,699
Anything, right?

89
00:04:53,719 --> 00:04:55,409
One size fits all approach.

90
00:04:55,409 --> 00:04:56,959
One size fits all message.

91
00:04:57,349 --> 00:04:57,879
Because.

92
00:04:58,819 --> 00:05:04,539
That is bearing it, that bears with it
a lot of assumptions about what you're

93
00:05:04,539 --> 00:05:06,409
offering and who you're talking to.

94
00:05:06,469 --> 00:05:11,729
And those can get you in
trouble on both sides.

95
00:05:11,939 --> 00:05:15,449
I don't like getting in trouble that
way, which is probably why I've spent

96
00:05:15,459 --> 00:05:19,519
so much time You know, because I've
had some horror stories of just whoop,

97
00:05:19,549 --> 00:05:21,179
that was not the right way to say that.

98
00:05:21,489 --> 00:05:24,109
And so that's, that's part of
where all this has come from.

99
00:05:24,109 --> 00:05:28,559
And now that I've gotten to a certain
point in my life, in my career, where I

100
00:05:28,559 --> 00:05:32,749
feel like it's mathematically impossible
for me to be the age that I am, but

101
00:05:34,699 --> 00:05:38,889
there are some objective truths, that I
really have gotten to a point where it's.

102
00:05:40,054 --> 00:05:43,674
Where I feel like, I have
something to say on this like I,

103
00:05:43,764 --> 00:05:46,844
I, I have put all this together.

104
00:05:46,844 --> 00:05:47,744
I've seen this work.

105
00:05:47,744 --> 00:05:48,594
I've done the work.

106
00:05:48,594 --> 00:05:50,254
I have done the research.

107
00:05:50,254 --> 00:05:54,921
I have done the testing just to see what
it is that works and doesn't work so

108
00:05:54,921 --> 00:05:58,309
that within a world that is constantly
changing and with people who are you

109
00:05:58,309 --> 00:06:04,392
know, I feel I have something to say on
this like I, I Just absolutely different.

110
00:06:04,612 --> 00:06:06,682
Person to person in so
many different ways.

111
00:06:07,122 --> 00:06:15,042
What are some of the things that are
reliably true, no matter what, no matter

112
00:06:15,052 --> 00:06:20,302
who you're talking to, no matter what the
situation is, because that I think gives

113
00:06:20,302 --> 00:06:25,812
you at least a place to start and gives
you a place to start where you're starting

114
00:06:25,812 --> 00:06:28,372
with the strength of what is Thanks.

115
00:06:29,152 --> 00:06:30,172
Known, right?

116
00:06:30,252 --> 00:06:33,192
This is how people think about things,
this is how people make sense of

117
00:06:33,192 --> 00:06:38,192
information, this is how people react
when they're treated a certain way.

118
00:06:38,202 --> 00:06:41,572
If those are some of the things that
either will move a change forward or

119
00:06:41,582 --> 00:06:47,012
back or get in the way of the message or
accelerate it, , it, solvable problems.

120
00:06:48,557 --> 00:06:51,397
Unsolved solvable problems drive me nuts.

121
00:06:51,427 --> 00:06:55,547
And this is one of those where I, when I
come to looking at messaging and change

122
00:06:55,567 --> 00:07:00,367
messaging, I'm like these, most of the
things, most of the places where we go

123
00:07:00,367 --> 00:07:04,777
wrong are completely solvable and I just
really wanted to help people solve that.

124
00:07:05,452 --> 00:07:06,432
Nola Simon: Yeah, no, it makes sense.

125
00:07:06,622 --> 00:07:11,612
So in Tamsyn's book, she has these
nine principles that are they're so

126
00:07:11,862 --> 00:07:15,382
logical, they're so straightforward,
but they're brilliant, right?

127
00:07:15,542 --> 00:07:15,712
Thank you.

128
00:07:15,742 --> 00:07:18,612
And one of them that really caught my
attention, I think that's really where

129
00:07:18,612 --> 00:07:22,042
you're talking about this too, is the
deepest beliefs are the hardest to shift.

130
00:07:22,692 --> 00:07:26,662
And I always found that because
I always lived north of the north

131
00:07:26,662 --> 00:07:28,622
of Toronto and worked in the city.

132
00:07:28,992 --> 00:07:31,812
And so they would the company
would often come out with like

133
00:07:31,852 --> 00:07:35,762
messages that were designed to
be for the majority of employees.

134
00:07:35,762 --> 00:07:38,552
I wasn't the majority of employees
because I didn't live in the city.

135
00:07:38,862 --> 00:07:43,027
I, A lot of and a lot of times I didn't
fit so they would come out my favorite

136
00:07:43,027 --> 00:07:45,307
was always the, let's save the planet.

137
00:07:45,337 --> 00:07:46,517
Let's bike to work.

138
00:07:46,857 --> 00:07:47,437
I don't know.

139
00:07:47,497 --> 00:07:51,107
I live 60 kilometers north of
the city like that's not going

140
00:07:51,107 --> 00:07:51,137
Tamsen Webster: to

141
00:07:51,137 --> 00:07:51,437
Nola Simon: happen.

142
00:07:51,537 --> 00:07:53,337
You can't bike on the freeway for one.

143
00:07:53,497 --> 00:07:56,927
It's illegal to I'm probably going to be.

144
00:07:57,107 --> 00:08:02,407
I'm still biking six hours later and then
I have to turn around and go home, right?

145
00:08:02,557 --> 00:08:06,587
So fundamentally, like my belief
was, this is not a message that's

146
00:08:06,597 --> 00:08:09,757
designed for me because you have
no clue how I even get to work.

147
00:08:09,767 --> 00:08:10,977
You don't even know who I am.

148
00:08:11,937 --> 00:08:16,157
Tamsen Webster: Or that's, oh, or
that's all you're left to think,

149
00:08:16,217 --> 00:08:20,107
absent the information, any other
information being put out there.

150
00:08:20,557 --> 00:08:24,387
So Again, it's such a
solvable problem, right?

151
00:08:24,527 --> 00:08:29,647
All that take, took, all that
would take is a, I'm no grammarian

152
00:08:29,957 --> 00:08:35,287
a dependent clause that says, for
those of you who live in the city.

153
00:08:35,307 --> 00:08:35,877
But, right?

154
00:08:36,037 --> 00:08:36,137
Yeah.

155
00:08:36,197 --> 00:08:39,297
Because at least what that
does is say, this is for you.

156
00:08:39,517 --> 00:08:47,297
And when it comes to those deep beliefs,
so the way that I, as you probably figured

157
00:08:47,297 --> 00:08:51,137
out by reading these things they're
all like nine different perspectives

158
00:08:51,137 --> 00:08:53,517
on what kind of sits in the center is.

159
00:08:54,117 --> 00:08:54,777
The same thing.

160
00:08:55,137 --> 00:08:59,847
It's not all the same thing, but it's
different avenues into this kind of nut

161
00:08:59,897 --> 00:09:05,887
of what is it that people have to hear in
order to understand and adapt a new idea.

162
00:09:06,407 --> 00:09:07,137
And.

163
00:09:07,987 --> 00:09:09,617
The deepest beliefs are
the hardest to shift.

164
00:09:09,777 --> 00:09:15,867
That one is in the trio, like that
one sits at the heart of the book.

165
00:09:15,867 --> 00:09:16,757
It's number five.

166
00:09:16,757 --> 00:09:20,647
So it's like literally in the
middle of all the pieces, because I

167
00:09:20,647 --> 00:09:29,767
think, for me, it is one of the most
counterintuitive principles of inspiring

168
00:09:29,767 --> 00:09:33,327
long term change or creating the
conditions that are more likely for it.

169
00:09:34,757 --> 00:09:35,987
And there's good reasons for that.

170
00:09:36,007 --> 00:09:39,807
The good reason for it is that it's
counterintuitive is that when we think

171
00:09:39,817 --> 00:09:44,687
about deep beliefs and, we'll acknowledge
that they're hard to shift, and the

172
00:09:44,687 --> 00:09:49,207
reason why I chose that phrasing was
because most people, A, would agree with

173
00:09:49,207 --> 00:09:51,527
it, but B, they see that as a problem.

174
00:09:52,717 --> 00:09:56,137
They see that it's a problem that
deep beliefs are hard to shift.

175
00:09:56,837 --> 00:09:59,217
And my perspective is that.

176
00:10:00,352 --> 00:10:01,512
No belief.

177
00:10:02,502 --> 00:10:03,432
Very few beliefs.

178
00:10:03,432 --> 00:10:04,352
Let me be careful.

179
00:10:04,362 --> 00:10:06,242
One always has to be
careful with absolutes.

180
00:10:06,642 --> 00:10:11,652
Very few beliefs that anybody
holds are equally true for

181
00:10:11,652 --> 00:10:14,282
them in every context, right?

182
00:10:14,842 --> 00:10:19,662
And what I mean by that is so all that
has to happen when you combine that

183
00:10:19,662 --> 00:10:25,012
principle with let's say every decision
has a story, which is the second one,

184
00:10:25,252 --> 00:10:33,342
which is All someone has to hear is
something else they believe to be true

185
00:10:33,872 --> 00:10:39,672
or recognize as true that is just as
strong or stronger and that they can

186
00:10:39,682 --> 00:10:43,842
notch into the story they're telling
themselves, but in a different way.

187
00:10:44,132 --> 00:10:48,572
And though I didn't have the language
for it back when I was a weight watchers

188
00:10:48,572 --> 00:10:54,132
leader it's again, one of the ones that,
that truly had its birth there because

189
00:10:55,252 --> 00:10:59,982
so often, your experience with weight
loss was my experience with weight loss,

190
00:10:59,982 --> 00:11:05,342
which is that I had tried and failed any
number of times before I finally found

191
00:11:05,342 --> 00:11:09,162
and created this kind of combination
of factors that, that worked for me.

192
00:11:09,772 --> 00:11:13,212
And certainly one of the things that
I observed over 13 years was that

193
00:11:13,212 --> 00:11:19,752
one of the biggest and most dangerous
things that could happen was someone

194
00:11:19,762 --> 00:11:25,182
faulting themselves for failure and
adding that to the mental tally of

195
00:11:25,182 --> 00:11:27,352
this belief that I can't do this thing.

196
00:11:28,042 --> 00:11:34,402
And so often when that's the operating
deep belief, I just can't, it's my genes.

197
00:11:34,402 --> 00:11:36,222
Like I'm just destined to be this way.

198
00:11:36,262 --> 00:11:39,162
And I felt that way about myself,
which is just like I come from

199
00:11:39,162 --> 00:11:41,042
a family of overweight women.

200
00:11:41,052 --> 00:11:44,482
And so maybe this is just
who I'm supposed to be.

201
00:11:45,062 --> 00:11:52,752
And what I found that was the antidote
to that kind of, setting where

202
00:11:52,752 --> 00:11:56,527
people set themselves up for failure
was instead of saying, put okay.

203
00:11:57,467 --> 00:12:03,447
Instead of putting all your eggs in a
belief that you haven't tested this is

204
00:12:03,447 --> 00:12:11,547
possible for me, or in a new behavior of
let me stop eating some food that I love.

205
00:12:12,867 --> 00:12:16,317
What would happen if, it really started
with a question, what would happen if

206
00:12:16,537 --> 00:12:21,767
we could map over something that they
are already good at someplace else?

207
00:12:22,037 --> 00:12:25,787
And for me personally,
just as an example, I am.

208
00:12:27,132 --> 00:12:31,722
almost pathologically a rule follower
and a systems follower, which is

209
00:12:31,722 --> 00:12:36,892
one of the reasons why for me Weight
watchers was a really good match.

210
00:12:37,092 --> 00:12:42,692
It is not a good match for people who
See it as a constricting framework.

211
00:12:42,902 --> 00:12:47,372
And or and aren't able or don't
have a leader who could show them or

212
00:12:47,572 --> 00:12:51,492
present them with a different way to
conceive of those same guidelines.

213
00:12:51,892 --> 00:12:56,402
But for me, it was like, once I found a
system, I was like, yes, this is awesome.

214
00:12:56,412 --> 00:12:58,812
I am great at following rules.

215
00:12:59,162 --> 00:13:03,202
Just give me rules as long as the
rules aren't too hard to follow.

216
00:13:03,612 --> 00:13:08,092
And for me, it was like mapping that
over and saying, oh, it's just a budget.

217
00:13:08,512 --> 00:13:12,682
And instead of thinking of myself
like, oh, I'm a bad person, food is

218
00:13:12,682 --> 00:13:20,192
good or bad, it for me, that system
neutralized the emotional attachment

219
00:13:20,192 --> 00:13:22,592
to it all to, to me, to, to the food.

220
00:13:22,922 --> 00:13:29,682
And so again, for me, once it, once, it
was, this is just about, solving a puzzle.

221
00:13:29,682 --> 00:13:33,462
Another thing I love, like
how do I get the food I want?

222
00:13:34,222 --> 00:13:38,492
into this framework that's
being presented to me, then it

223
00:13:38,502 --> 00:13:39,942
became actually like a game.

224
00:13:40,522 --> 00:13:44,822
Not one that I chose to gamify, because,
again, a thing I learned over time,

225
00:13:45,072 --> 00:13:48,032
was that, like, when you're trying
to play that game you win, you lose,

226
00:13:48,032 --> 00:13:49,052
and if you lose, you win, right?

227
00:13:49,052 --> 00:13:51,002
It's just you're, it's all you.

228
00:13:51,002 --> 00:13:52,382
Who are you trying to win against?

229
00:13:52,482 --> 00:13:53,682
Who are you playing against?

230
00:13:53,987 --> 00:13:54,647
Exactly.

231
00:13:54,947 --> 00:13:58,987
And, but I would, so once I was like
that, again, it wasn't the program

232
00:13:58,987 --> 00:14:04,407
that worked for me so much as there
was this aspect of the program that

233
00:14:04,447 --> 00:14:08,547
I could link to something that I was
already confident that I did well.

234
00:14:08,947 --> 00:14:09,787
And so that was a

235
00:14:09,787 --> 00:14:10,457
Nola Simon: stacking.

236
00:14:10,807 --> 00:14:13,297
Before habit stacking was a thing, really.

237
00:14:15,127 --> 00:14:17,417
Tamsen Webster: Yeah, because
it was just like this idea

238
00:14:17,417 --> 00:14:19,267
of again I'm, I love puzzles.

239
00:14:19,277 --> 00:14:20,257
Let me figure this out.

240
00:14:20,267 --> 00:14:22,007
Let me let me figure out how to do this.

241
00:14:22,017 --> 00:14:23,567
And I'm also a little ornery.

242
00:14:23,597 --> 00:14:24,717
I'm contrarian.

243
00:14:24,727 --> 00:14:29,137
So if you're like, It's not
possible to keep doing X, Y, or Z.

244
00:14:29,477 --> 00:14:32,817
Then I'm like I'm going to see if
it's possible if I can still have

245
00:14:32,817 --> 00:14:35,557
dark chocolate every day, and I
can still have my ice cream, and

246
00:14:35,557 --> 00:14:36,927
I can still have these things.

247
00:14:36,927 --> 00:14:40,087
The whole reason why I joined walked
into Weight Watchers for the first

248
00:14:40,087 --> 00:14:44,797
day is because I saw this hilarious
episode of the Oprah Winfrey show.

249
00:14:45,012 --> 00:14:48,142
When Sarah, the Duchess of
Ferguson was on here, this is

250
00:14:48,142 --> 00:14:50,042
dating me rather significantly.

251
00:14:50,072 --> 00:14:50,512
That's okay.

252
00:14:50,512 --> 00:14:51,452
We're the same age.

253
00:14:52,262 --> 00:14:52,502
Yeah.

254
00:14:53,032 --> 00:14:58,222
And they were, they like a got themselves
pretty much drunk on television and

255
00:14:58,222 --> 00:15:01,782
then attempted these two women who
really don't cook for themselves

256
00:15:01,802 --> 00:15:03,212
to make chocolate chip cookies.

257
00:15:03,522 --> 00:15:08,092
And I just, Hey, it was such like a
joyful thing, but also this whole idea

258
00:15:08,092 --> 00:15:11,882
of Oh, it linked into to bring it back
to some of the things that I talk about

259
00:15:11,882 --> 00:15:15,412
in the book, something that I recognized
is true, which is that if I couldn't

260
00:15:15,452 --> 00:15:21,142
lose weight doing the things that I
love, how could I possibly keep it off?

261
00:15:21,732 --> 00:15:25,907
So it just again from a thing that
You know, from assessing for myself.

262
00:15:25,907 --> 00:15:29,887
What hadn't worked in the past was
like, okay, if it's too restrictive,

263
00:15:29,887 --> 00:15:30,797
I'm not going to stay on it.

264
00:15:30,797 --> 00:15:34,837
If I telling me if I don't, if I feel
embarrassed about telling somebody

265
00:15:34,847 --> 00:15:39,497
else what I'm doing to lose weight or
to get healthy I'm not going to do it.

266
00:15:39,737 --> 00:15:41,657
If it's too extreme,
I'm not going to do it.

267
00:15:41,657 --> 00:15:47,817
And so it was really getting to a point
of saying, okay, I know what I need

268
00:15:47,827 --> 00:15:49,607
from something in order to make it work.

269
00:15:49,617 --> 00:15:52,817
And then it was just about
finding that intersection.

270
00:15:53,557 --> 00:15:57,967
And that was the role that I saw
myself as a way watchers leader with

271
00:15:57,997 --> 00:16:03,087
my members was, one thing that they
said that the company said to me once

272
00:16:03,087 --> 00:16:04,927
upon a time, which I couldn't unhear.

273
00:16:04,927 --> 00:16:08,177
And I still use this in any number of
ways was, they said to us at one point

274
00:16:08,177 --> 00:16:13,127
during ongoing training that we would
have that, our job was to be the expert.

275
00:16:13,467 --> 00:16:19,387
In the program and to recognize that our
members were the expert in themselves

276
00:16:20,237 --> 00:16:26,917
and that our job was to figure out how
to blend the expertise, not to presume

277
00:16:26,937 --> 00:16:29,917
that we knew what the right way to do.

278
00:16:29,917 --> 00:16:36,462
The program was for them, but to get
as much information and the Understand

279
00:16:36,462 --> 00:16:42,322
the program so thoroughly that we could
really adapt it to wherever somebody was.

280
00:16:42,332 --> 00:16:44,772
So an example, I find a window

281
00:16:44,772 --> 00:16:45,602
Nola Simon: or a door,

282
00:16:46,282 --> 00:16:46,662
Tamsen Webster: right?

283
00:16:46,692 --> 00:16:47,272
Exactly.

284
00:16:47,282 --> 00:16:51,292
And one of those windows of the
doors was I grew up in the point

285
00:16:51,292 --> 00:16:54,332
system of Weight Watchers, which
is basically like a budget, right?

286
00:16:54,332 --> 00:17:00,137
You get a certain number of Points to eat
in a day and food has points and your job,

287
00:17:00,177 --> 00:17:06,117
like a budget, is don't go over budget and
one of the things that was very difficult

288
00:17:06,127 --> 00:17:13,387
for people was when they deeply believed
that they were a night eater, like a

289
00:17:13,387 --> 00:17:17,057
label that they would assign to themselves
saying that they're a night eater and

290
00:17:17,077 --> 00:17:20,722
what that means for folks that may not
be familiar with that term is that it.

291
00:17:21,292 --> 00:17:26,432
They were they were great fleeing
things that you were they were,

292
00:17:26,522 --> 00:17:30,622
they felt like they really had
great and strong control through

293
00:17:30,622 --> 00:17:33,622
most of the day and through dinner.

294
00:17:34,022 --> 00:17:38,332
And then somewhere between dinner and
bedtime, the wheels would just come off.

295
00:17:39,002 --> 00:17:40,102
And some of that.

296
00:17:40,242 --> 00:17:43,732
As I observed over time again,
13 years and, with a number of

297
00:17:43,732 --> 00:17:48,012
meetings that I led in, around my
day job, I did the math one time.

298
00:17:48,012 --> 00:17:49,952
It was 3000 meetings.

299
00:17:50,482 --> 00:17:53,242
You pick up some data from doing that.

300
00:17:53,702 --> 00:17:55,167
And one of the things that I did.

301
00:17:55,687 --> 00:18:00,337
Picked up was that people that would
get so desperate because they would

302
00:18:00,337 --> 00:18:05,247
run out of points because the, the
points have worked for 24 hours.

303
00:18:05,297 --> 00:18:06,947
Most people started them in the morning.

304
00:18:06,947 --> 00:18:10,997
And so again, if you get to the end
of the day and at the time they wanted

305
00:18:10,997 --> 00:18:17,107
to or needed to eat or, do whatever
food was doing for them was the time

306
00:18:17,107 --> 00:18:18,017
when they had the fewest points.

307
00:18:18,992 --> 00:18:20,842
And they had got a lot of them again.

308
00:18:20,842 --> 00:18:24,402
We get to that point where they were
just like, then I can't do this because

309
00:18:24,442 --> 00:18:26,792
the program doesn't work with who I am.

310
00:18:27,702 --> 00:18:31,272
And I spent some time trying to
figure this one out for people

311
00:18:31,282 --> 00:18:34,252
because there really are a lot of
people for whom this is a challenge.

312
00:18:34,682 --> 00:18:40,662
And then I was like but there's
nowhere in this literature that says

313
00:18:40,662 --> 00:18:43,252
the points start in the morning.

314
00:18:43,432 --> 00:18:45,882
The points are just 24 hours.

315
00:18:46,432 --> 00:18:50,942
What I ended up doing was
saying to them, hey, guess what?

316
00:18:51,802 --> 00:18:56,432
There's no, nothing says that you have
to start the points in the morning.

317
00:18:57,042 --> 00:18:59,282
It's just 24 hours of points.

318
00:18:59,302 --> 00:19:02,312
And yeah, it's going to mean you're
going to need to play with the journaling

319
00:19:02,322 --> 00:19:05,272
things that we've got and where
you write things down a little bit.

320
00:19:05,652 --> 00:19:09,512
But as long as you can feel like
you can keep track, then start your

321
00:19:09,512 --> 00:19:15,942
points at dinner because deeper
belief that I anchored it to.

322
00:19:16,347 --> 00:19:18,067
That there's 24 hours in a day.

323
00:19:18,542 --> 00:19:18,782
Yeah.

324
00:19:18,862 --> 00:19:22,342
And that 24 hours can start at any time.

325
00:19:22,832 --> 00:19:26,472
And so for many people, I'm
not saying all, but for many

326
00:19:26,472 --> 00:19:28,562
people, just that simple shift.

327
00:19:28,562 --> 00:19:30,732
Again, I didn't have to tell
them they weren't night eaters.

328
00:19:30,962 --> 00:19:32,532
I didn't have to change who they were.

329
00:19:32,892 --> 00:19:36,822
All I was doing was saying,
there is something else that is

330
00:19:36,862 --> 00:19:41,662
actually, in this case, outside
of you, that's even more reliable.

331
00:19:42,157 --> 00:19:45,247
That it that when it comes
together with you actually

332
00:19:45,247 --> 00:19:46,897
gives you a path forward here.

333
00:19:47,337 --> 00:19:47,717
And

334
00:19:47,717 --> 00:19:50,497
Nola Simon: that works too for, cause
like people who work night shifts,

335
00:19:50,837 --> 00:19:53,947
it's a way to be more flexible
with the reality of who they're

336
00:19:54,297 --> 00:19:55,467
like, who they are in their life.

337
00:19:55,517 --> 00:19:55,657
Tamsen Webster: Yeah.

338
00:19:55,727 --> 00:19:55,897
And.

339
00:19:56,317 --> 00:19:57,677
There's always something like that.

340
00:19:57,697 --> 00:20:01,847
I I should say I always start with
the assumption or the belief that

341
00:20:01,847 --> 00:20:06,667
there's something like that because
it allows me to start looking for it.

342
00:20:06,717 --> 00:20:10,967
Then, if I come into any situation
where I'm trying to help someone

343
00:20:10,967 --> 00:20:14,777
change or help someone help other
people or their organization change.

344
00:20:15,967 --> 00:20:20,117
If I come in saying, how do we
get them to say yes to this?

345
00:20:20,537 --> 00:20:25,532
Then I've created a really binary
situation where it's just Yes, not

346
00:20:25,532 --> 00:20:31,552
yes to this change, not how can I
open up and say, All right, we are

347
00:20:31,552 --> 00:20:34,492
trying to achieve this larger thing.

348
00:20:35,152 --> 00:20:37,082
Are we all in agreement about that?

349
00:20:37,112 --> 00:20:40,842
Are we trying, in Weight Watchers,
are we trying to achieve health goals?

350
00:20:41,422 --> 00:20:41,852
Yeah.

351
00:20:41,902 --> 00:20:42,442
Okay, great.

352
00:20:42,852 --> 00:20:46,202
Then as long as we're in agreement
about that, we're going to start there.

353
00:20:46,322 --> 00:20:49,952
Now let's take point by point
and say, what, where else are we

354
00:20:49,962 --> 00:20:51,402
where are the points of conflict?

355
00:20:51,512 --> 00:20:52,432
Where aren't they?

356
00:20:53,102 --> 00:20:59,632
But by avoiding looking and trying to
challenge those deep beliefs and really

357
00:20:59,632 --> 00:21:03,582
just coming at it from whatever the
situation is from a different direction

358
00:21:04,142 --> 00:21:09,872
and finding something that is strong
as strong or a stronger than what's

359
00:21:09,872 --> 00:21:15,982
standing in the way, then we allow people
to tell themselves a different story.

360
00:21:17,032 --> 00:21:21,822
In their head or one that now
has a possibility of success,

361
00:21:21,992 --> 00:21:23,622
whereas the current one doesn't.

362
00:21:23,992 --> 00:21:28,792
And when somebody wants the outcome
enough, they will, at least at that point,

363
00:21:28,902 --> 00:21:34,472
be willing to try because they'll agree
in principle now that it's possible.

364
00:21:35,022 --> 00:21:35,802
And.

365
00:21:36,652 --> 00:21:39,222
For a lot of us and with a lot of
change that we're trying to do in

366
00:21:39,222 --> 00:21:44,792
organizations, like that's the first
barrier that we run up against, which

367
00:21:44,792 --> 00:21:49,662
is people reject it at a hand before
even because there's just dismissed.

368
00:21:49,662 --> 00:21:50,592
It is not possible.

369
00:21:50,902 --> 00:21:56,082
And this is where I, I, one of the many
things I hope that people pull from the

370
00:21:56,082 --> 00:22:04,392
book is just this idea of that little tiny
yes, that comes saying, is it possible?

371
00:22:05,027 --> 00:22:10,417
Do you agree in principle that this would
work, that this is, that this makes sense?

372
00:22:10,747 --> 00:22:13,607
Again, not based on data and evidence.

373
00:22:13,757 --> 00:22:14,617
Those are important.

374
00:22:14,797 --> 00:22:15,717
They come later.

375
00:22:16,067 --> 00:22:21,597
But intuitively, based on what you
recognize as true become something

376
00:22:21,607 --> 00:22:26,277
that will shift what you how
you think about the world or how

377
00:22:26,277 --> 00:22:28,557
you think about the situation or
how you think about this change.

378
00:22:28,897 --> 00:22:33,387
And I think that's really where the key
is so that it comes it flips from the

379
00:22:33,387 --> 00:22:38,947
deepest beliefs are the hardest to shift
as being a problem to the deepest beliefs

380
00:22:38,947 --> 00:22:43,647
are the hardest to shift actually tell
you where to start to solve the problem.

381
00:22:44,407 --> 00:22:48,547
Start with by building on
those deep beliefs rather

382
00:22:48,547 --> 00:22:50,647
than trying to challenge them.

383
00:22:51,377 --> 00:22:55,157
Nola Simon: Yeah, no, I the question
comes up with my work is the whole return

384
00:22:55,157 --> 00:22:59,927
to office debate and everybody, like all
these CEOs trying to bring people back in

385
00:22:59,927 --> 00:23:02,317
because of collaboration and innovation.

386
00:23:02,827 --> 00:23:06,037
And, that the work is just
better in the office and people

387
00:23:06,037 --> 00:23:07,667
fundamentally don't believe them.

388
00:23:07,822 --> 00:23:10,412
Because for one, they've been
able to work well at home.

389
00:23:10,912 --> 00:23:15,262
Two, their role doesn't really
involve innovation or collaboration.

390
00:23:15,532 --> 00:23:20,402
And as we've tried in the past, they
haven't succeeded to actually influence

391
00:23:20,402 --> 00:23:21,972
that innovation and collaboration.

392
00:23:22,352 --> 00:23:27,772
And so fundamentally there's that
disagreement about those beliefs.

393
00:23:27,872 --> 00:23:28,412
Tamsen Webster: Yes.

394
00:23:28,442 --> 00:23:30,157
And I would venture to say.

395
00:23:31,887 --> 00:23:32,677
That

396
00:23:37,447 --> 00:23:42,577
in some of those cases where the
leadership is bringing people back,

397
00:23:43,757 --> 00:23:47,667
they don't actually believe that
it they don't believe it either.

398
00:23:48,247 --> 00:23:49,907
And that actually isn't the reason.

399
00:23:50,767 --> 00:23:51,457
Bringing them back.

400
00:23:51,817 --> 00:23:56,337
And so the thing is that, particularly,
I think people's intuitive BS

401
00:23:56,357 --> 00:23:58,517
meter has always been very good.

402
00:23:58,807 --> 00:24:06,977
But employees to their employers is super
good because they have a lot of history

403
00:24:07,047 --> 00:24:09,127
with the behavior of the organization.

404
00:24:09,487 --> 00:24:10,687
And and guess what?

405
00:24:11,177 --> 00:24:19,022
We are, as humans, we are
actually Nonverbal first, right?

406
00:24:19,022 --> 00:24:29,142
Like that and we will trust what we
experience with all of ourselves far

407
00:24:29,692 --> 00:24:32,632
more than any words we ever attach to it.

408
00:24:33,332 --> 00:24:37,722
And this is where, again, as part
of the motivation of this book,

409
00:24:37,722 --> 00:24:42,482
which is just saying, listen, if
you can't actually make a, I know

410
00:24:42,482 --> 00:24:43,822
this is going to sound super direct.

411
00:24:44,967 --> 00:24:45,687
rational.

412
00:24:45,747 --> 00:24:47,287
I don't get to the reason why it's not.

413
00:24:47,297 --> 00:24:52,487
But if you can't make both a
valid and sound argument that

414
00:24:52,777 --> 00:24:55,987
your audience agrees is valid and
sound, and what I mean by valid and

415
00:24:55,987 --> 00:24:58,137
sound is it is a logical argument.

416
00:24:58,177 --> 00:25:02,747
Like it's complete, meaning this plus
this equals this and they agree with you.

417
00:25:03,737 --> 00:25:08,587
And sound, meaning the premises upon
which you are, like, the thing where

418
00:25:08,587 --> 00:25:12,067
you're saying, this is true, and this
is true, therefore, if they don't agree

419
00:25:12,067 --> 00:25:14,977
with one of those two things, then
the argument is dead in the water.

420
00:25:16,127 --> 00:25:17,377
And I know you're right.

421
00:25:17,377 --> 00:25:22,387
Because I've seen and I know you're right
because I've seen it as well that people

422
00:25:22,387 --> 00:25:26,187
don't believe that they're more creative
or innovative when they're all together.

423
00:25:26,767 --> 00:25:29,587
I also know that the studies say that.

424
00:25:30,322 --> 00:25:33,522
They are wrong that when people
are together, they actually are.

425
00:25:33,562 --> 00:25:35,132
And then you're going to say yes.

426
00:25:35,132 --> 00:25:38,002
And some of those studies came
from places like Microsoft.

427
00:25:38,002 --> 00:25:39,532
Of course, it's self serving again.

428
00:25:39,532 --> 00:25:42,282
Everybody's we can get the
numbers to say whatever we want.

429
00:25:42,762 --> 00:25:47,312
But here's what I would say
that even people who are

430
00:25:49,962 --> 00:25:52,492
reluctant to come back to the office.

431
00:25:53,017 --> 00:25:54,257
All the time, regardless.

432
00:25:54,577 --> 00:25:58,537
You know what I see, and you probably see
it, too, because I go into organizations

433
00:25:58,697 --> 00:26:02,747
to speak often at these occasions when
they have brought everyone together

434
00:26:02,977 --> 00:26:10,447
when they've been remote is that magic
happens, particularly in the non formal

435
00:26:10,807 --> 00:26:15,957
situations when you bring people together
when there's lunches together when they

436
00:26:15,957 --> 00:26:21,667
all go out to karaoke together and those
kinds of things and What I, where I

437
00:26:21,697 --> 00:26:25,887
think these back to work and I get not
an expert in all of this like you are,

438
00:26:25,887 --> 00:26:33,317
but where I suspect a lot of this breaks
down is that if the leadership actually

439
00:26:33,377 --> 00:26:36,047
articulated their own case to themselves,

440
00:26:39,177 --> 00:26:42,307
they actually wouldn't be able to make
an argument that actually because if

441
00:26:42,307 --> 00:26:45,072
they took off, one of the things I
talk about in the introduction to the

442
00:26:45,072 --> 00:26:50,092
book is what I call the persuaders
paradox, meaning we get so convinced

443
00:26:50,092 --> 00:26:53,377
of our own idea Or so charged with.

444
00:26:53,387 --> 00:26:56,597
We have to make this thing happen
that I have to convince people that

445
00:26:56,637 --> 00:27:03,157
we often will engage in a persuasion
techniques and attempts that if we were

446
00:27:03,157 --> 00:27:06,937
to take that hat off for a moment, we
would never tolerate for ourselves.

447
00:27:07,307 --> 00:27:08,197
Yeah, and.

448
00:27:10,117 --> 00:27:12,797
It's one of those things where,
you know, cause I see it a lot.

449
00:27:12,797 --> 00:27:15,057
It's the role I often
play in organizations.

450
00:27:15,067 --> 00:27:19,537
So thank you, brave clients where,
they'll say we believe that it's, it's

451
00:27:19,537 --> 00:27:20,817
going to be better for collaboration.

452
00:27:20,817 --> 00:27:21,307
Innovation.

453
00:27:21,307 --> 00:27:25,787
I'm like, and I would say, do you
believe you are more collaborative and

454
00:27:25,817 --> 00:27:28,987
innovative are equally collaborative,
innovative working remote.

455
00:27:29,397 --> 00:27:33,407
And I think a fair portion of those
people would be like yeah, I am, but.

456
00:27:33,772 --> 00:27:34,492
They aren't.

457
00:27:34,832 --> 00:27:35,042
Right?

458
00:27:35,122 --> 00:27:37,502
And it's this kind of perspective.

459
00:27:37,512 --> 00:27:40,952
So anyway, I think a lot of it
comes down to really thinking about

460
00:27:42,722 --> 00:27:47,792
what would be an argument that
The employees would agree is true.

461
00:27:48,412 --> 00:27:52,872
What would be the premises that the
employees would agree would make sense.

462
00:27:52,892 --> 00:27:59,972
And I think one of the one of the
avenues for that is recalling a recalling

463
00:27:59,972 --> 00:28:03,712
those experiences where there has been
something magical about getting people

464
00:28:03,722 --> 00:28:09,232
physically together and then be making
sure that your policies procedures

465
00:28:09,232 --> 00:28:11,062
that are in fact what's happening.

466
00:28:11,062 --> 00:28:14,512
The way that I've come to define
something that someone can't unhear

467
00:28:15,352 --> 00:28:23,132
is that it is a recognizable truth
that creates, crystallizes, or

468
00:28:23,132 --> 00:28:25,742
corrupts how they see the world.

469
00:28:27,172 --> 00:28:33,522
And the issue is when you're trying to
get someone to change, And they and the

470
00:28:33,542 --> 00:28:40,492
whatever you're presenting to them does
not do one of those four things, right?

471
00:28:40,492 --> 00:28:41,932
It's not a recognizable truth.

472
00:28:41,942 --> 00:28:46,412
They don't see it in play or
it doesn't do one of those and

473
00:28:46,442 --> 00:28:47,442
then it's not going to work.

474
00:28:47,702 --> 00:28:52,042
So when it comes to back to office
again, it's like, where do people agree?

475
00:28:52,182 --> 00:28:53,302
Can we start there?

476
00:28:53,752 --> 00:28:54,232
And.

477
00:28:54,527 --> 00:28:55,997
Again, I think the path is like there.

478
00:28:56,007 --> 00:28:59,087
There are these magical moments
where when people are physically

479
00:28:59,087 --> 00:29:00,687
together, other stuff happens.

480
00:29:00,707 --> 00:29:03,137
It may not be collaboration
and innovation.

481
00:29:03,137 --> 00:29:07,247
It may be something else that
enables more of that to happen later.

482
00:29:07,627 --> 00:29:12,617
But then the second step is critical
on the part of the organization, which

483
00:29:12,617 --> 00:29:18,257
is to set up the situations where those
things are actually going to happen.

484
00:29:18,577 --> 00:29:21,687
Because the vast majority of
people I talk to who have been at.

485
00:29:22,277 --> 00:29:26,947
In their terms, forced back to work part
of the reason why they're so frustrated

486
00:29:26,947 --> 00:29:32,577
by it is because they're sitting
physically at work in online meetings.

487
00:29:33,217 --> 00:29:37,947
Yes, I survived a return
to office mandate in 2013.

488
00:29:37,957 --> 00:29:42,297
So long before, online meetings
were really regular, I think.

489
00:29:42,677 --> 00:29:46,097
And part of it was we were brought
back because the infrastructure didn't

490
00:29:46,797 --> 00:29:50,097
necessarily support everything that we
were trying to do at that particular time.

491
00:29:51,812 --> 00:29:55,892
And I had driven a lot of it and I knew
it was completely possible to do it.

492
00:29:55,892 --> 00:29:59,462
They just needed to work together and
they needed to get their act together.

493
00:29:59,822 --> 00:30:04,102
So I had made specific recommendations,
but the way that I coped with that

494
00:30:04,152 --> 00:30:10,372
was actually flipping it and basically
saying that I can make this work for me

495
00:30:10,852 --> 00:30:16,272
because this is what I need to do so that
when we bring it back, it'll work well.

496
00:30:16,597 --> 00:30:20,587
So I flipped it to be like I
could totally work from home.

497
00:30:20,897 --> 00:30:22,047
I could make this work.

498
00:30:22,397 --> 00:30:23,897
But what do I have to do?

499
00:30:23,907 --> 00:30:28,007
How can I help so that everybody
else can get to where I am.

500
00:30:28,397 --> 00:30:31,887
So I went in and I started training
people how to use webinar software.

501
00:30:32,227 --> 00:30:35,857
I built out operating protocols
and I, I worked with like the tech

502
00:30:35,887 --> 00:30:37,397
team and I did all of that work.

503
00:30:37,397 --> 00:30:41,147
Like I never really stopped working on
it, even though it was never my job.

504
00:30:41,647 --> 00:30:46,267
And so assuming that identity and
flipping that helped me deal with the

505
00:30:46,267 --> 00:30:49,737
emotional impacts of it, even though,
it was still aggravating, but it's

506
00:30:49,737 --> 00:30:51,697
at least I could flip my perspective.

507
00:30:51,697 --> 00:30:54,817
And I became the person who
is going to make it work.

508
00:30:54,817 --> 00:30:56,787
He was invested and
committed for the longterm.

509
00:30:58,022 --> 00:31:01,322
Yeah, that, that's the,

510
00:31:04,342 --> 00:31:12,437
the risk in this approach is that you
discover that As most marketers know

511
00:31:12,447 --> 00:31:15,977
about marketing messaging, and this
is where a lot of this started for me,

512
00:31:15,987 --> 00:31:17,377
cause that's where my career started.

513
00:31:17,717 --> 00:31:23,247
Marketers know that no amount of great
marketing will fix a product problem.

514
00:31:23,437 --> 00:31:26,817
It's another version of, nothing killed
a bad product, like good advertising.

515
00:31:27,977 --> 00:31:30,092
There is no amount of messaging.

516
00:31:30,392 --> 00:31:34,882
that will make a change
that is not fundamentally in

517
00:31:34,882 --> 00:31:38,442
someone's favor, in their favor.

518
00:31:39,342 --> 00:31:43,262
And I would argue that anything where
you're trying to get them to believe

519
00:31:43,262 --> 00:31:48,067
that it's in their favor is Out of
line with my own personal ethics.

520
00:31:48,417 --> 00:31:53,237
People's own mileage may
vary, but the thing is that

521
00:31:53,277 --> 00:31:54,657
eventually they'll figure it out.

522
00:31:54,707 --> 00:31:56,517
Let's we can get all Shakespearean on it.

523
00:31:56,527 --> 00:32:01,667
Like the truth will out again,
over time, people will see whether

524
00:32:01,687 --> 00:32:05,887
there's a gap between what they
were told and what they experience.

525
00:32:06,267 --> 00:32:10,127
And they are always going to
trust their own experience more.

526
00:32:10,637 --> 00:32:19,077
And so when You know, in those situations
where it really isn't going to work

527
00:32:19,077 --> 00:32:25,407
out for some people on the team,
that's where, this underneath a lot

528
00:32:25,407 --> 00:32:30,177
of, there's a, there is a realization
that may come to some readers of this

529
00:32:30,177 --> 00:32:34,182
book, which is that what this is.

530
00:32:34,182 --> 00:32:38,372
And what that shift in approach does
is that it shifts the risk of the

531
00:32:38,372 --> 00:32:42,962
change onto the person asking for
it or onto the people asking for it.

532
00:32:43,662 --> 00:32:47,622
And that's again my bias.

533
00:32:47,622 --> 00:32:50,122
I've got a lot of reasons for
why I think that's appropriate,

534
00:32:50,122 --> 00:32:52,052
but it like get intuitively.

535
00:32:52,442 --> 00:32:56,412
This is definitely for a book for
people who would agree that is true,

536
00:32:56,432 --> 00:32:58,962
that if I am asking you to change.

537
00:32:59,502 --> 00:32:59,632
The.

538
00:33:01,692 --> 00:33:05,572
If it's a worthwhile change, I should
believe enough in that change to

539
00:33:05,612 --> 00:33:12,862
assume the risks of giving you my
honest, fully transparent reasoning

540
00:33:12,862 --> 00:33:17,742
for it and acknowledge and take
the risk that you may not agree.

541
00:33:18,632 --> 00:33:19,112
Oh, yeah.

542
00:33:19,182 --> 00:33:22,162
Yeah, we had that once
with a software program.

543
00:33:22,162 --> 00:33:22,932
They were trying to bring in.

544
00:33:22,942 --> 00:33:25,692
They did spend 2 million
dollars on like a.

545
00:33:25,922 --> 00:33:28,712
Basically, like a custom CRM
before Salesforce was a thing.

546
00:33:29,132 --> 00:33:31,922
And then they're like we spent
2, 000, 2 million on this.

547
00:33:31,922 --> 00:33:32,832
We need you to use it.

548
00:33:32,842 --> 00:33:34,322
And I'm like, okay, but
you're making my life.

549
00:33:34,757 --> 00:33:35,547
More difficult.

550
00:33:35,697 --> 00:33:36,637
Why would I use it?

551
00:33:36,637 --> 00:33:39,607
Because it doesn't solve
any problem that I have.

552
00:33:40,167 --> 00:33:42,227
You're just adding to my day.

553
00:33:42,497 --> 00:33:46,217
And then eventually they started
adding in things that were useful.

554
00:33:46,687 --> 00:33:49,657
So then it's okay I can
see the use case for that.

555
00:33:49,727 --> 00:33:51,417
That's making my day easier.

556
00:33:52,247 --> 00:33:52,967
I'll use it.

557
00:33:53,277 --> 00:33:56,317
I don't really care about your
2 million that you spent on it.

558
00:33:56,707 --> 00:33:58,467
That's poor planning on your part.

559
00:33:59,217 --> 00:33:59,527
Yes.

560
00:33:59,597 --> 00:34:01,277
If you make my day easier.

561
00:34:01,277 --> 00:34:01,332
Okay.

562
00:34:01,942 --> 00:34:02,772
I'll support you.

563
00:34:04,512 --> 00:34:08,602
And that is where, and that's, for
me, that's always the place to start

564
00:34:08,652 --> 00:34:12,872
a message of change is what, in
what direction are the people you're

565
00:34:12,872 --> 00:34:16,012
talking to already traveling, right?

566
00:34:16,292 --> 00:34:21,322
And one thing that you can rely
on is that your team always

567
00:34:21,322 --> 00:34:22,682
wants their day to be easier.

568
00:34:23,002 --> 00:34:26,502
They always want there
to be less annoyances.

569
00:34:26,502 --> 00:34:32,342
They always want to be, they always want
more time to do the things that they love.

570
00:34:32,682 --> 00:34:37,332
Right now in some companies that culture
is do more of the work and other for

571
00:34:37,332 --> 00:34:40,782
other people and maybe even within that
company that for other people that's

572
00:34:40,942 --> 00:34:45,362
spending more time with friends, family,
loved ones, crossword puzzles, dogs.

573
00:34:45,402 --> 00:34:46,732
I don't know what that is.

574
00:34:48,657 --> 00:34:52,117
This comes back to that fifth principle
of the deepest beliefs are the hardest

575
00:34:52,117 --> 00:34:57,407
to shift because part of the belief
is that I want the thing right?

576
00:34:57,697 --> 00:35:01,767
And if I'm already organized and wired
in the direction of, I'm going to

577
00:35:01,767 --> 00:35:07,757
pursue and be open to anything that
legitimately will make my life easier,

578
00:35:08,517 --> 00:35:10,497
then start the message of change there.

579
00:35:11,192 --> 00:35:14,632
Pretty much one thing that's usually not
going to fly is that it's for the good

580
00:35:14,632 --> 00:35:21,822
of the company, that may fly with your C
suite, but it's still conditional on as

581
00:35:21,832 --> 00:35:25,812
long as it doesn't make my job harder.

582
00:35:25,912 --> 00:35:28,912
And so starting from
there is the first thing.

583
00:35:29,102 --> 00:35:35,542
And then again, so often what we do
when we, All forms of messaging, but

584
00:35:35,542 --> 00:35:39,662
particularly around messaging that's
meant to drive a shift in thinking or

585
00:35:39,662 --> 00:35:46,892
behavior or just create an action is that
we think that, at least we've learned

586
00:35:46,892 --> 00:35:51,062
that just telling people what to do
doesn't work or doesn't work long term

587
00:35:51,072 --> 00:35:54,122
or doesn't work and build the kind of
relationships and culture that you want.

588
00:35:54,662 --> 00:35:58,022
So we've we've, Thanks in no
small part to Simon Sinek.

589
00:35:58,052 --> 00:35:59,172
We've got, we've got this.

590
00:35:59,242 --> 00:36:01,182
We've understood now
that we, yeah, exactly.

591
00:36:01,372 --> 00:36:04,302
We have to at least explain
why are we doing this thing?

592
00:36:04,512 --> 00:36:07,602
We're doing this thing because
now I would say that when

593
00:36:07,602 --> 00:36:09,182
you're trying to drive action.

594
00:36:09,672 --> 00:36:15,132
That we use the why that doesn't
resonate for people a lot of times,

595
00:36:15,152 --> 00:36:18,962
or it does, but it's a distant,
it's seven rooms over, right?

596
00:36:18,962 --> 00:36:22,852
Whereas if there was something closer,
like for you to say that to, for them

597
00:36:22,852 --> 00:36:24,202
to say we invested a lot of money.

598
00:36:24,202 --> 00:36:26,612
You're like, that doesn't
ring my bell at all.

599
00:36:26,982 --> 00:36:33,402
But if it were legitimately, even if it
were initially positioned as this is going

600
00:36:33,492 --> 00:36:37,132
to make your life easier, what we miss.

601
00:36:37,187 --> 00:36:43,077
And what that means is that is
starting with not just the why behind

602
00:36:43,077 --> 00:36:48,287
what the change is, but the why, but
behind what, how the change works.

603
00:36:48,297 --> 00:36:53,997
In other words, why will this change
actually accomplish this thing?

604
00:36:54,707 --> 00:36:59,572
And that's the one we skip, and that's
the one where we, More often than not

605
00:36:59,612 --> 00:37:04,702
end up with things that we trying to
argue based on things we wish were true,

606
00:37:04,812 --> 00:37:08,962
like the collaboration and innovation,
but not things again, something that

607
00:37:08,962 --> 00:37:14,132
someone can't unhear is a recognizable
truth doesn't mean it actually is, but

608
00:37:14,132 --> 00:37:15,802
they have to recognize it as truth.

609
00:37:15,802 --> 00:37:19,382
And this is where we resolve this
tension between someone going,

610
00:37:19,672 --> 00:37:21,062
this is a very logical approach.

611
00:37:21,472 --> 00:37:24,922
It's logic that uses beliefs in its input.

612
00:37:25,762 --> 00:37:28,492
That's not rational, totally not.

613
00:37:28,982 --> 00:37:31,742
So this is where we
find that middle ground.

614
00:37:31,772 --> 00:37:38,122
But it starts with saying, if you
want people to go along, it's not

615
00:37:38,142 --> 00:37:40,962
their job to move in a new direction.

616
00:37:41,082 --> 00:37:46,482
It's your job to show how the thing
that you're asking them to do doesn't

617
00:37:46,492 --> 00:37:48,082
take them off the path that they're on.

618
00:37:48,462 --> 00:37:53,092
And in fact, may actually
accelerate them towards whatever

619
00:37:53,092 --> 00:37:54,132
it is that they're pursuing.

620
00:37:54,392 --> 00:37:55,382
But it's your job.

621
00:37:55,382 --> 00:38:02,667
It's your team's job as a leader, as
a colleague to, to If you don't know

622
00:38:02,667 --> 00:38:07,587
specifically what those things are to just
to do the little bit of human work that

623
00:38:07,587 --> 00:38:12,457
would say what would a smart, capable,
good person, which all of your team is,

624
00:38:12,457 --> 00:38:19,257
by the way, what would they most likely
care about the most, what would be the

625
00:38:19,267 --> 00:38:24,297
most, what would be the thing that they're
most, caring about again, not, and it

626
00:38:24,297 --> 00:38:27,707
isn't by the way, long term avoiding pain.

627
00:38:27,987 --> 00:38:28,507
It's.

628
00:38:29,117 --> 00:38:32,247
Yes, they want to avoid pain in the
short term, but they also want, there's

629
00:38:32,247 --> 00:38:33,777
something else that they're looking for.

630
00:38:33,987 --> 00:38:39,027
So there's a lot to it, but ultimately
it is, does come down to very simple

631
00:38:39,027 --> 00:38:40,947
principles, which is why I wrote the book.

632
00:38:42,037 --> 00:38:46,297
I like to the smart, capable,
good approach because it helps

633
00:38:46,327 --> 00:38:48,297
people approach it with empathy.

634
00:38:48,582 --> 00:38:51,652
Right, and put themselves in
somebody else's shoes, I find.

635
00:38:51,662 --> 00:38:55,532
So if you assume that everybody is
smart, capable and good, which the

636
00:38:55,532 --> 00:38:59,832
majority of people want to be, I maybe
Elon Musk claims to be an evil genius.

637
00:38:59,832 --> 00:39:02,032
I'm not sure, but if everybody wants.

638
00:39:02,032 --> 00:39:07,952
Yeah, from that perspective, then you have
to consider that, there's a reason that's

639
00:39:07,952 --> 00:39:12,412
driving them that it makes you start
that curiosity thread, which I think is.

640
00:39:13,072 --> 00:39:13,792
It's helpful.

641
00:39:14,442 --> 00:39:14,942
That's right.

642
00:39:15,372 --> 00:39:17,642
So yeah, I love this topic.

643
00:39:17,652 --> 00:39:18,512
It's a couple things.

644
00:39:18,512 --> 00:39:23,422
One is, again, most of the things that
I've put in here come from trial and

645
00:39:23,432 --> 00:39:30,392
error experience of what business leaders
and humans do and don't talk, right?

646
00:39:30,632 --> 00:39:31,342
And.

647
00:39:31,902 --> 00:39:38,342
And one of those, particularly in
business, it can be for not for all people

648
00:39:38,342 --> 00:39:39,592
in business and not for all leaders.

649
00:39:39,592 --> 00:39:45,842
But the empathy is can for certain
people feel quite squishy on.

650
00:39:45,882 --> 00:39:50,132
And that's because oftentimes that
we've conflated that there's only one

651
00:39:50,132 --> 00:39:54,132
kind of empathy when, in fact, there's
actually multiple kinds of empathy and

652
00:39:54,707 --> 00:39:59,567
Most of the time what we're, what we
think we mean with empathy is emotional

653
00:39:59,577 --> 00:40:02,657
empathy, which is understanding
what somebody else is feeling.

654
00:40:03,267 --> 00:40:09,027
And that feels very touchy feely
to particularly, task oriented

655
00:40:09,027 --> 00:40:10,087
leaders and things like that.

656
00:40:10,087 --> 00:40:14,557
Not everybody's wired towards
relationships and that's okay by the way.

657
00:40:16,247 --> 00:40:20,327
But one thing that can help to
understand is Hey you don't.

658
00:40:20,587 --> 00:40:22,697
Control how somebody
feels about something.

659
00:40:22,827 --> 00:40:23,817
You do not.

660
00:40:24,297 --> 00:40:25,347
And they do.

661
00:40:25,617 --> 00:40:27,772
And that's On that.

662
00:40:27,842 --> 00:40:31,702
And so not only does it feel
uncomfortable for certain people

663
00:40:31,702 --> 00:40:33,252
because of how they're wired.

664
00:40:33,322 --> 00:40:38,152
I don't feel comfortable on this
feeling thing on another level.

665
00:40:39,022 --> 00:40:41,952
Other people may resist it because
they're like, I don't feel comfortable.

666
00:40:42,592 --> 00:40:45,162
I don't directly control
how they feel anyway.

667
00:40:45,162 --> 00:40:48,252
So again, what's for some folks that
maybe they're efficiency oriented.

668
00:40:48,362 --> 00:40:53,362
Like I don't, even if I wanted to know
or could know, I can't, there's, it's

669
00:40:53,372 --> 00:40:55,682
not a thing I can directly affect.

670
00:40:56,342 --> 00:40:59,352
And there's lots of people who
actually don't really understand

671
00:40:59,352 --> 00:41:00,522
what they're feeling either.

672
00:41:00,962 --> 00:41:04,202
Like admitting their own
emotions to themselves.

673
00:41:04,252 --> 00:41:05,102
So it's complex.

674
00:41:05,742 --> 00:41:09,832
And this is where understanding that
there's another avenue towards empathy

675
00:41:09,842 --> 00:41:13,952
that can be really important and that's
cognitive empathy, which is understanding

676
00:41:13,952 --> 00:41:15,572
what somebody else is thinking.

677
00:41:16,242 --> 00:41:20,712
And there's a huge amount of support
for the fact that many of our feelings

678
00:41:21,322 --> 00:41:24,122
are directly tied to our thoughts.

679
00:41:24,522 --> 00:41:28,572
And so if we can back up and
go, whoo, this person is super

680
00:41:28,572 --> 00:41:32,702
passionate about this, or, ooh, this
person's really angry about this.

681
00:41:33,162 --> 00:41:34,402
And instead of going.

682
00:41:34,967 --> 00:41:38,807
I don't understand the feeling, which
you may not, you're probably not going

683
00:41:38,807 --> 00:41:43,707
to understand it unless you start
to say what must they be thinking?

684
00:41:43,717 --> 00:41:49,227
Or what could they be thinking that would
produce that anger would produce that

685
00:41:49,237 --> 00:41:51,837
doubt that would produce that resistance?

686
00:41:52,417 --> 00:41:52,937
And.

687
00:41:53,482 --> 00:41:54,232
You're right.

688
00:41:54,332 --> 00:41:58,742
The smart, capable, good thing is
that most people want to be it.

689
00:41:59,172 --> 00:42:02,322
And I chose the phrasing in the
book quite consciously that most

690
00:42:02,322 --> 00:42:04,582
people want to be seen that way.

691
00:42:05,052 --> 00:42:08,592
Because I've spent enough years in
therapy to know that not everybody's

692
00:42:08,592 --> 00:42:11,262
convinced all the time that they
are smart, capable, or good.

693
00:42:12,382 --> 00:42:13,212
Most of us.

694
00:42:13,792 --> 00:42:17,652
The majority of us, I would say
even the Elon Musks of the world

695
00:42:18,142 --> 00:42:22,112
want to be seen as smart, capable
and good to their in group, right?

696
00:42:22,162 --> 00:42:23,622
Or to other people.

697
00:42:23,952 --> 00:42:28,962
And so they're very happy to be seen as
not good by a huge group of other people

698
00:42:28,992 --> 00:42:35,212
as long as they feel validated by the
people whose opinion they want or need.

699
00:42:35,832 --> 00:42:38,742
And so this is where.

700
00:42:39,582 --> 00:42:44,322
Again, putting that lens on just
saying again, you don't even have to

701
00:42:44,322 --> 00:42:48,452
believe I suggest that you do, though,
because still going to leak out.

702
00:42:48,452 --> 00:42:51,732
If you don't have to, though, but
at least take that step of saying,

703
00:42:52,562 --> 00:42:54,682
okay, let's just thought exercise.

704
00:42:54,732 --> 00:42:55,882
If this person.

705
00:42:56,417 --> 00:42:59,237
We're actually currently
smart, capable and good.

706
00:42:59,607 --> 00:43:01,417
Why would this make sense?

707
00:43:02,367 --> 00:43:06,317
Because people do follow
their own internal logic.

708
00:43:06,327 --> 00:43:10,027
It may not be logical to
you, but it is to them.

709
00:43:10,367 --> 00:43:16,437
We do not, as humans, operate outside
of internal logic for very long.

710
00:43:16,577 --> 00:43:17,197
We don't.

711
00:43:17,407 --> 00:43:20,047
We are very internally consistent people.

712
00:43:20,937 --> 00:43:23,547
Even if we're consistently
inconsistent, right?

713
00:43:23,547 --> 00:43:26,717
It's like Dan Ariely's like
predictably irrational.

714
00:43:27,637 --> 00:43:31,967
We in fact are predictably irrational, but
we're irrational in very predictable ways.

715
00:43:32,037 --> 00:43:35,297
We are logical and very illogical ways.

716
00:43:35,747 --> 00:43:37,557
And that's what we can count on.

717
00:43:37,557 --> 00:43:41,682
So if you can marry those two things
together, that people will operate.

718
00:43:41,922 --> 00:43:43,812
Long term on their own internal logic.

719
00:43:43,812 --> 00:43:49,282
So there is one there's some kind of
mental model or collection of models and

720
00:43:49,282 --> 00:43:51,952
beliefs and frameworks and worldview.

721
00:43:52,332 --> 00:43:56,542
Absolutely, which I love, by the way,
favorite topic and that people want

722
00:43:56,542 --> 00:43:58,232
to be seen as smart, capable and good.

723
00:43:58,242 --> 00:44:01,112
Then you can start to
solve for the worldview.

724
00:44:01,772 --> 00:44:06,112
You can say, I can see this reaction,
if I assume they're smart, capable, and

725
00:44:06,112 --> 00:44:11,572
good, given what I know of the world,
and of people, and even this person.

726
00:44:11,822 --> 00:44:13,072
What would have produced that?

727
00:44:13,322 --> 00:44:15,712
And if you can't figure it out guess what?

728
00:44:15,752 --> 00:44:19,642
It is a beautiful point, to
your point, Nola, of becoming

729
00:44:19,662 --> 00:44:21,662
curious, and asking them.

730
00:44:22,682 --> 00:44:24,352
What makes you say that?

731
00:44:24,452 --> 00:44:26,912
What is, what is it that you are?

732
00:44:27,412 --> 00:44:29,912
That are, what is it
that you are angry about?

733
00:44:29,952 --> 00:44:32,892
Again, not why that can be
a very triggering question.

734
00:44:32,892 --> 00:44:33,972
Like, why are you so angry?

735
00:44:33,972 --> 00:44:34,892
It's just what is it?

736
00:44:34,892 --> 00:44:39,972
Because that can start to really
focus the question on, you could, if

737
00:44:39,982 --> 00:44:43,342
someone said that to you with your
resistance to coming back to work or

738
00:44:43,342 --> 00:44:47,282
that to that implementation of that
software system what is it about this?

739
00:44:47,302 --> 00:44:49,502
That is, is so frustrating to you.

740
00:44:49,502 --> 00:44:52,102
You're like, it makes my job harder.

741
00:44:54,452 --> 00:44:57,332
It does again, like we operate.

742
00:44:57,967 --> 00:45:00,787
From these worldviews with
the assumption that people see

743
00:45:00,787 --> 00:45:01,957
the world the same way we do.

744
00:45:02,247 --> 00:45:07,717
And if we stop and for just even a split
second and go of course, not everybody

745
00:45:07,717 --> 00:45:14,127
does or can, but our brain saves brain
cells by assuming that everybody does.

746
00:45:14,757 --> 00:45:20,607
And so sometimes we have to create
those moments either in conversation

747
00:45:20,617 --> 00:45:30,257
or by presenting this case for change
that again, people can recognize.

748
00:45:31,287 --> 00:45:35,047
In that moment, because it doesn't
take long to really say because I

749
00:45:35,047 --> 00:45:36,967
believe this is true, and this is true.

750
00:45:37,527 --> 00:45:40,577
That's why I believe this is the
approach that's going to produce this

751
00:45:40,577 --> 00:45:47,077
outcome that doesn't take much to help
people identify where the friction

752
00:45:47,077 --> 00:45:52,387
is, where the alignment is, where
there's opportunity and where there is.

753
00:45:53,367 --> 00:45:57,167
And where there isn't and regardless,
what I have seen is that being able

754
00:45:57,167 --> 00:46:02,577
to do that and have that discussion
allows people to civilly agree to

755
00:46:02,577 --> 00:46:07,437
disagree and say, oh, I understand.

756
00:46:07,987 --> 00:46:11,147
I just don't agree and then
it's up to the leadership.

757
00:46:11,147 --> 00:46:13,737
It's up to you as an individual
working with that leadership

758
00:46:13,967 --> 00:46:15,497
to decide what that actually.

759
00:46:15,897 --> 00:46:16,657
Means for you.

760
00:46:16,817 --> 00:46:20,557
And like you did, you said how can I
reframe it so that I can do something

761
00:46:20,557 --> 00:46:22,267
with this and be helpful towards it?

762
00:46:22,887 --> 00:46:27,337
But that's how that response is
always gonna be personal to Yeah, and

763
00:46:27,337 --> 00:46:30,897
fundamentally, I think that's really
where the whole return to office thing

764
00:46:30,907 --> 00:46:33,947
breaks down is it's related to identity.

765
00:46:33,987 --> 00:46:37,027
So these leaders who want to
bring people back, that's how

766
00:46:37,027 --> 00:46:38,587
they've always been successful.

767
00:46:38,837 --> 00:46:42,147
If they tell the story of their
careers, it's told in person

768
00:46:42,147 --> 00:46:43,727
because that was their reality.

769
00:46:44,097 --> 00:46:47,757
You would think that they want to mentor
people, they want to train people,

770
00:46:47,757 --> 00:46:53,307
they, and to do that in the frame of
referenced in to their history, they

771
00:46:53,307 --> 00:46:56,697
can't do that if the people are at home.

772
00:46:57,197 --> 00:47:00,517
Like their reason for being successful
is fundamentally related to the

773
00:47:00,517 --> 00:47:03,877
fact that they were in person
seeing people in different contexts.

774
00:47:04,187 --> 00:47:09,567
And so they have to reframe their
whole entire understanding of their

775
00:47:09,567 --> 00:47:15,087
career success in a way that's really
uncomfortable for a lot of people.

776
00:47:16,527 --> 00:47:24,967
Yes, and that also means that in many
cases, it reveals to them in a way

777
00:47:24,967 --> 00:47:29,747
they may not want to face quickly
or ever how they were viewing the

778
00:47:29,757 --> 00:47:31,827
people who work with them, right?

779
00:47:31,857 --> 00:47:35,197
Meaning they were looking them as workers.

780
00:47:36,347 --> 00:47:42,787
Not as people because again, as a person
to put the persuaders paradox back in

781
00:47:42,787 --> 00:47:49,097
play as a person, they wouldn't want
to be seen as just a worker either.

782
00:47:49,097 --> 00:47:50,247
They would resist it.

783
00:47:50,637 --> 00:47:54,127
And so sometimes it's having that
perspective of just it's where

784
00:47:54,127 --> 00:47:57,277
that classic 90s 80s and 90s.

785
00:47:57,277 --> 00:47:58,487
It started in Toyota.

786
00:47:58,487 --> 00:47:59,617
The five wise.

787
00:48:00,682 --> 00:48:03,522
comes into play of just
keep, it isn't always five.

788
00:48:03,522 --> 00:48:08,262
Sometimes it's three, sometimes it's
seven, but keep going down until

789
00:48:08,962 --> 00:48:11,222
you, it's a, or even share Lockian.

790
00:48:11,232 --> 00:48:14,232
The only thing that's
left is what must be true.

791
00:48:14,612 --> 00:48:20,142
And sometimes that's uncomfortable and but
if you're really trying to get a change

792
00:48:20,142 --> 00:48:24,202
to be successful, that's the work, right?

793
00:48:24,242 --> 00:48:33,497
And sometimes the work is going to be
This realization that you are putting the

794
00:48:33,497 --> 00:48:39,057
needs of the company ahead of the needs
of your employees and that may go against

795
00:48:39,057 --> 00:48:42,997
what you have said Your values are right.

796
00:48:42,997 --> 00:48:45,547
And so that's where the
trust breaks down, right?

797
00:48:45,777 --> 00:48:49,907
Because it's the story
doesn't hang together, right?

798
00:48:49,947 --> 00:48:50,457
Exactly.

799
00:48:50,467 --> 00:48:51,357
It doesn't it.

800
00:48:51,417 --> 00:48:52,197
It doesn't.

801
00:48:52,447 --> 00:48:54,287
It is not recognizably true.

802
00:48:54,527 --> 00:48:59,977
So that's what you know, for me this idea
of these recognizable truths apply both

803
00:49:00,027 --> 00:49:06,417
to individual pieces and parts of this
story, but also to the story as a whole,

804
00:49:06,657 --> 00:49:11,357
because sometimes, we can hear something
that just completely, Like just shifts

805
00:49:11,367 --> 00:49:16,187
everything, and it just rewires the
rest of a story that's already in play.

806
00:49:16,217 --> 00:49:22,987
I would say we've seen that this week
in Kamala Harris's response on Call

807
00:49:22,987 --> 00:49:26,707
Her Daddy when she said there are many
women who do not aspire to be humble.

808
00:49:27,537 --> 00:49:31,837
And for many women, I'm not saying
all, for many women, that was

809
00:49:31,837 --> 00:49:33,517
one of those recognizable truths.

810
00:49:33,517 --> 00:49:35,667
All of a sudden they heard
the words and they're like.

811
00:49:36,312 --> 00:49:41,322
I recognize that as true and I
recognize that as true about me.

812
00:49:41,582 --> 00:49:46,682
And so what it did was it
crystallized for a group of people.

813
00:49:47,642 --> 00:49:49,832
This is why this something didn't work.

814
00:49:49,842 --> 00:49:55,222
This is why, some like something about
the story I'm being told about my

815
00:49:55,222 --> 00:49:59,282
role as a woman doesn't work because
I've just heard a recognizable truth.

816
00:49:59,952 --> 00:50:03,482
And then to your point, Nola,
sometimes it's the whole story, right?

817
00:50:03,522 --> 00:50:07,542
It's just it's, these
things don't track together.

818
00:50:07,592 --> 00:50:11,162
And that's, I, sorry to get all
Aristotelian on it, but it's it's not

819
00:50:11,162 --> 00:50:17,617
a, it's not a valid argument, meaning
A plus B does not equal C in this case.

820
00:50:17,617 --> 00:50:23,095
And And if that's verifiably true,
based on your audience's experience, if

821
00:50:23,095 --> 00:50:28,585
your audience cannot validate it based
on their own experience, first test.

822
00:50:28,585 --> 00:50:28,599
Test.

823
00:50:29,250 --> 00:50:29,890
Dead in the water.

824
00:50:30,150 --> 00:50:33,860
And so this is why so much of the
approach that I'm talking about in this

825
00:50:33,860 --> 00:50:41,650
book really relies on those underlying,
sometimes implicit, unspoken, in

826
00:50:41,680 --> 00:50:47,840
practice principles that are guiding
what the leaders do and team members do

827
00:50:48,200 --> 00:50:52,394
every day, because that is what we do.

828
00:50:52,825 --> 00:50:56,195
That is the first
validation of the change.

829
00:50:56,325 --> 00:50:59,995
The first yes, that always
has to pass is does it check?

830
00:51:00,385 --> 00:51:01,845
Does it check with my head?

831
00:51:01,855 --> 00:51:02,995
Does it make sense?

832
00:51:03,615 --> 00:51:05,425
And does it make sense?

833
00:51:05,445 --> 00:51:06,615
Does it feel right?

834
00:51:07,035 --> 00:51:10,714
And the ding, it has to be,
I don't hear an audible ding.

835
00:51:10,764 --> 00:51:16,704
When I hear a truth, I feel it like
in, in my chest, it's not audible.

836
00:51:16,704 --> 00:51:18,374
It's a feeling right.

837
00:51:18,764 --> 00:51:22,314
And that actually happened once where it
was something that somebody was dealing

838
00:51:22,314 --> 00:51:25,814
with an insurance claim and somebody told
me something that they shouldn't have told

839
00:51:25,814 --> 00:51:28,024
me and I'm like, Oh, this is the truth.

840
00:51:28,104 --> 00:51:29,154
This is what you're trying to do.

841
00:51:29,164 --> 00:51:33,354
And I got a 34, 000 settlement out of
them because I recognized their truth.

842
00:51:34,584 --> 00:51:40,554
Yes, we there's a lot as I'm, as
I am learning right now, cause

843
00:51:40,554 --> 00:51:42,424
I, I started amidst all of this.

844
00:51:42,425 --> 00:51:44,124
I started a doctorate program this summer.

845
00:51:44,454 --> 00:51:45,464
We have.

846
00:51:46,404 --> 00:51:52,314
I think overlooked in particularly Western
and Western culture and in business,

847
00:51:54,344 --> 00:51:56,514
the other forms of.

848
00:51:57,264 --> 00:52:02,694
Knowledge, wisdom and
learning that we have.

849
00:52:03,434 --> 00:52:10,834
And, it what is intriguing to me in this
environment of incredible complexity and

850
00:52:10,864 --> 00:52:16,939
incredible change is how important it is.

851
00:52:17,209 --> 00:52:18,869
To be able to

852
00:52:22,309 --> 00:52:27,489
not just articulate quickly why
something what something is, why is it

853
00:52:27,489 --> 00:52:31,509
important and what and be able to give
people that information that allows

854
00:52:31,519 --> 00:52:37,359
them to do that to do a very quick
check, but to be able to recognize.

855
00:52:38,604 --> 00:52:45,934
That actually nothing that happens up here
happens without the gut check happening

856
00:52:45,944 --> 00:52:55,634
first, and I don't care how B2B or how
engineering or tech or science focused,

857
00:52:56,134 --> 00:53:02,824
an organization is it's, it's proposal
review committee is or whatever that

858
00:53:02,834 --> 00:53:05,264
data, we're going to trust the data.

859
00:53:07,169 --> 00:53:12,169
That either aligns with what we've
seen and experienced ourselves, or in

860
00:53:12,169 --> 00:53:17,349
rare cases, we will trust it because
it either comes from a source that

861
00:53:17,349 --> 00:53:22,159
we really trust, or again, that it
finally unlocks, even in a way that

862
00:53:22,159 --> 00:53:24,729
we weren't expecting, something else.

863
00:53:25,709 --> 00:53:28,209
One of my best examples of that, and
I know we're running out of time,

864
00:53:28,209 --> 00:53:31,149
but one of my favorite examples
of that was with with Jay Baer.

865
00:53:31,159 --> 00:53:35,459
So Jay Baer is a customer service
and customer experience expert.

866
00:53:35,479 --> 00:53:39,709
And two books ago, three books ago, he
wrote a book called Hug Your Haters.

867
00:53:40,369 --> 00:53:44,319
And it started with, he started with,
by, he started it by doing research.

868
00:53:44,329 --> 00:53:48,849
So he started it by doing,
by gathering information on.

869
00:53:49,284 --> 00:53:53,324
Like, how often you need to respond
to the haters online and what the

870
00:53:53,324 --> 00:53:54,944
expectations were and all of that.

871
00:53:55,434 --> 00:54:00,784
And to Jay's eternal credit, his
original hypothesis about it, I don't

872
00:54:00,784 --> 00:54:02,474
even remember what it was disproved.

873
00:54:02,994 --> 00:54:08,384
And what he discovered in the data was
not that was that the haters were actually

874
00:54:08,674 --> 00:54:10,934
deeply passionate about the brand.

875
00:54:11,254 --> 00:54:15,104
And when they got angry, it's
because they cared so much.

876
00:54:15,614 --> 00:54:21,874
And so this is one of those places where,
when it suddenly, for him, what that

877
00:54:21,884 --> 00:54:25,544
created was, and I remember we worked
on the messaging around this, which was,

878
00:54:26,049 --> 00:54:29,639
That it wasn't that the haters weren't
the problem, ignoring them was the

879
00:54:29,639 --> 00:54:35,269
problem, because they were so passionate
about the brand, the company, etc.

880
00:54:35,769 --> 00:54:42,299
That hearing that disconfirming data is
what unlocked for him why haters could

881
00:54:42,309 --> 00:54:44,559
have, like, why they carried such power.

882
00:54:44,559 --> 00:54:49,369
It's because the people who I would
submit, it's because that passion.

883
00:54:49,704 --> 00:54:55,614
For the brand or for the way things should
be was so intense that people felt it

884
00:54:56,024 --> 00:55:00,094
even through, the austere online world.

885
00:55:00,934 --> 00:55:05,074
Yeah, I actually built my customer
service career around difficult

886
00:55:05,094 --> 00:55:08,424
callers and dealing with people that
other people couldn't deal with.

887
00:55:08,884 --> 00:55:09,254
And.

888
00:55:09,639 --> 00:55:14,319
That was how I was successful because
I listened to them, because honestly,

889
00:55:14,329 --> 00:55:18,049
the majority of the time is they had
a vision of what could be, and they

890
00:55:18,049 --> 00:55:21,619
were actually trying to help you get
there, if only you would pay attention.

891
00:55:22,159 --> 00:55:22,589
Yes.

892
00:55:22,849 --> 00:55:23,339
Yes.

893
00:55:23,699 --> 00:55:26,569
And that actually is what's happening
with the whole return to office thing

894
00:55:26,569 --> 00:55:28,829
is, it's not that people object to.

895
00:55:30,109 --> 00:55:31,819
It's not that they don't want to work.

896
00:55:31,819 --> 00:55:33,799
It's not that they refuse
to go into the office.

897
00:55:33,819 --> 00:55:35,729
It's because they don't feel heard.

898
00:55:36,359 --> 00:55:37,989
That's the really big
thing that's happened.

899
00:55:38,669 --> 00:55:39,079
That's right.

900
00:55:39,129 --> 00:55:42,479
And they are, and it's and
when the leadership says

901
00:55:42,479 --> 00:55:43,789
we don't feel heard either.

902
00:55:44,099 --> 00:55:46,249
This is where I would urge people to say,

903
00:55:48,869 --> 00:55:51,219
because are you asking people
to hear something that you

904
00:55:51,239 --> 00:55:54,279
haven't actually said, right?

905
00:55:54,359 --> 00:55:56,789
And that is how could they hear that?

906
00:55:57,019 --> 00:56:02,639
And so this is why so often it really
is so important to it's, to say what

907
00:56:02,639 --> 00:56:07,629
they can't unhear, you have to say
what they can't hear first, right?

908
00:56:07,629 --> 00:56:09,349
In order for that to be the case.

909
00:56:09,719 --> 00:56:15,969
And that sometimes means digging deep
into really understanding what is driving

910
00:56:15,979 --> 00:56:20,719
why you believe a particular change
is actually the right thing to do.

911
00:56:20,819 --> 00:56:23,129
And then discovering what in that.

912
00:56:23,454 --> 00:56:27,014
And then deciding what does that
mean for either how you change the

913
00:56:27,014 --> 00:56:31,524
message or how you're going about
making the change in the first place.

914
00:56:33,554 --> 00:56:36,214
All right, we should wrap it up
because we are over time at this

915
00:56:36,214 --> 00:56:38,174
point, but thank you so much.

916
00:56:38,184 --> 00:56:39,904
It's always lovely to chat with you.

917
00:56:40,004 --> 00:56:42,764
I did find the book immensely helpful.

918
00:56:42,764 --> 00:56:46,554
I think in my review, I actually
wrote immediately useful because.

919
00:56:46,944 --> 00:56:48,484
I was actually applying it.

920
00:56:48,574 --> 00:56:51,284
If I, if you go back through my
social, you'll actually see I was

921
00:56:51,284 --> 00:56:53,244
weaving, smart, capable, and good.

922
00:56:53,244 --> 00:56:56,444
And I was actually weaving it
into things I was already writing.

923
00:56:56,654 --> 00:56:57,374
Oh, I love that.

924
00:56:58,044 --> 00:56:59,584
Yeah, it was, is really cool.

925
00:56:59,584 --> 00:57:01,494
And so definitely the book is out today.

926
00:57:01,494 --> 00:57:03,284
I checked my mailbox to
see if it had arrived.

927
00:57:03,284 --> 00:57:04,224
It hadn't arrived yet.

928
00:57:04,634 --> 00:57:05,954
But it's already hitting the charts.

929
00:57:05,964 --> 00:57:09,604
So if you get the book, Say what
they can on here by Tamsyn Webster,

930
00:57:09,864 --> 00:57:11,564
write a review for her on Amazon.

931
00:57:12,054 --> 00:57:15,384
And we want the next book in the series
because it's helped me to this point.

932
00:57:15,384 --> 00:57:16,464
Share your time with me.

933
00:57:16,464 --> 00:57:18,994
And I'm just very grateful
to be able to have such an

934
00:57:19,004 --> 00:57:20,384
engaging conversation with you.

935
00:57:20,824 --> 00:57:21,704
Oh, thank you so much.

936
00:57:21,704 --> 00:57:22,354
I appreciate it.