Oct. 9, 2024

Say What They Can't Unhear: Tamsen Webster

Say What They Can't Unhear: Tamsen Webster
Say What They Can't Unhear: Tamsen Webster
Hope + Possibilities: A Love Letter to the Future of Work
Say What They Can't Unhear: Tamsen Webster

Here are the show notes based on the transcript:

Say What They Can't Unhear with Tamsen Webster

In this episode, host Nola Simon interviews Tamsen Webster about her new book "Say What They Can't Unhear" and discusses effective messaging strategies for driving change.

Key topics covered:

  • Tamsen's background as a message designer and "English to English translator"
  • The importance of understanding deep beliefs when trying to inspire change
  • How to find common ground and build on existing beliefs rather than challenging them
  • The "smart, capable, and good" approach to empathy in communication
  • Why the "deepest beliefs are hardest to shift" and how to work with that principle
  • Challenges with return-to-office mandates and aligning messaging with employee experiences
  • The concept of "recognizable truths" that resonate with audiences
  • How to present change in a way that doesn't conflict with people's existing worldviews
  • The role of cognitive empathy in understanding others' perspectives
  • Why messages need to pass both logical and emotional checks to be effective

Tamsen shares insights from her experience as a Weight Watchers leader and how those lessons apply to organizational change. She emphasizes the importance of starting with where people already are and finding ways to align change with their existing goals and beliefs.

The conversation explores why many change initiatives fail and how leaders can improve their approach by truly understanding their audience's perspective. Tamsen's book "Say What They Can't Unhear" provides a framework for creating more effective and resonant messaging.

Learn more about Tamsen Webster:

Part message designer, part English-to-English translator, part magpie, Tamsen Webster helps leaders craft their case for large-scale change. In addition to her work in and for major organizations such as Harvard Medical School, Fidelity Investments, and Klaviyo, she's a judge and mentor for the Harvard Innovation Labs, a professional advisor at the Martin Trust Center for MIT Entrepreneurship, and has spent over 10 years as the Idea Strategist for one of only nine legacy-level TEDx events in the world. She was named to the Thinkers50 Radar in 2022 and is the author of two books, Find Your Red Thread: Make Your Big Ideas Irresistible and Say What They Can't Unhear: The 9 Principles of Lasting Change. She lives in Boston with her husband, two sons, and two brindle Greyhounds, Hazel and Walnut.

Tamsen Webster - Message Designer, Author, Keynote Business Speaker

www.messagedesigninstitute.com

https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamsenwebster

1
00:00:00,640 --> 00:00:18,039
I'll see you next time.

2
00:00:22,104 --> 00:00:23,534
Thank you so much for joining me.

3
00:00:23,534 --> 00:00:24,413
I'm Nola Simon.

4
00:00:24,413 --> 00:00:27,034
I'm the host of the Hybrid Remote
Center of Excellence and joining

5
00:00:27,034 --> 00:00:28,734
me today is Tamsen Webster.

6
00:00:28,744 --> 00:00:35,034
She is a prime example of somebody that
I've built a relationship with over time.

7
00:00:35,104 --> 00:00:37,663
I've actually followed
Tamsen probably for years.

8
00:00:37,683 --> 00:00:39,013
When did the red thread come out?

9
00:00:39,513 --> 00:00:44,093
That came out in 2021, but
I've been talking about the

10
00:00:44,093 --> 00:00:46,173
red thread for eight years now.

11
00:00:46,173 --> 00:00:49,913
So my role was actually my corporate
role was actually restructured in 2020.

12
00:00:49,933 --> 00:00:52,383
So I started paying attention to LinkedIn.

13
00:00:52,603 --> 00:00:54,553
I wasn't writing, but
I was consuming a lot.

14
00:00:54,553 --> 00:00:56,543
And so I think I started
noticing you around there.

15
00:00:56,773 --> 00:00:59,753
So I've honestly been following
you probably since then, but

16
00:00:59,753 --> 00:01:00,883
I just connected this year.

17
00:01:01,173 --> 00:01:04,803
And I had attended one of your workshops
that one of my other podcast guests

18
00:01:04,823 --> 00:01:06,233
Marty Constant had made available.

19
00:01:06,253 --> 00:01:07,883
And then I connected after that.

20
00:01:07,903 --> 00:01:11,223
So I always tell people I, I don't
accept pitches from my podcast.

21
00:01:11,613 --> 00:01:14,433
I like to invite people that
I've got to know online.

22
00:01:14,433 --> 00:01:18,743
So I know your work, and Tansyn's work
has been instrumental to helping me

23
00:01:18,743 --> 00:01:20,683
develop the messaging for my business.

24
00:01:21,093 --> 00:01:23,353
And I'm really excited that she's
come out now with a new book,

25
00:01:23,413 --> 00:01:26,083
another new book, which is called
Say What They Can't Unhear.

26
00:01:26,653 --> 00:01:31,273
And I gotta tell you, the ding is
something that we really have to talk

27
00:01:31,283 --> 00:01:35,703
about because I know that although it
manifests differently for me as well.

28
00:01:36,073 --> 00:01:38,493
Tamsen, how do you
describe your profession?

29
00:01:38,513 --> 00:01:41,333
Obviously you're an author,
you're a keynote speaker you're

30
00:01:41,383 --> 00:01:44,813
deeply involved with TED Talks
How do you describe yourself?

31
00:01:44,813 --> 00:01:47,363
Like what's your perfect
message to deliver who you are?

32
00:01:48,583 --> 00:01:54,453
So I, for folks that would understand
at least somewhat intuitively I say that

33
00:01:54,453 --> 00:01:59,423
I'm message designer, so I have, after a
lot of trial and error, that seems to be

34
00:01:59,423 --> 00:02:01,863
something where most people generally.

35
00:02:02,123 --> 00:02:04,693
Yes, correctly what that probably means.

36
00:02:04,703 --> 00:02:07,493
So meaning you've got something
you want to say and you're trying

37
00:02:07,493 --> 00:02:08,623
to figure out how to say it.

38
00:02:09,133 --> 00:02:10,123
I help you do that.

39
00:02:10,333 --> 00:02:15,843
My more my like sassier answer, my
cheekier answer, which is also correct is

40
00:02:15,843 --> 00:02:17,993
that I'm an English to English translator.

41
00:02:18,053 --> 00:02:20,333
Because I think that's
what I'm I help people do.

42
00:02:20,333 --> 00:02:26,933
But fundamentally, I feel like that
my I don't even feel, I know that

43
00:02:26,933 --> 00:02:31,063
my deep passion is helping people
help other people create change.

44
00:02:31,473 --> 00:02:39,693
And so whatever I can put together,
learn, process, size, tams and eyes,

45
00:02:39,693 --> 00:02:44,593
whatever, to help people really get what
their, their difference of perspective,

46
00:02:44,963 --> 00:02:48,563
their approaches, their offerings,
their ideas, their initiatives, all of

47
00:02:48,563 --> 00:02:53,748
these things that they're, investing
time and money in to make a change for

48
00:02:53,748 --> 00:02:56,998
themselves, for the world, for clients,
customers, whatever it might be.

49
00:02:57,838 --> 00:03:03,758
I want to make sure that they have as
much opportunity for success as possible.

50
00:03:03,878 --> 00:03:10,578
And so that's where I come in because I've
somehow cobbled together this deep and

51
00:03:10,588 --> 00:03:15,738
long interest, both in transformational
change and in communications.

52
00:03:15,778 --> 00:03:17,688
And so I've put those together.

53
00:03:17,978 --> 00:03:19,378
To create message design.

54
00:03:19,878 --> 00:03:20,308
Awesome.

55
00:03:20,448 --> 00:03:20,928
Perfect.

56
00:03:21,168 --> 00:03:21,338
Yeah.

57
00:03:21,338 --> 00:03:25,048
I was always fascinated that part of your
origin story really is Weight Watchers.

58
00:03:26,058 --> 00:03:29,469
And a lot of that, when you're trying
to lose weight is cause I remember my

59
00:03:29,469 --> 00:03:32,219
mom did this probably in the eighties.

60
00:03:32,619 --> 00:03:33,259
A lot of it is,

61
00:03:36,929 --> 00:03:38,779
She did manage to lose a lot of weight.

62
00:03:38,819 --> 00:03:41,829
She came back, but that, that was always
something that caught my attention

63
00:03:41,829 --> 00:03:45,519
because I remember her experience
with that, but a lot of times it's the

64
00:03:45,519 --> 00:03:48,639
stories that you tell yourself, right?

65
00:03:48,769 --> 00:03:49,859
Yes, absolutely.

66
00:03:49,868 --> 00:03:52,919
And yes, it is a hundred percent.

67
00:03:53,284 --> 00:03:58,614
I think it's to quote one of my members
she always said that it's 99 percent

68
00:03:58,624 --> 00:04:00,554
mental and the rest is just food.

69
00:04:01,104 --> 00:04:06,933
And that's, that is, we know now
that's, it's not quite as pure as that.

70
00:04:06,943 --> 00:04:09,923
I think that's one of the things I'm
delighted that science has caught up

71
00:04:09,953 --> 00:04:15,283
with what was observable in the 13 years
that I was a Weight Watchers leader.

72
00:04:15,313 --> 00:04:16,933
And that is, is that.

73
00:04:17,853 --> 00:04:24,293
There are fundamental physiological
differences between people that

74
00:04:24,493 --> 00:04:30,404
no amount of retraining your
thoughts or positive self talk

75
00:04:30,414 --> 00:04:34,484
or willpower will, will overcome.

76
00:04:34,484 --> 00:04:36,904
And so it's not that it's not possible.

77
00:04:37,134 --> 00:04:42,164
It's just that it was one of the of so
many lessons I learned in the years that

78
00:04:42,164 --> 00:04:44,154
I moonlighted as a Weight Watchers leader.

79
00:04:44,374 --> 00:04:52,284
One of them is that to be very
wary of one size fits all.

80
00:04:52,669 --> 00:04:53,699
Anything, right?

81
00:04:53,719 --> 00:04:55,409
One size fits all approach.

82
00:04:55,409 --> 00:04:56,959
One size fits all message.

83
00:04:57,349 --> 00:04:57,879
Because.

84
00:04:58,819 --> 00:05:04,539
That is bearing it, that bears with it
a lot of assumptions about what you're

85
00:05:04,539 --> 00:05:06,409
offering and who you're talking to.

86
00:05:06,469 --> 00:05:11,729
And those can get you in
trouble on both sides.

87
00:05:11,939 --> 00:05:15,449
I don't like getting in trouble that
way, which is probably why I've spent

88
00:05:15,459 --> 00:05:19,519
so much time You know, because I've
had some horror stories of just whoop,

89
00:05:19,549 --> 00:05:21,179
that was not the right way to say that.

90
00:05:21,489 --> 00:05:24,109
And so that's, that's part of
where all this has come from.

91
00:05:24,109 --> 00:05:28,559
And now that I've gotten to a certain
point in my life, in my career, where I

92
00:05:28,559 --> 00:05:32,749
feel like it's mathematically impossible
for me to be the age that I am, but

93
00:05:34,699 --> 00:05:38,889
there are some objective truths, that I
really have gotten to a point where it's.

94
00:05:40,054 --> 00:05:43,674
Where I feel like, I have
something to say on this like I,

95
00:05:43,764 --> 00:05:46,844
I, I have put all this together.

96
00:05:46,844 --> 00:05:47,744
I've seen this work.

97
00:05:47,744 --> 00:05:48,594
I've done the work.

98
00:05:48,594 --> 00:05:50,254
I have done the research.

99
00:05:50,254 --> 00:05:54,921
I have done the testing just to see what
it is that works and doesn't work so

100
00:05:54,921 --> 00:05:58,309
that within a world that is constantly
changing and with people who are you

101
00:05:58,309 --> 00:06:04,392
know, I feel I have something to say on
this like I, I Just absolutely different.

102
00:06:04,612 --> 00:06:06,682
Person to person in so
many different ways.

103
00:06:07,122 --> 00:06:15,042
What are some of the things that are
reliably true, no matter what, no matter

104
00:06:15,052 --> 00:06:20,302
who you're talking to, no matter what the
situation is, because that I think gives

105
00:06:20,302 --> 00:06:25,812
you at least a place to start and gives
you a place to start where you're starting

106
00:06:25,812 --> 00:06:30,172
with the strength of what is Known, right?

107
00:06:30,252 --> 00:06:33,192
This is how people think about things,
this is how people make sense of

108
00:06:33,192 --> 00:06:38,192
information, this is how people react
when they're treated a certain way.

109
00:06:38,202 --> 00:06:41,572
If those are some of the things that
either will move a change forward or

110
00:06:41,582 --> 00:06:47,012
back or get in the way of the message or
accelerate it, , it, solvable problems.

111
00:06:48,557 --> 00:06:51,397
Unsolved solvable problems drive me nuts.

112
00:06:51,427 --> 00:06:55,547
And this is one of those where I, when I
come to looking at messaging and change

113
00:06:55,567 --> 00:07:00,367
messaging, I'm like these, most of the
things, most of the places where we go

114
00:07:00,367 --> 00:07:04,777
wrong are completely solvable and I just
really wanted to help people solve that.

115
00:07:05,452 --> 00:07:06,432
Yeah, no, it makes sense.

116
00:07:06,622 --> 00:07:11,612
So in Tamsyn's book, she has these
nine principles that are they're so

117
00:07:11,862 --> 00:07:15,382
logical, they're so straightforward,
but they're brilliant, right?

118
00:07:15,542 --> 00:07:15,712
Thank you.

119
00:07:15,742 --> 00:07:18,612
And one of them that really caught my
attention, I think that's really where

120
00:07:18,612 --> 00:07:22,042
you're talking about this too, is the
deepest beliefs are the hardest to shift.

121
00:07:22,692 --> 00:07:26,662
And I always found that because
I always lived north of the north

122
00:07:26,662 --> 00:07:28,622
of Toronto and worked in the city.

123
00:07:28,992 --> 00:07:31,812
And so they would the company
would often come out with like

124
00:07:31,852 --> 00:07:35,762
messages that were designed to
be for the majority of employees.

125
00:07:35,762 --> 00:07:38,552
I wasn't the majority of employees
because I didn't live in the city.

126
00:07:38,862 --> 00:07:43,027
I, A lot of and a lot of times I didn't
fit so they would come out my favorite

127
00:07:43,027 --> 00:07:45,307
was always the, let's save the planet.

128
00:07:45,337 --> 00:07:46,517
Let's bike to work.

129
00:07:46,857 --> 00:07:47,437
I don't know.

130
00:07:47,497 --> 00:07:51,437
I live 60 kilometers north of the
city like that's not going to happen.

131
00:07:51,537 --> 00:07:53,337
You can't bike on the freeway for one.

132
00:07:53,497 --> 00:07:56,927
It's illegal to I'm probably going to be.

133
00:07:57,107 --> 00:08:02,407
I'm still biking six hours later and then
I have to turn around and go home, right?

134
00:08:02,557 --> 00:08:06,587
So fundamentally, like my belief
was, this is not a message that's

135
00:08:06,597 --> 00:08:09,757
designed for me because you have
no clue how I even get to work.

136
00:08:09,767 --> 00:08:10,977
You don't even know who I am.

137
00:08:11,937 --> 00:08:18,397
Or that's, oh, or that's all you're left
to think, absent the information, any

138
00:08:18,397 --> 00:08:20,107
other information being put out there.

139
00:08:20,557 --> 00:08:24,387
So Again, it's such a
solvable problem, right?

140
00:08:24,527 --> 00:08:29,647
All that take, took, all that
would take is a, I'm no grammarian

141
00:08:29,957 --> 00:08:35,287
a dependent clause that says, for
those of you who live in the city.

142
00:08:35,307 --> 00:08:35,877
But, right?

143
00:08:36,037 --> 00:08:36,137
Yeah.

144
00:08:36,197 --> 00:08:39,297
Because at least what that
does is say, this is for you.

145
00:08:39,517 --> 00:08:47,297
And when it comes to those deep beliefs,
so the way that I, as you probably figured

146
00:08:47,297 --> 00:08:51,137
out by reading these things they're
all like nine different perspectives

147
00:08:51,137 --> 00:08:53,517
on what kind of sits in the center is.

148
00:08:54,117 --> 00:08:54,777
The same thing.

149
00:08:55,137 --> 00:08:59,847
It's not all the same thing, but it's
different avenues into this kind of nut

150
00:08:59,897 --> 00:09:05,887
of what is it that people have to hear in
order to understand and adapt a new idea.

151
00:09:06,407 --> 00:09:07,137
And.

152
00:09:07,987 --> 00:09:09,617
The deepest beliefs are
the hardest to shift.

153
00:09:09,777 --> 00:09:15,867
That one is in the trio, like that
one sits at the heart of the book.

154
00:09:15,867 --> 00:09:16,757
It's number five.

155
00:09:16,757 --> 00:09:20,647
So it's like literally in the
middle of all the pieces, because I

156
00:09:20,647 --> 00:09:29,767
think, for me, it is one of the most
counterintuitive principles of inspiring

157
00:09:29,767 --> 00:09:33,327
long term change or creating the
conditions that are more likely for it.

158
00:09:34,757 --> 00:09:35,987
And there's good reasons for that.

159
00:09:36,007 --> 00:09:39,807
The good reason for it is that it's
counterintuitive is that when we think

160
00:09:39,817 --> 00:09:44,687
about deep beliefs and, we'll acknowledge
that they're hard to shift, and the

161
00:09:44,687 --> 00:09:49,207
reason why I chose that phrasing was
because most people, A, would agree with

162
00:09:49,207 --> 00:09:51,527
it, but B, they see that as a problem.

163
00:09:52,717 --> 00:09:56,137
They see that it's a problem that
deep beliefs are hard to shift.

164
00:09:56,837 --> 00:09:59,217
And my perspective is that.

165
00:10:00,352 --> 00:10:01,512
No belief.

166
00:10:02,502 --> 00:10:03,432
Very few beliefs.

167
00:10:03,432 --> 00:10:04,352
Let me be careful.

168
00:10:04,362 --> 00:10:06,242
One always has to be
careful with absolutes.

169
00:10:06,642 --> 00:10:11,652
Very few beliefs that anybody
holds are equally true for

170
00:10:11,652 --> 00:10:14,282
them in every context, right?

171
00:10:14,842 --> 00:10:19,662
And what I mean by that is so all that
has to happen when you combine that

172
00:10:19,662 --> 00:10:25,012
principle with let's say every decision
has a story, which is the second one,

173
00:10:25,252 --> 00:10:33,342
which is All someone has to hear is
something else they believe to be true

174
00:10:33,872 --> 00:10:39,672
or recognize as true that is just as
strong or stronger and that they can

175
00:10:39,682 --> 00:10:43,842
notch into the story they're telling
themselves, but in a different way.

176
00:10:44,132 --> 00:10:48,572
And though I didn't have the language
for it back when I was a weight watchers

177
00:10:48,572 --> 00:10:54,132
leader it's again, one of the ones that,
that truly had its birth there because

178
00:10:55,252 --> 00:10:59,982
so often, your experience with weight
loss was my experience with weight loss,

179
00:10:59,982 --> 00:11:05,342
which is that I had tried and failed any
number of times before I finally found

180
00:11:05,342 --> 00:11:09,162
and created this kind of combination
of factors that, that worked for me.

181
00:11:09,772 --> 00:11:13,212
And certainly one of the things that
I observed over 13 years was that

182
00:11:13,212 --> 00:11:19,752
one of the biggest and most dangerous
things that could happen was someone

183
00:11:19,762 --> 00:11:25,182
faulting themselves for failure and
adding that to the mental tally of

184
00:11:25,182 --> 00:11:27,352
this belief that I can't do this thing.

185
00:11:28,042 --> 00:11:34,402
And so often when that's the operating
deep belief, I just can't, it's my genes.

186
00:11:34,402 --> 00:11:36,222
Like I'm just destined to be this way.

187
00:11:36,262 --> 00:11:39,162
And I felt that way about myself,
which is just like I come from

188
00:11:39,162 --> 00:11:41,042
a family of overweight women.

189
00:11:41,052 --> 00:11:44,482
And so maybe this is just
who I'm supposed to be.

190
00:11:45,062 --> 00:11:52,752
And what I found that was the antidote
to that kind of, setting where

191
00:11:52,752 --> 00:11:56,527
people set themselves up for failure
was instead of saying, put okay.

192
00:11:57,467 --> 00:12:03,447
Instead of putting all your eggs in a
belief that you haven't tested this is

193
00:12:03,447 --> 00:12:11,547
possible for me, or in a new behavior of
let me stop eating some food that I love.

194
00:12:12,867 --> 00:12:16,317
What would happen if, it really started
with a question, what would happen if

195
00:12:16,537 --> 00:12:21,767
we could map over something that they
are already good at someplace else?

196
00:12:22,037 --> 00:12:25,787
And for me personally,
just as an example, I am.

197
00:12:27,132 --> 00:12:31,722
almost pathologically a rule follower
and a systems follower, which is

198
00:12:31,722 --> 00:12:36,892
one of the reasons why for me Weight
watchers was a really good match.

199
00:12:37,092 --> 00:12:42,692
It is not a good match for people who
See it as a constricting framework.

200
00:12:42,902 --> 00:12:47,372
And or and aren't able or don't
have a leader who could show them or

201
00:12:47,572 --> 00:12:51,492
present them with a different way to
conceive of those same guidelines.

202
00:12:51,892 --> 00:12:56,402
But for me, it was like, once I found a
system, I was like, yes, this is awesome.

203
00:12:56,412 --> 00:12:58,812
I am great at following rules.

204
00:12:59,162 --> 00:13:03,202
Just give me rules as long as the
rules aren't too hard to follow.

205
00:13:03,612 --> 00:13:08,092
And for me, it was like mapping that
over and saying, oh, it's just a budget.

206
00:13:08,512 --> 00:13:12,682
And instead of thinking of myself
like, oh, I'm a bad person, food is

207
00:13:12,682 --> 00:13:20,192
good or bad, it for me, that system
neutralized the emotional attachment

208
00:13:20,192 --> 00:13:22,592
to it all to, to me, to, to the food.

209
00:13:22,922 --> 00:13:29,682
And so again, for me, once it, once, it
was, this is just about, solving a puzzle.

210
00:13:29,682 --> 00:13:33,462
Another thing I love, like
how do I get the food I want?

211
00:13:34,222 --> 00:13:38,492
into this framework that's
being presented to me, then it

212
00:13:38,502 --> 00:13:39,942
became actually like a game.

213
00:13:40,522 --> 00:13:44,822
Not one that I chose to gamify, because,
again, a thing I learned over time,

214
00:13:45,072 --> 00:13:48,032
was that, like, when you're trying
to play that game you win, you lose,

215
00:13:48,032 --> 00:13:49,052
and if you lose, you win, right?

216
00:13:49,052 --> 00:13:51,002
It's just you're, it's all you.

217
00:13:51,002 --> 00:13:52,382
Who are you trying to win against?

218
00:13:52,482 --> 00:13:53,682
Who are you playing against?

219
00:13:53,987 --> 00:13:54,647
Exactly.

220
00:13:54,947 --> 00:13:58,987
And, but I would, so once I was like
that, again, it wasn't the program

221
00:13:58,987 --> 00:14:04,407
that worked for me so much as there
was this aspect of the program that

222
00:14:04,447 --> 00:14:08,547
I could link to something that I was
already confident that I did well.

223
00:14:08,947 --> 00:14:10,457
And so that was a stacking.

224
00:14:10,807 --> 00:14:13,297
Before habit stacking was a thing, really.

225
00:14:15,127 --> 00:14:19,267
Yeah, because it was just like this
idea of again I'm, I love puzzles.

226
00:14:19,277 --> 00:14:20,257
Let me figure this out.

227
00:14:20,267 --> 00:14:22,007
Let me let me figure out how to do this.

228
00:14:22,017 --> 00:14:23,567
And I'm also a little ornery.

229
00:14:23,597 --> 00:14:24,717
I'm contrarian.

230
00:14:24,727 --> 00:14:29,137
So if you're like, It's not
possible to keep doing X, Y, or Z.

231
00:14:29,477 --> 00:14:32,817
Then I'm like I'm going to see if
it's possible if I can still have

232
00:14:32,817 --> 00:14:35,557
dark chocolate every day, and I
can still have my ice cream, and

233
00:14:35,557 --> 00:14:36,927
I can still have these things.

234
00:14:36,927 --> 00:14:40,087
The whole reason why I joined walked
into Weight Watchers for the first

235
00:14:40,087 --> 00:14:44,797
day is because I saw this hilarious
episode of the Oprah Winfrey show.

236
00:14:45,012 --> 00:14:48,142
When Sarah, the Duchess of
Ferguson was on here, this is

237
00:14:48,142 --> 00:14:50,042
dating me rather significantly.

238
00:14:50,072 --> 00:14:50,512
That's okay.

239
00:14:50,512 --> 00:14:51,452
We're the same age.

240
00:14:52,262 --> 00:14:52,502
Yeah.

241
00:14:53,032 --> 00:14:58,222
And they were, they like a got themselves
pretty much drunk on television and

242
00:14:58,222 --> 00:15:01,782
then attempted these two women who
really don't cook for themselves

243
00:15:01,802 --> 00:15:03,212
to make chocolate chip cookies.

244
00:15:03,522 --> 00:15:08,092
And I just, Hey, it was such like a
joyful thing, but also this whole idea

245
00:15:08,092 --> 00:15:11,882
of Oh, it linked into to bring it back
to some of the things that I talk about

246
00:15:11,882 --> 00:15:15,412
in the book, something that I recognized
is true, which is that if I couldn't

247
00:15:15,452 --> 00:15:21,142
lose weight doing the things that I
love, how could I possibly keep it off?

248
00:15:21,732 --> 00:15:25,907
So it just again from a thing that
You know, from assessing for myself.

249
00:15:25,907 --> 00:15:29,887
What hadn't worked in the past was
like, okay, if it's too restrictive,

250
00:15:29,887 --> 00:15:30,797
I'm not going to stay on it.

251
00:15:30,797 --> 00:15:34,837
If I telling me if I don't, if I feel
embarrassed about telling somebody

252
00:15:34,847 --> 00:15:39,497
else what I'm doing to lose weight or
to get healthy I'm not going to do it.

253
00:15:39,737 --> 00:15:41,657
If it's too extreme,
I'm not going to do it.

254
00:15:41,657 --> 00:15:47,817
And so it was really getting to a point
of saying, okay, I know what I need

255
00:15:47,827 --> 00:15:49,607
from something in order to make it work.

256
00:15:49,617 --> 00:15:52,817
And then it was just about
finding that intersection.

257
00:15:53,557 --> 00:15:57,967
And that was the role that I saw
myself as a way watchers leader with

258
00:15:57,997 --> 00:16:03,087
my members was, one thing that they
said that the company said to me once

259
00:16:03,087 --> 00:16:04,927
upon a time, which I couldn't unhear.

260
00:16:04,927 --> 00:16:08,177
And I still use this in any number of
ways was, they said to us at one point

261
00:16:08,177 --> 00:16:13,127
during ongoing training that we would
have that, our job was to be the expert.

262
00:16:13,467 --> 00:16:19,387
In the program and to recognize that our
members were the expert in themselves

263
00:16:20,237 --> 00:16:26,917
and that our job was to figure out how
to blend the expertise, not to presume

264
00:16:26,937 --> 00:16:29,917
that we knew what the right way to do.

265
00:16:29,917 --> 00:16:36,152
The program was for them, but to get
as much information and Understand the

266
00:16:36,152 --> 00:16:41,942
program so thoroughly that we could
really adapt it to wherever somebody was.

267
00:16:41,952 --> 00:16:46,282
So an example, I find a
window or a door, right?

268
00:16:46,312 --> 00:16:46,892
Exactly.

269
00:16:46,902 --> 00:16:50,912
And one of those windows of the
doors was I grew up in the point

270
00:16:50,912 --> 00:16:53,952
system of Weight Watchers, which
is basically like a budget, right?

271
00:16:53,952 --> 00:16:59,757
You get a certain number of Points to eat
in a day and food has points and your job,

272
00:16:59,797 --> 00:17:05,737
like a budget, is don't go over budget and
one of the things that was very difficult

273
00:17:05,747 --> 00:17:13,007
for people was when they deeply believed
that they were a night eater, like a

274
00:17:13,007 --> 00:17:16,677
label that they would assign to themselves
saying that they're a night eater and

275
00:17:16,697 --> 00:17:20,342
what that means for folks that may not
be familiar with that term is that it.

276
00:17:20,912 --> 00:17:26,052
They were they were great fleeing
things that you were they were,

277
00:17:26,142 --> 00:17:30,242
they felt like they really had
great and strong control through

278
00:17:30,242 --> 00:17:33,242
most of the day and through dinner.

279
00:17:33,642 --> 00:17:37,952
And then somewhere between dinner and
bedtime, the wheels would just come off.

280
00:17:38,622 --> 00:17:39,722
And some of that.

281
00:17:39,862 --> 00:17:43,352
As I observed over time again,
13 years and, with a number of

282
00:17:43,352 --> 00:17:47,632
meetings that I led in, around my
day job, I did the math one time.

283
00:17:47,632 --> 00:17:49,572
It was 3000 meetings.

284
00:17:50,102 --> 00:17:52,862
You pick up some data from doing that.

285
00:17:53,322 --> 00:17:54,787
And one of the things that I did.

286
00:17:55,307 --> 00:17:59,957
Picked up was that people that would
get so desperate because they would

287
00:17:59,957 --> 00:18:04,867
run out of points because the, the
points have worked for 24 hours.

288
00:18:04,917 --> 00:18:06,567
Most people started them in the morning.

289
00:18:06,567 --> 00:18:10,617
And so again, if you get to the end
of the day and at the time they wanted

290
00:18:10,617 --> 00:18:16,727
to or needed to eat or, do whatever
food was doing for them was the time

291
00:18:16,727 --> 00:18:17,637
when they had the fewest points.

292
00:18:18,612 --> 00:18:20,462
And they had got a lot of them again.

293
00:18:20,462 --> 00:18:24,022
We get to that point where they were
just like, then I can't do this because

294
00:18:24,062 --> 00:18:26,412
the program doesn't work with who I am.

295
00:18:27,322 --> 00:18:30,892
And I spent some time trying to
figure this one out for people

296
00:18:30,902 --> 00:18:33,872
because there really are a lot of
people for whom this is a challenge.

297
00:18:34,302 --> 00:18:40,282
And then I was like but there's
nowhere in this literature that says

298
00:18:40,282 --> 00:18:42,872
the points start in the morning.

299
00:18:43,052 --> 00:18:45,502
The points are just 24 hours.

300
00:18:46,052 --> 00:18:50,562
What I ended up doing was
saying to them, hey, guess what?

301
00:18:51,422 --> 00:18:56,052
There's no, nothing says that you have
to start the points in the morning.

302
00:18:56,662 --> 00:18:58,902
It's just 24 hours of points.

303
00:18:58,922 --> 00:19:01,932
And yeah, it's going to mean you're
going to need to play with the journaling

304
00:19:01,942 --> 00:19:04,892
things that we've got and where
you write things down a little bit.

305
00:19:05,272 --> 00:19:09,132
But as long as you can feel like
you can keep track, then start your

306
00:19:09,132 --> 00:19:15,562
points at dinner because deeper
belief that I anchored it to.

307
00:19:15,967 --> 00:19:17,687
That there's 24 hours in a day.

308
00:19:18,162 --> 00:19:18,402
Yeah.

309
00:19:18,482 --> 00:19:21,962
And that 24 hours can start at any time.

310
00:19:22,452 --> 00:19:26,092
And so for many people, I'm
not saying all, but for many

311
00:19:26,092 --> 00:19:28,182
people, just that simple shift.

312
00:19:28,182 --> 00:19:30,352
Again, I didn't have to tell
them they weren't night eaters.

313
00:19:30,582 --> 00:19:32,152
I didn't have to change who they were.

314
00:19:32,512 --> 00:19:36,442
All I was doing was saying,
there is something else that is

315
00:19:36,482 --> 00:19:41,282
actually, in this case, outside
of you, that's even more reliable.

316
00:19:41,777 --> 00:19:44,867
That it that when it comes
together with you actually

317
00:19:44,867 --> 00:19:46,517
gives you a path forward here.

318
00:19:46,957 --> 00:19:51,457
And that works too for, cause like people
who work night shifts, it's a way to be

319
00:19:51,527 --> 00:19:55,087
more flexible with the reality of who
they're like, who they are in their life.

320
00:19:55,137 --> 00:19:55,277
Yeah.

321
00:19:55,347 --> 00:19:55,517
And.

322
00:19:55,937 --> 00:19:57,297
There's always something like that.

323
00:19:57,317 --> 00:20:01,467
I I should say I always start with
the assumption or the belief that

324
00:20:01,467 --> 00:20:06,287
there's something like that because
it allows me to start looking for it.

325
00:20:06,337 --> 00:20:10,587
Then, if I come into any situation
where I'm trying to help someone

326
00:20:10,587 --> 00:20:14,397
change or help someone help other
people or their organization change.

327
00:20:15,587 --> 00:20:19,737
If I come in saying, how do we
get them to say yes to this?

328
00:20:20,157 --> 00:20:25,152
Then I've created a really binary
situation where it's just Yes, not

329
00:20:25,152 --> 00:20:31,172
yes to this change, not how can I
open up and say, All right, we are

330
00:20:31,172 --> 00:20:34,112
trying to achieve this larger thing.

331
00:20:34,772 --> 00:20:36,702
Are we all in agreement about that?

332
00:20:36,732 --> 00:20:40,462
Are we trying, in Weight Watchers,
are we trying to achieve health goals?

333
00:20:41,042 --> 00:20:41,472
Yeah.

334
00:20:41,522 --> 00:20:42,062
Okay, great.

335
00:20:42,472 --> 00:20:45,822
Then as long as we're in agreement
about that, we're going to start there.

336
00:20:45,942 --> 00:20:49,572
Now let's take point by point
and say, what, where else are we

337
00:20:49,582 --> 00:20:51,022
where are the points of conflict?

338
00:20:51,132 --> 00:20:52,052
Where aren't they?

339
00:20:52,722 --> 00:20:59,252
But by avoiding looking and trying to
challenge those deep beliefs and really

340
00:20:59,252 --> 00:21:03,202
just coming at it from whatever the
situation is from a different direction

341
00:21:03,762 --> 00:21:09,492
and finding something that is strong
as strong or a stronger than what's

342
00:21:09,492 --> 00:21:15,602
standing in the way, then we allow people
to tell themselves a different story.

343
00:21:16,652 --> 00:21:21,442
In their head or one that now
has a possibility of success,

344
00:21:21,612 --> 00:21:23,242
whereas the current one doesn't.

345
00:21:23,612 --> 00:21:28,412
And when somebody wants the outcome
enough, they will, at least at that point,

346
00:21:28,522 --> 00:21:34,092
be willing to try because they'll agree
in principle now that it's possible.

347
00:21:34,642 --> 00:21:35,422
And.

348
00:21:36,272 --> 00:21:38,842
For a lot of us and with a lot of
change that we're trying to do in

349
00:21:38,842 --> 00:21:44,412
organizations, like that's the first
barrier that we run up against, which

350
00:21:44,412 --> 00:21:49,282
is people reject it at a hand before
even because there's just dismissed.

351
00:21:49,282 --> 00:21:50,212
It is not possible.

352
00:21:50,522 --> 00:21:55,702
And this is where I, I, one of the many
things I hope that people pull from the

353
00:21:55,702 --> 00:22:04,012
book is just this idea of that little tiny
yes, that comes saying, is it possible?

354
00:22:04,647 --> 00:22:10,037
Do you agree in principle that this would
work, that this is, that this makes sense?

355
00:22:10,367 --> 00:22:13,227
Again, not based on data and evidence.

356
00:22:13,377 --> 00:22:14,237
Those are important.

357
00:22:14,417 --> 00:22:15,337
They come later.

358
00:22:15,687 --> 00:22:21,217
But intuitively, based on what you
recognize as true become something

359
00:22:21,227 --> 00:22:25,897
that will shift what you how
you think about the world or how

360
00:22:25,897 --> 00:22:28,177
you think about the situation or
how you think about this change.

361
00:22:28,517 --> 00:22:33,007
And I think that's really where the key
is so that it comes it flips from the

362
00:22:33,007 --> 00:22:38,567
deepest beliefs are the hardest to shift
as being a problem to the deepest beliefs

363
00:22:38,567 --> 00:22:43,267
are the hardest to shift actually tell
you where to start to solve the problem.

364
00:22:44,027 --> 00:22:48,167
Start with by building on
those deep beliefs rather

365
00:22:48,167 --> 00:22:50,267
than trying to challenge them.

366
00:22:50,997 --> 00:22:55,637
Yeah, no, I the question comes up with
my work is the whole return to office

367
00:22:55,747 --> 00:22:59,547
debate and everybody, like all these
CEOs trying to bring people back in

368
00:22:59,547 --> 00:23:01,937
because of collaboration and innovation.

369
00:23:02,447 --> 00:23:05,657
And, that the work is just
better in the office and people

370
00:23:05,657 --> 00:23:07,287
fundamentally don't believe them.

371
00:23:07,442 --> 00:23:10,032
Because for one, they've been
able to work well at home.

372
00:23:10,532 --> 00:23:14,882
Two, their role doesn't really
involve innovation or collaboration.

373
00:23:15,152 --> 00:23:20,022
And as we've tried in the past, they
haven't succeeded to actually influence

374
00:23:20,022 --> 00:23:21,592
that innovation and collaboration.

375
00:23:21,972 --> 00:23:27,392
And so fundamentally there's that
disagreement about those beliefs.

376
00:23:27,492 --> 00:23:28,032
Yes.

377
00:23:28,062 --> 00:23:29,777
And I would venture to say.

378
00:23:31,507 --> 00:23:32,297
That

379
00:23:37,067 --> 00:23:42,197
in some of those cases where the
leadership is bringing people back,

380
00:23:43,377 --> 00:23:47,287
they don't actually believe that
it they don't believe it either.

381
00:23:47,867 --> 00:23:49,527
And that actually isn't the reason.

382
00:23:50,387 --> 00:23:51,077
Bringing them back.

383
00:23:51,437 --> 00:23:55,957
And so the thing is that, particularly,
I think people's intuitive BS

384
00:23:55,977 --> 00:23:58,137
meter has always been very good.

385
00:23:58,427 --> 00:24:06,597
But employees to their employers is super
good because they have a lot of history

386
00:24:06,667 --> 00:24:08,747
with the behavior of the organization.

387
00:24:09,107 --> 00:24:10,307
And and guess what?

388
00:24:10,797 --> 00:24:18,332
We are, as humans, we are
actually Nonverbal first.

389
00:24:18,382 --> 00:24:18,742
Like that.

390
00:24:19,292 --> 00:24:30,122
And we will trust what we experience
with all of ourselves far more than

391
00:24:30,122 --> 00:24:32,162
any words we ever attach to it.

392
00:24:32,682 --> 00:24:32,802
Yeah.

393
00:24:32,862 --> 00:24:37,652
And this is where, again, as part of the
motivation of this book, which is just

394
00:24:37,652 --> 00:24:43,162
saying, listen, if you can't actually
make a, I know this is gonna sound super.

395
00:24:44,357 --> 00:24:45,077
rational.

396
00:24:45,137 --> 00:24:46,677
I don't get to the reason why it's not.

397
00:24:46,687 --> 00:24:51,877
But if you can't make both a
valid and sound argument that

398
00:24:52,167 --> 00:24:55,377
your audience agrees is valid and
sound, and what I mean by valid and

399
00:24:55,377 --> 00:24:57,527
sound is it is a logical argument.

400
00:24:57,567 --> 00:25:02,137
Like it's complete, meaning this plus
this equals this and they agree with you.

401
00:25:03,127 --> 00:25:07,977
And sound, meaning the premises upon
which you are, like, the thing where

402
00:25:07,977 --> 00:25:11,457
you're saying, this is true, and this
is true, therefore, if they don't agree

403
00:25:11,457 --> 00:25:14,367
with one of those two things, then
the argument is dead in the water.

404
00:25:15,517 --> 00:25:16,767
And I know you're right.

405
00:25:16,767 --> 00:25:21,777
Because I've seen and I know you're right
because I've seen it as well that people

406
00:25:21,777 --> 00:25:25,577
don't believe that they're more creative
or innovative when they're all together.

407
00:25:26,157 --> 00:25:28,977
I also know that the studies say that.

408
00:25:29,712 --> 00:25:32,912
They are wrong that when people
are together, they actually are.

409
00:25:32,952 --> 00:25:34,522
And then you're going to say yes.

410
00:25:34,522 --> 00:25:37,392
And some of those studies came
from places like Microsoft.

411
00:25:37,392 --> 00:25:38,922
Of course, it's self serving again.

412
00:25:38,922 --> 00:25:41,672
Everybody's we can get the
numbers to say whatever we want.

413
00:25:42,152 --> 00:25:46,702
But here's what I would say
that even people who are

414
00:25:49,352 --> 00:25:51,882
reluctant to come back to the office.

415
00:25:52,407 --> 00:25:53,647
All the time, regardless.

416
00:25:53,967 --> 00:25:57,927
You know what I see, and you probably see
it, too, because I go into organizations

417
00:25:58,087 --> 00:26:02,137
to speak often at these occasions when
they have brought everyone together

418
00:26:02,367 --> 00:26:09,837
when they've been remote is that magic
happens, particularly in the non formal

419
00:26:10,197 --> 00:26:15,297
situations when you bring people together
when there's lunches together when they

420
00:26:15,297 --> 00:26:21,057
all go out to karaoke together and those
kinds of things and What I, where I

421
00:26:21,087 --> 00:26:25,277
think these back to work and I get not
an expert in all of this like you are,

422
00:26:25,277 --> 00:26:32,707
but where I suspect a lot of this breaks
down is that if the leadership actually

423
00:26:32,767 --> 00:26:35,437
articulated their own case to themselves,

424
00:26:38,567 --> 00:26:41,697
they actually wouldn't be able to make
an argument that actually because if

425
00:26:41,697 --> 00:26:44,462
they took off, one of the things I
talk about in the introduction to the

426
00:26:44,462 --> 00:26:49,482
book is what I call the persuaders
paradox, meaning we get so convinced

427
00:26:49,482 --> 00:26:52,767
of our own idea Or so charged with.

428
00:26:52,777 --> 00:26:55,987
We have to make this thing happen
that I have to convince people that

429
00:26:56,027 --> 00:27:02,547
we often will engage in a persuasion
techniques and attempts that if we were

430
00:27:02,547 --> 00:27:06,327
to take that hat off for a moment, we
would never tolerate for ourselves.

431
00:27:06,697 --> 00:27:07,587
Yeah, and.

432
00:27:09,507 --> 00:27:12,187
It's one of those things where,
you know, cause I see it a lot.

433
00:27:12,187 --> 00:27:14,447
It's the role I often
play in organizations.

434
00:27:14,457 --> 00:27:18,927
So thank you, brave clients where,
they'll say we believe that it's, it's

435
00:27:18,927 --> 00:27:20,207
going to be better for collaboration.

436
00:27:20,207 --> 00:27:20,697
Innovation.

437
00:27:20,697 --> 00:27:25,177
I'm like, and I would say, do you
believe you are more collaborative and

438
00:27:25,207 --> 00:27:28,377
innovative are equally collaborative,
innovative working remote.

439
00:27:28,787 --> 00:27:32,797
And I think a fair portion of those
people would be like yeah, I am, but.

440
00:27:33,162 --> 00:27:33,882
They aren't.

441
00:27:34,222 --> 00:27:34,432
Right?

442
00:27:34,512 --> 00:27:36,892
And it's this kind of perspective.

443
00:27:36,902 --> 00:27:40,342
So anyway, I think a lot of it
comes down to really thinking about

444
00:27:42,112 --> 00:27:47,182
what would be an argument that
The employees would agree is true.

445
00:27:47,802 --> 00:27:52,262
What would be the premises that the
employees would agree would make sense.

446
00:27:52,282 --> 00:27:59,362
And I think one of the one of the
avenues for that is recalling a recalling

447
00:27:59,362 --> 00:28:03,102
those experiences where there has been
something magical about getting people

448
00:28:03,112 --> 00:28:08,622
physically together and then be making
sure that your policies procedures

449
00:28:08,622 --> 00:28:10,452
that are in fact what's happening.

450
00:28:10,452 --> 00:28:13,902
The way that I've come to define
something that someone can't unhear

451
00:28:14,742 --> 00:28:22,522
is that it is a recognizable truth
that creates, crystallizes, or

452
00:28:22,522 --> 00:28:25,132
corrupts how they see the world.

453
00:28:26,562 --> 00:28:32,912
And the issue is when you're trying to
get someone to change, And they and the

454
00:28:32,932 --> 00:28:39,882
whatever you're presenting to them does
not do one of those four things, right?

455
00:28:39,882 --> 00:28:41,322
It's not a recognizable truth.

456
00:28:41,332 --> 00:28:45,802
They don't see it in play or
it doesn't do one of those and

457
00:28:45,832 --> 00:28:46,832
then it's not going to work.

458
00:28:47,092 --> 00:28:51,432
So when it comes to back to office
again, it's like, where do people agree?

459
00:28:51,572 --> 00:28:52,692
Can we start there?

460
00:28:53,142 --> 00:28:53,622
And.

461
00:28:53,917 --> 00:28:55,387
Again, I think the path is like there.

462
00:28:55,397 --> 00:28:58,477
There are these magical moments
where when people are physically

463
00:28:58,477 --> 00:29:00,077
together, other stuff happens.

464
00:29:00,097 --> 00:29:02,527
It may not be collaboration
and innovation.

465
00:29:02,527 --> 00:29:06,637
It may be something else that
enables more of that to happen later.

466
00:29:07,017 --> 00:29:12,007
But then the second step is critical
on the part of the organization, which

467
00:29:12,007 --> 00:29:17,647
is to set up the situations where those
things are actually going to happen.

468
00:29:17,967 --> 00:29:21,077
Because the vast majority of
people I talk to who have been at.

469
00:29:21,667 --> 00:29:26,337
In their terms, forced back to work part
of the reason why they're so frustrated

470
00:29:26,337 --> 00:29:31,967
by it is because they're sitting
physically at work in online meetings.

471
00:29:32,607 --> 00:29:37,337
Yes, I survived a return
to office mandate in 2013.

472
00:29:37,347 --> 00:29:41,187
So long before online meetings
were really regular, I think.

473
00:29:41,567 --> 00:29:44,987
And part of it was we were brought
back because the infrastructure didn't

474
00:29:45,687 --> 00:29:48,987
necessarily support everything that we
were trying to do at that particular time.

475
00:29:50,702 --> 00:29:54,782
And I had driven a lot of it and I knew
it was completely possible to do it.

476
00:29:54,782 --> 00:29:58,352
They just needed to work together and
they needed to get their act together.

477
00:29:58,712 --> 00:30:02,992
So I had made specific recommendations,
but the way that I coped with that

478
00:30:03,042 --> 00:30:09,262
was actually flipping it and basically
saying that I can make this work for me

479
00:30:09,742 --> 00:30:15,162
because this is what I need to do so that
when we bring it back, it'll work well.

480
00:30:15,487 --> 00:30:19,477
So I flipped it to be like I
could totally work from home.

481
00:30:19,787 --> 00:30:20,937
I could make this work.

482
00:30:21,287 --> 00:30:22,787
But what do I have to do?

483
00:30:22,797 --> 00:30:26,897
How can I help so that everybody
else can get to where I am.

484
00:30:27,287 --> 00:30:30,777
So I went in and I started training
people how to use webinar software.

485
00:30:31,117 --> 00:30:34,747
I built out operating protocols
and I, I worked with like the tech

486
00:30:34,777 --> 00:30:36,287
team and I did all of that work.

487
00:30:36,287 --> 00:30:40,037
Like I never really stopped working on
it, even though it was never my job.

488
00:30:40,537 --> 00:30:45,157
And so assuming that identity and
flipping that helped me deal with the

489
00:30:45,157 --> 00:30:48,627
emotional impacts of it, even though,
it was still aggravating, but it's

490
00:30:48,627 --> 00:30:50,587
at least I could flip my perspective.

491
00:30:50,587 --> 00:30:53,707
And I became the person who
is going to make it work.

492
00:30:53,707 --> 00:30:55,677
He was invested and
committed for the longterm.

493
00:30:56,912 --> 00:31:00,212
Yeah, that, that's the,

494
00:31:03,232 --> 00:31:11,327
the risk in this approach is that you
discover that As most marketers know

495
00:31:11,337 --> 00:31:14,867
about marketing messaging, and this
is where a lot of this started for me,

496
00:31:14,877 --> 00:31:16,267
cause that's where my career started.

497
00:31:16,607 --> 00:31:22,137
Marketers know that no amount of great
marketing will fix a product problem.

498
00:31:22,327 --> 00:31:25,707
It's another version of, nothing killed
a bad product, like good advertising.

499
00:31:26,867 --> 00:31:28,982
There is no amount of messaging.

500
00:31:29,282 --> 00:31:33,772
that will make a change
that is not fundamentally in

501
00:31:33,772 --> 00:31:37,332
someone's favor, in their favor.

502
00:31:38,232 --> 00:31:42,152
And I would argue that anything where
you're trying to get them to believe

503
00:31:42,152 --> 00:31:46,957
that it's in their favor is Out of
line with my own personal ethics.

504
00:31:47,307 --> 00:31:52,127
People's own mileage may
vary, but the thing is that

505
00:31:52,167 --> 00:31:53,547
eventually they'll figure it out.

506
00:31:53,597 --> 00:31:55,407
Let's we can get all Shakespearean on it.

507
00:31:55,417 --> 00:32:00,557
Like the truth will out again,
over time, people will see whether

508
00:32:00,577 --> 00:32:04,777
there's a gap between what they
were told and what they experience.

509
00:32:05,157 --> 00:32:09,017
And they are always going to
trust their own experience more.

510
00:32:09,527 --> 00:32:17,967
And so when You know, in those situations
where it really isn't going to work

511
00:32:17,967 --> 00:32:24,297
out for some people on the team,
that's where, this underneath a lot

512
00:32:24,297 --> 00:32:29,067
of, there's a, there is a realization
that may come to some readers of this

513
00:32:29,067 --> 00:32:33,072
book, which is that what this is.

514
00:32:33,072 --> 00:32:37,262
And what that shift in approach does
is that it shifts the risk of the

515
00:32:37,262 --> 00:32:41,852
change onto the person asking for
it or onto the people asking for it.

516
00:32:42,552 --> 00:32:46,512
And that's again my bias.

517
00:32:46,512 --> 00:32:49,012
I've got a lot of reasons for
why I think that's appropriate,

518
00:32:49,012 --> 00:32:50,942
but it like get intuitively.

519
00:32:51,332 --> 00:32:55,302
This is definitely for a book for
people who would agree that is true,

520
00:32:55,322 --> 00:32:57,852
that if I am asking you to change.

521
00:32:58,392 --> 00:32:58,522
The.

522
00:33:00,582 --> 00:33:04,462
If it's a worthwhile change, I should
believe enough in that change to

523
00:33:04,502 --> 00:33:11,752
assume the risks of giving you my
honest, fully transparent reasoning

524
00:33:11,752 --> 00:33:16,632
for it and acknowledge and take
the risk that you may not agree.

525
00:33:17,522 --> 00:33:18,002
Oh, yeah.

526
00:33:18,072 --> 00:33:21,052
Yeah, we had that once
with a software program.

527
00:33:21,052 --> 00:33:21,822
They were trying to bring in.

528
00:33:21,832 --> 00:33:24,582
They did spend 2 million
dollars on like a.

529
00:33:24,812 --> 00:33:27,602
Basically, like a custom CRM
before Salesforce was a thing.

530
00:33:28,022 --> 00:33:30,812
And then they're like we spent
2, 000, 2 million on this.

531
00:33:30,812 --> 00:33:31,722
We need you to use it.

532
00:33:31,732 --> 00:33:33,212
And I'm like, okay, but
you're making my life.

533
00:33:33,647 --> 00:33:34,437
More difficult.

534
00:33:34,587 --> 00:33:35,527
Why would I use it?

535
00:33:35,527 --> 00:33:38,497
Because it doesn't solve
any problem that I have.

536
00:33:39,057 --> 00:33:41,117
You're just adding to my day.

537
00:33:41,387 --> 00:33:45,107
And then eventually they started
adding in things that were useful.

538
00:33:45,577 --> 00:33:48,547
So then it's okay I can
see the use case for that.

539
00:33:48,617 --> 00:33:50,307
That's making my day easier.

540
00:33:51,137 --> 00:33:51,857
I'll use it.

541
00:33:52,167 --> 00:33:55,207
I don't really care about your
2 million that you spent on it.

542
00:33:55,597 --> 00:33:57,357
That's poor planning on your part.

543
00:33:58,107 --> 00:33:58,417
Yes.

544
00:33:58,487 --> 00:34:00,167
If you make my day easier.

545
00:34:00,167 --> 00:34:00,222
Okay.

546
00:34:00,832 --> 00:34:01,662
I'll support you.

547
00:34:03,402 --> 00:34:07,492
And that is where, and that's, for
me, that's always the place to start

548
00:34:07,542 --> 00:34:11,762
a message of change is what, in
what direction are the people you're

549
00:34:11,762 --> 00:34:14,902
talking to already traveling, right?

550
00:34:15,182 --> 00:34:20,212
And one thing that you can rely
on is that your team always

551
00:34:20,212 --> 00:34:21,572
wants their day to be easier.

552
00:34:21,892 --> 00:34:25,392
They always want there
to be less annoyances.

553
00:34:25,392 --> 00:34:31,232
They always want to be, they always want
more time to do the things that they love.

554
00:34:31,572 --> 00:34:36,222
Right now in some companies that culture
is do more of the work and other for

555
00:34:36,222 --> 00:34:39,672
other people and maybe even within that
company that for other people that's

556
00:34:39,832 --> 00:34:44,252
spending more time with friends, family,
loved ones, crossword puzzles, dogs.

557
00:34:44,292 --> 00:34:45,622
I don't know what that is.

558
00:34:47,547 --> 00:34:51,007
This comes back to that fifth principle
of the deepest beliefs are the hardest

559
00:34:51,007 --> 00:34:56,297
to shift because part of the belief
is that I want the thing right?

560
00:34:56,587 --> 00:35:00,657
And if I'm already organized and wired
in the direction of, I'm going to

561
00:35:00,657 --> 00:35:06,647
pursue and be open to anything that
legitimately will make my life easier,

562
00:35:07,407 --> 00:35:09,387
then start the message of change there.

563
00:35:10,082 --> 00:35:13,522
Pretty much one thing that's usually not
going to fly is that it's for the good

564
00:35:13,522 --> 00:35:20,712
of the company, that may fly with your C
suite, but it's still conditional on as

565
00:35:20,722 --> 00:35:24,702
long as it doesn't make my job harder.

566
00:35:24,802 --> 00:35:27,802
And so starting from
there is the first thing.

567
00:35:27,992 --> 00:35:34,432
And then again, so often what we do
when we, All forms of messaging, but

568
00:35:34,432 --> 00:35:38,552
particularly around messaging that's
meant to drive a shift in thinking or

569
00:35:38,552 --> 00:35:45,782
behavior or just create an action is that
we think that, at least we've learned

570
00:35:45,782 --> 00:35:49,952
that just telling people what to do
doesn't work or doesn't work long term

571
00:35:49,962 --> 00:35:53,012
or doesn't work and build the kind of
relationships and culture that you want.

572
00:35:53,552 --> 00:35:56,912
So we've we've, Thanks in no
small part to Simon Sinek.

573
00:35:56,942 --> 00:36:00,072
We've got, we've got this we've
understood now that we, yeah, exactly.

574
00:36:00,262 --> 00:36:01,972
We have to at least explain why.

575
00:36:02,322 --> 00:36:03,852
Why are we doing this thing?

576
00:36:04,062 --> 00:36:07,152
We're doing this thing because
now I would say that when

577
00:36:07,152 --> 00:36:08,732
you're trying to drive action.

578
00:36:09,222 --> 00:36:14,682
That we use the why that doesn't
resonate for people a lot of times,

579
00:36:14,702 --> 00:36:18,512
or it does, but it's a distant,
it's seven rooms over, right?

580
00:36:18,512 --> 00:36:22,402
Whereas if there was something closer,
like for you to say that to, for them

581
00:36:22,402 --> 00:36:23,752
to say we invested a lot of money.

582
00:36:23,752 --> 00:36:26,162
You're like, that doesn't
ring my bell at all.

583
00:36:26,532 --> 00:36:32,952
But if it were legitimately, even if it
were initially positioned as this is going

584
00:36:33,042 --> 00:36:36,682
to make your life easier, what we miss.

585
00:36:36,737 --> 00:36:42,627
And what that means is that is
starting with not just the why behind

586
00:36:42,627 --> 00:36:47,837
what the change is, but the why, but
behind what, how the change works.

587
00:36:47,847 --> 00:36:53,547
In other words, why will this change
actually accomplish this thing?

588
00:36:54,257 --> 00:36:59,122
And that's the one we skip, and that's
the one where we, More often than not

589
00:36:59,162 --> 00:37:04,252
end up with things that we trying to
argue based on things we wish were true,

590
00:37:04,362 --> 00:37:08,512
like the collaboration and innovation,
but not things again, something that

591
00:37:08,512 --> 00:37:13,682
someone can't unhear is a recognizable
truth doesn't mean it actually is, but

592
00:37:13,682 --> 00:37:15,352
they have to recognize it as truth.

593
00:37:15,352 --> 00:37:18,932
And this is where we resolve this
tension between someone going,

594
00:37:19,222 --> 00:37:20,612
this is a very logical approach.

595
00:37:21,022 --> 00:37:24,472
It's logic that uses beliefs in its input.

596
00:37:25,312 --> 00:37:28,042
That's not rational, totally not.

597
00:37:28,532 --> 00:37:31,292
So this is where we
find that middle ground.

598
00:37:31,322 --> 00:37:37,672
But it starts with saying, if you
want people to go along, it's not

599
00:37:37,692 --> 00:37:40,512
their job to move in a new direction.

600
00:37:40,632 --> 00:37:46,032
It's your job to show how the thing
that you're asking them to do doesn't

601
00:37:46,042 --> 00:37:47,632
take them off the path that they're on.

602
00:37:48,012 --> 00:37:52,642
And in fact, may actually
accelerate them towards whatever

603
00:37:52,642 --> 00:37:53,682
it is that they're pursuing.

604
00:37:53,942 --> 00:38:00,107
But it's your job, it's your team's
job, as a leader, as a colleague to, If

605
00:38:00,107 --> 00:38:04,587
you don't know specifically what those
things are to just to do the little

606
00:38:04,587 --> 00:38:09,307
bit of human work that would say what
would a smart, capable, good person,

607
00:38:09,307 --> 00:38:15,147
which all of your team is, by the way,
what would they most likely care about

608
00:38:15,767 --> 00:38:19,647
the most, what would be the most, what
would be the thing that they're most,

609
00:38:20,147 --> 00:38:25,857
caring about again, not, and it isn't
by the way, long term avoiding pain.

610
00:38:26,137 --> 00:38:26,657
It's.

611
00:38:27,267 --> 00:38:30,397
Yes, they want to avoid pain in the
short term, but they also want, there's

612
00:38:30,397 --> 00:38:31,927
something else that they're looking for.

613
00:38:32,137 --> 00:38:37,177
So there's a lot to it, but ultimately
it is, does come down to very simple

614
00:38:37,177 --> 00:38:39,097
principles, which is why I wrote the book.

615
00:38:40,187 --> 00:38:44,447
I like to the smart, capable,
good approach because it helps

616
00:38:44,477 --> 00:38:46,447
people approach it with empathy.

617
00:38:46,732 --> 00:38:49,802
Right, and put themselves in
somebody else's shoes, I find.

618
00:38:49,812 --> 00:38:53,682
So if you assume that everybody is
smart, capable and good, which the

619
00:38:53,682 --> 00:38:57,982
majority of people want to be, I maybe
Elon Musk claims to be an evil genius.

620
00:38:57,982 --> 00:39:00,182
I'm not sure, but if everybody wants.

621
00:39:00,182 --> 00:39:06,102
Yeah, from that perspective, then you have
to consider that, there's a reason that's

622
00:39:06,102 --> 00:39:10,562
driving them that it makes you start
that curiosity thread, which I think is.

623
00:39:11,222 --> 00:39:11,942
It's helpful.

624
00:39:12,592 --> 00:39:13,092
That's right.

625
00:39:13,522 --> 00:39:15,792
So yeah, I love this topic.

626
00:39:15,802 --> 00:39:16,662
It's a couple things.

627
00:39:16,662 --> 00:39:21,572
One is, again, most of the things that
I've put in here come from trial and

628
00:39:21,582 --> 00:39:28,542
error experience of what business leaders
and humans do and don't talk, right?

629
00:39:28,782 --> 00:39:29,492
And.

630
00:39:30,052 --> 00:39:36,492
And one of those, particularly in
business, it can be for not for all people

631
00:39:36,492 --> 00:39:37,742
in business and not for all leaders.

632
00:39:37,742 --> 00:39:43,992
But the empathy is can for certain
people feel quite squishy on.

633
00:39:44,032 --> 00:39:48,282
And that's because oftentimes that
we've conflated that there's only one

634
00:39:48,282 --> 00:39:52,282
kind of empathy when, in fact, there's
actually multiple kinds of empathy and

635
00:39:52,857 --> 00:39:57,717
Most of the time what we're, what we
think we mean with empathy is emotional

636
00:39:57,727 --> 00:40:00,807
empathy, which is understanding
what somebody else is feeling.

637
00:40:01,417 --> 00:40:07,177
And that feels very touchy feely
to particularly, task oriented

638
00:40:07,177 --> 00:40:08,237
leaders and things like that.

639
00:40:08,237 --> 00:40:12,707
Not everybody's wired towards
relationships and that's okay by the way.

640
00:40:14,397 --> 00:40:18,477
But one thing that can help to
understand is Hey you don't.

641
00:40:18,737 --> 00:40:20,847
Control how somebody
feels about something.

642
00:40:20,977 --> 00:40:21,967
You do not.

643
00:40:22,447 --> 00:40:23,497
And they do.

644
00:40:23,767 --> 00:40:25,922
And that's On that.

645
00:40:25,992 --> 00:40:29,852
And so not only does it feel
uncomfortable for certain people

646
00:40:29,852 --> 00:40:31,402
because of how they're wired.

647
00:40:31,472 --> 00:40:36,302
I don't feel comfortable on this
feeling thing on another level.

648
00:40:37,172 --> 00:40:40,102
Other people may resist it because
they're like, I don't feel comfortable.

649
00:40:40,742 --> 00:40:43,312
I don't directly control
how they feel anyway.

650
00:40:43,312 --> 00:40:46,402
So again, what's for some folks that
maybe they're efficiency oriented.

651
00:40:46,512 --> 00:40:51,512
Like I don't, even if I wanted to know
or could know, I can't, there's, it's

652
00:40:51,522 --> 00:40:53,832
not a thing I can directly affect.

653
00:40:54,492 --> 00:40:57,502
And there's lots of people who
actually don't really understand

654
00:40:57,502 --> 00:40:58,672
what they're feeling either.

655
00:40:59,112 --> 00:41:02,352
Like admitting their own
emotions to themselves.

656
00:41:02,402 --> 00:41:03,252
So it's complex.

657
00:41:03,892 --> 00:41:07,982
And this is where understanding that
there's another avenue towards empathy

658
00:41:07,992 --> 00:41:12,102
that can be really important and that's
cognitive empathy, which is understanding

659
00:41:12,102 --> 00:41:13,722
what somebody else is thinking.

660
00:41:14,392 --> 00:41:18,862
And there's a huge amount of support
for the fact that many of our feelings

661
00:41:19,472 --> 00:41:22,272
are directly tied to our thoughts.

662
00:41:22,672 --> 00:41:26,722
And so if we can back up and
go, whoo, this person is super

663
00:41:26,722 --> 00:41:30,852
passionate about this, or, ooh, this
person's really angry about this.

664
00:41:31,312 --> 00:41:32,552
And instead of going.

665
00:41:33,117 --> 00:41:36,957
I don't understand the feeling, which
you may not, you're probably not going

666
00:41:36,957 --> 00:41:41,857
to understand it unless you start
to say what must they be thinking?

667
00:41:41,867 --> 00:41:47,377
Or what could they be thinking that would
produce that anger would produce that

668
00:41:47,387 --> 00:41:49,987
doubt that would produce that resistance?

669
00:41:50,567 --> 00:41:51,087
And.

670
00:41:51,632 --> 00:41:52,382
You're right.

671
00:41:52,482 --> 00:41:56,892
The smart, capable, good thing is
that most people want to be it.

672
00:41:57,322 --> 00:42:00,472
And I chose the phrasing in the
book quite consciously that most

673
00:42:00,472 --> 00:42:02,732
people want to be seen that way.

674
00:42:03,202 --> 00:42:06,742
Because I've spent enough years in
therapy to know that not everybody's

675
00:42:06,742 --> 00:42:09,412
convinced all the time that they
are smart, capable, or good.

676
00:42:10,532 --> 00:42:11,362
Most of us.

677
00:42:11,942 --> 00:42:15,802
The majority of us, I would say
even the Elon Musks of the world

678
00:42:16,292 --> 00:42:20,262
want to be seen as smart, capable
and good to their in group, right?

679
00:42:20,312 --> 00:42:21,772
Or to other people.

680
00:42:22,102 --> 00:42:27,112
And so they're very happy to be seen as
not good by a huge group of other people

681
00:42:27,142 --> 00:42:33,362
as long as they feel validated by the
people whose opinion they want or need.

682
00:42:33,982 --> 00:42:36,892
And so this is where.

683
00:42:37,732 --> 00:42:42,472
Again, putting that lens on just
saying again, you don't even have to

684
00:42:42,472 --> 00:42:46,602
believe I suggest that you do, though,
because still going to leak out.

685
00:42:46,602 --> 00:42:49,882
If you don't have to, though, but
at least take that step of saying,

686
00:42:50,712 --> 00:42:52,832
okay, let's just thought exercise.

687
00:42:52,882 --> 00:42:54,032
If this person.

688
00:42:54,567 --> 00:42:57,387
We're actually currently
smart, capable and good.

689
00:42:57,757 --> 00:42:59,567
Why would this make sense?

690
00:43:00,517 --> 00:43:04,467
Because people do follow
their own internal logic.

691
00:43:04,477 --> 00:43:08,177
It may not be logical to
you, but it is to them.

692
00:43:08,517 --> 00:43:14,587
We do not, as humans, operate outside
of internal logic for very long.

693
00:43:14,727 --> 00:43:15,347
We don't.

694
00:43:15,557 --> 00:43:18,197
We are very internally consistent people.

695
00:43:19,087 --> 00:43:21,697
Even if we're consistently
inconsistent, right?

696
00:43:21,697 --> 00:43:24,867
It's like Dan Ariely's like
predictably irrational.

697
00:43:25,787 --> 00:43:30,117
We in fact are predictably irrational, but
we're irrational in very predictable ways.

698
00:43:30,187 --> 00:43:33,447
We are logical and very illogical ways.

699
00:43:33,897 --> 00:43:35,707
And that's what we can count on.

700
00:43:35,707 --> 00:43:39,832
So if you can marry those two things
together, that people will operate.

701
00:43:40,072 --> 00:43:41,962
Long term on their own internal logic.

702
00:43:41,962 --> 00:43:47,432
So there is one there's some kind of
mental model or collection of models and

703
00:43:47,432 --> 00:43:50,102
beliefs and frameworks and worldview.

704
00:43:50,482 --> 00:43:54,692
Absolutely, which I love, by the way,
favorite topic and that people want

705
00:43:54,692 --> 00:43:56,382
to be seen as smart, capable and good.

706
00:43:56,392 --> 00:43:59,262
Then you can start to
solve for the worldview.

707
00:43:59,922 --> 00:44:04,262
You can say, I can see this reaction,
if I assume they're smart, capable, and

708
00:44:04,262 --> 00:44:09,722
good, given what I know of the world,
and of people, and even this person.

709
00:44:09,972 --> 00:44:11,222
What would have produced that?

710
00:44:11,472 --> 00:44:13,862
And if you can't figure it out guess what?

711
00:44:13,902 --> 00:44:17,792
It is a beautiful point, to
your point, Nola, of becoming

712
00:44:17,812 --> 00:44:19,812
curious, and asking them.

713
00:44:20,832 --> 00:44:22,502
What makes you say that?

714
00:44:22,602 --> 00:44:25,062
What is, what is it that you are?

715
00:44:25,562 --> 00:44:28,062
That are, what is it
that you are angry about?

716
00:44:28,102 --> 00:44:31,042
Again, not why that can be
a very triggering question.

717
00:44:31,042 --> 00:44:32,122
Like, why are you so angry?

718
00:44:32,122 --> 00:44:33,042
It's just what is it?

719
00:44:33,042 --> 00:44:38,122
Because that can start to really
focus the question on, you could, if

720
00:44:38,132 --> 00:44:41,492
someone said that to you with your
resistance to coming back to work or

721
00:44:41,492 --> 00:44:45,432
that to that implementation of that
software system what is it about this?

722
00:44:45,452 --> 00:44:47,652
That is, is so frustrating to you.

723
00:44:47,652 --> 00:44:50,252
You're like, it makes my job harder.

724
00:44:52,602 --> 00:44:55,482
It does again, like we operate.

725
00:44:56,117 --> 00:44:58,937
From these worldviews with
the assumption that people see

726
00:44:58,937 --> 00:45:00,107
the world the same way we do.

727
00:45:00,397 --> 00:45:05,867
And if we stop and for just even a split
second and go of course, not everybody

728
00:45:05,867 --> 00:45:12,277
does or can, but our brain saves brain
cells by assuming that everybody does.

729
00:45:12,907 --> 00:45:18,757
And so sometimes we have to create
those moments either in conversation

730
00:45:18,767 --> 00:45:28,407
or by presenting this case for change
that again, people can recognize.

731
00:45:29,437 --> 00:45:33,197
In that moment, because it doesn't
take long to really say because I

732
00:45:33,197 --> 00:45:35,117
believe this is true, and this is true.

733
00:45:35,677 --> 00:45:38,727
That's why I believe this is the
approach that's going to produce this

734
00:45:38,727 --> 00:45:45,227
outcome that doesn't take much to help
people identify where the friction

735
00:45:45,227 --> 00:45:50,537
is, where the alignment is, where
there's opportunity and where there is.

736
00:45:51,517 --> 00:45:55,317
And where there isn't and regardless,
what I have seen is that being able

737
00:45:55,317 --> 00:46:00,727
to do that and have that discussion
allows people to civilly agree to

738
00:46:00,727 --> 00:46:05,587
disagree and say, oh, I understand.

739
00:46:06,137 --> 00:46:09,297
I just don't agree and then
it's up to the leadership.

740
00:46:09,297 --> 00:46:11,887
It's up to you as an individual
working with that leadership

741
00:46:12,117 --> 00:46:13,647
to decide what that actually.

742
00:46:14,047 --> 00:46:14,807
Means for you.

743
00:46:14,967 --> 00:46:18,707
And like you did, you said how can I
reframe it so that I can do something

744
00:46:18,707 --> 00:46:20,417
with this and be helpful towards it?

745
00:46:21,037 --> 00:46:25,487
But that's how that response is
always gonna be personal to Yeah, and

746
00:46:25,487 --> 00:46:29,047
fundamentally, I think that's really
where the whole return to office thing

747
00:46:29,057 --> 00:46:32,097
breaks down is it's related to identity.

748
00:46:32,137 --> 00:46:35,177
So these leaders who want to
bring people back, that's how

749
00:46:35,177 --> 00:46:36,737
they've always been successful.

750
00:46:36,987 --> 00:46:40,297
If they tell the story of their
careers, it's told in person

751
00:46:40,297 --> 00:46:41,877
because that was their reality.

752
00:46:42,247 --> 00:46:45,907
You would think that they want to mentor
people, they want to train people,

753
00:46:45,907 --> 00:46:51,457
they, and to do that in the frame of
referenced in to their history, they

754
00:46:51,457 --> 00:46:54,847
can't do that if the people are at home.

755
00:46:55,347 --> 00:46:58,667
Like their reason for being successful
is fundamentally related to the

756
00:46:58,667 --> 00:47:02,027
fact that they were in person
seeing people in different contexts.

757
00:47:02,337 --> 00:47:07,717
And so they have to reframe their
whole entire understanding of their

758
00:47:07,717 --> 00:47:13,237
career success in a way that's really
uncomfortable for a lot of people.

759
00:47:14,677 --> 00:47:23,117
Yes, and that also means that in many
cases, it reveals to them in a way

760
00:47:23,117 --> 00:47:27,897
they may not want to face quickly
or ever how they were viewing the

761
00:47:27,907 --> 00:47:29,977
people who work with them, right?

762
00:47:30,007 --> 00:47:33,347
Meaning they were looking them as workers.

763
00:47:34,497 --> 00:47:40,937
Not as people because again, as a person
to put the persuaders paradox back in

764
00:47:40,937 --> 00:47:47,247
play as a person, they wouldn't want
to be seen as just a worker either.

765
00:47:47,247 --> 00:47:48,397
They would resist it.

766
00:47:48,787 --> 00:47:52,277
And so sometimes it's having that
perspective of just it's where

767
00:47:52,277 --> 00:47:55,427
that classic 90s 80s and 90s.

768
00:47:55,427 --> 00:47:56,637
It started in Toyota.

769
00:47:56,637 --> 00:47:57,767
The five wise.

770
00:47:58,832 --> 00:48:01,672
comes into play of just
keep, it isn't always five.

771
00:48:01,672 --> 00:48:06,412
Sometimes it's three, sometimes it's
seven, but keep going down until

772
00:48:07,112 --> 00:48:09,372
you, it's a, or even share Lockian.

773
00:48:09,382 --> 00:48:12,382
The only thing that's
left is what must be true.

774
00:48:12,762 --> 00:48:18,292
And sometimes that's uncomfortable and but
if you're really trying to get a change

775
00:48:18,292 --> 00:48:22,352
to be successful, that's the work, right?

776
00:48:22,392 --> 00:48:31,647
And sometimes the work is going to be
This realization that you are putting the

777
00:48:31,647 --> 00:48:37,207
needs of the company ahead of the needs
of your employees and that may go against

778
00:48:37,207 --> 00:48:41,147
what you have said Your values are right.

779
00:48:41,147 --> 00:48:43,697
And so that's where the
trust breaks down, right?

780
00:48:43,927 --> 00:48:48,057
Because it's the story
doesn't hang together, right?

781
00:48:48,097 --> 00:48:48,607
Exactly.

782
00:48:48,617 --> 00:48:49,507
It doesn't it.

783
00:48:49,567 --> 00:48:50,347
It doesn't.

784
00:48:50,597 --> 00:48:52,437
It is not recognizably true.

785
00:48:52,677 --> 00:48:58,127
So that's what you know, for me this idea
of these recognizable truths apply both

786
00:48:58,177 --> 00:49:04,567
to individual pieces and parts of this
story, but also to the story as a whole,

787
00:49:04,807 --> 00:49:09,507
because sometimes, we can hear something
that just completely, Like just shifts

788
00:49:09,517 --> 00:49:14,337
everything, and it just rewires the
rest of a story that's already in play.

789
00:49:14,367 --> 00:49:21,137
I would say we've seen that this week
in Kamala Harris's response on Call

790
00:49:21,137 --> 00:49:24,857
Her Daddy when she said there are many
women who do not aspire to be humble.

791
00:49:25,687 --> 00:49:29,987
And for many women, I'm not saying
all, for many women, that was

792
00:49:29,987 --> 00:49:31,667
one of those recognizable truths.

793
00:49:31,667 --> 00:49:33,817
All of a sudden they heard
the words and they're like.

794
00:49:34,462 --> 00:49:39,472
I recognize that as true and I
recognize that as true about me.

795
00:49:39,732 --> 00:49:44,832
And so what it did was it
crystallized for a group of people.

796
00:49:45,792 --> 00:49:47,982
This is why this something didn't work.

797
00:49:47,992 --> 00:49:53,372
This is why, some like something about
the story I'm being told about my

798
00:49:53,372 --> 00:49:57,432
role as a woman doesn't work because
I've just heard a recognizable truth.

799
00:49:58,102 --> 00:50:01,632
And then to your point, Nola,
sometimes it's the whole story, right?

800
00:50:01,672 --> 00:50:05,692
It's just it's, these
things don't track together.

801
00:50:05,742 --> 00:50:09,312
And that's, I, sorry to get all
Aristotelian on it, but it's it's not

802
00:50:09,312 --> 00:50:15,767
a, it's not a valid argument, meaning
A plus B does not equal C in this case.

803
00:50:15,767 --> 00:50:21,245
And And if that's verifiably true,
based on your audience's experience, if

804
00:50:21,245 --> 00:50:26,735
your audience cannot validate it based
on their own experience, first test.

805
00:50:26,735 --> 00:50:26,750
Test.

806
00:50:27,400 --> 00:50:28,040
Dead in the water.

807
00:50:28,300 --> 00:50:32,010
And so this is why so much of the
approach that I'm talking about in this

808
00:50:32,010 --> 00:50:39,800
book really relies on those underlying,
sometimes implicit, unspoken, in

809
00:50:39,830 --> 00:50:45,990
practice principles that are guiding
what the leaders do and team members do

810
00:50:46,350 --> 00:50:50,545
every day, because that is what we do.

811
00:50:50,975 --> 00:50:54,345
That is the first
validation of the change.

812
00:50:54,475 --> 00:50:58,145
The first yes, that always
has to pass is does it check?

813
00:50:58,535 --> 00:50:59,995
Does it check with my head?

814
00:51:00,005 --> 00:51:01,145
Does it make sense?

815
00:51:01,765 --> 00:51:03,575
And does it make sense?

816
00:51:03,595 --> 00:51:04,765
Does it feel right?

817
00:51:05,185 --> 00:51:08,865
And the ding, it has to be,
I don't hear an audible ding.

818
00:51:08,915 --> 00:51:14,855
When I hear a truth, I feel it like
in, in my chest, it's not audible.

819
00:51:14,855 --> 00:51:16,525
It's a feeling right.

820
00:51:16,915 --> 00:51:20,465
And that actually happened once where it
was something that somebody was dealing

821
00:51:20,465 --> 00:51:23,965
with an insurance claim and somebody told
me something that they shouldn't have told

822
00:51:23,965 --> 00:51:26,175
me and I'm like, Oh, this is the truth.

823
00:51:26,255 --> 00:51:27,305
This is what you're trying to do.

824
00:51:27,315 --> 00:51:31,505
And I got a 34, 000 settlement out of
them because I recognized their truth.

825
00:51:32,735 --> 00:51:38,705
Yes, we there's a lot as I'm, as
I am learning right now, cause

826
00:51:38,705 --> 00:51:40,575
I, I started amidst all of this.

827
00:51:40,575 --> 00:51:42,275
I started a doctorate program this summer.

828
00:51:42,605 --> 00:51:43,615
We have.

829
00:51:44,555 --> 00:51:50,465
I think overlooked in particularly Western
and Western culture and in business,

830
00:51:52,495 --> 00:51:54,665
the other forms of.

831
00:51:55,415 --> 00:52:04,775
Knowledge, wisdom and learning that
we have and you know it what is

832
00:52:04,775 --> 00:52:11,225
intriguing to me in this environment
of incredible complexity and incredible

833
00:52:11,225 --> 00:52:16,159
change is how important it is.

834
00:52:16,430 --> 00:52:18,090
To be able to

835
00:52:21,530 --> 00:52:26,710
not just articulate quickly why
something what something is, why is it

836
00:52:26,710 --> 00:52:30,730
important and what and be able to give
people that information that allows

837
00:52:30,740 --> 00:52:36,580
them to do that to do a very quick
check, but to be able to recognize.

838
00:52:37,825 --> 00:52:45,155
That actually nothing that happens up here
happens without the gut check happening

839
00:52:45,165 --> 00:52:54,855
first, and I don't care how B2B or how
engineering or tech or science focused,

840
00:52:55,355 --> 00:53:02,045
an organization is it's, it's proposal
review committee is or whatever that

841
00:53:02,055 --> 00:53:04,485
data, we're going to trust the data.

842
00:53:06,390 --> 00:53:11,390
That either aligns with what we've
seen and experienced ourselves, or in

843
00:53:11,390 --> 00:53:16,570
rare cases, we will trust it because
it either comes from a source that

844
00:53:16,570 --> 00:53:21,380
we really trust, or again, that it
finally unlocks, even in a way that

845
00:53:21,380 --> 00:53:23,950
we weren't expecting, something else.

846
00:53:24,930 --> 00:53:27,430
One of my best examples of that, and
I know we're running out of time,

847
00:53:27,430 --> 00:53:30,370
but one of my favorite examples
of that was with with Jay Baer.

848
00:53:30,380 --> 00:53:34,680
So Jay Baer is a customer service
and customer experience expert.

849
00:53:34,700 --> 00:53:38,930
And two books ago, three books ago, he
wrote a book called Hug Your Haters.

850
00:53:39,590 --> 00:53:43,540
And it started with, he started with,
by, he started it by doing research.

851
00:53:43,550 --> 00:53:48,070
So he started it by doing,
by gathering information on.

852
00:53:48,505 --> 00:53:52,545
Like, how often you need to respond
to the haters online and what the

853
00:53:52,545 --> 00:53:54,165
expectations were and all of that.

854
00:53:54,655 --> 00:54:00,005
And to Jay's eternal credit, his
original hypothesis about it, I don't

855
00:54:00,005 --> 00:54:01,695
even remember what it was disproved.

856
00:54:02,215 --> 00:54:07,605
And what he discovered in the data was
not that was that the haters were actually

857
00:54:07,895 --> 00:54:10,155
deeply passionate about the brand.

858
00:54:10,475 --> 00:54:14,325
And when they got angry, it's
because they cared so much.

859
00:54:14,835 --> 00:54:21,095
And so this is one of those places where,
when it suddenly, for him, what that

860
00:54:21,105 --> 00:54:24,765
created was, and I remember we worked
on the messaging around this, which was,

861
00:54:25,270 --> 00:54:28,860
That it wasn't that the haters weren't
the problem, ignoring them was the

862
00:54:28,860 --> 00:54:34,490
problem, because they were so passionate
about the brand, the company, etc.

863
00:54:34,990 --> 00:54:41,520
That hearing that disconfirming data is
what unlocked for him why haters could

864
00:54:41,530 --> 00:54:43,780
have, like, why they carried such power.

865
00:54:43,780 --> 00:54:48,590
It's because the people who I would
submit, it's because that passion.

866
00:54:48,925 --> 00:54:54,835
For the brand or for the way things should
be was so intense that people felt it

867
00:54:55,245 --> 00:54:59,315
even through, the austere online world.

868
00:55:00,155 --> 00:55:04,295
Yeah, I actually built my customer
service career around difficult

869
00:55:04,315 --> 00:55:07,645
callers and dealing with people that
other people couldn't deal with.

870
00:55:08,105 --> 00:55:08,475
And.

871
00:55:08,860 --> 00:55:13,540
That was how I was successful because
I listened to them, because honestly,

872
00:55:13,550 --> 00:55:17,270
the majority of the time is they had
a vision of what could be, and they

873
00:55:17,270 --> 00:55:20,840
were actually trying to help you get
there, if only you would pay attention.

874
00:55:21,380 --> 00:55:21,810
Yes.

875
00:55:22,070 --> 00:55:22,560
Yes.

876
00:55:22,920 --> 00:55:25,790
And that actually is what's happening
with the whole return to office thing

877
00:55:25,790 --> 00:55:28,050
is, it's not that people object to.

878
00:55:28,980 --> 00:55:31,040
And it's not that they don't want to work.

879
00:55:31,040 --> 00:55:33,020
It's not that they refuse
to go into the office.

880
00:55:33,040 --> 00:55:34,950
It's because they don't feel heard.

881
00:55:35,580 --> 00:55:37,480
That's the really big
thing that's happened.

882
00:55:38,160 --> 00:55:38,570
That's right.

883
00:55:38,620 --> 00:55:39,430
And they are.

884
00:55:40,250 --> 00:55:43,280
And it's and when the leadership
says we don't feel heard either.

885
00:55:43,590 --> 00:55:45,740
This is where I would urge people to say,

886
00:55:48,360 --> 00:55:51,890
because are you asking people to hear
something that you haven't actually said?

887
00:55:52,420 --> 00:55:54,850
And that is how could they hear that?

888
00:55:55,080 --> 00:56:00,700
And so this is why so often it really
is so important to it's, to say what

889
00:56:00,700 --> 00:56:05,690
they can't unhear, you have to say
what they can't hear first, right?

890
00:56:05,690 --> 00:56:07,410
In order for that to be the case.

891
00:56:07,780 --> 00:56:14,030
And that sometimes means digging deep
into really understanding what is driving

892
00:56:14,040 --> 00:56:18,780
why you believe a particular change
is actually the right thing to do.

893
00:56:18,880 --> 00:56:21,190
And then discovering what in that.

894
00:56:21,515 --> 00:56:25,075
And then deciding what does that
mean for either how you change the

895
00:56:25,075 --> 00:56:29,585
message or how you're going about
making the change in the first place.

896
00:56:31,615 --> 00:56:34,275
All right we should wrap it up
because we are over time at this

897
00:56:34,275 --> 00:56:36,235
point, but thank you so much.

898
00:56:36,245 --> 00:56:37,965
It's always lovely to chat with you.

899
00:56:38,065 --> 00:56:40,825
I did find the book immensely helpful.

900
00:56:40,825 --> 00:56:44,615
I think in my review, I actually
wrote immediately useful because.

901
00:56:45,005 --> 00:56:46,545
I was actually applying it.

902
00:56:46,635 --> 00:56:49,345
If I, if you go back through my
social, you'll actually see I was

903
00:56:49,345 --> 00:56:51,305
weaving, smart, capable, and good.

904
00:56:51,305 --> 00:56:54,505
And I was actually weaving it
into things I was already writing.

905
00:56:54,715 --> 00:56:55,435
Oh, I love that.

906
00:56:56,105 --> 00:56:57,645
Yeah, it was, is really cool.

907
00:56:57,645 --> 00:56:59,555
And so definitely the book is out today.

908
00:56:59,555 --> 00:57:01,345
I checked my mailbox to
see if it had arrived.

909
00:57:01,345 --> 00:57:02,285
It hadn't arrived yet.

910
00:57:02,695 --> 00:57:04,015
But it's already hitting the charts.

911
00:57:04,025 --> 00:57:07,665
So if you get the book, Say what
they can on here by Tamsyn Webster,

912
00:57:07,925 --> 00:57:09,625
write a review for her on Amazon.

913
00:57:10,115 --> 00:57:13,445
And we want the next book in the series
because it's helped me to this point.

914
00:57:14,825 --> 00:57:15,495
You got to keep going.

915
00:57:15,495 --> 00:57:18,825
No, thank you so much.

916
00:57:18,825 --> 00:57:20,875
It's so generous to
share your time with me.

917
00:57:20,875 --> 00:57:23,405
And I'm just very grateful
to be able to have such an

918
00:57:23,415 --> 00:57:24,795
engaging conversation with you.

919
00:57:25,235 --> 00:57:26,115
Oh, thank you so much.

920
00:57:26,115 --> 00:57:26,765
I appreciate it.

921
00:57:27,405 --> 00:57:44,804
I'll see you next time.