July 23, 2026

Should Harry Lose His Royal Role? Plus the Buckingham Palace Problem

Should Harry Lose His Royal Role? Plus the Buckingham Palace Problem

Could Prince Harry eventually lose his position as a Counsellor of State? Royal commentators debate whether King Charles has quietly solved the problem—or simply postponed it for King William. We also examine the deeper constitutional question of who would actually govern if Prince George inherited the throne while still a minor, and whether Parliament should legislate now to avoid a future crisis. Then we turn to another royal mystery: why neither Queen Elizabeth II nor King Charles has truly wanted to live at Buckingham Palace, and whether transforming Britain’s most famous palace into little more than a ceremonial office changes the symbolism of the modern monarchy.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/palace-intrigue-king-charles-meghan-markle-and-all-the-royal-family-gossip--4522904/support.

Palace Intrigue is a daily British royal family podcast covering King Charles, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, Kate Middleton and the House of Windsor. New episodes every day. Follow on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. Part of the Caloroga Shark Media network.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:13.199
Caloroga Shark Media at low and Welcome to Palace Entry.

2
00:00:13.359 --> 00:00:16.359
I am your host. Mark Francis questions on once again

3
00:00:16.399 --> 00:00:18.960
being asked about whether Prince Harry could one day lose

4
00:00:19.000 --> 00:00:22.280
his position as Counselor of State, with one royal commentator

5
00:00:22.320 --> 00:00:24.719
suggesting Prince William may take a different approach when he

6
00:00:24.760 --> 00:00:28.039
eventually becomes king. Councilors of State are senior members of

7
00:00:28.039 --> 00:00:30.839
the royal family who can carry out certain official duties

8
00:00:30.879 --> 00:00:33.240
on behalf of the monarch if the sovereign is overseas

9
00:00:33.320 --> 00:00:37.320
or temporarily unable to perform them. The current list includes

10
00:00:37.399 --> 00:00:40.320
Queen Camilla, Prince William, Princess Anne, Prince Edward, Andrew mount

11
00:00:40.359 --> 00:00:44.960
Batten Windsor, Princess Beatrice, and Prince Harry. Although Harry stepped

12
00:00:45.000 --> 00:00:47.840
back from royal duties in twenty twenty and now lives

13
00:00:47.840 --> 00:00:52.719
in California, he technically remains eligible. However, King Charles expanded

14
00:00:52.719 --> 00:00:54.960
the pool of working royals by appointing Princess Anne and

15
00:00:55.000 --> 00:00:59.280
Prince Edward as additional Counselors of State, reducing any practical

16
00:00:59.359 --> 00:01:01.640
need for either He, Harry or Andrew to perform the role.

17
00:01:02.000 --> 00:01:05.640
Speaking on Pallace Confidential Daily Mail Diary editor Richard Eden

18
00:01:05.680 --> 00:01:08.959
said he believes that decisions signal the King Charles has

19
00:01:09.000 --> 00:01:12.200
no intention of removing Harry. Eden said, so the idea

20
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:14.400
was that they wouldn't need to use Andrew or Harry

21
00:01:14.400 --> 00:01:16.640
because they had other people to take that role if needed.

22
00:01:16.959 --> 00:01:18.879
So I think it's clear the King won't. Who knows.

23
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:21.040
It's hard to predict what William will do, but I

24
00:01:21.079 --> 00:01:23.000
think it's fair to say he will do something about it.

25
00:01:23.159 --> 00:01:27.280
He'll take a very different line. Royal biographer Robert Hartman

26
00:01:27.359 --> 00:01:30.000
pointed out that any change would not simply be a

27
00:01:30.040 --> 00:01:33.120
decision for the monarch. Removing a Council of State requires

28
00:01:33.359 --> 00:01:36.680
legislation passed by Parliament, meaning it there's ultimately a matter

29
00:01:36.719 --> 00:01:40.159
for the government, rather than the King acting alone. Daily

30
00:01:40.159 --> 00:01:42.959
Mail Royal editor Rebecca English argued that many members of

31
00:01:42.959 --> 00:01:46.200
the public view removing such roles as appropriate response when

32
00:01:46.319 --> 00:01:48.799
members of the royal family have either stepped away from

33
00:01:48.879 --> 00:01:52.920
royal duties or brought controversy upon the institution. What else

34
00:01:52.959 --> 00:01:55.040
can you do, apart from telling them they're a very

35
00:01:55.120 --> 00:01:57.799
naughty boy, she said, take away the things that give

36
00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:02.159
them validity. Roylan Side at Deep Crown tells us. I

37
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:04.120
have thought about this a lot. Let us conduct an

38
00:02:04.159 --> 00:02:08.159
intellectual exercise. Unpleasant though it may be, William is king.

39
00:02:08.400 --> 00:02:11.439
Something happens, a fall and illness, a moment of incapacity

40
00:02:11.479 --> 00:02:14.599
that leaves him temporarily unable to perform his duties, or

41
00:02:14.639 --> 00:02:17.520
something worse. George is not eighteen yet who acts in

42
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:20.639
his place? The answer under the regency acts as Harry,

43
00:02:21.039 --> 00:02:24.919
Charlotte and Lewis are children. Both are disqualified. Going back

44
00:02:24.960 --> 00:02:26.960
up the line, we land on the other son of Charles.

45
00:02:27.000 --> 00:02:29.280
He is an adult, and yet he is the Duke

46
00:02:29.319 --> 00:02:32.719
of Sussex, resident in California, operating a media company that's

47
00:02:32.719 --> 00:02:36.240
built itself on institutional criticism. He is, in other words,

48
00:02:36.400 --> 00:02:41.879
politically radioactive. But he is also technically eligible. Skipping over

49
00:02:41.879 --> 00:02:44.120
Harry's children, andrews next. Andrew is still in a line

50
00:02:44.159 --> 00:02:46.960
of succession. Andrew is an adult domiciled in the UK.

51
00:02:47.120 --> 00:02:49.800
But Andrew is also, by the standards that have governed

52
00:02:49.800 --> 00:02:54.039
every other institutional decision, this reign completely disqualified. You cannot

53
00:02:54.080 --> 00:02:55.960
have a regency where the regent is the man the

54
00:02:56.000 --> 00:03:01.680
institution itself is declared unsuitable. It would be institutional suicide.

55
00:03:01.800 --> 00:03:04.960
Beatrice is next, Beatrice is an adult technically eligible. But

56
00:03:05.000 --> 00:03:08.360
Beatrice is engaged in business relationships with Saudi Arabia. She

57
00:03:08.479 --> 00:03:10.840
is not a working royal. She is, in other words,

58
00:03:10.960 --> 00:03:15.240
marginal to the institution. More importantly, appointing Beatrice's regent over

59
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:18.039
Harry over the entire Sussex machine would signal that the

60
00:03:18.039 --> 00:03:20.360
Palace is willing to elevate a non working royal rather

61
00:03:20.400 --> 00:03:23.879
than trust their heir zone uncle. The institutional message would

62
00:03:23.919 --> 00:03:29.520
be corrosive. Also, her father is Andrew. Eugenie is similarly positioned.

63
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:31.879
You are left with Harry, and Harry is the problem.

64
00:03:32.000 --> 00:03:35.759
Charles left unresolved. Consider what this means. George becomes king.

65
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:37.800
He is the monarch of the United Kingdom, but he

66
00:03:37.879 --> 00:03:42.000
does not reign. Instead, he is groomed, trained, prepared. He

67
00:03:42.039 --> 00:03:45.080
does not attend university as his singlic spite he does

68
00:03:45.080 --> 00:03:48.280
not have a normal adolescence. He cannot afford to every

69
00:03:48.280 --> 00:03:51.000
moment until age eighteen, is consumed by the machinery of

70
00:03:51.120 --> 00:03:53.599
preparation for the moment he turns eighteen and must actually

71
00:03:53.599 --> 00:03:55.680
take the throne, And for those years, his uncle, the

72
00:03:55.719 --> 00:03:58.599
man his family has spent years trying to distance itself from,

73
00:03:58.840 --> 00:04:02.479
is his regent is the architect of his preparation, is

74
00:04:02.520 --> 00:04:07.039
the visible face of the institution's continuity. Parliament does not

75
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:09.560
need to remove Harry. Parliament needs to legislate now, before

76
00:04:09.599 --> 00:04:13.719
any crisis arrives, to designate Edward explicitly as regent. Should

77
00:04:13.719 --> 00:04:16.600
a minor ever ascend to the throne. There is president

78
00:04:16.600 --> 00:04:18.720
for this. There is a precedent for all of it.

79
00:04:19.199 --> 00:04:21.199
In nineteen fifty two, King George the sixth died and

80
00:04:21.279 --> 00:04:25.240
was succeeded by his daughter, Queen Elizabeth. Her eldest son

81
00:04:25.279 --> 00:04:27.759
and heir apparent, Prince Charles was only four years old.

82
00:04:28.199 --> 00:04:31.000
The Regency Act nineteen thirty seven would have provided that

83
00:04:31.040 --> 00:04:33.800
his aunt, Princess Margaret, would serve as regent if something

84
00:04:33.839 --> 00:04:37.319
happened to Elizabeth before childs turned eighteen, but Parliament wanted

85
00:04:37.319 --> 00:04:40.839
to change that. In nineteen fifty three, Parliament passed legislation

86
00:04:40.920 --> 00:04:43.079
providing that in the event of a child of Her

87
00:04:43.120 --> 00:04:46.000
Majesty and His Royal Highness, the Duke of Edinburgh acceding

88
00:04:46.040 --> 00:04:48.240
to the throne while under the age of eighteen years,

89
00:04:48.560 --> 00:04:52.959
his Royal Highness, if living, shall be the regent. The

90
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:57.839
president is explicit. Parliament can legislate in advance to designate

91
00:04:57.879 --> 00:05:01.000
exactly who should serve as regent. They did it for Philip.

92
00:05:01.040 --> 00:05:03.680
They did it to avoid an awkward situation where the

93
00:05:03.720 --> 00:05:06.680
reignings monarch's system might have to govern on behalf of

94
00:05:06.680 --> 00:05:09.879
the monarch's four year old son. Parliament looked at the contingency,

95
00:05:10.040 --> 00:05:14.240
considered who should actually serve, and legislated the answer. Parliament

96
00:05:14.240 --> 00:05:16.360
can do the same now, spell it out by law,

97
00:05:16.519 --> 00:05:20.120
Make it institutional rather than reactive. Make it about competence

98
00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:23.759
and preparation, not about punishment or family drama. Edward as

99
00:05:23.839 --> 00:05:28.920
regent problem solved. But there is another possibility. Kate is

100
00:05:28.920 --> 00:05:31.279
the wife of the heir to the throne. If William

101
00:05:31.319 --> 00:05:34.560
became incapacitated while George was a minor, Kate would be

102
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:38.279
the natural guardian of the child king. Parliament could legislate

103
00:05:38.319 --> 00:05:40.879
to designate her as regent, as they did for Philip

104
00:05:40.879 --> 00:05:44.759
in nineteen fifty three. Parliament could pass legislation tomorrow making

105
00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:47.560
this explicit. In the event George becomes king as a miner,

106
00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:52.720
Kate is regent until he turns eighteen. Clean, institutional, family centered.

107
00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:56.839
It removes the constitutional ambiguity entirely and places the machinery

108
00:05:56.839 --> 00:05:59.399
of regency and hands that have already spent years preparing

109
00:05:59.399 --> 00:06:03.120
to support the institution more palace in just a moment.

110
00:06:07.040 --> 00:06:09.680
Many Royal watchers have been asking a simple question, why

111
00:06:09.680 --> 00:06:12.399
does no one seem to want to live at Buckingham Palace.

112
00:06:12.720 --> 00:06:14.759
Former Royal Chef Darren McGrady, who worked for the Royal

113
00:06:14.800 --> 00:06:18.199
family for fifteen years, has previously suggested even Queen Elizabeth

114
00:06:18.279 --> 00:06:21.000
viewed Buckingham Palace more as an office than a home,

115
00:06:21.079 --> 00:06:23.920
saying she's never really liked the palace. It's always been

116
00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:26.720
the office to the Queen. The Queen would always be

117
00:06:26.720 --> 00:06:29.120
whizzing off back to Windsor Castle. She can't wait to

118
00:06:29.160 --> 00:06:33.040
get back there. While Queen Elizabeth spent week days carrying

119
00:06:33.079 --> 00:06:36.879
out official duties at Buckingham Palace, Windsor Castle increasingly became

120
00:06:36.920 --> 00:06:40.680
her preferred retreat, particularly in her later years. During the

121
00:06:40.720 --> 00:06:44.920
COVID pandemic, she remained almost exclusively at Windsor and ultimately

122
00:06:44.920 --> 00:06:48.160
spent much of the remainder of her reign there. King

123
00:06:48.279 --> 00:06:51.720
Charles appears to have inherited a similar outlook When in London,

124
00:06:51.759 --> 00:06:54.439
he and Queen Camilla continue to live at nearby Clarence House,

125
00:06:54.480 --> 00:06:56.639
where they have been based since two thousand and five.

126
00:06:57.120 --> 00:06:59.879
Away from the capital. Charles is widely believed for most

127
00:07:00.079 --> 00:07:03.160
home at High Grove House in Gloucestershire, the country estate

128
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:08.040
he has carefully developed over several decades. Buckingham Palace, by contrast,

129
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:11.319
is a very different proposition. With seven hundred and seventy

130
00:07:11.360 --> 00:07:14.839
five rooms, hundreds of staff, constant security operations, and thousands

131
00:07:14.839 --> 00:07:17.199
of tourists gathering outside its gates every day, it is

132
00:07:17.319 --> 00:07:21.360
arguably better suited to state occasions than everyday family life.

133
00:07:22.000 --> 00:07:24.360
Reports have also suggested the Prince and Princess of Wales

134
00:07:24.399 --> 00:07:27.279
view Windsor as their long term family base, even after

135
00:07:27.319 --> 00:07:32.360
William eventually becomes king. In The Express, Emily Ferguson writes,

136
00:07:32.519 --> 00:07:34.160
the decision for the King and Queen to stay at

137
00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:38.199
Clarence House perhaps seems sensible. It saves the transportation of

138
00:07:38.240 --> 00:07:41.519
their belongings, moving their domestic household over and saying goodbye

139
00:07:41.519 --> 00:07:43.439
to a home they have loved living in for over

140
00:07:43.480 --> 00:07:46.240
twenty three years. But while it may be a decision

141
00:07:46.240 --> 00:07:48.000
from the heart, what impact will it have on the

142
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:51.439
wider monarchy? Charles will continue to pop across the road

143
00:07:51.480 --> 00:07:55.319
to hold audience's receptions. State visits and the ceremonial events

144
00:07:55.360 --> 00:07:57.199
such as trooping the color. So it does it really

145
00:07:57.240 --> 00:08:00.680
matter if he doesn't sleep there? Sensible people will argue, No,

146
00:08:00.879 --> 00:08:03.920
it reflects the modern error and the king's relatable desire

147
00:08:03.959 --> 00:08:07.680
to live in cozy, a more comfortable surroundings aged seventy seven.

148
00:08:07.959 --> 00:08:11.160
But as with all change, the decision doesn't come without

149
00:08:11.199 --> 00:08:13.639
its risks. Start us to the royal family is at

150
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:16.600
risk and the Palace is reduced to a mere office.

151
00:08:17.279 --> 00:08:19.439
I can't see Britain's and tourists alike during bucking and

152
00:08:19.480 --> 00:08:22.240
Palaces anything but the visible symbol of the monarchy, even

153
00:08:22.240 --> 00:08:24.439
if it isn't the king's home. But there's no doubt

154
00:08:24.480 --> 00:08:28.800
it gives Republicans something else to weaponize, and they have it.

155
00:08:29.279 --> 00:08:31.519
If you'd like to email us our addresses The Palace

156
00:08:31.560 --> 00:08:35.080
Intrigue at gmail dot com. Please follow us on Spotify,

157
00:08:35.240 --> 00:08:37.679
Rabble and live. A comment for us on Spotify. These

158
00:08:37.720 --> 00:08:40.360
days I mark Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This

159
00:08:40.480 --> 00:08:42.840
airs Palace Intrigue and good times