Caloroga Shark Media
Sept. 15, 2026

Prince William Blocks Meghan's Diana Comeback? New Claims Over Canceled Charity Gala

Prince William Blocks Meghan's Diana Comeback? New Claims Over Canceled Charity Gala

A planned Diana Award gala reportedly falls apart amid fresh speculation about William, Harry and Meghan. We sort through the conflicting reports, look at Earl Spencer's deeply personal new Diana book, claims Harry is developing a documentary for the Princess's thirtieth anniversary, and why royal commentators believe William and Harry may ultimately have to reunite.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/palace-intrigue-harry-meghan-the-crown-royal-family-news-and-gossip--4522904/support.

Palace Intrigue is a daily British royal family podcast covering King Charles, Meghan Markle, Prince Harry, Kate Middleton and the House of Windsor. New episodes every day. Follow on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you listen. Part of the Caloroga Shark Media network.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.250 --> 00:00:12.150
Hello and welcome to Palace Intrigue. I am your host,

2
00:00:12.210 --> 00:00:15.820
Mark Francis. William seemingly was not planning on celebrating Harry's

3
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:19.800
birthday today, with the heir having a plan to visit Princetown,

4
00:00:20.359 --> 00:00:24.019
near Dartmoor Prison, where a new fund will support projects

5
00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:26.890
proposed by local people. The money is intended for social,

6
00:00:26.949 --> 00:00:30.870
economic and environmental improvements in the rural community. The plan

7
00:00:30.910 --> 00:00:34.130
includes a stop at Gather and Moor, community and cultural hub,

8
00:00:34.549 --> 00:00:38.170
where he will meet representatives from Princeton Press. He will

9
00:00:38.189 --> 00:00:41.570
also visit a youth club that has received Duchy of

10
00:00:41.630 --> 00:00:46.140
Cornwall funding to improve its facilities. William may have played

11
00:00:46.179 --> 00:00:48.640
a role in the collapse of a planned Diana Award

12
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:51.899
gala in London. The September 18th event at the Raffles

13
00:00:51.939 --> 00:00:54.740
Hotel became the subject of conflicting reports after the Mail

14
00:00:54.780 --> 00:00:57.740
on Sunday claimed Prince Harry and Meghan planned to attend.

15
00:00:58.179 --> 00:01:02.259
Their spokesperson said, Despite the Daily Mail's reporting to the contrary,

16
00:01:02.299 --> 00:01:04.400
the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are not scheduled to

17
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:08.609
attend a Diana Award event at Raffles Hotel OWO London

18
00:01:08.650 --> 00:01:12.950
on September 18th. Facts matter. Accuracy matters. Apparently neither made

19
00:01:12.989 --> 00:01:16.989
the guest list for this particular story. Royal commentator Tom

20
00:01:17.069 --> 00:01:20.510
Sykes now says that despite the Sussex denial, he understands

21
00:01:20.549 --> 00:01:24.329
an event really had been in development. After a lengthy

22
00:01:24.349 --> 00:01:26.629
consultation with our lawyers, I am able to say that

23
00:01:26.650 --> 00:01:28.959
it is my understanding that that an event organised by

24
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:32.640
the Diana Awards was indeed booked. Sykes also alleged that

25
00:01:32.680 --> 00:01:35.939
plans had been made for a particular musician to perform,

26
00:01:36.260 --> 00:01:38.319
and the key people involved in it had been asked

27
00:01:38.359 --> 00:01:41.719
about their availability, and if they would be available. According

28
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:44.819
to Radar Online, the dinner was subsequently cancelled. Sykes suggested

29
00:01:44.920 --> 00:01:48.040
tensions involving William, Harry and Meghan may have contributed. But

30
00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:49.840
why is it no longer going ahead? I think it

31
00:01:49.890 --> 00:01:52.829
speaks to what you're saying about the difficulty of the relationship,

32
00:01:52.870 --> 00:01:56.069
the difficulty of the situation that Harry is putting William into.

33
00:01:57.019 --> 00:02:00.120
Sykes also claimed Meghan has been very keen to go

34
00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:02.040
to the event and had apparently even got to the

35
00:02:02.060 --> 00:02:04.799
stage of reaching out to British designers to dress her.

36
00:02:06.140 --> 00:02:09.800
The Diana Award occupies an unusual position because it continues

37
00:02:09.819 --> 00:02:12.159
to receive support from both William and Harry despite the

38
00:02:12.210 --> 00:02:15.449
breakdown in the brothers' relationship. Neither brother is actually a

39
00:02:15.530 --> 00:02:19.949
patron of the organisation. Sykes said the charity enjoys the

40
00:02:19.990 --> 00:02:22.789
support of both of the princes before offering his theory

41
00:02:22.849 --> 00:02:26.889
about William's possible reaction to Meghan attending the dinner And

42
00:02:26.909 --> 00:02:28.729
I wouldn't be surprised, let's put it this way, if

43
00:02:28.810 --> 00:02:31.229
William felt that he didn't want his mother's memory used

44
00:02:31.270 --> 00:02:34.009
as a kind of relaunch pad for Meghan in the UK.

45
00:02:36.000 --> 00:02:38.879
Earl Charles Spencer has received the first printed copy of

46
00:02:38.939 --> 00:02:41.120
his new book about Princess Diana just before it goes

47
00:02:41.180 --> 00:02:45.219
on sale. Spencer shared photographs of himself holding Swan Song, Diana,

48
00:02:45.259 --> 00:02:48.659
My Sister, which will be published in Britain on the 22nd.

49
00:02:49.180 --> 00:02:51.900
He wrote, Always an amazing moment for an author to

50
00:02:51.939 --> 00:02:53.979
receive a printed copy of their new book for the

51
00:02:54.039 --> 00:02:57.949
first time, particularly on this occasion. with Swansong being my

52
00:02:58.229 --> 00:03:00.949
most personal work by some distance. At the end of

53
00:03:00.990 --> 00:03:03.610
the day, it's a brother's tribute to an extraordinary sister.

54
00:03:04.770 --> 00:03:08.289
Spencer has previously said the approaching 30th anniversary of Diana's

55
00:03:08.360 --> 00:03:10.539
death prompted him to write the book because he wanted

56
00:03:10.580 --> 00:03:12.400
to put his own memories of his sister on the

57
00:03:12.460 --> 00:03:16.780
record rather than continue responding to interview requests. With the

58
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:19.819
30th anniversary of Diana's tragic death on the skyline, I've

59
00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:23.139
been inundated yet again with requests for interviews about my sister.

60
00:03:23.900 --> 00:03:26.000
This has convinced me to write down my own thoughts

61
00:03:26.039 --> 00:03:28.719
and memories, ones and for all, rather than having the

62
00:03:28.740 --> 00:03:32.090
discomfort of again reading the opinions of others, many of

63
00:03:32.129 --> 00:03:35.150
which are based on untruths that have become accepted over time.

64
00:03:35.810 --> 00:03:37.330
The aim of this book is to tell the truth

65
00:03:37.389 --> 00:03:40.530
about Diana from her brother's perspective, just as I attempted

66
00:03:40.550 --> 00:03:43.849
to do when speaking at her funeral. As with my eulogy,

67
00:03:44.129 --> 00:03:46.069
I want to speak on Diana's behalf and do so

68
00:03:46.180 --> 00:03:49.740
in an openly positive way. I hope this book will

69
00:03:49.780 --> 00:03:51.939
be of interest to the many who still cherish the

70
00:03:51.979 --> 00:03:54.189
memory of Diana when she was alive, and I would

71
00:03:54.210 --> 00:03:56.770
be delighted if those two young two remember her in

72
00:03:56.810 --> 00:04:00.189
her heyday feel after reading this, that they get who

73
00:04:00.210 --> 00:04:03.449
she really was, a one-off, dynamic character full of love,

74
00:04:03.629 --> 00:04:06.189
charisma and self-doubt, who gave life a hell of a

75
00:04:06.229 --> 00:04:09.409
go and left the world a far better place, despite

76
00:04:09.509 --> 00:04:13.819
exiting the stage while still so young. Harry is reportedly

77
00:04:13.879 --> 00:04:16.779
exploring a film about Princess Diana ahead of the 30th

78
00:04:16.819 --> 00:04:20.019
anniversary of her death next August. The Daily Express reports

79
00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:22.439
that Harry has approached some of Diana's friends about taking

80
00:04:22.500 --> 00:04:26.170
part in interviews. For journalist Richard Kay, the brothers' joint

81
00:04:26.250 --> 00:04:29.589
work around the 20th anniversary offers a reminder of how

82
00:04:29.649 --> 00:04:33.430
much their relationship has changed. When they made, nine years ago,

83
00:04:33.490 --> 00:04:36.240
those documentaries to mark the 20th anniversary of their mother's death,

84
00:04:36.740 --> 00:04:39.180
that was the last time they were really in step together.

85
00:04:39.620 --> 00:04:41.839
William is just as much his mother's son as Harry is.

86
00:04:42.519 --> 00:04:44.860
The issue of trying to use Diana, the Spencer brand,

87
00:04:44.980 --> 00:04:47.480
the Spencer name, to divide himself away from the House

88
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:49.439
of Windsor, I think is something we're going to see

89
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:51.959
even more of. Let's not forget who Harry spent time

90
00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:54.040
with when he was here in July. It was Diana's

91
00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:58.480
family at Oldthorpe. Royal author Robert Jobson believes the anniversary

92
00:04:58.500 --> 00:05:01.649
should bring the brothers together. How can they not be together?

93
00:05:01.709 --> 00:05:03.430
There's going to be a moment where there has to

94
00:05:03.470 --> 00:05:05.689
be some sort of arrangement for the 30th anniversary of

95
00:05:05.730 --> 00:05:08.389
Diana's death. They have to be on the same stage.

96
00:05:09.470 --> 00:05:15.250
More palace in just a moment. The Royal Collection Trust

97
00:05:15.310 --> 00:05:19.120
has corrected an Instagram post after Royal Watchers spotted that

98
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:20.779
it had given the wrong year for the start of

99
00:05:20.819 --> 00:05:24.269
King Charles' reign. The Trust shared a coronation portrait on

100
00:05:24.329 --> 00:05:27.610
September 8th with the caption, On this day in 2023,

101
00:05:27.610 --> 00:05:30.839
King Charles III ceded the throne. It was a year out.

102
00:05:31.100 --> 00:05:35.160
Charles became king on September 8th, 2022, when Queen Elizabeth died.

103
00:05:35.420 --> 00:05:39.279
His coronation followed on May 6th, 2023. For an organisation

104
00:05:39.300 --> 00:05:42.500
responsible for sharing royal history, the mistake invited some pointed response.

105
00:05:43.110 --> 00:05:48.550
One commentator wrote, You'd think they'd know. In the news.com.au,

106
00:05:48.610 --> 00:05:51.689
Daniela also writes, Chekhov had a theory when it came

107
00:05:51.730 --> 00:05:55.990
to rioting Show, don't tell. Clearly, Kate, the Princess of Wales,

108
00:05:56.029 --> 00:05:59.250
is a student of Mr Cherry Orchard himself. There she

109
00:05:59.269 --> 00:06:02.329
was on Thursday in Liverpool, wearing an Adeline Lee suit

110
00:06:02.389 --> 00:06:04.629
and kicking off the new working royal year by giving

111
00:06:04.670 --> 00:06:08.170
us a no-nonsense business princess, looking more like the CEO

112
00:06:08.209 --> 00:06:10.870
of a company gearing up to IPO than someone familiar

113
00:06:10.889 --> 00:06:14.920
with the technicalities of ribbon-cutting. See that, Mr and Mrs

114
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:17.860
supposedly living in the Cotswolds? What Kate seemed to be

115
00:06:18.360 --> 00:06:21.620
Chekhovian-ly showing was strength and a keep calm and keep

116
00:06:21.660 --> 00:06:24.959
power suiting on But no $ 1, 200 pair of trousers or

117
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:27.300
a crisply cut blazer can take away from the fact

118
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:29.939
that Kate's new working royal year is shaping up to

119
00:06:29.959 --> 00:06:32.870
be hell. It does not appear the Sussexes have any

120
00:06:32.949 --> 00:06:35.870
plans to sit quietly in the shires to reclusively collect

121
00:06:36.149 --> 00:06:40.149
delphinium cuttings and rescue dogs. This month Harry will embark

122
00:06:40.209 --> 00:06:43.439
on a week of charity engagements, thing a charity skydive,

123
00:06:43.819 --> 00:06:46.019
what more of a bells and whistles way to announce

124
00:06:46.060 --> 00:06:48.899
his back and howl. But it won't just be him,

125
00:06:49.139 --> 00:06:51.819
as it's been reported that Meghan is keen to rekindle

126
00:06:51.860 --> 00:06:54.819
her relationships with British charities. A source close to the

127
00:06:54.870 --> 00:06:56.970
Duchess told the Times, she wants to pick up with

128
00:06:57.009 --> 00:06:59.230
a lot of people, though whether they will take the

129
00:06:59.290 --> 00:07:02.449
call remains to be seen. For Kate, what are the

130
00:07:02.470 --> 00:07:05.069
chances of Harry and Meghan's off-brand roiling not stealing all

131
00:07:05.089 --> 00:07:07.949
the available thunder? Who would you prefer to read about?

132
00:07:08.129 --> 00:07:10.500
Someone doing their duty or a duke willing to throw

133
00:07:10.540 --> 00:07:13.910
himself out of a plane? hard workers doing competent jobs

134
00:07:13.970 --> 00:07:16.629
and talking about serious issues, or about two people who

135
00:07:16.670 --> 00:07:21.350
manage to generate melodrama as easily as plants photosynthesize oxygen.

136
00:07:21.870 --> 00:07:23.939
Who would be interested in hearing Kate and William enthuse

137
00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:27.379
about carbon-neutral tenders or some such should Harry and Meghan

138
00:07:27.420 --> 00:07:30.160
decide to, funnily enough at the same moment, do a

139
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:33.459
fundraising bungee jump or decide to write empowering messages on

140
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:37.389
oranges to be handed out to OnlyFans stars? The issue

141
00:07:37.410 --> 00:07:39.670
of the Sussexes 2.0 is not just one of our

142
00:07:39.769 --> 00:07:43.120
fickle attention but of narrative and image. William and Kate

143
00:07:43.139 --> 00:07:45.490
have one story they want to tell and sell. Look

144
00:07:45.529 --> 00:07:48.990
at us helping make the world better. They have professionalized

145
00:07:49.069 --> 00:07:52.129
prince and princessing, and are selling themselves as doers and

146
00:07:52.189 --> 00:07:56.540
leaders in climate, mental health, and childhood development. But that

147
00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:59.399
message could be lost in the wash of the Kardashian-ness

148
00:07:59.439 --> 00:08:02.560
of the Sussexes' return. And there you have it. If

149
00:08:02.579 --> 00:08:05.019
you'd like to email us or address us at thepalaceintrigageemail.com,

150
00:08:06.110 --> 00:08:08.569
If you're on Spotify, leave us a comment. If you're

151
00:08:08.589 --> 00:08:10.420
on Apple, hit that button up there that says listen

152
00:08:10.519 --> 00:08:13.139
uninterrupted and get the show commercial free for just five

153
00:08:13.180 --> 00:08:16.160
bucks a month. I'm Mark Francis. My thanks to John McDermott.

154
00:08:16.180 --> 00:08:18.329
This is Palace Intrigue. Good times.