WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.250 --> 00:00:12.150
Hello and welcome to Palace Intrigue. I am your host,
2
00:00:12.210 --> 00:00:15.820
Mark Francis. William seemingly was not planning on celebrating Harry's
3
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:19.800
birthday today, with the heir having a plan to visit Princetown,
4
00:00:20.359 --> 00:00:24.019
near Dartmoor Prison, where a new fund will support projects
5
00:00:24.120 --> 00:00:26.890
proposed by local people. The money is intended for social,
6
00:00:26.949 --> 00:00:30.870
economic and environmental improvements in the rural community. The plan
7
00:00:30.910 --> 00:00:34.130
includes a stop at Gather and Moor, community and cultural hub,
8
00:00:34.549 --> 00:00:38.170
where he will meet representatives from Princeton Press. He will
9
00:00:38.189 --> 00:00:41.570
also visit a youth club that has received Duchy of
10
00:00:41.630 --> 00:00:46.140
Cornwall funding to improve its facilities. William may have played
11
00:00:46.179 --> 00:00:48.640
a role in the collapse of a planned Diana Award
12
00:00:48.719 --> 00:00:51.899
gala in London. The September 18th event at the Raffles
13
00:00:51.939 --> 00:00:54.740
Hotel became the subject of conflicting reports after the Mail
14
00:00:54.780 --> 00:00:57.740
on Sunday claimed Prince Harry and Meghan planned to attend.
15
00:00:58.179 --> 00:01:02.259
Their spokesperson said, Despite the Daily Mail's reporting to the contrary,
16
00:01:02.299 --> 00:01:04.400
the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are not scheduled to
17
00:01:04.439 --> 00:01:08.609
attend a Diana Award event at Raffles Hotel OWO London
18
00:01:08.650 --> 00:01:12.950
on September 18th. Facts matter. Accuracy matters. Apparently neither made
19
00:01:12.989 --> 00:01:16.989
the guest list for this particular story. Royal commentator Tom
20
00:01:17.069 --> 00:01:20.510
Sykes now says that despite the Sussex denial, he understands
21
00:01:20.549 --> 00:01:24.329
an event really had been in development. After a lengthy
22
00:01:24.349 --> 00:01:26.629
consultation with our lawyers, I am able to say that
23
00:01:26.650 --> 00:01:28.959
it is my understanding that that an event organised by
24
00:01:29.000 --> 00:01:32.640
the Diana Awards was indeed booked. Sykes also alleged that
25
00:01:32.680 --> 00:01:35.939
plans had been made for a particular musician to perform,
26
00:01:36.260 --> 00:01:38.319
and the key people involved in it had been asked
27
00:01:38.359 --> 00:01:41.719
about their availability, and if they would be available. According
28
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:44.819
to Radar Online, the dinner was subsequently cancelled. Sykes suggested
29
00:01:44.920 --> 00:01:48.040
tensions involving William, Harry and Meghan may have contributed. But
30
00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:49.840
why is it no longer going ahead? I think it
31
00:01:49.890 --> 00:01:52.829
speaks to what you're saying about the difficulty of the relationship,
32
00:01:52.870 --> 00:01:56.069
the difficulty of the situation that Harry is putting William into.
33
00:01:57.019 --> 00:02:00.120
Sykes also claimed Meghan has been very keen to go
34
00:02:00.159 --> 00:02:02.040
to the event and had apparently even got to the
35
00:02:02.060 --> 00:02:04.799
stage of reaching out to British designers to dress her.
36
00:02:06.140 --> 00:02:09.800
The Diana Award occupies an unusual position because it continues
37
00:02:09.819 --> 00:02:12.159
to receive support from both William and Harry despite the
38
00:02:12.210 --> 00:02:15.449
breakdown in the brothers' relationship. Neither brother is actually a
39
00:02:15.530 --> 00:02:19.949
patron of the organisation. Sykes said the charity enjoys the
40
00:02:19.990 --> 00:02:22.789
support of both of the princes before offering his theory
41
00:02:22.849 --> 00:02:26.889
about William's possible reaction to Meghan attending the dinner And
42
00:02:26.909 --> 00:02:28.729
I wouldn't be surprised, let's put it this way, if
43
00:02:28.810 --> 00:02:31.229
William felt that he didn't want his mother's memory used
44
00:02:31.270 --> 00:02:34.009
as a kind of relaunch pad for Meghan in the UK.
45
00:02:36.000 --> 00:02:38.879
Earl Charles Spencer has received the first printed copy of
46
00:02:38.939 --> 00:02:41.120
his new book about Princess Diana just before it goes
47
00:02:41.180 --> 00:02:45.219
on sale. Spencer shared photographs of himself holding Swan Song, Diana,
48
00:02:45.259 --> 00:02:48.659
My Sister, which will be published in Britain on the 22nd.
49
00:02:49.180 --> 00:02:51.900
He wrote, Always an amazing moment for an author to
50
00:02:51.939 --> 00:02:53.979
receive a printed copy of their new book for the
51
00:02:54.039 --> 00:02:57.949
first time, particularly on this occasion. with Swansong being my
52
00:02:58.229 --> 00:03:00.949
most personal work by some distance. At the end of
53
00:03:00.990 --> 00:03:03.610
the day, it's a brother's tribute to an extraordinary sister.
54
00:03:04.770 --> 00:03:08.289
Spencer has previously said the approaching 30th anniversary of Diana's
55
00:03:08.360 --> 00:03:10.539
death prompted him to write the book because he wanted
56
00:03:10.580 --> 00:03:12.400
to put his own memories of his sister on the
57
00:03:12.460 --> 00:03:16.780
record rather than continue responding to interview requests. With the
58
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:19.819
30th anniversary of Diana's tragic death on the skyline, I've
59
00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:23.139
been inundated yet again with requests for interviews about my sister.
60
00:03:23.900 --> 00:03:26.000
This has convinced me to write down my own thoughts
61
00:03:26.039 --> 00:03:28.719
and memories, ones and for all, rather than having the
62
00:03:28.740 --> 00:03:32.090
discomfort of again reading the opinions of others, many of
63
00:03:32.129 --> 00:03:35.150
which are based on untruths that have become accepted over time.
64
00:03:35.810 --> 00:03:37.330
The aim of this book is to tell the truth
65
00:03:37.389 --> 00:03:40.530
about Diana from her brother's perspective, just as I attempted
66
00:03:40.550 --> 00:03:43.849
to do when speaking at her funeral. As with my eulogy,
67
00:03:44.129 --> 00:03:46.069
I want to speak on Diana's behalf and do so
68
00:03:46.180 --> 00:03:49.740
in an openly positive way. I hope this book will
69
00:03:49.780 --> 00:03:51.939
be of interest to the many who still cherish the
70
00:03:51.979 --> 00:03:54.189
memory of Diana when she was alive, and I would
71
00:03:54.210 --> 00:03:56.770
be delighted if those two young two remember her in
72
00:03:56.810 --> 00:04:00.189
her heyday feel after reading this, that they get who
73
00:04:00.210 --> 00:04:03.449
she really was, a one-off, dynamic character full of love,
74
00:04:03.629 --> 00:04:06.189
charisma and self-doubt, who gave life a hell of a
75
00:04:06.229 --> 00:04:09.409
go and left the world a far better place, despite
76
00:04:09.509 --> 00:04:13.819
exiting the stage while still so young. Harry is reportedly
77
00:04:13.879 --> 00:04:16.779
exploring a film about Princess Diana ahead of the 30th
78
00:04:16.819 --> 00:04:20.019
anniversary of her death next August. The Daily Express reports
79
00:04:20.040 --> 00:04:22.439
that Harry has approached some of Diana's friends about taking
80
00:04:22.500 --> 00:04:26.170
part in interviews. For journalist Richard Kay, the brothers' joint
81
00:04:26.250 --> 00:04:29.589
work around the 20th anniversary offers a reminder of how
82
00:04:29.649 --> 00:04:33.430
much their relationship has changed. When they made, nine years ago,
83
00:04:33.490 --> 00:04:36.240
those documentaries to mark the 20th anniversary of their mother's death,
84
00:04:36.740 --> 00:04:39.180
that was the last time they were really in step together.
85
00:04:39.620 --> 00:04:41.839
William is just as much his mother's son as Harry is.
86
00:04:42.519 --> 00:04:44.860
The issue of trying to use Diana, the Spencer brand,
87
00:04:44.980 --> 00:04:47.480
the Spencer name, to divide himself away from the House
88
00:04:47.519 --> 00:04:49.439
of Windsor, I think is something we're going to see
89
00:04:49.519 --> 00:04:51.959
even more of. Let's not forget who Harry spent time
90
00:04:52.000 --> 00:04:54.040
with when he was here in July. It was Diana's
91
00:04:54.079 --> 00:04:58.480
family at Oldthorpe. Royal author Robert Jobson believes the anniversary
92
00:04:58.500 --> 00:05:01.649
should bring the brothers together. How can they not be together?
93
00:05:01.709 --> 00:05:03.430
There's going to be a moment where there has to
94
00:05:03.470 --> 00:05:05.689
be some sort of arrangement for the 30th anniversary of
95
00:05:05.730 --> 00:05:08.389
Diana's death. They have to be on the same stage.
96
00:05:09.470 --> 00:05:15.250
More palace in just a moment. The Royal Collection Trust
97
00:05:15.310 --> 00:05:19.120
has corrected an Instagram post after Royal Watchers spotted that
98
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:20.779
it had given the wrong year for the start of
99
00:05:20.819 --> 00:05:24.269
King Charles' reign. The Trust shared a coronation portrait on
100
00:05:24.329 --> 00:05:27.610
September 8th with the caption, On this day in 2023,
101
00:05:27.610 --> 00:05:30.839
King Charles III ceded the throne. It was a year out.
102
00:05:31.100 --> 00:05:35.160
Charles became king on September 8th, 2022, when Queen Elizabeth died.
103
00:05:35.420 --> 00:05:39.279
His coronation followed on May 6th, 2023. For an organisation
104
00:05:39.300 --> 00:05:42.500
responsible for sharing royal history, the mistake invited some pointed response.
105
00:05:43.110 --> 00:05:48.550
One commentator wrote, You'd think they'd know. In the news.com.au,
106
00:05:48.610 --> 00:05:51.689
Daniela also writes, Chekhov had a theory when it came
107
00:05:51.730 --> 00:05:55.990
to rioting Show, don't tell. Clearly, Kate, the Princess of Wales,
108
00:05:56.029 --> 00:05:59.250
is a student of Mr Cherry Orchard himself. There she
109
00:05:59.269 --> 00:06:02.329
was on Thursday in Liverpool, wearing an Adeline Lee suit
110
00:06:02.389 --> 00:06:04.629
and kicking off the new working royal year by giving
111
00:06:04.670 --> 00:06:08.170
us a no-nonsense business princess, looking more like the CEO
112
00:06:08.209 --> 00:06:10.870
of a company gearing up to IPO than someone familiar
113
00:06:10.889 --> 00:06:14.920
with the technicalities of ribbon-cutting. See that, Mr and Mrs
114
00:06:15.079 --> 00:06:17.860
supposedly living in the Cotswolds? What Kate seemed to be
115
00:06:18.360 --> 00:06:21.620
Chekhovian-ly showing was strength and a keep calm and keep
116
00:06:21.660 --> 00:06:24.959
power suiting on But no $ 1, 200 pair of trousers or
117
00:06:25.000 --> 00:06:27.300
a crisply cut blazer can take away from the fact
118
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:29.939
that Kate's new working royal year is shaping up to
119
00:06:29.959 --> 00:06:32.870
be hell. It does not appear the Sussexes have any
120
00:06:32.949 --> 00:06:35.870
plans to sit quietly in the shires to reclusively collect
121
00:06:36.149 --> 00:06:40.149
delphinium cuttings and rescue dogs. This month Harry will embark
122
00:06:40.209 --> 00:06:43.439
on a week of charity engagements, thing a charity skydive,
123
00:06:43.819 --> 00:06:46.019
what more of a bells and whistles way to announce
124
00:06:46.060 --> 00:06:48.899
his back and howl. But it won't just be him,
125
00:06:49.139 --> 00:06:51.819
as it's been reported that Meghan is keen to rekindle
126
00:06:51.860 --> 00:06:54.819
her relationships with British charities. A source close to the
127
00:06:54.870 --> 00:06:56.970
Duchess told the Times, she wants to pick up with
128
00:06:57.009 --> 00:06:59.230
a lot of people, though whether they will take the
129
00:06:59.290 --> 00:07:02.449
call remains to be seen. For Kate, what are the
130
00:07:02.470 --> 00:07:05.069
chances of Harry and Meghan's off-brand roiling not stealing all
131
00:07:05.089 --> 00:07:07.949
the available thunder? Who would you prefer to read about?
132
00:07:08.129 --> 00:07:10.500
Someone doing their duty or a duke willing to throw
133
00:07:10.540 --> 00:07:13.910
himself out of a plane? hard workers doing competent jobs
134
00:07:13.970 --> 00:07:16.629
and talking about serious issues, or about two people who
135
00:07:16.670 --> 00:07:21.350
manage to generate melodrama as easily as plants photosynthesize oxygen.
136
00:07:21.870 --> 00:07:23.939
Who would be interested in hearing Kate and William enthuse
137
00:07:23.980 --> 00:07:27.379
about carbon-neutral tenders or some such should Harry and Meghan
138
00:07:27.420 --> 00:07:30.160
decide to, funnily enough at the same moment, do a
139
00:07:30.220 --> 00:07:33.459
fundraising bungee jump or decide to write empowering messages on
140
00:07:33.600 --> 00:07:37.389
oranges to be handed out to OnlyFans stars? The issue
141
00:07:37.410 --> 00:07:39.670
of the Sussexes 2.0 is not just one of our
142
00:07:39.769 --> 00:07:43.120
fickle attention but of narrative and image. William and Kate
143
00:07:43.139 --> 00:07:45.490
have one story they want to tell and sell. Look
144
00:07:45.529 --> 00:07:48.990
at us helping make the world better. They have professionalized
145
00:07:49.069 --> 00:07:52.129
prince and princessing, and are selling themselves as doers and
146
00:07:52.189 --> 00:07:56.540
leaders in climate, mental health, and childhood development. But that
147
00:07:56.600 --> 00:07:59.399
message could be lost in the wash of the Kardashian-ness
148
00:07:59.439 --> 00:08:02.560
of the Sussexes' return. And there you have it. If
149
00:08:02.579 --> 00:08:05.019
you'd like to email us or address us at thepalaceintrigageemail.com,
150
00:08:06.110 --> 00:08:08.569
If you're on Spotify, leave us a comment. If you're
151
00:08:08.589 --> 00:08:10.420
on Apple, hit that button up there that says listen
152
00:08:10.519 --> 00:08:13.139
uninterrupted and get the show commercial free for just five
153
00:08:13.180 --> 00:08:16.160
bucks a month. I'm Mark Francis. My thanks to John McDermott.
154
00:08:16.180 --> 00:08:18.329
This is Palace Intrigue. Good times.