March 16, 2025

Palace Weekly - Royal Rift? Trump Fumes. Kate Middleton Shines. Coked-Up Playboy. King Charles jams.

Show Notes
Transcript

Royal Rift? Trump Fumes as King Charles's Warm Welcome to Zelensky Cools Diplomatic Ties

Palace Scandal: King Charles Fooled by 'Coked-Up Playboy' with Fake Art Fortune

Kate Middleton Shines: The Beloved Princess's Newfound Mojo Captivates Audiences

From Blue to Bold Red: Is the Princess of Wales Making a Strategic Fashion Shift?

Royal Beats: King Charles Shares His Personal Playlist, Celebrating Musical Diversity on Commonwealth Day

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!

We now have Merch! FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com

Get more info from Caloroga Shark Media and if you have any comments, suggestions, or just want to get in touch our email is info@caloroga.com

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:09.800
Calorokashark Media.

2
00:00:12.919 --> 00:00:16.199
Hello and welcome through Palace Weekly. This is our weekly

3
00:00:16.440 --> 00:00:19.800
show with a recap of all the stories you may

4
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:23.359
have missed this week. It is generated by Notebook LM

5
00:00:23.440 --> 00:00:25.800
and our friends at Google. If you don't like this

6
00:00:25.960 --> 00:00:29.839
extra content, it's fine. It's just for bonus content for

7
00:00:29.920 --> 00:00:32.079
those who didn't have the time to catch up with

8
00:00:32.119 --> 00:00:34.280
all the shows this week, and you can get a

9
00:00:34.439 --> 00:00:39.320
fresh new show every day from me right in your inbox,

10
00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:42.039
So please enjoy this week's Palace Weekly.

11
00:00:42.759 --> 00:00:45.600
Welcome back everybody for another deep dive. This time we're

12
00:00:45.600 --> 00:00:47.840
taking a look at the world of royalty and what's

13
00:00:47.880 --> 00:00:50.560
been going on this past week, and we've got some

14
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:55.200
interesting stories, from international relations to art scandals, even a

15
00:00:55.200 --> 00:00:57.719
little bit of fashion analysis. There's a lot to unpack.

16
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:00.520
It really is fascinating. You see all these stories coming

17
00:01:00.520 --> 00:01:03.799
out at the same time, and you can't help to think,

18
00:01:04.359 --> 00:01:07.719
is this the monarchy at some kind of crossroads, trying

19
00:01:07.719 --> 00:01:10.719
to balance these modern challenges with that traditional role.

20
00:01:10.760 --> 00:01:14.959
It's a lot, definitely, So let's jump right in. First up,

21
00:01:15.000 --> 00:01:17.439
we have the Daily Mail and some potential tension between

22
00:01:17.519 --> 00:01:19.400
King Charles and President Trump.

23
00:01:19.760 --> 00:01:23.079
Right, so apparently Trump was not too happy with Charles's

24
00:01:23.079 --> 00:01:26.680
warm welcome of Presidents Lenski at Sandringham, especially with Trump's

25
00:01:26.680 --> 00:01:29.159
own meeting with Zelensky only a few days before. And

26
00:01:29.159 --> 00:01:32.400
then you also have Trump's recent criticism of Canada, which

27
00:01:32.599 --> 00:01:34.000
you know Charles's had a state there too.

28
00:01:34.519 --> 00:01:38.760
Yeah, so the diplomatic sources are saying that Trump's allies

29
00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:41.840
actually tried to put pressure on the UK government to

30
00:01:41.920 --> 00:01:45.159
call off the Zelensky meeting, but they were essentially told

31
00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:49.799
that King Charles makes his own calls. So in your opinion,

32
00:01:49.840 --> 00:01:51.359
how big of a deal is this. Is it just

33
00:01:51.400 --> 00:01:55.079
something for the tabloids or could there be real diplomatic consequences.

34
00:01:56.079 --> 00:01:57.760
It's definitely worth keeping an eye on time. We have

35
00:01:57.799 --> 00:02:01.040
to remember quit Elizabeth was so good at those somatic situations,

36
00:02:01.319 --> 00:02:06.000
navigating everything carefully. But Charles, he seems to be taking

37
00:02:06.000 --> 00:02:09.319
a more assertive approach, and I think that could definitely

38
00:02:09.319 --> 00:02:11.719
cause some friction, especially with someone like Trump.

39
00:02:11.840 --> 00:02:13.759
That's interesting that you mentioned the Queen because she did

40
00:02:13.800 --> 00:02:16.159
meet with Trump during his presidency and it seemed like

41
00:02:16.199 --> 00:02:19.080
a pretty cordial visit from everything that we saw. Do

42
00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:21.840
you think this is Charles intentionally trying to distance himself

43
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:25.120
from Trump's policies or even just his personality.

44
00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:27.080
Well, it's really hard to say for sure, but this

45
00:02:27.199 --> 00:02:29.439
incident does feel like a bit of a shift in style,

46
00:02:29.800 --> 00:02:31.800
and there have been hints of this elsewhere too. The

47
00:02:31.840 --> 00:02:35.759
Sunday Times had this piece about Charles really considering his

48
00:02:35.879 --> 00:02:39.240
role in Canada and the Commonwealth in general, which, of

49
00:02:39.280 --> 00:02:42.439
course Trump is also criticized. So it seems like Charles

50
00:02:42.479 --> 00:02:45.639
is trying to forge his own path and that could

51
00:02:45.719 --> 00:02:48.199
lead to some really interesting developments on the world stage.

52
00:02:48.520 --> 00:02:51.039
That makes sense, Okay, Well, let's move on to a

53
00:02:51.080 --> 00:02:53.240
story that feels like something straight out of a movie.

54
00:02:53.560 --> 00:02:56.840
The Times did this investigation about an art forgery ring

55
00:02:57.199 --> 00:03:01.919
that had ties to King Charles's own charitable foundation, Dumfries House.

56
00:03:02.120 --> 00:03:04.240
Yeah, this one's a head scratcher for sure. The guy

57
00:03:04.319 --> 00:03:07.199
James Stunt, who The Times describes as a coked up playboy,

58
00:03:07.360 --> 00:03:10.599
loaned a bunch of supposed masterpieces to Dumfries House.

59
00:03:10.639 --> 00:03:12.479
And we're not talking about just any pieces. It was

60
00:03:12.479 --> 00:03:16.479
a Monet supposedly worth fifty million pounds, a Dolly estimated

61
00:03:16.520 --> 00:03:19.919
at twelve million, and a Chagall and Picasso with crazy

62
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:22.120
valuations as well. Only problem is they were all fake.

63
00:03:22.479 --> 00:03:24.639
Yeah, and apparently all these fakes were made by this

64
00:03:24.719 --> 00:03:28.120
Tony Tetro, who's a convicted art forger, made them all

65
00:03:28.159 --> 00:03:31.080
in his kitchen in La It's unbelievable. And what's even

66
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:33.879
weirder is that Charles actually wrote a letter to Stunt

67
00:03:34.159 --> 00:03:38.639
praising his kindness and generosity. I mean, he clearly had

68
00:03:38.680 --> 00:03:39.919
no idea they were forgeries.

69
00:03:39.960 --> 00:03:42.560
Wow. You have to wonder what he's thinking now. The

70
00:03:42.599 --> 00:03:45.400
whole thing is just embarrassing for the Palace, especially since

71
00:03:45.439 --> 00:03:48.360
Dumfrey's house is so important to Charles. You know, it

72
00:03:48.400 --> 00:03:49.759
was run down when he bought it back in two

73
00:03:49.800 --> 00:03:52.360
thousand and seven, and he's put so much work into

74
00:03:52.400 --> 00:03:55.319
restoring it and turning it into this center for education

75
00:03:55.479 --> 00:03:56.719
and community programs.

76
00:03:56.840 --> 00:03:59.639
Yeah. Absolutely, And that's what makes this whole thing so damaging.

77
00:03:59.680 --> 00:04:01.919
It really raises some big questions about how they check

78
00:04:01.919 --> 00:04:05.319
out donations, especially to a royal charity. How did they

79
00:04:05.319 --> 00:04:07.960
miss this? Did anyone at Dumfries's house, or even Charles

80
00:04:08.039 --> 00:04:10.840
himself have any clue that these might not be the

81
00:04:10.879 --> 00:04:11.439
real deal?

82
00:04:11.639 --> 00:04:14.280
Those are great questions. And then there's James Stunt himself.

83
00:04:14.560 --> 00:04:17.879
The Times called him a mogul with the street cred

84
00:04:17.920 --> 00:04:21.680
of a gangster, and he bragged about cocaine and prostitutes.

85
00:04:21.759 --> 00:04:23.600
Kind of an interesting picture to paint of someone who

86
00:04:23.639 --> 00:04:25.360
is close enough to the king to make these kinds

87
00:04:25.360 --> 00:04:26.040
of donations.

88
00:04:26.199 --> 00:04:28.759
Yeah, it is a very strange mix. And when they

89
00:04:28.839 --> 00:04:31.759
asked Stunt about the forgeries, he just denied everything, told

90
00:04:31.759 --> 00:04:34.120
the reporter to shut the f up. But of course

91
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:36.360
the truth came out eventually, and the Palace just gave

92
00:04:36.399 --> 00:04:41.000
this really understated statement calling the whole thing extremely regrettable.

93
00:04:41.120 --> 00:04:43.920
Regrettable. It's probably putting it mildly, but you do wonder

94
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:47.040
what kind of damage control is happening behind the scenes.

95
00:04:47.199 --> 00:04:49.480
What do you think the long term impact of this

96
00:04:49.560 --> 00:04:53.399
will be for Charles and for Dumfries's house. Could it

97
00:04:53.439 --> 00:04:56.519
affect donations or even hurt Charles's reputation?

98
00:04:56.879 --> 00:05:00.480
Yeah, it's definitely possible. Trust is so important for any charity,

99
00:05:00.480 --> 00:05:03.519
but especially when connected to the monarchy. They'll need to

100
00:05:03.560 --> 00:05:07.120
be very transparent about what happened and reassure donors that

101
00:05:07.160 --> 00:05:09.680
they're taking steps so it doesn't happen again. Otherwise it

102
00:05:09.720 --> 00:05:11.920
could have a really big impact on their future support.

103
00:05:12.079 --> 00:05:14.480
It's a good point, and let's not forget about the

104
00:05:14.600 --> 00:05:17.639
art world in general. This whole thing has really highlighted

105
00:05:17.639 --> 00:05:20.720
the issue of forgeries and how difficult it can be

106
00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:24.000
to make sure a piece is authentic, especially when you're

107
00:05:24.000 --> 00:05:27.240
talking about pieces worth millions. What are your thoughts on that.

108
00:05:27.360 --> 00:05:29.920
Do you think the scandal could lead to any changes

109
00:05:29.959 --> 00:05:33.000
in how art is appraised or how it's authenticated.

110
00:05:33.120 --> 00:05:35.279
Oh, I definitely think it's put a huge spotlight on

111
00:05:35.279 --> 00:05:37.720
the problem. This is a very extreme example, of course,

112
00:05:38.120 --> 00:05:40.720
but art forgery is a much bigger problem than a

113
00:05:40.759 --> 00:05:43.399
lot of people realize. This could lead to people being

114
00:05:43.439 --> 00:05:45.959
a lot more careful about how they check art, maybe

115
00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:49.160
stricter rules or even new technology to help spot fakes.

116
00:05:49.560 --> 00:05:50.920
It'll be interesting to see what happens.

117
00:05:50.959 --> 00:05:52.879
It's amazing how something like this can have such a

118
00:05:52.879 --> 00:05:56.480
big impact, affecting everything from charity to the art market.

119
00:05:57.199 --> 00:05:59.240
But before we move on, I have to ask what

120
00:05:59.360 --> 00:06:03.079
surprised you about this whole story. The audacity of trying

121
00:06:03.120 --> 00:06:05.399
to pass these off is real. The fact that it

122
00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:08.439
involves someone like Stunt, or that it happened right under

123
00:06:08.439 --> 00:06:09.800
the nose of a royal charity.

124
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:12.920
Well, it's tough to pick just one, but I think

125
00:06:12.920 --> 00:06:14.839
what gets me is just how bold it all was,

126
00:06:15.360 --> 00:06:19.480
trying to pass off these huge forgeries to a royal charity.

127
00:06:19.519 --> 00:06:21.839
No less, it's just unbelievable. You have to have some

128
00:06:21.879 --> 00:06:24.959
serious confidence to even try that, or maybe just be delusional.

129
00:06:25.199 --> 00:06:26.000
It's hard to say.

130
00:06:26.160 --> 00:06:28.399
It is a wild story. Okay, Well, let's switch gears

131
00:06:28.439 --> 00:06:30.759
a bit and talk about something a little lighter. Kate

132
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:33.600
Middleton's been making a lot of public appearances lately and

133
00:06:33.639 --> 00:06:35.720
people are buzzing about her style choices.

134
00:06:36.319 --> 00:06:38.759
Yeah. Royal watchers have been saying that Kate's got this

135
00:06:38.879 --> 00:06:42.199
new glow since becoming the Princess of Wales. She's been

136
00:06:42.240 --> 00:06:46.040
looking radiant and very confident at all these engagements, and

137
00:06:46.079 --> 00:06:48.839
there's been a lot to talk about what's behind the change.

138
00:06:49.000 --> 00:06:51.439
Jenny Bond, who used to cover the Royals for the BBC,

139
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:53.800
even said that Kate got her mojo back and that

140
00:06:53.839 --> 00:06:57.040
she's the star of the Royal family now. Bond also

141
00:06:57.120 --> 00:06:59.360
suggested that maybe all the challenges the Royals have been

142
00:06:59.439 --> 00:07:02.439
facing lately has actually made Kate and William stronger.

143
00:07:02.759 --> 00:07:05.519
Yeah, and she said something really interesting. She said, life,

144
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:08.120
as you know it can change in an instant, and

145
00:07:08.160 --> 00:07:10.079
we have had to find a way to navigate the

146
00:07:10.120 --> 00:07:13.439
stormy waters and road unknown. I don't think anyone is

147
00:07:13.480 --> 00:07:16.720
ever the same after an experience with cancer. Makes you

148
00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.600
wonder if those experiences have changed how Kate approaches her role.

149
00:07:19.759 --> 00:07:22.240
Yeah, for sure. And speaking of her role, a lot

150
00:07:22.240 --> 00:07:25.040
of people have been talking about her wardrobe, especially the

151
00:07:25.040 --> 00:07:27.160
fact that she's been wearing a lot of red lately.

152
00:07:27.279 --> 00:07:31.000
Oh yeah, She's been spotted and read everywhere Christmas Carols,

153
00:07:31.120 --> 00:07:37.079
prison visits, even the Commonwealth Day Service, Alexander McQueen, Maroon turtlenecks,

154
00:07:37.120 --> 00:07:40.360
Catherine Walker. It's definitely a trend.

155
00:07:40.399 --> 00:07:42.800
So what do you make of this red revolution? Is

156
00:07:42.839 --> 00:07:45.560
it a fashion statement or just a coincidence?

157
00:07:45.600 --> 00:07:47.720
Well, there are a few theories going around. Some say

158
00:07:47.759 --> 00:07:51.839
it's to differentiate herself from Queen Camilla, who often wears blue.

159
00:07:52.120 --> 00:07:54.639
Others think it's kind of like flag dressing, where red

160
00:07:54.680 --> 00:07:58.319
symbolizes Britain and her bigger role in the monarchy.

161
00:07:58.639 --> 00:08:00.240
And then there's the theory that she's doing doing it

162
00:08:00.279 --> 00:08:02.519
on purpose to get people to focus on her work

163
00:08:02.600 --> 00:08:06.040
and not her clothes. A source from the Palace even

164
00:08:06.079 --> 00:08:09.160
told The Sunday Times that Kate wants the attention on

165
00:08:09.680 --> 00:08:12.639
the really important issues, the people and the causes she

166
00:08:12.720 --> 00:08:16.040
is spotlighting. What do you think could wearing the same

167
00:08:16.079 --> 00:08:20.279
bold color actually make people pay less attention to individual outfits.

168
00:08:20.680 --> 00:08:22.839
It's a really interesting idea. I mean, it wouldn't be

169
00:08:22.839 --> 00:08:25.240
the first time someone in the public eye used fashion

170
00:08:25.360 --> 00:08:27.959
to control the narrative. But then you have Susan Kelly.

171
00:08:28.000 --> 00:08:30.639
She's the founder of What Kate Wore, and she argues

172
00:08:30.680 --> 00:08:33.399
that it's possible to cover both Kate's work and her

173
00:08:33.440 --> 00:08:36.879
fashion and that they both contribute to her image.

174
00:08:37.679 --> 00:08:39.879
That's true. What do you think is this a deliberate

175
00:08:39.919 --> 00:08:41.879
strategy or are we reading too much into it?

176
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:44.360
Hard to say for sure, but I do think it's

177
00:08:44.360 --> 00:08:48.519
worth thinking about how powerful clothing choices can be, especially

178
00:08:48.519 --> 00:08:50.480
for someone like Kate who's always in the spotlight.

179
00:08:50.799 --> 00:08:53.120
Yeah, it's a fascinating part of her role and something

180
00:08:53.120 --> 00:08:58.840
we'll be keeping an eye on for sure. But now

181
00:08:58.919 --> 00:09:01.960
let's talk about someone who's known for having more traditional tastes,

182
00:09:02.519 --> 00:09:06.120
King Charles. He surprised everyone by releasing his own playlist

183
00:09:06.200 --> 00:09:07.000
on Apple Music.

184
00:09:07.120 --> 00:09:09.519
Yeah, it's called The King's Music Room and it's a

185
00:09:09.559 --> 00:09:13.320
collaboration with Apple Music for Commonwealth Day and the mix

186
00:09:13.399 --> 00:09:17.759
is surprisingly eclectic. You've got everything from nineteen thirties krooners

187
00:09:17.799 --> 00:09:21.919
to afrobeats, disco, reggae. It's not what you'd expect from him.

188
00:09:21.759 --> 00:09:24.440
You really wouldn't. It's not exactly the image most people

189
00:09:24.440 --> 00:09:25.559
have of him exactly.

190
00:09:25.879 --> 00:09:28.559
But in a statement about the playlist, Charles talked about

191
00:09:28.600 --> 00:09:31.759
how much music means to him, so that throughout my life,

192
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:34.320
music has meant a great deal to me. It brings

193
00:09:34.399 --> 00:09:37.039
us joy. Sounds like he wanted to share that with everyone.

194
00:09:37.240 --> 00:09:39.200
So what do you think. Is this a genuine attempt

195
00:09:39.200 --> 00:09:41.200
to connect with a younger audience or is it just

196
00:09:41.279 --> 00:09:42.200
good pr.

197
00:09:42.559 --> 00:09:44.799
I think it's probably a little bit of both. The

198
00:09:44.840 --> 00:09:47.840
monarchy has to find ways to stay relevant, and this

199
00:09:47.919 --> 00:09:50.080
is definitely a clever way to do that. It makes

200
00:09:50.159 --> 00:09:53.879
Charles seem more human, more approachable, less stuck in the past.

201
00:09:54.639 --> 00:09:56.639
But I do think there's some real passion there too.

202
00:09:56.960 --> 00:09:58.600
You can tell he put a lot of thought into

203
00:09:58.639 --> 00:10:01.440
choosing the songs. Some of them are pretty interesting choices.

204
00:10:01.639 --> 00:10:03.759
It gives you a glimpse into his personal taste.

205
00:10:03.960 --> 00:10:07.720
Yeah, definitely, and recording the playlist in his office at

206
00:10:07.720 --> 00:10:11.240
Buckingham Palace makes it even more personal. They even released

207
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:13.759
footage of him doing it with an on air sign.

208
00:10:14.159 --> 00:10:15.360
It's actually pretty endearing.

209
00:10:15.519 --> 00:10:17.440
Yeah, you don't see that side of him very often,

210
00:10:17.799 --> 00:10:20.600
and he's gotten some good feedback too, Arilyn Wallin, Who's

211
00:10:20.639 --> 00:10:22.840
the Master of the King's Music. That's a real title,

212
00:10:22.840 --> 00:10:25.720
by the way, Praise the playlist said, it shows Charles's

213
00:10:25.840 --> 00:10:27.799
wide ranging enthusiasm for music.

214
00:10:28.440 --> 00:10:31.759
It's interesting how the Royals are using platforms like Apple

215
00:10:31.840 --> 00:10:34.720
Music more and more to connect with people. Prince William

216
00:10:34.759 --> 00:10:37.720
did an episode for Apple Fitness Plus Timed Walk series

217
00:10:38.240 --> 00:10:40.799
and Prince Harry worked with Oprah on a mental health

218
00:10:40.840 --> 00:10:42.440
documentary for Apple TV.

219
00:10:42.519 --> 00:10:44.919
Plux shows you how they're trying to keep up with

220
00:10:44.960 --> 00:10:48.320
how people consume media. But what's really interesting about Charles's

221
00:10:48.360 --> 00:10:51.120
playlist is the variety of music. It's got artists from

222
00:10:51.159 --> 00:10:54.559
all over the Commonwealth, which reflects how involved he is

223
00:10:54.720 --> 00:10:58.240
with those countries. What message do you think he's sending

224
00:10:58.279 --> 00:10:59.120
with these choices.

225
00:10:59.440 --> 00:11:02.519
I think it's subtle, but it's a powerful way to

226
00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:06.000
highlight the diversity of the Commonwealth and how connected all

227
00:11:06.039 --> 00:11:08.879
those people are. Music is a universal language. It can

228
00:11:08.879 --> 00:11:11.399
bring people together, and it feels like he's trying to

229
00:11:11.440 --> 00:11:14.120
show off the richness and variety of all the different

230
00:11:14.120 --> 00:11:15.960
cultures within the Commonwealth.

231
00:11:16.120 --> 00:11:18.480
It's a fascinating way to use music as a tool

232
00:11:18.559 --> 00:11:22.000
for diplomacy. What surprised you the most about all the

233
00:11:22.000 --> 00:11:24.200
stories we've talked about today, You know.

234
00:11:24.159 --> 00:11:27.039
What struck me is how all these stories are so different,

235
00:11:28.000 --> 00:11:30.679
but they all touch on the challenges and opportunities the

236
00:11:30.679 --> 00:11:34.399
monarchy is facing today. They're dealing with these really complex

237
00:11:34.480 --> 00:11:39.399
issues like international relations, the role of charity, the constant

238
00:11:39.440 --> 00:11:42.519
media attention, and they're trying to stay relevant in a

239
00:11:42.559 --> 00:11:44.639
world that's changing so fast. It's not easy.

240
00:11:44.840 --> 00:11:47.159
It's a tough balancing act, for sure, and it'll be

241
00:11:47.159 --> 00:11:49.279
fascinating to see how they handle it all in the

242
00:11:49.360 --> 00:11:51.200
years to come. But that's all the time we have

243
00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:54.279
for today. We encourage you to keep exploring these topics,

244
00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:57.279
read the news, listen to that playlist, and maybe even

245
00:11:57.279 --> 00:11:59.759
think about how tradition and modernity play a role in

246
00:11:59.759 --> 00:12:00.519
your own life.

247
00:12:00.679 --> 00:12:03.879
And until next time, keep those minds curious, and we'll

248
00:12:03.919 --> 00:12:05.639
see you back here for another deep dive.

Palace Weekly - Royal Rift? Trump Fumes. Kate Middleton Shines. Coked-Up Playboy. King Charles jams.

Listen On

Recent Episodes