WEBVTT
1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:12.640
Ah Calorogus Shark Media. Hello and welcome to Pallas Intrigue.
2
00:00:12.679 --> 00:00:15.839
I am your post Mark Francis. Questions are continuing to
3
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:20.440
swirl around Meghan Markel's latest business venture, with reports suggesting
4
00:00:20.519 --> 00:00:23.239
the Duchess of Sussex may be earning commissions from outfits
5
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:26.559
she has worn to the Invictor's games. According to reports,
6
00:00:26.600 --> 00:00:29.760
Megan has been promoting clothing featured during her Invictor's appearances
7
00:00:30.039 --> 00:00:33.479
through one Off, an AI powered fashion platform in which
8
00:00:33.640 --> 00:00:36.960
she is said to hold an investment. It is understood
9
00:00:36.960 --> 00:00:39.759
she receives a percentage of sales generated through the platform.
10
00:00:40.560 --> 00:00:43.159
One source speaking to Heat World said Harry is always
11
00:00:43.159 --> 00:00:45.479
going to defend Meghan publicly, but it's no secret this
12
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:48.039
is making him deeply uncomfortable. The last thing he needs
13
00:00:48.079 --> 00:00:50.960
is even a whiff of impropriety at such a sensitive time.
14
00:00:52.039 --> 00:00:54.439
Harry would hate the idea of the conversation becoming about
15
00:00:54.479 --> 00:00:58.479
Meghan's wardrobe or social media strategy. Royal commentator Tom Sykes
16
00:00:58.479 --> 00:01:03.479
has previously described the reported arrangement is sickening. Fresh reports
17
00:01:03.560 --> 00:01:06.280
suggest Prince Harry and Meghan are unhappy with what is
18
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:09.879
being described as a growing closeness between Princess Beatrice, Princess Eugenian,
19
00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:14.400
Prince William. Speaking on the Daily Expresso podcast, hosts JJ
20
00:01:14.519 --> 00:01:16.920
and Sobi claimed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have
21
00:01:16.959 --> 00:01:19.120
been left frustrated by what he described as the sister's
22
00:01:19.159 --> 00:01:23.519
efforts to strengthen tie with the future King, and as
23
00:01:23.519 --> 00:01:26.159
Cobi said, Harry and Meghan has spent hours upon hours
24
00:01:26.159 --> 00:01:28.760
on the phone to them, consoling them, giving them advice,
25
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:30.719
and offering them a place to stay in the US.
26
00:01:31.239 --> 00:01:33.400
Now they're peed off because they see Princess Eugenie and
27
00:01:33.439 --> 00:01:36.840
Beatrice sucking up to William. I can't blame the cousins.
28
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:38.840
They're trying to secure their future and stay close to
29
00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:41.400
the future King, but Harry and Meghan are very annoyed
30
00:01:41.400 --> 00:01:43.319
that they are sucking up to William after everything they've
31
00:01:43.359 --> 00:01:46.719
done for them. Talk TV presenter Mark Dolan appeared less
32
00:01:46.719 --> 00:01:50.439
convinced by the Sussex's motivations. He responded, even when they
33
00:01:50.480 --> 00:01:53.120
do something nice, such as embracing welcome Beatrice and Eugenie,
34
00:01:53.120 --> 00:01:55.840
I'm thinking, what's the ulterior motive. It could be that
35
00:01:55.879 --> 00:01:58.359
they are being nice, but because of their past history,
36
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:02.120
you have to question everything they do one source quota
37
00:02:02.120 --> 00:02:04.680
by heat Well, suggested that development had not gone unnoticed
38
00:02:04.719 --> 00:02:07.920
in California. The source said, seeing them quite literally kiss
39
00:02:07.959 --> 00:02:10.120
up to William after all the hours they've spent counseling
40
00:02:10.159 --> 00:02:12.800
on how to handle this threat of the viction he's
41
00:02:12.840 --> 00:02:15.360
been banging over them, was very disturbing for Harry and Meghan.
42
00:02:17.159 --> 00:02:20.000
Questions are increasingly being asked about where Princess Beatrice and
43
00:02:20.039 --> 00:02:23.319
Princess Eugenie fit into the future of the monarchy. Neither
44
00:02:23.360 --> 00:02:26.319
attended the Royal family's Easter service this year, neither appeared
45
00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:29.719
at any Royal Garden parties, despite both having attended similar
46
00:02:29.719 --> 00:02:33.240
events in previous years, and notably, neither princess was present
47
00:02:33.280 --> 00:02:36.680
at Royal Ascot, where they have previously appeared in the
48
00:02:36.800 --> 00:02:39.360
Royal carriage procession and occupied seats in the Royal Box.
49
00:02:40.159 --> 00:02:42.520
Their absence attracted attention because it came at a moment
50
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:45.719
when other non working members of the family, including Zara Tyndall,
51
00:02:45.800 --> 00:02:49.840
remained visible at royal events. However, there is little indication
52
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:53.039
that either princess had been excluded from the family itself.
53
00:02:53.960 --> 00:02:57.199
Both attended Peter Phillips's wedding, where photographers captured Prince William
54
00:02:57.199 --> 00:03:00.759
warmly greeting Princess Beatrice. The images were widely interpreted as
55
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:04.919
evidence that family relationships remain intact despite ongoing discussions about
56
00:03:04.960 --> 00:03:09.080
official roles. Royal journalist Emily Andrews told Town and Country
57
00:03:09.120 --> 00:03:12.400
there is an important distinction between family membership and public
58
00:03:12.439 --> 00:03:16.719
representation of the monarchy. She said at Peter Phillips's wedding,
59
00:03:16.800 --> 00:03:18.680
it was clear that Eugenie and Beatrice were there as
60
00:03:18.719 --> 00:03:21.319
members of the family. Prince William greeted both women and
61
00:03:21.360 --> 00:03:24.000
their husbands warmly. They were very much welcome and part
62
00:03:24.039 --> 00:03:27.360
of the family. However, Andrews also said there has been
63
00:03:27.400 --> 00:03:30.240
some suggestion from William's camp at Kensington Palace that he
64
00:03:30.280 --> 00:03:33.199
wants to draw more of a clear distinction between the
65
00:03:33.319 --> 00:03:37.159
York family and working royals. I think the princesses will
66
00:03:37.199 --> 00:03:40.599
potentially become collateral damage and how William wants to reshape
67
00:03:40.639 --> 00:03:43.280
the monarchy to make it very clear who are the
68
00:03:43.319 --> 00:03:46.360
working royals funded by the British taxpayer and who are
69
00:03:46.360 --> 00:03:49.759
not and have to pay their own way. Royal commentator
70
00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:52.840
Richard Palmer offered a similar assessment. He told the magazine
71
00:03:53.000 --> 00:03:54.879
sources close to William have already made it clear that
72
00:03:54.919 --> 00:03:57.120
when he becomes king he will want to review their homes.
73
00:03:57.159 --> 00:03:59.280
I think the writing is on the wall for them
74
00:04:00.240 --> 00:04:07.439
in just a moment. A new poll suggests support for
75
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:09.520
the monarchy has fallen to its lowest level in more
76
00:04:09.560 --> 00:04:13.240
than three decades, with the sharpest decline coming among younger Britons.
77
00:04:13.919 --> 00:04:16.600
The survey, conducted by IPSOS, found that fifty five percent
78
00:04:16.639 --> 00:04:19.519
of the public now support Britain remaining a monarchy. That
79
00:04:19.639 --> 00:04:22.040
represents a drop of eleven percentage points in the past
80
00:04:22.040 --> 00:04:25.079
three years and marks the lowest level recorded by IPSOS
81
00:04:25.079 --> 00:04:27.519
since it began tracking attitudes towards the royal family more
82
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:31.519
than thirty years ago. Six and ten respondents said King
83
00:04:31.600 --> 00:04:34.120
Charles is doing a good job, while seventy one percent
84
00:04:34.160 --> 00:04:38.040
said the same of William. The most significant change appears
85
00:04:38.079 --> 00:04:41.839
among younger generations. Among people aged eighteen to thirty four,
86
00:04:42.120 --> 00:04:44.519
support for the monarchy now stands at just thirty three percent.
87
00:04:44.839 --> 00:04:48.519
In twenty thirteen, that figure was seventy four percent. IPSOS
88
00:04:48.639 --> 00:04:51.600
Senior director Gideon Skinner said the findings reveal a trend
89
00:04:51.680 --> 00:04:55.240
the monarchy should take seriously. He said the monarchy still
90
00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:57.600
has its strengths and King Charles and especially Prince William,
91
00:04:57.600 --> 00:05:00.639
remained personally popular, with satisfaction ratings that most most politicians
92
00:05:00.680 --> 00:05:03.680
could only dream of. To turn this trend around will
93
00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:06.720
require convincing young people, in particular that the monarchy still
94
00:05:06.759 --> 00:05:09.279
has an important, relevant role to play in the future
95
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:13.720
of the country. Headlines reported on William's secret outings, but
96
00:05:13.759 --> 00:05:16.000
the truth is final less intriguing than the headline would
97
00:05:16.040 --> 00:05:19.680
have you believe. The secret outings involve regular visits to
98
00:05:19.720 --> 00:05:22.680
the vast Duchy of Cornwall, estate he inherited from his father.
99
00:05:23.680 --> 00:05:26.519
According to reports, William makes regular private visits to the estate,
100
00:05:26.600 --> 00:05:28.959
often traveling without Catherine or the children, and without any
101
00:05:28.959 --> 00:05:32.399
public announcement. The Telegraph reported that William tries to visit
102
00:05:32.439 --> 00:05:34.399
part of the duchy once every four to six weeks,
103
00:05:34.399 --> 00:05:36.360
working its way through its farms and officers, to meet
104
00:05:36.399 --> 00:05:39.120
families and staff, shake hands and quiz them on what
105
00:05:39.160 --> 00:05:41.920
he can do to help. His visits are usually private,
106
00:05:42.040 --> 00:05:45.240
rarely making the court circular, and kept quiet by loyal
107
00:05:45.360 --> 00:05:49.079
locals who are used to royal comings and goings. Perhaps
108
00:05:49.079 --> 00:05:51.560
we can find controversy in this story. Is Harriet Phillips
109
00:05:51.600 --> 00:05:55.240
copying Kate's fashion? The discussion gained momentum after a Royal
110
00:05:55.279 --> 00:05:58.399
fashion account shared signed by side images comparing several of
111
00:05:58.439 --> 00:06:01.839
Harriet's recent outfits with looks worn by the Princess of
112
00:06:01.839 --> 00:06:05.360
Wales at previous engagements. On comparison focus on a pale
113
00:06:05.399 --> 00:06:08.759
blue ascot ensemble worn by Harriet that some believe echoed
114
00:06:08.759 --> 00:06:11.920
one of Catherine's best known powder blue looks. Another highlighted
115
00:06:11.959 --> 00:06:16.000
similarities between lace stresses featuring high necklines and classic detailing.
116
00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:19.920
One social media user wrote, copy Kates, they all copy
117
00:06:20.040 --> 00:06:23.480
Princess Catherine. Meanwhile, a royal commentator has suggested that the
118
00:06:23.560 --> 00:06:26.839
Royal family's newest high profile couple could be attracting the
119
00:06:26.920 --> 00:06:29.759
kind of public attention once associated with Prince Harry and
120
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:33.439
Meghan Markle. Writing for The Express, commentator Chris Richards argues
121
00:06:33.439 --> 00:06:35.759
that the royal family now has a number of relatives who,
122
00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:40.279
while not officially working royals, help strengthen the institution's public image.
123
00:06:40.480 --> 00:06:43.600
Riches points to Zara and Mike Tindall as examples, writing
124
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:47.040
already we've seen Zara and Mike Tindall up to and
125
00:06:47.040 --> 00:06:50.000
seemingly keen to take on roles that come close to
126
00:06:50.120 --> 00:06:52.920
working royal status, especially when it comes to sporting and
127
00:06:52.959 --> 00:06:56.839
a Questrian of duties representing the firm. Riches also praised
128
00:06:56.839 --> 00:06:59.279
the Duke and Duchess of Edinburgh, writing the Duke and
129
00:06:59.319 --> 00:07:01.920
Duchess of Edinburgh have also proved a safe and steady
130
00:07:02.040 --> 00:07:04.920
set of hands as actual working royals and have the
131
00:07:04.959 --> 00:07:07.680
complete confidence not only of King Charles but also Prince
132
00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:10.120
William and Princess Catherine. But now we have a new
133
00:07:10.120 --> 00:07:12.839
couple on the scene who bring that extra pizazz of
134
00:07:12.920 --> 00:07:15.639
being newlyweds as well as next Janet royals and the
135
00:07:15.639 --> 00:07:19.079
fairy tale Princess Disney feel too much, I'm sure to
136
00:07:19.199 --> 00:07:22.399
Megan's ayre and this female fairy tale holds a UK
137
00:07:22.480 --> 00:07:26.160
trump card that Megan just can't match. She's a pediatric
138
00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:28.519
nurse who works for the NHS. That's a pr trump
139
00:07:28.560 --> 00:07:32.279
card you simply cannot beat. Whether the newlyweds ultimately take
140
00:07:32.279 --> 00:07:34.160
on a larger public role remains to be seen. But
141
00:07:34.199 --> 00:07:36.879
as we have mentioned before, future King William is going
142
00:07:36.920 --> 00:07:41.120
to be in need of working royals. There you have it, hey,
143
00:07:41.160 --> 00:07:43.519
all this month we're encouraging listeners are Palace Intrigue to
144
00:07:43.560 --> 00:07:46.000
help spread the word. If you enjoy the show, tell
145
00:07:46.000 --> 00:07:49.199
a friend not better yet, share an episode with someone
146
00:07:49.240 --> 00:07:51.279
who loves following the royal family. You know who they are.
147
00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:53.560
Be sure to follow Palace Intrigue on Spotify and tune
148
00:07:53.560 --> 00:07:56.480
on your notification so you never miss an episode, and
149
00:07:56.519 --> 00:07:58.399
we'd love to hear from you with your thoughts on
150
00:07:58.399 --> 00:07:59.959
today's stories If you can live a comment for us
151
00:08:00.079 --> 00:08:03.160
on Spotify. I my Francis my thanks to John McDermott.
152
00:08:03.160 --> 00:08:05.360
This is Palace Intrigue. Good James,