Meghan Named 2025’s Most Disappointing Celebrity as Diana Film Claims Spark New William-Harry Tension
Meghan Markle has been labelled the most disappointing celebrity of 2025 by the Toronto Star, in a critical opinion piece arguing she had the ingredients for global success but “slowly deflated” over the past year. The article is notable given Meghan’s long connection to Toronto during her years filming Suits and the city’s significance in the early stages of her relationship with Prince Harry.
Meanwhile, Star magazine claims tensions between Prince William and Prince Harry have flared again over Princess Diana’s legacy, with a source suggesting Harry wants to pursue a screen project without William’s involvement and would lean on existing Netflix relationships to do it. Rob Shuter also claims Meghan wants to direct, with one source describing her as “intensely hands-on.”
We also review comments from communications professionals who say the Sussexes’ staff turnover is unusually high and potentially damaging, warning that repeated departures have become a story in their own right and may make it harder to recruit top-tier advisers going forward.
Hear our new show "Crown and Controversy: Prince Andrew" here.
Check out "Palace Intrigue Presents: King WIlliam" here.
👑 Follow our hit series Crown and Controversy! Season 1 and 2 are fully available now for everyone. Season 3 has new episodes every Sunday on the regular feed. GET THE FULL SEASON 3 BEFORE REGULAR LISTENERS as a subscriber! Hit that "UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING" Banner on the top of the Apple player. AND listen to Crown and Controversy "NORWAY'S ROYAL REBELS" here and get the full season as a premium subscriber now.
👑 The Palace Intrigue Social Hub is Live! Join the conversation on Facebook and Instagram or click the links to start your royal journey!
0:03 Caloroga Shark Media. Hello and welcome through Palace Intrigue. Am your host Mark Ransis. Megan Mikal has been labeled the most disappointing celebrity of twenty twenty five by her former hometown newspaper, The Toronto Star. The opinion piece argues that despite having all the ingredients to become a global success, she has failed to live up to expectations over the past year and has instead slowly deflated. Meghan spent seven years living in Toronto while filming the legal drama Suits, a period she has often described as allowing her to live a normal life despite her growing fame. It was also during the time in the city that she began her relationship with Prince Harry, who reportedly traveled quietly to Toronto in twenty sixteen to visit her. Toronto has long held symbolic importance for the couple. It was where they made their first public appearance together at the Invictus Schemes and twenty seventeen, and as recently as November, Harry publicly thanked the city for giving him a wife during a speech at the True Patriot Love Foundation National Tribute Dinner.
1:12 Despite that history, the Toronto Star article offers a sharply critical reassessment, while stopping short of calling Megan an abject failure. According to Star, tensions between William and Harry have reportedly flared once again, this time over how the legacy of their late mother, Princess Diana should be handled and Inside It tells the magazine that the Duke of Sussex is determined to honor his mother and share her story with the next generation, and does not believe his older brother needs to be involved. The source ads that Harry intends to use his existing Netflix relationship when the time comes, saying he would go straight there, a move that is said to further anger the Prince of Wales, particularly given lingering resentment over the crown. What is said to trouble Prince William most, however, is Meghan Markle's alleged involvement. According to gossip columnist Rob Shooter, sources claim that Harry and Meghan are developing a feature film centered on Diana, and that Megan wants to direct the project. Shooter Scoops Insider reports they've been meeting with writers, agents and producers, breaking story and talking casting. Meghan is intensely hands on and wants control from start to finish and inside a Telstarr doesn't want her anywhere near his mother's story, But of course that doesn't matter one bit to Harry. He is absolutely second that Harry and my extension, Meghan will be profiting off Diana. To him, it's nothing more than a shameless money grab, and he's vowing to do whatever it takes to stop them. Harry's not asking anyone's permission anymore, especially not Williams. In his eyes, the monarchy failed Diana,
2:43 so they ought to be the last ones in charge of honoring her. We'll have our popcorn ready either way. A series of high level staff departures from Prince Harry and Meghan Michael's team has prompted fresh criticism from communications experts, who say the turnover is unusual, high and potentially damaging. Doug Elridge, founder of Achilles pr told Fox News Digital that losing five senior communications advisors within a year is highly irregular outside of the final months of an outgoing government administration. He said it remains unclear whether the exits were driven by budget pressures at archwell, a strategic consolidation, or the natural end of consultancy contracts, nothing there has been, noting there has been no indication that any advisors were formally fired or quit in protest. Elrich said successful communications operations depend on clarity, continuity, and execution, adding that stability is difficult to achieve when a team becomes a revolving door.
3:45 Royal photographer Helena Chard echoed that concern, telling Fox News that the latest departures feel like deja vu as what she described as the couple's high staff turnover merry go round continues. She suggested that the controversy surrounding Harry and Meghan's appearance at Chris Janet's birthday party may have contributed to former Chief Communications Officer Meredith Mainz deciding to step away amid scrutiny over media handling in public perception, Chad said means a well regarded communications professional may have chosen to protect her reputation, stressing that a strategy only works if all parties adhere to it. She was appointed to what she call a lack of clarity and consistency in the Sussex's messaging, adding there are murmurs the couple do not always follow expert advice. Royal commentator Hilary Fordage was more blunt, describing the departures as confirmation that Harry and Meghan are unimaginably high maintenance and calling them the common factor in what she labeled a dysfunctional situation. She noted that senior communications professionals typically stay in rolls for three to five years, with frequent turnover more common in startups or organizations, and crisis. Such patterns, she said, can signal either difficult principles, shrinking operation, or both. Fortage contrasted the Sussexes situation with that of Prince William Kate Middleton, whose senior communication staff have remained in place for years, a stability she attributed to clear hierarchies and established protocols. Elridge
5:16 and Chard also warned that the departures themselves are creating the very headlines Harry and meganusent to want to avoid. Elridge said that without a strong communications team shaping narratives, attention inevitably shifts to why senior advisers keep leaving, a perception he believes will be particularly damaging in both the UK and the United States. Fortage added that the ongoing turbulence could make it increasingly difficult for the Sussexes to attract top tier professionals in the future, arguing that experienced advisers are unlikely to commit to what she described as a volatile environment with unclear strategy and a contracting philanthropic operation. More palace in just a moment. By the way, I want to thank our subscribers for putting up with our little glitch over the weekend with Apple and the inability to remove the commercials. We seem to have gotten everything resolved and hope you are enjoying once again a commercial free experience and appreciate the support very much. Thank you for putting up with that. In The Guardian and at Whitelock Rits Walter Bagohart, the Victorian journalist and political essayist, I argue that the British monarchy's mystery is its life, and that we must not let in daylight upon magic.
6:33 This has for more than one hundred and fifty years provided the justification for our constitutional monarchy to remain shrouded in secrecy, above scrutiny and protected from sustained critique. As Bagohart wrote, above all things, our royalty is to be reverenced and if you begin to poke about it, you cannot reverence it. Yet automatic deference or reverence is no more. Contemporary expectations of transparency and accountability are finally beginning to focus on the monarchy. Silence now suggests there is something to hide, and this erodes public trust and with it acceptance of a minded faction for the institution. There are questions around what was known and ignored regarding Andrew mount Batten windsor what further questions of accountability and transparency may arise should it not be more widely known and considered that as monarch, our head of state has sovereign immunity and so cannot be tried in court. And then there is the little known fact that the King's consent has sought for all legislation that affects the personal property or personal interests of the crown. The royal family has consistently been reactive rather than proactive when it comes to change in public opinion, and continues to believe in privilege and privacy at all costs. Yet for the monarchy to survive and thrive, and the king to continue to play a role as a unifying figurehead supporting charitable causes and exercising soft power internationally, he needs to embrace openness and accountability.
7:56 Reverence towards the institution is all but lost, but without transparency and letting in the daylight, it risks further alienation, mistrust, and fatal irrelevance. As the King is praised for the openness with which he has spoken about his health, perhaps he might reflect on the expectations the public may have of a truly modern monarch. Queen Camilla has spoken publicly for the first time about being indecently assaulted as a teenager, sharing her experience during a special edition of BBC Radio fours Today program. The queen said the incident occurred when she was attacked by a stranger on a train while reading a book. Recalling the moment, she said, somebody I didn't know attacked me and I did fight it back.
8:37 She added that she was left deeply angry by the experience, saying I was so furious about it, and it sort of lurked for many years. Camilla told the program that when she arrived home, her mother immediately noticed something was wrong, asking why a hare was standing on end, why a button was missing from her coat. Reflecting on the long term impact. The Queen said the memory resurfaced strongly as she became more involve in supporting victims of domestic abuse and sexual violence. Throughout her public life, Queen Camilla has made supporting survivors of rape, domestic violence and sexual abuse a central part of her work. King Charles and Queen Camilla marked the arrival of the new year by sharing a distinctive animated message on social media. The post featured a stylized display of fireworks bursting above Bunkingham Palace before forming the words Happy New Year, accompanied by the sound of cheering as twenty twenty six began. Alongside the animation, King Charles the Third and Queen Camilla wrote, as twenty twenty six arrives around the world, we wish you all a very happy New Year, and they have it. If you'd like to email us or address it's the Palace Intrigue at gmail dot com. Please follow us on Spotify, Apple, or Facebook or Instagram or all the social media sites were all over the place. Come say hi, I'm Mark Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This is Palace Intrigue in good terms.
Apple Podcasts
Amazon Music
Spotify
Castro
RSS Feed