WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:09.599
Calorogus Shark Media Today, a look at Vanity Fears relationship
2
00:00:09.640 --> 00:00:13.160
with the Sussexes gone cold, how Trump could complicate things
3
00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:21.399
for Harry and Meghan, and whatever happened to Meghan's pal Jessica.
4
00:00:21.679 --> 00:00:23.920
Hello and welcome to Pallace Intrigue. I am your host,
5
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:27.640
Mark Francis. Richard Eden writes in the Daily Mail under
6
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:31.320
the headline, sources reveal what Meghan did before marriage that
7
00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:33.920
they describe as a punch to the soul of pleaguxus.
8
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:36.439
They tell me why it set alarm bells ringing and
9
00:00:36.479 --> 00:00:41.359
made them fear her motivations. Per Eden. I can disclose, however,
10
00:00:41.399 --> 00:00:43.560
that it was not this Vanity Fair article, but a
11
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:46.960
previous interview in the magazine that truly alarmed at buckinghand Palace.
12
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:50.600
Back in twenty seventeen, the then Meghan Markel was thrilled
13
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:52.159
when she learned she would be on the cover of
14
00:00:52.159 --> 00:00:55.200
the respected US magazine. It was an ambition that she
15
00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:58.280
had long help, but one of which she could only
16
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:01.000
dream while still a minor actress on the TV legal
17
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:04.560
drama Suits. The cover of Vanity Fair was reserved for
18
00:01:04.719 --> 00:01:07.920
genuine stars, so when she was approached by the magazine
19
00:01:08.040 --> 00:01:10.319
after news broke of her romance with Prince Harry the
20
00:01:10.359 --> 00:01:14.840
previous October. Megan couldn't contain her excitement. She's just wild
21
00:01:14.879 --> 00:01:19.079
about Harry, gushed the headline that September inside the magazine
22
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:23.159
declared as Markle tells Vanity Fair about her biracial background,
23
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:26.120
her romance who hit series suits. It seems that this
24
00:01:26.239 --> 00:01:28.680
thirty six year old American may be just the woman
25
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:33.400
for Britain's iconoclastic Royal. While Megan was jubilant at the
26
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:35.879
prospect of her double whammy bagging a prince in a
27
00:01:35.959 --> 00:01:40.040
Vanity Fair cover, Royal officials were perturbed by the article
28
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:42.560
when it was published. It was like a punch to
29
00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:45.280
the solar plexus, and a Royal source told Eden, we
30
00:01:45.400 --> 00:01:47.640
do not expect friends of members of the Royal family
31
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:50.799
to give such interviews. The source pointed out that Cap
32
00:01:50.840 --> 00:01:53.799
Middleton and Lady Diana Spencer, for example, waited until after
33
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:56.959
their engagements had been announced before they gave an interview,
34
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:00.000
and in both cases it was organized by Pallas Affair
35
00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:04.120
for the TV cameras under the strictness of conditions. While
36
00:02:04.120 --> 00:02:06.599
people were pleased that Harry had found a serious girlfriend,
37
00:02:06.879 --> 00:02:09.360
the article did settle arm bells ringing. The source told
38
00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:11.960
me it made people worry that Miss Markle was seeking
39
00:02:11.960 --> 00:02:15.879
to use the relationship for publicity purposes. She is just
40
00:02:15.960 --> 00:02:19.319
wild about Harry, the Vanity Fair headline gushed in twenty seventeen,
41
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:21.680
but Megan was not happy with the cover story and
42
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:26.560
neither was Buckingham Palace, say sources. Royal author Valentine Lowe
43
00:02:26.599 --> 00:02:29.680
wrote in his book Courtiers, The Hidden Power Behind the Crown,
44
00:02:29.879 --> 00:02:32.360
that Meghan was troubled by the focus of the article
45
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:35.879
being her relationship with Harry. A source was quoted as
46
00:02:35.879 --> 00:02:38.800
saying she was very unhappy with how that had been handled,
47
00:02:38.919 --> 00:02:41.919
and she was looking to throw blame in every possible direction,
48
00:02:42.360 --> 00:02:45.360
despite it having been a positive peace. She did not
49
00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:48.280
like the photographs. She thought the story was negative. She
50
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:50.639
was upset that it was about Harry, not about her.
51
00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:55.199
Harry and Meghan also allegedly thought the headline was racially motivated,
52
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:57.879
and pointed out the song I'm Just Wild About Harry
53
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:01.120
had been performed by Judy Garland and Rooney as a
54
00:03:01.240 --> 00:03:05.560
blackface number in the nineteen thirty nine film Babes in Arms.
55
00:03:06.479 --> 00:03:09.719
Royal journalist Sarah Luise Robertson tells gb News that Donald
56
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:12.199
Trump can do anything. At the moment, Harry and Meghan
57
00:03:12.240 --> 00:03:15.319
are so low down on his list of priorities. At
58
00:03:15.319 --> 00:03:17.199
the moment, he won't have given them a thought. But
59
00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:19.520
later down the line, if they say something else to
60
00:03:19.639 --> 00:03:22.400
upset him, I don't think he would have any qualms.
61
00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:24.840
The sticking point would be that he seems to really
62
00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:27.520
adore Prince William, he adores King Charles, and he loves
63
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.120
our royal family, so he probably wouldn't want to do
64
00:03:30.159 --> 00:03:33.719
anything that would cause upset to them. However, Trump has
65
00:03:33.759 --> 00:03:36.039
a long memory and he doesn't like people who are disloyal.
66
00:03:36.400 --> 00:03:39.280
He didn't like the way they conducted themselves. Royal journalist
67
00:03:39.400 --> 00:03:42.120
Sarah Luise added he didn't like the way they acted
68
00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:45.719
toward the Queen and the documentary that they made. Also,
69
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:47.479
he didn't like the way they snubbed him when he
70
00:03:47.479 --> 00:03:50.680
came across from his royal visit, and Megan Caldon misogynistic
71
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:53.879
in an interview. He doesn't forget things like this, and
72
00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:56.599
he may very well do what Biden didn't and actually
73
00:03:56.599 --> 00:04:00.599
make public Harries visa application, which will show IF's lied
74
00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:05.479
or not about taking drugs. Some interesting words from Camilla
75
00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:09.240
Tommeny in The Telegraph, she writes Prince Harry's autobiography. Spare
76
00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:12.960
would go on to incorrectly describe me as the Telegraph's
77
00:04:13.240 --> 00:04:16.839
royal correspondent who had reported a sci fi fantasy that
78
00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:21.160
Meg had reduced Kate to tears. No, I hadn't, Regardless,
79
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:24.040
he went on to say, I was someone who always
80
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:27.639
made me ill, adding she had always always got stuff wrong.
81
00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:30.560
This felt more than wrong. It's a curious comment to
82
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:33.360
make about a journalist whom he personally invited to cover
83
00:04:33.439 --> 00:04:36.920
his HIV initiative with Rhianna in Barbados, and who broke
84
00:04:36.959 --> 00:04:39.240
the accurate news of his relationship with Meg and Markle
85
00:04:39.319 --> 00:04:41.839
in the first place. But it seems there's Harry and
86
00:04:41.879 --> 00:04:45.360
Meghan's truth, and then there is everyone else's, incidentally on
87
00:04:45.439 --> 00:04:48.199
collusion with the Palace. When I broke that world exclusive,
88
00:04:48.480 --> 00:04:50.600
I didn't even run the story by the Royal Press
89
00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:53.160
Office beforehand, because I knew it was true and I
90
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:56.759
didn't want to deal with any unnecessary interference. I also
91
00:04:56.839 --> 00:04:59.040
didn't want it to leak and get out scooped by
92
00:04:59.079 --> 00:05:02.600
any of my rival In all my times a royal reporter,
93
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:05.040
I was never handed stories by the Palace. In fact,
94
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:07.720
they would actively trade a block any negative reporting of
95
00:05:07.959 --> 00:05:11.040
any member of the royal family, including Prince Harry I
96
00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:14.199
was a constant thorn in their side and vice versa,
97
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:17.920
and on the vendetta point rarely. In reality, what happened
98
00:05:17.959 --> 00:05:20.160
is that the undiluted praise that was being heaped on
99
00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:23.439
the Sussexes by journalists including me, She's a breath of
100
00:05:23.480 --> 00:05:26.399
fresh air changed when we started getting wind of staff
101
00:05:26.480 --> 00:05:30.160
leaving in their droves, tension between the royal brothers, tensions
102
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:33.480
with royal sisters in law, and tensions within the royal household.
103
00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:36.959
As we accurately reported at the time, the Sussexes were
104
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:39.480
growing increasingly unhappy and were looking for a way out.
105
00:05:39.879 --> 00:05:43.720
There were also bullying claims, which the couple denied. What
106
00:05:43.720 --> 00:05:45.959
were they supposed to do? Ignore all this and only
107
00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:49.120
tell one side of the story. That's not journalism. We
108
00:05:49.240 --> 00:05:51.800
leave that kind of propaganda to the Sussex squads on
109
00:05:51.839 --> 00:05:55.480
social media who think nothing of using the hashtag Camillatomeny
110
00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:58.079
is a liar without having even been within five feet
111
00:05:58.120 --> 00:06:01.240
of a royal figure, let alone a fact. Seven years on,
112
00:06:01.360 --> 00:06:03.800
and vanity fairs has produced an eight thousand word cover
113
00:06:03.879 --> 00:06:06.199
story which appears to further vindicate what I was writing
114
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:09.560
back in twenty eighteen and beyond. Despite all that's been
115
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.720
said and done, I'm genuinely pleased for Prince Harry. The
116
00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:20.120
truth matters. Pallas Intrigum me rat back. For years, Megan
117
00:06:20.120 --> 00:06:23.920
Michael and stylists Jessica mulroney were close friends, with mulroney
118
00:06:23.959 --> 00:06:27.079
playing a significant role in Meghan's life from her royal
119
00:06:27.079 --> 00:06:29.680
wedding to her baby shower and even the couple's Australian
120
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:33.879
royal tour, but their once close bonds seemingly unraveled, with
121
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:38.079
the pair now distant, if not completely estranged. Jessica Mulroney's
122
00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:41.079
three children famously featured in Meghan and Prince Harry's twenty
123
00:06:41.160 --> 00:06:44.439
eighteen wedding, with her daughter Ivy serving as flower girl
124
00:06:44.519 --> 00:06:47.360
and her twin sons Brian and John charming the world
125
00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:51.199
as page boys. Mulroney was also present for Meghan's lavish
126
00:06:51.279 --> 00:06:54.480
New York baby shower in twenty nineteen, and reportedly played
127
00:06:54.480 --> 00:06:56.839
her behind the scenes role during the couple's decision to
128
00:06:56.920 --> 00:07:00.079
step back from royal duties. However, the friendship began to
129
00:07:00.240 --> 00:07:04.360
falter in twenty twenty following a public controversy. The rift
130
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:07.639
started when mulroney faced allegations of racism during a feud
131
00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:12.720
with lifestyle blogger Susha Exeter. Exeter accused mulroney threatening her
132
00:07:12.759 --> 00:07:16.360
brand connections during a dispute about a Black Lives Matter post.
133
00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.959
Despite mulroney's public apologies and attempts to repair her reputation,
134
00:07:20.120 --> 00:07:22.879
the fallout was swift and her losing TV gigs and
135
00:07:23.000 --> 00:07:28.040
enduring significant public criticism. Around the same time, reports emerged
136
00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:33.199
suggesting Megan had distanced herself from mulroney. While mulroney initially
137
00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:36.959
insisted their friendship remained intact, sharing public messages of support
138
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:41.000
from Megan, signs of strain continued to surface. Cryptic Instagram
139
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:44.199
posts by mulroney about losing friends and reflecting on toxic
140
00:07:44.240 --> 00:07:48.600
relationships fueled speculation that their bond had cooled. In twenty
141
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:51.040
twenty two, the pair appeared even further apart, and by
142
00:07:51.160 --> 00:07:54.399
twenty twenty three, Meghan and Harry's visit to Canada marked
143
00:07:54.399 --> 00:07:58.199
a notable moment of separation. Despite being in mulroney's home country,
144
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:00.680
The Sussexes reportedly chose to space end their time with
145
00:08:00.720 --> 00:08:03.680
other friends such as Michael Boublay and his wife, rather
146
00:08:03.720 --> 00:08:08.360
than reconnect with mulroney. Now, with Meghan's recent return to Instagram,
147
00:08:08.439 --> 00:08:12.319
fans have noticed mulroney's absence from the Duchess's social media activity.
148
00:08:12.800 --> 00:08:15.720
Mulroney is not following Meghan's new account, and her silence
149
00:08:15.759 --> 00:08:18.680
about Meghan's posts, ranging from a heartfelt tribute to her
150
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:21.879
late dog Guy to the trailer for her upcoming Netflix show,
151
00:08:22.319 --> 00:08:25.680
has not gone unnoticed. It seems the once close relationship
152
00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:29.439
may be a thing of the past, and they have
153
00:08:29.519 --> 00:08:31.959
it'd like to email us. Our address is the palaceintrig
154
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:34.000
at gmail dot com. Please follow us a Spotify, Apple
155
00:08:34.080 --> 00:08:36.320
or the app of your choice and leave us a
156
00:08:36.360 --> 00:08:39.240
review or some stars if you're enjoying the show. I'm
157
00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:42.000
Mark Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This is Palace Intriguan.
158
00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:48.480
Good Damns.