Jan. 31, 2025

How Trump could complicate things for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

How Trump could complicate things for Prince Harry and Meghan Markle

A look at Vanity Fair’s relationship with the Sussexes gone cold, how Trump could complicate things for Harry & Meghan, and whatever happened to Meghan’s pal Jessica?

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our...

A look at Vanity Fair’s relationship with the Sussexes gone cold, how Trump could complicate things for Harry & Meghan, and whatever happened to Meghan’s pal Jessica?

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed! You also get 20+ other shows on the network ad-free!

Subscribe to Deep Crown’s free newsletter at https://deepcrown.substack.com

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:09.599
Calorogus Shark Media Today, a look at Vanity Fears relationship

2
00:00:09.640 --> 00:00:13.160
with the Sussexes gone cold, how Trump could complicate things

3
00:00:13.199 --> 00:00:21.399
for Harry and Meghan, and whatever happened to Meghan's pal Jessica.

4
00:00:21.679 --> 00:00:23.920
Hello and welcome to Pallace Intrigue. I am your host,

5
00:00:24.440 --> 00:00:27.640
Mark Francis. Richard Eden writes in the Daily Mail under

6
00:00:27.640 --> 00:00:31.320
the headline, sources reveal what Meghan did before marriage that

7
00:00:31.359 --> 00:00:33.920
they describe as a punch to the soul of pleaguxus.

8
00:00:34.280 --> 00:00:36.439
They tell me why it set alarm bells ringing and

9
00:00:36.479 --> 00:00:41.359
made them fear her motivations. Per Eden. I can disclose, however,

10
00:00:41.399 --> 00:00:43.560
that it was not this Vanity Fair article, but a

11
00:00:43.600 --> 00:00:46.960
previous interview in the magazine that truly alarmed at buckinghand Palace.

12
00:00:47.600 --> 00:00:50.600
Back in twenty seventeen, the then Meghan Markel was thrilled

13
00:00:50.640 --> 00:00:52.159
when she learned she would be on the cover of

14
00:00:52.159 --> 00:00:55.200
the respected US magazine. It was an ambition that she

15
00:00:55.280 --> 00:00:58.280
had long help, but one of which she could only

16
00:00:58.399 --> 00:01:01.000
dream while still a minor actress on the TV legal

17
00:01:01.119 --> 00:01:04.560
drama Suits. The cover of Vanity Fair was reserved for

18
00:01:04.719 --> 00:01:07.920
genuine stars, so when she was approached by the magazine

19
00:01:08.040 --> 00:01:10.319
after news broke of her romance with Prince Harry the

20
00:01:10.359 --> 00:01:14.840
previous October. Megan couldn't contain her excitement. She's just wild

21
00:01:14.879 --> 00:01:19.079
about Harry, gushed the headline that September inside the magazine

22
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:23.159
declared as Markle tells Vanity Fair about her biracial background,

23
00:01:23.239 --> 00:01:26.120
her romance who hit series suits. It seems that this

24
00:01:26.239 --> 00:01:28.680
thirty six year old American may be just the woman

25
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:33.400
for Britain's iconoclastic Royal. While Megan was jubilant at the

26
00:01:33.400 --> 00:01:35.879
prospect of her double whammy bagging a prince in a

27
00:01:35.959 --> 00:01:40.040
Vanity Fair cover, Royal officials were perturbed by the article

28
00:01:40.079 --> 00:01:42.560
when it was published. It was like a punch to

29
00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:45.280
the solar plexus, and a Royal source told Eden, we

30
00:01:45.400 --> 00:01:47.640
do not expect friends of members of the Royal family

31
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:50.799
to give such interviews. The source pointed out that Cap

32
00:01:50.840 --> 00:01:53.799
Middleton and Lady Diana Spencer, for example, waited until after

33
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:56.959
their engagements had been announced before they gave an interview,

34
00:01:57.359 --> 00:02:00.000
and in both cases it was organized by Pallas Affair

35
00:02:00.319 --> 00:02:04.120
for the TV cameras under the strictness of conditions. While

36
00:02:04.120 --> 00:02:06.599
people were pleased that Harry had found a serious girlfriend,

37
00:02:06.879 --> 00:02:09.360
the article did settle arm bells ringing. The source told

38
00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:11.960
me it made people worry that Miss Markle was seeking

39
00:02:11.960 --> 00:02:15.879
to use the relationship for publicity purposes. She is just

40
00:02:15.960 --> 00:02:19.319
wild about Harry, the Vanity Fair headline gushed in twenty seventeen,

41
00:02:19.360 --> 00:02:21.680
but Megan was not happy with the cover story and

42
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:26.560
neither was Buckingham Palace, say sources. Royal author Valentine Lowe

43
00:02:26.599 --> 00:02:29.680
wrote in his book Courtiers, The Hidden Power Behind the Crown,

44
00:02:29.879 --> 00:02:32.360
that Meghan was troubled by the focus of the article

45
00:02:32.400 --> 00:02:35.879
being her relationship with Harry. A source was quoted as

46
00:02:35.879 --> 00:02:38.800
saying she was very unhappy with how that had been handled,

47
00:02:38.919 --> 00:02:41.919
and she was looking to throw blame in every possible direction,

48
00:02:42.360 --> 00:02:45.360
despite it having been a positive peace. She did not

49
00:02:45.520 --> 00:02:48.280
like the photographs. She thought the story was negative. She

50
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:50.639
was upset that it was about Harry, not about her.

51
00:02:51.360 --> 00:02:55.199
Harry and Meghan also allegedly thought the headline was racially motivated,

52
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:57.879
and pointed out the song I'm Just Wild About Harry

53
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:01.120
had been performed by Judy Garland and Rooney as a

54
00:03:01.240 --> 00:03:05.560
blackface number in the nineteen thirty nine film Babes in Arms.

55
00:03:06.479 --> 00:03:09.719
Royal journalist Sarah Luise Robertson tells gb News that Donald

56
00:03:09.719 --> 00:03:12.199
Trump can do anything. At the moment, Harry and Meghan

57
00:03:12.240 --> 00:03:15.319
are so low down on his list of priorities. At

58
00:03:15.319 --> 00:03:17.199
the moment, he won't have given them a thought. But

59
00:03:17.280 --> 00:03:19.520
later down the line, if they say something else to

60
00:03:19.639 --> 00:03:22.400
upset him, I don't think he would have any qualms.

61
00:03:22.800 --> 00:03:24.840
The sticking point would be that he seems to really

62
00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:27.520
adore Prince William, he adores King Charles, and he loves

63
00:03:27.520 --> 00:03:30.120
our royal family, so he probably wouldn't want to do

64
00:03:30.159 --> 00:03:33.719
anything that would cause upset to them. However, Trump has

65
00:03:33.759 --> 00:03:36.039
a long memory and he doesn't like people who are disloyal.

66
00:03:36.400 --> 00:03:39.280
He didn't like the way they conducted themselves. Royal journalist

67
00:03:39.400 --> 00:03:42.120
Sarah Luise added he didn't like the way they acted

68
00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:45.719
toward the Queen and the documentary that they made. Also,

69
00:03:45.759 --> 00:03:47.479
he didn't like the way they snubbed him when he

70
00:03:47.479 --> 00:03:50.680
came across from his royal visit, and Megan Caldon misogynistic

71
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:53.879
in an interview. He doesn't forget things like this, and

72
00:03:53.919 --> 00:03:56.599
he may very well do what Biden didn't and actually

73
00:03:56.599 --> 00:04:00.599
make public Harries visa application, which will show IF's lied

74
00:04:00.879 --> 00:04:05.479
or not about taking drugs. Some interesting words from Camilla

75
00:04:05.520 --> 00:04:09.240
Tommeny in The Telegraph, she writes Prince Harry's autobiography. Spare

76
00:04:09.280 --> 00:04:12.960
would go on to incorrectly describe me as the Telegraph's

77
00:04:13.240 --> 00:04:16.839
royal correspondent who had reported a sci fi fantasy that

78
00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:21.160
Meg had reduced Kate to tears. No, I hadn't, Regardless,

79
00:04:21.160 --> 00:04:24.040
he went on to say, I was someone who always

80
00:04:24.160 --> 00:04:27.639
made me ill, adding she had always always got stuff wrong.

81
00:04:27.800 --> 00:04:30.560
This felt more than wrong. It's a curious comment to

82
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:33.360
make about a journalist whom he personally invited to cover

83
00:04:33.439 --> 00:04:36.920
his HIV initiative with Rhianna in Barbados, and who broke

84
00:04:36.959 --> 00:04:39.240
the accurate news of his relationship with Meg and Markle

85
00:04:39.319 --> 00:04:41.839
in the first place. But it seems there's Harry and

86
00:04:41.879 --> 00:04:45.360
Meghan's truth, and then there is everyone else's, incidentally on

87
00:04:45.439 --> 00:04:48.199
collusion with the Palace. When I broke that world exclusive,

88
00:04:48.480 --> 00:04:50.600
I didn't even run the story by the Royal Press

89
00:04:50.639 --> 00:04:53.160
Office beforehand, because I knew it was true and I

90
00:04:53.199 --> 00:04:56.759
didn't want to deal with any unnecessary interference. I also

91
00:04:56.839 --> 00:04:59.040
didn't want it to leak and get out scooped by

92
00:04:59.079 --> 00:05:02.600
any of my rival In all my times a royal reporter,

93
00:05:02.720 --> 00:05:05.040
I was never handed stories by the Palace. In fact,

94
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:07.720
they would actively trade a block any negative reporting of

95
00:05:07.959 --> 00:05:11.040
any member of the royal family, including Prince Harry I

96
00:05:11.199 --> 00:05:14.199
was a constant thorn in their side and vice versa,

97
00:05:15.000 --> 00:05:17.920
and on the vendetta point rarely. In reality, what happened

98
00:05:17.959 --> 00:05:20.160
is that the undiluted praise that was being heaped on

99
00:05:20.160 --> 00:05:23.439
the Sussexes by journalists including me, She's a breath of

100
00:05:23.480 --> 00:05:26.399
fresh air changed when we started getting wind of staff

101
00:05:26.480 --> 00:05:30.160
leaving in their droves, tension between the royal brothers, tensions

102
00:05:30.160 --> 00:05:33.480
with royal sisters in law, and tensions within the royal household.

103
00:05:34.120 --> 00:05:36.959
As we accurately reported at the time, the Sussexes were

104
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:39.480
growing increasingly unhappy and were looking for a way out.

105
00:05:39.879 --> 00:05:43.720
There were also bullying claims, which the couple denied. What

106
00:05:43.720 --> 00:05:45.959
were they supposed to do? Ignore all this and only

107
00:05:46.000 --> 00:05:49.120
tell one side of the story. That's not journalism. We

108
00:05:49.240 --> 00:05:51.800
leave that kind of propaganda to the Sussex squads on

109
00:05:51.839 --> 00:05:55.480
social media who think nothing of using the hashtag Camillatomeny

110
00:05:55.560 --> 00:05:58.079
is a liar without having even been within five feet

111
00:05:58.120 --> 00:06:01.240
of a royal figure, let alone a fact. Seven years on,

112
00:06:01.360 --> 00:06:03.800
and vanity fairs has produced an eight thousand word cover

113
00:06:03.879 --> 00:06:06.199
story which appears to further vindicate what I was writing

114
00:06:06.240 --> 00:06:09.560
back in twenty eighteen and beyond. Despite all that's been

115
00:06:09.600 --> 00:06:12.720
said and done, I'm genuinely pleased for Prince Harry. The

116
00:06:12.800 --> 00:06:20.120
truth matters. Pallas Intrigum me rat back. For years, Megan

117
00:06:20.120 --> 00:06:23.920
Michael and stylists Jessica mulroney were close friends, with mulroney

118
00:06:23.959 --> 00:06:27.079
playing a significant role in Meghan's life from her royal

119
00:06:27.079 --> 00:06:29.680
wedding to her baby shower and even the couple's Australian

120
00:06:29.759 --> 00:06:33.879
royal tour, but their once close bonds seemingly unraveled, with

121
00:06:33.920 --> 00:06:38.079
the pair now distant, if not completely estranged. Jessica Mulroney's

122
00:06:38.120 --> 00:06:41.079
three children famously featured in Meghan and Prince Harry's twenty

123
00:06:41.160 --> 00:06:44.439
eighteen wedding, with her daughter Ivy serving as flower girl

124
00:06:44.519 --> 00:06:47.360
and her twin sons Brian and John charming the world

125
00:06:47.360 --> 00:06:51.199
as page boys. Mulroney was also present for Meghan's lavish

126
00:06:51.279 --> 00:06:54.480
New York baby shower in twenty nineteen, and reportedly played

127
00:06:54.480 --> 00:06:56.839
her behind the scenes role during the couple's decision to

128
00:06:56.920 --> 00:07:00.079
step back from royal duties. However, the friendship began to

129
00:07:00.240 --> 00:07:04.360
falter in twenty twenty following a public controversy. The rift

130
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:07.639
started when mulroney faced allegations of racism during a feud

131
00:07:07.680 --> 00:07:12.720
with lifestyle blogger Susha Exeter. Exeter accused mulroney threatening her

132
00:07:12.759 --> 00:07:16.360
brand connections during a dispute about a Black Lives Matter post.

133
00:07:16.759 --> 00:07:19.959
Despite mulroney's public apologies and attempts to repair her reputation,

134
00:07:20.120 --> 00:07:22.879
the fallout was swift and her losing TV gigs and

135
00:07:23.000 --> 00:07:28.040
enduring significant public criticism. Around the same time, reports emerged

136
00:07:28.160 --> 00:07:33.199
suggesting Megan had distanced herself from mulroney. While mulroney initially

137
00:07:33.199 --> 00:07:36.959
insisted their friendship remained intact, sharing public messages of support

138
00:07:37.000 --> 00:07:41.000
from Megan, signs of strain continued to surface. Cryptic Instagram

139
00:07:41.040 --> 00:07:44.199
posts by mulroney about losing friends and reflecting on toxic

140
00:07:44.240 --> 00:07:48.600
relationships fueled speculation that their bond had cooled. In twenty

141
00:07:48.639 --> 00:07:51.040
twenty two, the pair appeared even further apart, and by

142
00:07:51.160 --> 00:07:54.399
twenty twenty three, Meghan and Harry's visit to Canada marked

143
00:07:54.399 --> 00:07:58.199
a notable moment of separation. Despite being in mulroney's home country,

144
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:00.680
The Sussexes reportedly chose to space end their time with

145
00:08:00.720 --> 00:08:03.680
other friends such as Michael Boublay and his wife, rather

146
00:08:03.720 --> 00:08:08.360
than reconnect with mulroney. Now, with Meghan's recent return to Instagram,

147
00:08:08.439 --> 00:08:12.319
fans have noticed mulroney's absence from the Duchess's social media activity.

148
00:08:12.800 --> 00:08:15.720
Mulroney is not following Meghan's new account, and her silence

149
00:08:15.759 --> 00:08:18.680
about Meghan's posts, ranging from a heartfelt tribute to her

150
00:08:18.720 --> 00:08:21.879
late dog Guy to the trailer for her upcoming Netflix show,

151
00:08:22.319 --> 00:08:25.680
has not gone unnoticed. It seems the once close relationship

152
00:08:25.800 --> 00:08:29.439
may be a thing of the past, and they have

153
00:08:29.519 --> 00:08:31.959
it'd like to email us. Our address is the palaceintrig

154
00:08:32.000 --> 00:08:34.000
at gmail dot com. Please follow us a Spotify, Apple

155
00:08:34.080 --> 00:08:36.320
or the app of your choice and leave us a

156
00:08:36.360 --> 00:08:39.240
review or some stars if you're enjoying the show. I'm

157
00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:42.000
Mark Francis my thanks to John McDermott. This is Palace Intriguan.

158
00:08:42.360 --> 00:08:48.480
Good Damns.