Aug. 27, 2026

SpaceX Hit the Moon, and the Real Problem Is Just Beginning

SpaceX Hit the Moon, and the Real Problem Is Just Beginning

Space Nuts: Moon impact, Roman Observatory launch, and Neptune’s odd moons Andrew Dunkley is joined by Professor Jonti Horner, Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Southern Queensland, for a wide-ranging astronomy update. They cover SpaceX’s...

Space Nuts: Moon impact, Roman Observatory launch, and Neptune’s odd moons
Andrew Dunkley is joined by Professor Jonti Horner, Professor of Astrophysics at the University of Southern Queensland, for a wide-ranging astronomy update. They cover SpaceX’s out-of-control rocket body hitting the Moon, the imminent launch of the Nancy Grace Roman Observatory, and a new result that may explain the strange origin of some of Neptune’s moons.
We discuss why lunar impacts matter far beyond the Moon itself, how Roman will study exoplanets and dark energy, and why clay minerals on Neptune’s small moons are such a big clue about a violent early solar system.
Key topics
SpaceX’s rocket body impacted the Moon after being left in a long, uncontrolled orbit
Why lunar impacts are a real concern for future habitats, infrastructure, and Apollo heritage sites
The sheer scale of human-made objects that have already hit or landed on the Moon
Elon Musk’s vision for lunar factories, rail-gun launches, and large-scale off-Earth manufacturing
Why the same company could end up both creating the risk and needing to solve it
The Nancy Grace Roman Observatory launching around 9 months ahead of schedule
Roman’s 2.4 metre mirror, 300 megapixel wide-field camera, and hydrazine-fueled journey to L2
How Roman will study dark energy, gravitational lensing, exoplanets, and free-floating planets
New James Webb observations of Neptune’s moons showing clay-type minerals on Larissa and Galatea
Why those clays suggest a much older, more violent system shaped by Triton’s capture and moon-to-moon collisions
Timestamps:
00:00 - Studio prep, muting phones, and getting ready to record
01:53 - Episode intro: SpaceX lunar impact, Roman Observatory, and Neptune moons
03:00 - Jonti Horner joins the show
04:26 - SpaceX rocket body crashes into the Moon
07:03 - Predicted impact plume and expected crater size
08:54 - Korean spacecraft Danuri captures post-impact images
10:19 - Why Moon impacts matter for future lunar bases
11:47 - Protecting Apollo landing sites and lunar archaeology
12:15 - More than 3,000 human-made objects have hit the Moon
14:32 - Law, responsibility, and the problem of cleanup beyond Earth
16:07 - Musk’s plans for Moon factories and Starlink-style expansion
18:12 - Rail guns, Optimus robots, and scaling lunar industry
19:34 - SpaceX’s own industry could be threatened by its own debris
21:24 - Balancing commercial benefits and environmental costs
23:46 - The Nancy Grace Roman Observatory launch approaches
26:03 - Roman’s orbit, hydrazine fuel, and five-year mission plan
27:57 - From WFIRST to Roman: how the telescope evolved
29:23 - Roman’s mirror, 300 megapixel camera, and survey power
30:14 - Exoplanets, microlensing, and the coronagraph
33:29 - Roman’s launch status and the excitement ahead
34:17 - Neptune’s moons and the role of Triton

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:00.920
Jonti Horner: Hi there.

1
00:00:00.920 --> 00:00:02.920
Andrew Dunkley: Thanks for joining us. My name is Andrew

2
00:00:02.920 --> 00:00:05.720
Dunkley. This is Space Nuts, uh, where we

3
00:00:05.720 --> 00:00:08.440
talk astronomy and space science. And coming

4
00:00:08.440 --> 00:00:11.200
up on Today's programme, uh, SpaceX

5
00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:14.080
in the news, you could say

6
00:00:14.080 --> 00:00:16.760
for all the wrong reasons, but, um, that's

7
00:00:16.760 --> 00:00:18.840
debatable, depending on which part of this

8
00:00:18.840 --> 00:00:21.640
storey that, um, you're talking about. But,

9
00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:24.600
uh, they've hit the moon. Uh, not in a good

10
00:00:24.600 --> 00:00:26.840
way. Uh, we'll also be looking at the

11
00:00:26.840 --> 00:00:29.360
upcoming launch of the Nancy Grace

12
00:00:29.360 --> 00:00:32.310
Roman Observatory. Uh, we've received a lot

13
00:00:32.310 --> 00:00:33.920
of questions from the audience about that,

14
00:00:33.920 --> 00:00:36.190
uh, in recent times and with good reason.

15
00:00:36.190 --> 00:00:39.190
It's a very exciting mission indeed and

16
00:00:39.190 --> 00:00:41.790
if time allows us, we'll, uh, look into a new

17
00:00:41.790 --> 00:00:44.750
study about Neptune's moons. Stick with

18
00:00:44.750 --> 00:00:47.190
us. That's all coming up on this edition of

19
00:00:47.190 --> 00:00:49.390
Space Nuts. 15 seconds.

20
00:00:49.390 --> 00:00:51.714
Jonti Horner: Guidance is internal. 10,

21
00:00:51.866 --> 00:00:52.550
9.

22
00:00:53.030 --> 00:00:54.710
Andrew Dunkley: Ignition sequence start.

23
00:00:54.870 --> 00:00:57.196
Jonti Horner: Space Nuts. 5, 4, 3, 2.

24
00:00:57.264 --> 00:01:00.256
Andrew Dunkley: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2,

25
00:01:00.324 --> 00:01:03.070
1. Space Nuts astronauts report at

26
00:01:03.070 --> 00:01:06.050
Beale. And joining us to, uh, furnish us

27
00:01:06.050 --> 00:01:08.010
with all his knowledge, which will only take

28
00:01:08.010 --> 00:01:10.330
a couple of minutes. No, no, it's not. It'll

29
00:01:10.330 --> 00:01:12.610
take probably a lot longer than that is

30
00:01:12.610 --> 00:01:14.330
Professor Jonty Horner, professor of

31
00:01:14.330 --> 00:01:16.250
Astrophysics at the University of Southern

32
00:01:16.250 --> 00:01:17.810
Queensland. Jonty, hello.

33
00:01:18.050 --> 00:01:19.330
Jonti Horner: Good afternoon. How are you going?

34
00:01:19.970 --> 00:01:22.050
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, good. You should feel good too, because

35
00:01:22.050 --> 00:01:24.010
it's only when I get to like people that I

36
00:01:24.010 --> 00:01:25.010
insult them like that.

37
00:01:25.970 --> 00:01:27.530
Jonti Horner: It's fine. It's just like growing up in

38
00:01:27.530 --> 00:01:30.170
Yorkshire again. It seems to be a

39
00:01:30.170 --> 00:01:31.970
recurring theme with kind of the better parts

40
00:01:31.970 --> 00:01:33.570
of the world is that the more you get on with

41
00:01:33.570 --> 00:01:36.030
people, the more offensively you critic. And,

42
00:01:36.190 --> 00:01:39.070
you know, the

43
00:01:39.070 --> 00:01:41.070
inverse of that being that the less you like

44
00:01:41.070 --> 00:01:42.670
people, the more polite you get. Which

45
00:01:42.670 --> 00:01:45.350
reminds me of Pratchett's almost version of

46
00:01:45.350 --> 00:01:47.470
the Montagues and Capulets with the old

47
00:01:48.030 --> 00:01:50.590
warring aristocracy who'd now got to such a

48
00:01:51.070 --> 00:01:53.350
level of dissatisfaction with one another

49
00:01:53.350 --> 00:01:55.310
that the only polite forms of conversation

50
00:01:55.310 --> 00:01:56.910
were about the weather. And that was it. So

51
00:01:56.910 --> 00:01:58.750
they have these meetings at formal events.

52
00:01:58.750 --> 00:02:00.150
It's like, oh, the weather today is

53
00:02:00.150 --> 00:02:02.350
beautiful, isn't it? M well, you know. Oh,

54
00:02:02.350 --> 00:02:03.920
yes, yes, but you're not.

55
00:02:04.240 --> 00:02:07.140
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, that kind of thing. M. Uh,

56
00:02:07.140 --> 00:02:09.200
we've got a lot to get through and, uh, very

57
00:02:09.200 --> 00:02:11.480
little time to do it, but we will manage as

58
00:02:11.480 --> 00:02:12.160
best we can.

59
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:14.840
And this, uh, first storey is a bit of a

60
00:02:14.840 --> 00:02:17.440
combo. Two lunar based

61
00:02:17.520 --> 00:02:20.440
storeys and depending on where you sit

62
00:02:20.440 --> 00:02:22.520
on the spectrum of should we or should we

63
00:02:22.520 --> 00:02:25.440
not, um, they could both be considered bad or

64
00:02:25.440 --> 00:02:28.120
one could be sort of considered Good.

65
00:02:28.120 --> 00:02:31.020
Depending on. Yeah, perspective. But,

66
00:02:31.240 --> 00:02:34.140
uh, it's involving SpaceX and, uh, the

67
00:02:34.140 --> 00:02:36.500
recent collision, if you want to call it

68
00:02:36.500 --> 00:02:39.100
that, between a SpaceX rocket body and

69
00:02:39.260 --> 00:02:41.900
the lunar surface, uh, which,

70
00:02:42.260 --> 00:02:43.580
uh, happened not so long ago.

71
00:02:44.300 --> 00:02:45.980
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. I mean, as we're recording this,

72
00:02:45.980 --> 00:02:47.660
it was very, very recent. Very, very.

73
00:02:47.980 --> 00:02:50.140
Listening to this, it's slightly in the

74
00:02:50.140 --> 00:02:51.860
future. And for that reason we didn't talk

75
00:02:51.860 --> 00:02:53.980
about this last time, because last time we

76
00:02:53.980 --> 00:02:55.660
were recording in advance of this happening,

77
00:02:55.660 --> 00:02:57.100
but the broadcast would have gone out after

78
00:02:57.100 --> 00:02:58.380
it happened, which would have been very

79
00:02:58.380 --> 00:03:01.290
bizarre. Now we're recording after the

80
00:03:01.290 --> 00:03:02.930
event and you're hearing after the event, so

81
00:03:02.930 --> 00:03:05.170
at least the time flow is in an appropriate

82
00:03:05.170 --> 00:03:05.530
order.

83
00:03:06.170 --> 00:03:09.010
The storey here is basically

84
00:03:09.010 --> 00:03:11.730
one of celestial littering, which is a

85
00:03:11.730 --> 00:03:14.730
recurring theme. We've got this ongoing

86
00:03:14.730 --> 00:03:17.130
discussion in the past of what goes up, must

87
00:03:17.130 --> 00:03:19.770
come down, and the ongoing issue

88
00:03:19.770 --> 00:03:22.730
with the commercialization of space leading

89
00:03:22.730 --> 00:03:24.930
to a lot of things being launched. And the

90
00:03:24.930 --> 00:03:26.770
vast majority of those things that are

91
00:03:26.770 --> 00:03:29.490
launched return to Earth in a fiery blaze of

92
00:03:29.490 --> 00:03:31.810
glory. We see space junk more and more often

93
00:03:31.810 --> 00:03:33.990
in our skies, but on Earth,

94
00:03:34.630 --> 00:03:36.350
the concerns are primarily about the

95
00:03:36.350 --> 00:03:37.870
atmosphere with the stuff coming back. And

96
00:03:37.870 --> 00:03:39.950
we've talked a lot in the past about the

97
00:03:39.950 --> 00:03:41.910
worries atmospheric scientists have about

98
00:03:42.150 --> 00:03:43.990
dumping all these metals into the upper

99
00:03:43.990 --> 00:03:46.110
atmosphere and what it'll mean. But very

100
00:03:46.110 --> 00:03:49.030
rarely do pieces of space junk make it to the

101
00:03:49.030 --> 00:03:51.030
Earth's surface. And, um, that's because

102
00:03:51.030 --> 00:03:52.710
we've got an atmosphere. The atmosphere is

103
00:03:52.710 --> 00:03:54.950
brilliant and protects the surface of the

104
00:03:54.950 --> 00:03:56.590
Earth from all but the biggest bits of space

105
00:03:56.590 --> 00:03:58.070
junk. Making it down to Earth.

106
00:03:58.070 --> 00:03:58.630
Andrew Dunkley: Yep.

107
00:03:59.020 --> 00:04:01.220
Jonti Horner: Despite that, there is enough concern that

108
00:04:01.220 --> 00:04:03.420
people are, ah, doing things like calculating

109
00:04:03.420 --> 00:04:05.140
the odds for insurance companies of how

110
00:04:05.140 --> 00:04:07.180
likely it is that someone on Earth will die

111
00:04:07.340 --> 00:04:09.500
due to space junkie in the next decade,

112
00:04:09.660 --> 00:04:12.620
things like this. So it's not a null

113
00:04:12.620 --> 00:04:14.340
concern for people on the surface of Earth,

114
00:04:14.340 --> 00:04:16.500
but the odds of something crashing into

115
00:04:16.500 --> 00:04:18.580
Earth's surface, that is something we put up

116
00:04:18.580 --> 00:04:20.860
into orbit, are usually fairly low because

117
00:04:20.860 --> 00:04:23.580
most of it goes away in the atmosphere,

118
00:04:23.820 --> 00:04:25.900
ablates. It doesn't burn up. I'm always

119
00:04:25.900 --> 00:04:27.620
cautious of using the phrasing burn up

120
00:04:27.620 --> 00:04:30.140
because that evokes fire and fire requires

121
00:04:30.140 --> 00:04:32.120
oxygen and it's a chemical reaction. This is

122
00:04:32.360 --> 00:04:34.600
ablation because the air gets superheated and

123
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:37.400
bakes away the material. But effectively,

124
00:04:37.480 --> 00:04:39.800
colloquially, you'd say this all burns up.

125
00:04:40.680 --> 00:04:43.160
The Earth, though, isn't the only thing out

126
00:04:43.160 --> 00:04:46.160
there that's in the firing line and this

127
00:04:46.160 --> 00:04:48.200
is where this storey comes in. So a while

128
00:04:48.200 --> 00:04:51.080
back, SpaceX launched a couple of

129
00:04:51.080 --> 00:04:53.960
things to head to the Moon. And in order

130
00:04:53.960 --> 00:04:55.760
to do that, they had to boost their rocket to

131
00:04:55.760 --> 00:04:57.400
a higher speed than they normally would do,

132
00:04:57.480 --> 00:04:59.280
which meant that the upper stage of this

133
00:04:59.280 --> 00:05:01.440
rocket went onto a very elongated orbit

134
00:05:01.440 --> 00:05:03.420
around the Earth, uh uh, and then essentially

135
00:05:03.420 --> 00:05:06.100
goes into free fall. It has burned all its

136
00:05:06.100 --> 00:05:08.900
fuel. It is, to all intents and purposes, out

137
00:05:08.900 --> 00:05:10.820
of control. And that means its orbit just

138
00:05:10.980 --> 00:05:12.860
evolves under the gravity of the Earth and

139
00:05:12.860 --> 00:05:15.060
the Moon and the vagaries of the environment

140
00:05:15.300 --> 00:05:18.220
around the Earth. Fast forward to

141
00:05:18.220 --> 00:05:20.500
now and that out of control rocket body

142
00:05:20.980 --> 00:05:23.620
crashed into the Moon. Now, the final

143
00:05:24.580 --> 00:05:27.260
collision was predicted in advance. This was

144
00:05:27.260 --> 00:05:29.540
big news for at least a week beforehand,

145
00:05:30.020 --> 00:05:32.340
and it was estimated roughly where the thing

146
00:05:32.340 --> 00:05:34.330
would hit the Moon. Now you're talking hit

147
00:05:34.560 --> 00:05:36.840
about a fairly hefty chunk of material.

148
00:05:36.840 --> 00:05:39.800
You're talking about, you know, a couple of

149
00:05:39.800 --> 00:05:42.560
thousand kilos, if not more, a fairly big

150
00:05:42.560 --> 00:05:45.280
chunk of material crashing into the Moon's

151
00:05:45.280 --> 00:05:48.080
surface at a speed of a few kilometres per

152
00:05:48.080 --> 00:05:51.040
second. And so the predictions were that

153
00:05:51.040 --> 00:05:53.600
when this hit in the location it hit,

154
00:05:53.840 --> 00:05:56.760
it would dig out a crater maybe 20, 25 metres

155
00:05:56.760 --> 00:05:59.320
across, and kick a load of dust and material

156
00:05:59.320 --> 00:06:01.800
up. It will create a plume that would rise

157
00:06:01.800 --> 00:06:03.640
above the Moon's limb, probably rise as high

158
00:06:03.640 --> 00:06:05.720
as 100 kilometres or so, and slowly fall back

159
00:06:05.720 --> 00:06:06.940
to the surf of the Moon.

160
00:06:08.540 --> 00:06:10.180
The time at which impact was going to happen

161
00:06:10.180 --> 00:06:13.020
was predicted, so astronomers on the part of

162
00:06:13.020 --> 00:06:14.340
the Earth that could see the Moon were

163
00:06:14.340 --> 00:06:17.100
watching to see what happened. Albert,

164
00:06:17.180 --> 00:06:19.500
to be fair, it was predicted that for most

165
00:06:19.500 --> 00:06:21.340
people you would see absolutely nothing. This

166
00:06:21.340 --> 00:06:22.820
thing was going to hit on the daylight side

167
00:06:22.820 --> 00:06:25.340
of the Moon and so reflected sunlight would

168
00:06:25.580 --> 00:06:27.180
obscure pretty much everything.

169
00:06:28.380 --> 00:06:31.100
So people looked, didn't really see anything.

170
00:06:31.100 --> 00:06:33.470
The only really, I think,

171
00:06:34.510 --> 00:06:36.470
strong indication that something was seen

172
00:06:36.470 --> 00:06:38.590
from the ground were a group of people

173
00:06:38.670 --> 00:06:40.710
observing from the Lowell Observatory in the

174
00:06:40.710 --> 00:06:42.350
US who were looking

175
00:06:43.150 --> 00:06:46.070
specifically at very specific wavelengths of

176
00:06:46.070 --> 00:06:48.990
light for sodium ions and lithium ions.

177
00:06:49.710 --> 00:06:51.470
And they saw what appeared to be an impact

178
00:06:51.550 --> 00:06:54.390
plume at the right location at the right

179
00:06:54.390 --> 00:06:56.670
time, kind of confirming that the impact

180
00:06:56.750 --> 00:06:57.310
happened.

181
00:06:57.390 --> 00:06:57.870
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

182
00:06:58.030 --> 00:07:00.750
Jonti Horner: Then after the event, the first images came

183
00:07:00.750 --> 00:07:02.840
back of the site that was hit. And those

184
00:07:02.840 --> 00:07:05.400
images came back from a Korean

185
00:07:05.400 --> 00:07:08.000
spacecraft, um, South Korea's first ever

186
00:07:08.000 --> 00:07:10.320
lunar spacecraft, that was launched back in

187
00:07:10.320 --> 00:07:12.640
2022, actually in August

188
00:07:12.640 --> 00:07:15.160
2022 has been floating around, minding its

189
00:07:15.160 --> 00:07:17.360
own business, doing work and pretty much

190
00:07:17.360 --> 00:07:19.280
widely being forgotten. I don't remember ever

191
00:07:19.280 --> 00:07:20.920
talking about this spacecraft before, even

192
00:07:20.920 --> 00:07:23.320
though me. It's a great. Yeah, even though

193
00:07:23.320 --> 00:07:25.200
it's a great achievement that the Koreans got

194
00:07:25.200 --> 00:07:26.920
it into lunar orbit and have been doing great

195
00:07:26.920 --> 00:07:27.600
stuff with it.

196
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:27.960
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

197
00:07:27.960 --> 00:07:30.800
Jonti Horner: But this spacecraft, Dunuri, flew

198
00:07:30.800 --> 00:07:33.240
repeatedly over the area where the impact was

199
00:07:33.240 --> 00:07:35.820
going. And the

200
00:07:35.820 --> 00:07:38.660
Korean, um, Aerospace Research Institute

201
00:07:38.660 --> 00:07:41.500
Carri released an announcement that said,

202
00:07:41.820 --> 00:07:44.020
and I'm quoting here, Dhanuri began

203
00:07:44.020 --> 00:07:45.860
observations about 30 minutes before the

204
00:07:45.860 --> 00:07:47.980
collision and um, through orbit control

205
00:07:48.060 --> 00:07:50.300
passed over the impact site multiple times,

206
00:07:50.380 --> 00:07:52.780
conducting a total of eight imaging

207
00:07:52.780 --> 00:07:55.540
sessions. Through this observation, changes

208
00:07:55.540 --> 00:07:57.300
in the terrain around the impact site and

209
00:07:57.300 --> 00:08:00.100
traces of ejecta spread were confirmed. The

210
00:08:00.100 --> 00:08:02.380
spacecraft secured both pre collision and

211
00:08:02.380 --> 00:08:04.860
immediate post collision footage, enabling

212
00:08:04.860 --> 00:08:06.240
analysis of the changes. Changes, uh, that

213
00:08:06.240 --> 00:08:08.480
have happened. So there are now images only

214
00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:10.960
looks like a little black smudge, but to be

215
00:08:10.960 --> 00:08:13.440
fair, this is an area maybe 20 or 25 metres

216
00:08:13.440 --> 00:08:15.840
across. It's pretty impressive that we can

217
00:08:15.840 --> 00:08:18.800
get images that resolve that impact feature

218
00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:21.360
on the surface of the moon. And I think that

219
00:08:21.360 --> 00:08:24.160
in itself is going to be pretty important

220
00:08:24.160 --> 00:08:26.760
for researchers studying how craters form,

221
00:08:26.760 --> 00:08:29.400
how the lunar impact kind of scenarios

222
00:08:29.400 --> 00:08:31.520
happen. When you're hitting an object with

223
00:08:31.520 --> 00:08:34.179
the regolith, like the moon without an

224
00:08:34.179 --> 00:08:36.299
atmosphere to protect it, all this kind of

225
00:08:36.299 --> 00:08:38.059
stuff's pretty important. But it's doubly

226
00:08:38.059 --> 00:08:40.339
important in the context of our future use of

227
00:08:40.339 --> 00:08:42.699
the moon. You know, NASA have got these plans

228
00:08:42.699 --> 00:08:44.979
to put astronauts in a permanent lunar base

229
00:08:44.979 --> 00:08:46.499
at the South Pole. I know China have

230
00:08:46.499 --> 00:08:49.339
expressed similar aspirations. Elon Musk is

231
00:08:49.339 --> 00:08:51.499
looking at building a lunar industry, which

232
00:08:51.499 --> 00:08:54.019
we'll come to in a minute. Yeah. Ah, if

233
00:08:54.019 --> 00:08:56.619
you're wanting to have permanent presence on

234
00:08:56.619 --> 00:08:57.939
the moon, and particularly permanent human

235
00:08:57.939 --> 00:09:00.179
presence, you need to have a fairly good

236
00:09:00.179 --> 00:09:01.739
understanding of what's going to happen when

237
00:09:01.739 --> 00:09:04.219
impacts happen. You would have also thought

238
00:09:04.219 --> 00:09:06.240
though that you'd like to prevent impacts

239
00:09:06.240 --> 00:09:07.760
from happening, particularly impacts from

240
00:09:07.760 --> 00:09:09.800
things that are out of control. Because if

241
00:09:09.800 --> 00:09:10.920
this thing had come into the Earth's

242
00:09:10.920 --> 00:09:13.000
atmosphere, pretty much all of it would have

243
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:15.240
ablated. You wouldn't have had to worry on

244
00:09:15.240 --> 00:09:17.640
the ground. On the Moon though,

245
00:09:18.520 --> 00:09:21.479
it makes it to the surface intact. That

246
00:09:21.479 --> 00:09:24.240
size of that impact scar, 25, 27 metres

247
00:09:24.240 --> 00:09:27.080
across, sounds to me very much like the size

248
00:09:27.080 --> 00:09:29.840
of a lunar habitat that you'd build. And the

249
00:09:29.840 --> 00:09:31.880
last thing I would want is to send astronauts

250
00:09:31.880 --> 00:09:33.640
up to the moon and then have a bit of a

251
00:09:33.880 --> 00:09:36.040
discarded rocket crash in and wipe out the

252
00:09:36.040 --> 00:09:38.300
habitat and kill them. Doesn't sound like a

253
00:09:38.300 --> 00:09:41.060
good idea. Not just that it's raised

254
00:09:41.060 --> 00:09:43.420
concerns not only about our kind of future

255
00:09:43.420 --> 00:09:44.700
presence on the moon, but about the

256
00:09:44.700 --> 00:09:46.900
preservation of our archaeological sites on

257
00:09:46.900 --> 00:09:49.180
the moon. We've talked about the incredible

258
00:09:49.180 --> 00:09:51.860
work of Professor Alice Gorman in Adelaide,

259
00:09:51.860 --> 00:09:54.460
who talks about space archaeology and has

260
00:09:54.460 --> 00:09:56.020
Been trying to raise awareness of the

261
00:09:56.020 --> 00:09:58.180
cultural impact of places like the Apollo 11

262
00:09:58.180 --> 00:10:00.500
landing site, where we've got this pristine

263
00:10:00.500 --> 00:10:02.820
record of humanity's first steps on the moon.

264
00:10:03.480 --> 00:10:05.080
And it'd be tragic if something like this

265
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.680
happened and crashed into that. Yeah, it's

266
00:10:07.680 --> 00:10:10.280
really caused a lot of discussion about

267
00:10:10.920 --> 00:10:13.160
what's going on, what we should do about it.

268
00:10:13.160 --> 00:10:15.200
And I don't know that it's a particularly

269
00:10:15.200 --> 00:10:17.000
good look for SpaceX that this has happened,

270
00:10:17.000 --> 00:10:18.540
but it should be stressed that they are far,

271
00:10:18.540 --> 00:10:21.160
uh, from alone. I saw listed on a

272
00:10:21.160 --> 00:10:24.000
BBC article at the time of the

273
00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:26.720
impact detailed some of the other things that

274
00:10:26.720 --> 00:10:29.400
have hit the moon and they reckon that

275
00:10:30.090 --> 00:10:33.050
more than 3,000 human made objects have

276
00:10:33.050 --> 00:10:35.290
now either landed on or impacted the moon.

277
00:10:35.450 --> 00:10:36.584
Andrew Dunkley: Really? 3,000?

278
00:10:36.756 --> 00:10:38.650
Jonti Horner: 3,000 or more.

279
00:10:38.810 --> 00:10:40.650
Andrew Dunkley: I would never have guessed that many.

280
00:10:40.650 --> 00:10:42.610
Jonti Horner: It's astonishing. And that's a total of more

281
00:10:42.610 --> 00:10:44.970
than 190 tonnes of material. Now

282
00:10:45.369 --> 00:10:47.410
some of that landed softly. You know, we

283
00:10:47.410 --> 00:10:49.570
talked about Apollo 11 for example. The lunar

284
00:10:49.570 --> 00:10:52.210
landers from many nations, many nations have

285
00:10:52.210 --> 00:10:54.210
now landed on the moon. We've got crash

286
00:10:54.210 --> 00:10:56.290
landings like the Israeli mission that

287
00:10:56.290 --> 00:10:58.290
spattered tardigrades across the moon because

288
00:10:58.290 --> 00:11:00.650
they could. Which still strikes me as one of

289
00:11:00.650 --> 00:11:02.790
the dumbest space missions ever carried out.

290
00:11:03.110 --> 00:11:05.070
You know, from an astrobiology point of view,

291
00:11:05.070 --> 00:11:06.630
we want to go to places and look for evidence

292
00:11:06.630 --> 00:11:08.030
of life. The last thing you want to do is

293
00:11:08.030 --> 00:11:10.950
smear it over the face of the moon. Hey look,

294
00:11:10.950 --> 00:11:12.750
we've put life there anyway. That's an

295
00:11:12.750 --> 00:11:14.630
entirely other topic. But there's this long

296
00:11:14.630 --> 00:11:17.509
history of things hitting the moon in a both

297
00:11:17.509 --> 00:11:19.950
controlled and uncontrolled fashion. And it's

298
00:11:19.950 --> 00:11:21.590
going to happen more and more the more we put

299
00:11:21.590 --> 00:11:22.390
stuff out there.

300
00:11:22.550 --> 00:11:23.110
Andrew Dunkley: Yep.

301
00:11:23.830 --> 00:11:26.550
Jonti Horner: So it's caused a lot of discussion. It is

302
00:11:26.550 --> 00:11:29.230
really, really interesting. But it does shine

303
00:11:29.230 --> 00:11:31.230
a light on the risk for future missions more

304
00:11:31.230 --> 00:11:32.070
than anything else.

305
00:11:32.820 --> 00:11:34.180
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it does. Um,

306
00:11:34.980 --> 00:11:36.580
notwithstanding that, there is,

307
00:11:37.980 --> 00:11:40.260
um, an international law in place that you're

308
00:11:40.260 --> 00:11:42.260
responsible for cleaning up your own mess.

309
00:11:42.260 --> 00:11:45.140
But, um, when things get out of control

310
00:11:45.220 --> 00:11:47.980
or fly off in directions that make them

311
00:11:47.980 --> 00:11:50.980
irretrievable, what can you do

312
00:11:50.980 --> 00:11:51.540
about it?

313
00:11:51.860 --> 00:11:54.380
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And I would be very interested to

314
00:11:54.380 --> 00:11:56.580
see whether any applications of that law

315
00:11:57.220 --> 00:11:59.140
apply to things beyond the Earth's

316
00:11:59.140 --> 00:12:01.300
atmosphere, because that

317
00:12:01.770 --> 00:12:04.130
gets enforced when you look at people

318
00:12:04.130 --> 00:12:06.370
cleaning up things on Earth. So there was a

319
00:12:06.370 --> 00:12:09.290
storey a few years ago about some SpaceX

320
00:12:09.290 --> 00:12:12.170
rocket parts, um, in the snowy

321
00:12:12.170 --> 00:12:14.970
mountains in Australia and SpaceX in theory

322
00:12:14.970 --> 00:12:17.010
had to come and collect them and there was a

323
00:12:17.010 --> 00:12:19.010
little bit of a lag in that happening.

324
00:12:19.010 --> 00:12:20.930
Similarly, when There was a fragmentation of

325
00:12:20.930 --> 00:12:23.230
one of their big starship test launchers that

326
00:12:23.230 --> 00:12:25.050
uh, dropped debris around the Caribbean.

327
00:12:25.290 --> 00:12:27.210
There was a lot of controversy about whether

328
00:12:27.210 --> 00:12:28.930
they were actually bothering to collect stuff

329
00:12:28.930 --> 00:12:29.260
or not.

330
00:12:29.890 --> 00:12:32.050
Andrew Dunkley: There is a faster way. It's called ebay.

331
00:12:32.210 --> 00:12:33.330
Jonti Horner: Oh absolutely.

332
00:12:36.370 --> 00:12:38.810
This is kind of an ongoing thing and I'm not

333
00:12:38.810 --> 00:12:41.690
sure that once again legislation has kept

334
00:12:41.690 --> 00:12:44.050
up with our use. We were talking about this

335
00:12:44.450 --> 00:12:46.570
last week with satellites I think, and with

336
00:12:46.570 --> 00:12:49.490
the FAA and FCC approving things but making

337
00:12:49.490 --> 00:12:51.050
it very clear that they weren't there to

338
00:12:51.050 --> 00:12:53.250
judge on whether the use of space was

339
00:12:53.250 --> 00:12:54.850
sensible. They were just ruling on their

340
00:12:54.850 --> 00:12:57.330
small area of influence and abrogating other

341
00:12:57.330 --> 00:12:58.050
responsibility.

342
00:12:58.530 --> 00:13:00.930
I don't think we have yet any real

343
00:13:01.850 --> 00:13:04.530
global pathway to improving things and

344
00:13:04.530 --> 00:13:06.770
getting a better handle on what we should and

345
00:13:06.770 --> 00:13:08.770
shouldn't do. But the discussions are

346
00:13:08.770 --> 00:13:10.250
happening and every time something like this

347
00:13:10.250 --> 00:13:12.650
comes along it further prompts those

348
00:13:12.650 --> 00:13:14.370
discussions and raises awareness of the

349
00:13:14.370 --> 00:13:15.210
problem, I guess.

350
00:13:15.370 --> 00:13:18.330
Andrew Dunkley: Yes. And uh, once people are

351
00:13:18.330 --> 00:13:20.530
up there in a permanent or semi permanent

352
00:13:20.530 --> 00:13:23.370
situation, that's when you've really

353
00:13:23.370 --> 00:13:25.250
got to start thinking about these kinds of

354
00:13:25.250 --> 00:13:27.130
problems. Hitting the moon at the moment is

355
00:13:27.270 --> 00:13:30.090
um, it is a risk for

356
00:13:30.330 --> 00:13:33.130
existing infrastructure and historical sites.

357
00:13:33.610 --> 00:13:35.610
But the day will come where people are there

358
00:13:35.690 --> 00:13:38.330
and that creates a whole new ball game. So.

359
00:13:38.570 --> 00:13:40.730
Jonti Horner: And industry will be there. Which brings us

360
00:13:40.890 --> 00:13:42.490
to the second half of this storey.

361
00:13:42.570 --> 00:13:44.650
Andrew Dunkley: Well, let's, let's get into that because this

362
00:13:44.650 --> 00:13:47.210
also involves SpaceX and

363
00:13:47.290 --> 00:13:50.250
Elon's big plan is to put a,

364
00:13:50.290 --> 00:13:53.250
um, uh, manufacturing plant on

365
00:13:53.250 --> 00:13:55.820
the moon to build uh, his

366
00:13:55.900 --> 00:13:58.780
starmind AI satellite array.

367
00:13:59.350 --> 00:14:02.020
Uh, and it looks like that this will be a

368
00:14:02.020 --> 00:14:04.540
fully automated system. They'll manufacture

369
00:14:04.540 --> 00:14:07.100
these things and launch them from the moon.

370
00:14:07.100 --> 00:14:10.059
And we're talking like, I don't

371
00:14:10.059 --> 00:14:12.780
know, M. Is it a million of these things?

372
00:14:12.780 --> 00:14:13.820
Jonti Horner: That's what it wants to do.

373
00:14:14.060 --> 00:14:16.860
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, that's. I mean this is the stuff of

374
00:14:16.860 --> 00:14:19.340
science fiction, but it's rapidly becoming

375
00:14:19.580 --> 00:14:20.770
something real, isn't it?

376
00:14:21.240 --> 00:14:23.360
Jonti Horner: It is. And I mean we've discussed the light

377
00:14:23.360 --> 00:14:25.280
pollution side of this repeatedly on the

378
00:14:25.280 --> 00:14:28.200
show, both myself and Fred Watson. This

379
00:14:28.440 --> 00:14:31.080
StarMind idea is the idea that

380
00:14:31.320 --> 00:14:34.160
they will launch essentially data centres and

381
00:14:34.160 --> 00:14:36.680
AI centres into Earth orbit to farm

382
00:14:36.760 --> 00:14:38.920
solar energy and you'll have these

383
00:14:40.360 --> 00:14:42.600
heavily computing based satellites with

384
00:14:42.600 --> 00:14:45.400
enormous solar panels probably at a

385
00:14:45.400 --> 00:14:47.520
relatively high altitude above the Earth so

386
00:14:47.520 --> 00:14:50.160
that they can get permanent sunshine, which I

387
00:14:50.160 --> 00:14:51.680
know a number of reports over the last few

388
00:14:51.680 --> 00:14:54.340
months since this has talked about have

389
00:14:54.340 --> 00:14:56.180
spoken about how this will give a visible

390
00:14:56.180 --> 00:14:58.660
ring in the night sky that'll be visible

391
00:14:58.980 --> 00:15:01.140
all night from all locations on the Earth.

392
00:15:01.140 --> 00:15:03.460
And it'll be like living with a

393
00:15:03.940 --> 00:15:06.860
narrow, very thin ring, a bit like Saturn's

394
00:15:06.860 --> 00:15:08.779
rings, but just a single ring rather than

395
00:15:08.779 --> 00:15:11.220
really broad one. Lots of concern,

396
00:15:11.780 --> 00:15:14.580
lots of speculation about that. This

397
00:15:14.580 --> 00:15:16.740
storey relates to one of the

398
00:15:17.220 --> 00:15:19.280
quarterly calls that

399
00:15:19.750 --> 00:15:21.550
SpaceX are having. This is apparently the

400
00:15:21.550 --> 00:15:23.510
first ever, but they're going to happen every

401
00:15:23.510 --> 00:15:25.470
quarter and it's probably something that's

402
00:15:25.470 --> 00:15:27.390
followed on from the listing of SpaceX on the

403
00:15:27.390 --> 00:15:29.190
stock exchange and that where

404
00:15:30.310 --> 00:15:33.230
Musk talks to the investors. And um, this

405
00:15:33.230 --> 00:15:35.670
call was on the 4th of August, just under a

406
00:15:35.670 --> 00:15:37.390
week ago for me, but by the time you hear

407
00:15:37.390 --> 00:15:40.350
this three weeks ago. And in

408
00:15:40.350 --> 00:15:43.270
that call, Musk talked widely about

409
00:15:43.510 --> 00:15:46.170
his dreams to put factories on the

410
00:15:46.170 --> 00:15:47.970
moon. This is something he's talked about

411
00:15:47.970 --> 00:15:50.090
before, so it's not utterly new, but he's

412
00:15:50.090 --> 00:15:52.970
given more detail of what they want. He

413
00:15:52.970 --> 00:15:54.970
talks about landing a huge amount of tonnage

414
00:15:54.970 --> 00:15:57.450
on the moon to build factories. The factories

415
00:15:57.450 --> 00:16:00.010
will use robots akin to the Optimus robots

416
00:16:00.010 --> 00:16:02.370
that they use in the, um, Tesla car

417
00:16:02.370 --> 00:16:04.490
manufacturers, I think. And he's already

418
00:16:04.490 --> 00:16:06.370
talking about sending some of those Optimus

419
00:16:06.370 --> 00:16:09.250
robots to Mars. He wants to use

420
00:16:09.250 --> 00:16:12.050
the moon to build these starmind

421
00:16:12.050 --> 00:16:14.690
AI satellites which he'll then launch with

422
00:16:14.690 --> 00:16:17.590
giant rail guns using the obs abundant solar

423
00:16:17.590 --> 00:16:19.070
power you can generate on the moon, building

424
00:16:19.070 --> 00:16:21.630
a really, really, really long track with a

425
00:16:21.630 --> 00:16:24.070
kink at the end where you can accelerate

426
00:16:24.070 --> 00:16:26.830
using magnets, something to launch

427
00:16:27.070 --> 00:16:28.710
speed. And this is again something that's

428
00:16:28.710 --> 00:16:30.550
featured heavily in science fiction over the

429
00:16:30.550 --> 00:16:32.590
years as a method for launching things from

430
00:16:33.230 --> 00:16:35.990
bodies without an atmosphere. All makes

431
00:16:35.990 --> 00:16:38.990
sense, but the idea he's got is

432
00:16:38.990 --> 00:16:41.590
that, uh, by going onto the moon, he can

433
00:16:41.590 --> 00:16:44.270
scale up manufacturing to get to being a

434
00:16:44.270 --> 00:16:47.190
factor of a thousand and a factor of

435
00:16:47.190 --> 00:16:49.930
a million times more than he has on Earth.

436
00:16:50.410 --> 00:16:53.370
So a huge, vast expansion in their

437
00:16:53.930 --> 00:16:56.810
building capacity. And it's a kind

438
00:16:56.810 --> 00:16:59.010
of thing that, huh, many people might poo

439
00:16:59.010 --> 00:17:00.850
poo, but I think if we were talking a decade

440
00:17:00.850 --> 00:17:02.530
ago, people would have been poo pooing the

441
00:17:02.530 --> 00:17:04.929
idea of Starlink. And he's been very

442
00:17:04.929 --> 00:17:06.610
successful getting that off the ground and up

443
00:17:06.610 --> 00:17:09.010
and running. So I wouldn't rule this out. And

444
00:17:09.010 --> 00:17:11.930
long term we are seeing the dawn

445
00:17:11.930 --> 00:17:13.850
of the commercial use of space and the

446
00:17:13.850 --> 00:17:15.490
commercial exploitation of the moon and

447
00:17:15.490 --> 00:17:18.050
asteroids is sure to follow. So it wouldn't

448
00:17:18.050 --> 00:17:19.570
surprise me if other companies are having

449
00:17:19.570 --> 00:17:21.830
similar ideas and it may maybe that SpaceX

450
00:17:22.070 --> 00:17:24.510
are the first but not the only ones to do

451
00:17:24.510 --> 00:17:27.430
this if it happens. What I

452
00:17:27.430 --> 00:17:30.390
found interesting about this is this storey's

453
00:17:30.390 --> 00:17:32.790
going round at exactly the same time that

454
00:17:32.790 --> 00:17:34.550
we're talking about the uncontrolled crash of

455
00:17:34.550 --> 00:17:37.430
the SpaceX rocket to the moon. Which means

456
00:17:37.430 --> 00:17:40.230
you've got this almost a conflict of interest

457
00:17:40.390 --> 00:17:43.110
for SpaceX here because on the one hand

458
00:17:43.510 --> 00:17:45.070
they want to be able to launch their rockets.

459
00:17:45.070 --> 00:17:46.590
They've got to get that tonnage into space,

460
00:17:46.590 --> 00:17:48.550
as Musk says. And if they're launching things

461
00:17:48.550 --> 00:17:51.030
to the moon, that'll leave a lot of rocket

462
00:17:51.030 --> 00:17:52.930
bodies on orbits that could event actually

463
00:17:52.930 --> 00:17:55.250
impact the moon and they're out of control.

464
00:17:55.730 --> 00:17:57.770
Yet at the same time he's looking at building

465
00:17:57.770 --> 00:18:00.610
capacity for manufacturing on the surface of

466
00:18:00.610 --> 00:18:03.570
the moon. Now that strikes me that on the

467
00:18:03.570 --> 00:18:05.890
one hand he's increasing the risk that his

468
00:18:06.130 --> 00:18:08.130
industry will be damaged by his own industry,

469
00:18:08.130 --> 00:18:10.290
if that makes sense. Oh yeah, there's always

470
00:18:10.290 --> 00:18:12.170
a possibility that one of his rockets will

471
00:18:12.170 --> 00:18:14.770
crash into one of his factories. So it may

472
00:18:14.770 --> 00:18:17.490
well be that that leads to a certain amount

473
00:18:17.490 --> 00:18:19.210
of self interest in looking at ways to manage

474
00:18:19.210 --> 00:18:21.890
it that the outcry of astronomers wouldn't.

475
00:18:22.370 --> 00:18:25.360
It's a lot more impelling for

476
00:18:25.360 --> 00:18:27.360
a company like SpaceX to want to find a

477
00:18:27.360 --> 00:18:29.840
solution to a problem that will directly

478
00:18:29.840 --> 00:18:32.000
impact them than a problem that's just

479
00:18:32.000 --> 00:18:33.960
upsetting a few people and is considered a

480
00:18:33.960 --> 00:18:35.040
little niche. So it's going to be really

481
00:18:35.040 --> 00:18:37.360
interesting to see how these two things kind

482
00:18:37.360 --> 00:18:38.840
of develop in parallel, I think.

483
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:42.140
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. Uh, Elon Musk is um,

484
00:18:42.840 --> 00:18:45.160
to some a visionary, to others an absolute

485
00:18:45.160 --> 00:18:48.000
nutter. But uh, when you look at what he's

486
00:18:48.000 --> 00:18:50.920
achieved, you can't deny it. And when he

487
00:18:50.920 --> 00:18:52.760
starts to talk about doing things like this,

488
00:18:53.720 --> 00:18:56.440
you can't say it won't happen because

489
00:18:57.240 --> 00:18:59.120
he's proven that he'll put his money where

490
00:18:59.120 --> 00:19:00.920
his mouth is over and over again.

491
00:19:01.240 --> 00:19:03.240
Jonti Horner: Yeah. Um, and I do try when I'm talking about

492
00:19:03.240 --> 00:19:05.560
this, I know I fail sometimes, but I try to

493
00:19:05.560 --> 00:19:07.360
be as evenhanded as I can be M because I

494
00:19:07.360 --> 00:19:10.160
think very few people are purely good or

495
00:19:10.160 --> 00:19:11.960
purely evil. There's good and bad to most

496
00:19:11.960 --> 00:19:13.240
people and there are good and bad to the

497
00:19:13.240 --> 00:19:15.680
things that people do. And when we've talked

498
00:19:15.680 --> 00:19:18.560
a lot about Starlink, I always want

499
00:19:18.560 --> 00:19:20.280
to be a parent of stress that there is real

500
00:19:20.280 --> 00:19:21.960
benefit comes from this as well. Cause I

501
00:19:21.960 --> 00:19:23.840
think a big mistake people make is only

502
00:19:23.840 --> 00:19:26.260
focusing on the negative. And that doesn't

503
00:19:26.260 --> 00:19:28.180
put you in a good position. You need to look

504
00:19:28.420 --> 00:19:30.500
not to stop things entirely, but to look for

505
00:19:30.500 --> 00:19:32.060
a position where you get the maximum benefit

506
00:19:32.060 --> 00:19:33.740
for the minimum cost. You know that sweet

507
00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:34.180
spot.

508
00:19:34.340 --> 00:19:34.820
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

509
00:19:34.900 --> 00:19:37.820
Jonti Horner: And it is undeniable that Starlink has

510
00:19:37.820 --> 00:19:40.620
brought with it great benefits to people

511
00:19:40.620 --> 00:19:42.460
in terms of being able to access the Internet

512
00:19:42.460 --> 00:19:44.220
and access communication where previously

513
00:19:44.220 --> 00:19:45.940
they weren't able to see, were too remote.

514
00:19:46.100 --> 00:19:48.660
It's also come with associated problems and I

515
00:19:48.660 --> 00:19:51.260
think this kind of endeavour is going to be

516
00:19:51.260 --> 00:19:54.140
the same. It's also probably very fair to say

517
00:19:54.140 --> 00:19:56.930
that that commercial use of the Moon and

518
00:19:56.930 --> 00:19:58.650
commercial use of other things in the solar

519
00:19:58.650 --> 00:20:00.570
system is going to happen whether SpaceX do

520
00:20:00.570 --> 00:20:02.610
it or not. But they're very much at the

521
00:20:02.610 --> 00:20:05.250
forefront. So I don't see an argument to be

522
00:20:05.250 --> 00:20:06.450
made for just saying, oh well, they should

523
00:20:06.450 --> 00:20:08.210
stop this and think about it. I think what's

524
00:20:08.210 --> 00:20:10.730
really important is all this stuff is

525
00:20:10.730 --> 00:20:13.180
discussed very publicly and, um,

526
00:20:13.770 --> 00:20:16.570
we figure out what humanity as a

527
00:20:16.570 --> 00:20:19.210
whole thinks is the right balance to have.

528
00:20:19.690 --> 00:20:21.730
And that's challenging. I mean, it's not a

529
00:20:21.730 --> 00:20:23.250
case of nothing and it's not a case of

530
00:20:23.250 --> 00:20:25.790
everything. But it's probably going to be the

531
00:20:25.790 --> 00:20:28.110
case that, uh, the use of the Moon is just

532
00:20:28.110 --> 00:20:30.110
like the use of low Earth orbit, where the

533
00:20:30.110 --> 00:20:32.790
commercial use rapidly outstrips our,

534
00:20:32.790 --> 00:20:34.950
uh, abilities, at least at first, to

535
00:20:34.950 --> 00:20:36.950
legislate around it and then the legislation

536
00:20:36.950 --> 00:20:39.670
will come afterwards in much the same way. We

537
00:20:39.670 --> 00:20:41.550
were talking last week about previous

538
00:20:41.550 --> 00:20:43.470
examples being things like the Internet or

539
00:20:43.470 --> 00:20:45.670
even the printing press, things like this.

540
00:20:45.670 --> 00:20:48.150
The use always outstrips the legislation.

541
00:20:48.230 --> 00:20:50.620
Then the legislation sprints capture.

542
00:20:51.170 --> 00:20:54.090
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, uh, well, it crawls

543
00:20:54.090 --> 00:20:56.950
in some cases, but I know what you mean. Um,

544
00:20:57.170 --> 00:20:59.890
and look, if SpaceX don't do this, as you

545
00:20:59.890 --> 00:21:02.570
said, someone else will. It's, um, you know,

546
00:21:02.570 --> 00:21:04.610
everyone can point the finger at Elon Musk

547
00:21:04.610 --> 00:21:07.330
and SpaceX and say, oh, naughty. But

548
00:21:07.410 --> 00:21:10.370
if they say, look, yeah, okay, we agree

549
00:21:10.370 --> 00:21:12.490
it's a bad idea, we won't do it, someone else

550
00:21:12.490 --> 00:21:14.610
will. Absolutely, most certainly.

551
00:21:15.330 --> 00:21:18.100
So, uh, it's probably more a case of finding

552
00:21:18.100 --> 00:21:21.100
a way to manage this properly into the future

553
00:21:21.340 --> 00:21:23.500
rather than just saying, no, it shouldn't

554
00:21:23.500 --> 00:21:26.140
happen, shouldn't be done, no way, no how,

555
00:21:26.140 --> 00:21:28.460
because it will happen regardless.

556
00:21:29.660 --> 00:21:31.740
Interesting times ahead. Uh, yeah, a couple

557
00:21:31.740 --> 00:21:34.420
of interesting storeys focused, uh, on the

558
00:21:34.420 --> 00:21:35.940
Moon. And if you want to read about that

559
00:21:35.940 --> 00:21:38.220
impact, you can do that at,

560
00:21:38.540 --> 00:21:39.420
uh, the

561
00:21:40.860 --> 00:21:43.180
space.com website. I knew I'd find it there

562
00:21:43.180 --> 00:21:45.460
somewhere. This is Space Nuts with Andrew

563
00:21:45.460 --> 00:21:47.580
Dunkley and Professor Jonty Horner.

564
00:21:49.640 --> 00:21:51.600
I believe that this nation should commit

565
00:21:51.600 --> 00:21:53.800
itself to achieving the goal,

566
00:21:54.440 --> 00:21:57.360
before this decade is out, of landing a

567
00:21:57.360 --> 00:21:57.560
man

568
00:21:57.560 --> 00:21:59.920
Jonti Horner: on the moon and returning him safely to the

569
00:21:59.920 --> 00:22:01.080
Earth. These nuts.

570
00:22:02.120 --> 00:22:04.440
Andrew Dunkley: Now to something very exciting. We've been

571
00:22:04.440 --> 00:22:07.080
building up to this for quite some time and

572
00:22:07.160 --> 00:22:09.960
as this podcast, uh, goes

573
00:22:09.960 --> 00:22:12.640
out um, the day of release for this one is

574
00:22:12.640 --> 00:22:15.600
the 27th of August. Uh, we are three

575
00:22:15.600 --> 00:22:18.200
days away from the launch

576
00:22:18.440 --> 00:22:20.740
of the Nancy Grey Space Roman

577
00:22:20.900 --> 00:22:23.220
Observatory. That is big time

578
00:22:23.300 --> 00:22:24.100
excitement.

579
00:22:24.660 --> 00:22:26.980
Jonti Horner: It is of course the caveat is that uh, in the

580
00:22:26.980 --> 00:22:28.820
couple of weeks between recording this and it

581
00:22:28.820 --> 00:22:30.940
going live, it could be delayed change, you

582
00:22:30.940 --> 00:22:32.820
know, it's like, like the trains in the uk,

583
00:22:32.820 --> 00:22:34.220
never trust that they're going to arrive

584
00:22:34.220 --> 00:22:35.780
until they actually have done and even then

585
00:22:35.780 --> 00:22:38.620
be sceptical. Yeah, it's that kind of

586
00:22:38.620 --> 00:22:41.100
thing. But in this case that would be quite

587
00:22:41.100 --> 00:22:42.980
startling because until very recently

588
00:22:44.020 --> 00:22:45.980
everybody was expecting this telescope to be

589
00:22:45.980 --> 00:22:48.840
launched next year. So the, the launch,

590
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:51.240
if it goes ahead on 30 August

591
00:22:51.800 --> 00:22:53.880
will be a launch that is nine months ahead of

592
00:22:53.880 --> 00:22:55.960
schedule, which is very, very cool. Now the

593
00:22:55.960 --> 00:22:58.080
scheduled launch time at the time of

594
00:22:58.080 --> 00:23:00.830
recording will be the 30th of August at

595
00:23:00.830 --> 00:23:03.560
uh, 9:26pm Australian

596
00:23:03.560 --> 00:23:05.590
Eastern Standard Time, which is 11, um,

597
00:23:05.960 --> 00:23:08.880
26:00am Universal Time or Greenwich Mean

598
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:11.360
Time. I think a lot of these launches get

599
00:23:11.360 --> 00:23:13.120
streamed online so for those of you who are

600
00:23:13.120 --> 00:23:15.360
keen, there will almost certainly be live

601
00:23:15.360 --> 00:23:17.000
coverage of that. Uh, and a lot of very

602
00:23:17.000 --> 00:23:18.800
nervous people watching the launch hoping

603
00:23:18.800 --> 00:23:21.300
that it doesn't turn into a. Which has

604
00:23:21.300 --> 00:23:22.020
happened before.

605
00:23:22.260 --> 00:23:25.260
Andrew Dunkley: It has. We don't want to think about

606
00:23:25.260 --> 00:23:27.860
that. We're talking $4 billion

607
00:23:28.300 --> 00:23:29.300
worth of hardware.

608
00:23:29.620 --> 00:23:31.380
Jonti Horner: We are. But I mean this is why there are

609
00:23:31.380 --> 00:23:34.270
insurance policies, right? It's um,

610
00:23:35.540 --> 00:23:36.420
there is a risk.

611
00:23:36.500 --> 00:23:38.540
Andrew Dunkley: I'm surprised you'd find an insurance company

612
00:23:38.540 --> 00:23:39.060
willing.

613
00:23:40.100 --> 00:23:41.740
Jonti Horner: I think it's become fairly big business

614
00:23:41.740 --> 00:23:43.860
actually. I mean it's not my area, but I

615
00:23:43.860 --> 00:23:46.730
remember when we went to meetings

616
00:23:46.730 --> 00:23:49.090
a few years ago about off Earth resource

617
00:23:49.090 --> 00:23:50.610
collection, there was discussion about

618
00:23:50.610 --> 00:23:53.130
insurance and stuff like that and apparently

619
00:23:53.130 --> 00:23:55.170
there are insurance underwriters who insure

620
00:23:55.170 --> 00:23:58.010
satellites and launchers and

621
00:23:58.010 --> 00:24:00.370
I think I seem to remember, although I stand

622
00:24:00.370 --> 00:24:02.490
to be corrected on this, that the cluster

623
00:24:02.490 --> 00:24:05.210
mission probably 15, 20 years ago

624
00:24:05.210 --> 00:24:07.890
now blew up on the launch pad and insurance

625
00:24:07.890 --> 00:24:10.410
allowed them to essentially rebuild it and

626
00:24:10.410 --> 00:24:13.180
launch it again. Um, so it does happen, but

627
00:24:13.180 --> 00:24:16.060
fingers crossed, touch wood, there will be no

628
00:24:16.060 --> 00:24:17.940
problems with this. And um, what will happen

629
00:24:17.940 --> 00:24:20.580
is that on the 30th of August a uh, rocket

630
00:24:20.580 --> 00:24:23.020
will take off. SpaceX rocket that will carry

631
00:24:23.020 --> 00:24:25.540
Nancy Grace Roman Telescope

632
00:24:25.940 --> 00:24:28.260
into Earth orbit and beyond will boost

633
00:24:28.900 --> 00:24:30.540
hard, um, just like happened with the James

634
00:24:30.540 --> 00:24:32.420
Webb Space Telescope to give it a good kick

635
00:24:32.420 --> 00:24:34.380
because this thing is destined to go out to

636
00:24:34.380 --> 00:24:37.300
join James Webb at the outer Lagrange point,

637
00:24:37.620 --> 00:24:39.380
um, beyond the Earth, uh, so about a million

638
00:24:39.380 --> 00:24:41.180
kilometres further from the sun than the

639
00:24:41.180 --> 00:24:43.820
Earth is but moving in lockstep with our ah,

640
00:24:43.820 --> 00:24:45.960
at this kind of gravitational sweet spot

641
00:24:45.960 --> 00:24:48.080
where you can hang around fairly safely for a

642
00:24:48.080 --> 00:24:50.960
long time. To do that it is

643
00:24:50.960 --> 00:24:53.720
loaded with what is described as a very

644
00:24:53.720 --> 00:24:56.640
toxic fuel, um, hydrazine.

645
00:24:57.200 --> 00:24:59.000
They want to move away from it but until they

646
00:24:59.000 --> 00:25:00.720
find a better alternative they haven't yet.

647
00:25:00.720 --> 00:25:03.360
So as we talk right now

648
00:25:03.680 --> 00:25:06.160
the spacecraft has been fully fueled

649
00:25:06.400 --> 00:25:08.280
which is why they're fairly confident that

650
00:25:08.280 --> 00:25:11.280
they'll launch on time. That amount of fuel

651
00:25:11.520 --> 00:25:14.080
sets the lifetime of the mission. And there

652
00:25:14.080 --> 00:25:15.780
were similar discussions with Jim James Webb

653
00:25:15.780 --> 00:25:18.340
when it launched a few years ago in that the

654
00:25:18.340 --> 00:25:21.100
nominal mission is five years. So once Nancy

655
00:25:21.100 --> 00:25:23.260
Grace Roman gets to the L2 point and that

656
00:25:23.260 --> 00:25:25.100
journey will take about 100 days from the

657
00:25:25.100 --> 00:25:27.820
launch it is scheduled to have

658
00:25:28.220 --> 00:25:30.700
around a five year mission.

659
00:25:31.660 --> 00:25:34.380
May have a longer mission than that if it

660
00:25:34.380 --> 00:25:37.060
manages to keep hold of its hydrozine fuel.

661
00:25:37.060 --> 00:25:39.280
So what happened with James Webb was uh,

662
00:25:39.280 --> 00:25:41.300
everybody was delighted with how accurately

663
00:25:41.300 --> 00:25:43.780
and beautifully it launched so it needed to

664
00:25:43.780 --> 00:25:46.620
use less fuel to get on station which meant

665
00:25:46.620 --> 00:25:48.760
that have more fuel for a longer life

666
00:25:49.640 --> 00:25:52.640
and therefore the projected mission went from

667
00:25:52.640 --> 00:25:55.560
five years to maybe 10 or 20. Managed to keep

668
00:25:55.560 --> 00:25:57.920
those sorts of fuel and hopefully fingers

669
00:25:57.920 --> 00:26:00.000
crossed, such wood. Again the same will be

670
00:26:00.000 --> 00:26:02.280
true for Nancy Grace Roman Telescope.

671
00:26:03.160 --> 00:26:04.760
People have been really looking forward to

672
00:26:04.760 --> 00:26:07.040
this. Now the first I remember of Nancy Grace

673
00:26:07.040 --> 00:26:09.240
Roman Telescope was when it used to be badged

674
00:26:09.240 --> 00:26:11.680
as wfirst a Wide Field Infrared Survey

675
00:26:11.680 --> 00:26:13.720
Telescope. That was kind of the first

676
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:15.852
proposal and that was going back to 2011,

677
00:26:15.988 --> 00:26:18.930
2012. And shortly after those first

678
00:26:18.930 --> 00:26:21.250
proposals there was a really interesting

679
00:26:21.250 --> 00:26:24.090
storey came out that NASA had been told

680
00:26:24.090 --> 00:26:26.330
that there were suddenly a number of

681
00:26:27.290 --> 00:26:29.450
what are known as National Reconnaissance

682
00:26:29.450 --> 00:26:31.730
Office telescopes made m by the Harris

683
00:26:31.730 --> 00:26:34.570
Corporation. Um, the nro

684
00:26:34.570 --> 00:26:37.250
uh, offered to donate two telescopes to

685
00:26:37.250 --> 00:26:40.130
NASA which are telescopes comparable in

686
00:26:40.130 --> 00:26:41.930
size to the Hubble Space Telescope but a

687
00:26:41.930 --> 00:26:44.500
wider field of view. To put that in other

688
00:26:44.500 --> 00:26:46.940
language. Effectively the defence community

689
00:26:46.940 --> 00:26:48.740
in the US said by the way, we've got a couple

690
00:26:48.740 --> 00:26:50.500
of spy satellites that we're not going to use

691
00:26:50.500 --> 00:26:52.420
so do you want them to actually do science?

692
00:26:53.300 --> 00:26:56.180
Which meant at least to me for the first time

693
00:26:56.180 --> 00:26:57.780
I became aware of the fact that there were a

694
00:26:57.780 --> 00:26:59.820
number of Hubble class telescopes orbiting

695
00:26:59.820 --> 00:27:02.420
the Earth. Looking down, um, I hadn't quite

696
00:27:02.420 --> 00:27:04.220
realised spy satellites had got that big and

697
00:27:04.220 --> 00:27:07.100
that impressive. But anyway

698
00:27:07.100 --> 00:27:08.740
that was a really nice

699
00:27:09.610 --> 00:27:12.290
mechanism through which you know you could do

700
00:27:12.290 --> 00:27:15.130
a cool mission a little bit cheaper. That

701
00:27:15.130 --> 00:27:16.890
got a bit of political interest and all the

702
00:27:16.890 --> 00:27:19.290
rest of it. But over time since

703
00:27:19.610 --> 00:27:22.570
the telescope was planned and then approved

704
00:27:22.570 --> 00:27:25.290
and then built. Now, I must confess

705
00:27:25.290 --> 00:27:27.010
that I don't actually know whether the

706
00:27:27.010 --> 00:27:29.450
current iteration of Nancy Grace Roman is a

707
00:27:29.450 --> 00:27:31.250
former spy satellite or whether they moved

708
00:27:31.250 --> 00:27:34.090
away from that. But what it is going to be is

709
00:27:34.090 --> 00:27:37.090
a space telescope with a mirror 2.4 metres

710
00:27:37.090 --> 00:27:39.370
across, which is your Hubble Space Telescope

711
00:27:39.370 --> 00:27:42.230
size, wider field of view than Hubble

712
00:27:42.950 --> 00:27:45.950
that will observe in the optical and in the

713
00:27:45.950 --> 00:27:48.550
near infrared using two instruments. So it's

714
00:27:48.550 --> 00:27:50.830
going to have a very wonderful wide field

715
00:27:50.830 --> 00:27:53.190
camera. This is a camera with

716
00:27:53.510 --> 00:27:56.510
300 megapixels. So

717
00:27:56.510 --> 00:27:58.590
that's a hell of a lot better than the CCD

718
00:27:58.590 --> 00:28:01.510
camera I've got on my digital telescope here.

719
00:28:01.510 --> 00:28:04.430
On my telescope here. Fabulous camera

720
00:28:04.430 --> 00:28:06.150
that will work at both visible and near

721
00:28:06.150 --> 00:28:08.920
infrared, will be able to take take images in

722
00:28:08.920 --> 00:28:10.920
a wide variety of colour bands and things

723
00:28:10.920 --> 00:28:12.560
like this. So that's going to be a fabulous

724
00:28:13.120 --> 00:28:15.360
camera that allows survey work to be done.

725
00:28:15.600 --> 00:28:18.080
And a lot of the work that is planned for

726
00:28:18.240 --> 00:28:21.040
this incredible telescope will be looking at

727
00:28:21.040 --> 00:28:22.920
the kind of cosmology stuff that you get so

728
00:28:22.920 --> 00:28:25.160
many questions about dark energy and

729
00:28:25.160 --> 00:28:27.200
gravitational lensing and things like this.

730
00:28:27.600 --> 00:28:29.760
Stuff that's a bit outside my professional

731
00:28:29.760 --> 00:28:32.000
wheelhouse, but it's also going to be

732
00:28:32.160 --> 00:28:34.440
carrying out an incredible survey looking for

733
00:28:34.440 --> 00:28:36.640
exoplanets. It's going to stare at the bulge

734
00:28:36.640 --> 00:28:39.350
of the Milky Way galaxy, looking for gravity

735
00:28:39.420 --> 00:28:41.420
gravitational microlensing events, which is

736
00:28:41.420 --> 00:28:43.980
when a planet going around a star where we

737
00:28:43.980 --> 00:28:45.900
can see neither the star nor the planet

738
00:28:46.140 --> 00:28:48.460
passes between us and a more distant star

739
00:28:48.860 --> 00:28:50.740
and some of the light from that sour is bent

740
00:28:50.740 --> 00:28:52.660
and focused towards us, causing the star to

741
00:28:52.660 --> 00:28:55.340
brighten and then fade. That microlensing

742
00:28:55.340 --> 00:28:57.460
event lets us detect the object that we can't

743
00:28:57.460 --> 00:29:00.380
see passing by in between and it

744
00:29:00.380 --> 00:29:02.820
will also let us find free floating planets.

745
00:29:02.820 --> 00:29:05.180
So Nancy Grace Roman Telescope still going to

746
00:29:05.180 --> 00:29:07.580
do a fabulous kind of census type survey

747
00:29:07.980 --> 00:29:10.380
of planets towards the middle of our galaxy

748
00:29:10.380 --> 00:29:13.120
using this micro technique. It's

749
00:29:13.120 --> 00:29:15.400
also carrying its other instrument, which is

750
00:29:15.960 --> 00:29:18.800
a really high contrast camera with a very

751
00:29:18.800 --> 00:29:21.680
small field of view, very different, that is

752
00:29:21.680 --> 00:29:24.280
attached to a coronagraph. And a coronagraph

753
00:29:24.280 --> 00:29:26.760
is a fabulous device that allows you to block

754
00:29:26.760 --> 00:29:29.760
out the light from a light source like

755
00:29:29.760 --> 00:29:32.400
a star and allow you to look at things that

756
00:29:32.400 --> 00:29:34.320
are very near to that light source that would

757
00:29:34.320 --> 00:29:36.680
normally be lost in the glare. And um, this

758
00:29:36.680 --> 00:29:38.800
is planned to take advantage of the fact that

759
00:29:38.800 --> 00:29:40.400
this thing's in space. We don't have the

760
00:29:40.400 --> 00:29:42.680
Earth's atmosphere to deal with to

761
00:29:43.300 --> 00:29:45.580
use both the camera and a spectrograph that

762
00:29:45.580 --> 00:29:48.340
are connected to this coronagraph

763
00:29:48.820 --> 00:29:51.540
to look at exoplanets and actually try and

764
00:29:51.540 --> 00:29:54.260
get direct imaging observations of them and

765
00:29:54.260 --> 00:29:56.220
to learn more about their atmospheres. It'll

766
00:29:56.220 --> 00:29:57.900
be used for planets more like the size of

767
00:29:57.900 --> 00:30:00.180
Jupiter than the Earth, but it's going to be

768
00:30:00.180 --> 00:30:02.420
an incredible tool for learning more about

769
00:30:02.420 --> 00:30:03.780
planets around stars like the sun

770
00:30:03.780 --> 00:30:04.340
effectively.

771
00:30:04.740 --> 00:30:07.210
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it's going to be very exciting and uh,

772
00:30:07.300 --> 00:30:09.220
can't wait. Hopefully everything will run

773
00:30:09.300 --> 00:30:12.180
according to plan on August 30th, which

774
00:30:12.400 --> 00:30:14.710
uh, by the time this, this podcast is

775
00:30:14.710 --> 00:30:17.630
released we'll be three days away. And

776
00:30:18.080 --> 00:30:21.070
um, yeah, we wait with bated breath. Uh, it's

777
00:30:21.070 --> 00:30:23.590
only got to go a million kilometres to get

778
00:30:23.590 --> 00:30:26.510
where it's going which will take um, it's not

779
00:30:26.510 --> 00:30:28.550
a heck of a long trip but it's going to take

780
00:30:28.550 --> 00:30:31.350
them ah, a little while to get there. I can't

781
00:30:31.350 --> 00:30:32.670
remember how long it was now.

782
00:30:33.070 --> 00:30:35.470
Jonti Horner: Oh well it's 100 days to roll on out to the

783
00:30:35.470 --> 00:30:37.470
Lagrange point for a start and then it'll be

784
00:30:37.470 --> 00:30:40.470
time to get yourself fired up and

785
00:30:40.470 --> 00:30:42.270
get all the testing done and all the rest of

786
00:30:42.270 --> 00:30:44.770
it. But it's going to be a fabulous tool and

787
00:30:44.770 --> 00:30:47.530
I think, I know I myself, my

788
00:30:47.530 --> 00:30:49.810
research is mainly theoretical, I'm mainly

789
00:30:49.810 --> 00:30:51.490
working on computers and to be honest I'm at

790
00:30:51.490 --> 00:30:53.290
a stage in my career and I'm sure Fred Watson

791
00:30:53.290 --> 00:30:54.650
can empathise with this where I'm becoming

792
00:30:54.650 --> 00:30:56.450
more of an administrator and a supervisor

793
00:30:56.450 --> 00:30:58.610
than I am a researcher. But um, I know

794
00:30:58.610 --> 00:31:00.890
colleagues of mine at UNISQ have been very

795
00:31:00.890 --> 00:31:03.290
successful in getting time to use the James

796
00:31:03.290 --> 00:31:05.290
Webb Space Telescope to study exoplanet

797
00:31:05.290 --> 00:31:06.770
atmospheres. And I'm thinking here

798
00:31:06.770 --> 00:31:09.130
particularly of George Zhao and Chelsea Huang

799
00:31:09.130 --> 00:31:11.210
who are really uh, truly world class

800
00:31:11.210 --> 00:31:13.570
scientists and I think they are waiting with

801
00:31:13.570 --> 00:31:15.670
bated breath to see what be able to do with

802
00:31:15.670 --> 00:31:18.270
this. So yes, you'll get a lot of discoveries

803
00:31:18.270 --> 00:31:20.030
coming out from the us but we will have

804
00:31:20.030 --> 00:31:22.270
Australian involvement looking at this and

805
00:31:22.430 --> 00:31:24.670
getting amazing results right here in

806
00:31:24.670 --> 00:31:26.870
Australia and for people living in other

807
00:31:26.870 --> 00:31:28.510
countries, other countries will have their

808
00:31:28.510 --> 00:31:30.830
own scientists beavering away

809
00:31:31.310 --> 00:31:33.710
using Nancy Grey's Roman telescope to do

810
00:31:33.710 --> 00:31:35.630
amazing, amazing things indeed.

811
00:31:35.790 --> 00:31:38.630
Andrew Dunkley: And uh, we will uh, obviously let you

812
00:31:38.630 --> 00:31:41.630
know how it all goes uh, once we know

813
00:31:42.300 --> 00:31:44.140
whether or not it launched on time, whether

814
00:31:44.140 --> 00:31:46.650
or not anything fingers crossed happened to

815
00:31:46.650 --> 00:31:49.100
uh, slow it down, whatever. Hopefully not. It

816
00:31:49.980 --> 00:31:52.860
should all go according to plan one

817
00:31:52.860 --> 00:31:55.340
hopes. Um, anyway we'll watch with interest

818
00:31:55.340 --> 00:31:57.100
and you can read that storey also on

819
00:31:57.100 --> 00:31:59.060
space.com, but uh, there are plenty of

820
00:31:59.060 --> 00:32:01.340
platforms carrying the storey of the Nancy

821
00:32:01.340 --> 00:32:03.710
Grace Roman Observatory. And um,

822
00:32:03.980 --> 00:32:06.380
if all goes to plan, there'll be many, many

823
00:32:06.380 --> 00:32:08.820
more storeys in a few days time. This is

824
00:32:08.820 --> 00:32:11.460
Space Nuts and you're uh, with Andrew Dunkley

825
00:32:11.460 --> 00:32:12.860
and Professor Jonty Horn.

826
00:32:16.120 --> 00:32:18.200
Jonti Horner: Three, two, one.

827
00:32:18.840 --> 00:32:20.040
Space Nuts.

828
00:32:20.360 --> 00:32:22.280
Andrew Dunkley: And seeing we've got a few minutes up our

829
00:32:22.280 --> 00:32:24.920
sleeve, we'll go on to our third and final

830
00:32:24.920 --> 00:32:25.320
storey.

831
00:32:25.480 --> 00:32:27.960
And this one involves three, uh,

832
00:32:28.280 --> 00:32:30.960
moons of Neptune which they think,

833
00:32:30.960 --> 00:32:33.360
according to a new study, might have uh, been

834
00:32:33.360 --> 00:32:35.800
created in a rather

835
00:32:36.350 --> 00:32:38.560
um, Earth, uh, shattering or Neptune

836
00:32:38.560 --> 00:32:41.210
shattering way involving the moon

837
00:32:41.210 --> 00:32:43.970
Triton, which is also a very mysterious

838
00:32:43.970 --> 00:32:45.330
place in our solar system.

839
00:32:46.050 --> 00:32:48.090
Jonti Horner: Yeah, and this is a fascinating one. Now some

840
00:32:48.090 --> 00:32:50.810
of the coverage of this has been kind of

841
00:32:50.810 --> 00:32:53.210
presenting this as a new theory that's come

842
00:32:53.210 --> 00:32:54.770
up from the observations. And to me it's

843
00:32:54.770 --> 00:32:57.170
actually a bit the other way around where

844
00:32:57.170 --> 00:32:59.250
these are observations that are potentially

845
00:32:59.250 --> 00:33:01.810
supporting ideas that have been held for a

846
00:33:01.810 --> 00:33:04.770
fair while. Now. Neptune has a

847
00:33:04.770 --> 00:33:07.210
system of satellites like the other giant

848
00:33:07.210 --> 00:33:09.730
planets in the ice giant Uranus. But

849
00:33:09.730 --> 00:33:12.350
Neptune's is unusual. You've a

850
00:33:12.350 --> 00:33:15.310
real behemoth of a moon in the form of Triton

851
00:33:15.870 --> 00:33:18.710
that along with our moon is one of the two

852
00:33:18.710 --> 00:33:20.950
oddest moons of any planet in the solar

853
00:33:20.950 --> 00:33:23.310
system. To give a bit of context from that

854
00:33:23.310 --> 00:33:26.150
and take a step back, aside from our moon and

855
00:33:26.150 --> 00:33:29.070
Triton, all of the other hundreds of moons

856
00:33:29.070 --> 00:33:31.510
in the solar system fall into two real

857
00:33:31.510 --> 00:33:33.870
categories. You've got regular satellites

858
00:33:34.190 --> 00:33:37.150
which fall on orbits

859
00:33:37.150 --> 00:33:39.110
that are above the equators of their planets,

860
00:33:39.110 --> 00:33:41.190
are very close in and they're going around on

861
00:33:41.190 --> 00:33:43.030
circular orbits that are in the same

862
00:33:43.030 --> 00:33:45.310
direction as a planet's spin. And they're

863
00:33:45.310 --> 00:33:47.470
thought to have formed particularly around

864
00:33:47.470 --> 00:33:50.030
the gas giant planets, but also around Uranus

865
00:33:50.030 --> 00:33:52.150
and Neptune in much the same way that the

866
00:33:52.150 --> 00:33:53.710
planets formed around the sun in that you had

867
00:33:53.710 --> 00:33:55.390
a disc of material around the planet and

868
00:33:55.390 --> 00:33:57.190
moons formed in that disc. They're quite

869
00:33:57.190 --> 00:34:00.070
compact and close in. You've

870
00:34:00.070 --> 00:34:02.470
then got irregular satellites which are um,

871
00:34:02.470 --> 00:34:04.790
much, much, much further from their planets,

872
00:34:05.510 --> 00:34:07.750
um, are found around. The outer planets

873
00:34:08.310 --> 00:34:11.230
are moving on a wide range of very elongated,

874
00:34:11.230 --> 00:34:14.130
often retrograde orbits to be captured

875
00:34:14.130 --> 00:34:16.610
objects that have then been smashed into

876
00:34:16.610 --> 00:34:19.570
pieces, giving you families of satellites.

877
00:34:19.810 --> 00:34:21.770
And it's these that give Jupiter and Saturn

878
00:34:21.770 --> 00:34:23.930
in particular such incredible numbers of

879
00:34:23.930 --> 00:34:26.090
satellites. More than 100 for Jupiter, more

880
00:34:26.090 --> 00:34:27.970
than 200 for Saturn, currently known.

881
00:34:29.730 --> 00:34:32.330
Triton and our moon stand out as

882
00:34:32.330 --> 00:34:34.610
oddities because they don't quite fit either

883
00:34:34.610 --> 00:34:37.210
class. And for Earth's

884
00:34:37.210 --> 00:34:39.530
satellite, the moon, the origin of the moon

885
00:34:39.530 --> 00:34:41.490
seems to have been a giant impact, very

886
00:34:41.490 --> 00:34:43.490
different to either scenario. For the Regular

887
00:34:43.490 --> 00:34:46.270
irregular sate. But Triton around

888
00:34:46.270 --> 00:34:49.190
Neptune is really kind of weird.

889
00:34:49.190 --> 00:34:51.670
It's a moon that is 2,700 kilometres in

890
00:34:51.670 --> 00:34:54.670
diameter. It's a chunky

891
00:34:54.670 --> 00:34:57.510
boy. It is close enough in that it

892
00:34:57.510 --> 00:34:59.030
would normally be considered one of the

893
00:34:59.030 --> 00:35:01.550
regular satellites. And it is orbiting

894
00:35:01.790 --> 00:35:04.190
pretty much above Neptune's equator. But it's

895
00:35:04.190 --> 00:35:06.390
going around the wrong way. It's moving on a

896
00:35:06.390 --> 00:35:09.190
retrograde orbit when all of the other

897
00:35:09.190 --> 00:35:11.470
moons in the inner part of the Neptune system

898
00:35:11.470 --> 00:35:14.020
are going around on a programme red orbit. So

899
00:35:14.020 --> 00:35:16.700
there is no real possibility that Triton

900
00:35:16.700 --> 00:35:18.700
could have formed where it is today. And

901
00:35:18.700 --> 00:35:21.380
that's led for many decades

902
00:35:21.540 --> 00:35:23.420
people to speculate as to the origin of

903
00:35:23.420 --> 00:35:26.420
Triton. And typically the two main ideas

904
00:35:26.420 --> 00:35:29.340
are either that it was formed by a

905
00:35:29.340 --> 00:35:31.940
transeptunion object or an object like Pluto

906
00:35:32.420 --> 00:35:34.700
coming into the Neptune system, colliding

907
00:35:34.700 --> 00:35:36.300
with the moon, knocking that moon out of

908
00:35:36.300 --> 00:35:38.260
orbit, and Triton being captured by the

909
00:35:38.260 --> 00:35:40.980
exchange of angular momentum. That's not

910
00:35:40.980 --> 00:35:42.300
really the favourite idea though. The

911
00:35:42.300 --> 00:35:44.940
favoured idea is that you had a binary object

912
00:35:44.940 --> 00:35:47.340
a bit like Pluto and Charon, or

913
00:35:47.980 --> 00:35:50.180
many of the transeptunion objects are these

914
00:35:50.180 --> 00:35:53.100
quite wide binaries of objects with similar

915
00:35:53.100 --> 00:35:55.780
sizes. You had one of these

916
00:35:55.780 --> 00:35:57.940
objects in the early days of the solar

917
00:35:57.940 --> 00:35:59.780
system, came very close to Neptune and you

918
00:35:59.780 --> 00:36:01.540
had this three body encounter where you've

919
00:36:01.540 --> 00:36:04.380
got Triton and um, its companion,

920
00:36:04.380 --> 00:36:06.180
which was possibly another object the size of

921
00:36:06.180 --> 00:36:09.050
Pluto, bound together, coming

922
00:36:09.050 --> 00:36:11.130
so close to Neptune that Neptune tore the

923
00:36:11.130 --> 00:36:14.010
couple apart. As it tore them apart,

924
00:36:14.010 --> 00:36:16.490
Triton was moving around its shared centre of

925
00:36:16.490 --> 00:36:19.410
mass with its partner at such a speed that it

926
00:36:19.410 --> 00:36:21.290
was moving slower than the escape velocity of

927
00:36:21.290 --> 00:36:23.770
Neptune. So one component of the binary was

928
00:36:23.770 --> 00:36:25.690
flung out and the other was captured. And

929
00:36:25.690 --> 00:36:27.610
that's a way to slow something down enough

930
00:36:27.610 --> 00:36:30.450
that it can be captured. So you trap Triton

931
00:36:30.450 --> 00:36:33.090
into this orbit that is retrograde,

932
00:36:33.490 --> 00:36:35.910
going around the wrong way around that

933
00:36:35.910 --> 00:36:38.110
quickly damps down to become circular because

934
00:36:38.110 --> 00:36:40.230
of tidal effects with Neptune.

935
00:36:41.270 --> 00:36:43.030
Now that seems to be the storey of Triton.

936
00:36:43.030 --> 00:36:45.310
And what supports this is that the regular

937
00:36:45.310 --> 00:36:47.870
satellites of Neptune are uh, pretty small

938
00:36:47.870 --> 00:36:50.750
and insignificant and smaller and

939
00:36:50.750 --> 00:36:53.550
more insignificant than the similar satellite

940
00:36:53.550 --> 00:36:55.150
systems of the other planets. They seem to be

941
00:36:55.150 --> 00:36:56.750
a bit smaller and more weedy than you'd

942
00:36:56.750 --> 00:36:57.670
expect them to be.

943
00:36:57.910 --> 00:36:58.470
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

944
00:36:58.630 --> 00:37:00.950
Jonti Horner: So the idea is that the capture of a moon the

945
00:37:00.950 --> 00:37:03.830
size of Triton would be pretty dramatic

946
00:37:03.830 --> 00:37:05.830
and would destabilise the Neptune system.

947
00:37:06.470 --> 00:37:09.170
The outside Triton, Nereid, which was the

948
00:37:09.170 --> 00:37:11.610
second moon to be found around Neptune, is a

949
00:37:11.610 --> 00:37:14.090
really interesting one because it's a fair

950
00:37:14.090 --> 00:37:15.890
bit further out than Triton but it's moving

951
00:37:15.890 --> 00:37:18.690
on this really elongated prograde orbit.

952
00:37:18.770 --> 00:37:20.490
And um, it's thought that that may well have

953
00:37:20.490 --> 00:37:23.490
been initially a regular satellite

954
00:37:23.490 --> 00:37:25.610
that was destabilised by Triton and flung

955
00:37:25.610 --> 00:37:27.810
onto this longer orbit. It's not really

956
00:37:27.810 --> 00:37:30.250
considered an irregular moon even though it

957
00:37:30.250 --> 00:37:32.290
behaves a bit like when it's really close in.

958
00:37:32.530 --> 00:37:34.710
But the moon's closer to Neptune, Neptune

959
00:37:34.710 --> 00:37:37.310
than Triton, of which there are seven known.

960
00:37:37.310 --> 00:37:39.390
We've got Naiad, Thalassa, Despina,

961
00:37:39.550 --> 00:37:42.430
Galatea, Larissa, Hippocamp and Proteus.

962
00:37:43.310 --> 00:37:45.550
They're all relatively small.

963
00:37:45.790 --> 00:37:48.430
Proteus is the biggest at 420ks.

964
00:37:48.590 --> 00:37:51.430
The rest are not quite as big. And um, the

965
00:37:51.430 --> 00:37:53.150
only images we've got up close and personal

966
00:37:53.230 --> 00:37:55.790
come from the Voyager 2 spacecraft in 1989

967
00:37:55.790 --> 00:37:57.390
that show these moons to be a little bit

968
00:37:57.390 --> 00:38:00.150
irregular. And um, they're also a little bit

969
00:38:00.150 --> 00:38:03.110
more stirred up and agitated in orbital

970
00:38:03.110 --> 00:38:05.870
tilts and orbital eccentricities than in,

971
00:38:06.490 --> 00:38:08.130
I mean they're barely tilted and they're

972
00:38:08.130 --> 00:38:10.610
barely on non circular orbits but you'd

973
00:38:10.610 --> 00:38:12.490
expect them, if they were properly original

974
00:38:12.490 --> 00:38:14.490
regulars to be totally circular.

975
00:38:15.610 --> 00:38:18.490
So the idea is maybe Triton stir them up.

976
00:38:19.050 --> 00:38:21.210
Now one of the suggestions to explain why

977
00:38:21.210 --> 00:38:23.970
they're all so small is that Triton as it was

978
00:38:23.970 --> 00:38:26.130
captured and then at its migrated senses,

979
00:38:26.130 --> 00:38:27.570
stirred them up enough that the original

980
00:38:27.570 --> 00:38:30.290
moons were destroyed. It stirred them onto

981
00:38:30.290 --> 00:38:32.910
all bits that collided with each other that

982
00:38:32.910 --> 00:38:34.870
formed a new disc of material. Some was lost

983
00:38:34.870 --> 00:38:37.580
but new moons were born of the process. And

984
00:38:37.580 --> 00:38:39.990
uh, that's become kind of like the canonical

985
00:38:40.230 --> 00:38:42.630
understanding of what we think happened to

986
00:38:42.630 --> 00:38:44.070
Neptune's moons in the early days.

987
00:38:44.070 --> 00:38:46.630
And that all a lot of background brings us to

988
00:38:46.630 --> 00:38:48.910
the new observations. As I say, the

989
00:38:48.910 --> 00:38:51.710
observations we had before came from

990
00:38:51.710 --> 00:38:54.070
Voyager 2. That's the up close and personal

991
00:38:54.070 --> 00:38:56.670
we've got. But there's been some new work

992
00:38:56.670 --> 00:38:59.190
done using the James Webb Space Telescope to

993
00:38:59.190 --> 00:39:01.910
get data ah on three of these moons,

994
00:39:02.070 --> 00:39:05.020
Lara, Larissa and Galatea being two of them

995
00:39:05.180 --> 00:39:07.590
and I think the third one was um,

996
00:39:07.660 --> 00:39:10.140
possibly um, the next one out

997
00:39:10.140 --> 00:39:12.380
Proteus have to double cheque that but I

998
00:39:12.380 --> 00:39:14.660
think it was. And what they found though was

999
00:39:14.660 --> 00:39:17.350
when they looked at both Larissa and

1000
00:39:17.350 --> 00:39:20.180
um, Galatea, they

1001
00:39:20.180 --> 00:39:22.940
found clear signals of clay

1002
00:39:22.940 --> 00:39:25.580
type minerals on the surfaces of these moons.

1003
00:39:26.300 --> 00:39:28.300
Now that's really unexpected.

1004
00:39:29.200 --> 00:39:31.820
Clay minerals form at uh,

1005
00:39:31.840 --> 00:39:33.360
temperatures high enough for you to have

1006
00:39:33.360 --> 00:39:36.080
liquid water because clays are formed in the

1007
00:39:36.080 --> 00:39:38.680
presence of liquid water. And the surfaces of

1008
00:39:38.680 --> 00:39:41.640
moons in Neptune's orbit are blooming cold.

1009
00:39:41.640 --> 00:39:44.399
You know, they're like 180200 degrees below

1010
00:39:44.399 --> 00:39:46.640
freezing, which is not where you'd expect to

1011
00:39:46.640 --> 00:39:48.840
find liquid water. So what the authors are

1012
00:39:48.840 --> 00:39:51.560
proposing is that, uh, the surfaces of these

1013
00:39:51.560 --> 00:39:53.120
moons, which look, to be honest, more like

1014
00:39:53.120 --> 00:39:54.960
the surfaces of asteroids in the asteroid

1015
00:39:54.960 --> 00:39:57.830
belt, are actually made from

1016
00:39:57.830 --> 00:40:00.470
material that was once deep in the interior

1017
00:40:00.870 --> 00:40:03.750
of moons that formed before, that therefore

1018
00:40:03.750 --> 00:40:05.790
got hot enough for liquid water to be

1019
00:40:05.790 --> 00:40:07.350
present. And we've talked a lot before about

1020
00:40:07.350 --> 00:40:09.110
other moons in the solar system that have

1021
00:40:09.110 --> 00:40:11.910
subsurface oceans. So you have these

1022
00:40:12.070 --> 00:40:13.670
first generation of moons with their

1023
00:40:13.670 --> 00:40:16.390
subsurface oceans water present

1024
00:40:16.630 --> 00:40:18.470
high enough temperatures for you to develop

1025
00:40:18.470 --> 00:40:21.390
all these clay minerals. Then those moons get

1026
00:40:21.390 --> 00:40:23.790
stirred up. When Triton is captured, there

1027
00:40:23.790 --> 00:40:25.470
are collisions, they're smashed apart, and

1028
00:40:25.470 --> 00:40:28.230
you create a disc of material around Neptune

1029
00:40:28.930 --> 00:40:30.770
that contains the material from the old

1030
00:40:30.770 --> 00:40:33.690
moons, clays and all. Then you form new

1031
00:40:33.690 --> 00:40:35.770
moons, and some of those new moons have that

1032
00:40:35.770 --> 00:40:38.770
clay material on their surface. So what's

1033
00:40:38.770 --> 00:40:41.190
been argued essentially, is that this, uh,

1034
00:40:41.450 --> 00:40:43.850
detection of clays in the last place you'd

1035
00:40:43.850 --> 00:40:46.690
expect to find them is like the smoking gun.

1036
00:40:46.690 --> 00:40:49.210
It's a clue that is telling us about the

1037
00:40:49.210 --> 00:40:51.050
heritage of this system, about events that

1038
00:40:51.050 --> 00:40:53.330
happened more than 4 billion years ago.

1039
00:40:53.890 --> 00:40:55.530
And he's telling us about this kind of

1040
00:40:55.530 --> 00:40:57.490
collisional history and the dramatic storey

1041
00:40:57.490 --> 00:40:59.570
of the Neptune satellite system. I think it's

1042
00:40:59.570 --> 00:41:02.150
an astonish, astonishingly cool result. And

1043
00:41:02.150 --> 00:41:04.270
it's really cool for me, as someone who's

1044
00:41:04.350 --> 00:41:06.470
read about Triton a lot in the past, thought

1045
00:41:06.470 --> 00:41:08.790
about it a lot, that the ideas that were

1046
00:41:08.790 --> 00:41:10.630
being put around even when I was a teenager

1047
00:41:10.630 --> 00:41:12.630
and listening to talks at my local astronomy

1048
00:41:12.630 --> 00:41:15.070
society about the disruption of the Neptune

1049
00:41:15.070 --> 00:41:17.550
satellite system are suddenly finding a test,

1050
00:41:17.550 --> 00:41:20.070
thanks to people using James Webb. So theory

1051
00:41:20.070 --> 00:41:22.710
making a prediction, that prediction getting

1052
00:41:22.710 --> 00:41:25.070
more support. I think this is really lovely.

1053
00:41:25.230 --> 00:41:27.470
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it is. Uh, and it certainly shows the

1054
00:41:27.470 --> 00:41:30.200
worth of James Webb. And very soon, the

1055
00:41:30.200 --> 00:41:32.180
Nancy Grace Roman Observatory, we're, uh,

1056
00:41:32.400 --> 00:41:33.960
going to learn more and more about some of

1057
00:41:33.960 --> 00:41:36.080
those, um, not so deep

1058
00:41:36.240 --> 00:41:39.160
mysteries in the scheme of things. It's not

1059
00:41:39.160 --> 00:41:41.280
far away, Neptune, but, uh, it's far enough

1060
00:41:41.280 --> 00:41:44.160
away to still be mysterious in many

1061
00:41:44.160 --> 00:41:46.760
ways. We really need to send a mission out

1062
00:41:46.760 --> 00:41:48.160
there again soon, don't we?

1063
00:41:48.240 --> 00:41:50.000
Jonti Horner: I was just thinking that there's been a lot

1064
00:41:50.000 --> 00:41:53.000
of talk over the last decade

1065
00:41:53.000 --> 00:41:55.385
or so, really, with solar system astronomers,

1066
00:41:55.385 --> 00:41:56.980
astronomers getting more and more

1067
00:41:56.980 --> 00:41:59.780
enthusiastic about the idea of sending new

1068
00:41:59.780 --> 00:42:02.450
spacecraft out to Uranus and Neptune. Um,

1069
00:42:02.450 --> 00:42:04.020
there's always debate when

1070
00:42:05.140 --> 00:42:07.580
it's time to pitch new missions for NASA, of

1071
00:42:07.580 --> 00:42:10.580
the different scales people put in competing

1072
00:42:10.580 --> 00:42:13.020
proposals. And I know at the Last round there

1073
00:42:13.020 --> 00:42:14.620
were a number of proposals of missions to

1074
00:42:14.620 --> 00:42:16.220
Venus because we've not been there for a long

1075
00:42:16.220 --> 00:42:18.420
time in terms of the Americans sent me. I

1076
00:42:18.420 --> 00:42:21.300
know Japan had a fabulous orbit, are doing

1077
00:42:21.300 --> 00:42:23.710
some great work there. There were also some

1078
00:42:23.710 --> 00:42:26.070
really strong proposals of missions

1079
00:42:26.470 --> 00:42:28.830
to Uranus and Neptune. I think this was a

1080
00:42:28.830 --> 00:42:31.190
kind of medium sized stuff, so not Nancy

1081
00:42:31.190 --> 00:42:34.190
Grace Roman pots of money, but more the $400

1082
00:42:34.190 --> 00:42:36.430
million rather than $4 billion price

1083
00:42:36.430 --> 00:42:39.070
missions. And in the last round I think the

1084
00:42:39.070 --> 00:42:41.990
Venus missions won. But there is this growing

1085
00:42:42.550 --> 00:42:45.190
longing to get missions to go back there

1086
00:42:45.270 --> 00:42:47.150
and actually have orbiters because both

1087
00:42:47.150 --> 00:42:49.830
Uranus and Neptune, the only up close and

1088
00:42:49.830 --> 00:42:51.510
personal we've had with them were the Voyager

1089
00:42:51.510 --> 00:42:54.190
spacecraft that launched in 1979.

1090
00:42:55.470 --> 00:42:57.550
You know, launched back when I was one year

1091
00:42:57.550 --> 00:42:57.870
old.

1092
00:42:58.270 --> 00:42:58.710
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

1093
00:42:58.710 --> 00:43:01.070
Jonti Horner: And flew past Uranus and Neptune. It was only

1094
00:43:01.070 --> 00:43:03.310
Voyager 2 that got there. Voyager 1 went off

1095
00:43:03.310 --> 00:43:05.590
on a different journey. So we've had one

1096
00:43:05.590 --> 00:43:07.470
spacecraft that flew past faster than a

1097
00:43:07.470 --> 00:43:09.350
speeding bullet, that spent less than a day

1098
00:43:09.350 --> 00:43:11.390
within good imaging distance of these

1099
00:43:11.390 --> 00:43:14.390
planets, return really tantalising

1100
00:43:14.390 --> 00:43:17.260
information and then departed. And we've

1101
00:43:17.260 --> 00:43:19.580
seen how much we learned from Galileo at

1102
00:43:19.580 --> 00:43:22.380
Jupiter, from Cassini at Saturn, from Juno at

1103
00:43:22.380 --> 00:43:24.700
Jupiter. So there's this growing body of

1104
00:43:24.700 --> 00:43:26.660
scientists who are desperate to see this

1105
00:43:26.660 --> 00:43:29.220
happen. Won't be cheap. And the other thing

1106
00:43:29.220 --> 00:43:31.820
is, if such a mission was approved like next

1107
00:43:31.820 --> 00:43:34.020
week, probably wouldn't launch for the best

1108
00:43:34.020 --> 00:43:36.300
part of a decade and it would take the best

1109
00:43:36.300 --> 00:43:38.500
part of a decade to get there. So it's the

1110
00:43:38.500 --> 00:43:39.860
kind of thing where we're talking now. And

1111
00:43:39.860 --> 00:43:42.100
I'll probably be retarded, retired when these

1112
00:43:42.100 --> 00:43:43.260
spacecraft get there.

1113
00:43:43.260 --> 00:43:44.700
Andrew Dunkley: I don't want to think about it.

1114
00:43:47.980 --> 00:43:49.900
I don't think I'll be beyond retired.

1115
00:43:49.900 --> 00:43:51.980
Jonti Horner: Let's just say that the sooner the better

1116
00:43:51.980 --> 00:43:52.940
that we get there then.

1117
00:43:53.020 --> 00:43:55.900
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, indeed, great storey. You can read

1118
00:43:55.900 --> 00:43:58.660
about it online. Um, plenty of, uh, platforms

1119
00:43:58.660 --> 00:44:01.060
have got storeys about uh, Neptune

1120
00:44:01.060 --> 00:44:03.660
satellites. You can read the scientific paper

1121
00:44:03.820 --> 00:44:06.140
in detail at the journal Science

1122
00:44:06.220 --> 00:44:08.780
Advances. That brings us to the end.

1123
00:44:08.780 --> 00:44:09.980
Jonty, thank you very much.

1124
00:44:10.140 --> 00:44:11.620
Jonti Horner: That's an absolute pleasure. Thank you for

1125
00:44:11.620 --> 00:44:12.140
having me.

1126
00:44:12.600 --> 00:44:14.320
Andrew Dunkley: Always a pleasure. Professor, uh, John de

1127
00:44:14.320 --> 00:44:16.440
Horner, professor of Astrophysics at the

1128
00:44:17.160 --> 00:44:19.200
University of Southern Queensland. Between

1129
00:44:19.200 --> 00:44:21.400
episodes, don't forget to visit our website

1130
00:44:21.640 --> 00:44:24.520
for um, things to see and do like

1131
00:44:24.520 --> 00:44:26.760
you can, um, send us messages or questions

1132
00:44:26.760 --> 00:44:28.560
through the Ask me anything button at the

1133
00:44:28.560 --> 00:44:31.520
top. It's labelled ama. You can sign up for

1134
00:44:31.520 --> 00:44:33.280
the Astronomy AstroDailyPod feed. Uh, please

1135
00:44:33.280 --> 00:44:35.680
leave reviews about the podcast wherever you

1136
00:44:35.680 --> 00:44:38.600
listen to us and visit, uh, the Space

1137
00:44:38.600 --> 00:44:40.440
Nuts shop while you're there.

1138
00:44:40.760 --> 00:44:43.470
Um, Father's Day in Australia coming up

1139
00:44:43.470 --> 00:44:45.150
soon. That's, you know, you might find

1140
00:44:45.150 --> 00:44:46.990
something good in there. A couple of good

1141
00:44:46.990 --> 00:44:48.590
books have been released lately. You might

1142
00:44:48.830 --> 00:44:51.620
like the little cat, maybe. Uh,

1143
00:44:51.630 --> 00:44:54.310
and, uh, thanks to Huw in the studio couldn't

1144
00:44:54.310 --> 00:44:56.830
be with us today. He was actually driving

1145
00:44:56.910 --> 00:44:59.830
over to, um, get to the studio

1146
00:44:59.830 --> 00:45:02.710
for us today. But then, uh, as was

1147
00:45:02.710 --> 00:45:05.310
the case with Neptune, uh, he got hit by a

1148
00:45:05.310 --> 00:45:07.310
Mitsubishi Triton and that was the end of

1149
00:45:07.310 --> 00:45:09.790
that. Uh, and from me, Andrew Dunkley. Oh,

1150
00:45:09.790 --> 00:45:12.030
he's actually okay, you know, he just

1151
00:45:12.030 --> 00:45:13.550
couldn't make it. And from me, Andrew

1152
00:45:13.550 --> 00:45:14.950
Dunkley. Thanks for your company. We'll catch

1153
00:45:14.950 --> 00:45:17.030
you on the next episode of Space Nuts. Bye.

1154
00:45:17.030 --> 00:45:20.030
Bye. You've been listening to the

1155
00:45:20.030 --> 00:45:20.790
Space Nuts

1156
00:45:20.790 --> 00:45:23.750
Jonti Horner: podcast, available at

1157
00:45:23.750 --> 00:45:25.750
Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

1158
00:45:25.989 --> 00:45:28.670
iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast

1159
00:45:28.670 --> 00:45:30.430
player. You can also stream on

1160
00:45:30.430 --> 00:45:32.070
demand@bytes.com.

1161
00:45:32.390 --> 00:45:34.470
Andrew Dunkley: this has been another quality podcast

1162
00:45:34.470 --> 00:45:36.280
production from bytes.com.

1163
00:45:36.280 --> 00:45:37.130
Jonti Horner: um,
Send a Voicemail