April 30, 2026

Nuclear Power in Space, SETI from the Moon & the Hubble Tension Unravelled

Nuclear Power in Space, SETI from the Moon & the Hubble Tension Unravelled

Sponsor Link: To check out our special NordVPN deal with big savings and 4 extra months free, visit https://nordvpn.com/spacenuts Nuclear Space Policies, SETI from the Moon, and the Hubble Tension In this riveting episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew...

Sponsor Link:
To check out our special NordVPN deal with big savings and 4 extra months free, visit nordvpn.com/spacenuts

Nuclear Space Policies, SETI from the Moon, and the Hubble Tension In this riveting episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into a range of fascinating topics that are shaping the future of space exploration. From the Pentagon's new nuclear energy policy for space missions to the exciting potential of searching for extraterrestrial intelligence from the far side of the Moon, this episode is packed with insights that will leave you pondering the cosmos.
Episode Highlights:
- Nuclear Energy in Space: Andrew and Fred Watson discuss the recent directive from the Pentagon to NASA for the development of nuclear power stations in space, exploring the implications for lunar and orbital power supply systems. They examine the benefits and challenges of using nuclear energy in space, addressing public concerns and the potential for collaboration among government agencies.
- SETI from the Far Side of the Moon: The hosts explore the advantages of conducting the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) from the Moon's far side, where Earthly radio noise is absent. They discuss the capabilities of China's Chang'e 4 mission and its low-frequency radio spectrometer, which is attempting to detect technosignatures that could indicate the presence of alien life.
- The Hubble Tension Debate: Andrew and Fred Watson unpack the ongoing debate surrounding the Hubble constant, highlighting the discrepancies between measurements obtained through different methods. They discuss new research that aims to refine our understanding of the universe's expansion rate and its implications for our grasp of dark matter and dark energy.

For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.560 --> 00:00:02.560
Andrew Dunkley: Hello again. Thank you for joining us. This

1
00:00:02.560 --> 00:00:05.240
is Space Nuts. My name is Andrew

2
00:00:05.240 --> 00:00:07.120
Dunkley. If you've never heard of Space Nuts,

3
00:00:07.120 --> 00:00:08.720
where have you been for the last 10 years?

4
00:00:09.520 --> 00:00:11.040
Good, uh, to have you along if you're a first

5
00:00:11.040 --> 00:00:13.600
timer. And everybody else who's been with us

6
00:00:13.600 --> 00:00:16.080
for aeons. Uh, today

7
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:18.560
on the show we will be talking about,

8
00:00:18.960 --> 00:00:21.920
uh, a. Ah, really interesting and some

9
00:00:21.920 --> 00:00:24.400
might think scary development, nuclear

10
00:00:24.560 --> 00:00:27.520
space policies. I don't think they're talking

11
00:00:27.520 --> 00:00:30.190
about, you know, weapons of mass destruction,

12
00:00:30.430 --> 00:00:32.350
but they are talking about power supply

13
00:00:32.350 --> 00:00:34.590
systems. We're, uh, also going to look at

14
00:00:34.590 --> 00:00:37.470
SETI from the far side of the moon because,

15
00:00:37.780 --> 00:00:40.550
uh, that's the best place to listen for alien

16
00:00:40.550 --> 00:00:43.390
civilizations because, well, Earth is very

17
00:00:43.390 --> 00:00:46.030
noisy. But the far side of the moon,

18
00:00:46.190 --> 00:00:48.830
you can't hear a thing. Except the aliens,

19
00:00:49.070 --> 00:00:52.070
apparently. And. Oh, uh, no. The

20
00:00:52.070 --> 00:00:54.870
Hubble tension debate is simmering

21
00:00:54.870 --> 00:00:56.910
again. We'll get into all of that on, on

22
00:00:56.910 --> 00:00:59.830
this, uh, this episode of space

23
00:00:59.830 --> 00:01:00.430
nuts.

24
00:01:00.670 --> 00:01:03.150
Generic: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

25
00:01:03.390 --> 00:01:06.030
10, 9. Ignition

26
00:01:06.030 --> 00:01:07.070
sequence start.

27
00:01:07.230 --> 00:01:07.951
Professor Fred Watson: Space nuts.

28
00:01:08.023 --> 00:01:10.810
Generic: 5, 4, 3, 2. 1. 2, 3, 4,

29
00:01:10.881 --> 00:01:12.990
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

30
00:01:13.070 --> 00:01:14.270
Andrew Dunkley: Space nuts.

31
00:01:14.270 --> 00:01:16.110
Generic: Astronauts report it feels good.

32
00:01:17.070 --> 00:01:19.830
Andrew Dunkley: And joining us to nuke a few storeys is

33
00:01:19.830 --> 00:01:21.670
Professor Fred Watson Watson, uh, astronomer

34
00:01:21.670 --> 00:01:22.830
at large. Hello, Fred Watson.

35
00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:26.720
Professor Fred Watson: Hello, Andrew. Lovely to hear, uh, your

36
00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:28.080
voice and see your face.

37
00:01:28.160 --> 00:01:30.720
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, my voice is still a little bit down

38
00:01:31.680 --> 00:01:33.760
like that. Could do an Elvis song as a

39
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:34.120
backing.

40
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:36.640
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, you could, yeah, yeah, Way on, just down.

41
00:01:37.520 --> 00:01:39.840
Well, we. So at the end of the show, you

42
00:01:39.840 --> 00:01:42.040
definitely need to say thank you very much.

43
00:01:42.040 --> 00:01:44.080
Andrew Dunkley: Thank you very much. Uh, yes,

44
00:01:44.880 --> 00:01:46.960
that's what happens when I get a cold. My

45
00:01:46.960 --> 00:01:49.040
voice just goes down deep. When I first

46
00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:51.900
started in radio, I did midnight to dawns. In

47
00:01:51.900 --> 00:01:53.540
the days where they didn't automate it,

48
00:01:53.540 --> 00:01:55.460
everything, everything was live.

49
00:01:56.260 --> 00:01:58.620
And around four in the morning when I used to

50
00:01:58.620 --> 00:02:01.300
get really, really tired, my voice would just

51
00:02:01.300 --> 00:02:04.100
naturally go down there and.

52
00:02:05.140 --> 00:02:07.700
And it was really weird because, um,

53
00:02:07.940 --> 00:02:10.160
it wasn't my natural voice. But,

54
00:02:10.160 --> 00:02:12.860
um, at the moment it's. It's enjoying that

55
00:02:12.860 --> 00:02:14.100
part of the spectrum.

56
00:02:14.100 --> 00:02:16.020
Professor Fred Watson: So, m. Yes.

57
00:02:16.180 --> 00:02:18.060
Andrew Dunkley: Hopefully it'll get better soon. I don't like

58
00:02:18.060 --> 00:02:19.380
the feeling, I must say.

59
00:02:19.930 --> 00:02:20.890
Professor Fred Watson: No, you wouldn't.

60
00:02:20.970 --> 00:02:22.810
Andrew Dunkley: Anyway, we battle on, don't we?

61
00:02:22.810 --> 00:02:25.690
Professor Fred Watson: No point getting all that's. You know,

62
00:02:25.690 --> 00:02:28.570
we do in Space Nuts. We come rain or shine

63
00:02:28.570 --> 00:02:31.450
or absence or whatever, we keep going. We do.

64
00:02:31.850 --> 00:02:34.490
Andrew Dunkley: Speaking of battling on nuclear energy,

65
00:02:36.520 --> 00:02:39.250
uh, this. This is a policy that's just been

66
00:02:39.250 --> 00:02:42.090
announced by the Pentagon and the Department

67
00:02:42.090 --> 00:02:44.650
of Energy and they've kind of dragged NASA

68
00:02:44.650 --> 00:02:47.130
into it. They said, hey, NASA,

69
00:02:47.590 --> 00:02:49.150
we want you to build us a couple of power

70
00:02:49.150 --> 00:02:50.830
stations and they've got to be nuclear and

71
00:02:50.830 --> 00:02:53.510
they've got to be ready by 2028. How about

72
00:02:53.510 --> 00:02:53.830
it?

73
00:02:54.550 --> 00:02:56.390
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's more or less it.

74
00:02:57.510 --> 00:03:00.230
It's a six page policy document.

75
00:03:00.840 --> 00:03:03.840
Uh, its title is NSTM

76
00:03:03.840 --> 00:03:06.750
M3. Uh, which is

77
00:03:06.750 --> 00:03:09.030
to direct a parallel and mutually

78
00:03:09.030 --> 00:03:11.790
reinforcing design, uh, set of design

79
00:03:11.790 --> 00:03:14.030
competitions by NASA and the Defence

80
00:03:14.030 --> 00:03:16.150
Department to enable, and I'm quoting here,

81
00:03:16.230 --> 00:03:18.950
to enable near term demonstration and use of

82
00:03:19.490 --> 00:03:22.330
mid power space reactors in orbit and on the

83
00:03:22.330 --> 00:03:24.850
lunar surface and prepare to deploy

84
00:03:25.170 --> 00:03:27.970
high power reactors in the 2000 and 30s.

85
00:03:28.800 --> 00:03:31.720
Uh, I'm quoting here from uh,

86
00:03:31.890 --> 00:03:33.930
people who are closely involved with this.

87
00:03:33.930 --> 00:03:36.210
For this to work it has to be a collaboration

88
00:03:36.210 --> 00:03:38.610
between multiple government agencies. Well

89
00:03:39.010 --> 00:03:41.090
that's a novel idea, isn't it? Yeah,

90
00:03:41.160 --> 00:03:43.810
um, that's the way that work.

91
00:03:44.610 --> 00:03:47.450
Yeah, that's the way that we do the right R

92
00:03:47.450 --> 00:03:49.370
D and get the right tools in place for these

93
00:03:49.370 --> 00:03:51.240
events to unfold over the next few years.

94
00:03:51.550 --> 00:03:54.430
Yeah. Yes. So um, that's right. So the

95
00:03:54.430 --> 00:03:57.190
bottom line is NASA is

96
00:03:57.190 --> 00:03:59.790
directed to start work within

97
00:03:59.950 --> 00:04:02.590
30 days on a mid power space

98
00:04:02.590 --> 00:04:05.030
reactor generating at least 20 kilowatts of

99
00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:07.190
power with a variant that can operate on the

100
00:04:07.190 --> 00:04:09.750
lunar surface. He calls for the

101
00:04:09.750 --> 00:04:11.710
agency to work with multiple companies on

102
00:04:11.710 --> 00:04:13.670
reactor designs including for a low power

103
00:04:13.670 --> 00:04:16.030
system that produces as little as 1 kilowatt

104
00:04:16.430 --> 00:04:19.270
if doing so offers lower cost and schedule

105
00:04:19.270 --> 00:04:21.790
risk. And this is um, it's a White House

106
00:04:22.030 --> 00:04:24.210
release, uh, that I'm quot from here. So

107
00:04:24.210 --> 00:04:26.410
it's, it's definitely the official thing.

108
00:04:26.570 --> 00:04:27.450
Yeah. Wow.

109
00:04:27.930 --> 00:04:29.880
Andrew Dunkley: Should we be surprised by this though?

110
00:04:29.880 --> 00:04:32.850
Professor Fred Watson: Uh no, no we shouldn't. I mean actually

111
00:04:32.850 --> 00:04:35.580
we did get um. Was it Jared Isaacman, the

112
00:04:35.580 --> 00:04:38.250
uh, the new, relatively new head of

113
00:04:38.250 --> 00:04:41.210
NASA, who I think we covered this uh,

114
00:04:41.610 --> 00:04:44.210
quite a few months ago, talked about the idea

115
00:04:44.210 --> 00:04:46.970
of uh, using a uh, 100 kilowatt

116
00:04:47.050 --> 00:04:49.410
nuclear reactor on the lunar surface. Because

117
00:04:49.410 --> 00:04:51.890
that raises a few eyebrows. Uh, but it looks

118
00:04:51.890 --> 00:04:54.010
as though this is the first step in, in

119
00:04:55.610 --> 00:04:58.330
expediting that uh, to start small,

120
00:04:58.330 --> 00:05:01.130
maybe even the smallest 1kW it'll run an

121
00:05:01.130 --> 00:05:03.580
electric fire and uh,

122
00:05:04.570 --> 00:05:07.090
keep um, going upwards. Uh, there's an

123
00:05:07.090 --> 00:05:09.530
interesting uh, disparity in

124
00:05:10.170 --> 00:05:12.090
the sort of urgency of this though because

125
00:05:12.360 --> 00:05:15.130
um, the next paragraph of the White House

126
00:05:15.130 --> 00:05:17.450
release says the policy calls on the Defence

127
00:05:17.450 --> 00:05:20.290
Department to provide a briefing to the

128
00:05:20.290 --> 00:05:23.250
White House in 90 days on um, potential

129
00:05:23.250 --> 00:05:26.030
uses and payloads for space nuclear systems

130
00:05:26.030 --> 00:05:28.670
of varying power levels. The Pentagon will in

131
00:05:28.670 --> 00:05:30.950
the first year of the policy use its space

132
00:05:30.950 --> 00:05:33.510
nuclear funding to support NASA's efforts,

133
00:05:33.510 --> 00:05:35.910
then conduct its own competition for space

134
00:05:35.910 --> 00:05:38.430
nuclear power systems. I get the feeling here

135
00:05:38.430 --> 00:05:40.350
that there's going to be too many fingers in

136
00:05:40.350 --> 00:05:43.350
the pie and too many people deciding which

137
00:05:43.350 --> 00:05:45.110
companies are going to get the, you know,

138
00:05:45.430 --> 00:05:47.110
going to get the contracts to do this.

139
00:05:48.550 --> 00:05:51.470
Andrew Dunkley: The options for nuclear power these days

140
00:05:51.470 --> 00:05:53.140
are so much more,

141
00:05:54.220 --> 00:05:56.900
uh, available and simple. Like

142
00:05:56.980 --> 00:05:59.900
you can make very small nuclear power

143
00:05:59.900 --> 00:06:02.660
stations now. You can, you can build one

144
00:06:03.140 --> 00:06:05.900
that's, that's small enough just to service a

145
00:06:05.900 --> 00:06:08.340
town these days. You don't need these big

146
00:06:08.420 --> 00:06:11.300
complex setups anymore.

147
00:06:11.380 --> 00:06:14.340
So it probably is the logical way to go.

148
00:06:14.340 --> 00:06:16.340
Even though when you say the word nuclear,

149
00:06:16.340 --> 00:06:18.700
everybody sort of runs for the hills. Not

150
00:06:18.700 --> 00:06:21.580
that that would save them, but um,

151
00:06:21.840 --> 00:06:24.160
it's not, ah, as big and scary as people

152
00:06:25.280 --> 00:06:28.160
envisage. But um, it's, it's got bad

153
00:06:28.160 --> 00:06:30.400
press for a long, long time. So whenever you

154
00:06:30.400 --> 00:06:32.360
talk about nuclear power station or look what

155
00:06:32.360 --> 00:06:35.360
happened in Australia, um, we're so

156
00:06:35.360 --> 00:06:36.720
scared of it. We've never done it.

157
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:40.520
Professor Fred Watson: And people think of Three Mile, Three Mile

158
00:06:40.520 --> 00:06:42.240
island in Chernobyl.

159
00:06:43.100 --> 00:06:46.000
Uh, and uh, yes. And the bottom line

160
00:06:46.000 --> 00:06:48.640
is that if things go wrong, you have a very

161
00:06:48.640 --> 00:06:51.600
big environmental problem. And uh, that would

162
00:06:51.600 --> 00:06:52.440
be the case.

163
00:06:52.440 --> 00:06:53.280
Andrew Dunkley: It's fukush.

164
00:06:53.580 --> 00:06:53.860
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

165
00:06:53.860 --> 00:06:56.780
Andrew Dunkley: With the earthquake and the tide and the

166
00:06:56.780 --> 00:06:59.260
tsunami. Yeah, that's so mess.

167
00:06:59.820 --> 00:07:02.660
Professor Fred Watson: Yes. So, uh, it is scary, I

168
00:07:02.660 --> 00:07:05.660
think. Um, but, but

169
00:07:05.660 --> 00:07:08.460
well, so I grew up in a country that, uh,

170
00:07:08.460 --> 00:07:10.940
pioneered nuclear power with the US

171
00:07:11.260 --> 00:07:13.500
and there are several nuclear power stations.

172
00:07:14.100 --> 00:07:15.980
Uh, I used to live not very far from one

173
00:07:15.980 --> 00:07:18.940
actually at uh, Torness in Scotland.

174
00:07:20.510 --> 00:07:22.590
Yes, I think it's Taunus. Uh, and

175
00:07:23.470 --> 00:07:26.390
look, everybody just regarded it as

176
00:07:26.390 --> 00:07:29.030
a normal power station. It was very much a

177
00:07:29.030 --> 00:07:31.870
low key thing. Uh, and you

178
00:07:32.590 --> 00:07:35.070
see statistics like there's more

179
00:07:35.630 --> 00:07:38.390
radiation comes from the natural emissions

180
00:07:38.390 --> 00:07:40.390
from rocks in the uk. If you go down to

181
00:07:40.390 --> 00:07:43.110
Cornwall, the rocks are basically radioactive

182
00:07:43.110 --> 00:07:43.470
there.

183
00:07:43.470 --> 00:07:44.030
Andrew Dunkley: Oh wow.

184
00:07:44.030 --> 00:07:47.030
Professor Fred Watson: There's radon in the atmosphere. Um, but it's

185
00:07:47.030 --> 00:07:49.980
at a level that humans can tolerate. Humans

186
00:07:49.980 --> 00:07:52.500
have been tolerating it for hundreds of

187
00:07:52.500 --> 00:07:54.700
thousands of years. And uh, that's.

188
00:07:54.780 --> 00:07:57.380
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, you're exposed to radiation every time

189
00:07:57.380 --> 00:07:58.060
you walk outside.

190
00:07:58.780 --> 00:08:01.780
Professor Fred Watson: Well, that's right, you are. Yes. So, um, so

191
00:08:01.780 --> 00:08:04.300
it, it's got to be treated with respect.

192
00:08:04.820 --> 00:08:07.820
Um, I, I think what freaks people out

193
00:08:07.820 --> 00:08:10.820
though as well is the idea of sticking a

194
00:08:10.820 --> 00:08:13.500
nuclear reactor on top of a rocket and then

195
00:08:13.980 --> 00:08:15.780
sending it into space. And there was an

196
00:08:15.780 --> 00:08:18.740
accident, uh, with a. So just

197
00:08:18.740 --> 00:08:21.720
stepping back, uh, NAS, their

198
00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:24.200
RTGs, radioisotope

199
00:08:24.360 --> 00:08:27.360
thermal generator, thermoelectric generators,

200
00:08:27.360 --> 00:08:29.960
I think that's what it stands for. Uh, on

201
00:08:29.960 --> 00:08:31.720
several spacecraft, including the two

202
00:08:31.720 --> 00:08:34.240
Voyagers, I think the pioneers have got it as

203
00:08:34.240 --> 00:08:36.960
well. Um, the Curiosity, um,

204
00:08:38.040 --> 00:08:40.880
and um, Perseverance.

205
00:08:40.880 --> 00:08:43.840
Both have RTG power supplies. Uh,

206
00:08:43.880 --> 00:08:46.680
so that's uh, uh,

207
00:08:46.760 --> 00:08:49.040
a well trodden path. But there was an

208
00:08:49.040 --> 00:08:50.760
accident, I think it might have been in the

209
00:08:50.760 --> 00:08:52.840
80s with a spacecraft that was launched with

210
00:08:53.060 --> 00:08:55.860
something like an RTG on board and it did,

211
00:08:56.080 --> 00:08:59.020
uh, it went wrong. I can't remember

212
00:08:59.020 --> 00:09:01.220
the details but I think it was Canada that

213
00:09:01.220 --> 00:09:03.780
took the punch. And there was a lot of

214
00:09:04.260 --> 00:09:06.980
radioactive debris that got spread over

215
00:09:07.860 --> 00:09:09.860
very, very sparsely, uh,

216
00:09:10.380 --> 00:09:12.480
populated regions. Uh,

217
00:09:12.980 --> 00:09:15.980
literal fallout. Yes, that's right. Yes,

218
00:09:15.980 --> 00:09:18.020
exactly. Flaws out the sky. If I remember

219
00:09:18.020 --> 00:09:20.100
rightly. I'm digging up things from the past

220
00:09:20.100 --> 00:09:22.380
year, but I think that's the case and that

221
00:09:22.380 --> 00:09:24.810
clearly freaks people out. If you've got a

222
00:09:24.960 --> 00:09:27.680
launch that doesn't work, uh, what's going to

223
00:09:27.680 --> 00:09:27.920
happen?

224
00:09:28.080 --> 00:09:31.080
Andrew Dunkley: I imagine so. But uh, it certainly does ramp

225
00:09:31.080 --> 00:09:33.280
up the space race between the US and China.

226
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:35.480
And you know, China's probably going to fall

227
00:09:35.480 --> 00:09:37.160
a bit behind here because I think they were

228
00:09:37.160 --> 00:09:39.400
trying to set up a coal fired power station

229
00:09:39.400 --> 00:09:40.680
on the moon. You know, it

230
00:09:40.680 --> 00:09:43.400
um, might m, might

231
00:09:43.400 --> 00:09:44.400
slow them down a bit.

232
00:09:44.640 --> 00:09:46.760
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, China's doing pretty well. They are

233
00:09:46.760 --> 00:09:49.600
doing sustainability. Yeah, yeah, they are.

234
00:09:49.600 --> 00:09:51.520
Ah, but yeah, they do use a lot of coal

235
00:09:51.520 --> 00:09:51.800
still.

236
00:09:51.800 --> 00:09:54.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, they do, they do. So this is probably

237
00:09:54.560 --> 00:09:57.440
going to happen and what other

238
00:09:57.440 --> 00:09:59.240
option would there be? That's the thing. I

239
00:09:59.240 --> 00:10:01.440
mean some people will say no, put up solar

240
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:04.020
energy systems, but um,

241
00:10:04.020 --> 00:10:06.680
nuclear is probably a much more

242
00:10:06.680 --> 00:10:08.080
efficient way of doing it.

243
00:10:08.880 --> 00:10:10.360
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, well for a start, you've got the

244
00:10:10.360 --> 00:10:12.920
baseline load. You're not worried about where

245
00:10:12.920 --> 00:10:15.840
the sun is in the sky. The idea

246
00:10:15.840 --> 00:10:18.400
of being at the south pole of the moon,

247
00:10:19.250 --> 00:10:21.970
which is where the focus is in terms

248
00:10:21.970 --> 00:10:24.450
of our uh, exploration of the moon.

249
00:10:24.960 --> 00:10:27.850
Uh, it puts a different slant

250
00:10:27.850 --> 00:10:30.210
on it because it means that you are looking

251
00:10:30.370 --> 00:10:33.210
at a very low sun altitude in the

252
00:10:33.210 --> 00:10:35.450
sky. Uh, the sun's coming in nearly

253
00:10:35.450 --> 00:10:37.570
horizontally. The sunlight, now that's not

254
00:10:38.400 --> 00:10:41.290
uh, as bad a thing on the moon as it would be

255
00:10:41.290 --> 00:10:43.610
on the Earth. The Earth, as the sun gets

256
00:10:43.610 --> 00:10:44.930
lower, it's going through a thicker and

257
00:10:44.930 --> 00:10:47.290
thicker layer of atmosphere. So its uh, power

258
00:10:47.290 --> 00:10:50.090
is attenuated. On the moon that doesn't

259
00:10:50.090 --> 00:10:52.270
happen because there ain't no atmosphere. But

260
00:10:52.270 --> 00:10:55.030
it does bring challenges for your solar

261
00:10:55.030 --> 00:10:56.750
panels. You know, you've got to build arrays

262
00:10:56.750 --> 00:10:58.910
that are almost vertical and if you're

263
00:10:58.910 --> 00:11:01.470
looking for a big structure, uh, then

264
00:11:01.860 --> 00:11:04.470
uh, it becomes different slightly different

265
00:11:04.470 --> 00:11:07.430
engineering, um, issue. Plus you've got to

266
00:11:07.430 --> 00:11:09.830
take all that stuff up there as well. You

267
00:11:09.830 --> 00:11:12.310
know, going up to the moon with arrays of

268
00:11:12.310 --> 00:11:14.510
solar panels in the spacecraft might not

269
00:11:14.510 --> 00:11:16.470
leave room for much else. Whereas a nuclear

270
00:11:16.470 --> 00:11:18.470
reactor of the kind that people are talking

271
00:11:18.470 --> 00:11:20.740
about would be relatively compact. I m mean,

272
00:11:20.740 --> 00:11:23.700
the RTG devices are, I think

273
00:11:23.700 --> 00:11:26.420
it's, is it 13 kilogrammes of, uh,

274
00:11:26.700 --> 00:11:29.340
plutonium that they have in them.

275
00:11:29.660 --> 00:11:32.620
They're about the size of a, you know,

276
00:11:32.860 --> 00:11:35.860
a tea urn or something like that. Or a drink

277
00:11:35.860 --> 00:11:37.340
serum. Yeah, yeah.

278
00:11:37.740 --> 00:11:40.470
Andrew Dunkley: It's much simpler than it was 20, 30,

279
00:11:40.530 --> 00:11:43.060
40, 50 years ago. And of course they're

280
00:11:43.060 --> 00:11:45.300
talking not only about the moon, but people,

281
00:11:45.300 --> 00:11:48.060
uh, on Mars, uh, they'll need power as well.

282
00:11:48.260 --> 00:11:50.340
Um, I know in the movie the Martian they used

283
00:11:50.340 --> 00:11:52.750
solar panels, but that Mars is a bit further

284
00:11:52.750 --> 00:11:54.750
away, so the solar panels probably wouldn't

285
00:11:54.750 --> 00:11:55.670
be as efficient.

286
00:11:55.670 --> 00:11:56.390
Professor Fred Watson: Exactly.

287
00:11:57.110 --> 00:11:59.790
Andrew Dunkley: Nuclear, um, power makes, Makes perfect

288
00:11:59.790 --> 00:12:02.430
sense. Uh, although, you know, solar energy

289
00:12:02.430 --> 00:12:05.270
is quite, um, well used

290
00:12:05.750 --> 00:12:08.710
in space. Artemis 2 used it.

291
00:12:09.260 --> 00:12:11.960
Professor Fred Watson: Um, that's correct, yes. Uh, and

292
00:12:11.960 --> 00:12:13.990
um, you know, thinking of the different

293
00:12:13.990 --> 00:12:15.950
spacecraft, the one that's got perhaps the

294
00:12:15.950 --> 00:12:17.900
most spectacular solar panels is Lucy, uh,

295
00:12:18.350 --> 00:12:20.950
spacecraft which is on its way to the Trojan

296
00:12:20.950 --> 00:12:23.410
asteroids. Uh, and that's got

297
00:12:23.570 --> 00:12:26.170
solar panels which are huge. And that's

298
00:12:26.170 --> 00:12:28.770
because you're going out to the asteroid belt

299
00:12:28.770 --> 00:12:30.490
and beyond. Actually you go into the orbit of

300
00:12:30.490 --> 00:12:32.570
Jupiter, which is where the Trojan asteroids

301
00:12:32.570 --> 00:12:35.530
hang out. Uh, so you need big solar

302
00:12:35.530 --> 00:12:37.610
panels to collect all the energy. Yeah.

303
00:12:37.610 --> 00:12:39.490
Andrew Dunkley: The other problem with solar panels on Mars

304
00:12:39.490 --> 00:12:42.450
would be dust, because it's

305
00:12:42.450 --> 00:12:43.490
a pretty grubby place.

306
00:12:43.890 --> 00:12:46.730
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's what, um, probably brought an

307
00:12:46.730 --> 00:12:49.570
end to. Uh, so Spirit and Opportunity both

308
00:12:49.570 --> 00:12:52.250
had solar panels. Uh, and there were

309
00:12:52.250 --> 00:12:55.030
certainly times when the amount of dust was

310
00:12:55.030 --> 00:12:57.990
stopping the power generation. And uh, that

311
00:12:57.990 --> 00:13:00.550
was cleared by, uh, Willy Willies, as they're

312
00:13:00.550 --> 00:13:03.310
called. Uh, the um, dust

313
00:13:03.310 --> 00:13:05.230
devils. That's right. On Mars. Yeah.

314
00:13:05.230 --> 00:13:05.950
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating.

315
00:13:05.950 --> 00:13:08.950
All right, so the um, the directive has

316
00:13:08.950 --> 00:13:11.230
been put to NASA to start working on this,

317
00:13:11.980 --> 00:13:14.350
uh, and it comes from the White House. So,

318
00:13:14.380 --> 00:13:16.710
um, it's all systems go and they hope to have

319
00:13:16.710 --> 00:13:19.494
something operational as soon as 20,

320
00:13:19.606 --> 00:13:22.350
28. So they're not mucking around. In fact, I

321
00:13:22.350 --> 00:13:24.070
think NASA, after this was released, were

322
00:13:24.070 --> 00:13:25.770
given one month to it.

323
00:13:26.420 --> 00:13:28.490
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, that's, uh, exactly right. That's the 30

324
00:13:28.490 --> 00:13:29.370
days that I mentioned.

325
00:13:29.610 --> 00:13:30.570
Andrew Dunkley: No mucking around.

326
00:13:30.650 --> 00:13:31.290
Professor Fred Watson: Get going.

327
00:13:31.530 --> 00:13:33.130
Andrew Dunkley: Yep. Uh, you can read all about

328
00:13:33.130 --> 00:13:35.610
it@spacenews.com.

329
00:13:36.090 --> 00:13:38.770
this is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and

330
00:13:38.770 --> 00:13:40.250
Professor Fred Watson Watson.

331
00:13:44.890 --> 00:13:45.930
Space Nuts.

332
00:13:46.010 --> 00:13:48.130
Well, we mentioned the moon. We'll stick with

333
00:13:48.130 --> 00:13:51.010
the moon. This storey though has nothing to

334
00:13:51.010 --> 00:13:53.600
do with people on the moon. It's got uh,

335
00:13:53.600 --> 00:13:56.090
everything to do with people that are not on

336
00:13:56.090 --> 00:13:58.190
Earth or the Moon or, or Mars for that

337
00:13:58.190 --> 00:14:00.470
matter. Uh, they're out there somewhere.

338
00:14:00.870 --> 00:14:02.470
We're looking for them. We're talking about

339
00:14:02.470 --> 00:14:05.350
the search for extraterrestrial intelligence

340
00:14:05.910 --> 00:14:07.950
and the dark side of the moon. The far side

341
00:14:07.950 --> 00:14:10.910
of the moon is um, the best place

342
00:14:10.910 --> 00:14:11.750
to start looking.

343
00:14:13.240 --> 00:14:15.030
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, that's right. So we've been looking for

344
00:14:15.030 --> 00:14:16.070
this for 60 years

345
00:14:18.470 --> 00:14:20.790
and using ground, uh, based

346
00:14:21.110 --> 00:14:24.060
antennas here on planet Earth, uh,

347
00:14:24.310 --> 00:14:26.870
which are very, uh, very capable.

348
00:14:28.100 --> 00:14:30.080
Um, once the Square Kilometre Array

349
00:14:30.080 --> 00:14:32.440
Observatory comes on stream towards the end

350
00:14:32.440 --> 00:14:34.640
of the decade, uh, we'll have the

351
00:14:34.880 --> 00:14:37.560
finest, most capable radio

352
00:14:37.560 --> 00:14:40.480
telescope in the world, uh, which will not

353
00:14:40.960 --> 00:14:43.960
directly engage with SETI programmes, but

354
00:14:43.960 --> 00:14:46.680
it will uh, have the

355
00:14:46.680 --> 00:14:49.640
sensitivity to detect. Well the thing that

356
00:14:49.640 --> 00:14:51.480
my colleagues tell me is it'll detect an

357
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:53.360
airport radar at 50 light years.

358
00:14:54.400 --> 00:14:56.800
So that's the kind of sensitivity

359
00:14:57.300 --> 00:14:59.820
uh, that you're talking about. Um, but

360
00:15:00.060 --> 00:15:02.180
the main problem with ground based, with

361
00:15:02.180 --> 00:15:05.020
Earth based uh, radio telescopes

362
00:15:05.100 --> 00:15:07.340
is that they're compromised by all the

363
00:15:07.660 --> 00:15:10.460
cacophony of radio signals that

364
00:15:10.460 --> 00:15:12.660
surrounds us. From your mobile phones, from

365
00:15:12.660 --> 00:15:15.460
broadcasts from people like you and

366
00:15:15.460 --> 00:15:17.900
me doing this, going out into the ether,

367
00:15:18.220 --> 00:15:21.020
WI fi routers, WI fi, uh, the whole thing,

368
00:15:21.020 --> 00:15:23.420
microwave ovens, it all provides this

369
00:15:23.900 --> 00:15:26.700
noisy radio background and that's not getting

370
00:15:26.700 --> 00:15:29.660
any better with the um, satellite mega

371
00:15:29.660 --> 00:15:32.640
constellations. Uh, I was in uh, a meeting

372
00:15:32.640 --> 00:15:35.600
yesterday. It's

373
00:15:35.600 --> 00:15:37.720
a meeting of the um, International

374
00:15:37.800 --> 00:15:40.400
Astronomical Union Centre, uh, for the

375
00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:43.080
protection of the dark and quiet sky from

376
00:15:43.160 --> 00:15:45.880
satellite interference. Uh, and it

377
00:15:45.880 --> 00:15:48.120
was um, you know one of the things that's

378
00:15:48.120 --> 00:15:51.040
raising anxiety is the idea of uh, Elon

379
00:15:51.040 --> 00:15:52.840
Musk's million satellites for

380
00:15:55.100 --> 00:15:57.880
um, orbital data centres and

381
00:15:57.880 --> 00:16:00.320
this mirror in the sky idea, sunlight on

382
00:16:00.320 --> 00:16:02.980
demand, that also has a million satel mirrors

383
00:16:02.980 --> 00:16:05.140
on it. So that's more for the optical

384
00:16:05.140 --> 00:16:07.220
astronomers. But it's all a concern,

385
00:16:07.920 --> 00:16:10.780
uh, and it basically is eroding our

386
00:16:10.780 --> 00:16:13.340
capability slowly but surely to

387
00:16:13.340 --> 00:16:16.020
detect uh, faint extraterrestrial

388
00:16:16.020 --> 00:16:18.980
signals. Uh, so that

389
00:16:18.980 --> 00:16:21.860
brings us to currently possibly

390
00:16:21.860 --> 00:16:24.820
the best place to do this sort of thing from

391
00:16:25.060 --> 00:16:27.620
which is the far side of the moon.

392
00:16:28.220 --> 00:16:31.060
Uh, and um, uh,

393
00:16:31.130 --> 00:16:34.010
we have one uh, spacecraft.

394
00:16:34.010 --> 00:16:36.530
By we, I mean humankind have one

395
00:16:36.530 --> 00:16:39.180
spacecraft on the far side of the moon. Uh,

396
00:16:39.180 --> 00:16:41.210
it is China's Chang' e 4,

397
00:16:41.880 --> 00:16:44.530
uh, which soft landed on the far side of the

398
00:16:44.530 --> 00:16:47.530
moon back in 2019. Can you believe it?

399
00:16:47.530 --> 00:16:50.370
It's been there uh, seven

400
00:16:50.370 --> 00:16:53.340
years. It's quite Extraordinary. Um,

401
00:16:53.340 --> 00:16:55.700
but uh, now that, that

402
00:16:56.220 --> 00:16:58.260
um. Spacecraft was not set up

403
00:16:58.840 --> 00:17:01.480
uh specifically for uh,

404
00:17:01.860 --> 00:17:04.620
looking for um, SETI search for

405
00:17:04.620 --> 00:17:07.140
extraterrestrial intelligence but

406
00:17:07.460 --> 00:17:09.860
it's got a low frequency radio

407
00:17:09.860 --> 00:17:12.500
spectrometer on board um that

408
00:17:12.740 --> 00:17:15.660
actually has been used to conduct the first

409
00:17:15.660 --> 00:17:18.620
ever SETI search from the lunar far

410
00:17:18.620 --> 00:17:21.060
side. Um and so the

411
00:17:21.300 --> 00:17:23.789
goal, uh, the idea

412
00:17:24.109 --> 00:17:26.749
is to use that equipment which is

413
00:17:26.749 --> 00:17:29.549
designed to do natural sciences

414
00:17:29.869 --> 00:17:32.349
but to look for those

415
00:17:32.760 --> 00:17:35.360
ah, technosignatures, uh

416
00:17:35.360 --> 00:17:38.020
technomarkers they're sometimes called, uh,

417
00:17:38.020 --> 00:17:40.549
which might suggest that you're getting a

418
00:17:40.549 --> 00:17:43.309
signal from an artificially generated

419
00:17:43.309 --> 00:17:45.469
source. And what you're really looking for

420
00:17:46.109 --> 00:17:48.680
are ah, periodic

421
00:17:49.340 --> 00:17:52.200
um, bursts of radiation with perhaps

422
00:17:52.200 --> 00:17:53.480
regular intervals

423
00:17:54.180 --> 00:17:57.080
um, that are not easily explained

424
00:17:57.640 --> 00:18:00.520
by natural processes. And you've got to

425
00:18:00.520 --> 00:18:03.480
think back to Jocelyn Bell Burnell and her

426
00:18:04.040 --> 00:18:06.200
discovery uh, of the first pulsar because

427
00:18:06.200 --> 00:18:08.840
that's what she saw. Narrow um, band.

428
00:18:09.120 --> 00:18:12.000
Um. Sorry, narrow uh, band

429
00:18:12.000 --> 00:18:14.890
in time signatures, uh, or

430
00:18:14.890 --> 00:18:17.450
bursts of radiation which we now know is the

431
00:18:17.450 --> 00:18:19.450
pulsar, the kind of light ass beam of

432
00:18:19.450 --> 00:18:22.170
radiation from the pulsar sweeping around and

433
00:18:22.170 --> 00:18:25.130
passing the earth. Um, she didn't know that

434
00:18:25.130 --> 00:18:27.490
then. So she wrote little green men in her

435
00:18:27.560 --> 00:18:30.450
uh. On her chart record of very,

436
00:18:30.450 --> 00:18:33.380
very famous words. Um,

437
00:18:33.490 --> 00:18:36.400
so that's what basically uh, the uh,

438
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:39.210
Chang', E, um Low Frequency Radio

439
00:18:39.210 --> 00:18:41.850
Spectrometer has been looking for. Uh, and

440
00:18:41.850 --> 00:18:44.770
it's things that um, you know, that speak

441
00:18:44.770 --> 00:18:47.470
of an artificial generated source.

442
00:18:47.550 --> 00:18:50.470
And so um, what they've

443
00:18:50.470 --> 00:18:52.670
done, uh the scientists working on this,

444
00:18:52.880 --> 00:18:55.550
uh basically they built an algorithm

445
00:18:56.700 --> 00:18:58.990
uh that ah, uh trawled through the data

446
00:18:59.550 --> 00:19:02.270
looking for anything that might

447
00:19:02.670 --> 00:19:05.310
be artificial. With no

448
00:19:05.950 --> 00:19:08.350
credible candidates revealed,

449
00:19:08.800 --> 00:19:11.630
uh, nothing that couldn't be explained either

450
00:19:11.630 --> 00:19:14.420
by you know, natural phenomena or by

451
00:19:14.500 --> 00:19:16.100
instrument, uh, issues.

452
00:19:17.140 --> 00:19:20.100
Um, there's a nice comment though

453
00:19:20.100 --> 00:19:22.940
from uh, phys.org who is carrying this

454
00:19:22.940 --> 00:19:25.540
storey. Uh, this is,

455
00:19:25.780 --> 00:19:28.379
I'll quote this. This is not a failure, it is

456
00:19:28.379 --> 00:19:30.580
a beginning. As Carl Sagan once put it,

457
00:19:30.820 --> 00:19:33.740
absence of evidence is not evidence of

458
00:19:33.740 --> 00:19:35.940
absence. Brilliant. Really good point.

459
00:19:36.820 --> 00:19:39.620
Andrew Dunkley: I had a lot of time for Carl Sagan, uh, very

460
00:19:39.620 --> 00:19:42.330
wise man and um. Yeah, he uh, he did a lot

461
00:19:42.330 --> 00:19:45.020
for astronomy during his time. But um,

462
00:19:45.490 --> 00:19:48.410
that's a valid point and, and I suppose you

463
00:19:48.410 --> 00:19:50.410
and I have spoken about it in the past. The

464
00:19:50.410 --> 00:19:52.850
big problem is distance. There might,

465
00:19:53.330 --> 00:19:55.450
there might be civilizations out there that

466
00:19:55.450 --> 00:19:58.090
are advanced and capable of communication but

467
00:19:58.090 --> 00:20:00.170
they're so far away we will never hear from

468
00:20:00.170 --> 00:20:01.970
them. Maybe that.

469
00:20:02.050 --> 00:20:04.600
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, um, that's right. Uh,

470
00:20:04.690 --> 00:20:07.410
and you know, and time is the other issue.

471
00:20:07.410 --> 00:20:09.690
It's a needle in A haystack both in distance

472
00:20:09.690 --> 00:20:11.930
and in time because you've got to hit your

473
00:20:11.930 --> 00:20:14.910
civil station just at the right time. Yes.

474
00:20:15.020 --> 00:20:17.950
Uh, when uh, they are uh, technologically

475
00:20:17.950 --> 00:20:19.590
enough to have airport radar, uh, for

476
00:20:19.590 --> 00:20:22.270
example, but haven't wiped themselves out

477
00:20:22.430 --> 00:20:23.830
because of the loonies that they've

478
00:20:23.830 --> 00:20:24.350
generated.

479
00:20:24.350 --> 00:20:26.270
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, you're more, you're more likely to get

480
00:20:26.270 --> 00:20:29.110
a um, a tick tock of some

481
00:20:29.110 --> 00:20:31.590
kid doing a stupid raps hole. That's

482
00:20:31.590 --> 00:20:34.190
probably, that's what you'll get from,

483
00:20:35.150 --> 00:20:38.100
from an extraterrestrial intelligence, um.

484
00:20:38.100 --> 00:20:40.540
What, what, what I wonder

485
00:20:40.860 --> 00:20:43.100
is with the far side of the moon? Yes, it's

486
00:20:43.100 --> 00:20:45.860
radio silent, but does it cover enough

487
00:20:45.860 --> 00:20:48.060
of the spectrum of the universe to

488
00:20:48.860 --> 00:20:51.740
pick up something or is it fairly

489
00:20:51.740 --> 00:20:53.340
narrow in its scope?

490
00:20:53.900 --> 00:20:56.300
Professor Fred Watson: Do you mean in terms of direction or.

491
00:20:56.300 --> 00:20:58.060
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, being able to pick something up.

492
00:20:58.060 --> 00:21:00.620
Professor Fred Watson: Has it got like a wide array? Yeah, I mean

493
00:21:00.620 --> 00:21:03.540
the far side of the moon, um, you know,

494
00:21:03.540 --> 00:21:06.020
if you plunk something on the equator of the

495
00:21:06.020 --> 00:21:08.840
moon on the far side over a month

496
00:21:08.840 --> 00:21:11.840
you cover the entire sky. If you're,

497
00:21:11.840 --> 00:21:14.440
yeah, if you're um, if your

498
00:21:14.860 --> 00:21:17.480
uh, equipment is broadband enough

499
00:21:17.560 --> 00:21:20.360
and all the SETI stuff is, it's got a very

500
00:21:20.360 --> 00:21:22.760
wide range of spectral, of uh, frequencies

501
00:21:22.760 --> 00:21:25.640
although they do tend to concentrate on

502
00:21:26.920 --> 00:21:29.440
what uh, we call the 21 centimetre line. This

503
00:21:29.440 --> 00:21:32.040
is the frequency, the specific frequency

504
00:21:32.040 --> 00:21:34.380
that's radiated by called hydrogen.

505
00:21:34.860 --> 00:21:37.300
Uh and they do tend to concentrate on that

506
00:21:37.300 --> 00:21:39.460
because everybody in the universe will be

507
00:21:39.460 --> 00:21:41.740
aware of that 21 centimetre

508
00:21:42.300 --> 00:21:44.860
uh, wavelength because

509
00:21:44.860 --> 00:21:47.580
that's called hydrogen. Which is the same

510
00:21:47.580 --> 00:21:48.140
everywhere.

511
00:21:48.300 --> 00:21:51.180
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, makes sense. All right,

512
00:21:51.580 --> 00:21:54.220
fascinating. Um, storey, um, nothing yet.

513
00:21:54.380 --> 00:21:56.500
But that doesn't mean, that doesn't mean

514
00:21:56.500 --> 00:21:57.660
it'll always be nothing.

515
00:21:57.740 --> 00:22:00.420
Professor Fred Watson: So it's not evidence of

516
00:22:00.420 --> 00:22:01.420
absence. That's right.

517
00:22:01.520 --> 00:22:04.030
Andrew Dunkley: M exactly. You can read all about it as

518
00:22:04.030 --> 00:22:05.830
Fred Watson said at the phys

519
00:22:06.070 --> 00:22:08.550
phys.org website,

520
00:22:08.950 --> 00:22:11.270
this is Space Nuts Andrew Dunkley here with

521
00:22:11.350 --> 00:22:12.710
Professor Fred Watson Watson.

522
00:22:15.110 --> 00:22:17.190
Professor Fred Watson: Okay, we checked all four systems and

523
00:22:17.190 --> 00:22:19.920
Andrew Dunkley: being with a go, Space Nuts, our uh,

524
00:22:19.950 --> 00:22:22.950
final storey. Fred Watson brings uh, us back

525
00:22:22.950 --> 00:22:25.670
to that old debate about the Hubble

526
00:22:25.670 --> 00:22:28.630
tension. Now the Hubble tension is measured

527
00:22:28.630 --> 00:22:30.870
in two different ways and they come up with

528
00:22:30.870 --> 00:22:33.470
two different answers. And that's troubled

529
00:22:33.470 --> 00:22:36.030
people for a while. Although we did a storey

530
00:22:36.030 --> 00:22:38.070
not so long ago that suggested. Hang on a

531
00:22:38.070 --> 00:22:40.630
minute, the differences aren't uh, that

532
00:22:40.870 --> 00:22:43.350
significant. So they're probably both right

533
00:22:43.590 --> 00:22:46.270
if you allow for the um, you know, the, the

534
00:22:46.270 --> 00:22:49.070
variables. But this storey is saying.

535
00:22:49.070 --> 00:22:51.870
Hang on a minute, we, we think there's a

536
00:22:51.870 --> 00:22:52.390
better way.

537
00:22:53.750 --> 00:22:56.150
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right. Uh, in

538
00:22:56.150 --> 00:22:58.950
Exactly. That it's all about. So

539
00:22:59.510 --> 00:23:02.460
let's just, uh, backtrack. What is the Hubble

540
00:23:02.460 --> 00:23:05.100
tension? Uh, so the

541
00:23:05.180 --> 00:23:07.840
expansion rate of the universe, uh,

542
00:23:07.840 --> 00:23:10.700
basically is a number that we was

543
00:23:10.700 --> 00:23:13.340
first measured by Edwin hubble back in 1929.

544
00:23:13.860 --> 00:23:15.900
Um, he got the wrong answer because he was

545
00:23:15.900 --> 00:23:17.860
only looking at a very small number of

546
00:23:17.860 --> 00:23:20.700
galaxies. But it comes about because, as

547
00:23:20.700 --> 00:23:23.700
you look at galaxies, ah, in the

548
00:23:23.700 --> 00:23:26.540
wider universe, uh, they get,

549
00:23:26.920 --> 00:23:29.350
um. Their velocity away from us

550
00:23:29.830 --> 00:23:31.990
is bigger the further away they are.

551
00:23:32.710 --> 00:23:34.510
And that comes about when you've got a

552
00:23:34.510 --> 00:23:36.830
universe that's expanding. That's the natural

553
00:23:36.830 --> 00:23:39.030
assumption and we've believed that ever

554
00:23:39.030 --> 00:23:41.590
since. Yeah. Excuse me. So.

555
00:23:42.550 --> 00:23:44.590
So, um, I've got a bit of Hubble tension in

556
00:23:44.590 --> 00:23:47.350
my chest there. Um, so that's how

557
00:23:47.430 --> 00:23:50.310
it's normally measured, measured the Hubble

558
00:23:50.310 --> 00:23:52.710
constant, this number,

559
00:23:53.110 --> 00:23:56.030
which is in slightly bizarre units, it's

560
00:23:56.030 --> 00:23:58.390
in megapas, uh, kilometres per second per

561
00:23:58.390 --> 00:24:01.090
megaparsec. Kilometres per second is

562
00:24:01.090 --> 00:24:04.050
the recession speed of a galaxy.

563
00:24:04.450 --> 00:24:06.210
A megaparsec is,

564
00:24:07.000 --> 00:24:09.890
uh, it 3.26. I can never remember the

565
00:24:09.890 --> 00:24:11.410
name. Million light years.

566
00:24:12.850 --> 00:24:14.810
It's the units that astronomers use for

567
00:24:14.810 --> 00:24:17.410
measuring distance parsecs. And it's a

568
00:24:17.410 --> 00:24:20.370
million parsecs. So, um, kilometres

569
00:24:20.370 --> 00:24:23.250
per second per megaparsec tells you how

570
00:24:23.250 --> 00:24:25.770
the velocity of a galaxy

571
00:24:25.770 --> 00:24:28.570
increases with distance and that's the

572
00:24:28.570 --> 00:24:30.290
result of the expansion of the universe. So

573
00:24:30.290 --> 00:24:33.270
the Hubble constant tells you how fast the

574
00:24:33.270 --> 00:24:35.070
universe is expanding. Now,

575
00:24:35.950 --> 00:24:38.870
now you can. The normal way of

576
00:24:38.870 --> 00:24:41.750
doing this is, uh. And it's actually why the

577
00:24:41.750 --> 00:24:44.470
Hubble telescope was created and why it got

578
00:24:44.470 --> 00:24:47.349
its name. Uh, we. Excuse me, we

579
00:24:47.349 --> 00:24:50.310
measure the brightness. Sorry, I've

580
00:24:50.310 --> 00:24:52.110
got my. Got my tension back there.

581
00:24:53.630 --> 00:24:55.630
If you want to cut this bit out, Huw, you're

582
00:24:55.630 --> 00:24:56.670
more than welcome to,

583
00:24:58.720 --> 00:25:01.070
um. It's fine now, uh,

584
00:25:02.080 --> 00:25:05.010
uh, the tension comes about. So, no, let me

585
00:25:05.010 --> 00:25:07.890
step back again. The measure, uh, where

586
00:25:07.890 --> 00:25:10.770
it's measured is you build up a sort of

587
00:25:10.770 --> 00:25:12.610
distance scale ladder. So the direct

588
00:25:12.610 --> 00:25:15.610
measurement of star distances in outer

589
00:25:15.610 --> 00:25:18.250
space comes about by the parallax

590
00:25:18.250 --> 00:25:21.090
method. As the Earth goes around the sun, we

591
00:25:21.090 --> 00:25:24.090
see stars, uh, apparently changing their

592
00:25:24.090 --> 00:25:26.970
position relative to very distant

593
00:25:26.970 --> 00:25:29.390
background stars. And that changing position

594
00:25:29.390 --> 00:25:31.910
you can measure. Uh, and in fact

595
00:25:31.990 --> 00:25:34.270
it's that. That gives the parsec its name.

596
00:25:34.270 --> 00:25:37.230
It's a parallax of 1/ arc second is what

597
00:25:37.230 --> 00:25:39.510
it's short for. And so that's a direct

598
00:25:39.910 --> 00:25:42.230
geometrical way of measuring the distance to

599
00:25:42.230 --> 00:25:44.989
certain stars. If you can do that to

600
00:25:44.989 --> 00:25:47.270
stars whose intrinsic brightness, you know,

601
00:25:47.590 --> 00:25:49.910
and these are typically, uh, Cepheid variable

602
00:25:49.910 --> 00:25:52.590
stars, then you can extend it because you

603
00:25:52.590 --> 00:25:54.910
know their brightness, uh, their intrinsic

604
00:25:54.910 --> 00:25:57.110
brightness, how much uh, light they radiate,

605
00:25:57.660 --> 00:25:59.580
then you can look at how faint they are

606
00:25:59.660 --> 00:26:02.220
further and further on. Um, and that's the,

607
00:26:02.220 --> 00:26:04.540
that's how we started off because Hubble

608
00:26:05.500 --> 00:26:08.500
measured um, um. In fact in

609
00:26:08.500 --> 00:26:11.180
1923 used these variable stars to

610
00:26:11.180 --> 00:26:12.500
measure the distance of the Andromeda, um,

611
00:26:12.940 --> 00:26:15.100
galaxy. Once again, he got it a bit wrong by

612
00:26:15.100 --> 00:26:17.700
today's standards. But that uh, was when we

613
00:26:17.700 --> 00:26:19.580
realised that galaxies weren't little things

614
00:26:19.580 --> 00:26:22.260
frutaling around in our own Milky Way. They

615
00:26:22.260 --> 00:26:25.030
are very distant objects. So, so that's the

616
00:26:25.030 --> 00:26:27.950
basic process and that has now been

617
00:26:28.500 --> 00:26:31.470
uh, basically elaborated by

618
00:26:31.550 --> 00:26:34.470
additional things which involve supernovae,

619
00:26:34.470 --> 00:26:37.150
the exploding stars, all sorts of other

620
00:26:37.600 --> 00:26:40.309
uh, cosmic phenomena. And that's the

621
00:26:40.309 --> 00:26:43.230
basis of what this storey is about

622
00:26:43.710 --> 00:26:46.030
because uh, that

623
00:26:46.430 --> 00:26:48.430
technology has now been

624
00:26:49.070 --> 00:26:51.630
absolutely refined to the nth degree,

625
00:26:52.180 --> 00:26:55.140
uh, by the scientists who are uh,

626
00:26:55.200 --> 00:26:57.800
uh, who are um, um,

627
00:26:57.800 --> 00:27:00.710
basically reporting this work. It's

628
00:27:00.710 --> 00:27:03.390
a study in astronomy and astrophysics, one of

629
00:27:03.390 --> 00:27:05.310
the leading journals, actually a European

630
00:27:05.310 --> 00:27:08.150
journal. Uh, and these scientists

631
00:27:08.150 --> 00:27:10.590
have spent a lot of time

632
00:27:11.310 --> 00:27:14.270
getting uh, the answer right from

633
00:27:14.270 --> 00:27:16.430
this method, what we call the distance ladder

634
00:27:16.430 --> 00:27:19.230
or the distance scale, by invoking

635
00:27:19.550 --> 00:27:22.130
objects of all kinds. And so they

636
00:27:22.370 --> 00:27:24.930
have produced a number for the Hubble

637
00:27:24.930 --> 00:27:27.650
constant which has a very, very

638
00:27:28.130 --> 00:27:30.840
small error. In fact they quote it as Ah,

639
00:27:30.890 --> 00:27:32.770
73.50

640
00:27:33.570 --> 00:27:36.210
kilometres per second per megaparsec

641
00:27:36.450 --> 00:27:39.050
plus or minus point zero, sorry,

642
00:27:39.050 --> 00:27:42.010
0.81 kilometres per

643
00:27:42.010 --> 00:27:44.650
second per megaset parsec. So they're talking

644
00:27:44.650 --> 00:27:47.210
about something that's either somewhere

645
00:27:47.210 --> 00:27:50.210
between 72.0 and 74. Sorry,

646
00:27:50.210 --> 00:27:52.510
72.5 and 74. 4.5

647
00:27:52.510 --> 00:27:55.030
thereabouts, which is a very, very

648
00:27:55.110 --> 00:27:57.990
tight uh, estimate of this

649
00:27:57.990 --> 00:28:00.990
velocity. Uh, so what's

650
00:28:00.990 --> 00:28:03.710
the tension about until somebody debunks

651
00:28:03.710 --> 00:28:06.370
them? Yeah, uh,

652
00:28:06.630 --> 00:28:09.030
well, it's true. Um, I do remember,

653
00:28:09.630 --> 00:28:11.830
um, back in the 70s, and I've told you this

654
00:28:11.830 --> 00:28:14.510
before, Andrew, there were two schools of

655
00:28:14.510 --> 00:28:17.310
thought, both offering measurements with very

656
00:28:17.310 --> 00:28:19.870
tight error limits, one of which said that

657
00:28:19.870 --> 00:28:22.100
the number was 50 and the other which said

658
00:28:22.100 --> 00:28:25.100
the number was 100. And lo and behold, when

659
00:28:25.100 --> 00:28:26.660
the Hubble telescope gave us the right

660
00:28:26.660 --> 00:28:28.700
answer, it was basically the average of those

661
00:28:28.700 --> 00:28:31.180
two around about 75. And it's now been

662
00:28:31.180 --> 00:28:31.700
refined.

663
00:28:31.780 --> 00:28:33.300
Andrew Dunkley: It's kind of what they're doing with this,

664
00:28:33.300 --> 00:28:33.860
isn't it?

665
00:28:34.580 --> 00:28:37.260
Professor Fred Watson: A little bit. Although they're really giving

666
00:28:37.260 --> 00:28:39.060
tight, very tight

667
00:28:39.510 --> 00:28:42.460
um, estimates based on everything that

668
00:28:42.460 --> 00:28:45.140
we can observe. Uh, whereas the previous

669
00:28:45.380 --> 00:28:47.780
this with the difference between 50 and 100

670
00:28:47.780 --> 00:28:49.820
and that was a kind of Hubble tension. We

671
00:28:49.820 --> 00:28:51.350
didn't call it the ah, that but that's sort

672
00:28:51.350 --> 00:28:54.070
of what it was. That was uh, based on

673
00:28:54.760 --> 00:28:57.350
uh, just individual, individual measurements

674
00:28:57.510 --> 00:29:00.350
from you know, their own particular school of

675
00:29:00.350 --> 00:29:02.830
thought. One was galaxies, one was supernovae

676
00:29:02.830 --> 00:29:04.310
or something. I can't remember how it worked,

677
00:29:04.310 --> 00:29:06.030
I can't remember the details. Probably could

678
00:29:06.030 --> 00:29:08.550
if I thought about it. Uh, but this brings

679
00:29:08.550 --> 00:29:11.350
them all together to get this super accurate

680
00:29:11.670 --> 00:29:14.310
so called value of 73.5.

681
00:29:14.790 --> 00:29:17.740
So the tension is that there is another way

682
00:29:18.220 --> 00:29:21.020
of determining uh, the Hubble

683
00:29:21.020 --> 00:29:23.900
constant and it involves uh, observing

684
00:29:23.900 --> 00:29:26.100
the cosmic microwave background radiation.

685
00:29:26.100 --> 00:29:28.620
That's the radiation that we see from the Big

686
00:29:28.620 --> 00:29:31.020
Bang. We're looking back 13.8 billion years

687
00:29:31.340 --> 00:29:33.900
to see that. What's sometimes called the

688
00:29:33.900 --> 00:29:35.900
afterglow of the Big Bang. It's really still

689
00:29:35.900 --> 00:29:37.540
the light of the Big Bang that you can see

690
00:29:37.540 --> 00:29:39.500
because you're looking so far back in time.

691
00:29:40.140 --> 00:29:43.140
And that gives us a different number. You

692
00:29:43.140 --> 00:29:46.040
can look at the, the, it's what's

693
00:29:46.040 --> 00:29:47.960
called the power spectrum. The cosmic

694
00:29:47.960 --> 00:29:49.800
microwave background radiation has these

695
00:29:49.800 --> 00:29:52.760
tiny, tiny fluctuations and by tiny

696
00:29:52.760 --> 00:29:54.960
I mean the amount fluctuations in

697
00:29:54.960 --> 00:29:56.560
temperature. You can measure the temperature

698
00:29:56.560 --> 00:29:59.560
of the radiation and they form in little

699
00:29:59.560 --> 00:30:02.480
blobs and we think that's where the galaxies

700
00:30:02.480 --> 00:30:04.320
came from. The cooler parts were where

701
00:30:04.320 --> 00:30:07.280
galaxies formed, the warmer parts were not.

702
00:30:07.700 --> 00:30:10.440
Uh, and so the microwave

703
00:30:10.440 --> 00:30:12.160
background radiation when you look at,

704
00:30:13.720 --> 00:30:16.580
looks like a wallpaper, uh, which is

705
00:30:16.580 --> 00:30:18.700
why I sometimes call it the cosmic wallpaper.

706
00:30:18.780 --> 00:30:20.620
Partly because it's behind everything else.

707
00:30:20.620 --> 00:30:22.540
Just like the wallpaper in a room is behind

708
00:30:22.540 --> 00:30:25.300
everything. But it's also got these patterns.

709
00:30:25.300 --> 00:30:27.820
So you can use those patterns to make another

710
00:30:27.900 --> 00:30:30.460
estimate of the uh, Hubble

711
00:30:30.460 --> 00:30:30.940
constant.

712
00:30:30.940 --> 00:30:33.820
And the answer that you get is 67

713
00:30:33.820 --> 00:30:36.620
kilometres per second per megaparsec, which

714
00:30:36.620 --> 00:30:39.260
is well outside the error

715
00:30:39.260 --> 00:30:41.920
band of the sort of traditional method.

716
00:30:41.990 --> 00:30:44.990
Method. And so I think

717
00:30:44.990 --> 00:30:47.830
what the direction this is going

718
00:30:47.830 --> 00:30:50.750
in is. So uh, as you and I have

719
00:30:50.750 --> 00:30:53.390
spoken about before, people have done a lot

720
00:30:53.390 --> 00:30:56.230
of work to try and look for where we've

721
00:30:56.230 --> 00:30:58.109
gone wrong here because these two numbers

722
00:30:58.109 --> 00:30:59.750
should give you the same answer. But they

723
00:30:59.750 --> 00:31:02.750
don't. But they don't. So

724
00:31:02.750 --> 00:31:04.590
now people are turning it upside down and

725
00:31:04.590 --> 00:31:06.790
saying maybe the fact that they don't give

726
00:31:06.790 --> 00:31:08.470
the same answer is telling us something

727
00:31:08.470 --> 00:31:10.330
about, about the physics of the universe that

728
00:31:10.330 --> 00:31:11.050
we don't know

729
00:31:12.810 --> 00:31:14.690
Andrew Dunkley: or we're just not accounting for everything

730
00:31:14.690 --> 00:31:16.610
we need to put into the formula.

731
00:31:16.610 --> 00:31:19.370
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah there's that too. And, but I think

732
00:31:19.370 --> 00:31:22.090
that's. So as time goes on people are ticking

733
00:31:22.090 --> 00:31:24.570
off all those things uh, simply because

734
00:31:24.730 --> 00:31:27.290
there's a lot more work being done on this

735
00:31:27.290 --> 00:31:29.930
topic. So the Hubble tension could turn out

736
00:31:29.930 --> 00:31:32.730
to be, uh, the gateway

737
00:31:32.890 --> 00:31:35.730
into new physics. That might tell us about

738
00:31:35.730 --> 00:31:38.170
dark matter and dark energy and all the other

739
00:31:38.170 --> 00:31:41.100
dark stuff that we think about. Yeah.

740
00:31:41.180 --> 00:31:44.060
So it's potentially, uh, something

741
00:31:44.060 --> 00:31:46.660
that I think, uh, scientists everywhere will

742
00:31:46.660 --> 00:31:49.400
keep an eye on. But, uh, it is really, um,

743
00:31:49.400 --> 00:31:51.620
really, uh, in many ways getting quite

744
00:31:51.620 --> 00:31:53.460
exciting that this Hubble tension is not

745
00:31:53.460 --> 00:31:55.420
going away. No, definitely not.

746
00:31:55.420 --> 00:31:57.780
Andrew Dunkley: It's come up a few times in the last 10 years

747
00:31:57.780 --> 00:31:59.940
that we've been doing this. So they keep

748
00:31:59.940 --> 00:32:01.620
looking at it and that's. And very good

749
00:32:01.620 --> 00:32:04.220
reasons to do so. Uh, for the record, a

750
00:32:04.220 --> 00:32:07.190
megaparsec is approximately 3.0 million light

751
00:32:07.190 --> 00:32:08.710
years. I think that's what you said.

752
00:32:08.870 --> 00:32:10.630
Professor Fred Watson: It is what I said. Yeah. I could never

753
00:32:10.630 --> 00:32:12.150
remember. I think it's 3.26.

754
00:32:12.150 --> 00:32:14.510
Andrew Dunkley: I thought that's what I found. Yes.

755
00:32:14.510 --> 00:32:15.990
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Very good.

756
00:32:16.070 --> 00:32:18.070
Andrew Dunkley: All right, uh, hopefully they've finally

757
00:32:18.070 --> 00:32:20.750
cracked the Hubble tension debate. Uh, I

758
00:32:20.750 --> 00:32:22.470
guess we'll find out if they keep coming up

759
00:32:22.470 --> 00:32:24.310
with different numbers in, in the future.

760
00:32:24.630 --> 00:32:26.100
But, uh, you can look it up@, uh,

761
00:32:26.100 --> 00:32:28.390
dailygalaxy.com or you can read the

762
00:32:28.550 --> 00:32:30.830
published paper at Astronomy and

763
00:32:30.830 --> 00:32:31.830
Astrophysics.

764
00:32:32.710 --> 00:32:34.110
Fred Watson, that brings us to the end of the

765
00:32:34.110 --> 00:32:35.350
programme. Thank you so much.

766
00:32:36.310 --> 00:32:38.750
Professor Fred Watson: A great pleasure, Andrew. Uh, we've covered

767
00:32:38.750 --> 00:32:41.510
some great topics today and, uh, it's always

768
00:32:41.510 --> 00:32:42.150
a delight.

769
00:32:42.470 --> 00:32:45.190
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it's very. A few different types of

770
00:32:45.270 --> 00:32:47.670
storeys this time around, which we like.

771
00:32:48.070 --> 00:32:49.590
We'll catch you on the next one, Fred Watson.

772
00:32:50.550 --> 00:32:52.310
Professor Fred Watson: I guess we will. Yes. Sounds good.

773
00:32:52.550 --> 00:32:54.350
Andrew Dunkley: Professor Fred Watson Watson, astronomer at

774
00:32:54.350 --> 00:32:56.310
large. And thanks to Huw in the studio. He

775
00:32:56.310 --> 00:32:58.710
couldn't be with us today because he caused a

776
00:32:58.710 --> 00:33:01.410
bit of, of hubby tension at home

777
00:33:03.010 --> 00:33:04.930
and he's been sent to the naughty corner.

778
00:33:05.490 --> 00:33:08.380
Don't, uh, forget to visit us online or, um,

779
00:33:08.380 --> 00:33:10.330
visit, uh, us on social media. And don't

780
00:33:10.330 --> 00:33:12.490
forget to send us your comments and questions

781
00:33:12.490 --> 00:33:13.690
via, uh, our website, space

782
00:33:13.690 --> 00:33:16.010
nutspodcast.com or

783
00:33:16.010 --> 00:33:19.010
spacenuts IO and, uh, leave

784
00:33:19.010 --> 00:33:21.050
reviews from your favourite podcasting

785
00:33:21.050 --> 00:33:23.530
platform in the meantime, from me, Andrew

786
00:33:23.530 --> 00:33:24.850
Dunkley. Thanks for your company. We'll see

787
00:33:24.850 --> 00:33:27.010
you on the very next episode of Space Nuts.

788
00:33:27.010 --> 00:33:27.690
Professor Fred Watson: Bye. Bye.

789
00:33:28.890 --> 00:33:31.090
Andrew Dunkley: You've been listening to the Space Nuts

790
00:33:31.090 --> 00:33:34.050
podcast, available at

791
00:33:34.050 --> 00:33:36.010
Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

792
00:33:36.250 --> 00:33:38.970
iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast

793
00:33:38.970 --> 00:33:40.650
player. You can also stream on

794
00:33:40.650 --> 00:33:42.410
demand@bytes.com.

795
00:33:42.730 --> 00:33:44.770
Professor Fred Watson: this has been another quality podcast

796
00:33:44.770 --> 00:33:46.890
production from bytes.com.
Send a Voicemail