Dec. 16, 2024

Jupiter's Giant Leap, Gravity's Infinite Debate & Cosmic Queries: #478 Q&A

Jupiter's Giant Leap, Gravity's Infinite Debate & Cosmic Queries: #478 Q&A

Space Nuts Episode #478 Q&A
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this engaging Q&A edition of Space Nuts as they tackle intriguing questions from listeners worldwide. From the massive size of Jupiter to the nature of gravity and...

Space Nuts Episode #478 Q&A
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this engaging Q&A edition of Space Nuts as they tackle intriguing questions from listeners worldwide. From the massive size of Jupiter to the nature of gravity and the mysteries of the universe's accelerating expansion, this episode is packed with cosmic conundrums and insightful discussions.
Episode Highlights:
- Jupiter's Massive Growth: Dive into the fascinating story of why Jupiter grew to such a colossal size compared to other planets. Explore the role of gas accretion, planetesimals, and the runaway growth effect in shaping the largest planet in our solar system.
- The Nature of Gravity: Examine the intriguing question of whether gravity is finite or infinite. Discover the complexities of gravitational waves, the stiffness of Space, and how these concepts influence our understanding of gravity's reach.
- The Night Sky in Earth's Early Era: Imagine standing on Earth when it first formed and ponder what the night sky would have looked like. Understand how the universe's expansion and the redshift of the Big Bang's light affect our cosmic view.
- The Fate of Comets: Consider the life cycle of comets and whether they can lose enough material to become nothing. Learn about the trails of dust left behind and their connection to meteor showers.
- Solar Panels at Night: Explore the possibility of generating solar power at night using light from stars and the moon. Delve into the limitations of current technology and the potential for future innovations.
- The Universe's Accelerating Expansion: Discuss the acceleration of the universe's expansion and whether it is constant or variable. Contemplate the implications for our understanding of dark energy and the structure of the universe.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com.
If you'd like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
00:00 - This is a Q and A episode where we let the audience set the agenda
01:19 - Why did Jupiter grow to such a massive size compared to other planets
07:30 - Dean in Queensland has a question about whether gravity is infinite or finite
12:00 - Dean: We really don't understand gravity. Well, it'll be when quantum gravity really comes of age
13:50 - Professor Fred Watson answers a few quick fire questions via text message
14:22 - Given the night sky seems fairly full of stars to the naked eye today
18:26 - Could you develop solar panels that work at night by collecting energy from other stars
20:04 - Daniel asks whether the rate of acceleration is constant or ever so slightly variable
25:49 - The Space Nuts podcast group Facebook page has thousands of members
✍️ Episode References
Scientific American article on Jupiter's growth
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-was-jupiters-rapid-growth-spurt-delayed-for-millions-of-years/
Nature Astronomy journal
https://www.nature.com/natastron/

Become a...

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.880 --> 00:00:03.640
Hi, there, Space Nuts again Andrew Dunkley. Here, this is

2
00:00:03.680 --> 00:00:06.719
a Q and A episode where we let the audience

3
00:00:06.839 --> 00:00:10.080
set the agenda, and today we'll be answering questions about

4
00:00:10.080 --> 00:00:16.120
the size of Jupiter. That's a why question, another maybe

5
00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:22.399
what if question? Or why question? Is gravity finite? And

6
00:00:22.839 --> 00:00:26.399
what would the night sky have been like if you're

7
00:00:26.399 --> 00:00:29.879
standing on the surfaces of Earth in its very early era?

8
00:00:30.879 --> 00:00:34.840
Plus the demise of comets, can we generate solar power

9
00:00:34.840 --> 00:00:37.520
at night? And the acceleration of the universe. All our

10
00:00:37.600 --> 00:00:42.320
questions will be answered on this episode of Space Nuts.

11
00:00:42.240 --> 00:00:56.719
Fifteen second Channel ten nine ignition Space Nuts or three two.

12
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:57.640
One Space Nuts as the Night Report. It Bil's good

13
00:00:58.799 --> 00:01:01.560
and you just can't get an enough of audience questions.

14
00:01:01.600 --> 00:01:04.480
It is Professor Fred, what's an astronomer at large? Hello Fred?

15
00:01:05.799 --> 00:01:08.680
Hello Andrew, Yes, sir, I do enjoy the audience questions

16
00:01:09.480 --> 00:01:12.480
because it tells me we've got an audience which is some.

17
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:17.799
And we get a lot of questions in audio and

18
00:01:17.920 --> 00:01:21.480
text format and we might as well go straight to

19
00:01:21.560 --> 00:01:27.719
our first one. And this one comes from David Dave

20
00:01:27.879 --> 00:01:31.879
in Verrel in northern New South Wales in Burrell, the

21
00:01:31.959 --> 00:01:35.239
gem capital of New South Wales. I would I would

22
00:01:35.239 --> 00:01:37.359
suggest a lot of people go up there. FOSSi king

23
00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:41.439
for gems and Dave, thanks for your kind words. Of course,

24
00:01:41.480 --> 00:01:44.799
in a recent episode, I went public about my fight

25
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:48.480
with prostate cancer, and Dave has been dealing with his

26
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:53.799
own issues. But Dave, I appreciate your your thoughts. Thank

27
00:01:53.840 --> 00:01:58.280
you so much. Dave asks Gray, Andrew and Fred. Just

28
00:01:58.319 --> 00:02:01.200
a quick question for Fred, because I wouldn't know the answer.

29
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:05.319
Is that what you're saying, Dave? Why? I don't why

30
00:02:05.319 --> 00:02:08.879
did Jupiter grow to such a massive size compared to

31
00:02:08.919 --> 00:02:12.039
other planets. Was there simply just more gas and material

32
00:02:12.120 --> 00:02:16.400
available in that part of the solid disc where it formed. Jeez, Dave,

33
00:02:17.479 --> 00:02:19.319
he might have answered it straight up, or is there

34
00:02:19.400 --> 00:02:20.520
something else in play here?

35
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:24.479
For it's an interesting story, and I'm grateful today for

36
00:02:24.520 --> 00:02:28.400
sending me down the rabbit hole of Jupiter's formation to

37
00:02:28.479 --> 00:02:32.319
see what the story is. I mean, it's what Dave

38
00:02:32.360 --> 00:02:36.280
says is partly the case. There's a big reservoir of

39
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:40.199
gas and dust. I mean, we think it was the

40
00:02:40.280 --> 00:02:43.240
dusty material that formed the core, and then the gas

41
00:02:43.319 --> 00:02:48.159
was collected once that was in place. But there's some

42
00:02:48.199 --> 00:02:52.240
subtleties here, and I'm going to point Dave in particular

43
00:02:53.360 --> 00:02:56.960
to a very nice article. It's six years old now

44
00:02:57.360 --> 00:03:03.360
twenty eighteen on the Scientific American website, really excellent website

45
00:03:03.400 --> 00:03:08.639
with you know, very high degree of accuracy. But it's

46
00:03:08.680 --> 00:03:12.879
called why was Jupiter's rapid growth delayed for millions of years?

47
00:03:14.280 --> 00:03:20.719
And it's basically saying that it wasn't just a continuous

48
00:03:21.400 --> 00:03:29.879
growing process that Jupiter underwent, but it actually was was delayed,

49
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:34.520
and the mechanism for that delay is quite interesting. So

50
00:03:35.319 --> 00:03:40.639
this is basically research that came from from Swiss Switzerland.

51
00:03:41.479 --> 00:03:47.479
So we we believe that the planet is amals. These

52
00:03:47.520 --> 00:03:54.439
sort of kilometer sized asteroids are what basically was the

53
00:03:54.520 --> 00:03:57.159
raw material of the planets, and the planetimals in turn

54
00:03:57.199 --> 00:04:01.520
had grown from dust sticking together, part electrostatically in the beginning,

55
00:04:01.599 --> 00:04:04.360
but eventually by gravity and they formed their own you know,

56
00:04:04.360 --> 00:04:07.000
their own gravity pools in more stuff. So you've got

57
00:04:07.479 --> 00:04:13.639
these planetsimals, and the thinking is that during the first

58
00:04:13.719 --> 00:04:18.199
two million years of Jupiter's formation, it was in the

59
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:20.680
right place for a lot of these things to smash

60
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:26.639
into the proto Jupiter, and that made it hot. A

61
00:04:26.639 --> 00:04:31.279
lot of energy caused by collision, and what that does

62
00:04:31.959 --> 00:04:37.120
is stops the process of gas screting. In other words,

63
00:04:37.439 --> 00:04:40.399
you know the gas molecules that are out and about

64
00:04:40.439 --> 00:04:43.399
in space which are eventually going to form part of

65
00:04:43.519 --> 00:04:45.920
Jupiter's very thick atmosphere that make it the big world

66
00:04:45.959 --> 00:04:52.079
that it is. These authors are suggesting that the bombardment

67
00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:57.240
by planet simals gave so much heat energy that the

68
00:04:57.439 --> 00:05:01.120
gas did not want to collect it, it didn't accrete,

69
00:05:01.519 --> 00:05:04.720
and so the planet grew more slowly than it had been.

70
00:05:06.079 --> 00:05:10.600
And then it says, you know, the theory says that

71
00:05:13.040 --> 00:05:18.279
basically the first few million years, within the first few

72
00:05:18.279 --> 00:05:21.319
million years, it was twenty times the mass of Earth.

73
00:05:22.319 --> 00:05:27.839
But then the larger Planetisimals were bombarding it and they,

74
00:05:28.639 --> 00:05:33.399
as I've just said, crashed into to Jupiter, releasing energy,

75
00:05:33.800 --> 00:05:39.800
stopping the collection of gas, and so it's growth rate

76
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:42.199
they now think had slowed down so that by three

77
00:05:42.240 --> 00:05:46.560
million years of age, it was only fifty times the

78
00:05:46.560 --> 00:05:50.000
mass of the Earth, which means that it took two

79
00:05:50.040 --> 00:05:52.879
million years to grow thirty times the mass of the Earth.

80
00:05:53.360 --> 00:05:58.920
But then sort of something happened, and it's a processed

81
00:05:58.920 --> 00:06:02.040
that the authors of this article is calling runaway gas

82
00:06:02.040 --> 00:06:06.120
secretion where the gas actually collects, and then that makes

83
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:08.360
it more massive, and then more gas collects and it's

84
00:06:08.360 --> 00:06:12.600
more massive, and so it grew to its current roughly

85
00:06:12.639 --> 00:06:14.879
three hundred times the massive the Earth size that it

86
00:06:14.920 --> 00:06:15.319
is now.

87
00:06:16.560 --> 00:06:18.759
So this is like a like a like a snowball

88
00:06:18.839 --> 00:06:19.680
rolling down a hill.

89
00:06:20.199 --> 00:06:23.240
Yeah, that's a very nice and analog. Yeah, that's right.

90
00:06:23.279 --> 00:06:26.560
It's you know, you can't stop, it's going down the hill.

91
00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:29.720
It's gonna it's gonna collect more and more smooth hmm.

92
00:06:30.279 --> 00:06:30.800
Interesting.

93
00:06:31.759 --> 00:06:35.079
So the and they and you know, they think that

94
00:06:35.160 --> 00:06:39.680
once Jupiter started to become dominant, then it was a

95
00:06:39.759 --> 00:06:42.319
runaway effect because the bigger it is, the more stuff

96
00:06:42.360 --> 00:06:47.839
it pulls in, uh, and basically grows to its present size.

97
00:06:47.959 --> 00:06:50.920
It's an article that has got a lot of complexity

98
00:06:50.959 --> 00:06:56.600
in it, but is one that's worth reading, Dave, if

99
00:06:56.639 --> 00:06:59.240
you're interested in why Jupiter got to be the size

100
00:06:59.279 --> 00:07:03.160
it is. Actually, the original paper was produced was published

101
00:07:03.199 --> 00:07:06.720
in Nature Astronomy. But there's a nice scientific American article

102
00:07:06.720 --> 00:07:09.600
as I mentioned, why was Jupis's rapid growth spurt delayed

103
00:07:09.600 --> 00:07:10.600
for millions of years?

104
00:07:11.800 --> 00:07:14.240
There you are, Dave, there is a good reason for

105
00:07:14.279 --> 00:07:16.959
it right place at the right time, although it took

106
00:07:16.959 --> 00:07:23.000
a long time, it fits and starts all right. Thanks Dave.

107
00:07:23.040 --> 00:07:23.800
Great to hear from you.

108
00:07:26.360 --> 00:07:27.240
Okay, we take a.

109
00:07:29.279 --> 00:07:34.639
Space nuts and next question comes from Dean in Redcliffe

110
00:07:34.639 --> 00:07:38.519
and I wonder if Dean is a Dolphins fan. The

111
00:07:38.560 --> 00:07:42.720
Dolphins football team based in Redcliffe in Queensland, and they've

112
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.839
just lost their coach to a team in Sydney, the

113
00:07:45.920 --> 00:07:49.720
South Sydney rabbit Os. And guess what the National Rugby

114
00:07:49.800 --> 00:07:52.519
League's done as the first game of next year the

115
00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:56.519
Dolphins versus the Rabbits. So I'm wondering how Dean will

116
00:07:56.560 --> 00:08:00.680
feel about that if he's a Dolphins fans. Here rahm

117
00:08:00.759 --> 00:08:01.680
Dean's question.

118
00:08:02.439 --> 00:08:05.480
Hi Fred and Andrew. This is Dean in Redcliffe in Queensland.

119
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:08.600
I'm a retired architect and I've been a Space Nunts

120
00:08:08.639 --> 00:08:11.839
listener for a long time. Finally I have got around

121
00:08:11.839 --> 00:08:14.879
to send in in a question. I had always understood

122
00:08:14.879 --> 00:08:18.120
that the effect of gravity was infinite, although negligible at

123
00:08:18.160 --> 00:08:22.759
great distances. However, I recently heard that it may be finite.

124
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:25.120
This seems like a reasonable idea when I think about

125
00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:29.040
ocean waves here on Earth. Ocean waves will dispact to

126
00:08:29.120 --> 00:08:32.600
zero over enough distance if the wind stops pushing them.

127
00:08:33.039 --> 00:08:35.919
Ripples from a pebble dropped in a still pond will

128
00:08:35.960 --> 00:08:39.200
also dissipate to zero. This may be due to surface

129
00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:42.720
tension and friction between water molecules, which is an inherent

130
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:46.480
quality of the medium conducting the waves. Now of my question,

131
00:08:47.440 --> 00:08:51.000
space time is the medium that gravity distorts. Could it

132
00:08:51.080 --> 00:08:54.519
beat at the stiffness of space? Time eventually overcomes the

133
00:08:54.559 --> 00:08:58.360
diminishing gravity of a distant massive object so that its

134
00:08:58.440 --> 00:09:03.639
gravitational effect become zero rather than just negligible. T I'm

135
00:09:03.639 --> 00:09:06.679
on the right track with the particles and dark matter

136
00:09:06.759 --> 00:09:10.559
within space contribute to its stiffness and to the dissipation

137
00:09:10.799 --> 00:09:14.320
of gravity waves. Thanks for the podcast. Look forward to

138
00:09:14.320 --> 00:09:15.120
hearing your answer.

139
00:09:15.840 --> 00:09:19.360
M Thank you, Jan, great question, really good question.

140
00:09:20.639 --> 00:09:26.840
It is, And yeah, I guess the answer is maybe.

141
00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:31.759
I mean Dean's right. We've talked about the stiffness of space.

142
00:09:31.919 --> 00:09:34.840
Actually in one of the and we talked about taking

143
00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:39.080
one of the Fred's flippant facts, didn't we Yes, I

144
00:09:39.360 --> 00:09:44.080
said space is flexible, but not very It's Young's modulus,

145
00:09:44.159 --> 00:09:47.120
which is the measure of stiffness, which Dean would definitely

146
00:09:47.159 --> 00:09:50.480
be familiar with as an architect. The Young's modulus of

147
00:09:50.519 --> 00:09:54.120
space is one hundred billion billion times that of steel,

148
00:09:54.799 --> 00:10:00.799
so it's very stiff indeed, But I'm not sure that

149
00:10:00.799 --> 00:10:11.639
that stiffness would contribute to an attenuation of the gravitational force.

150
00:10:11.919 --> 00:10:16.840
We're kind of talking about two things. Gravity itself is

151
00:10:17.320 --> 00:10:22.320
the distortion of space. Gravitational waves, which we know travel

152
00:10:22.320 --> 00:10:28.960
at the speed of light, are basically vibrations in space,

153
00:10:29.039 --> 00:10:33.399
and you can imagine that gravitational waves would be attenuated

154
00:10:33.440 --> 00:10:37.159
to zero by the stiffness of space because of that

155
00:10:37.320 --> 00:10:43.840
Young's modulus. But gravity itself is an inverse square or

156
00:10:44.639 --> 00:10:49.840
which says that it's infinite. If you sort of have

157
00:10:49.919 --> 00:10:52.559
a look online to see what people think about gravity

158
00:10:52.600 --> 00:10:56.879
being whether it's infinite or not, there's some quite interesting.

159
00:10:58.080 --> 00:10:59.080
Aspects come out.

160
00:11:00.159 --> 00:11:06.440
One is that, well, gravitational waves aren't infinite because eventually

161
00:11:06.480 --> 00:11:10.799
they would reach the cosmic horizon, the microwave background radiation

162
00:11:10.840 --> 00:11:14.519
which is moving away at the speed of light, and

163
00:11:14.679 --> 00:11:20.720
these things would you know, they basically the gravitational waves

164
00:11:20.720 --> 00:11:24.519
themselves would interact with that and maybe cancel out. I'm

165
00:11:24.559 --> 00:11:26.480
not quite sure. I didn't really follow the logic of

166
00:11:26.480 --> 00:11:32.759
that one. And someone else. I thought that because the

167
00:11:32.759 --> 00:11:42.279
plank length is the length in matter below which the

168
00:11:42.360 --> 00:11:46.399
laws of physics don't apply, the plank length will be

169
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:52.600
something that would stop gravitational waves being infinite. We're talking

170
00:11:52.600 --> 00:11:56.600
about gravitational waves, no, not gravity, because eventually you get

171
00:11:56.679 --> 00:11:59.200
vibrations that were less than the plank length. That was

172
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:01.840
the point of that. So a lot of stuff that

173
00:12:02.200 --> 00:12:05.279
seems to me to be going around in circles. But

174
00:12:05.799 --> 00:12:10.679
my my take on it is still that there's an

175
00:12:10.679 --> 00:12:16.639
inverse squall or gravity. Gravitation Uh, excuse me, excuse me.

176
00:12:16.919 --> 00:12:20.320
Reach is an infinite distance. It's effectively zero. It a

177
00:12:20.440 --> 00:12:23.960
symptotically approaches zero. That means it gets nearer and nearer

178
00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:29.440
to being zero. No fundation formally never reaches it, but

179
00:12:29.480 --> 00:12:33.399
it is. Yes, it's an infinite force. So I don't

180
00:12:33.440 --> 00:12:36.120
know that dark energy and dark matter thrown into that

181
00:12:36.120 --> 00:12:38.720
makes really add anything to it. It's a great question, lie,

182
00:12:38.799 --> 00:12:41.320
and it's maybe thick about these things. Sorry, Andrew, go ahead.

183
00:12:41.759 --> 00:12:48.000
So are we saying are we saying that they phase it,

184
00:12:48.039 --> 00:12:49.200
they just sort of fizzle.

185
00:12:49.559 --> 00:12:52.720
Well, maybe maybe gravitational waves do, and it might be

186
00:12:52.720 --> 00:12:57.159
because of that stiffness. But gravity itself doesn't.

187
00:12:57.679 --> 00:13:01.759
That's okay until it runs into something else. And well

188
00:13:01.759 --> 00:13:06.679
it's also creating a gravity, yes, I meet. And yeah,

189
00:13:06.720 --> 00:13:09.039
and then did they just push against each other and

190
00:13:09.080 --> 00:13:09.519
create that?

191
00:13:10.639 --> 00:13:12.679
As you know, they can cancel out because exactly as

192
00:13:12.679 --> 00:13:14.279
you've said, that's how the brunch points work.

193
00:13:14.519 --> 00:13:19.159
Yes, m M. It's really interesting and it adds more

194
00:13:19.879 --> 00:13:22.600
to the empty vessel that is our knowledge of gravity.

195
00:13:24.360 --> 00:13:28.919
It is should really don't understand gravity. Yeah, we just

196
00:13:29.000 --> 00:13:33.440
know it's there. It's it's one of those I suppose

197
00:13:33.480 --> 00:13:36.000
if someone ever figures it out, that's a Nobel prize

198
00:13:36.000 --> 00:13:37.240
waiting the hell on, isn't it?

199
00:13:37.279 --> 00:13:40.840
Definitely? Well, it will be quite when quantum gravity really

200
00:13:40.919 --> 00:13:43.919
comes of age, when we really understand quantum gravity, which

201
00:13:43.919 --> 00:13:44.799
we don't at the moment.

202
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:49.159
So yeah, that will meet right. Thank you, Dean and

203
00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:51.480
all the best. Thanks for your question. This is Space

204
00:13:51.600 --> 00:14:01.600
Nuts Andrew Dunkley here with Professor Fairy Watson. Space Nuts.

205
00:14:02.559 --> 00:14:06.320
We've got another text question, Fred, and this one comes

206
00:14:06.360 --> 00:14:10.639
from Daniel who is in Adelaide, and he said, I've

207
00:14:10.919 --> 00:14:13.519
saved up a few quick fire questions I'm hoping you

208
00:14:13.559 --> 00:14:17.200
could answer please. Yes, we'd be happy to do so.

209
00:14:17.200 --> 00:14:19.919
So we'll knock them all off one at a time.

210
00:14:20.399 --> 00:14:22.480
Quick fire means you don't have to spend too much

211
00:14:22.519 --> 00:14:26.519
time on them. Fred, we know the universe's expansion has

212
00:14:26.559 --> 00:14:30.399
been accelerating for about the last five billion years. Given

213
00:14:30.440 --> 00:14:32.759
the night sky seems fairly full of stars to the

214
00:14:32.840 --> 00:14:36.200
naked eye today, what would it have looked like if

215
00:14:36.240 --> 00:14:38.799
you were standing on Earth when it formed? Would the

216
00:14:38.919 --> 00:14:42.519
night sky have been as bright as day? For example?

217
00:14:42.759 --> 00:14:43.799
That's his first question.

218
00:14:44.159 --> 00:14:49.600
Yeah, the answers no, So our vantage point four point

219
00:14:49.960 --> 00:14:53.480
six billion years ago when the Earth was forming, would

220
00:14:53.519 --> 00:14:56.600
be similar to what it is today. Yes, galaxies are

221
00:14:56.600 --> 00:15:00.600
closer together, and they might be, you know, a little

222
00:15:00.639 --> 00:15:04.879
bit brighter than we see them now, but I think

223
00:15:04.919 --> 00:15:07.799
it would still be a similar sky that we'd see.

224
00:15:08.080 --> 00:15:11.759
You've got to go back a lot further in time

225
00:15:12.279 --> 00:15:14.960
to be able to see a night sky as bright

226
00:15:15.000 --> 00:15:17.519
as day. And what that is is still being able

227
00:15:17.559 --> 00:15:19.919
to see the flash of the Big Bang, And at

228
00:15:19.919 --> 00:15:21.919
the moment, that flash of the Big Bang has been

229
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:24.440
redshifted into microwaves, which is why we don't see a

230
00:15:24.480 --> 00:15:28.879
brilliant sky. But we would if our eyes were sensitive

231
00:15:28.879 --> 00:15:32.559
to microwaves, or if we were looking at the early universe,

232
00:15:33.159 --> 00:15:35.960
you know, not long after it became transparent, then we'd

233
00:15:35.960 --> 00:15:36.960
see a very bright sky.

234
00:15:38.039 --> 00:15:41.799
That just a totally unrelated question, but that just prompted

235
00:15:41.840 --> 00:15:44.879
in my mind a thought about animals and insects. Would

236
00:15:44.879 --> 00:15:48.080
they see the night sky completely differently to us?

237
00:15:48.720 --> 00:15:51.960
That's what some of Mani's work is about. She works

238
00:15:51.960 --> 00:15:53.799
on that sort of thing from the point of view

239
00:15:53.840 --> 00:15:57.600
of light pollution. Yes, they do. They're sensitive. Many of

240
00:15:57.600 --> 00:16:00.840
them are sensitive to different wavebands than what we are,

241
00:16:01.399 --> 00:16:04.200
and in fact, something in sex need the night sky.

242
00:16:04.320 --> 00:16:08.720
Dung beetles work by aligning the direction of trouble with

243
00:16:08.759 --> 00:16:12.360
the milky way, so you know, it's quite an extraordinary Yeah,

244
00:16:12.360 --> 00:16:13.320
they do check it out.

245
00:16:17.000 --> 00:16:26.559
Yep. Wow, so so many one liners I can't use now. Sprats. Oh,

246
00:16:26.559 --> 00:16:29.879
that's fascinating. It's totally off the track in terms of

247
00:16:30.320 --> 00:16:36.080
the question, but yeah, amazing. So that's your first answer, Daniel.

248
00:16:36.120 --> 00:16:39.639
Your second question. When a comet passes a star, it

249
00:16:39.720 --> 00:16:42.320
gets its dust and ice blown off. But will that

250
00:16:42.440 --> 00:16:46.279
comet ever lose enough material to become nothing or does

251
00:16:46.279 --> 00:16:51.080
it add material back in a tin back as it

252
00:16:51.159 --> 00:16:55.440
traverses space. Well, some of them actually just end up

253
00:16:55.480 --> 00:16:59.720
crashing into planets and the Sun itself, which means they're

254
00:17:00.039 --> 00:17:03.799
adding to those things somewhat. But yeah, can they just

255
00:17:03.879 --> 00:17:06.839
be sort of, as I've used this word before, fizzled

256
00:17:06.880 --> 00:17:07.759
out over time.

257
00:17:09.039 --> 00:17:12.240
Yeah, they can, And what you would be left with

258
00:17:12.480 --> 00:17:17.000
is basically a trailer, you know, a trail of dust,

259
00:17:17.039 --> 00:17:21.440
which is what we pass through when we see meteor streams.

260
00:17:22.160 --> 00:17:25.240
So they probably are comets that have eventually dissipated. I'm

261
00:17:25.279 --> 00:17:29.319
not sure that any that have been seen by humans

262
00:17:29.759 --> 00:17:32.960
and recognized as comets. I'm not sure that any of

263
00:17:33.000 --> 00:17:36.200
those have dissipated to being just trailers of dust. But

264
00:17:36.240 --> 00:17:40.079
that's the end process, because you know, comets are made

265
00:17:40.079 --> 00:17:42.160
of dust, which is sort of bonded together by ice,

266
00:17:42.599 --> 00:17:45.440
and the ice sublimes. It goes straight into a gas

267
00:17:45.480 --> 00:17:48.160
and gets blown away and some of the dust is released,

268
00:17:48.160 --> 00:17:51.559
and eventually you're going to wind up just with a

269
00:17:51.559 --> 00:17:54.599
little pile of dust that will spread itself along the

270
00:17:54.640 --> 00:17:56.480
path of the comets forward.

271
00:17:57.119 --> 00:18:00.400
Yeah, and the Earth passes through these dust else from

272
00:18:00.440 --> 00:18:05.440
time to time when we see those meteorites that appear

273
00:18:05.440 --> 00:18:08.440
in the night sky at certain times of the year, meteors,

274
00:18:08.839 --> 00:18:11.400
they're only medials if you do their line meteorites when

275
00:18:11.440 --> 00:18:12.039
they hit the ground.

276
00:18:12.079 --> 00:18:14.880
Yeah, yeah, that's right. So we see, we see that.

277
00:18:14.880 --> 00:18:19.039
It's all right, it's part of my job. They yeah,

278
00:18:19.079 --> 00:18:22.079
they that's exactly right. We see the meteor showers which

279
00:18:22.079 --> 00:18:24.319
are because we're passing through the dust trail from a comet.

280
00:18:26.119 --> 00:18:32.240
And the last question from Daniel is could you develop

281
00:18:32.359 --> 00:18:36.359
solar panels that work at night by collecting energy from

282
00:18:36.400 --> 00:18:41.119
other stars and or the reflected light from the moon. Yeah.

283
00:18:41.160 --> 00:18:43.039
The amount of light we get from stars in the

284
00:18:43.079 --> 00:18:47.759
moon is very small compared with sunlight. And I mean,

285
00:18:47.759 --> 00:18:51.079
we do know we can create electricity from all of

286
00:18:51.119 --> 00:18:53.079
those objects, and we do it as soon as we

287
00:18:53.119 --> 00:18:56.039
take a photograph of the stars of the moon with

288
00:18:56.119 --> 00:19:00.279
a digital camera, because that's you know, the sun is

289
00:19:00.319 --> 00:19:06.000
in your phone or your camera, generating electricity which you

290
00:19:06.440 --> 00:19:10.920
can then measure and detect. But it's not really useful amounts.

291
00:19:11.319 --> 00:19:16.119
And I think probably the physics of silicon, which is

292
00:19:16.160 --> 00:19:18.720
one of the materials that does this, will probably limit

293
00:19:18.759 --> 00:19:22.920
how much electricity you could collect. You probably have fairly

294
00:19:22.920 --> 00:19:26.559
low efficiency, So I suspect the lunar panels are something

295
00:19:26.559 --> 00:19:28.920
that we're not going to see much of in the

296
00:19:28.960 --> 00:19:31.079
near future. They might be developed evictually.

297
00:19:32.160 --> 00:19:36.279
Yes, I certainly know that my solar panels don't show

298
00:19:36.440 --> 00:19:41.720
a sceric of electricity generation at night when we've got

299
00:19:41.720 --> 00:19:47.200
a big, bright, full moon, because I've looked so technology. Yeah,

300
00:19:47.960 --> 00:19:50.039
technology is beyond us at the moment, but I will

301
00:19:50.119 --> 00:19:54.799
check again next time we've got a big moon, because yes,

302
00:19:54.880 --> 00:19:57.799
I'm not in the same house now, I've got a

303
00:19:57.799 --> 00:20:01.440
different array. So maybe it's in proved technology, but I

304
00:20:01.559 --> 00:20:06.039
doubt it. I really doubt it would do anything. Thank you, Daniel.

305
00:20:06.359 --> 00:20:08.559
I think that's all of your questions done, and our

306
00:20:08.599 --> 00:20:13.039
final question today comes from Chris who is in Tasmania.

307
00:20:13.119 --> 00:20:15.400
Hi, Fred Andrew, this is Chris here from the Human

308
00:20:15.480 --> 00:20:19.000
Valley in Tasmania. My question is that we know that

309
00:20:19.039 --> 00:20:22.240
the expansion of the universe accelerate, but I was wondering

310
00:20:22.240 --> 00:20:24.640
if we're able to detect whether the rate of acceleration

311
00:20:24.880 --> 00:20:28.279
is constant or ever so slightly variable, and whether that

312
00:20:28.400 --> 00:20:31.000
might provide a clue as the structure of what the

313
00:20:31.079 --> 00:20:34.920
universe is expanding in, as in the expansion hitting regions

314
00:20:34.920 --> 00:20:38.160
of different density of who knows what causing the acceleration

315
00:20:38.279 --> 00:20:40.359
to temporarily slow speeder.

316
00:20:41.400 --> 00:20:44.119
That's my question. Thanks. For the show. Really enjoy it,

317
00:20:44.720 --> 00:20:48.960
Thanks Chris. The Huon Valley is a glorious part of

318
00:20:48.960 --> 00:20:51.920
the world if you like cold weather. But I know

319
00:20:52.039 --> 00:20:55.599
it's Tassy's wonderful. I've got some friends down there visiting

320
00:20:55.640 --> 00:20:57.960
at the moment, and I'm checking out all their photos

321
00:20:58.000 --> 00:21:02.960
on Facebook. Guard Judy and I actually honeymooned in Tasmania.

322
00:21:04.960 --> 00:21:08.599
What's thirty thirty eight nearly thirty eight years ago? Oh

323
00:21:08.640 --> 00:21:12.880
my gosh, No, it wouldn't be that long, you know.

324
00:21:13.039 --> 00:21:16.680
How else's calm now? Thirty eight years ago? Thirty thirty

325
00:21:17.200 --> 00:21:18.119
thirty seven years ago?

326
00:21:18.160 --> 00:21:18.480
I don't know.

327
00:21:18.559 --> 00:21:21.200
I can't end it up seven up Tilden, But thirty

328
00:21:21.200 --> 00:21:24.759
five years ago, there you go. I find it. Judy,

329
00:21:24.839 --> 00:21:28.920
what's he talking about? Yeah, she'd she just rolls her

330
00:21:28.920 --> 00:21:33.640
eyes whenever I try to figure these things in. So, yeah,

331
00:21:33.799 --> 00:21:38.519
acceleration of the universe, speeding up, slowing down, stopping, being interrupted.

332
00:21:39.480 --> 00:21:42.640
What's the story? And we can't see that though, can we?

333
00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:45.559
We can't see beyond a certain limit when we observe

334
00:21:45.599 --> 00:21:50.960
the universe. We talk about the observable universe, and then

335
00:21:51.000 --> 00:21:53.839
there's the universe beyond that because we just can't see it.

336
00:21:54.079 --> 00:21:57.200
So we really don't know what's going on out there,

337
00:21:57.240 --> 00:21:57.640
do we.

338
00:21:58.200 --> 00:22:01.640
No, that's right, the bit that we can't see, we don't.

339
00:22:01.759 --> 00:22:03.440
I guess it's more or less the same as it

340
00:22:03.480 --> 00:22:07.519
is here. But look this question, and it's a great

341
00:22:07.519 --> 00:22:11.160
one from Chris is right at the forefront of cosmology.

342
00:22:12.680 --> 00:22:17.960
Has the accelerated expansion of the universe changed over time

343
00:22:19.119 --> 00:22:26.519
or is it constant? And the theory that's been most

344
00:22:26.559 --> 00:22:29.680
popular in the last twenty years has been that it

345
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:33.039
is constant. In fact, we've added what's called Einstein's cosmological

346
00:22:33.160 --> 00:22:37.559
constant to the equations that describe that. So what it's

347
00:22:37.599 --> 00:22:42.839
saying is the acceleration by constant, I mean, let me

348
00:22:43.319 --> 00:22:48.079
change my wording slightly. It's proportional to the volume of space.

349
00:22:48.480 --> 00:22:51.359
So the more space you have, the more acceleration you get,

350
00:22:51.680 --> 00:22:56.200
the more dark energy you have, and hence the more acceleration. Now,

351
00:22:58.119 --> 00:23:01.640
I think the current thinking is that there may be

352
00:23:01.680 --> 00:23:04.680
a change. It may not be something that's got this

353
00:23:05.119 --> 00:23:09.160
cosmological constant. It might have varied over the age of

354
00:23:09.200 --> 00:23:15.279
the universe, and that would perhaps help to illuminate what

355
00:23:15.400 --> 00:23:18.440
dark energy is, because that's the problem at the moment,

356
00:23:18.480 --> 00:23:20.319
with no idea what it is. It's just something that

357
00:23:20.359 --> 00:23:25.160
makes the universe expand more rapidly. It is a springiness

358
00:23:25.160 --> 00:23:27.599
of space. That's a nice way to put it. Probably,

359
00:23:28.440 --> 00:23:35.680
but it's not so any change in the acceleration wouldn't

360
00:23:35.720 --> 00:23:39.680
necessarily In fact, probably not at all. As Christus conjectured,

361
00:23:40.119 --> 00:23:44.039
it wouldn't speak of the universe plowing into an area

362
00:23:44.079 --> 00:23:47.359
of higher density, because it's the universe itself that we're

363
00:23:47.400 --> 00:23:50.240
talking about. It's not anything that it's in. It's just

364
00:23:50.359 --> 00:23:56.279
the universe, the content based some time. Yeah, but yeah,

365
00:23:56.279 --> 00:23:58.039
if it can be shown that it has varied, and

366
00:23:58.079 --> 00:24:00.440
there are observations going on as we speak to try

367
00:24:00.480 --> 00:24:03.799
and determine that. If it's can be shown that it's varied,

368
00:24:03.839 --> 00:24:08.039
then yeah, that might illuminate what dark energy is and

369
00:24:08.079 --> 00:24:10.200
give us some better idea because at the moment we

370
00:24:10.240 --> 00:24:14.319
haven't a clue, and it's not just a clue nobody has.

371
00:24:16.079 --> 00:24:19.000
That's the sixty four thousand dollars question, isn't it really?

372
00:24:19.039 --> 00:24:23.039
Indeed it is? Yes, Yeah, that's another Nobel Prize winner

373
00:24:23.079 --> 00:24:27.200
probably if that's that one. Yeah, Yeah, so Chris, you're

374
00:24:27.279 --> 00:24:30.880
you're asking Nobel Prize winning questions.

375
00:24:30.680 --> 00:24:33.839
Exactly a lot of our listeners do, which is great.

376
00:24:34.079 --> 00:24:39.240
That shows we should be a Nobel Prize winning podcast.

377
00:24:38.880 --> 00:24:39.480
Really should we.

378
00:24:41.720 --> 00:24:45.480
Well, they had the Australian Podcast Awards the other day.

379
00:24:46.839 --> 00:24:49.799
We didn't get nominated because we didn't even know it existed.

380
00:24:52.559 --> 00:24:54.480
Sounds like SMA.

381
00:24:55.119 --> 00:24:57.240
Yeah, yeah, we just carry on, you know, we just

382
00:24:57.279 --> 00:24:59.400
do our job. You guys can have all the prizes.

383
00:25:00.400 --> 00:25:01.839
We'll just do our thing.

384
00:25:02.000 --> 00:25:09.839
Yeah, listeners with us, Yeah, exactly right, exactly right, Thank you, Chris.

385
00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:13.240
A great question, but yeah, a pretty tricky one at

386
00:25:13.240 --> 00:25:15.759
this point in time. Maybe you down the track when

387
00:25:15.799 --> 00:25:18.920
somebody's waving their prize in front of us in the

388
00:25:18.920 --> 00:25:21.000
form of a Nobel prize, will know the ender of

389
00:25:21.079 --> 00:25:24.240
that one. And if you've got a question for us,

390
00:25:24.240 --> 00:25:26.880
go to our website and click on that little link

391
00:25:26.920 --> 00:25:29.839
at the top that's got ama and send us your

392
00:25:29.839 --> 00:25:33.119
text audio question and that way we will do our

393
00:25:33.200 --> 00:25:37.839
level best to answer them for you. And that's about it,

394
00:25:37.880 --> 00:25:39.960
and have a bit of a browse around the website.

395
00:25:40.000 --> 00:25:43.440
Don't forget to join our social media followers on the

396
00:25:43.480 --> 00:25:48.039
Space Nuts facebook page, Space Nuts on Instagram, or of

397
00:25:48.119 --> 00:25:52.079
the supporters page the Space Nuts podcast group Facebook page.

398
00:25:52.119 --> 00:25:55.640
That's where listeners get together and chat and compare their

399
00:25:55.680 --> 00:25:59.359
astronomical pictures and they even tell a few terrible dad jokes.

400
00:25:59.400 --> 00:26:01.960
I don't know where they got that idea from, but yeah,

401
00:26:02.000 --> 00:26:05.559
it's it's a great little community if you want to join.

402
00:26:06.839 --> 00:26:09.160
There's a few thousand people involved in that now, which

403
00:26:09.200 --> 00:26:14.799
is quite incredible. And that's about it. Thank you, Fred,

404
00:26:15.160 --> 00:26:18.599
We will catch you again real soon. Sounds good. Thank

405
00:26:18.640 --> 00:26:23.000
you Andre all right, Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer at Large,

406
00:26:23.160 --> 00:26:26.759
and Hugh in the studio. Yeah, it couldn't be with

407
00:26:26.839 --> 00:26:32.640
us today due to cosmological inconsistencies. And from me Andrew Dunkley,

408
00:26:32.680 --> 00:26:34.480
thanks for your company. We'll see you on the next

409
00:26:34.480 --> 00:26:38.839
episode of Space Nuts. By For now, you'll be listening

410
00:26:38.960 --> 00:26:44.960
to the Space Nuts podcast available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

411
00:26:45.279 --> 00:26:49.039
iHeart Radio, all your favorite podcast player. You can also

412
00:26:49.119 --> 00:26:52.279
stream on demand at bides dot com. This has been

413
00:26:52.319 --> 00:26:57.440
another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail