July 8, 2026

How SpaceX Breaks Satellite Records and What It Means for Earth Orbit Safety

How SpaceX Breaks Satellite Records and What It Means for Earth Orbit Safety

Space Nuts Episode 641: Exploring SpaceX Milestones, Lunar Realities, and Particle Physics In this episode, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into recent breakthroughs in space technology, lunar surface understanding, and the physics of...

Space Nuts Episode 641: Exploring SpaceX Milestones, Lunar Realities, and Particle Physics
In this episode, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into recent breakthroughs in space technology, lunar surface understanding, and the physics of light and matter. From SpaceX's record-breaking satellite launches to the complexities of stopping photons and the intriguing origins of interstellar objects, this episode covers some of the most fascinating topics in space science today.
In this episode:
SpaceX has launched over 15,000 satellites, more than all other space launches combined since 1957
The successful reuse of Falcon 9 boosters, setting a new milestone in spaceflight
The ambitious plans for orbital data systems using Starship and their impact on space traffic
Challenges faced by lunar explorers, including dust, terrain tilt, and small craters, highlighted by NASA’s expert critique
Comet 3i Atlas offers clues about the early universe, potentially 10-12 billion years old
The physics behind slowing down—then stopping and reviving—photons in Bose-Einstein condensates
How relativistic effects prevent particles in colliders from exceeding the speed of light during high-energy collisions
Innovative ideas for managing space debris, including repositioning defunct satellites into graveyard orbits
The questions about how different cosmic fields may intertwine, forming superpositions in fundamental physics
A humorous sci-fi joke about neutrinos and a reminder to ask questions about our universe
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction and overview of topics
02:00 – SpaceX's satellite launch record and starlink constellation
05:00 – Reusability of Falcon 9 boosters and future launch plans
08:00 – SpaceX’s enhanced satellite megaconstellation and artificial intelligence systems
12:00 – Challenges for lunar surface exploration: dust, terrain tilt, and small craters
16:00 – NASA’s critique of lunar surface imagery and exploration preparedness
20:00 – Comet 3i Atlas: what it reveals about the early universe
25:00 – Isotopic analysis of interstellar objects and their origins
30:00 – Physics of stopping and reviving light in Bose-Einstein condensates
40:00 – Relativistic collision velocities and Einstein's effects at particle accelerators
55:00 – Managing space debris and satellite orbits through action-reaction principles
61:00 – Fields and superpositions in fundamental physics
66:00 – Fun question: neutrino jokes and questions viewers sent in
70:00 – Wrap-up and upcoming episodes
Resources & Links:
SpaceX’s Satellite Missions & Starlink
NASA Artemis Program
NASA's Space Resources Roundtable
Comet 3i Atlas Discoveries in Nature Astronomy
NASA Webb Telescope Science
Physics World article on Stopping Light
Connect with Fred Watson:
Professor Fred Watson - LinkedIn
Fred Watson - Official Site
Note:
Stay curious, ask questions, and look up the references for more in-depth understanding of these fascinating topics. The universe is vast and full of surprises—adventure awaits.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:02.280
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us. This is

1
00:00:02.280 --> 00:00:04.760
Space Nuts. We talk astronomy and space

2
00:00:04.760 --> 00:00:07.160
science and sometimes we talk about things

3
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:09.000
that have got nothing to do with astronomy

4
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:11.520
and space science. You just never know. We

5
00:00:11.520 --> 00:00:13.560
throw up all sorts of things and sometimes we

6
00:00:13.560 --> 00:00:15.200
throw up. Uh, today

7
00:00:16.720 --> 00:00:19.040
we will be talking about SpaceX. They're in

8
00:00:19.040 --> 00:00:21.800
the news again and it's all about the

9
00:00:21.800 --> 00:00:23.360
numbers. And I'm not talking their share

10
00:00:23.360 --> 00:00:25.600
price. Well, actually, I probably will. Um,

11
00:00:26.260 --> 00:00:28.820
educating the public about the real moon.

12
00:00:29.460 --> 00:00:31.660
It's a, ah, it's an issue that NASA thinks

13
00:00:31.660 --> 00:00:33.980
needs to be dealt with. We've got a Three Eye

14
00:00:33.980 --> 00:00:36.260
Atlas update. Yes. You thought it was long

15
00:00:36.260 --> 00:00:38.740
gone, never to be spoken of again. Not true.

16
00:00:38.980 --> 00:00:41.250
Fascinating, uh, facts have been, uh,

17
00:00:41.250 --> 00:00:43.860
revealed about this amazing little rock

18
00:00:44.340 --> 00:00:44.740
and,

19
00:00:46.660 --> 00:00:47.060
Professor Fred Watson: and

20
00:00:47.380 --> 00:00:48.580
Andrew Dunkley: we might have to start again.

21
00:00:50.180 --> 00:00:52.300
Professor Fred Watson: I'm sorry, I can cut this bit out. Just cut

22
00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:55.220
that bit out. I'm sorry. M. Marty's just got

23
00:00:55.220 --> 00:00:56.980
back from walking the dog. Hi, Marty.

24
00:00:57.220 --> 00:00:58.560
Andrew Dunkley: We that bit in?

25
00:00:58.720 --> 00:00:59.240
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah.

26
00:00:59.240 --> 00:01:01.920
Andrew Dunkley: That's okay. And what was the last thing?

27
00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:03.680
Uh, our, uh, son's death.

28
00:01:03.680 --> 00:01:05.040
Professor Fred Watson: I've already interrupted it.

29
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:06.040
Andrew Dunkley: G'.

30
00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:06.240
Professor Fred Watson: Day.

31
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:08.160
Professor Fred Watson: Sorry.

32
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:09.160
Andrew Dunkley: You're right.

33
00:01:09.160 --> 00:01:11.040
Professor Fred Watson: It's all good. It's all good.

34
00:01:11.120 --> 00:01:12.320
Andrew Dunkley: It's only the intro.

35
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:13.440
Professor Fred Watson: It's only the intro.

36
00:01:13.440 --> 00:01:16.440
Andrew Dunkley: Not an important bit. Anyway,

37
00:01:16.440 --> 00:01:18.240
whatever I was talking about is all coming up

38
00:01:18.240 --> 00:01:20.640
on this episode of space

39
00:01:20.640 --> 00:01:21.280
nuts.

40
00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:23.760
Professor Fred Watson: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

41
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:26.720
10, 9. Ignition

42
00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:27.460
sequence start.

43
00:01:27.460 --> 00:01:28.632
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, space nuts.

44
00:01:28.699 --> 00:01:31.629
Professor Fred Watson: 5, 4, 4, 3, 2. 1, 2, 3, 4,

45
00:01:31.695 --> 00:01:33.660
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

46
00:01:33.740 --> 00:01:34.940
Professor Fred Watson: Space nuts.

47
00:01:34.940 --> 00:01:36.780
Professor Fred Watson: Astronauts report. It feels good.

48
00:01:37.580 --> 00:01:39.900
Andrew Dunkley: Takes me back to my old radio policy. If

49
00:01:39.900 --> 00:01:41.980
somebody walked into the studio, they were on

50
00:01:41.980 --> 00:01:44.500
the show and that's exactly what happened.

51
00:01:44.500 --> 00:01:46.700
And joining us aside from Marnie is Professor

52
00:01:46.700 --> 00:01:48.780
Fred Watson Watson, astronomer at large.

53
00:01:48.780 --> 00:01:49.500
Hello, Fred Watson.

54
00:01:50.300 --> 00:01:52.060
Professor Fred Watson: Hello, Andrew. Sorry.

55
00:01:53.260 --> 00:01:54.060
Andrew Dunkley: That's okay.

56
00:01:54.060 --> 00:01:54.500
Professor Fred Watson: I'm glad.

57
00:01:54.500 --> 00:01:57.060
Andrew Dunkley: I don't mind. I don't mind. I used to work

58
00:01:57.060 --> 00:01:59.940
with some radio people who got so annoyed, so

59
00:01:59.940 --> 00:02:02.200
annoyed if they were interrupted, any reason

60
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:05.160
whatsoever. We even had one guy who

61
00:02:05.320 --> 00:02:08.200
wouldn't even accept you looking

62
00:02:08.200 --> 00:02:09.480
at him through the window.

63
00:02:10.520 --> 00:02:10.920
Professor Fred Watson: Really?

64
00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:13.880
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, he used to get really steamed

65
00:02:14.040 --> 00:02:16.120
Professor Fred Watson: from the producer suite through to the.

66
00:02:16.600 --> 00:02:17.640
Yeah, yeah.

67
00:02:18.280 --> 00:02:20.800
Andrew Dunkley: When he was in the studio, you weren't

68
00:02:20.800 --> 00:02:23.440
allowed to go in and you weren't allowed to

69
00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:26.360
look at him through the window. Three solid

70
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:29.080
hours of isolation. Uh, yeah, it was,

71
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:31.520
um. And you know, sometimes you'd do it

72
00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:32.120
accidentally.

73
00:02:32.200 --> 00:02:34.160
Professor Fred Watson: Of course you would. Yeah, yeah. Of course

74
00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:34.900
you would. Yeah.

75
00:02:34.900 --> 00:02:36.440
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, they were fun times.

76
00:02:36.600 --> 00:02:37.160
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

77
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:37.880
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

78
00:02:37.900 --> 00:02:40.440
Andrew Dunkley: Um, so Marnie's well and you're well and

79
00:02:40.440 --> 00:02:41.400
everybody's well.

80
00:02:41.560 --> 00:02:43.080
Professor Fred Watson: We're doing all right. That's right.

81
00:02:43.799 --> 00:02:46.040
Andrew Dunkley: And something else that's doing well is

82
00:02:46.120 --> 00:02:48.920
SpaceX. Probably not their share price,

83
00:02:48.920 --> 00:02:51.920
which, uh, is currently showing what they

84
00:02:51.920 --> 00:02:54.600
call correction, but it hit a

85
00:02:54.600 --> 00:02:56.680
massive high not long after the,

86
00:02:56.890 --> 00:02:59.480
um, company went public. But, uh, now,

87
00:03:00.010 --> 00:03:02.140
uh, what do they call it? Adjusting. Yeah,

88
00:03:02.140 --> 00:03:02.820
adjusting.

89
00:03:03.140 --> 00:03:05.860
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Um, those numbers are,

90
00:03:05.910 --> 00:03:08.760
um, a bit alien to me. Uh,

91
00:03:08.820 --> 00:03:11.380
as I've said before, I only understood. I

92
00:03:11.380 --> 00:03:13.180
only understand billions when they've got

93
00:03:13.180 --> 00:03:16.060
light years after them. Uh, but they have

94
00:03:16.060 --> 00:03:18.620
dollars after them. And I have watched, yes,

95
00:03:18.620 --> 00:03:20.900
I've watched the fortunes of, um, SpaceX

96
00:03:20.980 --> 00:03:23.940
since the IPO. See, I'm in the jargon there.

97
00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.610
The initial public year, uh,

98
00:03:26.660 --> 00:03:29.590
and uh, yes, you're right, it looks as though

99
00:03:29.590 --> 00:03:31.910
it's going to be back where it started. I

100
00:03:31.910 --> 00:03:33.230
think the way things are going,

101
00:03:34.190 --> 00:03:36.070
Andrew Dunkley: that's generally what happens. And sometimes

102
00:03:36.070 --> 00:03:38.470
they keep going below that and they bounce

103
00:03:38.470 --> 00:03:39.070
back later.

104
00:03:39.170 --> 00:03:39.270
Professor Fred Watson: Um,

105
00:03:42.110 --> 00:03:45.110
Andrew Dunkley: I find it really bizarre that we base our

106
00:03:45.110 --> 00:03:47.950
entire wealth and future on

107
00:03:47.950 --> 00:03:49.990
something as volatile as the stock market.

108
00:03:49.990 --> 00:03:52.710
I've never understood that side of the

109
00:03:52.710 --> 00:03:55.710
business world. And your whole retirement

110
00:03:55.710 --> 00:03:58.710
is based on this stuff? Uh, in

111
00:03:58.710 --> 00:04:00.670
some cases, and especially in Australia with

112
00:04:00.670 --> 00:04:03.630
our superannuation system and um, you

113
00:04:03.630 --> 00:04:06.070
know, you could just be. I've known people

114
00:04:06.070 --> 00:04:07.830
who were just about to retire and there'd

115
00:04:07.830 --> 00:04:09.910
been a big crash and they had to work another

116
00:04:09.910 --> 00:04:10.470
decade.

117
00:04:10.710 --> 00:04:11.510
Professor Fred Watson: It's just. Wow.

118
00:04:11.510 --> 00:04:13.110
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, Gosh, wow.

119
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:14.470
Professor Fred Watson: M. Scary stuff.

120
00:04:14.470 --> 00:04:16.750
Andrew Dunkley: Anyway, we're not talking about that today.

121
00:04:16.750 --> 00:04:18.390
Even though we were talking about that today.

122
00:04:18.520 --> 00:04:20.870
Uh, we're talking about, uh, uh, something

123
00:04:20.870 --> 00:04:23.190
else to do with Elon Musk's company,

124
00:04:23.190 --> 00:04:25.510
SpaceX, and that is that they have,

125
00:04:25.780 --> 00:04:28.630
um, They've basically set a space launch

126
00:04:28.630 --> 00:04:29.030
record.

127
00:04:30.290 --> 00:04:32.530
Professor Fred Watson: They have. It's really quite a milestone when

128
00:04:32.530 --> 00:04:35.330
you think about it. What they have

129
00:04:35.650 --> 00:04:38.530
done, uh, is launched

130
00:04:38.850 --> 00:04:41.490
15,262

131
00:04:41.490 --> 00:04:44.322
satellites, uh, as of June

132
00:04:44.418 --> 00:04:46.650
12th. I mean, they're launching so many, uh,

133
00:04:47.490 --> 00:04:50.050
you've got to pick a date for it. But June

134
00:04:50.050 --> 00:04:53.010
12, 15,262 satellites.

135
00:04:53.330 --> 00:04:55.330
But here's the rub, here's why it's a record.

136
00:04:55.410 --> 00:04:58.290
The combined total of all

137
00:04:58.450 --> 00:05:00.370
other companies and organ

138
00:05:01.470 --> 00:05:04.430
since 1957, when Sputnik 1 was launched,

139
00:05:04.990 --> 00:05:07.390
is 15,138.

140
00:05:07.790 --> 00:05:10.630
So SpaceX has now launched more

141
00:05:10.630 --> 00:05:13.510
satellites than anyone else in

142
00:05:13.510 --> 00:05:16.270
history combined. Combined.

143
00:05:16.510 --> 00:05:19.270
Andrew Dunkley: Wow. So they've more or less doubled the

144
00:05:19.270 --> 00:05:22.110
number of satellites by themselves.

145
00:05:22.590 --> 00:05:24.530
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. Except a lot of those, uh,

146
00:05:24.530 --> 00:05:24.750
they're

147
00:05:24.750 --> 00:05:25.630
Andrew Dunkley: not up there anymore.

148
00:05:25.630 --> 00:05:27.070
Professor Fred Watson: A lot of those aren't up there anymore. I

149
00:05:27.070 --> 00:05:29.230
think they have. I think it's about 11,000

150
00:05:29.390 --> 00:05:31.310
operational Starlink satellites At the

151
00:05:31.310 --> 00:05:34.210
moment, but there's that have re entered and

152
00:05:34.210 --> 00:05:37.090
1,000 more that are not activated yet. Those

153
00:05:37.090 --> 00:05:39.850
are the sorts of numbers. Um, so

154
00:05:40.010 --> 00:05:41.690
it means uh, the total

155
00:05:42.890 --> 00:05:44.730
few days or a few weeks since I looked at

156
00:05:44.730 --> 00:05:47.530
this figure, but it's about 15,000 altogether

157
00:05:47.530 --> 00:05:49.970
is the number of operational satellites with

158
00:05:49.970 --> 00:05:52.490
of course huge numbers of ones that are no

159
00:05:52.490 --> 00:05:54.850
longer operational and even more numbers of

160
00:05:54.850 --> 00:05:57.050
bits of space junk that you can't track.

161
00:05:57.690 --> 00:06:00.450
But yes, what an extraordinary record. And of

162
00:06:00.450 --> 00:06:02.730
course what's brought this

163
00:06:03.370 --> 00:06:06.350
is uh, uh, what's brought SpaceX

164
00:06:06.350 --> 00:06:08.550
to this milestone is the Falcon 9 rocket

165
00:06:08.710 --> 00:06:11.430
which has been so successful,

166
00:06:11.930 --> 00:06:14.830
um, uh, they're now reused. I think

167
00:06:14.830 --> 00:06:17.470
the record is still 33 for the number of

168
00:06:17.470 --> 00:06:20.470
times a Falcon booster has been reused. That

169
00:06:20.470 --> 00:06:23.110
would have been unthinkable, uh,

170
00:06:23.190 --> 00:06:25.510
not much more than a decade ago. It was 2015

171
00:06:25.510 --> 00:06:27.350
when they launched, when they had the first

172
00:06:27.350 --> 00:06:29.750
recovery. Um, yes, ah,

173
00:06:30.150 --> 00:06:32.960
really quite remarkable. So there were 165

174
00:06:33.140 --> 00:06:36.070
falcon flights in 20. 25. That's

175
00:06:36.510 --> 00:06:38.610
uh, you, that's uh, three a week basically,

176
00:06:38.610 --> 00:06:39.090
isn't it?

177
00:06:39.090 --> 00:06:42.010
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. That's incredible. And of

178
00:06:42.010 --> 00:06:43.550
course he's talking about that um,

179
00:06:43.970 --> 00:06:46.770
supercomputer satellite system that

180
00:06:46.850 --> 00:06:49.570
he wants to um, create and that's going to

181
00:06:49.570 --> 00:06:52.410
put many, many more up there if he goes ahead

182
00:06:52.410 --> 00:06:52.850
with it.

183
00:06:53.009 --> 00:06:55.440
Professor Fred Watson: It's a million. That's right. Which is uh,

184
00:06:55.730 --> 00:06:58.210
eye watering in many ways.

185
00:06:58.530 --> 00:07:00.250
It makes you shed tears if you're an

186
00:07:00.250 --> 00:07:02.930
astronomer. Um, what's going to speed

187
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:03.800
basically for

188
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:05.840
Andrew Dunkley: artificial intelligence systems, isn't it?

189
00:07:05.840 --> 00:07:08.120
Professor Fred Watson: It is, yes. It's they're orbiting the plans

190
00:07:08.120 --> 00:07:10.840
for an orbital data centre with a million

191
00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:13.880
linked satellites. And what will enable that

192
00:07:13.880 --> 00:07:15.960
or yes, what will facilitate it, perhaps

193
00:07:15.960 --> 00:07:18.760
that's the word is the next step, which is

194
00:07:18.760 --> 00:07:21.000
already, it's already been tested out, is

195
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:23.880
launching these satellites using uh, Starship

196
00:07:23.880 --> 00:07:26.040
rather than the Falcon, because Starship can,

197
00:07:26.200 --> 00:07:28.400
I mean falcons typically, they launch about

198
00:07:28.400 --> 00:07:30.840
20 at a time, 20 Starlink satellites at a

199
00:07:30.840 --> 00:07:32.870
time. With the Falcon 9 um,

200
00:07:33.320 --> 00:07:35.020
it's when you move to

201
00:07:35.820 --> 00:07:38.460
Starship you're talking about much, much

202
00:07:38.460 --> 00:07:40.780
higher numbers. I don't know how many they

203
00:07:40.780 --> 00:07:43.620
could launch but it's probably uh, well over

204
00:07:43.620 --> 00:07:46.540
100, maybe even in the 200s. Wow.

205
00:07:46.540 --> 00:07:48.420
Andrew Dunkley: I know astronomers wouldn't be happy with

206
00:07:48.420 --> 00:07:50.860
another million satellites up there crunching

207
00:07:51.020 --> 00:07:53.940
AI data. But um, interestingly

208
00:07:53.940 --> 00:07:56.660
enough we were talking to our son the other

209
00:07:56.660 --> 00:07:59.010
day who works in um, uh,

210
00:07:59.790 --> 00:08:01.420
I suppose you could call it the uh,

211
00:08:02.590 --> 00:08:05.150
gross retail area of electronics

212
00:08:06.110 --> 00:08:08.990
and he is frustrated at the

213
00:08:08.990 --> 00:08:11.270
moment because he'll get a client that wants

214
00:08:11.270 --> 00:08:14.110
quotes on various electronic Items, and

215
00:08:14.110 --> 00:08:15.910
we're talking smartphones, other smart

216
00:08:15.910 --> 00:08:18.790
devices. And then when the

217
00:08:18.790 --> 00:08:20.910
order comes in, the price has been hiked

218
00:08:21.150 --> 00:08:23.830
because of a lack of random

219
00:08:23.830 --> 00:08:26.030
access memory available because it's being

220
00:08:26.030 --> 00:08:27.990
chewed up by AI companies.

221
00:08:27.990 --> 00:08:28.750
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, interesting.

222
00:08:28.910 --> 00:08:31.460
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. So there's a world shortage

223
00:08:31.690 --> 00:08:34.170
of, um, RAM and DRAM and a few other,

224
00:08:35.680 --> 00:08:38.170
um, memory chips that are required for

225
00:08:38.170 --> 00:08:40.650
household devices like computers,

226
00:08:41.620 --> 00:08:44.090
um, because they're all being

227
00:08:44.730 --> 00:08:47.450
eaten up by these, uh, AI facilities.

228
00:08:48.250 --> 00:08:49.930
It's a bit of a problem at the moment.

229
00:08:50.970 --> 00:08:53.090
Professor Fred Watson: It's a good point. It hadn't occurred to me

230
00:08:53.090 --> 00:08:54.810
that there might be a shortage of that sort

231
00:08:54.810 --> 00:08:57.050
Andrew Dunkley: of thing because, well, and it's hitting the

232
00:08:57.050 --> 00:08:59.210
household market. People who want to buy a

233
00:08:59.210 --> 00:09:01.850
computer for themselves at home, uh, facing

234
00:09:01.930 --> 00:09:03.910
price hikes because of this. So

235
00:09:04.710 --> 00:09:07.710
it's a thing. It is a thing. So maybe,

236
00:09:07.710 --> 00:09:10.350
maybe Elon's found a way around that, or

237
00:09:10.350 --> 00:09:12.030
maybe he's getting all the chips. I don't

238
00:09:12.030 --> 00:09:12.270
know.

239
00:09:12.270 --> 00:09:14.910
Professor Fred Watson: Well, I think that's what it is. Uh, yeah. If

240
00:09:14.910 --> 00:09:17.650
the AI companies have got first dibs on, uh,

241
00:09:18.070 --> 00:09:20.470
the memories for the data centres, that's

242
00:09:20.470 --> 00:09:21.830
where it's all going to happen. Yes.

243
00:09:23.350 --> 00:09:24.790
Andrew Dunkley: It's like when I was at school, Fred Watson,

244
00:09:24.790 --> 00:09:26.230
you don't share your chips.

245
00:09:29.430 --> 00:09:31.750
Professor Fred Watson: You were lucky to have chips. We didn't have

246
00:09:31.750 --> 00:09:33.110
chips when we were at school.

247
00:09:33.350 --> 00:09:34.870
Andrew Dunkley: Just to live in a tin pan.

248
00:09:36.930 --> 00:09:37.570
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, boy.

249
00:09:37.890 --> 00:09:40.730
Andrew Dunkley: So, yeah, things are, um, steadily moving

250
00:09:40.730 --> 00:09:43.250
along for SpaceX and they've achieved

251
00:09:43.490 --> 00:09:46.170
a major milestone, which probably won't stop

252
00:09:46.170 --> 00:09:48.450
there, but they're 100 ahead of the

253
00:09:48.450 --> 00:09:51.170
collective number of satellites put into

254
00:09:51.250 --> 00:09:53.890
orbit around Earth since 1957.

255
00:09:54.700 --> 00:09:57.210
Um, yeah, they've doubled the number and

256
00:09:57.210 --> 00:09:59.970
some. And probably will continue.

257
00:10:00.930 --> 00:10:03.410
This is Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley here with

258
00:10:03.410 --> 00:10:04.930
Professor Fred Watson Watson.

259
00:10:07.580 --> 00:10:08.820
Professor Fred Watson: Roger, your lab is right here.

260
00:10:08.820 --> 00:10:10.300
Professor Fred Watson: Also Space Nuts.

261
00:10:10.380 --> 00:10:13.260
Andrew Dunkley: Our next storey takes us to the moon.

262
00:10:13.260 --> 00:10:15.180
It's kind of in fashion again now,

263
00:10:15.180 --> 00:10:17.180
particularly with the Artemis programme and,

264
00:10:17.260 --> 00:10:19.860
uh, the recent mission to fling people around

265
00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:21.900
the moon and take some pretty pictures and

266
00:10:22.060 --> 00:10:23.780
witness some of the amazing things that

267
00:10:23.780 --> 00:10:26.700
happen on the moon. However,

268
00:10:27.180 --> 00:10:29.860
NASA believes that things need to be done

269
00:10:29.860 --> 00:10:32.540
properly in terms of educating the public.

270
00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:34.220
Why is this happening?

271
00:10:35.520 --> 00:10:38.270
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, it's, uh, the initiative of a

272
00:10:38.430 --> 00:10:40.990
professor of astronomy and planetary

273
00:10:41.630 --> 00:10:43.350
sciences in the Department of Physics at the

274
00:10:43.350 --> 00:10:45.750
University of Central Florida, whose name is

275
00:10:45.750 --> 00:10:48.110
Daniel Britt, uh, and

276
00:10:48.990 --> 00:10:51.790
he's very well up, uh, in

277
00:10:51.790 --> 00:10:53.710
what it's like on the moon because he's

278
00:10:54.270 --> 00:10:56.390
director, uh, of the Centre for Lunar and

279
00:10:56.390 --> 00:10:58.910
Asteroid Surface Science. So

280
00:10:59.470 --> 00:11:02.230
they had, um, what they call a Space

281
00:11:02.230 --> 00:11:04.910
Resources Roundtable earlier this month,

282
00:11:05.100 --> 00:11:07.614
uh, and this month being June uh, 20,

283
00:11:07.715 --> 00:11:10.650
26, uh, at the Colorado School of Mines.

284
00:11:10.650 --> 00:11:12.490
And that sort of gives you a bit of an idea

285
00:11:12.490 --> 00:11:13.690
where this is coming from.

286
00:11:13.850 --> 00:11:14.320
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

287
00:11:14.320 --> 00:11:16.700
Professor Fred Watson: Um, and uh. So um,

288
00:11:16.700 --> 00:11:19.210
Professor Britt, uh, Daniel Britt,

289
00:11:19.420 --> 00:11:21.600
uh, says um.

290
00:11:22.410 --> 00:11:25.330
And really to put this in a nutshell, to put

291
00:11:25.330 --> 00:11:27.730
the nub of the storey, he says, I wish I

292
00:11:27.730 --> 00:11:29.810
could say that engineers and managers know

293
00:11:29.810 --> 00:11:32.770
better, but they don't. We are training a

294
00:11:32.770 --> 00:11:35.770
generation of engineers not to worry about

295
00:11:36.170 --> 00:11:39.000
terrain. If the artists are

296
00:11:39.000 --> 00:11:40.960
getting it wrong when they depict the moon,

297
00:11:40.960 --> 00:11:43.920
it's our fault. Let's stop fooling ourselves.

298
00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:47.720
Um, and basically he went on

299
00:11:47.720 --> 00:11:50.560
to complain uh, about a number

300
00:11:50.880 --> 00:11:53.440
of uh, the sort of artists

301
00:11:54.160 --> 00:11:56.800
representations of the lunar

302
00:11:56.960 --> 00:11:59.240
surface, um, which are

303
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:02.240
promulgated by commercial space ventures,

304
00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:04.800
but also NASA. Um, and

305
00:12:04.800 --> 00:12:07.640
I've actually had the same thought.

306
00:12:07.640 --> 00:12:10.500
I've seen some of NASA's artists impressions

307
00:12:10.500 --> 00:12:12.580
of you know, a base on the moon and what they

308
00:12:12.580 --> 00:12:15.060
look like and thought that all looks very,

309
00:12:15.060 --> 00:12:18.020
very neat and tidy. Uh, very neat

310
00:12:18.020 --> 00:12:20.690
and tidy indeed. And so um, what Daniel, uh,

311
00:12:21.140 --> 00:12:23.180
Britt has done is kind of

312
00:12:23.340 --> 00:12:26.180
highlighted uh, all the things that are wrong

313
00:12:26.180 --> 00:12:28.460
with those pictures that might actually

314
00:12:28.540 --> 00:12:31.260
transform the way we think about the lunar

315
00:12:31.260 --> 00:12:31.820
surface.

316
00:12:32.780 --> 00:12:35.060
Andrew Dunkley: Why is that such a problem though? Um,

317
00:12:35.420 --> 00:12:38.340
is this going to um. You know, what

318
00:12:38.340 --> 00:12:38.940
does it change?

319
00:12:39.610 --> 00:12:42.250
Professor Fred Watson: So um. The reality

320
00:12:42.250 --> 00:12:45.010
is different from uh, what we

321
00:12:45.010 --> 00:12:47.850
depict. So if you're always depicting the

322
00:12:47.850 --> 00:12:49.570
lunar surface as something neat and tidy

323
00:12:49.570 --> 00:12:51.890
then. And you're training your engineers who

324
00:12:51.890 --> 00:12:53.690
are building the spacecraft and doing all the

325
00:12:53.690 --> 00:12:55.249
rest, you know, setting up all the

326
00:12:55.249 --> 00:12:57.690
infrastructure and they've got a false idea

327
00:12:57.690 --> 00:13:00.250
of what it's like. And so what um, Daniel

328
00:13:00.250 --> 00:13:02.410
Britt has done is highlighted

329
00:13:03.610 --> 00:13:05.900
some uh, of the, you know, some of the

330
00:13:05.900 --> 00:13:08.660
problems uh in those illustrations starting

331
00:13:08.660 --> 00:13:11.460
with small craters and the

332
00:13:11.460 --> 00:13:14.240
lunar dust. Uh, and um,

333
00:13:14.260 --> 00:13:16.940
it goes on to talk about dirty astronauts,

334
00:13:16.940 --> 00:13:19.700
dirty equipment and dirty habitats and you've

335
00:13:19.700 --> 00:13:22.420
only to look at um, some of the

336
00:13:22.500 --> 00:13:25.180
imagery from the Apollo missions to see

337
00:13:25.180 --> 00:13:27.940
how dirty the astronauts get

338
00:13:27.940 --> 00:13:30.890
because that dust gets everywhere. It's

339
00:13:30.890 --> 00:13:33.870
uh, as it said, captioned to ah, one of

340
00:13:33.870 --> 00:13:36.490
um, uh, Daniel Britt's images. Dust is a fact

341
00:13:36.800 --> 00:13:39.040
of life in lunar ops. It gets everywhere.

342
00:13:39.670 --> 00:13:42.640
Uh, and so we've got the Apollo

343
00:13:42.640 --> 00:13:45.360
experience to judge from. Um.

344
00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:48.640
And it's also

345
00:13:49.520 --> 00:13:52.240
going to be um, much more difficult

346
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:55.320
to cope with the dust uh in the

347
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:58.080
Apollo programmes because you're

348
00:13:58.530 --> 00:14:01.000
uh, in the south polar region of the moon.

349
00:14:01.000 --> 00:14:03.440
That's where, sorry, not Apollo, Artemis,

350
00:14:03.810 --> 00:14:05.920
uh, Artemis is concentrating on the south

351
00:14:05.920 --> 00:14:08.700
polar region of the moon. And the. That

352
00:14:08.700 --> 00:14:11.580
means you've got a very Low sun angle and

353
00:14:12.540 --> 00:14:15.420
the dust is just going to be everywhere.

354
00:14:15.550 --> 00:14:18.150
Uh, and you know, um,

355
00:14:18.670 --> 00:14:21.620
uh, so you might have interference from

356
00:14:21.620 --> 00:14:24.579
the dust, but also, um, if

357
00:14:24.579 --> 00:14:27.380
you're walking around on the surface, it's

358
00:14:27.380 --> 00:14:29.380
going to be very easy to miss because of the

359
00:14:29.380 --> 00:14:31.140
lower sun angle. The sun's always in your

360
00:14:31.140 --> 00:14:33.020
eyes. It's going to be very easy to miss

361
00:14:33.100 --> 00:14:35.540
little craters and there are small craters

362
00:14:35.540 --> 00:14:38.270
everywhere. Um, uh, it's

363
00:14:39.620 --> 00:14:42.220
a really difficult environment in that

364
00:14:42.220 --> 00:14:44.900
regard. Uh, and he goes on to

365
00:14:45.150 --> 00:14:47.780
um, you know, to sort of spot,

366
00:14:48.590 --> 00:14:50.420
uh, the other things that are going to be

367
00:14:50.580 --> 00:14:52.170
problematic. Um,

368
00:14:53.100 --> 00:14:55.620
uh, one of them is the number of boulders

369
00:14:55.620 --> 00:14:57.630
there are as well on the surface. Um,

370
00:14:58.740 --> 00:15:00.900
um, it's got a.

371
00:15:02.340 --> 00:15:05.030
The Apollo images, he

372
00:15:05.030 --> 00:15:07.790
says, uh, were taken down sun.

373
00:15:07.790 --> 00:15:09.590
In other words, you're looking with the sun

374
00:15:09.590 --> 00:15:12.590
behind you. Uh, and that gives.

375
00:15:12.590 --> 00:15:14.630
It sort of hides all the shadows of all the

376
00:15:14.630 --> 00:15:16.430
boulders and things that were lying around.

377
00:15:17.040 --> 00:15:18.910
Um, I mean we've talked before about how

378
00:15:18.910 --> 00:15:21.910
lucky Apollo 11 was because there were, you

379
00:15:21.910 --> 00:15:24.270
know, when Neil Armstrong was bringing the

380
00:15:24.350 --> 00:15:27.030
lunar module down onto the surface, uh,

381
00:15:27.390 --> 00:15:29.310
all he could see was all these boulders.

382
00:15:31.380 --> 00:15:34.340
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, And I'm just looking at a

383
00:15:34.340 --> 00:15:36.740
real image of Apollo 15

384
00:15:36.980 --> 00:15:39.620
and they had a dicey landing as well.

385
00:15:39.780 --> 00:15:42.340
They actually landed on a piece of

386
00:15:42.420 --> 00:15:45.220
ground at an 11 degree tilt.

387
00:15:45.620 --> 00:15:48.100
Professor Fred Watson: That's correct, yes. That's one of the other

388
00:15:48.100 --> 00:15:50.580
issues that he's highlighted is the tilt,

389
00:15:51.150 --> 00:15:54.140
uh, uh, of the terrain that you

390
00:15:54.140 --> 00:15:56.820
land on. Um, Apollo 14, 7 degrees,

391
00:15:56.820 --> 00:15:59.700
Apollo 15, 11 degrees. And yes, that's quite

392
00:15:59.700 --> 00:16:02.680
a serious angle. It is. That does not,

393
00:16:02.850 --> 00:16:05.680
um, go well if you've got a

394
00:16:05.680 --> 00:16:08.680
very tall landing craft, which is what the

395
00:16:10.520 --> 00:16:13.280
SpaceX's starship will be. Starship? The

396
00:16:13.280 --> 00:16:16.160
Lunar Lander. Um, that's one of the

397
00:16:16.160 --> 00:16:18.480
two, um, landing vehicles that are currently

398
00:16:18.480 --> 00:16:21.160
being considered by NASA. That's. I can't

399
00:16:21.160 --> 00:16:22.960
remember what it is. I think it's 37 metres

400
00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:25.360
tall. It might be even taller than that. It's

401
00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:27.640
enormous. And if you put that on an 11 degree

402
00:16:27.640 --> 00:16:30.130
tilt, you're going to be worried that the

403
00:16:30.130 --> 00:16:32.010
things are going to fall over, which will not

404
00:16:32.010 --> 00:16:32.610
be good news.

405
00:16:32.690 --> 00:16:34.290
Andrew Dunkley: You're going to have to pick a really, really

406
00:16:34.290 --> 00:16:37.010
good spot and they're few and far between on

407
00:16:37.010 --> 00:16:39.370
the moon. And I can imagine, you know, a

408
00:16:39.370 --> 00:16:42.340
vertical landing craft like

409
00:16:42.340 --> 00:16:45.210
uh, that a very tall rocket is going to blast

410
00:16:45.210 --> 00:16:47.410
up dust like nothing else.

411
00:16:47.490 --> 00:16:50.170
Professor Fred Watson: Yep, that's right. Uh, and in fact I think

412
00:16:50.170 --> 00:16:52.170
there's a quote from one of the Apollo

413
00:16:52.170 --> 00:16:55.090
astronauts because of the amount of dust that

414
00:16:55.090 --> 00:16:57.530
was being blown up by their exhaust as they

415
00:16:57.530 --> 00:16:59.170
were trying to land, they couldn't actually

416
00:16:59.790 --> 00:17:02.430
sea. Uh, where. Where to.

417
00:17:02.510 --> 00:17:04.510
Where. Where was the safest landing

418
00:17:05.150 --> 00:17:05.550
point.

419
00:17:06.030 --> 00:17:06.179
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

420
00:17:06.179 --> 00:17:07.990
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, that's scary, isn't it? And not to

421
00:17:07.990 --> 00:17:10.990
mention that dust is one of the big perils

422
00:17:10.990 --> 00:17:11.870
of electronics.

423
00:17:12.190 --> 00:17:13.310
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.

424
00:17:13.390 --> 00:17:16.070
Andrew Dunkley: You don't want dust getting into anything. In

425
00:17:16.070 --> 00:17:18.030
fact, I think in the early days of home

426
00:17:18.030 --> 00:17:20.750
computing, one of the big problems was,

427
00:17:20.959 --> 00:17:22.750
uh, you had to keep your computer cool, but

428
00:17:22.750 --> 00:17:25.110
in doing so, you're sucking dust into the,

429
00:17:25.110 --> 00:17:27.190
into the machine and that's. That could get

430
00:17:27.190 --> 00:17:29.990
into the processes and the. And the

431
00:17:29.990 --> 00:17:32.850
drives and. Yeah, all sorts of trouble. In

432
00:17:32.850 --> 00:17:35.720
fact, um, if you ever open up a home,

433
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:37.810
um, computer, particularly an old desktop,

434
00:17:38.210 --> 00:17:40.370
first thing you notice is all the dust.

435
00:17:40.370 --> 00:17:42.650
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's correct, yes. Which has been

436
00:17:42.650 --> 00:17:44.960
sucked in. Exactly. As you've said. Um,

437
00:17:46.130 --> 00:17:48.330
if I can. There's a couple of paragraphs that

438
00:17:48.330 --> 00:17:50.970
really sum up, ah, Daniel Britt's view of all

439
00:17:50.970 --> 00:17:53.330
this. And remember, he's a professor of lunar

440
00:17:53.330 --> 00:17:55.890
surfaces, so he knows what he's doing. Yes,

441
00:17:55.890 --> 00:17:58.010
he says these are artists impressions, but

442
00:17:58.010 --> 00:17:59.890
somebody is telling the artist what to draw.

443
00:17:59.970 --> 00:18:02.450
I love the idea of landing and operating on a

444
00:18:02.450 --> 00:18:04.470
moon without dust, small craters and rough

445
00:18:04.470 --> 00:18:07.470
terrain. However, we see the misconception

446
00:18:07.470 --> 00:18:09.950
of a flat, gentle moon everywhere. Commercial

447
00:18:09.950 --> 00:18:12.590
providers are just as bad. No dust, almost no

448
00:18:12.590 --> 00:18:14.310
small craters, no tipping problems.

449
00:18:14.310 --> 00:18:16.650
Yes, these are artists impressions and, uh,

450
00:18:16.670 --> 00:18:19.269
getting it wrong. NASA knows better. All

451
00:18:19.269 --> 00:18:20.990
these people should know better. But don't

452
00:18:20.990 --> 00:18:22.910
let's not fool the public. We owe them better

453
00:18:22.910 --> 00:18:25.110
data. He's really having a go about it, isn't

454
00:18:25.110 --> 00:18:25.390
he?

455
00:18:25.390 --> 00:18:26.950
Andrew Dunkley: Well, I think he's got a good point.

456
00:18:26.950 --> 00:18:28.870
Professor Fred Watson: He's got a very good point. Yes, he has

457
00:18:28.870 --> 00:18:29.580
indeed. Yeah.

458
00:18:29.760 --> 00:18:32.100
Andrew Dunkley: Um, you know, we might go on holiday there

459
00:18:32.100 --> 00:18:33.820
one day and we'd turn up and go, this place

460
00:18:33.820 --> 00:18:35.400
is crap, it's a dump. Um,

461
00:18:36.460 --> 00:18:38.860
where's the pool? Oh, yeah,

462
00:18:39.020 --> 00:18:41.660
yeah, it was in the

463
00:18:41.660 --> 00:18:44.340
brochure. Um, but no, I see his

464
00:18:44.340 --> 00:18:47.180
point. And, um. Yeah, I suppose

465
00:18:47.180 --> 00:18:49.660
organisations like NASA who have

466
00:18:50.060 --> 00:18:52.860
basically led the race to the moon since

467
00:18:53.100 --> 00:18:55.530
the year Dot. Um, yeah, probably should.

468
00:18:55.600 --> 00:18:58.360
Should just take a bit of notice of what he's

469
00:18:58.360 --> 00:19:01.200
saying. Yeah, for sure. If you'd like to

470
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:03.200
cheque that storey out, it's a good read.

471
00:19:03.200 --> 00:19:04.960
It's@space.com.

472
00:19:06.350 --> 00:19:07.800
uh, let's move straight on to our next

473
00:19:07.800 --> 00:19:08.400
storey, Fred Watson.

474
00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:11.280
And this one is, uh. Oh, gosh, something

475
00:19:11.280 --> 00:19:13.520
we've spoken about, uh, several times

476
00:19:13.520 --> 00:19:15.400
recently because it was a pretty exciting

477
00:19:15.400 --> 00:19:18.000
find. That was Comet, uh, 3i

478
00:19:18.080 --> 00:19:20.800
Atlas. What brings it back to the

479
00:19:20.800 --> 00:19:22.800
fore? I thought it was all dealt with and

480
00:19:22.800 --> 00:19:25.660
gone and on its way to wherever the heck it's

481
00:19:25.660 --> 00:19:28.580
headed. But it's, it's

482
00:19:28.580 --> 00:19:29.340
back in the news.

483
00:19:29.580 --> 00:19:31.540
Professor Fred Watson: It is back in the news and I think it's back

484
00:19:31.540 --> 00:19:33.580
in the news. Um, this might be the.

485
00:19:34.380 --> 00:19:37.340
Well who. Never say never but I

486
00:19:37.340 --> 00:19:39.100
think this might be the last major paper

487
00:19:39.580 --> 00:19:42.300
about UH3i Atlas

488
00:19:42.380 --> 00:19:45.220
and its composition and what

489
00:19:45.220 --> 00:19:47.700
we now know about it. And it comes from a

490
00:19:47.700 --> 00:19:50.460
number of studies principally

491
00:19:50.460 --> 00:19:53.020
using uh the Webb Telescope.

492
00:19:54.600 --> 00:19:57.420
Uh these are analyses of

493
00:19:57.420 --> 00:19:59.660
the outgassing, the material that's

494
00:19:59.660 --> 00:20:02.540
outgassing being outgassed uh from

495
00:20:02.540 --> 00:20:05.340
3i atlas surface. Remember it's ah, an

496
00:20:05.340 --> 00:20:07.340
interstellar asteroid. It has entered the

497
00:20:07.340 --> 00:20:09.860
solar system. Last October I think was when

498
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:12.420
it was discovered uh zooming through at

499
00:20:12.420 --> 00:20:14.700
speeds in the region of 60 kilometres per

500
00:20:14.700 --> 00:20:16.540
second which is too fast for it to belong to

501
00:20:16.540 --> 00:20:18.620
the solar system. And it's now on its way

502
00:20:18.620 --> 00:20:21.620
out. Uh but uh, a lot of um,

503
00:20:21.830 --> 00:20:23.430
resources have been used to observe it

504
00:20:23.430 --> 00:20:25.870
because it's a free gift from another solar

505
00:20:25.870 --> 00:20:28.710
system. The fact that we've got uh this

506
00:20:28.950 --> 00:20:31.390
object coming through and so the

507
00:20:31.390 --> 00:20:33.910
analyses that have been done are

508
00:20:34.790 --> 00:20:37.510
really very very interesting uh

509
00:20:37.510 --> 00:20:40.070
in terms of what they tell us about

510
00:20:41.190 --> 00:20:44.190
the wide blue yonder, about the chemical

511
00:20:44.190 --> 00:20:47.110
composition of solar systems other

512
00:20:47.110 --> 00:20:49.860
than our own. And and in

513
00:20:50.100 --> 00:20:52.740
the same breath it sort of tells us

514
00:20:53.420 --> 00:20:56.300
uh a bit more about our own solar

515
00:20:56.300 --> 00:20:59.080
system, how unusual it might be uh

516
00:20:59.380 --> 00:21:02.140
because this is something quite

517
00:21:02.140 --> 00:21:05.019
different. Um so the two

518
00:21:05.019 --> 00:21:07.820
studies involved, one which was conducted

519
00:21:07.820 --> 00:21:10.500
using the Webb Telescope, uh and the other

520
00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:13.020
uh which was led by um an astronomer from the

521
00:21:13.020 --> 00:21:15.220
University of Edinburgh uh which was one of

522
00:21:15.220 --> 00:21:18.100
my alma maters, uh, uh that was

523
00:21:18.100 --> 00:21:20.840
using the Very Large Telescope, the vlt uh at

524
00:21:20.840 --> 00:21:23.760
Cerro Paranal in Chile, the European

525
00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:26.160
Southern Observatory's major facility.

526
00:21:26.800 --> 00:21:29.280
And what they've done is essentially looked

527
00:21:29.280 --> 00:21:32.150
at isotope ratios. Uh

528
00:21:32.240 --> 00:21:35.160
they've looked in particular molecules,

529
00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:37.760
particular molecules like H2O water,

530
00:21:38.080 --> 00:21:40.760
CO2, carbon dioxide, CO, carbon

531
00:21:40.760 --> 00:21:42.620
monoxide and um

532
00:21:43.840 --> 00:21:46.640
there's a plot uh which is on. It's actually

533
00:21:46.880 --> 00:21:49.780
basically NASA's press release about this. Uh

534
00:21:49.780 --> 00:21:52.400
the press release is titled NASA's Webb Find

535
00:21:52.620 --> 00:21:55.500
Clues to Ancient Distant Origin of Comet 3i

536
00:21:55.500 --> 00:21:57.980
Atlas. And the plot shows

537
00:21:58.620 --> 00:22:01.460
sort of the um isotope ratios.

538
00:22:01.460 --> 00:22:03.620
It's basically too small for me to read the

539
00:22:03.620 --> 00:22:06.140
individual numbers on it. Um but

540
00:22:06.300 --> 00:22:08.380
for uh all the

541
00:22:09.040 --> 00:22:11.940
um solar system comets that have

542
00:22:11.940 --> 00:22:14.430
been observed, uh including I notice uh

543
00:22:14.780 --> 00:22:17.700
Comet Hartley 2 which is uh one discovered by

544
00:22:17.700 --> 00:22:20.690
my old friend and colleague Malcolm Hartley,

545
00:22:20.690 --> 00:22:22.860
uh it was visited by a spacecraft a number of

546
00:22:22.860 --> 00:22:25.000
years ago. He became a, an international

547
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:27.160
celebrity because of that, we, uh, used to

548
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:28.920
work together at the Schmidt UK Schmidt

549
00:22:28.920 --> 00:22:31.770
telescope. But that's one of the, um,

550
00:22:31.800 --> 00:22:33.800
solar system comets that they highlight in

551
00:22:33.800 --> 00:22:36.360
this plot. And you can see that the various,

552
00:22:36.910 --> 00:22:39.759
um, aspects, notably what are called

553
00:22:39.759 --> 00:22:42.520
heavy carbon and heavy hydrogen. So these are

554
00:22:42.520 --> 00:22:45.160
different isotopes of carbon and hydrogen.

555
00:22:45.320 --> 00:22:48.240
You can see where they sit in

556
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:50.240
the solar system, this whole line of

557
00:22:51.910 --> 00:22:54.710
red circles which are, uh, representations on

558
00:22:54.710 --> 00:22:57.510
the plot, um, all in a neat,

559
00:22:57.510 --> 00:23:00.350
neatish line anyway. And then way off

560
00:23:00.350 --> 00:23:02.710
to the right at, uh, much higher

561
00:23:02.870 --> 00:23:05.870
ratios of carbon 12 to carbon 13 and much

562
00:23:05.870 --> 00:23:08.690
higher ratios of heavy hydrogen, uh,

563
00:23:08.870 --> 00:23:11.390
to normal, uh, hydrogen, which we've talked

564
00:23:11.390 --> 00:23:14.110
about a lot. But way off to the right is

565
00:23:14.110 --> 00:23:15.190
3i atlas.

566
00:23:15.500 --> 00:23:18.000
Andrew Dunkley: Um, so that's saying the concentrations are,

567
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:19.150
uh, more significant.

568
00:23:20.030 --> 00:23:22.670
Professor Fred Watson: They're very, very different, different

569
00:23:22.750 --> 00:23:25.390
concentrations of the isotopes. Um,

570
00:23:26.670 --> 00:23:29.150
and that basically,

571
00:23:30.420 --> 00:23:33.390
uh, suggests, um, some of the issues

572
00:23:33.790 --> 00:23:36.750
on the history, uh, of

573
00:23:38.190 --> 00:23:40.670
the comet. I might read a little bit because

574
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.230
there's some very nice summaries here on the

575
00:23:43.230 --> 00:23:45.170
press release. Um,

576
00:23:46.110 --> 00:23:48.590
so one of the M instruments used on the web

577
00:23:48.590 --> 00:23:51.390
showed only traces of carbon 13 compared to

578
00:23:51.390 --> 00:23:54.110
lighter weight carbon 12. This points to a

579
00:23:54.110 --> 00:23:56.990
very old origin for 3i atlas

580
00:23:57.150 --> 00:23:59.230
as stellar systems become enriched with

581
00:23:59.230 --> 00:24:01.710
carbon 13 over time as generations of stars

582
00:24:01.710 --> 00:24:03.870
are born and die in the galaxy. That's why

583
00:24:03.870 --> 00:24:06.110
there are higher levels of carbon 13 in our

584
00:24:06.110 --> 00:24:08.310
system around our sun, which formed

585
00:24:08.310 --> 00:24:10.990
relatively recently, 4.5 billion

586
00:24:11.070 --> 00:24:13.480
years ago. Um, it,

587
00:24:13.750 --> 00:24:16.400
uh, also says, uh, there were

588
00:24:16.400 --> 00:24:18.800
exceptionally high levels of deuterium, about

589
00:24:18.800 --> 00:24:20.960
30 times more than seen in solar system

590
00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:23.880
comets. This implies that 3i Atlas

591
00:24:23.880 --> 00:24:26.440
may have originated in a very cold system

592
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:28.750
much earlier in the history of our, ah,

593
00:24:28.839 --> 00:24:31.680
galaxy. Um, uh, so these

594
00:24:31.680 --> 00:24:34.070
are all clues about, uh,

595
00:24:34.520 --> 00:24:36.920
the origin. And, uh, once again, reading from

596
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:38.360
the press release, the research team

597
00:24:38.360 --> 00:24:41.160
estimates that 3i Atlas could have formed

598
00:24:41.160 --> 00:24:43.960
as long as 10 to 12 billion years

599
00:24:43.960 --> 00:24:44.280
ago.

600
00:24:44.580 --> 00:24:44.980
Professor Fred Watson: Wow.

601
00:24:45.140 --> 00:24:47.660
Professor Fred Watson: During the universe's cosmic noon, when star

602
00:24:47.660 --> 00:24:50.180
formation was at its height, its young

603
00:24:50.180 --> 00:24:53.060
origin solar system was likely ensconced

604
00:24:53.060 --> 00:24:55.620
in a relatively cold, dense cloud.

605
00:24:56.020 --> 00:24:58.980
The abundance of heavy water shows that 3i

606
00:24:58.980 --> 00:25:01.980
Atlas spent its formative years in a deeply

607
00:25:01.980 --> 00:25:04.740
frozen state. This is quite extraordinary.

608
00:25:05.140 --> 00:25:05.700
Andrew Dunkley: Amazing.

609
00:25:05.700 --> 00:25:06.000
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Ah,

610
00:25:07.780 --> 00:25:09.540
Andrew Dunkley: it's come from a place that was very

611
00:25:09.540 --> 00:25:11.970
different to now. Um, and, and

612
00:25:13.890 --> 00:25:16.690
I guess that's the difference in

613
00:25:16.690 --> 00:25:18.850
terms of the time scales we're talking about

614
00:25:19.090 --> 00:25:21.090
what it was like then, what it's like now.

615
00:25:21.570 --> 00:25:22.530
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.

616
00:25:22.850 --> 00:25:24.450
Andrew Dunkley: It's like a little time machine.

617
00:25:24.770 --> 00:25:27.769
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Uh, but yes, exactly. It's a

618
00:25:27.769 --> 00:25:30.210
time capsule. It's a lovely time capsule.

619
00:25:30.500 --> 00:25:33.330
Um, in uh, the way it's been analysed,

620
00:25:33.810 --> 00:25:35.730
I'd have to say I take my hat off to all

621
00:25:35.730 --> 00:25:38.650
these scientists for the imagination that's

622
00:25:38.650 --> 00:25:40.950
been used in, in devising the experiments

623
00:25:40.950 --> 00:25:42.950
that have been developed. These observations

624
00:25:42.950 --> 00:25:45.870
tell us, uh, quite unequivocal things about

625
00:25:45.870 --> 00:25:48.230
this object which we would not otherwise have

626
00:25:48.230 --> 00:25:50.710
known. And it again highlights

627
00:25:51.590 --> 00:25:54.310
just how different our own solar system is to

628
00:25:54.630 --> 00:25:57.390
probably most of the other solar

629
00:25:57.390 --> 00:25:59.550
systems that we can look out of and look out

630
00:25:59.550 --> 00:26:02.280
of beyond our galaxy and see, um,

631
00:26:02.550 --> 00:26:05.550
something formed 12 billion years ago that

632
00:26:05.550 --> 00:26:07.990
would be very, very different from the

633
00:26:08.230 --> 00:26:09.480
universe that we see now.

634
00:26:10.430 --> 00:26:12.790
Andrew Dunkley: I think it's incredible that in this day and

635
00:26:12.790 --> 00:26:15.150
age that we can look at a rock hurtling

636
00:26:15.150 --> 00:26:18.030
through space at 1.4 billion kilometres

637
00:26:18.030 --> 00:26:19.950
distant or wherever. You know, it was close

638
00:26:19.950 --> 00:26:21.590
in that at one stage, but you know what I

639
00:26:21.590 --> 00:26:24.430
mean, and be able to break it down and say

640
00:26:24.430 --> 00:26:26.670
this is exactly what we're looking at. And

641
00:26:27.230 --> 00:26:30.070
because of that we think it came from the

642
00:26:30.070 --> 00:26:32.870
early universe. Yeah, it's just incredible.

643
00:26:32.870 --> 00:26:35.710
Incredible. Uh, and a great storey to,

644
00:26:35.840 --> 00:26:38.830
um, uh, read, uh, which you can do at, uh,

645
00:26:38.830 --> 00:26:41.690
The NASA website, science.NASA.gov uh,

646
00:26:41.850 --> 00:26:43.610
you can also read the paper which was

647
00:26:43.610 --> 00:26:46.250
published in the journal Nature. This is

648
00:26:46.250 --> 00:26:48.450
Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley with Professor

649
00:26:48.450 --> 00:26:49.370
Fred Watson Watson.

650
00:26:51.770 --> 00:26:53.530
Professor Fred Watson: I'm going to step off the land now.

651
00:26:55.770 --> 00:26:58.090
That's one small step for man,

652
00:27:01.130 --> 00:27:03.450
one diabetes for man.

653
00:27:04.010 --> 00:27:05.050
Professor Fred Watson: Space Nuts.

654
00:27:06.230 --> 00:27:07.900
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, the other day for Fred Watson.

655
00:27:07.900 --> 00:27:10.060
In one of our previous episodes we talked

656
00:27:10.060 --> 00:27:12.940
about the death of our sun and how

657
00:27:12.940 --> 00:27:15.620
it'll turn into a red giant and fry us all

658
00:27:15.700 --> 00:27:18.660
and, um, you know, free barbecue gas. But

659
00:27:18.660 --> 00:27:20.100
that's about it. Um,

660
00:27:21.780 --> 00:27:24.019
and we've had questions about it as well.

661
00:27:24.660 --> 00:27:27.100
Now there's some new information about the

662
00:27:27.100 --> 00:27:29.700
death spiral of our, of our only

663
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:32.260
or our nearest star. And

664
00:27:33.780 --> 00:27:34.750
it's a bit weird.

665
00:27:35.910 --> 00:27:38.340
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, it is. Uh, there's a very nice Space.com

666
00:27:38.340 --> 00:27:40.670
piece on this written by Robert Lee. I, uh,

667
00:27:40.780 --> 00:27:43.460
love, uh, Robert's headline. Uh, our sun

668
00:27:43.540 --> 00:27:46.260
is destined to kick and spit its way

669
00:27:46.260 --> 00:27:48.420
across the solar system when it dies.

670
00:27:48.820 --> 00:27:50.900
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, great.

671
00:27:51.350 --> 00:27:53.300
Professor Fred Watson: Um, that's right.

672
00:27:54.230 --> 00:27:57.060
Uh, and the first sentence

673
00:27:57.060 --> 00:27:58.740
is. Scientists have discovered that dying

674
00:27:58.740 --> 00:28:01.660
stars don't go down without a fight. Um, Yes,

675
00:28:01.660 --> 00:28:03.060
I like that theme very much.

676
00:28:03.140 --> 00:28:04.740
Andrew Dunkley: We shouldn't be surprised by that.

677
00:28:04.900 --> 00:28:07.600
Professor Fred Watson: Not really. No. That's right. So, uh, what

678
00:28:07.600 --> 00:28:10.400
this is about is the later stages of

679
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:13.040
the sun's life. Um, it,

680
00:28:13.800 --> 00:28:16.800
uh, seems, um, inevitable from what we know

681
00:28:16.800 --> 00:28:19.320
about the way stars behave, that within the

682
00:28:19.320 --> 00:28:21.280
next 3 to 5 billion years the

683
00:28:21.920 --> 00:28:24.400
hydrogen in the core of the sun will run out

684
00:28:24.400 --> 00:28:27.000
the Core collapses and the outer layers of

685
00:28:27.000 --> 00:28:29.920
the star uh basically puff outwards,

686
00:28:30.100 --> 00:28:33.000
um perhaps making the star 100

687
00:28:33.000 --> 00:28:35.280
times its original diameter.

688
00:28:36.080 --> 00:28:38.160
So you know our sun's going to get very big,

689
00:28:38.260 --> 00:28:40.980
uh, big enough probably to swallow up the

690
00:28:40.980 --> 00:28:43.860
Earth. Um and what you get is

691
00:28:43.860 --> 00:28:46.420
the uh, you know, you get a planetary nebula

692
00:28:46.420 --> 00:28:48.260
forming. That's what we call them. That's

693
00:28:48.260 --> 00:28:51.060
that glow of circle of glowing gas or sphere

694
00:28:51.060 --> 00:28:53.540
of glowing gas with a white dwarf at the

695
00:28:53.540 --> 00:28:56.440
centre. Um, probably actually uh,

696
00:28:58.100 --> 00:29:00.220
um, the sun might even be as big as the orbit

697
00:29:00.220 --> 00:29:03.100
of Mars uh when it goes. But it's a person

698
00:29:03.260 --> 00:29:05.500
at ah, California Institute of Technology,

699
00:29:06.180 --> 00:29:09.180
Uh Jim Fuller has calculated

700
00:29:09.740 --> 00:29:11.900
that during that process

701
00:29:12.460 --> 00:29:14.980
before the star becomes a white

702
00:29:14.980 --> 00:29:16.780
dwarf, it

703
00:29:17.500 --> 00:29:20.060
basically spits. Uh,

704
00:29:20.700 --> 00:29:23.420
he says it will receive around

705
00:29:23.500 --> 00:29:26.340
10,000 little kicks over the

706
00:29:26.340 --> 00:29:28.860
course of hundreds of thousands of years. So

707
00:29:29.020 --> 00:29:31.420
they're well spaced out. But these are

708
00:29:31.660 --> 00:29:33.980
blobs of plasma that are being

709
00:29:33.980 --> 00:29:36.390
ejected from the, the

710
00:29:36.630 --> 00:29:39.630
surface of this bloated uh, version

711
00:29:39.630 --> 00:29:42.590
of the sun, the red giant. And the point

712
00:29:42.590 --> 00:29:45.590
that uh, Jim Fuller is making is

713
00:29:45.860 --> 00:29:48.630
um, it's a good one. It's basic physics.

714
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:51.910
If you eject a blob of matter

715
00:29:52.230 --> 00:29:54.870
from the sun, the sun gets a kick in the

716
00:29:54.870 --> 00:29:57.390
opposite direction. Um, oh yeah, that makes

717
00:29:57.390 --> 00:29:59.790
sense. For every action there's an equal and

718
00:29:59.790 --> 00:30:02.550
opposite reaction. And so these,

719
00:30:02.920 --> 00:30:05.910
um, he suggests will

720
00:30:06.790 --> 00:30:09.020
push the sun around uh,

721
00:30:10.380 --> 00:30:13.110
uh, in different random directions. What

722
00:30:13.910 --> 00:30:16.810
is technically known as a random walk. Um,

723
00:30:16.870 --> 00:30:19.870
so basically Random Walk is as the

724
00:30:19.870 --> 00:30:22.690
title suggests, uh, you um,

725
00:30:23.110 --> 00:30:25.590
you know, you basically

726
00:30:25.590 --> 00:30:28.550
randomise uh movement uh in

727
00:30:28.550 --> 00:30:31.070
any given direction and you end up with this

728
00:30:31.070 --> 00:30:33.790
random walk process. And so uh, Jim

729
00:30:33.790 --> 00:30:36.770
Fuller said that for a red giant

730
00:30:37.490 --> 00:30:39.570
the random walk

731
00:30:40.290 --> 00:30:43.010
would basically uh, each of these spits

732
00:30:43.570 --> 00:30:45.970
would see uh, the thing moving

733
00:30:46.210 --> 00:30:48.290
at uh, the sun moving at around

734
00:30:48.370 --> 00:30:50.930
3,540 kilometres an hour.

735
00:30:51.410 --> 00:30:51.890
Professor Fred Watson: Whoa.

736
00:30:52.270 --> 00:30:54.290
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, now that's a lot uh in

737
00:30:54.690 --> 00:30:56.940
terrestrial terms. But um,

738
00:30:57.410 --> 00:30:59.610
when you think about stars that are

739
00:30:59.610 --> 00:31:02.610
collapsing uh into um,

740
00:31:02.790 --> 00:31:05.070
basically black holes, uh in supernova

741
00:31:05.070 --> 00:31:07.430
explosions which the sun won't do, uh because

742
00:31:07.430 --> 00:31:09.750
it's not big enough, uh, uh,

743
00:31:10.230 --> 00:31:13.230
that's still a very small velocity but it

744
00:31:13.230 --> 00:31:15.470
still produces a random walk. I think that

745
00:31:15.470 --> 00:31:18.070
velocity is actually the

746
00:31:19.060 --> 00:31:21.510
uh, overall motion that you get from this

747
00:31:21.510 --> 00:31:23.470
random walk process. You get it actually

748
00:31:23.470 --> 00:31:26.470
moving in a random direction in space.

749
00:31:27.350 --> 00:31:30.230
Andrew Dunkley: So it's going to kick and scream and go

750
00:31:30.230 --> 00:31:32.850
down like, I don't know, um,

751
00:31:33.650 --> 00:31:35.930
a heavyweight boxer. It's, it's, it's not.

752
00:31:35.930 --> 00:31:37.410
And it's going to bounce around the ring

753
00:31:37.410 --> 00:31:37.730
like.

754
00:31:38.290 --> 00:31:39.210
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, yeah.

755
00:31:39.210 --> 00:31:40.050
Andrew Dunkley: Muhammad Ali.

756
00:31:40.850 --> 00:31:43.610
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yep. Or, or even Cassius Clay.

757
00:31:43.610 --> 00:31:45.490
Andrew Dunkley: Or Cassius Clay, whichever you like.

758
00:31:45.760 --> 00:31:47.410
Professor Fred Watson: Um, same person,

759
00:31:48.130 --> 00:31:48.770
definitely.

760
00:31:49.410 --> 00:31:50.930
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, okay. Well,

761
00:31:52.450 --> 00:31:54.330
I guess the question is how did they figure

762
00:31:54.330 --> 00:31:54.770
that out?

763
00:31:55.730 --> 00:31:58.620
Professor Fred Watson: Yes. So, um, I think that's, um. You

764
00:31:58.620 --> 00:32:01.130
know, what you do is you look at the, um,

765
00:32:01.130 --> 00:32:03.580
thermo hydrodynamics of the interior of the

766
00:32:03.580 --> 00:32:06.340
sun as its atmosphere is

767
00:32:06.340 --> 00:32:09.340
changing. Uh, in fact,

768
00:32:09.340 --> 00:32:11.860
I should say the atmospheres of stars, uh,

769
00:32:11.860 --> 00:32:14.660
are, uh, an area of research that has been

770
00:32:14.660 --> 00:32:17.620
really very well studied over the last 50

771
00:32:17.620 --> 00:32:19.540
years from a theoretical viewpoint. And I've

772
00:32:19.540 --> 00:32:21.580
sort of watched that the way that evolves a

773
00:32:21.580 --> 00:32:24.550
bit. Because my, um, job at one

774
00:32:24.550 --> 00:32:26.430
stage as the project manager of the RAVE

775
00:32:26.430 --> 00:32:28.750
survey, the Radial Velocity Experiment, uh,

776
00:32:28.750 --> 00:32:31.350
which we carried out on the UK

777
00:32:31.350 --> 00:32:33.470
Schmidt, measured the spectra of half a

778
00:32:33.470 --> 00:32:35.950
million stars. And a lot of what we did with

779
00:32:35.950 --> 00:32:37.670
that, uh, was to do with the atmospheres of

780
00:32:37.670 --> 00:32:40.350
these stars. And I kind of watched

781
00:32:40.510 --> 00:32:43.150
the way the technology evolved,

782
00:32:43.670 --> 00:32:46.550
uh, and all the buzzwords that. I mean, I

783
00:32:46.550 --> 00:32:48.390
didn't understand the science because I've

784
00:32:48.390 --> 00:32:51.350
never really dwelt on the interiors of

785
00:32:51.350 --> 00:32:53.830
stars in any deep level. At least not as far

786
00:32:53.830 --> 00:32:56.330
as the hydrothermal dynamics are concerned.

787
00:32:56.790 --> 00:32:59.530
Um, uh, but the buzzwords that they were

788
00:32:59.530 --> 00:33:02.490
using changed over the years and the codes,

789
00:33:02.930 --> 00:33:05.370
um, the software that was being used to make

790
00:33:05.370 --> 00:33:08.290
these analyses, uh, and so they're well

791
00:33:08.290 --> 00:33:10.450
understood. And I guess it's a deeper

792
00:33:10.450 --> 00:33:13.450
analysis of that that gives

793
00:33:13.450 --> 00:33:15.570
rise to the idea that you get spits and

794
00:33:15.570 --> 00:33:17.930
perhaps I can suggest the direction that

795
00:33:17.930 --> 00:33:20.330
might have come in. Because normally when you

796
00:33:20.330 --> 00:33:22.530
think of the atmosphere of a star, you

797
00:33:22.530 --> 00:33:25.510
imagine it as something. The atmosphere,

798
00:33:25.630 --> 00:33:28.550
um, is basically in shells,

799
00:33:28.550 --> 00:33:30.950
different shells. You can imagine its

800
00:33:30.950 --> 00:33:33.110
structure changes, but you always

801
00:33:33.750 --> 00:33:35.910
imagine it to be completely spherically

802
00:33:35.910 --> 00:33:37.790
symmetric. That you're talking just about

803
00:33:37.790 --> 00:33:40.310
spheres. Now if you break those spheres down,

804
00:33:40.470 --> 00:33:42.470
then you're going to get different processes

805
00:33:42.470 --> 00:33:45.030
going on at one side of a sphere from you get

806
00:33:45.350 --> 00:33:47.270
at the other side. And that might be where

807
00:33:47.270 --> 00:33:49.320
these, uh, phenomena, uh,

808
00:33:49.590 --> 00:33:52.070
originate in what Jim Fuller's talking about.

809
00:33:53.030 --> 00:33:55.150
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating. You can read all about it at

810
00:33:55.150 --> 00:33:57.690
Space. It was presented at the

811
00:33:57.690 --> 00:34:00.170
248th meeting of the American Astronomical

812
00:34:00.170 --> 00:34:02.810
Society in Pasadena, uh,

813
00:34:02.850 --> 00:34:05.330
and has been submitted to the Proceedings of

814
00:34:05.330 --> 00:34:08.050
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.

815
00:34:08.290 --> 00:34:10.570
So, uh, yeah, it's

816
00:34:10.570 --> 00:34:13.330
uh, a fascinating discovery

817
00:34:13.330 --> 00:34:15.970
and glad we won't be around to see all that.

818
00:34:17.650 --> 00:34:18.130
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.

819
00:34:18.570 --> 00:34:20.410
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, Fred Watson, we're done. Thank you so

820
00:34:20.410 --> 00:34:20.930
very much.

821
00:34:21.590 --> 00:34:23.670
Professor Fred Watson: Um, thank you, Andrew. It's been. Been jolly

822
00:34:23.670 --> 00:34:25.670
as always and, uh, hope we can do it again

823
00:34:25.670 --> 00:34:26.310
sometime.

824
00:34:26.630 --> 00:34:29.470
Andrew Dunkley: Maybe in a few minutes. Who knows? Professor

825
00:34:29.470 --> 00:34:31.060
Fred Watson Watson, astronomer at large. Um,

826
00:34:31.510 --> 00:34:33.710
and between episodes, please visit our

827
00:34:33.710 --> 00:34:36.630
website or our uh, social media platforms and

828
00:34:36.710 --> 00:34:38.510
maybe uh, you can go to the podcast group and

829
00:34:38.510 --> 00:34:40.310
have a chat with other people that listen to

830
00:34:40.310 --> 00:34:42.790
the show and um, yeah, they

831
00:34:43.270 --> 00:34:45.830
quite often talk um, about what we've talked

832
00:34:45.830 --> 00:34:48.310
about and carve it all up between themselves

833
00:34:48.310 --> 00:34:51.110
which is good. Uh, and you can cheque out all

834
00:34:51.110 --> 00:34:53.950
our other stuff on the website as well.

835
00:34:53.950 --> 00:34:56.690
Space nuts podcast.com and

836
00:34:56.690 --> 00:34:59.130
thanks to Huw in the studio who couldn't be

837
00:34:59.130 --> 00:35:01.850
with us today because he, he proved Newton's

838
00:35:01.850 --> 00:35:03.970
law. We turned up so he went the other way.

839
00:35:04.610 --> 00:35:06.570
And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your

840
00:35:06.570 --> 00:35:08.890
company. We will see you on the next episode

841
00:35:08.890 --> 00:35:10.370
of Space Nuts. Bye Bye.

842
00:35:11.490 --> 00:35:13.690
You've been listening to the Space Nuts

843
00:35:13.690 --> 00:35:16.650
podcast available at

844
00:35:16.650 --> 00:35:19.450
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, I have

845
00:35:19.450 --> 00:35:22.260
radio or your favourite podcast player. You

846
00:35:22.260 --> 00:35:25.020
can also stream on demand@bytes.com.

847
00:35:25.340 --> 00:35:27.380
this has been another quality podcast

848
00:35:27.380 --> 00:35:29.500
production from bytes.com.
Send a Voicemail