How SpaceX Breaks Satellite Records and What It Means for Earth Orbit Safety
Space Nuts Episode 641: Exploring SpaceX Milestones, Lunar Realities, and Particle Physics In this episode, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into recent breakthroughs in space technology, lunar surface understanding, and the physics of...
Space Nuts Episode 641: Exploring SpaceX Milestones, Lunar Realities, and Particle Physics
In this episode, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into recent breakthroughs in space technology, lunar surface understanding, and the physics of light and matter. From SpaceX's record-breaking satellite launches to the complexities of stopping photons and the intriguing origins of interstellar objects, this episode covers some of the most fascinating topics in space science today.
In this episode:
SpaceX has launched over 15,000 satellites, more than all other space launches combined since 1957
The successful reuse of Falcon 9 boosters, setting a new milestone in spaceflight
The ambitious plans for orbital data systems using Starship and their impact on space traffic
Challenges faced by lunar explorers, including dust, terrain tilt, and small craters, highlighted by NASA’s expert critique
Comet 3i Atlas offers clues about the early universe, potentially 10-12 billion years old
The physics behind slowing down—then stopping and reviving—photons in Bose-Einstein condensates
How relativistic effects prevent particles in colliders from exceeding the speed of light during high-energy collisions
Innovative ideas for managing space debris, including repositioning defunct satellites into graveyard orbits
The questions about how different cosmic fields may intertwine, forming superpositions in fundamental physics
A humorous sci-fi joke about neutrinos and a reminder to ask questions about our universe
Timestamps:
00:00 – Introduction and overview of topics
02:00 – SpaceX's satellite launch record and starlink constellation
05:00 – Reusability of Falcon 9 boosters and future launch plans
08:00 – SpaceX’s enhanced satellite megaconstellation and artificial intelligence systems
12:00 – Challenges for lunar surface exploration: dust, terrain tilt, and small craters
16:00 – NASA’s critique of lunar surface imagery and exploration preparedness
20:00 – Comet 3i Atlas: what it reveals about the early universe
25:00 – Isotopic analysis of interstellar objects and their origins
30:00 – Physics of stopping and reviving light in Bose-Einstein condensates
40:00 – Relativistic collision velocities and Einstein's effects at particle accelerators
55:00 – Managing space debris and satellite orbits through action-reaction principles
61:00 – Fields and superpositions in fundamental physics
66:00 – Fun question: neutrino jokes and questions viewers sent in
70:00 – Wrap-up and upcoming episodes
Resources & Links:
SpaceX’s Satellite Missions & Starlink
NASA Artemis Program
NASA's Space Resources Roundtable
Comet 3i Atlas Discoveries in Nature Astronomy
NASA Webb Telescope Science
Physics World article on Stopping Light
Connect with Fred Watson:
Professor Fred Watson - LinkedIn
Fred Watson - Official Site
Note:
Stay curious, ask questions, and look up the references for more in-depth understanding of these fascinating topics. The universe is vast and full of surprises—adventure awaits.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
0
00:00:00.480 --> 00:00:02.280
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us. This is
1
00:00:02.280 --> 00:00:04.760
Space Nuts. We talk astronomy and space
2
00:00:04.760 --> 00:00:07.160
science and sometimes we talk about things
3
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:09.000
that have got nothing to do with astronomy
4
00:00:09.000 --> 00:00:11.520
and space science. You just never know. We
5
00:00:11.520 --> 00:00:13.560
throw up all sorts of things and sometimes we
6
00:00:13.560 --> 00:00:15.200
throw up. Uh, today
7
00:00:16.720 --> 00:00:19.040
we will be talking about SpaceX. They're in
8
00:00:19.040 --> 00:00:21.800
the news again and it's all about the
9
00:00:21.800 --> 00:00:23.360
numbers. And I'm not talking their share
10
00:00:23.360 --> 00:00:25.600
price. Well, actually, I probably will. Um,
11
00:00:26.260 --> 00:00:28.820
educating the public about the real moon.
12
00:00:29.460 --> 00:00:31.660
It's a, ah, it's an issue that NASA thinks
13
00:00:31.660 --> 00:00:33.980
needs to be dealt with. We've got a Three Eye
14
00:00:33.980 --> 00:00:36.260
Atlas update. Yes. You thought it was long
15
00:00:36.260 --> 00:00:38.740
gone, never to be spoken of again. Not true.
16
00:00:38.980 --> 00:00:41.250
Fascinating, uh, facts have been, uh,
17
00:00:41.250 --> 00:00:43.860
revealed about this amazing little rock
18
00:00:44.340 --> 00:00:44.740
and,
19
00:00:46.660 --> 00:00:47.060
Professor Fred Watson: and
20
00:00:47.380 --> 00:00:48.580
Andrew Dunkley: we might have to start again.
21
00:00:50.180 --> 00:00:52.300
Professor Fred Watson: I'm sorry, I can cut this bit out. Just cut
22
00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:55.220
that bit out. I'm sorry. M. Marty's just got
23
00:00:55.220 --> 00:00:56.980
back from walking the dog. Hi, Marty.
24
00:00:57.220 --> 00:00:58.560
Andrew Dunkley: We that bit in?
25
00:00:58.720 --> 00:00:59.240
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yeah.
26
00:00:59.240 --> 00:01:01.920
Andrew Dunkley: That's okay. And what was the last thing?
27
00:01:02.200 --> 00:01:03.680
Uh, our, uh, son's death.
28
00:01:03.680 --> 00:01:05.040
Professor Fred Watson: I've already interrupted it.
29
00:01:05.760 --> 00:01:06.040
Andrew Dunkley: G'.
30
00:01:06.040 --> 00:01:06.240
Professor Fred Watson: Day.
31
00:01:07.680 --> 00:01:08.160
Professor Fred Watson: Sorry.
32
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:09.160
Andrew Dunkley: You're right.
33
00:01:09.160 --> 00:01:11.040
Professor Fred Watson: It's all good. It's all good.
34
00:01:11.120 --> 00:01:12.320
Andrew Dunkley: It's only the intro.
35
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:13.440
Professor Fred Watson: It's only the intro.
36
00:01:13.440 --> 00:01:16.440
Andrew Dunkley: Not an important bit. Anyway,
37
00:01:16.440 --> 00:01:18.240
whatever I was talking about is all coming up
38
00:01:18.240 --> 00:01:20.640
on this episode of space
39
00:01:20.640 --> 00:01:21.280
nuts.
40
00:01:21.280 --> 00:01:23.760
Professor Fred Watson: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
41
00:01:24.000 --> 00:01:26.720
10, 9. Ignition
42
00:01:26.720 --> 00:01:27.460
sequence start.
43
00:01:27.460 --> 00:01:28.632
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, space nuts.
44
00:01:28.699 --> 00:01:31.629
Professor Fred Watson: 5, 4, 4, 3, 2. 1, 2, 3, 4,
45
00:01:31.695 --> 00:01:33.660
5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
46
00:01:33.740 --> 00:01:34.940
Professor Fred Watson: Space nuts.
47
00:01:34.940 --> 00:01:36.780
Professor Fred Watson: Astronauts report. It feels good.
48
00:01:37.580 --> 00:01:39.900
Andrew Dunkley: Takes me back to my old radio policy. If
49
00:01:39.900 --> 00:01:41.980
somebody walked into the studio, they were on
50
00:01:41.980 --> 00:01:44.500
the show and that's exactly what happened.
51
00:01:44.500 --> 00:01:46.700
And joining us aside from Marnie is Professor
52
00:01:46.700 --> 00:01:48.780
Fred Watson Watson, astronomer at large.
53
00:01:48.780 --> 00:01:49.500
Hello, Fred Watson.
54
00:01:50.300 --> 00:01:52.060
Professor Fred Watson: Hello, Andrew. Sorry.
55
00:01:53.260 --> 00:01:54.060
Andrew Dunkley: That's okay.
56
00:01:54.060 --> 00:01:54.500
Professor Fred Watson: I'm glad.
57
00:01:54.500 --> 00:01:57.060
Andrew Dunkley: I don't mind. I don't mind. I used to work
58
00:01:57.060 --> 00:01:59.940
with some radio people who got so annoyed, so
59
00:01:59.940 --> 00:02:02.200
annoyed if they were interrupted, any reason
60
00:02:02.200 --> 00:02:05.160
whatsoever. We even had one guy who
61
00:02:05.320 --> 00:02:08.200
wouldn't even accept you looking
62
00:02:08.200 --> 00:02:09.480
at him through the window.
63
00:02:10.520 --> 00:02:10.920
Professor Fred Watson: Really?
64
00:02:11.320 --> 00:02:13.880
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, he used to get really steamed
65
00:02:14.040 --> 00:02:16.120
Professor Fred Watson: from the producer suite through to the.
66
00:02:16.600 --> 00:02:17.640
Yeah, yeah.
67
00:02:18.280 --> 00:02:20.800
Andrew Dunkley: When he was in the studio, you weren't
68
00:02:20.800 --> 00:02:23.440
allowed to go in and you weren't allowed to
69
00:02:23.440 --> 00:02:26.360
look at him through the window. Three solid
70
00:02:26.360 --> 00:02:29.080
hours of isolation. Uh, yeah, it was,
71
00:02:29.120 --> 00:02:31.520
um. And you know, sometimes you'd do it
72
00:02:31.520 --> 00:02:32.120
accidentally.
73
00:02:32.200 --> 00:02:34.160
Professor Fred Watson: Of course you would. Yeah, yeah. Of course
74
00:02:34.160 --> 00:02:34.900
you would. Yeah.
75
00:02:34.900 --> 00:02:36.440
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, they were fun times.
76
00:02:36.600 --> 00:02:37.160
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
77
00:02:37.400 --> 00:02:37.880
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
78
00:02:37.900 --> 00:02:40.440
Andrew Dunkley: Um, so Marnie's well and you're well and
79
00:02:40.440 --> 00:02:41.400
everybody's well.
80
00:02:41.560 --> 00:02:43.080
Professor Fred Watson: We're doing all right. That's right.
81
00:02:43.799 --> 00:02:46.040
Andrew Dunkley: And something else that's doing well is
82
00:02:46.120 --> 00:02:48.920
SpaceX. Probably not their share price,
83
00:02:48.920 --> 00:02:51.920
which, uh, is currently showing what they
84
00:02:51.920 --> 00:02:54.600
call correction, but it hit a
85
00:02:54.600 --> 00:02:56.680
massive high not long after the,
86
00:02:56.890 --> 00:02:59.480
um, company went public. But, uh, now,
87
00:03:00.010 --> 00:03:02.140
uh, what do they call it? Adjusting. Yeah,
88
00:03:02.140 --> 00:03:02.820
adjusting.
89
00:03:03.140 --> 00:03:05.860
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Um, those numbers are,
90
00:03:05.910 --> 00:03:08.760
um, a bit alien to me. Uh,
91
00:03:08.820 --> 00:03:11.380
as I've said before, I only understood. I
92
00:03:11.380 --> 00:03:13.180
only understand billions when they've got
93
00:03:13.180 --> 00:03:16.060
light years after them. Uh, but they have
94
00:03:16.060 --> 00:03:18.620
dollars after them. And I have watched, yes,
95
00:03:18.620 --> 00:03:20.900
I've watched the fortunes of, um, SpaceX
96
00:03:20.980 --> 00:03:23.940
since the IPO. See, I'm in the jargon there.
97
00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.610
The initial public year, uh,
98
00:03:26.660 --> 00:03:29.590
and uh, yes, you're right, it looks as though
99
00:03:29.590 --> 00:03:31.910
it's going to be back where it started. I
100
00:03:31.910 --> 00:03:33.230
think the way things are going,
101
00:03:34.190 --> 00:03:36.070
Andrew Dunkley: that's generally what happens. And sometimes
102
00:03:36.070 --> 00:03:38.470
they keep going below that and they bounce
103
00:03:38.470 --> 00:03:39.070
back later.
104
00:03:39.170 --> 00:03:39.270
Professor Fred Watson: Um,
105
00:03:42.110 --> 00:03:45.110
Andrew Dunkley: I find it really bizarre that we base our
106
00:03:45.110 --> 00:03:47.950
entire wealth and future on
107
00:03:47.950 --> 00:03:49.990
something as volatile as the stock market.
108
00:03:49.990 --> 00:03:52.710
I've never understood that side of the
109
00:03:52.710 --> 00:03:55.710
business world. And your whole retirement
110
00:03:55.710 --> 00:03:58.710
is based on this stuff? Uh, in
111
00:03:58.710 --> 00:04:00.670
some cases, and especially in Australia with
112
00:04:00.670 --> 00:04:03.630
our superannuation system and um, you
113
00:04:03.630 --> 00:04:06.070
know, you could just be. I've known people
114
00:04:06.070 --> 00:04:07.830
who were just about to retire and there'd
115
00:04:07.830 --> 00:04:09.910
been a big crash and they had to work another
116
00:04:09.910 --> 00:04:10.470
decade.
117
00:04:10.710 --> 00:04:11.510
Professor Fred Watson: It's just. Wow.
118
00:04:11.510 --> 00:04:13.110
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, Gosh, wow.
119
00:04:13.440 --> 00:04:14.470
Professor Fred Watson: M. Scary stuff.
120
00:04:14.470 --> 00:04:16.750
Andrew Dunkley: Anyway, we're not talking about that today.
121
00:04:16.750 --> 00:04:18.390
Even though we were talking about that today.
122
00:04:18.520 --> 00:04:20.870
Uh, we're talking about, uh, uh, something
123
00:04:20.870 --> 00:04:23.190
else to do with Elon Musk's company,
124
00:04:23.190 --> 00:04:25.510
SpaceX, and that is that they have,
125
00:04:25.780 --> 00:04:28.630
um, They've basically set a space launch
126
00:04:28.630 --> 00:04:29.030
record.
127
00:04:30.290 --> 00:04:32.530
Professor Fred Watson: They have. It's really quite a milestone when
128
00:04:32.530 --> 00:04:35.330
you think about it. What they have
129
00:04:35.650 --> 00:04:38.530
done, uh, is launched
130
00:04:38.850 --> 00:04:41.490
15,262
131
00:04:41.490 --> 00:04:44.322
satellites, uh, as of June
132
00:04:44.418 --> 00:04:46.650
12th. I mean, they're launching so many, uh,
133
00:04:47.490 --> 00:04:50.050
you've got to pick a date for it. But June
134
00:04:50.050 --> 00:04:53.010
12, 15,262 satellites.
135
00:04:53.330 --> 00:04:55.330
But here's the rub, here's why it's a record.
136
00:04:55.410 --> 00:04:58.290
The combined total of all
137
00:04:58.450 --> 00:05:00.370
other companies and organ
138
00:05:01.470 --> 00:05:04.430
since 1957, when Sputnik 1 was launched,
139
00:05:04.990 --> 00:05:07.390
is 15,138.
140
00:05:07.790 --> 00:05:10.630
So SpaceX has now launched more
141
00:05:10.630 --> 00:05:13.510
satellites than anyone else in
142
00:05:13.510 --> 00:05:16.270
history combined. Combined.
143
00:05:16.510 --> 00:05:19.270
Andrew Dunkley: Wow. So they've more or less doubled the
144
00:05:19.270 --> 00:05:22.110
number of satellites by themselves.
145
00:05:22.590 --> 00:05:24.530
Professor Fred Watson: That's right. Except a lot of those, uh,
146
00:05:24.530 --> 00:05:24.750
they're
147
00:05:24.750 --> 00:05:25.630
Andrew Dunkley: not up there anymore.
148
00:05:25.630 --> 00:05:27.070
Professor Fred Watson: A lot of those aren't up there anymore. I
149
00:05:27.070 --> 00:05:29.230
think they have. I think it's about 11,000
150
00:05:29.390 --> 00:05:31.310
operational Starlink satellites At the
151
00:05:31.310 --> 00:05:34.210
moment, but there's that have re entered and
152
00:05:34.210 --> 00:05:37.090
1,000 more that are not activated yet. Those
153
00:05:37.090 --> 00:05:39.850
are the sorts of numbers. Um, so
154
00:05:40.010 --> 00:05:41.690
it means uh, the total
155
00:05:42.890 --> 00:05:44.730
few days or a few weeks since I looked at
156
00:05:44.730 --> 00:05:47.530
this figure, but it's about 15,000 altogether
157
00:05:47.530 --> 00:05:49.970
is the number of operational satellites with
158
00:05:49.970 --> 00:05:52.490
of course huge numbers of ones that are no
159
00:05:52.490 --> 00:05:54.850
longer operational and even more numbers of
160
00:05:54.850 --> 00:05:57.050
bits of space junk that you can't track.
161
00:05:57.690 --> 00:06:00.450
But yes, what an extraordinary record. And of
162
00:06:00.450 --> 00:06:02.730
course what's brought this
163
00:06:03.370 --> 00:06:06.350
is uh, uh, what's brought SpaceX
164
00:06:06.350 --> 00:06:08.550
to this milestone is the Falcon 9 rocket
165
00:06:08.710 --> 00:06:11.430
which has been so successful,
166
00:06:11.930 --> 00:06:14.830
um, uh, they're now reused. I think
167
00:06:14.830 --> 00:06:17.470
the record is still 33 for the number of
168
00:06:17.470 --> 00:06:20.470
times a Falcon booster has been reused. That
169
00:06:20.470 --> 00:06:23.110
would have been unthinkable, uh,
170
00:06:23.190 --> 00:06:25.510
not much more than a decade ago. It was 2015
171
00:06:25.510 --> 00:06:27.350
when they launched, when they had the first
172
00:06:27.350 --> 00:06:29.750
recovery. Um, yes, ah,
173
00:06:30.150 --> 00:06:32.960
really quite remarkable. So there were 165
174
00:06:33.140 --> 00:06:36.070
falcon flights in 20. 25. That's
175
00:06:36.510 --> 00:06:38.610
uh, you, that's uh, three a week basically,
176
00:06:38.610 --> 00:06:39.090
isn't it?
177
00:06:39.090 --> 00:06:42.010
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. That's incredible. And of
178
00:06:42.010 --> 00:06:43.550
course he's talking about that um,
179
00:06:43.970 --> 00:06:46.770
supercomputer satellite system that
180
00:06:46.850 --> 00:06:49.570
he wants to um, create and that's going to
181
00:06:49.570 --> 00:06:52.410
put many, many more up there if he goes ahead
182
00:06:52.410 --> 00:06:52.850
with it.
183
00:06:53.009 --> 00:06:55.440
Professor Fred Watson: It's a million. That's right. Which is uh,
184
00:06:55.730 --> 00:06:58.210
eye watering in many ways.
185
00:06:58.530 --> 00:07:00.250
It makes you shed tears if you're an
186
00:07:00.250 --> 00:07:02.930
astronomer. Um, what's going to speed
187
00:07:03.240 --> 00:07:03.800
basically for
188
00:07:03.800 --> 00:07:05.840
Andrew Dunkley: artificial intelligence systems, isn't it?
189
00:07:05.840 --> 00:07:08.120
Professor Fred Watson: It is, yes. It's they're orbiting the plans
190
00:07:08.120 --> 00:07:10.840
for an orbital data centre with a million
191
00:07:11.000 --> 00:07:13.880
linked satellites. And what will enable that
192
00:07:13.880 --> 00:07:15.960
or yes, what will facilitate it, perhaps
193
00:07:15.960 --> 00:07:18.760
that's the word is the next step, which is
194
00:07:18.760 --> 00:07:21.000
already, it's already been tested out, is
195
00:07:21.000 --> 00:07:23.880
launching these satellites using uh, Starship
196
00:07:23.880 --> 00:07:26.040
rather than the Falcon, because Starship can,
197
00:07:26.200 --> 00:07:28.400
I mean falcons typically, they launch about
198
00:07:28.400 --> 00:07:30.840
20 at a time, 20 Starlink satellites at a
199
00:07:30.840 --> 00:07:32.870
time. With the Falcon 9 um,
200
00:07:33.320 --> 00:07:35.020
it's when you move to
201
00:07:35.820 --> 00:07:38.460
Starship you're talking about much, much
202
00:07:38.460 --> 00:07:40.780
higher numbers. I don't know how many they
203
00:07:40.780 --> 00:07:43.620
could launch but it's probably uh, well over
204
00:07:43.620 --> 00:07:46.540
100, maybe even in the 200s. Wow.
205
00:07:46.540 --> 00:07:48.420
Andrew Dunkley: I know astronomers wouldn't be happy with
206
00:07:48.420 --> 00:07:50.860
another million satellites up there crunching
207
00:07:51.020 --> 00:07:53.940
AI data. But um, interestingly
208
00:07:53.940 --> 00:07:56.660
enough we were talking to our son the other
209
00:07:56.660 --> 00:07:59.010
day who works in um, uh,
210
00:07:59.790 --> 00:08:01.420
I suppose you could call it the uh,
211
00:08:02.590 --> 00:08:05.150
gross retail area of electronics
212
00:08:06.110 --> 00:08:08.990
and he is frustrated at the
213
00:08:08.990 --> 00:08:11.270
moment because he'll get a client that wants
214
00:08:11.270 --> 00:08:14.110
quotes on various electronic Items, and
215
00:08:14.110 --> 00:08:15.910
we're talking smartphones, other smart
216
00:08:15.910 --> 00:08:18.790
devices. And then when the
217
00:08:18.790 --> 00:08:20.910
order comes in, the price has been hiked
218
00:08:21.150 --> 00:08:23.830
because of a lack of random
219
00:08:23.830 --> 00:08:26.030
access memory available because it's being
220
00:08:26.030 --> 00:08:27.990
chewed up by AI companies.
221
00:08:27.990 --> 00:08:28.750
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, interesting.
222
00:08:28.910 --> 00:08:31.460
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. So there's a world shortage
223
00:08:31.690 --> 00:08:34.170
of, um, RAM and DRAM and a few other,
224
00:08:35.680 --> 00:08:38.170
um, memory chips that are required for
225
00:08:38.170 --> 00:08:40.650
household devices like computers,
226
00:08:41.620 --> 00:08:44.090
um, because they're all being
227
00:08:44.730 --> 00:08:47.450
eaten up by these, uh, AI facilities.
228
00:08:48.250 --> 00:08:49.930
It's a bit of a problem at the moment.
229
00:08:50.970 --> 00:08:53.090
Professor Fred Watson: It's a good point. It hadn't occurred to me
230
00:08:53.090 --> 00:08:54.810
that there might be a shortage of that sort
231
00:08:54.810 --> 00:08:57.050
Andrew Dunkley: of thing because, well, and it's hitting the
232
00:08:57.050 --> 00:08:59.210
household market. People who want to buy a
233
00:08:59.210 --> 00:09:01.850
computer for themselves at home, uh, facing
234
00:09:01.930 --> 00:09:03.910
price hikes because of this. So
235
00:09:04.710 --> 00:09:07.710
it's a thing. It is a thing. So maybe,
236
00:09:07.710 --> 00:09:10.350
maybe Elon's found a way around that, or
237
00:09:10.350 --> 00:09:12.030
maybe he's getting all the chips. I don't
238
00:09:12.030 --> 00:09:12.270
know.
239
00:09:12.270 --> 00:09:14.910
Professor Fred Watson: Well, I think that's what it is. Uh, yeah. If
240
00:09:14.910 --> 00:09:17.650
the AI companies have got first dibs on, uh,
241
00:09:18.070 --> 00:09:20.470
the memories for the data centres, that's
242
00:09:20.470 --> 00:09:21.830
where it's all going to happen. Yes.
243
00:09:23.350 --> 00:09:24.790
Andrew Dunkley: It's like when I was at school, Fred Watson,
244
00:09:24.790 --> 00:09:26.230
you don't share your chips.
245
00:09:29.430 --> 00:09:31.750
Professor Fred Watson: You were lucky to have chips. We didn't have
246
00:09:31.750 --> 00:09:33.110
chips when we were at school.
247
00:09:33.350 --> 00:09:34.870
Andrew Dunkley: Just to live in a tin pan.
248
00:09:36.930 --> 00:09:37.570
Professor Fred Watson: Oh, boy.
249
00:09:37.890 --> 00:09:40.730
Andrew Dunkley: So, yeah, things are, um, steadily moving
250
00:09:40.730 --> 00:09:43.250
along for SpaceX and they've achieved
251
00:09:43.490 --> 00:09:46.170
a major milestone, which probably won't stop
252
00:09:46.170 --> 00:09:48.450
there, but they're 100 ahead of the
253
00:09:48.450 --> 00:09:51.170
collective number of satellites put into
254
00:09:51.250 --> 00:09:53.890
orbit around Earth since 1957.
255
00:09:54.700 --> 00:09:57.210
Um, yeah, they've doubled the number and
256
00:09:57.210 --> 00:09:59.970
some. And probably will continue.
257
00:10:00.930 --> 00:10:03.410
This is Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley here with
258
00:10:03.410 --> 00:10:04.930
Professor Fred Watson Watson.
259
00:10:07.580 --> 00:10:08.820
Professor Fred Watson: Roger, your lab is right here.
260
00:10:08.820 --> 00:10:10.300
Professor Fred Watson: Also Space Nuts.
261
00:10:10.380 --> 00:10:13.260
Andrew Dunkley: Our next storey takes us to the moon.
262
00:10:13.260 --> 00:10:15.180
It's kind of in fashion again now,
263
00:10:15.180 --> 00:10:17.180
particularly with the Artemis programme and,
264
00:10:17.260 --> 00:10:19.860
uh, the recent mission to fling people around
265
00:10:19.860 --> 00:10:21.900
the moon and take some pretty pictures and
266
00:10:22.060 --> 00:10:23.780
witness some of the amazing things that
267
00:10:23.780 --> 00:10:26.700
happen on the moon. However,
268
00:10:27.180 --> 00:10:29.860
NASA believes that things need to be done
269
00:10:29.860 --> 00:10:32.540
properly in terms of educating the public.
270
00:10:33.100 --> 00:10:34.220
Why is this happening?
271
00:10:35.520 --> 00:10:38.270
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, it's, uh, the initiative of a
272
00:10:38.430 --> 00:10:40.990
professor of astronomy and planetary
273
00:10:41.630 --> 00:10:43.350
sciences in the Department of Physics at the
274
00:10:43.350 --> 00:10:45.750
University of Central Florida, whose name is
275
00:10:45.750 --> 00:10:48.110
Daniel Britt, uh, and
276
00:10:48.990 --> 00:10:51.790
he's very well up, uh, in
277
00:10:51.790 --> 00:10:53.710
what it's like on the moon because he's
278
00:10:54.270 --> 00:10:56.390
director, uh, of the Centre for Lunar and
279
00:10:56.390 --> 00:10:58.910
Asteroid Surface Science. So
280
00:10:59.470 --> 00:11:02.230
they had, um, what they call a Space
281
00:11:02.230 --> 00:11:04.910
Resources Roundtable earlier this month,
282
00:11:05.100 --> 00:11:07.614
uh, and this month being June uh, 20,
283
00:11:07.715 --> 00:11:10.650
26, uh, at the Colorado School of Mines.
284
00:11:10.650 --> 00:11:12.490
And that sort of gives you a bit of an idea
285
00:11:12.490 --> 00:11:13.690
where this is coming from.
286
00:11:13.850 --> 00:11:14.320
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
287
00:11:14.320 --> 00:11:16.700
Professor Fred Watson: Um, and uh. So um,
288
00:11:16.700 --> 00:11:19.210
Professor Britt, uh, Daniel Britt,
289
00:11:19.420 --> 00:11:21.600
uh, says um.
290
00:11:22.410 --> 00:11:25.330
And really to put this in a nutshell, to put
291
00:11:25.330 --> 00:11:27.730
the nub of the storey, he says, I wish I
292
00:11:27.730 --> 00:11:29.810
could say that engineers and managers know
293
00:11:29.810 --> 00:11:32.770
better, but they don't. We are training a
294
00:11:32.770 --> 00:11:35.770
generation of engineers not to worry about
295
00:11:36.170 --> 00:11:39.000
terrain. If the artists are
296
00:11:39.000 --> 00:11:40.960
getting it wrong when they depict the moon,
297
00:11:40.960 --> 00:11:43.920
it's our fault. Let's stop fooling ourselves.
298
00:11:44.720 --> 00:11:47.720
Um, and basically he went on
299
00:11:47.720 --> 00:11:50.560
to complain uh, about a number
300
00:11:50.880 --> 00:11:53.440
of uh, the sort of artists
301
00:11:54.160 --> 00:11:56.800
representations of the lunar
302
00:11:56.960 --> 00:11:59.240
surface, um, which are
303
00:11:59.240 --> 00:12:02.240
promulgated by commercial space ventures,
304
00:12:02.240 --> 00:12:04.800
but also NASA. Um, and
305
00:12:04.800 --> 00:12:07.640
I've actually had the same thought.
306
00:12:07.640 --> 00:12:10.500
I've seen some of NASA's artists impressions
307
00:12:10.500 --> 00:12:12.580
of you know, a base on the moon and what they
308
00:12:12.580 --> 00:12:15.060
look like and thought that all looks very,
309
00:12:15.060 --> 00:12:18.020
very neat and tidy. Uh, very neat
310
00:12:18.020 --> 00:12:20.690
and tidy indeed. And so um, what Daniel, uh,
311
00:12:21.140 --> 00:12:23.180
Britt has done is kind of
312
00:12:23.340 --> 00:12:26.180
highlighted uh, all the things that are wrong
313
00:12:26.180 --> 00:12:28.460
with those pictures that might actually
314
00:12:28.540 --> 00:12:31.260
transform the way we think about the lunar
315
00:12:31.260 --> 00:12:31.820
surface.
316
00:12:32.780 --> 00:12:35.060
Andrew Dunkley: Why is that such a problem though? Um,
317
00:12:35.420 --> 00:12:38.340
is this going to um. You know, what
318
00:12:38.340 --> 00:12:38.940
does it change?
319
00:12:39.610 --> 00:12:42.250
Professor Fred Watson: So um. The reality
320
00:12:42.250 --> 00:12:45.010
is different from uh, what we
321
00:12:45.010 --> 00:12:47.850
depict. So if you're always depicting the
322
00:12:47.850 --> 00:12:49.570
lunar surface as something neat and tidy
323
00:12:49.570 --> 00:12:51.890
then. And you're training your engineers who
324
00:12:51.890 --> 00:12:53.690
are building the spacecraft and doing all the
325
00:12:53.690 --> 00:12:55.249
rest, you know, setting up all the
326
00:12:55.249 --> 00:12:57.690
infrastructure and they've got a false idea
327
00:12:57.690 --> 00:13:00.250
of what it's like. And so what um, Daniel
328
00:13:00.250 --> 00:13:02.410
Britt has done is highlighted
329
00:13:03.610 --> 00:13:05.900
some uh, of the, you know, some of the
330
00:13:05.900 --> 00:13:08.660
problems uh in those illustrations starting
331
00:13:08.660 --> 00:13:11.460
with small craters and the
332
00:13:11.460 --> 00:13:14.240
lunar dust. Uh, and um,
333
00:13:14.260 --> 00:13:16.940
it goes on to talk about dirty astronauts,
334
00:13:16.940 --> 00:13:19.700
dirty equipment and dirty habitats and you've
335
00:13:19.700 --> 00:13:22.420
only to look at um, some of the
336
00:13:22.500 --> 00:13:25.180
imagery from the Apollo missions to see
337
00:13:25.180 --> 00:13:27.940
how dirty the astronauts get
338
00:13:27.940 --> 00:13:30.890
because that dust gets everywhere. It's
339
00:13:30.890 --> 00:13:33.870
uh, as it said, captioned to ah, one of
340
00:13:33.870 --> 00:13:36.490
um, uh, Daniel Britt's images. Dust is a fact
341
00:13:36.800 --> 00:13:39.040
of life in lunar ops. It gets everywhere.
342
00:13:39.670 --> 00:13:42.640
Uh, and so we've got the Apollo
343
00:13:42.640 --> 00:13:45.360
experience to judge from. Um.
344
00:13:46.240 --> 00:13:48.640
And it's also
345
00:13:49.520 --> 00:13:52.240
going to be um, much more difficult
346
00:13:52.720 --> 00:13:55.320
to cope with the dust uh in the
347
00:13:55.320 --> 00:13:58.080
Apollo programmes because you're
348
00:13:58.530 --> 00:14:01.000
uh, in the south polar region of the moon.
349
00:14:01.000 --> 00:14:03.440
That's where, sorry, not Apollo, Artemis,
350
00:14:03.810 --> 00:14:05.920
uh, Artemis is concentrating on the south
351
00:14:05.920 --> 00:14:08.700
polar region of the moon. And the. That
352
00:14:08.700 --> 00:14:11.580
means you've got a very Low sun angle and
353
00:14:12.540 --> 00:14:15.420
the dust is just going to be everywhere.
354
00:14:15.550 --> 00:14:18.150
Uh, and you know, um,
355
00:14:18.670 --> 00:14:21.620
uh, so you might have interference from
356
00:14:21.620 --> 00:14:24.579
the dust, but also, um, if
357
00:14:24.579 --> 00:14:27.380
you're walking around on the surface, it's
358
00:14:27.380 --> 00:14:29.380
going to be very easy to miss because of the
359
00:14:29.380 --> 00:14:31.140
lower sun angle. The sun's always in your
360
00:14:31.140 --> 00:14:33.020
eyes. It's going to be very easy to miss
361
00:14:33.100 --> 00:14:35.540
little craters and there are small craters
362
00:14:35.540 --> 00:14:38.270
everywhere. Um, uh, it's
363
00:14:39.620 --> 00:14:42.220
a really difficult environment in that
364
00:14:42.220 --> 00:14:44.900
regard. Uh, and he goes on to
365
00:14:45.150 --> 00:14:47.780
um, you know, to sort of spot,
366
00:14:48.590 --> 00:14:50.420
uh, the other things that are going to be
367
00:14:50.580 --> 00:14:52.170
problematic. Um,
368
00:14:53.100 --> 00:14:55.620
uh, one of them is the number of boulders
369
00:14:55.620 --> 00:14:57.630
there are as well on the surface. Um,
370
00:14:58.740 --> 00:15:00.900
um, it's got a.
371
00:15:02.340 --> 00:15:05.030
The Apollo images, he
372
00:15:05.030 --> 00:15:07.790
says, uh, were taken down sun.
373
00:15:07.790 --> 00:15:09.590
In other words, you're looking with the sun
374
00:15:09.590 --> 00:15:12.590
behind you. Uh, and that gives.
375
00:15:12.590 --> 00:15:14.630
It sort of hides all the shadows of all the
376
00:15:14.630 --> 00:15:16.430
boulders and things that were lying around.
377
00:15:17.040 --> 00:15:18.910
Um, I mean we've talked before about how
378
00:15:18.910 --> 00:15:21.910
lucky Apollo 11 was because there were, you
379
00:15:21.910 --> 00:15:24.270
know, when Neil Armstrong was bringing the
380
00:15:24.350 --> 00:15:27.030
lunar module down onto the surface, uh,
381
00:15:27.390 --> 00:15:29.310
all he could see was all these boulders.
382
00:15:31.380 --> 00:15:34.340
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, And I'm just looking at a
383
00:15:34.340 --> 00:15:36.740
real image of Apollo 15
384
00:15:36.980 --> 00:15:39.620
and they had a dicey landing as well.
385
00:15:39.780 --> 00:15:42.340
They actually landed on a piece of
386
00:15:42.420 --> 00:15:45.220
ground at an 11 degree tilt.
387
00:15:45.620 --> 00:15:48.100
Professor Fred Watson: That's correct, yes. That's one of the other
388
00:15:48.100 --> 00:15:50.580
issues that he's highlighted is the tilt,
389
00:15:51.150 --> 00:15:54.140
uh, uh, of the terrain that you
390
00:15:54.140 --> 00:15:56.820
land on. Um, Apollo 14, 7 degrees,
391
00:15:56.820 --> 00:15:59.700
Apollo 15, 11 degrees. And yes, that's quite
392
00:15:59.700 --> 00:16:02.680
a serious angle. It is. That does not,
393
00:16:02.850 --> 00:16:05.680
um, go well if you've got a
394
00:16:05.680 --> 00:16:08.680
very tall landing craft, which is what the
395
00:16:10.520 --> 00:16:13.280
SpaceX's starship will be. Starship? The
396
00:16:13.280 --> 00:16:16.160
Lunar Lander. Um, that's one of the
397
00:16:16.160 --> 00:16:18.480
two, um, landing vehicles that are currently
398
00:16:18.480 --> 00:16:21.160
being considered by NASA. That's. I can't
399
00:16:21.160 --> 00:16:22.960
remember what it is. I think it's 37 metres
400
00:16:22.960 --> 00:16:25.360
tall. It might be even taller than that. It's
401
00:16:25.360 --> 00:16:27.640
enormous. And if you put that on an 11 degree
402
00:16:27.640 --> 00:16:30.130
tilt, you're going to be worried that the
403
00:16:30.130 --> 00:16:32.010
things are going to fall over, which will not
404
00:16:32.010 --> 00:16:32.610
be good news.
405
00:16:32.690 --> 00:16:34.290
Andrew Dunkley: You're going to have to pick a really, really
406
00:16:34.290 --> 00:16:37.010
good spot and they're few and far between on
407
00:16:37.010 --> 00:16:39.370
the moon. And I can imagine, you know, a
408
00:16:39.370 --> 00:16:42.340
vertical landing craft like
409
00:16:42.340 --> 00:16:45.210
uh, that a very tall rocket is going to blast
410
00:16:45.210 --> 00:16:47.410
up dust like nothing else.
411
00:16:47.490 --> 00:16:50.170
Professor Fred Watson: Yep, that's right. Uh, and in fact I think
412
00:16:50.170 --> 00:16:52.170
there's a quote from one of the Apollo
413
00:16:52.170 --> 00:16:55.090
astronauts because of the amount of dust that
414
00:16:55.090 --> 00:16:57.530
was being blown up by their exhaust as they
415
00:16:57.530 --> 00:16:59.170
were trying to land, they couldn't actually
416
00:16:59.790 --> 00:17:02.430
sea. Uh, where. Where to.
417
00:17:02.510 --> 00:17:04.510
Where. Where was the safest landing
418
00:17:05.150 --> 00:17:05.550
point.
419
00:17:06.030 --> 00:17:06.179
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
420
00:17:06.179 --> 00:17:07.990
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, that's scary, isn't it? And not to
421
00:17:07.990 --> 00:17:10.990
mention that dust is one of the big perils
422
00:17:10.990 --> 00:17:11.870
of electronics.
423
00:17:12.190 --> 00:17:13.310
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.
424
00:17:13.390 --> 00:17:16.070
Andrew Dunkley: You don't want dust getting into anything. In
425
00:17:16.070 --> 00:17:18.030
fact, I think in the early days of home
426
00:17:18.030 --> 00:17:20.750
computing, one of the big problems was,
427
00:17:20.959 --> 00:17:22.750
uh, you had to keep your computer cool, but
428
00:17:22.750 --> 00:17:25.110
in doing so, you're sucking dust into the,
429
00:17:25.110 --> 00:17:27.190
into the machine and that's. That could get
430
00:17:27.190 --> 00:17:29.990
into the processes and the. And the
431
00:17:29.990 --> 00:17:32.850
drives and. Yeah, all sorts of trouble. In
432
00:17:32.850 --> 00:17:35.720
fact, um, if you ever open up a home,
433
00:17:35.720 --> 00:17:37.810
um, computer, particularly an old desktop,
434
00:17:38.210 --> 00:17:40.370
first thing you notice is all the dust.
435
00:17:40.370 --> 00:17:42.650
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, that's correct, yes. Which has been
436
00:17:42.650 --> 00:17:44.960
sucked in. Exactly. As you've said. Um,
437
00:17:46.130 --> 00:17:48.330
if I can. There's a couple of paragraphs that
438
00:17:48.330 --> 00:17:50.970
really sum up, ah, Daniel Britt's view of all
439
00:17:50.970 --> 00:17:53.330
this. And remember, he's a professor of lunar
440
00:17:53.330 --> 00:17:55.890
surfaces, so he knows what he's doing. Yes,
441
00:17:55.890 --> 00:17:58.010
he says these are artists impressions, but
442
00:17:58.010 --> 00:17:59.890
somebody is telling the artist what to draw.
443
00:17:59.970 --> 00:18:02.450
I love the idea of landing and operating on a
444
00:18:02.450 --> 00:18:04.470
moon without dust, small craters and rough
445
00:18:04.470 --> 00:18:07.470
terrain. However, we see the misconception
446
00:18:07.470 --> 00:18:09.950
of a flat, gentle moon everywhere. Commercial
447
00:18:09.950 --> 00:18:12.590
providers are just as bad. No dust, almost no
448
00:18:12.590 --> 00:18:14.310
small craters, no tipping problems.
449
00:18:14.310 --> 00:18:16.650
Yes, these are artists impressions and, uh,
450
00:18:16.670 --> 00:18:19.269
getting it wrong. NASA knows better. All
451
00:18:19.269 --> 00:18:20.990
these people should know better. But don't
452
00:18:20.990 --> 00:18:22.910
let's not fool the public. We owe them better
453
00:18:22.910 --> 00:18:25.110
data. He's really having a go about it, isn't
454
00:18:25.110 --> 00:18:25.390
he?
455
00:18:25.390 --> 00:18:26.950
Andrew Dunkley: Well, I think he's got a good point.
456
00:18:26.950 --> 00:18:28.870
Professor Fred Watson: He's got a very good point. Yes, he has
457
00:18:28.870 --> 00:18:29.580
indeed. Yeah.
458
00:18:29.760 --> 00:18:32.100
Andrew Dunkley: Um, you know, we might go on holiday there
459
00:18:32.100 --> 00:18:33.820
one day and we'd turn up and go, this place
460
00:18:33.820 --> 00:18:35.400
is crap, it's a dump. Um,
461
00:18:36.460 --> 00:18:38.860
where's the pool? Oh, yeah,
462
00:18:39.020 --> 00:18:41.660
yeah, it was in the
463
00:18:41.660 --> 00:18:44.340
brochure. Um, but no, I see his
464
00:18:44.340 --> 00:18:47.180
point. And, um. Yeah, I suppose
465
00:18:47.180 --> 00:18:49.660
organisations like NASA who have
466
00:18:50.060 --> 00:18:52.860
basically led the race to the moon since
467
00:18:53.100 --> 00:18:55.530
the year Dot. Um, yeah, probably should.
468
00:18:55.600 --> 00:18:58.360
Should just take a bit of notice of what he's
469
00:18:58.360 --> 00:19:01.200
saying. Yeah, for sure. If you'd like to
470
00:19:01.200 --> 00:19:03.200
cheque that storey out, it's a good read.
471
00:19:03.200 --> 00:19:04.960
It's@space.com.
472
00:19:06.350 --> 00:19:07.800
uh, let's move straight on to our next
473
00:19:07.800 --> 00:19:08.400
storey, Fred Watson.
474
00:19:08.400 --> 00:19:11.280
And this one is, uh. Oh, gosh, something
475
00:19:11.280 --> 00:19:13.520
we've spoken about, uh, several times
476
00:19:13.520 --> 00:19:15.400
recently because it was a pretty exciting
477
00:19:15.400 --> 00:19:18.000
find. That was Comet, uh, 3i
478
00:19:18.080 --> 00:19:20.800
Atlas. What brings it back to the
479
00:19:20.800 --> 00:19:22.800
fore? I thought it was all dealt with and
480
00:19:22.800 --> 00:19:25.660
gone and on its way to wherever the heck it's
481
00:19:25.660 --> 00:19:28.580
headed. But it's, it's
482
00:19:28.580 --> 00:19:29.340
back in the news.
483
00:19:29.580 --> 00:19:31.540
Professor Fred Watson: It is back in the news and I think it's back
484
00:19:31.540 --> 00:19:33.580
in the news. Um, this might be the.
485
00:19:34.380 --> 00:19:37.340
Well who. Never say never but I
486
00:19:37.340 --> 00:19:39.100
think this might be the last major paper
487
00:19:39.580 --> 00:19:42.300
about UH3i Atlas
488
00:19:42.380 --> 00:19:45.220
and its composition and what
489
00:19:45.220 --> 00:19:47.700
we now know about it. And it comes from a
490
00:19:47.700 --> 00:19:50.460
number of studies principally
491
00:19:50.460 --> 00:19:53.020
using uh the Webb Telescope.
492
00:19:54.600 --> 00:19:57.420
Uh these are analyses of
493
00:19:57.420 --> 00:19:59.660
the outgassing, the material that's
494
00:19:59.660 --> 00:20:02.540
outgassing being outgassed uh from
495
00:20:02.540 --> 00:20:05.340
3i atlas surface. Remember it's ah, an
496
00:20:05.340 --> 00:20:07.340
interstellar asteroid. It has entered the
497
00:20:07.340 --> 00:20:09.860
solar system. Last October I think was when
498
00:20:09.860 --> 00:20:12.420
it was discovered uh zooming through at
499
00:20:12.420 --> 00:20:14.700
speeds in the region of 60 kilometres per
500
00:20:14.700 --> 00:20:16.540
second which is too fast for it to belong to
501
00:20:16.540 --> 00:20:18.620
the solar system. And it's now on its way
502
00:20:18.620 --> 00:20:21.620
out. Uh but uh, a lot of um,
503
00:20:21.830 --> 00:20:23.430
resources have been used to observe it
504
00:20:23.430 --> 00:20:25.870
because it's a free gift from another solar
505
00:20:25.870 --> 00:20:28.710
system. The fact that we've got uh this
506
00:20:28.950 --> 00:20:31.390
object coming through and so the
507
00:20:31.390 --> 00:20:33.910
analyses that have been done are
508
00:20:34.790 --> 00:20:37.510
really very very interesting uh
509
00:20:37.510 --> 00:20:40.070
in terms of what they tell us about
510
00:20:41.190 --> 00:20:44.190
the wide blue yonder, about the chemical
511
00:20:44.190 --> 00:20:47.110
composition of solar systems other
512
00:20:47.110 --> 00:20:49.860
than our own. And and in
513
00:20:50.100 --> 00:20:52.740
the same breath it sort of tells us
514
00:20:53.420 --> 00:20:56.300
uh a bit more about our own solar
515
00:20:56.300 --> 00:20:59.080
system, how unusual it might be uh
516
00:20:59.380 --> 00:21:02.140
because this is something quite
517
00:21:02.140 --> 00:21:05.019
different. Um so the two
518
00:21:05.019 --> 00:21:07.820
studies involved, one which was conducted
519
00:21:07.820 --> 00:21:10.500
using the Webb Telescope, uh and the other
520
00:21:10.680 --> 00:21:13.020
uh which was led by um an astronomer from the
521
00:21:13.020 --> 00:21:15.220
University of Edinburgh uh which was one of
522
00:21:15.220 --> 00:21:18.100
my alma maters, uh, uh that was
523
00:21:18.100 --> 00:21:20.840
using the Very Large Telescope, the vlt uh at
524
00:21:20.840 --> 00:21:23.760
Cerro Paranal in Chile, the European
525
00:21:23.760 --> 00:21:26.160
Southern Observatory's major facility.
526
00:21:26.800 --> 00:21:29.280
And what they've done is essentially looked
527
00:21:29.280 --> 00:21:32.150
at isotope ratios. Uh
528
00:21:32.240 --> 00:21:35.160
they've looked in particular molecules,
529
00:21:35.160 --> 00:21:37.760
particular molecules like H2O water,
530
00:21:38.080 --> 00:21:40.760
CO2, carbon dioxide, CO, carbon
531
00:21:40.760 --> 00:21:42.620
monoxide and um
532
00:21:43.840 --> 00:21:46.640
there's a plot uh which is on. It's actually
533
00:21:46.880 --> 00:21:49.780
basically NASA's press release about this. Uh
534
00:21:49.780 --> 00:21:52.400
the press release is titled NASA's Webb Find
535
00:21:52.620 --> 00:21:55.500
Clues to Ancient Distant Origin of Comet 3i
536
00:21:55.500 --> 00:21:57.980
Atlas. And the plot shows
537
00:21:58.620 --> 00:22:01.460
sort of the um isotope ratios.
538
00:22:01.460 --> 00:22:03.620
It's basically too small for me to read the
539
00:22:03.620 --> 00:22:06.140
individual numbers on it. Um but
540
00:22:06.300 --> 00:22:08.380
for uh all the
541
00:22:09.040 --> 00:22:11.940
um solar system comets that have
542
00:22:11.940 --> 00:22:14.430
been observed, uh including I notice uh
543
00:22:14.780 --> 00:22:17.700
Comet Hartley 2 which is uh one discovered by
544
00:22:17.700 --> 00:22:20.690
my old friend and colleague Malcolm Hartley,
545
00:22:20.690 --> 00:22:22.860
uh it was visited by a spacecraft a number of
546
00:22:22.860 --> 00:22:25.000
years ago. He became a, an international
547
00:22:25.160 --> 00:22:27.160
celebrity because of that, we, uh, used to
548
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:28.920
work together at the Schmidt UK Schmidt
549
00:22:28.920 --> 00:22:31.770
telescope. But that's one of the, um,
550
00:22:31.800 --> 00:22:33.800
solar system comets that they highlight in
551
00:22:33.800 --> 00:22:36.360
this plot. And you can see that the various,
552
00:22:36.910 --> 00:22:39.759
um, aspects, notably what are called
553
00:22:39.759 --> 00:22:42.520
heavy carbon and heavy hydrogen. So these are
554
00:22:42.520 --> 00:22:45.160
different isotopes of carbon and hydrogen.
555
00:22:45.320 --> 00:22:48.240
You can see where they sit in
556
00:22:48.240 --> 00:22:50.240
the solar system, this whole line of
557
00:22:51.910 --> 00:22:54.710
red circles which are, uh, representations on
558
00:22:54.710 --> 00:22:57.510
the plot, um, all in a neat,
559
00:22:57.510 --> 00:23:00.350
neatish line anyway. And then way off
560
00:23:00.350 --> 00:23:02.710
to the right at, uh, much higher
561
00:23:02.870 --> 00:23:05.870
ratios of carbon 12 to carbon 13 and much
562
00:23:05.870 --> 00:23:08.690
higher ratios of heavy hydrogen, uh,
563
00:23:08.870 --> 00:23:11.390
to normal, uh, hydrogen, which we've talked
564
00:23:11.390 --> 00:23:14.110
about a lot. But way off to the right is
565
00:23:14.110 --> 00:23:15.190
3i atlas.
566
00:23:15.500 --> 00:23:18.000
Andrew Dunkley: Um, so that's saying the concentrations are,
567
00:23:18.000 --> 00:23:19.150
uh, more significant.
568
00:23:20.030 --> 00:23:22.670
Professor Fred Watson: They're very, very different, different
569
00:23:22.750 --> 00:23:25.390
concentrations of the isotopes. Um,
570
00:23:26.670 --> 00:23:29.150
and that basically,
571
00:23:30.420 --> 00:23:33.390
uh, suggests, um, some of the issues
572
00:23:33.790 --> 00:23:36.750
on the history, uh, of
573
00:23:38.190 --> 00:23:40.670
the comet. I might read a little bit because
574
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.230
there's some very nice summaries here on the
575
00:23:43.230 --> 00:23:45.170
press release. Um,
576
00:23:46.110 --> 00:23:48.590
so one of the M instruments used on the web
577
00:23:48.590 --> 00:23:51.390
showed only traces of carbon 13 compared to
578
00:23:51.390 --> 00:23:54.110
lighter weight carbon 12. This points to a
579
00:23:54.110 --> 00:23:56.990
very old origin for 3i atlas
580
00:23:57.150 --> 00:23:59.230
as stellar systems become enriched with
581
00:23:59.230 --> 00:24:01.710
carbon 13 over time as generations of stars
582
00:24:01.710 --> 00:24:03.870
are born and die in the galaxy. That's why
583
00:24:03.870 --> 00:24:06.110
there are higher levels of carbon 13 in our
584
00:24:06.110 --> 00:24:08.310
system around our sun, which formed
585
00:24:08.310 --> 00:24:10.990
relatively recently, 4.5 billion
586
00:24:11.070 --> 00:24:13.480
years ago. Um, it,
587
00:24:13.750 --> 00:24:16.400
uh, also says, uh, there were
588
00:24:16.400 --> 00:24:18.800
exceptionally high levels of deuterium, about
589
00:24:18.800 --> 00:24:20.960
30 times more than seen in solar system
590
00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:23.880
comets. This implies that 3i Atlas
591
00:24:23.880 --> 00:24:26.440
may have originated in a very cold system
592
00:24:26.920 --> 00:24:28.750
much earlier in the history of our, ah,
593
00:24:28.839 --> 00:24:31.680
galaxy. Um, uh, so these
594
00:24:31.680 --> 00:24:34.070
are all clues about, uh,
595
00:24:34.520 --> 00:24:36.920
the origin. And, uh, once again, reading from
596
00:24:36.920 --> 00:24:38.360
the press release, the research team
597
00:24:38.360 --> 00:24:41.160
estimates that 3i Atlas could have formed
598
00:24:41.160 --> 00:24:43.960
as long as 10 to 12 billion years
599
00:24:43.960 --> 00:24:44.280
ago.
600
00:24:44.580 --> 00:24:44.980
Professor Fred Watson: Wow.
601
00:24:45.140 --> 00:24:47.660
Professor Fred Watson: During the universe's cosmic noon, when star
602
00:24:47.660 --> 00:24:50.180
formation was at its height, its young
603
00:24:50.180 --> 00:24:53.060
origin solar system was likely ensconced
604
00:24:53.060 --> 00:24:55.620
in a relatively cold, dense cloud.
605
00:24:56.020 --> 00:24:58.980
The abundance of heavy water shows that 3i
606
00:24:58.980 --> 00:25:01.980
Atlas spent its formative years in a deeply
607
00:25:01.980 --> 00:25:04.740
frozen state. This is quite extraordinary.
608
00:25:05.140 --> 00:25:05.700
Andrew Dunkley: Amazing.
609
00:25:05.700 --> 00:25:06.000
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Ah,
610
00:25:07.780 --> 00:25:09.540
Andrew Dunkley: it's come from a place that was very
611
00:25:09.540 --> 00:25:11.970
different to now. Um, and, and
612
00:25:13.890 --> 00:25:16.690
I guess that's the difference in
613
00:25:16.690 --> 00:25:18.850
terms of the time scales we're talking about
614
00:25:19.090 --> 00:25:21.090
what it was like then, what it's like now.
615
00:25:21.570 --> 00:25:22.530
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, that's right.
616
00:25:22.850 --> 00:25:24.450
Andrew Dunkley: It's like a little time machine.
617
00:25:24.770 --> 00:25:27.769
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah. Uh, but yes, exactly. It's a
618
00:25:27.769 --> 00:25:30.210
time capsule. It's a lovely time capsule.
619
00:25:30.500 --> 00:25:33.330
Um, in uh, the way it's been analysed,
620
00:25:33.810 --> 00:25:35.730
I'd have to say I take my hat off to all
621
00:25:35.730 --> 00:25:38.650
these scientists for the imagination that's
622
00:25:38.650 --> 00:25:40.950
been used in, in devising the experiments
623
00:25:40.950 --> 00:25:42.950
that have been developed. These observations
624
00:25:42.950 --> 00:25:45.870
tell us, uh, quite unequivocal things about
625
00:25:45.870 --> 00:25:48.230
this object which we would not otherwise have
626
00:25:48.230 --> 00:25:50.710
known. And it again highlights
627
00:25:51.590 --> 00:25:54.310
just how different our own solar system is to
628
00:25:54.630 --> 00:25:57.390
probably most of the other solar
629
00:25:57.390 --> 00:25:59.550
systems that we can look out of and look out
630
00:25:59.550 --> 00:26:02.280
of beyond our galaxy and see, um,
631
00:26:02.550 --> 00:26:05.550
something formed 12 billion years ago that
632
00:26:05.550 --> 00:26:07.990
would be very, very different from the
633
00:26:08.230 --> 00:26:09.480
universe that we see now.
634
00:26:10.430 --> 00:26:12.790
Andrew Dunkley: I think it's incredible that in this day and
635
00:26:12.790 --> 00:26:15.150
age that we can look at a rock hurtling
636
00:26:15.150 --> 00:26:18.030
through space at 1.4 billion kilometres
637
00:26:18.030 --> 00:26:19.950
distant or wherever. You know, it was close
638
00:26:19.950 --> 00:26:21.590
in that at one stage, but you know what I
639
00:26:21.590 --> 00:26:24.430
mean, and be able to break it down and say
640
00:26:24.430 --> 00:26:26.670
this is exactly what we're looking at. And
641
00:26:27.230 --> 00:26:30.070
because of that we think it came from the
642
00:26:30.070 --> 00:26:32.870
early universe. Yeah, it's just incredible.
643
00:26:32.870 --> 00:26:35.710
Incredible. Uh, and a great storey to,
644
00:26:35.840 --> 00:26:38.830
um, uh, read, uh, which you can do at, uh,
645
00:26:38.830 --> 00:26:41.690
The NASA website, science.NASA.gov uh,
646
00:26:41.850 --> 00:26:43.610
you can also read the paper which was
647
00:26:43.610 --> 00:26:46.250
published in the journal Nature. This is
648
00:26:46.250 --> 00:26:48.450
Space Nuts, Andrew Dunkley with Professor
649
00:26:48.450 --> 00:26:49.370
Fred Watson Watson.
650
00:26:51.770 --> 00:26:53.530
Professor Fred Watson: I'm going to step off the land now.
651
00:26:55.770 --> 00:26:58.090
That's one small step for man,
652
00:27:01.130 --> 00:27:03.450
one diabetes for man.
653
00:27:04.010 --> 00:27:05.050
Professor Fred Watson: Space Nuts.
654
00:27:06.230 --> 00:27:07.900
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, the other day for Fred Watson.
655
00:27:07.900 --> 00:27:10.060
In one of our previous episodes we talked
656
00:27:10.060 --> 00:27:12.940
about the death of our sun and how
657
00:27:12.940 --> 00:27:15.620
it'll turn into a red giant and fry us all
658
00:27:15.700 --> 00:27:18.660
and, um, you know, free barbecue gas. But
659
00:27:18.660 --> 00:27:20.100
that's about it. Um,
660
00:27:21.780 --> 00:27:24.019
and we've had questions about it as well.
661
00:27:24.660 --> 00:27:27.100
Now there's some new information about the
662
00:27:27.100 --> 00:27:29.700
death spiral of our, of our only
663
00:27:29.860 --> 00:27:32.260
or our nearest star. And
664
00:27:33.780 --> 00:27:34.750
it's a bit weird.
665
00:27:35.910 --> 00:27:38.340
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, it is. Uh, there's a very nice Space.com
666
00:27:38.340 --> 00:27:40.670
piece on this written by Robert Lee. I, uh,
667
00:27:40.780 --> 00:27:43.460
love, uh, Robert's headline. Uh, our sun
668
00:27:43.540 --> 00:27:46.260
is destined to kick and spit its way
669
00:27:46.260 --> 00:27:48.420
across the solar system when it dies.
670
00:27:48.820 --> 00:27:50.900
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, great.
671
00:27:51.350 --> 00:27:53.300
Professor Fred Watson: Um, that's right.
672
00:27:54.230 --> 00:27:57.060
Uh, and the first sentence
673
00:27:57.060 --> 00:27:58.740
is. Scientists have discovered that dying
674
00:27:58.740 --> 00:28:01.660
stars don't go down without a fight. Um, Yes,
675
00:28:01.660 --> 00:28:03.060
I like that theme very much.
676
00:28:03.140 --> 00:28:04.740
Andrew Dunkley: We shouldn't be surprised by that.
677
00:28:04.900 --> 00:28:07.600
Professor Fred Watson: Not really. No. That's right. So, uh, what
678
00:28:07.600 --> 00:28:10.400
this is about is the later stages of
679
00:28:10.480 --> 00:28:13.040
the sun's life. Um, it,
680
00:28:13.800 --> 00:28:16.800
uh, seems, um, inevitable from what we know
681
00:28:16.800 --> 00:28:19.320
about the way stars behave, that within the
682
00:28:19.320 --> 00:28:21.280
next 3 to 5 billion years the
683
00:28:21.920 --> 00:28:24.400
hydrogen in the core of the sun will run out
684
00:28:24.400 --> 00:28:27.000
the Core collapses and the outer layers of
685
00:28:27.000 --> 00:28:29.920
the star uh basically puff outwards,
686
00:28:30.100 --> 00:28:33.000
um perhaps making the star 100
687
00:28:33.000 --> 00:28:35.280
times its original diameter.
688
00:28:36.080 --> 00:28:38.160
So you know our sun's going to get very big,
689
00:28:38.260 --> 00:28:40.980
uh, big enough probably to swallow up the
690
00:28:40.980 --> 00:28:43.860
Earth. Um and what you get is
691
00:28:43.860 --> 00:28:46.420
the uh, you know, you get a planetary nebula
692
00:28:46.420 --> 00:28:48.260
forming. That's what we call them. That's
693
00:28:48.260 --> 00:28:51.060
that glow of circle of glowing gas or sphere
694
00:28:51.060 --> 00:28:53.540
of glowing gas with a white dwarf at the
695
00:28:53.540 --> 00:28:56.440
centre. Um, probably actually uh,
696
00:28:58.100 --> 00:29:00.220
um, the sun might even be as big as the orbit
697
00:29:00.220 --> 00:29:03.100
of Mars uh when it goes. But it's a person
698
00:29:03.260 --> 00:29:05.500
at ah, California Institute of Technology,
699
00:29:06.180 --> 00:29:09.180
Uh Jim Fuller has calculated
700
00:29:09.740 --> 00:29:11.900
that during that process
701
00:29:12.460 --> 00:29:14.980
before the star becomes a white
702
00:29:14.980 --> 00:29:16.780
dwarf, it
703
00:29:17.500 --> 00:29:20.060
basically spits. Uh,
704
00:29:20.700 --> 00:29:23.420
he says it will receive around
705
00:29:23.500 --> 00:29:26.340
10,000 little kicks over the
706
00:29:26.340 --> 00:29:28.860
course of hundreds of thousands of years. So
707
00:29:29.020 --> 00:29:31.420
they're well spaced out. But these are
708
00:29:31.660 --> 00:29:33.980
blobs of plasma that are being
709
00:29:33.980 --> 00:29:36.390
ejected from the, the
710
00:29:36.630 --> 00:29:39.630
surface of this bloated uh, version
711
00:29:39.630 --> 00:29:42.590
of the sun, the red giant. And the point
712
00:29:42.590 --> 00:29:45.590
that uh, Jim Fuller is making is
713
00:29:45.860 --> 00:29:48.630
um, it's a good one. It's basic physics.
714
00:29:49.510 --> 00:29:51.910
If you eject a blob of matter
715
00:29:52.230 --> 00:29:54.870
from the sun, the sun gets a kick in the
716
00:29:54.870 --> 00:29:57.390
opposite direction. Um, oh yeah, that makes
717
00:29:57.390 --> 00:29:59.790
sense. For every action there's an equal and
718
00:29:59.790 --> 00:30:02.550
opposite reaction. And so these,
719
00:30:02.920 --> 00:30:05.910
um, he suggests will
720
00:30:06.790 --> 00:30:09.020
push the sun around uh,
721
00:30:10.380 --> 00:30:13.110
uh, in different random directions. What
722
00:30:13.910 --> 00:30:16.810
is technically known as a random walk. Um,
723
00:30:16.870 --> 00:30:19.870
so basically Random Walk is as the
724
00:30:19.870 --> 00:30:22.690
title suggests, uh, you um,
725
00:30:23.110 --> 00:30:25.590
you know, you basically
726
00:30:25.590 --> 00:30:28.550
randomise uh movement uh in
727
00:30:28.550 --> 00:30:31.070
any given direction and you end up with this
728
00:30:31.070 --> 00:30:33.790
random walk process. And so uh, Jim
729
00:30:33.790 --> 00:30:36.770
Fuller said that for a red giant
730
00:30:37.490 --> 00:30:39.570
the random walk
731
00:30:40.290 --> 00:30:43.010
would basically uh, each of these spits
732
00:30:43.570 --> 00:30:45.970
would see uh, the thing moving
733
00:30:46.210 --> 00:30:48.290
at uh, the sun moving at around
734
00:30:48.370 --> 00:30:50.930
3,540 kilometres an hour.
735
00:30:51.410 --> 00:30:51.890
Professor Fred Watson: Whoa.
736
00:30:52.270 --> 00:30:54.290
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, now that's a lot uh in
737
00:30:54.690 --> 00:30:56.940
terrestrial terms. But um,
738
00:30:57.410 --> 00:30:59.610
when you think about stars that are
739
00:30:59.610 --> 00:31:02.610
collapsing uh into um,
740
00:31:02.790 --> 00:31:05.070
basically black holes, uh in supernova
741
00:31:05.070 --> 00:31:07.430
explosions which the sun won't do, uh because
742
00:31:07.430 --> 00:31:09.750
it's not big enough, uh, uh,
743
00:31:10.230 --> 00:31:13.230
that's still a very small velocity but it
744
00:31:13.230 --> 00:31:15.470
still produces a random walk. I think that
745
00:31:15.470 --> 00:31:18.070
velocity is actually the
746
00:31:19.060 --> 00:31:21.510
uh, overall motion that you get from this
747
00:31:21.510 --> 00:31:23.470
random walk process. You get it actually
748
00:31:23.470 --> 00:31:26.470
moving in a random direction in space.
749
00:31:27.350 --> 00:31:30.230
Andrew Dunkley: So it's going to kick and scream and go
750
00:31:30.230 --> 00:31:32.850
down like, I don't know, um,
751
00:31:33.650 --> 00:31:35.930
a heavyweight boxer. It's, it's, it's not.
752
00:31:35.930 --> 00:31:37.410
And it's going to bounce around the ring
753
00:31:37.410 --> 00:31:37.730
like.
754
00:31:38.290 --> 00:31:39.210
Professor Fred Watson: Yes, yeah.
755
00:31:39.210 --> 00:31:40.050
Andrew Dunkley: Muhammad Ali.
756
00:31:40.850 --> 00:31:43.610
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, yep. Or, or even Cassius Clay.
757
00:31:43.610 --> 00:31:45.490
Andrew Dunkley: Or Cassius Clay, whichever you like.
758
00:31:45.760 --> 00:31:47.410
Professor Fred Watson: Um, same person,
759
00:31:48.130 --> 00:31:48.770
definitely.
760
00:31:49.410 --> 00:31:50.930
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, okay. Well,
761
00:31:52.450 --> 00:31:54.330
I guess the question is how did they figure
762
00:31:54.330 --> 00:31:54.770
that out?
763
00:31:55.730 --> 00:31:58.620
Professor Fred Watson: Yes. So, um, I think that's, um. You
764
00:31:58.620 --> 00:32:01.130
know, what you do is you look at the, um,
765
00:32:01.130 --> 00:32:03.580
thermo hydrodynamics of the interior of the
766
00:32:03.580 --> 00:32:06.340
sun as its atmosphere is
767
00:32:06.340 --> 00:32:09.340
changing. Uh, in fact,
768
00:32:09.340 --> 00:32:11.860
I should say the atmospheres of stars, uh,
769
00:32:11.860 --> 00:32:14.660
are, uh, an area of research that has been
770
00:32:14.660 --> 00:32:17.620
really very well studied over the last 50
771
00:32:17.620 --> 00:32:19.540
years from a theoretical viewpoint. And I've
772
00:32:19.540 --> 00:32:21.580
sort of watched that the way that evolves a
773
00:32:21.580 --> 00:32:24.550
bit. Because my, um, job at one
774
00:32:24.550 --> 00:32:26.430
stage as the project manager of the RAVE
775
00:32:26.430 --> 00:32:28.750
survey, the Radial Velocity Experiment, uh,
776
00:32:28.750 --> 00:32:31.350
which we carried out on the UK
777
00:32:31.350 --> 00:32:33.470
Schmidt, measured the spectra of half a
778
00:32:33.470 --> 00:32:35.950
million stars. And a lot of what we did with
779
00:32:35.950 --> 00:32:37.670
that, uh, was to do with the atmospheres of
780
00:32:37.670 --> 00:32:40.350
these stars. And I kind of watched
781
00:32:40.510 --> 00:32:43.150
the way the technology evolved,
782
00:32:43.670 --> 00:32:46.550
uh, and all the buzzwords that. I mean, I
783
00:32:46.550 --> 00:32:48.390
didn't understand the science because I've
784
00:32:48.390 --> 00:32:51.350
never really dwelt on the interiors of
785
00:32:51.350 --> 00:32:53.830
stars in any deep level. At least not as far
786
00:32:53.830 --> 00:32:56.330
as the hydrothermal dynamics are concerned.
787
00:32:56.790 --> 00:32:59.530
Um, uh, but the buzzwords that they were
788
00:32:59.530 --> 00:33:02.490
using changed over the years and the codes,
789
00:33:02.930 --> 00:33:05.370
um, the software that was being used to make
790
00:33:05.370 --> 00:33:08.290
these analyses, uh, and so they're well
791
00:33:08.290 --> 00:33:10.450
understood. And I guess it's a deeper
792
00:33:10.450 --> 00:33:13.450
analysis of that that gives
793
00:33:13.450 --> 00:33:15.570
rise to the idea that you get spits and
794
00:33:15.570 --> 00:33:17.930
perhaps I can suggest the direction that
795
00:33:17.930 --> 00:33:20.330
might have come in. Because normally when you
796
00:33:20.330 --> 00:33:22.530
think of the atmosphere of a star, you
797
00:33:22.530 --> 00:33:25.510
imagine it as something. The atmosphere,
798
00:33:25.630 --> 00:33:28.550
um, is basically in shells,
799
00:33:28.550 --> 00:33:30.950
different shells. You can imagine its
800
00:33:30.950 --> 00:33:33.110
structure changes, but you always
801
00:33:33.750 --> 00:33:35.910
imagine it to be completely spherically
802
00:33:35.910 --> 00:33:37.790
symmetric. That you're talking just about
803
00:33:37.790 --> 00:33:40.310
spheres. Now if you break those spheres down,
804
00:33:40.470 --> 00:33:42.470
then you're going to get different processes
805
00:33:42.470 --> 00:33:45.030
going on at one side of a sphere from you get
806
00:33:45.350 --> 00:33:47.270
at the other side. And that might be where
807
00:33:47.270 --> 00:33:49.320
these, uh, phenomena, uh,
808
00:33:49.590 --> 00:33:52.070
originate in what Jim Fuller's talking about.
809
00:33:53.030 --> 00:33:55.150
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating. You can read all about it at
810
00:33:55.150 --> 00:33:57.690
Space. It was presented at the
811
00:33:57.690 --> 00:34:00.170
248th meeting of the American Astronomical
812
00:34:00.170 --> 00:34:02.810
Society in Pasadena, uh,
813
00:34:02.850 --> 00:34:05.330
and has been submitted to the Proceedings of
814
00:34:05.330 --> 00:34:08.050
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
815
00:34:08.290 --> 00:34:10.570
So, uh, yeah, it's
816
00:34:10.570 --> 00:34:13.330
uh, a fascinating discovery
817
00:34:13.330 --> 00:34:15.970
and glad we won't be around to see all that.
818
00:34:17.650 --> 00:34:18.130
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah.
819
00:34:18.570 --> 00:34:20.410
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, Fred Watson, we're done. Thank you so
820
00:34:20.410 --> 00:34:20.930
very much.
821
00:34:21.590 --> 00:34:23.670
Professor Fred Watson: Um, thank you, Andrew. It's been. Been jolly
822
00:34:23.670 --> 00:34:25.670
as always and, uh, hope we can do it again
823
00:34:25.670 --> 00:34:26.310
sometime.
824
00:34:26.630 --> 00:34:29.470
Andrew Dunkley: Maybe in a few minutes. Who knows? Professor
825
00:34:29.470 --> 00:34:31.060
Fred Watson Watson, astronomer at large. Um,
826
00:34:31.510 --> 00:34:33.710
and between episodes, please visit our
827
00:34:33.710 --> 00:34:36.630
website or our uh, social media platforms and
828
00:34:36.710 --> 00:34:38.510
maybe uh, you can go to the podcast group and
829
00:34:38.510 --> 00:34:40.310
have a chat with other people that listen to
830
00:34:40.310 --> 00:34:42.790
the show and um, yeah, they
831
00:34:43.270 --> 00:34:45.830
quite often talk um, about what we've talked
832
00:34:45.830 --> 00:34:48.310
about and carve it all up between themselves
833
00:34:48.310 --> 00:34:51.110
which is good. Uh, and you can cheque out all
834
00:34:51.110 --> 00:34:53.950
our other stuff on the website as well.
835
00:34:53.950 --> 00:34:56.690
Space nuts podcast.com and
836
00:34:56.690 --> 00:34:59.130
thanks to Huw in the studio who couldn't be
837
00:34:59.130 --> 00:35:01.850
with us today because he, he proved Newton's
838
00:35:01.850 --> 00:35:03.970
law. We turned up so he went the other way.
839
00:35:04.610 --> 00:35:06.570
And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your
840
00:35:06.570 --> 00:35:08.890
company. We will see you on the next episode
841
00:35:08.890 --> 00:35:10.370
of Space Nuts. Bye Bye.
842
00:35:11.490 --> 00:35:13.690
You've been listening to the Space Nuts
843
00:35:13.690 --> 00:35:16.650
podcast available at
844
00:35:16.650 --> 00:35:19.450
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, I have
845
00:35:19.450 --> 00:35:22.260
radio or your favourite podcast player. You
846
00:35:22.260 --> 00:35:25.020
can also stream on demand@bytes.com.
847
00:35:25.340 --> 00:35:27.380
this has been another quality podcast
848
00:35:27.380 --> 00:35:29.500
production from bytes.com.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed