April 20, 2025

Cosmic Questions, Gravitational Waves & the Mysteries of Space-Time

Cosmic Questions, Gravitational Waves & the Mysteries of Space-Time

This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN, the official VPN service of the Space Nuts team. We use it and you should too. To get our special deal of up to 74% off and 4 months extra for free, just visit...

This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN, the official VPN service of the Space Nuts team. We use it and you should too. To get our special deal of up to 74% off and 4 months extra for free, just visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts
In this thought-provoking episode of Space Nuts, host Heidi Campo takes the reins while Andrew Dunkley enjoys a well-deserved holiday. Joined by the ever-insightful Professor Fred Watson, they dive into a range of captivating questions submitted by listeners. From the potential discovery of habitable exoplanets within our lifetime to the mysteries of gravitational waves and the intriguing concept of the cosmic jerk, this episode is a treasure trove of astronomical knowledge and cosmic wonder.
Episode Highlights:
- Habitable Exoplanets: Heidi and Fred discuss a question from Thomas, a year 11 student, about the likelihood of finding a habitable planet during our lifetime. Fred shares insights on the thousands of exoplanets already discovered and the promising candidates that may support life.
- Gravitational Waves and LIGO: Adriano from Italy poses an intriguing question about how LIGO measures gravitational waves from colliding black holes. Fred explains the mechanics behind these measurements and explores the potential to detect gravitational waves from the early universe.
- The Moon's Shifting Position: Anthony from Sydney wonders why the moon appears to shift so dramatically in the sky. Fred clarifies the geometry behind the moon's orbit and its relationship to the sun, providing a fascinating perspective on lunar observations.
- Space Tearing and the Big Rip: Mikey from Illinois asks if space can tear and what that would look like. Fred discusses the theoretical notion of "space tearing," the Big Rip hypothesis, and the extreme conditions required for such an event to occur.
- The Cosmic Jerk: Greg from Minnesota raises a question about the acceleration of the universe and whether it is changing at a constant rate. Fred elaborates on recent findings from the Dark Energy Survey Instrument and the implications for our understanding of cosmic expansion.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website.Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts with Heidi Campo and Fred Watson
(01:10) Discussion on the potential for habitable exoplanets
(10:50) How LIGO measures gravitational waves from black holes
(20:30) The shifting position of the moon in the sky
(28:15) Exploring the concept of space tearing and the Big Rip
(35:20) The cosmic jerk and the acceleration of the universe
For commercial-free versions of Space Nuts, join us on Patreon, Supercast, Apple Podcasts, or become a supporter here: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.280 --> 00:00:05.200
You are listening to another wonderful episode of Space Nuts

2
00:00:05.440 --> 00:00:08.320
and I am your host for today, Heidi Compo. Well,

3
00:00:08.519 --> 00:00:11.720
our beloved Andrew Dunkley is out on holiday. Don't worry,

4
00:00:11.720 --> 00:00:14.599
he will be back soon. But the brains and brawn

5
00:00:14.679 --> 00:00:19.760
of the show, you're beloved, Fred Watson, is here with

6
00:00:19.839 --> 00:00:24.280
us today. Fred. Hello, Hello, you ready? Hid you ready

7
00:00:24.280 --> 00:00:27.839
to answer some questions on our Q and A episode today?

8
00:00:27.960 --> 00:00:28.440
Yeah?

9
00:00:28.519 --> 00:00:32.679
Look, Q and A is the real meat of Space

10
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:36.520
Nuts because we love people telling us what they want

11
00:00:36.520 --> 00:00:39.320
to hear about. It's far better than me spouting on

12
00:00:39.439 --> 00:00:42.240
things that they don't want to hear about. So yeah,

13
00:00:42.640 --> 00:00:43.560
sound ready to go?

14
00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:46.960
All right, and we get just such a wonderful, diverse

15
00:00:47.079 --> 00:00:50.679
range of questions from our listeners. Starting you know today

16
00:00:50.759 --> 00:00:56.000
we have Thomas dear Professor Fred Watson. My name is

17
00:00:56.000 --> 00:00:59.119
Thomas Wood. I mean, you're eleven student doing my research

18
00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:02.200
project on the question. And the question that I have

19
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:06.840
is what is the chance of a habitable planet being found?

20
00:01:07.599 --> 00:01:11.599
Here's the key word within our lifetime? So what do

21
00:01:11.640 --> 00:01:13.840
you think, Fred, within our lifetime?

22
00:01:14.599 --> 00:01:19.000
Yeah? I think? I mean we're talking here about planets

23
00:01:19.000 --> 00:01:23.480
of other stars, exoplanets, It doesn't really matter whether they're

24
00:01:23.519 --> 00:01:25.799
habitable or not. Because they're so far away, we're never

25
00:01:25.879 --> 00:01:28.840
going to manage to get to them within what you

26
00:01:28.879 --> 00:01:33.200
might call a human timescale. But there are certainly candidates

27
00:01:33.239 --> 00:01:37.920
already for habitable planets among the five or six thousand

28
00:01:38.439 --> 00:01:41.239
exoplanets that we know of today, and there are more

29
00:01:41.319 --> 00:01:44.519
being discovered all the time. There are planets that sit

30
00:01:44.640 --> 00:01:49.920
within the habitable zone of their parents' star and may

31
00:01:50.000 --> 00:01:54.239
have atmospheres that could sustain life. Those have not yet

32
00:01:54.319 --> 00:01:58.319
been confirmed, they've not been definitively confirmed, but I do

33
00:01:58.400 --> 00:02:01.599
think they will be within our life time, and probably Thomas,

34
00:02:01.640 --> 00:02:05.159
as Year eleven students, your lifetime is rather longer than

35
00:02:05.200 --> 00:02:10.319
mine is, but that's all right. I can deal with that.

36
00:02:11.080 --> 00:02:13.639
I think we'll find them within my lifetime. There you go.

37
00:02:13.719 --> 00:02:15.759
That's putting the that's putting the odds on it.

38
00:02:17.159 --> 00:02:20.439
Well, Fred, I think you have certainly done a lot

39
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:24.439
with your lifetime so far, and you have really broken

40
00:02:24.639 --> 00:02:27.719
broken the ground for so many more to follow. Our

41
00:02:27.800 --> 00:02:33.879
next question is an audio question. This is Adriana from Florence, Italy.

42
00:02:34.599 --> 00:02:38.400
Hi, Federalreo. This is Adriano from Florence in Italy. I

43
00:02:38.560 --> 00:02:42.800
was listening to a conversation about LIGO so the LASI interferometer,

44
00:02:43.280 --> 00:02:46.800
where they explained that by measuring the gravitational waves from

45
00:02:46.919 --> 00:02:51.159
too colliding the Coursa, for example, they can also estimate

46
00:02:51.319 --> 00:02:55.039
the master of the two objects. Can you please explain

47
00:02:55.120 --> 00:02:58.639
how they can do that? And they also mentioned that

48
00:02:59.159 --> 00:03:02.879
with a much or czable instrumental we should be able

49
00:03:02.960 --> 00:03:07.400
to measure the gravitational waves from the big banger. Is

50
00:03:07.400 --> 00:03:11.319
this is a correct and if so, will we be

51
00:03:11.400 --> 00:03:15.159
able to estimate the master of the entire universe and

52
00:03:15.199 --> 00:03:19.319
therefore to confirm more than I the particis around the

53
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:23.639
dark energy and dark matter. Thank you guys for your

54
00:03:23.800 --> 00:03:25.680
inspiring podcast Whitby.

55
00:03:26.400 --> 00:03:30.360
These are fantastic questions from Adriana really, you know, on

56
00:03:30.400 --> 00:03:33.840
the edge of our knowledge really, and it's a good question.

57
00:03:33.960 --> 00:03:37.560
How so Ligo, as you said, the Laser into from

58
00:03:38.439 --> 00:03:44.599
Gravitational Wave Observatory is one of several gravitational wave observatories. Now,

59
00:03:44.840 --> 00:03:48.960
LIGO was the first to actually detect gravitational waves back

60
00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:56.080
in twenty fifteen, and what we saw was so gravitational

61
00:03:56.120 --> 00:04:00.240
waves are formed by vibrations in space and waves move

62
00:04:00.280 --> 00:04:09.159
through space, which you know, they're basically propagated by the vibrations.

63
00:04:09.360 --> 00:04:12.919
The waves are propagated by the vibrations of space because

64
00:04:12.919 --> 00:04:17.439
space is flexible. It's one hundred billion billion times more

65
00:04:17.519 --> 00:04:22.040
rigid than steel, but it's still flexible. So what we

66
00:04:22.360 --> 00:04:27.639
have is this phenomenon where we can actually measure those

67
00:04:27.720 --> 00:04:33.800
vibrations directly. And it turns out that ligo is sensitive

68
00:04:33.920 --> 00:04:38.800
to gravitational waves with the same sort of frequency as

69
00:04:38.839 --> 00:04:42.720
the audio waves that we hear through our ears. So

70
00:04:42.879 --> 00:04:47.360
audio waves are frequencies of a few hundred killer hers,

71
00:04:47.839 --> 00:04:51.000
and the gravitational waves that ligo is sensitive to are

72
00:04:51.040 --> 00:04:53.920
the same. And when you look at the traces of

73
00:04:53.959 --> 00:04:58.279
these waves, you can see them in great detail and

74
00:04:58.480 --> 00:05:02.079
measure the way they change as two black holes or

75
00:05:02.160 --> 00:05:06.759
neutron stars combined together. Because there's a characteristic signal, it's

76
00:05:06.759 --> 00:05:10.199
called the chirp. I'll do one for you, Heidi, because

77
00:05:10.240 --> 00:05:13.120
I haven't chirped to you before. If you listen to

78
00:05:13.160 --> 00:05:18.040
the audio, it sounds like and the chirp at the

79
00:05:18.160 --> 00:05:22.319
end is when the gravitational waves, sorry, the black holes,

80
00:05:22.319 --> 00:05:25.759
actually emerge. They come together, and it's the way that

81
00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:29.920
signal changes over those few tens of seconds at the

82
00:05:30.040 --> 00:05:34.079
end of their lives that let you model exactly what

83
00:05:34.199 --> 00:05:36.519
it is that is coming together. You can model the

84
00:05:37.600 --> 00:05:42.240
objects that are colliding by analyzing that waveform in detail.

85
00:05:42.360 --> 00:05:47.839
So that's how it's done. You don't look as though

86
00:05:47.839 --> 00:05:48.399
you believe me.

87
00:05:50.639 --> 00:05:56.120
I just think Adriana's question was a little bit over

88
00:05:56.240 --> 00:06:01.519
my IQ or at least my knowledge. But this sounds

89
00:06:02.360 --> 00:06:05.560
very fantastic, and I'm very excited for all the people

90
00:06:05.560 --> 00:06:09.560
who understood explanation.

91
00:06:10.000 --> 00:06:13.160
Let's go to just finish off his other question though,

92
00:06:13.199 --> 00:06:17.560
because that's really interesting. He says, with a bigger interferometer,

93
00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:22.920
could you detect the Big Bang? And the answer is

94
00:06:24.279 --> 00:06:27.959
basically no, you need something quite different. So, as I said,

95
00:06:28.040 --> 00:06:32.959
the ligo, and it's ilk sensitive to gravitational waves with

96
00:06:34.040 --> 00:06:39.439
killer hurts frequencies, so a few hundred cycles per second

97
00:06:39.480 --> 00:06:44.519
as we used to call it. Did I say killer hurts? Yes,

98
00:06:44.600 --> 00:06:48.519
I meant the wrong. Yeah, well I'm talking. Yeah, killer

99
00:06:48.560 --> 00:06:51.120
hurts are a bit high. It's hundreds of hurts rather

100
00:06:51.160 --> 00:06:53.800
than killer hurts. So you know, five hundred and six

101
00:06:53.839 --> 00:06:57.720
hundred hrs. Killer hurts is a thousand obviously, so just

102
00:06:57.800 --> 00:07:02.120
replay that bit. Anyway, The bottom line is to look

103
00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:05.199
for phenomena in the early universe, and it's not so

104
00:07:05.279 --> 00:07:08.040
much the Big Bang itself as the inflationary period that

105
00:07:08.079 --> 00:07:11.360
followed it, when the universe expanded by ten to the

106
00:07:11.360 --> 00:07:13.720
power fifty and ten to the minus thirty three of

107
00:07:13.759 --> 00:07:18.639
a second, which is just beggars the imagination. But to

108
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:23.720
pick up phenomena like that, you need to be sensitive

109
00:07:23.879 --> 00:07:31.360
to gravitational waves with nanohertz frequencies. That means, how can

110
00:07:31.399 --> 00:07:35.600
I put it? A billionth of a billionth of a

111
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:39.319
cycle per second? In other words, they make one cycle

112
00:07:39.480 --> 00:07:43.480
over a very long period of time years, decades, maybe

113
00:07:43.480 --> 00:07:46.240
even millions of years with some of them, so you

114
00:07:46.319 --> 00:07:49.319
never see the vibrations. You just see part of one

115
00:07:49.399 --> 00:07:52.839
cycle because it's so slow. The period of these vibrations

116
00:07:52.920 --> 00:07:56.360
is so slow, and so you need different technologies to

117
00:07:56.399 --> 00:07:59.199
do that, and people are working on those. And indeed

118
00:07:59.240 --> 00:08:02.279
we've spoken about on space Nuts in the past.

119
00:08:03.680 --> 00:08:06.399
People just like people just like you, I'd say, people

120
00:08:06.439 --> 00:08:09.160
like you and me, but probably a little bit more

121
00:08:09.800 --> 00:08:10.480
people like you.

122
00:08:12.680 --> 00:08:15.399
Let's take a short break from space Nuts to tell

123
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:19.319
you about our sponsor, nord vp N. Now. I've talked

124
00:08:19.319 --> 00:08:22.560
about virtual private networks before and how they can protect

125
00:08:22.600 --> 00:08:26.920
you online, and no one does it better than Nord Now.

126
00:08:26.959 --> 00:08:30.399
I've been using Nord for over two years and I

127
00:08:30.639 --> 00:08:34.440
have no complaints. I'm also using some of their other tools,

128
00:08:34.480 --> 00:08:39.080
including the brilliant password manager and the one terabyte of

129
00:08:39.279 --> 00:08:41.960
cloud storage. And let's face it, you just can't get

130
00:08:42.080 --> 00:08:45.320
enough storage these days. And cloud storage is good because

131
00:08:45.320 --> 00:08:47.879
it's backed up. If you've got it on a drive

132
00:08:47.919 --> 00:08:50.720
attached to your computer, that drive will eventually die and

133
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:54.279
you don't want to lose all that stuff. So yeah,

134
00:08:54.320 --> 00:08:57.679
cloud storage is the way to go right now. Space

135
00:08:57.759 --> 00:09:01.759
Nuts listeners get an exclusive deals extra for free when

136
00:09:01.759 --> 00:09:03.759
you sign up for a two year plan, and that's

137
00:09:03.799 --> 00:09:07.600
a saving of seventy four percent, plus it comes with

138
00:09:07.679 --> 00:09:11.080
their thirty day money back guarantee. All you have to

139
00:09:11.080 --> 00:09:15.159
do is head over to NordVPN slash space Nuts and

140
00:09:15.240 --> 00:09:19.559
click on get NordVPN. You'll see all the current deals

141
00:09:19.639 --> 00:09:24.919
and options, including their VPN service, malware protection, ad blocker,

142
00:09:25.000 --> 00:09:28.759
track a blocker, they're awesome, password manager, and even a

143
00:09:28.879 --> 00:09:33.679
data breach scanner. Seriously, have a look at it. NordVPN

144
00:09:33.759 --> 00:09:38.639
dot com slash space Nuts. Nord vpn dot com slash

145
00:09:38.919 --> 00:09:42.279
space Nuts. All right, let's get back to the show.

146
00:09:44.399 --> 00:09:45.159
Space Nuts.

147
00:09:46.360 --> 00:09:49.200
Our next question is actually from your side of the world,

148
00:09:49.799 --> 00:09:54.679
and it's from Anthony. Anthony love the show, of course.

149
00:09:54.879 --> 00:09:59.080
My question is, even though the Moon's orbit is tilted

150
00:09:59.320 --> 00:10:02.879
relative to the Earth only by or sorry, by only

151
00:10:02.919 --> 00:10:06.039
seven degrees, why does it appear to shift so much

152
00:10:06.159 --> 00:10:09.759
in the sky tonight? For example, it is really low

153
00:10:09.840 --> 00:10:12.360
in the north from my location in Sydney, but at

154
00:10:12.399 --> 00:10:16.080
other times, sometimes not too far apart, it is almost overhead.

155
00:10:16.519 --> 00:10:19.919
It must be simple geometry, but the differences seem far

156
00:10:20.000 --> 00:10:23.159
too great to be seven or fourteen degrees. It seems

157
00:10:23.200 --> 00:10:26.240
like much more than forty five degrees, certainly more than

158
00:10:26.240 --> 00:10:32.080
the first three lengths. Think. Thanks. That's from Anthony from Sydney, Australia.

159
00:10:32.840 --> 00:10:35.240
Yeah, it's probably not very far from where I'm sitting now,

160
00:10:36.320 --> 00:10:37.039
Hello Anthony.

161
00:10:37.600 --> 00:10:40.240
So seven to fourteen degrees away from you?

162
00:10:40.559 --> 00:10:45.759
Yes, so, actually it's five degrees, not seven degrees. The

163
00:10:45.799 --> 00:10:50.759
tilt of the Moon's orbit is five degrees. But the

164
00:10:50.799 --> 00:10:55.279
main point is that that five degrees is with respect

165
00:10:55.399 --> 00:10:59.480
to the ecliptic, which is the plane of the sorbit

166
00:10:59.559 --> 00:11:03.759
in space. So and in the sky, the ecliptic is

167
00:11:03.799 --> 00:11:08.039
the path of the Sun through the sky. So five

168
00:11:08.120 --> 00:11:14.000
degree tilt to the ecliptic means that effectively the moon

169
00:11:14.159 --> 00:11:17.159
follows the Sun's path through the sky with a bit

170
00:11:17.200 --> 00:11:20.600
of five degrees either side of it, so that, as

171
00:11:21.039 --> 00:11:24.840
Anthony says, that's not very much. But the bottom line is,

172
00:11:24.879 --> 00:11:27.039
of course the Sun's path through the sky is tilted

173
00:11:27.039 --> 00:11:29.879
at twenty three and a half degrees with respect to

174
00:11:29.919 --> 00:11:35.039
the equator, and that's why we see such large variations.

175
00:11:35.080 --> 00:11:37.600
So if you think about what the Sun does in

176
00:11:37.639 --> 00:11:40.559
a year, the moon does more or less the same

177
00:11:40.600 --> 00:11:44.799
thing in a month, because it goes around the ecliptic

178
00:11:45.200 --> 00:11:47.279
five degrees one side or the other of it, but

179
00:11:47.360 --> 00:11:49.879
more or less going around the ecliptic in one month,

180
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:52.519
which is why, over very short periods of time you

181
00:11:52.559 --> 00:11:56.399
see the moon in very very different places in the sky.

182
00:11:57.559 --> 00:12:01.720
One little characteristic, and this might illuminate one of the

183
00:12:01.759 --> 00:12:08.320
comments that Anthony made is that when you're near the solstices,

184
00:12:08.399 --> 00:12:13.120
either the summer solstice, which for us in Australia is

185
00:12:13.159 --> 00:12:15.919
in December the sun is at its highest in the sky,

186
00:12:17.279 --> 00:12:20.000
or the winter solstice, which for us in Australia is June,

187
00:12:20.919 --> 00:12:23.799
then the moon in its path through the sky and Basically,

188
00:12:24.840 --> 00:12:28.440
when it's full, a full moon is exactly opposite where

189
00:12:28.440 --> 00:12:30.480
the sun is. So when the sun's very high in

190
00:12:30.519 --> 00:12:33.039
the sky, a full moon is very low in the sky,

191
00:12:33.320 --> 00:12:37.960
it's right opposite it, within five degrees either side. So

192
00:12:38.080 --> 00:12:40.519
I always think of that when I look at a

193
00:12:40.559 --> 00:12:44.039
full moon, I imagine it's where the sun will be

194
00:12:44.080 --> 00:12:47.639
in six months time, at the different time of year,

195
00:12:47.840 --> 00:12:51.159
which is kind of quite cute, really in a peculiar

196
00:12:51.159 --> 00:12:55.240
sort of way. So yes, it's a good observation. But

197
00:12:55.320 --> 00:12:58.879
the reason for it is, as you said, it's geometry.

198
00:12:59.440 --> 00:13:03.559
I never thought that that's a quite a cool little tinbit.

199
00:13:04.039 --> 00:13:05.879
I'm just I'm thinking back. This is a little bit

200
00:13:05.919 --> 00:13:08.639
of a side story. But I got married. I insisted.

201
00:13:08.639 --> 00:13:10.840
I told my husband I wanted to do an astronomy

202
00:13:10.919 --> 00:13:13.279
kind of themed wedding, and so we got married under

203
00:13:13.360 --> 00:13:17.039
We chose the October full moon, the Hunter's moon, and

204
00:13:17.320 --> 00:13:20.399
we got married, and then we immediately the next day

205
00:13:20.440 --> 00:13:23.159
we were driving across the country because I was from Utah.

206
00:13:23.279 --> 00:13:25.200
He was in Florida at the time, so we started

207
00:13:25.240 --> 00:13:27.480
our road trip to Florida the day after we got married.

208
00:13:27.919 --> 00:13:31.399
And I just remember, because we did our full moon wedding,

209
00:13:31.399 --> 00:13:32.799
and I got married right at the time that the

210
00:13:32.799 --> 00:13:34.919
moon was supposed to be at his fullest. I'm a

211
00:13:34.960 --> 00:13:36.840
little bit of a weirdo. But then the next day

212
00:13:37.000 --> 00:13:41.279
the moon was so low in the sky and bright red.

213
00:13:41.440 --> 00:13:44.639
I just remember it was the most brilliant looking thing

214
00:13:44.679 --> 00:13:46.720
I've ever seen, and so just really kind of thinking

215
00:13:46.720 --> 00:13:49.240
about Anthony's question with you know, when we got married,

216
00:13:49.279 --> 00:13:50.759
it was up in the sky, and then the very

217
00:13:50.799 --> 00:13:53.399
next day it's right down low on the horizon like

218
00:13:53.440 --> 00:13:55.600
a movie. It was like like like almost like a

219
00:13:55.679 --> 00:13:59.440
Lawrence of Arabia type kind of look. Was very cool.

220
00:14:00.519 --> 00:14:03.679
HARDI I'm going to pick up on that today because

221
00:14:03.679 --> 00:14:07.000
I can't resist this. Marny and I too had an

222
00:14:07.039 --> 00:14:12.039
astronomical wedding. We got married, and this is why I'm

223
00:14:12.080 --> 00:14:16.120
picking up on this six years ago today. It's actually

224
00:14:16.159 --> 00:14:17.799
today is our anniversary.

225
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:20.559
Oh, happy anniversary, Thank.

226
00:14:20.399 --> 00:14:23.200
You very much. Yeah, we've been together for nearly twenty years,

227
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:25.120
but it took us quite a while to get married.

228
00:14:25.919 --> 00:14:29.000
Six years ago today. We got married on the summit

229
00:14:29.080 --> 00:14:33.879
of Haliakala on Maui, which has a number of large

230
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:37.799
significant telescopes on it, including pan stars to the asteroid

231
00:14:37.879 --> 00:14:43.240
Guardian Telescope and the Daniel K. Nui Solar Telescope is

232
00:14:43.240 --> 00:14:45.360
the biggest solar telescope in the world. They were right

233
00:14:45.399 --> 00:14:47.799
behind us when we got married at ten thousand feet

234
00:14:48.120 --> 00:14:51.559
on the summit of and I got wonderfully sunburned on

235
00:14:51.600 --> 00:14:52.080
the top.

236
00:14:51.919 --> 00:14:57.159
Of Oh, that's such a beautiful story. Well, congrats to you,

237
00:14:57.720 --> 00:15:00.759
and congrats to congrats to you yours and that's a

238
00:15:00.960 --> 00:15:03.360
that's such a beautiful story. I guess we're dedicating this

239
00:15:03.440 --> 00:15:11.600
episode to our our significant others and the.

240
00:15:09.159 --> 00:15:13.279
On the moon. That's right. Yeah, sorry, sorry to hijack

241
00:15:13.320 --> 00:15:13.759
that comes.

242
00:15:13.799 --> 00:15:16.320
Oh no, that was a. That was well, that was fun.

243
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:19.600
You know, maybe maybe people are curious about your you know,

244
00:15:19.679 --> 00:15:23.639
your personal personal experiences with space because I think, you know,

245
00:15:23.759 --> 00:15:25.960
sometimes it's nice to add and infuse a little bit

246
00:15:25.960 --> 00:15:28.440
of the personal love for space too.

247
00:15:31.200 --> 00:15:31.879
Okay, t.

248
00:15:34.080 --> 00:15:38.919
Space nuts. Our next question is an audio question, and

249
00:15:38.960 --> 00:15:42.399
this is Mikey from Illinoi's USA.

250
00:15:43.159 --> 00:15:46.039
Hey friend Andrew, this is Mikey once again from Illinois

251
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:49.399
and the US of A. I'm just wondering if you

252
00:15:49.440 --> 00:15:51.639
guys have any room in your house for me and

253
00:15:51.679 --> 00:15:55.799
my family. I'm just kidding, let's just serious. I'm just joking,

254
00:15:56.080 --> 00:15:59.200
unless you want me to. I'm just kidding. Keep it

255
00:15:59.240 --> 00:16:05.600
in mind. So I know that space can bend, space

256
00:16:05.679 --> 00:16:09.519
can warp, space can ripple space, can it supposedly tear?

257
00:16:10.759 --> 00:16:14.039
I was curious as to what it means for space

258
00:16:14.080 --> 00:16:18.960
to actually tear, like have we seen examples in real

259
00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:21.399
life of space tearing and what would that look like?

260
00:16:21.639 --> 00:16:23.960
Or is it just we know it can but we

261
00:16:24.039 --> 00:16:26.480
haven't seen it. Yeah, I was just hoping you guys

262
00:16:26.519 --> 00:16:28.679
could explain that a little bit more. I appreciate you

263
00:16:28.679 --> 00:16:29.480
guys love the show.

264
00:16:30.600 --> 00:16:37.919
What an interesting question, and it is hypothetical, the idea

265
00:16:37.960 --> 00:16:43.480
of space tearing, because we've never ever seen anything symptomatic

266
00:16:43.519 --> 00:16:47.159
of tearing space, either here on our planet or in

267
00:16:47.200 --> 00:16:50.399
the wider universe, and it would have to be under

268
00:16:50.559 --> 00:16:57.559
very very extreme circumstances that it would happen. So by extreme,

269
00:16:57.639 --> 00:17:01.879
I mean space being stretched beyond its limits. And the

270
00:17:01.919 --> 00:17:06.079
reason why this is a popular notion is because of

271
00:17:06.319 --> 00:17:12.960
the discovery back in back in nineteen ninety eight that

272
00:17:13.359 --> 00:17:19.200
space is accelerating in its expansion. We've known since nineteen

273
00:17:19.200 --> 00:17:22.279
twenty nine that the universe is expanding that's taking space

274
00:17:22.319 --> 00:17:24.960
with it. But since nineteen ninety eight, we've known that

275
00:17:25.200 --> 00:17:29.920
that expansion has been ever faster, ever more rapid. It's accelerating,

276
00:17:30.920 --> 00:17:33.720
and so that's given rise to the idea of if

277
00:17:33.720 --> 00:17:37.279
this goes on into the far distant future, are we

278
00:17:37.400 --> 00:17:39.920
going to get to a situation where space is so

279
00:17:40.079 --> 00:17:44.720
stretched that it falls apart? And that gives rise to

280
00:17:44.759 --> 00:17:50.160
the notion of the big Rip. And actually, the best

281
00:17:50.279 --> 00:17:53.240
place I can direct mikey to on the web, because

282
00:17:53.240 --> 00:17:58.920
it's explained very I won't say concisely, it's exploring great detail,

283
00:17:59.519 --> 00:18:03.920
but it's easy to read is the Big Rip entry

284
00:18:04.119 --> 00:18:08.960
on Wikipedia. I'm a big fan of Wikipedia, and the

285
00:18:08.960 --> 00:18:12.960
Big Rip entry is really quite extraordinary because it talks

286
00:18:13.000 --> 00:18:18.240
about the hypothesis that space could tear. It talks a

287
00:18:18.240 --> 00:18:21.359
little bit about the work that's been done on this,

288
00:18:21.440 --> 00:18:25.119
the research that has been carried out in a serious,

289
00:18:25.680 --> 00:18:29.359
you know, academic manner as to what might constitute space

290
00:18:29.440 --> 00:18:34.720
being ripped apart, and you can sort of define that

291
00:18:34.880 --> 00:18:39.680
in terms of the various fundamental forces of nature. And

292
00:18:40.000 --> 00:18:43.839
there is a hypothesis that then suggests that what might

293
00:18:43.920 --> 00:18:45.920
be the trigger for a big rip in terms of,

294
00:18:46.559 --> 00:18:50.960
you know, the tension that is involved, and that One

295
00:18:50.960 --> 00:18:53.920
of the authors of that hypothesis is Robert Caldwell of

296
00:18:54.000 --> 00:18:58.519
Dartmouth College, who presents us with a formula which defines

297
00:18:58.599 --> 00:19:02.519
when the big rip will take. It's quite a neat formula.

298
00:19:02.599 --> 00:19:05.920
It includes things like the Hubble constant and the baryonic

299
00:19:05.960 --> 00:19:08.880
mass content of the universe. It's all there on the page.

300
00:19:09.799 --> 00:19:12.319
And I think the bottom line is is it twenty

301
00:19:12.359 --> 00:19:15.119
billion years if something like that? Oh no, wait a minute,

302
00:19:15.240 --> 00:19:17.960
The earliest is one hundred and fifty two billion years time.

303
00:19:18.240 --> 00:19:21.680
That's when space. Yeah, one hundred and fifty two billion years.

304
00:19:21.680 --> 00:19:24.440
Put it in your diary, miikey, because that's when you

305
00:19:24.519 --> 00:19:27.440
will find the first example of space being with.

306
00:19:28.680 --> 00:19:33.319
Oh my, well, our very last question is from my

307
00:19:33.359 --> 00:19:37.799
side of the world again. So we got Greg from Minnesota.

308
00:19:37.920 --> 00:19:41.359
So he says, hello from Minnesota, USA. I'm Greg, and

309
00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:44.720
I have a question about the cosmic jerk. And no,

310
00:19:45.359 --> 00:19:50.880
I don't mean Fred, oh Fred. And his question is

311
00:19:51.000 --> 00:19:54.559
the change of position over time is velocity, and the

312
00:19:54.680 --> 00:19:59.279
change of velocity over time is acceleration. But we don't

313
00:19:59.359 --> 00:20:03.000
need to stop there. The change of acceleration over time

314
00:20:03.160 --> 00:20:07.319
is called jerk. We know the universe is accelerating, but

315
00:20:08.240 --> 00:20:11.079
have we been able to measure whether or not it's

316
00:20:11.119 --> 00:20:15.240
accelerating at a constant rate? Love the podcast, Keep up

317
00:20:15.279 --> 00:20:19.839
the good work if you're curious. The next derivatives after

318
00:20:19.920 --> 00:20:21.839
jerk are snap, crackle.

319
00:20:21.559 --> 00:20:21.880
And pop.

320
00:20:23.680 --> 00:20:23.880
Yeah.

321
00:20:24.960 --> 00:20:29.519
So, I'll refrain from using the term jerk since it's

322
00:20:29.559 --> 00:20:33.640
been applied to me and to give it its proper name,

323
00:20:33.720 --> 00:20:38.039
which is the rate of change of acceleration. So acceleration

324
00:20:38.160 --> 00:20:40.240
is the rate of change of velocity. Velocity is the

325
00:20:40.359 --> 00:20:43.759
rate of change of position. As exactly as Greg says,

326
00:20:43.920 --> 00:20:44.319
I was.

327
00:20:44.759 --> 00:20:46.279
Thinking this question was going to be for me for

328
00:20:46.319 --> 00:20:47.880
a second. I was like, wait a second, that's what

329
00:20:47.920 --> 00:20:49.000
I do my research in.

330
00:20:50.240 --> 00:20:57.119
Yes, so yeah, so so. But Greg's question is is

331
00:20:58.079 --> 00:21:02.119
very very topical at the moment, because yes, we've known

332
00:21:02.160 --> 00:21:04.079
that the universe is accelerating, as I said a few

333
00:21:04.079 --> 00:21:07.359
minutes ago, since nineteen ninety eight discovery made by an

334
00:21:07.400 --> 00:21:14.400
Australian and a US scientist in working independently. That discovery

335
00:21:15.119 --> 00:21:19.720
immediately led to the question is the acceleration changing? In

336
00:21:19.759 --> 00:21:22.079
other words, is there a rate of change of acceleration?

337
00:21:22.440 --> 00:21:27.279
And that's a very hard observation to make. You need

338
00:21:27.319 --> 00:21:31.440
to look at the universe over the widest possible range

339
00:21:31.480 --> 00:21:33.880
of look back times. So you want to look back

340
00:21:33.960 --> 00:21:36.839
eleven billion years if you can, you know, sort of

341
00:21:36.880 --> 00:21:40.240
seven eighths of the age of the universe. And so

342
00:21:41.039 --> 00:21:46.359
what's happened recently is something called DESI, which is the

343
00:21:46.440 --> 00:21:49.559
Dark Energy Survey Instrument, and dark energy is, by the way,

344
00:21:50.000 --> 00:21:53.160
the mechanism which we think is causing the universe to expand,

345
00:21:53.200 --> 00:21:56.400
that space has an energy of its own. Until now,

346
00:21:56.799 --> 00:22:00.480
we've believed that was a constant, that their acceleration of

347
00:22:00.519 --> 00:22:05.000
the universe was a constant. But DESI, the Dark Energy

348
00:22:05.039 --> 00:22:09.680
Survey Instrument on a telescope in Arizona, based on the

349
00:22:09.680 --> 00:22:12.319
Male telescope before me to the telescope at kick Peak,

350
00:22:13.279 --> 00:22:18.000
that seems to be indicating and it's still not speculative.

351
00:22:18.039 --> 00:22:23.200
It's still one of these results that's still got a

352
00:22:23.279 --> 00:22:25.480
question mark over it, but it seems to indicate that

353
00:22:25.519 --> 00:22:29.480
the acceleration is slowing down, and slowing down the acceleration

354
00:22:29.720 --> 00:22:32.200
is a good thing because it might put off the

355
00:22:32.279 --> 00:22:35.880
big rip beyond one hundred and fifty two billion years,

356
00:22:36.240 --> 00:22:39.839
might push it back into the more distant horizon. So

357
00:22:40.279 --> 00:22:43.640
we will It remains to be seen, but I think

358
00:22:43.880 --> 00:22:45.920
the odds are that over the next few years will

359
00:22:45.920 --> 00:22:50.519
find compelling evidence that the acceleration of the universe's expansion

360
00:22:50.960 --> 00:22:54.960
is slowing down. And that's a mystery because that needs

361
00:22:54.960 --> 00:22:58.039
a mechanism, and it probably suggests there are new physics

362
00:22:58.039 --> 00:23:02.039
that we do not understand that have yet to be determined,

363
00:23:02.200 --> 00:23:04.839
and it opens up all kinds of areas of research,

364
00:23:05.599 --> 00:23:07.519
which seems like a really good way to wrap up

365
00:23:07.519 --> 00:23:10.519
this Q and a session of space nuts.

366
00:23:10.960 --> 00:23:17.400
Absolutely, and I'll tie that in with love, another one

367
00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:21.759
of life's greatest mysteries. Since we're talking about our loved ones.

368
00:23:21.799 --> 00:23:24.960
If there is somebody that you love and you would

369
00:23:25.000 --> 00:23:27.920
love to share this podcast with, we would be just

370
00:23:28.079 --> 00:23:31.759
tickled if you could tell everybody that you love, and

371
00:23:31.799 --> 00:23:33.799
maybe some people that you don't even really care for

372
00:23:33.960 --> 00:23:36.640
but you sit next to them at the office. Tell

373
00:23:36.720 --> 00:23:39.119
your friends, tell your family, tell the people you don't like,

374
00:23:39.319 --> 00:23:42.440
tell your dog, tell your cat about space nuts. We

375
00:23:42.480 --> 00:23:46.599
are here for you. We've got our question and answer

376
00:23:46.640 --> 00:23:49.920
episodes and our more I guess what do we call

377
00:23:49.960 --> 00:23:54.880
this more narrative story style episodes every week and so, Fred,

378
00:23:54.880 --> 00:23:56.559
do you have anything else you want to add before

379
00:23:56.640 --> 00:23:57.599
we sign off.

380
00:23:57.400 --> 00:23:58.079
For the day.

381
00:23:58.359 --> 00:24:01.920
I think we've covered some much of the big mysteries

382
00:24:01.960 --> 00:24:04.240
today that we should just go away with our heads

383
00:24:04.240 --> 00:24:06.359
spinning and try and think of some more questions for

384
00:24:06.440 --> 00:24:06.960
next time.

385
00:24:07.279 --> 00:24:09.839
Excellent. Well, hey Fred, thank you so much. This has

386
00:24:09.880 --> 00:24:12.680
been another episode of Space Nuts.

387
00:24:12.880 --> 00:24:13.599
Space Nuts.

388
00:24:13.920 --> 00:24:17.240
You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast.

389
00:24:18.240 --> 00:24:24.279
Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player.

390
00:24:24.440 --> 00:24:27.759
You can also stream on demand at bytes dot com.

391
00:24:27.759 --> 00:24:33.480
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail