June 6, 2026

Cosmic Life Hunt: Delving into Astrobiology Part 2 & the Quest for Extraterrestrial Existence

Cosmic Life Hunt: Delving into Astrobiology Part 2 & the Quest for Extraterrestrial Existence

Sponsor Link: This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN, your go-to solution for online security. To take advantage of our special offer, including four extra months for free, visit https://www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts Astrobiology Part 2:...

Sponsor Link:
This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN, your go-to solution for online security. To take advantage of our special offer, including four extra months for free, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts.

Astrobiology Part 2: The Search for Life Beyond Earth In this captivating continuation of our exploration of astrobiology, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner delve deeper into the complexities of life in the universe. Following up on their previous discussion, they tackle the intriguing factors that influence the potential for life on other planets, as well as the implications of our own technological advancements.
Episode Highlights:
- Review of Astrobiology: The episode kicks off with a quick recap of the previous discussion on the history of astrobiology, including the ongoing search for life within our solar system and beyond.
- The Exoplanet Era: Jonty shares insights on our current capabilities to identify exoplanets that may harbour life, discussing the significance of size, distance from stars, and other critical factors in determining habitability.
- Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The hosts explore the challenges of detecting intelligent life and the fascinating concept of alien megastructures, as well as the importance of understanding what to look for in the cosmos.
- Planetary Systems and Habitability: The conversation shifts to the dynamics of planetary systems and how factors like Milankovitch cycles, orbital stability, and the presence of water influence a planet's ability to support life.
- Ethics of Seeding Life: A listener question prompts a discussion on the ethical implications of potentially seeding other planets with life, exploring the concept of panspermia and the responsibilities of humanity in the cosmos.

For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

- Recap of Astrobiology Part 1
- The Exoplanet Landscape
- Searching for Intelligent Life
- Factors Influencing Habitability
- Ethical Considerations in Seeding Life

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:01.960
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us again. This

1
00:00:01.960 --> 00:00:04.720
is Space Nuts where we talk astronomy and

2
00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:07.440
space science and all sorts of other things.

3
00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:09.840
And over the last, uh, few

4
00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:13.520
episodes we've been doing some specials

5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:15.800
because Fred Watson's away gallivanting

6
00:00:15.800 --> 00:00:18.240
around Scotland playing a lot of golf. Not.

7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.640
Uh, so we're doing some specials with Jonty

8
00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:24.360
Horner. Uh, and we're doing part

9
00:00:24.360 --> 00:00:25.680
two today of

10
00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:28.640
Astrobiology, a fascinating

11
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:31.640
part of astronomy and space science. Uh,

12
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:34.620
one area we get so many questions about. So

13
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:37.580
stand by as we get into that on this

14
00:00:37.580 --> 00:00:39.900
episode of space nuts. 15

15
00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:40.700
seconds.

16
00:00:40.700 --> 00:00:43.116
Jonti Horner: Guidance is internal. 10,

17
00:00:43.297 --> 00:00:45.980
9, ignition sequence start.

18
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.005
Space nuts. 5, 4, 3, 2. 1. 2,

19
00:00:49.077 --> 00:00:51.900
3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

20
00:00:51.980 --> 00:00:53.180
Space nuts.

21
00:00:53.180 --> 00:00:55.020
Andrew Dunkley: Astronauts report it feels good.

22
00:00:56.140 --> 00:00:58.260
And back with us again is Johnty Horner,

23
00:00:58.260 --> 00:01:00.060
professor of astrophysics at the University

24
00:01:00.140 --> 00:01:02.300
of Southern Queensland. Jonty, hello.

25
00:01:02.460 --> 00:01:03.260
Jonti Horner: Noon. How are you?

26
00:01:03.930 --> 00:01:05.450
Andrew Dunkley: I'm m all right. Can you imagine Fred Watson

27
00:01:05.450 --> 00:01:06.170
playing golf?

28
00:01:06.650 --> 00:01:08.930
Jonti Horner: No, uh, not sure. I mean, growing up in

29
00:01:08.930 --> 00:01:10.970
Yorkshire, the weather wasn't always suited

30
00:01:10.970 --> 00:01:13.290
to it and we were too busy in gravel anyway,

31
00:01:13.290 --> 00:01:13.690
so.

32
00:01:14.970 --> 00:01:17.970
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, took

33
00:01:17.970 --> 00:01:20.410
a moment. I got that. Yes, yes.

34
00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:22.730
Uh, used to look clean with the tongues.

35
00:01:22.810 --> 00:01:24.450
Jonti Horner: Used to have to get up in the morning at 10

36
00:01:24.450 --> 00:01:25.970
o' clock at night, half an hour before I went

37
00:01:25.970 --> 00:01:26.490
to bed.

38
00:01:27.770 --> 00:01:30.250
Andrew Dunkley: It's just one of the best pieces of comedy

39
00:01:30.250 --> 00:01:30.450
ever.

40
00:01:30.450 --> 00:01:31.930
Jonti Horner: And it's funny because it's true.

41
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:34.360
Yes.

42
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:36.040
Andrew Dunkley: Tell the young people that.

43
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:37.240
Jonti Horner: They won't believe you.

44
00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:42.520
Andrew Dunkley: Oh gosh, it's all flooding back. Uh, we've

45
00:01:42.520 --> 00:01:44.120
got a lot to talk about so we better get

46
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:44.440
started.

47
00:01:44.440 --> 00:01:47.420
Astrobiology Part two. Um,

48
00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:49.760
a couple of episodes ago we talked

49
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:52.580
Astrobiology Part one, surprisingly. Um,

50
00:01:52.760 --> 00:01:54.120
let's just do a quick review.

51
00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:56.800
Jonti Horner: Yeah, this is a bit like the bit that really

52
00:01:56.800 --> 00:01:59.080
annoys you at the start of those multi

53
00:01:59.080 --> 00:02:01.360
episode shows where they're previously on

54
00:02:01.360 --> 00:02:03.880
Astrobiology. Um, but

55
00:02:05.550 --> 00:02:07.910
this is basically a case of Jonty talks too

56
00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:09.990
much and so therefore we run out of time. I

57
00:02:09.990 --> 00:02:11.350
mean, we don't need to sugarcoat that. And

58
00:02:11.350 --> 00:02:13.430
it's always a problem when you're talking

59
00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:14.510
about something you love and you're

60
00:02:14.510 --> 00:02:16.510
passionate about that. The time just flies by

61
00:02:16.510 --> 00:02:18.510
and hopefully it's flying by for the

62
00:02:18.510 --> 00:02:20.870
listeners as well, rather than boring them to

63
00:02:20.870 --> 00:02:22.590
tears. But you know, I can't really control

64
00:02:22.590 --> 00:02:24.990
that. In the first episode

65
00:02:25.470 --> 00:02:27.470
we talked a fair bit about the fact that

66
00:02:27.470 --> 00:02:29.230
we've always wondered whether there's life

67
00:02:29.230 --> 00:02:31.350
elsewhere. We talked a bit about the history

68
00:02:31.350 --> 00:02:33.270
in particular things like the ideas of

69
00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:35.510
potentially there being life on Mars that led

70
00:02:35.510 --> 00:02:37.090
to the panic over the War of the Worlds

71
00:02:37.090 --> 00:02:39.370
broadcast and the Fact that In the late

72
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.450
1800s, people were that convinced there

73
00:02:41.450 --> 00:02:43.810
already was known to be life on Mars, that

74
00:02:43.810 --> 00:02:45.410
when a major prize was offered for the

75
00:02:45.410 --> 00:02:47.010
detection of life elsewhere, Mars was

76
00:02:47.010 --> 00:02:49.770
explicitly excluded because that's too easy,

77
00:02:49.770 --> 00:02:51.370
you know. So we've had these ideas for a very

78
00:02:51.370 --> 00:02:54.250
long time, but finding evidence of life

79
00:02:54.250 --> 00:02:56.570
out there is really, really difficult.

80
00:02:57.130 --> 00:02:59.570
We've talked a fair bit about the search for

81
00:02:59.570 --> 00:03:02.250
life within the solar system. You know,

82
00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:04.370
places like looking at Mars, looking at

83
00:03:04.370 --> 00:03:06.210
Europa, all the icy moons. And we talk about

84
00:03:06.210 --> 00:03:08.350
that a lot in the questions that we week by

85
00:03:08.350 --> 00:03:09.430
week as well on the show.

86
00:03:09.990 --> 00:03:12.030
And one thing I've always been really

87
00:03:12.030 --> 00:03:13.870
interested in and passionate about is the

88
00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:15.830
search for life outside the solar system.

89
00:03:16.390 --> 00:03:18.590
Given that we've moved into the exoplanet

90
00:03:18.590 --> 00:03:20.110
era, and we talked a lot about this in the

91
00:03:20.110 --> 00:03:22.550
previous episode as well, we're now in a

92
00:03:22.550 --> 00:03:24.910
position where 30 years ago would have seemed

93
00:03:24.910 --> 00:03:26.750
impossible. Thirty years ago, we'd only just

94
00:03:26.750 --> 00:03:28.390
found the first planet for under the Stars,

95
00:03:28.390 --> 00:03:30.670
and only just answered that question of

96
00:03:30.670 --> 00:03:32.950
whether there are planets at all beyond the

97
00:03:32.950 --> 00:03:35.510
solar system. Now we're at a position where

98
00:03:35.510 --> 00:03:37.990
we are finding places that theoretically, in

99
00:03:37.990 --> 00:03:40.610
the future, we could search to see whether

100
00:03:40.610 --> 00:03:42.210
there's any evidence of life in those

101
00:03:42.210 --> 00:03:44.410
planetary systems. And in all honesty,

102
00:03:44.410 --> 00:03:46.610
despite some of the hyperbolic media

103
00:03:47.170 --> 00:03:49.610
articles that you sometimes see, we haven't

104
00:03:49.610 --> 00:03:52.050
yet found a planet that would really look

105
00:03:52.050 --> 00:03:53.730
like another Earth. But we're getting there,

106
00:03:53.890 --> 00:03:55.450
we're getting closer, we're getting to

107
00:03:55.450 --> 00:03:57.610
planets that are more similar to ours in

108
00:03:57.610 --> 00:03:59.450
size, at more similar distance from their

109
00:03:59.450 --> 00:04:01.690
stars, and we're learning more about them.

110
00:04:01.690 --> 00:04:03.450
And it's very feasible then in the next

111
00:04:03.450 --> 00:04:05.250
decade or so, that we can actually start

112
00:04:05.810 --> 00:04:07.930
looking to see whether there's any evidence

113
00:04:07.930 --> 00:04:09.810
of life on those planets. Now, that's a

114
00:04:09.810 --> 00:04:12.710
little bit separate to looking for signs of

115
00:04:12.710 --> 00:04:15.550
communicative alien technological

116
00:04:15.550 --> 00:04:17.910
life, which is a search for extraterrestrial

117
00:04:17.910 --> 00:04:19.150
intelligence or the search for

118
00:04:19.150 --> 00:04:20.870
extraterrestrial artefacts. There two areas

119
00:04:20.870 --> 00:04:23.310
of science that are fascinating, but they're

120
00:04:23.310 --> 00:04:25.190
more like a search for a needle in a hair

121
00:04:25.190 --> 00:04:28.190
sack, where we don't even know if there is

122
00:04:28.190 --> 00:04:30.430
life elsewhere, never mind intelligent life.

123
00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:32.310
I mean, some people argue whether there's

124
00:04:32.310 --> 00:04:34.070
intelligent life on Earth looking at the news

125
00:04:34.070 --> 00:04:36.270
at the minute, but looking for intelligent

126
00:04:36.270 --> 00:04:38.270
life that has reached certain technological

127
00:04:38.270 --> 00:04:41.250
level to communicate with us is challenging.

128
00:04:41.250 --> 00:04:42.770
It's one of those things if we don't know

129
00:04:42.770 --> 00:04:44.290
what we're looking for, but if we don't look,

130
00:04:44.290 --> 00:04:47.210
we'll never find it. But it still led to some

131
00:04:47.210 --> 00:04:49.250
really fascinating research, and there's a

132
00:04:49.250 --> 00:04:51.650
guy who works with us as part of our Planet

133
00:04:51.650 --> 00:04:53.730
Search Consortium, a guy called Jason Reutt

134
00:04:53.730 --> 00:04:56.130
in the US who spent some of his time actually

135
00:04:56.290 --> 00:04:59.290
thinking about alien megastructures, the

136
00:04:59.290 --> 00:05:01.530
kind of things that feature so heavily in

137
00:05:01.530 --> 00:05:03.130
some advanced science fiction, like Larry

138
00:05:03.130 --> 00:05:06.130
Niven's Ringworld or Dyson Spheres, these

139
00:05:06.370 --> 00:05:08.610
enormous structures that you can imagine a

140
00:05:09.170 --> 00:05:11.810
civilization building. If their technologies

141
00:05:11.810 --> 00:05:14.030
are far above ours, as ours is from the Stone

142
00:05:14.030 --> 00:05:16.070
Age, the idea that you could build something

143
00:05:16.070 --> 00:05:18.230
to harness all the material in your planetary

144
00:05:18.230 --> 00:05:20.270
system m harness all the energy from your

145
00:05:20.270 --> 00:05:22.550
star. Now, many people argue that while

146
00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:23.990
that's theoretically possible, it just

147
00:05:23.990 --> 00:05:26.510
wouldn't be worth the effort. But what

148
00:05:26.510 --> 00:05:28.429
Jason's been looking into is

149
00:05:29.070 --> 00:05:31.910
effectively not could people do

150
00:05:31.910 --> 00:05:34.350
this? But rather if they did, what would it

151
00:05:34.350 --> 00:05:36.790
look like? So it's not really putting any

152
00:05:36.790 --> 00:05:39.630
weight on the probability of

153
00:05:39.630 --> 00:05:41.910
these things existing, but rather saying,

154
00:05:41.910 --> 00:05:44.370
here are things we could imagine that are

155
00:05:44.370 --> 00:05:46.610
within the bounds of physical possibility to

156
00:05:46.610 --> 00:05:47.810
build. Even if they'd be on this

157
00:05:47.810 --> 00:05:50.370
technologically, what would they look like to

158
00:05:50.370 --> 00:05:52.450
our different kinds of telescopes? What would

159
00:05:52.450 --> 00:05:54.770
the signatures be? And, um, that work's

160
00:05:54.770 --> 00:05:57.370
really important because if you don't have an

161
00:05:57.370 --> 00:05:59.730
idea what these peculiar objects would look

162
00:05:59.730 --> 00:06:02.530
like, when you find something unusual, you

163
00:06:02.530 --> 00:06:04.610
won't have that thing to reference again to

164
00:06:04.610 --> 00:06:06.690
cheque it out. So both the search for

165
00:06:06.690 --> 00:06:08.530
extraterrestrial intelligence and the search

166
00:06:08.530 --> 00:06:11.500
for alien artefacts, a kind of

167
00:06:11.500 --> 00:06:13.860
a separate splinter of astrobiology that are

168
00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:16.420
ongoing, that are very precious to us here in

169
00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:17.980
Australia. Of course, we would have lost the

170
00:06:17.980 --> 00:06:20.340
Parks Radio telescope under the Liberal

171
00:06:20.340 --> 00:06:22.900
government in the 2010s in the previous

172
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.180
decade because they wanted to shut it down

173
00:06:25.180 --> 00:06:27.299
and demolish it to save money. And it only

174
00:06:27.380 --> 00:06:30.100
kept going by a large investment

175
00:06:30.820 --> 00:06:33.580
as part of a project to listen

176
00:06:33.580 --> 00:06:36.340
for aliens. So, like 40. I remember

177
00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:38.220
that telescope has been used to search for

178
00:06:38.220 --> 00:06:40.060
extraterrestrial intelligence in the form of

179
00:06:40.060 --> 00:06:42.740
radio signals. And that has kept one of our,

180
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:44.960
uh, incredible pieces of astronomical

181
00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:46.320
heritage in Australia. And something

182
00:06:46.320 --> 00:06:48.840
incredibly precious and beloved has kept it

183
00:06:48.840 --> 00:06:50.880
going and kept it standing despite the worst

184
00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:53.600
vagaries of politicians and

185
00:06:53.840 --> 00:06:54.880
all those challenges.

186
00:06:55.520 --> 00:06:58.320
Andrew Dunkley: Could you argue that we, uh, have

187
00:06:58.320 --> 00:07:00.240
already created a

188
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:03.160
megastructure around Earth with the number of

189
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:05.840
satellites that are currently in orbit and

190
00:07:05.920 --> 00:07:08.240
the so many thousands more that are going to

191
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:09.600
be put up there in the near future?

192
00:07:09.920 --> 00:07:11.640
Jonti Horner: Certainly feels like that from the inside.

193
00:07:11.640 --> 00:07:13.720
Looking out. I mean, I'm enjoying all the

194
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:16.102
photos. People are, uh, of Comet 2025

195
00:07:16.218 --> 00:07:19.180
R3 Pan stars at the minute, which behind

196
00:07:19.180 --> 00:07:20.900
both of us are our attempts. We're showing

197
00:07:20.900 --> 00:07:22.980
them off. Andrew's ever so proud from his

198
00:07:22.980 --> 00:07:23.820
attempt last night.

199
00:07:24.060 --> 00:07:25.340
Andrew Dunkley: My first ever comet.

200
00:07:25.340 --> 00:07:27.860
Jonti Horner: Fabulous photos that people are getting, but

201
00:07:27.860 --> 00:07:29.620
I've seen a lot of them getting photobombed

202
00:07:29.620 --> 00:07:32.020
by Starlink satellites. And I've got. I'm

203
00:07:32.020 --> 00:07:34.060
currently, thanks to learning something new

204
00:07:34.060 --> 00:07:35.740
about astrophotography over the last two

205
00:07:35.740 --> 00:07:37.460
days. I'm going back to images I took of

206
00:07:37.460 --> 00:07:39.700
Comet Atlas and Comet um, Church in Chan

207
00:07:39.700 --> 00:07:41.700
Atlas, which were the great comets of 2024

208
00:07:41.700 --> 00:07:44.300
and 2025 to reprocess those

209
00:07:44.300 --> 00:07:47.280
images. But one of my abiding Comet Atlas

210
00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:49.080
was I had this incredible view of it on the

211
00:07:49.080 --> 00:07:51.760
horizon. Took this long series of photos and

212
00:07:51.760 --> 00:07:54.080
every single blooming photo was ruined by a

213
00:07:54.080 --> 00:07:55.760
Starlink satellite because I got a Starlink

214
00:07:55.760 --> 00:07:57.640
train passing overhead that had recently been

215
00:07:57.640 --> 00:07:59.680
launched. All of which went straight through

216
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.080
the middle of the comet and rendered all the

217
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:03.520
photos unusable on my only really good clear

218
00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:06.040
night. Now, I may be able to solve it, but

219
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:08.840
that isn't quite at the megastructure stage

220
00:08:08.840 --> 00:08:11.680
yet for me in that I suspect with the

221
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:13.560
level of technology we've got now or in the

222
00:08:13.560 --> 00:08:16.270
near future, that network of

223
00:08:16.270 --> 00:08:17.950
satellites around the Earth, uh, wouldn't be

224
00:08:17.950 --> 00:08:20.110
something we could detect orbiting a planet

225
00:08:20.110 --> 00:08:22.830
around another star. Right. They're not there

226
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:24.510
yet, but they're the forebears of something

227
00:08:24.510 --> 00:08:27.470
that could be. Now, being that

228
00:08:27.470 --> 00:08:29.830
they're around a planet rather than a star,

229
00:08:29.830 --> 00:08:31.870
their signature will be different. And given

230
00:08:31.870 --> 00:08:34.350
that we are very skilled now at

231
00:08:34.350 --> 00:08:36.310
broadcasting in one direction rather than

232
00:08:36.310 --> 00:08:38.830
many, and that broadcasting directionally

233
00:08:38.830 --> 00:08:40.750
rather than broadcasting the boy band one

234
00:08:40.750 --> 00:08:43.750
direction should be said, um, broadcasting

235
00:08:44.209 --> 00:08:46.689
in a directional sense. We are moving towards

236
00:08:46.689 --> 00:08:48.329
the point where we're going to stop shrieking

237
00:08:48.329 --> 00:08:50.649
like a screaming infant into the cosmos

238
00:08:50.649 --> 00:08:52.889
anyway. So it may be that we're going to go

239
00:08:52.889 --> 00:08:54.889
radio silent fairly soon, and satellites like

240
00:08:54.889 --> 00:08:56.769
that are going to be part of that journey.

241
00:08:57.489 --> 00:08:59.289
But I think they are an indication of how

242
00:08:59.289 --> 00:09:01.009
quickly these things can happen. You know, if

243
00:09:01.009 --> 00:09:03.169
we were talking a decade ago, we'd have been

244
00:09:03.169 --> 00:09:05.289
talking about a couple of thousand satellites

245
00:09:05.289 --> 00:09:07.249
orbiting Earth. We're now talking about

246
00:09:07.489 --> 00:09:09.929
roughly 50,000. With plants have more than a

247
00:09:09.929 --> 00:09:12.849
million within the next decade, it's getting

248
00:09:13.870 --> 00:09:16.670
quite terrifying, actually. As much from the

249
00:09:16.670 --> 00:09:18.310
atmosphere and climate side of things as

250
00:09:18.310 --> 00:09:20.630
anything else. You know, if we have a million

251
00:09:20.630 --> 00:09:23.430
Starlink satellites in orbit in five years or

252
00:09:23.430 --> 00:09:26.030
10 years time, they have an average lifetime

253
00:09:26.030 --> 00:09:27.590
of five years, which means we'd have more

254
00:09:27.590 --> 00:09:29.470
than 500 per day burning up in the

255
00:09:29.470 --> 00:09:31.310
atmosphere. And that's

256
00:09:32.510 --> 00:09:35.350
a factor of 100, if not more times

257
00:09:35.350 --> 00:09:37.190
material entering the atmosphere on a daily

258
00:09:37.190 --> 00:09:39.590
basis than we get from the background of

259
00:09:39.590 --> 00:09:42.430
space stuff falling in. We'll be running an

260
00:09:42.510 --> 00:09:44.430
experiment in atmospheric science that we've

261
00:09:44.430 --> 00:09:47.250
never run, dumping hundreds of

262
00:09:47.250 --> 00:09:49.010
tonnes of aluminium into the upper atmosphere

263
00:09:49.010 --> 00:09:49.530
every day.

264
00:09:50.090 --> 00:09:52.490
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, what's the effect going to be? And

265
00:09:52.730 --> 00:09:55.730
that's the $64,000 question, I suppose.

266
00:09:55.730 --> 00:09:57.370
Jonti Horner: But now the interesting thing there, coming

267
00:09:57.370 --> 00:10:00.090
back to the astrobiology, is that might

268
00:10:00.170 --> 00:10:02.650
well create a signature in the Earth's

269
00:10:02.650 --> 00:10:04.490
atmosphere that would be detectable

270
00:10:05.370 --> 00:10:07.610
from observers from around another star.

271
00:10:08.010 --> 00:10:10.170
Because one of the ways that we would look

272
00:10:10.570 --> 00:10:13.510
for biosignatures, at least early

273
00:10:13.510 --> 00:10:16.310
on, will be to look at the light

274
00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:19.470
from a star reaching us whilst a given

275
00:10:19.470 --> 00:10:21.710
planet is transiting between us and the star,

276
00:10:21.710 --> 00:10:24.030
so blocking a bit of that star's light. We

277
00:10:24.030 --> 00:10:25.830
can currently do this with giant planets,

278
00:10:25.830 --> 00:10:28.430
Jupiter sized, and a fraction of the light

279
00:10:28.430 --> 00:10:30.830
from the star passes through the planet's

280
00:10:30.830 --> 00:10:33.150
atmosphere. And you get imprinted on the

281
00:10:33.150 --> 00:10:35.110
stars like the chemical fingerprint of the

282
00:10:35.110 --> 00:10:37.110
constituents of the outer layers of the

283
00:10:37.110 --> 00:10:39.230
atmosphere where the lights pass through in

284
00:10:39.230 --> 00:10:41.510
the form of absorption lines. And um, by

285
00:10:41.510 --> 00:10:43.410
studying them, we can work out some of the

286
00:10:43.410 --> 00:10:45.130
chemical species that are prevalent there and

287
00:10:45.130 --> 00:10:46.810
even learn a bit about the structure of the

288
00:10:46.810 --> 00:10:48.650
atmosphere, the presence of clouds, things

289
00:10:48.650 --> 00:10:51.650
like that. Now when we get to the point where

290
00:10:51.650 --> 00:10:53.290
we've got all those satellites burning up in

291
00:10:53.290 --> 00:10:56.250
our atmosphere, imagining with the kind of

292
00:10:56.250 --> 00:10:57.930
technology that we're looking at developing

293
00:10:57.930 --> 00:11:00.130
within the next decade or so, or maybe a

294
00:11:00.130 --> 00:11:02.210
little bit longer, imagining being on a

295
00:11:02.210 --> 00:11:04.050
nearby star looking at the sun while the

296
00:11:04.050 --> 00:11:06.450
Earth is transiting, you're suddenly

297
00:11:06.450 --> 00:11:09.130
introducing a huge spike of aluminium and

298
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:11.400
into the absorption in an Earth like planet's

299
00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:14.200
atmosphere. And there is no natural way that

300
00:11:14.200 --> 00:11:16.080
I'm aware of that you could get that.

301
00:11:17.040 --> 00:11:19.400
So that would not only be a sign of something

302
00:11:19.400 --> 00:11:21.800
way going on, it would be a bio signature of

303
00:11:21.800 --> 00:11:24.280
technologically developed life that is not

304
00:11:24.280 --> 00:11:26.000
quite so developed as to have learned that

305
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:26.800
pollution is bad.

306
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:30.440
Andrew Dunkley: Maybe that's how we find an

307
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:33.240
intelligent species, uh, beyond Earth.

308
00:11:33.240 --> 00:11:36.050
They find us first and send us a, you

309
00:11:36.050 --> 00:11:37.010
know, welcome pack.

310
00:11:37.010 --> 00:11:40.010
Jonti Horner: Yes. 10 helpful things you can do to fix your

311
00:11:40.010 --> 00:11:42.690
problems. Stop burning things up in the

312
00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:43.370
atmosphere.

313
00:11:44.100 --> 00:11:47.090
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yes, yeah, they may have already

314
00:11:47.090 --> 00:11:50.010
learned that lesson, but um, yeah, okay,

315
00:11:50.010 --> 00:11:52.610
so that's where we're at so far. Where do we

316
00:11:52.610 --> 00:11:55.170
go from here on the astrobiology

317
00:11:55.170 --> 00:11:55.690
train?

318
00:11:55.850 --> 00:11:58.210
Jonti Horner: Well, where we moved to in the latter part of

319
00:11:58.210 --> 00:12:00.330
the last astrobiology episode

320
00:12:00.890 --> 00:12:03.790
was my argument that

321
00:12:03.790 --> 00:12:05.590
you can't just look at a planet and say it's

322
00:12:05.590 --> 00:12:07.750
at the right temperature in the habitable

323
00:12:07.750 --> 00:12:10.070
zone. Um, we can look There. Whee.

324
00:12:10.630 --> 00:12:12.990
It kind of feels a bit like that when you

325
00:12:12.990 --> 00:12:15.030
read a lot of storeys, that the only

326
00:12:15.030 --> 00:12:16.990
consideration that comes into play is how far

327
00:12:16.990 --> 00:12:19.190
the planet is from its star. And I think

328
00:12:19.270 --> 00:12:21.510
instead, it's fairer to say that there are a

329
00:12:21.590 --> 00:12:24.470
huge variety of factors that can make

330
00:12:24.470 --> 00:12:27.310
one planet more or less suitable for the

331
00:12:27.310 --> 00:12:28.870
development of life and therefore for the

332
00:12:28.870 --> 00:12:31.510
observability of life on planets around other

333
00:12:31.510 --> 00:12:33.800
stars. And therefore, given that the

334
00:12:33.800 --> 00:12:35.440
observations to find life are going to be

335
00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:37.440
overwhelmingly the hardest we've ever had to

336
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.040
carry out, we'll have hundreds, if not

337
00:12:40.040 --> 00:12:41.640
thousands of targets to choose from, but

338
00:12:41.640 --> 00:12:43.440
we'll only be able to look at a tiny handful

339
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.080
of them in detail at first. So we need to be

340
00:12:46.080 --> 00:12:48.600
very careful about where we look. The

341
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.960
proximity of the planet and its host star to

342
00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:53.320
the sun will be important because the closer

343
00:12:53.320 --> 00:12:55.440
the star is to a zombie we get for a given

344
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:58.120
brightness of star, and also the more widely

345
00:12:58.120 --> 00:13:00.520
separated on the sky a star and planet will

346
00:13:00.520 --> 00:13:02.760
be for a given orbital distance between them.

347
00:13:02.920 --> 00:13:04.560
Closer they are, the more widely separated

348
00:13:04.560 --> 00:13:06.620
they are. And while people listening can't

349
00:13:06.620 --> 00:13:08.860
see this, I'm at the minute pointing fingers

350
00:13:08.860 --> 00:13:10.540
up at the side of my eyes to Andrew and then

351
00:13:10.540 --> 00:13:12.340
moving them towards the camera. Fingers are

352
00:13:12.340 --> 00:13:14.180
the same distance apart, but they get wider

353
00:13:14.180 --> 00:13:15.740
and wider apart on the screen as they get

354
00:13:15.740 --> 00:13:18.340
closer. Yeah. So there are clear reasons that

355
00:13:18.340 --> 00:13:21.099
we will look at stars that are nearer to

356
00:13:21.099 --> 00:13:23.740
us rather than further away. But beyond

357
00:13:23.740 --> 00:13:25.740
that, I think it's really important to

358
00:13:25.740 --> 00:13:28.740
consider all the different things that could

359
00:13:28.820 --> 00:13:30.900
factor in to make a given planet more

360
00:13:30.900 --> 00:13:33.770
suitable or less suitable for the

361
00:13:33.770 --> 00:13:35.970
development of life, and view them as like

362
00:13:36.290 --> 00:13:38.850
sliders on a mixing board in a sound studio,

363
00:13:39.170 --> 00:13:41.810
where you can fine tune things to see which

364
00:13:41.810 --> 00:13:43.610
gets the best sound, which gets the best

365
00:13:43.610 --> 00:13:46.490
score. You can rank your targets and

366
00:13:46.490 --> 00:13:48.450
you can start with the most promising ones,

367
00:13:48.450 --> 00:13:50.930
because with limited resources, you don't

368
00:13:50.930 --> 00:13:52.650
just want to do an unbiased survey, you want

369
00:13:52.650 --> 00:13:54.530
to instead maximise your chances of a

370
00:13:54.530 --> 00:13:56.930
positive result. Now, we're heavily biassed.

371
00:13:56.930 --> 00:13:58.890
We only know of one kind of life and that's

372
00:13:58.890 --> 00:14:01.410
Earth life. So we are very biassed towards

373
00:14:01.410 --> 00:14:03.410
looking for places that could support life

374
00:14:03.710 --> 00:14:05.630
like Earth life, because that's the only kind

375
00:14:05.630 --> 00:14:08.310
of life we do know exists that'll factor into

376
00:14:08.310 --> 00:14:10.510
it as well. But in the previous episode,

377
00:14:10.510 --> 00:14:12.430
towards the end, we talked about the way in

378
00:14:12.430 --> 00:14:13.990
which the location in the galaxy could

379
00:14:13.990 --> 00:14:16.510
potentially influence this, with the caveat,

380
00:14:16.510 --> 00:14:17.670
of course, that, uh, we're going to be

381
00:14:17.670 --> 00:14:19.190
looking at everything nearby. So whilst

382
00:14:19.190 --> 00:14:20.870
that's interesting scientifically, it's not

383
00:14:20.870 --> 00:14:23.190
that relevant. And then we also talked about

384
00:14:23.190 --> 00:14:25.430
the way that the nature of the stars that the

385
00:14:25.430 --> 00:14:28.380
planet orbits can influence things. And uh,

386
00:14:28.430 --> 00:14:30.020
not just from the point of view of is a star,

387
00:14:30.020 --> 00:14:32.910
ah, stable or single, but down to more subtle

388
00:14:32.910 --> 00:14:35.070
things like the fact that stars brighten over

389
00:14:35.070 --> 00:14:37.330
time. So just because a planet is in the

390
00:14:37.330 --> 00:14:39.570
habitable zone now doesn't mean it's been in

391
00:14:39.570 --> 00:14:42.090
that zone for long enough for life to become

392
00:14:42.090 --> 00:14:42.770
well established.

393
00:14:42.770 --> 00:14:45.170
So we talked about all that, where we

394
00:14:45.170 --> 00:14:47.610
finished up though we didn't get to my own

395
00:14:48.170 --> 00:14:50.050
personal favourite parts of the science and

396
00:14:50.050 --> 00:14:52.170
the stuff I'm more directly involved with,

397
00:14:52.890 --> 00:14:54.850
which are the more local influences on the

398
00:14:54.850 --> 00:14:57.090
planet, that is the influence of the

399
00:14:57.090 --> 00:14:59.050
planetary system in which that planet moves,

400
00:14:59.050 --> 00:15:00.770
all the other planets and all the debris

401
00:15:00.770 --> 00:15:03.690
therein, but also the impact of the planet

402
00:15:03.690 --> 00:15:06.050
itself, what it's made of, how it behaves.

403
00:15:06.050 --> 00:15:07.830
And there's a lot of subtlety in that that.

404
00:15:08.070 --> 00:15:10.430
When I prepared with my old mentor, Professor

405
00:15:10.430 --> 00:15:12.870
Barry Jones this review article on this 16

406
00:15:12.870 --> 00:15:15.670
years ago now, we dug into and it

407
00:15:15.670 --> 00:15:18.390
highlighted to me how none of these questions

408
00:15:18.390 --> 00:15:20.230
can be answered from people within a single

409
00:15:20.230 --> 00:15:23.030
research silo at all. You need researchers

410
00:15:23.030 --> 00:15:24.670
from all different disciplines of human

411
00:15:24.670 --> 00:15:27.510
experience, from the sciences, the biological

412
00:15:27.510 --> 00:15:29.830
sciences, physical sciences, geosciences,

413
00:15:29.830 --> 00:15:31.830
chemistry and astronomers all to come

414
00:15:31.830 --> 00:15:34.830
together. You probably also need philosophers

415
00:15:34.830 --> 00:15:36.430
and archaeologists to come into the

416
00:15:36.430 --> 00:15:38.280
discussion to talk about, about how we look

417
00:15:38.280 --> 00:15:40.400
and why we look and what we look for. And

418
00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:43.120
that's particularly true when we start moving

419
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:46.080
from simple life to life that could talk

420
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:48.560
back to us. And a very dear friend of mine in

421
00:15:48.560 --> 00:15:50.480
Australia who Fred Watson probably knows very

422
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:52.680
well as well is Professor Alice Gorman down

423
00:15:52.680 --> 00:15:55.280
at Adelaide, who's a space archaeologist and

424
00:15:55.280 --> 00:15:57.680
has given some of the most astonishing and

425
00:15:57.680 --> 00:15:59.480
mind blowing talks I've ever seen from the

426
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:01.680
point of view of someone who is trained in

427
00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:04.480
archaeology looking at the record of human

428
00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:06.440
space flight and what we should do to

429
00:16:06.440 --> 00:16:08.440
preserve artefacts like the Apollo landing

430
00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:09.980
site for future generations. Generations how

431
00:16:09.980 --> 00:16:11.060
we should consider that

432
00:16:13.300 --> 00:16:14.900
Andrew Dunkley: I absolutely agree because

433
00:16:16.180 --> 00:16:19.100
it was probably one of the

434
00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:21.860
greatest achievements in human history, if

435
00:16:21.860 --> 00:16:23.780
not the greatest achievement in human

436
00:16:23.780 --> 00:16:25.940
history. I mean inventing the wheel probably

437
00:16:25.940 --> 00:16:27.740
would have been a pretty cool thing too, but

438
00:16:27.740 --> 00:16:29.340
I don't know where that happened or when and

439
00:16:29.340 --> 00:16:31.980
they never would have thought to commemorate

440
00:16:31.980 --> 00:16:34.820
it. But um, it is something that

441
00:16:34.820 --> 00:16:37.000
should, should, you know, when we eventually

442
00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:39.480
have permanent residents on the moon,

443
00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:42.200
at least need to put a cyclone fence around

444
00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:44.520
it just for the time being until we can build

445
00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:48.080
a proper structure to protect

446
00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:48.320
it.

447
00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:49.880
Jonti Horner: Probably a good place to have rabbit proof

448
00:16:49.880 --> 00:16:51.960
fence because that will, that'll do the job.

449
00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:55.000
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yeah, well, you know that rabbits will

450
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:57.600
ultimately be on the moon. They tend to be

451
00:16:57.600 --> 00:16:58.100
everywhere else.

452
00:16:58.100 --> 00:17:00.480
Jonti Horner: Um, now one of the greatest conference talks

453
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:02.400
ever witnessed actually was a talk by a list

454
00:17:02.400 --> 00:17:03.920
talking about archaeology. And it was from

455
00:17:03.920 --> 00:17:06.730
the education and biases

456
00:17:06.730 --> 00:17:08.290
point of view. And I know this is already a

457
00:17:08.290 --> 00:17:10.290
bit off topic, but it's a storey I think

458
00:17:10.290 --> 00:17:12.370
really well worth repeating. Alice is an

459
00:17:12.370 --> 00:17:14.210
archaeologist and so she teaches archaeology

460
00:17:14.210 --> 00:17:16.850
students and she gave this talk about how she

461
00:17:16.850 --> 00:17:18.770
took a group of her uh, final year students

462
00:17:19.250 --> 00:17:21.410
to this site in Fairlie Regional New South

463
00:17:21.410 --> 00:17:24.250
Wales for a two day dig. Basically go out

464
00:17:24.250 --> 00:17:25.770
there, dig and come back to me with what you

465
00:17:25.770 --> 00:17:27.290
find and tell me about the storey of the

466
00:17:27.290 --> 00:17:29.890
site. And after two days all these

467
00:17:30.130 --> 00:17:31.730
young students came back and said, look, we

468
00:17:31.730 --> 00:17:33.250
didn't really find much, we found a few

469
00:17:33.930 --> 00:17:35.610
Aboriginal artefacts and that's kind of

470
00:17:35.610 --> 00:17:37.210
interesting, but all we found was a load of

471
00:17:37.210 --> 00:17:38.930
rubbish. We found all these blooming cable

472
00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:40.850
ties and bits of plastic that are polluting

473
00:17:40.850 --> 00:17:43.810
the site. What she then went on to do

474
00:17:43.810 --> 00:17:46.210
was the whole point was that the cable ties

475
00:17:46.210 --> 00:17:48.170
were actually the archaeology that she was

476
00:17:48.170 --> 00:17:50.420
interested in. So she went um, on and um,

477
00:17:50.810 --> 00:17:52.490
said in the talk that this was an old

478
00:17:52.490 --> 00:17:54.730
decommissioned listening station that had

479
00:17:54.730 --> 00:17:56.730
been built I think in like the late 1940s,

480
00:17:56.730 --> 00:17:58.610
post World War II, and operated into maybe

481
00:17:58.610 --> 00:18:00.930
the late 60s, early 70s before being

482
00:18:00.930 --> 00:18:03.530
demolished and removed. But by looking at the

483
00:18:03.530 --> 00:18:05.430
cable ties where they'd been identified had

484
00:18:05.900 --> 00:18:08.060
knowing a little bit about how cable ties and

485
00:18:08.060 --> 00:18:10.060
cable tie technology changed over the years,

486
00:18:10.620 --> 00:18:12.820
you could not only map out exactly where all

487
00:18:12.820 --> 00:18:14.380
the buildings had been and where the wire

488
00:18:14.380 --> 00:18:16.300
runs have been and get the structure of this

489
00:18:16.700 --> 00:18:19.620
long vanished building, you could also

490
00:18:19.620 --> 00:18:21.970
work out which bits were built when. And um,

491
00:18:22.220 --> 00:18:24.260
the whole importance here was partly that

492
00:18:24.260 --> 00:18:25.660
whole thing of one man's trash is another

493
00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:28.060
man's treasure, but it's also how

494
00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:30.870
as a scientist and a researcher, uh,

495
00:18:31.520 --> 00:18:34.000
you will miss things and you'll make mistakes

496
00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:36.760
because of your own personal biases that are

497
00:18:36.760 --> 00:18:39.720
quite often unconscious. And in this case for

498
00:18:39.720 --> 00:18:40.920
these students who've been studying

499
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:43.560
archaeology, their unconscious bias was that

500
00:18:43.560 --> 00:18:46.080
anything modern is not archaeology. That's

501
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.440
rubbish in the way of good archaeology. And

502
00:18:48.440 --> 00:18:50.240
so they totally miss the point. And it's a

503
00:18:50.240 --> 00:18:52.480
fabulous learning thing. It's why as

504
00:18:52.480 --> 00:18:54.680
scientists we use statistics so much. I know

505
00:18:54.680 --> 00:18:56.440
there's all this stuff about you can show

506
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:58.200
anything with statistics, damn lies and

507
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.160
statistics, all the rest of it. But

508
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:01.920
fundamentally the reason that we use

509
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:04.580
statistics as a tool school is because we as

510
00:19:04.580 --> 00:19:06.460
humans are biassed we've got this incredible

511
00:19:06.460 --> 00:19:09.380
evolutionary ability to see patterns when

512
00:19:09.380 --> 00:19:11.780
they're barely there, but we also have a very

513
00:19:11.780 --> 00:19:13.740
strong ability to see patterns that we expect

514
00:19:13.740 --> 00:19:15.580
to see when those patterns aren't actually

515
00:19:15.580 --> 00:19:18.340
there. And, um, that's certainly true of the

516
00:19:18.340 --> 00:19:20.260
canals on Mars. You know, Giovanni

517
00:19:20.260 --> 00:19:23.060
Schiaparelli saw these canals, these

518
00:19:23.060 --> 00:19:25.740
channels on, um, Mars, which I think the best

519
00:19:25.740 --> 00:19:27.660
explanation is that Mars was really bright.

520
00:19:27.660 --> 00:19:29.100
He had a big telescope and he was actually

521
00:19:29.100 --> 00:19:30.740
seeing the projection of his own capillaries

522
00:19:30.740 --> 00:19:33.100
in his eye, like I'm gonna see tomorrow when

523
00:19:33.100 --> 00:19:34.740
I get my eye test at the opticians and they

524
00:19:34.740 --> 00:19:37.060
do the bright light thing. But all these

525
00:19:37.060 --> 00:19:38.900
other observers with less good eyes and less

526
00:19:38.900 --> 00:19:40.860
good telescopes suddenly started seeing the

527
00:19:40.860 --> 00:19:43.660
canals. And it's this

528
00:19:43.660 --> 00:19:45.620
whole thing of when you're really straining

529
00:19:45.620 --> 00:19:47.140
at the limits of your vision, you see what

530
00:19:47.140 --> 00:19:48.820
you think you're going to see, not what there

531
00:19:48.820 --> 00:19:51.540
actually is. And that's true with our data.

532
00:19:51.540 --> 00:19:54.420
Uh, therefore, you use statistics

533
00:19:54.420 --> 00:19:55.900
to give you a feel for whether what you're

534
00:19:55.900 --> 00:19:57.980
seeing is significant or not, or whether it

535
00:19:57.980 --> 00:20:00.260
exists in the first place. And that's a way

536
00:20:00.260 --> 00:20:03.260
of us combating those biases. Now, that wasn'

537
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:05.440
in that way to the archaeology students who

538
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:07.160
thought that cable ties were rubbish, but it

539
00:20:07.160 --> 00:20:10.080
was a fabulous reminder of how we really

540
00:20:10.080 --> 00:20:12.320
need to be aware not only of the explicit

541
00:20:12.320 --> 00:20:14.520
biases, which are the things we choose to do.

542
00:20:15.560 --> 00:20:18.320
If they're doing a survey of people on hair

543
00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:20.040
loss and they say we interviewed men between

544
00:20:20.040 --> 00:20:23.040
18 and 30, that's clearly biassed to

545
00:20:23.040 --> 00:20:25.280
be for men between 18 and 30, not for men of

546
00:20:25.280 --> 00:20:27.680
our age, for example. That's an explicit

547
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:29.400
bias, it's one that's a conscious choice.

548
00:20:29.800 --> 00:20:31.680
Implicit biases are the sneaky ones, where

549
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:33.770
you don't realise you're making them. And

550
00:20:33.770 --> 00:20:35.650
that's why I've made it so clear up front

551
00:20:35.650 --> 00:20:37.890
here that we can imagine

552
00:20:38.370 --> 00:20:40.690
all kinds of life. Science fiction does it

553
00:20:40.690 --> 00:20:43.460
wonderfully, but our implicit bias is that,

554
00:20:43.460 --> 00:20:44.890
uh, when we talk about the search for life,

555
00:20:44.890 --> 00:20:46.690
at least in the very short term, we're

556
00:20:46.690 --> 00:20:49.049
actually looking for life like us, not you

557
00:20:49.049 --> 00:20:51.890
and I, but lifelike Earth, uh, life based on

558
00:20:51.890 --> 00:20:54.090
a planet with oceans, living on the surface,

559
00:20:54.090 --> 00:20:56.330
modifying the atmosphere, because that's the

560
00:20:56.330 --> 00:20:58.130
one kind of life we know exists, but also

561
00:20:58.690 --> 00:21:00.440
because that's the one kind of life we could

562
00:21:00.440 --> 00:21:02.600
probably identify with our observations. Life

563
00:21:02.600 --> 00:21:05.440
beneath the ice on Europa is fascinating, but

564
00:21:05.440 --> 00:21:07.600
we can't see it in the solar system. We

565
00:21:07.600 --> 00:21:09.880
wouldn't have a prayer if Europa was found

566
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:11.640
orbiting another star, because the ice is in

567
00:21:11.640 --> 00:21:14.400
the way life on a surface that modifies an

568
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:16.319
atmosphere is at least something we

569
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:18.680
theoretically could detect. So that's making

570
00:21:18.680 --> 00:21:20.680
the implicit explicit.

571
00:21:21.800 --> 00:21:23.960
Andrew Dunkley: Gotcha. All right, we're gonna take a breath,

572
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:27.160
uh, and get back to Astrobiology Part 2

573
00:21:27.560 --> 00:21:29.000
on Space Nuts.

574
00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:32.780
Let's take a little break from the to tell

575
00:21:32.780 --> 00:21:35.460
you about online, uh, security with our

576
00:21:35.460 --> 00:21:38.460
sponsor NordVPN. Now, ah, you

577
00:21:38.460 --> 00:21:40.980
probably heard us talk about NORDVPN before.

578
00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:43.260
Uh, they've been with us for a long time and

579
00:21:43.260 --> 00:21:45.260
we really appreciate it. But there's a good

580
00:21:45.260 --> 00:21:47.780
reason for that. It's something that we

581
00:21:47.859 --> 00:21:50.660
actually use, me personally, uh, especially

582
00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:53.220
when travelling. In fact, last year when Judy

583
00:21:53.220 --> 00:21:55.380
and I were overseas, we ran into a situation

584
00:21:55.380 --> 00:21:58.270
where some of our everyday online apps

585
00:21:58.270 --> 00:22:01.150
on our phones just wouldn't work. Our

586
00:22:01.150 --> 00:22:03.390
banking app for example. And that was crucial

587
00:22:03.630 --> 00:22:05.790
because we were actually selling a house

588
00:22:05.790 --> 00:22:08.790
while we were on a cruise ship. Yeah, don't

589
00:22:08.790 --> 00:22:11.460
ask. It was, it was a strange situation but

590
00:22:11.460 --> 00:22:13.709
uh, we needed access to our bank accounts to

591
00:22:13.709 --> 00:22:16.630
make all that happen and NORDVPN was

592
00:22:16.630 --> 00:22:19.350
there for us. Uh, I even got to watch sport

593
00:22:19.350 --> 00:22:21.990
back home even though we were geofenced out

594
00:22:21.990 --> 00:22:24.750
of the district because we were over in, in

595
00:22:24.910 --> 00:22:27.270
the Mediterranean or somewhere like that. So

596
00:22:27.270 --> 00:22:30.190
with NordVPN, I was able to log in and watch

597
00:22:30.190 --> 00:22:32.510
the football back home. It lets you

598
00:22:32.590 --> 00:22:34.990
securely connect through servers in your home

599
00:22:34.990 --> 00:22:37.550
country, so your apps will behave like

600
00:22:37.710 --> 00:22:40.549
you're at home. Uh, but it's not just

601
00:22:40.549 --> 00:22:43.310
about access, it's about protection. NORDVPN

602
00:22:43.310 --> 00:22:45.910
encrypts your Internet traffic, so whether

603
00:22:45.910 --> 00:22:48.710
you're uh, on public WI fi or on your home

604
00:22:48.710 --> 00:22:51.310
network, your data is shielded from hackers

605
00:22:51.310 --> 00:22:53.450
and trackers and other unwanted snooping.

606
00:22:54.330 --> 00:22:56.290
It also has a built in threat protection

607
00:22:56.290 --> 00:22:59.210
system which can block malicious websites and

608
00:22:59.210 --> 00:23:01.770
annoying ads and even prevent malware

609
00:23:01.770 --> 00:23:04.490
downloads before they happen. And

610
00:23:04.570 --> 00:23:07.050
setting it up, very easy. One click and

611
00:23:07.050 --> 00:23:09.650
you're protected across multiple devices. Up

612
00:23:09.650 --> 00:23:11.930
to six devices with one service

613
00:23:12.570 --> 00:23:14.530
right now. If you'd like to take advantage of

614
00:23:14.530 --> 00:23:17.530
a special Space Nuts listener offer, uh,

615
00:23:17.530 --> 00:23:20.270
you can head to this URL for more

616
00:23:20.270 --> 00:23:22.672
information. Nordvpn.com/spacenuts

617
00:23:23.028 --> 00:23:25.870
spacenuts to get 4 extra months

618
00:23:25.870 --> 00:23:28.350
free plus a 30 day money back

619
00:23:28.510 --> 00:23:31.150
guarantee. They can't make a much better

620
00:23:31.150 --> 00:23:32.830
offer than that, can they? That's

621
00:23:32.830 --> 00:23:34.830
nordvpn.com

622
00:23:35.870 --> 00:23:38.110
spacenuts and don't forget to use the code

623
00:23:38.110 --> 00:23:40.670
word SPACENUTS. Secure your

624
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.030
connection wherever you are in the world or

625
00:23:43.030 --> 00:23:46.000
the universe with NordVPN, uh, our

626
00:23:46.000 --> 00:23:46.600
sponsor.

627
00:23:47.560 --> 00:23:49.800
Jonti Horner: 3, 2, 1

628
00:23:50.360 --> 00:23:51.640
space nuts.

629
00:23:51.960 --> 00:23:54.520
Andrew Dunkley: And you're with Andrew Dunkley and Professor

630
00:23:54.520 --> 00:23:57.080
Jonty Horner okay, what next,

631
00:23:57.080 --> 00:23:59.480
Jonty, in this search for

632
00:23:59.560 --> 00:24:01.000
extraterrestrial life?

633
00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:03.600
Jonti Horner: Well, I think we come back to moving away

634
00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:05.640
from the diversions of archaeology and stuff

635
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:08.360
to the factors that could make a planet more

636
00:24:08.360 --> 00:24:11.000
or less suitable as a target. And like I

637
00:24:11.000 --> 00:24:12.440
said, we talked about the galaxy, we talked

638
00:24:12.440 --> 00:24:15.320
about the stars. To me, as a person who

639
00:24:15.320 --> 00:24:16.640
comes originally from a solar system

640
00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:18.380
background, particularly fascinated with

641
00:24:18.380 --> 00:24:20.260
comets and asteroids and stuff like that,

642
00:24:21.300 --> 00:24:23.660
there are a lot of factors that have been

643
00:24:23.660 --> 00:24:26.340
proposed that relate to

644
00:24:26.580 --> 00:24:28.460
the interaction of planets and the

645
00:24:28.460 --> 00:24:30.180
interaction with the debris that's around

646
00:24:30.580 --> 00:24:32.420
that could render planets more or less

647
00:24:32.420 --> 00:24:35.300
suitable as targets. Now one

648
00:24:35.300 --> 00:24:37.620
example of this is the stability of orbits.

649
00:24:37.620 --> 00:24:40.020
You know, there are a variety of different

650
00:24:40.340 --> 00:24:42.500
models of the solar system's youth, some of

651
00:24:42.500 --> 00:24:44.100
which suggest that there were periods of

652
00:24:44.340 --> 00:24:46.740
chaotic instability where the planets orbits

653
00:24:46.740 --> 00:24:49.130
got stirred up, planets maybe even swapped

654
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.880
orbits. Now this is the kind of thing we can

655
00:24:51.880 --> 00:24:53.600
model. And when we discover planetary

656
00:24:53.600 --> 00:24:56.480
systems, we can take the planets that we

657
00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:58.840
think are there and put them into computer

658
00:24:58.840 --> 00:25:00.760
software to run their orbits forward and back

659
00:25:00.760 --> 00:25:03.160
in time to see how they behave. And that's

660
00:25:03.160 --> 00:25:05.280
actually part of my day to day work. That's

661
00:25:05.760 --> 00:25:08.400
the technology I use and lots of tools I've

662
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:10.280
used in the past to kill planetary systems

663
00:25:10.280 --> 00:25:12.400
that people thought were there because I run

664
00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:14.120
simulations and showed they're simply not

665
00:25:14.120 --> 00:25:15.620
stable on very short timescales.

666
00:25:17.130 --> 00:25:18.930
But on longer time scales, these kind of

667
00:25:18.930 --> 00:25:21.930
perturbations can have a significant impact

668
00:25:22.170 --> 00:25:24.730
on the orbits of planets. You can get

669
00:25:24.730 --> 00:25:27.370
significant shifts over time. You can get

670
00:25:27.370 --> 00:25:29.890
encounters and stirring up, which means

671
00:25:29.890 --> 00:25:32.050
sometimes that a planet will be on an orbit

672
00:25:32.050 --> 00:25:34.690
now that is not the orbit it's occupied in

673
00:25:34.690 --> 00:25:37.010
the past. And uh, those are things that we

674
00:25:37.010 --> 00:25:38.650
could probably pull out, tease out from the

675
00:25:38.650 --> 00:25:40.850
simulation kind of work that I do. And

676
00:25:40.850 --> 00:25:42.710
obviously a planet that is now in the

677
00:25:43.340 --> 00:25:45.140
habitable zone, um, but that was previously

678
00:25:45.140 --> 00:25:47.860
well outside it would not be a good place to

679
00:25:47.860 --> 00:25:50.660
look. Even though it looks good now, it's not

680
00:25:50.660 --> 00:25:52.900
great. It's like, I guess, you know, you've

681
00:25:52.900 --> 00:25:54.820
got two petri dishes in front of you that you

682
00:25:54.820 --> 00:25:56.300
could look at for life, but you can tell that

683
00:25:56.300 --> 00:25:58.020
one of them's been absolutely melted in a

684
00:25:58.020 --> 00:26:00.420
fire. It's at room temperature now, but that

685
00:26:00.420 --> 00:26:02.620
doesn't mean it always has been that same

686
00:26:02.620 --> 00:26:04.820
kind of idea. So that on a coarse scale has

687
00:26:04.820 --> 00:26:06.660
an effect. But there's a subtler version of

688
00:26:06.660 --> 00:26:08.660
that that I've done a little bit of work on

689
00:26:08.660 --> 00:26:10.940
in the past. And I've got a PhD student

690
00:26:10.940 --> 00:26:12.560
working with me at the moment minute, who's

691
00:26:12.560 --> 00:26:13.720
going to look into this a lot more. A

692
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:16.280
wonderful student called Amber Tilly. It's

693
00:26:16.280 --> 00:26:18.040
the idea of the Milankovitch cycles.

694
00:26:19.080 --> 00:26:22.040
Now, on Earth, we

695
00:26:22.120 --> 00:26:24.280
look at climate change in the short term as

696
00:26:24.280 --> 00:26:26.960
being a big problem because it's a very rapid

697
00:26:26.960 --> 00:26:29.000
change that is being caused by human action.

698
00:26:29.480 --> 00:26:32.160
But on much longer timescales, the climate of

699
00:26:32.160 --> 00:26:34.840
Earth is periodically variable. We've had ice

700
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.160
ages and interglacial periods for the last 2

701
00:26:37.160 --> 00:26:39.850
or 3 million years, which are the direct

702
00:26:39.850 --> 00:26:42.290
result of the subtle nudges and tweaks on

703
00:26:42.290 --> 00:26:44.410
the, uh, Earth from all the other objects in

704
00:26:44.410 --> 00:26:46.370
the solar system, primarily the other

705
00:26:46.370 --> 00:26:48.770
planets, and not mainly Jupiter to be honest.

706
00:26:48.770 --> 00:26:51.570
But most of the planets contribute. These are

707
00:26:51.570 --> 00:26:54.170
called the Milankovitch cycles. They have a

708
00:26:54.170 --> 00:26:56.610
number of effects. Firstly, the Earth on its

709
00:26:56.610 --> 00:26:59.490
axis precesses. It wobbles with a period of

710
00:26:59.490 --> 00:27:02.450
about 23,000 years. So our polar

711
00:27:02.450 --> 00:27:04.890
axis, which is tilted by currently 23 and a

712
00:27:04.890 --> 00:27:07.280
half degrees to the plane of our orbit,

713
00:27:07.520 --> 00:27:09.880
wobbles around like a kid's wobbly spinning

714
00:27:09.880 --> 00:27:12.360
toy coming to a stop. It precesses, wobbles

715
00:27:12.360 --> 00:27:13.880
around a bit like the thing in Inception

716
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:16.000
about to fall over. You see this procession?

717
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:18.720
That's a procession of the equinoxes. That's

718
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:20.400
why your horoscopes are wrong. While it's one

719
00:27:20.400 --> 00:27:22.080
of the many reasons that your horoscopes are

720
00:27:22.080 --> 00:27:23.560
wrong, but it's particularly why your

721
00:27:23.560 --> 00:27:26.520
horoscopes are out by one particular one

722
00:27:26.520 --> 00:27:29.440
full calendar month. Because the

723
00:27:29.440 --> 00:27:31.850
horoscopes are based on where the sun is, was

724
00:27:31.850 --> 00:27:34.730
in the sky at that date 2,000 years ago.

725
00:27:35.050 --> 00:27:37.130
And, um, the axis of the Earth has wobbled

726
00:27:37.130 --> 00:27:38.890
round, so it's now one constellation round.

727
00:27:39.610 --> 00:27:42.130
So when the sun is in Aries, according to

728
00:27:42.130 --> 00:27:44.090
your horoscope, it's actually now in Pisces,

729
00:27:45.290 --> 00:27:47.529
all because of the wobble. That wobble takes

730
00:27:47.529 --> 00:27:50.410
23,000 years to complete. That means that

731
00:27:50.410 --> 00:27:52.610
the direction that the Earth is pointing

732
00:27:52.610 --> 00:27:55.570
changes over time. Essentially. Added

733
00:27:55.570 --> 00:27:57.730
to that, you've got a very slight wobble up

734
00:27:57.730 --> 00:27:59.650
and down where the tilt fire axis, which is

735
00:27:59.650 --> 00:28:02.290
currently 23 and a half degrees, changes from

736
00:28:02.290 --> 00:28:04.830
about 22 to, to 24 degrees, rocking back and

737
00:28:04.830 --> 00:28:07.070
forward. So that causes the size of the

738
00:28:07.070 --> 00:28:09.150
Arctic and Antarctic circles to grow and

739
00:28:09.150 --> 00:28:12.150
shrink very slightly. On um, top of all that,

740
00:28:12.150 --> 00:28:13.710
you've then got the Earth's orbit around the

741
00:28:13.710 --> 00:28:16.390
sun flexing and tilting. Its shape

742
00:28:16.390 --> 00:28:18.710
becomes more circular and more elongated,

743
00:28:19.189 --> 00:28:21.670
more eccentric. With a longer period period,

744
00:28:21.670 --> 00:28:23.910
I think about 100,000 years, something like

745
00:28:23.910 --> 00:28:26.310
that, our orbit, compared to the orbits of

746
00:28:26.310 --> 00:28:28.830
Jupiter and Saturn, tilts a little bit up and

747
00:28:28.830 --> 00:28:31.270
down the inclination changes, which adds to

748
00:28:31.270 --> 00:28:33.590
the change of the tilt in our spin axis a

749
00:28:33.590 --> 00:28:36.290
little bit. We also have the Earth's orbit

750
00:28:36.290 --> 00:28:37.930
precessing around in just the same way our

751
00:28:37.930 --> 00:28:39.690
poles do, and that's a little bit harder to

752
00:28:39.690 --> 00:28:42.370
visualise. But what that means is that the

753
00:28:42.530 --> 00:28:45.490
direction, if you drew a line from the sun

754
00:28:45.570 --> 00:28:47.240
through the Earth and out into space at, ah,

755
00:28:47.290 --> 00:28:49.770
the point the Earth was at perihelion closest

756
00:28:49.770 --> 00:28:52.490
to the sun, that direction will

757
00:28:52.490 --> 00:28:54.410
gradually move round over time, doing a full

758
00:28:54.410 --> 00:28:56.490
lap with a period of several tens of

759
00:28:56.490 --> 00:28:58.650
thousands of years. So our perihelion

760
00:28:58.650 --> 00:29:01.360
possession processes as well, all of the,

761
00:29:01.590 --> 00:29:04.390
that combined means that, uh,

762
00:29:04.390 --> 00:29:06.830
on average the amount of energy reaching the

763
00:29:06.830 --> 00:29:08.870
Earth's polar regions, averaged over a given

764
00:29:08.870 --> 00:29:11.870
year, varies with type. Sometimes the

765
00:29:11.870 --> 00:29:13.910
poles get a bit more energy and the ice

766
00:29:14.070 --> 00:29:16.590
sheets retreat. Sometimes they get a bit less

767
00:29:16.590 --> 00:29:18.190
energy and the ice sheets come back towards

768
00:29:18.190 --> 00:29:20.390
the equator again. Now, there's a lot of

769
00:29:20.390 --> 00:29:22.110
complex feedback from the Earth because ice

770
00:29:22.110 --> 00:29:24.830
is more reflective than water or land. So

771
00:29:24.830 --> 00:29:26.750
when ice is growing, it has a tendency to

772
00:29:26.750 --> 00:29:29.320
keep growing, and when it's shrinking, that

773
00:29:29.320 --> 00:29:31.320
has a tendency to run away as well. So you've

774
00:29:31.320 --> 00:29:33.800
got all these different feedbacks. But what

775
00:29:33.800 --> 00:29:35.520
that means is that on the Earth we've got

776
00:29:35.520 --> 00:29:38.480
these periodic variations in the

777
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:40.160
amount of energy at the poles which lead to

778
00:29:40.160 --> 00:29:42.200
periodic glaciations and interglacial

779
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:44.680
periods. That's the Milankovitch cycles.

780
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:47.200
It means that on timescales of tens of

781
00:29:47.200 --> 00:29:49.240
thousands of years, our climate is relatively

782
00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:52.040
changeable. What would

783
00:29:52.040 --> 00:29:54.720
happen if the planets were on different

784
00:29:54.720 --> 00:29:57.630
orbits or if you were in a

785
00:29:57.630 --> 00:29:59.310
planetary system with a totally different

786
00:29:59.310 --> 00:30:01.830
architecture? The result would be very

787
00:30:01.830 --> 00:30:04.590
different Milankovitch cycles. You'd have

788
00:30:04.590 --> 00:30:06.430
different periods and you'd also have

789
00:30:06.430 --> 00:30:08.710
different amplitudes. You could imagine

790
00:30:08.710 --> 00:30:10.710
scenarios where instead of our Earth rocking

791
00:30:10.710 --> 00:30:13.510
a little bit from 22 to 24 degrees and back

792
00:30:13.510 --> 00:30:16.030
with its polar axis, it could be like Mars,

793
00:30:16.030 --> 00:30:18.630
whose spin axis varies chaotically, can even

794
00:30:18.630 --> 00:30:21.470
tip over on its side. You could have systems

795
00:30:21.470 --> 00:30:23.150
where there's barely any change whatsoever.

796
00:30:23.150 --> 00:30:25.840
You've got this full gap. Now the beauty is,

797
00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:28.480
again, we've got the tools to test this.

798
00:30:28.800 --> 00:30:30.640
We can run the kind of computational

799
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:32.880
simulations that I've spent my career doing

800
00:30:33.120 --> 00:30:35.120
and, uh, model the orbits of a planet over

801
00:30:35.120 --> 00:30:36.640
time under the influence of all the other

802
00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:39.560
planets. And I did a lot of simulations of

803
00:30:39.560 --> 00:30:42.360
this between 2012 and 2020. I

804
00:30:42.360 --> 00:30:44.000
kept coming back to the idea, but never got

805
00:30:44.000 --> 00:30:46.400
around to publishing it until we got to 2020,

806
00:30:46.800 --> 00:30:49.160
where I published it with, um, Stephen Cain

807
00:30:49.160 --> 00:30:51.120
from University of California, Riverside. Pam

808
00:30:51.120 --> 00:30:53.280
Vervoort, who was his PhD student at the

809
00:30:53.280 --> 00:30:55.810
time, a couple of other people, people where

810
00:30:55.810 --> 00:30:58.490
we said, what is the influence of Jupiter on

811
00:30:58.490 --> 00:31:00.210
our Milankovitch cycles? What would happen if

812
00:31:00.210 --> 00:31:02.250
you move Jupiter closer to the sun or further

813
00:31:02.250 --> 00:31:04.970
away? If you made Jupiter's

814
00:31:04.970 --> 00:31:07.530
orbit more eccentric or less eccentric, how

815
00:31:07.530 --> 00:31:09.350
would that change the period and, um,

816
00:31:09.350 --> 00:31:11.210
amplitude of the Earth's? Milankovic cycles

817
00:31:12.170 --> 00:31:14.090
did the test. And in many cases, moving

818
00:31:14.090 --> 00:31:16.090
Jupiter destroyed the solar system, which

819
00:31:16.090 --> 00:31:18.250
meant the Earth wouldn't be here, which was

820
00:31:18.250 --> 00:31:21.010
kind of fun, but not very helpful. But for

821
00:31:21.010 --> 00:31:22.870
the versions of the solar system where the,

822
00:31:23.100 --> 00:31:26.060
the Earth was not removed, we got to see

823
00:31:26.060 --> 00:31:28.580
the range, the variety of Milankovitch cycles

824
00:31:28.580 --> 00:31:31.300
we would have from moving Jupiter in a bit

825
00:31:31.300 --> 00:31:33.060
closer or moving it a bit further away. And

826
00:31:33.060 --> 00:31:34.940
for those really interested, we moved Jupiter

827
00:31:34.940 --> 00:31:37.740
in as far as 3 Au from the sun, out as far as

828
00:31:37.740 --> 00:31:40.020
7 Au from the sun, where 5 Au is about where

829
00:31:40.020 --> 00:31:42.780
it is at the minute, 5.2. What we

830
00:31:42.780 --> 00:31:44.900
found, which is quite surprising, is that the

831
00:31:44.900 --> 00:31:46.860
Earth's, uh, Milankovitch cycles are neither

832
00:31:47.180 --> 00:31:49.020
unusually big or unusually small. They're

833
00:31:49.020 --> 00:31:50.810
somewhere in the middle. Middle. Which is a

834
00:31:50.810 --> 00:31:52.610
bit of an argument against a hypothesis

835
00:31:52.610 --> 00:31:55.090
called the Rare Earth hypothesis.

836
00:31:55.570 --> 00:31:58.376
This idea has been around for about 20, 25,

837
00:31:58.470 --> 00:32:01.330
30 years, and I've never really liked it.

838
00:32:01.330 --> 00:32:04.330
It's the idea that life on Earth is such a

839
00:32:04.330 --> 00:32:07.090
remarkable, incredible fluke

840
00:32:07.650 --> 00:32:09.730
that we will never find life elsewhere. And

841
00:32:09.730 --> 00:32:11.650
the authors put forward all these

842
00:32:11.650 --> 00:32:13.810
peculiarities about the Earth, uh, and argue

843
00:32:13.810 --> 00:32:15.970
that without them we would not be here.

844
00:32:16.900 --> 00:32:18.980
And it's a bit of a philosophical thing, but

845
00:32:19.300 --> 00:32:21.180
I think it's very dangerous to look at

846
00:32:21.180 --> 00:32:23.620
somewhere that has life and say, this place

847
00:32:23.620 --> 00:32:25.420
has all these unusual things and they are

848
00:32:25.420 --> 00:32:27.100
therefore required for life because we've

849
00:32:27.100 --> 00:32:29.820
never found life elsewhere. A good example is

850
00:32:29.820 --> 00:32:31.260
the presence of a large moon. And we'll talk

851
00:32:31.260 --> 00:32:33.580
about this a bit more later on. We have life

852
00:32:33.580 --> 00:32:35.380
on Earth and we have a big moon, so it's

853
00:32:35.380 --> 00:32:37.220
natural to think you need a big moon to have

854
00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:39.780
life. But we won't know that until we find

855
00:32:39.780 --> 00:32:42.380
life elsewhere. But that led to this argument

856
00:32:42.380 --> 00:32:44.500
of rare Earth life will be uncommon in the

857
00:32:44.500 --> 00:32:47.060
universe. If rare Earth were true,

858
00:32:47.460 --> 00:32:48.940
then when you look at something like the

859
00:32:48.940 --> 00:32:50.900
Milankovitch cycles, you would expect our

860
00:32:50.900 --> 00:32:52.820
Earth to be unusual in some way,

861
00:32:54.020 --> 00:32:56.660
to have conditions that favour life over your

862
00:32:56.660 --> 00:32:59.380
typical system. And we simply don't find that

863
00:32:59.380 --> 00:33:01.419
our Milankovitch cycles are fairly run of the

864
00:33:01.419 --> 00:33:03.220
mill. They're not big, they're not small,

865
00:33:03.220 --> 00:33:06.140
they're not fast. They're not slow, they're

866
00:33:06.140 --> 00:33:08.020
somewhere in the middle. Now,

867
00:33:08.810 --> 00:33:11.420
um, sorry, Pam went with that. Pam lava vault

868
00:33:11.420 --> 00:33:11.580
was.

869
00:33:11.580 --> 00:33:13.460
She then took the output of that and run it

870
00:33:13.460 --> 00:33:15.780
into climate modelling software, which was

871
00:33:15.780 --> 00:33:17.480
fabulous. And she published that work, work

872
00:33:17.480 --> 00:33:20.360
with us in 2022, where

873
00:33:20.360 --> 00:33:22.400
she was able to link the Milankovitch cycles.

874
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:24.400
We predicted if you moved Jupiter around

875
00:33:25.360 --> 00:33:28.200
with the amplitude and frequency of the

876
00:33:28.200 --> 00:33:29.960
ice ages, we'd get. And it was really

877
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:31.240
interesting because it turned out that when

878
00:33:31.240 --> 00:33:33.680
you factor in some of the feedback mechanisms

879
00:33:33.680 --> 00:33:35.840
that are in climate modelling, you actually

880
00:33:35.840 --> 00:33:37.840
could change the Earth's Milkovitch cycles a

881
00:33:37.840 --> 00:33:39.880
little bit and get very drastically different

882
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:42.560
ice ages, much more frequent and shallower,

883
00:33:42.560 --> 00:33:45.280
or much less frequent and deeper just by

884
00:33:45.280 --> 00:33:47.800
small changes. Now, now, it's all

885
00:33:47.800 --> 00:33:49.560
fascinating just from the solar system point

886
00:33:49.560 --> 00:33:51.880
of view, but what we're really doing is we're

887
00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:54.520
putting down tools that when we find

888
00:33:54.520 --> 00:33:56.840
planets that could be suitable, we can do

889
00:33:56.840 --> 00:33:58.920
these same tests. We can look at them and

890
00:33:58.920 --> 00:34:00.480
say, we're thinking that you might be a

891
00:34:00.480 --> 00:34:02.600
target for life. Let's see what your

892
00:34:02.600 --> 00:34:04.360
Melankovic cycles are like. Let's see how

893
00:34:04.360 --> 00:34:06.920
stable your climate is. And if we find

894
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:09.120
somewhere that flops between snowball Earth

895
00:34:09.120 --> 00:34:12.080
and a hothouse every 10 years, or that has

896
00:34:12.080 --> 00:34:13.960
incredibly long snowball Earth periods

897
00:34:13.960 --> 00:34:15.960
followed by short periods of temperate

898
00:34:15.960 --> 00:34:18.039
climate climate, even though everything else

899
00:34:18.039 --> 00:34:19.610
looks good, that's probably not as, uh,

900
00:34:19.679 --> 00:34:21.959
suitable for life as somewhere that is

901
00:34:21.959 --> 00:34:24.239
temperate all the time. So we can use that as

902
00:34:24.239 --> 00:34:26.519
a bit of a filter. And that's where the new

903
00:34:26.519 --> 00:34:28.519
PhD student we've got, Amber Tilly, comes in.

904
00:34:28.519 --> 00:34:30.039
Amber's, um, going to be doing the same kind

905
00:34:30.039 --> 00:34:32.399
of work, moving it forward, where she's going

906
00:34:32.399 --> 00:34:33.999
to be looking at a whole slew of different

907
00:34:33.999 --> 00:34:36.799
parameters to see how the

908
00:34:36.799 --> 00:34:39.279
Milankovitch cycles change as you vary

909
00:34:39.279 --> 00:34:41.479
things. She's both going to look at what

910
00:34:41.479 --> 00:34:42.919
would happen if the Earth was a bit more

911
00:34:42.919 --> 00:34:44.599
massive or less massive. How would that

912
00:34:44.599 --> 00:34:46.799
change things? Because of the feedback, you

913
00:34:46.799 --> 00:34:48.149
make Earth more massive, it interacts,

914
00:34:48.219 --> 00:34:49.859
interacts more with other things, stirs them

915
00:34:49.859 --> 00:34:52.739
up, you get a feedback there. She's also

916
00:34:52.739 --> 00:34:54.339
going to look, working with colleagues of

917
00:34:54.339 --> 00:34:57.139
ours overseas, at, uh, models of planet

918
00:34:57.139 --> 00:34:59.739
formation that form planetary systems similar

919
00:34:59.739 --> 00:35:02.539
to the solar system as theoretical

920
00:35:02.539 --> 00:35:04.739
data, and say, what would the Milankovitch

921
00:35:04.739 --> 00:35:07.019
cycles be like in this hypothetical system?

922
00:35:07.499 --> 00:35:09.419
So it's not just a purely hypothetical

923
00:35:09.419 --> 00:35:10.859
question, it's something we can actually dig

924
00:35:10.859 --> 00:35:13.659
into and, um, we can test. And I think

925
00:35:13.659 --> 00:35:15.379
that's fundamental to science. It's no good

926
00:35:15.379 --> 00:35:16.779
just arguing something you want to be able to

927
00:35:16.779 --> 00:35:17.520
Test. Test it.

928
00:35:18.480 --> 00:35:21.120
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. I suppose what you're suggesting is

929
00:35:21.360 --> 00:35:24.000
that by mucking around with

930
00:35:24.960 --> 00:35:27.640
what we know and making slight alterations,

931
00:35:27.640 --> 00:35:30.600
it gives you an idea of what to look

932
00:35:30.600 --> 00:35:33.560
for going forward in identifying

933
00:35:33.560 --> 00:35:34.640
potential targets.

934
00:35:34.880 --> 00:35:37.520
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And it's good because one of the

935
00:35:37.520 --> 00:35:39.080
reasons that you'd want to use the Earth is

936
00:35:39.080 --> 00:35:41.600
because we've got a ground truth. You can run

937
00:35:41.600 --> 00:35:43.080
the Earth with the current solar system

938
00:35:43.080 --> 00:35:45.080
parameters and put them into a climate model.

939
00:35:45.080 --> 00:35:47.530
And you should get what we see so we can

940
00:35:47.530 --> 00:35:49.130
ground truth it, which is really, really

941
00:35:49.130 --> 00:35:51.850
important. And, um, that is, I think, one of

942
00:35:51.850 --> 00:35:54.130
the main, most obvious ways where even in a

943
00:35:54.130 --> 00:35:56.010
dynamically stable system, a system that

944
00:35:56.010 --> 00:35:58.890
isn't tearing itself apart, interaction

945
00:35:58.890 --> 00:36:00.530
between planets could have a significant

946
00:36:00.610 --> 00:36:03.130
impact on habitability. And we want to look

947
00:36:03.130 --> 00:36:05.010
into it. It's really, really fascinating.

948
00:36:06.050 --> 00:36:08.930
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed it is. All right, um, we

949
00:36:08.930 --> 00:36:11.810
are talking astrobiology on this

950
00:36:11.970 --> 00:36:14.770
special episode of Space Nuts with Professor

951
00:36:14.770 --> 00:36:15.890
Jonty Horner.

952
00:36:15.890 --> 00:36:16.370
Back in.

953
00:36:19.310 --> 00:36:21.270
Okay, we checked all four systems and

954
00:36:21.270 --> 00:36:23.070
Jonti Horner: being with a go, space nets.

955
00:36:23.310 --> 00:36:25.950
Andrew Dunkley: Jody, I thought we might just start off

956
00:36:25.950 --> 00:36:28.670
this, uh, final segment with a

957
00:36:28.750 --> 00:36:30.910
question from the audience. Uh, it's funny

958
00:36:30.910 --> 00:36:33.590
because this question's come in before any of

959
00:36:33.590 --> 00:36:36.590
these astrobiology episodes have

960
00:36:36.590 --> 00:36:39.310
been released. And yet it's

961
00:36:39.310 --> 00:36:41.510
exactly what we've been talking about. This

962
00:36:41.510 --> 00:36:42.750
comes from Chris.

963
00:36:42.910 --> 00:36:45.630
Jonti Horner: Hi, um, I'm Chris from Axmouth in the uk.

964
00:36:46.270 --> 00:36:48.110
I'd, uh, just like to ask, um, given that

965
00:36:48.110 --> 00:36:50.690
interstellar travel to distance solar systems

966
00:36:50.690 --> 00:36:52.970
is likely to remain impractical for humans,

967
00:36:53.540 --> 00:36:55.770
um, do you think a more realistic long term

968
00:36:55.770 --> 00:36:56.970
strategy would be to

969
00:36:57.050 --> 00:36:58.970
Andrew Dunkley: seed the galaxy with the basic building

970
00:36:58.970 --> 00:37:01.690
blocks of life? Uh, for example,

971
00:37:01.860 --> 00:37:04.050
uh, sending autonomous probes carrying

972
00:37:04.050 --> 00:37:06.530
microbes or prebiotic material that could

973
00:37:06.530 --> 00:37:08.490
Jonti Horner: eventually take hold on suitable planets,

974
00:37:08.890 --> 00:37:09.210
even

975
00:37:09.210 --> 00:37:11.450
Andrew Dunkley: if that process takes thousands or millions

976
00:37:11.450 --> 00:37:11.930
of years.

977
00:37:12.490 --> 00:37:12.970
Jonti Horner: Thanks.

978
00:37:14.330 --> 00:37:16.380
Andrew Dunkley: There's a, uh, thought from Chris. So

979
00:37:17.420 --> 00:37:19.420
he's probably suggesting, you know, could we

980
00:37:19.420 --> 00:37:22.260
seed other planets? Uh, would that be

981
00:37:22.260 --> 00:37:24.780
the way to go? Uh, and autonomous,

982
00:37:25.060 --> 00:37:27.980
uh, vehicles. I think last

983
00:37:27.980 --> 00:37:29.580
time we talked about this a couple of

984
00:37:29.580 --> 00:37:32.300
episodes ago, you, you suggested it's,

985
00:37:32.300 --> 00:37:34.860
it's beyond us to actually

986
00:37:34.940 --> 00:37:37.860
send a human mission to another world

987
00:37:37.860 --> 00:37:40.860
to investigate life. But we could

988
00:37:41.340 --> 00:37:43.580
go the way of autonomous vehicles.

989
00:37:44.200 --> 00:37:46.720
Uh, but for the major

990
00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:50.730
distances, like the impossible distances, uh,

991
00:37:50.730 --> 00:37:53.240
we would have to come up with equipment in

992
00:37:53.240 --> 00:37:56.200
the future that could do it from a

993
00:37:56.200 --> 00:37:58.750
stable environment nearby. Um,

994
00:37:59.120 --> 00:38:00.440
I don't know how you want to tackle that

995
00:38:00.440 --> 00:38:00.720
question.

996
00:38:01.200 --> 00:38:02.600
Jonti Horner: There's a fair bit to it, and I mean, it

997
00:38:02.600 --> 00:38:05.200
reminds me of the wonderful Bobbyverse books

998
00:38:05.200 --> 00:38:07.160
that I've quite enjoyed. You know, um, the

999
00:38:07.160 --> 00:38:09.400
Storey of the Self Intelligent Von Neumann

1000
00:38:09.400 --> 00:38:11.800
probes, which are, uh, easy listening and

1001
00:38:11.800 --> 00:38:13.360
work very well as audiobooks.

1002
00:38:14.560 --> 00:38:17.440
It's a challenging one. So we could

1003
00:38:17.520 --> 00:38:20.400
do this. It would be feasible.

1004
00:38:20.560 --> 00:38:22.440
The question would become whether it's

1005
00:38:22.440 --> 00:38:25.440
ethical and right. Yes, and that's a really

1006
00:38:25.440 --> 00:38:27.520
challenging one. Now, there is something that

1007
00:38:27.520 --> 00:38:30.400
costs research missions

1008
00:38:30.480 --> 00:38:32.920
a vast amount of money called planetary

1009
00:38:32.920 --> 00:38:35.640
protection. And it's the idea that if we're

1010
00:38:35.640 --> 00:38:37.880
sending a spacecraft that has a possibility

1011
00:38:37.880 --> 00:38:40.870
of touching down on a place where we are

1012
00:38:40.870 --> 00:38:42.870
currently interested in looking for life,

1013
00:38:42.870 --> 00:38:45.550
where there could be life, such as Mars, such

1014
00:38:45.550 --> 00:38:48.030
as Europa, uh, Ganymede, Titan, around

1015
00:38:48.030 --> 00:38:50.910
Saturn. We don't want to take life with

1016
00:38:50.910 --> 00:38:52.630
us because you don't want to find life on

1017
00:38:52.630 --> 00:38:54.630
Mars only to discover it's what you took with

1018
00:38:54.630 --> 00:38:56.550
you. And also we don't want to pollute or

1019
00:38:56.550 --> 00:38:59.190
contaminate those environments. So there's a

1020
00:38:59.190 --> 00:39:01.750
huge amount of effort and expense, goes into

1021
00:39:02.070 --> 00:39:04.590
extreme sterilisation of spacecraft to kind

1022
00:39:04.590 --> 00:39:06.950
of prevent exactly the hypothesis being

1023
00:39:06.950 --> 00:39:08.870
discussed here. At the same time,

1024
00:39:09.870 --> 00:39:12.750
that idea of populating the galaxy with

1025
00:39:12.750 --> 00:39:15.430
simple life that could one day grow

1026
00:39:15.430 --> 00:39:18.110
to resemblers or something else has

1027
00:39:18.110 --> 00:39:20.270
cropped a few times in science fiction. I

1028
00:39:20.270 --> 00:39:23.110
believe that was how Star Trek got

1029
00:39:23.110 --> 00:39:25.910
around the fact that all of their humanoid

1030
00:39:25.910 --> 00:39:27.870
species looked like people with makeup on.

1031
00:39:28.390 --> 00:39:30.790
Um, which of course is a budgetary issue and

1032
00:39:30.790 --> 00:39:32.790
a special effects issue. But they had an

1033
00:39:32.790 --> 00:39:34.390
episode where people found the founders,

1034
00:39:34.390 --> 00:39:37.090
which were an alien, ancient alien humanoid

1035
00:39:37.090 --> 00:39:39.570
race at seed of the galaxy. And billions of

1036
00:39:39.570 --> 00:39:41.290
years later all these different planets had

1037
00:39:41.290 --> 00:39:43.530
grown humanoids that looked like them and.

1038
00:39:43.530 --> 00:39:46.050
Oh, well, convenient job done. Stop asking us

1039
00:39:46.050 --> 00:39:48.970
that question now, please. Effectively it

1040
00:39:48.970 --> 00:39:51.410
is something we could do and the timescales

1041
00:39:51.410 --> 00:39:53.250
would be immense. It's also something that,

1042
00:39:53.650 --> 00:39:55.930
in all honesty, has already happened. There's

1043
00:39:55.930 --> 00:39:58.610
this idea called panspermia, which is the

1044
00:39:58.610 --> 00:40:00.450
idea that life could be transferred through

1045
00:40:00.450 --> 00:40:02.570
space from planet to planet, carried by

1046
00:40:02.570 --> 00:40:05.450
debris from impacts and talking. Thirty or

1047
00:40:05.450 --> 00:40:07.310
40 years ago, it was viewed as very much

1048
00:40:07.310 --> 00:40:09.750
crank science, not feasible. But every

1049
00:40:09.750 --> 00:40:11.390
experiment that people have ever done

1050
00:40:11.470 --> 00:40:13.430
suggests that it could work. And I've even

1051
00:40:13.430 --> 00:40:15.630
had a PhD student just submit his thesis,

1052
00:40:16.030 --> 00:40:18.430
Greg Davis, who has been looking at this

1053
00:40:19.150 --> 00:40:20.950
from the point of view of the viability of

1054
00:40:20.950 --> 00:40:23.790
bacteria transferred from Earth to Mars or

1055
00:40:23.790 --> 00:40:26.510
Mars to Earth in the radiation environment in

1056
00:40:26.510 --> 00:40:27.950
the solar system. And it seems to work.

1057
00:40:29.470 --> 00:40:31.650
Now, to me, the fact that biological, uh,

1058
00:40:32.310 --> 00:40:34.270
material from Earth will have rained down on

1059
00:40:34.270 --> 00:40:36.230
Mars and Europa and Ganymede and everywhere

1060
00:40:36.230 --> 00:40:38.270
else for the last 4 billion years

1061
00:40:39.030 --> 00:40:40.990
probably means that we're being a bit over

1062
00:40:40.990 --> 00:40:43.190
cautious with our planet protection efforts

1063
00:40:43.190 --> 00:40:45.230
because we're trying not to take something

1064
00:40:45.230 --> 00:40:47.310
there when it's already there, it's already

1065
00:40:47.310 --> 00:40:49.310
been delivered. The other thing is that

1066
00:40:49.310 --> 00:40:51.150
anything we take with us to a place that has

1067
00:40:51.150 --> 00:40:52.790
an incredibly, incredibly different

1068
00:40:52.790 --> 00:40:55.230
environment, if there is life there already,

1069
00:40:55.230 --> 00:40:57.470
that life should hugely outcompete anything

1070
00:40:57.470 --> 00:40:59.150
we take with us because it's better adapted

1071
00:40:59.150 --> 00:41:01.590
for that environment. And that would be one

1072
00:41:01.590 --> 00:41:03.310
of the challenges with this, is sending stuff

1073
00:41:03.310 --> 00:41:05.270
out. It'd have to be lucky to get exactly the

1074
00:41:05.270 --> 00:41:06.630
right environment to grow. But with the

1075
00:41:06.630 --> 00:41:09.270
amount of real estate we've got out there it

1076
00:41:09.270 --> 00:41:12.190
could happen. People have even in some more

1077
00:41:12.190 --> 00:41:15.070
extreme sci fi suggested kind of

1078
00:41:15.310 --> 00:41:18.230
this type approach as a way to

1079
00:41:18.230 --> 00:41:20.350
begin terraforming planets ahead of human

1080
00:41:20.350 --> 00:41:21.990
arrival. This idea that you could send

1081
00:41:21.990 --> 00:41:24.670
generation ships which have to go

1082
00:41:24.830 --> 00:41:26.510
slowly because they're really big and carry a

1083
00:41:26.510 --> 00:41:28.190
lot of people. But you could send faster

1084
00:41:28.190 --> 00:41:31.030
moving, smaller things first to start

1085
00:41:31.030 --> 00:41:33.030
working on the biosphere of a planet to make

1086
00:41:33.030 --> 00:41:35.670
it so that when we get there that planet is a

1087
00:41:35.670 --> 00:41:37.230
suitable home. So there's a lot of ways it

1088
00:41:37.230 --> 00:41:40.170
could be taken. Taken. I think to do it

1089
00:41:40.170 --> 00:41:42.930
in the near future in an official organised

1090
00:41:42.930 --> 00:41:44.970
way would require a significant shift in

1091
00:41:44.970 --> 00:41:46.890
global morality in the way we think about

1092
00:41:47.130 --> 00:41:49.770
other habitats. If we found that

1093
00:41:49.770 --> 00:41:52.610
Mars absolutely has no life and

1094
00:41:52.610 --> 00:41:54.570
possibly that it never had life, which I

1095
00:41:54.570 --> 00:41:56.850
think is probably unlikely, then I could see

1096
00:41:56.850 --> 00:41:58.890
people arguing then for terraforming.

1097
00:41:58.890 --> 00:42:00.690
Similarly people have argued about, I think

1098
00:42:00.690 --> 00:42:03.290
Carl Sagan suggested this, creating

1099
00:42:03.530 --> 00:42:06.190
engineering bacteria that could float in the

1100
00:42:06.190 --> 00:42:08.750
clouds of Venus and um, precipitate out the

1101
00:42:08.750 --> 00:42:10.910
carbon to eventually make Venus a more

1102
00:42:11.150 --> 00:42:13.270
habitable planet on long timescales. The idea

1103
00:42:13.270 --> 00:42:15.790
of terraforming these worlds is real. But I

1104
00:42:15.790 --> 00:42:18.790
think it would require either a state

1105
00:42:18.790 --> 00:42:21.070
to go its own way because as we know, once

1106
00:42:21.070 --> 00:42:22.830
things are up in space, ain't nobody going to

1107
00:42:22.830 --> 00:42:24.950
stop you. Uh, as was the case with the

1108
00:42:24.950 --> 00:42:27.390
Israeli spacecraft that spattered tamigards,

1109
00:42:27.820 --> 00:42:29.750
um, water bears over the moon to show that

1110
00:42:29.750 --> 00:42:32.590
they could, which was so dumb it's untrue.

1111
00:42:33.160 --> 00:42:36.070
Um, yep, there are water bears on the moon,

1112
00:42:36.390 --> 00:42:38.310
probably desiccated and dried up, but they

1113
00:42:38.310 --> 00:42:40.390
can come back from that, we know that. Um, so

1114
00:42:40.390 --> 00:42:42.110
you could have a nation just decide to do it

1115
00:42:42.110 --> 00:42:44.630
anyway. At the end of the day, if a

1116
00:42:44.630 --> 00:42:46.670
random government decided to send a

1117
00:42:46.670 --> 00:42:49.430
spacecraft to Mars within a capsule inside

1118
00:42:49.590 --> 00:42:52.150
laden with biological bacterial life

1119
00:42:52.390 --> 00:42:55.230
to spurt out on the surface, no way we could

1120
00:42:55.230 --> 00:42:57.860
stop them. And once it's done, it's done. Um,

1121
00:42:57.990 --> 00:43:00.510
but I think the block to the question is not

1122
00:43:00.510 --> 00:43:02.070
actually a scientific one, it's an ethical

1123
00:43:02.070 --> 00:43:04.460
one and it's about how we, we choose to

1124
00:43:04.460 --> 00:43:06.300
interact with the galaxy going forward and

1125
00:43:06.300 --> 00:43:08.300
particularly our local environment. That'll

1126
00:43:08.300 --> 00:43:10.020
determine at what stage we do that, if we

1127
00:43:10.020 --> 00:43:11.380
ever do so. It's a really good question.

1128
00:43:12.100 --> 00:43:14.700
Andrew Dunkley: It is. Uh, thanks for the uh, question,

1129
00:43:14.700 --> 00:43:16.660
Chris. Uh, Chris, you might be interested to

1130
00:43:16.660 --> 00:43:19.299
look up the BBC radio science

1131
00:43:19.299 --> 00:43:22.060
fiction comedy called Paradise Lost in Space.

1132
00:43:22.060 --> 00:43:24.900
Have you heard of this one? It's so funny.

1133
00:43:24.900 --> 00:43:27.860
It's about two blokes who um, get ejected

1134
00:43:28.180 --> 00:43:30.620
from a spaceship by an exploding toilet or

1135
00:43:30.620 --> 00:43:32.940
something and they end up on a world that's

1136
00:43:32.940 --> 00:43:35.570
occupied by uh, an insect, intelligent but

1137
00:43:35.570 --> 00:43:38.210
very naive species. So

1138
00:43:38.690 --> 00:43:41.170
basically what they do is they try to

1139
00:43:41.650 --> 00:43:44.210
pass on their Earth knowledge and

1140
00:43:44.210 --> 00:43:46.130
intelligence to these, these people

1141
00:43:46.930 --> 00:43:48.930
and ultimately destroy the planet.

1142
00:43:50.850 --> 00:43:51.730
Jonti Horner: It's a perfect reflection.

1143
00:43:51.970 --> 00:43:52.330
Andrew Dunkley: Brilliant.

1144
00:43:52.330 --> 00:43:53.890
Jonti Horner: It's very funny. Yes.

1145
00:43:55.330 --> 00:43:58.290
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it's funny stuff. So yeah, it's called

1146
00:43:58.470 --> 00:44:01.450
um, Paradise Lost in Space. I

1147
00:44:01.450 --> 00:44:03.290
only remember it because we ran it as a

1148
00:44:03.290 --> 00:44:05.850
series on the ABC some years ago and, and got

1149
00:44:05.850 --> 00:44:08.530
a uh, fabulous response. And I always,

1150
00:44:08.610 --> 00:44:10.410
I sat there in the studio while we were

1151
00:44:10.410 --> 00:44:12.930
running it and I just cackled as to. Because

1152
00:44:13.490 --> 00:44:16.210
I could imagine that's what we might do.

1153
00:44:16.770 --> 00:44:19.450
Not on purpose, but um. Yeah. And it's what

1154
00:44:19.450 --> 00:44:21.650
you say, it's the ethics of sending

1155
00:44:23.090 --> 00:44:26.090
our ah, junk to other places that are already

1156
00:44:26.090 --> 00:44:28.490
occupied. Yeah. Um,

1157
00:44:29.010 --> 00:44:31.040
we're running out of time I suppose. But um,

1158
00:44:32.100 --> 00:44:33.700
how do you want to wind this up? Uh, how do

1159
00:44:33.700 --> 00:44:33.940
you.

1160
00:44:34.180 --> 00:44:36.100
There's so much to talk about, it could go on

1161
00:44:36.100 --> 00:44:36.420
for hours.

1162
00:44:36.420 --> 00:44:38.540
Jonti Horner: I know more to talk about. I think I'll carry

1163
00:44:38.540 --> 00:44:41.020
on until you kind of get the hook and pull me

1164
00:44:41.020 --> 00:44:43.660
off about the different things that influence

1165
00:44:43.660 --> 00:44:45.260
planet's habitability. Because we've talked

1166
00:44:45.260 --> 00:44:48.260
about Milankovitch cycles. We also have as

1167
00:44:48.260 --> 00:44:50.180
the influence of the planetary system impact

1168
00:44:50.180 --> 00:44:53.100
us just as the dinosaurs, they had a very bad

1169
00:44:53.100 --> 00:44:55.540
day. And there has historically been this

1170
00:44:55.540 --> 00:44:57.940
idea that ties into the rare Earth thing that

1171
00:44:57.940 --> 00:45:00.700
Jupiter is our friend and saviour and without

1172
00:45:00.700 --> 00:45:02.660
Jupiter we'd be hit by asteroids more often

1173
00:45:02.660 --> 00:45:04.760
and we wouldn't be here. And therefore life

1174
00:45:04.760 --> 00:45:07.280
is rare in the universe. Um, idea

1175
00:45:07.680 --> 00:45:09.640
basically that Jupiter is our bestest friend

1176
00:45:09.640 --> 00:45:12.400
and it's honestly a lot of cobs wallop and

1177
00:45:12.720 --> 00:45:15.160
it's both one of my favourite bits of

1178
00:45:15.160 --> 00:45:16.680
research I ever did. And probably one of the

1179
00:45:16.680 --> 00:45:19.360
biggest bugbears of my career is uh, I

1180
00:45:19.600 --> 00:45:22.560
did work again with Barry Jones starting 20

1181
00:45:22.560 --> 00:45:24.880
years ago for a few years that resulted in a

1182
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:27.120
series of pep called Jupiter Friend or Foe.

1183
00:45:27.440 --> 00:45:29.880
And we did simulations to test the role of

1184
00:45:29.880 --> 00:45:32.400
Jupiter in protecting us from impacts or not.

1185
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:34.790
And it turns out that Jupiter is not shielded

1186
00:45:35.020 --> 00:45:37.820
all if you took Jupiter away, Earth would be

1187
00:45:37.820 --> 00:45:40.820
hit less often. If however you

1188
00:45:40.820 --> 00:45:42.580
replace Jupiter with a planet, the mass of

1189
00:45:42.580 --> 00:45:45.380
Saturn, Earth would be hit more often than we

1190
00:45:45.380 --> 00:45:47.540
are today. And with Jupiter, the mass it

1191
00:45:47.540 --> 00:45:49.060
currently is, we'd be hit more than if it

1192
00:45:49.060 --> 00:45:50.899
wasn't there, but less than if we put Saturn

1193
00:45:50.899 --> 00:45:53.260
there. All down to the subtleties of how

1194
00:45:53.260 --> 00:45:55.980
gravity all works. And so basically if you

1195
00:45:55.980 --> 00:45:57.620
replace Jupiter with Saturn, it's like the

1196
00:45:57.620 --> 00:45:59.500
anti Goldilocks case where you've lesser

1197
00:45:59.500 --> 00:46:01.980
porridge with strychnine. But the reality is

1198
00:46:01.980 --> 00:46:04.540
that Jupiter's role is complicated,

1199
00:46:05.500 --> 00:46:07.740
best illustrated by Comet Lexell in

1200
00:46:07.740 --> 00:46:10.620
1770, which I always love. Comet Lexell was

1201
00:46:11.020 --> 00:46:13.260
a great comet. It was very bright in our sky.

1202
00:46:13.260 --> 00:46:15.380
Discovered by Charles Messier I think 1st of

1203
00:46:15.380 --> 00:46:18.180
June 1770. Quickly got as

1204
00:46:18.180 --> 00:46:19.940
bright as the brightest stars in the sky, but

1205
00:46:19.940 --> 00:46:22.260
looked unusual. It was very big and fuzzy and

1206
00:46:22.260 --> 00:46:24.340
it moved unusually rapidly across the sky at

1207
00:46:24.340 --> 00:46:26.660
its quickest, covering 42 degrees in a single

1208
00:46:26.660 --> 00:46:29.580
hour. When they worked out the orbit of this

1209
00:46:29.580 --> 00:46:31.380
thing, they found a that it had come very

1210
00:46:31.380 --> 00:46:32.900
close to the Earth. It passed within 2

1211
00:46:32.900 --> 00:46:34.770
million kilometres, which is the close

1212
00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:36.760
closest approach of a large comet in

1213
00:46:37.000 --> 00:46:40.000
historical times. It also was moving

1214
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:41.920
on an orbit that was just less than six years

1215
00:46:41.920 --> 00:46:44.360
in period. Big bright comet going around

1216
00:46:44.360 --> 00:46:46.080
every six years. Why on Earth have we not

1217
00:46:46.080 --> 00:46:47.680
seen it before? Why have we not seen it in

1218
00:46:47.680 --> 00:46:50.520
1764 or 1758? Well,

1219
00:46:50.520 --> 00:46:52.240
when they worked out the orbit and run it

1220
00:46:52.240 --> 00:46:54.160
back in time and this was hard at the time

1221
00:46:54.160 --> 00:46:56.000
because they didn't have mechanical

1222
00:46:56.000 --> 00:46:58.280
computers, they had human computers who sat

1223
00:46:58.280 --> 00:47:00.320
there and did calculations with abakai and

1224
00:47:00.320 --> 00:47:02.650
slide rules and all the rest of it. They

1225
00:47:02.650 --> 00:47:04.490
found that three years before it nearly hit

1226
00:47:04.490 --> 00:47:07.170
the Earth it was very close to Jupiter. In

1227
00:47:07.170 --> 00:47:08.810
fact, prior to that it had been moving on an

1228
00:47:08.810 --> 00:47:11.130
orbit that came nowhere near the Earth, that

1229
00:47:11.130 --> 00:47:12.930
was probably hundreds or thousands of years

1230
00:47:12.930 --> 00:47:15.330
in period and it was flying in to come

1231
00:47:15.330 --> 00:47:16.890
nowhere near the inner solar system. When it

1232
00:47:16.890 --> 00:47:18.490
had this close encounter with Jupiter that

1233
00:47:18.490 --> 00:47:20.570
trapped it and threw it at the Earth and

1234
00:47:20.570 --> 00:47:22.690
captured it onto the six year long Jupiter

1235
00:47:22.690 --> 00:47:25.090
family comet orbit. So Jupiter took something

1236
00:47:25.090 --> 00:47:27.265
that was coming nowhere near us and threw it

1237
00:47:27.265 --> 00:47:30.110
out at us. We don't see the comet

1238
00:47:30.110 --> 00:47:33.030
anymore because 2 times 6 years is

1239
00:47:33.030 --> 00:47:34.990
12 years and Jupiter takes 12 years to go

1240
00:47:34.990 --> 00:47:37.470
around the sun. So the comet did two laps in

1241
00:47:37.470 --> 00:47:39.950
the time Jupiter took to take one. And when

1242
00:47:39.950 --> 00:47:41.990
the comet got back out there again 12 years

1243
00:47:42.230 --> 00:47:44.150
after the first encounter, Jupiter was there,

1244
00:47:44.150 --> 00:47:45.670
grabbed hold of it and threw it away again,

1245
00:47:45.830 --> 00:47:48.790
never to return. So in just this 12 year

1246
00:47:48.790 --> 00:47:51.030
period, Jupiter threw something at us and

1247
00:47:51.030 --> 00:47:53.350
then cleaned up after itself. And whether

1248
00:47:53.350 --> 00:47:55.030
Jupiter's more of a shield or more of a

1249
00:47:55.030 --> 00:47:56.670
threat is down to the balance of those two

1250
00:47:56.670 --> 00:47:59.350
effects. Um, and what we found in our

1251
00:47:59.350 --> 00:48:02.190
simulations is, to be honest with Jupiter, we

1252
00:48:02.190 --> 00:48:03.990
get hit more than we would do if it wasn't

1253
00:48:03.990 --> 00:48:06.910
there. That takes away the idea

1254
00:48:06.910 --> 00:48:09.430
that it's our protector. It takes away the

1255
00:48:09.430 --> 00:48:11.590
idea that you need a shield to shield a

1256
00:48:11.590 --> 00:48:14.470
planet to prevent life from being wiped out.

1257
00:48:14.950 --> 00:48:17.430
Another nail in the coffin of rare Earth. And

1258
00:48:17.430 --> 00:48:19.990
it bugs me a bit that so many documentaries

1259
00:48:19.990 --> 00:48:22.190
still trot out this trite idea that Jupiter

1260
00:48:22.190 --> 00:48:24.150
shields us from impacts. And it's wonderful

1261
00:48:24.550 --> 00:48:27.070
because I disprove that 20 years ago. It's

1262
00:48:27.070 --> 00:48:29.820
much more complicated. But even that idea

1263
00:48:29.820 --> 00:48:31.580
gets complicated because obviously we don't

1264
00:48:31.580 --> 00:48:32.550
want to have the Earth punishingly, uh,

1265
00:48:33.180 --> 00:48:36.180
pummelling because we'd be wiped out. But

1266
00:48:36.180 --> 00:48:37.660
where the Earth formed in the solar system,

1267
00:48:37.660 --> 00:48:40.620
it probably formed dry. We formed interior to

1268
00:48:40.620 --> 00:48:42.580
the location of the ice line. So there wasn't

1269
00:48:42.580 --> 00:48:45.220
any available solid water, the water was all

1270
00:48:45.220 --> 00:48:47.940
gas. So how the Earth got its water was a

1271
00:48:47.940 --> 00:48:50.740
long, outstanding problem, exacerbated by the

1272
00:48:50.740 --> 00:48:52.100
fact that towards the end of our planet's

1273
00:48:52.100 --> 00:48:53.980
formation, we got smashed into by an object

1274
00:48:53.980 --> 00:48:56.340
the size of Mars, which stripped off a lot of

1275
00:48:56.340 --> 00:48:57.740
the Earth's core and mantle and would have

1276
00:48:57.740 --> 00:48:59.820
desiccated our planet because m water would

1277
00:48:59.820 --> 00:49:01.680
have been in the. Or a mantle, in the crust

1278
00:49:01.680 --> 00:49:04.320
and mantle. Sorry, up near the surface. Yeah.

1279
00:49:04.480 --> 00:49:06.280
So where did the water come from? And Earth

1280
00:49:06.280 --> 00:49:08.220
is actually a remarkably dry planet, um,

1281
00:49:08.560 --> 00:49:10.840
particularly at the moment in Queensland. The

1282
00:49:10.840 --> 00:49:13.240
idea is down here. Yeah, the idea is that our

1283
00:49:13.240 --> 00:49:15.520
water, at least in significant part, was

1284
00:49:15.520 --> 00:49:18.440
delivered from further out by impacts in what

1285
00:49:18.440 --> 00:49:20.320
is often described as a late veneer.

1286
00:49:21.120 --> 00:49:23.200
That's really interesting air because that's

1287
00:49:23.200 --> 00:49:25.080
a stochastic process, it's random, it's

1288
00:49:25.080 --> 00:49:27.120
driven by the orbits of the planets and the

1289
00:49:27.120 --> 00:49:29.440
cleanup phase of solar system formation.

1290
00:49:29.920 --> 00:49:31.640
So different planetary systems will give

1291
00:49:31.640 --> 00:49:34.100
planets with different amounts of water. But

1292
00:49:34.100 --> 00:49:36.140
it's also indicating that you actually don't

1293
00:49:36.140 --> 00:49:38.500
want too much shielding, you need

1294
00:49:38.500 --> 00:49:40.660
impacts. Because if the Earth had never had

1295
00:49:40.660 --> 00:49:42.460
the impacts, we'd have never got enough water

1296
00:49:42.540 --> 00:49:45.220
for life to develop and thrive. On top of

1297
00:49:45.220 --> 00:49:46.540
that, if the Earth didn't have enough

1298
00:49:46.540 --> 00:49:48.339
impacts, the dinosaurs would never have been

1299
00:49:48.339 --> 00:49:50.340
wiped out. And maybe you and I will be

1300
00:49:50.340 --> 00:49:52.780
reptiles or maybe we'll be here, you know,

1301
00:49:53.180 --> 00:49:55.340
so there's a whole aspect of that. Now,

1302
00:49:55.340 --> 00:49:58.180
again, those Simulations I did, we can

1303
00:49:58.180 --> 00:50:00.140
rerun through the planetary systems, we can

1304
00:50:00.140 --> 00:50:02.020
find the debris belts in those systems, we

1305
00:50:02.020 --> 00:50:04.560
can find the planets so we can model their

1306
00:50:04.560 --> 00:50:06.440
impact rates. And I'd argue that we want to

1307
00:50:06.440 --> 00:50:08.840
look somewhere that doesn't have too many

1308
00:50:08.840 --> 00:50:10.920
impacts, but also doesn't have too few,

1309
00:50:11.560 --> 00:50:13.640
because each of those could pose problems.

1310
00:50:14.360 --> 00:50:17.080
That is a really big part of the storey

1311
00:50:17.160 --> 00:50:19.880
and it feeds into the last point, really,

1312
00:50:21.000 --> 00:50:23.920
which is the planet itself and a little bit

1313
00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:26.800
tied to the large moon. So our Earth, it has

1314
00:50:26.800 --> 00:50:28.960
been suggested again by the rare Earth crowd,

1315
00:50:28.960 --> 00:50:31.800
that the large moon we have stabilises our

1316
00:50:31.800 --> 00:50:33.710
atmosphere axis and has kept the Earth

1317
00:50:33.710 --> 00:50:35.390
habitable. So therefore you need a giant

1318
00:50:35.390 --> 00:50:38.390
satellite. But simulations by Dave

1319
00:50:38.390 --> 00:50:40.230
Waltham, who's a guy I know very well in the

1320
00:50:40.230 --> 00:50:42.710
uk, looked into this and what he found was

1321
00:50:42.710 --> 00:50:44.700
that you could take the Moon away and, uh,

1322
00:50:44.710 --> 00:50:46.150
the Earth's axis would still be fairly

1323
00:50:46.150 --> 00:50:48.149
stable. It still wobbled between about 22 and

1324
00:50:48.149 --> 00:50:50.590
24 degrees, maybe a little bit more. But

1325
00:50:50.590 --> 00:50:52.550
quirkily, if you made the moon just 12

1326
00:50:52.550 --> 00:50:54.670
kilometres larger in diameter,

1327
00:50:55.310 --> 00:50:57.910
it would make the Earth's axis unstable and

1328
00:50:57.910 --> 00:51:00.480
chaotic. So if the moon was only slightly

1329
00:51:00.480 --> 00:51:03.400
larger, we would not be here. The

1330
00:51:03.400 --> 00:51:04.920
other reason that a large moon has been

1331
00:51:04.920 --> 00:51:07.640
suggested is that it drives bigger tides. And

1332
00:51:07.640 --> 00:51:09.960
one of the common arguments for how life

1333
00:51:09.960 --> 00:51:12.400
first got going and, um, for how life moved

1334
00:51:12.400 --> 00:51:14.320
out of the oceans in both cases is to do with

1335
00:51:14.320 --> 00:51:16.360
the large tidal intertidal areas that we

1336
00:51:16.360 --> 00:51:18.600
have, where at low tide it's dry and at high

1337
00:51:18.600 --> 00:51:21.080
tide it's underwater. And the idea is that

1338
00:51:21.080 --> 00:51:23.360
without the moon those areas would be smaller

1339
00:51:23.600 --> 00:51:25.160
and life would have had less chance to get

1340
00:51:25.160 --> 00:51:26.960
going. I don't really buy that, because if

1341
00:51:26.960 --> 00:51:29.120
you took the moon away, the tides of sun

1342
00:51:29.120 --> 00:51:31.260
raises would still be half the size, so you'd

1343
00:51:31.260 --> 00:51:33.620
still have substantial tides. But these are

1344
00:51:33.620 --> 00:51:36.020
all the kind of questions people ask before

1345
00:51:36.020 --> 00:51:38.140
you get to the planet itself. And the planet

1346
00:51:38.140 --> 00:51:40.300
itself is where my head really hurt. Now, I'm

1347
00:51:40.300 --> 00:51:43.220
not a geophysicist at

1348
00:51:43.220 --> 00:51:45.060
all, so a lot of this was new to me. Now, we

1349
00:51:45.060 --> 00:51:47.540
talked a little bit about the hydration. You

1350
00:51:47.540 --> 00:51:49.500
could imagine anything from desert worlds to

1351
00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:51.460
worlds with hundreds of kilometres depth of

1352
00:51:51.460 --> 00:51:53.980
ocean. Now, if the ocean's too deep,

1353
00:51:54.700 --> 00:51:56.940
the planet is probably habitable, but not

1354
00:51:56.940 --> 00:51:59.340
detectably habitable because the life will be

1355
00:51:59.340 --> 00:52:00.500
at the bottom of the ocean where the

1356
00:52:00.500 --> 00:52:02.960
nutrients have been introduced by volc. But

1357
00:52:02.960 --> 00:52:04.960
an ocean deeper than a few tens of kilometres

1358
00:52:04.960 --> 00:52:07.040
is thought to become stagnant. And so it

1359
00:52:07.040 --> 00:52:09.240
doesn't mix things up to the surface, so you

1360
00:52:09.240 --> 00:52:11.320
don't want to look at water worlds that are

1361
00:52:11.640 --> 00:52:13.720
ocean for hundreds or thousands of kilometres

1362
00:52:13.720 --> 00:52:16.160
depth, but equally you want to have some mix

1363
00:52:16.160 --> 00:52:18.000
of ocean and continent to allow all the

1364
00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:20.800
carbon cycles and weathering to happen, to

1365
00:52:20.800 --> 00:52:23.240
allow life to engage with the atmosphere. So

1366
00:52:23.240 --> 00:52:24.880
that's a bit of a sweet spot there. But what

1367
00:52:24.880 --> 00:52:27.640
I didn't realise was how critical

1368
00:52:27.640 --> 00:52:30.290
water has been been to the

1369
00:52:30.290 --> 00:52:33.130
maintenance of our atmosphere and um, thereby

1370
00:52:33.130 --> 00:52:35.890
our climate against the vagaries of the solar

1371
00:52:35.890 --> 00:52:37.650
wind and against the vagaries of plate

1372
00:52:37.650 --> 00:52:40.250
tectonics. Now compare the Earth and Mars

1373
00:52:40.490 --> 00:52:42.410
and the Earth is warm and wet. We've got a

1374
00:52:42.410 --> 00:52:44.690
lovely thick atmosphere and we've not really

1375
00:52:44.690 --> 00:52:46.570
lost much of our atmosphere. We've got the

1376
00:52:46.570 --> 00:52:49.010
ozone layer which protects us to some degree

1377
00:52:49.010 --> 00:52:51.530
from UV radiation. We've got a temperature

1378
00:52:51.530 --> 00:52:53.210
inversion about 10 kilometres up in the

1379
00:52:53.210 --> 00:52:55.530
atmosphere that traps water below that level.

1380
00:52:55.770 --> 00:52:57.650
If water gets above that level, it freezes

1381
00:52:57.650 --> 00:52:59.970
and falls back down. So the water can't get

1382
00:52:59.970 --> 00:53:01.990
high enough to be ionised and split hydrogen

1383
00:53:01.990 --> 00:53:04.710
and helium and lost. Mars doesn't have that.

1384
00:53:05.030 --> 00:53:06.950
Mars doesn't have much of a magnetic field

1385
00:53:06.950 --> 00:53:08.830
whereas the Earth does. And the magnetic

1386
00:53:08.830 --> 00:53:10.390
field protects the atmosphere from being

1387
00:53:10.390 --> 00:53:12.990
stripped away from the outside in. Mars

1388
00:53:12.990 --> 00:53:15.720
doesn't have plate tectonics, but we do. And

1389
00:53:15.720 --> 00:53:18.310
um, plate tectonics prevents the atmosphere

1390
00:53:18.310 --> 00:53:21.190
from being precipitated out onto the surface

1391
00:53:21.190 --> 00:53:23.190
through chemistry and trapped there because

1392
00:53:23.190 --> 00:53:25.910
plate tectonics recycles the crust. So

1393
00:53:25.910 --> 00:53:27.630
anything that chemically gets weathered onto

1394
00:53:27.630 --> 00:53:29.670
Earth's surface gets put back into the

1395
00:53:29.670 --> 00:53:32.190
atmosphere through volcanic volcanoes. So

1396
00:53:32.190 --> 00:53:34.110
Mars and Earth probably started out looking

1397
00:53:34.110 --> 00:53:36.230
very similar and are now very, very

1398
00:53:36.230 --> 00:53:38.830
different. And so the nature of the planet

1399
00:53:38.830 --> 00:53:40.390
itself is going to be a real important

1400
00:53:40.470 --> 00:53:43.110
factor. And plate tectonics looks like it's

1401
00:53:43.110 --> 00:53:46.070
going to be fairly key. Plate tectonics is a

1402
00:53:46.070 --> 00:53:47.790
mechanism by which you stop the atmosphere

1403
00:53:47.790 --> 00:53:49.870
getting precipitated out and frozen in onto

1404
00:53:49.870 --> 00:53:51.350
the surface, which is a big part of what's

1405
00:53:51.350 --> 00:53:53.710
happened m on Mars because of that recycling

1406
00:53:53.710 --> 00:53:56.190
effect. But it also turns out that plate

1407
00:53:56.190 --> 00:53:58.490
tectonics is key in ensuring the

1408
00:53:58.890 --> 00:54:01.690
magnetic field is retained. And um, this is a

1409
00:54:01.690 --> 00:54:03.490
bit that really hurt my head because I'm

1410
00:54:03.490 --> 00:54:06.370
like, I'm not a geophysicist. Seems that on

1411
00:54:06.370 --> 00:54:09.330
the Earth if the Earth didn't have plate

1412
00:54:09.330 --> 00:54:11.650
tectonics, we'd probably have lost most of

1413
00:54:11.650 --> 00:54:14.490
our magnetic field like Mars and like Venus.

1414
00:54:15.130 --> 00:54:16.970
What's happening is that the magnetic field

1415
00:54:16.970 --> 00:54:19.250
is driven by convection currents in the outer

1416
00:54:19.250 --> 00:54:21.730
mantle. Like when you see water boiling in a

1417
00:54:21.730 --> 00:54:24.110
kettle overturn, um, motion of mollie and

1418
00:54:24.110 --> 00:54:26.590
metal Rising and falling. That

1419
00:54:26.590 --> 00:54:28.510
convection can only happen if you've got a

1420
00:54:28.510 --> 00:54:30.430
big temperature difference between the bottom

1421
00:54:30.430 --> 00:54:32.710
and the top of the outer core. Sorry.

1422
00:54:33.430 --> 00:54:35.190
In order to get that temperature difference,

1423
00:54:35.190 --> 00:54:37.030
you need to be able to very effectively cool

1424
00:54:37.030 --> 00:54:39.310
the top of the outer core because otherwise

1425
00:54:39.310 --> 00:54:40.950
it would warm up so much convection would

1426
00:54:40.950 --> 00:54:42.470
stop because you don't have enough

1427
00:54:42.470 --> 00:54:44.790
temperature difference. The way the outer

1428
00:54:44.790 --> 00:54:46.470
core is cooled is by convection in the

1429
00:54:46.470 --> 00:54:48.110
mantle. That takes the heat away from the top

1430
00:54:48.110 --> 00:54:49.470
of the outer core and brings it to the

1431
00:54:49.470 --> 00:54:51.910
surface. We've got these huge convection

1432
00:54:51.910 --> 00:54:53.990
cells in the mantle that transfer heat very

1433
00:54:53.990 --> 00:54:56.970
quickly. Allowing cool the outer core's top

1434
00:54:56.970 --> 00:54:59.170
to get this big temperature difference allows

1435
00:54:59.170 --> 00:55:01.010
a motion that drives a magnetic field.

1436
00:55:02.530 --> 00:55:04.570
That motion is also what drives plate

1437
00:55:04.570 --> 00:55:06.410
tectonics. Now, the quirky thing that came

1438
00:55:06.410 --> 00:55:07.890
out of all of this when I was reading about

1439
00:55:07.890 --> 00:55:10.170
it is that, uh, if you run simulations of the

1440
00:55:10.170 --> 00:55:12.450
motion of the Earth's mantle and the crust

1441
00:55:12.690 --> 00:55:15.570
and the Earth is dry, the Earth is too small

1442
00:55:15.570 --> 00:55:18.410
to sustain plate tectonics because the mantle

1443
00:55:18.410 --> 00:55:21.090
is too stiff. If you have water

1444
00:55:21.330 --> 00:55:23.410
and you mix water into the mantle, you

1445
00:55:23.410 --> 00:55:25.880
lubricate, lubricate it. You allow convection

1446
00:55:25.880 --> 00:55:28.000
in the mantle, which allows plate tectonics,

1447
00:55:28.320 --> 00:55:31.000
which allows you to recycle the surface. But

1448
00:55:31.000 --> 00:55:33.080
that plate tectonics also allows you to cool

1449
00:55:33.080 --> 00:55:35.320
the outer core to maintain the magnetic

1450
00:55:35.320 --> 00:55:37.480
field, allowing you to have that magnetic

1451
00:55:37.480 --> 00:55:39.560
shield that protects your planet from the

1452
00:55:39.560 --> 00:55:40.960
atmosphere being whittled away from the

1453
00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:43.800
outside in by the solar wind. It

1454
00:55:43.800 --> 00:55:46.520
seems that the storey of plate tectonics, the

1455
00:55:46.520 --> 00:55:48.640
Earth's magnetic field and, um, the

1456
00:55:48.640 --> 00:55:51.290
atmosphere being retained, is all tied

1457
00:55:51.290 --> 00:55:53.290
together by water. Which brings us back to

1458
00:55:53.290 --> 00:55:55.410
that delivery question. If the Earth had not

1459
00:55:55.410 --> 00:55:57.650
got that veneer of water, would plate

1460
00:55:57.650 --> 00:56:00.210
tectonics still happen? The infinite

1461
00:56:00.210 --> 00:56:02.010
suggestion, and this was fabulous work by

1462
00:56:02.010 --> 00:56:03.930
people working with the great Craig o',

1463
00:56:03.930 --> 00:56:06.169
Neill, a great Australian scientist who does

1464
00:56:06.650 --> 00:56:08.410
earthquakes and, um, plate tectonics

1465
00:56:08.410 --> 00:56:11.090
modelling in an astrobiology sense that

1466
00:56:11.090 --> 00:56:14.010
says the Earth's plate tectonics are

1467
00:56:14.010 --> 00:56:15.890
really hard to get started. If you run models

1468
00:56:15.890 --> 00:56:17.810
of the Earth without plate tectonics with the

1469
00:56:17.810 --> 00:56:19.970
young Earth, with how hot it was, plate

1470
00:56:19.970 --> 00:56:22.950
tectonics don't just happen. However, if

1471
00:56:22.950 --> 00:56:25.270
you introduce impacts from big asteroids,

1472
00:56:25.270 --> 00:56:27.110
like the things you got at the end of planet

1473
00:56:27.110 --> 00:56:29.830
formation, those can dump enough energy

1474
00:56:29.990 --> 00:56:32.990
in terms of a downward pulse to push magma

1475
00:56:32.990 --> 00:56:35.670
up somewhere else to trigger a convection

1476
00:56:35.670 --> 00:56:38.230
cell that then becomes self sustaining. So

1477
00:56:38.230 --> 00:56:40.950
it's quite possible that the same impact

1478
00:56:41.110 --> 00:56:43.350
regime that led to the delivery of water,

1479
00:56:43.670 --> 00:56:45.710
that led in the extreme case to the formation

1480
00:56:45.710 --> 00:56:48.190
of the moon, also triggered plate

1481
00:56:48.190 --> 00:56:50.990
Tectonics. And by triggering plate tectonics

1482
00:56:50.990 --> 00:56:53.480
and delivering water to the mantle allowed

1483
00:56:53.480 --> 00:56:55.360
the Earth to become the planet it is today to

1484
00:56:55.360 --> 00:56:58.120
allow life to thrive. Now there's far, far

1485
00:56:58.120 --> 00:56:59.480
more that you could look into about the

1486
00:56:59.480 --> 00:57:01.360
planets themselves. I'm not like, say, a

1487
00:57:01.360 --> 00:57:04.360
geophysicist, but the interplay of these

1488
00:57:04.360 --> 00:57:05.960
things is fascinating and it's a real

1489
00:57:05.960 --> 00:57:08.720
reminder of that multidisciplinary thing. You

1490
00:57:08.720 --> 00:57:10.440
can't do it all if you're just an astronomy.

1491
00:57:10.440 --> 00:57:13.040
You need everybody from all different

1492
00:57:13.040 --> 00:57:15.600
disciplines to come together so we can figure

1493
00:57:15.600 --> 00:57:17.480
out what factors are and, um, aren't

1494
00:57:17.480 --> 00:57:19.880
important. So that when we find another

1495
00:57:20.130 --> 00:57:22.210
thousand, another ten thousand, another

1496
00:57:22.210 --> 00:57:24.610
hundred thousand planets, we can pick the

1497
00:57:24.610 --> 00:57:26.530
best targets to search for life upon them.

1498
00:57:26.930 --> 00:57:28.810
And that was a motivation and it just blew my

1499
00:57:28.810 --> 00:57:31.610
mind when I got to that final part. Just how

1500
00:57:31.610 --> 00:57:34.170
much complexity there is in the

1501
00:57:34.170 --> 00:57:35.690
interplay between the atmosphere, the

1502
00:57:35.690 --> 00:57:37.890
climate, the plate tectonics, the oceans

1503
00:57:38.850 --> 00:57:41.810
that are so, uh, variable and so chaotic.

1504
00:57:42.530 --> 00:57:44.410
What does that mean? How can we learn from

1505
00:57:44.410 --> 00:57:46.290
that? Well, that's what we learn when we look

1506
00:57:46.290 --> 00:57:47.770
at planets around other stars. But at least

1507
00:57:47.770 --> 00:57:48.970
this gives us a bit of a starting point

1508
00:57:49.040 --> 00:57:49.600
point, I think.

1509
00:57:50.320 --> 00:57:52.880
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, I see what you're saying. So it's

1510
00:57:53.200 --> 00:57:55.200
like the popular press saying, oh, we found a

1511
00:57:55.200 --> 00:57:57.760
rocky planet in the Goldilocks zone and it

1512
00:57:57.760 --> 00:57:59.920
probably has water, so, you know, it's got to

1513
00:57:59.920 --> 00:58:02.360
have life. Uh, there's so much more than

1514
00:58:02.360 --> 00:58:04.410
that. Like, yeah, it's um.

1515
00:58:04.560 --> 00:58:06.800
Jonti Horner: Even they probably have water is a leap

1516
00:58:06.800 --> 00:58:09.680
because like, yeah, if we'd not had

1517
00:58:09.680 --> 00:58:11.600
water added after the moon forming impact,

1518
00:58:11.600 --> 00:58:12.800
the Earth would be a desert

1519
00:58:14.320 --> 00:58:17.160
Andrew Dunkley: and we wouldn't probably exist at all.

1520
00:58:17.160 --> 00:58:18.720
Jonti Horner: Absolutely, yeah.

1521
00:58:18.720 --> 00:58:21.320
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating stuff, Jonty. We'll leave it

1522
00:58:21.320 --> 00:58:23.760
there. But, um, it's just such a

1523
00:58:24.080 --> 00:58:25.520
fascinating topic. But

1524
00:58:26.800 --> 00:58:29.120
what goes into, uh, the future

1525
00:58:29.120 --> 00:58:31.600
identification of potential targets is

1526
00:58:32.000 --> 00:58:34.040
so much more than most people would have

1527
00:58:34.040 --> 00:58:35.720
considered. So thank you very much, really

1528
00:58:35.720 --> 00:58:36.280
appreciate it.

1529
00:58:36.280 --> 00:58:37.400
Jonti Horner: It's an absolute pleasure and thanks for

1530
00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:40.280
letting me rant on my topics of choice for a

1531
00:58:40.280 --> 00:58:43.280
change. Like I said, it would be helpful. I'm

1532
00:58:43.280 --> 00:58:44.160
sure your readers will.

1533
00:58:44.160 --> 00:58:46.120
Readers, listeners will give feedback on

1534
00:58:46.120 --> 00:58:48.160
this, but I know we've done something

1535
00:58:48.160 --> 00:58:51.080
different. I really do. I am aware

1536
00:58:51.080 --> 00:58:52.680
of the fact that these are not your typical

1537
00:58:52.680 --> 00:58:55.040
episodes and that may be different for

1538
00:58:55.040 --> 00:58:56.720
people. So I appreciate the opportunity to do

1539
00:58:56.720 --> 00:58:58.680
this, but if people have enjoyed it or

1540
00:58:58.680 --> 00:59:00.880
didn't, it'd probably be worth letting Andrew

1541
00:59:00.880 --> 00:59:03.280
and Fred Watson know once I'm gone. Um, won't

1542
00:59:03.280 --> 00:59:04.640
hurt my feelings. Don't worry about it

1543
00:59:04.640 --> 00:59:06.120
because if it's Something you've enjoyed.

1544
00:59:06.280 --> 00:59:08.200
There's possibilities to do things like this

1545
00:59:08.200 --> 00:59:10.880
again in future if it isn't. We tried it and

1546
00:59:10.880 --> 00:59:12.690
it didn't work and that's entirely fine. Fine

1547
00:59:12.690 --> 00:59:14.490
too. So hopefully it was fun, hopefully it

1548
00:59:14.490 --> 00:59:16.380
was educational and I won't be too hurt, uh,

1549
00:59:16.410 --> 00:59:17.450
if nobody enjoyed it.

1550
00:59:18.570 --> 00:59:20.810
Andrew Dunkley: I'm pretty sure they did. Jonty, and we

1551
00:59:20.810 --> 00:59:23.130
really appreciate your time and uh, we've,

1552
00:59:23.130 --> 00:59:24.970
we've got one more episode to do with you.

1553
00:59:25.020 --> 00:59:27.330
Uh, it's a Q and A episode and we, we're

1554
00:59:27.330 --> 00:59:29.330
talking about, we haven't nailed it down yet,

1555
00:59:29.330 --> 00:59:31.210
but we're talking about doing a, an

1556
00:59:31.210 --> 00:59:32.650
astrophotography special.

1557
00:59:32.810 --> 00:59:33.290
Jonti Horner: Yeah.

1558
00:59:33.290 --> 00:59:34.970
Andrew Dunkley: Because we do get a lot of questions about

1559
00:59:34.970 --> 00:59:37.730
astrophotography so, uh, that, that'd be

1560
00:59:37.730 --> 00:59:38.890
worth getting into as well.

1561
00:59:38.890 --> 00:59:40.460
Jonti Horner: Yeah. I've got a couple of good friends who

1562
00:59:40.460 --> 00:59:42.640
uh, are award winning astrophotographers who

1563
00:59:42.640 --> 00:59:44.520
we're going to try and rope into that. So

1564
00:59:44.520 --> 00:59:46.840
watch this space is what I'd say. Yes.

1565
00:59:46.840 --> 00:59:48.840
Andrew Dunkley: Fingers crossed we can nail that one down.

1566
00:59:49.000 --> 00:59:50.720
Jonty, thanks so much. We'll see you real

1567
00:59:50.720 --> 00:59:51.000
soon.

1568
00:59:51.080 --> 00:59:52.360
Jonti Horner: Pleasure. Thank you for having me.

1569
00:59:52.760 --> 00:59:54.920
Andrew Dunkley: Johnty Horner, professor of Astrophysics at

1570
00:59:54.920 --> 00:59:57.720
the University of Southern Queensland.

1571
00:59:58.040 --> 01:00:00.560
And if you've got time, jump on our website

1572
01:00:00.560 --> 01:00:02.840
and have a look around. Uh, maybe send your

1573
01:00:02.840 --> 01:00:05.800
comments and thoughts, uh, to us via the

1574
01:00:05.800 --> 01:00:07.880
Ask me anything button at the top. It's

1575
01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:10.440
labelled ama. And while you're there, cheque

1576
01:00:10.440 --> 01:00:12.660
out the Astronomy AstroDailyPod feed. Maybe

1577
01:00:12.660 --> 01:00:15.180
sign up for your daily dose of astronomy

1578
01:00:15.180 --> 01:00:17.980
news. Um, maybe you'd like to become a

1579
01:00:17.980 --> 01:00:20.140
subscriber. You can do that. Visit, uh, the

1580
01:00:20.140 --> 01:00:22.660
shop. Lots of goodies in our shop and plenty

1581
01:00:22.660 --> 01:00:25.660
more. So cheque it out and thanks to Huw

1582
01:00:25.660 --> 01:00:27.300
in the studio as always, because

1583
01:00:28.580 --> 01:00:31.580
he does something which we one day might

1584
01:00:31.580 --> 01:00:33.900
find out about. And from me, Andrew Dunkley,

1585
01:00:33.900 --> 01:00:35.220
thanks for your company. We'll see you on the

1586
01:00:35.220 --> 01:00:37.860
next episode of Space Nuts. Bye Bye.

1587
01:00:38.020 --> 01:00:39.060
Space Nuts.

1588
01:00:39.060 --> 01:00:40.910
You've been listening to the Space Nuts

1589
01:00:40.980 --> 01:00:43.860
Jonti Horner: Arts podcast, available

1590
01:00:43.940 --> 01:00:46.180
at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

1591
01:00:46.260 --> 01:00:49.180
iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast

1592
01:00:49.180 --> 01:00:51.460
player. You can also stream on demand at

1593
01:00:51.460 --> 01:00:52.240
bytes. Com.

1594
01:00:52.240 --> 01:00:54.940
Andrew Dunkley: Um, this has been another quality podcast

1595
01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:56.740
production from Bytes. Com.

1596
01:00:56.740 --> 01:00:57.520
Jonti Horner: Um,
Send a Voicemail