June 6, 2026
Cosmic Life Hunt: Delving into Astrobiology Part 2 & the Quest for Extraterrestrial Existence
Sponsor Link: This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN, your go-to solution for online security. To take advantage of our special offer, including four extra months for free, visit https://www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts Astrobiology Part 2:...
Sponsor Link:
This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN, your go-to solution for online security. To take advantage of our special offer, including four extra months for free, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
Astrobiology Part 2: The Search for Life Beyond Earth In this captivating continuation of our exploration of astrobiology, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner delve deeper into the complexities of life in the universe. Following up on their previous discussion, they tackle the intriguing factors that influence the potential for life on other planets, as well as the implications of our own technological advancements.
Episode Highlights:
- Review of Astrobiology: The episode kicks off with a quick recap of the previous discussion on the history of astrobiology, including the ongoing search for life within our solar system and beyond.
- The Exoplanet Era: Jonty shares insights on our current capabilities to identify exoplanets that may harbour life, discussing the significance of size, distance from stars, and other critical factors in determining habitability.
- Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The hosts explore the challenges of detecting intelligent life and the fascinating concept of alien megastructures, as well as the importance of understanding what to look for in the cosmos.
- Planetary Systems and Habitability: The conversation shifts to the dynamics of planetary systems and how factors like Milankovitch cycles, orbital stability, and the presence of water influence a planet's ability to support life.
- Ethics of Seeding Life: A listener question prompts a discussion on the ethical implications of potentially seeding other planets with life, exploring the concept of panspermia and the responsibilities of humanity in the cosmos.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
- Recap of Astrobiology Part 1
- The Exoplanet Landscape
- Searching for Intelligent Life
- Factors Influencing Habitability
- Ethical Considerations in Seeding Life
This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by NordVPN, your go-to solution for online security. To take advantage of our special offer, including four extra months for free, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts.
Astrobiology Part 2: The Search for Life Beyond Earth In this captivating continuation of our exploration of astrobiology, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner delve deeper into the complexities of life in the universe. Following up on their previous discussion, they tackle the intriguing factors that influence the potential for life on other planets, as well as the implications of our own technological advancements.
Episode Highlights:
- Review of Astrobiology: The episode kicks off with a quick recap of the previous discussion on the history of astrobiology, including the ongoing search for life within our solar system and beyond.
- The Exoplanet Era: Jonty shares insights on our current capabilities to identify exoplanets that may harbour life, discussing the significance of size, distance from stars, and other critical factors in determining habitability.
- Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence: The hosts explore the challenges of detecting intelligent life and the fascinating concept of alien megastructures, as well as the importance of understanding what to look for in the cosmos.
- Planetary Systems and Habitability: The conversation shifts to the dynamics of planetary systems and how factors like Milankovitch cycles, orbital stability, and the presence of water influence a planet's ability to support life.
- Ethics of Seeding Life: A listener question prompts a discussion on the ethical implications of potentially seeding other planets with life, exploring the concept of panspermia and the responsibilities of humanity in the cosmos.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, Instagram, and more. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
- Recap of Astrobiology Part 1
- The Exoplanet Landscape
- Searching for Intelligent Life
- Factors Influencing Habitability
- Ethical Considerations in Seeding Life
WEBVTT
0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:01.960
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us again. This
1
00:00:01.960 --> 00:00:04.720
is Space Nuts where we talk astronomy and
2
00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:07.440
space science and all sorts of other things.
3
00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:09.840
And over the last, uh, few
4
00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:13.520
episodes we've been doing some specials
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:15.800
because Fred Watson's away gallivanting
6
00:00:15.800 --> 00:00:18.240
around Scotland playing a lot of golf. Not.
7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.640
Uh, so we're doing some specials with Jonty
8
00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:24.360
Horner. Uh, and we're doing part
9
00:00:24.360 --> 00:00:25.680
two today of
10
00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:28.640
Astrobiology, a fascinating
11
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:31.640
part of astronomy and space science. Uh,
12
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:34.620
one area we get so many questions about. So
13
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:37.580
stand by as we get into that on this
14
00:00:37.580 --> 00:00:39.900
episode of space nuts. 15
15
00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:40.700
seconds.
16
00:00:40.700 --> 00:00:43.116
Jonti Horner: Guidance is internal. 10,
17
00:00:43.297 --> 00:00:45.980
9, ignition sequence start.
18
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.005
Space nuts. 5, 4, 3, 2. 1. 2,
19
00:00:49.077 --> 00:00:51.900
3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
20
00:00:51.980 --> 00:00:53.180
Space nuts.
21
00:00:53.180 --> 00:00:55.020
Andrew Dunkley: Astronauts report it feels good.
22
00:00:56.140 --> 00:00:58.260
And back with us again is Johnty Horner,
23
00:00:58.260 --> 00:01:00.060
professor of astrophysics at the University
24
00:01:00.140 --> 00:01:02.300
of Southern Queensland. Jonty, hello.
25
00:01:02.460 --> 00:01:03.260
Jonti Horner: Noon. How are you?
26
00:01:03.930 --> 00:01:05.450
Andrew Dunkley: I'm m all right. Can you imagine Fred Watson
27
00:01:05.450 --> 00:01:06.170
playing golf?
28
00:01:06.650 --> 00:01:08.930
Jonti Horner: No, uh, not sure. I mean, growing up in
29
00:01:08.930 --> 00:01:10.970
Yorkshire, the weather wasn't always suited
30
00:01:10.970 --> 00:01:13.290
to it and we were too busy in gravel anyway,
31
00:01:13.290 --> 00:01:13.690
so.
32
00:01:14.970 --> 00:01:17.970
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, took
33
00:01:17.970 --> 00:01:20.410
a moment. I got that. Yes, yes.
34
00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:22.730
Uh, used to look clean with the tongues.
35
00:01:22.810 --> 00:01:24.450
Jonti Horner: Used to have to get up in the morning at 10
36
00:01:24.450 --> 00:01:25.970
o' clock at night, half an hour before I went
37
00:01:25.970 --> 00:01:26.490
to bed.
38
00:01:27.770 --> 00:01:30.250
Andrew Dunkley: It's just one of the best pieces of comedy
39
00:01:30.250 --> 00:01:30.450
ever.
40
00:01:30.450 --> 00:01:31.930
Jonti Horner: And it's funny because it's true.
41
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:34.360
Yes.
42
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:36.040
Andrew Dunkley: Tell the young people that.
43
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:37.240
Jonti Horner: They won't believe you.
44
00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:42.520
Andrew Dunkley: Oh gosh, it's all flooding back. Uh, we've
45
00:01:42.520 --> 00:01:44.120
got a lot to talk about so we better get
46
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:44.440
started.
47
00:01:44.440 --> 00:01:47.420
Astrobiology Part two. Um,
48
00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:49.760
a couple of episodes ago we talked
49
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:52.580
Astrobiology Part one, surprisingly. Um,
50
00:01:52.760 --> 00:01:54.120
let's just do a quick review.
51
00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:56.800
Jonti Horner: Yeah, this is a bit like the bit that really
52
00:01:56.800 --> 00:01:59.080
annoys you at the start of those multi
53
00:01:59.080 --> 00:02:01.360
episode shows where they're previously on
54
00:02:01.360 --> 00:02:03.880
Astrobiology. Um, but
55
00:02:05.550 --> 00:02:07.910
this is basically a case of Jonty talks too
56
00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:09.990
much and so therefore we run out of time. I
57
00:02:09.990 --> 00:02:11.350
mean, we don't need to sugarcoat that. And
58
00:02:11.350 --> 00:02:13.430
it's always a problem when you're talking
59
00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:14.510
about something you love and you're
60
00:02:14.510 --> 00:02:16.510
passionate about that. The time just flies by
61
00:02:16.510 --> 00:02:18.510
and hopefully it's flying by for the
62
00:02:18.510 --> 00:02:20.870
listeners as well, rather than boring them to
63
00:02:20.870 --> 00:02:22.590
tears. But you know, I can't really control
64
00:02:22.590 --> 00:02:24.990
that. In the first episode
65
00:02:25.470 --> 00:02:27.470
we talked a fair bit about the fact that
66
00:02:27.470 --> 00:02:29.230
we've always wondered whether there's life
67
00:02:29.230 --> 00:02:31.350
elsewhere. We talked a bit about the history
68
00:02:31.350 --> 00:02:33.270
in particular things like the ideas of
69
00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:35.510
potentially there being life on Mars that led
70
00:02:35.510 --> 00:02:37.090
to the panic over the War of the Worlds
71
00:02:37.090 --> 00:02:39.370
broadcast and the Fact that In the late
72
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.450
1800s, people were that convinced there
73
00:02:41.450 --> 00:02:43.810
already was known to be life on Mars, that
74
00:02:43.810 --> 00:02:45.410
when a major prize was offered for the
75
00:02:45.410 --> 00:02:47.010
detection of life elsewhere, Mars was
76
00:02:47.010 --> 00:02:49.770
explicitly excluded because that's too easy,
77
00:02:49.770 --> 00:02:51.370
you know. So we've had these ideas for a very
78
00:02:51.370 --> 00:02:54.250
long time, but finding evidence of life
79
00:02:54.250 --> 00:02:56.570
out there is really, really difficult.
80
00:02:57.130 --> 00:02:59.570
We've talked a fair bit about the search for
81
00:02:59.570 --> 00:03:02.250
life within the solar system. You know,
82
00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:04.370
places like looking at Mars, looking at
83
00:03:04.370 --> 00:03:06.210
Europa, all the icy moons. And we talk about
84
00:03:06.210 --> 00:03:08.350
that a lot in the questions that we week by
85
00:03:08.350 --> 00:03:09.430
week as well on the show.
86
00:03:09.990 --> 00:03:12.030
And one thing I've always been really
87
00:03:12.030 --> 00:03:13.870
interested in and passionate about is the
88
00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:15.830
search for life outside the solar system.
89
00:03:16.390 --> 00:03:18.590
Given that we've moved into the exoplanet
90
00:03:18.590 --> 00:03:20.110
era, and we talked a lot about this in the
91
00:03:20.110 --> 00:03:22.550
previous episode as well, we're now in a
92
00:03:22.550 --> 00:03:24.910
position where 30 years ago would have seemed
93
00:03:24.910 --> 00:03:26.750
impossible. Thirty years ago, we'd only just
94
00:03:26.750 --> 00:03:28.390
found the first planet for under the Stars,
95
00:03:28.390 --> 00:03:30.670
and only just answered that question of
96
00:03:30.670 --> 00:03:32.950
whether there are planets at all beyond the
97
00:03:32.950 --> 00:03:35.510
solar system. Now we're at a position where
98
00:03:35.510 --> 00:03:37.990
we are finding places that theoretically, in
99
00:03:37.990 --> 00:03:40.610
the future, we could search to see whether
100
00:03:40.610 --> 00:03:42.210
there's any evidence of life in those
101
00:03:42.210 --> 00:03:44.410
planetary systems. And in all honesty,
102
00:03:44.410 --> 00:03:46.610
despite some of the hyperbolic media
103
00:03:47.170 --> 00:03:49.610
articles that you sometimes see, we haven't
104
00:03:49.610 --> 00:03:52.050
yet found a planet that would really look
105
00:03:52.050 --> 00:03:53.730
like another Earth. But we're getting there,
106
00:03:53.890 --> 00:03:55.450
we're getting closer, we're getting to
107
00:03:55.450 --> 00:03:57.610
planets that are more similar to ours in
108
00:03:57.610 --> 00:03:59.450
size, at more similar distance from their
109
00:03:59.450 --> 00:04:01.690
stars, and we're learning more about them.
110
00:04:01.690 --> 00:04:03.450
And it's very feasible then in the next
111
00:04:03.450 --> 00:04:05.250
decade or so, that we can actually start
112
00:04:05.810 --> 00:04:07.930
looking to see whether there's any evidence
113
00:04:07.930 --> 00:04:09.810
of life on those planets. Now, that's a
114
00:04:09.810 --> 00:04:12.710
little bit separate to looking for signs of
115
00:04:12.710 --> 00:04:15.550
communicative alien technological
116
00:04:15.550 --> 00:04:17.910
life, which is a search for extraterrestrial
117
00:04:17.910 --> 00:04:19.150
intelligence or the search for
118
00:04:19.150 --> 00:04:20.870
extraterrestrial artefacts. There two areas
119
00:04:20.870 --> 00:04:23.310
of science that are fascinating, but they're
120
00:04:23.310 --> 00:04:25.190
more like a search for a needle in a hair
121
00:04:25.190 --> 00:04:28.190
sack, where we don't even know if there is
122
00:04:28.190 --> 00:04:30.430
life elsewhere, never mind intelligent life.
123
00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:32.310
I mean, some people argue whether there's
124
00:04:32.310 --> 00:04:34.070
intelligent life on Earth looking at the news
125
00:04:34.070 --> 00:04:36.270
at the minute, but looking for intelligent
126
00:04:36.270 --> 00:04:38.270
life that has reached certain technological
127
00:04:38.270 --> 00:04:41.250
level to communicate with us is challenging.
128
00:04:41.250 --> 00:04:42.770
It's one of those things if we don't know
129
00:04:42.770 --> 00:04:44.290
what we're looking for, but if we don't look,
130
00:04:44.290 --> 00:04:47.210
we'll never find it. But it still led to some
131
00:04:47.210 --> 00:04:49.250
really fascinating research, and there's a
132
00:04:49.250 --> 00:04:51.650
guy who works with us as part of our Planet
133
00:04:51.650 --> 00:04:53.730
Search Consortium, a guy called Jason Reutt
134
00:04:53.730 --> 00:04:56.130
in the US who spent some of his time actually
135
00:04:56.290 --> 00:04:59.290
thinking about alien megastructures, the
136
00:04:59.290 --> 00:05:01.530
kind of things that feature so heavily in
137
00:05:01.530 --> 00:05:03.130
some advanced science fiction, like Larry
138
00:05:03.130 --> 00:05:06.130
Niven's Ringworld or Dyson Spheres, these
139
00:05:06.370 --> 00:05:08.610
enormous structures that you can imagine a
140
00:05:09.170 --> 00:05:11.810
civilization building. If their technologies
141
00:05:11.810 --> 00:05:14.030
are far above ours, as ours is from the Stone
142
00:05:14.030 --> 00:05:16.070
Age, the idea that you could build something
143
00:05:16.070 --> 00:05:18.230
to harness all the material in your planetary
144
00:05:18.230 --> 00:05:20.270
system m harness all the energy from your
145
00:05:20.270 --> 00:05:22.550
star. Now, many people argue that while
146
00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:23.990
that's theoretically possible, it just
147
00:05:23.990 --> 00:05:26.510
wouldn't be worth the effort. But what
148
00:05:26.510 --> 00:05:28.429
Jason's been looking into is
149
00:05:29.070 --> 00:05:31.910
effectively not could people do
150
00:05:31.910 --> 00:05:34.350
this? But rather if they did, what would it
151
00:05:34.350 --> 00:05:36.790
look like? So it's not really putting any
152
00:05:36.790 --> 00:05:39.630
weight on the probability of
153
00:05:39.630 --> 00:05:41.910
these things existing, but rather saying,
154
00:05:41.910 --> 00:05:44.370
here are things we could imagine that are
155
00:05:44.370 --> 00:05:46.610
within the bounds of physical possibility to
156
00:05:46.610 --> 00:05:47.810
build. Even if they'd be on this
157
00:05:47.810 --> 00:05:50.370
technologically, what would they look like to
158
00:05:50.370 --> 00:05:52.450
our different kinds of telescopes? What would
159
00:05:52.450 --> 00:05:54.770
the signatures be? And, um, that work's
160
00:05:54.770 --> 00:05:57.370
really important because if you don't have an
161
00:05:57.370 --> 00:05:59.730
idea what these peculiar objects would look
162
00:05:59.730 --> 00:06:02.530
like, when you find something unusual, you
163
00:06:02.530 --> 00:06:04.610
won't have that thing to reference again to
164
00:06:04.610 --> 00:06:06.690
cheque it out. So both the search for
165
00:06:06.690 --> 00:06:08.530
extraterrestrial intelligence and the search
166
00:06:08.530 --> 00:06:11.500
for alien artefacts, a kind of
167
00:06:11.500 --> 00:06:13.860
a separate splinter of astrobiology that are
168
00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:16.420
ongoing, that are very precious to us here in
169
00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:17.980
Australia. Of course, we would have lost the
170
00:06:17.980 --> 00:06:20.340
Parks Radio telescope under the Liberal
171
00:06:20.340 --> 00:06:22.900
government in the 2010s in the previous
172
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.180
decade because they wanted to shut it down
173
00:06:25.180 --> 00:06:27.299
and demolish it to save money. And it only
174
00:06:27.380 --> 00:06:30.100
kept going by a large investment
175
00:06:30.820 --> 00:06:33.580
as part of a project to listen
176
00:06:33.580 --> 00:06:36.340
for aliens. So, like 40. I remember
177
00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:38.220
that telescope has been used to search for
178
00:06:38.220 --> 00:06:40.060
extraterrestrial intelligence in the form of
179
00:06:40.060 --> 00:06:42.740
radio signals. And that has kept one of our,
180
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:44.960
uh, incredible pieces of astronomical
181
00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:46.320
heritage in Australia. And something
182
00:06:46.320 --> 00:06:48.840
incredibly precious and beloved has kept it
183
00:06:48.840 --> 00:06:50.880
going and kept it standing despite the worst
184
00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:53.600
vagaries of politicians and
185
00:06:53.840 --> 00:06:54.880
all those challenges.
186
00:06:55.520 --> 00:06:58.320
Andrew Dunkley: Could you argue that we, uh, have
187
00:06:58.320 --> 00:07:00.240
already created a
188
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:03.160
megastructure around Earth with the number of
189
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:05.840
satellites that are currently in orbit and
190
00:07:05.920 --> 00:07:08.240
the so many thousands more that are going to
191
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:09.600
be put up there in the near future?
192
00:07:09.920 --> 00:07:11.640
Jonti Horner: Certainly feels like that from the inside.
193
00:07:11.640 --> 00:07:13.720
Looking out. I mean, I'm enjoying all the
194
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:16.102
photos. People are, uh, of Comet 2025
195
00:07:16.218 --> 00:07:19.180
R3 Pan stars at the minute, which behind
196
00:07:19.180 --> 00:07:20.900
both of us are our attempts. We're showing
197
00:07:20.900 --> 00:07:22.980
them off. Andrew's ever so proud from his
198
00:07:22.980 --> 00:07:23.820
attempt last night.
199
00:07:24.060 --> 00:07:25.340
Andrew Dunkley: My first ever comet.
200
00:07:25.340 --> 00:07:27.860
Jonti Horner: Fabulous photos that people are getting, but
201
00:07:27.860 --> 00:07:29.620
I've seen a lot of them getting photobombed
202
00:07:29.620 --> 00:07:32.020
by Starlink satellites. And I've got. I'm
203
00:07:32.020 --> 00:07:34.060
currently, thanks to learning something new
204
00:07:34.060 --> 00:07:35.740
about astrophotography over the last two
205
00:07:35.740 --> 00:07:37.460
days. I'm going back to images I took of
206
00:07:37.460 --> 00:07:39.700
Comet Atlas and Comet um, Church in Chan
207
00:07:39.700 --> 00:07:41.700
Atlas, which were the great comets of 2024
208
00:07:41.700 --> 00:07:44.300
and 2025 to reprocess those
209
00:07:44.300 --> 00:07:47.280
images. But one of my abiding Comet Atlas
210
00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:49.080
was I had this incredible view of it on the
211
00:07:49.080 --> 00:07:51.760
horizon. Took this long series of photos and
212
00:07:51.760 --> 00:07:54.080
every single blooming photo was ruined by a
213
00:07:54.080 --> 00:07:55.760
Starlink satellite because I got a Starlink
214
00:07:55.760 --> 00:07:57.640
train passing overhead that had recently been
215
00:07:57.640 --> 00:07:59.680
launched. All of which went straight through
216
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.080
the middle of the comet and rendered all the
217
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:03.520
photos unusable on my only really good clear
218
00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:06.040
night. Now, I may be able to solve it, but
219
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:08.840
that isn't quite at the megastructure stage
220
00:08:08.840 --> 00:08:11.680
yet for me in that I suspect with the
221
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:13.560
level of technology we've got now or in the
222
00:08:13.560 --> 00:08:16.270
near future, that network of
223
00:08:16.270 --> 00:08:17.950
satellites around the Earth, uh, wouldn't be
224
00:08:17.950 --> 00:08:20.110
something we could detect orbiting a planet
225
00:08:20.110 --> 00:08:22.830
around another star. Right. They're not there
226
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:24.510
yet, but they're the forebears of something
227
00:08:24.510 --> 00:08:27.470
that could be. Now, being that
228
00:08:27.470 --> 00:08:29.830
they're around a planet rather than a star,
229
00:08:29.830 --> 00:08:31.870
their signature will be different. And given
230
00:08:31.870 --> 00:08:34.350
that we are very skilled now at
231
00:08:34.350 --> 00:08:36.310
broadcasting in one direction rather than
232
00:08:36.310 --> 00:08:38.830
many, and that broadcasting directionally
233
00:08:38.830 --> 00:08:40.750
rather than broadcasting the boy band one
234
00:08:40.750 --> 00:08:43.750
direction should be said, um, broadcasting
235
00:08:44.209 --> 00:08:46.689
in a directional sense. We are moving towards
236
00:08:46.689 --> 00:08:48.329
the point where we're going to stop shrieking
237
00:08:48.329 --> 00:08:50.649
like a screaming infant into the cosmos
238
00:08:50.649 --> 00:08:52.889
anyway. So it may be that we're going to go
239
00:08:52.889 --> 00:08:54.889
radio silent fairly soon, and satellites like
240
00:08:54.889 --> 00:08:56.769
that are going to be part of that journey.
241
00:08:57.489 --> 00:08:59.289
But I think they are an indication of how
242
00:08:59.289 --> 00:09:01.009
quickly these things can happen. You know, if
243
00:09:01.009 --> 00:09:03.169
we were talking a decade ago, we'd have been
244
00:09:03.169 --> 00:09:05.289
talking about a couple of thousand satellites
245
00:09:05.289 --> 00:09:07.249
orbiting Earth. We're now talking about
246
00:09:07.489 --> 00:09:09.929
roughly 50,000. With plants have more than a
247
00:09:09.929 --> 00:09:12.849
million within the next decade, it's getting
248
00:09:13.870 --> 00:09:16.670
quite terrifying, actually. As much from the
249
00:09:16.670 --> 00:09:18.310
atmosphere and climate side of things as
250
00:09:18.310 --> 00:09:20.630
anything else. You know, if we have a million
251
00:09:20.630 --> 00:09:23.430
Starlink satellites in orbit in five years or
252
00:09:23.430 --> 00:09:26.030
10 years time, they have an average lifetime
253
00:09:26.030 --> 00:09:27.590
of five years, which means we'd have more
254
00:09:27.590 --> 00:09:29.470
than 500 per day burning up in the
255
00:09:29.470 --> 00:09:31.310
atmosphere. And that's
256
00:09:32.510 --> 00:09:35.350
a factor of 100, if not more times
257
00:09:35.350 --> 00:09:37.190
material entering the atmosphere on a daily
258
00:09:37.190 --> 00:09:39.590
basis than we get from the background of
259
00:09:39.590 --> 00:09:42.430
space stuff falling in. We'll be running an
260
00:09:42.510 --> 00:09:44.430
experiment in atmospheric science that we've
261
00:09:44.430 --> 00:09:47.250
never run, dumping hundreds of
262
00:09:47.250 --> 00:09:49.010
tonnes of aluminium into the upper atmosphere
263
00:09:49.010 --> 00:09:49.530
every day.
264
00:09:50.090 --> 00:09:52.490
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, what's the effect going to be? And
265
00:09:52.730 --> 00:09:55.730
that's the $64,000 question, I suppose.
266
00:09:55.730 --> 00:09:57.370
Jonti Horner: But now the interesting thing there, coming
267
00:09:57.370 --> 00:10:00.090
back to the astrobiology, is that might
268
00:10:00.170 --> 00:10:02.650
well create a signature in the Earth's
269
00:10:02.650 --> 00:10:04.490
atmosphere that would be detectable
270
00:10:05.370 --> 00:10:07.610
from observers from around another star.
271
00:10:08.010 --> 00:10:10.170
Because one of the ways that we would look
272
00:10:10.570 --> 00:10:13.510
for biosignatures, at least early
273
00:10:13.510 --> 00:10:16.310
on, will be to look at the light
274
00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:19.470
from a star reaching us whilst a given
275
00:10:19.470 --> 00:10:21.710
planet is transiting between us and the star,
276
00:10:21.710 --> 00:10:24.030
so blocking a bit of that star's light. We
277
00:10:24.030 --> 00:10:25.830
can currently do this with giant planets,
278
00:10:25.830 --> 00:10:28.430
Jupiter sized, and a fraction of the light
279
00:10:28.430 --> 00:10:30.830
from the star passes through the planet's
280
00:10:30.830 --> 00:10:33.150
atmosphere. And you get imprinted on the
281
00:10:33.150 --> 00:10:35.110
stars like the chemical fingerprint of the
282
00:10:35.110 --> 00:10:37.110
constituents of the outer layers of the
283
00:10:37.110 --> 00:10:39.230
atmosphere where the lights pass through in
284
00:10:39.230 --> 00:10:41.510
the form of absorption lines. And um, by
285
00:10:41.510 --> 00:10:43.410
studying them, we can work out some of the
286
00:10:43.410 --> 00:10:45.130
chemical species that are prevalent there and
287
00:10:45.130 --> 00:10:46.810
even learn a bit about the structure of the
288
00:10:46.810 --> 00:10:48.650
atmosphere, the presence of clouds, things
289
00:10:48.650 --> 00:10:51.650
like that. Now when we get to the point where
290
00:10:51.650 --> 00:10:53.290
we've got all those satellites burning up in
291
00:10:53.290 --> 00:10:56.250
our atmosphere, imagining with the kind of
292
00:10:56.250 --> 00:10:57.930
technology that we're looking at developing
293
00:10:57.930 --> 00:11:00.130
within the next decade or so, or maybe a
294
00:11:00.130 --> 00:11:02.210
little bit longer, imagining being on a
295
00:11:02.210 --> 00:11:04.050
nearby star looking at the sun while the
296
00:11:04.050 --> 00:11:06.450
Earth is transiting, you're suddenly
297
00:11:06.450 --> 00:11:09.130
introducing a huge spike of aluminium and
298
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:11.400
into the absorption in an Earth like planet's
299
00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:14.200
atmosphere. And there is no natural way that
300
00:11:14.200 --> 00:11:16.080
I'm aware of that you could get that.
301
00:11:17.040 --> 00:11:19.400
So that would not only be a sign of something
302
00:11:19.400 --> 00:11:21.800
way going on, it would be a bio signature of
303
00:11:21.800 --> 00:11:24.280
technologically developed life that is not
304
00:11:24.280 --> 00:11:26.000
quite so developed as to have learned that
305
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:26.800
pollution is bad.
306
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:30.440
Andrew Dunkley: Maybe that's how we find an
307
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:33.240
intelligent species, uh, beyond Earth.
308
00:11:33.240 --> 00:11:36.050
They find us first and send us a, you
309
00:11:36.050 --> 00:11:37.010
know, welcome pack.
310
00:11:37.010 --> 00:11:40.010
Jonti Horner: Yes. 10 helpful things you can do to fix your
311
00:11:40.010 --> 00:11:42.690
problems. Stop burning things up in the
312
00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:43.370
atmosphere.
313
00:11:44.100 --> 00:11:47.090
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yes, yeah, they may have already
314
00:11:47.090 --> 00:11:50.010
learned that lesson, but um, yeah, okay,
315
00:11:50.010 --> 00:11:52.610
so that's where we're at so far. Where do we
316
00:11:52.610 --> 00:11:55.170
go from here on the astrobiology
317
00:11:55.170 --> 00:11:55.690
train?
318
00:11:55.850 --> 00:11:58.210
Jonti Horner: Well, where we moved to in the latter part of
319
00:11:58.210 --> 00:12:00.330
the last astrobiology episode
320
00:12:00.890 --> 00:12:03.790
was my argument that
321
00:12:03.790 --> 00:12:05.590
you can't just look at a planet and say it's
322
00:12:05.590 --> 00:12:07.750
at the right temperature in the habitable
323
00:12:07.750 --> 00:12:10.070
zone. Um, we can look There. Whee.
324
00:12:10.630 --> 00:12:12.990
It kind of feels a bit like that when you
325
00:12:12.990 --> 00:12:15.030
read a lot of storeys, that the only
326
00:12:15.030 --> 00:12:16.990
consideration that comes into play is how far
327
00:12:16.990 --> 00:12:19.190
the planet is from its star. And I think
328
00:12:19.270 --> 00:12:21.510
instead, it's fairer to say that there are a
329
00:12:21.590 --> 00:12:24.470
huge variety of factors that can make
330
00:12:24.470 --> 00:12:27.310
one planet more or less suitable for the
331
00:12:27.310 --> 00:12:28.870
development of life and therefore for the
332
00:12:28.870 --> 00:12:31.510
observability of life on planets around other
333
00:12:31.510 --> 00:12:33.800
stars. And therefore, given that the
334
00:12:33.800 --> 00:12:35.440
observations to find life are going to be
335
00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:37.440
overwhelmingly the hardest we've ever had to
336
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.040
carry out, we'll have hundreds, if not
337
00:12:40.040 --> 00:12:41.640
thousands of targets to choose from, but
338
00:12:41.640 --> 00:12:43.440
we'll only be able to look at a tiny handful
339
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.080
of them in detail at first. So we need to be
340
00:12:46.080 --> 00:12:48.600
very careful about where we look. The
341
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.960
proximity of the planet and its host star to
342
00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:53.320
the sun will be important because the closer
343
00:12:53.320 --> 00:12:55.440
the star is to a zombie we get for a given
344
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:58.120
brightness of star, and also the more widely
345
00:12:58.120 --> 00:13:00.520
separated on the sky a star and planet will
346
00:13:00.520 --> 00:13:02.760
be for a given orbital distance between them.
347
00:13:02.920 --> 00:13:04.560
Closer they are, the more widely separated
348
00:13:04.560 --> 00:13:06.620
they are. And while people listening can't
349
00:13:06.620 --> 00:13:08.860
see this, I'm at the minute pointing fingers
350
00:13:08.860 --> 00:13:10.540
up at the side of my eyes to Andrew and then
351
00:13:10.540 --> 00:13:12.340
moving them towards the camera. Fingers are
352
00:13:12.340 --> 00:13:14.180
the same distance apart, but they get wider
353
00:13:14.180 --> 00:13:15.740
and wider apart on the screen as they get
354
00:13:15.740 --> 00:13:18.340
closer. Yeah. So there are clear reasons that
355
00:13:18.340 --> 00:13:21.099
we will look at stars that are nearer to
356
00:13:21.099 --> 00:13:23.740
us rather than further away. But beyond
357
00:13:23.740 --> 00:13:25.740
that, I think it's really important to
358
00:13:25.740 --> 00:13:28.740
consider all the different things that could
359
00:13:28.820 --> 00:13:30.900
factor in to make a given planet more
360
00:13:30.900 --> 00:13:33.770
suitable or less suitable for the
361
00:13:33.770 --> 00:13:35.970
development of life, and view them as like
362
00:13:36.290 --> 00:13:38.850
sliders on a mixing board in a sound studio,
363
00:13:39.170 --> 00:13:41.810
where you can fine tune things to see which
364
00:13:41.810 --> 00:13:43.610
gets the best sound, which gets the best
365
00:13:43.610 --> 00:13:46.490
score. You can rank your targets and
366
00:13:46.490 --> 00:13:48.450
you can start with the most promising ones,
367
00:13:48.450 --> 00:13:50.930
because with limited resources, you don't
368
00:13:50.930 --> 00:13:52.650
just want to do an unbiased survey, you want
369
00:13:52.650 --> 00:13:54.530
to instead maximise your chances of a
370
00:13:54.530 --> 00:13:56.930
positive result. Now, we're heavily biassed.
371
00:13:56.930 --> 00:13:58.890
We only know of one kind of life and that's
372
00:13:58.890 --> 00:14:01.410
Earth life. So we are very biassed towards
373
00:14:01.410 --> 00:14:03.410
looking for places that could support life
374
00:14:03.710 --> 00:14:05.630
like Earth life, because that's the only kind
375
00:14:05.630 --> 00:14:08.310
of life we do know exists that'll factor into
376
00:14:08.310 --> 00:14:10.510
it as well. But in the previous episode,
377
00:14:10.510 --> 00:14:12.430
towards the end, we talked about the way in
378
00:14:12.430 --> 00:14:13.990
which the location in the galaxy could
379
00:14:13.990 --> 00:14:16.510
potentially influence this, with the caveat,
380
00:14:16.510 --> 00:14:17.670
of course, that, uh, we're going to be
381
00:14:17.670 --> 00:14:19.190
looking at everything nearby. So whilst
382
00:14:19.190 --> 00:14:20.870
that's interesting scientifically, it's not
383
00:14:20.870 --> 00:14:23.190
that relevant. And then we also talked about
384
00:14:23.190 --> 00:14:25.430
the way that the nature of the stars that the
385
00:14:25.430 --> 00:14:28.380
planet orbits can influence things. And uh,
386
00:14:28.430 --> 00:14:30.020
not just from the point of view of is a star,
387
00:14:30.020 --> 00:14:32.910
ah, stable or single, but down to more subtle
388
00:14:32.910 --> 00:14:35.070
things like the fact that stars brighten over
389
00:14:35.070 --> 00:14:37.330
time. So just because a planet is in the
390
00:14:37.330 --> 00:14:39.570
habitable zone now doesn't mean it's been in
391
00:14:39.570 --> 00:14:42.090
that zone for long enough for life to become
392
00:14:42.090 --> 00:14:42.770
well established.
393
00:14:42.770 --> 00:14:45.170
So we talked about all that, where we
394
00:14:45.170 --> 00:14:47.610
finished up though we didn't get to my own
395
00:14:48.170 --> 00:14:50.050
personal favourite parts of the science and
396
00:14:50.050 --> 00:14:52.170
the stuff I'm more directly involved with,
397
00:14:52.890 --> 00:14:54.850
which are the more local influences on the
398
00:14:54.850 --> 00:14:57.090
planet, that is the influence of the
399
00:14:57.090 --> 00:14:59.050
planetary system in which that planet moves,
400
00:14:59.050 --> 00:15:00.770
all the other planets and all the debris
401
00:15:00.770 --> 00:15:03.690
therein, but also the impact of the planet
402
00:15:03.690 --> 00:15:06.050
itself, what it's made of, how it behaves.
403
00:15:06.050 --> 00:15:07.830
And there's a lot of subtlety in that that.
404
00:15:08.070 --> 00:15:10.430
When I prepared with my old mentor, Professor
405
00:15:10.430 --> 00:15:12.870
Barry Jones this review article on this 16
406
00:15:12.870 --> 00:15:15.670
years ago now, we dug into and it
407
00:15:15.670 --> 00:15:18.390
highlighted to me how none of these questions
408
00:15:18.390 --> 00:15:20.230
can be answered from people within a single
409
00:15:20.230 --> 00:15:23.030
research silo at all. You need researchers
410
00:15:23.030 --> 00:15:24.670
from all different disciplines of human
411
00:15:24.670 --> 00:15:27.510
experience, from the sciences, the biological
412
00:15:27.510 --> 00:15:29.830
sciences, physical sciences, geosciences,
413
00:15:29.830 --> 00:15:31.830
chemistry and astronomers all to come
414
00:15:31.830 --> 00:15:34.830
together. You probably also need philosophers
415
00:15:34.830 --> 00:15:36.430
and archaeologists to come into the
416
00:15:36.430 --> 00:15:38.280
discussion to talk about, about how we look
417
00:15:38.280 --> 00:15:40.400
and why we look and what we look for. And
418
00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:43.120
that's particularly true when we start moving
419
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:46.080
from simple life to life that could talk
420
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:48.560
back to us. And a very dear friend of mine in
421
00:15:48.560 --> 00:15:50.480
Australia who Fred Watson probably knows very
422
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:52.680
well as well is Professor Alice Gorman down
423
00:15:52.680 --> 00:15:55.280
at Adelaide, who's a space archaeologist and
424
00:15:55.280 --> 00:15:57.680
has given some of the most astonishing and
425
00:15:57.680 --> 00:15:59.480
mind blowing talks I've ever seen from the
426
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:01.680
point of view of someone who is trained in
427
00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:04.480
archaeology looking at the record of human
428
00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:06.440
space flight and what we should do to
429
00:16:06.440 --> 00:16:08.440
preserve artefacts like the Apollo landing
430
00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:09.980
site for future generations. Generations how
431
00:16:09.980 --> 00:16:11.060
we should consider that
432
00:16:13.300 --> 00:16:14.900
Andrew Dunkley: I absolutely agree because
433
00:16:16.180 --> 00:16:19.100
it was probably one of the
434
00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:21.860
greatest achievements in human history, if
435
00:16:21.860 --> 00:16:23.780
not the greatest achievement in human
436
00:16:23.780 --> 00:16:25.940
history. I mean inventing the wheel probably
437
00:16:25.940 --> 00:16:27.740
would have been a pretty cool thing too, but
438
00:16:27.740 --> 00:16:29.340
I don't know where that happened or when and
439
00:16:29.340 --> 00:16:31.980
they never would have thought to commemorate
440
00:16:31.980 --> 00:16:34.820
it. But um, it is something that
441
00:16:34.820 --> 00:16:37.000
should, should, you know, when we eventually
442
00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:39.480
have permanent residents on the moon,
443
00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:42.200
at least need to put a cyclone fence around
444
00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:44.520
it just for the time being until we can build
445
00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:48.080
a proper structure to protect
446
00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:48.320
it.
447
00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:49.880
Jonti Horner: Probably a good place to have rabbit proof
448
00:16:49.880 --> 00:16:51.960
fence because that will, that'll do the job.
449
00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:55.000
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yeah, well, you know that rabbits will
450
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:57.600
ultimately be on the moon. They tend to be
451
00:16:57.600 --> 00:16:58.100
everywhere else.
452
00:16:58.100 --> 00:17:00.480
Jonti Horner: Um, now one of the greatest conference talks
453
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:02.400
ever witnessed actually was a talk by a list
454
00:17:02.400 --> 00:17:03.920
talking about archaeology. And it was from
455
00:17:03.920 --> 00:17:06.730
the education and biases
456
00:17:06.730 --> 00:17:08.290
point of view. And I know this is already a
457
00:17:08.290 --> 00:17:10.290
bit off topic, but it's a storey I think
458
00:17:10.290 --> 00:17:12.370
really well worth repeating. Alice is an
459
00:17:12.370 --> 00:17:14.210
archaeologist and so she teaches archaeology
460
00:17:14.210 --> 00:17:16.850
students and she gave this talk about how she
461
00:17:16.850 --> 00:17:18.770
took a group of her uh, final year students
462
00:17:19.250 --> 00:17:21.410
to this site in Fairlie Regional New South
463
00:17:21.410 --> 00:17:24.250
Wales for a two day dig. Basically go out
464
00:17:24.250 --> 00:17:25.770
there, dig and come back to me with what you
465
00:17:25.770 --> 00:17:27.290
find and tell me about the storey of the
466
00:17:27.290 --> 00:17:29.890
site. And after two days all these
467
00:17:30.130 --> 00:17:31.730
young students came back and said, look, we
468
00:17:31.730 --> 00:17:33.250
didn't really find much, we found a few
469
00:17:33.930 --> 00:17:35.610
Aboriginal artefacts and that's kind of
470
00:17:35.610 --> 00:17:37.210
interesting, but all we found was a load of
471
00:17:37.210 --> 00:17:38.930
rubbish. We found all these blooming cable
472
00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:40.850
ties and bits of plastic that are polluting
473
00:17:40.850 --> 00:17:43.810
the site. What she then went on to do
474
00:17:43.810 --> 00:17:46.210
was the whole point was that the cable ties
475
00:17:46.210 --> 00:17:48.170
were actually the archaeology that she was
476
00:17:48.170 --> 00:17:50.420
interested in. So she went um, on and um,
477
00:17:50.810 --> 00:17:52.490
said in the talk that this was an old
478
00:17:52.490 --> 00:17:54.730
decommissioned listening station that had
479
00:17:54.730 --> 00:17:56.730
been built I think in like the late 1940s,
480
00:17:56.730 --> 00:17:58.610
post World War II, and operated into maybe
481
00:17:58.610 --> 00:18:00.930
the late 60s, early 70s before being
482
00:18:00.930 --> 00:18:03.530
demolished and removed. But by looking at the
483
00:18:03.530 --> 00:18:05.430
cable ties where they'd been identified had
484
00:18:05.900 --> 00:18:08.060
knowing a little bit about how cable ties and
485
00:18:08.060 --> 00:18:10.060
cable tie technology changed over the years,
486
00:18:10.620 --> 00:18:12.820
you could not only map out exactly where all
487
00:18:12.820 --> 00:18:14.380
the buildings had been and where the wire
488
00:18:14.380 --> 00:18:16.300
runs have been and get the structure of this
489
00:18:16.700 --> 00:18:19.620
long vanished building, you could also
490
00:18:19.620 --> 00:18:21.970
work out which bits were built when. And um,
491
00:18:22.220 --> 00:18:24.260
the whole importance here was partly that
492
00:18:24.260 --> 00:18:25.660
whole thing of one man's trash is another
493
00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:28.060
man's treasure, but it's also how
494
00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:30.870
as a scientist and a researcher, uh,
495
00:18:31.520 --> 00:18:34.000
you will miss things and you'll make mistakes
496
00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:36.760
because of your own personal biases that are
497
00:18:36.760 --> 00:18:39.720
quite often unconscious. And in this case for
498
00:18:39.720 --> 00:18:40.920
these students who've been studying
499
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:43.560
archaeology, their unconscious bias was that
500
00:18:43.560 --> 00:18:46.080
anything modern is not archaeology. That's
501
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.440
rubbish in the way of good archaeology. And
502
00:18:48.440 --> 00:18:50.240
so they totally miss the point. And it's a
503
00:18:50.240 --> 00:18:52.480
fabulous learning thing. It's why as
504
00:18:52.480 --> 00:18:54.680
scientists we use statistics so much. I know
505
00:18:54.680 --> 00:18:56.440
there's all this stuff about you can show
506
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:58.200
anything with statistics, damn lies and
507
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.160
statistics, all the rest of it. But
508
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:01.920
fundamentally the reason that we use
509
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:04.580
statistics as a tool school is because we as
510
00:19:04.580 --> 00:19:06.460
humans are biassed we've got this incredible
511
00:19:06.460 --> 00:19:09.380
evolutionary ability to see patterns when
512
00:19:09.380 --> 00:19:11.780
they're barely there, but we also have a very
513
00:19:11.780 --> 00:19:13.740
strong ability to see patterns that we expect
514
00:19:13.740 --> 00:19:15.580
to see when those patterns aren't actually
515
00:19:15.580 --> 00:19:18.340
there. And, um, that's certainly true of the
516
00:19:18.340 --> 00:19:20.260
canals on Mars. You know, Giovanni
517
00:19:20.260 --> 00:19:23.060
Schiaparelli saw these canals, these
518
00:19:23.060 --> 00:19:25.740
channels on, um, Mars, which I think the best
519
00:19:25.740 --> 00:19:27.660
explanation is that Mars was really bright.
520
00:19:27.660 --> 00:19:29.100
He had a big telescope and he was actually
521
00:19:29.100 --> 00:19:30.740
seeing the projection of his own capillaries
522
00:19:30.740 --> 00:19:33.100
in his eye, like I'm gonna see tomorrow when
523
00:19:33.100 --> 00:19:34.740
I get my eye test at the opticians and they
524
00:19:34.740 --> 00:19:37.060
do the bright light thing. But all these
525
00:19:37.060 --> 00:19:38.900
other observers with less good eyes and less
526
00:19:38.900 --> 00:19:40.860
good telescopes suddenly started seeing the
527
00:19:40.860 --> 00:19:43.660
canals. And it's this
528
00:19:43.660 --> 00:19:45.620
whole thing of when you're really straining
529
00:19:45.620 --> 00:19:47.140
at the limits of your vision, you see what
530
00:19:47.140 --> 00:19:48.820
you think you're going to see, not what there
531
00:19:48.820 --> 00:19:51.540
actually is. And that's true with our data.
532
00:19:51.540 --> 00:19:54.420
Uh, therefore, you use statistics
533
00:19:54.420 --> 00:19:55.900
to give you a feel for whether what you're
534
00:19:55.900 --> 00:19:57.980
seeing is significant or not, or whether it
535
00:19:57.980 --> 00:20:00.260
exists in the first place. And that's a way
536
00:20:00.260 --> 00:20:03.260
of us combating those biases. Now, that wasn'
537
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:05.440
in that way to the archaeology students who
538
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:07.160
thought that cable ties were rubbish, but it
539
00:20:07.160 --> 00:20:10.080
was a fabulous reminder of how we really
540
00:20:10.080 --> 00:20:12.320
need to be aware not only of the explicit
541
00:20:12.320 --> 00:20:14.520
biases, which are the things we choose to do.
542
00:20:15.560 --> 00:20:18.320
If they're doing a survey of people on hair
543
00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:20.040
loss and they say we interviewed men between
544
00:20:20.040 --> 00:20:23.040
18 and 30, that's clearly biassed to
545
00:20:23.040 --> 00:20:25.280
be for men between 18 and 30, not for men of
546
00:20:25.280 --> 00:20:27.680
our age, for example. That's an explicit
547
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:29.400
bias, it's one that's a conscious choice.
548
00:20:29.800 --> 00:20:31.680
Implicit biases are the sneaky ones, where
549
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:33.770
you don't realise you're making them. And
550
00:20:33.770 --> 00:20:35.650
that's why I've made it so clear up front
551
00:20:35.650 --> 00:20:37.890
here that we can imagine
552
00:20:38.370 --> 00:20:40.690
all kinds of life. Science fiction does it
553
00:20:40.690 --> 00:20:43.460
wonderfully, but our implicit bias is that,
554
00:20:43.460 --> 00:20:44.890
uh, when we talk about the search for life,
555
00:20:44.890 --> 00:20:46.690
at least in the very short term, we're
556
00:20:46.690 --> 00:20:49.049
actually looking for life like us, not you
557
00:20:49.049 --> 00:20:51.890
and I, but lifelike Earth, uh, life based on
558
00:20:51.890 --> 00:20:54.090
a planet with oceans, living on the surface,
559
00:20:54.090 --> 00:20:56.330
modifying the atmosphere, because that's the
560
00:20:56.330 --> 00:20:58.130
one kind of life we know exists, but also
561
00:20:58.690 --> 00:21:00.440
because that's the one kind of life we could
562
00:21:00.440 --> 00:21:02.600
probably identify with our observations. Life
563
00:21:02.600 --> 00:21:05.440
beneath the ice on Europa is fascinating, but
564
00:21:05.440 --> 00:21:07.600
we can't see it in the solar system. We
565
00:21:07.600 --> 00:21:09.880
wouldn't have a prayer if Europa was found
566
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:11.640
orbiting another star, because the ice is in
567
00:21:11.640 --> 00:21:14.400
the way life on a surface that modifies an
568
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:16.319
atmosphere is at least something we
569
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:18.680
theoretically could detect. So that's making
570
00:21:18.680 --> 00:21:20.680
the implicit explicit.
571
00:21:21.800 --> 00:21:23.960
Andrew Dunkley: Gotcha. All right, we're gonna take a breath,
572
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:27.160
uh, and get back to Astrobiology Part 2
573
00:21:27.560 --> 00:21:29.000
on Space Nuts.
574
00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:32.780
Let's take a little break from the to tell
575
00:21:32.780 --> 00:21:35.460
you about online, uh, security with our
576
00:21:35.460 --> 00:21:38.460
sponsor NordVPN. Now, ah, you
577
00:21:38.460 --> 00:21:40.980
probably heard us talk about NORDVPN before.
578
00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:43.260
Uh, they've been with us for a long time and
579
00:21:43.260 --> 00:21:45.260
we really appreciate it. But there's a good
580
00:21:45.260 --> 00:21:47.780
reason for that. It's something that we
581
00:21:47.859 --> 00:21:50.660
actually use, me personally, uh, especially
582
00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:53.220
when travelling. In fact, last year when Judy
583
00:21:53.220 --> 00:21:55.380
and I were overseas, we ran into a situation
584
00:21:55.380 --> 00:21:58.270
where some of our everyday online apps
585
00:21:58.270 --> 00:22:01.150
on our phones just wouldn't work. Our
586
00:22:01.150 --> 00:22:03.390
banking app for example. And that was crucial
587
00:22:03.630 --> 00:22:05.790
because we were actually selling a house
588
00:22:05.790 --> 00:22:08.790
while we were on a cruise ship. Yeah, don't
589
00:22:08.790 --> 00:22:11.460
ask. It was, it was a strange situation but
590
00:22:11.460 --> 00:22:13.709
uh, we needed access to our bank accounts to
591
00:22:13.709 --> 00:22:16.630
make all that happen and NORDVPN was
592
00:22:16.630 --> 00:22:19.350
there for us. Uh, I even got to watch sport
593
00:22:19.350 --> 00:22:21.990
back home even though we were geofenced out
594
00:22:21.990 --> 00:22:24.750
of the district because we were over in, in
595
00:22:24.910 --> 00:22:27.270
the Mediterranean or somewhere like that. So
596
00:22:27.270 --> 00:22:30.190
with NordVPN, I was able to log in and watch
597
00:22:30.190 --> 00:22:32.510
the football back home. It lets you
598
00:22:32.590 --> 00:22:34.990
securely connect through servers in your home
599
00:22:34.990 --> 00:22:37.550
country, so your apps will behave like
600
00:22:37.710 --> 00:22:40.549
you're at home. Uh, but it's not just
601
00:22:40.549 --> 00:22:43.310
about access, it's about protection. NORDVPN
602
00:22:43.310 --> 00:22:45.910
encrypts your Internet traffic, so whether
603
00:22:45.910 --> 00:22:48.710
you're uh, on public WI fi or on your home
604
00:22:48.710 --> 00:22:51.310
network, your data is shielded from hackers
605
00:22:51.310 --> 00:22:53.450
and trackers and other unwanted snooping.
606
00:22:54.330 --> 00:22:56.290
It also has a built in threat protection
607
00:22:56.290 --> 00:22:59.210
system which can block malicious websites and
608
00:22:59.210 --> 00:23:01.770
annoying ads and even prevent malware
609
00:23:01.770 --> 00:23:04.490
downloads before they happen. And
610
00:23:04.570 --> 00:23:07.050
setting it up, very easy. One click and
611
00:23:07.050 --> 00:23:09.650
you're protected across multiple devices. Up
612
00:23:09.650 --> 00:23:11.930
to six devices with one service
613
00:23:12.570 --> 00:23:14.530
right now. If you'd like to take advantage of
614
00:23:14.530 --> 00:23:17.530
a special Space Nuts listener offer, uh,
615
00:23:17.530 --> 00:23:20.270
you can head to this URL for more
616
00:23:20.270 --> 00:23:22.672
information. Nordvpn.com/spacenuts
617
00:23:23.028 --> 00:23:25.870
spacenuts to get 4 extra months
618
00:23:25.870 --> 00:23:28.350
free plus a 30 day money back
619
00:23:28.510 --> 00:23:31.150
guarantee. They can't make a much better
620
00:23:31.150 --> 00:23:32.830
offer than that, can they? That's
621
00:23:32.830 --> 00:23:34.830
nordvpn.com
622
00:23:35.870 --> 00:23:38.110
spacenuts and don't forget to use the code
623
00:23:38.110 --> 00:23:40.670
word SPACENUTS. Secure your
624
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.030
connection wherever you are in the world or
625
00:23:43.030 --> 00:23:46.000
the universe with NordVPN, uh, our
626
00:23:46.000 --> 00:23:46.600
sponsor.
627
00:23:47.560 --> 00:23:49.800
Jonti Horner: 3, 2, 1
628
00:23:50.360 --> 00:23:51.640
space nuts.
629
00:23:51.960 --> 00:23:54.520
Andrew Dunkley: And you're with Andrew Dunkley and Professor
630
00:23:54.520 --> 00:23:57.080
Jonty Horner okay, what next,
631
00:23:57.080 --> 00:23:59.480
Jonty, in this search for
632
00:23:59.560 --> 00:24:01.000
extraterrestrial life?
633
00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:03.600
Jonti Horner: Well, I think we come back to moving away
634
00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:05.640
from the diversions of archaeology and stuff
635
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:08.360
to the factors that could make a planet more
636
00:24:08.360 --> 00:24:11.000
or less suitable as a target. And like I
637
00:24:11.000 --> 00:24:12.440
said, we talked about the galaxy, we talked
638
00:24:12.440 --> 00:24:15.320
about the stars. To me, as a person who
639
00:24:15.320 --> 00:24:16.640
comes originally from a solar system
640
00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:18.380
background, particularly fascinated with
641
00:24:18.380 --> 00:24:20.260
comets and asteroids and stuff like that,
642
00:24:21.300 --> 00:24:23.660
there are a lot of factors that have been
643
00:24:23.660 --> 00:24:26.340
proposed that relate to
644
00:24:26.580 --> 00:24:28.460
the interaction of planets and the
645
00:24:28.460 --> 00:24:30.180
interaction with the debris that's around
646
00:24:30.580 --> 00:24:32.420
that could render planets more or less
647
00:24:32.420 --> 00:24:35.300
suitable as targets. Now one
648
00:24:35.300 --> 00:24:37.620
example of this is the stability of orbits.
649
00:24:37.620 --> 00:24:40.020
You know, there are a variety of different
650
00:24:40.340 --> 00:24:42.500
models of the solar system's youth, some of
651
00:24:42.500 --> 00:24:44.100
which suggest that there were periods of
652
00:24:44.340 --> 00:24:46.740
chaotic instability where the planets orbits
653
00:24:46.740 --> 00:24:49.130
got stirred up, planets maybe even swapped
654
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.880
orbits. Now this is the kind of thing we can
655
00:24:51.880 --> 00:24:53.600
model. And when we discover planetary
656
00:24:53.600 --> 00:24:56.480
systems, we can take the planets that we
657
00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:58.840
think are there and put them into computer
658
00:24:58.840 --> 00:25:00.760
software to run their orbits forward and back
659
00:25:00.760 --> 00:25:03.160
in time to see how they behave. And that's
660
00:25:03.160 --> 00:25:05.280
actually part of my day to day work. That's
661
00:25:05.760 --> 00:25:08.400
the technology I use and lots of tools I've
662
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:10.280
used in the past to kill planetary systems
663
00:25:10.280 --> 00:25:12.400
that people thought were there because I run
664
00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:14.120
simulations and showed they're simply not
665
00:25:14.120 --> 00:25:15.620
stable on very short timescales.
666
00:25:17.130 --> 00:25:18.930
But on longer time scales, these kind of
667
00:25:18.930 --> 00:25:21.930
perturbations can have a significant impact
668
00:25:22.170 --> 00:25:24.730
on the orbits of planets. You can get
669
00:25:24.730 --> 00:25:27.370
significant shifts over time. You can get
670
00:25:27.370 --> 00:25:29.890
encounters and stirring up, which means
671
00:25:29.890 --> 00:25:32.050
sometimes that a planet will be on an orbit
672
00:25:32.050 --> 00:25:34.690
now that is not the orbit it's occupied in
673
00:25:34.690 --> 00:25:37.010
the past. And uh, those are things that we
674
00:25:37.010 --> 00:25:38.650
could probably pull out, tease out from the
675
00:25:38.650 --> 00:25:40.850
simulation kind of work that I do. And
676
00:25:40.850 --> 00:25:42.710
obviously a planet that is now in the
677
00:25:43.340 --> 00:25:45.140
habitable zone, um, but that was previously
678
00:25:45.140 --> 00:25:47.860
well outside it would not be a good place to
679
00:25:47.860 --> 00:25:50.660
look. Even though it looks good now, it's not
680
00:25:50.660 --> 00:25:52.900
great. It's like, I guess, you know, you've
681
00:25:52.900 --> 00:25:54.820
got two petri dishes in front of you that you
682
00:25:54.820 --> 00:25:56.300
could look at for life, but you can tell that
683
00:25:56.300 --> 00:25:58.020
one of them's been absolutely melted in a
684
00:25:58.020 --> 00:26:00.420
fire. It's at room temperature now, but that
685
00:26:00.420 --> 00:26:02.620
doesn't mean it always has been that same
686
00:26:02.620 --> 00:26:04.820
kind of idea. So that on a coarse scale has
687
00:26:04.820 --> 00:26:06.660
an effect. But there's a subtler version of
688
00:26:06.660 --> 00:26:08.660
that that I've done a little bit of work on
689
00:26:08.660 --> 00:26:10.940
in the past. And I've got a PhD student
690
00:26:10.940 --> 00:26:12.560
working with me at the moment minute, who's
691
00:26:12.560 --> 00:26:13.720
going to look into this a lot more. A
692
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:16.280
wonderful student called Amber Tilly. It's
693
00:26:16.280 --> 00:26:18.040
the idea of the Milankovitch cycles.
694
00:26:19.080 --> 00:26:22.040
Now, on Earth, we
695
00:26:22.120 --> 00:26:24.280
look at climate change in the short term as
696
00:26:24.280 --> 00:26:26.960
being a big problem because it's a very rapid
697
00:26:26.960 --> 00:26:29.000
change that is being caused by human action.
698
00:26:29.480 --> 00:26:32.160
But on much longer timescales, the climate of
699
00:26:32.160 --> 00:26:34.840
Earth is periodically variable. We've had ice
700
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.160
ages and interglacial periods for the last 2
701
00:26:37.160 --> 00:26:39.850
or 3 million years, which are the direct
702
00:26:39.850 --> 00:26:42.290
result of the subtle nudges and tweaks on
703
00:26:42.290 --> 00:26:44.410
the, uh, Earth from all the other objects in
704
00:26:44.410 --> 00:26:46.370
the solar system, primarily the other
705
00:26:46.370 --> 00:26:48.770
planets, and not mainly Jupiter to be honest.
706
00:26:48.770 --> 00:26:51.570
But most of the planets contribute. These are
707
00:26:51.570 --> 00:26:54.170
called the Milankovitch cycles. They have a
708
00:26:54.170 --> 00:26:56.610
number of effects. Firstly, the Earth on its
709
00:26:56.610 --> 00:26:59.490
axis precesses. It wobbles with a period of
710
00:26:59.490 --> 00:27:02.450
about 23,000 years. So our polar
711
00:27:02.450 --> 00:27:04.890
axis, which is tilted by currently 23 and a
712
00:27:04.890 --> 00:27:07.280
half degrees to the plane of our orbit,
713
00:27:07.520 --> 00:27:09.880
wobbles around like a kid's wobbly spinning
714
00:27:09.880 --> 00:27:12.360
toy coming to a stop. It precesses, wobbles
715
00:27:12.360 --> 00:27:13.880
around a bit like the thing in Inception
716
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:16.000
about to fall over. You see this procession?
717
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:18.720
That's a procession of the equinoxes. That's
718
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:20.400
why your horoscopes are wrong. While it's one
719
00:27:20.400 --> 00:27:22.080
of the many reasons that your horoscopes are
720
00:27:22.080 --> 00:27:23.560
wrong, but it's particularly why your
721
00:27:23.560 --> 00:27:26.520
horoscopes are out by one particular one
722
00:27:26.520 --> 00:27:29.440
full calendar month. Because the
723
00:27:29.440 --> 00:27:31.850
horoscopes are based on where the sun is, was
724
00:27:31.850 --> 00:27:34.730
in the sky at that date 2,000 years ago.
725
00:27:35.050 --> 00:27:37.130
And, um, the axis of the Earth has wobbled
726
00:27:37.130 --> 00:27:38.890
round, so it's now one constellation round.
727
00:27:39.610 --> 00:27:42.130
So when the sun is in Aries, according to
728
00:27:42.130 --> 00:27:44.090
your horoscope, it's actually now in Pisces,
729
00:27:45.290 --> 00:27:47.529
all because of the wobble. That wobble takes
730
00:27:47.529 --> 00:27:50.410
23,000 years to complete. That means that
731
00:27:50.410 --> 00:27:52.610
the direction that the Earth is pointing
732
00:27:52.610 --> 00:27:55.570
changes over time. Essentially. Added
733
00:27:55.570 --> 00:27:57.730
to that, you've got a very slight wobble up
734
00:27:57.730 --> 00:27:59.650
and down where the tilt fire axis, which is
735
00:27:59.650 --> 00:28:02.290
currently 23 and a half degrees, changes from
736
00:28:02.290 --> 00:28:04.830
about 22 to, to 24 degrees, rocking back and
737
00:28:04.830 --> 00:28:07.070
forward. So that causes the size of the
738
00:28:07.070 --> 00:28:09.150
Arctic and Antarctic circles to grow and
739
00:28:09.150 --> 00:28:12.150
shrink very slightly. On um, top of all that,
740
00:28:12.150 --> 00:28:13.710
you've then got the Earth's orbit around the
741
00:28:13.710 --> 00:28:16.390
sun flexing and tilting. Its shape
742
00:28:16.390 --> 00:28:18.710
becomes more circular and more elongated,
743
00:28:19.189 --> 00:28:21.670
more eccentric. With a longer period period,
744
00:28:21.670 --> 00:28:23.910
I think about 100,000 years, something like
745
00:28:23.910 --> 00:28:26.310
that, our orbit, compared to the orbits of
746
00:28:26.310 --> 00:28:28.830
Jupiter and Saturn, tilts a little bit up and
747
00:28:28.830 --> 00:28:31.270
down the inclination changes, which adds to
748
00:28:31.270 --> 00:28:33.590
the change of the tilt in our spin axis a
749
00:28:33.590 --> 00:28:36.290
little bit. We also have the Earth's orbit
750
00:28:36.290 --> 00:28:37.930
precessing around in just the same way our
751
00:28:37.930 --> 00:28:39.690
poles do, and that's a little bit harder to
752
00:28:39.690 --> 00:28:42.370
visualise. But what that means is that the
753
00:28:42.530 --> 00:28:45.490
direction, if you drew a line from the sun
754
00:28:45.570 --> 00:28:47.240
through the Earth and out into space at, ah,
755
00:28:47.290 --> 00:28:49.770
the point the Earth was at perihelion closest
756
00:28:49.770 --> 00:28:52.490
to the sun, that direction will
757
00:28:52.490 --> 00:28:54.410
gradually move round over time, doing a full
758
00:28:54.410 --> 00:28:56.490
lap with a period of several tens of
759
00:28:56.490 --> 00:28:58.650
thousands of years. So our perihelion
760
00:28:58.650 --> 00:29:01.360
possession processes as well, all of the,
761
00:29:01.590 --> 00:29:04.390
that combined means that, uh,
762
00:29:04.390 --> 00:29:06.830
on average the amount of energy reaching the
763
00:29:06.830 --> 00:29:08.870
Earth's polar regions, averaged over a given
764
00:29:08.870 --> 00:29:11.870
year, varies with type. Sometimes the
765
00:29:11.870 --> 00:29:13.910
poles get a bit more energy and the ice
766
00:29:14.070 --> 00:29:16.590
sheets retreat. Sometimes they get a bit less
767
00:29:16.590 --> 00:29:18.190
energy and the ice sheets come back towards
768
00:29:18.190 --> 00:29:20.390
the equator again. Now, there's a lot of
769
00:29:20.390 --> 00:29:22.110
complex feedback from the Earth because ice
770
00:29:22.110 --> 00:29:24.830
is more reflective than water or land. So
771
00:29:24.830 --> 00:29:26.750
when ice is growing, it has a tendency to
772
00:29:26.750 --> 00:29:29.320
keep growing, and when it's shrinking, that
773
00:29:29.320 --> 00:29:31.320
has a tendency to run away as well. So you've
774
00:29:31.320 --> 00:29:33.800
got all these different feedbacks. But what
775
00:29:33.800 --> 00:29:35.520
that means is that on the Earth we've got
776
00:29:35.520 --> 00:29:38.480
these periodic variations in the
777
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:40.160
amount of energy at the poles which lead to
778
00:29:40.160 --> 00:29:42.200
periodic glaciations and interglacial
779
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:44.680
periods. That's the Milankovitch cycles.
780
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:47.200
It means that on timescales of tens of
781
00:29:47.200 --> 00:29:49.240
thousands of years, our climate is relatively
782
00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:52.040
changeable. What would
783
00:29:52.040 --> 00:29:54.720
happen if the planets were on different
784
00:29:54.720 --> 00:29:57.630
orbits or if you were in a
785
00:29:57.630 --> 00:29:59.310
planetary system with a totally different
786
00:29:59.310 --> 00:30:01.830
architecture? The result would be very
787
00:30:01.830 --> 00:30:04.590
different Milankovitch cycles. You'd have
788
00:30:04.590 --> 00:30:06.430
different periods and you'd also have
789
00:30:06.430 --> 00:30:08.710
different amplitudes. You could imagine
790
00:30:08.710 --> 00:30:10.710
scenarios where instead of our Earth rocking
791
00:30:10.710 --> 00:30:13.510
a little bit from 22 to 24 degrees and back
792
00:30:13.510 --> 00:30:16.030
with its polar axis, it could be like Mars,
793
00:30:16.030 --> 00:30:18.630
whose spin axis varies chaotically, can even
794
00:30:18.630 --> 00:30:21.470
tip over on its side. You could have systems
795
00:30:21.470 --> 00:30:23.150
where there's barely any change whatsoever.
796
00:30:23.150 --> 00:30:25.840
You've got this full gap. Now the beauty is,
797
00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:28.480
again, we've got the tools to test this.
798
00:30:28.800 --> 00:30:30.640
We can run the kind of computational
799
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:32.880
simulations that I've spent my career doing
800
00:30:33.120 --> 00:30:35.120
and, uh, model the orbits of a planet over
801
00:30:35.120 --> 00:30:36.640
time under the influence of all the other
802
00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:39.560
planets. And I did a lot of simulations of
803
00:30:39.560 --> 00:30:42.360
this between 2012 and 2020. I
804
00:30:42.360 --> 00:30:44.000
kept coming back to the idea, but never got
805
00:30:44.000 --> 00:30:46.400
around to publishing it until we got to 2020,
806
00:30:46.800 --> 00:30:49.160
where I published it with, um, Stephen Cain
807
00:30:49.160 --> 00:30:51.120
from University of California, Riverside. Pam
808
00:30:51.120 --> 00:30:53.280
Vervoort, who was his PhD student at the
809
00:30:53.280 --> 00:30:55.810
time, a couple of other people, people where
810
00:30:55.810 --> 00:30:58.490
we said, what is the influence of Jupiter on
811
00:30:58.490 --> 00:31:00.210
our Milankovitch cycles? What would happen if
812
00:31:00.210 --> 00:31:02.250
you move Jupiter closer to the sun or further
813
00:31:02.250 --> 00:31:04.970
away? If you made Jupiter's
814
00:31:04.970 --> 00:31:07.530
orbit more eccentric or less eccentric, how
815
00:31:07.530 --> 00:31:09.350
would that change the period and, um,
816
00:31:09.350 --> 00:31:11.210
amplitude of the Earth's? Milankovic cycles
817
00:31:12.170 --> 00:31:14.090
did the test. And in many cases, moving
818
00:31:14.090 --> 00:31:16.090
Jupiter destroyed the solar system, which
819
00:31:16.090 --> 00:31:18.250
meant the Earth wouldn't be here, which was
820
00:31:18.250 --> 00:31:21.010
kind of fun, but not very helpful. But for
821
00:31:21.010 --> 00:31:22.870
the versions of the solar system where the,
822
00:31:23.100 --> 00:31:26.060
the Earth was not removed, we got to see
823
00:31:26.060 --> 00:31:28.580
the range, the variety of Milankovitch cycles
824
00:31:28.580 --> 00:31:31.300
we would have from moving Jupiter in a bit
825
00:31:31.300 --> 00:31:33.060
closer or moving it a bit further away. And
826
00:31:33.060 --> 00:31:34.940
for those really interested, we moved Jupiter
827
00:31:34.940 --> 00:31:37.740
in as far as 3 Au from the sun, out as far as
828
00:31:37.740 --> 00:31:40.020
7 Au from the sun, where 5 Au is about where
829
00:31:40.020 --> 00:31:42.780
it is at the minute, 5.2. What we
830
00:31:42.780 --> 00:31:44.900
found, which is quite surprising, is that the
831
00:31:44.900 --> 00:31:46.860
Earth's, uh, Milankovitch cycles are neither
832
00:31:47.180 --> 00:31:49.020
unusually big or unusually small. They're
833
00:31:49.020 --> 00:31:50.810
somewhere in the middle. Middle. Which is a
834
00:31:50.810 --> 00:31:52.610
bit of an argument against a hypothesis
835
00:31:52.610 --> 00:31:55.090
called the Rare Earth hypothesis.
836
00:31:55.570 --> 00:31:58.376
This idea has been around for about 20, 25,
837
00:31:58.470 --> 00:32:01.330
30 years, and I've never really liked it.
838
00:32:01.330 --> 00:32:04.330
It's the idea that life on Earth is such a
839
00:32:04.330 --> 00:32:07.090
remarkable, incredible fluke
840
00:32:07.650 --> 00:32:09.730
that we will never find life elsewhere. And
841
00:32:09.730 --> 00:32:11.650
the authors put forward all these
842
00:32:11.650 --> 00:32:13.810
peculiarities about the Earth, uh, and argue
843
00:32:13.810 --> 00:32:15.970
that without them we would not be here.
844
00:32:16.900 --> 00:32:18.980
And it's a bit of a philosophical thing, but
845
00:32:19.300 --> 00:32:21.180
I think it's very dangerous to look at
846
00:32:21.180 --> 00:32:23.620
somewhere that has life and say, this place
847
00:32:23.620 --> 00:32:25.420
has all these unusual things and they are
848
00:32:25.420 --> 00:32:27.100
therefore required for life because we've
849
00:32:27.100 --> 00:32:29.820
never found life elsewhere. A good example is
850
00:32:29.820 --> 00:32:31.260
the presence of a large moon. And we'll talk
851
00:32:31.260 --> 00:32:33.580
about this a bit more later on. We have life
852
00:32:33.580 --> 00:32:35.380
on Earth and we have a big moon, so it's
853
00:32:35.380 --> 00:32:37.220
natural to think you need a big moon to have
854
00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:39.780
life. But we won't know that until we find
855
00:32:39.780 --> 00:32:42.380
life elsewhere. But that led to this argument
856
00:32:42.380 --> 00:32:44.500
of rare Earth life will be uncommon in the
857
00:32:44.500 --> 00:32:47.060
universe. If rare Earth were true,
858
00:32:47.460 --> 00:32:48.940
then when you look at something like the
859
00:32:48.940 --> 00:32:50.900
Milankovitch cycles, you would expect our
860
00:32:50.900 --> 00:32:52.820
Earth to be unusual in some way,
861
00:32:54.020 --> 00:32:56.660
to have conditions that favour life over your
862
00:32:56.660 --> 00:32:59.380
typical system. And we simply don't find that
863
00:32:59.380 --> 00:33:01.419
our Milankovitch cycles are fairly run of the
864
00:33:01.419 --> 00:33:03.220
mill. They're not big, they're not small,
865
00:33:03.220 --> 00:33:06.140
they're not fast. They're not slow, they're
866
00:33:06.140 --> 00:33:08.020
somewhere in the middle. Now,
867
00:33:08.810 --> 00:33:11.420
um, sorry, Pam went with that. Pam lava vault
868
00:33:11.420 --> 00:33:11.580
was.
869
00:33:11.580 --> 00:33:13.460
She then took the output of that and run it
870
00:33:13.460 --> 00:33:15.780
into climate modelling software, which was
871
00:33:15.780 --> 00:33:17.480
fabulous. And she published that work, work
872
00:33:17.480 --> 00:33:20.360
with us in 2022, where
873
00:33:20.360 --> 00:33:22.400
she was able to link the Milankovitch cycles.
874
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:24.400
We predicted if you moved Jupiter around
875
00:33:25.360 --> 00:33:28.200
with the amplitude and frequency of the
876
00:33:28.200 --> 00:33:29.960
ice ages, we'd get. And it was really
877
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:31.240
interesting because it turned out that when
878
00:33:31.240 --> 00:33:33.680
you factor in some of the feedback mechanisms
879
00:33:33.680 --> 00:33:35.840
that are in climate modelling, you actually
880
00:33:35.840 --> 00:33:37.840
could change the Earth's Milkovitch cycles a
881
00:33:37.840 --> 00:33:39.880
little bit and get very drastically different
882
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:42.560
ice ages, much more frequent and shallower,
883
00:33:42.560 --> 00:33:45.280
or much less frequent and deeper just by
884
00:33:45.280 --> 00:33:47.800
small changes. Now, now, it's all
885
00:33:47.800 --> 00:33:49.560
fascinating just from the solar system point
886
00:33:49.560 --> 00:33:51.880
of view, but what we're really doing is we're
887
00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:54.520
putting down tools that when we find
888
00:33:54.520 --> 00:33:56.840
planets that could be suitable, we can do
889
00:33:56.840 --> 00:33:58.920
these same tests. We can look at them and
890
00:33:58.920 --> 00:34:00.480
say, we're thinking that you might be a
891
00:34:00.480 --> 00:34:02.600
target for life. Let's see what your
892
00:34:02.600 --> 00:34:04.360
Melankovic cycles are like. Let's see how
893
00:34:04.360 --> 00:34:06.920
stable your climate is. And if we find
894
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:09.120
somewhere that flops between snowball Earth
895
00:34:09.120 --> 00:34:12.080
and a hothouse every 10 years, or that has
896
00:34:12.080 --> 00:34:13.960
incredibly long snowball Earth periods
897
00:34:13.960 --> 00:34:15.960
followed by short periods of temperate
898
00:34:15.960 --> 00:34:18.039
climate climate, even though everything else
899
00:34:18.039 --> 00:34:19.610
looks good, that's probably not as, uh,
900
00:34:19.679 --> 00:34:21.959
suitable for life as somewhere that is
901
00:34:21.959 --> 00:34:24.239
temperate all the time. So we can use that as
902
00:34:24.239 --> 00:34:26.519
a bit of a filter. And that's where the new
903
00:34:26.519 --> 00:34:28.519
PhD student we've got, Amber Tilly, comes in.
904
00:34:28.519 --> 00:34:30.039
Amber's, um, going to be doing the same kind
905
00:34:30.039 --> 00:34:32.399
of work, moving it forward, where she's going
906
00:34:32.399 --> 00:34:33.999
to be looking at a whole slew of different
907
00:34:33.999 --> 00:34:36.799
parameters to see how the
908
00:34:36.799 --> 00:34:39.279
Milankovitch cycles change as you vary
909
00:34:39.279 --> 00:34:41.479
things. She's both going to look at what
910
00:34:41.479 --> 00:34:42.919
would happen if the Earth was a bit more
911
00:34:42.919 --> 00:34:44.599
massive or less massive. How would that
912
00:34:44.599 --> 00:34:46.799
change things? Because of the feedback, you
913
00:34:46.799 --> 00:34:48.149
make Earth more massive, it interacts,
914
00:34:48.219 --> 00:34:49.859
interacts more with other things, stirs them
915
00:34:49.859 --> 00:34:52.739
up, you get a feedback there. She's also
916
00:34:52.739 --> 00:34:54.339
going to look, working with colleagues of
917
00:34:54.339 --> 00:34:57.139
ours overseas, at, uh, models of planet
918
00:34:57.139 --> 00:34:59.739
formation that form planetary systems similar
919
00:34:59.739 --> 00:35:02.539
to the solar system as theoretical
920
00:35:02.539 --> 00:35:04.739
data, and say, what would the Milankovitch
921
00:35:04.739 --> 00:35:07.019
cycles be like in this hypothetical system?
922
00:35:07.499 --> 00:35:09.419
So it's not just a purely hypothetical
923
00:35:09.419 --> 00:35:10.859
question, it's something we can actually dig
924
00:35:10.859 --> 00:35:13.659
into and, um, we can test. And I think
925
00:35:13.659 --> 00:35:15.379
that's fundamental to science. It's no good
926
00:35:15.379 --> 00:35:16.779
just arguing something you want to be able to
927
00:35:16.779 --> 00:35:17.520
Test. Test it.
928
00:35:18.480 --> 00:35:21.120
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. I suppose what you're suggesting is
929
00:35:21.360 --> 00:35:24.000
that by mucking around with
930
00:35:24.960 --> 00:35:27.640
what we know and making slight alterations,
931
00:35:27.640 --> 00:35:30.600
it gives you an idea of what to look
932
00:35:30.600 --> 00:35:33.560
for going forward in identifying
933
00:35:33.560 --> 00:35:34.640
potential targets.
934
00:35:34.880 --> 00:35:37.520
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And it's good because one of the
935
00:35:37.520 --> 00:35:39.080
reasons that you'd want to use the Earth is
936
00:35:39.080 --> 00:35:41.600
because we've got a ground truth. You can run
937
00:35:41.600 --> 00:35:43.080
the Earth with the current solar system
938
00:35:43.080 --> 00:35:45.080
parameters and put them into a climate model.
939
00:35:45.080 --> 00:35:47.530
And you should get what we see so we can
940
00:35:47.530 --> 00:35:49.130
ground truth it, which is really, really
941
00:35:49.130 --> 00:35:51.850
important. And, um, that is, I think, one of
942
00:35:51.850 --> 00:35:54.130
the main, most obvious ways where even in a
943
00:35:54.130 --> 00:35:56.010
dynamically stable system, a system that
944
00:35:56.010 --> 00:35:58.890
isn't tearing itself apart, interaction
945
00:35:58.890 --> 00:36:00.530
between planets could have a significant
946
00:36:00.610 --> 00:36:03.130
impact on habitability. And we want to look
947
00:36:03.130 --> 00:36:05.010
into it. It's really, really fascinating.
948
00:36:06.050 --> 00:36:08.930
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed it is. All right, um, we
949
00:36:08.930 --> 00:36:11.810
are talking astrobiology on this
950
00:36:11.970 --> 00:36:14.770
special episode of Space Nuts with Professor
951
00:36:14.770 --> 00:36:15.890
Jonty Horner.
952
00:36:15.890 --> 00:36:16.370
Back in.
953
00:36:19.310 --> 00:36:21.270
Okay, we checked all four systems and
954
00:36:21.270 --> 00:36:23.070
Jonti Horner: being with a go, space nets.
955
00:36:23.310 --> 00:36:25.950
Andrew Dunkley: Jody, I thought we might just start off
956
00:36:25.950 --> 00:36:28.670
this, uh, final segment with a
957
00:36:28.750 --> 00:36:30.910
question from the audience. Uh, it's funny
958
00:36:30.910 --> 00:36:33.590
because this question's come in before any of
959
00:36:33.590 --> 00:36:36.590
these astrobiology episodes have
960
00:36:36.590 --> 00:36:39.310
been released. And yet it's
961
00:36:39.310 --> 00:36:41.510
exactly what we've been talking about. This
962
00:36:41.510 --> 00:36:42.750
comes from Chris.
963
00:36:42.910 --> 00:36:45.630
Jonti Horner: Hi, um, I'm Chris from Axmouth in the uk.
964
00:36:46.270 --> 00:36:48.110
I'd, uh, just like to ask, um, given that
965
00:36:48.110 --> 00:36:50.690
interstellar travel to distance solar systems
966
00:36:50.690 --> 00:36:52.970
is likely to remain impractical for humans,
967
00:36:53.540 --> 00:36:55.770
um, do you think a more realistic long term
968
00:36:55.770 --> 00:36:56.970
strategy would be to
969
00:36:57.050 --> 00:36:58.970
Andrew Dunkley: seed the galaxy with the basic building
970
00:36:58.970 --> 00:37:01.690
blocks of life? Uh, for example,
971
00:37:01.860 --> 00:37:04.050
uh, sending autonomous probes carrying
972
00:37:04.050 --> 00:37:06.530
microbes or prebiotic material that could
973
00:37:06.530 --> 00:37:08.490
Jonti Horner: eventually take hold on suitable planets,
974
00:37:08.890 --> 00:37:09.210
even
975
00:37:09.210 --> 00:37:11.450
Andrew Dunkley: if that process takes thousands or millions
976
00:37:11.450 --> 00:37:11.930
of years.
977
00:37:12.490 --> 00:37:12.970
Jonti Horner: Thanks.
978
00:37:14.330 --> 00:37:16.380
Andrew Dunkley: There's a, uh, thought from Chris. So
979
00:37:17.420 --> 00:37:19.420
he's probably suggesting, you know, could we
980
00:37:19.420 --> 00:37:22.260
seed other planets? Uh, would that be
981
00:37:22.260 --> 00:37:24.780
the way to go? Uh, and autonomous,
982
00:37:25.060 --> 00:37:27.980
uh, vehicles. I think last
983
00:37:27.980 --> 00:37:29.580
time we talked about this a couple of
984
00:37:29.580 --> 00:37:32.300
episodes ago, you, you suggested it's,
985
00:37:32.300 --> 00:37:34.860
it's beyond us to actually
986
00:37:34.940 --> 00:37:37.860
send a human mission to another world
987
00:37:37.860 --> 00:37:40.860
to investigate life. But we could
988
00:37:41.340 --> 00:37:43.580
go the way of autonomous vehicles.
989
00:37:44.200 --> 00:37:46.720
Uh, but for the major
990
00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:50.730
distances, like the impossible distances, uh,
991
00:37:50.730 --> 00:37:53.240
we would have to come up with equipment in
992
00:37:53.240 --> 00:37:56.200
the future that could do it from a
993
00:37:56.200 --> 00:37:58.750
stable environment nearby. Um,
994
00:37:59.120 --> 00:38:00.440
I don't know how you want to tackle that
995
00:38:00.440 --> 00:38:00.720
question.
996
00:38:01.200 --> 00:38:02.600
Jonti Horner: There's a fair bit to it, and I mean, it
997
00:38:02.600 --> 00:38:05.200
reminds me of the wonderful Bobbyverse books
998
00:38:05.200 --> 00:38:07.160
that I've quite enjoyed. You know, um, the
999
00:38:07.160 --> 00:38:09.400
Storey of the Self Intelligent Von Neumann
1000
00:38:09.400 --> 00:38:11.800
probes, which are, uh, easy listening and
1001
00:38:11.800 --> 00:38:13.360
work very well as audiobooks.
1002
00:38:14.560 --> 00:38:17.440
It's a challenging one. So we could
1003
00:38:17.520 --> 00:38:20.400
do this. It would be feasible.
1004
00:38:20.560 --> 00:38:22.440
The question would become whether it's
1005
00:38:22.440 --> 00:38:25.440
ethical and right. Yes, and that's a really
1006
00:38:25.440 --> 00:38:27.520
challenging one. Now, there is something that
1007
00:38:27.520 --> 00:38:30.400
costs research missions
1008
00:38:30.480 --> 00:38:32.920
a vast amount of money called planetary
1009
00:38:32.920 --> 00:38:35.640
protection. And it's the idea that if we're
1010
00:38:35.640 --> 00:38:37.880
sending a spacecraft that has a possibility
1011
00:38:37.880 --> 00:38:40.870
of touching down on a place where we are
1012
00:38:40.870 --> 00:38:42.870
currently interested in looking for life,
1013
00:38:42.870 --> 00:38:45.550
where there could be life, such as Mars, such
1014
00:38:45.550 --> 00:38:48.030
as Europa, uh, Ganymede, Titan, around
1015
00:38:48.030 --> 00:38:50.910
Saturn. We don't want to take life with
1016
00:38:50.910 --> 00:38:52.630
us because you don't want to find life on
1017
00:38:52.630 --> 00:38:54.630
Mars only to discover it's what you took with
1018
00:38:54.630 --> 00:38:56.550
you. And also we don't want to pollute or
1019
00:38:56.550 --> 00:38:59.190
contaminate those environments. So there's a
1020
00:38:59.190 --> 00:39:01.750
huge amount of effort and expense, goes into
1021
00:39:02.070 --> 00:39:04.590
extreme sterilisation of spacecraft to kind
1022
00:39:04.590 --> 00:39:06.950
of prevent exactly the hypothesis being
1023
00:39:06.950 --> 00:39:08.870
discussed here. At the same time,
1024
00:39:09.870 --> 00:39:12.750
that idea of populating the galaxy with
1025
00:39:12.750 --> 00:39:15.430
simple life that could one day grow
1026
00:39:15.430 --> 00:39:18.110
to resemblers or something else has
1027
00:39:18.110 --> 00:39:20.270
cropped a few times in science fiction. I
1028
00:39:20.270 --> 00:39:23.110
believe that was how Star Trek got
1029
00:39:23.110 --> 00:39:25.910
around the fact that all of their humanoid
1030
00:39:25.910 --> 00:39:27.870
species looked like people with makeup on.
1031
00:39:28.390 --> 00:39:30.790
Um, which of course is a budgetary issue and
1032
00:39:30.790 --> 00:39:32.790
a special effects issue. But they had an
1033
00:39:32.790 --> 00:39:34.390
episode where people found the founders,
1034
00:39:34.390 --> 00:39:37.090
which were an alien, ancient alien humanoid
1035
00:39:37.090 --> 00:39:39.570
race at seed of the galaxy. And billions of
1036
00:39:39.570 --> 00:39:41.290
years later all these different planets had
1037
00:39:41.290 --> 00:39:43.530
grown humanoids that looked like them and.
1038
00:39:43.530 --> 00:39:46.050
Oh, well, convenient job done. Stop asking us
1039
00:39:46.050 --> 00:39:48.970
that question now, please. Effectively it
1040
00:39:48.970 --> 00:39:51.410
is something we could do and the timescales
1041
00:39:51.410 --> 00:39:53.250
would be immense. It's also something that,
1042
00:39:53.650 --> 00:39:55.930
in all honesty, has already happened. There's
1043
00:39:55.930 --> 00:39:58.610
this idea called panspermia, which is the
1044
00:39:58.610 --> 00:40:00.450
idea that life could be transferred through
1045
00:40:00.450 --> 00:40:02.570
space from planet to planet, carried by
1046
00:40:02.570 --> 00:40:05.450
debris from impacts and talking. Thirty or
1047
00:40:05.450 --> 00:40:07.310
40 years ago, it was viewed as very much
1048
00:40:07.310 --> 00:40:09.750
crank science, not feasible. But every
1049
00:40:09.750 --> 00:40:11.390
experiment that people have ever done
1050
00:40:11.470 --> 00:40:13.430
suggests that it could work. And I've even
1051
00:40:13.430 --> 00:40:15.630
had a PhD student just submit his thesis,
1052
00:40:16.030 --> 00:40:18.430
Greg Davis, who has been looking at this
1053
00:40:19.150 --> 00:40:20.950
from the point of view of the viability of
1054
00:40:20.950 --> 00:40:23.790
bacteria transferred from Earth to Mars or
1055
00:40:23.790 --> 00:40:26.510
Mars to Earth in the radiation environment in
1056
00:40:26.510 --> 00:40:27.950
the solar system. And it seems to work.
1057
00:40:29.470 --> 00:40:31.650
Now, to me, the fact that biological, uh,
1058
00:40:32.310 --> 00:40:34.270
material from Earth will have rained down on
1059
00:40:34.270 --> 00:40:36.230
Mars and Europa and Ganymede and everywhere
1060
00:40:36.230 --> 00:40:38.270
else for the last 4 billion years
1061
00:40:39.030 --> 00:40:40.990
probably means that we're being a bit over
1062
00:40:40.990 --> 00:40:43.190
cautious with our planet protection efforts
1063
00:40:43.190 --> 00:40:45.230
because we're trying not to take something
1064
00:40:45.230 --> 00:40:47.310
there when it's already there, it's already
1065
00:40:47.310 --> 00:40:49.310
been delivered. The other thing is that
1066
00:40:49.310 --> 00:40:51.150
anything we take with us to a place that has
1067
00:40:51.150 --> 00:40:52.790
an incredibly, incredibly different
1068
00:40:52.790 --> 00:40:55.230
environment, if there is life there already,
1069
00:40:55.230 --> 00:40:57.470
that life should hugely outcompete anything
1070
00:40:57.470 --> 00:40:59.150
we take with us because it's better adapted
1071
00:40:59.150 --> 00:41:01.590
for that environment. And that would be one
1072
00:41:01.590 --> 00:41:03.310
of the challenges with this, is sending stuff
1073
00:41:03.310 --> 00:41:05.270
out. It'd have to be lucky to get exactly the
1074
00:41:05.270 --> 00:41:06.630
right environment to grow. But with the
1075
00:41:06.630 --> 00:41:09.270
amount of real estate we've got out there it
1076
00:41:09.270 --> 00:41:12.190
could happen. People have even in some more
1077
00:41:12.190 --> 00:41:15.070
extreme sci fi suggested kind of
1078
00:41:15.310 --> 00:41:18.230
this type approach as a way to
1079
00:41:18.230 --> 00:41:20.350
begin terraforming planets ahead of human
1080
00:41:20.350 --> 00:41:21.990
arrival. This idea that you could send
1081
00:41:21.990 --> 00:41:24.670
generation ships which have to go
1082
00:41:24.830 --> 00:41:26.510
slowly because they're really big and carry a
1083
00:41:26.510 --> 00:41:28.190
lot of people. But you could send faster
1084
00:41:28.190 --> 00:41:31.030
moving, smaller things first to start
1085
00:41:31.030 --> 00:41:33.030
working on the biosphere of a planet to make
1086
00:41:33.030 --> 00:41:35.670
it so that when we get there that planet is a
1087
00:41:35.670 --> 00:41:37.230
suitable home. So there's a lot of ways it
1088
00:41:37.230 --> 00:41:40.170
could be taken. Taken. I think to do it
1089
00:41:40.170 --> 00:41:42.930
in the near future in an official organised
1090
00:41:42.930 --> 00:41:44.970
way would require a significant shift in
1091
00:41:44.970 --> 00:41:46.890
global morality in the way we think about
1092
00:41:47.130 --> 00:41:49.770
other habitats. If we found that
1093
00:41:49.770 --> 00:41:52.610
Mars absolutely has no life and
1094
00:41:52.610 --> 00:41:54.570
possibly that it never had life, which I
1095
00:41:54.570 --> 00:41:56.850
think is probably unlikely, then I could see
1096
00:41:56.850 --> 00:41:58.890
people arguing then for terraforming.
1097
00:41:58.890 --> 00:42:00.690
Similarly people have argued about, I think
1098
00:42:00.690 --> 00:42:03.290
Carl Sagan suggested this, creating
1099
00:42:03.530 --> 00:42:06.190
engineering bacteria that could float in the
1100
00:42:06.190 --> 00:42:08.750
clouds of Venus and um, precipitate out the
1101
00:42:08.750 --> 00:42:10.910
carbon to eventually make Venus a more
1102
00:42:11.150 --> 00:42:13.270
habitable planet on long timescales. The idea
1103
00:42:13.270 --> 00:42:15.790
of terraforming these worlds is real. But I
1104
00:42:15.790 --> 00:42:18.790
think it would require either a state
1105
00:42:18.790 --> 00:42:21.070
to go its own way because as we know, once
1106
00:42:21.070 --> 00:42:22.830
things are up in space, ain't nobody going to
1107
00:42:22.830 --> 00:42:24.950
stop you. Uh, as was the case with the
1108
00:42:24.950 --> 00:42:27.390
Israeli spacecraft that spattered tamigards,
1109
00:42:27.820 --> 00:42:29.750
um, water bears over the moon to show that
1110
00:42:29.750 --> 00:42:32.590
they could, which was so dumb it's untrue.
1111
00:42:33.160 --> 00:42:36.070
Um, yep, there are water bears on the moon,
1112
00:42:36.390 --> 00:42:38.310
probably desiccated and dried up, but they
1113
00:42:38.310 --> 00:42:40.390
can come back from that, we know that. Um, so
1114
00:42:40.390 --> 00:42:42.110
you could have a nation just decide to do it
1115
00:42:42.110 --> 00:42:44.630
anyway. At the end of the day, if a
1116
00:42:44.630 --> 00:42:46.670
random government decided to send a
1117
00:42:46.670 --> 00:42:49.430
spacecraft to Mars within a capsule inside
1118
00:42:49.590 --> 00:42:52.150
laden with biological bacterial life
1119
00:42:52.390 --> 00:42:55.230
to spurt out on the surface, no way we could
1120
00:42:55.230 --> 00:42:57.860
stop them. And once it's done, it's done. Um,
1121
00:42:57.990 --> 00:43:00.510
but I think the block to the question is not
1122
00:43:00.510 --> 00:43:02.070
actually a scientific one, it's an ethical
1123
00:43:02.070 --> 00:43:04.460
one and it's about how we, we choose to
1124
00:43:04.460 --> 00:43:06.300
interact with the galaxy going forward and
1125
00:43:06.300 --> 00:43:08.300
particularly our local environment. That'll
1126
00:43:08.300 --> 00:43:10.020
determine at what stage we do that, if we
1127
00:43:10.020 --> 00:43:11.380
ever do so. It's a really good question.
1128
00:43:12.100 --> 00:43:14.700
Andrew Dunkley: It is. Uh, thanks for the uh, question,
1129
00:43:14.700 --> 00:43:16.660
Chris. Uh, Chris, you might be interested to
1130
00:43:16.660 --> 00:43:19.299
look up the BBC radio science
1131
00:43:19.299 --> 00:43:22.060
fiction comedy called Paradise Lost in Space.
1132
00:43:22.060 --> 00:43:24.900
Have you heard of this one? It's so funny.
1133
00:43:24.900 --> 00:43:27.860
It's about two blokes who um, get ejected
1134
00:43:28.180 --> 00:43:30.620
from a spaceship by an exploding toilet or
1135
00:43:30.620 --> 00:43:32.940
something and they end up on a world that's
1136
00:43:32.940 --> 00:43:35.570
occupied by uh, an insect, intelligent but
1137
00:43:35.570 --> 00:43:38.210
very naive species. So
1138
00:43:38.690 --> 00:43:41.170
basically what they do is they try to
1139
00:43:41.650 --> 00:43:44.210
pass on their Earth knowledge and
1140
00:43:44.210 --> 00:43:46.130
intelligence to these, these people
1141
00:43:46.930 --> 00:43:48.930
and ultimately destroy the planet.
1142
00:43:50.850 --> 00:43:51.730
Jonti Horner: It's a perfect reflection.
1143
00:43:51.970 --> 00:43:52.330
Andrew Dunkley: Brilliant.
1144
00:43:52.330 --> 00:43:53.890
Jonti Horner: It's very funny. Yes.
1145
00:43:55.330 --> 00:43:58.290
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it's funny stuff. So yeah, it's called
1146
00:43:58.470 --> 00:44:01.450
um, Paradise Lost in Space. I
1147
00:44:01.450 --> 00:44:03.290
only remember it because we ran it as a
1148
00:44:03.290 --> 00:44:05.850
series on the ABC some years ago and, and got
1149
00:44:05.850 --> 00:44:08.530
a uh, fabulous response. And I always,
1150
00:44:08.610 --> 00:44:10.410
I sat there in the studio while we were
1151
00:44:10.410 --> 00:44:12.930
running it and I just cackled as to. Because
1152
00:44:13.490 --> 00:44:16.210
I could imagine that's what we might do.
1153
00:44:16.770 --> 00:44:19.450
Not on purpose, but um. Yeah. And it's what
1154
00:44:19.450 --> 00:44:21.650
you say, it's the ethics of sending
1155
00:44:23.090 --> 00:44:26.090
our ah, junk to other places that are already
1156
00:44:26.090 --> 00:44:28.490
occupied. Yeah. Um,
1157
00:44:29.010 --> 00:44:31.040
we're running out of time I suppose. But um,
1158
00:44:32.100 --> 00:44:33.700
how do you want to wind this up? Uh, how do
1159
00:44:33.700 --> 00:44:33.940
you.
1160
00:44:34.180 --> 00:44:36.100
There's so much to talk about, it could go on
1161
00:44:36.100 --> 00:44:36.420
for hours.
1162
00:44:36.420 --> 00:44:38.540
Jonti Horner: I know more to talk about. I think I'll carry
1163
00:44:38.540 --> 00:44:41.020
on until you kind of get the hook and pull me
1164
00:44:41.020 --> 00:44:43.660
off about the different things that influence
1165
00:44:43.660 --> 00:44:45.260
planet's habitability. Because we've talked
1166
00:44:45.260 --> 00:44:48.260
about Milankovitch cycles. We also have as
1167
00:44:48.260 --> 00:44:50.180
the influence of the planetary system impact
1168
00:44:50.180 --> 00:44:53.100
us just as the dinosaurs, they had a very bad
1169
00:44:53.100 --> 00:44:55.540
day. And there has historically been this
1170
00:44:55.540 --> 00:44:57.940
idea that ties into the rare Earth thing that
1171
00:44:57.940 --> 00:45:00.700
Jupiter is our friend and saviour and without
1172
00:45:00.700 --> 00:45:02.660
Jupiter we'd be hit by asteroids more often
1173
00:45:02.660 --> 00:45:04.760
and we wouldn't be here. And therefore life
1174
00:45:04.760 --> 00:45:07.280
is rare in the universe. Um, idea
1175
00:45:07.680 --> 00:45:09.640
basically that Jupiter is our bestest friend
1176
00:45:09.640 --> 00:45:12.400
and it's honestly a lot of cobs wallop and
1177
00:45:12.720 --> 00:45:15.160
it's both one of my favourite bits of
1178
00:45:15.160 --> 00:45:16.680
research I ever did. And probably one of the
1179
00:45:16.680 --> 00:45:19.360
biggest bugbears of my career is uh, I
1180
00:45:19.600 --> 00:45:22.560
did work again with Barry Jones starting 20
1181
00:45:22.560 --> 00:45:24.880
years ago for a few years that resulted in a
1182
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:27.120
series of pep called Jupiter Friend or Foe.
1183
00:45:27.440 --> 00:45:29.880
And we did simulations to test the role of
1184
00:45:29.880 --> 00:45:32.400
Jupiter in protecting us from impacts or not.
1185
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:34.790
And it turns out that Jupiter is not shielded
1186
00:45:35.020 --> 00:45:37.820
all if you took Jupiter away, Earth would be
1187
00:45:37.820 --> 00:45:40.820
hit less often. If however you
1188
00:45:40.820 --> 00:45:42.580
replace Jupiter with a planet, the mass of
1189
00:45:42.580 --> 00:45:45.380
Saturn, Earth would be hit more often than we
1190
00:45:45.380 --> 00:45:47.540
are today. And with Jupiter, the mass it
1191
00:45:47.540 --> 00:45:49.060
currently is, we'd be hit more than if it
1192
00:45:49.060 --> 00:45:50.899
wasn't there, but less than if we put Saturn
1193
00:45:50.899 --> 00:45:53.260
there. All down to the subtleties of how
1194
00:45:53.260 --> 00:45:55.980
gravity all works. And so basically if you
1195
00:45:55.980 --> 00:45:57.620
replace Jupiter with Saturn, it's like the
1196
00:45:57.620 --> 00:45:59.500
anti Goldilocks case where you've lesser
1197
00:45:59.500 --> 00:46:01.980
porridge with strychnine. But the reality is
1198
00:46:01.980 --> 00:46:04.540
that Jupiter's role is complicated,
1199
00:46:05.500 --> 00:46:07.740
best illustrated by Comet Lexell in
1200
00:46:07.740 --> 00:46:10.620
1770, which I always love. Comet Lexell was
1201
00:46:11.020 --> 00:46:13.260
a great comet. It was very bright in our sky.
1202
00:46:13.260 --> 00:46:15.380
Discovered by Charles Messier I think 1st of
1203
00:46:15.380 --> 00:46:18.180
June 1770. Quickly got as
1204
00:46:18.180 --> 00:46:19.940
bright as the brightest stars in the sky, but
1205
00:46:19.940 --> 00:46:22.260
looked unusual. It was very big and fuzzy and
1206
00:46:22.260 --> 00:46:24.340
it moved unusually rapidly across the sky at
1207
00:46:24.340 --> 00:46:26.660
its quickest, covering 42 degrees in a single
1208
00:46:26.660 --> 00:46:29.580
hour. When they worked out the orbit of this
1209
00:46:29.580 --> 00:46:31.380
thing, they found a that it had come very
1210
00:46:31.380 --> 00:46:32.900
close to the Earth. It passed within 2
1211
00:46:32.900 --> 00:46:34.770
million kilometres, which is the close
1212
00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:36.760
closest approach of a large comet in
1213
00:46:37.000 --> 00:46:40.000
historical times. It also was moving
1214
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:41.920
on an orbit that was just less than six years
1215
00:46:41.920 --> 00:46:44.360
in period. Big bright comet going around
1216
00:46:44.360 --> 00:46:46.080
every six years. Why on Earth have we not
1217
00:46:46.080 --> 00:46:47.680
seen it before? Why have we not seen it in
1218
00:46:47.680 --> 00:46:50.520
1764 or 1758? Well,
1219
00:46:50.520 --> 00:46:52.240
when they worked out the orbit and run it
1220
00:46:52.240 --> 00:46:54.160
back in time and this was hard at the time
1221
00:46:54.160 --> 00:46:56.000
because they didn't have mechanical
1222
00:46:56.000 --> 00:46:58.280
computers, they had human computers who sat
1223
00:46:58.280 --> 00:47:00.320
there and did calculations with abakai and
1224
00:47:00.320 --> 00:47:02.650
slide rules and all the rest of it. They
1225
00:47:02.650 --> 00:47:04.490
found that three years before it nearly hit
1226
00:47:04.490 --> 00:47:07.170
the Earth it was very close to Jupiter. In
1227
00:47:07.170 --> 00:47:08.810
fact, prior to that it had been moving on an
1228
00:47:08.810 --> 00:47:11.130
orbit that came nowhere near the Earth, that
1229
00:47:11.130 --> 00:47:12.930
was probably hundreds or thousands of years
1230
00:47:12.930 --> 00:47:15.330
in period and it was flying in to come
1231
00:47:15.330 --> 00:47:16.890
nowhere near the inner solar system. When it
1232
00:47:16.890 --> 00:47:18.490
had this close encounter with Jupiter that
1233
00:47:18.490 --> 00:47:20.570
trapped it and threw it at the Earth and
1234
00:47:20.570 --> 00:47:22.690
captured it onto the six year long Jupiter
1235
00:47:22.690 --> 00:47:25.090
family comet orbit. So Jupiter took something
1236
00:47:25.090 --> 00:47:27.265
that was coming nowhere near us and threw it
1237
00:47:27.265 --> 00:47:30.110
out at us. We don't see the comet
1238
00:47:30.110 --> 00:47:33.030
anymore because 2 times 6 years is
1239
00:47:33.030 --> 00:47:34.990
12 years and Jupiter takes 12 years to go
1240
00:47:34.990 --> 00:47:37.470
around the sun. So the comet did two laps in
1241
00:47:37.470 --> 00:47:39.950
the time Jupiter took to take one. And when
1242
00:47:39.950 --> 00:47:41.990
the comet got back out there again 12 years
1243
00:47:42.230 --> 00:47:44.150
after the first encounter, Jupiter was there,
1244
00:47:44.150 --> 00:47:45.670
grabbed hold of it and threw it away again,
1245
00:47:45.830 --> 00:47:48.790
never to return. So in just this 12 year
1246
00:47:48.790 --> 00:47:51.030
period, Jupiter threw something at us and
1247
00:47:51.030 --> 00:47:53.350
then cleaned up after itself. And whether
1248
00:47:53.350 --> 00:47:55.030
Jupiter's more of a shield or more of a
1249
00:47:55.030 --> 00:47:56.670
threat is down to the balance of those two
1250
00:47:56.670 --> 00:47:59.350
effects. Um, and what we found in our
1251
00:47:59.350 --> 00:48:02.190
simulations is, to be honest with Jupiter, we
1252
00:48:02.190 --> 00:48:03.990
get hit more than we would do if it wasn't
1253
00:48:03.990 --> 00:48:06.910
there. That takes away the idea
1254
00:48:06.910 --> 00:48:09.430
that it's our protector. It takes away the
1255
00:48:09.430 --> 00:48:11.590
idea that you need a shield to shield a
1256
00:48:11.590 --> 00:48:14.470
planet to prevent life from being wiped out.
1257
00:48:14.950 --> 00:48:17.430
Another nail in the coffin of rare Earth. And
1258
00:48:17.430 --> 00:48:19.990
it bugs me a bit that so many documentaries
1259
00:48:19.990 --> 00:48:22.190
still trot out this trite idea that Jupiter
1260
00:48:22.190 --> 00:48:24.150
shields us from impacts. And it's wonderful
1261
00:48:24.550 --> 00:48:27.070
because I disprove that 20 years ago. It's
1262
00:48:27.070 --> 00:48:29.820
much more complicated. But even that idea
1263
00:48:29.820 --> 00:48:31.580
gets complicated because obviously we don't
1264
00:48:31.580 --> 00:48:32.550
want to have the Earth punishingly, uh,
1265
00:48:33.180 --> 00:48:36.180
pummelling because we'd be wiped out. But
1266
00:48:36.180 --> 00:48:37.660
where the Earth formed in the solar system,
1267
00:48:37.660 --> 00:48:40.620
it probably formed dry. We formed interior to
1268
00:48:40.620 --> 00:48:42.580
the location of the ice line. So there wasn't
1269
00:48:42.580 --> 00:48:45.220
any available solid water, the water was all
1270
00:48:45.220 --> 00:48:47.940
gas. So how the Earth got its water was a
1271
00:48:47.940 --> 00:48:50.740
long, outstanding problem, exacerbated by the
1272
00:48:50.740 --> 00:48:52.100
fact that towards the end of our planet's
1273
00:48:52.100 --> 00:48:53.980
formation, we got smashed into by an object
1274
00:48:53.980 --> 00:48:56.340
the size of Mars, which stripped off a lot of
1275
00:48:56.340 --> 00:48:57.740
the Earth's core and mantle and would have
1276
00:48:57.740 --> 00:48:59.820
desiccated our planet because m water would
1277
00:48:59.820 --> 00:49:01.680
have been in the. Or a mantle, in the crust
1278
00:49:01.680 --> 00:49:04.320
and mantle. Sorry, up near the surface. Yeah.
1279
00:49:04.480 --> 00:49:06.280
So where did the water come from? And Earth
1280
00:49:06.280 --> 00:49:08.220
is actually a remarkably dry planet, um,
1281
00:49:08.560 --> 00:49:10.840
particularly at the moment in Queensland. The
1282
00:49:10.840 --> 00:49:13.240
idea is down here. Yeah, the idea is that our
1283
00:49:13.240 --> 00:49:15.520
water, at least in significant part, was
1284
00:49:15.520 --> 00:49:18.440
delivered from further out by impacts in what
1285
00:49:18.440 --> 00:49:20.320
is often described as a late veneer.
1286
00:49:21.120 --> 00:49:23.200
That's really interesting air because that's
1287
00:49:23.200 --> 00:49:25.080
a stochastic process, it's random, it's
1288
00:49:25.080 --> 00:49:27.120
driven by the orbits of the planets and the
1289
00:49:27.120 --> 00:49:29.440
cleanup phase of solar system formation.
1290
00:49:29.920 --> 00:49:31.640
So different planetary systems will give
1291
00:49:31.640 --> 00:49:34.100
planets with different amounts of water. But
1292
00:49:34.100 --> 00:49:36.140
it's also indicating that you actually don't
1293
00:49:36.140 --> 00:49:38.500
want too much shielding, you need
1294
00:49:38.500 --> 00:49:40.660
impacts. Because if the Earth had never had
1295
00:49:40.660 --> 00:49:42.460
the impacts, we'd have never got enough water
1296
00:49:42.540 --> 00:49:45.220
for life to develop and thrive. On top of
1297
00:49:45.220 --> 00:49:46.540
that, if the Earth didn't have enough
1298
00:49:46.540 --> 00:49:48.339
impacts, the dinosaurs would never have been
1299
00:49:48.339 --> 00:49:50.340
wiped out. And maybe you and I will be
1300
00:49:50.340 --> 00:49:52.780
reptiles or maybe we'll be here, you know,
1301
00:49:53.180 --> 00:49:55.340
so there's a whole aspect of that. Now,
1302
00:49:55.340 --> 00:49:58.180
again, those Simulations I did, we can
1303
00:49:58.180 --> 00:50:00.140
rerun through the planetary systems, we can
1304
00:50:00.140 --> 00:50:02.020
find the debris belts in those systems, we
1305
00:50:02.020 --> 00:50:04.560
can find the planets so we can model their
1306
00:50:04.560 --> 00:50:06.440
impact rates. And I'd argue that we want to
1307
00:50:06.440 --> 00:50:08.840
look somewhere that doesn't have too many
1308
00:50:08.840 --> 00:50:10.920
impacts, but also doesn't have too few,
1309
00:50:11.560 --> 00:50:13.640
because each of those could pose problems.
1310
00:50:14.360 --> 00:50:17.080
That is a really big part of the storey
1311
00:50:17.160 --> 00:50:19.880
and it feeds into the last point, really,
1312
00:50:21.000 --> 00:50:23.920
which is the planet itself and a little bit
1313
00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:26.800
tied to the large moon. So our Earth, it has
1314
00:50:26.800 --> 00:50:28.960
been suggested again by the rare Earth crowd,
1315
00:50:28.960 --> 00:50:31.800
that the large moon we have stabilises our
1316
00:50:31.800 --> 00:50:33.710
atmosphere axis and has kept the Earth
1317
00:50:33.710 --> 00:50:35.390
habitable. So therefore you need a giant
1318
00:50:35.390 --> 00:50:38.390
satellite. But simulations by Dave
1319
00:50:38.390 --> 00:50:40.230
Waltham, who's a guy I know very well in the
1320
00:50:40.230 --> 00:50:42.710
uk, looked into this and what he found was
1321
00:50:42.710 --> 00:50:44.700
that you could take the Moon away and, uh,
1322
00:50:44.710 --> 00:50:46.150
the Earth's axis would still be fairly
1323
00:50:46.150 --> 00:50:48.149
stable. It still wobbled between about 22 and
1324
00:50:48.149 --> 00:50:50.590
24 degrees, maybe a little bit more. But
1325
00:50:50.590 --> 00:50:52.550
quirkily, if you made the moon just 12
1326
00:50:52.550 --> 00:50:54.670
kilometres larger in diameter,
1327
00:50:55.310 --> 00:50:57.910
it would make the Earth's axis unstable and
1328
00:50:57.910 --> 00:51:00.480
chaotic. So if the moon was only slightly
1329
00:51:00.480 --> 00:51:03.400
larger, we would not be here. The
1330
00:51:03.400 --> 00:51:04.920
other reason that a large moon has been
1331
00:51:04.920 --> 00:51:07.640
suggested is that it drives bigger tides. And
1332
00:51:07.640 --> 00:51:09.960
one of the common arguments for how life
1333
00:51:09.960 --> 00:51:12.400
first got going and, um, for how life moved
1334
00:51:12.400 --> 00:51:14.320
out of the oceans in both cases is to do with
1335
00:51:14.320 --> 00:51:16.360
the large tidal intertidal areas that we
1336
00:51:16.360 --> 00:51:18.600
have, where at low tide it's dry and at high
1337
00:51:18.600 --> 00:51:21.080
tide it's underwater. And the idea is that
1338
00:51:21.080 --> 00:51:23.360
without the moon those areas would be smaller
1339
00:51:23.600 --> 00:51:25.160
and life would have had less chance to get
1340
00:51:25.160 --> 00:51:26.960
going. I don't really buy that, because if
1341
00:51:26.960 --> 00:51:29.120
you took the moon away, the tides of sun
1342
00:51:29.120 --> 00:51:31.260
raises would still be half the size, so you'd
1343
00:51:31.260 --> 00:51:33.620
still have substantial tides. But these are
1344
00:51:33.620 --> 00:51:36.020
all the kind of questions people ask before
1345
00:51:36.020 --> 00:51:38.140
you get to the planet itself. And the planet
1346
00:51:38.140 --> 00:51:40.300
itself is where my head really hurt. Now, I'm
1347
00:51:40.300 --> 00:51:43.220
not a geophysicist at
1348
00:51:43.220 --> 00:51:45.060
all, so a lot of this was new to me. Now, we
1349
00:51:45.060 --> 00:51:47.540
talked a little bit about the hydration. You
1350
00:51:47.540 --> 00:51:49.500
could imagine anything from desert worlds to
1351
00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:51.460
worlds with hundreds of kilometres depth of
1352
00:51:51.460 --> 00:51:53.980
ocean. Now, if the ocean's too deep,
1353
00:51:54.700 --> 00:51:56.940
the planet is probably habitable, but not
1354
00:51:56.940 --> 00:51:59.340
detectably habitable because the life will be
1355
00:51:59.340 --> 00:52:00.500
at the bottom of the ocean where the
1356
00:52:00.500 --> 00:52:02.960
nutrients have been introduced by volc. But
1357
00:52:02.960 --> 00:52:04.960
an ocean deeper than a few tens of kilometres
1358
00:52:04.960 --> 00:52:07.040
is thought to become stagnant. And so it
1359
00:52:07.040 --> 00:52:09.240
doesn't mix things up to the surface, so you
1360
00:52:09.240 --> 00:52:11.320
don't want to look at water worlds that are
1361
00:52:11.640 --> 00:52:13.720
ocean for hundreds or thousands of kilometres
1362
00:52:13.720 --> 00:52:16.160
depth, but equally you want to have some mix
1363
00:52:16.160 --> 00:52:18.000
of ocean and continent to allow all the
1364
00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:20.800
carbon cycles and weathering to happen, to
1365
00:52:20.800 --> 00:52:23.240
allow life to engage with the atmosphere. So
1366
00:52:23.240 --> 00:52:24.880
that's a bit of a sweet spot there. But what
1367
00:52:24.880 --> 00:52:27.640
I didn't realise was how critical
1368
00:52:27.640 --> 00:52:30.290
water has been been to the
1369
00:52:30.290 --> 00:52:33.130
maintenance of our atmosphere and um, thereby
1370
00:52:33.130 --> 00:52:35.890
our climate against the vagaries of the solar
1371
00:52:35.890 --> 00:52:37.650
wind and against the vagaries of plate
1372
00:52:37.650 --> 00:52:40.250
tectonics. Now compare the Earth and Mars
1373
00:52:40.490 --> 00:52:42.410
and the Earth is warm and wet. We've got a
1374
00:52:42.410 --> 00:52:44.690
lovely thick atmosphere and we've not really
1375
00:52:44.690 --> 00:52:46.570
lost much of our atmosphere. We've got the
1376
00:52:46.570 --> 00:52:49.010
ozone layer which protects us to some degree
1377
00:52:49.010 --> 00:52:51.530
from UV radiation. We've got a temperature
1378
00:52:51.530 --> 00:52:53.210
inversion about 10 kilometres up in the
1379
00:52:53.210 --> 00:52:55.530
atmosphere that traps water below that level.
1380
00:52:55.770 --> 00:52:57.650
If water gets above that level, it freezes
1381
00:52:57.650 --> 00:52:59.970
and falls back down. So the water can't get
1382
00:52:59.970 --> 00:53:01.990
high enough to be ionised and split hydrogen
1383
00:53:01.990 --> 00:53:04.710
and helium and lost. Mars doesn't have that.
1384
00:53:05.030 --> 00:53:06.950
Mars doesn't have much of a magnetic field
1385
00:53:06.950 --> 00:53:08.830
whereas the Earth does. And the magnetic
1386
00:53:08.830 --> 00:53:10.390
field protects the atmosphere from being
1387
00:53:10.390 --> 00:53:12.990
stripped away from the outside in. Mars
1388
00:53:12.990 --> 00:53:15.720
doesn't have plate tectonics, but we do. And
1389
00:53:15.720 --> 00:53:18.310
um, plate tectonics prevents the atmosphere
1390
00:53:18.310 --> 00:53:21.190
from being precipitated out onto the surface
1391
00:53:21.190 --> 00:53:23.190
through chemistry and trapped there because
1392
00:53:23.190 --> 00:53:25.910
plate tectonics recycles the crust. So
1393
00:53:25.910 --> 00:53:27.630
anything that chemically gets weathered onto
1394
00:53:27.630 --> 00:53:29.670
Earth's surface gets put back into the
1395
00:53:29.670 --> 00:53:32.190
atmosphere through volcanic volcanoes. So
1396
00:53:32.190 --> 00:53:34.110
Mars and Earth probably started out looking
1397
00:53:34.110 --> 00:53:36.230
very similar and are now very, very
1398
00:53:36.230 --> 00:53:38.830
different. And so the nature of the planet
1399
00:53:38.830 --> 00:53:40.390
itself is going to be a real important
1400
00:53:40.470 --> 00:53:43.110
factor. And plate tectonics looks like it's
1401
00:53:43.110 --> 00:53:46.070
going to be fairly key. Plate tectonics is a
1402
00:53:46.070 --> 00:53:47.790
mechanism by which you stop the atmosphere
1403
00:53:47.790 --> 00:53:49.870
getting precipitated out and frozen in onto
1404
00:53:49.870 --> 00:53:51.350
the surface, which is a big part of what's
1405
00:53:51.350 --> 00:53:53.710
happened m on Mars because of that recycling
1406
00:53:53.710 --> 00:53:56.190
effect. But it also turns out that plate
1407
00:53:56.190 --> 00:53:58.490
tectonics is key in ensuring the
1408
00:53:58.890 --> 00:54:01.690
magnetic field is retained. And um, this is a
1409
00:54:01.690 --> 00:54:03.490
bit that really hurt my head because I'm
1410
00:54:03.490 --> 00:54:06.370
like, I'm not a geophysicist. Seems that on
1411
00:54:06.370 --> 00:54:09.330
the Earth if the Earth didn't have plate
1412
00:54:09.330 --> 00:54:11.650
tectonics, we'd probably have lost most of
1413
00:54:11.650 --> 00:54:14.490
our magnetic field like Mars and like Venus.
1414
00:54:15.130 --> 00:54:16.970
What's happening is that the magnetic field
1415
00:54:16.970 --> 00:54:19.250
is driven by convection currents in the outer
1416
00:54:19.250 --> 00:54:21.730
mantle. Like when you see water boiling in a
1417
00:54:21.730 --> 00:54:24.110
kettle overturn, um, motion of mollie and
1418
00:54:24.110 --> 00:54:26.590
metal Rising and falling. That
1419
00:54:26.590 --> 00:54:28.510
convection can only happen if you've got a
1420
00:54:28.510 --> 00:54:30.430
big temperature difference between the bottom
1421
00:54:30.430 --> 00:54:32.710
and the top of the outer core. Sorry.
1422
00:54:33.430 --> 00:54:35.190
In order to get that temperature difference,
1423
00:54:35.190 --> 00:54:37.030
you need to be able to very effectively cool
1424
00:54:37.030 --> 00:54:39.310
the top of the outer core because otherwise
1425
00:54:39.310 --> 00:54:40.950
it would warm up so much convection would
1426
00:54:40.950 --> 00:54:42.470
stop because you don't have enough
1427
00:54:42.470 --> 00:54:44.790
temperature difference. The way the outer
1428
00:54:44.790 --> 00:54:46.470
core is cooled is by convection in the
1429
00:54:46.470 --> 00:54:48.110
mantle. That takes the heat away from the top
1430
00:54:48.110 --> 00:54:49.470
of the outer core and brings it to the
1431
00:54:49.470 --> 00:54:51.910
surface. We've got these huge convection
1432
00:54:51.910 --> 00:54:53.990
cells in the mantle that transfer heat very
1433
00:54:53.990 --> 00:54:56.970
quickly. Allowing cool the outer core's top
1434
00:54:56.970 --> 00:54:59.170
to get this big temperature difference allows
1435
00:54:59.170 --> 00:55:01.010
a motion that drives a magnetic field.
1436
00:55:02.530 --> 00:55:04.570
That motion is also what drives plate
1437
00:55:04.570 --> 00:55:06.410
tectonics. Now, the quirky thing that came
1438
00:55:06.410 --> 00:55:07.890
out of all of this when I was reading about
1439
00:55:07.890 --> 00:55:10.170
it is that, uh, if you run simulations of the
1440
00:55:10.170 --> 00:55:12.450
motion of the Earth's mantle and the crust
1441
00:55:12.690 --> 00:55:15.570
and the Earth is dry, the Earth is too small
1442
00:55:15.570 --> 00:55:18.410
to sustain plate tectonics because the mantle
1443
00:55:18.410 --> 00:55:21.090
is too stiff. If you have water
1444
00:55:21.330 --> 00:55:23.410
and you mix water into the mantle, you
1445
00:55:23.410 --> 00:55:25.880
lubricate, lubricate it. You allow convection
1446
00:55:25.880 --> 00:55:28.000
in the mantle, which allows plate tectonics,
1447
00:55:28.320 --> 00:55:31.000
which allows you to recycle the surface. But
1448
00:55:31.000 --> 00:55:33.080
that plate tectonics also allows you to cool
1449
00:55:33.080 --> 00:55:35.320
the outer core to maintain the magnetic
1450
00:55:35.320 --> 00:55:37.480
field, allowing you to have that magnetic
1451
00:55:37.480 --> 00:55:39.560
shield that protects your planet from the
1452
00:55:39.560 --> 00:55:40.960
atmosphere being whittled away from the
1453
00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:43.800
outside in by the solar wind. It
1454
00:55:43.800 --> 00:55:46.520
seems that the storey of plate tectonics, the
1455
00:55:46.520 --> 00:55:48.640
Earth's magnetic field and, um, the
1456
00:55:48.640 --> 00:55:51.290
atmosphere being retained, is all tied
1457
00:55:51.290 --> 00:55:53.290
together by water. Which brings us back to
1458
00:55:53.290 --> 00:55:55.410
that delivery question. If the Earth had not
1459
00:55:55.410 --> 00:55:57.650
got that veneer of water, would plate
1460
00:55:57.650 --> 00:56:00.210
tectonics still happen? The infinite
1461
00:56:00.210 --> 00:56:02.010
suggestion, and this was fabulous work by
1462
00:56:02.010 --> 00:56:03.930
people working with the great Craig o',
1463
00:56:03.930 --> 00:56:06.169
Neill, a great Australian scientist who does
1464
00:56:06.650 --> 00:56:08.410
earthquakes and, um, plate tectonics
1465
00:56:08.410 --> 00:56:11.090
modelling in an astrobiology sense that
1466
00:56:11.090 --> 00:56:14.010
says the Earth's plate tectonics are
1467
00:56:14.010 --> 00:56:15.890
really hard to get started. If you run models
1468
00:56:15.890 --> 00:56:17.810
of the Earth without plate tectonics with the
1469
00:56:17.810 --> 00:56:19.970
young Earth, with how hot it was, plate
1470
00:56:19.970 --> 00:56:22.950
tectonics don't just happen. However, if
1471
00:56:22.950 --> 00:56:25.270
you introduce impacts from big asteroids,
1472
00:56:25.270 --> 00:56:27.110
like the things you got at the end of planet
1473
00:56:27.110 --> 00:56:29.830
formation, those can dump enough energy
1474
00:56:29.990 --> 00:56:32.990
in terms of a downward pulse to push magma
1475
00:56:32.990 --> 00:56:35.670
up somewhere else to trigger a convection
1476
00:56:35.670 --> 00:56:38.230
cell that then becomes self sustaining. So
1477
00:56:38.230 --> 00:56:40.950
it's quite possible that the same impact
1478
00:56:41.110 --> 00:56:43.350
regime that led to the delivery of water,
1479
00:56:43.670 --> 00:56:45.710
that led in the extreme case to the formation
1480
00:56:45.710 --> 00:56:48.190
of the moon, also triggered plate
1481
00:56:48.190 --> 00:56:50.990
Tectonics. And by triggering plate tectonics
1482
00:56:50.990 --> 00:56:53.480
and delivering water to the mantle allowed
1483
00:56:53.480 --> 00:56:55.360
the Earth to become the planet it is today to
1484
00:56:55.360 --> 00:56:58.120
allow life to thrive. Now there's far, far
1485
00:56:58.120 --> 00:56:59.480
more that you could look into about the
1486
00:56:59.480 --> 00:57:01.360
planets themselves. I'm not like, say, a
1487
00:57:01.360 --> 00:57:04.360
geophysicist, but the interplay of these
1488
00:57:04.360 --> 00:57:05.960
things is fascinating and it's a real
1489
00:57:05.960 --> 00:57:08.720
reminder of that multidisciplinary thing. You
1490
00:57:08.720 --> 00:57:10.440
can't do it all if you're just an astronomy.
1491
00:57:10.440 --> 00:57:13.040
You need everybody from all different
1492
00:57:13.040 --> 00:57:15.600
disciplines to come together so we can figure
1493
00:57:15.600 --> 00:57:17.480
out what factors are and, um, aren't
1494
00:57:17.480 --> 00:57:19.880
important. So that when we find another
1495
00:57:20.130 --> 00:57:22.210
thousand, another ten thousand, another
1496
00:57:22.210 --> 00:57:24.610
hundred thousand planets, we can pick the
1497
00:57:24.610 --> 00:57:26.530
best targets to search for life upon them.
1498
00:57:26.930 --> 00:57:28.810
And that was a motivation and it just blew my
1499
00:57:28.810 --> 00:57:31.610
mind when I got to that final part. Just how
1500
00:57:31.610 --> 00:57:34.170
much complexity there is in the
1501
00:57:34.170 --> 00:57:35.690
interplay between the atmosphere, the
1502
00:57:35.690 --> 00:57:37.890
climate, the plate tectonics, the oceans
1503
00:57:38.850 --> 00:57:41.810
that are so, uh, variable and so chaotic.
1504
00:57:42.530 --> 00:57:44.410
What does that mean? How can we learn from
1505
00:57:44.410 --> 00:57:46.290
that? Well, that's what we learn when we look
1506
00:57:46.290 --> 00:57:47.770
at planets around other stars. But at least
1507
00:57:47.770 --> 00:57:48.970
this gives us a bit of a starting point
1508
00:57:49.040 --> 00:57:49.600
point, I think.
1509
00:57:50.320 --> 00:57:52.880
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, I see what you're saying. So it's
1510
00:57:53.200 --> 00:57:55.200
like the popular press saying, oh, we found a
1511
00:57:55.200 --> 00:57:57.760
rocky planet in the Goldilocks zone and it
1512
00:57:57.760 --> 00:57:59.920
probably has water, so, you know, it's got to
1513
00:57:59.920 --> 00:58:02.360
have life. Uh, there's so much more than
1514
00:58:02.360 --> 00:58:04.410
that. Like, yeah, it's um.
1515
00:58:04.560 --> 00:58:06.800
Jonti Horner: Even they probably have water is a leap
1516
00:58:06.800 --> 00:58:09.680
because like, yeah, if we'd not had
1517
00:58:09.680 --> 00:58:11.600
water added after the moon forming impact,
1518
00:58:11.600 --> 00:58:12.800
the Earth would be a desert
1519
00:58:14.320 --> 00:58:17.160
Andrew Dunkley: and we wouldn't probably exist at all.
1520
00:58:17.160 --> 00:58:18.720
Jonti Horner: Absolutely, yeah.
1521
00:58:18.720 --> 00:58:21.320
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating stuff, Jonty. We'll leave it
1522
00:58:21.320 --> 00:58:23.760
there. But, um, it's just such a
1523
00:58:24.080 --> 00:58:25.520
fascinating topic. But
1524
00:58:26.800 --> 00:58:29.120
what goes into, uh, the future
1525
00:58:29.120 --> 00:58:31.600
identification of potential targets is
1526
00:58:32.000 --> 00:58:34.040
so much more than most people would have
1527
00:58:34.040 --> 00:58:35.720
considered. So thank you very much, really
1528
00:58:35.720 --> 00:58:36.280
appreciate it.
1529
00:58:36.280 --> 00:58:37.400
Jonti Horner: It's an absolute pleasure and thanks for
1530
00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:40.280
letting me rant on my topics of choice for a
1531
00:58:40.280 --> 00:58:43.280
change. Like I said, it would be helpful. I'm
1532
00:58:43.280 --> 00:58:44.160
sure your readers will.
1533
00:58:44.160 --> 00:58:46.120
Readers, listeners will give feedback on
1534
00:58:46.120 --> 00:58:48.160
this, but I know we've done something
1535
00:58:48.160 --> 00:58:51.080
different. I really do. I am aware
1536
00:58:51.080 --> 00:58:52.680
of the fact that these are not your typical
1537
00:58:52.680 --> 00:58:55.040
episodes and that may be different for
1538
00:58:55.040 --> 00:58:56.720
people. So I appreciate the opportunity to do
1539
00:58:56.720 --> 00:58:58.680
this, but if people have enjoyed it or
1540
00:58:58.680 --> 00:59:00.880
didn't, it'd probably be worth letting Andrew
1541
00:59:00.880 --> 00:59:03.280
and Fred Watson know once I'm gone. Um, won't
1542
00:59:03.280 --> 00:59:04.640
hurt my feelings. Don't worry about it
1543
00:59:04.640 --> 00:59:06.120
because if it's Something you've enjoyed.
1544
00:59:06.280 --> 00:59:08.200
There's possibilities to do things like this
1545
00:59:08.200 --> 00:59:10.880
again in future if it isn't. We tried it and
1546
00:59:10.880 --> 00:59:12.690
it didn't work and that's entirely fine. Fine
1547
00:59:12.690 --> 00:59:14.490
too. So hopefully it was fun, hopefully it
1548
00:59:14.490 --> 00:59:16.380
was educational and I won't be too hurt, uh,
1549
00:59:16.410 --> 00:59:17.450
if nobody enjoyed it.
1550
00:59:18.570 --> 00:59:20.810
Andrew Dunkley: I'm pretty sure they did. Jonty, and we
1551
00:59:20.810 --> 00:59:23.130
really appreciate your time and uh, we've,
1552
00:59:23.130 --> 00:59:24.970
we've got one more episode to do with you.
1553
00:59:25.020 --> 00:59:27.330
Uh, it's a Q and A episode and we, we're
1554
00:59:27.330 --> 00:59:29.330
talking about, we haven't nailed it down yet,
1555
00:59:29.330 --> 00:59:31.210
but we're talking about doing a, an
1556
00:59:31.210 --> 00:59:32.650
astrophotography special.
1557
00:59:32.810 --> 00:59:33.290
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
1558
00:59:33.290 --> 00:59:34.970
Andrew Dunkley: Because we do get a lot of questions about
1559
00:59:34.970 --> 00:59:37.730
astrophotography so, uh, that, that'd be
1560
00:59:37.730 --> 00:59:38.890
worth getting into as well.
1561
00:59:38.890 --> 00:59:40.460
Jonti Horner: Yeah. I've got a couple of good friends who
1562
00:59:40.460 --> 00:59:42.640
uh, are award winning astrophotographers who
1563
00:59:42.640 --> 00:59:44.520
we're going to try and rope into that. So
1564
00:59:44.520 --> 00:59:46.840
watch this space is what I'd say. Yes.
1565
00:59:46.840 --> 00:59:48.840
Andrew Dunkley: Fingers crossed we can nail that one down.
1566
00:59:49.000 --> 00:59:50.720
Jonty, thanks so much. We'll see you real
1567
00:59:50.720 --> 00:59:51.000
soon.
1568
00:59:51.080 --> 00:59:52.360
Jonti Horner: Pleasure. Thank you for having me.
1569
00:59:52.760 --> 00:59:54.920
Andrew Dunkley: Johnty Horner, professor of Astrophysics at
1570
00:59:54.920 --> 00:59:57.720
the University of Southern Queensland.
1571
00:59:58.040 --> 01:00:00.560
And if you've got time, jump on our website
1572
01:00:00.560 --> 01:00:02.840
and have a look around. Uh, maybe send your
1573
01:00:02.840 --> 01:00:05.800
comments and thoughts, uh, to us via the
1574
01:00:05.800 --> 01:00:07.880
Ask me anything button at the top. It's
1575
01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:10.440
labelled ama. And while you're there, cheque
1576
01:00:10.440 --> 01:00:12.660
out the Astronomy AstroDailyPod feed. Maybe
1577
01:00:12.660 --> 01:00:15.180
sign up for your daily dose of astronomy
1578
01:00:15.180 --> 01:00:17.980
news. Um, maybe you'd like to become a
1579
01:00:17.980 --> 01:00:20.140
subscriber. You can do that. Visit, uh, the
1580
01:00:20.140 --> 01:00:22.660
shop. Lots of goodies in our shop and plenty
1581
01:00:22.660 --> 01:00:25.660
more. So cheque it out and thanks to Huw
1582
01:00:25.660 --> 01:00:27.300
in the studio as always, because
1583
01:00:28.580 --> 01:00:31.580
he does something which we one day might
1584
01:00:31.580 --> 01:00:33.900
find out about. And from me, Andrew Dunkley,
1585
01:00:33.900 --> 01:00:35.220
thanks for your company. We'll see you on the
1586
01:00:35.220 --> 01:00:37.860
next episode of Space Nuts. Bye Bye.
1587
01:00:38.020 --> 01:00:39.060
Space Nuts.
1588
01:00:39.060 --> 01:00:40.910
You've been listening to the Space Nuts
1589
01:00:40.980 --> 01:00:43.860
Jonti Horner: Arts podcast, available
1590
01:00:43.940 --> 01:00:46.180
at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
1591
01:00:46.260 --> 01:00:49.180
iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast
1592
01:00:49.180 --> 01:00:51.460
player. You can also stream on demand at
1593
01:00:51.460 --> 01:00:52.240
bytes. Com.
1594
01:00:52.240 --> 01:00:54.940
Andrew Dunkley: Um, this has been another quality podcast
1595
01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:56.740
production from Bytes. Com.
1596
01:00:56.740 --> 01:00:57.520
Jonti Horner: Um,
0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:01.960
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us again. This
1
00:00:01.960 --> 00:00:04.720
is Space Nuts where we talk astronomy and
2
00:00:04.880 --> 00:00:07.440
space science and all sorts of other things.
3
00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:09.840
And over the last, uh, few
4
00:00:10.560 --> 00:00:13.520
episodes we've been doing some specials
5
00:00:13.520 --> 00:00:15.800
because Fred Watson's away gallivanting
6
00:00:15.800 --> 00:00:18.240
around Scotland playing a lot of golf. Not.
7
00:00:18.800 --> 00:00:21.640
Uh, so we're doing some specials with Jonty
8
00:00:21.640 --> 00:00:24.360
Horner. Uh, and we're doing part
9
00:00:24.360 --> 00:00:25.680
two today of
10
00:00:25.680 --> 00:00:28.640
Astrobiology, a fascinating
11
00:00:28.640 --> 00:00:31.640
part of astronomy and space science. Uh,
12
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:34.620
one area we get so many questions about. So
13
00:00:34.620 --> 00:00:37.580
stand by as we get into that on this
14
00:00:37.580 --> 00:00:39.900
episode of space nuts. 15
15
00:00:40.140 --> 00:00:40.700
seconds.
16
00:00:40.700 --> 00:00:43.116
Jonti Horner: Guidance is internal. 10,
17
00:00:43.297 --> 00:00:45.980
9, ignition sequence start.
18
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.005
Space nuts. 5, 4, 3, 2. 1. 2,
19
00:00:49.077 --> 00:00:51.900
3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.
20
00:00:51.980 --> 00:00:53.180
Space nuts.
21
00:00:53.180 --> 00:00:55.020
Andrew Dunkley: Astronauts report it feels good.
22
00:00:56.140 --> 00:00:58.260
And back with us again is Johnty Horner,
23
00:00:58.260 --> 00:01:00.060
professor of astrophysics at the University
24
00:01:00.140 --> 00:01:02.300
of Southern Queensland. Jonty, hello.
25
00:01:02.460 --> 00:01:03.260
Jonti Horner: Noon. How are you?
26
00:01:03.930 --> 00:01:05.450
Andrew Dunkley: I'm m all right. Can you imagine Fred Watson
27
00:01:05.450 --> 00:01:06.170
playing golf?
28
00:01:06.650 --> 00:01:08.930
Jonti Horner: No, uh, not sure. I mean, growing up in
29
00:01:08.930 --> 00:01:10.970
Yorkshire, the weather wasn't always suited
30
00:01:10.970 --> 00:01:13.290
to it and we were too busy in gravel anyway,
31
00:01:13.290 --> 00:01:13.690
so.
32
00:01:14.970 --> 00:01:17.970
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, took
33
00:01:17.970 --> 00:01:20.410
a moment. I got that. Yes, yes.
34
00:01:20.760 --> 00:01:22.730
Uh, used to look clean with the tongues.
35
00:01:22.810 --> 00:01:24.450
Jonti Horner: Used to have to get up in the morning at 10
36
00:01:24.450 --> 00:01:25.970
o' clock at night, half an hour before I went
37
00:01:25.970 --> 00:01:26.490
to bed.
38
00:01:27.770 --> 00:01:30.250
Andrew Dunkley: It's just one of the best pieces of comedy
39
00:01:30.250 --> 00:01:30.450
ever.
40
00:01:30.450 --> 00:01:31.930
Jonti Horner: And it's funny because it's true.
41
00:01:33.960 --> 00:01:34.360
Yes.
42
00:01:34.840 --> 00:01:36.040
Andrew Dunkley: Tell the young people that.
43
00:01:36.040 --> 00:01:37.240
Jonti Horner: They won't believe you.
44
00:01:39.560 --> 00:01:42.520
Andrew Dunkley: Oh gosh, it's all flooding back. Uh, we've
45
00:01:42.520 --> 00:01:44.120
got a lot to talk about so we better get
46
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:44.440
started.
47
00:01:44.440 --> 00:01:47.420
Astrobiology Part two. Um,
48
00:01:47.560 --> 00:01:49.760
a couple of episodes ago we talked
49
00:01:49.760 --> 00:01:52.580
Astrobiology Part one, surprisingly. Um,
50
00:01:52.760 --> 00:01:54.120
let's just do a quick review.
51
00:01:54.760 --> 00:01:56.800
Jonti Horner: Yeah, this is a bit like the bit that really
52
00:01:56.800 --> 00:01:59.080
annoys you at the start of those multi
53
00:01:59.080 --> 00:02:01.360
episode shows where they're previously on
54
00:02:01.360 --> 00:02:03.880
Astrobiology. Um, but
55
00:02:05.550 --> 00:02:07.910
this is basically a case of Jonty talks too
56
00:02:07.910 --> 00:02:09.990
much and so therefore we run out of time. I
57
00:02:09.990 --> 00:02:11.350
mean, we don't need to sugarcoat that. And
58
00:02:11.350 --> 00:02:13.430
it's always a problem when you're talking
59
00:02:13.430 --> 00:02:14.510
about something you love and you're
60
00:02:14.510 --> 00:02:16.510
passionate about that. The time just flies by
61
00:02:16.510 --> 00:02:18.510
and hopefully it's flying by for the
62
00:02:18.510 --> 00:02:20.870
listeners as well, rather than boring them to
63
00:02:20.870 --> 00:02:22.590
tears. But you know, I can't really control
64
00:02:22.590 --> 00:02:24.990
that. In the first episode
65
00:02:25.470 --> 00:02:27.470
we talked a fair bit about the fact that
66
00:02:27.470 --> 00:02:29.230
we've always wondered whether there's life
67
00:02:29.230 --> 00:02:31.350
elsewhere. We talked a bit about the history
68
00:02:31.350 --> 00:02:33.270
in particular things like the ideas of
69
00:02:33.270 --> 00:02:35.510
potentially there being life on Mars that led
70
00:02:35.510 --> 00:02:37.090
to the panic over the War of the Worlds
71
00:02:37.090 --> 00:02:39.370
broadcast and the Fact that In the late
72
00:02:39.370 --> 00:02:41.450
1800s, people were that convinced there
73
00:02:41.450 --> 00:02:43.810
already was known to be life on Mars, that
74
00:02:43.810 --> 00:02:45.410
when a major prize was offered for the
75
00:02:45.410 --> 00:02:47.010
detection of life elsewhere, Mars was
76
00:02:47.010 --> 00:02:49.770
explicitly excluded because that's too easy,
77
00:02:49.770 --> 00:02:51.370
you know. So we've had these ideas for a very
78
00:02:51.370 --> 00:02:54.250
long time, but finding evidence of life
79
00:02:54.250 --> 00:02:56.570
out there is really, really difficult.
80
00:02:57.130 --> 00:02:59.570
We've talked a fair bit about the search for
81
00:02:59.570 --> 00:03:02.250
life within the solar system. You know,
82
00:03:02.250 --> 00:03:04.370
places like looking at Mars, looking at
83
00:03:04.370 --> 00:03:06.210
Europa, all the icy moons. And we talk about
84
00:03:06.210 --> 00:03:08.350
that a lot in the questions that we week by
85
00:03:08.350 --> 00:03:09.430
week as well on the show.
86
00:03:09.990 --> 00:03:12.030
And one thing I've always been really
87
00:03:12.030 --> 00:03:13.870
interested in and passionate about is the
88
00:03:13.870 --> 00:03:15.830
search for life outside the solar system.
89
00:03:16.390 --> 00:03:18.590
Given that we've moved into the exoplanet
90
00:03:18.590 --> 00:03:20.110
era, and we talked a lot about this in the
91
00:03:20.110 --> 00:03:22.550
previous episode as well, we're now in a
92
00:03:22.550 --> 00:03:24.910
position where 30 years ago would have seemed
93
00:03:24.910 --> 00:03:26.750
impossible. Thirty years ago, we'd only just
94
00:03:26.750 --> 00:03:28.390
found the first planet for under the Stars,
95
00:03:28.390 --> 00:03:30.670
and only just answered that question of
96
00:03:30.670 --> 00:03:32.950
whether there are planets at all beyond the
97
00:03:32.950 --> 00:03:35.510
solar system. Now we're at a position where
98
00:03:35.510 --> 00:03:37.990
we are finding places that theoretically, in
99
00:03:37.990 --> 00:03:40.610
the future, we could search to see whether
100
00:03:40.610 --> 00:03:42.210
there's any evidence of life in those
101
00:03:42.210 --> 00:03:44.410
planetary systems. And in all honesty,
102
00:03:44.410 --> 00:03:46.610
despite some of the hyperbolic media
103
00:03:47.170 --> 00:03:49.610
articles that you sometimes see, we haven't
104
00:03:49.610 --> 00:03:52.050
yet found a planet that would really look
105
00:03:52.050 --> 00:03:53.730
like another Earth. But we're getting there,
106
00:03:53.890 --> 00:03:55.450
we're getting closer, we're getting to
107
00:03:55.450 --> 00:03:57.610
planets that are more similar to ours in
108
00:03:57.610 --> 00:03:59.450
size, at more similar distance from their
109
00:03:59.450 --> 00:04:01.690
stars, and we're learning more about them.
110
00:04:01.690 --> 00:04:03.450
And it's very feasible then in the next
111
00:04:03.450 --> 00:04:05.250
decade or so, that we can actually start
112
00:04:05.810 --> 00:04:07.930
looking to see whether there's any evidence
113
00:04:07.930 --> 00:04:09.810
of life on those planets. Now, that's a
114
00:04:09.810 --> 00:04:12.710
little bit separate to looking for signs of
115
00:04:12.710 --> 00:04:15.550
communicative alien technological
116
00:04:15.550 --> 00:04:17.910
life, which is a search for extraterrestrial
117
00:04:17.910 --> 00:04:19.150
intelligence or the search for
118
00:04:19.150 --> 00:04:20.870
extraterrestrial artefacts. There two areas
119
00:04:20.870 --> 00:04:23.310
of science that are fascinating, but they're
120
00:04:23.310 --> 00:04:25.190
more like a search for a needle in a hair
121
00:04:25.190 --> 00:04:28.190
sack, where we don't even know if there is
122
00:04:28.190 --> 00:04:30.430
life elsewhere, never mind intelligent life.
123
00:04:30.670 --> 00:04:32.310
I mean, some people argue whether there's
124
00:04:32.310 --> 00:04:34.070
intelligent life on Earth looking at the news
125
00:04:34.070 --> 00:04:36.270
at the minute, but looking for intelligent
126
00:04:36.270 --> 00:04:38.270
life that has reached certain technological
127
00:04:38.270 --> 00:04:41.250
level to communicate with us is challenging.
128
00:04:41.250 --> 00:04:42.770
It's one of those things if we don't know
129
00:04:42.770 --> 00:04:44.290
what we're looking for, but if we don't look,
130
00:04:44.290 --> 00:04:47.210
we'll never find it. But it still led to some
131
00:04:47.210 --> 00:04:49.250
really fascinating research, and there's a
132
00:04:49.250 --> 00:04:51.650
guy who works with us as part of our Planet
133
00:04:51.650 --> 00:04:53.730
Search Consortium, a guy called Jason Reutt
134
00:04:53.730 --> 00:04:56.130
in the US who spent some of his time actually
135
00:04:56.290 --> 00:04:59.290
thinking about alien megastructures, the
136
00:04:59.290 --> 00:05:01.530
kind of things that feature so heavily in
137
00:05:01.530 --> 00:05:03.130
some advanced science fiction, like Larry
138
00:05:03.130 --> 00:05:06.130
Niven's Ringworld or Dyson Spheres, these
139
00:05:06.370 --> 00:05:08.610
enormous structures that you can imagine a
140
00:05:09.170 --> 00:05:11.810
civilization building. If their technologies
141
00:05:11.810 --> 00:05:14.030
are far above ours, as ours is from the Stone
142
00:05:14.030 --> 00:05:16.070
Age, the idea that you could build something
143
00:05:16.070 --> 00:05:18.230
to harness all the material in your planetary
144
00:05:18.230 --> 00:05:20.270
system m harness all the energy from your
145
00:05:20.270 --> 00:05:22.550
star. Now, many people argue that while
146
00:05:22.550 --> 00:05:23.990
that's theoretically possible, it just
147
00:05:23.990 --> 00:05:26.510
wouldn't be worth the effort. But what
148
00:05:26.510 --> 00:05:28.429
Jason's been looking into is
149
00:05:29.070 --> 00:05:31.910
effectively not could people do
150
00:05:31.910 --> 00:05:34.350
this? But rather if they did, what would it
151
00:05:34.350 --> 00:05:36.790
look like? So it's not really putting any
152
00:05:36.790 --> 00:05:39.630
weight on the probability of
153
00:05:39.630 --> 00:05:41.910
these things existing, but rather saying,
154
00:05:41.910 --> 00:05:44.370
here are things we could imagine that are
155
00:05:44.370 --> 00:05:46.610
within the bounds of physical possibility to
156
00:05:46.610 --> 00:05:47.810
build. Even if they'd be on this
157
00:05:47.810 --> 00:05:50.370
technologically, what would they look like to
158
00:05:50.370 --> 00:05:52.450
our different kinds of telescopes? What would
159
00:05:52.450 --> 00:05:54.770
the signatures be? And, um, that work's
160
00:05:54.770 --> 00:05:57.370
really important because if you don't have an
161
00:05:57.370 --> 00:05:59.730
idea what these peculiar objects would look
162
00:05:59.730 --> 00:06:02.530
like, when you find something unusual, you
163
00:06:02.530 --> 00:06:04.610
won't have that thing to reference again to
164
00:06:04.610 --> 00:06:06.690
cheque it out. So both the search for
165
00:06:06.690 --> 00:06:08.530
extraterrestrial intelligence and the search
166
00:06:08.530 --> 00:06:11.500
for alien artefacts, a kind of
167
00:06:11.500 --> 00:06:13.860
a separate splinter of astrobiology that are
168
00:06:14.100 --> 00:06:16.420
ongoing, that are very precious to us here in
169
00:06:16.420 --> 00:06:17.980
Australia. Of course, we would have lost the
170
00:06:17.980 --> 00:06:20.340
Parks Radio telescope under the Liberal
171
00:06:20.340 --> 00:06:22.900
government in the 2010s in the previous
172
00:06:22.900 --> 00:06:25.180
decade because they wanted to shut it down
173
00:06:25.180 --> 00:06:27.299
and demolish it to save money. And it only
174
00:06:27.380 --> 00:06:30.100
kept going by a large investment
175
00:06:30.820 --> 00:06:33.580
as part of a project to listen
176
00:06:33.580 --> 00:06:36.340
for aliens. So, like 40. I remember
177
00:06:36.500 --> 00:06:38.220
that telescope has been used to search for
178
00:06:38.220 --> 00:06:40.060
extraterrestrial intelligence in the form of
179
00:06:40.060 --> 00:06:42.740
radio signals. And that has kept one of our,
180
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:44.960
uh, incredible pieces of astronomical
181
00:06:44.960 --> 00:06:46.320
heritage in Australia. And something
182
00:06:46.320 --> 00:06:48.840
incredibly precious and beloved has kept it
183
00:06:48.840 --> 00:06:50.880
going and kept it standing despite the worst
184
00:06:50.880 --> 00:06:53.600
vagaries of politicians and
185
00:06:53.840 --> 00:06:54.880
all those challenges.
186
00:06:55.520 --> 00:06:58.320
Andrew Dunkley: Could you argue that we, uh, have
187
00:06:58.320 --> 00:07:00.240
already created a
188
00:07:00.480 --> 00:07:03.160
megastructure around Earth with the number of
189
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:05.840
satellites that are currently in orbit and
190
00:07:05.920 --> 00:07:08.240
the so many thousands more that are going to
191
00:07:08.240 --> 00:07:09.600
be put up there in the near future?
192
00:07:09.920 --> 00:07:11.640
Jonti Horner: Certainly feels like that from the inside.
193
00:07:11.640 --> 00:07:13.720
Looking out. I mean, I'm enjoying all the
194
00:07:13.720 --> 00:07:16.102
photos. People are, uh, of Comet 2025
195
00:07:16.218 --> 00:07:19.180
R3 Pan stars at the minute, which behind
196
00:07:19.180 --> 00:07:20.900
both of us are our attempts. We're showing
197
00:07:20.900 --> 00:07:22.980
them off. Andrew's ever so proud from his
198
00:07:22.980 --> 00:07:23.820
attempt last night.
199
00:07:24.060 --> 00:07:25.340
Andrew Dunkley: My first ever comet.
200
00:07:25.340 --> 00:07:27.860
Jonti Horner: Fabulous photos that people are getting, but
201
00:07:27.860 --> 00:07:29.620
I've seen a lot of them getting photobombed
202
00:07:29.620 --> 00:07:32.020
by Starlink satellites. And I've got. I'm
203
00:07:32.020 --> 00:07:34.060
currently, thanks to learning something new
204
00:07:34.060 --> 00:07:35.740
about astrophotography over the last two
205
00:07:35.740 --> 00:07:37.460
days. I'm going back to images I took of
206
00:07:37.460 --> 00:07:39.700
Comet Atlas and Comet um, Church in Chan
207
00:07:39.700 --> 00:07:41.700
Atlas, which were the great comets of 2024
208
00:07:41.700 --> 00:07:44.300
and 2025 to reprocess those
209
00:07:44.300 --> 00:07:47.280
images. But one of my abiding Comet Atlas
210
00:07:47.280 --> 00:07:49.080
was I had this incredible view of it on the
211
00:07:49.080 --> 00:07:51.760
horizon. Took this long series of photos and
212
00:07:51.760 --> 00:07:54.080
every single blooming photo was ruined by a
213
00:07:54.080 --> 00:07:55.760
Starlink satellite because I got a Starlink
214
00:07:55.760 --> 00:07:57.640
train passing overhead that had recently been
215
00:07:57.640 --> 00:07:59.680
launched. All of which went straight through
216
00:07:59.680 --> 00:08:01.080
the middle of the comet and rendered all the
217
00:08:01.080 --> 00:08:03.520
photos unusable on my only really good clear
218
00:08:03.520 --> 00:08:06.040
night. Now, I may be able to solve it, but
219
00:08:06.680 --> 00:08:08.840
that isn't quite at the megastructure stage
220
00:08:08.840 --> 00:08:11.680
yet for me in that I suspect with the
221
00:08:11.680 --> 00:08:13.560
level of technology we've got now or in the
222
00:08:13.560 --> 00:08:16.270
near future, that network of
223
00:08:16.270 --> 00:08:17.950
satellites around the Earth, uh, wouldn't be
224
00:08:17.950 --> 00:08:20.110
something we could detect orbiting a planet
225
00:08:20.110 --> 00:08:22.830
around another star. Right. They're not there
226
00:08:22.830 --> 00:08:24.510
yet, but they're the forebears of something
227
00:08:24.510 --> 00:08:27.470
that could be. Now, being that
228
00:08:27.470 --> 00:08:29.830
they're around a planet rather than a star,
229
00:08:29.830 --> 00:08:31.870
their signature will be different. And given
230
00:08:31.870 --> 00:08:34.350
that we are very skilled now at
231
00:08:34.350 --> 00:08:36.310
broadcasting in one direction rather than
232
00:08:36.310 --> 00:08:38.830
many, and that broadcasting directionally
233
00:08:38.830 --> 00:08:40.750
rather than broadcasting the boy band one
234
00:08:40.750 --> 00:08:43.750
direction should be said, um, broadcasting
235
00:08:44.209 --> 00:08:46.689
in a directional sense. We are moving towards
236
00:08:46.689 --> 00:08:48.329
the point where we're going to stop shrieking
237
00:08:48.329 --> 00:08:50.649
like a screaming infant into the cosmos
238
00:08:50.649 --> 00:08:52.889
anyway. So it may be that we're going to go
239
00:08:52.889 --> 00:08:54.889
radio silent fairly soon, and satellites like
240
00:08:54.889 --> 00:08:56.769
that are going to be part of that journey.
241
00:08:57.489 --> 00:08:59.289
But I think they are an indication of how
242
00:08:59.289 --> 00:09:01.009
quickly these things can happen. You know, if
243
00:09:01.009 --> 00:09:03.169
we were talking a decade ago, we'd have been
244
00:09:03.169 --> 00:09:05.289
talking about a couple of thousand satellites
245
00:09:05.289 --> 00:09:07.249
orbiting Earth. We're now talking about
246
00:09:07.489 --> 00:09:09.929
roughly 50,000. With plants have more than a
247
00:09:09.929 --> 00:09:12.849
million within the next decade, it's getting
248
00:09:13.870 --> 00:09:16.670
quite terrifying, actually. As much from the
249
00:09:16.670 --> 00:09:18.310
atmosphere and climate side of things as
250
00:09:18.310 --> 00:09:20.630
anything else. You know, if we have a million
251
00:09:20.630 --> 00:09:23.430
Starlink satellites in orbit in five years or
252
00:09:23.430 --> 00:09:26.030
10 years time, they have an average lifetime
253
00:09:26.030 --> 00:09:27.590
of five years, which means we'd have more
254
00:09:27.590 --> 00:09:29.470
than 500 per day burning up in the
255
00:09:29.470 --> 00:09:31.310
atmosphere. And that's
256
00:09:32.510 --> 00:09:35.350
a factor of 100, if not more times
257
00:09:35.350 --> 00:09:37.190
material entering the atmosphere on a daily
258
00:09:37.190 --> 00:09:39.590
basis than we get from the background of
259
00:09:39.590 --> 00:09:42.430
space stuff falling in. We'll be running an
260
00:09:42.510 --> 00:09:44.430
experiment in atmospheric science that we've
261
00:09:44.430 --> 00:09:47.250
never run, dumping hundreds of
262
00:09:47.250 --> 00:09:49.010
tonnes of aluminium into the upper atmosphere
263
00:09:49.010 --> 00:09:49.530
every day.
264
00:09:50.090 --> 00:09:52.490
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, what's the effect going to be? And
265
00:09:52.730 --> 00:09:55.730
that's the $64,000 question, I suppose.
266
00:09:55.730 --> 00:09:57.370
Jonti Horner: But now the interesting thing there, coming
267
00:09:57.370 --> 00:10:00.090
back to the astrobiology, is that might
268
00:10:00.170 --> 00:10:02.650
well create a signature in the Earth's
269
00:10:02.650 --> 00:10:04.490
atmosphere that would be detectable
270
00:10:05.370 --> 00:10:07.610
from observers from around another star.
271
00:10:08.010 --> 00:10:10.170
Because one of the ways that we would look
272
00:10:10.570 --> 00:10:13.510
for biosignatures, at least early
273
00:10:13.510 --> 00:10:16.310
on, will be to look at the light
274
00:10:16.470 --> 00:10:19.470
from a star reaching us whilst a given
275
00:10:19.470 --> 00:10:21.710
planet is transiting between us and the star,
276
00:10:21.710 --> 00:10:24.030
so blocking a bit of that star's light. We
277
00:10:24.030 --> 00:10:25.830
can currently do this with giant planets,
278
00:10:25.830 --> 00:10:28.430
Jupiter sized, and a fraction of the light
279
00:10:28.430 --> 00:10:30.830
from the star passes through the planet's
280
00:10:30.830 --> 00:10:33.150
atmosphere. And you get imprinted on the
281
00:10:33.150 --> 00:10:35.110
stars like the chemical fingerprint of the
282
00:10:35.110 --> 00:10:37.110
constituents of the outer layers of the
283
00:10:37.110 --> 00:10:39.230
atmosphere where the lights pass through in
284
00:10:39.230 --> 00:10:41.510
the form of absorption lines. And um, by
285
00:10:41.510 --> 00:10:43.410
studying them, we can work out some of the
286
00:10:43.410 --> 00:10:45.130
chemical species that are prevalent there and
287
00:10:45.130 --> 00:10:46.810
even learn a bit about the structure of the
288
00:10:46.810 --> 00:10:48.650
atmosphere, the presence of clouds, things
289
00:10:48.650 --> 00:10:51.650
like that. Now when we get to the point where
290
00:10:51.650 --> 00:10:53.290
we've got all those satellites burning up in
291
00:10:53.290 --> 00:10:56.250
our atmosphere, imagining with the kind of
292
00:10:56.250 --> 00:10:57.930
technology that we're looking at developing
293
00:10:57.930 --> 00:11:00.130
within the next decade or so, or maybe a
294
00:11:00.130 --> 00:11:02.210
little bit longer, imagining being on a
295
00:11:02.210 --> 00:11:04.050
nearby star looking at the sun while the
296
00:11:04.050 --> 00:11:06.450
Earth is transiting, you're suddenly
297
00:11:06.450 --> 00:11:09.130
introducing a huge spike of aluminium and
298
00:11:09.440 --> 00:11:11.400
into the absorption in an Earth like planet's
299
00:11:11.400 --> 00:11:14.200
atmosphere. And there is no natural way that
300
00:11:14.200 --> 00:11:16.080
I'm aware of that you could get that.
301
00:11:17.040 --> 00:11:19.400
So that would not only be a sign of something
302
00:11:19.400 --> 00:11:21.800
way going on, it would be a bio signature of
303
00:11:21.800 --> 00:11:24.280
technologically developed life that is not
304
00:11:24.280 --> 00:11:26.000
quite so developed as to have learned that
305
00:11:26.000 --> 00:11:26.800
pollution is bad.
306
00:11:28.080 --> 00:11:30.440
Andrew Dunkley: Maybe that's how we find an
307
00:11:30.440 --> 00:11:33.240
intelligent species, uh, beyond Earth.
308
00:11:33.240 --> 00:11:36.050
They find us first and send us a, you
309
00:11:36.050 --> 00:11:37.010
know, welcome pack.
310
00:11:37.010 --> 00:11:40.010
Jonti Horner: Yes. 10 helpful things you can do to fix your
311
00:11:40.010 --> 00:11:42.690
problems. Stop burning things up in the
312
00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:43.370
atmosphere.
313
00:11:44.100 --> 00:11:47.090
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yes, yeah, they may have already
314
00:11:47.090 --> 00:11:50.010
learned that lesson, but um, yeah, okay,
315
00:11:50.010 --> 00:11:52.610
so that's where we're at so far. Where do we
316
00:11:52.610 --> 00:11:55.170
go from here on the astrobiology
317
00:11:55.170 --> 00:11:55.690
train?
318
00:11:55.850 --> 00:11:58.210
Jonti Horner: Well, where we moved to in the latter part of
319
00:11:58.210 --> 00:12:00.330
the last astrobiology episode
320
00:12:00.890 --> 00:12:03.790
was my argument that
321
00:12:03.790 --> 00:12:05.590
you can't just look at a planet and say it's
322
00:12:05.590 --> 00:12:07.750
at the right temperature in the habitable
323
00:12:07.750 --> 00:12:10.070
zone. Um, we can look There. Whee.
324
00:12:10.630 --> 00:12:12.990
It kind of feels a bit like that when you
325
00:12:12.990 --> 00:12:15.030
read a lot of storeys, that the only
326
00:12:15.030 --> 00:12:16.990
consideration that comes into play is how far
327
00:12:16.990 --> 00:12:19.190
the planet is from its star. And I think
328
00:12:19.270 --> 00:12:21.510
instead, it's fairer to say that there are a
329
00:12:21.590 --> 00:12:24.470
huge variety of factors that can make
330
00:12:24.470 --> 00:12:27.310
one planet more or less suitable for the
331
00:12:27.310 --> 00:12:28.870
development of life and therefore for the
332
00:12:28.870 --> 00:12:31.510
observability of life on planets around other
333
00:12:31.510 --> 00:12:33.800
stars. And therefore, given that the
334
00:12:33.800 --> 00:12:35.440
observations to find life are going to be
335
00:12:35.440 --> 00:12:37.440
overwhelmingly the hardest we've ever had to
336
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:40.040
carry out, we'll have hundreds, if not
337
00:12:40.040 --> 00:12:41.640
thousands of targets to choose from, but
338
00:12:41.640 --> 00:12:43.440
we'll only be able to look at a tiny handful
339
00:12:43.440 --> 00:12:46.080
of them in detail at first. So we need to be
340
00:12:46.080 --> 00:12:48.600
very careful about where we look. The
341
00:12:48.600 --> 00:12:50.960
proximity of the planet and its host star to
342
00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:53.320
the sun will be important because the closer
343
00:12:53.320 --> 00:12:55.440
the star is to a zombie we get for a given
344
00:12:55.440 --> 00:12:58.120
brightness of star, and also the more widely
345
00:12:58.120 --> 00:13:00.520
separated on the sky a star and planet will
346
00:13:00.520 --> 00:13:02.760
be for a given orbital distance between them.
347
00:13:02.920 --> 00:13:04.560
Closer they are, the more widely separated
348
00:13:04.560 --> 00:13:06.620
they are. And while people listening can't
349
00:13:06.620 --> 00:13:08.860
see this, I'm at the minute pointing fingers
350
00:13:08.860 --> 00:13:10.540
up at the side of my eyes to Andrew and then
351
00:13:10.540 --> 00:13:12.340
moving them towards the camera. Fingers are
352
00:13:12.340 --> 00:13:14.180
the same distance apart, but they get wider
353
00:13:14.180 --> 00:13:15.740
and wider apart on the screen as they get
354
00:13:15.740 --> 00:13:18.340
closer. Yeah. So there are clear reasons that
355
00:13:18.340 --> 00:13:21.099
we will look at stars that are nearer to
356
00:13:21.099 --> 00:13:23.740
us rather than further away. But beyond
357
00:13:23.740 --> 00:13:25.740
that, I think it's really important to
358
00:13:25.740 --> 00:13:28.740
consider all the different things that could
359
00:13:28.820 --> 00:13:30.900
factor in to make a given planet more
360
00:13:30.900 --> 00:13:33.770
suitable or less suitable for the
361
00:13:33.770 --> 00:13:35.970
development of life, and view them as like
362
00:13:36.290 --> 00:13:38.850
sliders on a mixing board in a sound studio,
363
00:13:39.170 --> 00:13:41.810
where you can fine tune things to see which
364
00:13:41.810 --> 00:13:43.610
gets the best sound, which gets the best
365
00:13:43.610 --> 00:13:46.490
score. You can rank your targets and
366
00:13:46.490 --> 00:13:48.450
you can start with the most promising ones,
367
00:13:48.450 --> 00:13:50.930
because with limited resources, you don't
368
00:13:50.930 --> 00:13:52.650
just want to do an unbiased survey, you want
369
00:13:52.650 --> 00:13:54.530
to instead maximise your chances of a
370
00:13:54.530 --> 00:13:56.930
positive result. Now, we're heavily biassed.
371
00:13:56.930 --> 00:13:58.890
We only know of one kind of life and that's
372
00:13:58.890 --> 00:14:01.410
Earth life. So we are very biassed towards
373
00:14:01.410 --> 00:14:03.410
looking for places that could support life
374
00:14:03.710 --> 00:14:05.630
like Earth life, because that's the only kind
375
00:14:05.630 --> 00:14:08.310
of life we do know exists that'll factor into
376
00:14:08.310 --> 00:14:10.510
it as well. But in the previous episode,
377
00:14:10.510 --> 00:14:12.430
towards the end, we talked about the way in
378
00:14:12.430 --> 00:14:13.990
which the location in the galaxy could
379
00:14:13.990 --> 00:14:16.510
potentially influence this, with the caveat,
380
00:14:16.510 --> 00:14:17.670
of course, that, uh, we're going to be
381
00:14:17.670 --> 00:14:19.190
looking at everything nearby. So whilst
382
00:14:19.190 --> 00:14:20.870
that's interesting scientifically, it's not
383
00:14:20.870 --> 00:14:23.190
that relevant. And then we also talked about
384
00:14:23.190 --> 00:14:25.430
the way that the nature of the stars that the
385
00:14:25.430 --> 00:14:28.380
planet orbits can influence things. And uh,
386
00:14:28.430 --> 00:14:30.020
not just from the point of view of is a star,
387
00:14:30.020 --> 00:14:32.910
ah, stable or single, but down to more subtle
388
00:14:32.910 --> 00:14:35.070
things like the fact that stars brighten over
389
00:14:35.070 --> 00:14:37.330
time. So just because a planet is in the
390
00:14:37.330 --> 00:14:39.570
habitable zone now doesn't mean it's been in
391
00:14:39.570 --> 00:14:42.090
that zone for long enough for life to become
392
00:14:42.090 --> 00:14:42.770
well established.
393
00:14:42.770 --> 00:14:45.170
So we talked about all that, where we
394
00:14:45.170 --> 00:14:47.610
finished up though we didn't get to my own
395
00:14:48.170 --> 00:14:50.050
personal favourite parts of the science and
396
00:14:50.050 --> 00:14:52.170
the stuff I'm more directly involved with,
397
00:14:52.890 --> 00:14:54.850
which are the more local influences on the
398
00:14:54.850 --> 00:14:57.090
planet, that is the influence of the
399
00:14:57.090 --> 00:14:59.050
planetary system in which that planet moves,
400
00:14:59.050 --> 00:15:00.770
all the other planets and all the debris
401
00:15:00.770 --> 00:15:03.690
therein, but also the impact of the planet
402
00:15:03.690 --> 00:15:06.050
itself, what it's made of, how it behaves.
403
00:15:06.050 --> 00:15:07.830
And there's a lot of subtlety in that that.
404
00:15:08.070 --> 00:15:10.430
When I prepared with my old mentor, Professor
405
00:15:10.430 --> 00:15:12.870
Barry Jones this review article on this 16
406
00:15:12.870 --> 00:15:15.670
years ago now, we dug into and it
407
00:15:15.670 --> 00:15:18.390
highlighted to me how none of these questions
408
00:15:18.390 --> 00:15:20.230
can be answered from people within a single
409
00:15:20.230 --> 00:15:23.030
research silo at all. You need researchers
410
00:15:23.030 --> 00:15:24.670
from all different disciplines of human
411
00:15:24.670 --> 00:15:27.510
experience, from the sciences, the biological
412
00:15:27.510 --> 00:15:29.830
sciences, physical sciences, geosciences,
413
00:15:29.830 --> 00:15:31.830
chemistry and astronomers all to come
414
00:15:31.830 --> 00:15:34.830
together. You probably also need philosophers
415
00:15:34.830 --> 00:15:36.430
and archaeologists to come into the
416
00:15:36.430 --> 00:15:38.280
discussion to talk about, about how we look
417
00:15:38.280 --> 00:15:40.400
and why we look and what we look for. And
418
00:15:40.400 --> 00:15:43.120
that's particularly true when we start moving
419
00:15:43.120 --> 00:15:46.080
from simple life to life that could talk
420
00:15:46.080 --> 00:15:48.560
back to us. And a very dear friend of mine in
421
00:15:48.560 --> 00:15:50.480
Australia who Fred Watson probably knows very
422
00:15:50.480 --> 00:15:52.680
well as well is Professor Alice Gorman down
423
00:15:52.680 --> 00:15:55.280
at Adelaide, who's a space archaeologist and
424
00:15:55.280 --> 00:15:57.680
has given some of the most astonishing and
425
00:15:57.680 --> 00:15:59.480
mind blowing talks I've ever seen from the
426
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:01.680
point of view of someone who is trained in
427
00:16:01.680 --> 00:16:04.480
archaeology looking at the record of human
428
00:16:04.480 --> 00:16:06.440
space flight and what we should do to
429
00:16:06.440 --> 00:16:08.440
preserve artefacts like the Apollo landing
430
00:16:08.440 --> 00:16:09.980
site for future generations. Generations how
431
00:16:09.980 --> 00:16:11.060
we should consider that
432
00:16:13.300 --> 00:16:14.900
Andrew Dunkley: I absolutely agree because
433
00:16:16.180 --> 00:16:19.100
it was probably one of the
434
00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:21.860
greatest achievements in human history, if
435
00:16:21.860 --> 00:16:23.780
not the greatest achievement in human
436
00:16:23.780 --> 00:16:25.940
history. I mean inventing the wheel probably
437
00:16:25.940 --> 00:16:27.740
would have been a pretty cool thing too, but
438
00:16:27.740 --> 00:16:29.340
I don't know where that happened or when and
439
00:16:29.340 --> 00:16:31.980
they never would have thought to commemorate
440
00:16:31.980 --> 00:16:34.820
it. But um, it is something that
441
00:16:34.820 --> 00:16:37.000
should, should, you know, when we eventually
442
00:16:37.000 --> 00:16:39.480
have permanent residents on the moon,
443
00:16:39.960 --> 00:16:42.200
at least need to put a cyclone fence around
444
00:16:42.200 --> 00:16:44.520
it just for the time being until we can build
445
00:16:45.080 --> 00:16:48.080
a proper structure to protect
446
00:16:48.080 --> 00:16:48.320
it.
447
00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:49.880
Jonti Horner: Probably a good place to have rabbit proof
448
00:16:49.880 --> 00:16:51.960
fence because that will, that'll do the job.
449
00:16:52.400 --> 00:16:55.000
Andrew Dunkley: Um, yeah, well, you know that rabbits will
450
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:57.600
ultimately be on the moon. They tend to be
451
00:16:57.600 --> 00:16:58.100
everywhere else.
452
00:16:58.100 --> 00:17:00.480
Jonti Horner: Um, now one of the greatest conference talks
453
00:17:00.480 --> 00:17:02.400
ever witnessed actually was a talk by a list
454
00:17:02.400 --> 00:17:03.920
talking about archaeology. And it was from
455
00:17:03.920 --> 00:17:06.730
the education and biases
456
00:17:06.730 --> 00:17:08.290
point of view. And I know this is already a
457
00:17:08.290 --> 00:17:10.290
bit off topic, but it's a storey I think
458
00:17:10.290 --> 00:17:12.370
really well worth repeating. Alice is an
459
00:17:12.370 --> 00:17:14.210
archaeologist and so she teaches archaeology
460
00:17:14.210 --> 00:17:16.850
students and she gave this talk about how she
461
00:17:16.850 --> 00:17:18.770
took a group of her uh, final year students
462
00:17:19.250 --> 00:17:21.410
to this site in Fairlie Regional New South
463
00:17:21.410 --> 00:17:24.250
Wales for a two day dig. Basically go out
464
00:17:24.250 --> 00:17:25.770
there, dig and come back to me with what you
465
00:17:25.770 --> 00:17:27.290
find and tell me about the storey of the
466
00:17:27.290 --> 00:17:29.890
site. And after two days all these
467
00:17:30.130 --> 00:17:31.730
young students came back and said, look, we
468
00:17:31.730 --> 00:17:33.250
didn't really find much, we found a few
469
00:17:33.930 --> 00:17:35.610
Aboriginal artefacts and that's kind of
470
00:17:35.610 --> 00:17:37.210
interesting, but all we found was a load of
471
00:17:37.210 --> 00:17:38.930
rubbish. We found all these blooming cable
472
00:17:38.930 --> 00:17:40.850
ties and bits of plastic that are polluting
473
00:17:40.850 --> 00:17:43.810
the site. What she then went on to do
474
00:17:43.810 --> 00:17:46.210
was the whole point was that the cable ties
475
00:17:46.210 --> 00:17:48.170
were actually the archaeology that she was
476
00:17:48.170 --> 00:17:50.420
interested in. So she went um, on and um,
477
00:17:50.810 --> 00:17:52.490
said in the talk that this was an old
478
00:17:52.490 --> 00:17:54.730
decommissioned listening station that had
479
00:17:54.730 --> 00:17:56.730
been built I think in like the late 1940s,
480
00:17:56.730 --> 00:17:58.610
post World War II, and operated into maybe
481
00:17:58.610 --> 00:18:00.930
the late 60s, early 70s before being
482
00:18:00.930 --> 00:18:03.530
demolished and removed. But by looking at the
483
00:18:03.530 --> 00:18:05.430
cable ties where they'd been identified had
484
00:18:05.900 --> 00:18:08.060
knowing a little bit about how cable ties and
485
00:18:08.060 --> 00:18:10.060
cable tie technology changed over the years,
486
00:18:10.620 --> 00:18:12.820
you could not only map out exactly where all
487
00:18:12.820 --> 00:18:14.380
the buildings had been and where the wire
488
00:18:14.380 --> 00:18:16.300
runs have been and get the structure of this
489
00:18:16.700 --> 00:18:19.620
long vanished building, you could also
490
00:18:19.620 --> 00:18:21.970
work out which bits were built when. And um,
491
00:18:22.220 --> 00:18:24.260
the whole importance here was partly that
492
00:18:24.260 --> 00:18:25.660
whole thing of one man's trash is another
493
00:18:25.660 --> 00:18:28.060
man's treasure, but it's also how
494
00:18:28.620 --> 00:18:30.870
as a scientist and a researcher, uh,
495
00:18:31.520 --> 00:18:34.000
you will miss things and you'll make mistakes
496
00:18:34.000 --> 00:18:36.760
because of your own personal biases that are
497
00:18:36.760 --> 00:18:39.720
quite often unconscious. And in this case for
498
00:18:39.720 --> 00:18:40.920
these students who've been studying
499
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:43.560
archaeology, their unconscious bias was that
500
00:18:43.560 --> 00:18:46.080
anything modern is not archaeology. That's
501
00:18:46.080 --> 00:18:48.440
rubbish in the way of good archaeology. And
502
00:18:48.440 --> 00:18:50.240
so they totally miss the point. And it's a
503
00:18:50.240 --> 00:18:52.480
fabulous learning thing. It's why as
504
00:18:52.480 --> 00:18:54.680
scientists we use statistics so much. I know
505
00:18:54.680 --> 00:18:56.440
there's all this stuff about you can show
506
00:18:56.440 --> 00:18:58.200
anything with statistics, damn lies and
507
00:18:58.200 --> 00:19:00.160
statistics, all the rest of it. But
508
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:01.920
fundamentally the reason that we use
509
00:19:01.920 --> 00:19:04.580
statistics as a tool school is because we as
510
00:19:04.580 --> 00:19:06.460
humans are biassed we've got this incredible
511
00:19:06.460 --> 00:19:09.380
evolutionary ability to see patterns when
512
00:19:09.380 --> 00:19:11.780
they're barely there, but we also have a very
513
00:19:11.780 --> 00:19:13.740
strong ability to see patterns that we expect
514
00:19:13.740 --> 00:19:15.580
to see when those patterns aren't actually
515
00:19:15.580 --> 00:19:18.340
there. And, um, that's certainly true of the
516
00:19:18.340 --> 00:19:20.260
canals on Mars. You know, Giovanni
517
00:19:20.260 --> 00:19:23.060
Schiaparelli saw these canals, these
518
00:19:23.060 --> 00:19:25.740
channels on, um, Mars, which I think the best
519
00:19:25.740 --> 00:19:27.660
explanation is that Mars was really bright.
520
00:19:27.660 --> 00:19:29.100
He had a big telescope and he was actually
521
00:19:29.100 --> 00:19:30.740
seeing the projection of his own capillaries
522
00:19:30.740 --> 00:19:33.100
in his eye, like I'm gonna see tomorrow when
523
00:19:33.100 --> 00:19:34.740
I get my eye test at the opticians and they
524
00:19:34.740 --> 00:19:37.060
do the bright light thing. But all these
525
00:19:37.060 --> 00:19:38.900
other observers with less good eyes and less
526
00:19:38.900 --> 00:19:40.860
good telescopes suddenly started seeing the
527
00:19:40.860 --> 00:19:43.660
canals. And it's this
528
00:19:43.660 --> 00:19:45.620
whole thing of when you're really straining
529
00:19:45.620 --> 00:19:47.140
at the limits of your vision, you see what
530
00:19:47.140 --> 00:19:48.820
you think you're going to see, not what there
531
00:19:48.820 --> 00:19:51.540
actually is. And that's true with our data.
532
00:19:51.540 --> 00:19:54.420
Uh, therefore, you use statistics
533
00:19:54.420 --> 00:19:55.900
to give you a feel for whether what you're
534
00:19:55.900 --> 00:19:57.980
seeing is significant or not, or whether it
535
00:19:57.980 --> 00:20:00.260
exists in the first place. And that's a way
536
00:20:00.260 --> 00:20:03.260
of us combating those biases. Now, that wasn'
537
00:20:03.720 --> 00:20:05.440
in that way to the archaeology students who
538
00:20:05.440 --> 00:20:07.160
thought that cable ties were rubbish, but it
539
00:20:07.160 --> 00:20:10.080
was a fabulous reminder of how we really
540
00:20:10.080 --> 00:20:12.320
need to be aware not only of the explicit
541
00:20:12.320 --> 00:20:14.520
biases, which are the things we choose to do.
542
00:20:15.560 --> 00:20:18.320
If they're doing a survey of people on hair
543
00:20:18.320 --> 00:20:20.040
loss and they say we interviewed men between
544
00:20:20.040 --> 00:20:23.040
18 and 30, that's clearly biassed to
545
00:20:23.040 --> 00:20:25.280
be for men between 18 and 30, not for men of
546
00:20:25.280 --> 00:20:27.680
our age, for example. That's an explicit
547
00:20:27.680 --> 00:20:29.400
bias, it's one that's a conscious choice.
548
00:20:29.800 --> 00:20:31.680
Implicit biases are the sneaky ones, where
549
00:20:31.680 --> 00:20:33.770
you don't realise you're making them. And
550
00:20:33.770 --> 00:20:35.650
that's why I've made it so clear up front
551
00:20:35.650 --> 00:20:37.890
here that we can imagine
552
00:20:38.370 --> 00:20:40.690
all kinds of life. Science fiction does it
553
00:20:40.690 --> 00:20:43.460
wonderfully, but our implicit bias is that,
554
00:20:43.460 --> 00:20:44.890
uh, when we talk about the search for life,
555
00:20:44.890 --> 00:20:46.690
at least in the very short term, we're
556
00:20:46.690 --> 00:20:49.049
actually looking for life like us, not you
557
00:20:49.049 --> 00:20:51.890
and I, but lifelike Earth, uh, life based on
558
00:20:51.890 --> 00:20:54.090
a planet with oceans, living on the surface,
559
00:20:54.090 --> 00:20:56.330
modifying the atmosphere, because that's the
560
00:20:56.330 --> 00:20:58.130
one kind of life we know exists, but also
561
00:20:58.690 --> 00:21:00.440
because that's the one kind of life we could
562
00:21:00.440 --> 00:21:02.600
probably identify with our observations. Life
563
00:21:02.600 --> 00:21:05.440
beneath the ice on Europa is fascinating, but
564
00:21:05.440 --> 00:21:07.600
we can't see it in the solar system. We
565
00:21:07.600 --> 00:21:09.880
wouldn't have a prayer if Europa was found
566
00:21:09.880 --> 00:21:11.640
orbiting another star, because the ice is in
567
00:21:11.640 --> 00:21:14.400
the way life on a surface that modifies an
568
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:16.319
atmosphere is at least something we
569
00:21:16.319 --> 00:21:18.680
theoretically could detect. So that's making
570
00:21:18.680 --> 00:21:20.680
the implicit explicit.
571
00:21:21.800 --> 00:21:23.960
Andrew Dunkley: Gotcha. All right, we're gonna take a breath,
572
00:21:24.300 --> 00:21:27.160
uh, and get back to Astrobiology Part 2
573
00:21:27.560 --> 00:21:29.000
on Space Nuts.
574
00:21:30.520 --> 00:21:32.780
Let's take a little break from the to tell
575
00:21:32.780 --> 00:21:35.460
you about online, uh, security with our
576
00:21:35.460 --> 00:21:38.460
sponsor NordVPN. Now, ah, you
577
00:21:38.460 --> 00:21:40.980
probably heard us talk about NORDVPN before.
578
00:21:41.480 --> 00:21:43.260
Uh, they've been with us for a long time and
579
00:21:43.260 --> 00:21:45.260
we really appreciate it. But there's a good
580
00:21:45.260 --> 00:21:47.780
reason for that. It's something that we
581
00:21:47.859 --> 00:21:50.660
actually use, me personally, uh, especially
582
00:21:50.660 --> 00:21:53.220
when travelling. In fact, last year when Judy
583
00:21:53.220 --> 00:21:55.380
and I were overseas, we ran into a situation
584
00:21:55.380 --> 00:21:58.270
where some of our everyday online apps
585
00:21:58.270 --> 00:22:01.150
on our phones just wouldn't work. Our
586
00:22:01.150 --> 00:22:03.390
banking app for example. And that was crucial
587
00:22:03.630 --> 00:22:05.790
because we were actually selling a house
588
00:22:05.790 --> 00:22:08.790
while we were on a cruise ship. Yeah, don't
589
00:22:08.790 --> 00:22:11.460
ask. It was, it was a strange situation but
590
00:22:11.460 --> 00:22:13.709
uh, we needed access to our bank accounts to
591
00:22:13.709 --> 00:22:16.630
make all that happen and NORDVPN was
592
00:22:16.630 --> 00:22:19.350
there for us. Uh, I even got to watch sport
593
00:22:19.350 --> 00:22:21.990
back home even though we were geofenced out
594
00:22:21.990 --> 00:22:24.750
of the district because we were over in, in
595
00:22:24.910 --> 00:22:27.270
the Mediterranean or somewhere like that. So
596
00:22:27.270 --> 00:22:30.190
with NordVPN, I was able to log in and watch
597
00:22:30.190 --> 00:22:32.510
the football back home. It lets you
598
00:22:32.590 --> 00:22:34.990
securely connect through servers in your home
599
00:22:34.990 --> 00:22:37.550
country, so your apps will behave like
600
00:22:37.710 --> 00:22:40.549
you're at home. Uh, but it's not just
601
00:22:40.549 --> 00:22:43.310
about access, it's about protection. NORDVPN
602
00:22:43.310 --> 00:22:45.910
encrypts your Internet traffic, so whether
603
00:22:45.910 --> 00:22:48.710
you're uh, on public WI fi or on your home
604
00:22:48.710 --> 00:22:51.310
network, your data is shielded from hackers
605
00:22:51.310 --> 00:22:53.450
and trackers and other unwanted snooping.
606
00:22:54.330 --> 00:22:56.290
It also has a built in threat protection
607
00:22:56.290 --> 00:22:59.210
system which can block malicious websites and
608
00:22:59.210 --> 00:23:01.770
annoying ads and even prevent malware
609
00:23:01.770 --> 00:23:04.490
downloads before they happen. And
610
00:23:04.570 --> 00:23:07.050
setting it up, very easy. One click and
611
00:23:07.050 --> 00:23:09.650
you're protected across multiple devices. Up
612
00:23:09.650 --> 00:23:11.930
to six devices with one service
613
00:23:12.570 --> 00:23:14.530
right now. If you'd like to take advantage of
614
00:23:14.530 --> 00:23:17.530
a special Space Nuts listener offer, uh,
615
00:23:17.530 --> 00:23:20.270
you can head to this URL for more
616
00:23:20.270 --> 00:23:22.672
information. Nordvpn.com/spacenuts
617
00:23:23.028 --> 00:23:25.870
spacenuts to get 4 extra months
618
00:23:25.870 --> 00:23:28.350
free plus a 30 day money back
619
00:23:28.510 --> 00:23:31.150
guarantee. They can't make a much better
620
00:23:31.150 --> 00:23:32.830
offer than that, can they? That's
621
00:23:32.830 --> 00:23:34.830
nordvpn.com
622
00:23:35.870 --> 00:23:38.110
spacenuts and don't forget to use the code
623
00:23:38.110 --> 00:23:40.670
word SPACENUTS. Secure your
624
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.030
connection wherever you are in the world or
625
00:23:43.030 --> 00:23:46.000
the universe with NordVPN, uh, our
626
00:23:46.000 --> 00:23:46.600
sponsor.
627
00:23:47.560 --> 00:23:49.800
Jonti Horner: 3, 2, 1
628
00:23:50.360 --> 00:23:51.640
space nuts.
629
00:23:51.960 --> 00:23:54.520
Andrew Dunkley: And you're with Andrew Dunkley and Professor
630
00:23:54.520 --> 00:23:57.080
Jonty Horner okay, what next,
631
00:23:57.080 --> 00:23:59.480
Jonty, in this search for
632
00:23:59.560 --> 00:24:01.000
extraterrestrial life?
633
00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:03.600
Jonti Horner: Well, I think we come back to moving away
634
00:24:03.600 --> 00:24:05.640
from the diversions of archaeology and stuff
635
00:24:05.640 --> 00:24:08.360
to the factors that could make a planet more
636
00:24:08.360 --> 00:24:11.000
or less suitable as a target. And like I
637
00:24:11.000 --> 00:24:12.440
said, we talked about the galaxy, we talked
638
00:24:12.440 --> 00:24:15.320
about the stars. To me, as a person who
639
00:24:15.320 --> 00:24:16.640
comes originally from a solar system
640
00:24:16.640 --> 00:24:18.380
background, particularly fascinated with
641
00:24:18.380 --> 00:24:20.260
comets and asteroids and stuff like that,
642
00:24:21.300 --> 00:24:23.660
there are a lot of factors that have been
643
00:24:23.660 --> 00:24:26.340
proposed that relate to
644
00:24:26.580 --> 00:24:28.460
the interaction of planets and the
645
00:24:28.460 --> 00:24:30.180
interaction with the debris that's around
646
00:24:30.580 --> 00:24:32.420
that could render planets more or less
647
00:24:32.420 --> 00:24:35.300
suitable as targets. Now one
648
00:24:35.300 --> 00:24:37.620
example of this is the stability of orbits.
649
00:24:37.620 --> 00:24:40.020
You know, there are a variety of different
650
00:24:40.340 --> 00:24:42.500
models of the solar system's youth, some of
651
00:24:42.500 --> 00:24:44.100
which suggest that there were periods of
652
00:24:44.340 --> 00:24:46.740
chaotic instability where the planets orbits
653
00:24:46.740 --> 00:24:49.130
got stirred up, planets maybe even swapped
654
00:24:49.440 --> 00:24:51.880
orbits. Now this is the kind of thing we can
655
00:24:51.880 --> 00:24:53.600
model. And when we discover planetary
656
00:24:53.600 --> 00:24:56.480
systems, we can take the planets that we
657
00:24:56.480 --> 00:24:58.840
think are there and put them into computer
658
00:24:58.840 --> 00:25:00.760
software to run their orbits forward and back
659
00:25:00.760 --> 00:25:03.160
in time to see how they behave. And that's
660
00:25:03.160 --> 00:25:05.280
actually part of my day to day work. That's
661
00:25:05.760 --> 00:25:08.400
the technology I use and lots of tools I've
662
00:25:08.400 --> 00:25:10.280
used in the past to kill planetary systems
663
00:25:10.280 --> 00:25:12.400
that people thought were there because I run
664
00:25:12.400 --> 00:25:14.120
simulations and showed they're simply not
665
00:25:14.120 --> 00:25:15.620
stable on very short timescales.
666
00:25:17.130 --> 00:25:18.930
But on longer time scales, these kind of
667
00:25:18.930 --> 00:25:21.930
perturbations can have a significant impact
668
00:25:22.170 --> 00:25:24.730
on the orbits of planets. You can get
669
00:25:24.730 --> 00:25:27.370
significant shifts over time. You can get
670
00:25:27.370 --> 00:25:29.890
encounters and stirring up, which means
671
00:25:29.890 --> 00:25:32.050
sometimes that a planet will be on an orbit
672
00:25:32.050 --> 00:25:34.690
now that is not the orbit it's occupied in
673
00:25:34.690 --> 00:25:37.010
the past. And uh, those are things that we
674
00:25:37.010 --> 00:25:38.650
could probably pull out, tease out from the
675
00:25:38.650 --> 00:25:40.850
simulation kind of work that I do. And
676
00:25:40.850 --> 00:25:42.710
obviously a planet that is now in the
677
00:25:43.340 --> 00:25:45.140
habitable zone, um, but that was previously
678
00:25:45.140 --> 00:25:47.860
well outside it would not be a good place to
679
00:25:47.860 --> 00:25:50.660
look. Even though it looks good now, it's not
680
00:25:50.660 --> 00:25:52.900
great. It's like, I guess, you know, you've
681
00:25:52.900 --> 00:25:54.820
got two petri dishes in front of you that you
682
00:25:54.820 --> 00:25:56.300
could look at for life, but you can tell that
683
00:25:56.300 --> 00:25:58.020
one of them's been absolutely melted in a
684
00:25:58.020 --> 00:26:00.420
fire. It's at room temperature now, but that
685
00:26:00.420 --> 00:26:02.620
doesn't mean it always has been that same
686
00:26:02.620 --> 00:26:04.820
kind of idea. So that on a coarse scale has
687
00:26:04.820 --> 00:26:06.660
an effect. But there's a subtler version of
688
00:26:06.660 --> 00:26:08.660
that that I've done a little bit of work on
689
00:26:08.660 --> 00:26:10.940
in the past. And I've got a PhD student
690
00:26:10.940 --> 00:26:12.560
working with me at the moment minute, who's
691
00:26:12.560 --> 00:26:13.720
going to look into this a lot more. A
692
00:26:13.720 --> 00:26:16.280
wonderful student called Amber Tilly. It's
693
00:26:16.280 --> 00:26:18.040
the idea of the Milankovitch cycles.
694
00:26:19.080 --> 00:26:22.040
Now, on Earth, we
695
00:26:22.120 --> 00:26:24.280
look at climate change in the short term as
696
00:26:24.280 --> 00:26:26.960
being a big problem because it's a very rapid
697
00:26:26.960 --> 00:26:29.000
change that is being caused by human action.
698
00:26:29.480 --> 00:26:32.160
But on much longer timescales, the climate of
699
00:26:32.160 --> 00:26:34.840
Earth is periodically variable. We've had ice
700
00:26:34.840 --> 00:26:37.160
ages and interglacial periods for the last 2
701
00:26:37.160 --> 00:26:39.850
or 3 million years, which are the direct
702
00:26:39.850 --> 00:26:42.290
result of the subtle nudges and tweaks on
703
00:26:42.290 --> 00:26:44.410
the, uh, Earth from all the other objects in
704
00:26:44.410 --> 00:26:46.370
the solar system, primarily the other
705
00:26:46.370 --> 00:26:48.770
planets, and not mainly Jupiter to be honest.
706
00:26:48.770 --> 00:26:51.570
But most of the planets contribute. These are
707
00:26:51.570 --> 00:26:54.170
called the Milankovitch cycles. They have a
708
00:26:54.170 --> 00:26:56.610
number of effects. Firstly, the Earth on its
709
00:26:56.610 --> 00:26:59.490
axis precesses. It wobbles with a period of
710
00:26:59.490 --> 00:27:02.450
about 23,000 years. So our polar
711
00:27:02.450 --> 00:27:04.890
axis, which is tilted by currently 23 and a
712
00:27:04.890 --> 00:27:07.280
half degrees to the plane of our orbit,
713
00:27:07.520 --> 00:27:09.880
wobbles around like a kid's wobbly spinning
714
00:27:09.880 --> 00:27:12.360
toy coming to a stop. It precesses, wobbles
715
00:27:12.360 --> 00:27:13.880
around a bit like the thing in Inception
716
00:27:13.880 --> 00:27:16.000
about to fall over. You see this procession?
717
00:27:16.720 --> 00:27:18.720
That's a procession of the equinoxes. That's
718
00:27:18.720 --> 00:27:20.400
why your horoscopes are wrong. While it's one
719
00:27:20.400 --> 00:27:22.080
of the many reasons that your horoscopes are
720
00:27:22.080 --> 00:27:23.560
wrong, but it's particularly why your
721
00:27:23.560 --> 00:27:26.520
horoscopes are out by one particular one
722
00:27:26.520 --> 00:27:29.440
full calendar month. Because the
723
00:27:29.440 --> 00:27:31.850
horoscopes are based on where the sun is, was
724
00:27:31.850 --> 00:27:34.730
in the sky at that date 2,000 years ago.
725
00:27:35.050 --> 00:27:37.130
And, um, the axis of the Earth has wobbled
726
00:27:37.130 --> 00:27:38.890
round, so it's now one constellation round.
727
00:27:39.610 --> 00:27:42.130
So when the sun is in Aries, according to
728
00:27:42.130 --> 00:27:44.090
your horoscope, it's actually now in Pisces,
729
00:27:45.290 --> 00:27:47.529
all because of the wobble. That wobble takes
730
00:27:47.529 --> 00:27:50.410
23,000 years to complete. That means that
731
00:27:50.410 --> 00:27:52.610
the direction that the Earth is pointing
732
00:27:52.610 --> 00:27:55.570
changes over time. Essentially. Added
733
00:27:55.570 --> 00:27:57.730
to that, you've got a very slight wobble up
734
00:27:57.730 --> 00:27:59.650
and down where the tilt fire axis, which is
735
00:27:59.650 --> 00:28:02.290
currently 23 and a half degrees, changes from
736
00:28:02.290 --> 00:28:04.830
about 22 to, to 24 degrees, rocking back and
737
00:28:04.830 --> 00:28:07.070
forward. So that causes the size of the
738
00:28:07.070 --> 00:28:09.150
Arctic and Antarctic circles to grow and
739
00:28:09.150 --> 00:28:12.150
shrink very slightly. On um, top of all that,
740
00:28:12.150 --> 00:28:13.710
you've then got the Earth's orbit around the
741
00:28:13.710 --> 00:28:16.390
sun flexing and tilting. Its shape
742
00:28:16.390 --> 00:28:18.710
becomes more circular and more elongated,
743
00:28:19.189 --> 00:28:21.670
more eccentric. With a longer period period,
744
00:28:21.670 --> 00:28:23.910
I think about 100,000 years, something like
745
00:28:23.910 --> 00:28:26.310
that, our orbit, compared to the orbits of
746
00:28:26.310 --> 00:28:28.830
Jupiter and Saturn, tilts a little bit up and
747
00:28:28.830 --> 00:28:31.270
down the inclination changes, which adds to
748
00:28:31.270 --> 00:28:33.590
the change of the tilt in our spin axis a
749
00:28:33.590 --> 00:28:36.290
little bit. We also have the Earth's orbit
750
00:28:36.290 --> 00:28:37.930
precessing around in just the same way our
751
00:28:37.930 --> 00:28:39.690
poles do, and that's a little bit harder to
752
00:28:39.690 --> 00:28:42.370
visualise. But what that means is that the
753
00:28:42.530 --> 00:28:45.490
direction, if you drew a line from the sun
754
00:28:45.570 --> 00:28:47.240
through the Earth and out into space at, ah,
755
00:28:47.290 --> 00:28:49.770
the point the Earth was at perihelion closest
756
00:28:49.770 --> 00:28:52.490
to the sun, that direction will
757
00:28:52.490 --> 00:28:54.410
gradually move round over time, doing a full
758
00:28:54.410 --> 00:28:56.490
lap with a period of several tens of
759
00:28:56.490 --> 00:28:58.650
thousands of years. So our perihelion
760
00:28:58.650 --> 00:29:01.360
possession processes as well, all of the,
761
00:29:01.590 --> 00:29:04.390
that combined means that, uh,
762
00:29:04.390 --> 00:29:06.830
on average the amount of energy reaching the
763
00:29:06.830 --> 00:29:08.870
Earth's polar regions, averaged over a given
764
00:29:08.870 --> 00:29:11.870
year, varies with type. Sometimes the
765
00:29:11.870 --> 00:29:13.910
poles get a bit more energy and the ice
766
00:29:14.070 --> 00:29:16.590
sheets retreat. Sometimes they get a bit less
767
00:29:16.590 --> 00:29:18.190
energy and the ice sheets come back towards
768
00:29:18.190 --> 00:29:20.390
the equator again. Now, there's a lot of
769
00:29:20.390 --> 00:29:22.110
complex feedback from the Earth because ice
770
00:29:22.110 --> 00:29:24.830
is more reflective than water or land. So
771
00:29:24.830 --> 00:29:26.750
when ice is growing, it has a tendency to
772
00:29:26.750 --> 00:29:29.320
keep growing, and when it's shrinking, that
773
00:29:29.320 --> 00:29:31.320
has a tendency to run away as well. So you've
774
00:29:31.320 --> 00:29:33.800
got all these different feedbacks. But what
775
00:29:33.800 --> 00:29:35.520
that means is that on the Earth we've got
776
00:29:35.520 --> 00:29:38.480
these periodic variations in the
777
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:40.160
amount of energy at the poles which lead to
778
00:29:40.160 --> 00:29:42.200
periodic glaciations and interglacial
779
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:44.680
periods. That's the Milankovitch cycles.
780
00:29:45.240 --> 00:29:47.200
It means that on timescales of tens of
781
00:29:47.200 --> 00:29:49.240
thousands of years, our climate is relatively
782
00:29:49.240 --> 00:29:52.040
changeable. What would
783
00:29:52.040 --> 00:29:54.720
happen if the planets were on different
784
00:29:54.720 --> 00:29:57.630
orbits or if you were in a
785
00:29:57.630 --> 00:29:59.310
planetary system with a totally different
786
00:29:59.310 --> 00:30:01.830
architecture? The result would be very
787
00:30:01.830 --> 00:30:04.590
different Milankovitch cycles. You'd have
788
00:30:04.590 --> 00:30:06.430
different periods and you'd also have
789
00:30:06.430 --> 00:30:08.710
different amplitudes. You could imagine
790
00:30:08.710 --> 00:30:10.710
scenarios where instead of our Earth rocking
791
00:30:10.710 --> 00:30:13.510
a little bit from 22 to 24 degrees and back
792
00:30:13.510 --> 00:30:16.030
with its polar axis, it could be like Mars,
793
00:30:16.030 --> 00:30:18.630
whose spin axis varies chaotically, can even
794
00:30:18.630 --> 00:30:21.470
tip over on its side. You could have systems
795
00:30:21.470 --> 00:30:23.150
where there's barely any change whatsoever.
796
00:30:23.150 --> 00:30:25.840
You've got this full gap. Now the beauty is,
797
00:30:25.840 --> 00:30:28.480
again, we've got the tools to test this.
798
00:30:28.800 --> 00:30:30.640
We can run the kind of computational
799
00:30:30.640 --> 00:30:32.880
simulations that I've spent my career doing
800
00:30:33.120 --> 00:30:35.120
and, uh, model the orbits of a planet over
801
00:30:35.120 --> 00:30:36.640
time under the influence of all the other
802
00:30:36.640 --> 00:30:39.560
planets. And I did a lot of simulations of
803
00:30:39.560 --> 00:30:42.360
this between 2012 and 2020. I
804
00:30:42.360 --> 00:30:44.000
kept coming back to the idea, but never got
805
00:30:44.000 --> 00:30:46.400
around to publishing it until we got to 2020,
806
00:30:46.800 --> 00:30:49.160
where I published it with, um, Stephen Cain
807
00:30:49.160 --> 00:30:51.120
from University of California, Riverside. Pam
808
00:30:51.120 --> 00:30:53.280
Vervoort, who was his PhD student at the
809
00:30:53.280 --> 00:30:55.810
time, a couple of other people, people where
810
00:30:55.810 --> 00:30:58.490
we said, what is the influence of Jupiter on
811
00:30:58.490 --> 00:31:00.210
our Milankovitch cycles? What would happen if
812
00:31:00.210 --> 00:31:02.250
you move Jupiter closer to the sun or further
813
00:31:02.250 --> 00:31:04.970
away? If you made Jupiter's
814
00:31:04.970 --> 00:31:07.530
orbit more eccentric or less eccentric, how
815
00:31:07.530 --> 00:31:09.350
would that change the period and, um,
816
00:31:09.350 --> 00:31:11.210
amplitude of the Earth's? Milankovic cycles
817
00:31:12.170 --> 00:31:14.090
did the test. And in many cases, moving
818
00:31:14.090 --> 00:31:16.090
Jupiter destroyed the solar system, which
819
00:31:16.090 --> 00:31:18.250
meant the Earth wouldn't be here, which was
820
00:31:18.250 --> 00:31:21.010
kind of fun, but not very helpful. But for
821
00:31:21.010 --> 00:31:22.870
the versions of the solar system where the,
822
00:31:23.100 --> 00:31:26.060
the Earth was not removed, we got to see
823
00:31:26.060 --> 00:31:28.580
the range, the variety of Milankovitch cycles
824
00:31:28.580 --> 00:31:31.300
we would have from moving Jupiter in a bit
825
00:31:31.300 --> 00:31:33.060
closer or moving it a bit further away. And
826
00:31:33.060 --> 00:31:34.940
for those really interested, we moved Jupiter
827
00:31:34.940 --> 00:31:37.740
in as far as 3 Au from the sun, out as far as
828
00:31:37.740 --> 00:31:40.020
7 Au from the sun, where 5 Au is about where
829
00:31:40.020 --> 00:31:42.780
it is at the minute, 5.2. What we
830
00:31:42.780 --> 00:31:44.900
found, which is quite surprising, is that the
831
00:31:44.900 --> 00:31:46.860
Earth's, uh, Milankovitch cycles are neither
832
00:31:47.180 --> 00:31:49.020
unusually big or unusually small. They're
833
00:31:49.020 --> 00:31:50.810
somewhere in the middle. Middle. Which is a
834
00:31:50.810 --> 00:31:52.610
bit of an argument against a hypothesis
835
00:31:52.610 --> 00:31:55.090
called the Rare Earth hypothesis.
836
00:31:55.570 --> 00:31:58.376
This idea has been around for about 20, 25,
837
00:31:58.470 --> 00:32:01.330
30 years, and I've never really liked it.
838
00:32:01.330 --> 00:32:04.330
It's the idea that life on Earth is such a
839
00:32:04.330 --> 00:32:07.090
remarkable, incredible fluke
840
00:32:07.650 --> 00:32:09.730
that we will never find life elsewhere. And
841
00:32:09.730 --> 00:32:11.650
the authors put forward all these
842
00:32:11.650 --> 00:32:13.810
peculiarities about the Earth, uh, and argue
843
00:32:13.810 --> 00:32:15.970
that without them we would not be here.
844
00:32:16.900 --> 00:32:18.980
And it's a bit of a philosophical thing, but
845
00:32:19.300 --> 00:32:21.180
I think it's very dangerous to look at
846
00:32:21.180 --> 00:32:23.620
somewhere that has life and say, this place
847
00:32:23.620 --> 00:32:25.420
has all these unusual things and they are
848
00:32:25.420 --> 00:32:27.100
therefore required for life because we've
849
00:32:27.100 --> 00:32:29.820
never found life elsewhere. A good example is
850
00:32:29.820 --> 00:32:31.260
the presence of a large moon. And we'll talk
851
00:32:31.260 --> 00:32:33.580
about this a bit more later on. We have life
852
00:32:33.580 --> 00:32:35.380
on Earth and we have a big moon, so it's
853
00:32:35.380 --> 00:32:37.220
natural to think you need a big moon to have
854
00:32:37.220 --> 00:32:39.780
life. But we won't know that until we find
855
00:32:39.780 --> 00:32:42.380
life elsewhere. But that led to this argument
856
00:32:42.380 --> 00:32:44.500
of rare Earth life will be uncommon in the
857
00:32:44.500 --> 00:32:47.060
universe. If rare Earth were true,
858
00:32:47.460 --> 00:32:48.940
then when you look at something like the
859
00:32:48.940 --> 00:32:50.900
Milankovitch cycles, you would expect our
860
00:32:50.900 --> 00:32:52.820
Earth to be unusual in some way,
861
00:32:54.020 --> 00:32:56.660
to have conditions that favour life over your
862
00:32:56.660 --> 00:32:59.380
typical system. And we simply don't find that
863
00:32:59.380 --> 00:33:01.419
our Milankovitch cycles are fairly run of the
864
00:33:01.419 --> 00:33:03.220
mill. They're not big, they're not small,
865
00:33:03.220 --> 00:33:06.140
they're not fast. They're not slow, they're
866
00:33:06.140 --> 00:33:08.020
somewhere in the middle. Now,
867
00:33:08.810 --> 00:33:11.420
um, sorry, Pam went with that. Pam lava vault
868
00:33:11.420 --> 00:33:11.580
was.
869
00:33:11.580 --> 00:33:13.460
She then took the output of that and run it
870
00:33:13.460 --> 00:33:15.780
into climate modelling software, which was
871
00:33:15.780 --> 00:33:17.480
fabulous. And she published that work, work
872
00:33:17.480 --> 00:33:20.360
with us in 2022, where
873
00:33:20.360 --> 00:33:22.400
she was able to link the Milankovitch cycles.
874
00:33:22.400 --> 00:33:24.400
We predicted if you moved Jupiter around
875
00:33:25.360 --> 00:33:28.200
with the amplitude and frequency of the
876
00:33:28.200 --> 00:33:29.960
ice ages, we'd get. And it was really
877
00:33:29.960 --> 00:33:31.240
interesting because it turned out that when
878
00:33:31.240 --> 00:33:33.680
you factor in some of the feedback mechanisms
879
00:33:33.680 --> 00:33:35.840
that are in climate modelling, you actually
880
00:33:35.840 --> 00:33:37.840
could change the Earth's Milkovitch cycles a
881
00:33:37.840 --> 00:33:39.880
little bit and get very drastically different
882
00:33:39.880 --> 00:33:42.560
ice ages, much more frequent and shallower,
883
00:33:42.560 --> 00:33:45.280
or much less frequent and deeper just by
884
00:33:45.280 --> 00:33:47.800
small changes. Now, now, it's all
885
00:33:47.800 --> 00:33:49.560
fascinating just from the solar system point
886
00:33:49.560 --> 00:33:51.880
of view, but what we're really doing is we're
887
00:33:51.880 --> 00:33:54.520
putting down tools that when we find
888
00:33:54.520 --> 00:33:56.840
planets that could be suitable, we can do
889
00:33:56.840 --> 00:33:58.920
these same tests. We can look at them and
890
00:33:58.920 --> 00:34:00.480
say, we're thinking that you might be a
891
00:34:00.480 --> 00:34:02.600
target for life. Let's see what your
892
00:34:02.600 --> 00:34:04.360
Melankovic cycles are like. Let's see how
893
00:34:04.360 --> 00:34:06.920
stable your climate is. And if we find
894
00:34:06.920 --> 00:34:09.120
somewhere that flops between snowball Earth
895
00:34:09.120 --> 00:34:12.080
and a hothouse every 10 years, or that has
896
00:34:12.080 --> 00:34:13.960
incredibly long snowball Earth periods
897
00:34:13.960 --> 00:34:15.960
followed by short periods of temperate
898
00:34:15.960 --> 00:34:18.039
climate climate, even though everything else
899
00:34:18.039 --> 00:34:19.610
looks good, that's probably not as, uh,
900
00:34:19.679 --> 00:34:21.959
suitable for life as somewhere that is
901
00:34:21.959 --> 00:34:24.239
temperate all the time. So we can use that as
902
00:34:24.239 --> 00:34:26.519
a bit of a filter. And that's where the new
903
00:34:26.519 --> 00:34:28.519
PhD student we've got, Amber Tilly, comes in.
904
00:34:28.519 --> 00:34:30.039
Amber's, um, going to be doing the same kind
905
00:34:30.039 --> 00:34:32.399
of work, moving it forward, where she's going
906
00:34:32.399 --> 00:34:33.999
to be looking at a whole slew of different
907
00:34:33.999 --> 00:34:36.799
parameters to see how the
908
00:34:36.799 --> 00:34:39.279
Milankovitch cycles change as you vary
909
00:34:39.279 --> 00:34:41.479
things. She's both going to look at what
910
00:34:41.479 --> 00:34:42.919
would happen if the Earth was a bit more
911
00:34:42.919 --> 00:34:44.599
massive or less massive. How would that
912
00:34:44.599 --> 00:34:46.799
change things? Because of the feedback, you
913
00:34:46.799 --> 00:34:48.149
make Earth more massive, it interacts,
914
00:34:48.219 --> 00:34:49.859
interacts more with other things, stirs them
915
00:34:49.859 --> 00:34:52.739
up, you get a feedback there. She's also
916
00:34:52.739 --> 00:34:54.339
going to look, working with colleagues of
917
00:34:54.339 --> 00:34:57.139
ours overseas, at, uh, models of planet
918
00:34:57.139 --> 00:34:59.739
formation that form planetary systems similar
919
00:34:59.739 --> 00:35:02.539
to the solar system as theoretical
920
00:35:02.539 --> 00:35:04.739
data, and say, what would the Milankovitch
921
00:35:04.739 --> 00:35:07.019
cycles be like in this hypothetical system?
922
00:35:07.499 --> 00:35:09.419
So it's not just a purely hypothetical
923
00:35:09.419 --> 00:35:10.859
question, it's something we can actually dig
924
00:35:10.859 --> 00:35:13.659
into and, um, we can test. And I think
925
00:35:13.659 --> 00:35:15.379
that's fundamental to science. It's no good
926
00:35:15.379 --> 00:35:16.779
just arguing something you want to be able to
927
00:35:16.779 --> 00:35:17.520
Test. Test it.
928
00:35:18.480 --> 00:35:21.120
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. I suppose what you're suggesting is
929
00:35:21.360 --> 00:35:24.000
that by mucking around with
930
00:35:24.960 --> 00:35:27.640
what we know and making slight alterations,
931
00:35:27.640 --> 00:35:30.600
it gives you an idea of what to look
932
00:35:30.600 --> 00:35:33.560
for going forward in identifying
933
00:35:33.560 --> 00:35:34.640
potential targets.
934
00:35:34.880 --> 00:35:37.520
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And it's good because one of the
935
00:35:37.520 --> 00:35:39.080
reasons that you'd want to use the Earth is
936
00:35:39.080 --> 00:35:41.600
because we've got a ground truth. You can run
937
00:35:41.600 --> 00:35:43.080
the Earth with the current solar system
938
00:35:43.080 --> 00:35:45.080
parameters and put them into a climate model.
939
00:35:45.080 --> 00:35:47.530
And you should get what we see so we can
940
00:35:47.530 --> 00:35:49.130
ground truth it, which is really, really
941
00:35:49.130 --> 00:35:51.850
important. And, um, that is, I think, one of
942
00:35:51.850 --> 00:35:54.130
the main, most obvious ways where even in a
943
00:35:54.130 --> 00:35:56.010
dynamically stable system, a system that
944
00:35:56.010 --> 00:35:58.890
isn't tearing itself apart, interaction
945
00:35:58.890 --> 00:36:00.530
between planets could have a significant
946
00:36:00.610 --> 00:36:03.130
impact on habitability. And we want to look
947
00:36:03.130 --> 00:36:05.010
into it. It's really, really fascinating.
948
00:36:06.050 --> 00:36:08.930
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed it is. All right, um, we
949
00:36:08.930 --> 00:36:11.810
are talking astrobiology on this
950
00:36:11.970 --> 00:36:14.770
special episode of Space Nuts with Professor
951
00:36:14.770 --> 00:36:15.890
Jonty Horner.
952
00:36:15.890 --> 00:36:16.370
Back in.
953
00:36:19.310 --> 00:36:21.270
Okay, we checked all four systems and
954
00:36:21.270 --> 00:36:23.070
Jonti Horner: being with a go, space nets.
955
00:36:23.310 --> 00:36:25.950
Andrew Dunkley: Jody, I thought we might just start off
956
00:36:25.950 --> 00:36:28.670
this, uh, final segment with a
957
00:36:28.750 --> 00:36:30.910
question from the audience. Uh, it's funny
958
00:36:30.910 --> 00:36:33.590
because this question's come in before any of
959
00:36:33.590 --> 00:36:36.590
these astrobiology episodes have
960
00:36:36.590 --> 00:36:39.310
been released. And yet it's
961
00:36:39.310 --> 00:36:41.510
exactly what we've been talking about. This
962
00:36:41.510 --> 00:36:42.750
comes from Chris.
963
00:36:42.910 --> 00:36:45.630
Jonti Horner: Hi, um, I'm Chris from Axmouth in the uk.
964
00:36:46.270 --> 00:36:48.110
I'd, uh, just like to ask, um, given that
965
00:36:48.110 --> 00:36:50.690
interstellar travel to distance solar systems
966
00:36:50.690 --> 00:36:52.970
is likely to remain impractical for humans,
967
00:36:53.540 --> 00:36:55.770
um, do you think a more realistic long term
968
00:36:55.770 --> 00:36:56.970
strategy would be to
969
00:36:57.050 --> 00:36:58.970
Andrew Dunkley: seed the galaxy with the basic building
970
00:36:58.970 --> 00:37:01.690
blocks of life? Uh, for example,
971
00:37:01.860 --> 00:37:04.050
uh, sending autonomous probes carrying
972
00:37:04.050 --> 00:37:06.530
microbes or prebiotic material that could
973
00:37:06.530 --> 00:37:08.490
Jonti Horner: eventually take hold on suitable planets,
974
00:37:08.890 --> 00:37:09.210
even
975
00:37:09.210 --> 00:37:11.450
Andrew Dunkley: if that process takes thousands or millions
976
00:37:11.450 --> 00:37:11.930
of years.
977
00:37:12.490 --> 00:37:12.970
Jonti Horner: Thanks.
978
00:37:14.330 --> 00:37:16.380
Andrew Dunkley: There's a, uh, thought from Chris. So
979
00:37:17.420 --> 00:37:19.420
he's probably suggesting, you know, could we
980
00:37:19.420 --> 00:37:22.260
seed other planets? Uh, would that be
981
00:37:22.260 --> 00:37:24.780
the way to go? Uh, and autonomous,
982
00:37:25.060 --> 00:37:27.980
uh, vehicles. I think last
983
00:37:27.980 --> 00:37:29.580
time we talked about this a couple of
984
00:37:29.580 --> 00:37:32.300
episodes ago, you, you suggested it's,
985
00:37:32.300 --> 00:37:34.860
it's beyond us to actually
986
00:37:34.940 --> 00:37:37.860
send a human mission to another world
987
00:37:37.860 --> 00:37:40.860
to investigate life. But we could
988
00:37:41.340 --> 00:37:43.580
go the way of autonomous vehicles.
989
00:37:44.200 --> 00:37:46.720
Uh, but for the major
990
00:37:47.760 --> 00:37:50.730
distances, like the impossible distances, uh,
991
00:37:50.730 --> 00:37:53.240
we would have to come up with equipment in
992
00:37:53.240 --> 00:37:56.200
the future that could do it from a
993
00:37:56.200 --> 00:37:58.750
stable environment nearby. Um,
994
00:37:59.120 --> 00:38:00.440
I don't know how you want to tackle that
995
00:38:00.440 --> 00:38:00.720
question.
996
00:38:01.200 --> 00:38:02.600
Jonti Horner: There's a fair bit to it, and I mean, it
997
00:38:02.600 --> 00:38:05.200
reminds me of the wonderful Bobbyverse books
998
00:38:05.200 --> 00:38:07.160
that I've quite enjoyed. You know, um, the
999
00:38:07.160 --> 00:38:09.400
Storey of the Self Intelligent Von Neumann
1000
00:38:09.400 --> 00:38:11.800
probes, which are, uh, easy listening and
1001
00:38:11.800 --> 00:38:13.360
work very well as audiobooks.
1002
00:38:14.560 --> 00:38:17.440
It's a challenging one. So we could
1003
00:38:17.520 --> 00:38:20.400
do this. It would be feasible.
1004
00:38:20.560 --> 00:38:22.440
The question would become whether it's
1005
00:38:22.440 --> 00:38:25.440
ethical and right. Yes, and that's a really
1006
00:38:25.440 --> 00:38:27.520
challenging one. Now, there is something that
1007
00:38:27.520 --> 00:38:30.400
costs research missions
1008
00:38:30.480 --> 00:38:32.920
a vast amount of money called planetary
1009
00:38:32.920 --> 00:38:35.640
protection. And it's the idea that if we're
1010
00:38:35.640 --> 00:38:37.880
sending a spacecraft that has a possibility
1011
00:38:37.880 --> 00:38:40.870
of touching down on a place where we are
1012
00:38:40.870 --> 00:38:42.870
currently interested in looking for life,
1013
00:38:42.870 --> 00:38:45.550
where there could be life, such as Mars, such
1014
00:38:45.550 --> 00:38:48.030
as Europa, uh, Ganymede, Titan, around
1015
00:38:48.030 --> 00:38:50.910
Saturn. We don't want to take life with
1016
00:38:50.910 --> 00:38:52.630
us because you don't want to find life on
1017
00:38:52.630 --> 00:38:54.630
Mars only to discover it's what you took with
1018
00:38:54.630 --> 00:38:56.550
you. And also we don't want to pollute or
1019
00:38:56.550 --> 00:38:59.190
contaminate those environments. So there's a
1020
00:38:59.190 --> 00:39:01.750
huge amount of effort and expense, goes into
1021
00:39:02.070 --> 00:39:04.590
extreme sterilisation of spacecraft to kind
1022
00:39:04.590 --> 00:39:06.950
of prevent exactly the hypothesis being
1023
00:39:06.950 --> 00:39:08.870
discussed here. At the same time,
1024
00:39:09.870 --> 00:39:12.750
that idea of populating the galaxy with
1025
00:39:12.750 --> 00:39:15.430
simple life that could one day grow
1026
00:39:15.430 --> 00:39:18.110
to resemblers or something else has
1027
00:39:18.110 --> 00:39:20.270
cropped a few times in science fiction. I
1028
00:39:20.270 --> 00:39:23.110
believe that was how Star Trek got
1029
00:39:23.110 --> 00:39:25.910
around the fact that all of their humanoid
1030
00:39:25.910 --> 00:39:27.870
species looked like people with makeup on.
1031
00:39:28.390 --> 00:39:30.790
Um, which of course is a budgetary issue and
1032
00:39:30.790 --> 00:39:32.790
a special effects issue. But they had an
1033
00:39:32.790 --> 00:39:34.390
episode where people found the founders,
1034
00:39:34.390 --> 00:39:37.090
which were an alien, ancient alien humanoid
1035
00:39:37.090 --> 00:39:39.570
race at seed of the galaxy. And billions of
1036
00:39:39.570 --> 00:39:41.290
years later all these different planets had
1037
00:39:41.290 --> 00:39:43.530
grown humanoids that looked like them and.
1038
00:39:43.530 --> 00:39:46.050
Oh, well, convenient job done. Stop asking us
1039
00:39:46.050 --> 00:39:48.970
that question now, please. Effectively it
1040
00:39:48.970 --> 00:39:51.410
is something we could do and the timescales
1041
00:39:51.410 --> 00:39:53.250
would be immense. It's also something that,
1042
00:39:53.650 --> 00:39:55.930
in all honesty, has already happened. There's
1043
00:39:55.930 --> 00:39:58.610
this idea called panspermia, which is the
1044
00:39:58.610 --> 00:40:00.450
idea that life could be transferred through
1045
00:40:00.450 --> 00:40:02.570
space from planet to planet, carried by
1046
00:40:02.570 --> 00:40:05.450
debris from impacts and talking. Thirty or
1047
00:40:05.450 --> 00:40:07.310
40 years ago, it was viewed as very much
1048
00:40:07.310 --> 00:40:09.750
crank science, not feasible. But every
1049
00:40:09.750 --> 00:40:11.390
experiment that people have ever done
1050
00:40:11.470 --> 00:40:13.430
suggests that it could work. And I've even
1051
00:40:13.430 --> 00:40:15.630
had a PhD student just submit his thesis,
1052
00:40:16.030 --> 00:40:18.430
Greg Davis, who has been looking at this
1053
00:40:19.150 --> 00:40:20.950
from the point of view of the viability of
1054
00:40:20.950 --> 00:40:23.790
bacteria transferred from Earth to Mars or
1055
00:40:23.790 --> 00:40:26.510
Mars to Earth in the radiation environment in
1056
00:40:26.510 --> 00:40:27.950
the solar system. And it seems to work.
1057
00:40:29.470 --> 00:40:31.650
Now, to me, the fact that biological, uh,
1058
00:40:32.310 --> 00:40:34.270
material from Earth will have rained down on
1059
00:40:34.270 --> 00:40:36.230
Mars and Europa and Ganymede and everywhere
1060
00:40:36.230 --> 00:40:38.270
else for the last 4 billion years
1061
00:40:39.030 --> 00:40:40.990
probably means that we're being a bit over
1062
00:40:40.990 --> 00:40:43.190
cautious with our planet protection efforts
1063
00:40:43.190 --> 00:40:45.230
because we're trying not to take something
1064
00:40:45.230 --> 00:40:47.310
there when it's already there, it's already
1065
00:40:47.310 --> 00:40:49.310
been delivered. The other thing is that
1066
00:40:49.310 --> 00:40:51.150
anything we take with us to a place that has
1067
00:40:51.150 --> 00:40:52.790
an incredibly, incredibly different
1068
00:40:52.790 --> 00:40:55.230
environment, if there is life there already,
1069
00:40:55.230 --> 00:40:57.470
that life should hugely outcompete anything
1070
00:40:57.470 --> 00:40:59.150
we take with us because it's better adapted
1071
00:40:59.150 --> 00:41:01.590
for that environment. And that would be one
1072
00:41:01.590 --> 00:41:03.310
of the challenges with this, is sending stuff
1073
00:41:03.310 --> 00:41:05.270
out. It'd have to be lucky to get exactly the
1074
00:41:05.270 --> 00:41:06.630
right environment to grow. But with the
1075
00:41:06.630 --> 00:41:09.270
amount of real estate we've got out there it
1076
00:41:09.270 --> 00:41:12.190
could happen. People have even in some more
1077
00:41:12.190 --> 00:41:15.070
extreme sci fi suggested kind of
1078
00:41:15.310 --> 00:41:18.230
this type approach as a way to
1079
00:41:18.230 --> 00:41:20.350
begin terraforming planets ahead of human
1080
00:41:20.350 --> 00:41:21.990
arrival. This idea that you could send
1081
00:41:21.990 --> 00:41:24.670
generation ships which have to go
1082
00:41:24.830 --> 00:41:26.510
slowly because they're really big and carry a
1083
00:41:26.510 --> 00:41:28.190
lot of people. But you could send faster
1084
00:41:28.190 --> 00:41:31.030
moving, smaller things first to start
1085
00:41:31.030 --> 00:41:33.030
working on the biosphere of a planet to make
1086
00:41:33.030 --> 00:41:35.670
it so that when we get there that planet is a
1087
00:41:35.670 --> 00:41:37.230
suitable home. So there's a lot of ways it
1088
00:41:37.230 --> 00:41:40.170
could be taken. Taken. I think to do it
1089
00:41:40.170 --> 00:41:42.930
in the near future in an official organised
1090
00:41:42.930 --> 00:41:44.970
way would require a significant shift in
1091
00:41:44.970 --> 00:41:46.890
global morality in the way we think about
1092
00:41:47.130 --> 00:41:49.770
other habitats. If we found that
1093
00:41:49.770 --> 00:41:52.610
Mars absolutely has no life and
1094
00:41:52.610 --> 00:41:54.570
possibly that it never had life, which I
1095
00:41:54.570 --> 00:41:56.850
think is probably unlikely, then I could see
1096
00:41:56.850 --> 00:41:58.890
people arguing then for terraforming.
1097
00:41:58.890 --> 00:42:00.690
Similarly people have argued about, I think
1098
00:42:00.690 --> 00:42:03.290
Carl Sagan suggested this, creating
1099
00:42:03.530 --> 00:42:06.190
engineering bacteria that could float in the
1100
00:42:06.190 --> 00:42:08.750
clouds of Venus and um, precipitate out the
1101
00:42:08.750 --> 00:42:10.910
carbon to eventually make Venus a more
1102
00:42:11.150 --> 00:42:13.270
habitable planet on long timescales. The idea
1103
00:42:13.270 --> 00:42:15.790
of terraforming these worlds is real. But I
1104
00:42:15.790 --> 00:42:18.790
think it would require either a state
1105
00:42:18.790 --> 00:42:21.070
to go its own way because as we know, once
1106
00:42:21.070 --> 00:42:22.830
things are up in space, ain't nobody going to
1107
00:42:22.830 --> 00:42:24.950
stop you. Uh, as was the case with the
1108
00:42:24.950 --> 00:42:27.390
Israeli spacecraft that spattered tamigards,
1109
00:42:27.820 --> 00:42:29.750
um, water bears over the moon to show that
1110
00:42:29.750 --> 00:42:32.590
they could, which was so dumb it's untrue.
1111
00:42:33.160 --> 00:42:36.070
Um, yep, there are water bears on the moon,
1112
00:42:36.390 --> 00:42:38.310
probably desiccated and dried up, but they
1113
00:42:38.310 --> 00:42:40.390
can come back from that, we know that. Um, so
1114
00:42:40.390 --> 00:42:42.110
you could have a nation just decide to do it
1115
00:42:42.110 --> 00:42:44.630
anyway. At the end of the day, if a
1116
00:42:44.630 --> 00:42:46.670
random government decided to send a
1117
00:42:46.670 --> 00:42:49.430
spacecraft to Mars within a capsule inside
1118
00:42:49.590 --> 00:42:52.150
laden with biological bacterial life
1119
00:42:52.390 --> 00:42:55.230
to spurt out on the surface, no way we could
1120
00:42:55.230 --> 00:42:57.860
stop them. And once it's done, it's done. Um,
1121
00:42:57.990 --> 00:43:00.510
but I think the block to the question is not
1122
00:43:00.510 --> 00:43:02.070
actually a scientific one, it's an ethical
1123
00:43:02.070 --> 00:43:04.460
one and it's about how we, we choose to
1124
00:43:04.460 --> 00:43:06.300
interact with the galaxy going forward and
1125
00:43:06.300 --> 00:43:08.300
particularly our local environment. That'll
1126
00:43:08.300 --> 00:43:10.020
determine at what stage we do that, if we
1127
00:43:10.020 --> 00:43:11.380
ever do so. It's a really good question.
1128
00:43:12.100 --> 00:43:14.700
Andrew Dunkley: It is. Uh, thanks for the uh, question,
1129
00:43:14.700 --> 00:43:16.660
Chris. Uh, Chris, you might be interested to
1130
00:43:16.660 --> 00:43:19.299
look up the BBC radio science
1131
00:43:19.299 --> 00:43:22.060
fiction comedy called Paradise Lost in Space.
1132
00:43:22.060 --> 00:43:24.900
Have you heard of this one? It's so funny.
1133
00:43:24.900 --> 00:43:27.860
It's about two blokes who um, get ejected
1134
00:43:28.180 --> 00:43:30.620
from a spaceship by an exploding toilet or
1135
00:43:30.620 --> 00:43:32.940
something and they end up on a world that's
1136
00:43:32.940 --> 00:43:35.570
occupied by uh, an insect, intelligent but
1137
00:43:35.570 --> 00:43:38.210
very naive species. So
1138
00:43:38.690 --> 00:43:41.170
basically what they do is they try to
1139
00:43:41.650 --> 00:43:44.210
pass on their Earth knowledge and
1140
00:43:44.210 --> 00:43:46.130
intelligence to these, these people
1141
00:43:46.930 --> 00:43:48.930
and ultimately destroy the planet.
1142
00:43:50.850 --> 00:43:51.730
Jonti Horner: It's a perfect reflection.
1143
00:43:51.970 --> 00:43:52.330
Andrew Dunkley: Brilliant.
1144
00:43:52.330 --> 00:43:53.890
Jonti Horner: It's very funny. Yes.
1145
00:43:55.330 --> 00:43:58.290
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it's funny stuff. So yeah, it's called
1146
00:43:58.470 --> 00:44:01.450
um, Paradise Lost in Space. I
1147
00:44:01.450 --> 00:44:03.290
only remember it because we ran it as a
1148
00:44:03.290 --> 00:44:05.850
series on the ABC some years ago and, and got
1149
00:44:05.850 --> 00:44:08.530
a uh, fabulous response. And I always,
1150
00:44:08.610 --> 00:44:10.410
I sat there in the studio while we were
1151
00:44:10.410 --> 00:44:12.930
running it and I just cackled as to. Because
1152
00:44:13.490 --> 00:44:16.210
I could imagine that's what we might do.
1153
00:44:16.770 --> 00:44:19.450
Not on purpose, but um. Yeah. And it's what
1154
00:44:19.450 --> 00:44:21.650
you say, it's the ethics of sending
1155
00:44:23.090 --> 00:44:26.090
our ah, junk to other places that are already
1156
00:44:26.090 --> 00:44:28.490
occupied. Yeah. Um,
1157
00:44:29.010 --> 00:44:31.040
we're running out of time I suppose. But um,
1158
00:44:32.100 --> 00:44:33.700
how do you want to wind this up? Uh, how do
1159
00:44:33.700 --> 00:44:33.940
you.
1160
00:44:34.180 --> 00:44:36.100
There's so much to talk about, it could go on
1161
00:44:36.100 --> 00:44:36.420
for hours.
1162
00:44:36.420 --> 00:44:38.540
Jonti Horner: I know more to talk about. I think I'll carry
1163
00:44:38.540 --> 00:44:41.020
on until you kind of get the hook and pull me
1164
00:44:41.020 --> 00:44:43.660
off about the different things that influence
1165
00:44:43.660 --> 00:44:45.260
planet's habitability. Because we've talked
1166
00:44:45.260 --> 00:44:48.260
about Milankovitch cycles. We also have as
1167
00:44:48.260 --> 00:44:50.180
the influence of the planetary system impact
1168
00:44:50.180 --> 00:44:53.100
us just as the dinosaurs, they had a very bad
1169
00:44:53.100 --> 00:44:55.540
day. And there has historically been this
1170
00:44:55.540 --> 00:44:57.940
idea that ties into the rare Earth thing that
1171
00:44:57.940 --> 00:45:00.700
Jupiter is our friend and saviour and without
1172
00:45:00.700 --> 00:45:02.660
Jupiter we'd be hit by asteroids more often
1173
00:45:02.660 --> 00:45:04.760
and we wouldn't be here. And therefore life
1174
00:45:04.760 --> 00:45:07.280
is rare in the universe. Um, idea
1175
00:45:07.680 --> 00:45:09.640
basically that Jupiter is our bestest friend
1176
00:45:09.640 --> 00:45:12.400
and it's honestly a lot of cobs wallop and
1177
00:45:12.720 --> 00:45:15.160
it's both one of my favourite bits of
1178
00:45:15.160 --> 00:45:16.680
research I ever did. And probably one of the
1179
00:45:16.680 --> 00:45:19.360
biggest bugbears of my career is uh, I
1180
00:45:19.600 --> 00:45:22.560
did work again with Barry Jones starting 20
1181
00:45:22.560 --> 00:45:24.880
years ago for a few years that resulted in a
1182
00:45:24.880 --> 00:45:27.120
series of pep called Jupiter Friend or Foe.
1183
00:45:27.440 --> 00:45:29.880
And we did simulations to test the role of
1184
00:45:29.880 --> 00:45:32.400
Jupiter in protecting us from impacts or not.
1185
00:45:32.800 --> 00:45:34.790
And it turns out that Jupiter is not shielded
1186
00:45:35.020 --> 00:45:37.820
all if you took Jupiter away, Earth would be
1187
00:45:37.820 --> 00:45:40.820
hit less often. If however you
1188
00:45:40.820 --> 00:45:42.580
replace Jupiter with a planet, the mass of
1189
00:45:42.580 --> 00:45:45.380
Saturn, Earth would be hit more often than we
1190
00:45:45.380 --> 00:45:47.540
are today. And with Jupiter, the mass it
1191
00:45:47.540 --> 00:45:49.060
currently is, we'd be hit more than if it
1192
00:45:49.060 --> 00:45:50.899
wasn't there, but less than if we put Saturn
1193
00:45:50.899 --> 00:45:53.260
there. All down to the subtleties of how
1194
00:45:53.260 --> 00:45:55.980
gravity all works. And so basically if you
1195
00:45:55.980 --> 00:45:57.620
replace Jupiter with Saturn, it's like the
1196
00:45:57.620 --> 00:45:59.500
anti Goldilocks case where you've lesser
1197
00:45:59.500 --> 00:46:01.980
porridge with strychnine. But the reality is
1198
00:46:01.980 --> 00:46:04.540
that Jupiter's role is complicated,
1199
00:46:05.500 --> 00:46:07.740
best illustrated by Comet Lexell in
1200
00:46:07.740 --> 00:46:10.620
1770, which I always love. Comet Lexell was
1201
00:46:11.020 --> 00:46:13.260
a great comet. It was very bright in our sky.
1202
00:46:13.260 --> 00:46:15.380
Discovered by Charles Messier I think 1st of
1203
00:46:15.380 --> 00:46:18.180
June 1770. Quickly got as
1204
00:46:18.180 --> 00:46:19.940
bright as the brightest stars in the sky, but
1205
00:46:19.940 --> 00:46:22.260
looked unusual. It was very big and fuzzy and
1206
00:46:22.260 --> 00:46:24.340
it moved unusually rapidly across the sky at
1207
00:46:24.340 --> 00:46:26.660
its quickest, covering 42 degrees in a single
1208
00:46:26.660 --> 00:46:29.580
hour. When they worked out the orbit of this
1209
00:46:29.580 --> 00:46:31.380
thing, they found a that it had come very
1210
00:46:31.380 --> 00:46:32.900
close to the Earth. It passed within 2
1211
00:46:32.900 --> 00:46:34.770
million kilometres, which is the close
1212
00:46:34.920 --> 00:46:36.760
closest approach of a large comet in
1213
00:46:37.000 --> 00:46:40.000
historical times. It also was moving
1214
00:46:40.000 --> 00:46:41.920
on an orbit that was just less than six years
1215
00:46:41.920 --> 00:46:44.360
in period. Big bright comet going around
1216
00:46:44.360 --> 00:46:46.080
every six years. Why on Earth have we not
1217
00:46:46.080 --> 00:46:47.680
seen it before? Why have we not seen it in
1218
00:46:47.680 --> 00:46:50.520
1764 or 1758? Well,
1219
00:46:50.520 --> 00:46:52.240
when they worked out the orbit and run it
1220
00:46:52.240 --> 00:46:54.160
back in time and this was hard at the time
1221
00:46:54.160 --> 00:46:56.000
because they didn't have mechanical
1222
00:46:56.000 --> 00:46:58.280
computers, they had human computers who sat
1223
00:46:58.280 --> 00:47:00.320
there and did calculations with abakai and
1224
00:47:00.320 --> 00:47:02.650
slide rules and all the rest of it. They
1225
00:47:02.650 --> 00:47:04.490
found that three years before it nearly hit
1226
00:47:04.490 --> 00:47:07.170
the Earth it was very close to Jupiter. In
1227
00:47:07.170 --> 00:47:08.810
fact, prior to that it had been moving on an
1228
00:47:08.810 --> 00:47:11.130
orbit that came nowhere near the Earth, that
1229
00:47:11.130 --> 00:47:12.930
was probably hundreds or thousands of years
1230
00:47:12.930 --> 00:47:15.330
in period and it was flying in to come
1231
00:47:15.330 --> 00:47:16.890
nowhere near the inner solar system. When it
1232
00:47:16.890 --> 00:47:18.490
had this close encounter with Jupiter that
1233
00:47:18.490 --> 00:47:20.570
trapped it and threw it at the Earth and
1234
00:47:20.570 --> 00:47:22.690
captured it onto the six year long Jupiter
1235
00:47:22.690 --> 00:47:25.090
family comet orbit. So Jupiter took something
1236
00:47:25.090 --> 00:47:27.265
that was coming nowhere near us and threw it
1237
00:47:27.265 --> 00:47:30.110
out at us. We don't see the comet
1238
00:47:30.110 --> 00:47:33.030
anymore because 2 times 6 years is
1239
00:47:33.030 --> 00:47:34.990
12 years and Jupiter takes 12 years to go
1240
00:47:34.990 --> 00:47:37.470
around the sun. So the comet did two laps in
1241
00:47:37.470 --> 00:47:39.950
the time Jupiter took to take one. And when
1242
00:47:39.950 --> 00:47:41.990
the comet got back out there again 12 years
1243
00:47:42.230 --> 00:47:44.150
after the first encounter, Jupiter was there,
1244
00:47:44.150 --> 00:47:45.670
grabbed hold of it and threw it away again,
1245
00:47:45.830 --> 00:47:48.790
never to return. So in just this 12 year
1246
00:47:48.790 --> 00:47:51.030
period, Jupiter threw something at us and
1247
00:47:51.030 --> 00:47:53.350
then cleaned up after itself. And whether
1248
00:47:53.350 --> 00:47:55.030
Jupiter's more of a shield or more of a
1249
00:47:55.030 --> 00:47:56.670
threat is down to the balance of those two
1250
00:47:56.670 --> 00:47:59.350
effects. Um, and what we found in our
1251
00:47:59.350 --> 00:48:02.190
simulations is, to be honest with Jupiter, we
1252
00:48:02.190 --> 00:48:03.990
get hit more than we would do if it wasn't
1253
00:48:03.990 --> 00:48:06.910
there. That takes away the idea
1254
00:48:06.910 --> 00:48:09.430
that it's our protector. It takes away the
1255
00:48:09.430 --> 00:48:11.590
idea that you need a shield to shield a
1256
00:48:11.590 --> 00:48:14.470
planet to prevent life from being wiped out.
1257
00:48:14.950 --> 00:48:17.430
Another nail in the coffin of rare Earth. And
1258
00:48:17.430 --> 00:48:19.990
it bugs me a bit that so many documentaries
1259
00:48:19.990 --> 00:48:22.190
still trot out this trite idea that Jupiter
1260
00:48:22.190 --> 00:48:24.150
shields us from impacts. And it's wonderful
1261
00:48:24.550 --> 00:48:27.070
because I disprove that 20 years ago. It's
1262
00:48:27.070 --> 00:48:29.820
much more complicated. But even that idea
1263
00:48:29.820 --> 00:48:31.580
gets complicated because obviously we don't
1264
00:48:31.580 --> 00:48:32.550
want to have the Earth punishingly, uh,
1265
00:48:33.180 --> 00:48:36.180
pummelling because we'd be wiped out. But
1266
00:48:36.180 --> 00:48:37.660
where the Earth formed in the solar system,
1267
00:48:37.660 --> 00:48:40.620
it probably formed dry. We formed interior to
1268
00:48:40.620 --> 00:48:42.580
the location of the ice line. So there wasn't
1269
00:48:42.580 --> 00:48:45.220
any available solid water, the water was all
1270
00:48:45.220 --> 00:48:47.940
gas. So how the Earth got its water was a
1271
00:48:47.940 --> 00:48:50.740
long, outstanding problem, exacerbated by the
1272
00:48:50.740 --> 00:48:52.100
fact that towards the end of our planet's
1273
00:48:52.100 --> 00:48:53.980
formation, we got smashed into by an object
1274
00:48:53.980 --> 00:48:56.340
the size of Mars, which stripped off a lot of
1275
00:48:56.340 --> 00:48:57.740
the Earth's core and mantle and would have
1276
00:48:57.740 --> 00:48:59.820
desiccated our planet because m water would
1277
00:48:59.820 --> 00:49:01.680
have been in the. Or a mantle, in the crust
1278
00:49:01.680 --> 00:49:04.320
and mantle. Sorry, up near the surface. Yeah.
1279
00:49:04.480 --> 00:49:06.280
So where did the water come from? And Earth
1280
00:49:06.280 --> 00:49:08.220
is actually a remarkably dry planet, um,
1281
00:49:08.560 --> 00:49:10.840
particularly at the moment in Queensland. The
1282
00:49:10.840 --> 00:49:13.240
idea is down here. Yeah, the idea is that our
1283
00:49:13.240 --> 00:49:15.520
water, at least in significant part, was
1284
00:49:15.520 --> 00:49:18.440
delivered from further out by impacts in what
1285
00:49:18.440 --> 00:49:20.320
is often described as a late veneer.
1286
00:49:21.120 --> 00:49:23.200
That's really interesting air because that's
1287
00:49:23.200 --> 00:49:25.080
a stochastic process, it's random, it's
1288
00:49:25.080 --> 00:49:27.120
driven by the orbits of the planets and the
1289
00:49:27.120 --> 00:49:29.440
cleanup phase of solar system formation.
1290
00:49:29.920 --> 00:49:31.640
So different planetary systems will give
1291
00:49:31.640 --> 00:49:34.100
planets with different amounts of water. But
1292
00:49:34.100 --> 00:49:36.140
it's also indicating that you actually don't
1293
00:49:36.140 --> 00:49:38.500
want too much shielding, you need
1294
00:49:38.500 --> 00:49:40.660
impacts. Because if the Earth had never had
1295
00:49:40.660 --> 00:49:42.460
the impacts, we'd have never got enough water
1296
00:49:42.540 --> 00:49:45.220
for life to develop and thrive. On top of
1297
00:49:45.220 --> 00:49:46.540
that, if the Earth didn't have enough
1298
00:49:46.540 --> 00:49:48.339
impacts, the dinosaurs would never have been
1299
00:49:48.339 --> 00:49:50.340
wiped out. And maybe you and I will be
1300
00:49:50.340 --> 00:49:52.780
reptiles or maybe we'll be here, you know,
1301
00:49:53.180 --> 00:49:55.340
so there's a whole aspect of that. Now,
1302
00:49:55.340 --> 00:49:58.180
again, those Simulations I did, we can
1303
00:49:58.180 --> 00:50:00.140
rerun through the planetary systems, we can
1304
00:50:00.140 --> 00:50:02.020
find the debris belts in those systems, we
1305
00:50:02.020 --> 00:50:04.560
can find the planets so we can model their
1306
00:50:04.560 --> 00:50:06.440
impact rates. And I'd argue that we want to
1307
00:50:06.440 --> 00:50:08.840
look somewhere that doesn't have too many
1308
00:50:08.840 --> 00:50:10.920
impacts, but also doesn't have too few,
1309
00:50:11.560 --> 00:50:13.640
because each of those could pose problems.
1310
00:50:14.360 --> 00:50:17.080
That is a really big part of the storey
1311
00:50:17.160 --> 00:50:19.880
and it feeds into the last point, really,
1312
00:50:21.000 --> 00:50:23.920
which is the planet itself and a little bit
1313
00:50:23.920 --> 00:50:26.800
tied to the large moon. So our Earth, it has
1314
00:50:26.800 --> 00:50:28.960
been suggested again by the rare Earth crowd,
1315
00:50:28.960 --> 00:50:31.800
that the large moon we have stabilises our
1316
00:50:31.800 --> 00:50:33.710
atmosphere axis and has kept the Earth
1317
00:50:33.710 --> 00:50:35.390
habitable. So therefore you need a giant
1318
00:50:35.390 --> 00:50:38.390
satellite. But simulations by Dave
1319
00:50:38.390 --> 00:50:40.230
Waltham, who's a guy I know very well in the
1320
00:50:40.230 --> 00:50:42.710
uk, looked into this and what he found was
1321
00:50:42.710 --> 00:50:44.700
that you could take the Moon away and, uh,
1322
00:50:44.710 --> 00:50:46.150
the Earth's axis would still be fairly
1323
00:50:46.150 --> 00:50:48.149
stable. It still wobbled between about 22 and
1324
00:50:48.149 --> 00:50:50.590
24 degrees, maybe a little bit more. But
1325
00:50:50.590 --> 00:50:52.550
quirkily, if you made the moon just 12
1326
00:50:52.550 --> 00:50:54.670
kilometres larger in diameter,
1327
00:50:55.310 --> 00:50:57.910
it would make the Earth's axis unstable and
1328
00:50:57.910 --> 00:51:00.480
chaotic. So if the moon was only slightly
1329
00:51:00.480 --> 00:51:03.400
larger, we would not be here. The
1330
00:51:03.400 --> 00:51:04.920
other reason that a large moon has been
1331
00:51:04.920 --> 00:51:07.640
suggested is that it drives bigger tides. And
1332
00:51:07.640 --> 00:51:09.960
one of the common arguments for how life
1333
00:51:09.960 --> 00:51:12.400
first got going and, um, for how life moved
1334
00:51:12.400 --> 00:51:14.320
out of the oceans in both cases is to do with
1335
00:51:14.320 --> 00:51:16.360
the large tidal intertidal areas that we
1336
00:51:16.360 --> 00:51:18.600
have, where at low tide it's dry and at high
1337
00:51:18.600 --> 00:51:21.080
tide it's underwater. And the idea is that
1338
00:51:21.080 --> 00:51:23.360
without the moon those areas would be smaller
1339
00:51:23.600 --> 00:51:25.160
and life would have had less chance to get
1340
00:51:25.160 --> 00:51:26.960
going. I don't really buy that, because if
1341
00:51:26.960 --> 00:51:29.120
you took the moon away, the tides of sun
1342
00:51:29.120 --> 00:51:31.260
raises would still be half the size, so you'd
1343
00:51:31.260 --> 00:51:33.620
still have substantial tides. But these are
1344
00:51:33.620 --> 00:51:36.020
all the kind of questions people ask before
1345
00:51:36.020 --> 00:51:38.140
you get to the planet itself. And the planet
1346
00:51:38.140 --> 00:51:40.300
itself is where my head really hurt. Now, I'm
1347
00:51:40.300 --> 00:51:43.220
not a geophysicist at
1348
00:51:43.220 --> 00:51:45.060
all, so a lot of this was new to me. Now, we
1349
00:51:45.060 --> 00:51:47.540
talked a little bit about the hydration. You
1350
00:51:47.540 --> 00:51:49.500
could imagine anything from desert worlds to
1351
00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:51.460
worlds with hundreds of kilometres depth of
1352
00:51:51.460 --> 00:51:53.980
ocean. Now, if the ocean's too deep,
1353
00:51:54.700 --> 00:51:56.940
the planet is probably habitable, but not
1354
00:51:56.940 --> 00:51:59.340
detectably habitable because the life will be
1355
00:51:59.340 --> 00:52:00.500
at the bottom of the ocean where the
1356
00:52:00.500 --> 00:52:02.960
nutrients have been introduced by volc. But
1357
00:52:02.960 --> 00:52:04.960
an ocean deeper than a few tens of kilometres
1358
00:52:04.960 --> 00:52:07.040
is thought to become stagnant. And so it
1359
00:52:07.040 --> 00:52:09.240
doesn't mix things up to the surface, so you
1360
00:52:09.240 --> 00:52:11.320
don't want to look at water worlds that are
1361
00:52:11.640 --> 00:52:13.720
ocean for hundreds or thousands of kilometres
1362
00:52:13.720 --> 00:52:16.160
depth, but equally you want to have some mix
1363
00:52:16.160 --> 00:52:18.000
of ocean and continent to allow all the
1364
00:52:18.000 --> 00:52:20.800
carbon cycles and weathering to happen, to
1365
00:52:20.800 --> 00:52:23.240
allow life to engage with the atmosphere. So
1366
00:52:23.240 --> 00:52:24.880
that's a bit of a sweet spot there. But what
1367
00:52:24.880 --> 00:52:27.640
I didn't realise was how critical
1368
00:52:27.640 --> 00:52:30.290
water has been been to the
1369
00:52:30.290 --> 00:52:33.130
maintenance of our atmosphere and um, thereby
1370
00:52:33.130 --> 00:52:35.890
our climate against the vagaries of the solar
1371
00:52:35.890 --> 00:52:37.650
wind and against the vagaries of plate
1372
00:52:37.650 --> 00:52:40.250
tectonics. Now compare the Earth and Mars
1373
00:52:40.490 --> 00:52:42.410
and the Earth is warm and wet. We've got a
1374
00:52:42.410 --> 00:52:44.690
lovely thick atmosphere and we've not really
1375
00:52:44.690 --> 00:52:46.570
lost much of our atmosphere. We've got the
1376
00:52:46.570 --> 00:52:49.010
ozone layer which protects us to some degree
1377
00:52:49.010 --> 00:52:51.530
from UV radiation. We've got a temperature
1378
00:52:51.530 --> 00:52:53.210
inversion about 10 kilometres up in the
1379
00:52:53.210 --> 00:52:55.530
atmosphere that traps water below that level.
1380
00:52:55.770 --> 00:52:57.650
If water gets above that level, it freezes
1381
00:52:57.650 --> 00:52:59.970
and falls back down. So the water can't get
1382
00:52:59.970 --> 00:53:01.990
high enough to be ionised and split hydrogen
1383
00:53:01.990 --> 00:53:04.710
and helium and lost. Mars doesn't have that.
1384
00:53:05.030 --> 00:53:06.950
Mars doesn't have much of a magnetic field
1385
00:53:06.950 --> 00:53:08.830
whereas the Earth does. And the magnetic
1386
00:53:08.830 --> 00:53:10.390
field protects the atmosphere from being
1387
00:53:10.390 --> 00:53:12.990
stripped away from the outside in. Mars
1388
00:53:12.990 --> 00:53:15.720
doesn't have plate tectonics, but we do. And
1389
00:53:15.720 --> 00:53:18.310
um, plate tectonics prevents the atmosphere
1390
00:53:18.310 --> 00:53:21.190
from being precipitated out onto the surface
1391
00:53:21.190 --> 00:53:23.190
through chemistry and trapped there because
1392
00:53:23.190 --> 00:53:25.910
plate tectonics recycles the crust. So
1393
00:53:25.910 --> 00:53:27.630
anything that chemically gets weathered onto
1394
00:53:27.630 --> 00:53:29.670
Earth's surface gets put back into the
1395
00:53:29.670 --> 00:53:32.190
atmosphere through volcanic volcanoes. So
1396
00:53:32.190 --> 00:53:34.110
Mars and Earth probably started out looking
1397
00:53:34.110 --> 00:53:36.230
very similar and are now very, very
1398
00:53:36.230 --> 00:53:38.830
different. And so the nature of the planet
1399
00:53:38.830 --> 00:53:40.390
itself is going to be a real important
1400
00:53:40.470 --> 00:53:43.110
factor. And plate tectonics looks like it's
1401
00:53:43.110 --> 00:53:46.070
going to be fairly key. Plate tectonics is a
1402
00:53:46.070 --> 00:53:47.790
mechanism by which you stop the atmosphere
1403
00:53:47.790 --> 00:53:49.870
getting precipitated out and frozen in onto
1404
00:53:49.870 --> 00:53:51.350
the surface, which is a big part of what's
1405
00:53:51.350 --> 00:53:53.710
happened m on Mars because of that recycling
1406
00:53:53.710 --> 00:53:56.190
effect. But it also turns out that plate
1407
00:53:56.190 --> 00:53:58.490
tectonics is key in ensuring the
1408
00:53:58.890 --> 00:54:01.690
magnetic field is retained. And um, this is a
1409
00:54:01.690 --> 00:54:03.490
bit that really hurt my head because I'm
1410
00:54:03.490 --> 00:54:06.370
like, I'm not a geophysicist. Seems that on
1411
00:54:06.370 --> 00:54:09.330
the Earth if the Earth didn't have plate
1412
00:54:09.330 --> 00:54:11.650
tectonics, we'd probably have lost most of
1413
00:54:11.650 --> 00:54:14.490
our magnetic field like Mars and like Venus.
1414
00:54:15.130 --> 00:54:16.970
What's happening is that the magnetic field
1415
00:54:16.970 --> 00:54:19.250
is driven by convection currents in the outer
1416
00:54:19.250 --> 00:54:21.730
mantle. Like when you see water boiling in a
1417
00:54:21.730 --> 00:54:24.110
kettle overturn, um, motion of mollie and
1418
00:54:24.110 --> 00:54:26.590
metal Rising and falling. That
1419
00:54:26.590 --> 00:54:28.510
convection can only happen if you've got a
1420
00:54:28.510 --> 00:54:30.430
big temperature difference between the bottom
1421
00:54:30.430 --> 00:54:32.710
and the top of the outer core. Sorry.
1422
00:54:33.430 --> 00:54:35.190
In order to get that temperature difference,
1423
00:54:35.190 --> 00:54:37.030
you need to be able to very effectively cool
1424
00:54:37.030 --> 00:54:39.310
the top of the outer core because otherwise
1425
00:54:39.310 --> 00:54:40.950
it would warm up so much convection would
1426
00:54:40.950 --> 00:54:42.470
stop because you don't have enough
1427
00:54:42.470 --> 00:54:44.790
temperature difference. The way the outer
1428
00:54:44.790 --> 00:54:46.470
core is cooled is by convection in the
1429
00:54:46.470 --> 00:54:48.110
mantle. That takes the heat away from the top
1430
00:54:48.110 --> 00:54:49.470
of the outer core and brings it to the
1431
00:54:49.470 --> 00:54:51.910
surface. We've got these huge convection
1432
00:54:51.910 --> 00:54:53.990
cells in the mantle that transfer heat very
1433
00:54:53.990 --> 00:54:56.970
quickly. Allowing cool the outer core's top
1434
00:54:56.970 --> 00:54:59.170
to get this big temperature difference allows
1435
00:54:59.170 --> 00:55:01.010
a motion that drives a magnetic field.
1436
00:55:02.530 --> 00:55:04.570
That motion is also what drives plate
1437
00:55:04.570 --> 00:55:06.410
tectonics. Now, the quirky thing that came
1438
00:55:06.410 --> 00:55:07.890
out of all of this when I was reading about
1439
00:55:07.890 --> 00:55:10.170
it is that, uh, if you run simulations of the
1440
00:55:10.170 --> 00:55:12.450
motion of the Earth's mantle and the crust
1441
00:55:12.690 --> 00:55:15.570
and the Earth is dry, the Earth is too small
1442
00:55:15.570 --> 00:55:18.410
to sustain plate tectonics because the mantle
1443
00:55:18.410 --> 00:55:21.090
is too stiff. If you have water
1444
00:55:21.330 --> 00:55:23.410
and you mix water into the mantle, you
1445
00:55:23.410 --> 00:55:25.880
lubricate, lubricate it. You allow convection
1446
00:55:25.880 --> 00:55:28.000
in the mantle, which allows plate tectonics,
1447
00:55:28.320 --> 00:55:31.000
which allows you to recycle the surface. But
1448
00:55:31.000 --> 00:55:33.080
that plate tectonics also allows you to cool
1449
00:55:33.080 --> 00:55:35.320
the outer core to maintain the magnetic
1450
00:55:35.320 --> 00:55:37.480
field, allowing you to have that magnetic
1451
00:55:37.480 --> 00:55:39.560
shield that protects your planet from the
1452
00:55:39.560 --> 00:55:40.960
atmosphere being whittled away from the
1453
00:55:40.960 --> 00:55:43.800
outside in by the solar wind. It
1454
00:55:43.800 --> 00:55:46.520
seems that the storey of plate tectonics, the
1455
00:55:46.520 --> 00:55:48.640
Earth's magnetic field and, um, the
1456
00:55:48.640 --> 00:55:51.290
atmosphere being retained, is all tied
1457
00:55:51.290 --> 00:55:53.290
together by water. Which brings us back to
1458
00:55:53.290 --> 00:55:55.410
that delivery question. If the Earth had not
1459
00:55:55.410 --> 00:55:57.650
got that veneer of water, would plate
1460
00:55:57.650 --> 00:56:00.210
tectonics still happen? The infinite
1461
00:56:00.210 --> 00:56:02.010
suggestion, and this was fabulous work by
1462
00:56:02.010 --> 00:56:03.930
people working with the great Craig o',
1463
00:56:03.930 --> 00:56:06.169
Neill, a great Australian scientist who does
1464
00:56:06.650 --> 00:56:08.410
earthquakes and, um, plate tectonics
1465
00:56:08.410 --> 00:56:11.090
modelling in an astrobiology sense that
1466
00:56:11.090 --> 00:56:14.010
says the Earth's plate tectonics are
1467
00:56:14.010 --> 00:56:15.890
really hard to get started. If you run models
1468
00:56:15.890 --> 00:56:17.810
of the Earth without plate tectonics with the
1469
00:56:17.810 --> 00:56:19.970
young Earth, with how hot it was, plate
1470
00:56:19.970 --> 00:56:22.950
tectonics don't just happen. However, if
1471
00:56:22.950 --> 00:56:25.270
you introduce impacts from big asteroids,
1472
00:56:25.270 --> 00:56:27.110
like the things you got at the end of planet
1473
00:56:27.110 --> 00:56:29.830
formation, those can dump enough energy
1474
00:56:29.990 --> 00:56:32.990
in terms of a downward pulse to push magma
1475
00:56:32.990 --> 00:56:35.670
up somewhere else to trigger a convection
1476
00:56:35.670 --> 00:56:38.230
cell that then becomes self sustaining. So
1477
00:56:38.230 --> 00:56:40.950
it's quite possible that the same impact
1478
00:56:41.110 --> 00:56:43.350
regime that led to the delivery of water,
1479
00:56:43.670 --> 00:56:45.710
that led in the extreme case to the formation
1480
00:56:45.710 --> 00:56:48.190
of the moon, also triggered plate
1481
00:56:48.190 --> 00:56:50.990
Tectonics. And by triggering plate tectonics
1482
00:56:50.990 --> 00:56:53.480
and delivering water to the mantle allowed
1483
00:56:53.480 --> 00:56:55.360
the Earth to become the planet it is today to
1484
00:56:55.360 --> 00:56:58.120
allow life to thrive. Now there's far, far
1485
00:56:58.120 --> 00:56:59.480
more that you could look into about the
1486
00:56:59.480 --> 00:57:01.360
planets themselves. I'm not like, say, a
1487
00:57:01.360 --> 00:57:04.360
geophysicist, but the interplay of these
1488
00:57:04.360 --> 00:57:05.960
things is fascinating and it's a real
1489
00:57:05.960 --> 00:57:08.720
reminder of that multidisciplinary thing. You
1490
00:57:08.720 --> 00:57:10.440
can't do it all if you're just an astronomy.
1491
00:57:10.440 --> 00:57:13.040
You need everybody from all different
1492
00:57:13.040 --> 00:57:15.600
disciplines to come together so we can figure
1493
00:57:15.600 --> 00:57:17.480
out what factors are and, um, aren't
1494
00:57:17.480 --> 00:57:19.880
important. So that when we find another
1495
00:57:20.130 --> 00:57:22.210
thousand, another ten thousand, another
1496
00:57:22.210 --> 00:57:24.610
hundred thousand planets, we can pick the
1497
00:57:24.610 --> 00:57:26.530
best targets to search for life upon them.
1498
00:57:26.930 --> 00:57:28.810
And that was a motivation and it just blew my
1499
00:57:28.810 --> 00:57:31.610
mind when I got to that final part. Just how
1500
00:57:31.610 --> 00:57:34.170
much complexity there is in the
1501
00:57:34.170 --> 00:57:35.690
interplay between the atmosphere, the
1502
00:57:35.690 --> 00:57:37.890
climate, the plate tectonics, the oceans
1503
00:57:38.850 --> 00:57:41.810
that are so, uh, variable and so chaotic.
1504
00:57:42.530 --> 00:57:44.410
What does that mean? How can we learn from
1505
00:57:44.410 --> 00:57:46.290
that? Well, that's what we learn when we look
1506
00:57:46.290 --> 00:57:47.770
at planets around other stars. But at least
1507
00:57:47.770 --> 00:57:48.970
this gives us a bit of a starting point
1508
00:57:49.040 --> 00:57:49.600
point, I think.
1509
00:57:50.320 --> 00:57:52.880
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, I see what you're saying. So it's
1510
00:57:53.200 --> 00:57:55.200
like the popular press saying, oh, we found a
1511
00:57:55.200 --> 00:57:57.760
rocky planet in the Goldilocks zone and it
1512
00:57:57.760 --> 00:57:59.920
probably has water, so, you know, it's got to
1513
00:57:59.920 --> 00:58:02.360
have life. Uh, there's so much more than
1514
00:58:02.360 --> 00:58:04.410
that. Like, yeah, it's um.
1515
00:58:04.560 --> 00:58:06.800
Jonti Horner: Even they probably have water is a leap
1516
00:58:06.800 --> 00:58:09.680
because like, yeah, if we'd not had
1517
00:58:09.680 --> 00:58:11.600
water added after the moon forming impact,
1518
00:58:11.600 --> 00:58:12.800
the Earth would be a desert
1519
00:58:14.320 --> 00:58:17.160
Andrew Dunkley: and we wouldn't probably exist at all.
1520
00:58:17.160 --> 00:58:18.720
Jonti Horner: Absolutely, yeah.
1521
00:58:18.720 --> 00:58:21.320
Andrew Dunkley: Fascinating stuff, Jonty. We'll leave it
1522
00:58:21.320 --> 00:58:23.760
there. But, um, it's just such a
1523
00:58:24.080 --> 00:58:25.520
fascinating topic. But
1524
00:58:26.800 --> 00:58:29.120
what goes into, uh, the future
1525
00:58:29.120 --> 00:58:31.600
identification of potential targets is
1526
00:58:32.000 --> 00:58:34.040
so much more than most people would have
1527
00:58:34.040 --> 00:58:35.720
considered. So thank you very much, really
1528
00:58:35.720 --> 00:58:36.280
appreciate it.
1529
00:58:36.280 --> 00:58:37.400
Jonti Horner: It's an absolute pleasure and thanks for
1530
00:58:37.400 --> 00:58:40.280
letting me rant on my topics of choice for a
1531
00:58:40.280 --> 00:58:43.280
change. Like I said, it would be helpful. I'm
1532
00:58:43.280 --> 00:58:44.160
sure your readers will.
1533
00:58:44.160 --> 00:58:46.120
Readers, listeners will give feedback on
1534
00:58:46.120 --> 00:58:48.160
this, but I know we've done something
1535
00:58:48.160 --> 00:58:51.080
different. I really do. I am aware
1536
00:58:51.080 --> 00:58:52.680
of the fact that these are not your typical
1537
00:58:52.680 --> 00:58:55.040
episodes and that may be different for
1538
00:58:55.040 --> 00:58:56.720
people. So I appreciate the opportunity to do
1539
00:58:56.720 --> 00:58:58.680
this, but if people have enjoyed it or
1540
00:58:58.680 --> 00:59:00.880
didn't, it'd probably be worth letting Andrew
1541
00:59:00.880 --> 00:59:03.280
and Fred Watson know once I'm gone. Um, won't
1542
00:59:03.280 --> 00:59:04.640
hurt my feelings. Don't worry about it
1543
00:59:04.640 --> 00:59:06.120
because if it's Something you've enjoyed.
1544
00:59:06.280 --> 00:59:08.200
There's possibilities to do things like this
1545
00:59:08.200 --> 00:59:10.880
again in future if it isn't. We tried it and
1546
00:59:10.880 --> 00:59:12.690
it didn't work and that's entirely fine. Fine
1547
00:59:12.690 --> 00:59:14.490
too. So hopefully it was fun, hopefully it
1548
00:59:14.490 --> 00:59:16.380
was educational and I won't be too hurt, uh,
1549
00:59:16.410 --> 00:59:17.450
if nobody enjoyed it.
1550
00:59:18.570 --> 00:59:20.810
Andrew Dunkley: I'm pretty sure they did. Jonty, and we
1551
00:59:20.810 --> 00:59:23.130
really appreciate your time and uh, we've,
1552
00:59:23.130 --> 00:59:24.970
we've got one more episode to do with you.
1553
00:59:25.020 --> 00:59:27.330
Uh, it's a Q and A episode and we, we're
1554
00:59:27.330 --> 00:59:29.330
talking about, we haven't nailed it down yet,
1555
00:59:29.330 --> 00:59:31.210
but we're talking about doing a, an
1556
00:59:31.210 --> 00:59:32.650
astrophotography special.
1557
00:59:32.810 --> 00:59:33.290
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
1558
00:59:33.290 --> 00:59:34.970
Andrew Dunkley: Because we do get a lot of questions about
1559
00:59:34.970 --> 00:59:37.730
astrophotography so, uh, that, that'd be
1560
00:59:37.730 --> 00:59:38.890
worth getting into as well.
1561
00:59:38.890 --> 00:59:40.460
Jonti Horner: Yeah. I've got a couple of good friends who
1562
00:59:40.460 --> 00:59:42.640
uh, are award winning astrophotographers who
1563
00:59:42.640 --> 00:59:44.520
we're going to try and rope into that. So
1564
00:59:44.520 --> 00:59:46.840
watch this space is what I'd say. Yes.
1565
00:59:46.840 --> 00:59:48.840
Andrew Dunkley: Fingers crossed we can nail that one down.
1566
00:59:49.000 --> 00:59:50.720
Jonty, thanks so much. We'll see you real
1567
00:59:50.720 --> 00:59:51.000
soon.
1568
00:59:51.080 --> 00:59:52.360
Jonti Horner: Pleasure. Thank you for having me.
1569
00:59:52.760 --> 00:59:54.920
Andrew Dunkley: Johnty Horner, professor of Astrophysics at
1570
00:59:54.920 --> 00:59:57.720
the University of Southern Queensland.
1571
00:59:58.040 --> 01:00:00.560
And if you've got time, jump on our website
1572
01:00:00.560 --> 01:00:02.840
and have a look around. Uh, maybe send your
1573
01:00:02.840 --> 01:00:05.800
comments and thoughts, uh, to us via the
1574
01:00:05.800 --> 01:00:07.880
Ask me anything button at the top. It's
1575
01:00:07.880 --> 01:00:10.440
labelled ama. And while you're there, cheque
1576
01:00:10.440 --> 01:00:12.660
out the Astronomy AstroDailyPod feed. Maybe
1577
01:00:12.660 --> 01:00:15.180
sign up for your daily dose of astronomy
1578
01:00:15.180 --> 01:00:17.980
news. Um, maybe you'd like to become a
1579
01:00:17.980 --> 01:00:20.140
subscriber. You can do that. Visit, uh, the
1580
01:00:20.140 --> 01:00:22.660
shop. Lots of goodies in our shop and plenty
1581
01:00:22.660 --> 01:00:25.660
more. So cheque it out and thanks to Huw
1582
01:00:25.660 --> 01:00:27.300
in the studio as always, because
1583
01:00:28.580 --> 01:00:31.580
he does something which we one day might
1584
01:00:31.580 --> 01:00:33.900
find out about. And from me, Andrew Dunkley,
1585
01:00:33.900 --> 01:00:35.220
thanks for your company. We'll see you on the
1586
01:00:35.220 --> 01:00:37.860
next episode of Space Nuts. Bye Bye.
1587
01:00:38.020 --> 01:00:39.060
Space Nuts.
1588
01:00:39.060 --> 01:00:40.910
You've been listening to the Space Nuts
1589
01:00:40.980 --> 01:00:43.860
Jonti Horner: Arts podcast, available
1590
01:00:43.940 --> 01:00:46.180
at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
1591
01:00:46.260 --> 01:00:49.180
iHeartRadio or your favourite podcast
1592
01:00:49.180 --> 01:00:51.460
player. You can also stream on demand at
1593
01:00:51.460 --> 01:00:52.240
bytes. Com.
1594
01:00:52.240 --> 01:00:54.940
Andrew Dunkley: Um, this has been another quality podcast
1595
01:00:54.940 --> 01:00:56.740
production from Bytes. Com.
1596
01:00:56.740 --> 01:00:57.520
Jonti Horner: Um,
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed