April 14, 2025

Cosmic Colors, Stellar Mysteries & the Intricacies of Light: A Q&A Episode

Cosmic Colors, Stellar Mysteries & the Intricacies of Light: A Q&A Episode

This episode of Space Nuts is brought you with the support of Saily. If you love travelling, you need Saily by your side. To find out more and get the special Space Nuts listener discount, visit https://www.saily.com/spacenuts

Space Nuts Episode 512...

This episode of Space Nuts is brought you with the support of Saily. If you love travelling, you need Saily by your side. To find out more and get the special Space Nuts listener discount, visit www.saily.com/spacenuts

Space Nuts Episode 512 Q&A: Cosmic Colors, Gamma Ray Bursts, and Terraforming Venus
In this enlightening episode of Space Nuts, host Heidi Campo takes the helm alongside astronomer Professor Fred Watson to tackle a range of fascinating cosmic queries from our listeners. From the vibrant colors of celestial bodies to the dangers of gamma ray bursts, and the challenges of terraforming Venus, this episode is a treasure trove of astronomical insights that will spark your curiosity about the universe.
Episode Highlights:
- Cosmic Colors: Heidi and Fred discuss Rusty from Donnybrook's inquiry about the colors of stars, particularly red giants like Pollux and the blue hues of certain stars. They explore how large telescopes enhance our perception of these colors and the subtlety of what we actually see through the eyepiece.
- Gamma Ray Bursts Explained: The duo dives into the nature of gamma ray bursts and why their intensity diminishes with distance. Fred explains the inverse square law and clarifies the effects of dust and gas on signal strength, providing a comprehensive understanding of these powerful cosmic events.
- Terraforming Venus: A thought-provoking discussion on the feasibility of terraforming Venus reveals the planet's extreme conditions and the challenges posed by its thick atmosphere. Fred shares insights on whether blocking sunlight could reverse the runaway greenhouse effect and the implications of Venus's proximity to the sun.
- The Double Slit Experiment: The episode wraps up with a listener's question about the double slit experiment and the puzzling behavior of photons. Fred elaborates on the concept of quantum superposition and entanglement, shedding light on this fundamental experiment that underpins our understanding of light as both a particle and a wave.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
(00:00) Heidi Campo welcomes Professor Fred Watson to Space Nuts
(00:30) Andrew and Fred have some questions for you about telescopes and color
(06:36) Radio waves and gamma rays get weaker the further away they get
(09:41) Mike Cupid from the UK has a question about terraforming Venus
(11:41) How could you terraform Venus without losing runaway greenhouse effect
(16:45) Our very, uh, last question is from Todd. He's from Utah. His question is about spring skiing
(17:13) Todd from Utah has a question about the double slit experiment

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.160 --> 00:00:04.320
All right, let's rock and roll. Welcome to another episode

2
00:00:04.400 --> 00:00:07.960
of Space Nuts. I am your host, Heidi Compo today

3
00:00:08.000 --> 00:00:12.160
filling in for Andrew Dunkley, and I'm here with Professor Watson,

4
00:00:12.640 --> 00:00:19.079
Astronomer at Large, Professor Fred Watson. Actually it's just say

5
00:00:20.679 --> 00:00:22.600
If I just say Watson, it makes it sound like

6
00:00:22.640 --> 00:00:25.199
this is a mystery podcast and not a space podcast.

7
00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:27.760
That's right, elementary, my dear Watson.

8
00:00:30.440 --> 00:00:33.079
All right, well, speaking of mysteries, we have a lot

9
00:00:33.079 --> 00:00:36.880
of really good questions with mysteries for you to solve today.

10
00:00:37.759 --> 00:00:43.640
And our first question comes from Rusty from Donnie Brook.

11
00:00:44.200 --> 00:00:47.439
Okay, Andrew and Fritt, it's Rusty and Donnie Brook. I'm

12
00:00:47.479 --> 00:00:48.679
sitting out in a.

13
00:00:48.640 --> 00:00:54.000
Beautiful clean knot and looking June north to see lastly,

14
00:00:55.439 --> 00:00:59.079
and it's quite close to the Twins castor and products

15
00:00:59.119 --> 00:01:00.000
the Gemini Twins.

16
00:01:01.359 --> 00:01:08.840
It's closest to Pollucks, which is it's an orange giant

17
00:01:08.920 --> 00:01:15.719
star and it looks redder. Pollux looks redder than Mars.

18
00:01:18.040 --> 00:01:22.239
And if we look to the southwest from there we

19
00:01:22.280 --> 00:01:25.640
can see beetle juiced part of oryon that one looks

20
00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:26.319
radder again.

21
00:01:26.400 --> 00:01:30.040
So my question is when you.

22
00:01:31.359 --> 00:01:34.280
Take a picture through a very large telescope and you

23
00:01:34.319 --> 00:01:37.599
can really see these colors close up?

24
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:39.599
How colorful are they?

25
00:01:40.680 --> 00:01:41.519
Is a red.

26
00:01:41.359 --> 00:01:45.439
Giant as red as a as.

27
00:01:45.120 --> 00:01:50.879
A tomato or a pillar box? And what about the

28
00:01:51.480 --> 00:01:54.319
blue stars? How blue do they get? Is it like

29
00:01:54.840 --> 00:01:58.280
when we call them red and blue? Is that faired?

30
00:01:58.280 --> 00:01:58.599
Income?

31
00:02:00.040 --> 00:02:00.400
Anyway?

32
00:02:01.200 --> 00:02:04.319
Have a good one, and so I can imagine so

33
00:02:04.640 --> 00:02:08.879
rusty is one of our regular questions Donnybrook Donnybrook in

34
00:02:09.039 --> 00:02:13.840
Western Australia and always asking intriguing questions. And I think

35
00:02:13.879 --> 00:02:17.479
what he's thinking of here is if you set yourself

36
00:02:17.919 --> 00:02:22.280
at the eyepiece, for example, of the biggest telescope in Australia,

37
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:25.280
the one that I used to be astronomer in charge

38
00:02:25.319 --> 00:02:29.599
of up in Kunabarabon, with its three point nine meter

39
00:02:29.719 --> 00:02:35.280
diameter mirror, and you looked through an eyepiece at some

40
00:02:35.360 --> 00:02:37.520
of these objects, what would you see? Would you see

41
00:02:37.560 --> 00:02:40.919
the colors more richly than we do with a small

42
00:02:41.080 --> 00:02:44.280
instrument And the answer is a bit a little bit

43
00:02:46.840 --> 00:02:53.199
disappointing really, because the colors are still subtle looking through

44
00:02:53.240 --> 00:02:55.240
a very big telescope. And I've actually done it with

45
00:02:55.240 --> 00:02:57.919
the Angle Australian telescope. It's quite hard to get an

46
00:02:57.919 --> 00:03:00.840
eyepiece on the telescope like that, because it's festooned with

47
00:03:00.879 --> 00:03:06.240
spectrographs and auto guiders and instruments of all different kinds

48
00:03:06.280 --> 00:03:08.840
that don't have an eyepiece on them. But when you

49
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:13.000
look through, yes, you do see the colors Mars looking red,

50
00:03:13.719 --> 00:03:19.360
serious looking, dazzlingly white, some blue stars, the dual Box,

51
00:03:19.439 --> 00:03:23.080
which is a cluster of stars in the constellation of

52
00:03:23.120 --> 00:03:27.159
the Southern Cross, so name because it's got stars of

53
00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:31.000
different colors, including a particularly red one, which is a

54
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:35.199
sort of ruby colored stars. Those colors are exaggerated, but

55
00:03:35.199 --> 00:03:37.759
perhaps not as much as you think.

56
00:03:37.599 --> 00:03:38.120
They would be.

57
00:03:38.240 --> 00:03:42.599
Rusty they you know, they don't go deep red or

58
00:03:42.639 --> 00:03:46.039
anything like that. The colors are still as supple as

59
00:03:46.080 --> 00:03:48.879
you see them. But if I can put it this way,

60
00:03:48.960 --> 00:03:51.800
it's just like sliding up the saturation button on your

61
00:03:51.840 --> 00:03:57.879
color editor in whatever whatever photo editing system you use.

62
00:03:58.120 --> 00:03:59.960
Slide up saturation a bit, and you get a bit

63
00:04:00.080 --> 00:04:04.639
more color. Likewise, with the size of a telescope. What

64
00:04:04.680 --> 00:04:09.840
you might be surprised at, though, is that the detail

65
00:04:09.879 --> 00:04:15.120
that you see with a big telescope is not as

66
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:18.040
fine as you'd expect. And that's all about the way

67
00:04:18.040 --> 00:04:22.079
the atmosphere behaves the atmosphere in terms of the way

68
00:04:22.120 --> 00:04:25.639
turbulence in the atmosphere spoils the view through a telescope.

69
00:04:25.720 --> 00:04:28.639
It's actually far less forgiving of a big telescope than

70
00:04:28.759 --> 00:04:31.199
is in a smaller one. A smaller one you might

71
00:04:31.279 --> 00:04:33.759
just see the object moving around, but you can see

72
00:04:33.759 --> 00:04:36.519
it quite sharply, whereas with a big telescope it just

73
00:04:36.560 --> 00:04:37.680
tends to blur it out.

74
00:04:37.959 --> 00:04:38.639
It still moves it.

75
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:41.560
Whatever totally thought it was the other way around. I

76
00:04:41.600 --> 00:04:45.480
would have thought those big telescopes were like hide four

77
00:04:45.600 --> 00:04:48.839
K perfect picture they are.

78
00:04:48.800 --> 00:04:54.120
With modern technology. These not really new, they've been around

79
00:04:54.120 --> 00:04:56.240
for thirty years, but it's only within the last decade

80
00:04:56.240 --> 00:04:59.360
that they've been perfected what we call adaptive optic systems,

81
00:05:00.000 --> 00:05:02.639
which actually it's all about the turbulence the mirror and

82
00:05:02.680 --> 00:05:05.279
the telescopes themselves. If they were in space, they would

83
00:05:05.319 --> 00:05:08.759
reveal perfect images exactly like the web telescope or the

84
00:05:08.920 --> 00:05:11.680
humble telescope do. But because they're at the bottom of

85
00:05:11.680 --> 00:05:15.160
an atmosphere with a lot of turbulence in the air,

86
00:05:15.439 --> 00:05:19.480
even on top of mountains, it's turbulence that's what spoils

87
00:05:19.480 --> 00:05:23.519
the view. But modern technology lets you sense that turbulence.

88
00:05:23.600 --> 00:05:27.199
It lets you see what is the distortion that the

89
00:05:27.319 --> 00:05:30.199
atmosphere is providing, and then just like a pair of

90
00:05:30.720 --> 00:05:34.279
noise canceling headphones, it cancels it out. It provides the

91
00:05:34.279 --> 00:05:40.000
opposite signal, so it cancels out the turbulence. It's very

92
00:05:40.000 --> 00:05:45.879
hard technology because you have to measure the star use

93
00:05:45.920 --> 00:05:50.199
what's called a reference star, which is sometimes artificial. You've

94
00:05:50.240 --> 00:05:52.600
got to measure that star a thousand times a second

95
00:05:53.000 --> 00:05:56.480
for this process to work. So it needs very fast

96
00:05:56.519 --> 00:06:01.160
readout sensors, much faster than what you find in for example,

97
00:06:01.160 --> 00:06:04.199
a mobile phone, but the same sort of thing, but

98
00:06:04.240 --> 00:06:06.680
they're reading out a thousand times a second at least,

99
00:06:06.759 --> 00:06:08.600
in fact, sometimes twice that.

100
00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:11.040
That is so incredible. I just every day. I'm so

101
00:06:11.120 --> 00:06:13.360
proud of humanity for what we've come up with. It's

102
00:06:13.560 --> 00:06:16.240
just fantastic to think. And if you know, if we

103
00:06:16.279 --> 00:06:18.399
all just work together as a team, this would be

104
00:06:19.720 --> 00:06:22.160
you know, we'd already have you know, gone past our

105
00:06:22.160 --> 00:06:24.040
own solar system by now if we all worked as

106
00:06:24.040 --> 00:06:26.839
a big team. That is so incredible just to think

107
00:06:26.879 --> 00:06:29.759
of all the details of these technologies.

108
00:06:31.439 --> 00:06:33.120
Let's take a little break from the show to tell

109
00:06:33.160 --> 00:06:37.079
you about our sponsor, Saley. As you know, my wife

110
00:06:37.120 --> 00:06:40.079
and I like to travel. We've been overseas quite a

111
00:06:40.079 --> 00:06:43.120
few times in recent years. Now that I'm retired, we

112
00:06:43.240 --> 00:06:46.120
plan to do more. And one of the things I

113
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:48.680
really like to do is make sure I've got access

114
00:06:48.759 --> 00:06:52.360
to mobile phone data, particularly when I'm using maps, because

115
00:06:52.439 --> 00:06:54.439
it's so easy to get lost when you're in a

116
00:06:54.560 --> 00:06:59.519
very unfamiliar environment. Some time ago, we did use an

117
00:06:59.519 --> 00:07:04.199
EESIM service from another company and it did not work,

118
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:07.199
and it left us in a very difficult position. We

119
00:07:07.199 --> 00:07:11.639
were high and dry and we were not happy, and

120
00:07:11.800 --> 00:07:16.000
we didn't have any backup service, which was also very

121
00:07:16.079 --> 00:07:19.160
very disconcerting, so we had no one to call to say, look,

122
00:07:19.199 --> 00:07:22.959
with some work, what can you do? And it just

123
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:26.319
left us in a really difficult position and left a

124
00:07:26.439 --> 00:07:29.319
nasty taste in our mouths as well. I wish I'd

125
00:07:29.360 --> 00:07:33.360
known about sale at that point in time. Saley offers

126
00:07:33.399 --> 00:07:36.040
an e SIM service covering one hundred and eighty countries.

127
00:07:36.639 --> 00:07:39.399
With an e SIM, you don't have to physically change

128
00:07:39.439 --> 00:07:41.800
the SIM in your phone. You just download it and

129
00:07:41.959 --> 00:07:44.600
it works when you switch the service sign in whatever

130
00:07:44.639 --> 00:07:49.079
country or regional area that you want to serve the

131
00:07:49.120 --> 00:07:52.839
Internet on and it's as simple as going to your

132
00:07:52.959 --> 00:07:56.199
app store or play store, downloading the sale app, and

133
00:07:56.319 --> 00:08:00.879
choosing whatever service you need from whatever country and away

134
00:08:00.920 --> 00:08:03.959
you go. Simple as that. Right now, there's a discount

135
00:08:04.000 --> 00:08:07.800
available to space nuts listeners, and all you have to

136
00:08:07.839 --> 00:08:11.079
do when you buy whatever coverage area you've chosen is

137
00:08:11.240 --> 00:08:15.800
put space nuts the code word in at the checkout. Okay,

138
00:08:16.160 --> 00:08:18.759
so space nuts at the checkout will get you a

139
00:08:18.839 --> 00:08:22.959
discount as a space Nuts listener on sale. I highly

140
00:08:23.240 --> 00:08:26.319
recommend when you're overseas to use a service like this.

141
00:08:27.199 --> 00:08:29.240
So if you would like to get that discount as

142
00:08:29.240 --> 00:08:33.519
a space Nuts listener on sale, download the app from

143
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:36.279
your Android or Apple device, and when you get to

144
00:08:36.320 --> 00:08:39.039
the checkout, make sure you put space nuts in is

145
00:08:39.039 --> 00:08:41.559
the code word for the discount. No matter where you

146
00:08:41.639 --> 00:08:44.360
are or what you plan to do, this is a

147
00:08:44.399 --> 00:08:47.559
service that will back you one hundred percent and you

148
00:08:47.600 --> 00:08:50.039
can read all about it as well at Saley dot

149
00:08:50.039 --> 00:08:55.039
com slash space nuts. That's sale dot com slash space

150
00:08:55.120 --> 00:08:57.799
nuts and get all that stress out of your overseas travel.

151
00:08:57.879 --> 00:08:59.720
This is one thing you won't have to worry about

152
00:09:00.039 --> 00:09:01.960
the details. Of course, they are in our show notes.

153
00:09:03.159 --> 00:09:09.120
Now back to the show. Okay, we take a.

154
00:09:07.759 --> 00:09:12.840
Space nuts Well, our next question is from Dan from California,

155
00:09:13.399 --> 00:09:17.759
Dan the Man. He says, I was reading about gamma

156
00:09:17.840 --> 00:09:20.919
ray bursts and how devastating they can be should they

157
00:09:21.000 --> 00:09:24.399
hit Earth. Can you explain why gamma ray bursts become

158
00:09:24.639 --> 00:09:27.840
less lethal the further away they are because the majority

159
00:09:27.840 --> 00:09:31.279
of space is avoid rather than dust. I assume the

160
00:09:31.320 --> 00:09:34.799
same goes for radio waves, where over distance they get

161
00:09:34.840 --> 00:09:38.000
weaker and weaker. Is this really due to dust and

162
00:09:38.120 --> 00:09:40.240
gas that are weakening the signals?

163
00:09:40.600 --> 00:09:40.960
Thanks?

164
00:09:44.320 --> 00:09:49.360
Yes, it's actually nothing to do with dust and gas. Dan, Sorry,

165
00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:54.399
wrong name, reading the wrong bit of the question. Dan.

166
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:58.480
The reason why things get weaker the further away you

167
00:09:58.519 --> 00:10:01.919
get is because of a fundamental law of physics which

168
00:10:01.960 --> 00:10:05.240
is called the inverse square law. And that is that

169
00:10:06.000 --> 00:10:08.960
if you double the distance that you are from a

170
00:10:09.000 --> 00:10:12.120
source of gamma rays or radio waves or whatever, you

171
00:10:12.159 --> 00:10:15.720
double the distance, the signal drops by a factor of four.

172
00:10:16.000 --> 00:10:18.559
It's the square of the distance. That's why it's called

173
00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:22.960
the inverse square or so double the distance you get

174
00:10:23.360 --> 00:10:26.080
you know, a quarter of the signal, and if you

175
00:10:26.120 --> 00:10:30.080
then double the distance again, it goes down by an

176
00:10:30.120 --> 00:10:33.039
equally large you know, it goes down by the square

177
00:10:33.080 --> 00:10:35.679
of the new distance. A new distance is four, so

178
00:10:35.759 --> 00:10:38.480
it goes down by sixteen, a factor of sixteen. And

179
00:10:38.559 --> 00:10:43.039
that's why all these signals get weaker. Dust and gas

180
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:48.919
do impact on them. And for example, perhaps the best

181
00:10:48.960 --> 00:10:51.200
example of that is the center of our Milky Way

182
00:10:51.240 --> 00:10:54.840
galaxy at a distance of about twenty five thousand light years.

183
00:10:56.039 --> 00:10:58.840
We can't see the center of that with visible light

184
00:10:58.879 --> 00:11:01.879
telescopes because of the dust that blocks our view. It's

185
00:11:02.039 --> 00:11:04.639
dusty in the Milky Way, and the center of our

186
00:11:04.639 --> 00:11:09.240
galaxy is hidden. Infrared radiation penetrates the dust, and that's

187
00:11:09.279 --> 00:11:11.799
why we can actually see it, see the center of

188
00:11:11.799 --> 00:11:15.200
our galaxy in infrared, but not with visible light. So

189
00:11:15.320 --> 00:11:18.559
dust certainly has an effect, but it's the distance that

190
00:11:18.720 --> 00:11:21.919
is the real effect. This inverse square or means, you know,

191
00:11:21.960 --> 00:11:25.000
it's the square of the distance by which it drops

192
00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:26.919
every time you move away.

193
00:11:28.960 --> 00:11:31.720
I wonder if that's everyone has that crazy friend that

194
00:11:31.879 --> 00:11:33.960
always is just on speaker phone. They're like, oh, I

195
00:11:33.960 --> 00:11:35.639
don't want to hold the phone up to my head.

196
00:11:35.679 --> 00:11:37.960
I don't want the base to get me. You're going

197
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:41.240
to hold my phone you know, two feet away from

198
00:11:41.240 --> 00:11:43.039
my face and I'm going to shout into it so

199
00:11:43.080 --> 00:11:46.480
everybody can hear my conversation. The mouse maybe they may

200
00:11:46.559 --> 00:11:47.240
be under something.

201
00:11:47.840 --> 00:11:51.960
Well, you're right that sound waves also are affected by

202
00:11:51.960 --> 00:11:55.679
the inverse squail or. So if you double the distance

203
00:11:56.159 --> 00:12:00.200
from the person who's yelling into their phone, then it's

204
00:12:00.200 --> 00:12:02.200
going to go down by a factor of four. So

205
00:12:02.279 --> 00:12:05.639
that you you know, try try and try, you know,

206
00:12:06.000 --> 00:12:08.399
doubling the distance twice and it'll drop by a fighter

207
00:12:08.440 --> 00:12:09.120
of sixteen.

208
00:12:10.759 --> 00:12:15.519
Yeah, I can't hear you, all right. Our next question

209
00:12:15.639 --> 00:12:17.639
is from Mike from the UK.

210
00:12:18.399 --> 00:12:20.919
It might keep it from the UK. Here a very

211
00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:24.639
quick question, if I may. I have heard many, many

212
00:12:24.720 --> 00:12:28.720
questions over the years into you guys about terrorforming Mars,

213
00:12:29.080 --> 00:12:32.919
which is obviously something that is beyond our capability, but

214
00:12:33.080 --> 00:12:37.919
a lot of people dream about what about terrorforming Venus.

215
00:12:38.399 --> 00:12:41.360
It's not something I've heard a lot about. Now obviously

216
00:12:41.720 --> 00:12:46.159
it's probably still beyond our capability. So let's just talk

217
00:12:46.240 --> 00:12:49.679
sort of theoretical. But would it just be a case

218
00:12:49.919 --> 00:12:53.480
of blocking out some of the Sun's rays to cool

219
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:58.240
the planet down and potentially reverse that runaway greenhouse effect

220
00:12:58.320 --> 00:13:03.759
that's happened on Venus, So potentially, just thinking outside the box,

221
00:13:03.879 --> 00:13:10.440
possibly collide to asteroids together and let the debris catch

222
00:13:10.559 --> 00:13:12.879
in the orbit of Venus, blocking out some of the

223
00:13:12.919 --> 00:13:16.879
Sun and then cooling it down, or potentially even sort

224
00:13:16.879 --> 00:13:20.679
of build a structure to block some of the Sun's rays.

225
00:13:21.080 --> 00:13:23.480
And the other question as well. And like I say,

226
00:13:23.519 --> 00:13:26.879
I know this is probably beyond our capability. But if

227
00:13:26.919 --> 00:13:30.519
we did manage to do that and cool the planet down,

228
00:13:31.080 --> 00:13:33.960
if we could get the conditions on Venus to be

229
00:13:34.080 --> 00:13:39.080
similar to what they are on Earth, which would probably

230
00:13:39.120 --> 00:13:44.879
never happen anyway, but would it stabilize or would the

231
00:13:44.879 --> 00:13:50.159
greenhouse run away effect happen? Again? Is it too close

232
00:13:50.200 --> 00:13:55.000
to the Sun to hold a stable atmosphere and a

233
00:13:55.039 --> 00:13:59.320
similar temperature to Earth? Well, the show is my favorite

234
00:13:59.320 --> 00:14:02.240
podcasting in the world. I'll listen to it all the time.

235
00:14:02.279 --> 00:14:04.679
I think I've listened to just about every episode. So

236
00:14:05.120 --> 00:14:08.080
regardless of whether you answer my question or not, please

237
00:14:08.159 --> 00:14:10.360
keep up the good work and thank you very much

238
00:14:10.360 --> 00:14:10.759
for you Tim.

239
00:14:11.919 --> 00:14:17.840
Yeah, that's a great question, Mike, terraforming Venus. Venus is

240
00:14:17.960 --> 00:14:23.080
so different from the Earth in its natural environment that

241
00:14:23.240 --> 00:14:25.279
it's hard to think of a more Well, you can

242
00:14:25.399 --> 00:14:29.559
think of more different planets, because exoplanets are even wider

243
00:14:29.600 --> 00:14:31.399
in range. But yes, here we've got a planet with

244
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.440
the surface temperature of about four hundred and sixty degrees celsius,

245
00:14:34.919 --> 00:14:39.000
hot enough to melt lead, hot enough that the rocks

246
00:14:39.120 --> 00:14:42.919
probably glow a dull red as well because of that temperature,

247
00:14:43.600 --> 00:14:46.519
and an atmosphere whose pressure is one hundred times the

248
00:14:46.559 --> 00:14:50.600
pressure of the Earth's atmosphere, laden with carbon dioxide. And

249
00:14:50.799 --> 00:14:54.720
just to add to that lovely benign picture, in the

250
00:14:54.799 --> 00:14:58.200
upper atmosphere, a drizzles sulfuric acid. So you've really got

251
00:14:58.279 --> 00:15:04.919
a hellish circumstance for anybody on Venus. How could you

252
00:15:05.000 --> 00:15:10.480
terraform it? Well, you're right, that's the fact that Venus is.

253
00:15:11.000 --> 00:15:13.120
You know, it's much nearer the Sun than we are

254
00:15:13.200 --> 00:15:16.440
on Earth. That contributes and goes back to the question

255
00:15:16.480 --> 00:15:19.639
we were just talking about. It's the inverse squall or

256
00:15:20.360 --> 00:15:23.399
so you're actually getting far more radiation than you might

257
00:15:23.480 --> 00:15:26.919
think just by being you know, a few million killing

258
00:15:26.960 --> 00:15:29.080
of a few tens of millions of killing meters nearer to

259
00:15:29.120 --> 00:15:34.000
the Sun. The idea of blocking the Sun's light is

260
00:15:34.320 --> 00:15:40.000
something that has been suggested quite seriously on Earth in

261
00:15:40.080 --> 00:15:44.679
order to reduce the carbon footprint that we're all making.

262
00:15:46.759 --> 00:15:49.919
If you launch I'm trying to remember who suggested it.

263
00:15:49.960 --> 00:15:51.879
At first, it's somebody I know, and I can't remember

264
00:15:51.879 --> 00:15:54.960
who it was. But if you launch a swarm of

265
00:15:55.000 --> 00:15:58.879
spacecraft and put them at what we call the L

266
00:15:58.919 --> 00:16:01.480
two point, the second the Grange point, which is a

267
00:16:01.519 --> 00:16:05.480
stable position between any planet and the Sun where the

268
00:16:05.480 --> 00:16:08.600
gravity balance is out, you put this swarm of spacecraft.

269
00:16:08.600 --> 00:16:10.960
This was suggested for the Earth, but it would equally

270
00:16:10.960 --> 00:16:13.559
apply to Venus. You could do the same thing to

271
00:16:13.600 --> 00:16:17.159
try and block down the Sun's light. I'm not convinced

272
00:16:17.200 --> 00:16:23.039
that that would actually have any positive effect on the

273
00:16:23.080 --> 00:16:26.480
atmosphere of Venus. It would certainly cool the radiation that

274
00:16:26.559 --> 00:16:27.440
it feels from the.

275
00:16:27.360 --> 00:16:28.960
Sun, that.

276
00:16:30.519 --> 00:16:34.200
The carbon dioxide rich atmosphere would still act as a

277
00:16:35.440 --> 00:16:39.759
as a runaway greenhouse atmosphere, so I think you would

278
00:16:39.799 --> 00:16:43.919
still have these very high temperatures and I don't think

279
00:16:44.360 --> 00:16:47.639
there is any technology we could imagine that would change that.

280
00:16:48.279 --> 00:16:50.960
And if you were going to think about terraforming somewhere,

281
00:16:52.320 --> 00:16:55.000
and I should say it's pretty well impossible, but if

282
00:16:55.000 --> 00:16:57.120
you were going to think of it, Mars will be

283
00:16:57.120 --> 00:17:00.279
a better bet. You'd have to keep on terraforming though,

284
00:17:00.320 --> 00:17:03.120
because Mars doesn't have enough gravity to hang onto an

285
00:17:03.120 --> 00:17:07.359
atmosphere like the Earth's. So I think you're right that

286
00:17:07.440 --> 00:17:11.400
you would not. You would not lose the runaway greenhouse effect.

287
00:17:11.440 --> 00:17:13.839
It would not it would not go away.

288
00:17:13.920 --> 00:17:18.599
Basically, Yeah, Venus is really I'm sorry, Venus. It's a terrible,

289
00:17:18.759 --> 00:17:24.279
terrible planet. It's really, I think, pretty pretty nasty as

290
00:17:24.359 --> 00:17:27.359
far as everything that's going on in that planet. But

291
00:17:27.640 --> 00:17:31.000
you know, we we did it. Historically, used to think

292
00:17:31.039 --> 00:17:34.680
that that was going to be the most similar closest planet,

293
00:17:34.759 --> 00:17:37.839
too was and then we flew some satellites by it

294
00:17:37.880 --> 00:17:39.640
and we're like, oh, that's terrifying.

295
00:17:40.799 --> 00:17:43.279
But yeah, you're right, I mean it is similar. It's

296
00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:46.759
virtually the same size as Earth. There's some new research

297
00:17:47.039 --> 00:17:50.640
just been released actually, which I nearly thought we might

298
00:17:50.680 --> 00:17:53.680
talk about on Space Nuts, and it's about the crust

299
00:17:53.759 --> 00:18:01.599
of Venus. The because like the Earth, Venus, we don't

300
00:18:01.599 --> 00:18:04.440
know what said it's core. It doesn't have a magnetic field,

301
00:18:04.440 --> 00:18:07.400
so it's probably not an iron core like ours, a mantle,

302
00:18:07.480 --> 00:18:09.599
a sort of soft rock above that, and a crust.

303
00:18:10.680 --> 00:18:13.160
And we live on the Earth's crust, for example, which

304
00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:16.799
is not very thick. It's thirty or forty kilometers thick,

305
00:18:16.880 --> 00:18:21.680
which is quite slender. But the thinking is that Venus

306
00:18:21.720 --> 00:18:24.440
has a much thicker crust and that there is what

307
00:18:24.480 --> 00:18:29.400
we call convection, this heat rising or material rising because

308
00:18:29.400 --> 00:18:32.880
of heat convection taking place in the crust of Venus,

309
00:18:33.359 --> 00:18:36.839
which may be why Venus has the largest number of

310
00:18:36.920 --> 00:18:40.039
volcanoes of any object known in the Solar System. Now

311
00:18:40.039 --> 00:18:42.359
we don't know if they're active or not. This is

312
00:18:42.440 --> 00:18:46.119
just counting craters from radar measurements of its surface. It's

313
00:18:46.599 --> 00:18:51.279
got the largest number of certainly volcanic structures. And the

314
00:18:51.359 --> 00:18:53.960
thinking now is that comes from convection in the crust

315
00:18:54.079 --> 00:18:56.279
rather than convection in the mantle, which is what we

316
00:18:56.319 --> 00:18:59.279
have here on Earth. Just a little factoid about Venus

317
00:18:59.279 --> 00:19:02.960
that I think a tribute this to its reputation as

318
00:19:03.599 --> 00:19:04.720
an ugly system.

319
00:19:06.400 --> 00:19:09.920
Well, that is such a fun fact. I never knew

320
00:19:09.920 --> 00:19:16.079
that about Venus.

321
00:19:16.640 --> 00:19:17.640
Space nuts.

322
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:23.200
Our very last question is from Todd is from Utah.

323
00:19:23.279 --> 00:19:26.519
I am also from Utah, So Todd, thank you for

324
00:19:26.839 --> 00:19:31.559
representing our little state. Hopefully you're winding up for some

325
00:19:31.640 --> 00:19:35.720
good weather there and I'll springtime and Salt Lake's always

326
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:38.079
really beautiful. And I don't know if you're a skier,

327
00:19:38.079 --> 00:19:40.079
if you've got some good skiing in the season. But

328
00:19:41.200 --> 00:19:47.319
that's my little plug to a fella Utah. His question is, Hello, gentlemen,

329
00:19:47.799 --> 00:19:52.240
I have a question about the double slit experiment. Well, truthfully,

330
00:19:52.359 --> 00:19:55.200
I have many questions about it, but let's just focus

331
00:19:55.240 --> 00:19:58.880
on one for now. I have seen that some have

332
00:19:59.000 --> 00:20:04.279
done this experiment by shooting individual photons at the double slit,

333
00:20:04.720 --> 00:20:09.359
one at a time, yet this still produces an inference pattern. This,

334
00:20:09.480 --> 00:20:12.920
of course boggles my mind. I've read that I've read

335
00:20:12.960 --> 00:20:18.119
that this is an example of quantum super superposition and

336
00:20:18.440 --> 00:20:22.440
that somehow those photons are interacting with themselves. Can you

337
00:20:22.519 --> 00:20:26.559
and Fred please elaborate on what exactly we understand is

338
00:20:26.599 --> 00:20:29.559
happening here? Is this something silly along the lines of

339
00:20:29.599 --> 00:20:33.480
photons not being bound by time? Speaking of time? Thank

340
00:20:33.519 --> 00:20:37.559
you for yours. Finally, I have an observational joke for you.

341
00:20:38.519 --> 00:20:41.759
In three thy and twenty five years from now, life

342
00:20:41.799 --> 00:20:44.640
on Earth will either be really good or really bad.

343
00:20:45.119 --> 00:20:51.039
It's fifty to fifty. That is from uh Todd from Utah, USA.

344
00:20:51.200 --> 00:20:53.200
Thank you so much for the joke Todd and the

345
00:20:53.319 --> 00:20:55.680
question I like the joke.

346
00:20:55.519 --> 00:20:57.680
A lot, but nobody I've told it to so far.

347
00:20:57.920 --> 00:20:58.400
That's it.

348
00:20:58.480 --> 00:21:02.839
So I'm obviously lose something in the retelling there. It's

349
00:21:02.880 --> 00:21:03.799
a good one, thank you.

350
00:21:06.000 --> 00:21:08.640
They're not laughing at that there.

351
00:21:07.960 --> 00:21:13.759
Maybe, So yeah, anyway, the question, Yeah, this is and

352
00:21:13.920 --> 00:21:16.480
just to you know, sort of fill in the backstory.

353
00:21:16.480 --> 00:21:18.599
What are we talking about with the double slit experiment.

354
00:21:19.920 --> 00:21:24.640
If you pass beams of light through two slits under

355
00:21:24.680 --> 00:21:27.960
the right circumstance, they will interfere with one another, and

356
00:21:28.000 --> 00:21:31.720
that means we will see bright and dark patterns because

357
00:21:31.759 --> 00:21:35.319
of the way the waves mix. So waves of light

358
00:21:36.440 --> 00:21:39.319
basically can add together or can cancel out, and it's

359
00:21:39.359 --> 00:21:41.480
where they add together and cancel out that we see

360
00:21:41.519 --> 00:21:45.039
these bright and dark patterns. I was very keen on

361
00:21:45.200 --> 00:21:49.000
interferometry the technique of doing that and making measurements by

362
00:21:49.039 --> 00:21:52.720
it when I was a young student. But so that

363
00:21:53.359 --> 00:21:57.200
is basically it was the proof of the fact that

364
00:21:57.319 --> 00:22:01.640
light is a wave motion, because Newton thought it was particles.

365
00:22:02.880 --> 00:22:05.680
But it was demonstrated not long after Newton's time that

366
00:22:05.759 --> 00:22:08.519
it was a wave motion by virtue of this double

367
00:22:08.559 --> 00:22:12.640
slit experiment. At the beginning of the nineteenth century. But

368
00:22:12.799 --> 00:22:19.559
now we know that light is particles and waves, and

369
00:22:19.880 --> 00:22:22.960
sometimes maybe the way to imagine it is as wave packets.

370
00:22:23.359 --> 00:22:28.240
These photons, particles of light are sort of also a wave.

371
00:22:29.519 --> 00:22:31.559
That was the way we kind of looked at things,

372
00:22:31.559 --> 00:22:34.240
perhaps in the fifties and sixties, that photons were packets

373
00:22:34.240 --> 00:22:37.240
of waves, because that would let you then use particles,

374
00:22:37.279 --> 00:22:40.599
but that they would still do this interference trick so

375
00:22:40.680 --> 00:22:44.079
that proved they had a wave motion. Along comes quantum

376
00:22:44.119 --> 00:22:49.400
theory that says particles are basically made of waves. They're

377
00:22:49.440 --> 00:22:51.839
not just packets of waves. They're made of waves in

378
00:22:51.880 --> 00:22:59.039
a very odd way. And that experiment that Todd has

379
00:22:59.119 --> 00:23:03.240
referred to is the one that tells you that there's

380
00:23:03.240 --> 00:23:08.440
something really peculiar going on, because if you shoot photons,

381
00:23:08.440 --> 00:23:12.519
single photons through this double slit experiment one at a time,

382
00:23:12.680 --> 00:23:17.039
so that they never come together in a wave method,

383
00:23:17.440 --> 00:23:20.680
you still get the interference pattern building up that proves

384
00:23:20.680 --> 00:23:24.920
that they're waves. And I think you know Todd's comment

385
00:23:24.960 --> 00:23:28.960
about is it something silly like photon's not being bound

386
00:23:29.039 --> 00:23:33.960
by time in a way it is. I think it's

387
00:23:34.039 --> 00:23:41.160
more about the mystery of quantum entanglement, that these particles

388
00:23:41.160 --> 00:23:44.599
are entangled together, which means that they behave like a

389
00:23:44.640 --> 00:23:47.200
single particle. So if you've got one going through one

390
00:23:47.319 --> 00:23:49.480
side of the slit or one part of the slit

391
00:23:49.519 --> 00:23:53.720
one going through another, they're still part of the same object,

392
00:23:53.880 --> 00:23:59.480
even if they're going through at different times. So that's perhaps, yes,

393
00:23:59.559 --> 00:24:01.640
that they're not bound by time in that sense, but

394
00:24:01.680 --> 00:24:03.480
I think it's more to do with the phenomenon of

395
00:24:03.559 --> 00:24:07.880
quantum entanglement that things behave as though they're a single

396
00:24:07.960 --> 00:24:11.400
quantum object even though they're quite separate. They're separated sometimes

397
00:24:11.440 --> 00:24:17.079
by very large distances, but they have common behavior between them,

398
00:24:17.160 --> 00:24:20.880
and I think that's how the double slit experiment arises

399
00:24:20.960 --> 00:24:25.759
when you use photons separate photons. I probably left you

400
00:24:25.799 --> 00:24:27.240
completely called the ID.

401
00:24:28.039 --> 00:24:29.079
I thought this.

402
00:24:29.200 --> 00:24:31.880
Was fantastic and all wait, completely over my head.

403
00:24:33.000 --> 00:24:38.160
Yeah, but it's one of the sort of fundamental experiments

404
00:24:38.319 --> 00:24:41.200
of physics that tells you that light is both a

405
00:24:41.240 --> 00:24:44.359
wave and a particle, but the two somehow mixed together

406
00:24:44.480 --> 00:24:47.400
in a very mysterious way. I think that's the bottom line.

407
00:24:47.759 --> 00:24:51.640
Okay, Well, I think I can understand that it's a mystery,

408
00:24:51.720 --> 00:24:55.200
and they miss I understood those words.

409
00:24:54.599 --> 00:24:55.880
Yeah, oh wow.

410
00:24:56.079 --> 00:24:58.240
I mean, once again, thank you so much, Brad, for

411
00:24:58.519 --> 00:25:02.400
you always take such such patience and care with answering

412
00:25:02.400 --> 00:25:06.480
these questions and making making things make sense and just

413
00:25:06.519 --> 00:25:09.960
making it fun and relatable and just and just exploring

414
00:25:10.000 --> 00:25:14.519
and thinking together. So thank you so much for everything

415
00:25:14.559 --> 00:25:16.400
that you provided us with today.

416
00:25:17.000 --> 00:25:20.519
It's a pleasure, Canidie, thank you for being the kernel

417
00:25:20.559 --> 00:25:22.920
of the of the show by keeping it going. I

418
00:25:22.920 --> 00:25:26.720
mean K E R N E L rather than con.

419
00:25:28.359 --> 00:25:31.640
Much language is good interesting. Well, thank you so much

420
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:36.759
everybody for listening in to today's episode. This today's question

421
00:25:36.880 --> 00:25:40.640
and answer episode of Space Nuts, and we will catch

422
00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:43.039
you next week. I will be back here again for

423
00:25:43.160 --> 00:25:44.839
just a couple more weeks and then you'll get your

424
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:47.920
dear sweet and your bat. But until then you're stuck

425
00:25:47.960 --> 00:25:50.680
with me. Thanks again to those of you. I heard

426
00:25:50.759 --> 00:25:52.839
that a few of you wrote in with some kind

427
00:25:52.880 --> 00:25:55.039
words about me, so thank you so much. If you

428
00:25:55.039 --> 00:26:00.119
guys had compliments, I appreciate that. But until next time,

429
00:26:00.200 --> 00:26:02.119
we all will be signing off.

430
00:26:02.319 --> 00:26:05.000
Thank you so much, Thank you, Heidian. Thanks all so

431
00:26:05.160 --> 00:26:07.920
to Hugh in the background back in the studio keeping

432
00:26:07.960 --> 00:26:14.079
us all honest. We'll see you Next Time.

433
00:26:14.319 --> 00:26:21.400
The Space Nuts podcast available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart Radio,

434
00:26:21.720 --> 00:26:23.440
or your favorite podcast player.

435
00:26:23.640 --> 00:26:26.759
You can also stream on demand at bides dot com.

436
00:26:26.960 --> 00:26:32.680
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail