Nov. 25, 2024

#472: Titan's Unique Atmosphere, Tidal Locking Insights & Triton's Cosmic Journey

#472: Titan's Unique Atmosphere, Tidal Locking Insights & Triton's Cosmic Journey

Space Nuts #472 Q&A Edition: Titan's Mysteries and Cosmic Curiosities
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this intriguing Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they delve into the mysteries of our solar system and beyond, addressing...

Space Nuts #472 Q&A Edition: Titan's Mysteries and Cosmic Curiosities
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this intriguing Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they delve into the mysteries of our solar system and beyond, addressing questions from their curious audience. From the unique atmosphere of Titan to the hypothetical existence of Planet Nine, this episode is filled with captivating discussions and astronomical insights.
Episode Highlights:
- Titan's Atmospheric Enigma: Explore the origins of Titan's thick nitrogen atmosphere and its ability to retain it, unlike Mars. Discover the role of comets and organic chemistry in shaping this unique moon's environment.
- Tidal Locking Explained: Understand the gravitational phenomenon of tidal locking and why proximity and size matter. Learn about the differences in how natural and man-made satellites maintain their orientation.
- Planet Nine Hypothesis: Dive into a speculative theory about Planet Nine and its potential impact on Uranus and Mercury. Discuss the ongoing search for this elusive celestial body.
- Triton's Dwarf Planet Status: Uncover the history of Neptune's moon Triton and its possible past as a dwarf planet. Examine the characteristics that make Triton a fascinating world in its own right.
- Distinguishing Doppler Effects: Differentiate between Doppler shifts caused by relative motion and the redshift due to the universe's expansion. Explore how these phenomena are used to study cosmic objects.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts/support
or visit our Support page for more options: https://spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
00:00 - This is a Q and A episode and we will be doing some homework
01:17 - How come Titan can retain an atmosphere when Mars cannot
07:23 - Why is tidal locking a function of proximity of bound objects
11:00 - Ash Brisbane proposes that Planet Nine once existed on elliptical orbit
14:43 - Nigel from Brisbane Australia asks hypothetical question about Neptune's Triton
18:59 - Triton may have been formed much further out in the solar system
21:17 - Nigel asks where the word asteroid came from
23:24 - Fred answers question from Robert McCowan about Doppler effect
✍️ Episode References
Kelly Miller
https://www.swri.org
Space.com article
https://www.space.com/
saturn-moon-titan-makes-own-atmosphere.html
3--- Southwest Research Institute
https://www.swri.org
iHeartRadio
https://www.iheart.com
Apple Podcasts
https://www.apple.com/apple-podcasts/
Spotify
https://www.spotify.com
bitesz.com
https://www.bitesz.com

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:01.879
Hello again. This is Space Nuts.

2
00:00:02.040 --> 00:00:03.160
See I told you I'll be back.

3
00:00:03.759 --> 00:00:07.360
Andrew Dunkley here, great, they have your company, and this

4
00:00:07.440 --> 00:00:09.839
is a Q and A episode and we will be

5
00:00:10.359 --> 00:00:12.880
doing some homework. We had a question last time from

6
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:16.480
Yenst about why Titan has an atmosphere like it does,

7
00:00:17.120 --> 00:00:18.839
and Fred's done his homework.

8
00:00:18.480 --> 00:00:19.960
So we'll tell you all about it. Yenst.

9
00:00:20.039 --> 00:00:23.160
We're going to look at tidal Locke, a new theory

10
00:00:23.199 --> 00:00:26.800
about planet planet nine coming from one of our audience members,

11
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:29.440
and we're going to talk about something we've not talked

12
00:00:29.480 --> 00:00:32.159
about much, but it wrote to us and said, you

13
00:00:32.200 --> 00:00:35.880
don't talk about me. So we're going to look at Triton,

14
00:00:36.079 --> 00:00:41.200
which is the moon of Neptune, and the use of Doppler.

15
00:00:41.679 --> 00:00:44.240
We'll talk about all of that through questions on this

16
00:00:44.320 --> 00:00:46.320
episode of Space.

17
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:55.000
Nuts fifteen second Channel ten nine ignition Space Nuts or

18
00:00:55.520 --> 00:01:04.159
three two Space and I reported Neil Good and the

19
00:01:04.239 --> 00:01:08.519
man on this particular mission is Professor Fred Watson, astronomer

20
00:01:08.519 --> 00:01:10.879
at LA tellofred Illo.

21
00:01:10.959 --> 00:01:13.040
Andrew, it's good to join.

22
00:01:12.879 --> 00:01:16.359
You from a slightly different location from normal, but that's fine.

23
00:01:17.959 --> 00:01:21.920
Yes, let's get straight into it because there is a

24
00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:24.519
fair bit on the agenda. We're going to revisit a

25
00:01:24.640 --> 00:01:29.560
question from last week which came from Sweden. Yeah, it

26
00:01:29.719 --> 00:01:33.159
was YenS To who was asking about Titan's atmosphere. What

27
00:01:33.200 --> 00:01:36.959
we might do is just play yenst question. I gets

28
00:01:37.040 --> 00:01:40.959
how to say yenst question again and then we can

29
00:01:41.000 --> 00:01:41.840
fill in the blanks.

30
00:01:43.239 --> 00:01:46.280
Hello, space nuts, This is YenS from the Forest of

31
00:01:46.359 --> 00:01:50.480
Dulston at Sweden. As we all know, Saturn's moon Titan

32
00:01:50.640 --> 00:01:54.719
is a very special place. So here's my question. How

33
00:01:54.719 --> 00:01:58.719
did Titan become so special? How did it accumulate this

34
00:01:58.920 --> 00:02:02.000
sick night to Jenna atmosphere and not it's meeting and eating.

35
00:02:02.959 --> 00:02:06.680
There are dozens of months of auto planets, only Titan

36
00:02:06.719 --> 00:02:10.159
has an atmosphere. What is it about Titan that made

37
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:15.039
it become different from all the other moons? And another

38
00:02:15.159 --> 00:02:18.639
related question. It is often said that Mars is too

39
00:02:18.680 --> 00:02:22.080
small to retain an atmosphere in the long term. The

40
00:02:22.120 --> 00:02:25.280
Titan is even smaller. How came Titan carry ten an

41
00:02:25.280 --> 00:02:30.039
atmosphere when Mars cannot? Thanks very great show.

42
00:02:31.000 --> 00:02:34.800
Thanks to Angst. We did determine that Mars probably lost

43
00:02:34.800 --> 00:02:37.400
its atmosphere because of its proximity to the Sun, and

44
00:02:37.479 --> 00:02:41.599
it was all blown off by the solar winds, But

45
00:02:41.840 --> 00:02:46.319
we didn't determine why Titan might have the unusual atmosphere

46
00:02:46.319 --> 00:02:49.639
that it has and how it manages to retain that. Well,

47
00:02:49.680 --> 00:02:52.719
it probably retains it because it's far enough from the

48
00:02:52.759 --> 00:02:57.360
Sun not to be as significantly affected as Mars was.

49
00:02:58.000 --> 00:03:01.599
But how is it that it's got such a strange atmosphere.

50
00:03:02.159 --> 00:03:04.240
That's the pace of the puzzle we needed to do

51
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:05.319
some homework on for it.

52
00:03:06.759 --> 00:03:10.400
Yeah, that's right, and it's actually not that hard to

53
00:03:10.479 --> 00:03:18.080
find some interesting theories about why sorry, yes, why Titan?

54
00:03:19.080 --> 00:03:26.199
Why Titan has a thick atmosphere? And various pieces of

55
00:03:26.240 --> 00:03:28.840
work have been done on this. The one that I

56
00:03:28.879 --> 00:03:32.479
think really puts it most cogently is a paper that

57
00:03:32.599 --> 00:03:37.919
was actually published in January twenty nineteen, and that was

58
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:39.879
written by.

59
00:03:42.360 --> 00:03:43.439
A group of.

60
00:03:43.159 --> 00:03:48.240
Scientists led by Kelly Miller, who's at the Southwest Research

61
00:03:48.319 --> 00:03:52.560
Institute in Boulder, Colorado, one of the big centers for planetary.

62
00:03:52.120 --> 00:03:53.560
Studies in the USA.

63
00:03:55.199 --> 00:03:58.080
And Kelly says, and I'm quoting here, a lot of

64
00:03:58.199 --> 00:04:01.840
organic chemistry is no doubt happening on Titan. So it's

65
00:04:01.840 --> 00:04:06.400
an undeniable source of curiosity because Titan is the only

66
00:04:06.479 --> 00:04:10.120
moon in our Solar system with a substantial atmosphere. Scientists

67
00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:12.400
have wandered for a long time what its source was.

68
00:04:13.199 --> 00:04:16.560
The main theory has been that ammonia ice from comets

69
00:04:16.920 --> 00:04:21.759
was converted by impacts or photochemistry into nitrogen to form

70
00:04:21.839 --> 00:04:26.360
Titan's atmosphere. While that might still be an important process,

71
00:04:26.839 --> 00:04:29.879
it neglects the effects of what we now know is

72
00:04:29.920 --> 00:04:36.360
a very substantial portion of comets complex organic material. So

73
00:04:37.079 --> 00:04:41.480
what Kelly is saying there is that, yes, comets are

74
00:04:41.519 --> 00:04:46.920
mostly made of ice, but there is a significant proportion

75
00:04:47.079 --> 00:04:52.360
of them that are the organic chemicals that we form

76
00:04:52.439 --> 00:04:55.319
the building blocks of life here on Earth, the carbon

77
00:04:55.360 --> 00:05:01.480
containing chemicals. And so the theory is that those complex

78
00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:10.959
molecules have basically landed from comets and interacted with the

79
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:15.079
with the surface of Titan. So you've got the sort

80
00:05:15.079 --> 00:05:22.319
of nitrogen atmosphere on Titan, which also has methane ethane

81
00:05:22.360 --> 00:05:25.519
in it as well. And so stuff that would land

82
00:05:25.519 --> 00:05:30.879
from comets, these complex carbon containing molecules basically would would

83
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:37.120
react with the stuff that's already there. And so another

84
00:05:37.279 --> 00:05:43.160
comet comment from Kelly Miller comets and primitive bodies in

85
00:05:43.199 --> 00:05:46.639
the outer Solar System are really interesting because they're thought

86
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:49.000
to be left over building blocks of the Solar System.

87
00:05:49.519 --> 00:05:53.160
These those small bodies could be incorporated into larger bodies

88
00:05:53.199 --> 00:05:57.600
like Titan, and the dense, organic, rich rocky material could

89
00:05:57.639 --> 00:06:02.079
be found in its core. And that if you have

90
00:06:02.279 --> 00:06:06.480
these organic chemicals that have found their way into the

91
00:06:06.480 --> 00:06:09.839
core of Titan, that's the underlying rock that sits under

92
00:06:09.879 --> 00:06:13.319
the ocean, that sits under the ice, then you've got

93
00:06:13.759 --> 00:06:17.920
a possible source of the gases that we see in

94
00:06:18.000 --> 00:06:21.199
Titan's atmosphere. Now, so what we're talking about here is

95
00:06:22.560 --> 00:06:25.800
an atmosphere that's been replenished over time.

96
00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:28.120
Which is essentially.

97
00:06:29.079 --> 00:06:33.879
You know why you have a body that's got an

98
00:06:33.879 --> 00:06:37.519
atmosphere where you might not expect it to have. So

99
00:06:38.160 --> 00:06:41.319
when YenS thinks about this a bit more, maybe have

100
00:06:41.399 --> 00:06:46.959
a look at that work. Kelly Miller from Southwest Research Institute.

101
00:06:47.639 --> 00:06:50.480
There is actually a nice space dot Com article that

102
00:06:50.600 --> 00:06:54.079
reports it dating from January twenty six to twenty nineteen.

103
00:06:54.120 --> 00:06:57.399
Saturn's biggest moon, Titan, may bake its own atmosphere.

104
00:06:58.879 --> 00:07:01.040
So it's just like cooking a cake in the oven.

105
00:07:02.000 --> 00:07:05.600
Everything else creates a gas that.

106
00:07:06.160 --> 00:07:07.560
I think that's the bottom line Andrew.

107
00:07:07.720 --> 00:07:12.279
Yes clever, all right, they go against Have a look

108
00:07:12.319 --> 00:07:15.120
at that article from space dot Com if you want

109
00:07:15.120 --> 00:07:19.959
to read more about it. But that's basically the theory

110
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:25.040
behind Titan's atmosphere. Now moving on, we have got a

111
00:07:25.120 --> 00:07:30.040
question from Ken. Ken comes from Maruci door in Queensland.

112
00:07:30.040 --> 00:07:33.839
I've got a few Queenslanders sent us in questions for

113
00:07:33.879 --> 00:07:37.360
this week. Hi Fred and Andrew. Why is title locking

114
00:07:37.360 --> 00:07:42.000
a function of proximity of the bound objects? Plus do

115
00:07:43.399 --> 00:07:46.519
man made satellites that need to point antennas, et cetera

116
00:07:46.600 --> 00:07:49.879
to Earth automatically tidally lock or do they need initial

117
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:57.240
and ongoing manipulation to do so? Thanks Ken, so double whammy.

118
00:07:57.480 --> 00:08:02.360
Why is title locking a function of proximity of bound objects?

119
00:08:06.519 --> 00:08:13.639
So it is a gravitational phenomenon, but in order for

120
00:08:13.680 --> 00:08:19.839
it to work, you've got to have a reasonably sizeable object.

121
00:08:19.920 --> 00:08:23.240
So the whole thing about tides, Andrew, is that they're

122
00:08:23.279 --> 00:08:27.879
caused by or what you might call tidal disruption, things

123
00:08:27.920 --> 00:08:31.959
that are caused by a tidal effect. The tidal phenomenon

124
00:08:32.559 --> 00:08:36.240
relies on one side of an object feeling a different

125
00:08:36.279 --> 00:08:41.120
amount of gravity from the other side, and so, for example,

126
00:08:41.159 --> 00:08:41.960
in the case.

127
00:08:41.960 --> 00:08:42.600
Of the Earth.

128
00:08:43.559 --> 00:08:46.399
The far side of the Earth feels less gravity from

129
00:08:46.639 --> 00:08:50.240
the Moon than the near side does, and so that

130
00:08:50.320 --> 00:08:57.159
raises the tides on the Earth. And that process essentially

131
00:08:58.320 --> 00:09:02.279
involves a breaking phenomenon, because as the Earth trying to rotate,

132
00:09:02.919 --> 00:09:06.279
it's got this tidal pull from the Moon, and that's

133
00:09:06.320 --> 00:09:09.039
actually slowing down the Earth's rotation. Now, the converse has

134
00:09:09.080 --> 00:09:13.679
been true over billions of years. In fact, probably not

135
00:09:13.799 --> 00:09:17.279
that many. In fact, more like millions of years. The

136
00:09:17.320 --> 00:09:18.399
Moon felt the same thing.

137
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:19.159
One side of it was.

138
00:09:19.159 --> 00:09:20.879
Feeling more of the pool from the Earth than the

139
00:09:20.879 --> 00:09:26.480
other side, and so the breaking effect was felt and

140
00:09:27.000 --> 00:09:30.080
the moon's rotation slowed down until it was actually locked

141
00:09:30.279 --> 00:09:35.879
to be always facing the same side to the Earth. Now,

142
00:09:36.120 --> 00:09:40.080
spacecraft are too small for that phenomenon, you're.

143
00:09:39.879 --> 00:09:42.320
Going to say, I'll bet you that the problem is

144
00:09:42.399 --> 00:09:46.759
the size of an object would be a major ef factor.

145
00:09:48.480 --> 00:09:52.600
So Ken the second part of Ken's question is correct,

146
00:09:52.600 --> 00:09:56.600
Do they need initial and ongoing manipulation to point antennas

147
00:09:56.639 --> 00:10:01.000
to the Earth, And the answer is yes, they are directed,

148
00:10:02.120 --> 00:10:05.720
you know, using thrusters to point in the direction that

149
00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:08.480
they're meant to. It doesn't happen by tidal locking. It's

150
00:10:08.480 --> 00:10:12.200
a nice idea, but but they're too small for the

151
00:10:12.919 --> 00:10:13.600
It would.

152
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:16.919
It would certainly simplify things, wouldn't then if that could happen,

153
00:10:16.960 --> 00:10:17.879
it wouldn't make it easier.

154
00:10:17.879 --> 00:10:19.240
You just put it up there and it turns on

155
00:10:19.279 --> 00:10:21.720
its own to face the Earth. But that's not it works.

156
00:10:22.480 --> 00:10:25.120
And now moon is not the only thing in the

157
00:10:25.120 --> 00:10:28.240
Solar System that's tidally locked, is it. There's there's other

158
00:10:28.360 --> 00:10:31.200
moons that are tidally locked their air respective planets, and

159
00:10:31.240 --> 00:10:34.639
I think some of it is mercury tidally locked to

160
00:10:34.679 --> 00:10:35.000
the Sun.

161
00:10:35.200 --> 00:10:39.200
It's it's it's it's resonant. It's it's not exactly a lock,

162
00:10:39.279 --> 00:10:42.200
but it's a similar process. So it's resonant, as is venus.

163
00:10:42.840 --> 00:10:50.279
Okay, Steve, so yes, Ken, It's yes, it's a it's

164
00:10:50.720 --> 00:10:54.240
a function of size. Size matters apparently when it comes

165
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:55.120
to tidal locking.

166
00:10:55.840 --> 00:10:56.840
Good to hear from you.

167
00:10:56.759 --> 00:11:01.720
Thanks to your question. Okay, we've tacked all for crystal

168
00:11:03.080 --> 00:11:08.440
space nuts. Our next question comes from another Queenslander.

169
00:11:08.799 --> 00:11:11.279
His name is Ants.

170
00:11:12.799 --> 00:11:14.480
Got a bit of a what if question for you

171
00:11:14.559 --> 00:11:15.879
to wrap thinking here around.

172
00:11:16.679 --> 00:11:18.240
I'll propose that planet.

173
00:11:17.960 --> 00:11:21.720
Nourrin once did exist out there in the depth of

174
00:11:21.759 --> 00:11:25.039
the Solar System on Tyler olypical all but it came

175
00:11:25.120 --> 00:11:27.600
in and crossed paths. But the one and only ran Us,

176
00:11:27.600 --> 00:11:30.559
giving us smack on the way past delment Over in

177
00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:33.679
the process loses it's out of shell, making its size

178
00:11:33.679 --> 00:11:35.799
it is now and it lost a lot of its

179
00:11:35.840 --> 00:11:38.480
own momentum, making it drop into the inner Solar System

180
00:11:38.960 --> 00:11:43.360
and gets captured by the Sun. And yeah, we now

181
00:11:43.440 --> 00:11:45.840
call it planet Mercury. What do you think?

182
00:11:46.519 --> 00:11:48.120
All right, so guys step up to work.

183
00:11:49.080 --> 00:11:51.600
Yeah, thinks that I think there's a bit of science

184
00:11:51.639 --> 00:11:56.879
fiction in that one, only because I suspect that we

185
00:11:57.200 --> 00:12:00.320
know this something in the far reaches of the Solar

186
00:12:00.360 --> 00:12:05.000
System that's still impacting on the objects out there, and

187
00:12:05.039 --> 00:12:07.879
we haven't yet discovered what it is. But the mathematics

188
00:12:07.879 --> 00:12:12.440
says there is something. Therefore, if it's a planet, it's

189
00:12:12.440 --> 00:12:14.759
not Mercury. Would that be a fair assessment.

190
00:12:15.840 --> 00:12:19.399
Yeah, I think you've answered it quite well. I'm very nicely,

191
00:12:20.279 --> 00:12:22.120
and Jordie agrees with you. You might have heard him

192
00:12:22.159 --> 00:12:27.519
just yelling in the groove there. So yes, it's the

193
00:12:27.519 --> 00:12:32.320
the fact that that we've got this alignment of asteroid

194
00:12:32.759 --> 00:12:38.759
far distant asteroid Transnaptunian object orbits that makes people suspect

195
00:12:38.799 --> 00:12:41.080
that there is a planetary body in the.

196
00:12:40.960 --> 00:12:42.159
Depths of the Solar System.

197
00:12:42.960 --> 00:12:47.240
I think if you you know, if if the scenario

198
00:12:48.519 --> 00:12:55.200
and it's a complex but nicely elaborated scenario from Ash

199
00:12:55.320 --> 00:12:59.840
in Brisbane, if that had happened, I think these orbits

200
00:12:59.840 --> 00:13:03.960
were have now regularized so that the phenomenon would have disappeared.

201
00:13:03.960 --> 00:13:06.320
You know, if you take play Kine away and I

202
00:13:07.600 --> 00:13:09.960
think there will be other disruption in the Solar System.

203
00:13:10.000 --> 00:13:12.639
But I do like the way though the Ash ties

204
00:13:12.679 --> 00:13:16.720
in the you know, this peculiar orientation of Uranus which

205
00:13:16.759 --> 00:13:20.840
is on its side with the planet Mercury, which is mysterious.

206
00:13:20.919 --> 00:13:23.720
We think Mercury was once a bigger object because it's

207
00:13:23.759 --> 00:13:27.480
got a metal core that is too big for it.

208
00:13:27.639 --> 00:13:29.480
So we do think there might have been an impact

209
00:13:29.480 --> 00:13:34.799
there as well. So very nice thinking. Let's wait to

210
00:13:34.799 --> 00:13:38.000
see whether it becomes mainstream thinking, but I suspect its

211
00:13:38.080 --> 00:13:42.679
chances are pretty small, and for that you elucidated.

212
00:13:43.399 --> 00:13:45.120
We can have a bit of a smirk about it.

213
00:13:45.159 --> 00:13:47.519
But he's been very clever in putting a few things

214
00:13:47.519 --> 00:13:51.320
together that we know and coming up coming up with

215
00:13:51.360 --> 00:13:53.840
a theory, and theory is where you start when you're

216
00:13:53.840 --> 00:13:56.960
trying to solve these astronomical puzzles. So yeah, why not

217
00:13:57.039 --> 00:13:58.879
throw it out there. Someone might pick up on it

218
00:13:58.919 --> 00:14:00.399
and go, hang on minute.

219
00:14:02.159 --> 00:14:05.120
Yeah. What you've got to do, though, is you've absolutely

220
00:14:05.159 --> 00:14:08.159
got to do the mathematical rigor on it all and

221
00:14:08.200 --> 00:14:10.399
make sure that all the equations add up and that

222
00:14:10.480 --> 00:14:15.360
it ties together and it's physically possible. And that's Yes,

223
00:14:15.399 --> 00:14:19.440
that's where you need people with that sort of background,

224
00:14:20.240 --> 00:14:21.440
which I don't actually have.

225
00:14:23.000 --> 00:14:24.240
Not neither is Ash.

226
00:14:25.440 --> 00:14:26.559
Well, you know, you never know.

227
00:14:26.639 --> 00:14:27.240
Ash might be.

228
00:14:27.639 --> 00:14:31.320
Oh, it might be a closet planet to your dynamicis

229
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:32.399
that we don't know about.

230
00:14:32.440 --> 00:14:35.120
Who goes, Yeah, it may be. And I think we're

231
00:14:35.159 --> 00:14:38.159
overdue for a new song, Ash, come on, we're dropping

232
00:14:38.200 --> 00:14:42.200
the ball mate, No, a big good one. I like

233
00:14:42.279 --> 00:14:45.519
he's thinking, thanks Ash. This is Space Nuts Andrew Dunkley

234
00:14:45.600 --> 00:14:48.080
here with Professor Fred Watson.

235
00:14:54.159 --> 00:14:55.399
Space Nuts.

236
00:14:55.919 --> 00:15:00.000
Now. Our next question, Fred comes from another queen's.

237
00:15:00.399 --> 00:15:01.039
This is Nigel.

238
00:15:01.159 --> 00:15:04.279
Oh, friend and Andrew. This is Nigel from Brisbane, Australia.

239
00:15:04.960 --> 00:15:11.000
I have a hypothetical question about Neptune's moon Triton. I

240
00:15:11.039 --> 00:15:15.279
believe Triton is said to be captured by Neptune. I

241
00:15:15.279 --> 00:15:18.799
hope I got that right. But what if it wasn't

242
00:15:18.840 --> 00:15:22.200
captured and it was still orbiting the Sun out on

243
00:15:22.279 --> 00:15:26.080
its own in the Solar System? My question is would

244
00:15:26.080 --> 00:15:29.399
it be big enough to be a minor planet? And

245
00:15:30.120 --> 00:15:33.600
how do you describe a minor planet? Love the show,

246
00:15:33.799 --> 00:15:35.960
keep up the good work, Thank you, bye.

247
00:15:36.559 --> 00:15:43.960
Thanks Nigel. I think you'd call it planet ten. How

248
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:45.000
big is Triton?

249
00:15:45.639 --> 00:15:45.799
Right?

250
00:15:46.600 --> 00:15:50.639
It's two seven hundred and ten kilometers across.

251
00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:54.120
So it's too small to be official who designated a planet?

252
00:15:54.159 --> 00:15:59.120
If it wasn't orbiting Neptune, No.

253
00:15:59.120 --> 00:16:01.840
That wouldn't be what would stop it being a planet?

254
00:16:03.559 --> 00:16:06.240
It's so it's that it's bigger than Pluto. In fact,

255
00:16:06.320 --> 00:16:08.840
if I remember our Pluto is a little bit smaller

256
00:16:08.840 --> 00:16:09.240
than that.

257
00:16:10.360 --> 00:16:11.600
Got the number somewhere in my.

258
00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:15.080
Head sixteen hundred and eighty miles or twenty seven hundred

259
00:16:15.080 --> 00:16:20.120
and ten kilometers, So it it would be, without doubt

260
00:16:20.159 --> 00:16:25.840
a dwarf planet because it'spherical in you know, it's it's

261
00:16:26.480 --> 00:16:28.919
it's big enough for itsself gravity to have made its

262
00:16:28.960 --> 00:16:33.240
fairy coal. And that's partly the definition of a planet.

263
00:16:33.799 --> 00:16:36.679
But then to become a planet, it's got to have

264
00:16:36.759 --> 00:16:42.120
cleared its area of the Solar System become heredominant projects,

265
00:16:42.440 --> 00:16:47.519
which it hadn't done. So, but the thinking is is right,

266
00:16:48.360 --> 00:16:50.759
it's it would definitely have.

267
00:16:50.759 --> 00:16:51.799
Been a dwarf planet.

268
00:16:51.879 --> 00:16:59.840
And the you know, Nigel's correct in the in s

269
00:17:00.200 --> 00:17:03.679
that the thinking is that it has been captured, that

270
00:17:03.759 --> 00:17:06.880
it probably is a trans Neptunian object to dwarf planet

271
00:17:07.119 --> 00:17:10.440
that has been captured by Neptune itself. And the reason

272
00:17:10.480 --> 00:17:12.799
why we think that is that it orbits Neptune the

273
00:17:12.799 --> 00:17:16.960
wrong way around. It's in what's called retrograde orbit, which

274
00:17:17.680 --> 00:17:23.599
means it's going around in the opposite direction to Neptune's rotation.

275
00:17:24.279 --> 00:17:26.440
And it's actually the only big moon in the Solar

276
00:17:26.440 --> 00:17:28.319
System to do that. There are a few of the

277
00:17:28.359 --> 00:17:31.480
smaller moons of I think Jupiter and Saturn that are

278
00:17:31.480 --> 00:17:34.079
probably captured asteroids that do that, but this is the

279
00:17:34.079 --> 00:17:37.200
only big moon, and it is the seventh biggest moon

280
00:17:37.240 --> 00:17:41.400
in the Solar System, so it's quite substantial in size.

281
00:17:41.920 --> 00:17:46.680
So it would have been a dwarf planet. Now, the

282
00:17:47.559 --> 00:17:51.039
term that Nigel uses minor planets, that's really an old

283
00:17:51.119 --> 00:17:54.519
fashioned word or an old fashion term for what we

284
00:17:54.599 --> 00:18:00.279
now call asteroids. Minor planets were the sort of the

285
00:18:00.359 --> 00:18:03.960
posh term for astroids. Asteroid was always and I'm going

286
00:18:04.000 --> 00:18:06.960
back sixty years now or so, asteroid was thought to

287
00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:10.519
be a rather you know, sort of common a rather

288
00:18:10.599 --> 00:18:14.599
commonplace term that wasn't proper, And so if you were

289
00:18:15.079 --> 00:18:18.039
a scientist and you were working on asteroids, you would

290
00:18:18.079 --> 00:18:21.039
have called them minor planets. And in fact, the title

291
00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:25.200
of my master's thesis is Practical Techniques for the Determination

292
00:18:25.319 --> 00:18:28.319
of Minor planet orbits, because we didn't call them asteroids.

293
00:18:29.359 --> 00:18:32.960
And that was a set of a suite of software

294
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:36.599
to using these new phonal things called computers to work

295
00:18:36.640 --> 00:18:39.519
out the orbits of asteroids. So minor planet is a

296
00:18:39.640 --> 00:18:45.200
term that we don't now use. I suspect what Nigel

297
00:18:45.279 --> 00:18:48.079
thinking of is dwarf planets. So it would have definitely

298
00:18:48.119 --> 00:18:50.160
would have been categorized as a dwarf planet.

299
00:18:51.640 --> 00:18:56.680
Ah okay, so yes, well that doesn't surprise me at all. Really,

300
00:18:57.400 --> 00:19:00.519
it's not one we've talked about very often. What kind

301
00:19:00.559 --> 00:19:04.680
of moon is triedent and it must keep quiet because

302
00:19:04.720 --> 00:19:07.920
it's it's really embarrassed that it was a dwarf planet.

303
00:19:07.960 --> 00:19:09.640
But now it's been demoted to Moon.

304
00:19:11.079 --> 00:19:11.640
I mean, if you.

305
00:19:11.680 --> 00:19:13.480
Can't get worse, it can't get much worse.

306
00:19:15.160 --> 00:19:18.920
It's it's a once again, it's a nice world. We

307
00:19:19.039 --> 00:19:25.519
think like a cross device atop a probable subsurface ocean

308
00:19:26.079 --> 00:19:28.960
and then you know a rocky core in the middle.

309
00:19:30.559 --> 00:19:35.559
It is geologically active, and the reason why that's thought

310
00:19:35.680 --> 00:19:40.680
with the case is that its surface is pretty smooth,

311
00:19:41.680 --> 00:19:47.400
without much in the way of craters. The estimated average

312
00:19:47.480 --> 00:19:50.559
surface age is less than one hundred million years and

313
00:19:50.599 --> 00:19:54.559
that now that sounds like a long time, but you know,

314
00:19:55.680 --> 00:19:58.319
for example, our Moon bears the scars of the late

315
00:19:58.359 --> 00:20:02.039
Heavy bombardment three point eight billion years ago, so that's

316
00:20:02.079 --> 00:20:05.960
an old surface. So Triton has a young surface, and

317
00:20:06.039 --> 00:20:13.519
that there's probably evidence of maybe some evidence of there

318
00:20:13.559 --> 00:20:17.000
being geysers, you know, nice geysers of the kind that

319
00:20:17.000 --> 00:20:20.759
we see on Enceladus and Europa. And so it is

320
00:20:20.799 --> 00:20:26.440
a very very interesting world, especially being a captured possibly

321
00:20:26.440 --> 00:20:28.839
captured dwarf planet, so it may have been formed much

322
00:20:28.880 --> 00:20:32.400
further out in the Solar System. It's yeah, there's a

323
00:20:32.440 --> 00:20:35.039
number of things about Triton that make it very interesting,

324
00:20:35.039 --> 00:20:39.279
including its orbit. It's a very very circular orbit and

325
00:20:41.519 --> 00:20:44.240
you know, it's thought that that might have happened over

326
00:20:44.319 --> 00:20:50.160
the millennia, and because of usually if you've got a

327
00:20:50.160 --> 00:20:54.160
circular orbit, there's not much of a squashing and squeezing

328
00:20:54.200 --> 00:20:56.880
effect like we see on he O, Jupiter's moon Eo,

329
00:20:56.960 --> 00:20:59.599
which is in an orbit that carries it near and

330
00:20:59.680 --> 00:21:02.799
further from Jupiter, and squashing and squeezing is what makes

331
00:21:02.839 --> 00:21:06.599
it very volcanically active. Triton's is circular, but there is

332
00:21:06.680 --> 00:21:10.599
thinking that it still might have a warm interior from

333
00:21:10.960 --> 00:21:15.240
tidal heating. That squashing and squeezing that happens at a

334
00:21:15.359 --> 00:21:16.200
much lower level.

335
00:21:17.839 --> 00:21:20.880
I just thought while you were talking, it prompted a

336
00:21:20.960 --> 00:21:24.279
question in my brain about where the word asteroid came

337
00:21:24.319 --> 00:21:27.720
from if they were previously known as minor planets, And

338
00:21:27.960 --> 00:21:32.000
it actually came from the fact that William Herschel saw

339
00:21:32.079 --> 00:21:36.039
them and couldn't understand that. He was completely baffled, according

340
00:21:36.039 --> 00:21:39.839
to this article I've read, so he turned to another

341
00:21:39.920 --> 00:21:45.519
fellow who happened to be a poet to come up

342
00:21:45.559 --> 00:21:48.640
with a name for them. And I'll just quote this.

343
00:21:48.680 --> 00:21:52.039
So the Sunday before the Royal Society meeting, Herschel appealed

344
00:21:52.119 --> 00:21:56.799
to Charles Bernie, a poet with whom he was collaborating

345
00:21:56.880 --> 00:22:00.960
on an educational poem about the cosmos. Bernie considered the

346
00:22:01.039 --> 00:22:04.000
question and that night, by candlelight, penned a letter to

347
00:22:04.079 --> 00:22:08.880
his son, Greek expert Charles Bernie Jr. The Elder Bernie

348
00:22:08.920 --> 00:22:14.559
suggested that word asta ricos or stellular to describe the

349
00:22:14.640 --> 00:22:17.960
new celestial objects, and they came up with the term

350
00:22:18.119 --> 00:22:21.119
asteroid as a consequence. It didn't take off until the

351
00:22:21.160 --> 00:22:25.920
eighteen fifties. They didn't. Yeah, obviously the astronomy and the people,

352
00:22:26.559 --> 00:22:28.799
the big names in astronomy at the time went not

353
00:22:29.440 --> 00:22:31.319
using that, but eventually it caught on.

354
00:22:32.200 --> 00:22:34.359
Well, there was still doing They were still saying that

355
00:22:34.599 --> 00:22:36.039
when I was a young astronomer.

356
00:22:36.079 --> 00:22:37.559
Oh were they asteroids?

357
00:22:37.640 --> 00:22:37.880
Yeah?

358
00:22:37.920 --> 00:22:42.000
Absolutely, it's a minor plant. That was the proper term

359
00:22:42.079 --> 00:22:46.039
for anything else was vaguely commonplace, you know, not ze

360
00:22:46.200 --> 00:22:48.920
sing that we talked about, But yes, I do remember

361
00:22:48.920 --> 00:22:51.880
reading that. Actually it could have you know, it could

362
00:22:51.920 --> 00:22:54.720
have had a very old name asteroids, a lot nicer

363
00:22:54.759 --> 00:22:57.480
than some of the things that were being were being.

364
00:22:57.519 --> 00:23:01.359
Yeah, well what was the now they want stellulus stellular?

365
00:23:01.599 --> 00:23:05.160
Yeah, wus interesting.

366
00:23:06.319 --> 00:23:08.799
Thank you, Nigel. Good to have a chat about Triton.

367
00:23:08.880 --> 00:23:11.119
We haven't done that very much. I'm not sure we

368
00:23:11.200 --> 00:23:14.160
ever raised it before, to be honest, but yeah, it's

369
00:23:14.200 --> 00:23:17.559
out there. It's doing its thing. It's feeling fairly forlorn

370
00:23:17.640 --> 00:23:23.200
being demoted from dwarf planet to moon. It got itself caught.

371
00:23:23.319 --> 00:23:27.039
That's why it happened. One more question before we wrap up.

372
00:23:27.440 --> 00:23:29.279
This is a bit of a long one that comes

373
00:23:29.319 --> 00:23:32.799
from Robert McCown. Whereabouts unknown. I said that because he

374
00:23:32.799 --> 00:23:36.039
didn't tell us where he's strong. But that's okay, thanks Robert.

375
00:23:37.160 --> 00:23:40.720
When a radar station measures the motion of an airplane

376
00:23:40.920 --> 00:23:43.920
or weather that uses Doppler radar to tell if the

377
00:23:43.960 --> 00:23:46.440
target is moving toward or away from the radar by

378
00:23:46.519 --> 00:23:50.160
frequency shift. In other words, it measures the frequency change

379
00:23:50.160 --> 00:23:54.359
of waves or photons of the emitted signal. When we

380
00:23:54.559 --> 00:23:59.880
measure the signals from cosmologically distant objects like quasars and galaxies,

381
00:24:00.200 --> 00:24:05.880
we observe that they receive them at relativistic velocities. In

382
00:24:05.920 --> 00:24:10.960
this context, how is the difference of the Doppler effect

383
00:24:10.960 --> 00:24:14.759
observed on Earth and in the local universe different from

384
00:24:14.799 --> 00:24:18.160
the loss of energy of photons from the distant universe

385
00:24:18.559 --> 00:24:21.519
due to the expansion of space time based on dark

386
00:24:21.559 --> 00:24:22.880
and it expanded.

387
00:24:22.960 --> 00:24:23.400
Wow.

388
00:24:24.559 --> 00:24:27.599
Is this an example of the change in the symmetry

389
00:24:27.640 --> 00:24:33.200
of translation explained by Emma Noa And that's come from

390
00:24:33.240 --> 00:24:36.079
Robert McCowen notha.

391
00:24:36.279 --> 00:24:37.079
I think that's right.

392
00:24:39.599 --> 00:24:45.200
Noah, Yeah, Actually I think so.

393
00:24:46.000 --> 00:24:52.519
Roberts kind of answered it himself, because we do differentiate

394
00:24:52.759 --> 00:25:00.119
between the Doppler effect caused by motion relative motion, and

395
00:25:00.480 --> 00:25:04.240
the cosmological red shift caused by the expansion of the

396
00:25:04.319 --> 00:25:10.160
universe exactly as he says. So they are different, they're

397
00:25:10.200 --> 00:25:17.759
different things the sort of how can I put this?

398
00:25:17.880 --> 00:25:23.160
The physical way in which they manifest themselves is the same.

399
00:25:23.680 --> 00:25:26.640
It's a shift of the wavelength of light towards the

400
00:25:26.680 --> 00:25:30.519
red end of the spectrum, but one's caused by a

401
00:25:30.640 --> 00:25:34.920
relative motion between objects, and the other is caused simply

402
00:25:34.920 --> 00:25:40.640
by the stretching of light caused by the expansion of

403
00:25:40.680 --> 00:25:44.720
the universe. And in fact, we can sometimes work on

404
00:25:44.759 --> 00:25:47.160
these two things together. In fact, I've been involved with

405
00:25:47.200 --> 00:25:51.640
this because in the early two thousands, the UK Schmidt

406
00:25:51.640 --> 00:25:55.759
Telescope did a survey of about one hundred and thirty

407
00:25:55.759 --> 00:26:01.240
six thousand galaxies where we were looking at their red

408
00:26:01.359 --> 00:26:07.680
shift in other words, they expand, they shift towards the

409
00:26:07.720 --> 00:26:10.119
red of their light caused by the expansion of the universe.

410
00:26:10.119 --> 00:26:13.559
The fact that the light was being stretched, we could differentiate,

411
00:26:13.640 --> 00:26:17.559
We could measure that, but also we could work out

412
00:26:17.759 --> 00:26:21.119
what are called their peculiar velocities, and that is the

413
00:26:21.720 --> 00:26:26.400
independent motion of a galaxy when it's superimposed.

414
00:26:27.000 --> 00:26:28.680
If I put it this way on what we call

415
00:26:28.680 --> 00:26:29.359
the hubble flow.

416
00:26:29.400 --> 00:26:32.200
The hubble flow is the motion of galaxies as they're

417
00:26:32.240 --> 00:26:35.000
carried along by the expansion of the universe, but they've

418
00:26:35.039 --> 00:26:38.640
sometimes got their own individual motions on top of that.

419
00:26:38.720 --> 00:26:41.440
The usual analogue that we give is it's a bit

420
00:26:41.599 --> 00:26:45.119
like imagine somebody. Imagine somebody in a boat on a

421
00:26:45.359 --> 00:26:48.400
flowing river, and that flow of the river is what's

422
00:26:48.400 --> 00:26:50.720
carrying them along, but they can move the boat around

423
00:26:51.160 --> 00:26:53.880
within that flow, so they've got their own peculiar motion.

424
00:26:54.160 --> 00:26:57.559
We do the same with galaxies, and the way you

425
00:26:57.640 --> 00:27:00.000
do that is actually quite clever. You can measure proper

426
00:27:00.400 --> 00:27:06.640
of galaxies that give you basically an estimate of their

427
00:27:07.519 --> 00:27:10.799
intrinsic luminosity, how bright they are, and then you can

428
00:27:10.920 --> 00:27:15.039
use that as a distance measure and combine compare that

429
00:27:15.279 --> 00:27:17.880
with the measure you get from the hubble flow and

430
00:27:17.920 --> 00:27:21.000
if they're different, that's due to the peculiar motion of

431
00:27:21.119 --> 00:27:21.720
the galaxy.

432
00:27:21.960 --> 00:27:24.279
I've not explained that very well, but that's how it works.

433
00:27:24.680 --> 00:27:28.839
So yes, So the answer to the question is is

434
00:27:28.920 --> 00:27:31.160
basically yes, and thank you very much.

435
00:27:31.240 --> 00:27:35.079
Correct, excellent, Well Dan, Robert, and thanks for sending in

436
00:27:35.119 --> 00:27:37.839
your question, and don't forget if you have a question

437
00:27:37.920 --> 00:27:40.680
for us, you can do that or send it to

438
00:27:40.759 --> 00:27:43.480
us via our website, space nets podcast dot com or

439
00:27:43.559 --> 00:27:47.359
spacenats dot io and click on the AMA link at

440
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:49.839
the top. Now, we did have a question from somebody

441
00:27:49.880 --> 00:27:53.079
asking if there would be a better way of labeling

442
00:27:53.119 --> 00:27:57.000
the AMA link, and yes, that's a good question, and

443
00:27:57.279 --> 00:28:00.599
I've referred that one to Hugh who is looking into it.

444
00:28:01.000 --> 00:28:01.960
But yeah, it is a.

445
00:28:01.880 --> 00:28:04.880
Bit of an obscure target when it comes to finding

446
00:28:05.200 --> 00:28:07.839
a way of sending us questions, but we're getting plenty

447
00:28:07.839 --> 00:28:10.000
of them, so I think most people are aware of it.

448
00:28:10.240 --> 00:28:11.960
But yeah, if we can relabel it, we will.

449
00:28:12.400 --> 00:28:18.599
I'm not sure what the process entails, but yeah, it's

450
00:28:18.599 --> 00:28:21.799
a work in progress. Thanks Robert, thanks to everybody who's

451
00:28:21.799 --> 00:28:24.960
sent in questions, and thanks to you Fred for answering them.

452
00:28:25.000 --> 00:28:26.240
We really appreciate it.

453
00:28:28.480 --> 00:28:29.240
That's a pleasure.

454
00:28:30.000 --> 00:28:34.920
I always enjoy having my bread stretched by space, not

455
00:28:35.039 --> 00:28:36.160
as listener questions.

456
00:28:36.160 --> 00:28:39.759
It's good stuff, yes, which can be measured using the

457
00:28:39.799 --> 00:28:42.079
Doppler effect. Yes, indeed.

458
00:28:43.440 --> 00:28:45.000
Thanks Fred, We'll see you, sir.

459
00:28:48.240 --> 00:28:50.759
And thanks to here in the studio who we won't

460
00:28:50.759 --> 00:28:53.279
see soon but he's out there somewhere. And from me

461
00:28:53.359 --> 00:28:56.200
Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your company. Looking forward to joining

462
00:28:56.200 --> 00:28:59.480
you again soon might be on the next episode of

463
00:28:59.480 --> 00:29:01.640
Space Bye Bye.

464
00:29:02.400 --> 00:29:07.480
You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast, available at

465
00:29:07.480 --> 00:29:12.759
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player.

466
00:29:12.960 --> 00:29:16.079
You can also stream on demand at bites dot com.

467
00:29:16.279 --> 00:29:21.960
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail