Nov. 18, 2024

#470: Cosmic Questions: Dark Matter, Titan's Secrets & Universe's Energy

#470: Cosmic Questions: Dark Matter, Titan's Secrets & Universe's Energy

Space Nuts Q&A Edition #470 - Universe Enigmas and Titan's Mysteries
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this captivating Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they explore the cosmic questions posed by our curious audience. From the...

Space Nuts Q&A Edition #470 - Universe Enigmas and Titan's Mysteries
Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this captivating Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they explore the cosmic questions posed by our curious audience. From the mysteries of a universe without black holes to the peculiar atmosphere of Saturn's moon Titan, this episode is brimming with fascinating insights and astronomical discussions.
Episode Highlights:
- Universe Without Dark Matter and Energy: Delve into the possibilities of a universe devoid of dark matter, dark energy, and black holes. Explore the implications for galaxy formation and the cosmic web, and ponder the nature of dark energy's role in the universe's expansion.
- Energy Loss and the Universe's Age: Investigate the concept of energy loss in the universe and the methods used to calculate its age. Discover why uranium's half-life isn't the key to unlocking the universe's timeline and how the Hubble constant plays a role.
- Early Universe Surprises: Question the surprises of finding ancient cosmic structures in the early universe. Examine how galaxy formation models are continually refined and the potential revelations from the Square Kilometre Array.
- Titan's Unique Atmosphere: Unravel the mystery of Titan's dense atmosphere and compare it to Mars' inability to retain one. Consider the possible factors contributing to Titan's atmospheric retention and the role of cryovolcanism.
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts/support.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
00:00 - This is a Q and A edition of Space Nuts
01:53 - Dark matter and dark energy are at the forefront of modern day cosmology
09:10 - How much of the universe's energy is kind of like gone
12:30 - Uranium was created in supernova explosions after the universe was formed
13:33 - Using half life of uranium or lithium to calculate age of the universe is sinful
15:33 - Ben Harding asks: Should we be surprised that galaxies formed so quickly
21:39 - How did Saturn's moon Titan accumulate its thick nitrogen atmosphere
26:45 - Andrew Dunkley: Thanks to everyone who's sending questions for Space Nuts

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:02.120
Hi there, Thanks for joining us on a Q and

2
00:00:02.160 --> 00:00:05.080
A edition of Space Nuts. Andrew Duntley here, your Host's

3
00:00:05.080 --> 00:00:07.919
great to have your company. In this episode, we are

4
00:00:07.919 --> 00:00:11.320
going to talk about the universe without black holes, dark

5
00:00:11.400 --> 00:00:14.439
matter or dark energy. What would it be like? Yeah,

6
00:00:15.240 --> 00:00:19.239
probably completely different, mightn't exist at all, don't know. We've

7
00:00:19.280 --> 00:00:22.480
also got a question about loss of energy and the

8
00:00:22.519 --> 00:00:26.920
age of the universe. Another universe question, the early universe

9
00:00:27.800 --> 00:00:29.719
and all the matter and the stars and things, and

10
00:00:30.359 --> 00:00:32.880
why we get so surprised when we discover something that's

11
00:00:32.920 --> 00:00:35.320
old because it's all been there from the very beginning.

12
00:00:35.799 --> 00:00:39.200
It's a good question. And Titan's atmosphere has come up

13
00:00:40.079 --> 00:00:42.560
from one of our audience members. So we'll answer all

14
00:00:42.560 --> 00:00:46.439
of those questions today on Space Nuts.

15
00:00:46.439 --> 00:00:49.679
Fifteen said in channel ten.

16
00:00:50.359 --> 00:00:55.880
Nine ignition Space Nuts NI or three.

17
00:00:56.039 --> 00:01:01.159
Two more red one Space Nets and I report it

18
00:01:01.240 --> 00:01:02.079
Neils good.

19
00:01:02.520 --> 00:01:05.920
And he's back again for more. Can't believe it. It's

20
00:01:05.959 --> 00:01:07.680
Professor Fred Wat's an astronomer.

21
00:01:07.799 --> 00:01:10.519
La. I can't believe it either.

22
00:01:11.480 --> 00:01:15.439
How you doing, Andrew, Well, well, yeah, thank you, you're

23
00:01:15.480 --> 00:01:18.079
looking well to you. In fact, I would go as

24
00:01:18.079 --> 00:01:21.319
far as saying that since you left the public service

25
00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:24.760
you seem a lot, you seem a lot less tense.

26
00:01:25.319 --> 00:01:25.640
A lot.

27
00:01:25.719 --> 00:01:30.159
How it's really interesting because I don't have to scan

28
00:01:31.799 --> 00:01:36.400
my you know, my government laptop every morning to see

29
00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:38.840
what meetings I've got during the day, and that makes

30
00:01:38.879 --> 00:01:41.719
the day a lot more relaxed. I do still on

31
00:01:41.760 --> 00:01:44.359
the meetings, but they're under a lot better control.

32
00:01:45.159 --> 00:01:51.439
Yeah, well that's good, that's good. Shall we tackle some questions? Well,

33
00:01:51.519 --> 00:01:55.120
let's attempt it. All right, Let's go to our first

34
00:01:55.120 --> 00:01:58.799
one that comes from Reynold or he may pronounce it Renault.

35
00:02:00.079 --> 00:02:03.840
How would our universe behave without black holes, dark matter,

36
00:02:03.920 --> 00:02:07.760
and dark energy? At what phase did dark matter and

37
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:12.439
dark energy appear? That's a double banger. What do you

38
00:02:12.479 --> 00:02:12.879
think for it?

39
00:02:14.039 --> 00:02:16.960
Yeah, I think it's a profound question, and you know

40
00:02:17.000 --> 00:02:23.120
it's at the forefront of modern day cosmology. So we

41
00:02:23.240 --> 00:02:28.319
think that it was the dark matter that really caused

42
00:02:28.360 --> 00:02:36.719
the ability of the universe to form galaxies, well, stars

43
00:02:36.719 --> 00:02:40.919
and galaxies, because what we think happened was that the

44
00:02:41.000 --> 00:02:46.520
dark matter came first and sort of coalesced into what

45
00:02:46.560 --> 00:02:49.280
we call the cosmic web, this kind of honeycomb structure

46
00:02:49.919 --> 00:02:56.280
of sheets of dark matter, which attracted the hydrogen that

47
00:02:56.520 --> 00:03:01.199
that stage pervaded the universe to form a similar structure

48
00:03:01.199 --> 00:03:06.759
because the hydrogen collapse gravitationally to sort of mimic the

49
00:03:06.840 --> 00:03:11.680
underlying dark matter structure. And then, excuse me, during that collapse,

50
00:03:11.840 --> 00:03:16.800
many stars were formed. Star formation took place, Galaxies formed

51
00:03:16.840 --> 00:03:19.960
because the stars that you know, they all formed in

52
00:03:20.000 --> 00:03:23.560
these large blobs of matter. And we see that today.

53
00:03:23.599 --> 00:03:25.919
We still see when you look at a structure of

54
00:03:26.039 --> 00:03:28.719
where galaxies lie in today's universe, you find that they

55
00:03:28.719 --> 00:03:33.360
make up this honeycomb, which basically mimics what we see

56
00:03:33.759 --> 00:03:36.639
in the cosmic microwave background radiation, which we think is

57
00:03:36.680 --> 00:03:40.759
the precursor of those galaxies. That's the sound ways going

58
00:03:40.759 --> 00:03:44.960
through the early universe. So we think that without dark matter,

59
00:03:45.360 --> 00:03:48.520
the universe will be very different and wouldn't have this

60
00:03:48.759 --> 00:03:52.080
underlying web, and maybe galaxies and stars wouldn't have formed.

61
00:03:52.639 --> 00:03:57.439
That's really interesting. So now dark energy go ahead.

62
00:03:58.439 --> 00:04:02.319
No, I was going to say, so if dark energy

63
00:04:02.520 --> 00:04:07.039
was the driving force and it didn't exist, would our

64
00:04:07.159 --> 00:04:08.520
universe have formed at all?

65
00:04:08.599 --> 00:04:09.919
Anyway?

66
00:04:10.240 --> 00:04:10.479
Well?

67
00:04:10.560 --> 00:04:13.599
Yeah, dark energy is that different things? It's the.

68
00:04:16.000 --> 00:04:16.240
Yeah.

69
00:04:16.480 --> 00:04:20.720
So with that, yes, dark matter would think would is

70
00:04:20.759 --> 00:04:23.839
what allowed galaxies to form out the universe itself might

71
00:04:23.839 --> 00:04:27.480
have formed. We don't really understand the Big Bang well

72
00:04:27.600 --> 00:04:32.079
enough to know just where it all came from, but

73
00:04:34.639 --> 00:04:37.000
we might have had a universe devoid of dark matter,

74
00:04:38.000 --> 00:04:40.560
just full of cold hydrogen and not really doing anything.

75
00:04:41.240 --> 00:04:45.439
So that's pretty boring for the universe. And dark energy,

76
00:04:45.519 --> 00:04:49.959
it really is a property of the expansion of the universe,

77
00:04:50.040 --> 00:04:54.279
so it's set telling us that space itself has energy.

78
00:04:54.319 --> 00:04:59.160
So I think the second part of our renal question

79
00:04:59.519 --> 00:05:03.279
is at what phase did dark matter and dark energy appear?

80
00:05:03.680 --> 00:05:07.639
So we think dark matter appeared right at the beginning. Now,

81
00:05:07.720 --> 00:05:10.079
dark energy was probably always there. This is a hot

82
00:05:10.120 --> 00:05:14.680
topic in cosmology, but we think it's only manifested itself

83
00:05:16.439 --> 00:05:18.800
in the last five or six hundred sorry, the last

84
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:21.839
five or six billion years, in other words, about half

85
00:05:21.879 --> 00:05:26.360
the age of the universe. And we think that's probably

86
00:05:26.560 --> 00:05:29.040
because dark matter. Dark energy might have been there all

87
00:05:29.079 --> 00:05:34.879
the time, but it didn't have enough energy to cause

88
00:05:34.879 --> 00:05:38.519
the universe's expansion to accelerate, which is how we see

89
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:42.480
dark energy. It didn't have enough energy early on because

90
00:05:42.519 --> 00:05:46.160
the galaxies and stars, the galaxies themselves were too close

91
00:05:46.199 --> 00:05:50.680
together and their neutral gravitational pull was enough to sort

92
00:05:50.680 --> 00:05:54.199
of slow down the dark energy and hide its effect.

93
00:05:54.399 --> 00:05:57.519
So we think dark energy might always have been there.

94
00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:01.959
The big question is as if evolved, because for about

95
00:06:02.000 --> 00:06:04.879
the last twenty years, the thinking has been that it's

96
00:06:04.920 --> 00:06:08.920
a constant that it's a property of you know, the

97
00:06:08.959 --> 00:06:12.399
same amount of dark energy per unit volume of space

98
00:06:12.480 --> 00:06:17.160
per cubic centimeter if your like of space. That so

99
00:06:17.199 --> 00:06:19.120
it's said that, in other words, the dark energy is

100
00:06:19.160 --> 00:06:22.160
proportional to the volume of space. So as the space

101
00:06:22.199 --> 00:06:25.199
expands with the expansion of the universe, that you get

102
00:06:25.240 --> 00:06:27.959
more dark energy. But the thinking now is that maybe

103
00:06:28.000 --> 00:06:31.120
that's not quite true. There might be a slight evolution

104
00:06:31.240 --> 00:06:34.560
effect over time, which is still being explored.

105
00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:39.079
So another piece of his question was, you know, a

106
00:06:39.199 --> 00:06:43.639
universe devoid of black holes, what would that be like?

107
00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:51.040
Yeah, we think black holes are a natural consequence of

108
00:06:51.879 --> 00:06:56.800
the formation of stars and galaxies. Without a universe without

109
00:06:56.839 --> 00:07:02.560
black holes might not be that different because until forty

110
00:07:02.639 --> 00:07:04.639
or fifty years ago, we thought the universe didn't have

111
00:07:04.759 --> 00:07:09.480
black holes. That's true, and it's only by a lot

112
00:07:09.519 --> 00:07:12.560
of fairly detailed and careful research that we've discovered that

113
00:07:12.560 --> 00:07:16.519
the black holes everywhere. Yeah, So yes, that's an interesting question.

114
00:07:17.240 --> 00:07:19.879
I don't know that the consequences there would there will

115
00:07:19.879 --> 00:07:22.040
be a lot less high energy events going on in

116
00:07:22.040 --> 00:07:25.480
the universe. We wouldn't see quasars for a start. Quaisars

117
00:07:25.480 --> 00:07:27.920
are powered by black holes, the delinquent galaxies with a

118
00:07:27.959 --> 00:07:29.000
black hole at their center.

119
00:07:30.600 --> 00:07:30.759
HM.

120
00:07:31.360 --> 00:07:31.720
Okay.

121
00:07:32.360 --> 00:07:35.000
But if you didn't have any of that, in any

122
00:07:35.040 --> 00:07:39.360
of the black or dark stuff, you might just have

123
00:07:39.399 --> 00:07:43.639
a universe that's full of hydrogen, looking pretty boring. I

124
00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:47.879
suppose it might be the odd reactionary event that would

125
00:07:47.879 --> 00:07:51.199
create something, but it wouldn't be wouldn't be much to

126
00:07:51.199 --> 00:07:51.560
look at.

127
00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:57.199
It to be Boarsville. Yes, well, it would be Boarsville

128
00:07:57.199 --> 00:08:01.319
because without the formation of stars and galaxies, in particular stars.

129
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:04.040
Without the formation of stars, you don't get the heavy elements.

130
00:08:04.040 --> 00:08:06.959
All you get is a universe with hydrogen, helium, a

131
00:08:07.000 --> 00:08:08.759
little bit of lithium, and a couple of other things,

132
00:08:08.800 --> 00:08:13.040
and that's it. So it would be a very boring place.

133
00:08:13.199 --> 00:08:17.160
And talking of that, that is one of the main

134
00:08:17.240 --> 00:08:21.480
targets of the square kilometer array, because cold hydrogen actually

135
00:08:21.720 --> 00:08:28.879
radiates in relatively low frequency radio waves, and the square

136
00:08:28.920 --> 00:08:31.160
kilometer array is going to be able to look so

137
00:08:31.360 --> 00:08:33.519
far into space in other words, so far back in

138
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:36.320
time that it can see the dark ages when the

139
00:08:36.360 --> 00:08:39.399
first stars have not yet come into being, and all

140
00:08:39.440 --> 00:08:41.639
there was was cold hydrogen. So the built and map

141
00:08:41.679 --> 00:08:45.679
that cold hydrogen and see whether it does actually fall

142
00:08:45.720 --> 00:08:47.720
on the cosmic web as we believe it did.

143
00:08:48.840 --> 00:08:54.679
Fascinating, fascinating. Reynald the Answery A question was it'd be

144
00:08:54.679 --> 00:08:57.600
a very different universe without any of that stuff. Probably

145
00:08:57.679 --> 00:09:02.240
pretty boring, and it was probably always there at the

146
00:09:02.279 --> 00:09:07.600
beginning dark matter and dark energy perhaps as well. So yeah,

147
00:09:07.759 --> 00:09:10.919
it's a great question, Thanks for sending it in. Our

148
00:09:10.960 --> 00:09:15.320
next question, Fred comes from one of our regular although

149
00:09:15.320 --> 00:09:18.519
we haven't heard from him in a while, Sendor Interes buddy.

150
00:09:20.480 --> 00:09:23.840
Most case, that's his buddy from order again. How much

151
00:09:23.879 --> 00:09:30.639
is they energy of the universe is kind of like

152
00:09:31.159 --> 00:09:32.559
gone Basically.

153
00:09:34.639 --> 00:09:37.039
He's never going to touch anything or is going to

154
00:09:37.080 --> 00:09:43.320
just continue forever like light or gravitational waves, plus maybe

155
00:09:43.320 --> 00:09:44.840
the potential of the energy.

156
00:09:44.559 --> 00:09:47.159
Of moving object. How much of the viewers's energy is

157
00:09:47.200 --> 00:09:49.919
tied up that way? Gay, I got one? Not one

158
00:09:49.960 --> 00:09:50.440
more question?

159
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:54.200
Is it possible to calculate the age of the universe

160
00:09:54.240 --> 00:09:58.000
from the half life of uranium or liquum. All right, guys,

161
00:09:58.120 --> 00:09:59.559
keep up the good work, love the vodcas.

162
00:10:01.080 --> 00:10:01.759
Thank you, buddy.

163
00:10:02.240 --> 00:10:08.080
That's two very very good questions, so we'll tackle them

164
00:10:08.120 --> 00:10:11.159
one at a time. He was asking about energy that's

165
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:12.159
been lost.

166
00:10:12.519 --> 00:10:13.240
In the universe.

167
00:10:13.320 --> 00:10:16.240
I assume he means over the time the universe has existed,

168
00:10:19.240 --> 00:10:22.960
there was a big bang, everything expanded very quickly, and

169
00:10:23.000 --> 00:10:27.159
then it slowed down out speeding up. There's a lot

170
00:10:27.240 --> 00:10:31.320
been happening over billions and billions of years. But is

171
00:10:31.360 --> 00:10:33.600
there energy loss in that process?

172
00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:47.919
A great question that I'm thinking aloud here, Andrew, So, so, yeah,

173
00:10:47.919 --> 00:10:52.200
the energy budget of the universe is really interesting because

174
00:10:52.240 --> 00:10:54.240
it sort of ties in with the mass of the

175
00:10:54.320 --> 00:10:57.720
universe as well. You know, mass, as we know, has

176
00:10:57.759 --> 00:11:05.559
an intrinsic energy. Buddy is talking about the kinetic energy

177
00:11:06.000 --> 00:11:13.759
of moving objects, and that's certainly an energy component, but

178
00:11:13.960 --> 00:11:17.960
I think it is vanishingly small compared with the equivalent

179
00:11:18.039 --> 00:11:21.039
of the mass of the universe when you convert it

180
00:11:21.039 --> 00:11:24.679
to energy with the equals mc squared. So most of

181
00:11:24.720 --> 00:11:28.759
the energy of the universe is tied up, sorry, most

182
00:11:28.799 --> 00:11:32.639
of the Yeah, so most of the energy of the universe.

183
00:11:34.480 --> 00:11:38.519
Getting myself into knot here. If you regard mass as

184
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:41.240
part of the mass energy budget of the universe, and

185
00:11:41.279 --> 00:11:44.360
you can draw a pie chart, the stuff we can

186
00:11:44.399 --> 00:11:48.320
see is about five percent of that energy budget. So

187
00:11:48.480 --> 00:11:51.759
that's all the mass equivalent the energy equivalent of all

188
00:11:51.759 --> 00:11:55.559
the mass in the universe, and it's very very small

189
00:11:56.120 --> 00:12:00.000
compared with dark matter, which is about five times bigger.

190
00:12:00.639 --> 00:12:03.919
And then the rest, which is seventy five or eighty

191
00:12:04.120 --> 00:12:08.440
about seventy five percent is dark energy. So dark energy

192
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:11.279
is by far the biggest energy content of the universe,

193
00:12:11.320 --> 00:12:12.799
and the rest almost doesn't matter.

194
00:12:14.639 --> 00:12:14.840
You know.

195
00:12:14.879 --> 00:12:19.200
It is an incredible situation that we have that the

196
00:12:19.240 --> 00:12:22.000
biggest energy component of the universe is something we actually

197
00:12:22.000 --> 00:12:27.720
don't understand, making the universe expand ever more rapidly. So yeah,

198
00:12:28.039 --> 00:12:35.360
really very very interesting. Just moving on to uranium. Uraniums

199
00:12:35.559 --> 00:12:39.279
are not something that you can use to determine the

200
00:12:39.399 --> 00:12:43.399
age of the universe because it was created in super

201
00:12:43.399 --> 00:12:47.639
and over explosions which occurred after the universe was formed.

202
00:12:48.000 --> 00:12:54.799
With heavy elements like uranium are created within massive star

203
00:12:55.159 --> 00:13:00.159
either collisions, neutron star collisions, or massive super and ova eruptions.

204
00:13:01.799 --> 00:13:04.600
You can use uranium obviously, it has a half life,

205
00:13:05.480 --> 00:13:07.440
and you can. I think that might be one of

206
00:13:07.480 --> 00:13:09.840
the ways that you determine the age of the Earth. Actually,

207
00:13:10.440 --> 00:13:14.120
when I think about it, four point six billion years,

208
00:13:14.159 --> 00:13:20.039
I think the age of the Earth is partly due

209
00:13:20.080 --> 00:13:24.919
to our understanding of the radioactive decay of isotopes like uranium.

210
00:13:25.480 --> 00:13:30.039
So yes, it's got a place in cosmology, but not

211
00:13:30.360 --> 00:13:32.039
in regard to the Big Bang itself.

212
00:13:33.159 --> 00:13:35.759
Okay, you also mentioned lithium same day, did.

213
00:13:35.759 --> 00:13:38.639
Yeah, Now, lithium is not That's what I was just

214
00:13:38.679 --> 00:13:44.159
looking up. It's I think I'm not aware of the

215
00:13:44.279 --> 00:13:47.279
radioactive properties of lithium. Let me put it that way.

216
00:13:48.440 --> 00:13:48.799
Okay.

217
00:13:49.519 --> 00:13:52.639
Yeah, Well, we know about its properties when it comes

218
00:13:52.639 --> 00:13:58.840
to energy use on Earth, and it's a dwindling resource.

219
00:13:58.919 --> 00:14:01.240
So they've got to find something else eventually. And I

220
00:14:01.240 --> 00:14:05.559
think they're are working on sodium batteries and there's plenty

221
00:14:05.559 --> 00:14:09.840
of that stuff around. But yeah, So if you can't

222
00:14:09.919 --> 00:14:12.840
use the half life of uranium olthium to calculate the

223
00:14:12.879 --> 00:14:16.240
age of the universe, what do you use.

224
00:14:18.120 --> 00:14:21.120
The first way it was worked out was simply by

225
00:14:21.399 --> 00:14:24.679
the measure measuring the Hubble constant, which is the rate

226
00:14:24.720 --> 00:14:27.159
at which the universe is expanding. If you invert the

227
00:14:27.240 --> 00:14:30.759
Hubble constant, you get the time how long it's been

228
00:14:30.799 --> 00:14:35.080
expanding for You can basically use that simple number to

229
00:14:35.600 --> 00:14:38.799
work out when everything was altogether in one place. But

230
00:14:38.879 --> 00:14:42.759
that assumes that the expansion has been uniform throughout, and

231
00:14:42.799 --> 00:14:44.559
we don't believe that's the case now, so you've got

232
00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:47.279
to modify it. So these days it's a combination of

233
00:14:47.320 --> 00:14:50.600
looking at the distribution of galaxies in the universe, plus

234
00:14:51.120 --> 00:14:55.559
are observations of the flash of the Big Bang, which

235
00:14:55.600 --> 00:14:57.759
we could still see, of course, is a cosmic microwave

236
00:14:57.799 --> 00:15:02.080
background radiation, and you can deduce from that how the universes,

237
00:15:02.159 --> 00:15:04.559
because you know, it was visible light when it left

238
00:15:04.559 --> 00:15:07.759
and it's now microwaves, and that's the central calculation as well.

239
00:15:08.519 --> 00:15:12.480
Yeah, I suppose in terms of dwindling energy or lost

240
00:15:12.600 --> 00:15:14.240
energy in the universe, you can you can look at

241
00:15:14.320 --> 00:15:15.879
I think we've spoken about it before. You can look

242
00:15:15.919 --> 00:15:22.080
at photons, which do die, especially if they hit something,

243
00:15:22.080 --> 00:15:25.200
but that energy transfers into something else, does it.

244
00:15:25.679 --> 00:15:29.559
That's correct, Yeah, so it's conserved. That's right there. You go.

245
00:15:29.799 --> 00:15:32.320
Okay, thank you buddy. Great to hear from you. It's

246
00:15:32.320 --> 00:15:35.240
been a while. I hope you're well, our next question

247
00:15:35.480 --> 00:15:38.120
comes from Oh, hang on a second, we've got to

248
00:15:38.120 --> 00:15:45.759
do this first broad piece MUDs there we go, always

249
00:15:45.759 --> 00:15:48.759
got to check one of those in. Ben has sent

250
00:15:48.840 --> 00:15:54.519
us a question, and Ben asks, in the early universe

251
00:15:54.559 --> 00:15:57.480
it was physically much smaller, but the total amount of

252
00:15:57.559 --> 00:16:01.000
matter slash energy was the same, so everything was much

253
00:16:01.039 --> 00:16:03.919
closer together than now. So wouldn't that make it much

254
00:16:03.960 --> 00:16:07.960
easier to build stars, galaxies and stuff, even super massive

255
00:16:07.960 --> 00:16:10.759
black holes? Yet we are supposed to be surprised that

256
00:16:10.879 --> 00:16:14.120
these structures existed in the very early days. Why so

257
00:16:14.919 --> 00:16:18.360
I would be surprised if huge compact structures didn't form

258
00:16:18.519 --> 00:16:23.720
quickly as the ingredients were so readily available, Ben Hardy,

259
00:16:24.279 --> 00:16:26.480
Thank you, Ben. We've kind of been talking about that

260
00:16:26.600 --> 00:16:31.759
stuff as a part of today's program. And yes, you

261
00:16:31.799 --> 00:16:35.360
bring up an interesting point. We get excited when we

262
00:16:35.440 --> 00:16:39.879
find a primordial black hole or an ancient galaxy that

263
00:16:40.039 --> 00:16:43.759
seems to almost be as old as the universe itself,

264
00:16:44.440 --> 00:16:48.320
which has happened in recent times. Should we be surprised,

265
00:16:48.360 --> 00:16:52.000
Fred or is been onto something? Look, it was all

266
00:16:52.039 --> 00:16:55.799
there in the first place. Why are we getting super

267
00:16:55.840 --> 00:16:57.120
super excited about it?

268
00:16:58.120 --> 00:16:58.240
So?

269
00:16:58.759 --> 00:17:03.679
Yeah, so if our models galaxy formation were perfect and

270
00:17:03.720 --> 00:17:07.039
the perfect representation of reality, then we wouldn't be surprised

271
00:17:08.480 --> 00:17:12.359
because the models will predict that. But the models need

272
00:17:12.440 --> 00:17:18.960
fine tuning, so those surprises are I think. To be honest,

273
00:17:18.960 --> 00:17:21.839
they're often beat up by the media, including its base notes.

274
00:17:24.079 --> 00:17:31.400
So there is an element of you know, researchers who

275
00:17:32.400 --> 00:17:35.559
are the ones who put together models of the way

276
00:17:35.799 --> 00:17:40.039
galaxies form and evolve. They're the ones who've in some

277
00:17:40.160 --> 00:17:42.720
ways had to rewrite their models. They've had to tune

278
00:17:42.759 --> 00:17:48.519
the parameters. We had a talk at the fiftieth anniversary

279
00:17:48.559 --> 00:17:50.720
of the End of Australian Telescope, that symposium that I

280
00:17:50.880 --> 00:17:56.480
was chairing as the local Organizing Committee chair sorry Science

281
00:17:56.559 --> 00:17:59.279
Organizing Committee chair not very long ago. One of the

282
00:17:59.359 --> 00:18:04.559
talks was about exactly this, and that particular speaker said

283
00:18:04.599 --> 00:18:08.759
we shouldn't be surprised that these structures formed so early

284
00:18:08.839 --> 00:18:12.079
in the universe because the ingredients were there exactly as

285
00:18:12.119 --> 00:18:16.599
Ben says, But you know, there's a bit more to

286
00:18:16.720 --> 00:18:19.960
it than that. You've got to have the gravitational pull

287
00:18:20.000 --> 00:18:22.400
that's provided by that cosmic web structure that we were

288
00:18:22.400 --> 00:18:24.200
talking about a few minutes ago, that needs to be

289
00:18:24.400 --> 00:18:27.519
in place as well, and that must have formed very

290
00:18:27.640 --> 00:18:30.119
very early on in the history of the universe. That's

291
00:18:30.160 --> 00:18:34.119
what we learn from the square kilometer array. We might

292
00:18:34.240 --> 00:18:37.240
get surprises from the square kilometer array as well, because

293
00:18:37.279 --> 00:18:40.240
we think there is at least, you know, at least

294
00:18:40.599 --> 00:18:43.599
a time of more than one hundred million years when

295
00:18:44.079 --> 00:18:46.160
the universe went through the dark ages there were no

296
00:18:46.319 --> 00:18:49.559
stars shining. Now, that might turn out to be an

297
00:18:49.680 --> 00:18:53.839
underestimate or an overestimate, and it might surprise the theorists

298
00:18:53.920 --> 00:18:55.799
when we start to get the results from the square

299
00:18:55.880 --> 00:18:57.920
kilometer array, which won't be too far down the track.

300
00:18:57.960 --> 00:19:00.599
I don't think maybe two thousand to ask you.

301
00:19:00.680 --> 00:19:04.599
That it can't be too long before they switch that on,

302
00:19:04.759 --> 00:19:06.559
but it is still a while.

303
00:19:07.359 --> 00:19:12.680
Yeah, it's twenty twenty eight or thereabouts. Yeah, right, but

304
00:19:12.839 --> 00:19:15.279
there will switch on bits of it beforehand, so we

305
00:19:15.400 --> 00:19:18.359
might glean stuff. It is an array, so you know,

306
00:19:18.480 --> 00:19:23.480
it's not just a single telescope. Yes, tell us, Yeah, it.

307
00:19:23.519 --> 00:19:26.880
Was very good, Thank you, Ben. I think we basically

308
00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:31.759
answered it that yes, because of modeling and it's not

309
00:19:31.799 --> 00:19:35.680
an exact science. These discoveries are quite surprising from time

310
00:19:35.759 --> 00:19:39.839
to time, and not all us stuff was there in

311
00:19:39.880 --> 00:19:43.759
the first place, I suppose fred because the consequence of

312
00:19:43.880 --> 00:19:47.359
the Big Bang and that mix of materials that created

313
00:19:47.400 --> 00:19:51.440
more materials and new materials and new discoveries being made

314
00:19:51.440 --> 00:19:52.960
as a consequence of that, I suppose.

315
00:19:54.480 --> 00:19:54.680
Yeah.

316
00:19:54.920 --> 00:19:57.880
So, I mean the modeling of the Big bangs fairly

317
00:19:58.680 --> 00:19:59.400
pretty well.

318
00:19:59.680 --> 00:20:00.400
So up.

319
00:20:02.119 --> 00:20:05.279
And then it's within the first few minutes that you

320
00:20:05.359 --> 00:20:08.759
actually get atoms forming, but they are hydrogen and helium.

321
00:20:09.440 --> 00:20:09.559
Uh.

322
00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:14.119
And then you've got to wait a long time, probably

323
00:20:14.160 --> 00:20:17.960
one hundred million years before you started getting carbon and

324
00:20:18.039 --> 00:20:20.160
oxygen and the other things that are formed by the

325
00:20:20.279 --> 00:20:23.759
interior of stars. And that you know, that's a fairly

326
00:20:24.920 --> 00:20:29.640
coherent picture, which, as I said, will be demonstrated, we

327
00:20:29.759 --> 00:20:32.880
hope by the square kilometer ray. What will be a

328
00:20:32.920 --> 00:20:37.559
surprise there is if they when they analyze the signal

329
00:20:37.640 --> 00:20:41.359
coming from that early gas, if heavy elements were present

330
00:20:41.440 --> 00:20:44.119
in that early prime audio gas, then we really have

331
00:20:44.240 --> 00:20:48.359
to start rewriting the textbooks because at the moment we

332
00:20:48.440 --> 00:20:50.839
don't think there were any. So there's a there's a

333
00:20:50.960 --> 00:20:53.400
challenge for the square kilometerra and that would probably win

334
00:20:53.440 --> 00:20:55.079
a Nobel Prize a discovery like that.

335
00:20:55.279 --> 00:20:59.519
Yeah, I imagine. So, so Ben's basically asked his question,

336
00:20:59.640 --> 00:21:00.640
A few is too early.

337
00:21:01.319 --> 00:21:05.279
Yes, that's right. So if a Nobel price came from that,

338
00:21:05.400 --> 00:21:07.960
it will please me enormously, because I'm on record in

339
00:21:08.039 --> 00:21:12.599
Hansard as having promised the government that the square kilometer

340
00:21:12.799 --> 00:21:14.920
array would win a Nobel prize.

341
00:21:16.839 --> 00:21:20.000
Oh day, Yeah that was a few years.

342
00:21:22.200 --> 00:21:23.880
I'm just going to write a note because we're going

343
00:21:23.920 --> 00:21:29.920
to follow that up. Okay, thanks Ben, Okay, we take

344
00:21:32.079 --> 00:21:38.079
space nuts and our final question today comes from youngst.

345
00:21:39.759 --> 00:21:42.680
Hello, space Nuts. This is the young from the Forest

346
00:21:42.720 --> 00:21:46.400
of Dalston and Sweden. As we all know, Saturn's moon,

347
00:21:46.559 --> 00:21:49.920
Titan is a very special place. So here's my question.

348
00:21:51.039 --> 00:21:54.839
How did Titan become so special? How did it accumulate

349
00:21:55.359 --> 00:21:59.480
stick nitrogen atmosphere and know it's meeting and eating so

350
00:21:59.720 --> 00:22:04.119
does some months of out planets. Only Titan has an atmosphere.

351
00:22:04.839 --> 00:22:07.440
What is it about Titan that made it become different

352
00:22:07.519 --> 00:22:13.359
from all the other moons? And another related question. This

353
00:22:13.519 --> 00:22:16.440
often said that Mars is too small to retain an

354
00:22:16.440 --> 00:22:19.880
atmosphere in the long term, the Titan is even smaller.

355
00:22:20.440 --> 00:22:25.480
How came Titan carry in an atmosphere when Mars cannot? Thanks?

356
00:22:25.559 --> 00:22:30.720
Very great show, Thank you, Yes, great to hear from

357
00:22:30.759 --> 00:22:36.640
somebody in Sweden and gee, that were great questions, especially

358
00:22:36.720 --> 00:22:40.400
that last part comparing Mars that couldn't hold an atmosphere

359
00:22:40.480 --> 00:22:44.279
to Tighten that's smaller, that can hold an atmosphere, and

360
00:22:44.440 --> 00:22:46.599
had it Titan get its atmosphere in the first place

361
00:22:46.599 --> 00:22:51.119
because it's unique. I think that was a reasonably good

362
00:22:51.200 --> 00:22:51.920
paraphrasing it.

363
00:22:52.119 --> 00:22:55.039
Solo phrases it very well. Yeah, and I can paraphrase

364
00:22:55.119 --> 00:22:57.079
the answer, which is basically, I don't know.

365
00:22:59.279 --> 00:23:01.000
I'm home. Yeah.

366
00:23:01.079 --> 00:23:02.599
I think we will do some of homework on this,

367
00:23:02.759 --> 00:23:08.920
but it's a great question, yes, and I just thinking

368
00:23:08.960 --> 00:23:13.039
about it. You know, with Mars, the obvious difference between

369
00:23:13.119 --> 00:23:19.119
Mars and Titan is that Mars, well, Mars is bigger

370
00:23:19.160 --> 00:23:22.039
than Titan, but Mars is much closer to the Sun

371
00:23:23.240 --> 00:23:25.880
and so well, it's not in the Goldilock zone, it's

372
00:23:26.160 --> 00:23:29.240
it's near enough to the Sun that we think the

373
00:23:29.319 --> 00:23:32.680
Sun's radiation. By that, I mean the sub atomic particles

374
00:23:33.079 --> 00:23:38.559
has helped us strip off the atmosphere from Mars, which

375
00:23:40.480 --> 00:23:42.880
is you know, some of it, some of it is water,

376
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:45.359
baker that's frozen frozen out, a lot of that, but

377
00:23:45.759 --> 00:23:49.960
a lot of it was dissociated into well, the water

378
00:23:50.119 --> 00:23:53.079
was certainly dissociated into hydrogen and oxygen, and the hydrogen

379
00:23:53.119 --> 00:23:57.680
has just gone into space. Yeah, likewise, probably some of

380
00:23:57.720 --> 00:24:00.920
the carbon dioxide. It's so I think it's there's a

381
00:24:01.000 --> 00:24:04.960
temperature difference there. But once you get to Jupiter, now

382
00:24:05.039 --> 00:24:09.200
Ganymede is bigger than Titan, Ganymede doesn't have a sceric

383
00:24:09.240 --> 00:24:12.440
of an atmosphere. There's nothing there at all. So it's

384
00:24:12.480 --> 00:24:18.000
a really interesting question why Titan should have that thick atmosphere.

385
00:24:18.720 --> 00:24:22.359
And I am not an expert on planetary signs, but

386
00:24:22.480 --> 00:24:24.160
I will take that one un notice because I think

387
00:24:24.200 --> 00:24:26.559
that's worth following up just to find out. It's such

388
00:24:26.559 --> 00:24:29.839
a great question, and it's a you know, it's glaringly obvious.

389
00:24:29.960 --> 00:24:33.480
Why is this body in the outer Solar System? Why

390
00:24:33.599 --> 00:24:36.519
is it clung onto an atmosphere that is thick and

391
00:24:37.519 --> 00:24:44.880
murky when we've got a similar sized object, Ganymede, not

392
00:24:45.160 --> 00:24:49.559
that far nearer to the inner Solar System in orbit

393
00:24:49.640 --> 00:24:53.000
around Jupiter, that doesn't have any side of an atmosphere

394
00:24:53.119 --> 00:24:55.839
like that. So that is one I'll come back to

395
00:24:56.119 --> 00:24:57.079
and thank you for the question.

396
00:24:59.519 --> 00:25:01.839
Just throw it. There could be something to do with

397
00:25:02.039 --> 00:25:07.400
the volatility of Titan. It's it's it's volcanic, is it not?

398
00:25:07.559 --> 00:25:11.680
And it's throwing up a lot of these nasty, smelly guesses.

399
00:25:11.759 --> 00:25:15.680
And could it constantly be renewing its atmosphere, which anyway

400
00:25:15.680 --> 00:25:16.119
it cannot.

401
00:25:16.599 --> 00:25:20.640
Perhaps these are the cry of cry of volcanoes. We

402
00:25:20.759 --> 00:25:23.240
think it's a mixture of water and pneumonia that comes

403
00:25:23.319 --> 00:25:27.400
up from them and not, you know, not what the

404
00:25:27.559 --> 00:25:29.160
kind of thing that we imagine when we think of

405
00:25:29.200 --> 00:25:32.440
a terrestrial volcano. So the volcanoes are coming up from

406
00:25:32.480 --> 00:25:35.519
the ocean layer beneath the ice of Titan, because titan

407
00:25:35.640 --> 00:25:38.200
surface is solid ice, as we believe it is Ganymedes.

408
00:25:39.079 --> 00:25:42.559
So it's a it's such a contrast, I mean, in

409
00:25:42.680 --> 00:25:47.200
a sense. My first thought about this was, well, gas

410
00:25:47.319 --> 00:25:52.039
giants are you know, they grow their gasiness because they've

411
00:25:52.079 --> 00:25:56.839
got a massive core that's been built up by the

412
00:25:59.240 --> 00:26:02.279
fact that that the beyond the ice line so is

413
00:26:02.480 --> 00:26:05.079
has formed and they've got probably got an icy core.

414
00:26:07.519 --> 00:26:11.240
Whether you can apply the same argument to Titan, I'm

415
00:26:11.279 --> 00:26:15.160
not sure. I need to check on that. So, yeah,

416
00:26:15.240 --> 00:26:17.599
thanks for the question, and we'll we'll have a look

417
00:26:17.599 --> 00:26:17.799
at it.

418
00:26:18.319 --> 00:26:19.000
I'm going to put.

419
00:26:21.759 --> 00:26:24.200
We'll put a pin in that one and try and

420
00:26:24.279 --> 00:26:27.400
come back to it in a later episode. But great question.

421
00:26:27.799 --> 00:26:28.720
It's very very good.

422
00:26:28.799 --> 00:26:31.440
And hope all as well in Sweden. Are you're heading

423
00:26:31.480 --> 00:26:34.640
into the colder month so I won't be visiting for

424
00:26:34.720 --> 00:26:36.759
a while, Well we will.

425
00:26:36.640 --> 00:26:39.079
We'll be there next not next month, but the month after.

426
00:26:39.359 --> 00:26:40.599
We've been so wonderful.

427
00:26:42.759 --> 00:26:44.400
Ye, excellent.

428
00:26:45.240 --> 00:26:49.440
Okay, that's it for today. Thanks to everyone who's sending questions.

429
00:26:49.480 --> 00:26:52.400
Don't forget you can send us questions as well via

430
00:26:52.440 --> 00:26:56.440
our website space nuts dot Io. Just click on the

431
00:26:56.720 --> 00:26:59.279
A M A link up the top and send us

432
00:26:59.319 --> 00:27:02.599
your questions through that and have a look around while

433
00:27:02.599 --> 00:27:05.279
you're there, particularly the space nuts shop or the space

434
00:27:05.400 --> 00:27:07.359
Nuts support a button if you want to push that.

435
00:27:08.559 --> 00:27:10.839
What it does is as soon as you push that button,

436
00:27:10.960 --> 00:27:14.759
it sends out a trojan and and your bank bank account.

437
00:27:15.160 --> 00:27:17.200
No it doesn't, No, no it doesn't.

438
00:27:17.599 --> 00:27:18.799
Don't even joke about that.

439
00:27:19.799 --> 00:27:20.599
No it shouldn't.

440
00:27:20.680 --> 00:27:27.680
Really good grief, No it doesn't. It's purely voluntary. Thanks.

441
00:27:27.759 --> 00:27:31.039
Fred is always great to chat and great questions again

442
00:27:31.079 --> 00:27:31.440
this week.

443
00:27:32.160 --> 00:27:35.359
Well they're just they're terrific questions. Yeah, thank you very

444
00:27:35.440 --> 00:27:37.279
much everybody, and Thanks Andrew.

445
00:27:37.920 --> 00:27:40.599
No worries, catch you soon, Professor Fred Wat's an astronomer

446
00:27:40.599 --> 00:27:43.160
at large. And thanks to Hu in the studio for

447
00:27:43.279 --> 00:27:45.480
telling me about the trojan horse problem we've been having

448
00:27:45.559 --> 00:27:49.000
now and I'm kidding again No he didn't, although he's

449
00:27:49.039 --> 00:27:51.400
working on it. And from me Andrew Dunkley, thanks for

450
00:27:51.440 --> 00:27:53.799
your company. Will catch you on the very next episode

451
00:27:53.960 --> 00:27:57.599
of Space Nuts. See it then, Bye bye Nuts.

452
00:27:57.920 --> 00:28:01.039
You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast.

453
00:28:02.200 --> 00:28:08.240
Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player.

454
00:28:08.440 --> 00:28:11.200
You can also stream on demand at bites dot com.

455
00:28:11.759 --> 00:28:15.720
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail