Sept. 9, 2024

#450: Dark Matter Debate, Flawed Maths & Spinning Black Holes

#450: Dark Matter Debate, Flawed Maths & Spinning Black Holes

This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by Incogni...looking after your online privacy with no hassles. To check out our special Space Nuts deal, visit https://www.incogni.com/spacenuts

Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this...

This episode of Space Nuts is brought to you by Incogni...looking after your online privacy with no hassles. To check out our special Space Nuts deal, visit www.incogni.com/spacenuts

Join Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this thought-provoking Q&A episode of Space Nuts, where they tackle intriguing questions from our listeners about dark matter, flawed mathematics, black holes, and more.Episode Highlights:- Dark Matter Debate: Kevin from Melbourne challenges the Timms on their previous discussion about dark matter, questioning whether SpaceTime itself could be the elusive substance.
- Flawed Mathematics: Simon wonders if the breakdown of models at the extremes of the universe is due to our mathematics being flawed. Could our system of mathematics be misaligned with the real world?
- Black Holes and Spin: Isaac from Brisbane, aged nine, asks how black holes spin if they take up no Space and why spin affects Space.
- Gravity and Space: Isaac's dad inquires about how gravity bends Space and thus bends light traveling past it.
- Energy in Space: Rusty from Donnybrook speculates about harnessing the energy of Space and the potential for one g drives to revolutionise Space travel.
- 00:00:00 - This is a q and a edition of Space Nuts
- 00:01:05 - Kevin from Melbourne asks whether spacetime itself might be dark matter
- 00:07:22 - Is it possible that breakdown of models is due to our mathematics being flawed
- 00:11:38 - Simon: I just finished watching a science fiction series called dark matter
- 00:13:01 - Why do black holes spin if they take up no space
- 00:15:11 - Isaac's dad wants to know how gravity bends space
- 00:16:56 - Fred and Andrew: Soon we'll harness the energy of space itself
- 00:18:39 - If we could achieve one g drive, it would make travel around the solar system pretty schmick
- 00:24:16 - Space Nuts podcast available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio
For more Space Nuts, including our continually updating newsfeed, visit our website at spacenutspodcast.com. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on facebook, X, YouTube Music, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform. For more Space and Astronomy News Podcasts, visit our HQ at www.bitesz.com. Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts/support.Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:02.120
Hi there, thanks for joining us. This is a Q

2
00:00:02.279 --> 00:00:06.320
and a edition of Space Nuts. My name is Andrew Dunty.

3
00:00:06.799 --> 00:00:09.759
Coming up, we're going to look at a lot of issues,

4
00:00:09.800 --> 00:00:15.720
one involving dark matter. This question, though, comes about as

5
00:00:15.720 --> 00:00:19.239
a consequence of someone who wasn't real happy with a

6
00:00:20.199 --> 00:00:25.679
discussion we had recently, so we'll we'll certainly reinvestigate that.

7
00:00:26.440 --> 00:00:29.640
We'll also look at flawed mathematics. That sounds like my

8
00:00:29.839 --> 00:00:33.679
entire school career. We'll also be discussing black holes and

9
00:00:33.719 --> 00:00:36.880
gravity and energy in space. That's all coming up on

10
00:00:36.920 --> 00:00:41.359
this edition of Space Nuts fifteen seconds. Guidance is in

11
00:00:41.479 --> 00:00:49.000
channel ten nine ignition sequence Space Nuts or three.

12
00:00:49.119 --> 00:00:51.679
Two more review on.

13
00:00:52.039 --> 00:00:56.359
Space Nurse as can I reported Bills good and joining

14
00:00:56.399 --> 00:00:59.280
us again to sort all of this out is Professor

15
00:00:59.280 --> 00:00:59.920
Fred Watson.

16
00:01:00.200 --> 00:01:05.560
Hello Fred, Hello, I do let's get into those questions? Eh, Yes,

17
00:01:06.840 --> 00:01:09.120
let's just hit the nail on the head and start.

18
00:01:09.359 --> 00:01:13.359
And this first question comes about as a consequence of

19
00:01:13.439 --> 00:01:18.359
us answering a previous question. And I think we've kind

20
00:01:18.359 --> 00:01:21.760
of put Kevin's nose out of joint just slightly, I

21
00:01:21.920 --> 00:01:25.840
might say, though he's used a word that I think

22
00:01:25.959 --> 00:01:30.040
is probably not in keeping with the way you deal

23
00:01:30.120 --> 00:01:33.200
with things spread, I would never ever accuse you of

24
00:01:33.239 --> 00:01:38.079
being glip. However, that said, Kevin does have issue with

25
00:01:38.519 --> 00:01:42.359
the dark matter question. Now, so that I don't mash

26
00:01:42.480 --> 00:01:47.560
Kevin's question up, I have prepared it with an AI

27
00:01:47.760 --> 00:01:50.079
voice so that it comes out clean and.

28
00:01:51.359 --> 00:01:55.400
Unadulterated, if you like. So, let's see what the issue

29
00:01:55.439 --> 00:01:58.719
is and see if we can pick at the pieces

30
00:01:58.719 --> 00:02:02.840
and put it back together again. This is from Kevin.

31
00:02:02.640 --> 00:02:04.840
In your four hundred and twenty eighth episode. I was

32
00:02:04.879 --> 00:02:07.359
saddened by your response to a listener question asking if

33
00:02:07.400 --> 00:02:10.400
space time itself might be dark matter. I found your

34
00:02:10.439 --> 00:02:13.240
emphatic and almost glib No. Just doesn't fit with your

35
00:02:13.240 --> 00:02:17.000
regular open mindedness. I have asked similar questions before in

36
00:02:17.080 --> 00:02:20.479
other forums and received the same dismissive no response without

37
00:02:20.479 --> 00:02:23.560
any depth of thinking about the question. For starters, we

38
00:02:23.599 --> 00:02:26.400
don't yet know what space time actually is, but if

39
00:02:26.439 --> 00:02:28.479
it can be distorted, it has some aspect of a

40
00:02:28.520 --> 00:02:31.400
substance to it, and if it is a form of substance,

41
00:02:31.479 --> 00:02:33.439
why should it not be considered as a candidate for

42
00:02:33.520 --> 00:02:37.199
dark matter. It is everywhere, it is transparent to em

43
00:02:37.240 --> 00:02:40.199
it is weakly interacting it can be distorted, which means

44
00:02:40.240 --> 00:02:43.080
what that it becomes more dense in some areas than others.

45
00:02:43.439 --> 00:02:45.560
So what if areas that are denser have a positive

46
00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:50.159
gravitational effect compared to average background space, you might see clumping.

47
00:02:50.360 --> 00:02:52.199
So what if areas that are less dense have a

48
00:02:52.240 --> 00:02:55.639
repulsive gravitational effect compared to average background.

49
00:02:55.159 --> 00:02:57.319
Space, you might see voids.

50
00:02:57.520 --> 00:03:00.000
I'm not saying space time is dark matter, but dark

51
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:02.479
matter is not actually a thing that has been discovered yet.

52
00:03:03.159 --> 00:03:05.800
Variable density space time maybe all that is needed to

53
00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:08.639
explain the gravitation anomalies that we observed, and I think

54
00:03:08.639 --> 00:03:11.039
it deserves a more open minded level of exploring than

55
00:03:11.080 --> 00:03:13.639
a simple dismissal. What I'd like to know is how

56
00:03:13.639 --> 00:03:17.199
would you test it as hypothesis? Has anyone done said testing?

57
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:20.560
Has it been exhaustively ruled out by whom? How did

58
00:03:20.560 --> 00:03:24.039
they do that? Otherwise? Brilliant show. Kevin from Melbourne.

59
00:03:24.680 --> 00:03:26.840
Okay, Kevin, thank you very much. I hope you don't

60
00:03:26.840 --> 00:03:31.039
mind me using AI to put that question out there.

61
00:03:31.080 --> 00:03:34.599
I just wanted to make sure it was intact, because

62
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:41.240
you obviously are very serious about this issue, and you

63
00:03:42.560 --> 00:03:45.599
have had problems in the past getting a straight answer,

64
00:03:45.879 --> 00:03:48.639
and you put a lot of thought into it. I

65
00:03:48.719 --> 00:03:53.319
give you credit for that. So, Fred, how can we

66
00:03:54.080 --> 00:03:59.240
sort of discuss this question with a more robust approach.

67
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.719
By getting somebody who's more of a specialist in dark

68
00:04:03.759 --> 00:04:11.639
matter physics and cosmology than me as as a commentator.

69
00:04:11.879 --> 00:04:14.680
I mean, what I report on is what I understand

70
00:04:14.719 --> 00:04:17.959
from the work of my colleagues who work in this

71
00:04:18.079 --> 00:04:23.959
sort of field. And there's certainly nothing I've heard and

72
00:04:24.040 --> 00:04:29.560
seen in the literature that would equate dark matter with

73
00:04:29.680 --> 00:04:35.560
space time. It is always regarded as something that exists

74
00:04:35.600 --> 00:04:39.680
within space time. Now there'll be there'll be very good

75
00:04:39.720 --> 00:04:46.519
reasons for that, and almost certainly if some of my

76
00:04:46.639 --> 00:04:50.079
friends and colleagues were sitting right here now, they would

77
00:04:50.120 --> 00:04:53.000
be able to point us in the right direction as

78
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:55.600
to why that is the case. I haven't checked the

79
00:04:55.639 --> 00:05:01.560
details myself, but nobody is making that such. Yes, it is.

80
00:05:02.759 --> 00:05:08.600
It's almost universally accepted as being a sub atomic particle

81
00:05:08.600 --> 00:05:12.560
of some kind which exists within space time that we

82
00:05:12.600 --> 00:05:17.720
haven't yet detected. I'm sorry if I sounded glid, but

83
00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:21.560
it wasn't. Certainly wouldn't have been my intention, and dismissive.

84
00:05:21.680 --> 00:05:26.480
Isn't something I like to be described as either because

85
00:05:26.839 --> 00:05:30.920
you know, we normally, we normally exactly keep an open

86
00:05:30.920 --> 00:05:33.120
mind about many of these issues. And part of that

87
00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:36.759
open mindedness is because I'm not a specialist in the field.

88
00:05:36.839 --> 00:05:40.920
I'm reporting on what, you know, what my colleagues, not

89
00:05:41.079 --> 00:05:44.959
just one of them, but many of them are saying, so, yeah,

90
00:05:45.040 --> 00:05:49.160
let's keep it, keep it in mind. I will explore

91
00:05:49.199 --> 00:05:51.560
it a little bit further, the idea that Jody's going

92
00:05:51.600 --> 00:05:57.160
to get involved as well. I'll explore the reasons why

93
00:05:57.800 --> 00:06:01.879
we don't consider it to be part of space until

94
00:06:01.959 --> 00:06:02.480
later date.

95
00:06:03.160 --> 00:06:04.519
Okay, No, that's fair enough.

96
00:06:04.600 --> 00:06:06.560
I mean, thanks for your comments.

97
00:06:06.920 --> 00:06:11.399
Yeah, and look, I appreciate his frustration because he's obviously

98
00:06:11.439 --> 00:06:14.240
tried to get answers on this and may not have

99
00:06:14.439 --> 00:06:17.839
liked the way we approached it at that particular time.

100
00:06:17.959 --> 00:06:22.920
But it is an area that is under heavy investigation.

101
00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:26.920
Everyone is looking at. Even one or two episodes ago,

102
00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:31.519
we talked about a particular search for dark matter that

103
00:06:31.600 --> 00:06:35.800
came up with nothing, And that doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

104
00:06:35.920 --> 00:06:38.759
In fact, we know it exists. They just haven't found

105
00:06:38.800 --> 00:06:42.480
it within certain parameters, and so they'll be looking bigger.

106
00:06:42.519 --> 00:06:46.920
But that particular equipment hasn't actually been built yet, so

107
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:54.360
the frustration continues. So we hopefully are not a long

108
00:06:54.399 --> 00:06:59.480
way off figuring out dark matter. But right now there's

109
00:06:59.680 --> 00:07:04.319
lots small questions than there are answers, and it's I

110
00:07:04.360 --> 00:07:08.680
supposed to watch this space scenario, but no. We appreciate

111
00:07:08.720 --> 00:07:12.439
you passing on your thoughts, Kevin, and hopefully we will

112
00:07:12.480 --> 00:07:16.160
be able to come up with some more information moving

113
00:07:16.199 --> 00:07:20.720
forward once we've looked into it through the respective experts.

114
00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:24.920
Let's move on to our next question. This comes from

115
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:29.519
Simon and he says, hi, is it possible that the

116
00:07:29.560 --> 00:07:32.959
breakdown of models at extremes of the universe is due

117
00:07:33.000 --> 00:07:37.439
to our mathematics being flawed rather than the models? For example,

118
00:07:37.839 --> 00:07:44.000
fluid dynamic models of real world scenarios rely on imaginary numbers.

119
00:07:44.319 --> 00:07:48.360
Might our system of mathematics be slightly misaligned with the

120
00:07:48.399 --> 00:07:53.000
real world? Thank you, Simon. I think we've kind of

121
00:07:53.040 --> 00:07:57.240
talked about the mathematics being off in respect to some

122
00:07:57.360 --> 00:08:01.040
things in the past, and even Einstein consider is the

123
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:05.600
model of relativity is probably not right, even though we

124
00:08:05.600 --> 00:08:08.759
can't prove it wrong. So it is a good question

125
00:08:08.839 --> 00:08:12.079
to ask, and the answer is yeah, probably somewhere along

126
00:08:12.079 --> 00:08:14.000
the line, then the numbers don't stack up.

127
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:19.399
Yeah. I think it's an interesting you know Simon's postulate

128
00:08:19.439 --> 00:08:26.319
about particularly about imaginary numbers, which is we call them

129
00:08:26.360 --> 00:08:30.240
complex numbers. They have a real and an imaginary component.

130
00:08:30.879 --> 00:08:33.159
Why is it imaginary because it's the square root of

131
00:08:33.200 --> 00:08:40.799
minus one, which doesn't exist. But it's an incredibly useful

132
00:08:40.840 --> 00:08:45.559
tool in so many fields of science and engineering too.

133
00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:50.399
Your aerodynamics relies on the imaginary numbers, so it's imaginary

134
00:08:50.519 --> 00:08:54.919
numbers that keep you plane in the air. Could could

135
00:08:55.000 --> 00:08:58.840
that understanding be flawed? Yes? I think it could. And

136
00:08:58.919 --> 00:09:01.840
again I think, you know, we are pretty open minded

137
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:10.639
about this idea. What breaks down our physics in the

138
00:09:10.720 --> 00:09:13.879
extreme situations that I think Simon's referring to things like,

139
00:09:14.480 --> 00:09:17.960
you know, how do you deal with the way the

140
00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:21.799
universe behaved immediately after the Big Bang, where you've got

141
00:09:21.879 --> 00:09:25.919
temperatures and pressures that we've got no physical experience of

142
00:09:26.759 --> 00:09:30.600
in terms of working out how they would behave, and

143
00:09:30.639 --> 00:09:33.879
they become what we call highly nonlinear. That means that

144
00:09:33.919 --> 00:09:37.000
they behave in a way that is actually really hard

145
00:09:37.000 --> 00:09:42.360
to predict. And so that's saying that our physical models

146
00:09:42.639 --> 00:09:47.759
are not are not robust enough, not necessarily that the

147
00:09:47.799 --> 00:09:52.320
mathematics is not robust enough, but it is an interesting conjecture.

148
00:09:54.039 --> 00:09:59.279
I yeah, I think Simon's point is well made. Might

149
00:09:59.320 --> 00:10:01.960
our system of mathematics be slightly misaligned with the right

150
00:10:02.039 --> 00:10:04.639
real world? Well, in extreme cases it probably is. When

151
00:10:04.679 --> 00:10:08.000
you think about, you know, the temperature immediately after the

152
00:10:08.039 --> 00:10:08.519
Big Bang.

153
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:13.840
Well, yeah, that's a good point. I mean it's no

154
00:10:13.960 --> 00:10:18.320
easy remedy though, is this? No?

155
00:10:19.240 --> 00:10:24.480
I mean there are people who are modeling those scenarios

156
00:10:24.519 --> 00:10:27.039
where you do have these extremes, and they're probably relying

157
00:10:27.080 --> 00:10:31.759
on relatively conventional mathematics, although yes, the other they will

158
00:10:31.799 --> 00:10:34.840
involve complex numbers and all the rest of it. But

159
00:10:34.960 --> 00:10:39.399
I yeah, I think it gets weirdest. Actually, it gets

160
00:10:39.440 --> 00:10:46.000
weirder in the quantum world, where we've got all kinds

161
00:10:46.039 --> 00:10:52.480
of interesting notions that do rely heavily on mathematics, superposition, entanglement,

162
00:10:52.559 --> 00:10:56.519
all of these things, and they rely on particular types

163
00:10:56.559 --> 00:11:00.159
of mathematics Hilbert spaces and things of that sort, which

164
00:11:00.200 --> 00:11:05.840
are well understood. I have to say, but to you know,

165
00:11:05.960 --> 00:11:10.480
to the uneducated, and I include myself in that, because

166
00:11:10.519 --> 00:11:15.240
mathematics was my achilles heel at university nearly cost me

167
00:11:15.320 --> 00:11:21.399
my degree. The I think they look these things look

168
00:11:21.559 --> 00:11:24.039
like mathematics gone wrong, if I can put it that way,

169
00:11:24.080 --> 00:11:28.440
but they haven't. They we'll understood. So the misalignment with

170
00:11:28.519 --> 00:11:34.000
the real world, I think it's possible. But in many ways,

171
00:11:34.039 --> 00:11:36.320
the mathematics is all we've got to rely on, so

172
00:11:36.360 --> 00:11:38.360
we just keep plodding on with what we know.

173
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:42.519
Yeah, you mentioned superposition. I've just finished watching a science

174
00:11:42.519 --> 00:11:49.000
fiction series called Dark Matter, right, and they the goal

175
00:11:49.279 --> 00:11:54.519
of the main character, the scientist, that was the whole

176
00:11:54.519 --> 00:11:59.440
story was built around. His aim was to achieve superposition

177
00:11:59.720 --> 00:12:06.080
so they could travel into dimensionally. It was brilliantly done.

178
00:12:06.240 --> 00:12:11.080
Brilliantly done. They obviously had to work out how to

179
00:12:11.159 --> 00:12:14.919
make it a convincing storyline for those who are so

180
00:12:15.399 --> 00:12:19.279
into science fiction and science for that matter, to make

181
00:12:19.320 --> 00:12:22.000
it plausible, and they did a great job. It's a

182
00:12:22.120 --> 00:12:27.840
brilliant story, brilliant series. Really enjoyed it. Won't spoil it

183
00:12:27.879 --> 00:12:30.480
by telling you how it ended, but I doubt there

184
00:12:30.480 --> 00:12:33.360
will be a sequel because it did end, and it

185
00:12:33.399 --> 00:12:37.399
did end well. I thought, Okay, was it cool to

186
00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:41.759
dark Matter? Dark Dark Matter? And I think it was

187
00:12:41.799 --> 00:12:46.399
on Netflix. I can't remember now, But yeah, terrific series.

188
00:12:46.559 --> 00:12:49.919
Really enjoyed it and just so you know they could

189
00:12:49.919 --> 00:12:55.519
have well they did. It got so very confusingly complicated

190
00:12:55.919 --> 00:12:59.720
towards the end, but yeah, that's what made it so interesting.

191
00:13:01.120 --> 00:13:04.120
Thank you, Simon, And our next question coming up in

192
00:13:04.159 --> 00:13:08.039
a moment. Let's take a break from the show to

193
00:13:08.080 --> 00:13:11.120
tell you about our sponsor in Cogny, and I'll be

194
00:13:11.360 --> 00:13:14.759
giving you a special space nuts Url, so you can

195
00:13:14.840 --> 00:13:18.879
get up to sixty percent off in Cogni. But first,

196
00:13:19.000 --> 00:13:22.840
what's incognit all about. It's a way of cleaning up

197
00:13:22.879 --> 00:13:26.120
your online presence and reducing the risk of your personal

198
00:13:26.159 --> 00:13:30.480
information being sold to unscrupulous people via the dark web,

199
00:13:30.639 --> 00:13:33.799
or just via a hacker who's trying to fleece you

200
00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:37.639
or other people. It's also a great way to reduce

201
00:13:37.679 --> 00:13:41.320
spam emails and spam phone calls, reduce the risk of

202
00:13:41.360 --> 00:13:45.519
identity theft, which is big business these days. I think

203
00:13:45.720 --> 00:13:50.200
most significantly, it greatly reduces your risk of being scammed

204
00:13:50.679 --> 00:13:54.440
and that is just such a viral thing that's happening

205
00:13:54.799 --> 00:13:57.720
around the world at the moment. So how does all

206
00:13:57.720 --> 00:14:01.519
this work? Well, it's simple. All you have to do

207
00:14:01.600 --> 00:14:04.120
is sign up to in Cogni. Give them permission to

208
00:14:04.200 --> 00:14:07.159
act on your behalf and they'll do the rest. They'll

209
00:14:07.240 --> 00:14:10.799
trawl the Internet and remove your personal information from the web.

210
00:14:11.279 --> 00:14:14.720
The stuff that can be found on search engines, public websites,

211
00:14:14.759 --> 00:14:19.759
even private databases. It's all easily accessible. And let's face it,

212
00:14:20.559 --> 00:14:22.440
are you really going to be able to clean up

213
00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:26.480
the entire world wide web of your personal information by yourself?

214
00:14:27.480 --> 00:14:31.320
Right now? In Cogni is offering a significant discount for

215
00:14:31.440 --> 00:14:34.720
space Nuts listeners, up to sixty percent off and that

216
00:14:34.840 --> 00:14:39.320
comes with a thirty day money back guarantee. Just go

217
00:14:39.399 --> 00:14:45.480
to Incogni dot com slash space nuts that's I Ncogni,

218
00:14:45.919 --> 00:14:50.480
incogni dot com slash space nuts to find out more.

219
00:14:50.919 --> 00:14:54.919
And they have special prices for students and graduates as well.

220
00:14:55.600 --> 00:14:59.679
Make your personal information much harder to find online with

221
00:15:00.200 --> 00:15:04.480
in Cogny. Check out all their plans today at incogny

222
00:15:04.600 --> 00:15:08.639
dot com slash space nuts. Now back to the show.

223
00:15:10.240 --> 00:15:15.120
We're old on space Nuts and that's a moment this right,

224
00:15:15.919 --> 00:15:22.039
This one's from Isaac on the Gold. It is from Brisbane,

225
00:15:22.039 --> 00:15:26.559
actually in Australia. Isaac is nine years old. He said,

226
00:15:26.600 --> 00:15:30.679
I have two questions, how do black holes spin if

227
00:15:30.679 --> 00:15:35.200
they take up no space? And why does spin affect space?

228
00:15:37.200 --> 00:15:40.399
And his dad's got a question as well. My dad

229
00:15:40.440 --> 00:15:43.799
asks how does gravity bend space and thus bend light

230
00:15:44.000 --> 00:15:49.000
traveling past it? Isaac in Brisbane, nine years old. Great

231
00:15:49.000 --> 00:15:51.320
to hear from your Isaac. Thanks for sending your questions

232
00:15:51.320 --> 00:15:54.080
in why do black holes spin? I think someone else

233
00:15:54.120 --> 00:15:55.840
asked a similar question percently.

234
00:15:56.039 --> 00:15:58.919
We covered this not very long ago. Yeah, and so

235
00:15:59.120 --> 00:16:01.720
what you've got to think about is how black black

236
00:16:01.720 --> 00:16:07.000
holes are formed. If you have a star which is

237
00:16:07.120 --> 00:16:10.519
more than you know, ten times the mass of the Sun,

238
00:16:10.679 --> 00:16:14.320
something like that, gets to the end of its life,

239
00:16:13.799 --> 00:16:20.679
the nuclear propulsion system of the star stops until gravity

240
00:16:20.759 --> 00:16:26.320
takes over and the star collapses or its core collapses

241
00:16:27.000 --> 00:16:30.240
to become a black hole. So what you've got is

242
00:16:30.279 --> 00:16:33.240
a star that is going to be spinning. It will

243
00:16:33.440 --> 00:16:39.120
rotate because everything is rotating or evolving, and as it rotates,

244
00:16:39.679 --> 00:16:42.879
the spin will get faster because of the conservation of

245
00:16:42.879 --> 00:16:48.120
angular momentum. So spin is conserved. So even when the

246
00:16:48.320 --> 00:16:53.399
black hole becomes something that, as Isaac says, takes up

247
00:16:53.440 --> 00:16:58.480
no space, it's still spinning. Even though it is a

248
00:16:58.519 --> 00:17:02.879
single point. It's still spinning because it's the original style

249
00:17:02.919 --> 00:17:05.640
that collapsed to form. It was spinning, so that spin

250
00:17:05.759 --> 00:17:07.240
gets imparted to the black hole.

251
00:17:07.839 --> 00:17:09.640
So it's just inheriting basically.

252
00:17:10.039 --> 00:17:11.720
Yes, that's right. It's a good way of putting it,

253
00:17:11.799 --> 00:17:16.160
an inherited spin. I think I've got that as well.

254
00:17:16.880 --> 00:17:20.759
So and Isaac's dad wants to know how gravity bend space.

255
00:17:20.839 --> 00:17:25.880
We all want to know that actually, because it's what

256
00:17:25.920 --> 00:17:28.480
we know is how much in bend space. We do

257
00:17:28.599 --> 00:17:33.559
understand the mechanics of what happens when you put mass there.

258
00:17:33.599 --> 00:17:38.640
You can you can accurately predict just how and how

259
00:17:38.720 --> 00:17:44.480
much space will be bent, but why does it happens.

260
00:17:45.279 --> 00:17:49.119
It's the effect of gravity. That's the phenomenon we call gravity,

261
00:17:49.240 --> 00:17:52.400
and at that level we really don't understand it very well.

262
00:17:53.240 --> 00:17:55.720
Yeah, this is the thing. We know dark matter exists.

263
00:17:55.720 --> 00:17:59.079
We can't prove it yet. We know gravity exists, but

264
00:17:59.160 --> 00:18:03.240
we don't know about how it exists, in the way

265
00:18:03.279 --> 00:18:05.720
it exists, and whether or not it's a subatomic particle

266
00:18:05.759 --> 00:18:06.519
called a graviton.

267
00:18:08.279 --> 00:18:08.519
Yeah.

268
00:18:08.680 --> 00:18:10.680
I mean, we know a lot of things that exist,

269
00:18:10.759 --> 00:18:13.839
but we don't know much about why they exist and

270
00:18:13.880 --> 00:18:15.039
how they exist.

271
00:18:15.240 --> 00:18:17.960
Yeah, I suppose what you could say, is that we

272
00:18:18.039 --> 00:18:21.160
know extremely accurately. And this was you know, one of

273
00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:25.680
your answers to that last question. Relativity works like a dream.

274
00:18:25.799 --> 00:18:31.079
Everything is so precise, following the rules that Einstein laid

275
00:18:31.079 --> 00:18:37.519
out in nineteen fifteen. So that describes gravity incredibly well,

276
00:18:37.680 --> 00:18:41.720
incredibly accurately. But it is still only a description of gravity.

277
00:18:41.799 --> 00:18:46.160
It's not an understanding of how gravity arises. And so yes,

278
00:18:46.799 --> 00:18:48.480
we still have big mysteries.

279
00:18:48.039 --> 00:18:54.440
Though relatively speaking. Indeed, Yes, thanks Isaac, great to hear

280
00:18:54.480 --> 00:18:57.599
from you. Please send us questions again. I always love

281
00:18:57.640 --> 00:19:02.960
to hear from our younger listeners. And finally we have

282
00:19:03.480 --> 00:19:06.759
a question from our old mate Rusty. I believe Rusty

283
00:19:06.799 --> 00:19:07.680
is from Donnie Brook.

284
00:19:09.759 --> 00:19:13.680
Gooday, Fred and Andrew and all you space nuts. It's

285
00:19:13.759 --> 00:19:17.559
Rusty and Donny Roop, Western Australia. It seems to me

286
00:19:17.880 --> 00:19:23.920
that soon, and that may be in astronomical terms, we'll

287
00:19:23.960 --> 00:19:28.440
be able to harness the energy of space itself. We

288
00:19:28.519 --> 00:19:32.319
know there's a lot of energy in space. It has

289
00:19:32.359 --> 00:19:35.279
most of it if you look at the expanding universe

290
00:19:35.400 --> 00:19:41.720
and dark energy. But when we do harness the energy

291
00:19:41.920 --> 00:19:45.319
energy of space, we should be able to crank up

292
00:19:46.039 --> 00:19:50.839
one g drives and that allow us to go anywhere

293
00:19:50.880 --> 00:19:59.640
we like with swop over halfway, so the first half

294
00:19:59.680 --> 00:20:02.359
of the whege is accelerating at one g and the

295
00:20:02.400 --> 00:20:04.839
second half is decelerating at one G.

296
00:20:05.799 --> 00:20:06.839
A funny thing happens.

297
00:20:06.960 --> 00:20:07.599
The crew.

298
00:20:09.960 --> 00:20:13.519
To them seem to be traveling faster than the speed

299
00:20:13.559 --> 00:20:16.599
of light, so that they would go to Andromeda under

300
00:20:16.599 --> 00:20:19.799
these circumstances.

301
00:20:18.880 --> 00:20:21.079
In thirty crew years.

302
00:20:21.759 --> 00:20:26.480
So just wondering what Fred and Andrew, what your priorities

303
00:20:26.519 --> 00:20:29.839
would be once we do develop this drive both for

304
00:20:29.880 --> 00:20:31.000
the Solar System.

305
00:20:30.720 --> 00:20:35.400
And in the wider universe. Thank you, Oh Rusty, just

306
00:20:35.440 --> 00:20:40.359
put us right there in the middle of it. What

307
00:20:40.400 --> 00:20:44.640
would our priorities be over to you, Fred.

308
00:20:44.279 --> 00:20:48.880
Well, I've kind of said this before, and it's something

309
00:20:48.920 --> 00:20:53.880
that almost you know, rust is almost hinted by referring

310
00:20:53.880 --> 00:20:59.720
to a trip to Andromeda. The Andromeda galaxy. The view

311
00:20:59.720 --> 00:21:01.920
of our own galaxy from the outside is what I'd

312
00:21:01.960 --> 00:21:04.759
really like to see. Love to know how close our

313
00:21:04.759 --> 00:21:07.640
models are, just to make sure you got the color right,

314
00:21:08.119 --> 00:21:11.839
the color, how many spiral arms it's got? You know what?

315
00:21:12.119 --> 00:21:15.720
Don't we know that? No, not really. We think it's

316
00:21:15.720 --> 00:21:20.359
a forearm spiral, which is quite unusual. So you know,

317
00:21:20.480 --> 00:21:22.519
there's a there's a bar across the middle what we

318
00:21:22.599 --> 00:21:24.400
call a bar in the galaxy, not one you lean

319
00:21:24.480 --> 00:21:27.839
up against, but one that you you know, a bit

320
00:21:27.960 --> 00:21:30.440
like a rod or something like that. That's that's made

321
00:21:30.440 --> 00:21:33.160
of stars. And from each end of the bar, it

322
00:21:33.200 --> 00:21:35.720
looks as though there are two spiral arms that emerge.

323
00:21:36.119 --> 00:21:38.680
And that's based on mapping that we can do from

324
00:21:38.720 --> 00:21:40.680
the inside of the galaxy. But just imagine what it

325
00:21:40.720 --> 00:21:42.400
would look like if you're on the outside of it.

326
00:21:42.640 --> 00:21:47.960
Yeah, yeah, that's a great Yeah. I'd never contemplate a depth.

327
00:21:48.000 --> 00:21:49.880
To be honest, I know I have mentioned it before.

328
00:21:50.480 --> 00:21:55.400
I'd probably go further. I'd probably like to sort of

329
00:21:55.400 --> 00:22:02.799
get right away from our rum I suppose galactic cluster

330
00:22:03.279 --> 00:22:08.559
and look at the whole thing. I mean, I don't

331
00:22:08.599 --> 00:22:11.759
know how to explain it, but I'd like to be

332
00:22:11.839 --> 00:22:15.279
able to have in my view Andromeda and the Milky

333
00:22:15.319 --> 00:22:18.519
Way and whatever else is in the vicinity. You know,

334
00:22:20.039 --> 00:22:25.240
I'm assuming there are great voids between galaxy clusters, and

335
00:22:25.319 --> 00:22:27.160
I'd like to get out into one of them looking

336
00:22:27.160 --> 00:22:30.160
back at our galaxy cluster. I suppose that's what I'm saying.

337
00:22:30.240 --> 00:22:32.920
I think that would be fascinating just to see it

338
00:22:32.960 --> 00:22:35.279
all in one.

339
00:22:36.319 --> 00:22:41.480
Yes, yes, I think so. We're the Milky Way and

340
00:22:41.519 --> 00:22:43.759
the Andromeda Galaxy are the two biggest members of what

341
00:22:43.759 --> 00:22:48.720
we call the local Group, which is about thirty galaxies thereabouts.

342
00:22:49.319 --> 00:22:52.960
The next biggest one is the Triangular Galaxy, and then

343
00:22:53.000 --> 00:22:55.720
there's lots of small stuff. But we're part of a

344
00:22:56.039 --> 00:22:59.599
bigger cluster. I think it's a Virgo cluster that we're

345
00:22:59.640 --> 00:23:04.400
part of. I'm shocking it not remembering that that we're

346
00:23:04.720 --> 00:23:06.160
a little bit of that. It was certainly one of

347
00:23:06.160 --> 00:23:08.640
the bigger galaxy clusters we're part of as well. So

348
00:23:08.720 --> 00:23:11.799
you want to get right outside that and see what

349
00:23:11.839 --> 00:23:13.759
it looks like and be able to point to our

350
00:23:13.759 --> 00:23:17.240
Milky Way and say that's fled. Yeah.

351
00:23:17.359 --> 00:23:20.440
Yeah, I mean that's probably very un exciting to most people.

352
00:23:20.440 --> 00:23:23.119
I'm sure others have thought, oh, okay, well, if I

353
00:23:23.119 --> 00:23:25.119
could get a one G drive, what I would do

354
00:23:25.279 --> 00:23:31.079
is this, Maybe they can let us know. But you know,

355
00:23:31.160 --> 00:23:33.279
if we get achieved one G drive, it would make

356
00:23:33.319 --> 00:23:36.720
travel around the Solar System pretty schmick, wouldn't It is?

357
00:23:38.000 --> 00:23:42.880
It's it is. It's a nice concept because you you

358
00:23:42.960 --> 00:23:46.880
do two things. You give your spacecraft a long period

359
00:23:46.920 --> 00:23:50.279
of constant acceleration. But if you make it one G,

360
00:23:50.519 --> 00:23:54.200
then you've you've also provided your spacecraft with artificial gravity.

361
00:23:55.559 --> 00:23:58.680
So it means that everybody you know can stand upright

362
00:23:58.720 --> 00:24:01.880
on the bottom of the spacecraft as it's accelerating. Yeah,

363
00:24:02.319 --> 00:24:05.880
the end away from the the end of away from them, sorry,

364
00:24:05.920 --> 00:24:07.599
the way the end away from the point a bit

365
00:24:08.720 --> 00:24:14.720
that the bottom of your capsule that the acceleration would

366
00:24:14.839 --> 00:24:17.640
would mean that you were you were actually kept there

367
00:24:18.400 --> 00:24:20.839
exactly the same weight as you have on Earth. And

368
00:24:20.880 --> 00:24:22.839
then if you switched it around to slow down at

369
00:24:22.839 --> 00:24:24.960
the other end of your trip, you'd have one G

370
00:24:25.960 --> 00:24:29.759
also decelerating it. It's a really neat idea, if ever

371
00:24:29.839 --> 00:24:30.880
it can be made to work.

372
00:24:31.200 --> 00:24:32.400
Do you think it could work?

373
00:24:34.200 --> 00:24:38.640
Yes, well it could, but the main issue is sustaining

374
00:24:38.680 --> 00:24:41.240
it for a long period. That's why it's something that

375
00:24:41.279 --> 00:24:42.200
we haven't done yet.

376
00:24:43.640 --> 00:24:45.799
Maybe ion drive engines.

377
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:47.559
That sort of thing. That's why that's the kind of

378
00:24:47.559 --> 00:24:48.519
thing that people think of.

379
00:24:49.279 --> 00:24:52.920
Yeah, could be interesting. Thank you, Rusty. As always you

380
00:24:52.920 --> 00:24:56.279
you pulled one out of the big black box. It's

381
00:24:56.960 --> 00:24:59.039
he's always got a bit of a curve ball for us.

382
00:24:59.079 --> 00:25:03.599
Has Rusty nice to hear from you. That is the

383
00:25:03.720 --> 00:25:06.960
end of this particular episode. If you would like to

384
00:25:07.000 --> 00:25:10.920
ask questions of Fred by all means, go to our

385
00:25:10.920 --> 00:25:14.799
website spacenuts podcast dot com. Spacenuts dot io is the

386
00:25:14.839 --> 00:25:17.599
other url. I'll both take you to the same place.

387
00:25:18.000 --> 00:25:21.640
You just click on the tab at the top and

388
00:25:22.039 --> 00:25:23.799
when you go in there, it gives you the option

389
00:25:23.880 --> 00:25:26.000
to send us a text or audio question.

390
00:25:26.079 --> 00:25:26.640
If you've got a.

391
00:25:26.599 --> 00:25:29.759
Device with a microphone, it's as easy as saying, Hi,

392
00:25:29.839 --> 00:25:33.559
I'm Fred from Sydney and I want to know and

393
00:25:33.880 --> 00:25:37.039
awhere you go. And if you're not named Fred, you

394
00:25:37.079 --> 00:25:39.759
can send us questions to just tell us who you

395
00:25:39.799 --> 00:25:43.799
are and where you're from, and we'd love to hear

396
00:25:43.839 --> 00:25:46.759
from you, especially if you've contemplated sending a question and

397
00:25:46.799 --> 00:25:49.640
you've been a bit reluctant. There are no dumb questions

398
00:25:49.680 --> 00:25:53.200
in astronomy and space science, so yeah, please please do

399
00:25:54.000 --> 00:25:57.200
get onto our website and send us some questions asap.

400
00:25:58.400 --> 00:25:59.960
We're done, Fred, thank you very much.

401
00:26:01.279 --> 00:26:04.640
You're welcome. It's always a pleasure, Andrew, and we'll talk

402
00:26:04.680 --> 00:26:08.720
again to we will possibly in the next few days.

403
00:26:08.799 --> 00:26:12.799
Who knows. That's Professor Fred Wartson, astronomer at large here

404
00:26:12.880 --> 00:26:16.480
in the studio, is just being here in the studio today. Actually,

405
00:26:16.559 --> 00:26:19.440
I think he's been the guy who picks up the

406
00:26:19.480 --> 00:26:22.680
kids from school. Hugh in the studio and from me

407
00:26:22.720 --> 00:26:24.599
Andrew and Unkley, thanks for your company. We'll catch you

408
00:26:24.599 --> 00:26:29.519
again real soon on another episode of Space Nuts. Bye bye.

409
00:26:30.319 --> 00:26:32.519
To the Space Nuts podcast.

410
00:26:33.559 --> 00:26:39.640
Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player.

411
00:26:39.799 --> 00:26:42.920
You can also stream on demand at bides dot com.

412
00:26:43.119 --> 00:26:48.480
This has been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Send a Voicemail