#431: Ancient Universe Revealed by Webb & Space Junk Hits Home
Space Nuts Episode 431: James Webb Discoveries, Space Junk, and Ocean WorldsJoin Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this exciting episode of Space Nuts, where they explore the latest in space science and astronomy.
Episode Highlights:- James...
Space Nuts Episode 431: James Webb Discoveries, Space Junk, and Ocean WorldsJoin Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this exciting episode of Space Nuts, where they explore the latest in space science and astronomy.
Episode Highlights:- James Webb Space Telescope Discovery: The James Webb Space Telescope has captured images from a time when the universe was only 3% of its current age. Fred and Andrew discuss the significance of this discovery and the stunning images of star clusters in the cosmic gems arc.
- Space Junk Hits Home: Space junk re-entered Earth's atmosphere and struck a house in Florida. Discover the details of this near-disaster and the legal implications for NASA.
- Life in Ocean Worlds: Could life exist in the hydrothermal vents of ocean worlds like Europa and Enceladus? A new study suggests it's possible. Fred dives into the research and what it means for the search for extraterrestrial life.
Don't forget to send us your questions via our website... spacenuts.io.
Support Space Nuts and join us on this interstellar journey by visiting our website support page. Your contributions help us continue our mission to explore the wonders of the universe.
Clear skies and boundless exploration await on Space Nuts, where we make the cosmos your backyard.
Check out our sponsor: www.bitesz.com/nordvpn
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support
Visit our websites: www.spacenuts.io
www.bitesz.com
1
00:00:00.240 --> 00:00:03.600
Hi there, Andrew Dunkley here.
Thanks for joining us. This is Space
2
00:00:03.720 --> 00:00:10.759
Nuts, the astronomy and space science
podcast also heard on community radio across Australia
3
00:00:10.800 --> 00:00:14.960
and hello to you too. Coming
up in this episode, we will be
4
00:00:15.039 --> 00:00:21.440
looking at another James Webb space telescope
discovery and it will blow your mind as
5
00:00:21.440 --> 00:00:28.359
to how far back this dates.
Space junk has hit home literally and life
6
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:34.880
in the Solar System beyond Earth could
exist if the hydrothermal vents of some of
7
00:00:34.920 --> 00:00:39.520
those ocean worlds exist at the right
temperature. I think Goldilocks lives there.
8
00:00:39.960 --> 00:00:46.039
That's all coming up on this edition
of Space Nuts. Fifteen second in channel
9
00:00:46.520 --> 00:00:57.920
ten nine ignition sequence Space Nuts or
three two one Space Nuts. Can I
10
00:00:58.039 --> 00:01:02.439
record it? Bills good and here
he is again, Professor Fred Watson,
11
00:01:02.479 --> 00:01:04.959
Hello friend, Hello Andrew. Are
you looking very well? If I may
12
00:01:06.000 --> 00:01:08.280
say so? I need a haircut? Oh do you okay? Yeah,
13
00:01:10.120 --> 00:01:14.400
I'm booked. I'm booked in tomorrow. Very good. Yeah. I usually
14
00:01:14.439 --> 00:01:17.879
get it done every six weeks.
I have not much up top, but
15
00:01:17.959 --> 00:01:21.799
it sort of fuffs out at the
sides and I start looking like some kind
16
00:01:21.840 --> 00:01:25.280
of near One of the three sturges, which one was it Larry that had
17
00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:34.879
the big there's a paradox, because
I believe it or not, I get
18
00:01:34.920 --> 00:01:38.319
my hair cut every three weeks,
spice as often as you and I've got
19
00:01:38.319 --> 00:01:42.680
about five percent of the hair that
you've got. But it's a literal haircut.
20
00:01:42.719 --> 00:01:49.560
You get one haircut, I mean
one once the chance. We talked
21
00:01:49.560 --> 00:01:55.560
about dollars for it as well.
It's an expensive I've found a backyard business,
22
00:01:55.560 --> 00:02:00.000
so I get it nice and cheat
with a lawnmower. Pretty much.
23
00:02:00.120 --> 00:02:05.840
She's jumping the hole and done.
That explains. That explains the ballpatch on
24
00:02:05.840 --> 00:02:12.400
top of ballparts of the by ah, these are getting worse, terrible man.
25
00:02:12.919 --> 00:02:16.639
Okay, let us let us talk
about what is on today's agenda,
26
00:02:16.879 --> 00:02:23.000
and we'll start off with this incredible
discovery made by the James Webb Space Telescope.
27
00:02:23.800 --> 00:02:28.159
I'm sorry, Jordie, Jordy.
It's blowing Jordy's mind. You can
28
00:02:28.199 --> 00:02:34.000
tell. Sure has now to probably
get to the nuts and bolts of the
29
00:02:34.039 --> 00:02:38.319
story straight up. This dates back
to a time when the universe was only
30
00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:42.159
three percent of its current known age, and this is what the James Webb
31
00:02:42.240 --> 00:02:46.680
Space Telescope was all about. Going
back so far that we can almost see
32
00:02:46.680 --> 00:02:50.960
the beginning. Well, that's right. It's so that these that we're seeing
33
00:02:51.000 --> 00:02:54.759
these objects as they were when the
universe was five hundred million years old,
34
00:02:54.919 --> 00:02:59.479
And that sounds like a lot.
But the universe is thirteen point eight billion,
35
00:02:59.560 --> 00:03:01.280
yes, so as you said,
it's kind of a few percent of
36
00:03:01.319 --> 00:03:07.479
the age of the of the universe. And look, i'd you know,
37
00:03:07.599 --> 00:03:14.120
suggest all our listeners check out this
image. It is I've got it on
38
00:03:14.159 --> 00:03:19.039
a press release here from the web
Telescope, but the headline is web captures
39
00:03:19.080 --> 00:03:23.759
star clusters in cosmic gems are Cosmic
gems is the name of an arc of
40
00:03:23.879 --> 00:03:34.080
light which is the result of the
of the gravitational attraction of a huge cluster
41
00:03:34.159 --> 00:03:38.960
of galaxies. And so this image, it is just staggering the amount of
42
00:03:38.039 --> 00:03:42.080
stuff there is. There's a cluster
of galaxies in the foreground. There are
43
00:03:42.080 --> 00:03:49.000
a tiny tiny, excuse me,
almost invisible galaxies in the background, excuse
44
00:03:49.039 --> 00:03:54.400
me, which we see distorted because
of the gravitational lensing effect of the foreground
45
00:03:54.439 --> 00:04:03.360
cluster. So the foreground cluster is
called sptcl J zero six one five minus
46
00:04:03.400 --> 00:04:13.240
five seven four six. We get
that that's the cluster and it's a cluster
47
00:04:13.319 --> 00:04:18.040
that is massive enough that it's you
know, it's distorting the space around it,
48
00:04:18.439 --> 00:04:24.279
producing this phenomenon we know as a
gravitational lens and acting as a real
49
00:04:24.519 --> 00:04:30.480
magnifying glass for the distant objects behind
it, which are distorted, you know,
50
00:04:30.560 --> 00:04:35.480
in their appearance because of the gravitational
lens. Isn't like a perfect lens,
51
00:04:36.319 --> 00:04:40.079
a glass lens that we use,
kind of thing we think of in
52
00:04:40.079 --> 00:04:44.519
a pair of spectacles or something like
that. It's actually, this is a
53
00:04:44.560 --> 00:04:49.120
side note, it's shaped. If
you could imagine a gravitational lens converted into
54
00:04:49.160 --> 00:04:55.279
glass, it would be very similar
to the bottom of a wine glass,
55
00:04:55.279 --> 00:04:59.279
the part that sits on the table. That cusp shape of the bottom of
56
00:04:59.319 --> 00:05:02.759
a wine glass is a very close
approximation. What it does to light is
57
00:05:02.920 --> 00:05:08.199
very similar to what a cluster of
galaxies does to the light of the of
58
00:05:08.439 --> 00:05:11.800
whatever's behind it. And you can
see when you look through the bottom of
59
00:05:11.839 --> 00:05:14.560
a wine glass. It helps if
you've taken the wine out first, because
60
00:05:14.720 --> 00:05:24.439
as it goes all down your shirt
night did you before as well? Yeah,
61
00:05:24.680 --> 00:05:27.480
if you can look through it,
you can see that any light source
62
00:05:27.800 --> 00:05:31.360
is turned into an arc of light
by the refraction of the glass, and
63
00:05:31.399 --> 00:05:35.279
that's exactly what the gravitational lens does, only there's no glass involved. All
64
00:05:35.319 --> 00:05:41.319
there is is the distortion of space, which is just fantastic. So when
65
00:05:41.319 --> 00:05:46.399
you look closely at this image of
that cluster, who's never won't bother repeating,
66
00:05:46.680 --> 00:05:50.519
you see all these little arcs of
light, and there's a couple of
67
00:05:50.560 --> 00:05:56.600
them, which I think are what
are being called the cosmic gems arcs.
68
00:05:57.040 --> 00:06:01.240
They're nearly straight lines actually, and
they've got tiny dots of light in them,
69
00:06:01.439 --> 00:06:08.360
tiny tiny points of light. And
these have been identified as being due
70
00:06:08.560 --> 00:06:17.319
to clusters of clusters of stars actually
in a distorted galaxy. So you're probably
71
00:06:17.319 --> 00:06:23.680
aware we've talked about it before,
Andrew, that the Milky Way galaxy,
72
00:06:23.680 --> 00:06:28.839
our own galaxy has this swarm of
what we call globular clusters around it.
73
00:06:28.920 --> 00:06:32.680
There's up to about two hundred of
them, and these are compact star clusters.
74
00:06:32.680 --> 00:06:39.279
They're almost very cool. Some of
them are slightly flattened. But they've
75
00:06:39.279 --> 00:06:42.480
got the name globular cluster that comes
from William Herschel back in the day,
76
00:06:43.399 --> 00:06:46.560
because they look like globes, but
they're fuzzy and they're made of stars.
77
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:50.079
When you can look through some of
the bright ones here in the southern hemisphere
78
00:06:50.120 --> 00:06:55.560
through small telescopes or binoculars and you
tear flop, fuzzy blob. But they
79
00:06:55.560 --> 00:07:00.439
are in reality hundreds of thousands and
sometimes millions of stars, and they're very
80
00:07:00.519 --> 00:07:03.240
ancient. We know that these are
some of the most ancient stars we can
81
00:07:03.279 --> 00:07:08.040
observe. They go back twelve in
our galaxy's case, they go back twelve
82
00:07:08.040 --> 00:07:12.720
perhaps twelve and a half billion years, so the days when the galaxy was
83
00:07:12.800 --> 00:07:15.319
just a youngster, when the Milky
Way Galaxy was just a youngster. So
84
00:07:15.879 --> 00:07:23.480
what we're seeing now is evidence that
those clusters are in existence in some of
85
00:07:23.519 --> 00:07:28.759
the first galaxies to have formed.
So they must be very very old objects.
86
00:07:28.800 --> 00:07:32.480
Indeed, they're objects that date from
the very earliest period of the universe.
87
00:07:33.279 --> 00:07:40.600
And so all the scientists who've worked
on this, and actually principally they're
88
00:07:40.600 --> 00:07:50.759
Swedish in fact, but of course
sorry the James Webb and NASA scientists from
89
00:07:50.839 --> 00:07:58.519
the Hubble Telescope are also involved.
It's a very big collaboration. But they
90
00:07:58.560 --> 00:08:03.920
are so excited about this because this
gives us a window into studying these clusters
91
00:08:03.199 --> 00:08:07.759
without the gravitational lensing. You simply
would not see them. Without this natural
92
00:08:07.800 --> 00:08:13.879
magnifying glass provided by a four grand
cluster of galaxies, we wouldn't know that
93
00:08:13.920 --> 00:08:18.079
those star clusters belonging to much earlier
galaxies, we wouldn't know they were there.
94
00:08:18.600 --> 00:08:24.160
Well worth checking out the imagery.
It's very easy to find web captures
95
00:08:24.199 --> 00:08:28.600
star clusters in cosmic gems arc beautiful
stuff, yeah, quite incredible. Pictures
96
00:08:28.639 --> 00:08:33.799
are very very striking. And you
mentioned those cosmic gems. They kind of
97
00:08:33.840 --> 00:08:39.840
look like the trail that would be
left like by space junk re entering the
98
00:08:39.840 --> 00:08:46.279
Earth's aphere. It's breakof and glowing
the little blobs, and that's kind of
99
00:08:46.320 --> 00:08:50.759
what they look like. But the
whole starfield effect itself is quite staggering.
100
00:08:52.360 --> 00:08:56.200
My question, Fred, is how
do they know? It dates back to
101
00:08:56.360 --> 00:09:01.080
four hundred and sixty million years into
the existence of the universe. So it's
102
00:09:01.440 --> 00:09:07.919
all to do with colors and the
spectrum basically of the of these objects.
103
00:09:09.120 --> 00:09:15.440
So web is equipped with a way
of forming the spectrum of very very faint
104
00:09:15.519 --> 00:09:20.759
objects, and you look for you
know, if we're looking at stars,
105
00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:24.519
for example, in our own galaxy, you look at the spectrum you see
106
00:09:24.559 --> 00:09:26.600
the light broken up into its rainbow
colors. We never detect the colors because
107
00:09:26.639 --> 00:09:31.200
we don't need to. All we
want to see is that barcode of information
108
00:09:31.279 --> 00:09:37.960
that's encapsulated in that and that barcode
of information is there no matter when the
109
00:09:39.039 --> 00:09:41.600
light was emitted. You know,
even if the light was emitted five hundred
110
00:09:41.639 --> 00:09:46.679
million years after the birth of the
universe, it's still got that barcode imprinted
111
00:09:46.679 --> 00:09:52.679
on it. And in fact,
the scientists in this case look for not
112
00:09:52.759 --> 00:09:58.480
so much a barcode as a very
obvious feature that we know whose wavelength at
113
00:09:58.559 --> 00:10:01.759
rest we know, and it's red
shifted by the expansion of the universe.
114
00:10:01.759 --> 00:10:05.679
And by measuring that red shift,
that's what you can that's what how you
115
00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:09.279
can determine the age of you know, the age of the universe when when
116
00:10:09.320 --> 00:10:13.879
these these light, this light was
emitted. The particular feature they look for
117
00:10:13.960 --> 00:10:18.840
is something called the Lyman break.
It's in the ultraviolet where this region of
118
00:10:18.879 --> 00:10:24.279
the spectrum is, but it shifted
into the infrared because the red shift is
119
00:10:24.320 --> 00:10:28.799
so great, because we're looking back
so far in time. Yes, all
120
00:10:28.919 --> 00:10:35.919
right, another question, these images
are so very old. What would be
121
00:10:35.679 --> 00:10:39.480
there now? What would like they
wouldn't exist as we see them now.
122
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:43.320
We're seeing them in history because of
the amount of time it takes for that
123
00:10:43.480 --> 00:10:48.360
light to reach the James Wor of
Space telescope. So what would be there
124
00:10:48.399 --> 00:10:54.120
now? Probably a galaxy, probably
these same star clusters as we as we
125
00:10:54.240 --> 00:10:58.840
know just mentioned that the star clusters
in our own galaxy, the globular clusters,
126
00:10:58.840 --> 00:11:05.840
have been have been hallmarked with great
age, really since the early days
127
00:11:05.879 --> 00:11:09.120
of our understanding of the way stars
evolve. We know that these are made
128
00:11:09.120 --> 00:11:13.559
of very old stars. Indeed,
as I sense, they date back perhaps
129
00:11:13.600 --> 00:11:16.320
twelve twelve and a half, maybe
even thirteen billion years to the formation of
130
00:11:16.360 --> 00:11:20.600
our own galaxies. Now our galaxy
is still here, and the globular clusters
131
00:11:20.600 --> 00:11:26.559
are still here, and I expect
that the particular galaxies that we can see
132
00:11:26.559 --> 00:11:30.919
those clusters like a string of pearls, actually just these dots of light,
133
00:11:31.759 --> 00:11:37.120
those clusters they are, they're probably
still in existence. It might even be
134
00:11:37.200 --> 00:11:39.679
life forms on some of the planets
of the stars in those galaxies. Who
135
00:11:39.720 --> 00:11:45.200
knows, wouldn't that be something,
But we have to wait somewhere around thirteen
136
00:11:45.720 --> 00:11:48.679
billion years for them to be able
to see what's happening now, don't we
137
00:11:50.879 --> 00:11:54.200
Yes, that's correct. Yeah.
To see what those galaxies look like now,
138
00:11:54.200 --> 00:11:56.679
you've got to wait thirteen billion years, that's right. Yeah. I
139
00:11:56.679 --> 00:12:01.639
mean it's so hard to get a
head around that we're looking at something that
140
00:12:01.840 --> 00:12:07.919
was there almost the dawn of time
and to see it as it is now
141
00:12:07.200 --> 00:12:13.399
we have to wait that time frame
again almost. Yes, yes, you
142
00:12:13.440 --> 00:12:16.480
know, take your time over that. It's going to be a well,
143
00:12:18.840 --> 00:12:22.600
put it in your diary. Put
it in your diary. Thirteen point five
144
00:12:22.639 --> 00:12:24.399
million years. Have another look.
I mean, yeah, you know,
145
00:12:26.279 --> 00:12:28.879
I think our own galaxy as it
is today, and of course everything in
146
00:12:28.919 --> 00:12:33.919
our own galaxy we see, well
maybe a few thousand years ago when we
147
00:12:33.919 --> 00:12:35.799
look at the galactic center, we're
looking back twenty five thousand years. But
148
00:12:37.080 --> 00:12:43.440
nevertheless that's kind of today by the
standards which we're talking about now, and
149
00:12:43.480 --> 00:12:48.080
so they may well have evolved into
a galaxy very like ours, you know,
150
00:12:48.240 --> 00:12:52.200
with all the attributes that we see
in our own galaxy. And the
151
00:12:52.240 --> 00:12:56.879
other interesting part of this story is
without the James web Space Telescope, these
152
00:12:56.919 --> 00:13:01.799
images couldn't have been taken, couldn't
exist, correct, that's right, So
153
00:13:03.639 --> 00:13:07.440
marvelous piece of kit doing such a
great Yes. Indeed, it just keeps
154
00:13:07.759 --> 00:13:11.240
giving, doesn't it. It keeps
on giving, that's right. Yeah,
155
00:13:11.399 --> 00:13:13.720
yes, and we're still only really
in the early days of its mission,
156
00:13:13.840 --> 00:13:20.320
so who knows what we're going to
find out next. Yeah, it is
157
00:13:20.480 --> 00:13:22.879
mind blowing, absolutely mind blowing.
If you'd like to look at that story,
158
00:13:24.600 --> 00:13:28.799
you find it in plenty of places, butweb dot org that's a doublebeweb
159
00:13:30.120 --> 00:13:35.600
dot org. Fred I did mention
space junk re entering our atmosphere and how
160
00:13:35.639 --> 00:13:43.279
it looked very much like those cosmic
gems. Well that sort of dovetails beautifully
161
00:13:43.279 --> 00:13:46.159
with the next story, which almost
turned into a horror story because space junk
162
00:13:46.200 --> 00:13:50.360
did re enter our atmosphere earlier this
year, and it hit a house in
163
00:13:50.399 --> 00:13:54.679
Florida. Yeah, it went through
the roof. Apparently it's in Naples,
164
00:13:54.759 --> 00:14:01.759
Florida. A gentleman by the name
of Alejandro Otero. He has a seaside
165
00:14:01.759 --> 00:14:07.320
home in Naples, and basically March
the eighth, something came through his roof
166
00:14:07.759 --> 00:14:15.000
and two floors of the family home
very nearly hit his son. So that
167
00:14:16.120 --> 00:14:20.159
was, you know, the reason
why they got rather miffed about this.
168
00:14:20.799 --> 00:14:24.960
Turns out that what it was and
NAS has confirmed this an almost three ton
169
00:14:26.080 --> 00:14:33.879
palette of used batteries International Space station
batteries, which are you know, jettison
170
00:14:33.960 --> 00:14:37.039
from time to time, three tons
of it, nearly two point nine tons,
171
00:14:37.440 --> 00:14:45.240
and they were jettisoned in March two
years ago. My word, so
172
00:14:45.960 --> 00:14:50.120
they three years ago, Beggy Pan, three years ago? Yes, sorry,
173
00:14:50.440 --> 00:14:54.759
my originally TWE twenty twenty one.
That's right, three years ago.
174
00:14:54.279 --> 00:14:58.799
They were jettisoned. They were expected
just to the orbit, would be expected
175
00:14:58.799 --> 00:15:03.879
to k over time, and eventually
they'd re enter the atmosphere. They'd partially
176
00:15:03.879 --> 00:15:09.519
burn up, but something to two
point nine tons. You know, there's
177
00:15:09.639 --> 00:15:15.919
enough mass there that it almost certainly
would survive re entry, at least bits
178
00:15:15.919 --> 00:15:18.720
of it would. And part of
it has now come through the roof.
179
00:15:18.960 --> 00:15:24.240
And so, as you might expect, Alexandro is not very impressed with this,
180
00:15:26.080 --> 00:15:35.320
and so there is legal action taking
place which involves a claim to perhaps
181
00:15:35.039 --> 00:15:39.159
you know, pay for the damage, pay for down for the pawer of
182
00:15:39.200 --> 00:15:43.000
the damage. I'd certainly be thinking
along those lines. I'm not sure whether
183
00:15:43.039 --> 00:15:48.480
my home insurance policy covers space junk
coming through your roof. I know it
184
00:15:48.519 --> 00:15:52.720
covers trees coming through your roof,
because we had one not very long ago
185
00:15:52.840 --> 00:15:58.600
that did and in fact it did
little damage to ours, but sadly did
186
00:15:58.639 --> 00:16:03.120
more dumb show. Next door neighbor
was a tree that has had multiple parts
187
00:16:03.159 --> 00:16:07.159
to it, so they're covered by
our insurance. But if that had been
188
00:16:07.200 --> 00:16:11.200
space junk falling on our roof,
I don't know what the situation would have
189
00:16:11.240 --> 00:16:18.919
been. Now, we do know
that under a legal instrument called the Space
190
00:16:19.000 --> 00:16:26.840
Liability Convention, which is international and
international regulation, if the debris had fallen
191
00:16:27.399 --> 00:16:34.240
on Canada, for example, or
somewhere in South America, then NASA would
192
00:16:34.279 --> 00:16:42.080
have been liable for the damage.
Because when you put something into orbit,
193
00:16:42.759 --> 00:16:47.399
it's the Space Treaty going back to
nineteen sixty seven, it's the country that
194
00:16:47.480 --> 00:16:52.240
launches that that's responsible for it.
So it's a national thing, and that
195
00:16:52.360 --> 00:16:55.480
sort of made a lot of sense
back in the day when there were two
196
00:16:55.600 --> 00:17:02.320
basically two countries, two superpowers that
had had the capability to put stuff into
197
00:17:02.399 --> 00:17:06.119
orbit. Things are a lot different
now. Anybody with the right equipment can
198
00:17:06.119 --> 00:17:11.279
put something into orbit, but it's
still the national you know, the nation
199
00:17:11.440 --> 00:17:15.599
that is responsible for that launch that
actually has to pay for the damage.
200
00:17:17.519 --> 00:17:23.440
But apparently that doesn't work if it
falls through the roof of somewhere on your
201
00:17:23.480 --> 00:17:32.039
own territory. And so, as
a quote from the lawyer who's actually acting
202
00:17:32.119 --> 00:17:37.200
on behalf of the Otto family,
which is, we've asked NASA not to
203
00:17:37.279 --> 00:17:42.759
apply a different standard towards US citizens
or residents, but instead to take care
204
00:17:44.079 --> 00:17:48.079
of the Ottero's the family and make
them whole. That's a nice way of
205
00:17:48.119 --> 00:17:53.319
putting it. So it does set
a precedent this, you know, just
206
00:17:52.759 --> 00:17:59.400
to work out how much compensation there
should be. And it could turn out
207
00:17:59.440 --> 00:18:02.160
to be very inventive. You know, if you're insuring against this sort of
208
00:18:02.200 --> 00:18:08.480
thing, that's going to be a
very very costly way of operating spacecraft.
209
00:18:08.480 --> 00:18:14.480
You're going to have to build all
that into your liabilities cost. Yeah,
210
00:18:14.960 --> 00:18:19.880
it is. It really does open
up a can of cosmic worms. But
211
00:18:21.039 --> 00:18:25.400
going back to the incident itself,
NASA was confident, according to what I
212
00:18:25.480 --> 00:18:30.079
read, that it would burn up
on re entry completely and it didn't.
213
00:18:30.240 --> 00:18:33.440
So is it a combination of the
mass, the speed of re entry,
214
00:18:33.559 --> 00:18:38.799
and the angle of the trajectory that
probably stopped it from completely burning up?
215
00:18:40.400 --> 00:18:48.680
I suspect that's correct. Andrew the
you know, re entry is fairly well
216
00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:55.359
controlled process, but it does depend
on things like the atmosphere pressure. You
217
00:18:55.400 --> 00:19:00.279
know, the kind of ambient temperature
which does determine the pressure. A lot
218
00:19:00.319 --> 00:19:07.000
of things like that can influence it. We know that you know, periods
219
00:19:07.079 --> 00:19:10.720
when there's high solar activity, for
example, Yeah, our atmosphere fluffs up.
220
00:19:11.839 --> 00:19:18.039
It sort of puffs up a bit
like fairy floss, and that means
221
00:19:18.160 --> 00:19:22.119
that there's more drag on spacecraft that
would normally not be feeling that drag.
222
00:19:22.039 --> 00:19:26.519
So maybe if you've got the converse
situation where the atmosphere is nice and tight,
223
00:19:27.000 --> 00:19:30.880
you don't get the same burn up
effect when you put something through it
224
00:19:32.079 --> 00:19:37.240
to burn up, you don't get
the same perfect combustion. So really interesting
225
00:19:37.440 --> 00:19:41.319
stuff. And yeah, re entry
is still kind of a bit of a
226
00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:45.400
black art. I think that's the
bottom line. Yeah, interesting of course,
227
00:19:48.079 --> 00:19:52.759
law suit side. Does insurance cover
it? Yes or no? I
228
00:19:52.799 --> 00:19:56.680
don't know what the rules are in
Australia. You mentioned trees falling, but
229
00:19:56.960 --> 00:20:00.160
these days, at least in New
South Wales where we if you have to
230
00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:04.039
declare your trees if they're within a
certain distance of your house and a certain
231
00:20:04.079 --> 00:20:08.920
height. Okay, it's actually a
question when you apply for insurance, do
232
00:20:08.960 --> 00:20:15.839
you have trees exceeding such a height
within twenty meters of your home? And
233
00:20:15.880 --> 00:20:18.599
if you don't declare them and it
hits the house, I dare say,
234
00:20:18.680 --> 00:20:22.720
you can't make a claim. Maybe
it's interesting in the future. Yeah,
235
00:20:22.960 --> 00:20:27.480
I've had it happen a couple of
times when I've changed insurance companies. That's
236
00:20:27.519 --> 00:20:30.599
why I chopped all the trees down. No I didn't, No, I
237
00:20:30.640 --> 00:20:37.480
didn't. But maybe in the future
the option will be to declare the potential
238
00:20:37.599 --> 00:20:42.000
for space junk hitting your house.
As rare as that is, you might
239
00:20:42.039 --> 00:20:45.880
be able to add it to your
insurance, to your cover your especially if
240
00:20:45.920 --> 00:20:49.759
you live in Florida. I mean, you know you're on the you're sort
241
00:20:49.799 --> 00:20:56.480
of on the space highway there almost, although because this was from the International
242
00:20:56.480 --> 00:21:00.160
Space Station, it could have fallen
anywhere in the world. It's just that
243
00:21:00.200 --> 00:21:06.000
it hit Larns rather than see So
yeah, really interesting. Well it nearly
244
00:21:06.079 --> 00:21:11.480
hit the sea, yes, I
believe. So that's right, it's just
245
00:21:11.880 --> 00:21:17.559
missed it by that much. Yes, Well, all things being equal,
246
00:21:17.599 --> 00:21:22.839
I'm just so glad nobody was hurt. But yes, certainly a long way
247
00:21:22.480 --> 00:21:26.799
to go. Down the road of
this particular lawsuit. By the sound of
248
00:21:26.839 --> 00:21:30.039
it, this is space nuts.
Andrew Dunkley here with Professor Fred Watson.
249
00:21:33.599 --> 00:21:40.680
Okay, we'll take your space nuts. Fred. This story excites me because
250
00:21:40.720 --> 00:21:45.279
it talks about life beyond the Earth. And this is all to do with
251
00:21:45.400 --> 00:21:48.519
something we have talked about before.
And you've certainly considered that if we're going
252
00:21:48.559 --> 00:21:53.440
to find life elsewhere in our Solar
System, it might be in the ocean
253
00:21:53.640 --> 00:22:00.880
worlds, and particularly if they've got
hydro thermal events, and a new paper
254
00:22:00.880 --> 00:22:07.119
has been released suggesting just that correct, And yes, you're right. This
255
00:22:07.200 --> 00:22:11.640
is an exciting piece of It's a
kind of theoretical research in a way,
256
00:22:11.680 --> 00:22:18.559
although it's based on things that go
on on our own planet. We're talking
257
00:22:18.599 --> 00:22:23.160
about hydrothermal vents. We're talking about
an ocean floor and what sometimes are called
258
00:22:23.200 --> 00:22:30.119
black smokers, those plumes of super
hot water that are emitted from cracks and
259
00:22:30.319 --> 00:22:38.079
fissures in the seafloor. And we
know that the regions around those vents are
260
00:22:38.359 --> 00:22:48.480
very rich in well in both chemistry
sort of rich organic chemistry and living organisms.
261
00:22:48.519 --> 00:22:52.559
There are you know, lots and
lots of different species that make their
262
00:22:52.559 --> 00:23:03.480
home around these warm vents of hot
water, and so that's really the thrust
263
00:23:03.519 --> 00:23:07.240
of the thinking when it comes to
worlds like that. As you mentioned,
264
00:23:07.519 --> 00:23:12.559
Europa is one which we know has
a sub ice ocean with a rocky floor
265
00:23:12.599 --> 00:23:17.480
to it. Enceladus is another.
Enceladus. Of course, we have had
266
00:23:17.480 --> 00:23:22.319
a spacecraft Cassini, which flew through
the plumes of ice that were in the
267
00:23:22.359 --> 00:23:29.880
South Pole geysers that spurred out ice
from that ocean. And my recollection is,
268
00:23:30.119 --> 00:23:33.759
and this goes back to probably twenty
fifteen twenty sixteen or so, that
269
00:23:34.920 --> 00:23:42.759
there was discovered in those ice plumes
molecular hydrogen, which I think was seen
270
00:23:44.039 --> 00:23:51.279
as a smoking Garnifiing put it that
way. For there being hydrothermal vents down
271
00:23:51.319 --> 00:23:57.200
at the bottom of Enceladus's ocean,
the smokers were there and the hydrogen was
272
00:23:57.319 --> 00:24:03.160
being detected as a consequence of So
there's pretty good evidence that these oceans on
273
00:24:03.200 --> 00:24:11.519
the ocean worlds probably do have hydrothermal
events. Now, what has happened recently,
274
00:24:11.559 --> 00:24:15.119
and the reason why this is in
the news is a team of scientists
275
00:24:15.160 --> 00:24:21.599
at the University of California, Santa
Cruz have looked at some of the lower
276
00:24:21.640 --> 00:24:26.359
temperature events which are very very common
on the Earth's ocean floor. Not the
277
00:24:26.400 --> 00:24:30.880
ones where it's coming out boiling,
which you might think would be a little
278
00:24:30.880 --> 00:24:38.119
bit unsupportive of living organisms. The
lower temperature ones where you're talking about water
279
00:24:38.200 --> 00:24:45.400
coming out at fairly benign perhaps bath
water temperature. They've looked at the science
280
00:24:45.440 --> 00:24:56.960
of those, and in particular they've
studied one particular system, which is it's
281
00:24:57.000 --> 00:25:06.440
somewhere near something all the huanda Fuka
Ridge in the northwestern Pacific Ocean. So
282
00:25:07.200 --> 00:25:15.039
there is apparently a system of hydrothermal
vents there where you've got an extinct volcano,
283
00:25:15.599 --> 00:25:21.920
a seamount down at the bottom of
the ocean floor, and water that's
284
00:25:22.000 --> 00:25:26.319
cold. So water goes into that
through channels in it, and then it
285
00:25:26.559 --> 00:25:33.240
travels under underground for about forty five
kilometers and then comes back through another seamount,
286
00:25:33.319 --> 00:25:40.039
which is warmer because the water gets
warmer as it flows underneath the ocean's
287
00:25:40.160 --> 00:25:42.559
crust. It's quite extraordinary stuff we're
talking about, you know, we're talking
288
00:25:42.559 --> 00:25:48.119
about cavities and passages in the in
the crust of the earth underneath the ocean.
289
00:25:48.799 --> 00:25:55.200
The water comes in, it travels
along this forty five kilometers and so
290
00:25:55.319 --> 00:26:02.559
thirty miles and then pops up in
the sea amount where it's got a nice
291
00:26:02.759 --> 00:26:06.759
benign temperature. I'm not sure what
the temperature is, but it's not boiling
292
00:26:06.839 --> 00:26:11.000
hot. It's a sort of,
you know, just a reasonable temperature.
293
00:26:11.400 --> 00:26:17.680
They call that system Andrew a hydrothermal
siphon. We all know what a siphon
294
00:26:17.799 --> 00:26:19.880
is. It's the way, you
know, you can change the pressure to
295
00:26:19.880 --> 00:26:26.799
to get fluids through. It's me. It's how we used to clean the
296
00:26:26.799 --> 00:26:30.359
bottom of a swimming pool back in
the day before they had pump systems.
297
00:26:32.240 --> 00:26:37.079
It's how I used to drain my
petrol tank to patch leaks in the bottom
298
00:26:37.079 --> 00:26:41.119
of it when I had an ancient
car. Steel feel out of a car.
299
00:26:44.319 --> 00:26:47.559
That's right, yes, and on
that, but it's always my siphon.
300
00:26:48.039 --> 00:26:49.759
But yeah, so many of us
have had a mouthful of petrels setting
301
00:26:49.799 --> 00:26:53.039
up this siphon. Well, this
is a lot this is a lot more
302
00:26:53.440 --> 00:27:00.200
benign. A hydrothermal siphon keeps the
flow going because heat is being in jet
303
00:27:00.519 --> 00:27:07.079
by the heat of the rocks themselves. So yes, it is quite you
304
00:27:07.079 --> 00:27:15.279
know. An interesting study that they've
looked at and they apparently places where the
305
00:27:15.319 --> 00:27:23.720
gravity is very low, and that
includes Enceladus, probably includes Europa. Europe
306
00:27:23.799 --> 00:27:29.880
is bigger than Enceladus and Tellads only
about five hundred kilometers across. But it's
307
00:27:29.920 --> 00:27:40.839
they found that that low gravity is
not an an inhibitor for these hydrothermal siphons,
308
00:27:41.559 --> 00:27:45.519
and in particular, somewhere like Enceladus, you could have circulation taking place
309
00:27:47.319 --> 00:27:52.759
for millions or billions of years,
and you know, you might well have
310
00:27:53.480 --> 00:28:00.519
this sort of activity taking place long
enough for living organisms to kick off whatever
311
00:28:00.599 --> 00:28:04.359
chemistry is involved in setting up life. They might have a stable environment in
312
00:28:04.440 --> 00:28:11.839
one of these one of these planets. So one of these worlds. Yes,
313
00:28:11.960 --> 00:28:15.880
So that's that's, you know,
the kind of positive side of the
314
00:28:15.920 --> 00:28:22.079
story. There's there's lots of uncertainties, but it is a very interesting study.
315
00:28:22.119 --> 00:28:27.240
The paper, the research paper is
by at Fisheries. The author's sorry,
316
00:28:27.319 --> 00:28:36.039
the lead author Etol several other authors
Sustaining hydrothermal circulation with gravity relevant to
317
00:28:36.119 --> 00:28:41.519
ocean worlds. It's in the journal
Geo Physical Research Planets. It sort of
318
00:28:41.680 --> 00:28:45.839
is counter to a story we did
a few months ago about a study they
319
00:28:45.839 --> 00:28:49.079
did on Titan, and what they
found with Titan was, you know,
320
00:28:49.200 --> 00:28:53.720
life probably can't exist there, and
therefore probably can't exist anywhere in the Solar
321
00:28:53.759 --> 00:28:57.960
System beyond Earth. So yes,
one sort of counters that that's right,
322
00:28:59.039 --> 00:29:04.599
Yeah, And I can't remember.
It was something about what was leaking up
323
00:29:04.680 --> 00:29:11.000
through the ice, wasn't it from
the ocean? Something I've forgotten the details
324
00:29:11.039 --> 00:29:14.279
of it. That's a good point, which did. Yes, you're quite
325
00:29:14.319 --> 00:29:18.400
right. It did pour cold water
on the idea of there being living organisms
326
00:29:18.400 --> 00:29:22.400
in the sub ice ocean of Titan. Titan, of course, another ocean
327
00:29:22.440 --> 00:29:29.640
world. And I think it also
had relevance to the chemistry on the surface,
328
00:29:29.799 --> 00:29:34.000
because it's possible that Titan might have
life forms that don't look anything like
329
00:29:34.400 --> 00:29:37.880
what we have on Earth, that
don't use water as they're working fluid,
330
00:29:37.880 --> 00:29:42.160
but use liquid natural gas, liquid
ethane and methane. And we're talking about
331
00:29:42.200 --> 00:29:48.160
that last time, with the seas
of Titan perhaps having waves on them.
332
00:29:48.559 --> 00:29:53.400
So look, all these studies are
they're all trying to build up a picture
333
00:29:53.440 --> 00:29:56.960
of what we might expect. The
only way to find out is to go
334
00:29:57.039 --> 00:30:03.400
there and start looking detail. And
of course I think is it juice that's
335
00:30:03.440 --> 00:30:06.880
on its way? I think juice
is the one that's on its way out
336
00:30:06.920 --> 00:30:11.799
to EUROPEFT should check that because there's
two spacecraft heading in that direction. One's
337
00:30:11.839 --> 00:30:17.519
on its way and one's not.
And I'm remissing not know which is which.
338
00:30:18.839 --> 00:30:25.400
Never mind everything, but around our
black smokers inersations that there are there
339
00:30:25.440 --> 00:30:27.240
are worms, there are shrimp,
there are crabs, there are fish.
340
00:30:27.640 --> 00:30:33.279
I dare say, we wouldn't expect
to find that on ocean worlds beyond our
341
00:30:33.319 --> 00:30:37.160
planet, but there could be microscopic
life. Who knows, it could be
342
00:30:37.200 --> 00:30:41.880
something completely different that we wouldn't even
imagine. So it would be hopefully one
343
00:30:41.920 --> 00:30:45.799
day we'll find out. Won't be
tomorrow, probably not tomorrow, but hopefully
344
00:30:45.839 --> 00:30:51.279
within the lifetime of space. Yeah
it was. Did you say it was
345
00:30:51.400 --> 00:30:56.119
Cassini that went through the plume and
picked up all that. Yeah, it
346
00:30:56.279 --> 00:30:59.640
also picked up a note from Goldilock
saying send help, can't bear it.
347
00:31:03.920 --> 00:31:07.279
That's where it came from. I
wonder I thought it was much true.
348
00:31:07.559 --> 00:31:11.759
Is that the one with the ps
that says where's my porridge? Yeah,
349
00:31:12.680 --> 00:31:18.240
it's exactly. I think we'll leave
it there, Fred, Thank you so
350
00:31:18.319 --> 00:31:29.480
much already, but don't forget to
chase our our episodes on our website was
351
00:31:29.519 --> 00:31:32.920
what I was trying to say.
Space Nuts podcast dot com, Space Nuts
352
00:31:32.960 --> 00:31:37.200
dot Io. You can listen to
the back catalog. Some people are still
353
00:31:37.240 --> 00:31:41.039
doing that, and don't forget to
check out all the other things on our
354
00:31:41.079 --> 00:31:44.960
website while you're there. At the
Astronomy Daily newsletter, you can sign up
355
00:31:45.000 --> 00:31:48.519
for that. You can become a
supporter of Space Nuts. It's all on
356
00:31:48.519 --> 00:31:52.119
our website, so check it out. And if you're a YouTube follower,
357
00:31:52.160 --> 00:31:56.359
don't forget to subscribe. Fred,
thanks so much. We'll catch you next
358
00:31:56.359 --> 00:32:00.079
time. I hope so sounds good. See you soon, all right,
359
00:32:00.359 --> 00:32:04.960
Fred Watson, Astronomer at Large.
And Hugh in the studio who's not in
360
00:32:05.000 --> 00:32:07.960
the studio again, And from me
Andrew Duncley, thanks for your company.
361
00:32:08.079 --> 00:32:14.039
Catch you next time on another edition
of Space Nuts. Bye bye. You'll
362
00:32:14.079 --> 00:32:21.599
be listening to the Space Nuts podcast
available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeart
363
00:32:21.680 --> 00:32:25.119
Radio, or your favorite podcast player. You can also stream on demand at
364
00:32:25.200 --> 00:32:32.279
bites dot com. This has been
another quality podcast production from nights dot com.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed