#430: Dark Energy Theories & Voyager's Cosmic Rays: Your Queries Answered
Space Nuts Q&A: Black Holes, Voyager 1, and Atmospheric TubesJoin Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this lively Q&A edition of Space Nuts, where they tackle intriguing questions from listeners Geoff, Paddy, and Oliver. From the...
Space Nuts Q&A: Black Holes, Voyager 1, and Atmospheric TubesJoin Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson in this lively Q&A edition of Space Nuts, where they tackle intriguing questions from listeners Geoff, Paddy, and Oliver. From the mysteries of black holes to the adventures of Voyager 1, this episode is packed with cosmic insights.Episode Highlights:- **Black Holes and Radiation**: Young listener Oliver from Queensland poses a fascinating question about why radiation from black holes doesn't get sucked back in and whether black holes could be creating dark energy. Fred explains the concept of Hawking radiation and delves into the theories connecting black holes to dark energy.- **Voyager 1's Journey**: Paddy from Northern Ireland asks about cosmic rays, the recent drama with Voyager 1, and how NASA manages to communicate with such a distant spacecraft. Fred discusses the nature of cosmic rays, the shielding effect of Earth's atmosphere, and the impressive technology of the Deep Space Network.- **Atmospheric Tubes**: Geoff from the Isle of Wight presents a "what if" scenario involving a magic pipe extending into space. Fred explores the physics behind atmospheric pressure and gravitational pull, explaining why such a pipe wouldn't suck out Earth's atmosphere
Don't forget to send us your questions via our website... [spacenuts.io](https://www.spacenuts.io).
**Support Space Nuts** and join us on this interstellar journey by visiting our website support page. Your contributions help us continue our mission to explore the wonders of the universe.
Clear skies and boundless exploration await on Space Nuts, where we make the cosmos your backyard.
Become a **supporter** of this podcast: [https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support](https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support)
Visit our **websites**: [www.spacenuts.io](https://www.spacenuts.io) [www.bitesz.com](https://www.bitesz.com)
1
00:00:00.120 --> 00:00:04.200
Hi there. This is Space Nuts
where we talk astronomy and space science.
2
00:00:04.280 --> 00:00:06.919
My name is Andrew Dunkley, your
host. Good to have your company.
3
00:00:07.160 --> 00:00:12.320
This is our Q and A edition
where we take audience questions and we chop
4
00:00:12.359 --> 00:00:15.679
them up and throw them out because
we don't know the answer to anything.
5
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:21.120
But we are going to attempt to
discuss atmospheric tubes. Now, this is
6
00:00:21.199 --> 00:00:25.359
a question that Jeff's come up with. It's a sort of a what if
7
00:00:25.440 --> 00:00:30.239
question, so we'll look at that. Paddy is asking questions about Voyager one,
8
00:00:30.280 --> 00:00:34.200
which has been in the news lately. And Oliver, one of our
9
00:00:34.240 --> 00:00:38.719
younger listeners, is talking radiation,
dark matter and dark energy. All coming
10
00:00:38.799 --> 00:00:44.640
up on this episode of Space Nuts
fifteen seconds. Guidance is in channel ten
11
00:00:45.520 --> 00:00:55.520
nine ignition sequence Space Nuts or three
two more red ones Space Nuts. As
12
00:00:55.560 --> 00:00:59.960
can I report it. Bill's good
and we say hello once again to Professor
13
00:01:00.039 --> 00:01:03.520
Fred. What's an astronomer at La
TI? Fred? Hello, Andrew,
14
00:01:03.600 --> 00:01:10.159
fancy seeing you here? Yes,
welcome back. It's been minutes. Not
15
00:01:10.239 --> 00:01:12.560
even sure it was minutes. I
think it might just be saying continued.
16
00:01:14.599 --> 00:01:18.239
Do you think this joke is getting
a bit old? Now? It's pretty
17
00:01:18.239 --> 00:01:22.879
awful in it. But space Nuts
is nol for one thing. It's its
18
00:01:22.959 --> 00:01:26.480
bud jokes. Terrible jokes. Horrible
jokes. Yes, we'll keep them coming
19
00:01:26.519 --> 00:01:33.400
too. Shall we get straight into
it? No, let's let true.
20
00:01:33.439 --> 00:01:38.879
Well yeah, okay, fair enough. What I do love about space Nuts
21
00:01:38.959 --> 00:01:44.359
is we've got people listening all over
the world, lots of questions coming from
22
00:01:44.560 --> 00:01:48.280
different parts of the planet. But
we do have a young audience too,
23
00:01:48.319 --> 00:01:53.319
which I think is one of the
great things about it, having young people
24
00:01:55.239 --> 00:01:57.840
having such an interest in astronomy and
space science. One of those people is
25
00:01:57.879 --> 00:02:02.959
Oliver, and Oliver's got a well
a pretty curly one, but he's got
26
00:02:02.959 --> 00:02:07.359
his own ideas on this as well. Let's see what he's on about.
27
00:02:07.640 --> 00:02:10.120
Yeah. Hello, I am Oliver
from Queensland. I was just wondering a
28
00:02:10.199 --> 00:02:16.919
pretty interesting question. So you know
that a black hole creates radiation, How
29
00:02:16.960 --> 00:02:22.639
can it doesn't get immediately softened?
Does that mean the radiation has to go
30
00:02:22.800 --> 00:02:25.120
faster than the speed of light?
But what if it's just going a bit
31
00:02:25.199 --> 00:02:30.360
faster? But what if black holes
that could create dark energy that would actually
32
00:02:30.360 --> 00:02:36.120
solve a lot of things white it
And if dark energy, what if that
33
00:02:36.159 --> 00:02:39.520
combines with matter particles and that creates
dark matter. I think that would make
34
00:02:39.599 --> 00:02:46.000
a lot of scent. And with
little things that can go fast, it
35
00:02:46.039 --> 00:02:51.240
goes over there and makes the border
of the universe grow even faster and faster.
36
00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:55.560
And when it grows faster and faster, the reason it guru's faster and
37
00:02:55.599 --> 00:02:59.680
faster. I know, I'm saying
faster and faster a lot back. What
38
00:03:00.199 --> 00:03:05.039
if it goes faster and faster because
there's more space for the radiation to not
39
00:03:05.199 --> 00:03:07.800
collide with other minor particles, so
it can go to the border of the
40
00:03:07.879 --> 00:03:14.120
universe quicker. So we can't tell
because it's there because it's going so fast.
41
00:03:14.240 --> 00:03:19.120
Our telescopes, like the Hubble space
telescope can't see it because it's going
42
00:03:19.159 --> 00:03:23.199
faster than the speed of light.
It's just a quick question. Thanks,
43
00:03:23.319 --> 00:03:25.879
love the show, Goodbye. Please
tell me a good answer. No,
44
00:03:27.000 --> 00:03:32.199
I don't really care as long as
it gets solved there. I love that
45
00:03:32.360 --> 00:03:38.080
ending, Oliver. That's brilliant.
Gosh, what a there's a lot in
46
00:03:38.120 --> 00:03:46.039
there that we've got to unpack.
The first part was about radiation. How
47
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:49.560
come radiation from a black hole doesn't
get sucked straight back in? That's a
48
00:03:49.560 --> 00:03:54.039
good question. It's a great question
and more, you know, thank you
49
00:03:54.120 --> 00:04:00.199
again, Oliver for getting in touch
with us and for bringing a breath the
50
00:04:00.199 --> 00:04:03.840
fresh air to questions. It's great
to have your I just I'm revved up
51
00:04:03.879 --> 00:04:08.479
by his excitement, you know too, I really am me too. So
52
00:04:09.719 --> 00:04:13.879
we think that hawking radiation, or
the radiation that's emitted from black holes,
53
00:04:14.240 --> 00:04:17.800
doesn't come from the black hole itself. It actually comes at the event horizon.
54
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:24.439
So the event horizon is that sphere. It's an imaginary sphere around the
55
00:04:24.800 --> 00:04:30.720
black hole, but it's the point
where there's the black hole's gravitational attraction stops
56
00:04:30.839 --> 00:04:40.720
any light emanating from the black hole. So outside the black hole, light
57
00:04:40.839 --> 00:04:44.759
can travel around inside the black hole, it can't because it just gets pulled
58
00:04:44.800 --> 00:04:48.399
back in. Sorry, outside the
event horizon, light can travel around inside
59
00:04:48.399 --> 00:04:53.720
the event horizon, it just gets
pulled back in. And we think hawking
60
00:04:53.839 --> 00:04:58.360
radiation, well, it seems to
be the case that it's formed by what
61
00:04:58.480 --> 00:05:04.639
we call virtual party FLEs articles basically
coming into being and disappearing again. And
62
00:05:05.000 --> 00:05:09.839
they come into being in pairs.
And if one of the pair is inside
63
00:05:09.839 --> 00:05:13.519
the event horizon and the other one
isn't, then the one that's outside the
64
00:05:13.519 --> 00:05:18.360
event horizon gets away and can travel
because it's not within the region where the
65
00:05:19.160 --> 00:05:23.079
speed of light isn't enough to get
away from the black hole. I hope
66
00:05:23.120 --> 00:05:29.519
that makes sense. But that's why
the hawking radiation doesn't just get pulled back
67
00:05:29.519 --> 00:05:32.399
in. And it is electro excuse
me, it is electromagnetic radiation. It
68
00:05:32.519 --> 00:05:39.439
is a mixture of the different wavelengths. It's probably pretty low energy, and
69
00:05:39.920 --> 00:05:45.360
we have never detected it, but
the theoretical basis is sound enough that we
70
00:05:45.439 --> 00:05:50.120
are pretty sure that it exists.
Okay, And what leads, by the
71
00:05:50.160 --> 00:05:55.680
way to the evaporation of black holes. It's an energy loss from black holes
72
00:05:56.079 --> 00:06:00.399
that over billions, many billions,
perhaps tens of billions of years, the
73
00:06:00.439 --> 00:06:05.800
black hole will evaporate and disappear.
Thankfully. Sorry, So that's one part
74
00:06:05.800 --> 00:06:13.319
of his question. Yes, he
goes on to ask about a black hole
75
00:06:13.480 --> 00:06:17.079
being the reason the dark energies.
Now, there are some theories and studies
76
00:06:17.120 --> 00:06:21.639
going on that suggests this. That's
right, We've covered that, and I
77
00:06:21.720 --> 00:06:27.199
keep meaning to re look at that
paper just to work out what the mechanism
78
00:06:27.319 --> 00:06:31.959
is. But there is certainly a
view, if I remember rightly, was
79
00:06:32.000 --> 00:06:36.879
it Japanese scientists who postulated this.
I can't remember. We should look back
80
00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:41.079
at it and perhaps do it in
a bit more detail sometime. But yes,
81
00:06:41.079 --> 00:06:46.720
there was this view that perhaps phenomena
taking place within black holes are what
82
00:06:47.040 --> 00:06:53.399
lead to the dark energy of the
universe. The only issue with that that
83
00:06:53.480 --> 00:06:59.000
comes to my mind is that we
we equate, we believe, and the
84
00:06:59.040 --> 00:07:02.160
evidence seems to be that the dark
energy of the universe is totally uniform,
85
00:07:02.199 --> 00:07:06.360
that it's the same everywhere, And
if it was something to do with black
86
00:07:06.360 --> 00:07:09.879
calls, you might think it will
be a bit bomp it where, you
87
00:07:09.879 --> 00:07:12.160
know, the more black holes you've
got in one part of space, the
88
00:07:12.160 --> 00:07:15.600
more dark energy you've got. But
that doesn't seem to be the case.
89
00:07:15.680 --> 00:07:23.720
So I do need to look at
that again. Andrew, Okay, yeah,
90
00:07:24.519 --> 00:07:28.319
but see that there in lies the
problem with dark energy. We keep
91
00:07:28.360 --> 00:07:31.360
coming up with new theories, new
ideas, new problems associated with those new
92
00:07:31.399 --> 00:07:34.959
theories and new ideas, and it
just keeps going around and around and around.
93
00:07:34.959 --> 00:07:40.639
In our last episode was the question
came up as to how the galaxies
94
00:07:40.680 --> 00:07:46.399
and galaxy clusters can possibly exist as
they are if there isn't a dark matter
95
00:07:46.079 --> 00:07:49.360
halo big enough to cover it,
so we've got our thinking wrong. Well,
96
00:07:51.040 --> 00:07:54.480
yeah, I don't know. And
then Oliver goes on to ask if
97
00:07:54.759 --> 00:08:01.519
dark energy could, as it moves
through the the universe, affect particles and
98
00:08:01.639 --> 00:08:07.240
become dark matter. Could they be
a relationship between the two even though by
99
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:15.360
name they're not actually very accurate or
are well their names they're both called dark
100
00:08:15.439 --> 00:08:22.920
something, and that's probably where the
similarity ends. Very different in their nature.
101
00:08:22.079 --> 00:08:28.800
And yes, it's a good point. We Oliver talked about, you
102
00:08:28.839 --> 00:08:33.519
know, there being more space in
the universe as a dark energy makes it
103
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:37.559
expand things can travel to the boundary
of the universe more rapidly. We don't
104
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:41.480
actually know if the universe has a
boundary or not. We suspect it may
105
00:08:41.519 --> 00:08:45.200
not have. It may be infinite. The boundary that we can see as
106
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:50.120
a horizon the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is what blocks our view beyond,
107
00:08:50.759 --> 00:08:56.399
so that we don't see that the
you know, the more distant regions
108
00:08:56.399 --> 00:09:00.440
of the universe. The universe might
be very big, indeed that we can
109
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:05.639
see might be quite small in comparison, so and faster than light travel.
110
00:09:05.679 --> 00:09:11.480
I mean, Einstein's theory holds true. That in space itself, nothing can
111
00:09:11.519 --> 00:09:16.799
move faster than light. Space itself
can and probably did during the period of
112
00:09:18.080 --> 00:09:24.080
inflation, and it may do again
if dark energy keeps on accelerating the expansion
113
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:28.879
of the universe, so that one
day the universe is so big that some
114
00:09:28.960 --> 00:09:33.279
things that emit light it never gets
here because that those that have been carried
115
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:37.039
away faster than the speed of light
by the space itself, but not the
116
00:09:37.159 --> 00:09:41.960
light moving through it. So interesting
questions there. I do like your thinking,
117
00:09:43.120 --> 00:09:45.639
Oliver, and I hope as time
goes on we might hear from you
118
00:09:45.679 --> 00:09:48.799
again. Oh that would be lovely, Oliver. Thanks very much for getting
119
00:09:48.799 --> 00:09:54.000
in touch with us, and don't
lose that youthful enthusiasm ever, because it
120
00:09:54.120 --> 00:10:00.240
is such a ray of light,
and I really appreciate hearing from you.
121
00:10:00.360 --> 00:10:09.399
This is space Nuts. Andrew Dunkley
here with Professor Fred Watson. Space puts
122
00:10:09.679 --> 00:10:13.120
Now. Fred to a text question
that came in from Patty. Hi,
123
00:10:13.200 --> 00:10:18.600
guys, thanks for answering my last
question about the end of life. I
124
00:10:18.679 --> 00:10:22.759
remember that one. I remember that
one. Yeah, thanks Patty. So
125
00:10:22.039 --> 00:10:28.639
here's a more boring one or four. After Voyager one's recent drama, what
126
00:10:28.960 --> 00:10:33.759
is a cosmic ray and how came
it affects Voyager and not computers on Earth?
127
00:10:33.080 --> 00:10:39.279
Did NASA have to get people out
of retire out of retirement to reprogram
128
00:10:39.320 --> 00:10:41.879
the seventies computer? And he's made
a reference to the movie The Martian where
129
00:10:41.919 --> 00:10:48.159
they had to do that for the
path find a mission that they had to
130
00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:52.519
reinvent during that show. Three,
how can NASA hear such a week week
131
00:10:52.639 --> 00:10:58.559
signal? I've seen the DSN website
and the signal looks weaker than a mouse
132
00:10:58.600 --> 00:11:03.399
part the moon. He's got a
great turn of phrase, Isn't he's a
133
00:11:03.440 --> 00:11:09.919
technical term? Yeah? I know. We can shout really loud to Voyager,
134
00:11:09.960 --> 00:11:15.159
but the return signal is so weak. For will new horizons ever overtake
135
00:11:15.279 --> 00:11:18.759
Voyager given it smaller and launched on
a bigger rocket. I think that's more
136
00:11:18.799 --> 00:11:22.960
than four, but that's a full
episode covered. Thanks again, guys.
137
00:11:24.360 --> 00:11:31.320
Paddy from rainy Northern Ireland, home
of the Amar Observatory, where, at
138
00:11:31.320 --> 00:11:35.759
the age of eight his interest in
space began. Now, granddad, so
139
00:11:35.799 --> 00:11:41.320
it wasn't yesterday? Yeah, great
questions, budd It at Alma's a wonderful
140
00:11:41.360 --> 00:11:46.240
place we visited a few years ago. I know the director there very well,
141
00:11:46.279 --> 00:11:52.480
he's a colleague of mine from Edinburgh
days and also here in Australia.
142
00:11:52.519 --> 00:11:58.120
He worked for many years in Australia, Michael Burton. So let's go to
143
00:11:58.200 --> 00:12:01.559
the beginning that you've got a list
of four here. What's a cosmic ray,
144
00:12:01.679 --> 00:12:05.039
Well, it's high energy particle.
I think they're primarily muons if I
145
00:12:05.080 --> 00:12:11.720
remember rightly, and we think they
come from distant galaxies, that there are
146
00:12:11.399 --> 00:12:18.080
products of energetic, energetic events in
very different galaxies, and yet they're raining
147
00:12:18.120 --> 00:12:22.840
down on Earth all the time.
How come it affects Voyager and not computers
148
00:12:22.840 --> 00:12:28.879
on Earth because computers on Earth are
shielded by the Earth's magnetic field and its
149
00:12:28.919 --> 00:12:35.000
atmosphere, and so we are not
irradiated to the same extent. We do
150
00:12:35.120 --> 00:12:41.080
get them though. Cosmic ray events
are things that we used to deal with
151
00:12:41.000 --> 00:12:45.120
in some of the detectors that are
used. In fact, I think we
152
00:12:45.320 --> 00:12:48.399
spoke about this a little while ago. Maybe we didn't, can't remember,
153
00:12:48.720 --> 00:12:54.480
but the recent araori which we saw
on Earth May the tenth, we're also
154
00:12:54.720 --> 00:13:00.639
visible on Mars because the subatomic particles
from the Sun affected the detectors on some
155
00:13:00.679 --> 00:13:03.440
of the cameras. We had the
same thing actually with cosmic rays, which
156
00:13:03.480 --> 00:13:09.000
are much more energetic than the rays
that come from the sun. Back in
157
00:13:09.039 --> 00:13:11.559
the day when I used to build
instruments, one of the problems that we
158
00:13:11.600 --> 00:13:18.799
had was these cosmic rays essentially creating
little bright spots in the images, which
159
00:13:20.039 --> 00:13:22.879
you had to be careful you didn't
mix up with something that you were trying
160
00:13:22.879 --> 00:13:28.080
to try to measure. In fact, one of them we discovered that the
161
00:13:28.120 --> 00:13:33.000
window of the on the front of
the detector was slightly radioactive, so we
162
00:13:33.000 --> 00:13:37.679
were getting our own cosmic rays from
that. Anyway, the bottom line is
163
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:41.559
protection by the atmosphere. Didn't have
to get people out of retirement to reprogram
164
00:13:41.600 --> 00:13:48.759
the seventies computer, or probably it
happens to us a lot. Certainly the
165
00:13:48.840 --> 00:13:52.639
Australian Astronomical Observatory, where we used
to be astronomery in charge. That's a
166
00:13:52.799 --> 00:13:58.879
long lived observatory, celebrates its fiftieth
anniversary this year, and so the original
167
00:13:58.039 --> 00:14:05.720
some of the original pro programmers still
around. They're retired, but they are
168
00:14:05.840 --> 00:14:09.399
occasionally called in when there are problems. So it almost certainly happened with NASA
169
00:14:09.440 --> 00:14:13.399
too. How can NASA here such
a weak signal? Well, big dishes,
170
00:14:13.440 --> 00:14:20.879
big that's right. The darks.
The Deep Space Network website will tell
171
00:14:20.919 --> 00:14:24.799
you that the Tidbinbiller and the Goldstone
and the Madrid stations all have very big
172
00:14:26.480 --> 00:14:31.639
detectors, very big radio telescopes that
can pick up that really weak signal.
173
00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:37.480
Number four of Paddy's questions, will
New Horizons ever overtake Voyager giving it smaller
174
00:14:37.480 --> 00:14:41.799
and launched on a big rocket,
And the answer is no. You can
175
00:14:41.919 --> 00:14:46.600
very easily find the numbers on the
Events Above website. They've got a page
176
00:14:46.600 --> 00:14:52.279
on spacecraft leaving the Solar System and
the first thing you see is that the
177
00:14:52.279 --> 00:14:56.320
one that's going fastest is Voyager one, at sixteen point nine to three to
178
00:14:56.360 --> 00:15:01.720
three kilometers per second relative to the
Sun at present. New Horizons, on
179
00:15:01.759 --> 00:15:05.679
the other hand, thirteen point six
seventy five kilometers per second, so slower
180
00:15:07.440 --> 00:15:09.480
and not as far away. So
Voyager one is always going to be the
181
00:15:09.480 --> 00:15:15.919
most distant object, the most distant
human made object. It will it will
182
00:15:15.960 --> 00:15:24.080
always have that status unless it hits
something, and New Horizons don't. Well,
183
00:15:24.120 --> 00:15:26.799
the odds of yeah, you never
know, it might hit something.
184
00:15:28.679 --> 00:15:33.159
My guess is it will go on
forever because space is so big. Yeah,
185
00:15:33.519 --> 00:15:37.679
maybe it might get captured by you
know, it's further down the street
186
00:15:37.679 --> 00:15:41.279
to the chemist, but it's that's
right. Space is big. That's right.
187
00:15:43.639 --> 00:15:48.200
What was there? Was there another
one of she's at it, Thank
188
00:15:48.240 --> 00:15:54.480
you buddy. Fantastic questions, but
yeah, well worth asking because Voyager has
189
00:15:54.480 --> 00:15:58.240
been in the news because the've had
some technical issues but they've they've sorted them
190
00:15:58.240 --> 00:16:02.720
out, so that might be where
they drag back the old retired nineteen seventies
191
00:16:02.720 --> 00:16:08.519
computer programmers with their tape cartridges and
things like that. Yeah, those are
192
00:16:08.519 --> 00:16:14.320
the days. Like yeah, technology
is taking the fun out of everything.
193
00:16:14.360 --> 00:16:17.519
Back in the day of tape and
vinyl. Gosh, working in radio was
194
00:16:17.559 --> 00:16:19.440
such a joy. These days you
push a button and go to sleep for
195
00:16:19.480 --> 00:16:23.759
a couple of minutes. It wasn't
like that back in the day. I'll
196
00:16:23.799 --> 00:16:30.639
tell you now when I was a
lad. I'm say from my perspective,
197
00:16:30.879 --> 00:16:37.360
things are far far better now than
they It's certainly a lot easier until something
198
00:16:37.399 --> 00:16:42.879
breaks. Thank you, Patty space
Nuts. Now to our final question Fred,
199
00:16:42.919 --> 00:16:52.960
and this one comes from Jeff.
It's I'm down on the UK coast.
200
00:16:53.320 --> 00:16:57.919
I love the podcast, by the
way, boys. My question is
201
00:16:59.159 --> 00:17:08.880
if you have a magic pipe for
arguments say the meter wide diameter this pipe
202
00:17:08.920 --> 00:17:15.920
is totally in this story sport,
but it doesn't weigh anything. So if
203
00:17:15.960 --> 00:17:19.680
you extend it out, say six
hundred miles out into space, would it
204
00:17:19.720 --> 00:17:25.880
suck the atmosphere out? I don't
think it would, but be interesting nominal
205
00:17:26.079 --> 00:17:30.240
years anyway. Cheers, chaps,
keep it up, you know, I
206
00:17:30.720 --> 00:17:36.279
love what if questions? Jeffs And
that's a real rip up. So it's
207
00:17:36.319 --> 00:17:41.640
an indestructible pipe, so space junk
doesn't become a factor, and it's in
208
00:17:41.720 --> 00:17:45.960
the atmosphere. It's on Earth,
and you shove it up out through the
209
00:17:47.000 --> 00:17:52.200
atmosphere into space where the atmosphere is
almost nil, it's obviously hollow. Does
210
00:17:52.200 --> 00:18:00.559
it suck out our atmosphere and kill
us all? Uh? No, which
211
00:18:00.599 --> 00:18:06.640
is great relief to all of us. Rather so, the reason why is
212
00:18:06.680 --> 00:18:11.640
that the atmosphere in the tube just
feels the same gravitational pull as the atmosphere
213
00:18:11.640 --> 00:18:18.079
everywhere else. So the pressure at
the bottom of the tube is always going
214
00:18:18.119 --> 00:18:22.440
to be the same effectively as the
atmospheric pressure. It might vary slightly if
215
00:18:22.440 --> 00:18:26.359
the tube is sealed so that you
can't get leakage of varian at the bottom
216
00:18:26.400 --> 00:18:32.000
then it won't be subject to the
same quite the same atmosphere pressure changes that
217
00:18:33.200 --> 00:18:41.000
the outer atmosphere does. But it
basically is still the atmosphere and it's still
218
00:18:41.160 --> 00:18:44.960
bound by the gravity of the Earth. So yep, it won't. It
219
00:18:45.000 --> 00:18:48.440
won't leak away. So why having
the effect at all? You can't even
220
00:18:48.480 --> 00:18:52.960
wrong, japp is down. So
if you're thinking about, you know,
221
00:18:52.640 --> 00:18:56.759
checking that out building a tube from
the Isle of White up to six hundred
222
00:18:56.839 --> 00:19:00.039
kilometers, don't worry. It's not
going to away. It'd be a big
223
00:19:00.119 --> 00:19:04.920
chimney. Yeah, that would be
well, yeah, but the smoke it
224
00:19:06.000 --> 00:19:10.359
eventually back up, wouldn't It wouldn't
get out in the space. If it
225
00:19:10.480 --> 00:19:12.559
was a chimney, that's correct,
it would do what it does on Earth.
226
00:19:12.599 --> 00:19:18.440
It would just continue to it would
continue to rise as long as it
227
00:19:18.519 --> 00:19:22.359
was warm, and that it would
just contribute to the general less of the
228
00:19:22.400 --> 00:19:26.039
atmosphere in the tube. Indeed,
all right, so you were right,
229
00:19:26.119 --> 00:19:30.920
Jeff. You didn't even need to
ask the question because you knew the answer.
230
00:19:30.960 --> 00:19:34.200
But that's okay. I love these
types of questions, the what if
231
00:19:34.279 --> 00:19:37.920
questions. By the way, if
you do have a question for us,
232
00:19:37.960 --> 00:19:41.440
don't forget to visit our website,
where you can click on the amail link
233
00:19:41.480 --> 00:19:44.640
and send us a text or audio
question, or click on the send us
234
00:19:44.680 --> 00:19:49.200
your Questions button on the right hand
side of our homepage where you can leave
235
00:19:49.200 --> 00:19:52.799
an audio question. Don't forget to
tell us who you are and where you're
236
00:19:52.799 --> 00:19:56.440
from. We really do love to
know where you're at. And while you're
237
00:19:57.039 --> 00:20:02.720
listening to us on your preferred podcast
platform, please leave a review. That'll
238
00:20:02.759 --> 00:20:07.559
be doing us a wonderful favor.
Apparently reviews make a huge difference to the
239
00:20:07.599 --> 00:20:11.440
state of dark matter in the universe, or the dark matter on the Internet
240
00:20:11.440 --> 00:20:17.000
for that matter. Football Yeah,
we love your reviews. We really appreciate
241
00:20:17.039 --> 00:20:22.279
them. And Fred and thanks to
Jeff, Patty and Oliver for contributing today.
242
00:20:22.359 --> 00:20:23.880
Keep the questions coming, Fred,
we're done for another day. Thank
243
00:20:23.920 --> 00:20:27.799
you so much. Sounds great,
Andrew, and we'll touch up again soon,
244
00:20:27.880 --> 00:20:33.200
I hope, I hope so too. Yes, maybe today, maybe
245
00:20:33.200 --> 00:20:38.160
tomorrow, days, maybe next week. See then. Fred Watson astronomer at
246
00:20:38.200 --> 00:20:42.920
large and Hugh in the studio doing
what Hugh does best, and we don't
247
00:20:42.920 --> 00:20:45.359
know what that is. And for
me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your
248
00:20:45.400 --> 00:20:49.400
company. Catch you next time on
another episode of Space Nuts. Bye Bye
249
00:20:51.799 --> 00:20:59.559
You'll Be The Space Nuts podcast available
at Apple Podcasts, Spotify, I Heart
250
00:20:59.680 --> 00:21:03.160
Radio, or your favorite podcast player. You can also stream on demand at
251
00:21:03.200 --> 00:21:11.319
bites dot com. This has been
another quality podcast production from Knights dot com.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed