#402: Pergola Projections & Proxima Possibilities: Solar Shields and Exoplanetary Expeditions
Embark on another cosmic journey with your favorite celestial explorers, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson, in this insightful Q&A episode of Space Nuts. This time, the mysteries of the outer solar system take center stage as we delve into...
Embark on another cosmic journey with your favorite celestial explorers, Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson, in this insightful Q&A episode of Space Nuts. This time, the mysteries of the outer solar system take center stage as we delve into the elusive Planet Nine. Duncan from Weymouth, Dorset, ponders whether a rogue planet might have once danced through our neighborhood, stirring the orbits of distant objects before continuing on its cosmic path. Could this explain the peculiar movements without the need for a ninth planet?
Next, Rusty revisits his solar pergola concept, but with a twist. Imagine a constellation of satellites, each casting a penumbral shadow upon Earth, designed to reduce solar exposure by a subtle 2%. With advances in technology, could this be the geoengineering marvel we deploy within a decade to temper our planet's fever?
David from Seguin, Texas, presents us with a tantalizing "what if": If you could step foot on any exoplanet, which would it be? Andrew and Fred share their interstellar real estate preferences, revealing the allure of Earth-like worlds and the practical considerations of cosmic travel.
Lastly, we're tackling some homework from our inquisitive listeners. Wayne's curiosity about supernovas and gravitational waves leads to a discussion on cosmic symmetry, while Lee's question about InSight's ability to triangulate Marsquake epicenters unveils the intricate modeling of the Red Planet's inner structure.
So, fasten your seatbelts for a voyage through the wonders of space science, where questions spark discovery and the universe's secrets are just waiting to be unlocked. Don't forget, your questions might just be the next puzzle piece in our grand cosmic understanding, so keep them coming!
For more interstellar intrigue and to continue feeding your space curiosity, subscribe to Space Nuts on your preferred podcast platform. Until our next celestial navigation, remember to look up and let your imagination soar through the infinite expanse!
For more Space Nuts visit www.spacenuts.io or our HQ at www.bitesz.com.
(00:00) Andrew Dunkley: This is the separated second half of Space Nuts q&a
(02:23) Our first question comes from a regular Duncan. Just wondering about planet nine episode
(03:47) Andrew says rogue planet could be caused by passing star or other interference
(08:10) The solar system is very difficult to understand without planet nine, says Mike Brown
(10:26) Rusty suggests solar pergola could help solve climate crisis
(17:03) Plus it increases our classification as a. Civilization in doing so
(17:29) What if y'all could step foot on any planet outside our solar system
(21:34) Whether or not a supernova can cause a gravitational wave was asked recently
(26:36) Professor Fred Watson and Huw in the studio for Space Nuts podcast
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support.
1
00:00:00.200 --> 00:00:03.960
Hi there, Andrew Dunkley here.
Thanks for joining us on Space Nuts QDA.
2
00:00:04.000 --> 00:00:10.919
This is the separated second half of
what used to be a big podcast,
3
00:00:11.400 --> 00:00:16.239
but we've decided to break it up
because of audience feedback mainly, and
4
00:00:16.280 --> 00:00:22.440
that enables people to absorb the show
smaller chunks, which seems to be much
5
00:00:22.480 --> 00:00:26.640
more palatable for most. So we'll
carry on with this and see how it
6
00:00:26.679 --> 00:00:30.960
goes. Coming up on this episode, we're going to be answering questions about
7
00:00:31.000 --> 00:00:37.280
Planet nine. We'll also be chasing
up Rusty's solar pagola. Remember we talked
8
00:00:37.280 --> 00:00:40.200
about that a few weeks ago.
Well, Rusty's come up with a follow
9
00:00:40.280 --> 00:00:45.880
up idea and David's got a what
if question for us, which I've had
10
00:00:45.880 --> 00:00:50.200
to do some research on because I
honestly couldn't answer it until I did some
11
00:00:50.399 --> 00:00:53.200
homework. And I hope Fred's got
some homework too, but he might have
12
00:00:53.200 --> 00:00:57.479
a better idea than I have,
and a bit of homework as well.
13
00:00:57.920 --> 00:01:06.439
Following up questions from Wayn and Wayne
asked us about supernova supernov's causing gravitational waves,
14
00:01:06.480 --> 00:01:12.400
yes or no, and how insight
is able to triangulate impact points of
15
00:01:15.079 --> 00:01:19.079
things hitting the planet's surface. Lee
wanted to know about that, So we'll
16
00:01:19.079 --> 00:01:25.239
be doing all of that in this
episode of Space Nuts Q and A right
17
00:01:25.280 --> 00:01:33.560
now for fifteen seconds. Guidance is
Internal ten nine Ignition, Space Nuts NI
18
00:01:34.000 --> 00:01:42.319
four three two Space Nuts. As
I reported, Bill's good and joining us
19
00:01:42.359 --> 00:01:47.599
again is Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer
at Large. It's a coincidence spread that
20
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:49.920
we're both still wearing the same shirts
as we did in the last episode.
21
00:01:49.959 --> 00:01:53.480
I mean, I don't know how
that happened. It just means we're pretty
22
00:01:53.799 --> 00:01:59.560
scruffy. Really, we're very rough
around the edges in the mine's a Space
23
00:01:59.640 --> 00:02:01.239
Nuts shirt by the way. Yeah, I'm going to have to drag mine
24
00:02:01.239 --> 00:02:07.439
out because since we moved everything sort
of in different places and I haven't really
25
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:09.599
gone looking for them. I know
they're probably not far away. I know
26
00:02:09.639 --> 00:02:15.599
they're not in that wardrobe behind me
that's just full of junk. Had to
27
00:02:15.599 --> 00:02:20.919
put it somewhere. Let's get stuck
into it because we've got a few questions
28
00:02:21.439 --> 00:02:23.719
to deal with and a bit of
homework to follow up. Our first question
29
00:02:23.800 --> 00:02:30.199
comes from a regular Duncans. Hello, s Duncan here from Wellmouth, Indorset.
30
00:02:32.159 --> 00:02:40.039
Just another quick question for you just
wondering with the Planet nine episode and
31
00:02:40.840 --> 00:02:49.000
so far we've not been able to
find it. Also with all the rogue
32
00:02:49.080 --> 00:02:53.479
planets that have been found recently,
is it possible that in the past a
33
00:02:53.639 --> 00:03:00.479
rogue planet would have come through our
Solar System, or at least near to
34
00:03:00.560 --> 00:03:07.120
it, and perturb the objects out
in the York Cloud and the Kuiper Belt
35
00:03:07.280 --> 00:03:13.360
so that they present this strange orbit
that they've got now, and that the
36
00:03:13.479 --> 00:03:17.520
road planet would have then gone on
its way back out of our Solar system,
37
00:03:17.639 --> 00:03:23.879
and therefore there is no planet knowing
to be found, but the objects
38
00:03:23.479 --> 00:03:30.439
still exhibit the strange orbit into which
they were perturbed. Just thinking, you
39
00:03:30.479 --> 00:03:34.800
know, is that a possibility?
So we're looking for something that might no
40
00:03:34.919 --> 00:03:40.039
longer be there. Okay, thank
you anyway, and thanks for the good
41
00:03:40.120 --> 00:03:46.599
work and keep it up and all
that. Thank you. Bye. All
42
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:53.439
right, interesting idea. So possibly
a rogue planet or something else passing by
43
00:03:53.560 --> 00:03:59.560
that caused some interference that created the
anomalies that we now blame a planet on
44
00:03:59.639 --> 00:04:06.199
that may not be there. What
are your thoughts? Yes, so that's
45
00:04:06.280 --> 00:04:15.120
all possible, that's all possible.
Wow, But I think it's been basically
46
00:04:15.360 --> 00:04:25.560
eliminated by those people who are studying
the orbits of these distant transptune union objects.
47
00:04:25.560 --> 00:04:30.560
They're called extreme transceptuny on objects,
the ones whose orbits are aligned.
48
00:04:30.399 --> 00:04:34.720
So my feeling is that that,
if I remember rightly, so, there
49
00:04:34.720 --> 00:04:40.040
were papers published on this in twenty
sixteen and twenty seventeen. They were the
50
00:04:40.160 --> 00:04:46.040
kind of original proponent papers of the
idea that there has been that there is
51
00:04:46.120 --> 00:04:53.879
another planet in the Solar System,
co authored by Mike Brown, who's one
52
00:04:53.879 --> 00:04:59.680
of the main proponents of this.
Now I if I remember rightly, those
53
00:05:00.120 --> 00:05:05.480
he's looked at, you know exactly
these ideas that there have been more likely
54
00:05:05.519 --> 00:05:12.639
to be a passing star because the
Sun does wander near stars as it meanders
55
00:05:12.680 --> 00:05:17.759
around the galaxy, and those stars
do have a gravitational influence. We believe,
56
00:05:17.800 --> 00:05:23.480
for example that and this is not
a star, this is something even
57
00:05:23.480 --> 00:05:29.160
bigger, a giant molecular cloud.
But one of the theories that looked at
58
00:05:29.160 --> 00:05:33.000
the bombardment of the Earth by comets, done by colleague of mine in Edinburgh
59
00:05:33.000 --> 00:05:40.279
back in the day, they looked
at the idea that giant molecular clouds had
60
00:05:40.439 --> 00:05:46.600
influenced the Oort Cloud and basically dumped
comets into the inner Solar system, which
61
00:05:46.639 --> 00:05:51.160
meant that there were episodes of bombardment
on the Earth, which they found evidence
62
00:05:51.240 --> 00:05:57.199
for. So, you know,
it's an idea that is kind of well
63
00:05:57.279 --> 00:06:01.839
known in astronomy that the Sun is
fairly lonely at the moment. The nearest
64
00:06:01.879 --> 00:06:06.120
star is proxima centaury four point three
light years away, but they may well
65
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:12.040
have been closer encounters throughout the history
of the Sun. And I'm pretty sure
66
00:06:12.079 --> 00:06:16.199
that this sort of thing was looked
at in those early papers. But if
67
00:06:16.199 --> 00:06:20.519
I may to segue to a new
paper that's come out, and this is
68
00:06:20.560 --> 00:06:28.920
featured actually by our good friends at
Universe Today, the Universe Today website.
69
00:06:29.879 --> 00:06:36.079
They I think have had a chat
with Mike Brown, who is actually the
70
00:06:36.199 --> 00:06:43.879
Richard and Barbara Rosenberg professor of astronomy
at Caltech, and he's certainly one of
71
00:06:43.920 --> 00:06:48.920
the main proponents of this. They've
done some new research and they've narrowed down
72
00:06:49.600 --> 00:06:58.480
the area in which we should be
looking, which you know, is really
73
00:06:59.800 --> 00:07:03.959
a step forward because the searches that
have been carried out so far have been
74
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:06.920
over a very wide area. I
think they've narrowed it down. I can't
75
00:07:06.959 --> 00:07:11.120
remember to how many square degrees it
is, but it's narrowed down. And
76
00:07:11.240 --> 00:07:16.600
this is in advance of the via
SA Ruben telescope coming online, Andrew,
77
00:07:16.600 --> 00:07:20.879
which is going to be the world's
most effective survey telescopes, and eight point
78
00:07:20.920 --> 00:07:26.120
four meter telescope that will look at
the whole sky. Is it every three
79
00:07:26.240 --> 00:07:30.399
or four nights, the entire sky? Because it's a wide field telescope,
80
00:07:30.120 --> 00:07:34.759
and you know, the planet nine
will be high on the agenda of objects
81
00:07:34.839 --> 00:07:41.279
to be looking for by that telescope. A couple of quotes, if I
82
00:07:41.360 --> 00:07:48.360
may from from Mike Brown, planet
nine would be the fifth largest planet in
83
00:07:48.360 --> 00:07:51.680
the Solar System, and the only
one with a mass between the Earth and
84
00:07:51.839 --> 00:07:56.600
Uranus. Such planets are common around
other stars, and we would suddenly have
85
00:07:56.879 --> 00:08:07.319
a chance to study one in our
own mess would be your legs, like
86
00:08:07.040 --> 00:08:13.000
Jordie likes, I'm not going to
touch it, Andrew. Another another quote
87
00:08:13.040 --> 00:08:16.759
that I like, There are too
many signs. This is Mike Brown again,
88
00:08:18.040 --> 00:08:20.519
there are too many signs that planet
nine is there. The Solar System
89
00:08:20.639 --> 00:08:26.279
is very difficult to understand without planet
nine, and he goes on to say
90
00:08:26.920 --> 00:08:33.559
again talking to universe today, planet
nine explains many things about the orbits of
91
00:08:33.600 --> 00:08:39.000
objects in the outer Solar System that
we would be otherwise unexplainable and would each
92
00:08:39.120 --> 00:08:43.679
need some sort of separate explanation.
The cluster of the directions of the orbits
93
00:08:43.720 --> 00:08:46.679
is the best known, but there
is also a large perihelium distances of many
94
00:08:46.720 --> 00:08:52.159
objects, existence of highly inclined and
even retrograde objects. That's things that orbit
95
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:56.159
the wrong way round clockwise are seen
from above the North Pole. It's the
96
00:08:56.159 --> 00:09:01.879
wrong way round. And the high
abundance of very eccentric orbits which cross inside
97
00:09:01.879 --> 00:09:05.559
the orbits of Neptune. None of
these should happen in the Solar System,
98
00:09:05.879 --> 00:09:11.720
but are all easily explainable as an
effect of planet nine. So Dr Brown
99
00:09:11.840 --> 00:09:18.720
is still very much the proponent of
planet nine. And well, does planet
100
00:09:18.799 --> 00:09:22.559
nine exist? And we will find
it in coming years and decades, as
101
00:09:22.759 --> 00:09:26.480
Universe today asks, only time will
tell, and that's why we do the
102
00:09:26.600 --> 00:09:31.440
science. Yes. Indeed, although
there was one theory that it may not
103
00:09:31.519 --> 00:09:37.840
be a planet but a cluster of
staff, that cluster of stuff has been
104
00:09:37.879 --> 00:09:41.879
one. Clusters of stuff are very
difficult to hold together, Andrew, and
105
00:09:41.960 --> 00:09:46.759
so it needs to be something solid. But a mini black hole has also
106
00:09:46.879 --> 00:09:52.399
been suggested, and that might be
something that's more difficult to eliminate. Right,
107
00:09:52.559 --> 00:09:56.200
wow, Okay, there you go, Duncan. Great question and very
108
00:09:56.240 --> 00:10:00.600
timely given there some new information,
So thanks for sending it in. And
109
00:10:01.120 --> 00:10:03.759
yeah, we continue our search for
planet Night, not me personally. I'm
110
00:10:03.759 --> 00:10:07.559
going to leave that up to other
people that you know occasionally take a peek
111
00:10:09.799 --> 00:10:13.639
us, Yeah, yeah, yeah, my three point five will find it.
112
00:10:13.639 --> 00:10:18.240
It's not three point five meters,
it's three point five inches. But
113
00:10:18.559 --> 00:10:24.000
it's actually Michael, I don't know. I can't remember what size it Isn't
114
00:10:24.000 --> 00:10:30.120
that terrible? Thank you Duncan.
Now we've got a follow up concept,
115
00:10:30.200 --> 00:10:33.639
let's call it from Rusty about his
soular pagola, which he told us about
116
00:10:33.679 --> 00:10:37.080
a few weeks ago. This was
aimed at reducing the Earth's exposure to the
117
00:10:37.120 --> 00:10:43.159
Sun by around two percent, and
he sent us an email about it and
118
00:10:43.200 --> 00:10:48.720
he said, I'm afraid I gave
you and Fred and Andrew the wrong idea.
119
00:10:50.000 --> 00:10:54.960
Although I briefly considered a megastructure at
L one, rather foolishly thought calling
120
00:10:56.320 --> 00:11:00.600
the sunscreen I have in mind the
solar pegola would garners in. It may
121
00:11:00.639 --> 00:11:03.240
have done that, but it also
gave people the wrong idea. What I
122
00:11:03.320 --> 00:11:09.399
do have in mind is a constellation
of starling proportions. Each satellite would throw
123
00:11:09.639 --> 00:11:16.679
a penumberal shadow on the Earth,
and the total two percent sunscreen would not
124
00:11:16.759 --> 00:11:22.799
be noticeable. I'm convinced that using
emerging technologies, we could have this done
125
00:11:22.960 --> 00:11:28.360
in ten years. What do you
think of that? Friend? It's good
126
00:11:28.399 --> 00:11:35.759
stuff. And Duncan is Rusty.
Sorry, Beggy, pardon Rusty, Sorry,
127
00:11:35.879 --> 00:11:39.399
Rusty, Sorry, I'm mixing up
my listeners. All of them are
128
00:11:39.519 --> 00:11:43.960
a big fun of by the way. So yeah, but there's a lot
129
00:11:45.039 --> 00:11:48.480
going on in the you know,
in the scientific world along similar lines.
130
00:11:48.480 --> 00:11:54.600
And in fact only was it a
fortnights ago, three weeks ago as we
131
00:11:54.679 --> 00:11:58.320
stand now, there was a big
article in the New York Times, and
132
00:11:58.360 --> 00:12:03.360
I think it was all have picked
up in the Cinney Morning Hral entitled could
133
00:12:03.360 --> 00:12:09.240
a giant parasol in outer space help
solve the climate crisis? Now, that's
134
00:12:09.720 --> 00:12:15.960
sort of a bit of a reference
to the megastructure idea that Duncan, Sorry,
135
00:12:16.080 --> 00:12:20.879
Rusty, let me just write down
Rusty was thinking about before. But
136
00:12:20.960 --> 00:12:26.200
that article was good because it pointed
back to a lot of the earlier research
137
00:12:26.240 --> 00:12:33.039
that's been done on this, and
indeed there's papers everywhere. One that I
138
00:12:33.200 --> 00:12:41.440
liked was goes back to scientists in
the University of Hawaii who wrote a paper
139
00:12:41.799 --> 00:12:46.600
back in July last year about the
idea of a sun umbrella. In other
140
00:12:46.639 --> 00:12:50.879
words, you know, a parasol
tethered to an asteroid in order to give
141
00:12:50.919 --> 00:12:54.559
it some sort of stability. So
once again it's a megastructure, but it's
142
00:12:54.600 --> 00:13:03.759
got an asteroid tethering it. But
this is probably disappointment to Rusty. The
143
00:13:03.799 --> 00:13:07.679
one that essentially is identical to what
Rusty is suggesting was written by somebody I
144
00:13:07.759 --> 00:13:11.559
know, actually a scientist called Roger
Angel, who is a professor I think
145
00:13:11.559 --> 00:13:20.000
he might be now retired at the
University of Arizona. He published a paper
146
00:13:20.600 --> 00:13:26.919
in the Proceedings of the National Academy
of Science back on November fourteenth, two
147
00:13:26.000 --> 00:13:31.720
thousand and six, which is feasibility
of cooling the Earth with a cloud of
148
00:13:31.759 --> 00:13:35.039
small spacecraft near the inner lagrange point
L one, which I think is exactly
149
00:13:35.039 --> 00:13:41.080
what Rusty's suggesting. And I'd actually
suggest to Rusti that you actually look at
150
00:13:41.080 --> 00:13:46.840
this paper. It's pretty easy to
find pnas Proceedings of the National Academy of
151
00:13:46.879 --> 00:13:50.240
Science feasibility of cooling the Earth with
a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner
152
00:13:50.279 --> 00:13:56.000
La Grande point, and he goes
through the mathematics the stability of spacecraft at
153
00:13:56.480 --> 00:14:01.039
the Grande point because it is actually
a gravitational sadde, which means they wander
154
00:14:01.080 --> 00:14:05.720
off if you don't if you don't
do something about them. Let me just
155
00:14:05.799 --> 00:14:11.440
read a few things from his abstract. If it were to become apparent that
156
00:14:13.360 --> 00:14:18.879
dangerous changes in global climate were inevitable
despite greenhouse gas controls, active methods to
157
00:14:18.879 --> 00:14:22.320
cool the Earth on an emergency basis
might be desirable. The concept considered here
158
00:14:22.399 --> 00:14:26.639
is to block one point eight percent
of the solar flux with a space sunshade
159
00:14:26.799 --> 00:14:31.480
orbited near the inner lagrange point L
one in line between the Earth and the
160
00:14:31.519 --> 00:14:39.080
Sun. Following the work of Ja
Early another Early if I mixed metaphors their
161
00:14:39.919 --> 00:14:45.159
worker on this back in nineteen eighty
nine, he says transparent material would be
162
00:14:45.240 --> 00:14:50.600
used to deflect the sunlight rather than
to absorb it to minimize the shifting balance
163
00:14:50.679 --> 00:14:56.000
out from L one caused by radiation
pressure. So there are some real subtleties
164
00:14:56.000 --> 00:15:01.840
here. Andrew three advances aimed at
practical implement presented. First is an optical
165
00:15:01.879 --> 00:15:05.759
design for a very thin refractive screen
with low reflectivity, leading to a total
166
00:15:07.159 --> 00:15:11.279
sunshade mass of in the region of
twenty million tons. Second is a concept
167
00:15:11.480 --> 00:15:18.879
aimed at reducing transportation costs to fifty
dollars per kilogram by using electromagnetic acceleration to
168
00:15:18.960 --> 00:15:24.559
escape the Earth's gravity, followed by
iron production propulsion. Some neat work there
169
00:15:24.600 --> 00:15:30.639
with basically with light sales, and
third is an implementation of the sunshade as
170
00:15:30.679 --> 00:15:37.960
a cloud of many spacecraft autonomously stabilized
by modulating solar radiation pressure. These met
171
00:15:37.120 --> 00:15:43.440
sized flyers will be assembled completely before
launch, avoiding any need for construction or
172
00:15:43.519 --> 00:15:48.000
unfolding in space. They would weigh
one gram each, be launched in stacks
173
00:15:48.039 --> 00:15:54.159
of eight hundred thousand, and remain
for a projected lifetime of fifty years within
174
00:15:54.240 --> 00:15:58.240
a one hundred thousand kilometer long cloud. The concept builds on existing technologies.
175
00:15:58.320 --> 00:16:02.840
It seems feasa that it could be
developed and deployed in a region in the
176
00:16:02.919 --> 00:16:07.679
region of twenty five years at the
cost of a few trillion dollars less than
177
00:16:07.679 --> 00:16:12.600
point five percent of the world gross
domestic product over that time. So Rusty's
178
00:16:12.679 --> 00:16:18.399
thinking is very much in line with
what Roger Angel was proposing, except Rustina
179
00:16:18.519 --> 00:16:22.360
thinks we could get it down to
ten years because of the new technologies that
180
00:16:22.399 --> 00:16:25.759
we have in space launch, and
that might be absolutely right. Yeah,
181
00:16:26.240 --> 00:16:30.440
Look, we've got to do something
because from what I've read about the progress
182
00:16:30.480 --> 00:16:36.080
we're making in dealing with the problem
of global warming and climate change on Earth,
183
00:16:36.720 --> 00:16:42.320
we can't possibly do enough to alleviate
the effect. And you know,
184
00:16:42.360 --> 00:16:48.159
not every country is conforming, so
there needs to be another way. And
185
00:16:48.679 --> 00:16:52.919
maybe this is it. Just maybe
I'm not a big fan of major geo
186
00:16:53.000 --> 00:17:00.159
engineering. But yeah, as you
say, we really have to stay up
187
00:17:00.200 --> 00:17:06.119
on it in regard to what individual
countries are doing. Plus increases our classification
188
00:17:06.160 --> 00:17:11.480
as a civilization and do it so
he does for anybody who helps to be
189
00:17:11.519 --> 00:17:15.640
watching. Yes, well it's important, it's very important. Thank you,
190
00:17:15.759 --> 00:17:21.559
Rusty. Yes, we've now given
you some homework, so have a look
191
00:17:21.559 --> 00:17:32.000
at that. Okay, well takes. Let's move on to our last question
192
00:17:32.079 --> 00:17:37.079
before we do our homework. This
one comes from David. Hey, your
193
00:17:37.079 --> 00:17:42.720
friend Andrew, This is David from
Singing Texas go one on favorite kinds of
194
00:17:42.839 --> 00:17:51.880
questions. What if if you could
step foot onto any planet outside of our
195
00:17:51.920 --> 00:17:56.160
Solar system, which planet would it
be? And why are you more interested
196
00:17:56.200 --> 00:18:02.279
in that planet than others? Thanks
for all shell back, all right,
197
00:18:02.519 --> 00:18:07.559
David. Well, aside from Planet
nine, which is, you know,
198
00:18:07.680 --> 00:18:10.519
we're not sure if it's part of
our Solar system, but it's got to
199
00:18:10.559 --> 00:18:14.599
be. It's just so far out. I'll go first because I haven't got
200
00:18:14.680 --> 00:18:15.960
much to say that. I did
a bit of homework on this, and
201
00:18:17.480 --> 00:18:18.799
I thought, loo, if we're
going to step onto another planet, we
202
00:18:18.839 --> 00:18:23.319
really want to find a planet that's
earth like. And that took me to
203
00:18:23.359 --> 00:18:27.440
the Kepler System, and the one
that they think is most earth like,
204
00:18:27.519 --> 00:18:32.759
even though it's sixty percent larger than
Earth, is Kepler four or five to
205
00:18:32.799 --> 00:18:36.920
two B, which I like the
idea of until I read that it's probably
206
00:18:36.960 --> 00:18:40.839
got a run away greenhouse effect and
it's developed more like Venus than Earth.
207
00:18:40.920 --> 00:18:45.680
But they reckon that is probably the
most earth like planet so far that they've
208
00:18:45.720 --> 00:18:48.240
found outside our Solar System. I
wouldn't mind having a look at that,
209
00:18:51.599 --> 00:18:55.960
setting foot on it might prove a
challenge, though, But I mean,
210
00:18:56.000 --> 00:19:00.240
there's there's so many planets that they've
discovered. Now most of them gas giants,
211
00:19:00.960 --> 00:19:03.160
so you know, you don't want
to step on any of those.
212
00:19:03.279 --> 00:19:08.640
But any any rocky planet in a
goldie Locks zone would probably be attractive to
213
00:19:08.720 --> 00:19:12.680
me. And Kepler four five two
B is in the Goldilock zone, Fred,
214
00:19:12.759 --> 00:19:18.359
so maybe so, maybe so,
But yeah, it is. It
215
00:19:18.440 --> 00:19:23.279
is a strange world compared to what
we know, and the drawn the comparison
216
00:19:23.279 --> 00:19:30.680
to Venus, but it's probably it's
in the Trappist One system, I think,
217
00:19:32.400 --> 00:19:37.880
discovered by the Kepler space telescope,
So that one sort of jumps out
218
00:19:37.880 --> 00:19:41.720
at me. But I did have
to do homework because I honestly I haven't
219
00:19:41.759 --> 00:19:45.599
really analyzed what we've learned about too
many exoplanets, but it would have to
220
00:19:45.599 --> 00:19:49.519
be earth like and it would have
to be in the Goldilocks zone. That's
221
00:19:51.039 --> 00:19:56.519
I'd want to have a look at
any one of those. Really. Yeah,
222
00:19:56.079 --> 00:20:02.319
that's exactly the way my thinking went
as well, Andrew. And I'm
223
00:20:02.359 --> 00:20:07.680
not sure the distance of the trappis
One system, but I went for it's
224
00:20:07.720 --> 00:20:12.200
forty light years away. Yeah,
Okay, so that's just too far for
225
00:20:12.319 --> 00:20:18.160
me. I'm getting old and I'm
not sure I could. Yeah, so
226
00:20:18.240 --> 00:20:23.720
I'd be going to the nearest star
Proxima Centauri four point three light years away,
227
00:20:23.880 --> 00:20:30.599
which has does have Proxima Centauri B, which I think is in Proxima
228
00:20:30.680 --> 00:20:37.079
Centauri's habitable zone. I don't think
it's an Earth like planet, but it
229
00:20:37.160 --> 00:20:42.759
is within the habitable zone. And
the problem with planets going around red dwarfs,
230
00:20:42.759 --> 00:20:49.240
which Proxima Centaury is, is that
they're irradiated by the flares that these
231
00:20:49.279 --> 00:20:55.960
red dwarfs tend to emit from time
to time. And so I'd have my
232
00:20:56.160 --> 00:21:03.839
radiation shield on full power, be
sitting there watching what the effect of a
233
00:21:03.880 --> 00:21:08.960
solar flare, giantgantic solar flare is
on this poor little planet around the nearest
234
00:21:10.000 --> 00:21:12.839
world. But what I'd have in
the back of my mind is it's not
235
00:21:12.960 --> 00:21:18.000
too far to get back to Earth
because it's only four point three light years.
236
00:21:18.039 --> 00:21:22.480
Yes, yes, you know,
when we get our light speed engines
237
00:21:22.680 --> 00:21:25.720
or sort of out. Yeah,
I'll do it. Yeah. It's still
238
00:21:25.720 --> 00:21:30.240
a long trip though, Isn't it
all right? David? You are your
239
00:21:30.240 --> 00:21:34.359
what if question answered somewhat and thanks
for sending it in Now to some homework.
240
00:21:34.400 --> 00:21:38.759
We were asked recently by Wane whether
or not a super and ova can
241
00:21:38.839 --> 00:21:48.599
cause a gravitational wave. And the
answer is it depends. Why did I
242
00:21:48.680 --> 00:21:52.880
know that? Yeah, so it
depends on how symmetrical the explosion is.
243
00:21:52.920 --> 00:21:56.279
In other words, if you know, if you've got a perfect explosion,
244
00:21:57.079 --> 00:22:03.359
everything goes outwards completely medially from the
center, then you won't get a gravitational
245
00:22:03.400 --> 00:22:10.359
wave because all the acceleration accelerating masses
are balanced, you know, it's balanced,
246
00:22:10.839 --> 00:22:14.480
the ones going away from us balanced
by the ones coming towards us,
247
00:22:14.480 --> 00:22:18.079
so you don't get one. But
if he had an asymmetric Supernover explosion,
248
00:22:18.119 --> 00:22:22.200
and I think most of them probably
are. I remember seeing some simulations years
249
00:22:22.200 --> 00:22:27.640
ago of the gas dynamics of the
Supernover explosion, and yeah, there's certainly
250
00:22:29.039 --> 00:22:30.759
looked as though there was a lot
going one way and not quite as much
251
00:22:30.799 --> 00:22:34.039
going the other way. So that
would give rise to a gravitational wave.
252
00:22:34.400 --> 00:22:38.440
Okay, there you go away.
Yes, sometimes it's the problem with the
253
00:22:38.480 --> 00:22:47.200
answer. And Lee asked us about
how insight on Mars was able to triangulate
254
00:22:47.279 --> 00:22:52.000
the impact point of meteorites and other
things hitting the surface. We had to
255
00:22:52.000 --> 00:22:57.519
follow that up. We did,
and I did that. I was going
256
00:22:57.559 --> 00:23:03.480
to, but you offered because I
thought it was an interesting one. I
257
00:23:03.759 --> 00:23:08.079
kind of wondered the same thing myself. And you might remember, Andrew that
258
00:23:08.200 --> 00:23:15.799
I did waffle about the fact that
seismic waves are not just you know,
259
00:23:15.839 --> 00:23:18.240
they're not just one uniform thing.
They've got different frequencies, they've got different
260
00:23:18.279 --> 00:23:23.759
polarizations. There are sheer waves and
what's the other pressure waves and sheer waves
261
00:23:23.759 --> 00:23:30.319
the two different sorts. So and
I think I think I might be sort
262
00:23:30.359 --> 00:23:34.920
of have been vaguely on the right
track. I'm going to read though,
263
00:23:36.000 --> 00:23:44.880
from someone's answer to the question this
is on the Stack Exchange website. Question
264
00:23:45.000 --> 00:23:48.599
was can we know where the mass
quakes come from? An insight? And
265
00:23:48.680 --> 00:23:53.200
actually the question not read it out
because it puts it exactly. When doing
266
00:23:53.240 --> 00:23:57.160
seismology on Earth, we use information
from multiple stations to determine where a signal
267
00:23:57.279 --> 00:24:03.119
is coming from using triangulation. On
Mars, we only have one seismomeitor insight.
268
00:24:03.400 --> 00:24:06.640
Is this enough to get a very
rough idea of where the mass quake
269
00:24:06.680 --> 00:24:11.400
occurred? If so, how is
it done? And the answer is from
270
00:24:11.720 --> 00:24:18.559
Okay, okay, it's from somebody
I actually know. I've had dinner with
271
00:24:18.680 --> 00:24:23.079
him, Tom Spilker, who's Linda
Spilker's other half, Tom is a space
272
00:24:23.279 --> 00:24:27.799
engineer and very good space scientist,
so I think we can we can take
273
00:24:27.839 --> 00:24:32.440
this with some gravitars. I hadn't
noticed that Tom was the author of this
274
00:24:32.559 --> 00:24:38.960
answer. So Tom's answer is according
to this paper by the Inside Seismometter team.
275
00:24:40.039 --> 00:24:45.240
And this paper has a link to
it so you can click on it.
276
00:24:45.240 --> 00:24:49.319
It's the SIS team with a list
of authors. As long as you
277
00:24:49.400 --> 00:24:56.599
are that sounds like tom techniques.
Combining data about the arrival times of various
278
00:24:56.759 --> 00:25:02.119
modes of seismic waves, the amplitude
or strength of the waves, and surface
279
00:25:02.160 --> 00:25:07.240
waves that travel around Mars's globe more
than once can determine the location of Mars
280
00:25:07.319 --> 00:25:10.960
quakes. My reading of the paper
this is Tom again, is that the
281
00:25:11.000 --> 00:25:17.039
process isn't a straightforward calculation, but
instead involves modeling of Mars's interior structure and
282
00:25:17.119 --> 00:25:22.640
wave propagation characteristics, adjusting the models
until the coherent solution is reached. That
283
00:25:22.720 --> 00:25:26.960
solution includes the depth and geographic position
of the quakes focus. So a great
284
00:25:27.000 --> 00:25:33.359
answer, by what a delight to
find who it's from, and that includes
285
00:25:33.400 --> 00:25:41.400
impacts because just anything that causes the
right kind of vibration or by modeling,
286
00:25:41.440 --> 00:25:44.720
you can work out where it's come
from. Fascinating. There you go,
287
00:25:44.880 --> 00:25:48.119
Lee, that's how it's done.
Now, don't forget. If you have
288
00:25:48.240 --> 00:25:52.039
questions for us, please send them
in via our website. Just click on
289
00:25:52.079 --> 00:25:56.160
the AMA tab where you can send
us a text question or an audio question.
290
00:25:56.240 --> 00:26:00.599
We actually have very few audio questions
at the moment, so please get
291
00:26:00.640 --> 00:26:03.680
them into us. You can also
click on the thing on the right hand
292
00:26:03.720 --> 00:26:11.759
side, the greenish tearly sort of
spinmint colored button send us your question,
293
00:26:11.039 --> 00:26:15.079
although when you hover on it at
tur it's purple. And just as long
294
00:26:15.119 --> 00:26:21.319
as you've got a device with microphone, you can record your message. And
295
00:26:21.319 --> 00:26:25.039
don't forget to tell us who you
are and where you're from. And while
296
00:26:25.039 --> 00:26:27.279
you're on our website, have a
look around and see what you see.
297
00:26:27.720 --> 00:26:32.160
Fred, thanks so much. We'll
catch you on the next episode of Space
298
00:26:32.240 --> 00:26:36.319
Nuts very very soon. Sounds great, Andrew, take care and talk to
299
00:26:36.680 --> 00:26:40.400
okay, Professor Fred Watson, astronomer
at large and here in the studio.
300
00:26:40.519 --> 00:26:48.440
Who's got more editing to do than
a Disney cartoonist person who does Disney stuff.
301
00:26:48.880 --> 00:26:52.240
I don't know what they're called.
Animator all right, I'm out of
302
00:26:52.279 --> 00:26:55.960
here thanks to your company. Catch
you on the next episode of Space Nuts.
303
00:26:56.519 --> 00:27:03.400
Bye bye. You'll be listening to
the Space Snot's podcast, available at
304
00:27:03.440 --> 00:27:08.160
Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio,
or your favorite podcast player. You can
305
00:27:08.200 --> 00:27:14.160
also stream on demand at bites dot
com. This has been another quality podcast
306
00:27:14.160 --> 00:27:17.880
production from nights dot com.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed