March 17, 2024

#400: Big Bang Echoes & Eternal Suns: Probing Gravitational Waves and Immortal Earth

#400: Big Bang Echoes & Eternal Suns: Probing Gravitational Waves and Immortal Earth

Prepare to have your curiosity catapulted to cosmic proportions in this enthralling Q&A edition of Space Nuts, where our intrepid hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into the gravitational enigmas and hypotheticals of the...

Prepare to have your curiosity catapulted to cosmic proportions in this enthralling Q&A edition of Space Nuts, where our intrepid hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson delve into the gravitational enigmas and hypotheticals of the universe.
Firstly, Bo from Melbourne brings us a mind-bending question about the Big Bang and gravitational waves. Could the universe's colossal birth have sent ripples through the fabric of spacetime? Fred unpacks the complexities of detecting such ancient cosmic echoes and explores the tantalizing links to the cosmic microwave background radiation.
Next, Rennie from sunny West Hills, California, presents a tantalizing 'what if' scenario: What if the Sun never died? Would Earth eventually succumb to its own demise? Our dynamic duo contemplates the slow dance of celestial mechanics, the potential for human adaptability, and the intriguing future of a planet with a 42-day-long day.
Lastly, Daniel from Adelaide ponders a cosmic conundrum where time and dark energy might intertwine. As he questions the nature of the universe's accelerated expansion and the role of dark energy, Fred provides a nuanced response that sifts through the layers of cosmological understanding.
With each query, Andrew and Fred traverse the vastness of space, time, and possibility, offering insights that will leave you pondering long after the episode ends. So join us on this intergalactic expedition, and don't forget to submit your own questions to Space Nuts for a chance to be featured in future Q&A escapades!
For more space-time adventures and to satisfy your astronomical curiosity, subscribe to Space Nuts on your preferred podcast platform. Until we chart our next course through the cosmos, keep your eyes to the skies and your wonder boundless!
Episode Chapters:
(00:00) Welcome to Space Nuts Q&A with Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson
((01:08) Did the big Bang produce gravitational waves or echoes
(08:47) Would the earth eventually erode, decay and die on its own
(13:27) What if time and dark energy were actually the same thing
(14:35) Daniel Winfred: Is time and dark energy the same thing
(18:07) How to submit your questions and wrap-up

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:03.480
Hi there, thanks for joining us. This is Space Nuts Q and A.

2
00:00:03.839 --> 00:00:07.280
My name is Andrew Dunkley, your
host, and coming up on this

3
00:00:07.320 --> 00:00:11.839
episode, we've got a question about
gravitational waves in the Big Bang. We're

4
00:00:11.880 --> 00:00:15.400
also going to look at a what
if question love the what if questions,

5
00:00:16.320 --> 00:00:20.800
which is asking about the life of
Earth, not life on Earth, the

6
00:00:20.920 --> 00:00:28.519
life of Earth if the Sun never
died. Interesting angle. And we're also

7
00:00:28.600 --> 00:00:33.560
going to look at time and dark
energy. That's all coming up on the

8
00:00:33.640 --> 00:00:40.679
Q and A edition of Space Nuts
fifteen seconds. Guidance is Internal ten nine

9
00:00:41.280 --> 00:00:51.640
ignition, Space Nuts NY four three
two Space Nurse as when I reported Bill's

10
00:00:51.640 --> 00:00:55.719
good and joining me once again is
Professor Fred what's an astronomer at large?

11
00:00:55.719 --> 00:00:59.920
Hello? Fred? How are you
doing? I am doing as much as

12
00:01:00.479 --> 00:01:03.239
good. Good, good to be
Q and A ing with you, Yes

13
00:01:03.359 --> 00:01:10.480
you too? Shall we get stuck
straight? All right? Our first question

14
00:01:10.680 --> 00:01:12.640
comes. I'm not sure if it's
bo or Boa. I have to listen

15
00:01:12.719 --> 00:01:18.799
more carefully. Here we go,
Hello Fred, and Andrews is both here

16
00:01:18.840 --> 00:01:22.239
from Melbourne. I hope you're well. I have a question for you,

17
00:01:22.840 --> 00:01:27.000
and it is not about darknessy nor
it's about dark matter, but It's is

18
00:01:27.040 --> 00:01:34.040
about gravitational waves. It's just straightforward
question. Did the Big Bang produce gravitational

19
00:01:34.079 --> 00:01:40.640
waves? As the understand it,
gravitational waves that generated when two massive bodies

20
00:01:40.680 --> 00:01:44.920
such as neutron stars and black holes
I lie to each other and cause that

21
00:01:45.040 --> 00:01:51.760
ripple in the fabric club space time. But when the universe has just begang

22
00:01:52.480 --> 00:01:57.120
in internet density and so forth,
when it came into existence by the Big

23
00:01:57.200 --> 00:02:02.319
Bang, did it produce gravitational waves
or echoes? And can we detect those

24
00:02:02.439 --> 00:02:07.520
echoes in space and time very much
like the cosnic microwave background radiation that we

25
00:02:07.639 --> 00:02:12.360
see today. Anyway, I hope
that makes sense. I love to hear

26
00:02:12.400 --> 00:02:15.360
you answer. Thanks you very much, Thank you Boa. That's a good

27
00:02:15.439 --> 00:02:19.319
question. You know, we talk
about the Big Bang a lot. We

28
00:02:19.439 --> 00:02:23.960
get a lot of questions about it, and I mean, it was a

29
00:02:25.479 --> 00:02:30.439
massive event. We don't know why, we don't know a lot, but

30
00:02:30.919 --> 00:02:37.000
we know we can see that it
happened through the cosmic microwave background radiation that's

31
00:02:37.039 --> 00:02:44.560
still evident today. But gravitational waves
would I mean, if the universe didn't

32
00:02:44.599 --> 00:02:47.879
exist at the moment of the Big
Bang and was being created as a consequence

33
00:02:47.919 --> 00:02:53.919
of that I'm not sure gravitational waves
could have happened the way we understand them

34
00:02:54.039 --> 00:03:00.879
with other events in our universe.
I'm not sure about this one. So

35
00:03:02.319 --> 00:03:07.599
the thing is, Andrew, the
Yes, the universe was created in that

36
00:03:07.759 --> 00:03:13.719
instant of the Big Bang. And
so you're right. You know, in

37
00:03:13.800 --> 00:03:20.199
the conventional theory standard Einsteinian physics,
we we imagine that time and space didn't

38
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:23.599
exist before the Big Bang. So
you've got to create some space for your

39
00:03:23.639 --> 00:03:29.280
gravitational waves to go through, which
is kind of what you say, yeah

40
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:34.479
and so and so, Yes,
there was the instant of the Big Bang

41
00:03:34.719 --> 00:03:40.719
that created this singularity in time and
space, followed by this period, was

42
00:03:40.800 --> 00:03:45.240
it ten to the minus thirty three
of a second something like that in duration,

43
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:52.439
which we call the period of inflation, when when the expansion really took

44
00:03:52.560 --> 00:03:55.879
hold, and you know, the
universe went from the size of a football

45
00:03:55.919 --> 00:04:00.439
to the size of a galaxy in
something like ten to the minus three of

46
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:06.520
the second. And the thinking is, and I'm actually dragging this up from

47
00:04:08.080 --> 00:04:13.400
reading a few years ago, but
that, yes, that inflationary period as

48
00:04:13.479 --> 00:04:20.120
we call it, would have created
gravitational waves. Ah, or maybe a

49
00:04:20.279 --> 00:04:27.199
gravitational wave, but I was about
to say maybe just one being at that

50
00:04:27.319 --> 00:04:33.639
point, but that the issue is
that it is a gravitational wave a very

51
00:04:34.079 --> 00:04:42.199
very very low frequency. So the
gravitational waves that we get from colliding neutron

52
00:04:42.240 --> 00:04:49.040
stars, for example, they produce
waves which are basically have a frequency which

53
00:04:49.120 --> 00:04:53.000
is in the audio range. Which
is why we can, you know,

54
00:04:53.399 --> 00:04:59.279
turn those gravitational wave signals into an
audio signal very easily after you've amplified it

55
00:04:59.399 --> 00:05:02.240
up a bit, after Ligo has
done its magic on it, and that's

56
00:05:02.240 --> 00:05:09.120
where we get this chirp signal of
as to neutron stalisma or whatever merge together

57
00:05:09.920 --> 00:05:15.600
and eventually, because they're spinning ever
ever more rapidly, and so the frequency

58
00:05:15.639 --> 00:05:18.800
goes up of the waves that are
being emitted and then stop at a high

59
00:05:18.839 --> 00:05:25.879
point because that's where they've coreessed into
a single object. Now you can think

60
00:05:25.959 --> 00:05:32.600
of those audio frequencies. You know, we might talk about something like five

61
00:05:32.680 --> 00:05:38.839
hundred herts as an audio frequency,
or you could take four hundred and forty

62
00:05:38.920 --> 00:05:46.959
herts as the frequency of the standard
a note in the musical spectrum. So

63
00:05:47.000 --> 00:05:50.680
if let's stick with five hundred,
because that's an easy one. So the

64
00:05:51.959 --> 00:05:59.079
period of time between one peak of
the wave and the next is one five

65
00:05:59.199 --> 00:06:03.240
hundred of a second. And so
if you think that's the interval of time

66
00:06:03.839 --> 00:06:11.759
of a characteristic gravitational wave from two
colliding objects. Now the issue, as

67
00:06:11.839 --> 00:06:19.040
I understand it, is that the
interval between peaks in a gravitational wave produced

68
00:06:19.199 --> 00:06:26.519
by inflation is about the same as
the age of the universe. Now it's

69
00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:30.920
not one five hundreds of a second, it's you know, several several billion

70
00:06:31.040 --> 00:06:36.519
years, perhaps eve tens of billions
of views. It's quite a while since

71
00:06:36.519 --> 00:06:43.560
I read upon this. So normal
gravitational wave technology is simply not equipped to

72
00:06:43.680 --> 00:06:48.959
detect these low frequency, ultra low
frequency gravitational waves. But there might be

73
00:06:49.040 --> 00:06:54.079
other ways of seeing them. And
one of the things people have looked for,

74
00:06:55.319 --> 00:07:00.560
and I'm not really very well up
on this, but there is a

75
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:06.120
potential signal in the cosmic microwave background
radiation the flash of the Big Bang that

76
00:07:06.199 --> 00:07:11.399
we see that gives us what the
universe looked like three hundred and eighty thousand

77
00:07:11.480 --> 00:07:17.399
years after the Big Bang. That's
what we're seeing there. That radiation contains

78
00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:24.560
information not just on its brightness,
but also on its polarization. You know

79
00:07:24.800 --> 00:07:29.519
that radiation is polarized a bit like
light can be polarized. And I'm not

80
00:07:30.000 --> 00:07:34.360
really drawing the links very strongly here, but I understand that there are links

81
00:07:34.439 --> 00:07:40.600
between very low frequency gravitational waves and
that polarization signal. So it's one of

82
00:07:40.680 --> 00:07:46.160
the things that people are looking for
to try and detect this polarization within the

83
00:07:46.439 --> 00:07:49.879
cosmic microwave background radiation. So it's
not at all or tough question, but

84
00:07:50.000 --> 00:07:56.399
it's quite a complex answer. Yeah. Yeah, but the Big Bang itself

85
00:07:56.480 --> 00:08:03.439
could have initially been one create one
gravitational way. Let's try it. Yeah,

86
00:08:03.639 --> 00:08:07.480
that's more I say, yeah,
mmmmm, there you go, Boa,

87
00:08:07.279 --> 00:08:11.439
You're on on the money. It's
just a matter of finding a way

88
00:08:11.480 --> 00:08:16.120
of seeing them. Would Is it
possible to these gravitational waves still bouncing around

89
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:20.720
like the cosmic microwave background. Yes, yes, but it's such a lot

90
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:24.920
of frequency that you don't actually know
it's there. You've got to find another

91
00:08:24.519 --> 00:08:28.800
You've got to find other ways of
detecting it, because there's got not going

92
00:08:28.839 --> 00:08:31.399
to be any change in the gravitational
wave signal over you know, a human

93
00:08:31.720 --> 00:08:37.840
experimental lifetime. If you've got a
frequency whose time interval is made in billions

94
00:08:37.879 --> 00:08:45.080
of years forget it. Yeah,
that's a tough one. Thanks Boa,

95
00:08:45.200 --> 00:08:48.840
that's a great question and thanks for
sending it in. We've got a question

96
00:08:48.000 --> 00:08:52.120
from one of our regulars, Rennie, who is from Sunny West Hills,

97
00:08:52.200 --> 00:08:56.279
California. This is a what if
question. Theoretically, if the Sun were

98
00:08:56.399 --> 00:09:00.759
never to die, let's assume it's
just never going to die, would the

99
00:09:00.960 --> 00:09:09.879
Earth eventually erode, decay and die
on its own. Yeah, it's well,

100
00:09:09.120 --> 00:09:13.720
my answer is now, because we'll
destroy it first, it could be

101
00:09:13.840 --> 00:09:16.600
very different. I mean, so
if what ren is saying is that,

102
00:09:16.799 --> 00:09:18.960
yes, the Sun, we know
it's going to evolve over the next few

103
00:09:20.000 --> 00:09:22.799
billion years, and it will change, and that will eventually result in the

104
00:09:22.840 --> 00:09:26.000
Earth being swamped by the outer atmosphere
of the Sun, which might not be

105
00:09:26.159 --> 00:09:31.559
very nice for anybody left on Earth. But if that didn't happen, if

106
00:09:31.639 --> 00:09:37.240
the Sun just you know, went
on its merry way, being a normal

107
00:09:37.320 --> 00:09:41.720
star, there will be a few
things that will happen over that time scale

108
00:09:43.240 --> 00:09:46.279
which wouldn't which wouldn't which we know
won't happen because the Sun's going to the

109
00:09:46.519 --> 00:09:50.639
Sun turning into a red giant's going
to overtake it. One of them is

110
00:09:52.000 --> 00:09:58.600
the tidal breaking of the Earth's rotation
so that it always faces the moon.

111
00:10:00.840 --> 00:10:07.399
Day will change from twenty four hours
to something like if I remember rightly,

112
00:10:07.399 --> 00:10:11.840
it's forty two days, that it's
about that length of twelve and that's turning

113
00:10:11.919 --> 00:10:18.279
once and the moon will go around
the sky around the Earth in the same

114
00:10:18.399 --> 00:10:22.399
type. So the Earth and the
Moon will constantly face one another with a

115
00:10:22.480 --> 00:10:24.559
month and a day, which are
both equivalent to I think it's about forty

116
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:30.399
two forty three days something like that. So that's going to change things quite

117
00:10:30.440 --> 00:10:35.080
a bit. So that would you
know, certainly alter that the atmospheric dynamics

118
00:10:35.120 --> 00:10:39.440
of the Earth if one side's getting
warmed up forty of twenty days rather than

119
00:10:39.519 --> 00:10:43.720
just one day of day and night. So a lot of things change.

120
00:10:45.799 --> 00:10:52.679
And yeah, the constant bombardment by
the magnetic particles from the Sun. I

121
00:10:52.759 --> 00:10:54.919
don't know to what extent the earth
magnetic field mighty road, but there will

122
00:10:56.120 --> 00:11:01.720
certainly be changes maybe what a bit, So go ahead, go on,

123
00:11:01.879 --> 00:11:05.000
now, I was just going to
say, if humans were still around in

124
00:11:05.279 --> 00:11:11.320
that period, would we well,
okay, now let me rephrase, would

125
00:11:11.399 --> 00:11:16.080
we adapt as these things changed and
reached that point, would we be able

126
00:11:16.120 --> 00:11:20.120
to adapt as a species and other
life on Earth adapt to live in that

127
00:11:20.279 --> 00:11:22.720
kind of environment. Well, it
certainly. These changes are ones that take

128
00:11:22.759 --> 00:11:30.200
place very slowly, indeed, and
over kind of longer periods than the characteristic

129
00:11:30.399 --> 00:11:35.000
evolution time to get from you know, one mutation to another, whatever that

130
00:11:35.120 --> 00:11:41.440
might be for humans. So,
yeah, they're slow, and I'm sure

131
00:11:41.559 --> 00:11:46.000
humans could adapt to them. We're
a pretty adaptive species. We might also

132
00:11:46.120 --> 00:11:50.600
by then be capable of building the
megastructures that might protect us from some of

133
00:11:50.639 --> 00:11:54.759
the Sun's funny things going on.
It's hard to know, really, isn't

134
00:11:54.799 --> 00:11:58.639
it. But I think generally speaking, any questions a good one. What

135
00:11:58.720 --> 00:12:03.679
happen? If nothing happens to the
Sun, does the Earth just sort of

136
00:12:03.840 --> 00:12:09.799
survive? It probably survives, It
will be changed. We might find we're

137
00:12:09.799 --> 00:12:13.360
all living in plastic domes or something
by then, rather than you know,

138
00:12:13.080 --> 00:12:18.159
because the atmosphere has been so messed
about with. But yes, yes,

139
00:12:18.240 --> 00:12:22.159
I think I think I'm an optimist
that humor kind would survive. Yeah.

140
00:12:22.960 --> 00:12:28.440
No, it's interesting because I mean, we know what's going to happen.

141
00:12:28.519 --> 00:12:31.919
We kind of know when it's going
to happen. But if it didn't,

142
00:12:31.960 --> 00:12:37.000
it would create a whole array of
new challenges for humanity because we would have

143
00:12:37.159 --> 00:12:43.600
to learn to live in a very
somewhat hostile environment, I imagine, because

144
00:12:43.559 --> 00:12:48.159
the planet would not be the same, and I can't imagine what it would

145
00:12:48.200 --> 00:12:52.080
be like to have a forty two
long for the forty two day long day,

146
00:12:52.840 --> 00:12:56.159
well, you know, birthdays would
be few and fun a twain,

147
00:12:56.200 --> 00:12:58.799
wouldn't they there would. But you
know, we're going to know what that's

148
00:12:58.879 --> 00:13:03.840
like very soon, because the day
on the Moon is twenty you know,

149
00:13:03.919 --> 00:13:09.360
twenty nine days effectively from one from
Moon to another. So yeah, so

150
00:13:09.600 --> 00:13:15.159
we've already got something like that in
store for people to experience. It'll be

151
00:13:15.320 --> 00:13:18.759
very interesting to see what even the
Artemis astronauts on the Moon make of all

152
00:13:18.840 --> 00:13:24.399
that. Yeah, yeah, very
interesting. Rennie, that's a great question.

153
00:13:24.559 --> 00:13:28.440
Thanks for sending it in. Much
appreciated. And next up we've got

154
00:13:30.039 --> 00:13:37.960
Daniel. This is a sort of
dark energy question sort of. Hey guys,

155
00:13:37.039 --> 00:13:41.639
Daniel from Adelaide here. There seems
to be more and more discoveries lately

156
00:13:41.720 --> 00:13:45.480
in the very early universe that shouldn't
be possible because not enough time has passed.

157
00:13:45.720 --> 00:13:48.000
Late size of galaxies of black holes. I'll go far out here.

158
00:13:48.039 --> 00:13:52.120
I'd love to share. What if
time and dark energy were actually the same

159
00:13:52.200 --> 00:13:56.320
thing. So we know thro about
the second half of the universe that dark

160
00:13:56.440 --> 00:14:00.399
energy has been accelerating its expansion.
Could this there for me that there was

161
00:14:00.480 --> 00:14:03.679
less dark energy in the first half. And if that's the case, what

162
00:14:03.759 --> 00:14:07.080
if time actually went slower in the
early universe. So from our perspectives,

163
00:14:07.399 --> 00:14:11.320
what took a really short amount of
time actually happened in normal time, with

164
00:14:11.480 --> 00:14:15.320
normal being in quotes. I previously
asked the question on the show whether dark

165
00:14:15.440 --> 00:14:18.279
energy is related to black holes.
I think there was a paper around the

166
00:14:18.360 --> 00:14:20.840
time that kind of suggested that it
was. And we know that black holes

167
00:14:20.919 --> 00:14:24.399
do to store time. So if
time is part of the fabric of space,

168
00:14:26.840 --> 00:14:28.960
maybe dark energy is two, but
it's actually one of the same thing.

169
00:14:30.360 --> 00:14:33.879
I'm expecting a very quick, simple
no, but I wanted to ask

170
00:14:33.919 --> 00:14:39.200
anyway. All right, thanks,
Daniel, is time and dark energy?

171
00:14:39.559 --> 00:14:43.600
Are they the same thing? You
never get a quick and simple note from

172
00:14:43.639 --> 00:14:48.519
me. Done. You know there
was a long drawn out complex No,

173
00:14:50.000 --> 00:14:54.039
it's not all, but I think
in this case, yeah, your thinking

174
00:14:54.159 --> 00:15:03.639
is interesting. We've talked recently as
well about the fact that this new controversial

175
00:15:03.720 --> 00:15:09.840
theory from Joe Silk at all Over
in Baltimore, suggesting that perhaps black holes

176
00:15:09.919 --> 00:15:13.320
supermassive black holes came first, they
were formed in the early universe, and

177
00:15:13.440 --> 00:15:16.600
that goes a long way to explaining
the conundrum that you mentioned at the start

178
00:15:16.639 --> 00:15:20.200
of your question there that a lot
seems to have happened in the first in

179
00:15:20.279 --> 00:15:26.559
the first few millions or hundreds of
millions of years of the universe's existence,

180
00:15:28.720 --> 00:15:35.799
So we kind of understand the gravitational
time dilation effects pretty well, and they're

181
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:43.840
actually quite small from our vantage point
here thirty eight thirty point eight billion years

182
00:15:43.919 --> 00:15:50.639
later. And you're right to make
the point that dark energy only seems to

183
00:15:50.720 --> 00:15:54.960
have appeared over the second half of
the age of the universe, but that's

184
00:15:56.159 --> 00:16:03.639
more likely to be it's because it's
measurable effect has only become apparent. We

185
00:16:03.759 --> 00:16:11.200
think that during the first half of
the universe's age, the galaxies within the

186
00:16:11.279 --> 00:16:17.360
universe were close enough to each other
the gravitational attraction would have basically kept the

187
00:16:17.480 --> 00:16:22.559
expansion due to dark energy in check. The accelerated expansion due to dark energy,

188
00:16:22.200 --> 00:16:26.879
and so it's only when you get
past a kind of tipping point where

189
00:16:26.639 --> 00:16:33.600
suddenly the massive galaxies in the universe
is not enough, not strong enough gravitationally

190
00:16:33.080 --> 00:16:38.519
to break the acceleration of the expansion. By that, I mean brak rather

191
00:16:38.639 --> 00:16:45.000
than break. It's not enough to
slow it down, and so the acceleration

192
00:16:45.399 --> 00:16:51.320
takes over. And that's why it's
a tricky thing just to try and tease

193
00:16:51.399 --> 00:16:56.200
out. And we've talked about this
recently as well, whether the dark energy

194
00:16:56.279 --> 00:17:02.440
is a constant, whether it's something
that's a fact that hasn't changed in terms

195
00:17:02.519 --> 00:17:07.480
of its release a space, a
space expands, it's because there is this

196
00:17:07.680 --> 00:17:15.240
added impact of the gravitational pull of
the galaxies stopping us from basically seeing the

197
00:17:15.279 --> 00:17:19.519
effect of dark energy the accelerated ex
back in the early universe. So I

198
00:17:19.559 --> 00:17:25.400
think all those things are well and
truly understood and kept fairly separate by the

199
00:17:26.319 --> 00:17:29.839
scientists looking at them. And by
that I mean time and dark energy.

200
00:17:30.319 --> 00:17:37.160
So that's a long complicated new Yeah, yeah, okay. Daniel Winfred says,

201
00:17:37.319 --> 00:17:40.519
I think these things have been long
understood. That's that's his way of

202
00:17:40.599 --> 00:17:44.839
saying, you're way off, way, way off the mark. I don't

203
00:17:44.880 --> 00:17:51.640
know, but it's worth asking because
otherwise, you know, there's obviously this

204
00:17:51.799 --> 00:17:57.000
is something people are thinking about.
So it's worth asking these these different questions

205
00:17:57.759 --> 00:18:03.519
to just you know, see see
if it's a possibility. Thanks Daniel,

206
00:18:03.559 --> 00:18:07.960
appreciate that great question. If you've
got questions for us, please send them

207
00:18:07.000 --> 00:18:11.960
in because we could always use them. Just go to our website, Space

208
00:18:11.079 --> 00:18:15.240
nuts podcast dot com, Space nuts
dot io and click on the various links.

209
00:18:15.279 --> 00:18:22.319
The AMA link will give you access
to text and voice audio, or

210
00:18:22.400 --> 00:18:25.920
you can click on the little glass. It's not purple, it's green.

211
00:18:25.960 --> 00:18:29.880
When did they change the color of
that? Send us your No, it's

212
00:18:29.920 --> 00:18:33.160
purple when you hover on it.
The youer send us your questions on the

213
00:18:33.279 --> 00:18:37.440
right hand side of our homepage.
And don't forget to tell us who you

214
00:18:37.519 --> 00:18:40.279
are and where you're from. Fred, we're done again, Thank you so

215
00:18:40.440 --> 00:18:44.000
much. Always a pleasure, Andrew, and I hope we'll stick it doin

216
00:18:44.200 --> 00:18:49.319
very very soon. It's a distinct
possibility. Could be within thirteen point eight

217
00:18:49.440 --> 00:18:55.160
billion years in fact, yes,
thanks Fred, seas soon. Fred Wat's

218
00:18:55.200 --> 00:18:59.039
an astronomer at large, and thanks
to hue in the studio for making our

219
00:18:59.119 --> 00:19:03.640
lives so much more difficult with these
split episodes. But now it's okay uh

220
00:19:03.799 --> 00:19:06.839
and from me Andrew Dunkley, thank
you so much for joining us, looking

221
00:19:06.880 --> 00:19:11.039
forward to your company on the next
episode of Space Nuts see you. Then

222
00:19:11.359 --> 00:19:18.359
you'll be listening to the Space Nuts
podcast, available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

223
00:19:18.720 --> 00:19:23.480
iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player. You can also stream on demand

224
00:19:23.599 --> 00:19:30.160
at bites dot com. This has
been another quality podcast production from nights dot com.

Send a Voicemail