#396: Cosmic Riddles & Martian Quakes: Unpacking the Universe's Expansion & Insight's Seismic Secrets
Prepare to dive into the cosmic unknown with this captivating episode of Space Nuts, where your hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson tackle the enigmatic questions that baffle even the most seasoned space enthusiasts.
First up, Nate...
Prepare to dive into the cosmic unknown with this captivating episode of Space Nuts, where your hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Fred Watson tackle the enigmatic questions that baffle even the most seasoned space enthusiasts.
First up, Nate challenges us with a classic conundrum: If the universe is expanding, what is it expanding into? Fred sheds light on this perplexing query with a blend of cosmological insights and geometrical possibilities, leaving us to ponder the very fabric of reality and the potential of unseen dimensions.
Next, Lee from Sweden seeks to understand the inner workings of Mars through the eyes of the InSight mission. How can a single point of reference on the Red Planet reveal so much about its interior and the impact of distant meteorites? The answer lies in the ingenious science of seismic waves, which our hosts promise to explore further—homework for the curious minds!
Finally, Wayne, a longtime supporter, wonders about the gravitational waves generated by supernovae and whether LIGO can detect them. Fred navigates through the explosive symmetries of supernovae and the peculiarities of neutron star mountains, offering a glimpse into the cosmic ripples that traverse our universe.
Packed with humor, profound insights, and the occasional canine interruption, this episode of Space Nuts is not just a journey through space but a testament to the boundless curiosity that drives us all. So, sit back, subscribe, and let Andrew and Fred guide you through the stars. And don't forget, your questions are the fuel for our cosmic explorations—keep them coming!
For more interstellar adventures and the answers to your most intriguing space questions, subscribe to Space Nuts on your favorite podcast platform. Until our next galactic gathering, keep reaching for the stars!
📋 Episode Chapters
(00:00) This is Space Nuts. Coming up, we're talking about the expansion of space
(00:39) If space is expanding, what is it expanding into
(07:35) Lee Stevenson has sent us a question about Mars exploration
(08:21) Lee: How do you detect seismic signals on Mars from thousands of kilometres away
(12:36) What kind of gravitational wave is generated by a supernova
(19:17) Professor Fred Watson, astronomer at large, getting over his tick bite
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts--2631155/support.
1
00:00:00.080 --> 00:00:03.640
Hello again, thanks for joining us. This is Space Nuts coming up.
2
00:00:03.680 --> 00:00:11.039
We're talking questions about the expansion of
space again, the Insight mission and gravitational
3
00:00:11.080 --> 00:00:16.120
waves. That's all coming up on
this edition of Space Nuts. Fifteen seconds
4
00:00:16.199 --> 00:00:27.920
guidance in channel ten nine ignition sign
Space Nuts NY four three two one Space
5
00:00:28.160 --> 00:00:33.759
Nuts as when I re bought it, Bills Goods and joining me as always,
6
00:00:33.840 --> 00:00:38.079
Professor Fred. What's on Astronomer at
Large High Fred, Hello Andrew,
7
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:41.920
very good to see you again.
Now Fred, it is time to talk
8
00:00:42.159 --> 00:00:46.759
questions and answers from our audience.
We've got a few text questions to go
9
00:00:46.880 --> 00:00:52.399
through today and the first one comes
from Nate. Now, this this is
10
00:00:52.399 --> 00:00:57.399
a question we've had probably many times, but it's worth three visiting because you
11
00:00:57.439 --> 00:01:00.280
never know what we're going to learn. As we heard early on, things
12
00:01:00.320 --> 00:01:07.760
can change in the astronomical world at
the flick of a switch on the James
13
00:01:07.760 --> 00:01:14.159
Webspace telescope. So Nate asks,
thirteen point eight billion years ago, something
14
00:01:14.280 --> 00:01:18.879
happened. We know that whatever,
whether it was a big bang, the
15
00:01:18.920 --> 00:01:23.400
big bounce, or a big mac, we know there was an event in
16
00:01:23.439 --> 00:01:29.319
a seemingly centralized location. My question
is if space is expanding What is it
17
00:01:29.359 --> 00:01:34.640
expanding into or on? Even the
singularity? If that's even correct, should
18
00:01:34.959 --> 00:01:41.120
have been residing in something right.
Thanks for making my evenings great. Every
19
00:01:41.159 --> 00:01:44.879
podcast is listened to the moment it
is dropped, and I cherish each and
20
00:01:44.879 --> 00:01:49.000
every one. You two are fabulous
and have been a part of our lives
21
00:01:49.040 --> 00:01:53.519
since day one. Have a great
holiday. We're back and I can't wait
22
00:01:53.560 --> 00:01:57.560
to hear your answer. Yeah,
it's an old chestnut, this one.
23
00:01:57.840 --> 00:02:01.959
What are we expanding into? Or
although he goes, now, what could
24
00:02:02.000 --> 00:02:08.560
be expanding on? At an interesting
angle? Well, yes, yes it
25
00:02:08.639 --> 00:02:15.800
is. It's a nice additional way
of putting it. So I think the
26
00:02:15.919 --> 00:02:25.199
problem is that we apply our common
garden, everyday logic to problems of cosmology
27
00:02:27.159 --> 00:02:35.680
that don't necessarily work on those logical
principles like parallel lines never meeting and things
28
00:02:35.800 --> 00:02:42.319
like that, which is, actually
it is logic, but it's geometrical logic
29
00:02:42.400 --> 00:02:47.159
of an unusual kind. So the
observation that we can make, and I
30
00:02:47.199 --> 00:02:52.039
guess there's two or three of them, are that refer to relate to this.
31
00:02:52.159 --> 00:02:59.919
We can observe that the universe has
expanding because we've got this signature velocity
32
00:03:00.039 --> 00:03:05.280
distribution of galaxies, that the further
away galaxy you see, the faster it
33
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:09.000
is moving away from you, and
that's exactly what you will get from space
34
00:03:09.080 --> 00:03:16.879
that is expanding. We also know
that as far as we can see,
35
00:03:16.919 --> 00:03:23.360
there isn't an edge to it.
We can see a horizon, and that
36
00:03:23.560 --> 00:03:30.000
the easiest one to envisage is the
cosmic microwave background radiation, where you're looking
37
00:03:30.520 --> 00:03:34.439
so far back in time when you
look out into space that you're seeing the
38
00:03:34.479 --> 00:03:38.400
flash of the Big Bang, which
is now stretched from light waves to radio
39
00:03:38.719 --> 00:03:46.439
waves microwaves by the expansion of the
universe. So the likelihood is that the
40
00:03:46.520 --> 00:03:52.000
universe just goes on beyond that.
And if we were and there's nothing to
41
00:03:52.039 --> 00:03:55.159
suggest that's not the case, if
we were somewhere else in the universe and
42
00:03:55.159 --> 00:04:00.919
looked out from our vantage point,
which is different from where we are at
43
00:04:00.919 --> 00:04:05.080
the moment on our galaxy, from
somebody else's galaxy somewhere else, we would
44
00:04:05.120 --> 00:04:10.000
see the same thing, which is
cosmic microwave background radiation and lots of galaxies
45
00:04:10.039 --> 00:04:16.759
all expanding away from us. So
the the question about what's it expanding into.
46
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:27.639
We don't even know whether that's a
meaningful question, because it's actually compressing
47
00:04:27.680 --> 00:04:32.279
the thing into our own, you
know, perception of space and time.
48
00:04:33.160 --> 00:04:43.000
Whereas there are are possibilities, certainly
in terms of the geometry of the universe,
49
00:04:43.040 --> 00:04:46.399
there are possibilities that might say,
well, it doesn't have an edge,
50
00:04:46.839 --> 00:04:50.279
for example, if you you know, it's like that the idea of
51
00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:55.480
In fact, this is quite good
analogy. Actually, if you think of
52
00:04:56.439 --> 00:05:01.720
your excuse me, perception of the
universe reduced to two dimensions. Now,
53
00:05:01.759 --> 00:05:06.600
we normally think of two dimensions as
being on a piece of paper, a
54
00:05:06.600 --> 00:05:12.399
flat a flat surface, but it
could equally well be on a curved surface
55
00:05:12.439 --> 00:05:18.240
like a balloon. So if you
have your perception of space sitting on the
56
00:05:18.720 --> 00:05:27.079
surface of a balloon, it expands
as you blow up the balloon. And
57
00:05:27.199 --> 00:05:31.240
yes, in our that you know, that view that we've got, it
58
00:05:31.399 --> 00:05:36.000
is expanding into an additional dimension,
which is the third dimension of space.
59
00:05:36.519 --> 00:05:43.040
So maybe maybe it will turn out
that we will discover that there are hyper
60
00:05:43.079 --> 00:05:48.360
dimensional spaces within what we've been thinking
of as the universe. But maybe the
61
00:05:48.439 --> 00:05:53.120
universe is just something part of something
much smaller. So if you thought,
62
00:05:53.879 --> 00:05:56.879
sorry, I'm rambling a bit here, Andrew, but we've got a universe
63
00:05:56.959 --> 00:06:00.279
that's got three dimensions of space and
one of time. But if it was
64
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:06.800
embedded in a fifth dimension or something
in the same way that the balloon is
65
00:06:06.800 --> 00:06:14.839
embedded in proper space, then it
maybe is expanding into something else. That's
66
00:06:14.879 --> 00:06:18.360
a complex way of describing something quite
simple, which is, we don't really
67
00:06:18.439 --> 00:06:25.480
know, but you know, we
think there are possibilities. There are geometrical
68
00:06:25.480 --> 00:06:29.199
possibilities that would allow that to happen, for the universe not to have an
69
00:06:29.279 --> 00:06:35.160
edge and be expanding, but to
be expanding perhaps in relation to something like
70
00:06:35.399 --> 00:06:41.519
an additional dimension. We haven't seen
any evidence of extra dimensions yet in any
71
00:06:41.759 --> 00:06:46.240
sense, but there are some various
due to people that do believe that that
72
00:06:46.360 --> 00:06:50.680
may be a possibility. Yeah,
and that there are multiple universes as well,
73
00:06:50.920 --> 00:06:54.279
yes, of course. And what's
the other one? I heard?
74
00:06:54.319 --> 00:06:59.839
That the universe is folding back on
itself. That's another one I heard.
75
00:07:00.639 --> 00:07:05.319
But like a pile of washing,
yes, yes, the universe is just
76
00:07:05.360 --> 00:07:13.560
a massive laundry. Yeah. Well
it is a rather dirty place, isn't
77
00:07:13.600 --> 00:07:16.240
it. I mean it's just full
of dust. It's absolutely dusty, dust
78
00:07:16.279 --> 00:07:20.560
and gas and humans. Yeah,
just the mess. Yeah, that's right,
79
00:07:20.639 --> 00:07:27.439
completely all right, thank you,
Nate. The answer is yes,
80
00:07:27.480 --> 00:07:31.399
it's expanding. It's expanding at an
accelerating rate. And what it's expanding into
81
00:07:31.639 --> 00:07:38.000
we do not know. Lee Stevenson
has sent us a question. Hi guys,
82
00:07:38.040 --> 00:07:42.079
I'm an avid listener since discovering your
show around six months ago. You
83
00:07:42.160 --> 00:07:46.800
are funny and educational at the same
time, which one of us. Okay,
84
00:07:47.399 --> 00:07:51.560
it's a great show. My question
is how can we learn so much
85
00:07:51.600 --> 00:07:57.839
about Mars interior from the Insight mission. I can't figure out how we got
86
00:07:57.879 --> 00:08:01.720
the knowledge we have from a single
point of reference down to the estimated location
87
00:08:01.959 --> 00:08:07.439
of meteor impact. This has been
puzzling me for quite a while, and
88
00:08:07.480 --> 00:08:09.680
I hope you can explain and educate
me. Best wishes. Lee, an
89
00:08:09.759 --> 00:08:16.639
Englishman in speeding yat was it's not
that big a hot from England to Sweden,
90
00:08:16.720 --> 00:08:22.199
so stopped showing off. Actually I
meant to. I meant to.
91
00:08:22.439 --> 00:08:26.360
I saw this question and meant to
check it out. Because of being ill
92
00:08:28.040 --> 00:08:30.959
for the plus a few days,
I haven't really had time. But there
93
00:08:31.040 --> 00:08:37.240
is some yeah, there there's some
very very clever work that's been done by
94
00:08:37.399 --> 00:08:43.240
the by the Insight team, and
I think it involves of course, it
95
00:08:43.480 --> 00:08:48.600
like all seismology. You know,
most seismology, you've got a volcano or
96
00:08:48.639 --> 00:08:56.720
something that that erupts, or there's
something hits the ground, and you pick
97
00:08:56.799 --> 00:09:01.679
up by a network of seismographs or
seismometers all over the planet. This is
98
00:09:01.759 --> 00:09:07.960
on the Earth, of course,
you pick up the echoes of that particular
99
00:09:09.399 --> 00:09:16.279
seismic event, whether it's a reflection
off the core mental boundary, or whether
100
00:09:16.320 --> 00:09:20.279
it's a refraction past the core.
These are all things that you can pick
101
00:09:20.360 --> 00:09:24.039
up. But it's fairly easy to
understand what's going on that you can explore
102
00:09:24.080 --> 00:09:28.399
the inside of the Earth by having
multiple sample points. By that, I
103
00:09:28.399 --> 00:09:33.279
mean, you know lots of seismographs
all over Well, on Mars, you
104
00:09:33.320 --> 00:09:39.080
don't. You don't have that.
You've got one little seismic one little lander
105
00:09:39.200 --> 00:09:43.799
in sight, which I think I'm
right in turning is now defunct. It's
106
00:09:43.440 --> 00:09:52.399
yes, switching often there last year. It's got one censer. So how
107
00:09:52.399 --> 00:10:00.720
do you know when you are listening
to the seismic signal of a meteorite hitting
108
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:05.559
Mars thirteen thousand kilometers away or something
like that. But it's a very very
109
00:10:05.559 --> 00:10:09.480
good question now because I meant to
look this up I'm not going to give
110
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:11.759
a definitive anti here, but we
might we might take that down as a
111
00:10:11.799 --> 00:10:18.039
bit of homework. And but I'm
guessing it may be to do with the
112
00:10:18.039 --> 00:10:24.519
fact that seismic waves don't just come
in one variety. There are if I
113
00:10:24.559 --> 00:10:28.919
remember these pea waves and S waves. PA waves, I think are pressure
114
00:10:28.960 --> 00:10:35.639
waves and S waves are sheer waves, which is two different ways that the
115
00:10:35.639 --> 00:10:43.080
you know, the medium that this
is being transmitted through vibrates and it actually
116
00:10:43.120 --> 00:10:46.840
it's akin to sheer wave will be
a bit like a light wave, which
117
00:10:46.919 --> 00:10:52.120
is a transverse wave, that's what
we call it in electromodetic radiation, whereas
118
00:10:52.159 --> 00:10:56.399
a pea wave will be like a
sound wave. Because sound is transmitted by
119
00:10:56.519 --> 00:11:01.120
pressure mibratish variations in a medium.
It's got to have medium to transmit it.
120
00:11:01.679 --> 00:11:07.039
And I suspect that you can do
things with those like the kind of
121
00:11:07.080 --> 00:11:11.519
things that we do with fast radio
bursts in astronomy, where you know that
122
00:11:11.639 --> 00:11:20.159
the slower, the longer wavelength signals
are going to come slower than the higher
123
00:11:20.159 --> 00:11:24.039
sorry shorter wavelength signals. You otherwise
that the higher frequency signals are going to
124
00:11:24.120 --> 00:11:30.120
arrive first, and that's what causes
that dispersion that lets you get the distance
125
00:11:30.200 --> 00:11:33.720
to something without actually knowing its red
shift. You get the dispersion because you
126
00:11:33.759 --> 00:11:39.039
know, does it transmits as it
transmits through what we think of as empty
127
00:11:39.039 --> 00:11:43.840
space, But it's actually a lot
of electrons being very excited, so you
128
00:11:43.879 --> 00:11:48.440
can pick up information by that.
So I'm guessing it's something like that.
129
00:11:48.000 --> 00:11:50.679
But I will look that up because
that's such a good question. And as
130
00:11:50.679 --> 00:11:54.480
I said, I saw it and
I thought, yes, do some research
131
00:11:54.519 --> 00:12:01.200
into that. It's very clever science
though, that they can detect an impact
132
00:12:01.320 --> 00:12:07.399
so far away and actually isolates its
location. That's the thing, exactly the
133
00:12:07.440 --> 00:12:13.879
point of the question. And Insight
did go there with the intent of studying
134
00:12:13.960 --> 00:12:18.399
the interior of Mars, so it
had equipment that was designed to pick up
135
00:12:18.440 --> 00:12:22.919
these kinds of activities. So that
would go halfway to answering Lee's question.
136
00:12:24.000 --> 00:12:26.000
But we'll put it in the homework
homework folder. And for the record,
137
00:12:26.120 --> 00:12:33.679
Insights mission ended in December twenty twenty
two, about fourteen months ago before Give
138
00:12:33.759 --> 00:12:37.399
or Take Yeah, Thanks Lindsay,
Thank you, Lee, and to our
139
00:12:37.440 --> 00:12:43.720
final question for this episode from Wayne. Greetings, gentlemen, longtime Patreon supporter
140
00:12:43.840 --> 00:12:46.200
thank you, Wayne, We appreciate
it. First time questioner, though,
141
00:12:46.279 --> 00:12:50.559
what kind of gravitation wave, if
any, is generated by a supernova?
142
00:12:50.960 --> 00:12:56.360
Would these be detectable by late ligo? Love all the horrible dad jokes.
143
00:12:56.639 --> 00:13:03.159
Keep up the great work. Let's
someone then that's one. I mean,
144
00:13:03.519 --> 00:13:07.639
we do so. They're actually hard
to find some of them. Some of
145
00:13:07.639 --> 00:13:13.200
them are so yeah. I mean
I've found thousands, but ninety nine point
146
00:13:13.240 --> 00:13:18.320
nine percent of them are not airworthy. We must have a different website.
147
00:13:18.399 --> 00:13:22.480
I don't mean they're rude, they're
just so so terrible. Oh yeah,
148
00:13:22.679 --> 00:13:31.759
so Paulin, Yeah, so yeah, super nova does it make a gravitational
149
00:13:31.799 --> 00:13:33.679
wave? And as I suppose the
question, if I can expand it on
150
00:13:33.759 --> 00:13:41.320
a bit, is our gravitation waves
different according to what causes them? Yeah?
151
00:13:41.320 --> 00:13:46.440
Well the answer to that is certainly
yes. And you know, the
152
00:13:46.440 --> 00:13:52.759
the things that we can measure with
ligo in terms of gravitational ways, it's
153
00:13:52.879 --> 00:14:01.759
the amplitude and frequency of the wave
and the rate at which it decay or
154
00:14:01.679 --> 00:14:09.919
increases. In the case of merging
neutron stars, what you get is this
155
00:14:09.399 --> 00:14:16.039
chirp where the signal, if you
transfer transfer it to audio, becomes up
156
00:14:16.960 --> 00:14:22.159
because the they're spinning around one another, and then when they actually merge the
157
00:14:22.480 --> 00:14:24.879
that's the chirp. That's when it
goes up like that. But I think,
158
00:14:26.759 --> 00:14:31.440
and once again I'm sort of dragging
out from the bottom of my memories
159
00:14:31.480 --> 00:14:37.759
of researching into this quite a quite
deeply a few years ago. But what
160
00:14:37.759 --> 00:14:43.759
what what causes? Excuse me?
I'll be better when I've started the new
161
00:14:43.879 --> 00:14:48.320
dose of antibioty, which might be
the chemistry. You must really tick you
162
00:14:48.440 --> 00:14:52.879
off. I tell you, I've
never been as ticked off as I was
163
00:14:52.879 --> 00:14:56.799
when I discovered what it was.
Yeah, that's right, Yeah, that
164
00:14:56.919 --> 00:15:01.720
whatever bit me. Yeah, I'll
refrain from showing you what it Oh,
165
00:15:01.799 --> 00:15:05.840
yeah, thank you because we are
on YouTube at the moment. Don't want
166
00:15:05.840 --> 00:15:11.559
to get banned. No, we
don't get banned for showing horrible stuff anyway.
167
00:15:11.279 --> 00:15:15.639
So just going back to it,
So, to generate a gravitational wave,
168
00:15:15.720 --> 00:15:20.799
you've got to have an accelerating mass, and that's why neutron styles in
169
00:15:20.879 --> 00:15:28.960
orbits around on another do generate strong
gravitational ways because you've got two objects which
170
00:15:28.960 --> 00:15:37.960
are spinning around each other, revolving
around each other, and that basically constitutes
171
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:43.440
an accelerating mass now with a supernova, and in a sense we don't know
172
00:15:45.159 --> 00:15:52.960
that much about these details, but
supernova sort of generally speaking, are symmetrical.
173
00:15:52.799 --> 00:16:00.559
So you have an explosion and you
but you have stuff going out in
174
00:16:00.600 --> 00:16:07.200
all directions which kind of cancels itself
out, so you're not really generating a
175
00:16:07.360 --> 00:16:11.559
huge whatever in the background. I
can hear it. I know, I
176
00:16:11.559 --> 00:16:15.679
know there is. I'm trying to
ignore him actually, because he's he's just
177
00:16:15.720 --> 00:16:25.000
such a pain. Many Marney sent
me a cartoon this morning showing a little
178
00:16:25.000 --> 00:16:30.000
dog dressed in armor with a sword
in one hand of shield in the other,
179
00:16:30.080 --> 00:16:34.799
and it said, how small dogs
think of themselves when somebody rings the
180
00:16:34.840 --> 00:16:41.039
doorbell. That's exactly what he's likes, exactly what He's still only a puppy.
181
00:16:41.080 --> 00:16:44.840
He's only ten months old, so
you've got to give him some you
182
00:16:44.879 --> 00:16:48.879
know, understanding. Maybe one day
he won't do that anymore. Anyway,
183
00:16:48.399 --> 00:16:55.200
he is definitely an accelerating mass when
anybody comes to the door, and will
184
00:16:55.240 --> 00:17:02.480
probably generate his own gravitational word or
so. But just to carry it this
185
00:17:02.559 --> 00:17:10.599
a little bit further, I have
seen the question of whether a neutron star
186
00:17:11.200 --> 00:17:15.279
itself, which is often the end
product of a super and over explosion,
187
00:17:15.920 --> 00:17:22.359
Whether the neutron star that will be
left behind because it's rotating, whether that
188
00:17:22.400 --> 00:17:30.759
would generate a gravitational wave. But
it's because it's only rotating, it's not
189
00:17:30.559 --> 00:17:37.119
a mass being accelerated, you know, Linearly, it wouldn't unless it has
190
00:17:37.200 --> 00:17:40.759
mountains on it. And you and
I have spoken before about these millimeter high
191
00:17:40.759 --> 00:17:45.000
mountains. Yes, that neutron stars
might have. So if it's got a
192
00:17:45.000 --> 00:17:52.440
few melometer high mountains on it,
then it will generates generate a gravitational way.
193
00:17:52.480 --> 00:17:56.319
But to the best of my knowledge, nothing has yet been seen by
194
00:17:56.400 --> 00:18:03.000
Lego or the other detectors that actually
represents that. A great question from word.
195
00:18:03.880 --> 00:18:07.720
You might be interested to know Fred
that Wayne is actually watching us on
196
00:18:07.839 --> 00:18:14.599
YouTube right now, and apparently we've
got our YouTube listeners and viewers are pretty
197
00:18:14.599 --> 00:18:18.039
excited by the fact that Wayne's question
happened up happened to be served up right
198
00:18:18.079 --> 00:18:22.200
now, so that doesn't happen often. So that's really good. Thanks,
199
00:18:22.319 --> 00:18:26.119
Thanks for thanks for the question,
and thanks for watching. Wed. Sorry
200
00:18:26.119 --> 00:18:29.119
I've got a straight answer, but
I'll once again and have a look at
201
00:18:29.160 --> 00:18:30.359
the details, and so well,
it's just a look to all this stuff
202
00:18:30.960 --> 00:18:36.119
very good, all right, thank
you Wayne, and thanks for listening and
203
00:18:36.200 --> 00:18:38.920
good to have you along live.
And if you do have questions for us,
204
00:18:40.039 --> 00:18:44.920
remember you can send them through via
our website Space Nuts podcast dot com
205
00:18:45.039 --> 00:18:48.680
or space nuts dot io and click
on the AMA link to send us a
206
00:18:48.720 --> 00:18:51.880
text or audio question, or just
click on the purple thing on the right
207
00:18:51.920 --> 00:18:55.799
hand side of the homepage to send
us audio. As long as you've got
208
00:18:55.839 --> 00:19:00.240
a device with a microphone, you're
all set. And tell us who you
209
00:19:00.319 --> 00:19:03.440
are and where you're from. We
always like to know. And if you're
210
00:19:03.480 --> 00:19:06.960
watching this on YouTube, don't forget
I've got to do it again. Don't
211
00:19:07.039 --> 00:19:12.960
forget to press the subscribe button below. They all do it, are they?
212
00:19:14.039 --> 00:19:17.759
The people on YouTube? Don't forget
it to subscribe button below. So
213
00:19:17.839 --> 00:19:21.480
there we go. I've just done
it. And that brings us to the
214
00:19:21.559 --> 00:19:26.039
end of another program. Thank you
so much, Fred, pleasure, Andrew,
215
00:19:26.640 --> 00:19:29.720
good to talk again, and we'll
speak again to it we will,
216
00:19:29.759 --> 00:19:33.759
indeed, Professor Fred Watson, Astronomer
at Large getting over his tick bite.
217
00:19:33.960 --> 00:19:38.839
And to Hugh in the studio who
just gets ticked off all the time,
218
00:19:40.039 --> 00:19:41.920
and from me Andrew Untley, thanks
so much. For your company. Looking
219
00:19:41.960 --> 00:19:48.880
forward to joining you again on the
next episode of Space Nuts. Bye Byepacenuts.
220
00:19:48.160 --> 00:19:56.200
You'll be listening to the Nuts podcast
available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,
221
00:19:56.519 --> 00:20:00.519
iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast player. You can also stream on demand at
222
00:20:00.559 --> 00:20:07.720
bytes dot com. This has been
another quality podcast production from fights dot com.
Spotify
Apple Podcasts
Youtube Music
iHeartRadio
Spreaker
PocketCasts
YouTube
Goodpods
Amazon Music
TuneIn
Overcast
JioSaavn
Castro
RSS Feed