Los temas que “se quedaron por fuera” del escrito de acusación contra Álvaro Uribe

0:00 We have a bonus track. For years it had been hoped that the prosecution would correctly assess the evidentiary elements that existed in the trial of former President Alvaro Uribe and call him a trial, as the Supreme Court of Justice had done at the time. After years of delaying maneuvers in the prosecution of Francisco Barbosa and Gabriel Ramón Jaime, his coordinator of prosecutors before the Court, yesterday the first prosecutor delegated to the Supreme Court of Justice, Gilberto Villarrealbaava, decided to accuse him in a very brief thirteen- page brief. Although the brief states that the President acted with the so- called Aboganster to bribe witnesses and deceive justice. He uses the verbs cordino, directed and agreed to bribe witnesses and deceive justice. There are issues in the indictment that either remained on the outside or are very weakly sustained. These issues relate, inter alia, to the possible bribery of three witnesses imprisoned in Cvita prison, known as the Sinaik, David and Poli alias, and to the management offers to change places of detention for the convicted former prosecutor Hilda Niño Farfán. Those who know the file in detail point out that the indictment recognizes some issues but ignores others Olympically. In general, it is a loose writing and may end up favoring the former president

1:30 to the bar Uribe, prosecutor Gilberto Villarreal, Paava, who signs it. He became a prosecutor delegated to the Supreme Court of Justice by decision of Gabriel Ramón Jaimes, with whom he shares regional origin and alma mater that, by the way, is the same as the sadly remembered former prosecutor Alejandro Ordóñez. The brief must be substantially improved before the trial preparatory hearing or by its gaps, the former President will end up leaving the Barurib. This was today' s Colonel report. Thank you very much.