Jan. 12, 2026
The Colts Neck Murders: “He Waited In the Shadows” then “Hunted Them Down”
Apple Podcasts 
Spotify 
Castro 
RSS Feed The trial of 59-year-old Paul Caneiro finally began this morning, seven years after police say he murdered his brother Keith, his sister-in-law, his 11-year-old nephew and 8-year-old niece and then set fire to their home and eventually his own to cover up the crimes. Opening statements laid out both cases, the prosecution detailing the brutality of Caneiro’s alleged crimes while the defense already let jurors know they are offering a different suspect in these heinous murders, Paul and Keith’s other brother, Corey.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
00:00:02
Speaker 1: Hey there, folks.
00:00:02
Speaker 2: It is Monday, January twelfth, and today, finally, after seven years, we just heard opening statements in the case of a man accused of massacring his family and then setting two mansions on fire to cover it up. We've been waiting seven years to hear how he's going to defend himself, and we heard it this morning. With that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ and Robes. He's going to defend himself with the defense that's well been around since the invention of criminals.
00:00:33
Speaker 1: Wasn't me?
00:00:34
Speaker 3: Wasn't me? And who knew? I guess a lot of people did.
00:00:38
Speaker 4: There's a third brother and so it wasn't me, it was possibly.
00:00:44
Speaker 3: The other brother.
00:00:45
Speaker 2: To make that clear, one guy is on trial, One brother's on trial for killing another brother who's blaming now the other brother for the death.
00:00:52
Speaker 1: So all three of them.
00:00:53
Speaker 2: This is awful family actually awful family dynamic right now.
00:00:57
Speaker 3: That's an understatement. I was actually an imagining.
00:01:00
Speaker 4: I don't know if their parents are alive, but that has to be like the most chosrithic experience to know that one of your sons was brutally murdered and his entire family. Your other son is accused of doing it, and that son is accusing your other son of doing it.
00:01:17
Speaker 2: And that is what we found out. That is where we are a lot of people might remember or recognize the name Paul Canaro, certainly in the northeast, but this is a case that goes back to twenty eighteen when, yes, Paul Canaro is accused of going over to his brother's house, which only about twenty minutes away in the town in New Jersey, shooting his brother, then going in the house, shooting his brother's wife, killing her, and then killing his eleven year old nephew and eight year old niece, then setting fire to that house, driving back to his own mansion and setting it on fire to cover it up. That is the crime we're talking about. And Robes remind me, I know you did a deeper dived than I did on the reasons why it has taken so long is been seven years since the crime while we're only getting to opening statements today.
00:02:03
Speaker 4: Yes, Well, first of all, there were a lot of pre trial hearings where they were trying to get evidence excluded, namely this DNA evidence, which we actually heard his defense attorney reference and already set the stage to try and debunk when it came to their presentation of his defense, but that took a lot of time. They also blamed COVID. COVID nineteen set back this trial significantly. And so between I guess the pre trial hearings and the evidentiary hearings, what was going to be admitted, what wasn't, and then COVID nineteen, it's just taken seven long years.
00:02:41
Speaker 2: So we've gotten to this day. So yes, they had jury selection all last week, but opening statements today now the prosecutor came out and it's always interesting to me, and I go back again to Brian Walsh, the case we just covered. To see someone sitting in a courtroom in a V neck sweater and a tie and a button up, with glasses on, looking like a guy who might teach fifth grade social studies, who was accused of doing the most heinous things.
00:03:07
Speaker 4: Ever, when you just said that, I got chills because I thought it was interesting. In a lot of these courtrooms where there are cameras, you only see the back of the defendant's head. You only see maybe the side you can see when he's whispering to his attorneys. You had a full front angle of his face straight on, and I couldn't take my eyes away from his face because it was emotional.
00:03:33
Speaker 3: He looked, he looked. He wasn't stoic.
00:03:37
Speaker 4: I think a lot of times we see these defendants, they're stoic, they're unemotional, they sit there.
00:03:42
Speaker 3: He was clearly emotional listening to.
00:03:45
Speaker 4: The prosecution create and present their opening arguments, and what they were saying was horrific to hear.
00:03:52
Speaker 2: He almost looked defeated at times, and he did looked genuinely emotional at times in the courtroom. And that's not something I can say for a lot of defendant, at least before they hear not guilty.
00:04:04
Speaker 3: Don't attorneys.
00:04:06
Speaker 4: Defense attorneys tell their clients not to show emotion because they can be interpreted different ways. The jury is obviously looking at him, and I have to say, I was watching We haven't.
00:04:15
Speaker 3: Talked about our experiences.
00:04:16
Speaker 4: We were watching it together, but I also had it on my computer and I was watching it on YouTube, and you know, there's a live stream of comments and people were going off on his facial expression, saying he looks guilty, and I just kept thinking, I get that that could be an interpretation, and that is why attorneys tell their clients not to show emotion because he might be feeling something completely different. But it looked like he had this guilty emotion on his face. That's not necessarily fair to know what was behind the emotion, but people were already jumping to those conclusions.
00:04:49
Speaker 2: Yes, I'm on a jury, I'm sitting here in judgment of you, and I'm also judging how you're sitting there and your facial expressions. That's human nature. You have to to your point. Why they tell them give them nothing, don't be emotional in any way. But he looked like a human being today. He did bro Brian Walsh never did. I mean, he didn't look the same way this dude. And that's just the truth. Now, this was a smaller courtroom. Given how big of a story this has been, it is kind of a smaller courtroom.
00:05:15
Speaker 1: I think most of the.
00:05:16
Speaker 2: Pew it didn't seem jampack necessarily, but the pews were fairly full.
00:05:19
Speaker 1: That's the scene.
00:05:20
Speaker 4: Now.
00:05:20
Speaker 2: Nicole Wallace started the day off ro she's the prosecutor, and she laid out. She went in kind of hard. I don't think it was necessarily for shock value. These are the facts of the case, but she kind of laid out how the crime unfold.
00:05:34
Speaker 4: Yeah, she talked about how he waited in the shadows and then hunted them down. She used those types of phrases to describe what she claims he did leading up to the murders, the murders of his brother Paul Canaro. She claims deliberately disconnected the generator, cut the power off. He knew that his brother would come out to try and see what was going on, and she claims as he was waiting for him there in the dark, he shot his brother. I think she said he fired six shots, five of them hitting his brother execution style. So he had taken out the person who could have defended his family.
00:06:17
Speaker 1: And then it gets worse.
00:06:20
Speaker 2: They say, he goes into the house and this is where she said, I mean, he had cut power to the house, so in the dark, he is hunting an unsuspecting family. Now by all accounts, robes everybody was awake because of the disturbance, because of everything that's going on. The power's gone out and Dad has to go outside hunted them down. So the woman is found in one spot, shot on a staircase. One of the kids stabbed seventeen times. This was the little girl, and they made a point Robes to say, seventeen times in her forty five pound body.
00:06:54
Speaker 4: Didn't that just send just this horror throughout your entire body to him? Imagine a grown man over on top of a forty five pound eight year old girl who was his niece, who he presumably loved and spent a lot of time with.
00:07:13
Speaker 3: That is as horrific as it gets.
00:07:17
Speaker 2: And the same now as with eleven year old Jesse found in a different part of the home stabbed as well. So the prosecutor. I thought, at least I hadn't heard a lot of these details. I didn't do a deep enough diet to hear some of this. But and this is everything we've just said, and I apologize. I meant to actually give a warning at the top, just to say, hey, some of this stuff that came out in court today is awful, and I think this is probably the most awful thing given what we just said. This next thing is the most awful detail. Robes to hear that the kids had smoke in their lungs, so he kills everyone in the house. It does what he does. And they say he goes out and sets a fire that actually smolders for hours.
00:07:59
Speaker 3: They say, like a slow burning fire is how they describe it.
00:08:03
Speaker 2: They think, get a call about this fire for hours and hours and hours later, So it took a while for this thing to burn. So they're saying both kids had evidence of smoke and their lungs, meaning those kids were left alive in that house.
00:08:17
Speaker 3: Yeah, she put it like this.
00:08:18
Speaker 4: She said they were inhaling smoke as they bled to death. That is quite the scene, thinking about this family on the stairs bleeding out.
00:08:30
Speaker 2: Still, these things can Okay, she has to tell the facts and if it's true, But my god, how are you sitting on the jury and still in that moment going, okay, remember what the judge said that he's presumed innocent.
00:08:42
Speaker 1: How can you not want.
00:08:44
Speaker 2: To to get back at somebody for that just as a human being. All Right, it's tough to do your job there, but that that particular detail, hearing he killed them, hearing what they went through, like you want somebody to pay for that shit?
00:08:56
Speaker 3: It's hard to have.
00:08:57
Speaker 4: I mean, they're taking their lunch break and I after hearing what was set in court today, it's hard to even want to eat.
00:09:05
Speaker 3: That's how horrific this is.
00:09:07
Speaker 2: In addition to the other evidence there, he left the pile of clothes, they said, in his basement, and then they ended up being near where the fire started. This pile of clothes, I mean some of these details. They said that the niece and nephews some of their DNA, some of their blood on these clothes. There were six black gloves mixed in there, and there were blood. So they're putting together a case. You're scratching your head like, holy hell. Yeah, just for the overwhelming.
00:09:32
Speaker 4: Just from the opening statement alone from the prosecutor, the evidence is overwhelming. Yes, the pile of bloody clothes that are his clothes that have his niece and nephews DNA on them. They found a barrel of a gun in his backpack in the porch that the family was sitting. And so his family gets out of the fire, the fire that they say he set to cover it up to make it look like their entire family was targeted by someone. So he sets the fire to his own home, they claim, and then he gets his family out alive and they're waiting in the family's Porsche. But in that porsche was a backpack, and in that backpack was a lot of evidence, a lot of evidence.
00:10:12
Speaker 2: And so again we're trying to piece this together. But according to the prosecution, there is the barrel of a gun. There, they go in the house, they find another gun that's whose barrel had been swapped out. So they say though they can trace the barrel of the gun and the actual gun, both two bullets that were used at the other house. Again, this is all wildly overwhelming. Now the timeline I had not heard before either. This is one of those you have to go hmm. I know it looks bad, but this looks awful.
00:10:44
Speaker 4: This is terrible, This looks all So this is based on surveillance camera, so this isn't their estimation. They actually have video evidence at two six am that Porsche left Paul Canarrow's home. It's a twenty minute drive to his brother's house. At two fifty two the power was lost at the brother's house. They can document that. And then at three fourteen am to three eighteen am, there were four texts that went from Keith's phone that's the brother who was murdered, to Paul's phone and saying that the power was out and he was going to check his generator, like basically that he was updating his brother on what was happening.
00:11:25
Speaker 2: And then would you believe at three eighteen they said the last one that brother sent was saying, I'm gonna go out and check the generator.
00:11:31
Speaker 3: Yeah, okay.
00:11:33
Speaker 4: So three point thirty am there's a nine to one to one call from someone who heard gunshots. And then at four oh eight am that Porsche returns back to Paul Canaro's house, and at five oh two am there is a call about a fire at Paul Canaro's house. That timeline is, damn, it looks bad.
00:11:54
Speaker 3: It's his car.
00:11:55
Speaker 1: I know it looks bad. It all looks bad. I know it looks bad.
00:11:58
Speaker 2: Terrible again, So you're listening to this and like, how in God's name are they going to defend themselves because on top of all this, we talked about this in previous cases, jurys like to have a motive, and they are trying to set up a financial one here at least on two fronts. One, he's the beneficiary of a life insurance policy and also he was in business with his brother and that was going His.
00:12:22
Speaker 4: Brother had just found out that or claimed that Paul had stolen money from the company, and he was demanding answers the day before, saying, I need to know what's going on, asking for passwords to get into certain accounts to see what actually happened where this missing money was.
00:12:38
Speaker 2: And in addition, now the crazy part here about the life insurance. There was a three million dollar life insurance policy that Keith Canaro had. The beneficiary of that policy was his wife. But in the event of his wife's death, that money would go to the kids. God forbid, if everybody in the family's taken out, that three million dollars is to be split among two brothers.
00:13:02
Speaker 3: Paul Canaro and Cory Canaro.
00:13:05
Speaker 1: Those are the two that's left.
00:13:07
Speaker 2: And so if one of the brothers goes to prison, all of that money goes to Corey. Now that is a wild scenario that would you believe the defense is about to explore. Yes, stay here, we'll tell you about the defense opening statement and their line of defense.
00:13:37
Speaker 3: Welcome back everyone.
00:13:38
Speaker 4: We are talking about the explosive trial that is taking place in New Jersey seven years in the making.
00:13:46
Speaker 3: This is a horrific.
00:13:49
Speaker 4: It murders, it's a massacre of an entire family, and one brother is accused of murdering his other brother and his brother's family in the most terrific fashion. But he's now suggesting, according to his defense, that the other brother actually is the one who may.
00:14:08
Speaker 1: Be responsible, suggesting.
00:14:09
Speaker 2: They're I was trying to be I mean, they are not dancing around it, dude, did you take it?
00:14:15
Speaker 1: I didn't know.
00:14:15
Speaker 4: They are absolutely saying that, hey, this other brother, Corey, actually benefited the most if he could take one brother out by a murder, take out the other brother by framing him for the murder, and then he gets all the life insurance money.
00:14:30
Speaker 3: That is the defense they're setting up.
00:14:32
Speaker 4: I also thought it was interesting the defense attorney in this case started out by saying basically acknowledging the overwhelming evidence, and she said, it's so obvious it doesn't make sense. So they're actually using the fact that there's so much obvious evidence against Paul canarow that no one would be that stupid as to commit a murder and leave all this evidence behind.
00:14:54
Speaker 2: I am not Maybe that's good and legal strategy, but I am just a dude, and and I would have been offended by that on the jury, like you're actually telling me, don't believe the overwhelming evidence against your client, because it's so overwhelming. It's so overwhelming that it can't be true. Right, Nobody is a stupid of a criminal.
00:15:12
Speaker 3: That's basically what they're doing. Nobody is this stupid.
00:15:16
Speaker 2: I didn't necessarily it wasn't. Didn't love that opening, uh direction, she went, But okay, but she did acknowledge, and she walked over to the table at one point saying, I am not here to defend this tragedy. I am here to defend Paul Canaro and walked over to him and I thought that made sense and that was effective. But yes, they are going after the other brother and flat out saying that Paul Canaro did not do this. She is declaring he is innocent. This is not just another theory. She saying this is not the right guy. Part of that is robes. It looks like they are going to go after the investigation pretty strongly.
00:15:51
Speaker 4: Yes, they're saying that the police never once looked at Corey Canaro as a possible suspect. They zeroed in and immediately on Paul Canaro and had tunnel vision, and they.
00:16:04
Speaker 3: Only investigated him.
00:16:05
Speaker 4: They only checked his DNA, they only looked at his text and his life and any evidence appointed to Paul.
00:16:12
Speaker 3: They never once considered that Corey.
00:16:15
Speaker 4: Could have had something to do with it, and because of that they got the wrong guy.
00:16:20
Speaker 2: That seems crazy that they wouldn't have looked into the other brother in some way because she's making an argument the defense attorney that yes, they're saying she used house of cards, saying, my client is sitting here saying he had this financial house of cars and that's why he had to kill over money. Said Corey's house of cars was worse.
00:16:37
Speaker 4: Yes, they said our client's financial situation was bad, but Corey's was worse.
00:16:42
Speaker 3: That's what they were saying.
00:16:44
Speaker 4: Yes, And they said that the evidence is so conveniently overwhelming and that's why you should question their theory. They pointed to the fact that the gas can wasent conveniently in the front lawn.
00:16:55
Speaker 1: That's kind of crazy.
00:16:56
Speaker 3: That is. That is and you think about even the fact that.
00:17:01
Speaker 4: He took some of those clothes of the like bloodied clothes and then like put them in his own home and went to burn them, but they didn't burn completely, Like why would you even possibly leave that kind of evidence behind? It sounds stupid, Yes, it does sound very stupid shit.
00:17:18
Speaker 1: The barrel I'm gonna I need to hear about the barrel of the gun.
00:17:21
Speaker 4: Yeah, how did someone conveniently put that in his backpack in the period of time that, Yeah, there wasn't really a lot of opportunity there for Corey or anyone else.
00:17:30
Speaker 3: To do that.
00:17:31
Speaker 4: But they also pointed out about the relationship between Paul and Keith. They said that they were best friends, they were each other's person I.
00:17:40
Speaker 2: Thought that's strong, that that's a big deal. I mean, it sounds like they were really really close. That might be a factor. I thought it was in the middle of the night, something goes wrong with your house, the first thing you think to do is to text your brother. I thought that said a lot. That three in the morning. It was just his power out, and the first thing he did was textas brother several times. And they even said, Hey, I'm gonna go out and check it out.
00:18:01
Speaker 3: That suggested to me a very tight relationship.
00:18:05
Speaker 4: And in fact, you know, I've been doing a deep dive and this is so incredibly sad.
00:18:11
Speaker 3: But his adult daughters, who were there at the time of the fire, they have.
00:18:18
Speaker 4: Through social media over the years, paid tribute to their niece and their nephew, and their aunt and their uncle, saying how much they missed them, how much they loved them, putting up photos. This was a family that vacationed together, that ate together, that did everything together.
00:18:33
Speaker 3: She said.
00:18:33
Speaker 4: When she went away to college, her nephew, Jesse, facetimed her every day. Her niece she called her her little mini nie. So these were families that were so entwined and so close knit. They were a family in and of themselves. Even said, it wasn't even like there were two families. It was as if they were all one family in business and in pleasure.
00:18:54
Speaker 2: I mean, they decided to live twenty minutes apart.
00:18:58
Speaker 3: Yeah, ten miles from one another.
00:19:00
Speaker 2: They were over at each other's house all the time doing whatever. Those things open to have this all now playing out.
00:19:06
Speaker 1: But yes, that is.
00:19:07
Speaker 2: I'm not sure how far they're going to go with that theory and trying to prove it, or they're just hinting at it and suggesting it. But if you give an a juror's mind, another possibility, another option, And right now they're saying, there's somebody else who had just as much to gain from this, who made them it was a prosecutor. She said, this case is not about how much he had to gain, but about how much he had to lose. Wow, it wasn't about how much money was coming, but he was about to lose his way of life and had no way out.
00:19:35
Speaker 3: He was desperate.
00:19:36
Speaker 4: It's interesting because in the last two major court cases we followed Diddy and then Brian Walsh, we saw both of those defense teams choose not to put up a defense at all. And it'll be interesting to see this case because there are they are clearly at least an opening statement suggesting they have a full defense, that they're going to present an alternative theory.
00:19:58
Speaker 2: You hear her, She said, she told the jury five six or seven weeks, five six or seven weeks, and they are almost getting I was ready for a really boring a few weeks of testimony, and they acknowledged it. They said, Hey, this is going to be a lot of stats, a lot of info, a lot of financial records, a lot.
00:20:20
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's crazy in a story that is this salacious and this horrific and this headline provoking that it could immediately be so boring from the beginning. But once opening arguments ended and testimony began. It so far, it's exactly as they suggested, because they're getting into the financials of the company. They're getting into the financials, they're getting into the business. It is tedious, and it's not it's I found myself kind of having to make myself focused thinking about those jurors sitting in this room preparing themselves for two months of this.
00:20:51
Speaker 3: That's a lot.
00:20:52
Speaker 2: And then the guy that's up now as we're recording this, they're on lunch break. But that guy was frustrating the hell out of the judge and he was trying to read through emails and he was just all over the place and all this. Yes, it was one of them. I know these folks don't testify all the time, but yes, but yeah, folks with just want to hop on and give you that update. This is one we're keep a close eye on. Anytime there is a significant update. In this case, you can find it here always top right corner of your Apple podcast app where you see our show page a little button that says follow click that you don't have to go hunting for our updates.
00:21:25
Speaker 1: They'll come right to you. And but now on behalf of I mean robot I'm TJ. Holmes. Talk to y'll soon.
Speaker 1: Hey there, folks.
00:00:02
Speaker 2: It is Monday, January twelfth, and today, finally, after seven years, we just heard opening statements in the case of a man accused of massacring his family and then setting two mansions on fire to cover it up. We've been waiting seven years to hear how he's going to defend himself, and we heard it this morning. With that, welcome to this episode of Amy and TJ and Robes. He's going to defend himself with the defense that's well been around since the invention of criminals.
00:00:33
Speaker 1: Wasn't me?
00:00:34
Speaker 3: Wasn't me? And who knew? I guess a lot of people did.
00:00:38
Speaker 4: There's a third brother and so it wasn't me, it was possibly.
00:00:44
Speaker 3: The other brother.
00:00:45
Speaker 2: To make that clear, one guy is on trial, One brother's on trial for killing another brother who's blaming now the other brother for the death.
00:00:52
Speaker 1: So all three of them.
00:00:53
Speaker 2: This is awful family actually awful family dynamic right now.
00:00:57
Speaker 3: That's an understatement. I was actually an imagining.
00:01:00
Speaker 4: I don't know if their parents are alive, but that has to be like the most chosrithic experience to know that one of your sons was brutally murdered and his entire family. Your other son is accused of doing it, and that son is accusing your other son of doing it.
00:01:17
Speaker 2: And that is what we found out. That is where we are a lot of people might remember or recognize the name Paul Canaro, certainly in the northeast, but this is a case that goes back to twenty eighteen when, yes, Paul Canaro is accused of going over to his brother's house, which only about twenty minutes away in the town in New Jersey, shooting his brother, then going in the house, shooting his brother's wife, killing her, and then killing his eleven year old nephew and eight year old niece, then setting fire to that house, driving back to his own mansion and setting it on fire to cover it up. That is the crime we're talking about. And Robes remind me, I know you did a deeper dived than I did on the reasons why it has taken so long is been seven years since the crime while we're only getting to opening statements today.
00:02:03
Speaker 4: Yes, Well, first of all, there were a lot of pre trial hearings where they were trying to get evidence excluded, namely this DNA evidence, which we actually heard his defense attorney reference and already set the stage to try and debunk when it came to their presentation of his defense, but that took a lot of time. They also blamed COVID. COVID nineteen set back this trial significantly. And so between I guess the pre trial hearings and the evidentiary hearings, what was going to be admitted, what wasn't, and then COVID nineteen, it's just taken seven long years.
00:02:41
Speaker 2: So we've gotten to this day. So yes, they had jury selection all last week, but opening statements today now the prosecutor came out and it's always interesting to me, and I go back again to Brian Walsh, the case we just covered. To see someone sitting in a courtroom in a V neck sweater and a tie and a button up, with glasses on, looking like a guy who might teach fifth grade social studies, who was accused of doing the most heinous things.
00:03:07
Speaker 4: Ever, when you just said that, I got chills because I thought it was interesting. In a lot of these courtrooms where there are cameras, you only see the back of the defendant's head. You only see maybe the side you can see when he's whispering to his attorneys. You had a full front angle of his face straight on, and I couldn't take my eyes away from his face because it was emotional.
00:03:33
Speaker 3: He looked, he looked. He wasn't stoic.
00:03:37
Speaker 4: I think a lot of times we see these defendants, they're stoic, they're unemotional, they sit there.
00:03:42
Speaker 3: He was clearly emotional listening to.
00:03:45
Speaker 4: The prosecution create and present their opening arguments, and what they were saying was horrific to hear.
00:03:52
Speaker 2: He almost looked defeated at times, and he did looked genuinely emotional at times in the courtroom. And that's not something I can say for a lot of defendant, at least before they hear not guilty.
00:04:04
Speaker 3: Don't attorneys.
00:04:06
Speaker 4: Defense attorneys tell their clients not to show emotion because they can be interpreted different ways. The jury is obviously looking at him, and I have to say, I was watching We haven't.
00:04:15
Speaker 3: Talked about our experiences.
00:04:16
Speaker 4: We were watching it together, but I also had it on my computer and I was watching it on YouTube, and you know, there's a live stream of comments and people were going off on his facial expression, saying he looks guilty, and I just kept thinking, I get that that could be an interpretation, and that is why attorneys tell their clients not to show emotion because he might be feeling something completely different. But it looked like he had this guilty emotion on his face. That's not necessarily fair to know what was behind the emotion, but people were already jumping to those conclusions.
00:04:49
Speaker 2: Yes, I'm on a jury, I'm sitting here in judgment of you, and I'm also judging how you're sitting there and your facial expressions. That's human nature. You have to to your point. Why they tell them give them nothing, don't be emotional in any way. But he looked like a human being today. He did bro Brian Walsh never did. I mean, he didn't look the same way this dude. And that's just the truth. Now, this was a smaller courtroom. Given how big of a story this has been, it is kind of a smaller courtroom.
00:05:15
Speaker 1: I think most of the.
00:05:16
Speaker 2: Pew it didn't seem jampack necessarily, but the pews were fairly full.
00:05:19
Speaker 1: That's the scene.
00:05:20
Speaker 4: Now.
00:05:20
Speaker 2: Nicole Wallace started the day off ro she's the prosecutor, and she laid out. She went in kind of hard. I don't think it was necessarily for shock value. These are the facts of the case, but she kind of laid out how the crime unfold.
00:05:34
Speaker 4: Yeah, she talked about how he waited in the shadows and then hunted them down. She used those types of phrases to describe what she claims he did leading up to the murders, the murders of his brother Paul Canaro. She claims deliberately disconnected the generator, cut the power off. He knew that his brother would come out to try and see what was going on, and she claims as he was waiting for him there in the dark, he shot his brother. I think she said he fired six shots, five of them hitting his brother execution style. So he had taken out the person who could have defended his family.
00:06:17
Speaker 1: And then it gets worse.
00:06:20
Speaker 2: They say, he goes into the house and this is where she said, I mean, he had cut power to the house, so in the dark, he is hunting an unsuspecting family. Now by all accounts, robes everybody was awake because of the disturbance, because of everything that's going on. The power's gone out and Dad has to go outside hunted them down. So the woman is found in one spot, shot on a staircase. One of the kids stabbed seventeen times. This was the little girl, and they made a point Robes to say, seventeen times in her forty five pound body.
00:06:54
Speaker 4: Didn't that just send just this horror throughout your entire body to him? Imagine a grown man over on top of a forty five pound eight year old girl who was his niece, who he presumably loved and spent a lot of time with.
00:07:13
Speaker 3: That is as horrific as it gets.
00:07:17
Speaker 2: And the same now as with eleven year old Jesse found in a different part of the home stabbed as well. So the prosecutor. I thought, at least I hadn't heard a lot of these details. I didn't do a deep enough diet to hear some of this. But and this is everything we've just said, and I apologize. I meant to actually give a warning at the top, just to say, hey, some of this stuff that came out in court today is awful, and I think this is probably the most awful thing given what we just said. This next thing is the most awful detail. Robes to hear that the kids had smoke in their lungs, so he kills everyone in the house. It does what he does. And they say he goes out and sets a fire that actually smolders for hours.
00:07:59
Speaker 3: They say, like a slow burning fire is how they describe it.
00:08:03
Speaker 2: They think, get a call about this fire for hours and hours and hours later, So it took a while for this thing to burn. So they're saying both kids had evidence of smoke and their lungs, meaning those kids were left alive in that house.
00:08:17
Speaker 3: Yeah, she put it like this.
00:08:18
Speaker 4: She said they were inhaling smoke as they bled to death. That is quite the scene, thinking about this family on the stairs bleeding out.
00:08:30
Speaker 2: Still, these things can Okay, she has to tell the facts and if it's true, But my god, how are you sitting on the jury and still in that moment going, okay, remember what the judge said that he's presumed innocent.
00:08:42
Speaker 1: How can you not want.
00:08:44
Speaker 2: To to get back at somebody for that just as a human being. All Right, it's tough to do your job there, but that that particular detail, hearing he killed them, hearing what they went through, like you want somebody to pay for that shit?
00:08:56
Speaker 3: It's hard to have.
00:08:57
Speaker 4: I mean, they're taking their lunch break and I after hearing what was set in court today, it's hard to even want to eat.
00:09:05
Speaker 3: That's how horrific this is.
00:09:07
Speaker 2: In addition to the other evidence there, he left the pile of clothes, they said, in his basement, and then they ended up being near where the fire started. This pile of clothes, I mean some of these details. They said that the niece and nephews some of their DNA, some of their blood on these clothes. There were six black gloves mixed in there, and there were blood. So they're putting together a case. You're scratching your head like, holy hell. Yeah, just for the overwhelming.
00:09:32
Speaker 4: Just from the opening statement alone from the prosecutor, the evidence is overwhelming. Yes, the pile of bloody clothes that are his clothes that have his niece and nephews DNA on them. They found a barrel of a gun in his backpack in the porch that the family was sitting. And so his family gets out of the fire, the fire that they say he set to cover it up to make it look like their entire family was targeted by someone. So he sets the fire to his own home, they claim, and then he gets his family out alive and they're waiting in the family's Porsche. But in that porsche was a backpack, and in that backpack was a lot of evidence, a lot of evidence.
00:10:12
Speaker 2: And so again we're trying to piece this together. But according to the prosecution, there is the barrel of a gun. There, they go in the house, they find another gun that's whose barrel had been swapped out. So they say though they can trace the barrel of the gun and the actual gun, both two bullets that were used at the other house. Again, this is all wildly overwhelming. Now the timeline I had not heard before either. This is one of those you have to go hmm. I know it looks bad, but this looks awful.
00:10:44
Speaker 4: This is terrible, This looks all So this is based on surveillance camera, so this isn't their estimation. They actually have video evidence at two six am that Porsche left Paul Canarrow's home. It's a twenty minute drive to his brother's house. At two fifty two the power was lost at the brother's house. They can document that. And then at three fourteen am to three eighteen am, there were four texts that went from Keith's phone that's the brother who was murdered, to Paul's phone and saying that the power was out and he was going to check his generator, like basically that he was updating his brother on what was happening.
00:11:25
Speaker 2: And then would you believe at three eighteen they said the last one that brother sent was saying, I'm gonna go out and check the generator.
00:11:31
Speaker 3: Yeah, okay.
00:11:33
Speaker 4: So three point thirty am there's a nine to one to one call from someone who heard gunshots. And then at four oh eight am that Porsche returns back to Paul Canaro's house, and at five oh two am there is a call about a fire at Paul Canaro's house. That timeline is, damn, it looks bad.
00:11:54
Speaker 3: It's his car.
00:11:55
Speaker 1: I know it looks bad. It all looks bad. I know it looks bad.
00:11:58
Speaker 2: Terrible again, So you're listening to this and like, how in God's name are they going to defend themselves because on top of all this, we talked about this in previous cases, jurys like to have a motive, and they are trying to set up a financial one here at least on two fronts. One, he's the beneficiary of a life insurance policy and also he was in business with his brother and that was going His.
00:12:22
Speaker 4: Brother had just found out that or claimed that Paul had stolen money from the company, and he was demanding answers the day before, saying, I need to know what's going on, asking for passwords to get into certain accounts to see what actually happened where this missing money was.
00:12:38
Speaker 2: And in addition, now the crazy part here about the life insurance. There was a three million dollar life insurance policy that Keith Canaro had. The beneficiary of that policy was his wife. But in the event of his wife's death, that money would go to the kids. God forbid, if everybody in the family's taken out, that three million dollars is to be split among two brothers.
00:13:02
Speaker 3: Paul Canaro and Cory Canaro.
00:13:05
Speaker 1: Those are the two that's left.
00:13:07
Speaker 2: And so if one of the brothers goes to prison, all of that money goes to Corey. Now that is a wild scenario that would you believe the defense is about to explore. Yes, stay here, we'll tell you about the defense opening statement and their line of defense.
00:13:37
Speaker 3: Welcome back everyone.
00:13:38
Speaker 4: We are talking about the explosive trial that is taking place in New Jersey seven years in the making.
00:13:46
Speaker 3: This is a horrific.
00:13:49
Speaker 4: It murders, it's a massacre of an entire family, and one brother is accused of murdering his other brother and his brother's family in the most terrific fashion. But he's now suggesting, according to his defense, that the other brother actually is the one who may.
00:14:08
Speaker 1: Be responsible, suggesting.
00:14:09
Speaker 2: They're I was trying to be I mean, they are not dancing around it, dude, did you take it?
00:14:15
Speaker 1: I didn't know.
00:14:15
Speaker 4: They are absolutely saying that, hey, this other brother, Corey, actually benefited the most if he could take one brother out by a murder, take out the other brother by framing him for the murder, and then he gets all the life insurance money.
00:14:30
Speaker 3: That is the defense they're setting up.
00:14:32
Speaker 4: I also thought it was interesting the defense attorney in this case started out by saying basically acknowledging the overwhelming evidence, and she said, it's so obvious it doesn't make sense. So they're actually using the fact that there's so much obvious evidence against Paul canarow that no one would be that stupid as to commit a murder and leave all this evidence behind.
00:14:54
Speaker 2: I am not Maybe that's good and legal strategy, but I am just a dude, and and I would have been offended by that on the jury, like you're actually telling me, don't believe the overwhelming evidence against your client, because it's so overwhelming. It's so overwhelming that it can't be true. Right, Nobody is a stupid of a criminal.
00:15:12
Speaker 3: That's basically what they're doing. Nobody is this stupid.
00:15:16
Speaker 2: I didn't necessarily it wasn't. Didn't love that opening, uh direction, she went, But okay, but she did acknowledge, and she walked over to the table at one point saying, I am not here to defend this tragedy. I am here to defend Paul Canaro and walked over to him and I thought that made sense and that was effective. But yes, they are going after the other brother and flat out saying that Paul Canaro did not do this. She is declaring he is innocent. This is not just another theory. She saying this is not the right guy. Part of that is robes. It looks like they are going to go after the investigation pretty strongly.
00:15:51
Speaker 4: Yes, they're saying that the police never once looked at Corey Canaro as a possible suspect. They zeroed in and immediately on Paul Canaro and had tunnel vision, and they.
00:16:04
Speaker 3: Only investigated him.
00:16:05
Speaker 4: They only checked his DNA, they only looked at his text and his life and any evidence appointed to Paul.
00:16:12
Speaker 3: They never once considered that Corey.
00:16:15
Speaker 4: Could have had something to do with it, and because of that they got the wrong guy.
00:16:20
Speaker 2: That seems crazy that they wouldn't have looked into the other brother in some way because she's making an argument the defense attorney that yes, they're saying she used house of cards, saying, my client is sitting here saying he had this financial house of cars and that's why he had to kill over money. Said Corey's house of cars was worse.
00:16:37
Speaker 4: Yes, they said our client's financial situation was bad, but Corey's was worse.
00:16:42
Speaker 3: That's what they were saying.
00:16:44
Speaker 4: Yes, And they said that the evidence is so conveniently overwhelming and that's why you should question their theory. They pointed to the fact that the gas can wasent conveniently in the front lawn.
00:16:55
Speaker 1: That's kind of crazy.
00:16:56
Speaker 3: That is. That is and you think about even the fact that.
00:17:01
Speaker 4: He took some of those clothes of the like bloodied clothes and then like put them in his own home and went to burn them, but they didn't burn completely, Like why would you even possibly leave that kind of evidence behind? It sounds stupid, Yes, it does sound very stupid shit.
00:17:18
Speaker 1: The barrel I'm gonna I need to hear about the barrel of the gun.
00:17:21
Speaker 4: Yeah, how did someone conveniently put that in his backpack in the period of time that, Yeah, there wasn't really a lot of opportunity there for Corey or anyone else.
00:17:30
Speaker 3: To do that.
00:17:31
Speaker 4: But they also pointed out about the relationship between Paul and Keith. They said that they were best friends, they were each other's person I.
00:17:40
Speaker 2: Thought that's strong, that that's a big deal. I mean, it sounds like they were really really close. That might be a factor. I thought it was in the middle of the night, something goes wrong with your house, the first thing you think to do is to text your brother. I thought that said a lot. That three in the morning. It was just his power out, and the first thing he did was textas brother several times. And they even said, Hey, I'm gonna go out and check it out.
00:18:01
Speaker 3: That suggested to me a very tight relationship.
00:18:05
Speaker 4: And in fact, you know, I've been doing a deep dive and this is so incredibly sad.
00:18:11
Speaker 3: But his adult daughters, who were there at the time of the fire, they have.
00:18:18
Speaker 4: Through social media over the years, paid tribute to their niece and their nephew, and their aunt and their uncle, saying how much they missed them, how much they loved them, putting up photos. This was a family that vacationed together, that ate together, that did everything together.
00:18:33
Speaker 3: She said.
00:18:33
Speaker 4: When she went away to college, her nephew, Jesse, facetimed her every day. Her niece she called her her little mini nie. So these were families that were so entwined and so close knit. They were a family in and of themselves. Even said, it wasn't even like there were two families. It was as if they were all one family in business and in pleasure.
00:18:54
Speaker 2: I mean, they decided to live twenty minutes apart.
00:18:58
Speaker 3: Yeah, ten miles from one another.
00:19:00
Speaker 2: They were over at each other's house all the time doing whatever. Those things open to have this all now playing out.
00:19:06
Speaker 1: But yes, that is.
00:19:07
Speaker 2: I'm not sure how far they're going to go with that theory and trying to prove it, or they're just hinting at it and suggesting it. But if you give an a juror's mind, another possibility, another option, And right now they're saying, there's somebody else who had just as much to gain from this, who made them it was a prosecutor. She said, this case is not about how much he had to gain, but about how much he had to lose. Wow, it wasn't about how much money was coming, but he was about to lose his way of life and had no way out.
00:19:35
Speaker 3: He was desperate.
00:19:36
Speaker 4: It's interesting because in the last two major court cases we followed Diddy and then Brian Walsh, we saw both of those defense teams choose not to put up a defense at all. And it'll be interesting to see this case because there are they are clearly at least an opening statement suggesting they have a full defense, that they're going to present an alternative theory.
00:19:58
Speaker 2: You hear her, She said, she told the jury five six or seven weeks, five six or seven weeks, and they are almost getting I was ready for a really boring a few weeks of testimony, and they acknowledged it. They said, Hey, this is going to be a lot of stats, a lot of info, a lot of financial records, a lot.
00:20:20
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's crazy in a story that is this salacious and this horrific and this headline provoking that it could immediately be so boring from the beginning. But once opening arguments ended and testimony began. It so far, it's exactly as they suggested, because they're getting into the financials of the company. They're getting into the financials, they're getting into the business. It is tedious, and it's not it's I found myself kind of having to make myself focused thinking about those jurors sitting in this room preparing themselves for two months of this.
00:20:51
Speaker 3: That's a lot.
00:20:52
Speaker 2: And then the guy that's up now as we're recording this, they're on lunch break. But that guy was frustrating the hell out of the judge and he was trying to read through emails and he was just all over the place and all this. Yes, it was one of them. I know these folks don't testify all the time, but yes, but yeah, folks with just want to hop on and give you that update. This is one we're keep a close eye on. Anytime there is a significant update. In this case, you can find it here always top right corner of your Apple podcast app where you see our show page a little button that says follow click that you don't have to go hunting for our updates.
00:21:25
Speaker 1: They'll come right to you. And but now on behalf of I mean robot I'm TJ. Holmes. Talk to y'll soon.