May 27, 2026

Windsor Security Scare as Meghan Markle Faces Fresh Privacy Backlash

Show Notes
Transcript

A reported Windsor Castle security scare raises concerns after claims that armed officers slept on duty and abandoned key posts. Meanwhile, Meghan Markle faces renewed criticism over online safety, social media, family privacy, and her latest As Ever jam promotion. Plus, Hugo Vickers on Queen Elizabeth’s blind spot over Andrew, and Deep Crown reflects on what the late Queen can no longer answer for.

Get episodes of Palace Intrigue by becommming a paid subscriber on Apple Podcasts. Click the button that says uninterrupted listening. Just $5 a month, and that includes many ofther shows on the Caloroga Shark network.

A new season of King William is available now.

Our royal newsletter written by Deep Crown is available for free.

Royal Books:

Revenge: Meghan, Harry, and the War Between the Windsors by Tom Bower

William and Catherine: The Monarchy's New Era: The Inside Story

The Royal Insider: My Life with the Queen, the King and Princess Diana

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:11.359
Calarogu Shark Media, Hello and welcome through palace intrigue. I

2
00:00:11.400 --> 00:00:14.599
am your host, Mark Francis. A new security scare has

3
00:00:14.640 --> 00:00:19.760
reportedly triggered urgent concern around Windsor Castle after allegations surfaced

4
00:00:19.879 --> 00:00:22.960
that armed police officers guarding the royal residents were caught

5
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:27.800
sleeping on duty and abandoning key security posts. According to

6
00:00:27.839 --> 00:00:31.440
Rada online, the Metropolitan Police have launched an internal investigation

7
00:00:31.640 --> 00:00:36.439
involving members of the Royalty and Specialist Protection Unit assigned

8
00:00:36.520 --> 00:00:40.240
to Windsor Castle. The report claims between twenty and thirty

9
00:00:40.240 --> 00:00:43.119
officers and now part of the inquiry. Once was familiar

10
00:00:43.159 --> 00:00:46.560
with the investigation said there was genuine concern internally that

11
00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:50.960
some office became complacent because Windsor can appear quiet for

12
00:00:51.039 --> 00:00:54.320
long stretches when senior royals are not constantly moving around

13
00:00:54.359 --> 00:00:57.679
the estate. The fear is not simply about officers nodding

14
00:00:57.719 --> 00:00:59.560
off the wader concern is that any lapse of the

15
00:00:59.600 --> 00:01:02.520
site acting members of the royal family could create an

16
00:01:02.600 --> 00:01:06.439
opening for somebody with far more dangerous intentions. One source

17
00:01:06.480 --> 00:01:09.640
claimed one of the claims being examined involves an officer

18
00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:12.599
allegedly signing in for an armed protection shift but then

19
00:01:12.640 --> 00:01:15.719
failing to properly attend the position they have been assigned

20
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:19.079
to cover. It proven true. That's being viewed internally as

21
00:01:19.120 --> 00:01:22.319
an extremely serious lapse, given the sensitivity of the site

22
00:01:22.560 --> 00:01:26.159
and the level of responsibility attached to Royal protection duties.

23
00:01:27.079 --> 00:01:29.920
Another source familiar with the Royal security operations described a

24
00:01:30.000 --> 00:01:32.319
Windsor Castle as one of the most difficult Royal sites

25
00:01:32.319 --> 00:01:35.640
in the country to protect. The inside had said, You've

26
00:01:35.640 --> 00:01:39.239
got a vast estate to monitor, multiple access points, tourist

27
00:01:39.280 --> 00:01:44.239
traffic every day, staff coming and going constantly, official vehicles, deliveries,

28
00:01:44.359 --> 00:01:48.040
and major public events happening throughout the year. The fear

29
00:01:48.079 --> 00:01:51.159
among security professionals is that it only takes one lapse

30
00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:55.239
in concentration or one unattended position for somebody dangerous to

31
00:01:55.319 --> 00:02:00.519
exploit a weakness in the system. Meanwhile, Megan My's recent

32
00:02:00.519 --> 00:02:04.480
public appearances and promotional campaigns are reportedly triggering fresh security

33
00:02:04.519 --> 00:02:09.120
concerns among some observers, particularly because of her increasingly high

34
00:02:09.120 --> 00:02:13.400
profile display of expensive jewelry and design of fashion. A

35
00:02:13.439 --> 00:02:18.000
security consultant told Radar Online whenever somebody with Megan's global

36
00:02:18.039 --> 00:02:22.719
profile repeatedly displays extremely expensive jewelry, watches, and luxury items

37
00:02:22.759 --> 00:02:26.800
across social media and promotional campaigns. There will inevitably be

38
00:02:26.919 --> 00:02:32.439
conversations about whether it increases personal vulnerability. High profile figures

39
00:02:32.479 --> 00:02:35.639
are already targets for obsessive attention, and visible wealth can

40
00:02:35.680 --> 00:02:40.479
intensify those concerns. One security source claimed some believe she

41
00:02:40.560 --> 00:02:43.400
is unintentionally putting a target on her back for a

42
00:02:43.520 --> 00:02:47.639
kidnapping or heist by appearing draped and valuable jewelry almost

43
00:02:47.680 --> 00:02:51.840
everywhere she goes publicly. It's a day that ends in

44
00:02:52.039 --> 00:02:55.639
Ysomegan is facing criticism, this time after speaking about online

45
00:02:55.680 --> 00:02:59.120
harms affecting children, just days after posting a photograph featuring

46
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:03.800
Prince US a little Bit on Instagram. Internet personality Samara

47
00:03:03.879 --> 00:03:07.879
Gill accused the Duchess of Sussex of hypocrisy following Meghan's

48
00:03:07.919 --> 00:03:12.439
speech in Geneva on online safety. Gil said, it is

49
00:03:12.599 --> 00:03:14.919
tone death. It's not a good thing to be doing

50
00:03:15.000 --> 00:03:17.479
when you're trying to lecture those on keeping children away

51
00:03:17.479 --> 00:03:21.439
from social media, having some really strong words towards the

52
00:03:21.479 --> 00:03:24.199
tech companies, and then going and doing quite the opposite.

53
00:03:24.479 --> 00:03:27.800
Speaking on the Sun's Royal Exclusive podcast ATV News, Royal

54
00:03:27.919 --> 00:03:31.080
editor Chris Shipp said, pick a lane either don't put

55
00:03:31.120 --> 00:03:33.439
your kids on social media at all or do it.

56
00:03:33.479 --> 00:03:35.840
But if you do it, that's your choice as a parent.

57
00:03:36.199 --> 00:03:38.520
It's not your child's choice to go on social media.

58
00:03:39.039 --> 00:03:42.599
It's a really difficult choice for parents. The comments came

59
00:03:42.639 --> 00:03:45.439
after Meghan traveled to Geneva to speak at the opening

60
00:03:45.520 --> 00:03:49.120
of the Lost Screen Memorial, an event focused on online

61
00:03:49.159 --> 00:03:52.719
harms and child safety. During the speech, Meghan described children's

62
00:03:52.719 --> 00:03:57.199
online safety as a public health issue. She warned children

63
00:03:57.199 --> 00:04:00.520
today are being shamed by systems designed to capture attention

64
00:04:00.639 --> 00:04:06.560
at any cost, relentless algorithms, exploitative engagement, and endless exposure

65
00:04:06.599 --> 00:04:11.960
to harmful content that they are not seeking out. Possibly

66
00:04:12.080 --> 00:04:15.199
as part of the safety initiative, Meghan shared a new

67
00:04:15.280 --> 00:04:18.920
video revealing the favorite jams of harrying their children posting

68
00:04:18.920 --> 00:04:22.680
on Instagram for her as Ever lifestyle brand, The Duchess

69
00:04:22.680 --> 00:04:26.040
spoke about the family's different preferences while promoting the company's

70
00:04:26.040 --> 00:04:29.120
fruit spreads. In the video, she shared, everyone in my

71
00:04:29.160 --> 00:04:32.279
family has a different favorite. My husband loves the raspberry,

72
00:04:32.439 --> 00:04:35.720
Lil loves the strawberry, and Arch likes both, and I

73
00:04:35.879 --> 00:04:38.959
like the Mamaalade. The Duchess referred to her children by

74
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:42.519
the nicknames arch and Lil during the clip. The video

75
00:04:42.560 --> 00:04:45.360
showed Meghan preparing jam in her kitchen while wearing a

76
00:04:45.439 --> 00:04:47.720
dark top and apron, before cutting two shots of the

77
00:04:47.800 --> 00:04:52.680
products themselves, including orange Mama Laide. The accompanying caption read

78
00:04:52.839 --> 00:04:55.240
inspired by the jams Meghan has created in her own

79
00:04:55.319 --> 00:04:57.720
kitchen and shared over the years. Each spread reflects a

80
00:04:57.759 --> 00:05:01.800
small batch, carefully balanced approach to flavor. The post follows

81
00:05:01.800 --> 00:05:05.600
a series of personal family updates Megan has recently shared online,

82
00:05:05.920 --> 00:05:09.720
including photographs marking the Sussex's eighth wedding anniversary and earlier

83
00:05:09.759 --> 00:05:13.560
birthday tributes for Prince Archie. Pr expert Negie told The

84
00:05:13.600 --> 00:05:18.079
Express family content is incredibly powerful online because it creates

85
00:05:18.079 --> 00:05:22.160
emotional engagement. Prince also risky when you've previously spoken publicly

86
00:05:22.160 --> 00:05:25.959
about privacy and protecting children from media exposure. Speaking about

87
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:29.439
children's online safety and then almost immediately increasing the visibility

88
00:05:29.480 --> 00:05:33.000
of Archie and Lulibet even indirectly opened her up to

89
00:05:33.160 --> 00:05:38.279
accusations of hypocrisy. Fair or unfair, consistency is crucial in

90
00:05:38.360 --> 00:05:46.240
personal branding, and audiences notice contradictions instantly. Columnist DANIELA Elsa

91
00:05:46.319 --> 00:05:49.199
points out this is the same digital coal face that

92
00:05:49.240 --> 00:05:51.120
she and Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex have been

93
00:05:51.199 --> 00:05:54.399
chipping away at for years talking about the psychological and

94
00:05:54.439 --> 00:05:58.920
emotional cost of social media rampant. But here's the interesting bit,

95
00:05:59.439 --> 00:06:02.720
not the why where of Megan's appearance, or even who

96
00:06:02.720 --> 00:06:05.240
made her perfect black suit the money, of course, but

97
00:06:05.360 --> 00:06:07.199
what was going on in the background of the shots

98
00:06:07.519 --> 00:06:10.959
in Geneva, which is to say, nothing much. No mobs

99
00:06:11.040 --> 00:06:13.680
or hoardes on hand to witness the Duchess of Sussex

100
00:06:13.720 --> 00:06:17.279
give a deeply moving speech. Outside the metal barriers around

101
00:06:17.319 --> 00:06:20.160
the memorial passes by appeared to be just going about

102
00:06:20.199 --> 00:06:24.160
their day, generally unfussed the Daily Beast and the royalists.

103
00:06:24.199 --> 00:06:26.639
Tom Sykes, who was in Geneva, reported that there were

104
00:06:26.920 --> 00:06:30.040
sixty or seventy invited guests, but perhaps another fifty or

105
00:06:30.040 --> 00:06:32.000
sixty members of the public who had wandered in or

106
00:06:32.120 --> 00:06:35.240
stationed themselves at the edges. It was not embarrassing, but

107
00:06:35.279 --> 00:06:39.519
it was not, by any reasonable measure, a throng more palating,

108
00:06:39.560 --> 00:06:46.399
just a moment. Royal biographer Hugo Vickers claims Queen Elizabeth

109
00:06:46.560 --> 00:06:49.480
Icond that remained deeply concerned about Andrew in her final

110
00:06:49.560 --> 00:06:53.040
years and did not believe the allegations against him. Speaking

111
00:06:53.040 --> 00:06:56.240
to The Times, Vickers reflected on the late Queen's relationship

112
00:06:56.279 --> 00:07:00.680
with her second son while discussing his new book about Elizabeth,

113
00:07:01.040 --> 00:07:04.000
Beckaers said, Prince Andrew was the politest little boy you

114
00:07:04.000 --> 00:07:07.279
could possibly imagine. Okay, it changed, but you know, that's

115
00:07:07.279 --> 00:07:10.120
probably the little boy the queen saw, and he was

116
00:07:10.160 --> 00:07:12.639
good with the Queen. She was worried about him as well,

117
00:07:12.759 --> 00:07:15.600
worried what was going to happen to him. Thank God

118
00:07:15.639 --> 00:07:17.560
she didn't live to see what they did to him.

119
00:07:19.000 --> 00:07:22.680
In The Express, Royal commentator Rebecca Russell added, every legendary

120
00:07:22.759 --> 00:07:25.839
leader has to have a tragic floor. Achilles had his heel,

121
00:07:25.879 --> 00:07:28.839
a fellow was plagued by jealousy, Caesar had brutus, and

122
00:07:28.959 --> 00:07:33.120
Queen Elizabeth I she had Andrew. She truly was impeccable.

123
00:07:33.160 --> 00:07:35.560
There will never be another like her. It's not treacherous

124
00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:38.759
to admit that she had a blind spot on his

125
00:07:38.920 --> 00:07:42.279
substack Royal inside of deep crown rights, I understand why

126
00:07:42.279 --> 00:07:45.360
the documents keep arriving and why Elizabeth keeps getting pulled

127
00:07:45.360 --> 00:07:48.160
into the frame. The public appetite for a complete account

128
00:07:48.199 --> 00:07:51.560
of what happened and who knew and when is legitimate.

129
00:07:51.800 --> 00:07:54.680
The survivors of Epstein's network are owed a full accounting,

130
00:07:54.720 --> 00:07:57.240
and they do not begrudge them the pursuit of it.

131
00:07:57.680 --> 00:08:00.800
But there is a difference between a legitimate account and

132
00:08:00.839 --> 00:08:04.079
a retrospective trial conducted in newspaper columns, in which a

133
00:08:04.120 --> 00:08:07.720
woman who died in September twenty twenty two is asked

134
00:08:07.759 --> 00:08:10.759
to answer for decisions she can no longer explain or

135
00:08:10.800 --> 00:08:15.600
defend or contextualize. The documents tell us what was written.

136
00:08:15.680 --> 00:08:17.560
They do not tell us what was felt or feared

137
00:08:17.639 --> 00:08:22.160
or deliberately not examined. The gap is where Elizabeth actually lived,

138
00:08:22.319 --> 00:08:25.480
and it is a gap that no biography, however carefully researched,

139
00:08:25.519 --> 00:08:28.920
is going to close. Don't ask the dead to answer

140
00:08:29.040 --> 00:08:32.399
they cannot, And the questions we most want answered are

141
00:08:32.440 --> 00:08:35.440
precisely the ones that they took with them. And there

142
00:08:35.440 --> 00:08:39.480
you have it. Follow Palace Intrigue on Spotify as well

143
00:08:39.480 --> 00:08:42.240
as Apple and turn on notifications so you never miss

144
00:08:42.240 --> 00:08:45.519
an episode. And while you're there, leave us a comment

145
00:08:45.639 --> 00:08:47.720
on Spotify and let us know what you think about

146
00:08:47.759 --> 00:08:52.279
today's stories. I'm Mike Francis. No thanks to John McDermott.

147
00:08:52.279 --> 00:08:55.000
This is Palace intrigue and good times.

Windsor Security Scare as Meghan Markle Faces Fresh Privacy Backlash

Listen On

Recent Episodes