WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:11.679
Calorougus Shark Media. Hi, am welcome through palace intrigue game
2
00:00:11.720 --> 00:00:15.320
your host Mark Francis. Andrew mount Batten Windsor may have
3
00:00:15.359 --> 00:00:18.679
been released from custody, but his legal situation is far
4
00:00:18.679 --> 00:00:22.519
from resolved. Police searchers at Royal Lodge in Windsor continued
5
00:00:22.559 --> 00:00:25.879
on Friday, while searchers at Wood Farm on the Sandringham
6
00:00:26.000 --> 00:00:31.120
estate have concluded. According to Thames Valley Police, his release
7
00:00:31.199 --> 00:00:33.880
under investigation does not mean he has been cleared, nor
8
00:00:33.920 --> 00:00:36.479
does it mean he has been released on bail. There
9
00:00:36.479 --> 00:00:39.240
are no conditions attached. It indicates only that the police
10
00:00:39.240 --> 00:00:42.920
have completed this phase of questioning and are continuing their inquiry.
11
00:00:43.799 --> 00:00:46.600
Police retain the option to recall him for further questioning
12
00:00:46.759 --> 00:00:50.280
or re arrest him if necessary. They may also pursue
13
00:00:50.320 --> 00:00:54.600
additional lines of inquiry. Ultimately, investigators will consult with the
14
00:00:54.640 --> 00:00:58.520
Ground Prosecution Service to determine whether there is sufficient evidence
15
00:00:58.920 --> 00:01:02.119
to bring charges. That decision could take weeks or months.
16
00:01:03.000 --> 00:01:05.879
If charges were brought, the case would formally be styled
17
00:01:06.319 --> 00:01:10.280
the King Versus mount Batten Windsor, reflecting the constitutional reality.
18
00:01:10.319 --> 00:01:13.879
The prosecutions are brought in the name of the Crown.
19
00:01:14.760 --> 00:01:17.280
This is the case in England and Wales, so the
20
00:01:17.319 --> 00:01:21.560
case caption reads Rex v. Defendant Rex, being Latin for King.
21
00:01:21.879 --> 00:01:23.840
So if and we were charged and brought to trial,
22
00:01:23.879 --> 00:01:27.239
the case would formally read Rex v. Mount Batten windsor
23
00:01:27.760 --> 00:01:30.519
in the more common shorthand rendering used in British legal
24
00:01:30.519 --> 00:01:34.120
and media contexts, that becomes the King v. Mount Batten
25
00:01:34.159 --> 00:01:37.799
windsor The Crown in the legal sense is an abstraction.
26
00:01:38.040 --> 00:01:42.560
It represents the states prosecutorial authority, not the personal will
27
00:01:42.599 --> 00:01:46.159
of Charles the third. So it would be constitutionally imprecise
28
00:01:46.280 --> 00:01:49.159
to say the King is prosecuting his brother Charles has
29
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:53.120
no personal role in the prosecution, but constitutionally precise and
30
00:01:53.319 --> 00:01:57.079
symbolically devastating. The two entirely different things, and the optics
31
00:01:57.120 --> 00:02:00.280
of that case caption would be extraordinary. The King his
32
00:02:00.359 --> 00:02:03.760
brother Rex versus the man who was stripped of his HRH,
33
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.159
the full weight of the Crown's legal authority arrayed, at
34
00:02:07.239 --> 00:02:09.800
least in Naane against a member of the family that
35
00:02:09.879 --> 00:02:13.280
wears it. For now, the investigation continues, with no formal
36
00:02:13.360 --> 00:02:17.599
charge laid and no timeline announced. In the Daily Mail,
37
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:21.439
Richard Kay provides some perspective, writing for centuries, the monarchy
38
00:02:21.439 --> 00:02:26.199
has withstood scandal and insurrection, regicide and abdication, and yet survived.
39
00:02:26.719 --> 00:02:29.560
It has done so thanks to a combination of pragmatic adjustments,
40
00:02:29.800 --> 00:02:33.520
and with the exception of the briefest of Blip's public devotion.
41
00:02:34.039 --> 00:02:37.759
But this feels different, and dangerously so. But the affair
42
00:02:37.800 --> 00:02:40.000
of the ex Prince Andrew was of a different scale.
43
00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:43.759
In some savory allegations involving money, sex, and his abandonment
44
00:02:43.800 --> 00:02:47.479
of patriotism have permeated every crack of the royal fabric,
45
00:02:47.840 --> 00:02:52.759
overshadowing good intentions, obliterating hard won reputations, and somehow trapping
46
00:02:52.800 --> 00:02:56.000
the family in an endless cycle of sles. With it too,
47
00:02:56.120 --> 00:02:59.439
has gone public sympathy. It is now quite likely that,
48
00:02:59.479 --> 00:03:02.039
however long or short, the King's reign will be remembered
49
00:03:02.039 --> 00:03:04.599
for one thing, and one thing only, Andrew and how
50
00:03:04.599 --> 00:03:07.680
he dealt with him. Yesterday, some of the King's more
51
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:11.479
reliable supporters rushed to the airwaves to claim that charles interventions,
52
00:03:11.479 --> 00:03:15.759
commendable as they undoubtedly are, demonstrate the resilience of the monarchy,
53
00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:17.680
and that his statement in which he said the law
54
00:03:17.759 --> 00:03:20.080
must take its course was a sign of both his
55
00:03:20.240 --> 00:03:24.360
and his institution's openness and honesty. I cannot agree. As
56
00:03:24.400 --> 00:03:27.159
this whole saga has unfolded, it has felt more and
57
00:03:27.199 --> 00:03:29.879
more like a symbolic moment that has struck not just
58
00:03:30.080 --> 00:03:33.080
at the public's affection for the monarchy, but at something
59
00:03:33.120 --> 00:03:36.919
far more fundamental, our trust in it. There is, I believe,
60
00:03:36.960 --> 00:03:39.560
a very real sense of vulnerability, and the decline in
61
00:03:39.599 --> 00:03:42.719
public support is pivotal. It has been building for some time.
62
00:03:43.080 --> 00:03:45.879
The King has been heckled twice in public on official engagements,
63
00:03:46.159 --> 00:03:50.159
and in recent days journalists have been emboldened to shout
64
00:03:50.280 --> 00:03:52.759
questions at both Charles and Prince William as though they
65
00:03:52.759 --> 00:03:56.080
are politicians on the stump. When news that Andrew was
66
00:03:56.080 --> 00:03:59.199
no longer to be a prince broke on television, the
67
00:03:59.199 --> 00:04:03.280
audience on BBC Question Time broken to spontaneous applause. Even
68
00:04:03.360 --> 00:04:06.280
more questions are being asked about the wealth of the Windsors,
69
00:04:06.400 --> 00:04:09.719
their extensive properties, and their many privileges. All this can
70
00:04:09.759 --> 00:04:13.400
be traced back to Andrew in Broglio. The arrest, however,
71
00:04:13.639 --> 00:04:15.719
is not the end of the issue, but rather the
72
00:04:15.800 --> 00:04:22.959
beginning more palasage the moment. It's been more than three
73
00:04:22.959 --> 00:04:24.519
and a half century since a member of the British
74
00:04:24.560 --> 00:04:27.199
royal family was arrested. The last time a reigning monarch
75
00:04:27.240 --> 00:04:30.279
was taken into custody was during the English Civil War,
76
00:04:30.360 --> 00:04:33.720
when King Charles the First was seized by parliamentary forces.
77
00:04:33.959 --> 00:04:36.839
Now Andrew mount Batten Windsor has become the first modern
78
00:04:36.920 --> 00:04:39.839
royal to be detained by police, arrested on suspicion of
79
00:04:39.839 --> 00:04:43.879
misconduct in public office at Sandringham on Thursday morning. He
80
00:04:43.959 --> 00:04:47.160
denies all wrongdoing. The alleged offense carries a maximum sentence
81
00:04:47.160 --> 00:04:50.439
of life imprisonment. No royal has been arrested in the
82
00:04:50.480 --> 00:04:52.759
modern era. That does not mean members of the family
83
00:04:52.759 --> 00:04:56.439
have entirely avoided legal trouble, but recent incidents have been
84
00:04:56.519 --> 00:04:59.959
of a very different order. Princess Anne has had several
85
00:05:00.079 --> 00:05:02.279
speeding convictions. In two thousand and one, she was fined
86
00:05:02.319 --> 00:05:05.439
four hundred pounds and given five penalty points after driving
87
00:05:05.480 --> 00:05:08.240
her Bentley at ninety three miles an hour and seventy
88
00:05:08.279 --> 00:05:11.480
mile an hour zone in Gloucestershire. She reportedly said she
89
00:05:11.519 --> 00:05:14.000
believed the police car behind her was at Royal Escort.
90
00:05:14.519 --> 00:05:17.199
In January of seventy seven, at twenty six, she was
91
00:05:17.240 --> 00:05:20.720
fined forty pounds at Alfredton Magistrates Court in Derbyshire for
92
00:05:20.800 --> 00:05:23.759
traveling at ninety six miles an hour on the air one.
93
00:05:23.959 --> 00:05:26.079
In October of nineteen ninety she was fined one hundred
94
00:05:26.120 --> 00:05:28.680
and fifty pounds in banned from driving for one month
95
00:05:28.800 --> 00:05:31.639
at Stowe on the Wall after admitting two speeding events,
96
00:05:31.800 --> 00:05:35.560
saying she had been late for an engagement. In two
97
00:05:35.560 --> 00:05:38.399
thousand and two, Anne's English bull terrier Dotty bit two
98
00:05:38.439 --> 00:05:41.759
boys in Windsor Great Park. The Princess Royal pleaded guilty
99
00:05:41.839 --> 00:05:45.439
under the Dangerous Dogs Act at Slough Magistrates Court and
100
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:48.800
was fined five hundred pounds. Her daughter Zara was banned
101
00:05:48.800 --> 00:05:50.879
from driving for six months in twenty twenty after being
102
00:05:50.879 --> 00:05:53.560
caught speeding at ninety one miles an hour near her
103
00:05:53.639 --> 00:05:57.120
Cotswolds home. Prince Philip was involved in a road traffic
104
00:05:57.120 --> 00:06:00.240
accident near Sandringham in twenty nineteen when his land Over
105
00:06:00.319 --> 00:06:04.560
Freelander overturned after a collision with another vehicle. He accepted responsibility.
106
00:06:04.720 --> 00:06:07.600
The Crown Prosecution Service decided he would not face charges
107
00:06:08.040 --> 00:06:10.959
nor police later gave him suitable words of advice after
108
00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:14.040
he was photographed driving without a seat belt. He wrote
109
00:06:14.079 --> 00:06:17.519
a personal letter of apology to the other driver. Sarah
110
00:06:17.560 --> 00:06:20.600
Ferguson had previously recounted that she and Princess Diana were
111
00:06:20.839 --> 00:06:23.920
nearly arrested on her hand night in nineteen eighty six,
112
00:06:24.399 --> 00:06:27.000
after dressing as police women and ending up in the
113
00:06:27.000 --> 00:06:30.720
back of a park's police van. King Charles himself was
114
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:33.160
interviewed as a witness in two thousand and five as
115
00:06:33.199 --> 00:06:37.120
part of a Metropolitan Police investigation into the death of Diana,
116
00:06:37.199 --> 00:06:41.160
Princess of Wales. Lord Stephens of kirk Welbington later told
117
00:06:41.199 --> 00:06:43.600
The Daily Mail that he had interviewed the then Prince
118
00:06:43.600 --> 00:06:46.639
of Wales during a three year inquiry. The investigation examined,
119
00:06:46.680 --> 00:06:48.759
among other things, a note in which Diana had written
120
00:06:48.800 --> 00:06:51.560
that she feared she would die in a staged car
121
00:06:51.600 --> 00:06:55.480
accident involving brake failure and serious head injury. No evidence
122
00:06:55.480 --> 00:06:58.639
of a plot was found to find a royal detained
123
00:06:58.680 --> 00:07:01.959
in custody, however, must go back to the English Civil War.
124
00:07:02.480 --> 00:07:05.199
In sixteen forty six, King Charles the First surrendered to
125
00:07:05.240 --> 00:07:08.639
the Scottish Army after fleeing the besieged city of Oxford.
126
00:07:08.839 --> 00:07:11.439
The Scott's later handed him over to the English Parliament.
127
00:07:11.839 --> 00:07:14.920
He was held in guarded captivity at Hampton Court Palace,
128
00:07:15.480 --> 00:07:17.920
escaped with the help of supporters, and was recaptured and
129
00:07:17.959 --> 00:07:21.399
detained at Carsbrook Castle on the Isle of Wight. His
130
00:07:21.560 --> 00:07:25.199
continuing negotiations and attempts to rally support led to the
131
00:07:25.240 --> 00:07:29.040
Second Civil War. Charles the First was brought to trial
132
00:07:29.079 --> 00:07:31.839
in Westminster Hall in January of sixteen forty nine. He
133
00:07:31.920 --> 00:07:34.879
was convicted of high treason and executed later that month
134
00:07:34.920 --> 00:07:39.399
in Whitehall. In Tudor times, arrests within royal circles were
135
00:07:39.480 --> 00:07:43.240
more common. Henry Yates wives and Berlenin Catherine Howard were
136
00:07:43.240 --> 00:07:46.879
both accused of trees and adultery and were executed. Princess
137
00:07:46.879 --> 00:07:50.279
Elizabeth later Elizabeth the First was imprisoned in the Tower
138
00:07:50.279 --> 00:07:53.560
of London in fifteen fifty four under suspicion of involvement
139
00:07:53.600 --> 00:07:57.360
in the Wyatt Rebellion, before being released into house arrest.
140
00:07:57.720 --> 00:08:00.240
Mary Queen of Scot's was arrested in fifteen six sixty
141
00:08:00.279 --> 00:08:03.240
eight and held in custody in England for nearly two decades.
142
00:08:04.240 --> 00:08:08.000
Modern constitutional monarchy has until now largely avoided such scenes.
143
00:08:08.160 --> 00:08:11.680
Andrew mount Batten Winsor's arrest therefore marks an extraordinary moment
144
00:08:11.800 --> 00:08:15.040
in contemporary royal history, placing him in a line of
145
00:08:15.079 --> 00:08:20.279
royal's attentions that stretches back not decades, but centuries. Palace
146
00:08:20.319 --> 00:08:23.000
Intrigue will remain on a modified publishing schedule. We'll have
147
00:08:23.000 --> 00:08:26.879
another episode for you later today, and there you have it.
148
00:08:27.720 --> 00:08:29.720
If you'd like to email us, it addresses the Palace
149
00:08:29.759 --> 00:08:32.519
intrig Get Gmail and dot com. Please follo us on Spotify,
150
00:08:32.559 --> 00:08:34.480
Apple or the app of your choice. I Mark Francis
151
00:08:34.480 --> 00:08:36.919
my thanks to John McDermott. This is Palace Intrigue and
152
00:08:37.600 --> 00:08:38.200
good Times