Oct. 8, 2025

Prince Harry’s Stalker Scare and Meghan Markle’s Massive Paris Backlash

Prince Harry’s Stalker Scare and Meghan Markle’s Massive Paris Backlash
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Amazon Music podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

A stalker reportedly got within feet of Prince Harry during his visit to London, prompting renewed questions about his lack of royal protection. Then — as if the Sussexes needed another headline — Meghan Markle’s Paris Fashion Week trip sparks fury after a video filmed near Princess Diana’s crash site is branded “tone-deaf” and “beyond stupid.” Deep Crown weighs in, and TikTok turns Meghan’s Drew Barrymore interview into comedy gold. Plus: whispers of silence between King Charles and Prince William.

👑 The Palace Intrigue Social Hub is Live! Join the conversation on Facebook and Instagram or click the links to start your royal journey!

👑 Follow our hit series Crown and Controversy! Season 1 is fully available now for everyone. Season 2 starts Sunday 9/21 with 
new episodes every Sunday on the regular feed. GET THE FULL SEASON 2 BEFORE REGULAR LISTENERS as a subscriber! Hit that "UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING" Banner on the top of the Apple player. AND listent to Crown and Controversy "NORWAY'S ROYAL REBELS" here and get the full season as a premium subscriber now. 

PREMIUM SUBSCRIBERS get Crown & Controversy seasons including Norways Royal Rebels, Deep Crown Sunday episode and COMMERCIAL FREE LISTENING!! NO ADS!!

Plus you unlock 25+ series from Caloroga Shark Media!

WEBVTT

1
00:00:09.160 --> 00:00:12.919
Hello and welcome to Palace. Intrigue host Mark Francis, a

2
00:00:13.119 --> 00:00:16.679
stalker obsessed with Prince Harry, was reportedly able to get

3
00:00:16.760 --> 00:00:20.359
within feet of him on two separate occasions during his

4
00:00:20.519 --> 00:00:24.160
visit to London last month, raising new concerns about the

5
00:00:24.199 --> 00:00:28.519
Duke's personal security in the UK. According to reports, the woman,

6
00:00:28.600 --> 00:00:31.760
already known to Harry's private security team enlisted by a

7
00:00:31.839 --> 00:00:37.039
private intelligence affirm as a fixated individual, managed to enter

8
00:00:37.079 --> 00:00:41.439
a secure area at a central London hotel during the

9
00:00:41.479 --> 00:00:45.439
well Child Awards on September ninth. Two days later, she

10
00:00:45.560 --> 00:00:48.119
was intercepted by a member of Harry's staff at the

11
00:00:48.200 --> 00:00:51.520
Center for Blast Injury Studies in West London, where no

12
00:00:51.600 --> 00:00:55.439
police were present during the visit. The Metropolitan Police had

13
00:00:55.479 --> 00:00:58.600
provided security only for the day of the well Child

14
00:00:58.719 --> 00:01:02.560
Awards on their own initiative, due to the presence of

15
00:01:02.679 --> 00:01:07.040
children at the event. Neil Bazu, the former head of

16
00:01:07.079 --> 00:01:09.959
the UK's counter Terrorism Police, called the lack of a

17
00:01:10.000 --> 00:01:13.719
formal risk assessment for the due a mistake, arguing that

18
00:01:13.719 --> 00:01:17.159
Harry remains a high profile target. He said the most

19
00:01:17.239 --> 00:01:20.599
viable threat posed to the Royals is often from individuals

20
00:01:21.159 --> 00:01:25.599
fixated on a specific figure. After brief initial reports on

21
00:01:25.640 --> 00:01:28.840
the encounter, more details became available on Tuesday, with some

22
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:32.640
suspected that the leaked information is a way to change

23
00:01:32.680 --> 00:01:37.560
the news cycle from focusing on Megan's tasteless Paris selfie.

24
00:01:37.959 --> 00:01:40.959
We've now learned security staff were called when the woman

25
00:01:41.079 --> 00:01:44.439
was discovered in the ladies' toilets making what were described

26
00:01:44.480 --> 00:01:48.560
as odd comments about Harry. She was swiftly escorted from

27
00:01:48.560 --> 00:01:52.239
the premises moments before his arrival, and was later seen

28
00:01:52.280 --> 00:01:56.400
standing beside his car. Two days later, the same woman

29
00:01:56.519 --> 00:02:01.439
allegedly reappeared outside Imperial College's Center for Last Injury Studies,

30
00:02:02.120 --> 00:02:05.280
where Harry was attending another engagement. A source told reporters

31
00:02:05.319 --> 00:02:08.560
there was no police presence or close protection. It was

32
00:02:08.639 --> 00:02:12.719
left to to staffers from his office to intervene. This time,

33
00:02:12.719 --> 00:02:14.719
they got lucky. The woman, who is said to have

34
00:02:14.759 --> 00:02:17.439
mental health difficulties, is understood to be on a list

35
00:02:17.439 --> 00:02:21.800
of fixated individuals known to Harry's private security team. She's

36
00:02:21.840 --> 00:02:24.240
also believed to have followed Harry and Meghan during their

37
00:02:24.319 --> 00:02:29.599
visit to Nigeria last year. Megan Michael's long awaited return

38
00:02:29.680 --> 00:02:33.120
to Europe has drawn fierce criticism from public relations experts

39
00:02:33.159 --> 00:02:36.759
and royal commentators who say her latest appearance in Paris

40
00:02:36.840 --> 00:02:41.039
was a major misstep. Renee Smith, founder of the Atticism

41
00:02:41.120 --> 00:02:45.080
PR agency, called the Duchess of Sussex's decision to film

42
00:02:45.080 --> 00:02:49.120
a stylized video near the Ponte Lama tunnel where Princess

43
00:02:49.120 --> 00:02:53.080
Diana tragically died in nineteen ninety seven a terrible decision.

44
00:02:53.759 --> 00:02:57.039
Speaking to The Express, Smith said I wouldn't advise a

45
00:02:57.039 --> 00:02:59.919
single client of mind to get involved with them, no

46
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:03.199
way in hell. As we know, Megan has an incredible

47
00:03:03.199 --> 00:03:07.680
ability to turn neutral moments into controversy. The video near

48
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:10.319
the tunnel where Diana died was a terrible decision from

49
00:03:10.319 --> 00:03:15.560
a PR perspective. It's not just turn deaf, it's strategically reckless.

50
00:03:16.039 --> 00:03:18.520
She has to know how symbolic that location is, so

51
00:03:18.639 --> 00:03:23.120
doing a posed video there just looks self serving. American

52
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:26.319
royal commentator Lee Cohen was even more scathing, telling The Express,

53
00:03:26.719 --> 00:03:29.960
this vile stunt exposes her as a desperate zero with

54
00:03:30.000 --> 00:03:33.360
the emotional depth of a puddle, clawing for likes when

55
00:03:33.400 --> 00:03:39.319
trampling on sacred memories in Marie Claire Kirsten Contino defended

56
00:03:39.360 --> 00:03:43.439
Meghan's Paris video writing. The words tasteless and insensitive were

57
00:03:43.560 --> 00:03:46.840
thrown around in headlines covering how the duchess posted the

58
00:03:46.919 --> 00:03:49.960
video in an area near where Diana died, and Royal

59
00:03:49.960 --> 00:03:53.800
commentator Richard Fitzwilliams called the move beyond stupid and utterly

60
00:03:53.879 --> 00:03:57.800
bewildering in The Daily Mail. She couldn't possibly have intended

61
00:03:57.840 --> 00:04:00.479
to be disrespectful, but it's another exam sample of the

62
00:04:00.479 --> 00:04:04.439
Sussexes doing something that makes no sense at all, he

63
00:04:04.520 --> 00:04:07.439
told the publication. On ex Meghan was even accused of

64
00:04:07.560 --> 00:04:11.280
next level psychotic behavior by posting the clip on her story.

65
00:04:11.520 --> 00:04:14.280
There's no denying the emotional weight of that Paris tunnel,

66
00:04:14.319 --> 00:04:17.800
but context matters. The Duchess didn't film the entrance to

67
00:04:17.879 --> 00:04:20.560
the tunnel and passing close to the bridge where Diana died,

68
00:04:20.560 --> 00:04:23.920
as something anyone attending Paris Fashion Week might do, As

69
00:04:23.920 --> 00:04:26.480
one fan on x pointed out, unless she used a

70
00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:29.959
helicopter howlse was she to get across the city. She's

71
00:04:30.040 --> 00:04:35.399
driving past either Pont Dielma or Pont Alexandra. If anyone

72
00:04:35.399 --> 00:04:37.759
else in the royal family had posted the same video,

73
00:04:37.800 --> 00:04:40.600
it might have earned heart emojis or living her best

74
00:04:40.639 --> 00:04:43.040
life comments in stated, it's become another example of how

75
00:04:43.079 --> 00:04:46.759
Meghan can't win. If she's too quiet, she's hiding, she's

76
00:04:46.800 --> 00:04:50.879
too visible. Well, who does she think she is? We

77
00:04:50.920 --> 00:04:53.279
asked our royal inside a deep crown about this. He

78
00:04:53.319 --> 00:04:56.920
wrote back, I'm afraid miss Contino is out of touch

79
00:04:57.000 --> 00:05:00.560
as the Duchess herself. Anyone who has spent thirty seconds

80
00:05:00.600 --> 00:05:03.160
around Harry knows that everything about him comes back to

81
00:05:03.240 --> 00:05:08.720
Diana everything. One doesn't simply motive pass the Pont de Lama, however,

82
00:05:08.879 --> 00:05:12.160
inadvertently and post it to Instagram as though one were

83
00:05:12.199 --> 00:05:16.600
promoting a particularly delightful croissant. The question isn't whether she

84
00:05:16.759 --> 00:05:19.560
had to drive that route. Paris is a large city

85
00:05:19.600 --> 00:05:22.160
with many roots. The questions whether someone with even a

86
00:05:22.240 --> 00:05:25.720
modicum of sensitivity would think, perhaps I shan't film this

87
00:05:25.759 --> 00:05:29.079
particular journey and share it with nine million people. It's

88
00:05:29.399 --> 00:05:33.040
not about hiding or being too visible. It's about basic awareness.

89
00:05:33.480 --> 00:05:35.439
If you're married to a man whose mother died in

90
00:05:35.439 --> 00:05:37.759
that tunnel, you might consider that a video careening through

91
00:05:37.759 --> 00:05:41.720
those streets could stir rather painful memories. This isn't about

92
00:05:41.759 --> 00:05:45.439
winning or losing some imaginary public relations battle. It's about

93
00:05:45.519 --> 00:05:49.959
understanding the institution you married into, the husband you chose,

94
00:05:50.199 --> 00:05:53.480
and the wounds that never quite heal. One suspects the

95
00:05:53.600 --> 00:05:57.240
Duchess does not. Deep Cron had more to say about

96
00:05:57.240 --> 00:05:59.800
this in his sub stack, which you can read for

97
00:05:59.839 --> 00:06:05.360
free at Deep Crown dot co dot uk. That's Deepcrown

98
00:06:05.639 --> 00:06:10.319
dot co dot uk. A past interview between Megan Michael

99
00:06:10.319 --> 00:06:12.360
and Drew Barrymore has taken on a second at Life

100
00:06:12.360 --> 00:06:15.560
Online thanks to a TikTok creator who has been spoofing

101
00:06:15.560 --> 00:06:19.480
it for millions of viewers. Influencer Michael Pavano has made

102
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:22.879
a series of playful skits parodying Meghan's appearance on The

103
00:06:22.959 --> 00:06:26.360
Drew Barrymore Show in March, with clips still going viral

104
00:06:26.439 --> 00:06:29.279
six months later. One of his most popular posts, viewed

105
00:06:29.360 --> 00:06:32.600
one point one million times, pokes fun at Meghan's Netflix

106
00:06:32.639 --> 00:06:35.240
series With Love Meghan by showing her presenting Barrymore with

107
00:06:35.279 --> 00:06:39.079
a jar of Montecito rainwater, only to reveal it's being

108
00:06:39.160 --> 00:06:42.360
poured straight from a tap. Another parody, liked more than

109
00:06:42.399 --> 00:06:46.120
forty one thousand times, depicts Barrymore giving Megan flowers as

110
00:06:46.160 --> 00:06:50.000
a gift, followed by Pavano as Megan attempting to eat them,

111
00:06:50.079 --> 00:06:53.519
a nod to her fondness for edible flower sprinkles, which

112
00:06:53.759 --> 00:06:57.279
feature on her as Ever lifestyle website. An earlier post

113
00:06:57.279 --> 00:06:59.639
in September attracted two point four million views with a

114
00:06:59.639 --> 00:07:03.079
sketchule Meghan struggling to open a sea urchin before substituting

115
00:07:03.160 --> 00:07:07.199
shop bought sushi and calling it hand rolled garden sushi.

116
00:07:08.399 --> 00:07:11.439
The Royals are popular on TikTok. The different TikTok comparing

117
00:07:11.519 --> 00:07:14.120
the aura of Kate and Meghan has gone viral, drawing

118
00:07:14.120 --> 00:07:16.279
more than half a million views and tens of thousands

119
00:07:16.360 --> 00:07:19.879
of likes. The short montage opens on Meghan walking to

120
00:07:20.040 --> 00:07:22.560
the stage at the One Young World Summit at the

121
00:07:22.639 --> 00:07:27.600
Royal Albert Hall in October twenty nineteen, captioned aura, before

122
00:07:27.600 --> 00:07:30.639
cutting to Princess Catherine receiving a standing ovation at Wimbledon

123
00:07:30.680 --> 00:07:33.920
in July twenty twenty four, her second public appearance after

124
00:07:33.920 --> 00:07:39.120
beginning chemotherapy. Overlaid with this is the aura. One commenter wrote,

125
00:07:39.319 --> 00:07:42.639
the aura where everyone stands for Princess Catherine is exactly

126
00:07:42.680 --> 00:07:45.399
what m M thought was going to happen to her

127
00:07:45.759 --> 00:07:48.680
when she married Harry, and when it didn't, she left

128
00:07:48.720 --> 00:07:56.360
the IRF more palacy just a moment. Hey, we have

129
00:07:56.399 --> 00:08:00.360
a brand new series for you starting this weekend called

130
00:08:00.439 --> 00:08:05.800
Palace Intrigue Presents King William. This speculative drama imagines the

131
00:08:05.879 --> 00:08:09.199
moment the King dies and William becomes king. Episode one

132
00:08:09.240 --> 00:08:12.439
begins with that life changing phone call. From there, the

133
00:08:12.439 --> 00:08:17.360
story follows William through duty, grief, Queen Catherine's transformation, a

134
00:08:17.439 --> 00:08:20.759
former queen struggling to hold her place, and the reappearance

135
00:08:20.800 --> 00:08:25.560
of a controversial brother. The series begins this Sunday, October twelfth.

136
00:08:25.600 --> 00:08:29.000
Subscribers to Callaroga plus can binge the entire season. Plus

137
00:08:29.040 --> 00:08:32.679
you get all our show's commercial free for everyone else.

138
00:08:32.799 --> 00:08:37.720
New episodes release weekly every Sunday wherever you enjoy your podcasts.

139
00:08:38.960 --> 00:08:42.200
According to a Shutter scoop, the bond between King Charles

140
00:08:42.200 --> 00:08:45.879
and Prince William has reportedly collapsed into silence, with sources

141
00:08:45.879 --> 00:08:48.279
claiming the two men are no longer calling, texting, or

142
00:08:48.279 --> 00:08:51.679
even meeting face to face. Royal insiders say the rift

143
00:08:51.799 --> 00:08:55.159
deepened following William's recent comments about his own childhood and

144
00:08:55.200 --> 00:08:58.840
his vision for a reformed monarchy. Remarks. The King is

145
00:08:58.840 --> 00:09:02.200
said to have found it deeply hurtful speaking about raising

146
00:09:02.240 --> 00:09:05.240
Prince George William told interviewers, I hope we don't go

147
00:09:05.320 --> 00:09:07.279
back to some of the practices in the past that

148
00:09:07.320 --> 00:09:09.399
Harry and I had to grow up in, and I'll

149
00:09:09.440 --> 00:09:12.200
do everything I can to make sure we don't regress

150
00:09:12.240 --> 00:09:14.360
in that situation. I think it's safe to say that

151
00:09:14.440 --> 00:09:17.480
change is on my agenda, change for good, and I

152
00:09:17.519 --> 00:09:20.200
embrace that, and I enjoy that change. I don't fear it.

153
00:09:20.759 --> 00:09:23.120
That's the bit that excites me, is the idea of

154
00:09:23.120 --> 00:09:26.080
being able to bring some change, not overly radical change,

155
00:09:26.120 --> 00:09:30.240
but changes I think that need to happen. Those words,

156
00:09:30.320 --> 00:09:32.759
sources tell shut A scoop did not sit well with

157
00:09:32.799 --> 00:09:36.000
his majesty. The King sees it as betrayal, not honesty,

158
00:09:36.039 --> 00:09:39.000
when inside it's said it's not just family tension, it's

159
00:09:39.000 --> 00:09:42.360
about the crown itself. While advisers are said to be

160
00:09:42.360 --> 00:09:45.679
floating the idea of a public peace walk and image

161
00:09:45.679 --> 00:09:50.519
of unity to quiet speculation, the relationship remains fragile, and

162
00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:54.080
inside it claims trust is shattered. The silence between them

163
00:09:54.080 --> 00:09:58.320
speaks louder than any statement could. And there you have it.

164
00:09:58.440 --> 00:10:00.720
Like to email us addressed is the Palace Intrigue at

165
00:10:00.759 --> 00:10:03.799
Gmail dot com. Please follow us on Facebook or Instagram.

166
00:10:04.080 --> 00:10:07.399
Just search for Palace Intrigue there on Facebook groups or

167
00:10:07.519 --> 00:10:10.919
Facebook pages. I'm Mark Francis. Thanks to John McDermot. This

168
00:10:11.000 --> 00:10:13.000
is Palace Intriguing. Good times