WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:12.720
Callarogus, shark media at lower welcome through palace, intriguing, I
2
00:00:12.759 --> 00:00:16.000
am your host, Mark Francis, Prince Harry's latest battle with
3
00:00:16.120 --> 00:00:19.079
the British press has ended in his most significant court
4
00:00:19.160 --> 00:00:22.920
room defeat yet. The Duke of Sussex and six other
5
00:00:23.000 --> 00:00:28.600
high profile claimants, including Sir Elton John David Furnish, Baroness Dorrien, Lawrence,
6
00:00:28.719 --> 00:00:33.399
Elizabeth Hurley, Sadie Franst and former Liberal Democrat MP Simon Hughes,
7
00:00:33.719 --> 00:00:38.039
have lost their sweeping High Court case against Associated Newspapers Limited,
8
00:00:38.280 --> 00:00:42.520
publisher of the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday and Mail Online.
9
00:00:42.600 --> 00:00:45.719
After an eleven week trial earlier this year, and a
10
00:00:45.840 --> 00:00:49.840
judgment stretching more than four hundred pages, Mister Justice Nicklin
11
00:00:49.960 --> 00:00:53.719
dismissed every claim. The ruling represents a sharp contrast to
12
00:00:53.759 --> 00:00:57.679
Harry's previous victories against other newspaper publishers. This time, the
13
00:00:57.759 --> 00:01:01.439
judge concluded the claimants had failed to prove that Associated
14
00:01:01.439 --> 00:01:06.519
Newspapers obtained information through unlawful means. The judge's reasoning is
15
00:01:06.640 --> 00:01:08.959
likely to become one of the most quoted passages from
16
00:01:08.959 --> 00:01:12.359
the case, Mister Justice Nichlin wrote, while discussing one of
17
00:01:12.400 --> 00:01:16.519
Prince Harry's complaints. I accept that he found the article
18
00:01:16.680 --> 00:01:20.319
intrusive and was genuinely concerned by how journalists appeared to
19
00:01:20.480 --> 00:01:26.239
no private information concerning his relationships, But suspicion, even understandable suspicion,
20
00:01:26.560 --> 00:01:30.400
is not proof That sentence effectively became the theme of
21
00:01:30.439 --> 00:01:34.040
the entire judgment. Throughout the ruling, Mister Justice Nicklin repeatedly
22
00:01:34.040 --> 00:01:37.439
acknowledged that some of the articles would naturally have caused
23
00:01:37.480 --> 00:01:40.400
concern for those involved, but he said concern alone could
24
00:01:40.400 --> 00:01:44.640
not substitute for evidence. The allegations were serious, he wrote,
25
00:01:44.760 --> 00:01:50.680
explaining that they therefore required particularly convincing proof. Instead, he
26
00:01:50.680 --> 00:01:54.879
concluded the claimants had often relied on inference. The court
27
00:01:54.920 --> 00:01:57.680
rejected the attempt to prove the claims by broad inference
28
00:01:57.799 --> 00:02:01.840
where there remained a legitimate and realistic, possible lawful source pathway.
29
00:02:02.319 --> 00:02:04.959
The judge also declined to make the broader finding Harry's
30
00:02:05.040 --> 00:02:08.280
legal team had sought that unlawful information gathering had become
31
00:02:08.360 --> 00:02:12.719
widespread and habitual at the Daily Mail. Instead, he examined
32
00:02:12.719 --> 00:02:17.599
each disputed article individually. One particularly notable example involved a
33
00:02:17.680 --> 00:02:20.520
two thousand and two Mail On Sunday article about television
34
00:02:20.560 --> 00:02:25.080
presenter Natalie Pinkin. Printerry alleged the newspaper had lawfully obtained
35
00:02:25.159 --> 00:02:29.800
telephone billing information showing contact between the pair. Former Royal
36
00:02:29.800 --> 00:02:32.919
correspondent Katie Nickel testified that the flirtation between Harry and
37
00:02:32.960 --> 00:02:36.199
Pinkin was widely known among their friends. She said Pinkham
38
00:02:36.199 --> 00:02:38.520
occasionally spoke to her off the record, and that she
39
00:02:38.599 --> 00:02:42.400
had several sources close to both Harry and Pinkham. One source,
40
00:02:42.520 --> 00:02:45.439
she testified, had sometimes been present while Harry was on
41
00:02:45.479 --> 00:02:48.080
the telephone and had even been shown some of his
42
00:02:48.240 --> 00:02:52.759
text messages. The judge accepted that explanation outright, writing I
43
00:02:52.840 --> 00:02:56.120
accept that evidence as to the sourcing of the article.
44
00:02:57.240 --> 00:03:00.800
Another disputed story involved a twenty thirteen article suggesting Harry
45
00:03:00.800 --> 00:03:04.560
would spend New Year's Eve apart from then girlfriend Cresida Bonus.
46
00:03:05.080 --> 00:03:07.879
Harry described the reporting as creepy, saying he could not
47
00:03:08.000 --> 00:03:11.719
understand how the newspaper knew their separate travel plans. Again,
48
00:03:11.800 --> 00:03:14.400
the judge sided with the newspaper, except that he found
49
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:18.080
the article intrusive. The judge wrote, but suspicion, even understandable,
50
00:03:18.120 --> 00:03:23.159
suspicion is not proof. Timing also played an important role
51
00:03:23.199 --> 00:03:26.159
in the ruling, many of the allegations stretched back twenty
52
00:03:26.240 --> 00:03:30.879
or even thirty years. Mister Justice Nicklin observed put shortly,
53
00:03:31.039 --> 00:03:34.120
memories have faded, in some cases entirely, and many documents
54
00:03:34.159 --> 00:03:38.000
are no longer available. The publisher wasted little time celebrating.
55
00:03:38.520 --> 00:03:42.120
In a lengthy statement, Associated newspapers described the ruling as
56
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:46.080
an overwhelming victory for Daily Mail and its journalists. The
57
00:03:46.120 --> 00:03:49.319
company added, this is a magnificent vindication of the Daily
58
00:03:49.319 --> 00:03:52.479
Mails journalism. The reputations of our decent and hard working
59
00:03:52.560 --> 00:03:57.520
journalists were terribly impugned, and today they have been exonerated,
60
00:03:58.039 --> 00:04:02.319
as the judgment clearly shows every single article was legitimately sourced.
61
00:04:02.800 --> 00:04:05.400
The company also made clear it intends to seek recovery
62
00:04:05.400 --> 00:04:08.360
of its legal costs that could become the next major
63
00:04:08.439 --> 00:04:11.879
chapter in the story. The overall litigation is believed to
64
00:04:11.879 --> 00:04:14.240
have cost somewhere in the region of fifty million pounds,
65
00:04:14.639 --> 00:04:17.439
although exactly who will ultimately pay remains to be decided.
66
00:04:18.279 --> 00:04:21.160
A cost's hearing has now been scheduled for July twenty
67
00:04:21.319 --> 00:04:24.279
ninth and thirtieth For Prince Harry, the defeat came in
68
00:04:24.360 --> 00:04:27.800
particularly awkward fashion. He was not sitting inside a court
69
00:04:27.879 --> 00:04:30.240
room when the judgment was released. Instead, he was just
70
00:04:30.279 --> 00:04:33.560
two miles away at Chatham House, attending an Invictus Games
71
00:04:33.560 --> 00:04:37.639
event marking one year until the Birmingham Games. BBC Royal
72
00:04:37.680 --> 00:04:41.319
correspondent Shawn Coughlin described it as a split screen moment.
73
00:04:41.879 --> 00:04:44.240
As Harry entered the room to applause, Camra was focused
74
00:04:44.240 --> 00:04:47.480
on the Duke, while many journalists simultaneously looked down at
75
00:04:47.480 --> 00:04:50.800
their phones as the judgment landed in their inboxes. Harry
76
00:04:50.839 --> 00:04:53.920
proceeded with his prepared remarks, making no mention of the
77
00:04:53.920 --> 00:04:57.319
court decision. He told the audience not simply a week
78
00:04:57.319 --> 00:04:59.680
of sport every few years, but a community united by
79
00:04:59.720 --> 00:05:03.480
one belief that the unconquered human spirit exists in every nation,
80
00:05:03.879 --> 00:05:06.680
and that our shared responsibility is to create the conditions
81
00:05:06.879 --> 00:05:10.120
in which you can flourish. The BBC reporter that Harry
82
00:05:10.160 --> 00:05:12.800
stuck to the script throughout his appearance, determined to keep
83
00:05:12.800 --> 00:05:16.279
the focus on wounded veterans rather than his legal defeat.
84
00:05:17.040 --> 00:05:20.560
Daniel or Ralph, the BBC's senior Royal correspondent, reported there
85
00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:23.040
was no expectation Harry would make an on camera response
86
00:05:23.079 --> 00:05:26.680
after the ruling. The telegraphs reporters inside the room offered
87
00:05:26.680 --> 00:05:31.399
a more personal observation. They wrote that Harry appeared visibly shaken,
88
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:34.120
swallowing hard, his eyes darting around the room as he
89
00:05:34.199 --> 00:05:38.079
delivered a brief six minute speech. The newspaper noted that
90
00:05:38.120 --> 00:05:41.519
while he managed to complete his prepared remarks, the court
91
00:05:41.560 --> 00:05:44.959
case result was etched on his face. Legally, Harry still
92
00:05:44.959 --> 00:05:48.800
has options. An appeal remains possible. However, Mister Justice Nickling
93
00:05:48.839 --> 00:05:51.519
directed that no application for permission to appeal should be
94
00:05:51.560 --> 00:05:55.920
made until after the July Costs hearing more pallace in
95
00:05:56.000 --> 00:06:02.240
just a moment. Prince William is expected to stay out
96
00:06:02.279 --> 00:06:06.480
of Harry's continuing battle over security arrangements. Royal expert Jenny
97
00:06:06.480 --> 00:06:09.040
Bond told The Mirror Willie must surely have been paying
98
00:06:09.040 --> 00:06:11.600
attention to the row of a Harry's security. He could
99
00:06:11.639 --> 00:06:14.560
hardly avoid it, she said. I would have thought it
100
00:06:14.600 --> 00:06:16.480
was one area where he might have a measure of
101
00:06:16.480 --> 00:06:19.160
sympathy for his brother. You know, it's just how important
102
00:06:19.480 --> 00:06:21.720
it is to protect your family. Like me, he might
103
00:06:21.759 --> 00:06:24.399
wonder why the decision is taken not to give Harry
104
00:06:24.439 --> 00:06:27.160
and his family security for this very short period of time.
105
00:06:27.680 --> 00:06:30.160
But obviously this is a decision which he cannot and
106
00:06:30.279 --> 00:06:34.240
would not get involved in. An unnamed source has told
107
00:06:34.319 --> 00:06:37.360
Vanity Fair Harry was devastated and close to tears after
108
00:06:37.360 --> 00:06:39.959
failing to secure the level of protection he had hoped
109
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:42.720
for during the visit. He had assumed that because he
110
00:06:42.800 --> 00:06:44.480
was bringing the kids and the King had made a
111
00:06:44.519 --> 00:06:47.040
royal residence available to them, he would get what he
112
00:06:47.040 --> 00:06:50.199
had been pushing for all along, full time police protection.
113
00:06:52.240 --> 00:06:54.920
In The Express, Carol Malone wrote, if he's so frightened
114
00:06:54.920 --> 00:06:57.000
of a terror threat, why are he and Meghan currently
115
00:06:57.040 --> 00:06:59.439
holidaying in Europe at a six point three million pound
116
00:06:59.480 --> 00:07:04.079
Portugal engine without police protection? Do they think terrorists don't travel?
117
00:07:04.399 --> 00:07:06.879
Don't understand that if someone was determined to hurt him
118
00:07:07.000 --> 00:07:09.160
or his family, they do it there at home in
119
00:07:09.240 --> 00:07:11.720
Montecito or anywhere. But they don't because no one's after
120
00:07:11.759 --> 00:07:14.680
Harriet's or in his head. This is all about his
121
00:07:14.759 --> 00:07:17.120
ego and him getting his own way, and shame on
122
00:07:17.199 --> 00:07:19.040
him for leveraging his children to try and get his
123
00:07:19.079 --> 00:07:22.279
security back. But it's worse than that. Harry's security team,
124
00:07:22.319 --> 00:07:25.279
which he obviously pays, have said terrorists could create a
125
00:07:25.319 --> 00:07:28.560
mass casualty event if Harry is targeted at the twenty
126
00:07:28.639 --> 00:07:32.199
twenty seven Invictus Games in the UK next year. So
127
00:07:32.240 --> 00:07:35.079
where's the evidence he's going to be? They claim the
128
00:07:35.120 --> 00:07:38.720
biggest threat is from lone actors. No terrorist plot then,
129
00:07:38.879 --> 00:07:42.800
who often target people who get lots of negative publicity. Yes, well,
130
00:07:42.800 --> 00:07:45.319
a lone actor could be anyone anywhere. It could be
131
00:07:45.360 --> 00:07:47.720
a nutter down the road from their home in Monticito,
132
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:50.839
it could be some looney in Portugal. The fact is
133
00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:53.839
there are lone wolfs all over the world targeting anyone
134
00:07:53.879 --> 00:07:56.839
and everyone. Their targets don't even have to be famous.
135
00:07:57.560 --> 00:07:59.680
The threat is all in Harry's head. He's not a
136
00:07:59.720 --> 00:08:03.199
prime target for terrorists because he's just not important enough.
137
00:08:03.839 --> 00:08:05.759
This is all because he refuses to accept he's no
138
00:08:05.800 --> 00:08:08.040
longer entitled to the perks of being a working royal,
139
00:08:08.480 --> 00:08:12.839
which he chose not to be. And there you have it.
140
00:08:13.000 --> 00:08:15.360
If you'd like to email us, he addresses the palasintrig
141
00:08:15.360 --> 00:08:18.120
at gmail dot com. Please follow us on Apple and
142
00:08:18.279 --> 00:08:21.000
on Spotify. You can leave us a comment and mark
143
00:08:21.040 --> 00:08:24.560
Francis mean. Thanks to John McDermott, this airs Palace Intrigue.
144
00:08:24.800 --> 00:08:25.279
Good turn,