Jan. 9, 2026

Kate Middleton Dragged Into AI Sleaze Storm as TikTok Detectives Invent a Wales Royal Split

Kate Middleton Dragged Into AI Sleaze Storm as TikTok Detectives Invent a Wales Royal Split

A disturbing new front in royal harassment: an AI chatbot tied to X is accused of generating sexualised images of the Princess of Wales from real photos, prompting “urgent contact” from UK regulator Ofcom. Meanwhile, the internet does what it does — a short clip of Prince William arriving at Kensington Palace with George and Charlotte ignites baseless “separate lives” speculation, plus a side quest into royal travel protocol and why heirs aren’t supposed to fly together.

Also: the Waleses get compared to the Beckhams, some people love it, some people hate it, and somehow this becomes a whole thing. And we close with the big question: are the royals secretly obsessed with UFOs?

Palace Intrigue is your daily royal family podcast, diving deep into the modern-day drama, power struggles, and scandals shaping the future of the monarchy.

Hear our new show "Crown and Controversy: Prince Andrew" here.


Check out "Palace Intrigue Presents: King WIlliam" here.

👑 Follow our hit series Crown and Controversy! Season 1 and 2 are fully available now for everyone. Season 3 has new episodes every Sunday on the regular feed. GET THE FULL SEASON 3 BEFORE REGULAR LISTENERS as a subscriber! Hit that "UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING" Banner on the top of the Apple player. AND listen to Crown and Controversy "NORWAY'S ROYAL REBELS" here and get the full season as a premium subscriber now. 

👑 The Palace Intrigue Social Hub is Live! Join the conve

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:10.960
Calorogus Shark Media. Hello and welcome to Palace Intrigue. I

2
00:00:10.960 --> 00:00:15.160
I'm your host, Mark Ferrances. Catherine, the Princess of Wales,

3
00:00:15.160 --> 00:00:17.440
has become one of the highest profile victims of a

4
00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:22.559
disturbing misuse of artificial intelligence, after an AI chat pot

5
00:00:22.600 --> 00:00:24.640
on the social media platform X was found to be

6
00:00:24.679 --> 00:00:28.879
generating sexualized images of her. The platform is now facing

7
00:00:28.879 --> 00:00:33.719
scrutiny from UK regulators after grock x's artificial intelligence assistant

8
00:00:34.119 --> 00:00:36.719
was shown to be producing altered images of Kate. The

9
00:00:36.759 --> 00:00:39.799
depict her in a bikini and other minimal clothing. The

10
00:00:39.840 --> 00:00:43.840
images were created by redrawing publicly available photographs of the

11
00:00:43.880 --> 00:00:48.320
princess without her consent. Catherine is reportedly among thousands of

12
00:00:48.359 --> 00:00:51.880
women and children targeted by the tool. In multiple cases,

13
00:00:51.960 --> 00:00:55.640
real images have been manipulated to make women appear undressed

14
00:00:55.759 --> 00:00:59.840
or placed in sexualized situations, raising serious concerns about on

15
00:01:00.079 --> 00:01:04.680
lane safety and abuse. The issue has prompted intervention from OVCOM,

16
00:01:04.719 --> 00:01:08.400
the UK communications regulator OFCOM confirmed that it has made

17
00:01:08.560 --> 00:01:13.000
urgent contact with X and its artificial intelligence division, XAI,

18
00:01:13.680 --> 00:01:18.400
both owned by Elon Musk. The website board Panda, which

19
00:01:18.439 --> 00:01:22.040
also has articles such as the male, Karen Man's epic

20
00:01:22.120 --> 00:01:27.120
meltdown at Mamma Mia, Broadway Shows, Spark's heated debate and

21
00:01:27.359 --> 00:01:31.040
True Slavic Minimalism fifty Picks, showcasing the best and worst

22
00:01:31.079 --> 00:01:34.959
Soviet apartment building. Decor had a theory about a short

23
00:01:35.079 --> 00:01:37.599
video of Prince William arriving at Kensington Palace with two

24
00:01:37.640 --> 00:01:40.879
of his children. The footage, shared on social media earlier

25
00:01:40.920 --> 00:01:43.159
this week, shows the Prince of Wales landing by helicopter

26
00:01:43.239 --> 00:01:45.920
with Prince George and Princess Charlotte. The children were seen

27
00:01:45.959 --> 00:01:48.480
carrying bags as they walked into the palace alongside their

28
00:01:48.480 --> 00:01:51.120
father and the family dog. The Princess of Wales and

29
00:01:51.159 --> 00:01:54.400
the couple's youngest child, Prince Louis, were not visible in

30
00:01:54.400 --> 00:01:58.200
the clip. That absence was enough to ignite unfounded theories

31
00:01:58.239 --> 00:02:01.280
among a small but vocal group of online commentators, some

32
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:04.480
of whom claimed the couple are living separate lives behind

33
00:02:04.560 --> 00:02:08.000
closed doors. One commenter suggested it was William's week with

34
00:02:08.080 --> 00:02:11.080
the children, while another alleged the family was quietly co

35
00:02:11.199 --> 00:02:14.879
parenting from different homes. Others went further, claiming the marriage

36
00:02:14.879 --> 00:02:19.000
exists only for public appearances. Those claims have been widely

37
00:02:19.039 --> 00:02:21.639
dismissed by other royal watchers, with several responding that the

38
00:02:21.680 --> 00:02:26.439
speculation was baseless and conspiratorial. Our royal inside at Deep

39
00:02:26.439 --> 00:02:28.960
Crown tells us. The idea that they can maintain some

40
00:02:29.000 --> 00:02:32.719
elaborate charade of marital harmony whilst actually living a part

41
00:02:32.800 --> 00:02:35.919
defies all logic and understanding of how royal life actually functions.

42
00:02:36.520 --> 00:02:39.120
The marriage is solid, the family is intact, and frankly,

43
00:02:39.159 --> 00:02:43.360
these theories are beneath serious consideration. A version of the

44
00:02:43.360 --> 00:02:47.280
story appearing in Cosmopolitan was more focused on protocol. They write,

45
00:02:47.479 --> 00:02:49.280
it's a well known fact that royal airs are not

46
00:02:49.280 --> 00:02:51.759
permitted to fly together, be it on a plane or

47
00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.240
a helicopter, in case anything should happen that impacts the

48
00:02:54.280 --> 00:02:57.039
line of succession. It's because of this rule that King

49
00:02:57.159 --> 00:02:59.879
Charles and Prince William are not permitted to travel together,

50
00:03:00.080 --> 00:03:02.800
and then Prince Charles was also restricted from traveling with

51
00:03:02.840 --> 00:03:06.879
his mother, the late Queen. Once social media user pointed

52
00:03:06.919 --> 00:03:10.080
out didn't seem to care about protocol, which got the reply,

53
00:03:10.439 --> 00:03:12.159
I was thinking the same thing. They seemed to do

54
00:03:12.199 --> 00:03:16.319
whatever they want. Had something unthinkable happened, Princess Charlotte would

55
00:03:16.319 --> 00:03:19.000
have become the heir. Given that she is ten years old,

56
00:03:19.319 --> 00:03:21.479
there could have been a scenario of Prince Harry being

57
00:03:21.479 --> 00:03:24.759
in line to be the regent. However, this gets more dicey.

58
00:03:25.080 --> 00:03:28.360
If Charles passed, she would automatically become Queen Charlotte the

59
00:03:28.439 --> 00:03:31.639
moment the throne became vacant. There is no delay and

60
00:03:31.719 --> 00:03:36.240
no vote. Succession is instantaneous. However, because she would be

61
00:03:36.319 --> 00:03:39.080
under eighteen, she could not personally carry out the duties

62
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:41.960
of monarch. Under the Regency Act, a regent would be

63
00:03:42.000 --> 00:03:44.719
appointed to perform the role until she came of age.

64
00:03:45.719 --> 00:03:48.199
The regent is to find as the next person in

65
00:03:48.240 --> 00:03:51.439
line of succession who is over twenty one. And here's

66
00:03:51.479 --> 00:03:56.240
the interesting point. Domiciled in the United Kingdom, in that scenario,

67
00:03:56.479 --> 00:03:59.039
the next in line after Charlotte would be Prince Louis.

68
00:03:59.080 --> 00:04:01.599
But he's also my so he would be skipped. With

69
00:04:01.680 --> 00:04:04.879
Prince Harry not residing in the UK. And for purposes

70
00:04:04.919 --> 00:04:07.080
of this discussion, let's assume he did not want to

71
00:04:07.080 --> 00:04:10.719
come home. That would make number eight Andrew the regent

72
00:04:11.039 --> 00:04:15.719
under the current law. Yes, he's officially still eighth in line.

73
00:04:16.160 --> 00:04:19.839
In reality, Parliament would almost certainly intervene to change the law.

74
00:04:19.879 --> 00:04:23.800
If that situation arose, Princess Beatrice would be next in

75
00:04:23.879 --> 00:04:27.519
line as regent. Fortunately none of this happened, but it

76
00:04:27.560 --> 00:04:30.120
is a reminder to William there's a reason for the rules.

77
00:04:31.079 --> 00:04:32.959
William and Kate have found themselves at the center of

78
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:36.639
a curious media skirmish after a blowing newspaper profile likened

79
00:04:36.639 --> 00:04:39.279
their public appeal to that of David and Victoria Beckon.

80
00:04:40.160 --> 00:04:44.399
The comparison appeared in a recent feature praising the Wales's popularity, stability,

81
00:04:44.519 --> 00:04:47.399
and what one source described as a strong and authentic partnership.

82
00:04:48.040 --> 00:04:51.040
The source suggested that much like the Beckhams, the public

83
00:04:51.120 --> 00:04:54.319
recognizes a genuine relationship and a marriage that appears solid,

84
00:04:54.680 --> 00:04:57.879
balanced and mutually supportive, adding that this has become a

85
00:04:57.920 --> 00:05:02.160
significant asset to the couple. While the comparison was intended

86
00:05:02.199 --> 00:05:05.759
as praise, a triggered a sharp backlash from at least

87
00:05:05.800 --> 00:05:09.480
one commentator. Writing in The Daily Mail, columnist Amanda Plateau

88
00:05:09.680 --> 00:05:12.240
argued that likening the future king and Queen to celebrity

89
00:05:12.279 --> 00:05:16.399
figures cheapened them, questioning whether such a parallel was appropriate

90
00:05:16.560 --> 00:05:21.959
or desirable in an unforgiving social media age. Some rejected

91
00:05:21.959 --> 00:05:24.360
the idea that the Beckham comparison was negative at all,

92
00:05:24.639 --> 00:05:27.279
arguing instead that it reflected how William and Catherine are

93
00:05:27.279 --> 00:05:31.759
perceived as relatable, dependable and united, qualities that resonate strongly

94
00:05:32.040 --> 00:05:39.199
with the public. More palacing just a moment. The real

95
00:05:39.279 --> 00:05:41.639
question of the day comes from history dot co dot uk,

96
00:05:41.720 --> 00:05:46.079
who ask is the British royal family obsessed with UFOs.

97
00:05:46.519 --> 00:05:49.000
The fascination is said to stretch back well before the

98
00:05:49.040 --> 00:05:53.000
modern era. Researchers point to diary entries from Prince Albert,

99
00:05:53.120 --> 00:05:56.600
husband of Queen Victoria, who reportedly wrote about strange lights

100
00:05:56.639 --> 00:05:59.519
in the sky. But the story most often cited as

101
00:05:59.560 --> 00:06:03.040
a turning point came in the mid nineteen fifties, when

102
00:06:03.040 --> 00:06:05.800
a mysterious object said to have landed on the Broadlands

103
00:06:05.879 --> 00:06:09.720
estate in Hampshire, then owned by Lord mount Batten, uncle

104
00:06:09.800 --> 00:06:13.240
to Prince Philip. The original sighting was made by a laborer,

105
00:06:13.279 --> 00:06:15.040
but the tailor is believed to have been passed on

106
00:06:15.120 --> 00:06:18.800
within royal circles. Prince Philip is widely described as the

107
00:06:18.800 --> 00:06:22.399
most overtly interested royal when it came to UFO's former

108
00:06:22.439 --> 00:06:25.639
Ministry of Defense employee Nick Pope has said Philip quietly

109
00:06:25.720 --> 00:06:30.240
subscribed to UFO publications and asked trusted aids to keep

110
00:06:30.279 --> 00:06:34.279
him informed about alleged encounters. According to those accounts, the

111
00:06:34.360 --> 00:06:37.360
Duke of Edinburgh was careful to keep his curiosity private

112
00:06:38.000 --> 00:06:40.480
where it clashed with the official government view that UFO

113
00:06:40.600 --> 00:06:44.319
sightings posed no real national security threat. One of the

114
00:06:44.399 --> 00:06:47.800
stranger's stories linked to Philip involves an alleged attempt by

115
00:06:47.800 --> 00:06:51.639
a mysterious figure known as Janus to arrange a meeting

116
00:06:51.680 --> 00:06:55.120
with him in the nineteen fifties. While some later suggested

117
00:06:55.199 --> 00:06:58.639
Janus was more likely a foreign intelligence operative than anything

118
00:06:59.000 --> 00:07:02.160
extra terrestrial. Well, Philip is said to have declined any

119
00:07:02.199 --> 00:07:06.240
meeting to avoid scandal. There are also claims involving King Charles.

120
00:07:06.279 --> 00:07:10.319
In a documentary exploring royal links to UFO law, a

121
00:07:10.360 --> 00:07:13.319
Canadian witness alleged he saw the future King piloting as

122
00:07:13.319 --> 00:07:18.040
silent hovering experimental craft in Nova Scotia in the nineteen seventies.

123
00:07:18.519 --> 00:07:21.720
No evidence was No evidence has ever surfaced to support

124
00:07:21.759 --> 00:07:24.839
the claim, but it has become part of the wider mythology.

125
00:07:26.040 --> 00:07:27.800
Queen Elizabeth has also said to have shown a keen

126
00:07:27.839 --> 00:07:32.560
interest in the Renderlesome Forest incident of nineteen eighty often

127
00:07:32.600 --> 00:07:36.399
described as Britain's Roswell former investigators who claimed the Queen

128
00:07:36.399 --> 00:07:39.600
and Prince Philip followed the case closely and even corresponded

129
00:07:39.639 --> 00:07:43.639
with those researching it. Her curiosity reportedly extended to crop

130
00:07:43.680 --> 00:07:46.800
circles during the nineteen eighties, to the point that she

131
00:07:47.079 --> 00:07:51.519
sent a senior scientific advisor to inspect one in Wiltshire.

132
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:54.879
As for the current generation, there is no suggestion of

133
00:07:54.879 --> 00:07:57.839
official investigations or public statements, but the stories persist that

134
00:07:57.879 --> 00:08:01.560
interest in the unexplained is quite passed down through the family.

135
00:08:02.040 --> 00:08:06.040
Whether this reflects genuine belief, intellectual curiosity, or simply a

136
00:08:06.040 --> 00:08:09.759
long standing royal habit of asking questions others might dismiss

137
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:14.839
remains open to interpretation and they have it. If you'd

138
00:08:14.879 --> 00:08:17.000
like to email us or addresses to the palacintrig at

139
00:08:17.000 --> 00:08:20.560
email dot com. Please follow us on Spotify, Apple, Apple Choice.

140
00:08:21.040 --> 00:08:22.959
Leave us a nice reviewer for enjoying the show. I'm

141
00:08:22.959 --> 00:08:26.240
Mark Francis My thanks to John McDermott. This is Palace Intrigue.

142
00:08:26.680 --> 00:08:27.319
Good terms