Oct. 19, 2024

Metaphor vs Literal? Pt 3

Metaphor vs Literal? Pt 3

A discussion about biblical interpretation

Spreaker Apple Podcasts Spotify PocketCasts Amazon Music Overcast Audible Castro iHeartRadio Castbox Podchaser TuneIn Deezer Pandora RadioPublic Podcast Addict RSS Feed YouTube Fountain PlayerFM Goodpods Podverse Podyssey Breaker Podurama Audacy JioSaavn
Spreaker podcast player icon Spreaker Spreaker Apple Podcasts podcast player icon Apple Podcasts Apple Podcasts Spotify podcast player icon Spotify Spotify PocketCasts podcast player icon PocketCasts PocketCasts Amazon Music podcast player icon Amazon Music Amazon Music Overcast podcast player icon Overcast Overcast Audible podcast player icon Audible Audible Castro podcast player icon Castro Castro iHeartRadio podcast player icon iHeartRadio iHeartRadio Castbox podcast player icon Castbox Castbox Podchaser podcast player icon Podchaser Podchaser TuneIn podcast player icon TuneIn TuneIn Deezer podcast player icon Deezer Deezer Pandora podcast player icon Pandora Pandora RadioPublic podcast player icon RadioPublic RadioPublic Podcast Addict podcast player icon Podcast Addict Podcast Addict RSS Feed podcast player icon RSS Feed RSS Feed YouTube podcast player icon YouTube YouTube Fountain podcast player icon Fountain Fountain PlayerFM podcast player icon PlayerFM PlayerFM Goodpods podcast player icon Goodpods Goodpods Podverse podcast player icon Podverse Podverse Podyssey podcast player icon Podyssey Podyssey Breaker podcast player icon Breaker Breaker Podurama podcast player icon Podurama Podurama Audacy podcast player icon Audacy Audacy JioSaavn podcast player icon JioSaavn JioSaavn

A discussion about biblical interpretation

WEBVTT

1
00:00:02.279 --> 00:00:06.000
Looking at our world from a theological perspective. This is

2
00:00:06.040 --> 00:00:12.839
the Theology Central podcast, making Theology Central. Good morning everyone,

3
00:00:13.039 --> 00:00:17.440
It is Saturday, October nineteenth, twenty twenty four. It is

4
00:00:17.559 --> 00:00:22.039
currently eleven four am Central Time, and I am coming

5
00:00:22.039 --> 00:00:26.359
to you live from the Theology Central studio located right

6
00:00:26.519 --> 00:00:38.240
here in Abilene, Texas. Bible interpretation, Biblical hermeneutics, rules of

7
00:00:38.320 --> 00:00:46.000
Bible interpretation, Bible study, Bible study methods. Now, these are terms.

8
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:52.640
These are ideas that Christians across all denominations, all philological streams,

9
00:00:52.759 --> 00:00:55.200
they all talk about. They all will tell you the

10
00:00:55.240 --> 00:00:58.880
importance of it is important to study your Bible. It

11
00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:02.640
is important to study your Bible correctly. It is important

12
00:01:02.679 --> 00:01:06.760
to interpret the Bible and to interpret it correctly. Christians

13
00:01:06.799 --> 00:01:10.200
will talk about how they don't interpret the Bible correctly.

14
00:01:10.480 --> 00:01:13.079
They are wrong, they are wrong, They're wrong, but we

15
00:01:13.200 --> 00:01:17.519
are right. Everyone loves to talk about all of these concepts.

16
00:01:17.719 --> 00:01:21.159
But after all of the discussion, after all the books,

17
00:01:21.400 --> 00:01:25.480
after all the conferences, after all the sermons, when you

18
00:01:25.760 --> 00:01:29.000
get down to it, when you finally just remove all

19
00:01:29.040 --> 00:01:32.959
of that, You remove all the talk, you remove all

20
00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:35.640
of the materials, you remove everything. You know what It

21
00:01:35.680 --> 00:01:39.680
all comes down to Christians read the Bible and just

22
00:01:40.120 --> 00:01:43.000
make up whatever they want to make up. They can

23
00:01:43.079 --> 00:01:45.480
just make it say whatever they want it to say.

24
00:01:45.640 --> 00:01:49.159
There really aren't any rules, There aren't any actual ways

25
00:01:49.200 --> 00:01:53.079
of knowing. It's just a free for all. It's spiritual anarchy.

26
00:01:53.280 --> 00:01:59.680
It's chaos, it's subjective, it's relativistic. It's just it's just insanity. Now.

27
00:01:59.719 --> 00:02:01.799
I know when I say that, I'm going to get

28
00:02:01.799 --> 00:02:05.239
some immediate pushback and go no, no, no, there are

29
00:02:05.359 --> 00:02:08.599
rules and there's ways you have to do it. Everyone

30
00:02:08.719 --> 00:02:12.000
claims that, But when you really listen to the preaching

31
00:02:12.199 --> 00:02:15.360
and you really listen to what people say, it's just

32
00:02:15.840 --> 00:02:20.960
total complete Everyone makes it say whatever they want it

33
00:02:21.039 --> 00:02:24.840
to say. The Bible says whatever people want it to say.

34
00:02:25.039 --> 00:02:28.560
That's the reality. Now you can disagree with that, but

35
00:02:28.639 --> 00:02:33.560
I'm just telling you from a practical standpoint. Theoretically, I understand. Theoretically, no,

36
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:36.879
the Bible says what it means by the words that you.

37
00:02:37.080 --> 00:02:40.039
I know all the cliches, I know all the things

38
00:02:40.080 --> 00:02:45.120
we're supposed to say. But in reality, it's just a

39
00:02:45.240 --> 00:02:50.919
free for all. It's insane. And we've witnessed this over

40
00:02:50.960 --> 00:02:55.759
the last few days on this broadcast. I mean, it

41
00:02:55.840 --> 00:02:59.759
all started with, Hey, let's go to Second King's chapter six.

42
00:03:00.159 --> 00:03:02.560
Go to Second King's chapter six. Oh, it's about a

43
00:03:02.599 --> 00:03:06.520
floating axehead. Okay, all right, let's talk about it next thing,

44
00:03:06.560 --> 00:03:09.800
you know, the floating axehead wasn't a floating axehead. The

45
00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:14.360
axehead represents our fellowship. The axehead represents our effectiveness in

46
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:17.439
our work for God. The axehead represents our passion and

47
00:03:17.520 --> 00:03:20.439
zeal for God. It represents who knows a countless number

48
00:03:20.439 --> 00:03:25.199
of things, even though it's borrowed. But then the borrowed well, okay,

49
00:03:25.280 --> 00:03:27.960
and then it just it just got crazy. Then we

50
00:03:28.000 --> 00:03:29.560
did have a sermon that tried to take it from

51
00:03:29.599 --> 00:03:33.479
a much more literal approach, so that was interesting. But

52
00:03:33.680 --> 00:03:36.439
the more sermons you listen to on Second King's chapter six,

53
00:03:36.599 --> 00:03:38.560
at some point you're like, I don't know what it means.

54
00:03:38.680 --> 00:03:40.879
I don't know what it means because everyone thinks it

55
00:03:40.960 --> 00:03:44.520
means something else. Other people like, no, the axehead represents

56
00:03:44.560 --> 00:03:48.360
our lives. And when we're trying to chop down the tree,

57
00:03:48.439 --> 00:03:50.759
we're trying to chop down the wood. That's us trying

58
00:03:50.759 --> 00:03:52.919
to keep the law, and we're trying to keep the law.

59
00:03:52.919 --> 00:03:55.120
But we can't keep the law perfectly. So what happens

60
00:03:55.240 --> 00:03:58.680
The axehead comes off and it falls into the water,

61
00:03:58.879 --> 00:04:02.039
which is judge, it's the it's the wrath of God.

62
00:04:02.199 --> 00:04:05.439
And we sink to the bottom, consumed by God's wrath.

63
00:04:05.639 --> 00:04:07.520
So what can help us? Well, you put a stick

64
00:04:07.520 --> 00:04:10.120
in the water. That's the cross of Jesus Christ who

65
00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:13.879
died for us, and then we are resurrected. Okay, every everyone,

66
00:04:13.960 --> 00:04:15.800
just I mean, next thing, you know, who knows what

67
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:19.079
it means? Because everyone thinks they know. And then then

68
00:04:19.680 --> 00:04:22.120
so we listened to that and it just kind of

69
00:04:22.160 --> 00:04:24.079
turned into like what is going on? So we started

70
00:04:24.079 --> 00:04:29.959
talking about metaphorical language, how people interpret the Bible, and

71
00:04:30.000 --> 00:04:33.360
so it turned into a discussion and I told everyone

72
00:04:33.399 --> 00:04:35.519
to listen to sermons in the Second King's chapter six,

73
00:04:35.920 --> 00:04:38.360
and it was already a little bit like so how

74
00:04:38.399 --> 00:04:40.560
far do we take this? How much do we do?

75
00:04:40.920 --> 00:04:43.079
What do we how much work do we do on this?

76
00:04:43.240 --> 00:04:45.480
And just kind of like trying to figure it all out.

77
00:04:46.439 --> 00:04:48.360
So then I thought, well, we'll take a we'll take

78
00:04:48.360 --> 00:04:50.680
a little break, right, We'll take a little break. And

79
00:04:50.720 --> 00:04:56.560
then we saw a message on the metaphorical the metaphorical

80
00:04:56.759 --> 00:04:59.800
system of Bible interpretation. Well we do. We're like, oh,

81
00:04:59.839 --> 00:05:02.000
this this is on a series on Bible Study on

82
00:05:02.040 --> 00:05:03.839
how to study the Bible, and this is going to

83
00:05:03.879 --> 00:05:06.759
be I think they call it the allegorical method. I'm sorry,

84
00:05:06.759 --> 00:05:09.360
not the metaphorical, the allegorical. And we're like we'll get

85
00:05:09.360 --> 00:05:12.399
a little and well it turned into it was a

86
00:05:12.439 --> 00:05:15.560
metaphor because it wasn't the allegorical method. I don't even know.

87
00:05:15.680 --> 00:05:18.800
It was a misrepresentation of the allegorical method. It was

88
00:05:19.839 --> 00:05:23.759
making accusations about Calvinists that weren't accurate. It was just insane.

89
00:05:23.800 --> 00:05:26.199
I don't even know what that was. So then I'm like, okay,

90
00:05:26.319 --> 00:05:29.800
well this allegorical metaphorical, we've got to try to do

91
00:05:29.839 --> 00:05:31.839
a little bit of work on this. So we thought

92
00:05:31.839 --> 00:05:34.720
we could work on that. Then then I was like, well,

93
00:05:34.800 --> 00:05:37.279
let's take a little bit of a break. We'll do

94
00:05:37.480 --> 00:05:40.879
We'll find a sermon called Bible Study and it's well,

95
00:05:40.959 --> 00:05:44.920
it's a sermon on Proverbs chapter thirty. I'm like, okay,

96
00:05:45.079 --> 00:05:48.319
this will be fun, right because Proverbs chapter thirty, starting

97
00:05:48.319 --> 00:05:51.279
in verse eleven, there is a generation verse twelve, There

98
00:05:51.319 --> 00:05:54.480
is a generation verse thirteen. There is a generation Verse fourteen.

99
00:05:54.519 --> 00:05:57.319
There is a generation. Okay, that's that's going to be

100
00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:00.519
fun to take apart, right, Okay, how let's and the

101
00:06:00.560 --> 00:06:05.560
next thing, you know, we weren't talking about there is

102
00:06:05.600 --> 00:06:09.680
a generation. We were talking about there's coming a time

103
00:06:10.120 --> 00:06:15.279
where the people will eat poor folk. What there's coming

104
00:06:15.319 --> 00:06:18.879
a time where the people will eat poor folk? That

105
00:06:18.959 --> 00:06:21.439
there's coming a time that people will eat poor people,

106
00:06:21.639 --> 00:06:24.920
And you're like, what is happening right now? What is

107
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:27.360
going on? And then the next thing, you know, we're

108
00:06:27.360 --> 00:06:30.079
over in all of these other passages of scripture saying yes,

109
00:06:30.240 --> 00:06:32.879
there's coming a time where they're going to eat people

110
00:06:33.079 --> 00:06:35.720
and they're going to take them and they're going to

111
00:06:35.839 --> 00:06:40.120
chop off their heads, drink their blood, and eat their flesh.

112
00:06:40.160 --> 00:06:42.600
And you're like, what is am I listening to a sermon?

113
00:06:42.680 --> 00:06:44.920
What is going on? And yet this is from a sermon,

114
00:06:45.000 --> 00:06:47.879
ladies and gentlemen, not the latest horror movie from a sermon,

115
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:50.000
And you're like, what is all of this? And they

116
00:06:50.040 --> 00:06:53.240
were taking texts that many would say would be metaphorical

117
00:06:53.279 --> 00:06:56.959
and they were like, no, this is literal, and so

118
00:06:57.000 --> 00:07:00.839
it just got all confusing. So we listened to us

119
00:07:00.839 --> 00:07:04.639
somewhere where a person spent about fifteen to twenty minutes,

120
00:07:05.639 --> 00:07:09.720
starting in Proverbs thirty fourteen, there is a generation whose

121
00:07:09.800 --> 00:07:13.439
teeth are as swords, and their jaw teeth as knives,

122
00:07:13.639 --> 00:07:16.720
to devour the poor from off the earth and the

123
00:07:16.800 --> 00:07:22.399
needy from among men. All right, so they go here,

124
00:07:22.519 --> 00:07:25.360
they say this is literal. Well, they kind of, they

125
00:07:25.399 --> 00:07:27.399
try to hedge their beds a little bit, but before

126
00:07:27.439 --> 00:07:29.519
it's all said and done, they're basically making it that

127
00:07:29.560 --> 00:07:32.040
it's literal. There's coming a time, they say, it's in

128
00:07:32.079 --> 00:07:34.720
the tribulation where all of these horrible things gonna happen,

129
00:07:34.839 --> 00:07:38.680
and they're going to eat people rights that. They went

130
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:42.160
to Proverbs thirty. They also went to some the book

131
00:07:42.199 --> 00:07:46.680
of Psalms Psalm fourteen. They also went to Psalm fourteen.

132
00:07:47.480 --> 00:07:49.040
I'll turn to this one. I'm not going to go

133
00:07:49.040 --> 00:07:51.519
to all of them, Psalm fourteen. Four have all the

134
00:07:51.560 --> 00:07:54.959
workers of iniquity no knowledge? Who eat up my people

135
00:07:55.079 --> 00:07:58.120
as they eat bread? So now now are the poor

136
00:07:58.240 --> 00:08:01.319
going to be eaten my people? Here? It's Israel. Israel's

137
00:08:01.360 --> 00:08:03.319
going to be eaten up. Okay. Then they went to

138
00:08:03.800 --> 00:08:07.360
Micah chapter three, more people being eaten and then they

139
00:08:07.439 --> 00:08:10.120
go to the Book of Revelation and it was just oh,

140
00:08:10.160 --> 00:08:13.319
they went to Isaiah six and there was all these passages,

141
00:08:13.319 --> 00:08:16.120
but people are being eaten, and that they went from

142
00:08:16.240 --> 00:08:19.360
passage after passage after passage, and they were like, this

143
00:08:19.439 --> 00:08:25.079
is literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal. And then

144
00:08:25.279 --> 00:08:28.879
all of a sudden, after about fifteen to twenty minutes

145
00:08:28.920 --> 00:08:31.160
of showing us that all these people are going to

146
00:08:31.160 --> 00:08:34.840
be eaten and it's all literal, and how Satanists are

147
00:08:34.960 --> 00:08:38.840
literally doing this thing and grinding people up. After just this,

148
00:08:40.240 --> 00:08:41.799
I don't know what you call it. You can call

149
00:08:41.840 --> 00:08:43.080
it a I don't know how. I don't want to

150
00:08:43.080 --> 00:08:45.080
say anything in a negative way. But after all of

151
00:08:45.120 --> 00:08:48.679
this discussion about eating people, then all of a sudden,

152
00:08:48.960 --> 00:08:52.279
it's literal, literal, literal. All of a sudden, we get

153
00:08:52.320 --> 00:08:55.799
to the figurative part. All of a sudden, the entire

154
00:08:56.480 --> 00:08:59.919
tone changed when he said.

155
00:09:00.399 --> 00:09:08.559
This, you want to hear the figurative part. There's a

156
00:09:08.559 --> 00:09:14.120
group of people from Rome that do that every Sunday.

157
00:09:15.559 --> 00:09:19.600
That's what they teach. I don't believe they're eating the

158
00:09:19.600 --> 00:09:23.120
literal body of Jesus, but that's what they say. In fact,

159
00:09:23.840 --> 00:09:29.279
they say, if you don't believe that, you're damned that

160
00:09:29.360 --> 00:09:32.399
they drink in the little blood and eating the literal

161
00:09:32.399 --> 00:09:36.840
body of Jesus for their salvation. That priest stands up

162
00:09:36.879 --> 00:09:38.879
and says any meani mighty more or whatever he says.

163
00:09:38.919 --> 00:09:45.480
In Latin, they call it trans something substant Yeah, whatever

164
00:09:45.480 --> 00:09:48.879
that long word is, And what it means is he's

165
00:09:48.960 --> 00:09:52.799
turning that cup of wine into literal blood, and the

166
00:09:52.799 --> 00:09:56.720
people drink it. He's turning the wafer into literal body,

167
00:09:57.080 --> 00:10:03.840
and you digest it in your system. So there is

168
00:10:03.879 --> 00:10:05.039
a generation.

169
00:10:07.200 --> 00:10:11.320
Now. So then he goes after transubstantiation of Roman Catholicism

170
00:10:11.600 --> 00:10:14.720
and says, this is ridiculous, this is not true. Well,

171
00:10:14.720 --> 00:10:18.440
where would Roman Catholics go to support such a notion

172
00:10:18.519 --> 00:10:21.279
of transubstantiation. Where would they go? Well, they would go

173
00:10:21.320 --> 00:10:25.399
to John chapter six, verse fifty three, where we read

174
00:10:25.440 --> 00:10:29.200
these words. Then Jesus said, under them, verily, verily, I

175
00:10:29.240 --> 00:10:31.159
say into you, except you eat the flesh of the

176
00:10:31.200 --> 00:10:34.559
Son of Man and drink his blood, you have no

177
00:10:34.879 --> 00:10:37.960
life in you. Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my

178
00:10:38.039 --> 00:10:40.720
blood have eternal life. And I will raise him up

179
00:10:40.799 --> 00:10:43.720
the last day for my flesh is meat indeed, and

180
00:10:43.799 --> 00:10:46.720
my blood is drink. He that eateth my flesh and

181
00:10:46.799 --> 00:10:51.320
drinketh my blood, dwelleth in me, and I am in him.

182
00:10:52.039 --> 00:10:57.080
It repeats it multiple times. Eat my flesh, drink my blood,

183
00:10:57.120 --> 00:11:01.000
Eat my flesh, drink my blood. Now for him, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no no,

184
00:11:01.320 --> 00:11:09.279
all these other passages about people eating people literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal, literal.

185
00:11:09.399 --> 00:11:13.879
We get to John six all of a sudden, figurative figurative, figurative, figurative, figuritive, figurative,

186
00:11:13.919 --> 00:11:18.399
if not real, not true, not true. What does this demonstrate?

187
00:11:19.799 --> 00:11:24.159
It demonstrates that this is a major problem in Bible interpretation,

188
00:11:24.600 --> 00:11:26.960
is that people can say something is literal when they

189
00:11:27.000 --> 00:11:28.639
want it to be literal. They can say it's figurative

190
00:11:28.639 --> 00:11:30.559
when they want it to be figurative. When they want

191
00:11:30.600 --> 00:11:32.399
it to be a metaphor, they committim a metaphor. When

192
00:11:32.399 --> 00:11:34.559
they want it to be allegorical, they can make it allegorical.

193
00:11:34.720 --> 00:11:38.080
They can literally do anything they want. The Bible is

194
00:11:38.120 --> 00:11:41.519
basically Plato in the hands of Christians, and we don't

195
00:11:41.519 --> 00:11:44.879
want to acknowledge that but it is true. That's why

196
00:11:44.919 --> 00:11:47.000
when you listen to preaching, you can be like, well,

197
00:11:47.159 --> 00:11:49.840
these ten sermons interpret it this way, and these ten

198
00:11:49.919 --> 00:11:52.879
sermons interpret it this way, and these ten sermons interpret

199
00:11:52.919 --> 00:11:56.559
it another way. You can get fifty commentaries. They will

200
00:11:56.559 --> 00:12:03.759
give you one hundred different interpretations. It is literally insane.

201
00:12:04.120 --> 00:12:08.440
So it appears that we have found ourselves and somewhat

202
00:12:08.480 --> 00:12:11.399
of a dilemma. I think we have found ourselves. So

203
00:12:11.399 --> 00:12:14.320
at least I have found myself because now we're going

204
00:12:14.360 --> 00:12:16.279
to have to do a lot of work. Because when

205
00:12:16.279 --> 00:12:19.679
we listen to that message about you know, the allegorical method,

206
00:12:20.080 --> 00:12:24.840
the metaphorical method of Bible interpretation, they didn't even bother

207
00:12:24.960 --> 00:12:28.639
to actually teach what it is. They misrepresented it, they

208
00:12:28.679 --> 00:12:31.240
didn't even it was just a disaster. I don't even

209
00:12:31.240 --> 00:12:34.480
know what that. That was so frustrating. I really thought

210
00:12:34.480 --> 00:12:36.279
we were going to be able to go, oh, here's

211
00:12:36.279 --> 00:12:39.679
what the allegorical method teaches. Let's take the allegorical method.

212
00:12:39.840 --> 00:12:42.799
Let's go back to Second Kings chapter six, and let's

213
00:12:42.840 --> 00:12:45.799
see it if preachers are using really methods of the

214
00:12:45.840 --> 00:12:49.240
allegorical method to handle Second King six about the axe head,

215
00:12:49.440 --> 00:12:51.279
when even though they would say they don't agree with

216
00:12:51.320 --> 00:12:53.519
the allegorical method. I wanted to show a little bit

217
00:12:53.519 --> 00:12:56.399
of inconsistency, but we didn't even get the opportunity because

218
00:12:56.600 --> 00:12:59.960
it was not even an actual presentation on the allegorical method.

219
00:13:00.200 --> 00:13:02.399
And then the next thing, you know, we have someone saying, oh,

220
00:13:02.440 --> 00:13:05.840
in Proverbs thirty, they're eating people, and so I'm fourteen,

221
00:13:05.879 --> 00:13:08.559
they're eating people, and Micael three, they're eating people. In

222
00:13:08.559 --> 00:13:11.440
Revelation they're eating people, and then get very graphic in

223
00:13:11.519 --> 00:13:14.080
describing it. But then in the same sermons say no, no, no, no,

224
00:13:14.080 --> 00:13:16.879
no over here in John six, when that's not literal,

225
00:13:17.000 --> 00:13:20.639
that's that's figurative. And it's like, so, when is something literal?

226
00:13:20.679 --> 00:13:23.240
When is something figurative? When is it the allegorical method?

227
00:13:23.240 --> 00:13:27.360
When is the historical grammatical literal approach? Nobody seems to know,

228
00:13:27.440 --> 00:13:34.000
and it's just wild inconsistency. So I don't know where

229
00:13:34.000 --> 00:13:36.559
we're going to be going moving forward. We're going to

230
00:13:36.600 --> 00:13:38.440
be dealing with a lot of things. We're gonna be

231
00:13:38.440 --> 00:13:40.600
dealing with a lot of things. But I want to

232
00:13:40.600 --> 00:13:42.960
at least just take a few minutes here. I don't

233
00:13:42.960 --> 00:13:45.159
want to spend a lot of time. Well, I mean

234
00:13:45.440 --> 00:13:48.480
there's a there's a part of me that wants to say,

235
00:13:48.480 --> 00:13:51.039
you know what, for the next fifteen hours, we're just

236
00:13:51.080 --> 00:13:53.960
going to be talking about this, but I'm going to

237
00:13:54.000 --> 00:13:56.639
try to break things down into smaller segments at least

238
00:13:57.200 --> 00:13:59.600
maybe on the podcast. A lot of this may show

239
00:13:59.639 --> 00:14:01.919
up at church. There's other things we need to do

240
00:14:01.960 --> 00:14:03.759
at church, but it just feel like, I feel like

241
00:14:04.159 --> 00:14:08.679
we have to do something with this because it's just crazy.

242
00:14:09.120 --> 00:14:13.480
So when you take Proverbs thirty fourteen, right, and you've

243
00:14:13.519 --> 00:14:17.799
got someone saying that's literal, and then they cross reference

244
00:14:17.879 --> 00:14:21.600
that with Psalm fourteen, Micah three, Isaiah six, the Book

245
00:14:21.639 --> 00:14:24.080
of Revelation, and they're like, there's coming a time where

246
00:14:24.080 --> 00:14:27.320
people are going to eat poor people, and they say

247
00:14:27.360 --> 00:14:30.679
it's literal, But in the very same sermon you go

248
00:14:30.720 --> 00:14:33.960
to John six and say, no, that's not literal. I

249
00:14:34.000 --> 00:14:38.639
think that this highlights a common challenge in biblical interpretation,

250
00:14:39.159 --> 00:14:42.639
and that is one the need for consistency when applying

251
00:14:42.679 --> 00:14:48.600
hermeneutical principles. To interpret both Proverbs thirty fourteen and John

252
00:14:48.879 --> 00:14:54.279
six fifty three through fifty seven in a text based

253
00:14:54.879 --> 00:14:59.440
consistent manner, we would have to apply specific rules of

254
00:14:59.480 --> 00:15:03.799
Hermannudie that would help us determine whether a passage should

255
00:15:03.799 --> 00:15:08.639
be understood literally or metaphorically. We're going to look at

256
00:15:08.639 --> 00:15:11.639
some of those rules at least in these two passages,

257
00:15:12.120 --> 00:15:15.840
just to kind of continue this discussion, and then later

258
00:15:15.960 --> 00:15:19.000
time we'll really expand this a little bit more. So again,

259
00:15:19.080 --> 00:15:22.320
I'm just gonna put forth my hypotheses, and I know

260
00:15:22.360 --> 00:15:25.399
it's not popular, and I know people are going to disagree,

261
00:15:25.480 --> 00:15:28.159
but I think in reality, you know, we read about

262
00:15:28.159 --> 00:15:30.639
everyone did what was right in their own eyes. I

263
00:15:30.639 --> 00:15:35.960
think that's really that phrase. Metaphorically speaking, we could say

264
00:15:36.000 --> 00:15:40.000
that's really Christian hermeneutics. Everyone does what is right in

265
00:15:40.039 --> 00:15:43.320
their own eyes. But what makes Christian hermanutics so frustrating

266
00:15:43.799 --> 00:15:45.919
is everyone does what is right in their own eyes

267
00:15:46.240 --> 00:15:50.960
while at the very same time telling everyone that what

268
00:15:51.039 --> 00:15:53.039
they're doing, what is right in their own eyes, is

269
00:15:53.080 --> 00:15:56.080
not only right. If you don't agree with them, you

270
00:15:56.279 --> 00:16:01.559
are wrong. That's how Biblical Christians do Bible interpretation. My

271
00:16:01.679 --> 00:16:05.039
interpretation is right, yours is wrong, and if you're wrong

272
00:16:05.120 --> 00:16:07.000
too much, you're a heretic. And I may say you're

273
00:16:07.039 --> 00:16:09.120
not even safe because you have to agree with my

274
00:16:09.279 --> 00:16:15.679
interpretation because my interpretation is the only right interpretation. And

275
00:16:15.720 --> 00:16:19.200
this is where I'm going to take Christians off. But

276
00:16:19.320 --> 00:16:22.360
Christians love to run around and say, Sola scriptra, the

277
00:16:22.480 --> 00:16:25.159
scripture is the final authority. Now, the final authority is

278
00:16:25.200 --> 00:16:32.559
your own interpretation, because you make your interpretation authoritative and

279
00:16:32.600 --> 00:16:37.279
you judge everyone according to your interpretation. And you got

280
00:16:37.360 --> 00:16:40.399
Christians running around they will say this passage means this

281
00:16:40.720 --> 00:16:42.960
past I mean, I get emails all the time. I

282
00:16:42.960 --> 00:16:45.679
can offer any interpretation. I'll get an email saying you're wrong,

283
00:16:45.679 --> 00:16:47.840
you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong, you're wrong,

284
00:16:47.879 --> 00:16:51.320
you're wrong, you're wrong. It's like, okay, great, But then

285
00:16:51.360 --> 00:16:55.320
if you want to ask them basic questions about hermeneutical principles,

286
00:16:55.440 --> 00:16:57.360
they don't even know what you're talking about, but they

287
00:16:57.399 --> 00:17:00.919
feel qualified. Because that's very much the non Catholic world, right,

288
00:17:00.960 --> 00:17:04.559
the non Catholic world is every individual Christian is qualified.

289
00:17:04.559 --> 00:17:07.480
In fact, every individual Christian many of them will run

290
00:17:07.519 --> 00:17:10.640
around claiming not only are they qualified to interpret the Bible,

291
00:17:10.880 --> 00:17:15.079
they will claim they have God himself helping them interpret

292
00:17:15.079 --> 00:17:18.400
the Bible, which then logically would mean their interpretation comes

293
00:17:18.400 --> 00:17:21.680
from God. Therefore it's infallible. Therefore you cannot challenge it.

294
00:17:22.559 --> 00:17:24.759
And pastors play that game behind the pulpit, and the

295
00:17:24.759 --> 00:17:27.359
people in the peu say amen. If your pastor says

296
00:17:27.400 --> 00:17:30.200
God helped him interpret it, led him to the interpretation,

297
00:17:30.480 --> 00:17:33.519
or gave him the interpretation, he just now put himself

298
00:17:33.519 --> 00:17:37.039
in a position where you cannot challenge his interpretation. So

299
00:17:37.119 --> 00:17:38.920
if I would just get on the air and just

300
00:17:38.920 --> 00:17:41.519
say God gave me all of my interpretations, you couldn't

301
00:17:41.599 --> 00:17:43.559
email me and question me. I would tell you to

302
00:17:43.599 --> 00:17:47.279
email God. Well, see what that's Oh, there's so many

303
00:17:47.319 --> 00:17:52.640
things wrong with that whole approach. So what we're gonna

304
00:17:52.680 --> 00:17:54.559
do is just look at all I'm going to do

305
00:17:54.599 --> 00:17:58.079
in this message in this episode. It would go look

306
00:17:58.079 --> 00:18:02.160
at Proverbs thirty fourteen, John six fifty three, try to

307
00:18:02.200 --> 00:18:04.160
apply some rules and see where we come up with.

308
00:18:04.279 --> 00:18:09.240
Because again Proverbs thirty fourteen and one sermon, this is

309
00:18:09.559 --> 00:18:11.960
this is what makes even listening to preaching insane. And

310
00:18:12.079 --> 00:18:14.839
one sermon we hear Proverbs thirty fourteen, there is a

311
00:18:14.880 --> 00:18:18.359
generation whose teeth are as swords, and their jaws jaw

312
00:18:18.440 --> 00:18:22.240
teeth as knives, to devour the poor from off the earth.

313
00:18:23.119 --> 00:18:28.440
Right now, According to the sermon, literal. However, they did

314
00:18:28.480 --> 00:18:31.319
not quote John six fifty three, but they clearly are

315
00:18:31.359 --> 00:18:36.079
referencing the teaching that Catholicism has taken from John six

316
00:18:36.119 --> 00:18:40.119
fifty three. Transubstantiation barely rarely asked the into you, except

317
00:18:40.160 --> 00:18:42.920
you eat the flesh, eat the flesh of the sun

318
00:18:42.920 --> 00:18:44.759
of man, and drink his blood, you have no life

319
00:18:44.759 --> 00:18:48.799
in you. And he argued, that's the figurative part. Okay, Well,

320
00:18:50.200 --> 00:18:52.920
how did you come to this conclusion. Well, let's just

321
00:18:53.160 --> 00:18:55.519
let's just follow some basic rules. How about the rules

322
00:18:55.559 --> 00:19:00.000
of context Proverbs thirty fourteen and the context of Proverbs

323
00:19:00.160 --> 00:19:02.880
thirty The passage is a part of a list of

324
00:19:03.000 --> 00:19:10.759
negative characteristics of a certain people described metaphorically. The context

325
00:19:10.839 --> 00:19:16.640
suggests that devouring the poor is figurative language describing the

326
00:19:16.759 --> 00:19:22.839
exploitation or oppression of the poor. The passage uses strong

327
00:19:22.960 --> 00:19:26.039
imagery to emphasize the cruelty of those who take advantage

328
00:19:26.079 --> 00:19:29.559
of the vulnerable. The overall genre of proverbs wisdom literature

329
00:19:29.880 --> 00:19:35.720
commonly uses such metaphorical language to express moral or ethical points.

330
00:19:36.240 --> 00:19:40.119
So they say, the context here is using that type

331
00:19:40.119 --> 00:19:47.880
of thing, all right, and you can just look at

332
00:19:47.880 --> 00:19:52.599
the text itself, right, verse just go to Proverbs thirty thirteen,

333
00:19:53.000 --> 00:19:56.039
there is a generation. Oh, how lofty are their eyes?

334
00:19:56.480 --> 00:20:02.000
And their eyelids are lifted up? Issue about eyes and eyelids,

335
00:20:02.160 --> 00:20:06.240
No eyes and eyelids is being used metaphorically to represent pride.

336
00:20:06.279 --> 00:20:08.599
And then even in Proverbs thirty fourteen, the very verse,

337
00:20:08.640 --> 00:20:12.720
there is a generation whose teeth are as swords. As swords.

338
00:20:12.559 --> 00:20:16.000
It's clearly showing you, it's screaming at you, it's using

339
00:20:16.039 --> 00:20:21.559
metaphorical language. It clearly is. Now what about John Chapter six,

340
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:24.160
Verse fifty three and fifty seven. Well, in the context

341
00:20:24.160 --> 00:20:27.359
of John six, Jesus is using spiritual language to describe

342
00:20:27.400 --> 00:20:30.960
belief in him as the bread of life. The broader

343
00:20:31.000 --> 00:20:34.519
passage points to faith in Jesus as essential for eternal life.

344
00:20:34.599 --> 00:20:37.240
His statements about eating his flesh and drinking his blood

345
00:20:37.359 --> 00:20:41.279
are metaphorical, pointing to the need for intimate union with him,

346
00:20:42.319 --> 00:20:45.119
and this would be symbolized in the Lord's Supper. The

347
00:20:45.160 --> 00:20:47.920
context of the passage with reference to spiritual life and

348
00:20:48.000 --> 00:20:52.559
belief suggest a symbolic rather than literal meaning. I think

349
00:20:52.599 --> 00:20:55.079
most would see that right, because if you go to

350
00:20:55.160 --> 00:21:01.519
John six, I want to break these down in a

351
00:21:01.559 --> 00:21:06.480
much more like in a greater in a greater way,

352
00:21:08.160 --> 00:21:14.759
John six, John chapter.

353
00:21:14.400 --> 00:21:18.640
Six, he says, hang, if I can find the exact phrase,

354
00:21:23.440 --> 00:21:34.000
see John chapter six. Hang on, but yeah, John six

355
00:21:34.119 --> 00:21:38.000
thirty five, Jesus said into them, I am the Bread

356
00:21:38.200 --> 00:21:39.200
of life.

357
00:21:40.240 --> 00:21:43.359
I am the bread. Clearly, that's a metaphor. Clearly Jesus

358
00:21:43.440 --> 00:21:46.559
is not saying he's actual bread. Clear So already in

359
00:21:46.640 --> 00:21:50.079
John six thirty five, we already have the metaphorical language

360
00:21:50.160 --> 00:21:54.000
proven nobody would take that literal right. So there we

361
00:21:54.519 --> 00:21:58.160
and and Proverbs thirty we are we have metaphorical language

362
00:21:58.200 --> 00:22:01.640
clearly being utilized. So that help us understand the eating part.

363
00:22:01.880 --> 00:22:04.599
And in John six we have the metaphorical idea I

364
00:22:04.759 --> 00:22:08.319
am the bread of life, would clearly indicate Jesus is

365
00:22:08.359 --> 00:22:11.279
not actually bred. I think any reasonable person should be

366
00:22:11.319 --> 00:22:14.799
able to draw a conclusion that Proverbs thirty and John

367
00:22:14.920 --> 00:22:19.839
six is using metaphorical language at least in some to

368
00:22:20.039 --> 00:22:23.359
some level that we should make us go hmmm. I

369
00:22:23.359 --> 00:22:27.000
think we should be careful. So by considering the immediate

370
00:22:27.000 --> 00:22:29.599
and broader context, it becomes clear that both passages use

371
00:22:29.680 --> 00:22:33.480
metaphorical language to convey deeper spiritual truths. The context of

372
00:22:33.559 --> 00:22:37.200
each passage directs us to a non literal interpretation. The

373
00:22:37.319 --> 00:22:40.400
context would seem to go, I don't know if if

374
00:22:40.440 --> 00:22:44.000
Proverbs is talking about a future time prophetically that people

375
00:22:44.000 --> 00:22:47.440
are going to eat people, I think it's seemingly describe.

376
00:22:47.799 --> 00:22:51.519
There's pride, and then there's a generation that's going to

377
00:22:51.559 --> 00:22:55.599
treat the poor in a very exploitive and very oppressive way.

378
00:22:55.799 --> 00:22:58.079
That's going to be like devouring them off the face

379
00:22:58.079 --> 00:23:02.960
of the earth. They're going to be using this up. Oh,

380
00:23:03.039 --> 00:23:06.279
and here Jesus is making a reference here or that

381
00:23:06.519 --> 00:23:09.799
he's the bread. Hey, you at physical bread, but that

382
00:23:09.880 --> 00:23:12.920
bread you still die. I am the bread that will

383
00:23:12.960 --> 00:23:16.400
give you eternal life. Well, is Jesus saying we have

384
00:23:16.400 --> 00:23:19.839
to physically eat him? Or is Jesus saying that somehow

385
00:23:20.039 --> 00:23:23.799
we believe in him? Is is likened unto that?

386
00:23:26.119 --> 00:23:26.319
Right?

387
00:23:26.880 --> 00:23:30.200
And so in fact, if you if you go down,

388
00:23:30.359 --> 00:23:32.000
if you just look at the at the if you

389
00:23:32.039 --> 00:23:35.640
look at the text John six thirty five, I am

390
00:23:35.680 --> 00:23:37.319
the bread of life. He that cometh to me, she'll

391
00:23:37.359 --> 00:23:40.440
never hunger. He that believes up in me, she'll never thirst. Well,

392
00:23:40.440 --> 00:23:42.400
obviously we're still gonna get hungry, and we're still gonna

393
00:23:42.400 --> 00:23:45.599
get thirsty. So we already know this is metaphorically, he's

394
00:23:45.640 --> 00:23:50.400
the bread. We're never gonna hunger and thirst spiritually, not physically.

395
00:23:50.960 --> 00:23:53.519
But I say to you that ye also have seen

396
00:23:53.559 --> 00:23:57.160
me and believe not. Now there is the belief part

397
00:23:57.279 --> 00:24:01.039
brought in immediately right there, all right, look at verse forty,

398
00:24:01.039 --> 00:24:02.640
and this is the will of him that sent me,

399
00:24:02.880 --> 00:24:06.599
that everyone would see the sun and believeth on him

400
00:24:06.680 --> 00:24:09.440
may have everlasting life and will raise him up the

401
00:24:09.599 --> 00:24:12.960
last day. So the believing is in a sense the

402
00:24:13.079 --> 00:24:17.119
idea of the partaking, of the eating of the bread

403
00:24:17.119 --> 00:24:20.160
of life, which gives you eternal life by believing. So

404
00:24:20.359 --> 00:24:23.640
clearly you can see the metaphorical if you follow it three,

405
00:24:23.720 --> 00:24:26.799
you can see the metaphorical part. Now most all non

406
00:24:26.880 --> 00:24:30.720
Catholics would be like, well, obviously John six is not literal.

407
00:24:30.920 --> 00:24:33.920
But now we have a non Catholic going to Proverbs

408
00:24:33.920 --> 00:24:39.759
thirty going they're eating people. Well, you see the inconsistency there.

409
00:24:41.640 --> 00:24:43.799
So we have the real rule of context. I think

410
00:24:43.799 --> 00:24:46.039
if you just go through the context, you have what

411
00:24:46.079 --> 00:24:48.920
we will call the rule of genre or literary genre.

412
00:24:49.000 --> 00:24:52.160
Proverbs thirty fourteen. Proverbs is a part of wisdom literature,

413
00:24:52.279 --> 00:24:54.759
which is known for its frequent use of metaphor and

414
00:24:54.839 --> 00:24:58.799
hyperbole to illustrate moral and ethical principles. In this genre,

415
00:24:58.960 --> 00:25:02.400
descriptions like teeth, our swords, and devouring the poor are

416
00:25:02.440 --> 00:25:06.039
poetic expressions used to depict the cruelty of the wicked.

417
00:25:06.319 --> 00:25:09.559
I mean, it's the genre is right there. So and

418
00:25:09.680 --> 00:25:13.519
proverbs we know the genre. We shouldn't have any problems.

419
00:25:13.839 --> 00:25:19.160
Some there's poetry. It's using that metaphorical type of language.

420
00:25:19.200 --> 00:25:25.079
We've already talked about this. Now John six is where

421
00:25:25.079 --> 00:25:26.839
you can have a little bit. You would actually have

422
00:25:26.880 --> 00:25:29.519
a better argument for John six being literal than you

423
00:25:29.559 --> 00:25:35.079
would Proverbs, because John is a different literary style, literary genre.

424
00:25:35.759 --> 00:25:38.240
John six, the Gospel of John, has written in narrative

425
00:25:38.559 --> 00:25:44.000
and philological discourse, and Jesus often uses symbol symbolic language

426
00:25:44.039 --> 00:25:45.640
such as I am the lot of the world, I

427
00:25:45.680 --> 00:25:48.440
am the bread of life to convey spiritual truths. Now,

428
00:25:48.480 --> 00:25:51.720
on one hand, the type of literary the genre of

429
00:25:52.359 --> 00:25:55.200
literature that it is, you could kind of argue, well,

430
00:25:55.240 --> 00:25:57.519
we take a lot of John literally, do we not?

431
00:25:58.759 --> 00:26:01.039
We do? I mean, there's no way to get around it.

432
00:26:01.119 --> 00:26:04.319
Right when we reread about and John, we say, well,

433
00:26:04.319 --> 00:26:06.680
this is literal. This is literal. This is literal. So

434
00:26:06.759 --> 00:26:09.519
this makes it a little bit more You've got to

435
00:26:09.519 --> 00:26:11.480
be a little bit more cautious. But I think we

436
00:26:11.519 --> 00:26:15.839
can see that within the literal historical narrative there is

437
00:26:15.920 --> 00:26:21.759
philological discourse, and within the philological discourse there is figurative

438
00:26:22.079 --> 00:26:25.279
language being utilized, like I am the light of the world,

439
00:26:25.440 --> 00:26:29.240
or I am the door, or I'm bred. We see

440
00:26:29.640 --> 00:26:34.400
then that it's conveying these truths. The philological nature of

441
00:26:34.440 --> 00:26:38.119
John's Gospel emphasizes belief in union with Christ and Jesus

442
00:26:38.240 --> 00:26:42.680
uses metaphors and symbolisms frequently to explain these spiritual realities.

443
00:26:44.000 --> 00:26:49.279
The genres of both passages suggest non literal interpretations. Proverbs,

444
00:26:49.319 --> 00:26:54.880
poetic and moralistic genre invites metaphorical reading. John's philological discourses

445
00:26:55.160 --> 00:26:59.720
uses spiritual language to express deeper truths. And I think

446
00:26:59.759 --> 00:27:02.079
that's the case. But you can see where that even

447
00:27:02.119 --> 00:27:05.079
that can become IFFI in the beginning, was the word

448
00:27:05.279 --> 00:27:07.599
the word was with God, and the word was God? Well,

449
00:27:07.759 --> 00:27:10.720
well that's just figurative language, you see. And the word

450
00:27:10.759 --> 00:27:14.559
became flesh, Well is that figurative? See, this is where

451
00:27:14.559 --> 00:27:16.759
it can get iffy, right, because then you have another

452
00:27:16.839 --> 00:27:21.359
section of John, well, well that's not literal, that this

453
00:27:21.559 --> 00:27:27.960
is the very how can we say it? Almost a

454
00:27:28.400 --> 00:27:31.279
I don't like to say it. There is a subjective

455
00:27:31.640 --> 00:27:36.480
nature to Bible interpretation, which at times can be very

456
00:27:36.720 --> 00:27:41.000
troubling and inconsistent. Right, And what typically happens if you're

457
00:27:41.000 --> 00:27:43.160
in the pew, you just go with whatever you've been told.

458
00:27:44.279 --> 00:27:47.119
Someone tells you it's literal, someone tells you it's figurative,

459
00:27:47.400 --> 00:27:52.400
and you just go along with it. Now, so to me,

460
00:27:52.599 --> 00:27:55.880
the Catholics would have a greater argument and arguing that

461
00:27:56.000 --> 00:27:59.119
John six fifty three through the following should be taking literal,

462
00:27:59.160 --> 00:28:01.000
because they would just go so they could just flip

463
00:28:01.039 --> 00:28:04.240
over you a couple of chapters back and go, well,

464
00:28:04.279 --> 00:28:07.920
wait a minute, do you interpret John Chapter one? Is literal?

465
00:28:10.599 --> 00:28:13.400
Do you take that? Was the word made flesh? Was?

466
00:28:13.799 --> 00:28:19.880
Was he literally made flesh? Did he dwell among us? Was? Was?

467
00:28:20.880 --> 00:28:24.000
You know? All these things that happen were they were

468
00:28:24.000 --> 00:28:28.200
these literal? Were the miracles literal? And you would say, well,

469
00:28:28.200 --> 00:28:31.400
the miracles were literal? This was literal, This was literal,

470
00:28:31.519 --> 00:28:34.599
And then you would go John one, two, three, four,

471
00:28:35.000 --> 00:28:37.160
and all of a sudden, no, no, no, no, this isn't literal,

472
00:28:37.319 --> 00:28:40.160
So Catholics would actually have the better argument then going

473
00:28:40.200 --> 00:28:43.559
to proverbs, which is a part of poetry and wisdom literature,

474
00:28:43.759 --> 00:28:46.599
and then say well, they're eating people. I think you

475
00:28:46.640 --> 00:28:48.960
would have a better argument if you wanted to just

476
00:28:49.000 --> 00:28:52.279
look at it hermeneutically and arguing that the eating of

477
00:28:52.319 --> 00:28:54.400
the flesh and drinking of the blood is literal, at

478
00:28:54.440 --> 00:28:59.799
least from a contextual and literary genre standpoint. Now, I

479
00:29:00.039 --> 00:29:02.400
think the thing that helps us in John six is

480
00:29:02.400 --> 00:29:04.440
when Jesus says I am the Bread of life. We

481
00:29:04.559 --> 00:29:08.200
know that can't be. He's not literal bread. So therefore

482
00:29:08.400 --> 00:29:12.720
we have a little clue in John six that Jesus

483
00:29:12.839 --> 00:29:18.119
is using figurative language. Immediately, he's contrasting that bread with

484
00:29:18.440 --> 00:29:22.240
him being the bread. That bread you going to die

485
00:29:22.640 --> 00:29:24.559
with him? You have eternal life. Well, how do we

486
00:29:24.599 --> 00:29:27.039
have eternal life? Well, we have verse after verse by

487
00:29:27.079 --> 00:29:30.720
believing in him. So the believing is contrasted with the eating. Okay,

488
00:29:30.839 --> 00:29:33.799
we can make it work, but just make sure you

489
00:29:33.880 --> 00:29:39.000
understand it can be. It requires a little bit of effort,

490
00:29:39.480 --> 00:29:41.839
so we do have the rule of I think context

491
00:29:41.920 --> 00:29:46.400
here is most important more than genre. Literary genre I

492
00:29:46.440 --> 00:29:51.200
think helps us with psalms and helps us with proverbs. Okay,

493
00:29:51.240 --> 00:29:55.039
but when it comes to John six, the rule of

494
00:29:55.160 --> 00:29:58.680
genre or the rule of literary genre becomes a little

495
00:29:58.680 --> 00:30:03.200
bit more difficult. I think. So number one, we have

496
00:30:03.279 --> 00:30:05.200
what we call the rule of context. Number two we

497
00:30:05.240 --> 00:30:07.359
have the rule of genre, and number three the rule

498
00:30:07.480 --> 00:30:14.480
of figurative language indicators. So you look for are there

499
00:30:14.559 --> 00:30:17.079
figurative language indicators, which is what I've been trying to

500
00:30:18.039 --> 00:30:21.119
I place that within the role of the role of context.

501
00:30:21.359 --> 00:30:26.400
But within the context, do I find these figurative language indicators?

502
00:30:26.480 --> 00:30:29.599
Is there indicators? Well? In Proverbs thirty fourteen, I mean,

503
00:30:29.599 --> 00:30:34.039
I think it's very simple. Teeth teeth are swords, fangs

504
00:30:34.039 --> 00:30:38.920
are knives, strongly indicating figurative language. Literal teeth cannot be swords,

505
00:30:39.160 --> 00:30:42.480
nor do literal knives grow in people's mouths. The figurative

506
00:30:42.519 --> 00:30:46.279
indicator suggests that devouring the poor is a metaphor for oppressive,

507
00:30:46.359 --> 00:30:48.759
harmful behavior, and I think we can indicate that. And

508
00:30:48.759 --> 00:30:51.400
if you go back to verse thirteen, it's not talking

509
00:30:51.400 --> 00:30:55.920
about eyes and eyelids. That's being metaphorically speaking to be

510
00:30:55.960 --> 00:31:00.240
speaking about pride. So we have figurative language indicators. Now

511
00:31:00.279 --> 00:31:03.640
how about John six. Well, John uses figurative language when

512
00:31:03.680 --> 00:31:06.119
he says eat my flesh and drink my blood. Literal

513
00:31:06.160 --> 00:31:10.319
cannibalism would contradict other scriptural teaching, and Jesus intent is

514
00:31:10.319 --> 00:31:13.759
to emphasize the necessity of believing on him and participating

515
00:31:13.759 --> 00:31:17.880
in his life. The language Jesus uses meant to provoke

516
00:31:17.960 --> 00:31:21.519
deeper reflection on spiritual truth rather than literal consumption. But

517
00:31:22.039 --> 00:31:24.960
now that's one explanation again. I think if you go

518
00:31:25.079 --> 00:31:28.000
back when he says I am the bread of life

519
00:31:28.039 --> 00:31:32.039
in John six thirty five, I think that sets up. Hey, guys,

520
00:31:32.440 --> 00:31:35.759
I'm using a metaphor here. I'm using a figurative's language here.

521
00:31:36.079 --> 00:31:39.119
I think the text then that's where you have the indicator.

522
00:31:39.759 --> 00:31:42.200
I think when you go back, because I mean, it's

523
00:31:42.200 --> 00:31:47.359
only it's not that, it's what ten verses nine verses before.

524
00:31:48.519 --> 00:31:50.680
So it's in the very same section. We're not like

525
00:31:50.920 --> 00:31:54.240
going completely Well, actually, I'm sorry, take it back. It's

526
00:31:54.279 --> 00:31:57.519
more than that. It's thirty five he says I'm the

527
00:31:57.559 --> 00:31:59.559
bread of life. Fifty three is where he says eat

528
00:31:59.599 --> 00:32:01.759
my flesh. So it's a little it's more than that,

529
00:32:02.039 --> 00:32:05.319
but it's within the very same section. It's within the

530
00:32:05.359 --> 00:32:09.000
same discourse, it's within the same narrative. It's not like

531
00:32:09.079 --> 00:32:13.519
everything has changed here. So I think that makes sense,

532
00:32:16.160 --> 00:32:18.839
at least I believe it does. So what do we

533
00:32:18.920 --> 00:32:22.000
have here? We have the rule of context, we have

534
00:32:22.119 --> 00:32:24.960
the rule of genre, We have the rule of figurative

535
00:32:25.000 --> 00:32:29.559
language indicators number four. What we would call this the

536
00:32:29.640 --> 00:32:36.079
rule of absurdity, the rule of absurdity Proverbs thirty fourteen.

537
00:32:36.119 --> 00:32:38.680
A literal interpretation of the poor being physically eaten by

538
00:32:38.720 --> 00:32:41.559
oppressors would be absurd and not aligned with the overall

539
00:32:41.599 --> 00:32:44.640
teaching of scripture. The idea of people physically eating the

540
00:32:44.680 --> 00:32:47.920
poor would contradict the common Biblical theme of justice for

541
00:32:48.000 --> 00:32:50.319
the poor and vulnerable. Now, the only problem is I

542
00:32:50.319 --> 00:32:53.400
don't necessarily agree with that argument. Now, I do think

543
00:32:53.400 --> 00:32:56.160
there's a rule of absurdity, all right. I do think

544
00:32:56.200 --> 00:32:59.599
there's a rule of absurdity. But I don't think that's Hey,

545
00:33:00.200 --> 00:33:02.480
it would be absurd to have a text about people

546
00:33:02.480 --> 00:33:05.359
eating people, because it would go against basic morality. But

547
00:33:05.400 --> 00:33:07.480
the whole point of that text is there's a generation

548
00:33:07.599 --> 00:33:10.079
coming that's going to be wicked, and they're going to

549
00:33:10.119 --> 00:33:12.720
do things. They're not supposed to do, so I don't

550
00:33:12.720 --> 00:33:15.079
think that works. So I don't think that. I don't

551
00:33:15.079 --> 00:33:18.200
think that explanation works in any way, shape or form. Right.

552
00:33:18.400 --> 00:33:22.599
I think the reason it becomes absurd is a couple

553
00:33:22.680 --> 00:33:27.720
of things. Right, There is a generation, oh how see

554
00:33:27.839 --> 00:33:30.119
verse fourteen. There is a generation whose teeth are as

555
00:33:30.160 --> 00:33:33.240
swords and their jaw teeth as knives. All right, the

556
00:33:33.359 --> 00:33:36.359
text itself, it would be absurd to believe that someone's

557
00:33:36.559 --> 00:33:39.880
teeth really are becoming swords and knives. Clearly it's using

558
00:33:39.920 --> 00:33:43.440
a metaphor. So therefore it would be absurd to say

559
00:33:43.880 --> 00:33:47.599
their teeth is becoming knives swords, and they're eating people.

560
00:33:48.200 --> 00:33:51.960
The text would be absurd because you would have to

561
00:33:51.960 --> 00:33:55.519
then make it all work, and it would not. It

562
00:33:55.519 --> 00:33:57.920
would not work in any way, shape or form. It

563
00:33:57.960 --> 00:34:02.079
would not work. It's like the same thing in I

564
00:34:02.119 --> 00:34:11.800
think it's I think it's Micah three. Micah three. Um, yeah,

565
00:34:11.920 --> 00:34:14.280
so it talks about the people being eaten in Micah three,

566
00:34:14.400 --> 00:34:18.360
starting a verse two, they pluck off their skin, their

567
00:34:18.400 --> 00:34:20.599
flesh from off their bones. They will eat the flesh

568
00:34:20.599 --> 00:34:23.360
of my people. They will flay their skin. And then

569
00:34:23.360 --> 00:34:26.800
in verse fourteen, then shall they cry unto the Lord. Okay, well,

570
00:34:27.320 --> 00:34:30.000
I don't think people being eaten and their skin being

571
00:34:30.039 --> 00:34:32.039
flayed are going to be crying to the lord. And

572
00:34:32.079 --> 00:34:33.960
now I guess you could try to work around that,

573
00:34:34.280 --> 00:34:37.559
but I think you start finding yourself into the absurd.

574
00:34:38.079 --> 00:34:41.960
So I think with Proverbs thirty, the rule of absurdity

575
00:34:42.480 --> 00:34:45.639
is the fact that the very verse itself is using

576
00:34:45.719 --> 00:34:51.679
clearly metaphorical language, figurative language about their teeth. And it

577
00:34:51.719 --> 00:34:54.719
would be absurd then to say, no, that the eating

578
00:34:54.800 --> 00:34:57.280
is literal, but the other part is figuring. Now, that

579
00:34:57.320 --> 00:34:59.840
would be absurd just even in trying to make that work.

580
00:35:00.199 --> 00:35:01.840
That would be like, this is what it would be

581
00:35:01.880 --> 00:35:05.320
doing this generation whose teeth are as swords. Okay, that's

582
00:35:05.320 --> 00:35:07.679
not real soreds. It's just they have really sharp teeth

583
00:35:07.960 --> 00:35:10.800
and their jaw teeth as knives. It doesn't mean it's knives.

584
00:35:10.920 --> 00:35:14.360
It just means it's really sharp teeth to devour the poor.

585
00:35:15.360 --> 00:35:19.400
But they're really eating the poor. That's that's absurd. You

586
00:35:19.440 --> 00:35:23.519
don't averse that would be contrad having two different ways

587
00:35:23.559 --> 00:35:28.519
of interpreting it. Now, is there a rule of absurdity?

588
00:35:28.519 --> 00:35:32.480
In John six Well, a literal interpretation of eating Jesus

589
00:35:32.559 --> 00:35:35.400
flesh and drinking his blood would lead to an absurdity,

590
00:35:35.639 --> 00:35:39.920
especially considering that Jesus consistently teaches against literalism and other

591
00:35:40.000 --> 00:35:45.599
spiritual matters. When Nicodemus misunderstood being born again literally, because

592
00:35:45.679 --> 00:35:48.119
Jesus corrects that, like and John three, what does he

593
00:35:48.159 --> 00:35:50.679
do a man being born again? And Nicodemus is like,

594
00:35:50.719 --> 00:35:52.880
how can a man be born when he's all And

595
00:35:52.960 --> 00:35:56.440
Jesus is like, you're misunderstanding this, right, I'm talking about

596
00:35:56.519 --> 00:35:59.159
being born again from above, I'm talking about being born

597
00:35:59.199 --> 00:36:02.679
against spiritual Well, here I think the rule of absurdity

598
00:36:02.760 --> 00:36:05.920
shows up in John six. Because Jesus says I am

599
00:36:06.039 --> 00:36:09.280
the Bread of life. It would be absurd to turn

600
00:36:09.360 --> 00:36:13.400
him into a loaf of bread. Therefore we know immediately

601
00:36:13.679 --> 00:36:16.800
he's using the figurative language. The absurd part would be

602
00:36:16.880 --> 00:36:20.400
to have within the same narrative where Jesus says I

603
00:36:20.440 --> 00:36:23.440
am bread and then talks about eating and drinking of

604
00:36:23.480 --> 00:36:28.119
his flesh, to then make that literal when you just

605
00:36:28.119 --> 00:36:31.199
just you know versus before you have to go with

606
00:36:31.239 --> 00:36:34.519
the figurative once again, you would have within the same

607
00:36:34.679 --> 00:36:37.320
kind of section you're trying to have some literal and

608
00:36:37.400 --> 00:36:42.960
some figurative and that just doesn't make sense hermeneutically, a

609
00:36:43.599 --> 00:36:48.920
literal interpretation of both passages lead to absurd conclusions and contradictions. Therefore,

610
00:36:49.559 --> 00:36:53.639
metaphorical understanding is necessary for coherence. Now I do agree

611
00:36:53.679 --> 00:36:56.000
with that, I don't agree necessarily with the way they

612
00:36:56.119 --> 00:36:59.280
try to argue it. Can I think we can show

613
00:36:59.519 --> 00:37:01.920
when it's a absurd And I think that's the thing.

614
00:37:02.440 --> 00:37:05.960
Whenever you're trying to figure out whether it's metaphorical, is

615
00:37:06.000 --> 00:37:12.880
it absurd? Does it just stop making any sense? Right?

616
00:37:13.079 --> 00:37:16.840
So we have the rule of context, we have the

617
00:37:16.920 --> 00:37:20.599
rule of genre, we have the rule of figurative language indicators.

618
00:37:20.679 --> 00:37:23.440
We have the rule of absurdity. Next we have what

619
00:37:23.480 --> 00:37:28.159
we'll call the rule of philological consistency. Proverbs thirty fourteen.

620
00:37:28.199 --> 00:37:30.800
A literal interpretation of eating the poor would conflict with

621
00:37:30.840 --> 00:37:34.119
the Bible's broader teaching on protecting the poor and promoting justice.

622
00:37:34.119 --> 00:37:38.360
Se I don't I disagree with that. That makes no sense.

623
00:37:38.920 --> 00:37:40.760
The whole point of the passage is that people are

624
00:37:40.760 --> 00:37:43.800
doing that which is wrong. So that doesn't make any sense.

625
00:37:44.159 --> 00:37:46.679
You can't say, well, it would be thiologically inconsistent. I

626
00:37:46.679 --> 00:37:49.519
it's not promoting the eating of the poor, it would

627
00:37:49.559 --> 00:37:54.679
be condemning it. So it would be completely philologically consistent

628
00:37:54.960 --> 00:37:57.760
to say these people are doing horrible things, and these

629
00:37:57.800 --> 00:38:01.119
horrible things are wrong. It's so it would be theologically

630
00:38:01.159 --> 00:38:05.519
inconsistent to be saying go eat people, but another passage

631
00:38:05.519 --> 00:38:08.880
saying don't do that, that would be theologically inconsistent. So

632
00:38:08.920 --> 00:38:12.360
that makes no That makes no sense to me. Is

633
00:38:12.360 --> 00:38:16.079
there a thiologically uh? Is it theiologically consistent? I don't

634
00:38:16.079 --> 00:38:21.000
think there's a thiological consistency issue here. I don't think

635
00:38:21.000 --> 00:38:24.800
there's a theological consistency issue here. That rule I don't

636
00:38:24.840 --> 00:38:28.199
think has any application to this problem. How about in

637
00:38:28.280 --> 00:38:31.920
John six, a metaphorical interpretation of eating jesus flesh and

638
00:38:31.960 --> 00:38:35.559
drinking his blood aligns with the philological themes of union

639
00:38:35.599 --> 00:38:38.760
with Christ uh Jesus teaching here fits with a broader

640
00:38:38.800 --> 00:38:43.480
Biblical emphasis on spiritual sustenance and eternal life. I do

641
00:38:43.559 --> 00:38:46.119
think if you argued, if we actually have to eat

642
00:38:46.199 --> 00:38:50.840
jesus flesh and eat eat his flesh and drink his blood,

643
00:38:51.280 --> 00:38:55.039
now we would be like, now, where would be theological consistency? Well,

644
00:38:55.039 --> 00:38:58.400
now is that a violation? Are we are? We told?

645
00:38:58.400 --> 00:39:02.760
To eat people. Now we may have a thiological inconsistency

646
00:39:02.800 --> 00:39:05.000
because we're actually being told you have to do this

647
00:39:05.360 --> 00:39:09.079
basically in order to be saved. So it'd be actually,

648
00:39:09.280 --> 00:39:12.280
you're almost participating in some form of actually eating his

649
00:39:12.320 --> 00:39:14.280
s flesh and drinking his blood in order to be saved.

650
00:39:14.400 --> 00:39:17.639
Does that violate other scriptures? There would be some theologically

651
00:39:17.840 --> 00:39:21.719
inconsistency Proverbs thirty. I don't think that you have theologically

652
00:39:22.119 --> 00:39:26.639
inconsistency by saying, hey, this they're really eating people. That's

653
00:39:26.639 --> 00:39:30.360
not theologically inconsistent because this is describing wicked people. And

654
00:39:30.519 --> 00:39:33.000
John six it would be like you have to eat

655
00:39:33.199 --> 00:39:35.639
in order to be saved. Well, then we could argue

656
00:39:35.639 --> 00:39:43.760
there's theological inconsistency. So, yeah, I'm a I'm not a fan.

657
00:39:43.840 --> 00:39:46.079
I don't think that rule. Really. I think the rule

658
00:39:46.079 --> 00:39:47.960
may apply more to John six than it does to

659
00:39:48.000 --> 00:39:55.320
Proverbs thirty. So to avoid subjective interpretations, applying these hermeneutical

660
00:39:55.760 --> 00:40:00.679
principles consistently leads to a more reliable text based and interpretation.

661
00:40:01.599 --> 00:40:04.880
Proverbs thirty fourteen, the devouring of the people is clearly metaphorical,

662
00:40:04.920 --> 00:40:09.800
symbolizing oppression and exploitation, as supported by the context genre

663
00:40:10.039 --> 00:40:14.239
and philological themes of Proverbs John six fifty three through

664
00:40:14.280 --> 00:40:17.199
fifty seven. Jesus statement about eating his flesh and drinking

665
00:40:17.239 --> 00:40:22.039
his blood are metaphorical, emphasizing the spiritual relationship believers must

666
00:40:22.079 --> 00:40:24.760
have with him. The context of the passage and the

667
00:40:24.880 --> 00:40:29.639
genre of philological discourse support the symbolic understanding. By using

668
00:40:29.800 --> 00:40:32.920
rules of hermeneutics, we can interpret both passages in a

669
00:40:32.960 --> 00:40:36.960
way that is consistent, contextual, and faithful to the intent

670
00:40:37.079 --> 00:40:43.480
of the text, avoiding subjective interpretations that might lead to contradictions.

671
00:40:43.519 --> 00:40:45.920
Now I do agree with that, So let's go through

672
00:40:45.960 --> 00:40:49.440
the rules one more time. What are the rules? The

673
00:40:49.519 --> 00:40:55.800
rules of context, the rules of context. Now, when I

674
00:40:55.880 --> 00:40:58.840
first learned, you know, when I first started, you know,

675
00:40:58.880 --> 00:41:02.440
taking courses on Hermae and you know, working on degrees

676
00:41:02.480 --> 00:41:05.000
and biblical studies, and started trying to become, you know,

677
00:41:05.039 --> 00:41:07.440
as an expert as I could be with all the

678
00:41:07.480 --> 00:41:10.360
concepts of biblical harmoneutics, reading every book I could find

679
00:41:10.400 --> 00:41:15.119
on the subject, I thought it was like, ooh, context,

680
00:41:15.599 --> 00:41:18.320
if we just interpret the Bible in its proper context,

681
00:41:18.599 --> 00:41:21.840
we won't have any problems. That's what I always thought.

682
00:41:21.960 --> 00:41:24.239
But you know what, after a while, I don't even

683
00:41:24.320 --> 00:41:27.760
like even saying it anymore, because every Christian says that, Well,

684
00:41:27.800 --> 00:41:29.559
you just have to look at the context. You just

685
00:41:29.599 --> 00:41:31.360
have to look at the context. You just have to

686
00:41:31.400 --> 00:41:35.199
look at the context. You'll have a Presbyterian or an

687
00:41:35.199 --> 00:41:38.320
a millennial list or or you know, someone from from

688
00:41:38.519 --> 00:41:43.119
you know, an well from an all millennial system of eschatology,

689
00:41:44.480 --> 00:41:46.599
and they will go to the Old Testament, and we're

690
00:41:46.719 --> 00:41:48.880
over and over it mentions Israel, Israel, Israel. Now that

691
00:41:48.880 --> 00:41:52.440
that's not really Israel, that's not really Israel, that's spiritual Israel,

692
00:41:52.559 --> 00:41:55.079
that's the Church, and that land is not really land,

693
00:41:55.400 --> 00:41:57.760
And you're like, what in the world name of bubblegum

694
00:41:57.800 --> 00:41:59.719
are you talking about. You just have to read it

695
00:41:59.719 --> 00:42:03.360
and context. I've heard Presbyterians, so if you would just

696
00:42:03.400 --> 00:42:06.480
read the Bible in context, you would understand why there's

697
00:42:06.559 --> 00:42:09.599
infant baptism. I'm like, or I could just read and

698
00:42:09.639 --> 00:42:12.960
never see the concept. But you're right, I'm not reading

699
00:42:13.039 --> 00:42:16.159
it in context. Everyone claims that, right, Calvinists like, if

700
00:42:16.159 --> 00:42:18.599
you would just read it in context, non Calvinists, if

701
00:42:18.639 --> 00:42:20.880
you just read it in context, Lutherans, if you just

702
00:42:20.920 --> 00:42:23.400
read it in context. At Presbyterians, if you just read

703
00:42:23.440 --> 00:42:25.599
it in context. Baptist, if you would just read it

704
00:42:25.599 --> 00:42:29.239
in context, Charismatics, if you would just read it in context.

705
00:42:29.360 --> 00:42:31.559
Church of Christ, if you would just read it in context.

706
00:42:32.000 --> 00:42:34.480
Everyone says, if you would just read it in context,

707
00:42:34.599 --> 00:42:37.559
we would fix all of our problems. Clearly, just reading

708
00:42:37.599 --> 00:42:41.239
it in context doesn't really fix anything. So that's really

709
00:42:41.239 --> 00:42:43.559
that's really like there was a time I was like,

710
00:42:43.840 --> 00:42:47.159
that's the answer. Well, see, the reason the reason people

711
00:42:47.159 --> 00:42:49.679
don't interpret things the way I interpret them is they

712
00:42:49.760 --> 00:42:51.760
just don't read it in context. If they would read

713
00:42:51.800 --> 00:42:54.119
it in context, of course they would interpret it the

714
00:42:54.119 --> 00:42:58.920
way I interpret it. Now, it is a rule we

715
00:42:59.079 --> 00:43:02.639
have to look at content text. I do agree with that,

716
00:43:04.559 --> 00:43:10.039
but it doesn't matter. It just doesn't matter. I mean,

717
00:43:10.039 --> 00:43:13.519
I've been in too many philological debates and discussions. It

718
00:43:13.719 --> 00:43:16.719
just really it's just a waste of time. I Look,

719
00:43:16.760 --> 00:43:20.079
you'll have someone who'll go to Ezequel thirty six, say,

720
00:43:20.159 --> 00:43:22.440
we get a new heart, we get a new spirit,

721
00:43:22.840 --> 00:43:24.599
we get a new heart, we get a new spirit.

722
00:43:24.679 --> 00:43:27.000
It's right there in Ezequel thirty six. If you would

723
00:43:27.000 --> 00:43:29.320
just read it in its context, if you'll just read

724
00:43:29.360 --> 00:43:31.320
it in its context. I mean I've heard that a

725
00:43:31.440 --> 00:43:33.360
thousand times. I'm like, well, if I go to Ezequel

726
00:43:33.400 --> 00:43:36.320
thirty six and just read it in its context, I'm

727
00:43:36.360 --> 00:43:40.000
gonna see Israel Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel, Israel Israel.

728
00:43:40.039 --> 00:43:42.800
Mentioned I forgot how many times we counted it one

729
00:43:42.800 --> 00:43:45.159
time in church, over and over and over again. And

730
00:43:45.199 --> 00:43:47.559
then it says when they get their new heart, Oh,

731
00:43:47.639 --> 00:43:49.480
then they're going to go into the land, I promise

732
00:43:49.519 --> 00:43:53.239
their fathers. If I just read it in context, the

733
00:43:53.280 --> 00:43:55.159
promise of a new heart here is not for you

734
00:43:55.239 --> 00:43:57.760
or for me, It's for Israel, right before they go

735
00:43:57.880 --> 00:44:02.960
into the land. Oh but no, I'll get I'll get

736
00:44:02.960 --> 00:44:05.440
typically more on the reform side. Oh, you just don't

737
00:44:05.480 --> 00:44:08.000
know how to read, and you just don't know, Herman Nudison,

738
00:44:08.199 --> 00:44:11.079
you would just understand the context. You just don't know.

739
00:44:11.239 --> 00:44:14.199
You're you're basically an idiot. We're smart. I'm like, oh,

740
00:44:14.440 --> 00:44:15.840
I could just say you don't know how to read

741
00:44:15.880 --> 00:44:18.360
the Bible. See, I think I'm reading it correctly. They

742
00:44:18.360 --> 00:44:22.360
think they're reading it correctly. So conn I would love

743
00:44:22.440 --> 00:44:26.159
to think that context fixes everything, but it really doesn't.

744
00:44:26.880 --> 00:44:29.679
I wish it did, but it is still a rule.

745
00:44:30.760 --> 00:44:32.599
So we always have to look at the context. What

746
00:44:32.679 --> 00:44:35.079
that's going to actually accomplish, I don't know. I guess

747
00:44:35.079 --> 00:44:37.239
the one thing it would accomplish is if we could

748
00:44:37.239 --> 00:44:45.960
just get everyone to acknowledge the actual context. Maybe. I mean,

749
00:44:46.239 --> 00:44:50.000
if you read Ezequel thirty six, the context is this real?

750
00:44:50.440 --> 00:44:53.159
How can you get around that? If you're reading Jeremiah

751
00:44:53.199 --> 00:44:55.239
was at twenty nine to eleven the plans I have

752
00:44:55.360 --> 00:44:57.199
for you, if you just read the context, you know

753
00:44:57.239 --> 00:44:59.039
those plans are not for you or for me. Those

754
00:44:59.039 --> 00:45:01.719
are for the people coming out Babylonian captivity. Can we

755
00:45:01.760 --> 00:45:07.400
at least acknowledge that I can do all things through Christ,

756
00:45:07.440 --> 00:45:10.800
which strengthened to me. That's not about you dunking a

757
00:45:10.840 --> 00:45:17.519
basketball or running a marathon. Okay, the context is about contentment, right,

758
00:45:19.760 --> 00:45:23.199
So context matters, but in some ways it doesn't matter.

759
00:45:23.199 --> 00:45:26.880
But it is a rule. The rule of literary genre.

760
00:45:27.119 --> 00:45:29.440
I think this is important. I think this one should

761
00:45:29.440 --> 00:45:31.800
be helpful. A lot of times when people argue with me,

762
00:45:31.840 --> 00:45:34.000
I'll be like, well, what's the literary genre of the

763
00:45:34.000 --> 00:45:38.039
book you're quoting from? I don't But you know what,

764
00:45:38.079 --> 00:45:40.360
even if you even if you kind of stump them

765
00:45:40.679 --> 00:45:42.719
or they do a quick Google search and find out

766
00:45:43.159 --> 00:45:46.480
and they don't really know. It doesn't matter. They're still

767
00:45:46.480 --> 00:45:49.119
going to have the interpretation they want. Doesn't really matter.

768
00:45:51.079 --> 00:45:55.519
But rule of genre, rule of figurative language indicators, Now

769
00:45:55.519 --> 00:45:57.000
you think we should be able to go find the

770
00:45:57.000 --> 00:46:01.800
indicators going, hey, come on, that's I think that's an

771
00:46:01.800 --> 00:46:04.320
indicator that we should take this vigatively. Come on, I

772
00:46:04.320 --> 00:46:06.280
think that's an indicator. Don't you think. Don't you think

773
00:46:06.280 --> 00:46:09.760
that's a good indicator. When Jesus says he's bred, I

774
00:46:09.760 --> 00:46:11.760
think that's a pretty good indicator. When it talks about

775
00:46:11.760 --> 00:46:14.679
people's teeth becoming swords and knives, I think that's a

776
00:46:14.679 --> 00:46:19.679
pretty good indicator. The rule of absurdity, when your literal

777
00:46:19.719 --> 00:46:25.000
interpretation seems to become absord absurd, I think that I

778
00:46:25.000 --> 00:46:26.800
think we should be able to determine that. The problem

779
00:46:26.880 --> 00:46:29.000
is a lot of people won't think their interpretation is

780
00:46:29.159 --> 00:46:34.039
absurd even though it clearly seems to be absurd. And

781
00:46:34.079 --> 00:46:37.039
then rule of philological consistency. Now, I think that's a

782
00:46:37.039 --> 00:46:39.239
good point. If you're going to interpret to passage a

783
00:46:39.239 --> 00:46:42.639
certain way, got to make sure that's philologically consistent with

784
00:46:42.679 --> 00:46:49.880
everything else in the Bible. Right, I think that is fair.

785
00:46:50.639 --> 00:46:53.000
So those are some basic rules. And I just wanted

786
00:46:53.039 --> 00:46:57.199
to contrast Proverbs thirty fourteen and John six fifty three,

787
00:46:57.559 --> 00:46:59.840
just because in one sermon we had fifteen to twenty

788
00:46:59.840 --> 00:47:04.239
men of seeing Proverbs thirty fourteen they're literally eating John

789
00:47:04.360 --> 00:47:09.599
six they're not literally eating. And you're like, but it's

790
00:47:09.679 --> 00:47:17.679
the same type of language. Why why Why? Well, because

791
00:47:17.760 --> 00:47:21.880
guess what literally eating the flesh and drinking the blood

792
00:47:21.880 --> 00:47:26.400
of Christ goes against their theology. Having people eating the

793
00:47:26.440 --> 00:47:31.320
poor doesn't impact their theology. And guess what this determines

794
00:47:31.519 --> 00:47:34.039
or just what demonstrates over and over and over. The

795
00:47:34.079 --> 00:47:38.400
Bible is interpreted not based off rules of hermeneutics. The

796
00:47:38.440 --> 00:47:46.119
Bible is interpreted based off the principles of our theological system.

797
00:47:46.360 --> 00:47:49.320
So if you have a certain theological system, you always

798
00:47:49.400 --> 00:47:53.679
interpret the Bible consistent with your theological system. Our theology

799
00:47:53.760 --> 00:47:58.559
does the interpretation, not hermeneutics. And when your theology is

800
00:47:58.599 --> 00:48:02.679
guiding your interpretation and you're not doing Bible study, you're

801
00:48:02.719 --> 00:48:05.719
simply reading the Bible through the lens of your theology,

802
00:48:06.039 --> 00:48:08.880
You've got to take your theological system and burn it

803
00:48:09.280 --> 00:48:12.400
and throw it in the trash. When you study the Bible.

804
00:48:12.440 --> 00:48:14.760
I'm not saying you can't have a theological system, but

805
00:48:14.800 --> 00:48:16.840
you read and study the Bible and you don't care

806
00:48:17.079 --> 00:48:19.880
if it agrees or disagrees with your theological system. You

807
00:48:19.880 --> 00:48:23.280
don't care because you're not loyal to a thiological system.

808
00:48:23.320 --> 00:48:25.880
You're supposed to be loyal to the scriptures. Well, just

809
00:48:25.920 --> 00:48:27.880
what when you do that? Then you take off everyone.

810
00:48:28.039 --> 00:48:30.039
You take off the reform people, you ticked off, the

811
00:48:30.079 --> 00:48:33.440
non reform people, you take off the a millennialist, the premillennialist,

812
00:48:33.599 --> 00:48:36.559
you take off Calvinists. Non can you take off everyone?

813
00:48:37.360 --> 00:48:40.360
Because everybody thinks the Bible should be interpreted according to

814
00:48:40.400 --> 00:48:50.840
their theological system, and it never is that simple. So

815
00:48:50.920 --> 00:48:54.800
you can at least write these down. Rule of context,

816
00:48:54.880 --> 00:48:57.960
which I don't think actually means anything, rule of genre,

817
00:48:58.639 --> 00:49:02.760
rules of figurative language indicators, rule of absurdity, and rule

818
00:49:02.760 --> 00:49:12.800
of philological consistency. Now we haven't really advanced this very far,

819
00:49:12.960 --> 00:49:16.639
but I had to deal with that because we ended

820
00:49:16.679 --> 00:49:21.440
the last the last study with him going off on Catholics,

821
00:49:21.519 --> 00:49:23.599
and it was just seems so absurd to me, like

822
00:49:23.679 --> 00:49:26.079
he didn't even he didn't even register in his mind. Well,

823
00:49:26.119 --> 00:49:28.760
wait a minute, I've been saying all these passages are

824
00:49:29.199 --> 00:49:31.880
literal eating, but now I'm saying that this passage is

825
00:49:31.920 --> 00:49:36.320
not literal eating. Now you notice he didn't read John six.

826
00:49:36.840 --> 00:49:41.679
He just condemned Catholicism, made fun of them, mock them again,

827
00:49:41.760 --> 00:49:44.239
just you know, being very derogatory instead of just speaking.

828
00:49:44.239 --> 00:49:48.400
And you know, I'm more, I don't know reasonable, you know,

829
00:49:50.199 --> 00:49:52.519
I think a more accurate way. He just kind of

830
00:49:52.639 --> 00:49:57.480
used derogatory terms, but he didn't actually deal with the text.

831
00:49:58.079 --> 00:50:00.840
I've got the Catholic Catechism right here. If I pull

832
00:50:00.880 --> 00:50:03.000
it up and look up the section on the Eucharist,

833
00:50:03.119 --> 00:50:10.559
right on transubstantiation, it's going to quote John Siggs. Well,

834
00:50:10.719 --> 00:50:14.000
why wouldn't John six be literal eating? If Proverbs thirty

835
00:50:14.079 --> 00:50:16.840
is literal eating and Psalm fourteen four is literal eating,

836
00:50:16.840 --> 00:50:19.920
Amica three is literal eating. If all these other passes

837
00:50:20.039 --> 00:50:23.519
is are literal eating and using very similar language, then

838
00:50:23.519 --> 00:50:26.000
why wouldn't it just all of a sudden here, Well,

839
00:50:26.039 --> 00:50:35.480
because well, how do we handle that? All? Right? I

840
00:50:35.559 --> 00:50:38.639
know that leaves us with a million questions, but I

841
00:50:38.679 --> 00:50:40.519
wanted to at least get this done. I know it's

842
00:50:40.559 --> 00:50:43.440
not great. I know it's not perfect. I know, there's

843
00:50:44.760 --> 00:50:48.400
I feel like I'm kinda I feel like someone through

844
00:50:48.440 --> 00:50:50.519
me in the ocean, and I'm just trying to keep

845
00:50:50.519 --> 00:50:52.320
my head above water, trying to figure out what to do.

846
00:50:52.360 --> 00:50:54.960
And I'm overwhelmed with the ocean. Right, I'm like, I

847
00:50:54.960 --> 00:50:57.079
don't even know where we begin with all of this, Like,

848
00:50:57.320 --> 00:51:00.800
how did we get there? We were going to listen

849
00:51:00.840 --> 00:51:03.360
to a message on the allegorical method that just completely

850
00:51:03.639 --> 00:51:06.400
didn't even bother to teach us the allegorical method, so

851
00:51:06.440 --> 00:51:09.199
that was frustrating. And then I go to Proverbs thirty, thinking, Okay,

852
00:51:09.199 --> 00:51:11.760
we can escape all of this. We'll just get to

853
00:51:11.880 --> 00:51:14.239
have a good discussion about Proverbs thirty. And the next thing,

854
00:51:14.239 --> 00:51:17.559
you know, we're like people are eating people and I'm like,

855
00:51:17.639 --> 00:51:25.000
what is happening now? What is going on? So we

856
00:51:25.079 --> 00:51:29.039
will work all of this out at some point where

857
00:51:29.119 --> 00:51:31.760
we will do this, I don't know, but we will

858
00:51:31.760 --> 00:51:35.159
find a We're going to keep putting it together until

859
00:51:35.199 --> 00:51:40.159
we find a solution. So all right, thanks for listening. Everyone,

860
00:51:40.159 --> 00:51:42.400
have a great Saturday. God bless