One Term Only - Evan Jaqua Breaks Politicians Addiction to Power S3-EP10

1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:07,560
Since we've all heard the promises of, you know, anything from no new taxes to no new wars or the lower cost of inflation.

2
00:00:07,560 --> 00:00:10,320
And none of it's ever come true, pretty much ever.

3
00:00:11,080 --> 00:00:17,680
Yeah. I mean, that's a risk until things are actually, you know, say, codified in law.

4
00:00:18,040 --> 00:00:23,620
That, you know, you're going to get somebody who promises to run for just one term.

5
00:00:23,880 --> 00:00:25,660
But when they do it again.

6
00:00:25,740 --> 00:00:29,100
But I think, though, I think the voters will hold them accountable.

7
00:00:30,000 --> 00:00:52,380
All right, everybody.

8
00:00:52,580 --> 00:00:55,720
Welcome back to another episode of the Space Tomatoes podcast.

9
00:00:56,020 --> 00:00:56,840
I'm one of your hosts, Havoc.

10
00:00:57,680 --> 00:00:59,120
I'm the other guy, LX.

11
00:00:59,200 --> 00:00:59,440
Hello.

12
00:00:59,440 --> 00:01:00,140
Welcome back.

13
00:01:00,460 --> 00:01:00,880
All those things.

14
00:01:00,880 --> 00:01:03,040
There's that other guy, the two bearded guys.

15
00:01:03,700 --> 00:01:09,980
Today we're joined by a special guest, Evan Jaqua, creator of the Solutions Party.

16
00:01:11,580 --> 00:01:12,840
Welcome to the show, Evan.

17
00:01:13,320 --> 00:01:15,180
Well, thank you, Havoc and Alex.

18
00:01:15,260 --> 00:01:19,900
I have really been looking forward to this show for a long time, and I'm excited to be here,

19
00:01:19,960 --> 00:01:23,000
and I'm looking forward to a great conversation.

20
00:01:24,380 --> 00:01:25,880
Well, that sounds like our gig.

21
00:01:27,240 --> 00:01:28,360
We'll try our best.

22
00:01:28,360 --> 00:01:39,400
All right. So, excuse me, let's jump right in. What is the Solutions Party and what's the premise of it?

23
00:01:39,680 --> 00:01:47,540
Okay. Well, I think it really helps to just give a little bit of a background. I've spent most of the last 40 years, in fact, most of my life overseas.

24
00:01:47,540 --> 00:01:58,200
I spent 20 years in Japan. I actually got my master's degree there, worked there. I was the Naranani student. I worked for a Japanese company.

25
00:01:58,360 --> 00:02:04,140
was self-employed. Then I lived in China for a bit, communist China. And then most over the last

26
00:02:04,140 --> 00:02:11,160
20 years, I've been in South America. And I've had the wonderful opportunity to talk to different

27
00:02:11,160 --> 00:02:17,040
people around the world about the sort of issues and problems that they see in their government and

28
00:02:17,040 --> 00:02:22,960
their politicians. And based on those many conversations, I've sort of summarized them

29
00:02:22,960 --> 00:02:28,520
on my blog, which is solutionsparty.org. I would like to take all the credit for those ideas,

30
00:02:28,680 --> 00:02:37,040
but really, they were inspired by many people. And what it really comes down to, the core,

31
00:02:37,360 --> 00:02:42,600
the scene, the lowest common denominator of all these discussions seems to be something very,

32
00:02:42,700 --> 00:02:50,380
very basic. And I like to even start off talking about physiology, the human brain. You know,

33
00:02:50,380 --> 00:02:55,860
the human brain is a wonderful, amazing thing. But one of its greatest weaknesses is the ease

34
00:02:55,860 --> 00:03:00,640
with which it forms addictions. You know, people get addicted to alcohol. As I know, in my family,

35
00:03:00,640 --> 00:03:08,300
we've had lots of issues with that. Drugs, gambling, social media. Yeah, my dad was a tobacco.

36
00:03:08,980 --> 00:03:15,1000
And probably the most addictive thing of all, though, is power. And that once people get it,

37
00:03:16,000 --> 00:03:22,080
they do not want to give it up and in fact they can completely as john boehner the speaker of the

38
00:03:22,080 --> 00:03:27,380
house said he said he saw people get a little bit of power and it completely changed them and

39
00:03:27,380 --> 00:03:31,380
this is what to be expected if you've ever known somebody with an out of control addiction

40
00:03:31,380 --> 00:03:37,180
you know it completely changes them because the addiction becomes the priority you know i like to

41
00:03:37,180 --> 00:03:42,020
say well you know bladimir putin would probably even be a nice guy if you were a plumber outside

42
00:03:42,020 --> 00:03:45,960
of moscow somewhere you know you could probably go out and have a beer with them and be a lot of

43
00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:50,780
or Kim Jong-un, the North Korean dictator. Imagine how different he'd be if you were running an

44
00:03:50,780 --> 00:03:57,860
Airbnb in Hawaii and surfing every day. What turns these people in those cases from, you know,

45
00:03:58,020 --> 00:04:05,100
probably ordinary people in normal circumstances into vicious mass burden killers? It's their

46
00:04:05,100 --> 00:04:11,360
obsession with power. And we see that in our own government. You know, one of the reasons why our

47
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:16,460
our legislative branch is so subservient to the executive branch is because our politicians,

48
00:04:16,660 --> 00:04:24,020
our representatives, and our senators, they are so petrified at the thought of being primaried.

49
00:04:24,020 --> 00:04:30,720
So they all become compliant. So we have to acknowledge the fact that our politicians'

50
00:04:31,580 --> 00:04:38,320
first priority is getting reelected and supporting the special interests that help

51
00:04:38,320 --> 00:04:47,760
keep them in power. And so what I like to say is, you know, Havoc or Alex, if I were your doctor

52
00:04:47,760 --> 00:04:53,160
and I had to prescribe to you guys a very highly addictive medication, what would be the way to

53
00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:57,980
prescribe that, but minimize the probability you're going to get addicted to it? Well,

54
00:04:58,060 --> 00:05:04,480
I'd give you small doses spread apart. That's exactly how power must be allocated in small

55
00:05:04,480 --> 00:05:06,160
doses spread apart.

56
00:05:06,160 --> 00:05:18,880
So the fundamental idea behind the Solutions Party is one term limits You get one chance to make your mark on history There is no re possibility here

57
00:05:18,980 --> 00:05:20,680
In fact, you can't even run for another office

58
00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:21,520
while you're serving.

59
00:05:22,360 --> 00:05:26,180
And that means you don't dedicate 50% of your time

60
00:05:26,180 --> 00:05:29,560
to raising funds for your next campaign like they do now.

61
00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:32,120
You don't spend your time going to campaign rallies.

62
00:05:32,340 --> 00:05:35,620
You don't spend your time with the lobbyists

63
00:05:35,620 --> 00:05:37,200
of the special interests that support you.

64
00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:43,060
You focus exclusively on your job and history will hold you accountable.

65
00:05:43,420 --> 00:06:04,440
Now, I just want to say one last thing before I stop this sermon is our problems are complex and they require multifaceted and reinforcing, mutually reinforcing remedies, solutions, which is why I have a whole package of proposals that talk only about no reelection,

66
00:06:04,440 --> 00:06:11,080
But talk about reforming our political parties, our tribal, mindlessly tribal political parties.

67
00:06:11,360 --> 00:06:25,380
Talk about how we can make our journalism robust again, reforming our judiciary, reforming our elections, attacking all of the various weak points of our democracy so that it can achieve its, what I like to say, majestic potential.

68
00:06:26,240 --> 00:06:29,720
So in a long, big nutshell, that's what it's all about.

69
00:06:29,720 --> 00:06:37,1000
that's definitely an interesting uh concept i would think a lot of uh the people being governed

70
00:06:37,1000 --> 00:06:42,720
would certainly go for that i think the biggest obstacle would be getting the people doing the

71
00:06:42,720 --> 00:06:47,960
governing to sign up and say oh that's a good good idea because it would certainly change the entire

72
00:06:47,960 --> 00:06:54,860
paradigm for them yeah yeah i mean you're you're you're you're in kind of a a bind here right and

73
00:06:54,860 --> 00:06:57,960
And so I guess my first challenge to this is this.

74
00:06:58,560 --> 00:07:06,960
You are literally asking the people in power and attracting wealth to themselves to undo that for themselves.

75
00:07:07,960 --> 00:07:15,260
And that removes their pull, their ability to attain future power and wealth and everything else.

76
00:07:15,380 --> 00:07:20,520
So the only way, how do you get that done without, I mean, you know what I mean?

77
00:07:20,560 --> 00:07:24,180
You literally would have to come in, sweep the floor and say, everyone has to go now.

78
00:07:24,180 --> 00:07:48,920
I'm on this. You're not going to vote on whether or not you get term limits or not. Here's the deal. It's a done deal. You got to go. Other than that, I don't see how you get that done unless you've got an idea that that kind of surpasses this. And I would even put forward that that things like the Libertarian Party are a great kind of a plumb bob for this. Right.

79
00:07:48,920 --> 00:07:53,1000
the libertarian party has been trying to get into debates forever. And every time they get the

80
00:07:53,1000 --> 00:07:59,420
required number of signatures or whatever to get into the next debate, the rules change so that

81
00:07:59,420 --> 00:08:06,360
it's higher. Sorry, I can't come into the debate. Right. So how do you get past these types of

82
00:08:06,360 --> 00:08:14,400
entrenched systemic nightmarish problems? Gosh, you know, I hadn't thought about that.

83
00:08:14,400 --> 00:08:17,680
So I guess our conversation has come to an end. No, I'm just kidding.

84
00:08:18,920 --> 00:08:23,540
No, but that's what the true miracle of this is.

85
00:08:23,640 --> 00:08:31,680
Now, in an ideal world, all of this would be codified in law, one term, all these rules.

86
00:08:31,800 --> 00:08:33,740
But the thing is, is that we don't need that.

87
00:08:33,740 --> 00:08:47,660
All you need is the people to buy into that and to vote for candidates who promise, until we have this in law, who promise to serve only one term, just like Abraham Lincoln only served one term, just as he said he would.

88
00:08:47,660 --> 00:08:59,960
And so what we need are candidates who would be in lieu of having a hard wired limit who say, I'm only going to serve one term.

89
00:09:00,140 --> 00:09:06,920
I'm going to dedicate myself 100 percent to advancing the ideas that I have proposed.

90
00:09:07,500 --> 00:09:14,400
I'm going to go into Washington with the idea or the state legislature with the idea of, you know, I'm going to propose those ideas.

91
00:09:14,400 --> 00:09:28,480
I'm going to advocate for this. I'm going to fight for this. But I'm going to also understand that a democracy is a competition of ideas and that a democracy doesn't work when you have elected representatives who have the attitude my way or the highway.

92
00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:37,740
You know, we've always the great thing about our democracy is that precisely because it is a competition of ideas.

93
00:09:37,740 --> 00:09:57,220
And if it were an honest competition of ideas by people who, yeah, we want their diversity of points of view, but are also open minded enough to compromise and take the best ideas from across the political spectrum and move forward, which is a far better system than what the autocrats, the autocratic countries are offering.

94
00:09:57,220 --> 00:10:06,900
which is one idea, one opinion, no discussion. Our system is inherently far stronger because of

95
00:10:06,900 --> 00:10:13,780
the competition of our ideas. And what we need are elected officials who put those, you know,

96
00:10:13,820 --> 00:10:19,220
their priorities of serving the public, the general interests first, instead of the special interests

97
00:10:19,220 --> 00:10:35,159
that feed their addiction that keep them in power If you want to have control over somebody you know the best way is to have control over their addictions which is exactly what we have now So that how I would argue this Let get candidates who promise to serve one term

98
00:10:37,059 --> 00:10:45,639
So you can't, so don't get me wrong. I think these are valid ideas. I think these are,

99
00:10:45,639 --> 00:10:52,179
you know, in more a correct direction, at least what we've talked about so far.

100
00:10:53,219 --> 00:11:00,579
But again, you're talking about a country that, you know, literally is, you know, so,

101
00:11:01,879 --> 00:11:06,819
okay, I guess at the root of this, I would posit that the problem is not the system. The problem,

102
00:11:06,819 --> 00:11:30,679
The system is it's working exactly as designed. And the problem, I think, is something you identified right out of the gate, which is power. And, you know, kind of again, the big piece here is that power is not going to allow itself to be, you know, it's not going to vote itself out of power, money, fame, etc. Right.

103
00:11:30,679 --> 00:11:41,379
But in the voters, you know, I, you know, I mean, you know, I can tell you're not a young person and you've been around the block.

104
00:11:41,499 --> 00:11:46,839
You know, you've traveled, you've seen things, you've probably paid quite a good deal of attention.

105
00:11:47,399 --> 00:11:53,859
But getting voters to agree on anything is next to impossible.

106
00:11:53,859 --> 00:11:56,519
And there's a real reason for that.

107
00:11:56,519 --> 00:12:03,599
what you know if we all said hey what do you want to eat for lunch right right off the bat our desire

108
00:12:03,599 --> 00:12:07,719
is going to be different it doesn't make it wrong it doesn't that's hard enough when you get two

109
00:12:07,719 --> 00:12:13,739
people voting on that question right and so and so now you're talking about people agreeing to vote

110
00:12:13,739 --> 00:12:22,519
in a candidate uh and you know people have ideas that they want to push across i i you know personally

111
00:12:22,519 --> 00:12:34,559
uh, uh, anyway, I don't see how you can take such a divided group of people and, and realizing

112
00:12:34,559 --> 00:12:40,819
if you just sit back for a moment, just literally sit back for a moment and realize the division

113
00:12:40,819 --> 00:12:42,459
is all manufactured, right?

114
00:12:42,519 --> 00:12:42,979
Of course.

115
00:12:42,979 --> 00:12:47,399
And you can point this out to them and they will defend the division.

116
00:12:47,899 --> 00:12:48,339
Okay.

117
00:12:48,339 --> 00:13:03,379
How do you get them then to say, oh, yeah, we're going to do this and we're going to hold them accountable when you've got situations historically that I've seen all the way from days to now where, you know, the promises are made.

118
00:13:03,379 --> 00:13:11,479
They're not kept. There's no accountability. Congress has had a dismal rating for I don't even know.

119
00:13:11,479 --> 00:13:20,639
gosh, last 35 years, it's been like in the under 20%, you know, approval rating. And yet the same

120
00:13:20,639 --> 00:13:29,539
people are still in Congress from when I was, you know, from Carter era. So, you know, I see what

121
00:13:29,539 --> 00:13:36,079
you're saying, but I guess my concern is how do you practically get this movement going? And how

122
00:13:36,079 --> 00:13:42,119
do you practically influence the public? And Alex and I like to talk about this. We have a diverse

123
00:13:42,119 --> 00:13:48,039
group of friends and some of them are, you know, we are all on varying levels of the spectrum of

124
00:13:48,039 --> 00:13:54,639
political ideology, right? We come together every year and we have an absolutely great time for four

125
00:13:54,639 --> 00:14:02,999
days at my house and we just hang out and go do goofy stuff and sing karaoke and we all get along.

126
00:14:02,999 --> 00:14:15,459
But if you try and convince people outside that this is a reality and the manufactured division is just that, manufactured, they will defend the division and tell you you're wrong.

127
00:14:17,359 --> 00:14:31,119
Well, you know, this brings up, you know, the division actually benefits to the, you know, dividing people, exacerbating division, stoking emotions, getting one group to play off against another.

128
00:14:31,119 --> 00:14:33,779
This is the oldest trick in the book.

129
00:14:33,839 --> 00:14:34,979
And how do they achieve that?

130
00:14:35,099 --> 00:14:42,879
Well, they achieve that through misinformation, through lies, through stoking the culture wars.

131
00:14:43,439 --> 00:14:49,879
Now, I think that people are sick and tired of things how they are.

132
00:14:50,059 --> 00:14:52,499
And so I think people will be receptive to these ideas.

133
00:14:52,939 --> 00:14:56,679
Now, when you're talking about, you see, the thing is you can have –

134
00:14:56,679 --> 00:14:57,159
But the people are sick and tired.

135
00:14:57,839 --> 00:14:58,099
Yep.

136
00:14:58,799 --> 00:15:01,099
I'm just going to say you can have –

137
00:15:01,099 --> 00:15:02,979
Okay, go ahead, please. No, I was just going to say.

138
00:15:03,199 --> 00:15:04,279
No, no, no, no, please.

139
00:15:05,019 --> 00:15:15,599
I was just going to say that, you know, when we're talking about candidates for office, whether they're more on the conservative side or the liberal side, you know, they're going to be competing for that office.

140
00:15:15,599 --> 00:15:17,819
But that's good. That's a great thing.

141
00:15:17,859 --> 00:15:28,819
But the point is, is that if the ones that are running for that office, whether they're liberal or conservative, promise to serve only one term, that's the key.

142
00:15:28,819 --> 00:15:45,319
Now you know that why you know you bring up a lot of points and this is exactly why you have to have a whole what I would say a spectrum of different things of proposals that you want to implement to address these different problems

143
00:15:45,459 --> 00:15:52,079
Now, why do we have this division? Why do we have this? Well, so much of it has to do with our

144
00:15:52,079 --> 00:15:59,239
journalism. Our journalism, you know, in the old days, let's just say before the internet, you know,

145
00:15:59,239 --> 00:16:04,299
So, you know, if you want to start a newspaper, say, it was a huge investment.

146
00:16:04,419 --> 00:16:05,799
You had to buy the printing presses.

147
00:16:05,959 --> 00:16:06,839
You had to have reporters.

148
00:16:07,059 --> 00:16:08,619
You had to have a way to distribute the papers.

149
00:16:08,739 --> 00:16:13,499
You have an advertising department starting a news television syndicate or radio syndicate.

150
00:16:13,499 --> 00:16:14,179
It was a huge investment.

151
00:16:14,519 --> 00:16:18,919
Now anybody with a laptop and a web page can start a quote-unquote news site.

152
00:16:19,019 --> 00:16:22,719
So the basic model of news has broken down.

153
00:16:22,719 --> 00:16:27,079
That's why so many small-town newspapers and others have gone out of business.

154
00:16:27,079 --> 00:16:35,839
so we have to recognize that the traditional model of news is is no longer uh except for a few cases

155
00:16:35,839 --> 00:16:41,879
has uh has broken down and so what a lot of these major stations have done or you know channels or

156
00:16:41,879 --> 00:16:48,939
news organizations have done is they've switched from being uh trying to provide the news in a more

157
00:16:48,939 --> 00:16:53,959
or less honest way they become more entertainment channels they become more in the business of

158
00:16:53,959 --> 00:17:00,079
emotion manipulation. Just as the author Tobin Smith, I think it was a former Fox News,

159
00:17:00,159 --> 00:17:04,579
he wrote a book on this subject. And what was the first thing it would discuss every morning? Well,

160
00:17:04,899 --> 00:17:09,979
what are the stories that can stoke people's emotions? What are the stories that can get

161
00:17:09,979 --> 00:17:16,059
people feeling that daily dose of rage that they're addicted to? And so this is what our

162
00:17:16,059 --> 00:17:21,939
news organizations in so many cases have become. And this is why the division has become so

163
00:17:21,939 --> 00:17:28,779
so pronounced and so um so out of control so one of the things that we need to do if you think that

164
00:17:28,779 --> 00:17:34,819
um that this the pen is mightier than the sword which i happen to believe is that we have to

165
00:17:34,819 --> 00:17:41,159
consider that our journalism is as important to our national defense as our armed forces our armed

166
00:17:41,159 --> 00:17:46,519
forces protect us from enemies from without our journalism protects us from enemies from both

167
00:17:46,519 --> 00:17:54,019
within and without. And so what I've proposed some ideas to help make our journalism robust again,

168
00:17:54,019 --> 00:18:01,319
because I think that once we have a widely trusted, our journalism and our news organizations

169
00:18:01,319 --> 00:18:08,459
are more widely trusted, I think that'll go a long way to help reducing the division,

170
00:18:08,539 --> 00:18:15,719
because so much of the division now is due to the fact that our journalism is so untrusted.

171
00:18:15,719 --> 00:18:28,239
And that means the politicians and the entertainment news, entertainment channels can control the narrative, which for a politician to be able to control the narrative is, you know, is the cat's meow.

172
00:18:28,659 --> 00:18:31,159
We don't want the politicians to control the narrative.

173
00:18:31,539 --> 00:18:37,739
We want people to have the facts and that will go a long way to keeping the politicians honest.

174
00:18:37,799 --> 00:18:44,359
And we also have to implement real ramifications for politicians or candidates who lie.

175
00:18:44,359 --> 00:18:50,839
and uh you know like if i'm if i'm if i'm you know interviewing for a job with you and you catch me

176
00:18:50,839 --> 00:18:56,539
lying during the interview you have every right to kick me out of the interview if i'm working for

177
00:18:56,539 --> 00:19:03,119
you and i lie to you about some aspect of my job you have every right to fire me well our politicians

178
00:19:03,119 --> 00:19:10,219
when they lie they violate the sacred responsibility of a democracy and that is to be truthful to the

179
00:19:10,219 --> 00:19:15,079
voters, because just as a market economy assumes that the consumers have a perfect knowledge of

180
00:19:15,079 --> 00:19:22,859
their choices, a democracy assumes that the voters are perfectly informed. And we've got to work

181
00:19:22,859 --> 00:19:29,519
things back to a place where our voters, our electorate, our public, the citizenry,

182
00:19:30,199 --> 00:19:36,219
has much more faith, has a common set of facts that we can believe in and keep our politicians

183
00:19:36,219 --> 00:19:42,199
on us. So I think the division comes back to a couple of things. For one, the lack of trust in

184
00:19:42,199 --> 00:19:47,959
our journalism, and two, our politicians who will say anything, who will say anything to stay in

185
00:19:47,959 --> 00:19:57,019
office, no matter how outrageous. So go ahead. I was going to ask, how do you enforce even the

186
00:19:57,019 --> 00:20:05,399
promise that they would only run for one session in there instead of keeping running again?

187
00:20:05,399 --> 00:20:14,319
When the incentive is there, you know, these politicians get their salary, but then they walk out having, you know,

188
00:20:14,539 --> 00:20:18,119
portfolio was worth hundreds of millions of dollars because of whatever they're doing in there.

189
00:20:18,259 --> 00:20:24,819
And that incentive would be much more than a promise, I would think, since we've all heard the promises of, you know,

190
00:20:24,839 --> 00:20:29,999
anything from no new taxes to no new wars or the lower cost of inflation.

191
00:20:29,999 --> 00:20:32,759
And none of it's ever come true, pretty much ever.

192
00:20:32,759 --> 00:20:48,099
Yeah, I mean, that's a risk until things are actually, you know, say, codified in law, that, you know, you're going to get somebody who promises to run for just one term, but when they do it again.

193
00:20:50,011 --> 00:20:55,511
I think the voters will hold them accountable because I think voters will have voted for them precisely because they made that promise.

194
00:20:55,951 --> 00:21:04,391
And if they violate that promise, I think that they will they'll be treated accordingly when the elections come around.

195
00:21:04,391 --> 00:21:12,131
I mean, that, you know, that is the one risk is that you get liars who are going to say, oh, yeah, I'll only be one term.

196
00:21:12,191 --> 00:21:14,571
And I promise not to run for another office while I'm serving.

197
00:21:14,571 --> 00:21:22,791
But then they drink the Kool-Aid and they say, you know, if it's not me, you know, I'm the only one who can solve these problems type of stuff.

198
00:21:23,051 --> 00:21:24,811
And that is a risk.

199
00:21:25,051 --> 00:21:34,531
And until things are, you know, hopefully at some point actually written into law, that is something that, you know, you can't guarantee against.

200
00:21:34,831 --> 00:21:36,551
You know, you just can't.

201
00:21:36,551 --> 00:21:45,351
But I think, though, that if people buy into this idea of one term, and this, by the way, is not only my idea.

202
00:21:45,531 --> 00:21:49,071
It's the great conservative writer Thomas Sowell.

203
00:21:49,331 --> 00:21:57,991
He said the problem with term limits is the S, and that once you have even one re-election, that's going to become the priority.

204
00:21:58,451 --> 00:22:00,891
That's going to become what their first priority is.

205
00:22:01,071 --> 00:22:05,091
And so I think that people in this country are ready for a change.

206
00:22:05,091 --> 00:22:08,051
I think people in this country are sick and tired of the division.

207
00:22:08,711 --> 00:22:15,211
And, you know, I participate a lot on X, and I engage with people who can be really vicious.

208
00:22:15,451 --> 00:22:17,431
I mean, as you know, they're just really vicious.

209
00:22:17,531 --> 00:22:18,811
They start off with insults.

210
00:22:18,871 --> 00:22:28,991
But I have found that if you engage with them and you get beyond that first wall of just rage and emotion, you actually can have a pretty productive conversation.

211
00:22:28,991 --> 00:22:31,331
and even if you agree to disagree,

212
00:22:31,851 --> 00:22:33,031
I have found that,

213
00:22:33,231 --> 00:22:34,851
I have friends across the political spectrum

214
00:22:34,851 --> 00:22:36,011
and they're all great people.

215
00:22:36,211 --> 00:22:37,511
Whether you're talking about people

216
00:22:37,511 --> 00:22:38,331
who are hardcore MAGA

217
00:22:38,331 --> 00:22:40,251
or people who are socialists,

218
00:22:40,631 --> 00:22:42,011
the thing is that

219
00:22:42,011 --> 00:22:44,671
we all want the same thing, really.

220
00:22:44,791 --> 00:22:45,511
We all want freedom

221
00:22:45,511 --> 00:22:46,671
and we all want prosperity.

222
00:22:47,411 --> 00:22:49,271
The bad news is we have different ideas.

223
00:22:49,471 --> 00:22:50,811
Well, that's actually the good news.

224
00:22:50,951 --> 00:22:52,091
We have different ideas.

225
00:22:52,231 --> 00:22:52,991
Let's hear the ideas.

226
00:22:53,111 --> 00:22:54,671
Let's hear what they have to say.

227
00:22:54,671 --> 00:22:56,251
Let's not demonize people,

228
00:22:56,991 --> 00:22:58,271
knee-jerk demonize them.

229
00:22:58,271 --> 00:23:04,131
Let's hear their ideas and and decide which ideas we like best and move forward.

230
00:23:06,291 --> 00:23:12,951
Yeah, on the on the on the journalist, journalistic reform portions.

231
00:23:12,951 --> 00:23:20,751
Right. So, you know, you did point out something and I want to believe at this point that there is truth to it.

232
00:23:20,751 --> 00:23:31,391
I remember growing up and watching news and I still to this day want to believe that what we were being told was truthful and accurate.

233
00:23:32,571 --> 00:23:37,471
But I have very low confidence of that.

234
00:23:37,831 --> 00:23:49,931
I guess one of the things, excuse me, that I that I would point out, though, is that, you know, while our journalism has been largely turned to entertainment.

235
00:23:49,931 --> 00:23:50,431
Right.

236
00:23:50,751 --> 00:23:55,771
And, you know, I would even go as far as to say, you know, a propaganda wing.

237
00:23:55,771 --> 00:23:57,871
I don't disagree.

238
00:23:58,011 --> 00:24:03,451
One of the one of the things that that is, you know, quite interesting to me.

239
00:24:03,531 --> 00:24:19,871
And I think, you know, I I I recognize this as being a huge positive is there are a lot of guys with a laptop out there that are doing journalistic work and exposing things that no media has ever dared challenge.

240
00:24:19,871 --> 00:24:45,731
No media has ever dared to err or try to. You know, I mean, we could just go straight back to Julian Assange, right? One man with a laptop is what started that. And I'm sorry, but exposing Abu Ghraib would have never been done by a media outlet in the United States, no matter what independent, you know, organization you put as oversight, because it would be damaging.

241
00:24:45,731 --> 00:24:49,031
and that's a scary thing to me, right?

242
00:24:49,151 --> 00:24:53,451
So while I agree that journalistic reform needs to happen,

243
00:24:53,611 --> 00:24:56,771
I think really what needs to happen is there should, you know,

244
00:24:56,951 --> 00:25:01,411
honestly, it should just, I don't know.

245
00:25:01,411 --> 00:25:03,871
I have a thing.

246
00:25:03,951 --> 00:25:05,691
I don't want to control journalism, right?

247
00:25:05,751 --> 00:25:07,671
It goes back to the First Amendment, right?

248
00:25:08,451 --> 00:25:11,731
If I take a laptop and a pen and I want to go cover a story

249
00:25:11,731 --> 00:25:13,711
and write about it, I should be able to do so.

250
00:25:13,711 --> 00:25:21,391
on that same vein, if I write a piece that is BS, I should be called out and I should be,

251
00:25:21,611 --> 00:25:28,431
I should have to retract that and, you know, update that. And I think, you know, we lack any

252
00:25:28,431 --> 00:25:35,031
kind of a system for that. So how do you keep the, the, you know, freedom of the press and the

253
00:25:35,031 --> 00:25:43,151
first amendment tied together, but then reform journalistic integrity? Sure. That's a very,

254
00:25:43,291 --> 00:25:47,071
very good question. And I'm not, you know, railing against the one guy with the laptop,

255
00:25:47,071 --> 00:25:51,631
but the problem is, is that there's so much stuff out there. Nobody knows what's true,

256
00:25:51,631 --> 00:26:10,748
what false And you know this is especially crucial in as these deep fakes become more sophisticated because for example if somebody makes a deep fake video you Alex of robbing a bank and posts it or doing something awful

257
00:26:11,248 --> 00:26:14,728
OK, how are we going to know if that's true or not?

258
00:26:14,788 --> 00:26:17,748
Some people are just going to automatically believe it's true because they want to.

259
00:26:17,828 --> 00:26:19,768
And other people might be more skeptical.

260
00:26:20,108 --> 00:26:21,188
So what is the solution?

261
00:26:21,328 --> 00:26:25,348
Well, I think that, OK, we don't want to take anybody's freedom of speech away.

262
00:26:25,348 --> 00:26:54,448
And so what I am proposing are two things is one, let's have an organization like this is a society of professional journalists and maybe other independent organizations. Let's have a certification process. So like if you get a journalism degree, you automatically get certified. If you have a, you know, a long career in journalism, you're automatically certified. But that in itself is not enough. You've got to grade the journalist.

263
00:26:54,448 --> 00:27:08,668
So how do we grade the journalists based on things like the neutrality of their articles, the relevance of their articles, the fact-based nature of their articles, the neutrality, these things?

264
00:27:08,768 --> 00:27:10,368
How do you evaluate that?

265
00:27:10,428 --> 00:27:21,808
And how do you evaluate news organizations in general so that they are evaluated as neutral, as providing relevant neutral or providing at least a balanced different points of view?

266
00:27:21,808 --> 00:27:23,828
Well, you have an evaluation system.

267
00:27:23,908 --> 00:27:25,488
And how would that evaluation system work?

268
00:27:25,528 --> 00:27:29,428
It would be something like Rotten Tomatoes, where you have a whole bunch of different critics.

269
00:27:29,988 --> 00:27:32,248
And a lot of these could be AI programs, by the way.

270
00:27:32,308 --> 00:27:35,728
You could have independently developed AI programs, which will –

271
00:27:35,728 --> 00:27:36,748
I'm not saying –

272
00:27:36,748 --> 00:27:37,988
That's a terrible idea.

273
00:27:38,388 --> 00:27:39,328
Terrible idea.

274
00:27:39,448 --> 00:27:40,108
Well, okay.

275
00:27:40,828 --> 00:27:42,928
I'm not saying that that would be the only one.

276
00:27:43,108 --> 00:27:45,808
But you would have a series of AI programs on one hand.

277
00:27:45,808 --> 00:27:55,408
But you would also have professional evaluators who would evaluate, you know, given articles and given journalists, you know, their tendency over time.

278
00:27:55,468 --> 00:27:58,628
And based on that, you generate an average grade.

279
00:27:58,628 --> 00:28:10,568
Now, the higher the grade is, the idea is to have a national press fund, is what I call it, into which the government contribute, corporations contribute, citizens can contribute, anybody can contribute.

280
00:28:10,568 --> 00:28:17,388
And if you're a certified journalist, you would automatically qualify for a stipend for each article you write.

281
00:28:17,508 --> 00:28:27,908
That would bring back small-town journalism, which is pretty much dead in our country, which is a tragedy because small-town journalism has acted as a watchdog on local corruption.

282
00:28:28,408 --> 00:28:31,788
And the higher your evaluation, the bigger your stipend.

283
00:28:32,028 --> 00:28:40,188
And on the other hand, if your grade falls below a certain level, you actually risk being decertified.

284
00:28:40,188 --> 00:28:45,708
Now, the thing is, you don't have to be certified to call yourself a news station.

285
00:28:46,048 --> 00:28:51,128
Fox News, for example, or MSCBC could continue to operate just as they are now.

286
00:28:51,208 --> 00:28:52,108
They just wouldn't be certified.

287
00:28:52,748 --> 00:28:56,408
And, you know, any guy with a laptop could still continue to publish what they want.

288
00:28:56,468 --> 00:28:57,228
They just wouldn't be certified.

289
00:28:57,348 --> 00:29:02,708
But if they published a video of LX robbing a bank, well, the first question is, was that

290
00:29:02,708 --> 00:29:08,248
video posted on a certified news site or was it posted on Joe's Weekly World news site?

291
00:29:08,248 --> 00:29:22,768
And if a certified news site posts it, they would say that we cannot verify that this is an authentic video or this video is not authentic we've shown or they don't publish it at all.

292
00:29:23,688 --> 00:29:25,528
I think this is what you have to have.

293
00:29:25,588 --> 00:29:31,108
You have to have just like we certify doctors, we certify lawyers, we certify truck drivers, we certify despedious engineers.

294
00:29:31,108 --> 00:29:52,428
We should have a certification process in place for our journalists and a way to evaluate them in ways that give them incentives, that give them incentives to write better articles and to write more relevant and neutral fact-based articles and give opinions that are based on principles.

295
00:29:52,428 --> 00:30:04,908
And when I say principles, not the sort of journalists who are opinion columnists who will change their opinions if you just switch the names of the people or parties around, which is a big problem.

296
00:30:04,908 --> 00:30:10,248
I was going to say, so you're talking, again, we're going to go back to the human condition.

297
00:30:11,828 --> 00:30:18,848
Fields like this tend to quite often be biased one way or another, period.

298
00:30:19,008 --> 00:30:19,828
It's just a fact.

299
00:30:19,828 --> 00:30:24,028
I'm going to go back to the year 2020 and you can watch what happened.

300
00:30:24,448 --> 00:30:27,548
And I'm sorry, but that was a massive bias.

301
00:30:27,668 --> 00:30:32,388
Now, how do you keep the bias out of that group and who audits the auditors?

302
00:30:32,488 --> 00:30:39,488
If you've got a group of independent journalists that are in this group, who's auditing that group and who's auditing that?

303
00:30:39,488 --> 00:30:40,148
You see what I'm saying?

304
00:30:40,148 --> 00:30:51,588
How do you actually keep that group from becoming, you know, swayed and, you know, weighted towards, you know, one ideology or another or bias?

305
00:30:51,748 --> 00:30:53,288
Human bias is a reality.

306
00:30:53,428 --> 00:31:00,068
Look, anyone says they're non-biased is absolutely completely full of what's in the back pasture.

307
00:31:00,308 --> 00:31:03,728
OK, and it's just a reality.

308
00:31:03,888 --> 00:31:08,048
We all have biases and we can go back to the lunch thing, right?

309
00:31:08,288 --> 00:31:09,368
Like, I don't want to eat liver.

310
00:31:09,368 --> 00:31:20,824
I am biased against liver Sorry just not going to happen And no doesn matter who prepares it Well yeah that you you exactly right That just why you have to have multiple

311
00:31:20,824 --> 00:31:24,984
many, just like you have many movie critics. Some critics are going to look at a movie

312
00:31:24,984 --> 00:31:29,004
and 90% of them might say it's a great movie. 10% of them will say it's trash,

313
00:31:29,144 --> 00:31:33,804
but this is why, and you have to have faith that not all of them, it's not going to be just lemming

314
00:31:33,804 --> 00:31:37,264
that you're going to get a variety of opinions and you try to keep it honest. Now you,

315
00:31:37,264 --> 00:31:40,724
You say that, you know, about the AI idea.

316
00:31:40,844 --> 00:31:42,484
Well, you know, I actually worked in AI.

317
00:31:42,684 --> 00:31:45,504
And I know it, believe me, I know it's not a panacea.

318
00:31:46,704 --> 00:31:50,804
You know, I tell people, well, you know, there's a real solution to out of control AI.

319
00:31:51,024 --> 00:31:52,364
It's called unplugging the machine.

320
00:31:52,944 --> 00:31:57,644
You know, I, and so, you know, why AI is not perfect.

321
00:31:58,124 --> 00:32:05,644
It actually can, I think, this is one of the things where it could actually help be a check on the human element, the human.

322
00:32:05,644 --> 00:32:16,664
Now, these AI programs are going to have some bias built in, but they're going to have different – anybody who could develop an AI program to evaluate through these evaluations.

323
00:32:16,824 --> 00:32:23,604
They would have to – in order for these things to be recognized about, they would have to go through a series of evaluating some standard articles.

324
00:32:24,544 --> 00:32:30,724
And if they pass that, then they could be included in the evaluation process.

325
00:32:31,564 --> 00:32:34,504
But who – so, and again, back to the biases, right?

326
00:32:34,504 --> 00:32:36,364
Who develops those standards?

327
00:32:36,964 --> 00:32:41,804
And when you look at that, you're going to have embedded biases in there.

328
00:32:42,344 --> 00:32:43,544
Yeah, I think.

329
00:32:43,544 --> 00:32:45,324
I mean, I hear what you're saying.

330
00:32:45,724 --> 00:32:49,424
And here, I think there's also a stark contrast, right?

331
00:32:49,544 --> 00:32:53,264
Growing up, we had two news cycles every day.

332
00:32:53,364 --> 00:32:53,724
That was it.

333
00:32:54,124 --> 00:32:56,464
Five o'clock news and the 10 p.m. news.

334
00:32:56,684 --> 00:32:57,144
That was it.

335
00:32:57,484 --> 00:32:57,984
That was it.

336
00:32:58,584 --> 00:33:01,024
There wasn't, you know, you had a newspaper and that was it.

337
00:33:01,024 --> 00:33:09,124
nowadays you've got you know every every news outlet in the world is on this 24 7 365 i've got

338
00:33:09,124 --> 00:33:15,144
to have some kind of uh something coming out like every 30 seconds i've got to keep this going like

339
00:33:15,144 --> 00:33:22,404
sponge these people in and i would argue that's more problematic outside of independent journal

340
00:33:22,404 --> 00:33:29,684
journalism which i i put more weight into because again you know and yeah there's a lot of you know

341
00:33:29,684 --> 00:33:35,724
hokey ones out there, but there's a lot of them that have come up with stuff that just

342
00:33:35,724 --> 00:33:36,884
we would have never known.

343
00:33:37,104 --> 00:33:37,464
But anyway.

344
00:33:37,604 --> 00:33:37,944
Sure.

345
00:33:38,084 --> 00:33:39,004
I totally agree.

346
00:33:39,004 --> 00:33:45,824
But I would argue giving them only those two one-hour slots would probably solve a good

347
00:33:45,824 --> 00:33:46,504
deal of this.

348
00:33:46,744 --> 00:33:52,064
If you've got one hour that you've got to tell what happened in the entire day and hit

349
00:33:52,064 --> 00:33:56,584
all the highlights and the key points and the rest has to come out on a printed newspaper,

350
00:33:56,584 --> 00:34:05,804
you know there's not a whole lot of room for op-ed in that yeah we see you know as you say

351
00:34:05,804 --> 00:34:11,724
bias is always going to be there but I have a little more faith in that you know people who are

352
00:34:11,724 --> 00:34:18,284
who are certified evaluators but you know and you have a different group of them a different

353
00:34:18,284 --> 00:34:24,704
cross-section of them that when all the averages come out you're going to get something that you

354
00:34:24,704 --> 00:34:32,524
It's going to be a lot closer to a – I was not completely unbiased, but a lot closer to an unbiasing.

355
00:34:32,644 --> 00:34:33,784
Now, is this a perfect solution?

356
00:34:34,024 --> 00:34:34,424
No.

357
00:34:34,844 --> 00:34:45,504
But it's, I think, a far better system than we have now because if you – you can continue to watch the news, the entertainment, political infidelity channels that are not certified.

358
00:34:46,184 --> 00:34:51,684
You can continue to read Joe's Weekly World News site, which is uncertified.

359
00:34:51,744 --> 00:34:52,624
No problem at all.

360
00:34:52,624 --> 00:35:05,304
But I think that a lot of people are going to want to, when the chips are down, they're going to want to get their news from the certified, highly evaluated news sites and journalists.

361
00:35:06,124 --> 00:35:09,864
There certainly will be a number of them, right?

362
00:35:10,684 --> 00:35:15,384
And, you know, I think this is an interesting idea, right?

363
00:35:15,384 --> 00:35:27,724
I don't know that I, the stipend piece of it is a little concerning to me, especially because donations from, you know, pretty much anywhere.

364
00:35:28,104 --> 00:35:29,644
That's an interesting one.

365
00:35:29,844 --> 00:35:30,724
Not certain.

366
00:35:30,944 --> 00:35:32,844
I have to give that a lot more time.

367
00:35:33,004 --> 00:35:35,264
Can I just jump in there really quickly?

368
00:35:35,684 --> 00:35:42,924
That's why it's got to be, we don't want something like where we have the Washington Post, which is beholden to Jeff Bezos.

369
00:35:42,924 --> 00:35:47,144
You know, nobody in the Washington Post is going to write a negative article on Jeff Bezos.

370
00:35:47,684 --> 00:36:06,564
Or if you're getting funding directly from the government, you know, you might be very hesitant to write an article that, you know, could be interpreted as going against the powers that be in the government, which is why you have to have the funding, the stipend coming from a source that is not tied to any one thing.

371
00:36:06,564 --> 00:36:10,844
And that's why I call it the National Press Fund, into which, as I say, the government

372
00:36:10,844 --> 00:36:13,104
contribute, corporations contribute, individuals contribute.

373
00:36:13,524 --> 00:36:19,204
And then, so suppose you're a college student, you get your journalism degree, you move back

374
00:36:19,204 --> 00:36:33,240
to your small town in Lincoln Missouri and you start up your own local news site And you can count on you know if you writing relevant articles well articles you know you certified and you getting a certain grade for those

375
00:36:33,240 --> 00:36:39,120
articles, you can actually make a living as doing that. I mean, let's make journalism a viable

376
00:36:39,120 --> 00:36:45,420
career again, because right now it's just not, I mean, our journalists, they're actually encouraged

377
00:36:45,420 --> 00:36:51,560
to write clickbait. This is like, you know, like the Oregonian, used to be a great newspaper. And

378
00:36:51,560 --> 00:36:58,920
Now their articles are, you know, they're all trying to write clickbait, you know, regardless of how irrelevant or how biased or whatever.

379
00:36:59,400 --> 00:37:00,440
And we don't want that.

380
00:37:00,440 --> 00:37:04,960
We want to encourage our journalists, for one thing, to write.

381
00:37:05,780 --> 00:37:08,040
This is all about giving incentives.

382
00:37:08,200 --> 00:37:16,320
It's giving them incentives to write genuine fact-based articles that are as neutral as possible and evaluating them.

383
00:37:16,320 --> 00:37:22,180
And the better their valuation, the larger the stipend.

384
00:37:22,260 --> 00:37:24,340
And this would work for news organizations as well.

385
00:37:24,920 --> 00:37:37,720
We want to get their pay, their way of their living independent from any powerful organization, any powerful conglomerate or the government.

386
00:37:37,720 --> 00:37:56,240
We want their livelihood to be based on their dedication to being the best that they can be and not just going for clickbait or anything that's going to stoke people's emotions and get them coming back for that.

387
00:37:56,240 --> 00:38:07,300
Just like as the former Knox Fox news host said, they do these rage-baiting news stories because people – that's what sells.

388
00:38:07,720 --> 00:38:09,060
People get addicted to that.

389
00:38:09,060 --> 00:38:10,520
It's what every one of them does.

390
00:38:10,940 --> 00:38:12,160
Every single one of them.

391
00:38:13,280 --> 00:38:15,580
It's just the way of the world today.

392
00:38:15,720 --> 00:38:22,240
If you want any attention, you have to grab it in like, you know, the first, you know, fraction of a second.

393
00:38:22,240 --> 00:38:24,360
And if you don't, then they move on.

394
00:38:24,360 --> 00:38:30,040
So a non-click-baity title becomes a bunch of background noise.

395
00:38:30,040 --> 00:38:43,400
Even if it's the best article ever, you're going to be dependent on other people actually reading it and then sharing it and saying, no, you guys really need to read this, which is sad, but that's society today.

396
00:38:43,600 --> 00:38:49,920
I mean, you know, I remember when, you know, a 15, 20 minute YouTube you could send to someone and they're like, oh, yeah, let me check that out.

397
00:38:50,240 --> 00:38:53,700
And now if you send them a five minute YouTube, they're like, it's too long.

398
00:38:54,440 --> 00:38:54,880
Right.

399
00:38:55,140 --> 00:38:55,960
Yes, I know.

400
00:38:56,400 --> 00:38:56,840
I know.

401
00:38:57,380 --> 00:38:59,280
Yeah, I get it.

402
00:39:00,040 --> 00:39:07,020
Yeah. So, you know, like I say, this is, you know, there's never a perfect, it's never,

403
00:39:07,560 --> 00:39:13,960
there's no such thing as a perfect solution, but this, as I say, this I think would go along.

404
00:39:15,460 --> 00:39:21,360
Yeah, this is definitely, I think, you know, something that has merit, right? So what about

405
00:39:21,360 --> 00:39:26,360
the pool of, of, you know, auditors? I'm going to call them auditors because that's essentially

406
00:39:26,360 --> 00:39:33,680
what they would be. What about the pool of auditors? I would, you know, my brain goes in order to make

407
00:39:33,680 --> 00:39:43,140
that the most non-biased and fair that you could, so you got the right people, it would either have

408
00:39:43,140 --> 00:39:49,000
to be, I would almost say it would have to be voluntary. It would have to be people that have

409
00:39:49,000 --> 00:39:55,060
a passion about journalism and improving it just for that reason. And we're willing to spend some

410
00:39:55,060 --> 00:40:02,460
of their time simply because of their passion for accurate reporting. What are your thoughts on that

411
00:40:02,460 --> 00:40:08,440
though? Well, yeah, that's a, that's a really good question. And I have grappled with that myself.

412
00:40:08,840 --> 00:40:15,080
You know, one, one idea is to actually do the exact same thing with, with auditors is to give

413
00:40:15,080 --> 00:40:22,800
them a stipend and you know, base if their evaluations on, on in general are within certain

414
00:40:22,800 --> 00:40:27,160
standard, you know, over time, over standard, you know, certain standard deviations, they would,

415
00:40:27,720 --> 00:40:34,780
you know, qualify for a stipend and be evaluated accordingly. You know, this is a tough problem.

416
00:40:34,920 --> 00:40:40,540
It may be, it'd be better to have just a combination of professional auditors,

417
00:40:41,060 --> 00:40:46,440
AI programs, and just the general public. And you take sort of just like when you look at a movie,

418
00:40:46,580 --> 00:40:51,840
a movie review, you have the critics evaluation and you have the audience evaluation. And there

419
00:40:51,840 --> 00:40:55,800
There have been times where, you know, the critics love it, the audience hates it, and vice versa.

420
00:40:56,440 --> 00:41:02,200
And so, you know, you have to have sort of a multiple, you know, check system.

421
00:41:02,200 --> 00:41:20,600
And again, none of this is perfect, but the idea is to try to instill confidence that a certified journalist with a good evaluation is that you can probably count on them being a lot better source of news and information

422
00:41:20,600 --> 00:41:26,640
than a non-certified reporter of news

423
00:41:26,640 --> 00:41:28,700
or journalist or news organization.

424
00:41:29,800 --> 00:41:32,040
So that's the basic premise

425
00:41:32,040 --> 00:41:33,740
because as it is now,

426
00:41:34,580 --> 00:41:37,820
our journalism is just not trusted.

427
00:41:37,960 --> 00:41:39,960
And this is why our politicians can control

428
00:41:39,997 --> 00:41:44,897
narrative. And this is, that's, that's a dream come true for any politician. If any negative

429
00:41:44,897 --> 00:41:51,377
news comes up, they can just say, oh, that's negative, that's fake news. And we've got to get

430
00:41:51,377 --> 00:41:57,477
to a point, you know, back to a point where if, if they're, they're called out on something that

431
00:41:57,477 --> 00:42:02,237
they said that they, you know, they have, they can't just say, oh, that's fake news because we

432
00:42:02,237 --> 00:42:09,977
have many certified nudicides have shown or have said that this is, have reported that what this

433
00:42:09,977 --> 00:42:17,817
politician is saying is is just not true and uh we've it's absolutely there's an easy easy

434
00:42:17,817 --> 00:42:21,937
litmus litmus test for that are their lips moving

435
00:42:21,937 --> 00:42:31,437
well yeah this well this is exactly why um another proposal is to hold our politicians

436
00:42:31,437 --> 00:42:37,597
accountable for lying because lying you know lying to get a job is a bad thing lying on the

437
00:42:37,597 --> 00:42:42,857
job is a bad thing. But I would argue that lying to get elected is, as I've said earlier, a

438
00:42:42,857 --> 00:42:50,497
fundamental violation of the sacred responsibility of a candidate or a holder of political office.

439
00:42:50,497 --> 00:42:57,657
We are entrusting them with the sacred power of the people. They should be getting that privilege

440
00:42:57,657 --> 00:43:03,177
because, not because they're lying, not because they're going George Santos on us, but because

441
00:43:03,177 --> 00:43:10,477
they are, because we like their ideas, we like their vision. You know, I like to think about,

442
00:43:10,637 --> 00:43:15,237
you know, I've been in sales. My original field is technology, but I've been in sales. And I can

443
00:43:15,237 --> 00:43:21,657
tell you the best salespeople are the ones who can talk to their customers honestly about the

444
00:43:21,657 --> 00:43:27,457
pros and cons of their product. They can even speak respectfully of the competition because

445
00:43:27,457 --> 00:43:32,777
they can make the case that their product or their service is the best return on investment.

446
00:43:33,177 --> 00:43:40,917
The worst salespeople are the ones who will say anything to make a sale and who will say just absolutely absurd things about the competition.

447
00:43:41,037 --> 00:43:44,257
Whenever I hear a salesperson like that, I just walk out of the room.

448
00:43:44,877 --> 00:43:48,037
And our politicians now are basically fourth rate salespeople.

449
00:43:48,037 --> 00:43:51,777
They'll say anything to quote unquote make the sale.

450
00:43:52,577 --> 00:43:53,497
They'll lie.

451
00:43:53,617 --> 00:43:54,257
They're used car salesmen.

452
00:43:55,017 --> 00:43:57,257
Yeah, that's basically what they are.

453
00:43:57,257 --> 00:44:18,757
And, you know, if you are really confident in your ideas and you shouldn't need to lie, you know, that's what I think the thing, the key thing about a democracy is, is if your ideas are, quote unquote, really the best ones, let's say, over time, your ideas will prevail.

454
00:44:18,757 --> 00:44:27,537
And so, you know, if you're really confident on your ideas, you shouldn't need to lie about what you stand for or what your opponent stands for.

455
00:44:27,697 --> 00:44:38,337
You should be able to speak respectfully and debate respectfully with your political opponents if you are really confident in your own ideas.

456
00:44:40,137 --> 00:44:40,957
It's exactly that.

457
00:44:40,957 --> 00:44:46,057
Lying is just inflating the truth a little bit to, you know, get the desired result.

458
00:44:46,057 --> 00:44:56,137
Yeah. Well, I don't know. I think our politicians are just they just literally say anything now. Literally. That's probably true.

459
00:44:57,157 --> 00:45:07,117
Well, I mean, it's I'm just going to go back to I really believe that this is not a new thing. But that being said, here we are.

460
00:45:07,117 --> 00:45:08,917
Yeah, it's not a new thing.

461
00:45:08,917 --> 00:45:15,657
I can clearly remember, you know, how how we were going to be economically better off.

462
00:45:16,237 --> 00:45:26,417
And there was a very large vocal movement about the fact that we were about to cross the one trillion dollar death deadline.

463
00:45:26,757 --> 00:45:35,697
You know, so it's not the lies have been going on and they, you know, and it seems to just be a systemic part of the system.

464
00:45:35,697 --> 00:45:36,057
Right.

465
00:45:36,057 --> 00:45:42,977
so yeah I don't know I would love that if they were were held accountable for that um

466
00:45:42,977 --> 00:45:48,677
and I think that's a lofty goal to go for but at the same time you're asking the people that

467
00:45:48,677 --> 00:45:54,757
can lie to you and promise you whatever they want uh so that you'll give them money not to

468
00:45:54,757 --> 00:46:01,697
do that anymore and then they don't get money or re-elected and that right there is seems to be the

469
00:46:01,697 --> 00:46:07,917
biggest trap right now um for me anyway yeah that's why that's why we've got that's why we've

470
00:46:07,917 --> 00:46:14,117
got to elect new people new people who are going to go in and and but we don't even elect the people

471
00:46:14,117 --> 00:46:20,177
we don't even elect the people here let's be real about this nobody asked me if i wanted

472
00:46:20,177 --> 00:46:26,577
freaking was it trump and harris on a ticket nobody they said here's your candidates

473
00:46:26,577 --> 00:46:34,657
you've got to elect one of them and and you know i i i feel very strongly and differently than

474
00:46:34,657 --> 00:46:42,917
than than i i would imagine well i i yeah no sorry i think uh uh uh uh

475
00:46:42,917 --> 00:47:03,753
uh charles spurgeon said it what best right of two evils choose neither So you made a choice by not making a choice absolutely in our song about that somewhere yeah but you see the thing is so so so going to that

476
00:47:03,753 --> 00:47:07,993
how do we get the people that are going to promise this to be elected when we don't even

477
00:47:07,993 --> 00:47:15,853
get to choose who gets up onto the election platform well i i think that um

478
00:47:15,853 --> 00:47:27,433
I think that, you know, I'm a little more optimistic that independent candidates can actually win elections if their message gets through.

479
00:47:28,093 --> 00:47:38,133
And I happen to believe that people are sick of both parties, which is one reason why I have proposed, you know, let's disband political parties after 16 years.

480
00:47:38,133 --> 00:47:49,433
Because what happens with political parties, just like with any organization, they become institutionalized where their core mission becomes secondary to other priorities.

481
00:47:50,153 --> 00:47:54,373
And so party politics, George Washington, you go back to the founders.

482
00:47:54,373 --> 00:47:56,313
They said, absolutely not.

483
00:47:56,393 --> 00:47:57,753
This is this is a trap.

484
00:47:57,753 --> 00:47:59,333
If you get into this, exactly.

485
00:48:00,333 --> 00:48:00,893
Exactly.

486
00:48:01,113 --> 00:48:03,333
So that's what George Washington said.

487
00:48:03,413 --> 00:48:07,393
He warned us and rightfully so against political parties.

488
00:48:07,393 --> 00:48:21,373
Now, let's think about political parties. In theory, they should be a big tent under which people of similar ideas and beliefs can organize and present candidates accordingly. But what happens to these political parties over time?

489
00:48:21,373 --> 00:48:33,133
Well, they start becoming institutionalized, which means their first priority is winning elections at all costs, increasing their power, supporting the special interests that keep them in power.

490
00:48:33,313 --> 00:48:37,613
They become these vicious, mindless, tribal organizations.

491
00:48:37,613 --> 00:48:44,053
So we want the best of both worlds where we have political parties where people can organize and present candidates accordingly.

492
00:48:44,053 --> 00:48:49,053
but we don't want them around long enough where they become institutionalized

493
00:48:49,573 --> 00:48:54,873
and other priorities become job number one.

494
00:48:55,353 --> 00:48:56,053
And so that's why—

495
00:48:56,053 --> 00:48:59,593
I would disagree on that, and here's why.

496
00:48:59,793 --> 00:49:00,233
Okay.

497
00:49:00,353 --> 00:49:06,593
Not that I don't think it would be better to have them limited and, you know, etc.

498
00:49:07,653 --> 00:49:09,693
But my disagreement comes with this.

499
00:49:09,693 --> 00:49:16,053
I don't think we should have any tent or, or any party that anyone should ever be under.

500
00:49:16,213 --> 00:49:22,813
You should be looking at the candidates based on their merits, holding them to account based on their merits.

501
00:49:22,813 --> 00:49:28,153
And it shouldn't matter what color lapel pin they wear or tie.

502
00:49:28,233 --> 00:49:35,173
It should only be based on the merits, the pros and the cons of the person that you're trying to, you know, go in.

503
00:49:35,173 --> 00:49:38,353
The second you introduce a party, it doesn't matter.

504
00:49:38,353 --> 00:49:44,353
Now that you're telling, look, we can get our ideas across if we expand our party.

505
00:49:44,453 --> 00:49:46,053
It'll happen in two months.

506
00:49:46,273 --> 00:49:47,913
It's not going to take 16 years.

507
00:49:48,593 --> 00:49:51,413
So, you know, it's just like, you know, people, right?

508
00:49:51,473 --> 00:49:57,573
I mean, people will organize into groups based on the flip of a coin and then defend their group at all costs.

509
00:49:58,033 --> 00:49:59,253
You flipped a coin, dude.

510
00:49:59,433 --> 00:50:01,073
That's your allegiance here.

511
00:50:01,353 --> 00:50:02,353
Yeah, but we're heads.

512
00:50:02,453 --> 00:50:02,973
We're better.

513
00:50:03,373 --> 00:50:03,913
You know what I mean?

514
00:50:04,073 --> 00:50:05,053
It's human nature.

515
00:50:05,433 --> 00:50:06,793
It's just human nature.

516
00:50:06,793 --> 00:50:14,773
You can see this through multiple sociological studies, sociologists through history, philosophers.

517
00:50:15,733 --> 00:50:18,213
You know, you call tribalism.

518
00:50:18,653 --> 00:50:21,453
Tribalism is built into our genetic code.

519
00:50:22,253 --> 00:50:24,693
How do you survive on the savannahs?

520
00:50:24,693 --> 00:50:25,493
Just where they live.

521
00:50:26,053 --> 00:50:28,493
Yeah, well, you're exactly right.

522
00:50:28,613 --> 00:50:32,933
We humans are, by nature, very emotional beings and very tribal beings.

523
00:50:32,933 --> 00:50:47,513
And so, you know, our democracy or our former government is where you're actually trying to build a society based on ideas, not based on tribalism, because tribalism has been the traditional way that people have organized their societies.

524
00:50:48,333 --> 00:50:50,413
And so, you know, you make a really good point.

525
00:50:50,733 --> 00:50:55,053
You know, maybe political parties in and of themselves should be X.

526
00:50:55,053 --> 00:51:04,193
But I happen to think that, number one, political parties, if they're only around temporarily, can actually serve a useful purpose.

527
00:51:04,293 --> 00:51:19,153
And number two, I think that the political parties should not be, what do I want to say, you know, a lemming sort of organization where everybody has to agree on the same.

528
00:51:19,153 --> 00:51:26,893
And I, you know, what I like to say, you know, when I tell people if this actually becomes a political party, Solutions Party becomes a political party.

529
00:51:27,333 --> 00:51:31,033
Number one is that we would only be around for, you know, a limited amount of time.

530
00:51:31,153 --> 00:51:34,093
Number two is that we actually welcome diversity of ideas.

531
00:51:34,293 --> 00:51:37,113
You don't have to agree with all of the different proposals.

532
00:51:37,793 --> 00:51:49,613
You know, just a couple of proposals is one that, you know, the idea is that you're only going to serve one term and you're not going to run for another office or that office ever again while you're serving that one term.

533
00:51:49,613 --> 00:51:53,713
But other than that, you know, the field is open for different ideas.

534
00:51:53,873 --> 00:51:58,413
You know, somebody like, for example, one of the ideas is reforming the judiciary.

535
00:51:58,613 --> 00:52:11,749
Well you might not buy into that but that OK You see right now our political parties have just become these you know ultra lemming organizations where everybody got to toe the line

536
00:52:12,109 --> 00:52:15,929
Just, it's no different than it is like what I saw in communist China.

537
00:52:15,929 --> 00:52:24,329
I mean, I should say it's no different, but, you know, in communist China or North Korea, if you deviate, you know, you go to the firing squad.

538
00:52:24,329 --> 00:52:43,089
It's not quite that extreme here. But, you know, we both look, we can look at our political parties. And right now, look at like what's going on with the Democratic Party. You've got this, this, this, the traditional wing that's just petrified because of the Democratic Socialists of America, you know, the rise within that.

539
00:52:43,089 --> 00:52:50,089
And on the Republican side, you have the contest between the MAGA wing and the more conventional wing.

540
00:52:50,429 --> 00:52:52,469
And I would argue that these are actually good.

541
00:52:52,569 --> 00:52:54,689
We should have these debates within our political party.

542
00:52:54,749 --> 00:52:55,909
We shouldn't demonize them.

543
00:52:55,989 --> 00:52:59,649
It shouldn't be my way or the highway.

544
00:52:59,849 --> 00:53:00,829
This is the only way.

545
00:53:00,929 --> 00:53:04,069
We should have these healthy debates within the political parties.

546
00:53:04,369 --> 00:53:09,989
Now, whether or not political parties should be completely made obsolete, that's a really good point.

547
00:53:09,989 --> 00:53:17,009
A really interesting thing to think about and debate the pros and cons.

548
00:53:17,449 --> 00:53:32,989
But I have – my proposal is basically, okay, let's try to get the best of both worlds where political parties can serve a purpose, but let's just make them temporary so that they don't become, like I say, institutionalized, which means that they –

549
00:53:32,989 --> 00:53:42,789
You know, organizations tend to become institutionalized where their core mission becomes secondary to, you know, to other priorities.

550
00:53:42,789 --> 00:53:45,469
Like, let's look at very briefly, just look at Boeing.

551
00:53:45,669 --> 00:53:52,569
You know, their core mission was to build aircraft, but then they started putting more emphasis on stock price and profits.

552
00:53:52,809 --> 00:53:54,949
And they started making a lot of bad decisions.

553
00:53:55,769 --> 00:53:59,289
And, you know, they ended up losing a lot more money.

554
00:53:59,389 --> 00:54:02,689
Their profits went away and their stock price tanked.

555
00:54:02,989 --> 00:54:08,329
And this is just one example, but organizations tend to become institutionalized.

556
00:54:08,329 --> 00:54:14,769
So the solution when it comes to political parties, I believe, is that you just make them temporary.

557
00:54:15,229 --> 00:54:23,829
And this also applies to the government employment, which is why I proposed let's just make government employment wherever possible temporary.

558
00:54:24,169 --> 00:54:26,729
There are no more career government employees.

559
00:54:26,909 --> 00:54:29,089
You work five years and then you move on.

560
00:54:29,089 --> 00:54:46,969
And by the way, during those five years, if you can find ways to make the government more efficient, you'll get a commission. We'll give these temporary young, ideally young people right out of high school or college, these jobs, train them on what they need to know, and then give them incentives to make the government more efficient.

561
00:54:46,969 --> 00:54:53,529
and so i love that idea but i mean honestly a baboon could make the government more efficient

562
00:54:53,529 --> 00:55:00,749
uh you just let them loose in the office i mean literally it's that bad milton friedman said it

563
00:55:00,749 --> 00:55:06,769
best if you know if you gave the government control of the saharan desert in in a matter

564
00:55:06,769 --> 00:55:13,329
of years there'd be a shortage of sand yeah well this is this is exactly why you know talking about

565
00:55:13,329 --> 00:55:17,149
institutionalized, what is the core reason that things become institutionalized? Because people

566
00:55:17,149 --> 00:55:22,149
within the organization, they want to expand the power of the organization, and they want to use

567
00:55:22,149 --> 00:55:31,089
the organization as a vehicle for career, their own greedy career-based goals. And so that's why

568
00:55:31,089 --> 00:55:37,209
you've got to, again, make the employment temporary, and you give them so that there is no

569
00:55:37,209 --> 00:55:42,809
lifetime bureaucratic mentality involved here. This is, I think, the core reasons why,

570
00:55:42,809 --> 00:55:48,069
you know, governments end up functioning so poorly is because you get lifetime bureaucrats

571
00:55:48,069 --> 00:55:53,629
with lifetime bureaucratic mentalities who you get turf wars, you get, you know, people who want

572
00:55:53,629 --> 00:55:59,369
to use it for their own career advancement. Okay, let's make that a thing of the past. Let's

573
00:55:59,369 --> 00:56:06,249
make government employment temporary. You give people incentives. There's no long-term interest

574
00:56:06,249 --> 00:56:10,549
here. So there's no reason, you know, this is not going to be a long-term career path for you.

575
00:56:10,549 --> 00:56:14,549
And while you're there, you know, we're going to give you incentives to find ways

576
00:56:14,549 --> 00:56:18,589
to make things more efficient, which is exactly the opposite of what we have now.

577
00:56:18,909 --> 00:56:22,849
You know, our government organizations are encouraged to waste money so that they keep

578
00:56:22,849 --> 00:56:26,549
getting the same amount of money. I see this everywhere, not only in this country.

579
00:56:27,829 --> 00:56:32,409
Yeah. In Japan, for example, you know, there was a project right outside of an apartment,

580
00:56:32,409 --> 00:56:40,169
a road enhancement project went on for two years and most of the guys were just sitting around and

581
00:56:40,169 --> 00:56:44,749
they were just wasting money because they had to spend the money that the government had allocated

582
00:56:44,749 --> 00:56:50,269
to them and we want to turn that on its head we want to encourage people who are working government

583
00:56:50,269 --> 00:56:54,689
let's if they can find a way to save let's say a million dollars a year they'll get a 10 percent

584
00:56:54,689 --> 00:57:00,909
or not 10 percent a one percent commission for five years on that on that um on making that

585
00:57:00,909 --> 00:57:26,786
I think if you have people who are embedded there who can find ways to make things better I think young creative minds joining government for temporary just for temporary purposes will find ways to make government more efficient Now well is it a panacea Of course not But much better than having it run by lifetime government employees who have that lifetime bureaucratic mentality

586
00:57:26,786 --> 00:57:34,746
yeah as someone who will probably never get to visit a lot of the places where you've lived i

587
00:57:34,746 --> 00:57:39,046
would be interested in hearing some of your experiences on how these different places

588
00:57:39,046 --> 00:57:45,166
differ not only politically but maybe culturally from what we have here and and do you think we

589
00:57:45,166 --> 00:57:49,126
have it better here or do you think there's things that we could adopt from these other countries

590
00:57:49,126 --> 00:57:56,766
well i i think you know the great thing about america is not that we're perfect

591
00:57:56,766 --> 00:58:04,806
But the great thing about America is that we have the potential to really learn from our mistakes and improve.

592
00:58:04,886 --> 00:58:10,786
As Winston Churchill said, you know, Americans always do the right thing after they've done everything else.

593
00:58:11,346 --> 00:58:15,406
And I think that that's where our greatness lies.

594
00:58:15,566 --> 00:58:19,966
And not that we're, you know, the cat's meow in this case in every way.

595
00:58:19,966 --> 00:58:25,146
But, you know, the fact that we have it still within our power to change things.

596
00:58:25,146 --> 00:58:31,566
As long as the people have the power, there is hope that change can be brought about.

597
00:58:31,706 --> 00:58:34,866
Now, I talked about the inspiration for this.

598
00:58:34,986 --> 00:58:39,366
Well, it's actually based on the commonality that are independent of the different cultures.

599
00:58:39,486 --> 00:58:43,266
The government corruption, like I've seen the government corruption in Japan.

600
00:58:43,726 --> 00:58:45,246
I see it all the time in Peru.

601
00:58:45,746 --> 00:58:49,846
In China, it's obviously in an autocratic system, corruption is rife.

602
00:58:49,846 --> 00:59:04,806
It just, you know, it's really ironic because China is supposed to be a communist society, yet they have the government, you know, the party bosses are as rich as anybody else in the world.

603
00:59:04,806 --> 00:59:11,546
and um you know it's this happens in every autocratic society you know whether you're

604
00:59:11,546 --> 00:59:15,646
talking about uh nicholas maduro whether you're talking about putin whether you're talking about

605
00:59:15,646 --> 00:59:21,186
kim jong-un these guys are they're not interested in a classless society they're interested in

606
00:59:21,186 --> 00:59:26,946
expanding their own power and enhancing their own wealth and so you know the corruption is something

607
00:59:26,946 --> 00:59:33,406
that is worldwide and i see it all the time in peru i actually work with the military a lot in

608
00:59:33,406 --> 00:59:38,986
Peru. And the impression I have is that a lot of these officers, higher echelon officers,

609
00:59:39,146 --> 00:59:46,546
have joined the armed forces, not so much to defend the country, but to pillage the country.

610
00:59:47,306 --> 00:59:54,966
It's just a feeding fest, a feeding, what's the word I want? A feeding frenzy. And I think we

611
00:59:54,966 --> 01:00:00,366
have that somewhere in our Pentagon budget as well, a feeding frenzy of tax dollars.

612
01:00:01,166 --> 01:00:05,946
And that's one of the reasons why another proposal is a worldwide war on corruption.

613
01:00:06,106 --> 01:00:11,986
Now, I know everybody is tired of hearing war on this, war on that, war on drugs, war on terror, war on this, war on that.

614
01:00:11,986 --> 01:00:27,386
But I do think that a worldwide organized war on corruption, based on some of the proposals I've made, based on some of the conversations, would actually resonate with people because people around the world are so sick of it.

615
01:00:27,386 --> 01:00:29,186
You know, they're sick.

616
01:00:29,326 --> 01:00:34,826
Like in Peru, for example, the revolving doors of politicians who say they're going to fight corruption.

617
01:00:35,106 --> 01:00:39,506
They get into office and they drink the Kool-Aid and they're just as corrupt.

618
01:00:39,626 --> 01:00:41,386
It never, ever ends.

619
01:00:41,386 --> 01:00:47,546
And in the case of Peru, they should actually be a quite wealthy country because they've got incredible natural resources.

620
01:00:48,766 --> 01:00:50,806
And they could actually.

621
01:00:51,746 --> 01:00:52,486
What's that?

622
01:00:52,706 --> 01:00:55,846
You say you say a worldwide war on corruption.

623
01:00:55,846 --> 01:01:05,426
So you accurately pointed out the terminology leaves something to be desired given historical reference.

624
01:01:06,506 --> 01:01:16,246
But that means that are you talking about an activist type of a position where you get the locals in each place to go and do this?

625
01:01:16,506 --> 01:01:23,286
Or what do you help me understand what you mean by a worldwide war on corruption?

626
01:01:23,286 --> 01:01:34,966
Well, it's got to be addressed at multiple levels, whether we're talking about, you know, at the individual level, the cop who asked for a bribe or in the government bidding process.

627
01:01:35,186 --> 01:01:37,666
Let's take an example of the government bidding process.

628
01:01:37,666 --> 01:01:45,886
Right now, I can tell you from experience that the committees that make the bids are the ones who also decide the winner.

629
01:01:46,226 --> 01:01:50,126
Well, they're in bed with certain, you know, suppliers.

630
01:01:50,586 --> 01:01:50,766
Okay.

631
01:01:50,766 --> 01:02:20,566
Well, let's have the bids. Okay, you can have a committee that actually formulates the requirement for the bid. But let's have the bids evaluated by a completely independent, even maybe one that's not located in the country, which will evaluate the different bids based on, you know, the real variables that matter, you know, the price offered, the delivery times.

632
01:02:20,766 --> 01:02:23,806
any other goodies that they're throwing in there.

633
01:02:23,806 --> 01:02:25,726
Because as it is now,

634
01:02:25,726 --> 01:02:28,046
as it is now these bidding committees,

635
01:02:29,046 --> 01:02:29,946
you know, they put in

636
01:02:29,982 --> 01:02:36,702
conditions that will favor one supplier, the supplier wins, and they get their kickback.

637
01:02:37,542 --> 01:02:45,402
And so the corruption exists all the way from the lower level, like the customs officer who

638
01:02:45,402 --> 01:02:51,322
gets a bribe to let somebody into the country, or I've experienced corruption at the local level

639
01:02:51,322 --> 01:02:57,022
by the local police. You didn't have your headlights on on this highway, so they're

640
01:02:57,022 --> 01:03:02,422
going to charge you 500 bucks you know well let's have let's have all that being recorded

641
01:03:02,422 --> 01:03:10,362
and videotaped and analyzed uh in real time uh from this point on because uh that's one that's

642
01:03:10,362 --> 01:03:17,242
one idea for where this petty corruption can occur let's have these uh these lower level

643
01:03:17,242 --> 01:03:23,542
government employees monitored and and you can have their content automatically analyzed and you

644
01:03:23,542 --> 01:03:29,962
give them incentives to not be corrupt. If they've gone, you know, for a couple of years without any

645
01:03:29,962 --> 01:03:34,482
incidents, a suspicious incidents, you give them a raise. But if they are caught, there got to be

646
01:03:34,482 --> 01:03:42,262
severe ramifications. The same thing with bids. This has to be organized, I think, in a worldwide

647
01:03:42,262 --> 01:03:47,982
way, because I like to say corruption anywhere is a threat to prosperity everywhere. And so,

648
01:03:47,982 --> 01:03:50,322
So I think that...

649
01:03:50,322 --> 01:03:53,122
So I agree with you on premise.

650
01:03:53,402 --> 01:03:57,582
I think that, you know, tackling that is something that is a global problem.

651
01:03:57,582 --> 01:04:04,062
But at the same time, global policing just doesn't work.

652
01:04:04,802 --> 01:04:16,782
You know, there's absolutely no point where it's ever really provided any benefit and has been used as an oppressive tool more often than anything else.

653
01:04:16,782 --> 01:04:18,942
and so when I talk about global

654
01:04:18,942 --> 01:04:19,822
I guess the

655
01:04:19,822 --> 01:04:23,082
concern I have is

656
01:04:23,082 --> 01:04:25,282
when you say global what I think

657
01:04:25,282 --> 01:04:26,922
would be a much better

658
01:04:26,922 --> 01:04:28,862
and easier thing to tackle is

659
01:04:28,862 --> 01:04:30,222
to say you know

660
01:04:30,222 --> 01:04:33,142
let's start where it matters

661
01:04:33,142 --> 01:04:35,142
right a country wide

662
01:04:35,142 --> 01:04:37,022
right that's exactly right

663
01:04:37,022 --> 01:04:39,222
but that's what I mean when I say global

664
01:04:39,222 --> 01:04:41,082
I mean all around the world not that we're

665
01:04:41,082 --> 01:04:43,062
the only thing where I would bring in

666
01:04:43,062 --> 01:04:44,802
an external country

667
01:04:44,802 --> 01:04:46,322
involved in

668
01:04:46,322 --> 01:04:54,182
what I'm proposing involved in maybe the affairs of this country A and country B is when it comes

669
01:04:54,182 --> 01:05:00,282
to these government bids. And that is that you simply have organizations that would evaluate

670
01:05:00,282 --> 01:05:08,062
those bids and choose the winner independently of, say, the bidding committee, the one that came,

671
01:05:08,062 --> 01:05:13,702
that would evaluate the bids based on the real variables that matter. And they would also look

672
01:05:13,702 --> 01:05:18,082
at the bidding conditions. One of the tricks that some of these government organizations do

673
01:05:18,082 --> 01:05:25,142
is they'll, when they publish the bidding conditions, they'll put some completely impossible

674
01:05:25,142 --> 01:05:29,902
condition, like all of the technical documents have to be translated, officially translated,

675
01:05:30,402 --> 01:05:35,242
which, you know, if they've told their supplier ahead of time, okay, we're going to put this

676
01:05:35,242 --> 01:05:40,642
condition, get all your documents translated in time. So they have all of their documents

677
01:05:40,642 --> 01:05:46,882
translated in time when the bidding documents are actually published, but nobody else can possibly

678
01:05:46,882 --> 01:05:55,702
meet those translation deadlines in time for the bid. Conditions like that should be called out.

679
01:05:56,122 --> 01:06:02,922
In Japan, for example, I tried participating in some local bids there. I thought, well, Japan,

680
01:06:02,922 --> 01:06:08,142
this place would certainly be fair and square. But what did they do? They would publish bids,

681
01:06:08,142 --> 01:06:14,022
say for, you know, we were in the field of aviation lubricants. The government would post,

682
01:06:14,262 --> 01:06:19,362
yeah, we want lubricants, but they wouldn't say which kind of lubricants. They would say nothing.

683
01:06:19,502 --> 01:06:23,442
They would only tell their preferred supplier what the lubricants they want. And if you wanted more

684
01:06:23,442 --> 01:06:29,482
information, you couldn't request it, you know, through fax or through email. You had to actually

685
01:06:29,482 --> 01:06:37,502
go to the government office and request to see the details of the bid that they were conducting.

686
01:06:37,942 --> 01:06:46,722
It's things like this that, you know, whether it's Japan and, you know, in this country, you know, how many times have you heard no bid contracts?

687
01:06:47,262 --> 01:06:49,422
Or, you know, in Peru, I've seen it.

688
01:06:49,502 --> 01:06:53,862
This is a problem that exists worldwide, and it has to be addressed at the local level.

689
01:06:53,862 --> 01:07:06,822
But I think that if it were – if people around the world – if this were being done simultaneously around the world, there would be real momentum instead of just in one particular country.

690
01:07:06,822 --> 01:07:12,982
And the only thing, the policing, which I don't really like that word too much, would be for these government bids.

691
01:07:13,082 --> 01:07:26,042
You've got to have an independent way that completely takes the local officials out of it because they will try to rig the bid in a way that favors their preferred supplier.

692
01:07:26,042 --> 01:07:33,642
so i'm just going to posit this but i mean given everything we've talked about so far

693
01:07:33,642 --> 01:07:49,645
i think it would be uh i don think it a stretch and i i think it pretty reasonable to assume that government is the problem well you see that what uh ronald reagan said government is not the solution

694
01:07:49,645 --> 01:07:55,785
government is the problem and i i say you know well i actually would say it's i would say a

695
01:07:55,785 --> 01:08:00,925
little differently i would say politicians are the problem uh you know politicians are the ones

696
01:08:00,925 --> 01:08:05,085
who uh in whom we we entrust the sacred power of the people and they're the ones

697
01:08:05,085 --> 01:08:09,665
who can make our government work a lot better.

698
01:08:10,045 --> 01:08:11,985
And I think that that's one of the reasons

699
01:08:11,985 --> 01:08:14,565
why we've got to have our politicians

700
01:08:14,565 --> 01:08:16,545
working for the general interest,

701
01:08:16,605 --> 01:08:17,625
not the special interest,

702
01:08:18,025 --> 01:08:20,605
while they're focused 100% on doing their job

703
01:08:20,605 --> 01:08:22,745
and why they do this government reform.

704
01:08:22,845 --> 01:08:26,005
Like I say, let's make government employment temporary.

705
01:08:26,725 --> 01:08:29,525
Let's find out the places where corruption

706
01:08:29,525 --> 01:08:31,285
is likely to occur

707
01:08:31,285 --> 01:08:34,405
and put into place some countermeasures.

708
01:08:35,085 --> 01:08:37,165
And some of the countermeasures I've proposed.

709
01:08:37,305 --> 01:08:38,385
Now, are these perfect?

710
01:08:38,525 --> 01:08:38,805
No.

711
01:08:39,005 --> 01:08:40,525
Let's talk about them, make them better.

712
01:08:40,745 --> 01:08:43,325
These ideas aren't the do all and be all.

713
01:08:43,705 --> 01:08:44,865
They are a starting point.

714
01:08:45,205 --> 01:08:49,825
But I think that the general idea, the basic idea behind them is valid.

715
01:08:49,985 --> 01:08:51,705
Let's tweak the parameters.

716
01:08:52,245 --> 01:08:53,585
Let's make them better.

717
01:08:53,585 --> 01:08:59,265
But I think that when it comes at the petty level, there are ways we can address that now.

718
01:08:59,345 --> 01:09:02,545
The technology exists where we can address that now.

719
01:09:02,545 --> 01:09:16,345
When it comes to the really big corruption at the national level, bids level, there are ideas, some of the ideas I've proposed I think would help go a long way based on my experience with bidding in these countries that would make things a lot fair.

720
01:09:16,425 --> 01:09:26,745
Because I can tell you this, where I work in Peru, I have got some really fundamental advantages over the competition for reasons I won't go into.

721
01:09:27,165 --> 01:09:29,645
And I should be winning the vast majority of the bids.

722
01:09:29,745 --> 01:09:30,525
Why don't I?

723
01:09:30,525 --> 01:09:33,545
because of the corruption.

724
01:09:33,805 --> 01:09:38,225
And so based on these ideas or this experience that I've had,

725
01:09:38,265 --> 01:09:40,265
I've formulated these ideas,

726
01:09:40,485 --> 01:09:44,545
and it all comes down to these greedy government,

727
01:09:44,925 --> 01:09:50,645
lifetime bureaucrats who are using their position to enrich themselves

728
01:09:50,645 --> 01:09:53,465
and the good of the public be damned.

729
01:09:54,505 --> 01:09:58,265
And so based on that experience,

730
01:09:58,265 --> 01:10:01,065
that's the inspiration for some of these ideas.

731
01:10:03,485 --> 01:10:04,225
All right.

732
01:10:05,605 --> 01:10:08,505
I'm still going to posit my question.

733
01:10:08,905 --> 01:10:09,685
Okay, sure.

734
01:10:09,785 --> 01:10:10,965
No, no, I enjoy this.

735
01:10:11,065 --> 01:10:11,905
Please push back.

736
01:10:12,405 --> 01:10:15,945
No, I appreciate it as well.

737
01:10:16,005 --> 01:10:17,585
It's been a really good conversation.

738
01:10:18,505 --> 01:10:21,405
My general opinion is that there's, you know,

739
01:10:22,605 --> 01:10:25,505
my general opinion is this.

740
01:10:26,785 --> 01:10:27,945
Government is a tumor.

741
01:10:28,265 --> 01:10:43,685
And there's only one way to take care of a tumor. That's to eradicate it. It's my personal opinion. I, you know, unaffiliated with any party political anything or political person in any way, shape or form.

742
01:10:43,685 --> 01:10:49,905
um so that you know hey we're all individuals we get to have our own our own thoughts and our own

743
01:10:49,905 --> 01:10:56,405
beliefs uh and you know while i think these are all you know i think these are good ideas for

744
01:10:56,405 --> 01:11:03,785
reform right i really do i i would i would say that you know some of them i think you know need

745
01:11:03,785 --> 01:11:09,705
need some testing right there needs to be some real testing that goes on at a local level to

746
01:11:09,705 --> 01:11:15,765
see if you can actually get something like this done. And I think a lot of this needs to be put

747
01:11:15,765 --> 01:11:22,145
into an activist type of a position, right? Because I just, you know, to get the support for these

748
01:11:22,145 --> 01:11:29,005
ideas across the board, I mean, you're going to have to have, you know, activists out there,

749
01:11:29,005 --> 01:11:33,465
you know, espousing the ideas, talking about them and trying to put them in action

750
01:11:33,465 --> 01:11:41,125
at a local level and then show benefit to that at a local level, which should start to bubble up.

751
01:11:41,125 --> 01:11:48,445
Right. I do like the idea of limits on parties, but I also don't think we should have any party.

752
01:11:48,445 --> 01:11:56,145
I think every single political position. Well, I think they shouldn't exist, but that's that's my personal opinion.

753
01:11:56,145 --> 01:12:25,385
Um, you know, I, I live rural and, uh, you know, we don't, we don't rely on any of that stuff. Right. I mean, you know, there are certain things that exist like roads. Okay. But I have a 300 yard long driveway and nobody maintains that for me. Uh, we were capable of doing this before roads were put out here. So, but that being said, I think the idea behind it, the original idea was that you would be voting for candidates.

754
01:12:26,145 --> 01:12:34,605
that have a position that is for the populace, right? The populace they represent. And I think

755
01:12:34,605 --> 01:12:40,645
the, you know, the, the original ideas, you know, you can argue the merits of democracy versus what

756
01:12:40,645 --> 01:12:49,085
we have, you know, which is more of a, uh, uh, uh, uh, uh, republic, right. But when you get to

757
01:12:49,085 --> 01:13:04,088
a place this large where you got this many people in this many you know things I don know that a true democracy ever would succeed there You just have very small very highly populated centers dictating what everybody else did

758
01:13:04,168 --> 01:13:04,348
Right.

759
01:13:04,888 --> 01:13:12,328
So I guess the thing about this is parties breed that lemur mentality.

760
01:13:12,968 --> 01:13:19,308
And it's just a reality that a human will literally divide themselves based on the flip

761
01:13:19,308 --> 01:13:26,508
of a coin or the color of the shirt they may be wearing. Right. Um, so I would say, you know,

762
01:13:26,828 --> 01:13:33,248
espousing the idea of people getting back to this, this person is, you know, has our best interest

763
01:13:33,248 --> 01:13:39,788
is going to do the things that are better for us, not for his, you know, his pals, you know,

764
01:13:39,788 --> 01:13:46,068
over at company X, Y, or Z, et cetera. Um, and you know, I think one thing you should really

765
01:13:46,068 --> 01:13:52,908
throw in there is maybe a return to the, the old ways of, of funding these people as well,

766
01:13:52,908 --> 01:14:01,248
which is you got a stipend for your time sitting in the Capitol after that, man, you're, you're,

767
01:14:01,368 --> 01:14:06,428
you're on your own, right? This isn't like meant to be something that pays your salary. It never

768
01:14:06,428 --> 01:14:12,268
was. Exactly. Exactly. So yeah. And I agree. I think that that's why I think that anybody who

769
01:14:12,268 --> 01:14:20,648
serves elected office, you know, they have to live under a microscope or under, you know,

770
01:14:20,668 --> 01:14:25,748
a looking glass during that time. You know, if they're going to, if somebody wants to lobby them,

771
01:14:25,968 --> 01:14:31,448
okay, lobbying will be permitted, but it has to be done in a public format with an announcement,

772
01:14:31,668 --> 01:14:36,508
you know, so that people can attend the lobbying session.

773
01:14:36,508 --> 01:14:40,268
Why would we want lobbying at all?

774
01:14:40,448 --> 01:14:40,608
Right.

775
01:14:40,688 --> 01:14:50,848
That's that's again goes back to the root and the crux of the problem where you have uber wealthy people coming in to lobby their position on a certain topic.

776
01:14:51,288 --> 01:14:55,248
And they're using funds to do it that they happen to have that.

777
01:14:55,308 --> 01:14:55,528
Right.

778
01:14:55,688 --> 01:14:56,768
I don't.

779
01:14:56,848 --> 01:14:57,888
Alex doesn't.

780
01:14:58,028 --> 01:14:58,388
You don't.

781
01:14:58,448 --> 01:14:58,588
Yeah.

782
01:14:59,068 --> 01:14:59,348
Right.

783
01:14:59,348 --> 01:15:09,868
And so they are now becoming the representative or the represented as opposed to the people that are supposed to be being represented.

784
01:15:09,868 --> 01:15:27,988
I honestly think that all of the money going into politics, the entirety of it should be limited in size and it should be very small and it should absolutely have to come from an individual.

785
01:15:29,348 --> 01:15:34,948
Right. I mean, if you just take it all the way out, right. I think the more you look at taking

786
01:15:34,948 --> 01:15:41,428
away their money, the more the power is gone as well. Like the desire for power with no wealth,

787
01:15:41,428 --> 01:15:47,048
I think is going to be a very, very limited portion of the population. Like, Ooh,

788
01:15:47,048 --> 01:15:54,368
look at how powerful I am driving my Yugo. Yeah. Well, yeah, I think though, okay. You know,

789
01:15:54,368 --> 01:16:00,348
one of the reasons that, you know, these very powerful special interest organizations,

790
01:16:00,348 --> 01:16:05,828
people have such power is precisely because they do contribute lots and lots of money.

791
01:16:06,028 --> 01:16:10,508
So, but, you know, when I say lobbying, okay, that doesn't, okay.

792
01:16:10,988 --> 01:16:16,608
Again, I think that whoever is represented or whoever is representing the people

793
01:16:16,608 --> 01:16:18,788
and the companies in their district or whatever,

794
01:16:18,788 --> 01:16:27,068
to have the idea of a company or individuals coming to give their point of view,

795
01:16:27,248 --> 01:16:32,608
to make a pitch, proposals to that politician, but in a public format where, by the way,

796
01:16:32,608 --> 01:16:38,248
if they're going to make a presentation, they have to publish that presentation before they meet with the lobbyist.

797
01:16:38,648 --> 01:16:41,248
And anybody can attend that.

798
01:16:41,248 --> 01:16:48,928
And then after they made their presentation, other people can provide feedback or different ideas on that.

799
01:16:48,988 --> 01:16:53,788
But it would not in any way be tied to, you know, campaign funds.

800
01:16:53,848 --> 01:16:59,448
And not only that, you know, we have to have.

801
01:16:59,448 --> 01:17:06,888
Why do we want corporations to be driving the direction in any way, shape or form?

802
01:17:06,888 --> 01:17:10,888
And I'm just going to say this blatantly, because here's the fact.

803
01:17:11,248 --> 01:17:14,668
A corporation is run by a very small group of people.

804
01:17:15,308 --> 01:17:18,508
You're literally taking all of the people in an area.

805
01:17:19,028 --> 01:17:21,768
In a corporation, it could be 100,000 people.

806
01:17:21,908 --> 01:17:24,908
You mentioned, you know, that aircraft company.

807
01:17:25,428 --> 01:17:27,248
That could be, you know, I don't know.

808
01:17:27,408 --> 01:17:30,528
I'm imagining it's at least 100,000 people in there.

809
01:17:30,528 --> 01:17:36,008
Now you've got lobbies, lobby going on from a very small group of people.

810
01:17:36,008 --> 01:17:41,348
And they're essentially, you know, I mean, that's their representation.

811
01:17:41,688 --> 01:17:44,488
I think corporations should have zero influence in politics.

812
01:17:44,908 --> 01:17:45,828
Zero. None.

813
01:17:46,428 --> 01:17:54,788
Unless it's a warning to the politicians saying, hey, you know, this thing we just found is dangerous and there needs to be guardrails.

814
01:17:55,288 --> 01:17:59,588
Outside of that, I don't think corporations should be involved in politics at all.

815
01:17:59,728 --> 01:18:02,288
You make a product, you do a service, you do a thing.

816
01:18:02,288 --> 01:18:12,531
the only way they should be ever be involved in politics is like you know that standard something comes along and goes well hey we need toilets Oh hey we bid on your toilets right

817
01:18:12,591 --> 01:18:12,771
Okay.

818
01:18:13,991 --> 01:18:15,731
But corporations aren't people.

819
01:18:15,991 --> 01:18:20,431
And that, in my opinion, is just a blatant fact, right?

820
01:18:20,611 --> 01:18:20,791
Right.

821
01:18:20,911 --> 01:18:26,751
Now, if the, you know, the people in that small group want to put their presentation as themselves.

822
01:18:27,611 --> 01:18:28,051
Okay.

823
01:18:28,051 --> 01:18:34,551
but you know the problem that we have is the next thing you know these corporations maybe they're

824
01:18:34,551 --> 01:18:39,591
not funding them maybe they're just some gifts here or maybe they oh hey yeah let's take a

825
01:18:39,591 --> 01:18:44,211
vacation we'll go on my yacht we'll take my private jet we'll go to my private island

826
01:18:44,211 --> 01:18:51,071
you know what i mean people don't usually have that influence and if you you know if you take

827
01:18:51,071 --> 01:18:57,911
the take this again i think putting the power back into the represented's hands is the goal right

828
01:18:57,911 --> 01:19:02,791
So I would argue that corporations shouldn't even be in that picture.

829
01:19:03,451 --> 01:19:03,711
Okay.

830
01:19:03,951 --> 01:19:26,151
Well, I think, though, that if you make the lobbying public and people have to apply to lobby and the topics that are going to be proposed will be published ahead of time, whether you're talking about a company or whether you're talking about an individual, whether you're talking about a charity, whether you're talking about a local Indian tribe or a Native American tribe,

831
01:19:26,151 --> 01:19:36,151
You know, anybody can petition to, you know, spend a half an hour giving a presentation to their politician, but this will be published.

832
01:19:36,231 --> 01:19:42,431
It will be public and people, other people can attend to give their point of view and their pushback on whatever proposals they have.

833
01:19:42,431 --> 01:20:02,771
I think personally, whether we're talking about companies, organizations, people, that everybody who is under that influence of that politician who's making, who's proposing ideas that will influence their ability to do business, for example, or their ability to, in terms of a charity, to provide services to their local community.

834
01:20:02,771 --> 01:20:10,711
I think anybody should have the right to make their proposals and their ideas to the politician, but in a public way.

835
01:20:11,211 --> 01:20:16,231
And so that it's not private lobbying so that people can provide pushback.

836
01:20:16,451 --> 01:20:18,311
And we get an exchange of point of views.

837
01:20:18,391 --> 01:20:26,251
I think that a company's point of view or the upper management point of view is something that a politician, you know, maybe should hear.

838
01:20:26,611 --> 01:20:28,771
But they don't hear it in a private setting.

839
01:20:28,771 --> 01:20:34,391
setting. They hear it in a public setting and they get feedback and they get pushback from people who

840
01:20:34,391 --> 01:20:38,591
are, you know, opposed to those different proposals. And I think that would be a good

841
01:20:38,591 --> 01:20:47,051
thing. You get those proposals, counterproposals, ideas and pushback in that sort of public setting.

842
01:20:47,151 --> 01:20:53,071
I think that would be a good thing. Now, the other thing that is crucial is that once a politician

843
01:20:53,071 --> 01:20:57,711
or an elected official leaves office in this one term, what's envisioned in a one term thing,

844
01:20:57,711 --> 01:21:08,991
is that they should absolutely not be, you know, go to one of these large companies that had lobbied them earlier.

845
01:21:09,391 --> 01:21:13,111
And, you know, there's, I don't think you could actually prohibit that.

846
01:21:13,351 --> 01:21:17,271
But if they do that, that will influence how they will be viewed historically.

847
01:21:17,671 --> 01:21:25,231
And I think that when you only have one term, I think that you only have one chance to make your difference in history.

848
01:21:25,231 --> 01:21:30,111
it's just like an Olympic athlete they only have that one chance to make that gold medal

849
01:21:30,111 --> 01:21:35,631
they're going to want their legacy to be a positive one and not one that oh yeah okay right

850
01:21:35,631 --> 01:21:43,191
after they left office they went and joined this company as a high-paid consultant and by the way

851
01:21:43,191 --> 01:21:48,271
they're during their time in office they also made a lot of proposals that would have

852
01:21:48,271 --> 01:21:53,291
that would have benefited that company people will put you know two and two together and that

853
01:21:53,291 --> 01:22:00,311
person's legacy will be judged accordingly. I mean, again, this is all about incentives. You're

854
01:22:00,311 --> 01:22:08,771
trying to give elected officials incentives to do the best they can. Is this perfect? No. But I

855
01:22:08,771 --> 01:22:14,311
think it's far better than what we have now. Yeah, I think enough money, they probably don't

856
01:22:14,311 --> 01:22:18,611
care what their legacy is. They'll be happy in their mansion on their private island doing

857
01:22:18,611 --> 01:22:23,331
whatever they want to do, driving their Bentley and flying in their jet.

858
01:22:23,471 --> 01:22:27,511
I like to think that humans are better than that, but some aren't, period.

859
01:22:28,011 --> 01:22:28,971
And this is provable.

860
01:22:29,171 --> 01:22:30,091
You're exactly right.

861
01:22:30,111 --> 01:22:30,591
You just look.

862
01:22:31,291 --> 01:22:33,771
You're absolutely right.

863
01:22:33,911 --> 01:22:37,951
You're going to have – but I don't think everybody is going to be like that,

864
01:22:38,691 --> 01:22:45,751
that they would rather go down in history as somebody who made a difference

865
01:22:45,751 --> 01:22:51,391
and not somebody who used their time in office for their own personal benefit.

866
01:22:51,611 --> 01:22:52,811
I personally believe that.

867
01:22:52,851 --> 01:22:54,551
You're going to have some people who will, of course,

868
01:22:54,991 --> 01:22:59,411
but I have a little more faith that the people who really value

869
01:22:59,411 --> 01:23:03,011
and honor the sacred responsibility that they've been given

870
01:23:03,011 --> 01:23:05,891
and this one chance that they've been given

871
01:23:05,891 --> 01:23:15,471
would rather be sincere in their efforts to work for the general interest

872
01:23:15,471 --> 01:23:18,951
and not feather their own nest in one way or the other.

873
01:23:18,951 --> 01:23:19,951
And the other thing,

874
01:23:19,993 --> 01:23:22,753
is, you know, this insider trading stuff.

875
01:23:23,113 --> 01:23:25,793
Anybody who's elected into office, you know,

876
01:23:25,793 --> 01:23:27,773
should be expected to be under a microscope.

877
01:23:28,273 --> 01:23:32,953
And, you know, how are they using their office to,

878
01:23:33,193 --> 01:23:35,933
are they using their office to enrich themselves

879
01:23:35,933 --> 01:23:37,013
through insider trading?

880
01:23:37,093 --> 01:23:38,473
That should be something that, you know,

881
01:23:38,513 --> 01:23:39,353
if you're going to be elected,

882
01:23:39,673 --> 01:23:41,233
you're going to be an elected representative,

883
01:23:41,633 --> 01:23:44,033
you should expect that you're going to be

884
01:23:44,033 --> 01:23:45,713
living under a microscope.

885
01:23:45,713 --> 01:23:48,433
Right now, right now, our politicians,

886
01:23:48,433 --> 01:23:54,153
people in power can monitor us, you know, pretty much 24-7 through our smartphones or whatever.

887
01:23:54,473 --> 01:23:58,273
Well, let's turn that around. Let's have our elected officials. They're going to be the ones

888
01:23:58,273 --> 01:24:01,893
who are going to be monitored and closely watched during their time in office.

889
01:24:05,113 --> 01:24:09,533
All right. Well, I think this is a good place to start wrapping things up.

890
01:24:10,213 --> 01:24:15,953
I think it's been a great conversation and I really do appreciate your enthusiasm and your,

891
01:24:15,953 --> 01:24:23,633
you know your your positive views here i i i wish you well on your journey um and uh

892
01:24:23,633 --> 01:24:30,433
one one question that we like to ask all of our guests is throughout our lives we you know there's a

893
01:24:30,433 --> 01:24:38,273
a figure right that uh has a massive impact on our lives influences us greatly and could be an

894
01:24:38,273 --> 01:24:44,033
author historical figure sixth grade science teacher mom politician would you like to give a

895
01:24:44,033 --> 01:24:57,602
shout out Well you know that a very tough question because honestly I had so many people wonderful people influence me in many different ways But if I had to give one if somebody put a pistol in my head said name one

896
01:24:57,902 --> 01:25:02,902
I would probably name the historian Carol Quigley, who wrote the book, The Evolution

897
01:25:02,902 --> 01:25:11,782
of Civilizations. That book has been an inspiration to me ever since I was in my early 20s. And it

898
01:25:11,782 --> 01:25:18,242
provides a wonderful way to analyze history, an analytical way to analyze history. Whereas before

899
01:25:18,242 --> 01:25:24,002
Carolyn Quigley, it tended to be just sort of a random selection of different facts to weave a

900
01:25:24,002 --> 01:25:29,562
narrative. He actually proposed an analytical way to analyze history, and in particular,

901
01:25:29,562 --> 01:25:35,902
the rise and fall of civilizations and the commonality that existed in all of those different

902
01:25:35,902 --> 01:25:41,362
cases. And that's one of the reasons why I talk about organizations becoming institutionalized,

903
01:25:41,362 --> 01:25:48,202
because that's one of the key points that he made as to what leads to these civilizations crumbling,

904
01:25:48,202 --> 01:25:52,542
because the organizations that originally are the source of their power,

905
01:25:52,662 --> 01:25:58,602
they eventually become hijacked by greedy individuals who use that organization for their own personal benefit.

906
01:25:59,142 --> 01:26:04,382
And so I would definitely recommend that book by Carol Quigley,

907
01:26:04,502 --> 01:26:09,542
the great Georgetown University historian called The Evolution of Civilizations.

908
01:26:11,362 --> 01:26:17,602
Yeah, there are a couple others as well that are really good. She definitely, yeah.

909
01:26:17,882 --> 01:26:32,271
You said just one so I giving you my one No no yeah no that no I meant of her books right She you know she written I don know how many books but you know very very great shout out

910
01:26:32,391 --> 01:26:32,951
I love that.

911
01:26:33,051 --> 01:26:34,831
Well, Carol is actually a male.

912
01:26:35,191 --> 01:26:37,091
He's actually a guy.

913
01:26:37,111 --> 01:26:37,811
Yeah, I'm sorry.

914
01:26:37,991 --> 01:26:38,451
You're right.

915
01:26:38,551 --> 01:26:38,911
You're right.

916
01:26:38,971 --> 01:26:39,311
It is.

917
01:26:39,451 --> 01:26:39,791
I'm sorry.

918
01:26:39,871 --> 01:26:43,771
I mean, unless he transitioned, you know, without me knowing about it.

919
01:26:43,771 --> 01:26:44,531
No, I don't think so.

920
01:26:45,271 --> 01:26:46,371
I don't think so.

921
01:26:46,771 --> 01:26:48,591
So, yeah, my apologies for that.

922
01:26:48,591 --> 01:26:49,731
That was incorrect.

923
01:26:50,031 --> 01:26:51,271
And you are correct.

924
01:26:51,751 --> 01:26:54,311
But hey, it's been really great having you on.

925
01:26:54,391 --> 01:26:55,991
I think this has been a fun conversation.

926
01:26:57,771 --> 01:27:01,331
What do you have working or what are you working on right now?

927
01:27:01,431 --> 01:27:03,231
Where can people find and follow you?

928
01:27:03,851 --> 01:27:04,991
What do you got going on?

929
01:27:05,611 --> 01:27:08,811
Well, I just got back from living in Peru.

930
01:27:08,971 --> 01:27:10,751
So I'm just at baby steps right now.

931
01:27:10,851 --> 01:27:15,611
I'm now talking to lots of different local politicians, trying to, you know, just getting started.

932
01:27:15,611 --> 01:27:17,671
Just the first step is just talking to people.

933
01:27:17,671 --> 01:27:22,611
And this is a great example, getting their feedback and trying to get people excited about this.

934
01:27:22,811 --> 01:27:23,611
Will this go anywhere?

935
01:27:23,771 --> 01:27:24,291
I don't know.

936
01:27:24,391 --> 01:27:29,271
But, you know, you don't, you just can't, you just, you know, you've got to make it your best effort.

937
01:27:29,551 --> 01:27:35,051
So the ideas are at www.solutionsparty.org.

938
01:27:35,611 --> 01:27:39,431
My email is info at solutionsparty.org.

939
01:27:39,591 --> 01:27:42,311
I welcome anybody to contact me.

940
01:27:42,391 --> 01:27:46,371
And if you want to start something local, let's see how we can work together.

941
01:27:46,371 --> 01:27:50,831
And again, you don't have to agree with all the ideas on socialparty.org, but let's just

942
01:27:50,831 --> 01:28:02,279
buy into the first step Let find candidates and promote candidates who promise to serve only one term That is the first step Is that the silver bullet that going to solve everything

943
01:28:02,459 --> 01:28:07,819
No, but it is the crucial first step. If you can buy into that, the rest of the ideas, yeah.

944
01:28:08,159 --> 01:28:12,119
When we're talking about journalism, whether we're on election reform, whether we're talking about

945
01:28:12,119 --> 01:28:16,559
political party reform, you don't have to agree with all of those. That's fine. I enjoy the

946
01:28:16,559 --> 01:28:18,759
the diversity, the pushback.

947
01:28:19,139 --> 01:28:24,339
But let's bind that one idea and let's build on that and see where it goes.

948
01:28:26,499 --> 01:28:27,259
All right.

949
01:28:28,179 --> 01:28:31,739
Well, thank you again for giving us some of your time.

950
01:28:31,859 --> 01:28:33,579
Time is our most precious commodity.

951
01:28:33,579 --> 01:28:36,839
And thank you for giving us some of your time as well.

952
01:28:37,559 --> 01:28:38,539
You know where you can find us?

953
01:28:38,619 --> 01:28:39,579
It's pretty much everywhere.

954
01:28:40,059 --> 01:28:40,779
Leave us a comment.

955
01:28:41,019 --> 01:28:42,139
Give us a like if you like.

956
01:28:42,599 --> 01:28:42,979
Share.

957
01:28:43,839 --> 01:28:44,159
Follow.

958
01:28:44,419 --> 01:28:45,019
Do the thing.

959
01:28:45,199 --> 01:28:45,779
Do the stuff.

960
01:28:45,779 --> 01:28:46,919
We appreciate you.

961
01:28:47,059 --> 01:28:48,359
We will reply to your comments.

962
01:28:49,039 --> 01:28:49,899
So drop one.

963
01:28:50,819 --> 01:28:57,079
And remember, wherever you are, whenever you're watching this, have an amazing day.

964
01:28:58,119 --> 01:28:58,819
Thanks for coming by.

965
01:28:59,019 --> 01:28:59,459
See you, everybody.

966
01:28:59,539 --> 01:29:00,419
Thank you so much.

967
01:29:00,559 --> 01:29:01,679
I enjoyed this a lot.

968
01:29:01,779 --> 01:29:02,599
Thank you so much.

969
01:29:15,779 --> 01:29:27,679
We'll be right back.