Aug. 15, 2025

Lunar Quakes, Stellar Explosions, and the Mystery of Missing Sulphur

Lunar Quakes, Stellar Explosions, and the Mystery of Missing Sulphur
  • Seismic Secrets of the Moon: Explore new research revealing that our lunar neighbour is more seismically active than previously thought. This study highlights the potential risks posed by moonquakes to future lunar bases, emphasising the need for careful planning and site selection for long-term habitats on the Moon.
  • - Dramatic Stellar Demise: Witness the extraordinary tale of a massive star's explosive end as it interacts with a black hole companion. This unprecedented event, captured in real time by an AI system, provides groundbreaking insights into the dynamics of stellar explosions and the role of binary interactions.
  • - Unraveling the Mystery of Missing Sulphur: Delve into the cosmic enigma of sulphur's scarcity in the universe. Recent findings suggest that this essential element is not missing but rather locked away in solid forms within icy grains of interstellar dust, reshaping our understanding of its distribution and significance in planetary formation.
  • - Rethinking Vesta: Discover how a reanalysis of data from NASA's Dawn spacecraft is challenging our perceptions of Vesta, one of the largest objects in the asteroid belt. This research proposes that Vesta may not be a failed protoplanet but rather a remnant of a larger differentiated planet destroyed in the early solar system, offering new insights into planetary evolution.
  • For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.
  • Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna and Avery signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and stay curious about the wonders of our universe.
✍️ Episode References
Lunar Seismic Activity Study
[Smithsonian Institution](https://www.si.edu/)
Supernova SN2023ZKD Analysis
[Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics](https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/)
Sulphur Research Findings
[Nature Communications](https://www.nature.com/ncomms/)
Vesta Reanalysis
[NASA TV Propulsion Laboratory](https://www.jpl.nasa.gov/)
Astronomy Daily
[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support.
WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.880
Anna: Welcome back to Astronomy Daily, your go to

1
00:00:02.880 --> 00:00:05.400
podcast for all the latest happenings in our

2
00:00:05.400 --> 00:00:07.840
incredible universe. I'm Anna.

3
00:00:07.920 --> 00:00:10.840
Avery: And I'm Avery. We've got a big episode lined up for

4
00:00:10.840 --> 00:00:13.720
you today, packed with some truly fascinating cosmic

5
00:00:13.720 --> 00:00:14.160
updates.

6
00:00:14.480 --> 00:00:17.120
Anna: That's right, Avery. We'll be diving into new research

7
00:00:17.280 --> 00:00:20.200
about lunar seismic activity and what

8
00:00:20.200 --> 00:00:22.920
moonquakes could mean for future bases on our

9
00:00:22.920 --> 00:00:25.880
nearest celestial neighbour. Turns out the Moon

10
00:00:25.880 --> 00:00:28.000
is a lot shakier than you might think.

11
00:00:28.950 --> 00:00:31.870
Avery: And speaking of drama, we'll also explore the explosive

12
00:00:31.870 --> 00:00:34.830
end of a massive star that had a very close

13
00:00:34.830 --> 00:00:37.350
encounter with a black hole. It's a story

14
00:00:37.430 --> 00:00:40.150
straight out of a sci fi movie, but it's real.

15
00:00:40.550 --> 00:00:43.350
Anna: Plus, we're tackling some long standing cosmic

16
00:00:43.350 --> 00:00:46.310
mysteries, from the curious case of the universe's

17
00:00:46.310 --> 00:00:49.230
missing sulphur to groundbreaking new insights

18
00:00:49.230 --> 00:00:52.190
about Vesta, one of the largest objects in the

19
00:00:52.190 --> 00:00:54.750
asteroid belt. Which might be more than just an.

20
00:00:54.750 --> 00:00:57.470
Avery: Asteroid, but so buckle up because

21
00:00:57.470 --> 00:01:00.350
we're about to take a tour through the latest and greatest

22
00:01:00.350 --> 00:01:02.110
in space and astronomy news.

23
00:01:02.750 --> 00:01:05.710
Anna: Alright, let's kick things off with some big news about

24
00:01:05.710 --> 00:01:08.590
our own Moon. We often think of it as

25
00:01:08.590 --> 00:01:11.470
a quiet, unchanging place, but new research

26
00:01:11.630 --> 00:01:14.390
is challenging that idea, especially when we

27
00:01:14.390 --> 00:01:16.590
consider building long term bases there.

28
00:01:16.910 --> 00:01:19.670
Avery: That's right, Anna. It turns out our lunar

29
00:01:19.670 --> 00:01:22.590
neighbour is more seismically active than many might

30
00:01:22.590 --> 00:01:25.550
assume. A recent study focusing on the

31
00:01:25.550 --> 00:01:28.350
Lee Lincoln Fault in the Taurus Littrell

32
00:01:28.350 --> 00:01:30.910
Valley, where the Apollo 17 astronauts

33
00:01:30.910 --> 00:01:33.830
landed in 1972, highlights that these

34
00:01:33.830 --> 00:01:36.630
moonquakes could pose significant risks to future

35
00:01:36.710 --> 00:01:38.150
permanent lunar structures.

36
00:01:38.550 --> 00:01:41.430
Anna: This research, led by Smithsonian Senior

37
00:01:41.430 --> 00:01:44.150
Scientist Emeritus Thomas R. Waters,

38
00:01:44.310 --> 00:01:47.150
emphasises that the global distribution of

39
00:01:47.150 --> 00:01:50.150
these young thrust faults and their potential to still

40
00:01:50.150 --> 00:01:53.110
be active needs to be seriously considered.

41
00:01:53.600 --> 00:01:56.440
We're talking about planning locations and assessing

42
00:01:56.440 --> 00:01:59.280
the stability of any permanent outposts on the

43
00:01:59.280 --> 00:01:59.600
Moon.

44
00:01:59.920 --> 00:02:02.920
Avery: And, um, the evidence isn't new. It's based on moonquakes

45
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:05.600
in the region over the past 90 million years.

46
00:02:06.080 --> 00:02:08.840
Much of this evidence comes from material gathered by the

47
00:02:08.840 --> 00:02:11.800
Apollo astronauts themselves. Things like chunks

48
00:02:11.800 --> 00:02:14.720
of rocks and landslides are silent. But clear

49
00:02:14.720 --> 00:02:17.280
proof of the power of even magnitude

50
00:02:17.280 --> 00:02:19.880
3.0 quakes to shift surface

51
00:02:19.880 --> 00:02:22.680
materials around it really points to the Moon

52
00:02:22.680 --> 00:02:24.640
still being geologically active.

53
00:02:25.000 --> 00:02:27.560
Anna: It makes you wonder, why does the Moon even have

54
00:02:27.560 --> 00:02:30.280
quakes here on Earth? We're very familiar with

55
00:02:30.280 --> 00:02:33.240
earthquakes, primarily caused by plate tectonics

56
00:02:33.240 --> 00:02:36.080
and volcanic activity. Think of the San Andreas

57
00:02:36.080 --> 00:02:38.880
Fault or the Ring of Fire. Magma movement

58
00:02:38.880 --> 00:02:41.880
also causes tremors, like the recent events in Hawaii

59
00:02:41.880 --> 00:02:42.680
and Iceland.

60
00:02:43.160 --> 00:02:45.960
Avery: But the Moon operates differently. Its quakes

61
00:02:45.960 --> 00:02:47.880
are most Likely caused by two main

62
00:02:48.680 --> 00:02:51.280
Earth's tidal pulling and the Moon's continuous

63
00:02:51.280 --> 00:02:54.130
cooling and shrinking. The deep moonquakes

64
00:02:54.130 --> 00:02:56.970
occurring hundreds of miles inside are due to

65
00:02:56.970 --> 00:02:59.370
Earth's gravity pulling on her satellite.

66
00:02:59.450 --> 00:03:02.090
Anna: And the weaker quakes closer to the surface are

67
00:03:02.090 --> 00:03:05.050
generally attributed to the Moon's gradual cooling and

68
00:03:05.050 --> 00:03:07.890
shrinking. Since its formation billions of years

69
00:03:07.890 --> 00:03:10.490
ago, the Moon has actually lost about

70
00:03:10.490 --> 00:03:13.410
150ft of its diameter. There

71
00:03:13.410 --> 00:03:16.330
are also minor tremors from meteoroid impacts

72
00:03:16.330 --> 00:03:19.330
or surface rocks reacting to heating and cooling from

73
00:03:19.330 --> 00:03:22.320
the sun. So it's a world that's constantly shaking.

74
00:03:22.720 --> 00:03:25.560
Avery: When we talk about the risks to future bases, it

75
00:03:25.560 --> 00:03:28.520
becomes quite significant. Short term missions like

76
00:03:28.520 --> 00:03:31.520
the Apollo landings, where astronauts were on the Moon for

77
00:03:31.520 --> 00:03:34.320
less than two weeks, didn't face much danger.

78
00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:37.400
But for permanent bases, the chances of damage

79
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:40.000
during a quake go up simply due to the

80
00:03:40.000 --> 00:03:41.200
extended exposure.

81
00:03:41.680 --> 00:03:44.400
Anna: Nicholas Schmer put it into perspective. He

82
00:03:44.400 --> 00:03:47.320
said if astronauts are there for a day, they'd

83
00:03:47.320 --> 00:03:49.840
just have very bad luck. If there was a damaging event,

84
00:03:50.220 --> 00:03:53.170
they. But if you have a habitat or crewed mission up on

85
00:03:53.170 --> 00:03:55.410
the Moon for a whole decade, that's

86
00:03:55.410 --> 00:03:58.330
3,650 days times 1

87
00:03:58.330 --> 00:04:01.130
in 20 million. Or the risk of a hazardous

88
00:04:01.130 --> 00:04:03.970
moonquake becoming about 1 in 5,500.

89
00:04:04.450 --> 00:04:07.410
Avery: He likened it to, uh, going from the extremely low

90
00:04:07.410 --> 00:04:10.130
odds of winning a lottery to the much

91
00:04:10.130 --> 00:04:13.050
higher odds of being dealt a four of a kind poker

92
00:04:13.050 --> 00:04:15.890
hand. It really illustrates how much the probability

93
00:04:16.130 --> 00:04:17.250
increases over time.

94
00:04:18.179 --> 00:04:21.139
Anna: And it's not just habitats. Countries like

95
00:04:21.139 --> 00:04:24.139
Russia, China and the US are planning to put

96
00:04:24.139 --> 00:04:26.699
nuclear power plants on the Moon. These

97
00:04:26.699 --> 00:04:29.379
facilities would supply massive amounts of power,

98
00:04:29.379 --> 00:04:32.339
but they'd also be susceptible to quake damage.

99
00:04:32.579 --> 00:04:35.179
This means any construction will need tough

100
00:04:35.179 --> 00:04:38.179
safety margins and shouldn't be located near active

101
00:04:38.179 --> 00:04:38.979
fault lines.

102
00:04:39.699 --> 00:04:42.379
Avery: Which is a tall order considering how many fault

103
00:04:42.379 --> 00:04:45.290
lines thread through the Moon. That's why this study

104
00:04:45.290 --> 00:04:48.010
of lunar paleoseismology looking at

105
00:04:48.010 --> 00:04:50.770
evidence of past quakes is so crucial.

106
00:04:51.010 --> 00:04:53.890
It will help us chart the safest places to build

107
00:04:53.890 --> 00:04:56.810
these long term habitats and power plants. It's

108
00:04:56.810 --> 00:04:59.090
all about understanding our cosmic neighbourhood.

109
00:04:59.250 --> 00:05:01.930
Before we make ourselves at home from

110
00:05:01.930 --> 00:05:04.850
lunar shaking, let's zoom out to something truly

111
00:05:04.850 --> 00:05:07.810
dramatic happening in the cosmos. Scientists have

112
00:05:07.810 --> 00:05:10.690
captured the explosive end of a massive star

113
00:05:10.930 --> 00:05:13.810
in a scenario unlike anything they've seen before.

114
00:05:14.370 --> 00:05:17.090
Anna: That's right, Avery. This event, more than

115
00:05:17.170 --> 00:05:20.170
700 million light years away, began as

116
00:05:20.170 --> 00:05:22.890
a faint flicker. Within days, the light

117
00:05:22.890 --> 00:05:25.650
flared, faded, and then, surprisingly,

118
00:05:25.650 --> 00:05:28.370
flared again. It was completely

119
00:05:28.370 --> 00:05:31.010
unlike the standard playbook for dying stars.

120
00:05:31.810 --> 00:05:34.290
Avery: What makes this even more incredible is that an

121
00:05:34.290 --> 00:05:37.010
artificial intelligence System flagged the event

122
00:05:37.010 --> 00:05:39.650
in real time. This allowed scientists to

123
00:05:39.650 --> 00:05:42.370
capture every phase of what may be the first

124
00:05:42.370 --> 00:05:45.170
recorded case of a massive star exploding

125
00:05:45.330 --> 00:05:48.110
as it tried to devour a black hole companion.

126
00:05:48.510 --> 00:05:50.830
Talk about cosmic drama. This

127
00:05:50.830 --> 00:05:51.910
supernova, named

128
00:05:51.910 --> 00:05:54.830
SN2023ZKD, was

129
00:05:54.830 --> 00:05:57.830
first spotted in July 2023 by the Zwicky

130
00:05:57.830 --> 00:06:00.670
Transient Facility and then analysed by a team

131
00:06:00.670 --> 00:06:03.190
from the Centre for Astrophysics at Harvard and

132
00:06:03.190 --> 00:06:06.190
Smithsonian mit. Their findings, published

133
00:06:06.190 --> 00:06:09.150
in the Astrophysical Journal, provide the clearest

134
00:06:09.150 --> 00:06:11.710
evidence yet that such extreme binary

135
00:06:11.710 --> 00:06:14.230
interactions can actually trigger a stellar

136
00:06:14.230 --> 00:06:16.530
detonation. It was part of the Young

137
00:06:16.530 --> 00:06:19.370
Supernova Experiment, a project designed to

138
00:06:19.370 --> 00:06:21.970
catch these exploding stars in their earliest stages.

139
00:06:22.210 --> 00:06:25.090
The AI system gave astronomers a crucial head

140
00:06:25.090 --> 00:06:27.890
start, allowing them to follow the explosion in

141
00:06:27.890 --> 00:06:30.490
near real time from both ground and space

142
00:06:30.490 --> 00:06:31.409
observatories.

143
00:06:32.130 --> 00:06:35.130
Anna: Alexander Agliano, the lead author of

144
00:06:35.130 --> 00:06:38.130
the study, stated that their analysis shows the blast

145
00:06:38.130 --> 00:06:41.010
was sparked by a catastrophic encounter with a black

146
00:06:41.010 --> 00:06:43.940
hole companion, providing the strongest evidence

147
00:06:43.940 --> 00:06:46.780
to date that such close interactions can

148
00:06:46.860 --> 00:06:48.540
indeed detonate a star.

149
00:06:49.500 --> 00:06:52.500
Avery: The leading explanation is that this massive star and black

150
00:06:52.500 --> 00:06:55.460
hole were locked in a decaying orbit. As they drew

151
00:06:55.460 --> 00:06:58.179
closer, the black hole's immense gravity pulled

152
00:06:58.179 --> 00:07:00.940
gas from the star into a surrounding disc.

153
00:07:01.180 --> 00:07:03.940
This intense stress is believed to have triggered the

154
00:07:03.940 --> 00:07:06.860
explosion before the star could fully engulf the black

155
00:07:06.860 --> 00:07:07.260
hole.

156
00:07:08.230 --> 00:07:11.190
Anna: Another possibility is that the black hole completely

157
00:07:11.190 --> 00:07:14.150
shredded the star, with the debris's collisions

158
00:07:14.150 --> 00:07:16.910
then powering the supernova's light. In

159
00:07:16.910 --> 00:07:19.510
either scenario, the aftermath left behind

160
00:07:19.670 --> 00:07:21.110
a heavier black hole.

161
00:07:21.910 --> 00:07:24.670
Avery: What really stood out to astronomers were the unusual

162
00:07:24.670 --> 00:07:26.390
light patterns from Earth.

163
00:07:26.470 --> 00:07:29.430
SN2023ZKD initially

164
00:07:29.430 --> 00:07:32.190
looked like a normal supernova. A single burst of

165
00:07:32.190 --> 00:07:35.100
light followed by a gradual fade. But then,

166
00:07:35.260 --> 00:07:37.420
months later, it did something truly

167
00:07:37.420 --> 00:07:39.580
extraordinary. It brightened again.

168
00:07:40.540 --> 00:07:43.300
Anna: Archival records showed that the system had

169
00:07:43.300 --> 00:07:46.020
actually been slowly brightening for more than

170
00:07:46.020 --> 00:07:48.980
four years before the explosion, a

171
00:07:48.980 --> 00:07:51.820
rare and telling sign of pre death instability.

172
00:07:52.460 --> 00:07:55.420
The analysis revealed that the supernova's light was

173
00:07:55.420 --> 00:07:58.300
shaped by layers of gas shed by the star in

174
00:07:58.300 --> 00:07:59.180
its final years.

175
00:07:59.500 --> 00:08:02.420
Avery: The first brightening came from the blast wave colliding with

176
00:08:02.420 --> 00:08:05.380
diffused gas, while while that second peak was fueled by

177
00:08:05.380 --> 00:08:08.220
a slower collision with a dense disc shaped cloud.

178
00:08:08.700 --> 00:08:11.700
The structure and timing of these events strongly point to

179
00:08:11.700 --> 00:08:14.660
extreme gravitational forces from a nearby compact

180
00:08:14.660 --> 00:08:15.100
object.

181
00:08:15.340 --> 00:08:18.060
Anna: It's clear that AI played a crucial role

182
00:08:18.060 --> 00:08:20.980
here. As Gagliano mentioned, their machine

183
00:08:20.980 --> 00:08:22.500
Learning system flagged

184
00:08:22.500 --> 00:08:25.500
SN2023SKD months

185
00:08:25.500 --> 00:08:28.500
before its most unusual behaviour, which gave

186
00:08:28.500 --> 00:08:31.420
them ample time to secure the critical observations

187
00:08:31.820 --> 00:08:34.260
needed to unravel this extraordinary

188
00:08:34.260 --> 00:08:36.370
explosion V. Ashley Villar, a.

189
00:08:36.370 --> 00:08:38.950
Avery: AH co author and assistant professor of astronomy at

190
00:08:38.950 --> 00:08:41.550
cfa, added that this event shows some of the

191
00:08:41.550 --> 00:08:44.550
clearest signs they've seen of a massive star interacting

192
00:08:44.550 --> 00:08:47.350
with the companion in the years before an explosion.

193
00:08:47.510 --> 00:08:50.510
They believe this might be part of a whole class of hidden

194
00:08:50.510 --> 00:08:53.110
explosions that AI will help them discover in the future.

195
00:08:53.510 --> 00:08:56.510
Anna: With new observatories like the veracy Rubin

196
00:08:56.510 --> 00:08:59.350
Observatory soon scanning the entire sky every

197
00:08:59.350 --> 00:09:01.830
few nights and projects like the Young

198
00:09:01.910 --> 00:09:04.790
Supernova Experiment continuing to identify new

199
00:09:04.790 --> 00:09:07.690
events quickly, astronomers expect expect to catch

200
00:09:07.690 --> 00:09:10.450
more of these rare and complex explosions in

201
00:09:10.450 --> 00:09:13.210
action. It's truly a new era

202
00:09:13.210 --> 00:09:15.850
for observing the most extreme cosmic

203
00:09:15.850 --> 00:09:18.610
events. That's an incredible story of

204
00:09:18.610 --> 00:09:20.290
cosmic violence and detection.

205
00:09:20.770 --> 00:09:23.770
Now let's shift gears a bit and delve into a long

206
00:09:23.770 --> 00:09:26.610
standing cosmic mystery. The case of the

207
00:09:26.610 --> 00:09:28.690
universe's missing sulphur.

208
00:09:28.770 --> 00:09:31.730
Avery: It sounds like something out of a detective novel. For years,

209
00:09:31.730 --> 00:09:34.570
scientists have been puzzled because there simply isn't as

210
00:09:34.570 --> 00:09:37.370
much sulphur floating around in deep space as they

211
00:09:37.370 --> 00:09:40.010
expected. This is quite an enigma, considering

212
00:09:40.010 --> 00:09:42.570
Sulphur is the 10th most abundant element in the

213
00:09:42.570 --> 00:09:45.410
universe and crucial for both planets and life.

214
00:09:45.730 --> 00:09:48.450
Anna: Exactly. But a, uh, new international study

215
00:09:48.690 --> 00:09:51.010
might have finally found its hiding place.

216
00:09:51.410 --> 00:09:54.249
Researchers from the University of Mississippi, the

217
00:09:54.249 --> 00:09:56.850
University of Hawaii at Manoa and

218
00:09:56.850 --> 00:09:59.410
Georgia State University teamed up to search for

219
00:09:59.410 --> 00:10:01.970
answers, publishing their findings in Nature

220
00:10:01.970 --> 00:10:02.690
Communication.

221
00:10:03.250 --> 00:10:06.010
Avery: So where has all the sulphur been? The team's

222
00:10:06.010 --> 00:10:08.530
results suggest that it's not actually missing at all.

223
00:10:08.790 --> 00:10:11.790
Instead, it's locked away in solid forms, bound

224
00:10:11.790 --> 00:10:14.150
within icy grains of interstellar dust.

225
00:10:14.310 --> 00:10:17.230
Anna: In these frigid environments, sulphur atoms

226
00:10:17.230 --> 00:10:19.270
can arrange themselves in two main

227
00:10:19.990 --> 00:10:22.030
neat eight atom rings called

228
00:10:22.030 --> 00:10:24.909
octasulfur crowns and chains of

229
00:10:24.909 --> 00:10:27.670
sulphur atoms connected by hydrogen, known

230
00:10:27.670 --> 00:10:30.470
as polysulfons. These structures

231
00:10:30.630 --> 00:10:33.190
literally stick to icy dust grains,

232
00:10:33.190 --> 00:10:35.510
essentially freezing the sulphur out of view.

233
00:10:35.990 --> 00:10:38.910
Avery: It's fascinating how a common element on Earth found in

234
00:10:38.910 --> 00:10:41.390
volcanoes and power plants can be so

235
00:10:41.390 --> 00:10:44.270
elusive in space. Ralph Kaiser, one of the

236
00:10:44.270 --> 00:10:47.230
lead researchers, explained that the observed amount of sulphur

237
00:10:47.230 --> 00:10:50.230
in dense molecular clouds is three orders of

238
00:10:50.230 --> 00:10:52.750
magnitude less than predicted gas phase

239
00:10:52.750 --> 00:10:55.110
abundances. That's a huge difference.

240
00:10:55.350 --> 00:10:58.150
Anna: Astronomers typically identify elements in

241
00:10:58.150 --> 00:11:01.030
space by detecting the unique patterns of light

242
00:11:01.030 --> 00:11:03.990
they emit or absorb. While tools like

243
00:11:04.370 --> 00:11:07.090
James Webb Space Telescope can easily pick out

244
00:11:07.090 --> 00:11:10.010
oxygen, carbon and nitrogen, sulphur

245
00:11:10.010 --> 00:11:12.690
just doesn't follow the rules in the same way. As

246
00:11:12.690 --> 00:11:15.570
researcher uh, Ryan Fortenberry noted, when you do that

247
00:11:15.570 --> 00:11:17.410
for sulphur, it's out of whack.

248
00:11:17.570 --> 00:11:20.130
Avery: Another challenge is sulfur's shape. Shifting

249
00:11:20.130 --> 00:11:23.010
nature. Fortenberry likened it to a virus

250
00:11:23.090 --> 00:11:25.890
always changing shape as it moves, making it

251
00:11:25.890 --> 00:11:28.770
incredibly difficult to track. But this new research

252
00:11:28.770 --> 00:11:31.690
points to stable molecular forms that astronomers can

253
00:11:31.690 --> 00:11:34.690
now specifically hunt for using advanced radio

254
00:11:34.690 --> 00:11:35.330
telescopes.

255
00:11:35.750 --> 00:11:38.470
Anna: By recreating the conditions of deep space in

256
00:11:38.470 --> 00:11:41.350
laboratory experiments, the researchers confirmed

257
00:11:41.350 --> 00:11:44.350
that these solid sulphur compounds could indeed

258
00:11:44.350 --> 00:11:47.190
form on icy surfaces. And here's

259
00:11:47.190 --> 00:11:50.110
the Once these icy grains are heated in young

260
00:11:50.110 --> 00:11:52.710
star systems, the sulphur can sublime,

261
00:11:52.870 --> 00:11:55.870
meaning it transforms directly from a solid to a

262
00:11:55.870 --> 00:11:58.790
gas, making it finally detectable from Earth.

263
00:11:59.030 --> 00:12:01.550
Avery: This work could finally help astronomers piece together

264
00:12:01.550 --> 00:12:04.510
sulfur's role in both the formation of planets and

265
00:12:04.510 --> 00:12:07.420
the very chemistry that supports life. If they can

266
00:12:07.420 --> 00:12:10.300
pinpoint exactly where sulphur is stored, it could

267
00:12:10.300 --> 00:12:13.020
deepen our understanding of how essential life building

268
00:12:13.020 --> 00:12:15.750
elements are distributed across the cosmos. And, um,

269
00:12:15.860 --> 00:12:18.460
even improve models of planetary atmospheres,

270
00:12:18.540 --> 00:12:20.060
especially for exoplanets.

271
00:12:20.140 --> 00:12:22.979
Anna: It's a perfect example of astrochemistry

272
00:12:22.979 --> 00:12:25.900
forcing hard questions and leading to creative

273
00:12:25.900 --> 00:12:28.860
solutions. As Fortenberry put it, this

274
00:12:28.860 --> 00:12:31.740
kind of foundational research has the potential for

275
00:12:31.820 --> 00:12:34.700
significant unintended positive consequences

276
00:12:35.020 --> 00:12:37.500
for our broader understanding of the universe.

277
00:12:38.070 --> 00:12:39.510
Avery: That's a great point, Anna.

278
00:12:39.670 --> 00:12:42.310
Speaking of profound insights into how celestial

279
00:12:42.310 --> 00:12:44.990
bodies form, our next story completely

280
00:12:44.990 --> 00:12:47.950
redefines what we thought we knew about Vesta, one

281
00:12:47.950 --> 00:12:50.710
of the largest objects in the asteroid belt. For

282
00:12:50.710 --> 00:12:53.270
years, astronomers viewed Vesta as almost a

283
00:12:53.270 --> 00:12:56.150
miniature version of Earth, something between a rock

284
00:12:56.150 --> 00:12:59.030
in space and a full fledged planet due to its

285
00:12:59.030 --> 00:13:02.030
rocky surface, distinct layers, and volcanic

286
00:13:02.030 --> 00:13:02.310
history.

287
00:13:02.950 --> 00:13:05.750
Anna: But new research is truly shaking up that

288
00:13:05.750 --> 00:13:08.310
view. Data collected from NASA's dawn

289
00:13:08.310 --> 00:13:11.080
spacecraft, reanalyzed years later,

290
00:13:11.240 --> 00:13:13.880
is rewriting our understanding of how early

291
00:13:13.960 --> 00:13:16.760
planets may have formed and what might have gone wrong

292
00:13:16.760 --> 00:13:17.960
in Vesta's case.

293
00:13:18.000 --> 00:13:20.560
Avery: M the Dante spacecraft orbited Vesta from

294
00:13:20.560 --> 00:13:23.400
2011 to 2012, meticulously

295
00:13:23.400 --> 00:13:25.880
mapping its surface and measuring its gravity.

296
00:13:26.120 --> 00:13:28.680
Initially, this data suggested Vesta had

297
00:13:28.680 --> 00:13:31.640
undergone planetary differentiation, the

298
00:13:31.640 --> 00:13:34.320
process where dense materials sink to form a

299
00:13:34.320 --> 00:13:37.200
core and lighter materials create a mantle

300
00:13:37.200 --> 00:13:39.610
and crust. The Just like Earth or Mars,

301
00:13:40.170 --> 00:13:43.130
Vesta's volcanic surface seemed to confirm this.

302
00:13:43.930 --> 00:13:46.850
Anna: However, a decade after Dawn's mission ended

303
00:13:46.850 --> 00:13:49.850
in 2018, researchers at NASA's Jet

304
00:13:49.850 --> 00:13:52.810
Propulsion Lab, or JPL, decided to take

305
00:13:52.810 --> 00:13:55.610
a fresh look at the data, using better calibration

306
00:13:55.850 --> 00:13:58.770
and updated processing tools. And what they

307
00:13:58.770 --> 00:14:01.210
found completely challenged that long held

308
00:14:02.010 --> 00:14:04.490
Vesta may not have a core at all.

309
00:14:05.040 --> 00:14:07.840
Avery: That's a huge revelation. Ryan Park, a

310
00:14:07.840 --> 00:14:10.440
senior research scientist and principal engineer at

311
00:14:10.440 --> 00:14:13.040
jpl, expressed excitement, saying

312
00:14:13.200 --> 00:14:16.200
they were thrilled to confirm the data's strength in revealing

313
00:14:16.200 --> 00:14:18.720
Vesta's deep interior. By

314
00:14:18.720 --> 00:14:21.560
reanalyzing the dawn data, the team made a more

315
00:14:21.560 --> 00:14:24.400
precise estimate of, uh, Vesta's moment of

316
00:14:24.400 --> 00:14:25.040
inertia.

317
00:14:25.520 --> 00:14:28.360
Anna: For those wondering, the moment of inertia is a

318
00:14:28.360 --> 00:14:31.200
physics concept that reveals how mass is

319
00:14:31.200 --> 00:14:33.360
distributed within a rotating body.

320
00:14:34.100 --> 00:14:36.940
Assistant Professor Seth Jacobson of Michigan State

321
00:14:36.940 --> 00:14:39.300
University explained it with a simple

322
00:14:40.340 --> 00:14:43.140
Think of a figure skater. When they pull their

323
00:14:43.140 --> 00:14:46.060
arms in, they spin faster. When they stretch their

324
00:14:46.060 --> 00:14:49.020
arms out, they slow down. Celestial bodies

325
00:14:49.020 --> 00:14:51.900
with dense cores behave like skaters with their

326
00:14:51.900 --> 00:14:54.100
arms in rotating differently.

327
00:14:54.340 --> 00:14:57.260
Avery: And Vesta's behaviour simply didn't match what scientists

328
00:14:57.260 --> 00:15:00.180
expected from a core bearing body. Its

329
00:15:00.180 --> 00:15:02.600
moment of inertia and calculated at only

330
00:15:02.600 --> 00:15:05.560
6.6% lower than a perfectly

331
00:15:05.560 --> 00:15:08.280
uniform structure suggests its internal

332
00:15:08.280 --> 00:15:11.040
structure is. Surprisingly, even this

333
00:15:11.040 --> 00:15:14.040
value points to only a mild difference in density

334
00:15:14.040 --> 00:15:16.880
beneath its crust, not the deep layering

335
00:15:16.880 --> 00:15:19.320
we see in fully differentiated planets.

336
00:15:20.040 --> 00:15:22.760
Anna: This new perspective has forced scientists to

337
00:15:22.760 --> 00:15:25.440
rethink everything they thought they knew about Vesta's

338
00:15:25.440 --> 00:15:28.160
formation. They're now exploring two main

339
00:15:28.160 --> 00:15:31.130
ideas. The first is that Vesta began to

340
00:15:31.130 --> 00:15:34.050
differentiate. Its insides started to melt and

341
00:15:34.050 --> 00:15:36.370
separate into layers. But something

342
00:15:36.370 --> 00:15:39.090
interrupted the process. This could have been a

343
00:15:39.090 --> 00:15:42.090
late start in forming or limited exposure to

344
00:15:42.090 --> 00:15:45.049
heat producing elements like radioactive aluminium.

345
00:15:45.049 --> 00:15:47.890
Avery: 26 the second theory is even more

346
00:15:47.890 --> 00:15:50.690
dramatic. It suggests Vesta might be the

347
00:15:50.690 --> 00:15:52.930
shattered remnants of a much larger

348
00:15:52.930 --> 00:15:55.860
differentiated planet. That body could have been

349
00:15:55.860 --> 00:15:58.500
destroyed in a massive collision during the solar

350
00:15:58.500 --> 00:16:01.460
system's early years. And Vesta would then be just one

351
00:16:01.460 --> 00:16:04.460
of the reassembled pieces, essentially chunky

352
00:16:04.460 --> 00:16:07.420
space debris of, uh, a growing world that never

353
00:16:07.500 --> 00:16:10.060
quite made it. Seth Jacobson, who

354
00:16:10.060 --> 00:16:13.020
initially considered this idea a stretch years ago,

355
00:16:13.500 --> 00:16:14.940
now takes it seriously.

356
00:16:15.580 --> 00:16:18.180
Anna: The mystery deepens when you consider Vesta's

357
00:16:18.180 --> 00:16:21.100
meteorites. Researchers have collected thousands

358
00:16:21.100 --> 00:16:23.700
of space rocks on Earth believed to have come from

359
00:16:23.700 --> 00:16:26.460
Vesta. And these meteorites look like they

360
00:16:26.460 --> 00:16:29.180
formed in a molten environment showing signs of

361
00:16:29.180 --> 00:16:31.900
volcanic activity. However, they

362
00:16:31.900 --> 00:16:34.340
don't obviously suggest incomplete

363
00:16:34.340 --> 00:16:37.340
differentiation, which creates a problem for the

364
00:16:37.340 --> 00:16:39.460
first hypothesis of partial melting.

365
00:16:39.700 --> 00:16:42.620
Avery: That's quite the conundrum. The second idea,

366
00:16:42.620 --> 00:16:45.300
where Vesta is a remnant of a larger

367
00:16:45.300 --> 00:16:48.220
destroyed planet, might better explain the

368
00:16:48.220 --> 00:16:51.060
rocks by. But it also raises new questions

369
00:16:51.060 --> 00:16:53.660
about how such a colossal collision would occur.

370
00:16:54.140 --> 00:16:57.060
Jacobson's lab is actively modelling what those

371
00:16:57.060 --> 00:16:59.900
collisions m might have looked like and how debris like

372
00:16:59.900 --> 00:17:01.340
Vesta might have formed.

373
00:17:01.900 --> 00:17:04.900
Anna: Ultimately, Vesta's internal structure holds

374
00:17:04.900 --> 00:17:07.420
the key to understanding how planets grow

375
00:17:07.820 --> 00:17:10.300
or fail to. For a long time,

376
00:17:10.300 --> 00:17:12.380
Vesta seemed like a textbook

377
00:17:12.380 --> 00:17:15.260
protoplanet, an object that started forming

378
00:17:15.260 --> 00:17:17.870
but didn't quite make it. Now

379
00:17:18.110 --> 00:17:20.430
that picture has become much blurrier.

380
00:17:21.150 --> 00:17:24.150
Avery: Instead of being a failed planet, Vesta might

381
00:17:24.150 --> 00:17:26.870
be something even more intriguing. A, uh,

382
00:17:26.950 --> 00:17:29.870
survivor of cosmic violence. If it

383
00:17:29.870 --> 00:17:32.630
truly is a chunk of a planet destroyed in the

384
00:17:32.630 --> 00:17:35.470
early solar system, it could provide scientists

385
00:17:35.470 --> 00:17:38.350
with invaluable insights into the collisions

386
00:17:38.350 --> 00:17:41.110
and processes that shaped the worlds we see

387
00:17:41.110 --> 00:17:41.390
today.

388
00:17:42.420 --> 00:17:45.390
Anna: As Jacobsen puts it, no longer is the Vesta, um,

389
00:17:45.460 --> 00:17:48.420
meteorite collection a sample of a body in

390
00:17:48.420 --> 00:17:50.820
space that failed to make it as a planet.

391
00:17:51.300 --> 00:17:54.020
These could be pieces of an ancient planet

392
00:17:54.100 --> 00:17:57.100
before it grew to full completion. We just

393
00:17:57.100 --> 00:17:58.900
don't know which planet that is yet.

394
00:17:59.620 --> 00:18:02.620
Avery: This discovery is a powerful reminder that in

395
00:18:02.620 --> 00:18:05.340
science, answers often lead to more

396
00:18:05.340 --> 00:18:08.140
questions. This reanalysis of old

397
00:18:08.140 --> 00:18:11.020
data isn't just changing our understanding of one

398
00:18:11.020 --> 00:18:13.980
asteroid. It could reshape how researchers

399
00:18:13.980 --> 00:18:16.900
think about early planetary formation across the

400
00:18:16.900 --> 00:18:18.180
entire solar system.

401
00:18:18.900 --> 00:18:21.620
Anna: And that's it for this episode. What a

402
00:18:21.620 --> 00:18:24.180
journey we've had today. From the surprising

403
00:18:24.180 --> 00:18:27.180
seismic activity of our moon and the critical

404
00:18:27.180 --> 00:18:30.060
implications for future lunar bases, to the

405
00:18:30.060 --> 00:18:32.980
mind boggling explosion of a star trying to

406
00:18:32.980 --> 00:18:35.700
swallow a block whole, the universe

407
00:18:35.860 --> 00:18:37.540
certainly keeps us on our toes.

408
00:18:38.550 --> 00:18:41.430
Avery: Absolutely, Anna. Uh, and let's not forget the cosmic

409
00:18:41.430 --> 00:18:44.270
mystery of the missing sulphur, now believed to be

410
00:18:44.270 --> 00:18:46.790
hidden in icy dust, uh, grains. And the

411
00:18:46.790 --> 00:18:49.510
groundbreaking reanalysis of Vesta, which

412
00:18:49.590 --> 00:18:51.830
challenges its long held status as a

413
00:18:51.830 --> 00:18:54.350
protoplanet, suggesting it might be a

414
00:18:54.350 --> 00:18:56.070
fragment of a destroyed world.

415
00:18:56.710 --> 00:18:59.150
Anna: It's been a day packed with fascinating

416
00:18:59.150 --> 00:19:01.630
discoveries that push the boundaries of our

417
00:19:01.630 --> 00:19:02.230
understanding.

418
00:19:02.950 --> 00:19:05.750
Avery: Indeed. Thank you for joining us on Astronomy

419
00:19:05.750 --> 00:19:08.710
Daily. We hope you enjoyed diving into the latest space

420
00:19:08.710 --> 00:19:09.470
news with us.

421
00:19:10.030 --> 00:19:12.750
Anna: We look forward to having you back next time for more

422
00:19:12.750 --> 00:19:15.230
amazing insights from across the cosmos.

423
00:19:15.550 --> 00:19:17.390
Until then, keep looking up.