Dec. 23, 2025

From Rocket Crashes to Cosmic Balances: Your Daily Space Update

From Rocket Crashes to Cosmic Balances: Your Daily Space Update

In this episode, we navigate through a range of significant stories impacting the space industry today. We begin with a setback for South Korea's Innospace, as their Hanbit Nano rocket tragically crashes just 30 seconds after liftoff from Brazil's Alcantara Space Center. While the company cited a vehicle abnormality, the incident raises questions about the challenges faced by emerging private space firms. Next, we take a fascinating journey back in time to explore a period when Earth's day lasted only 19 hours. New research reveals a unique balance between lunar and solar forces that maintained this rhythm for a billion years, potentially influencing the evolution of early life on our planet. As we shift our focus to the present, we discuss an exciting and busy launch schedule for the end of 2025, featuring missions from China, India, Russia, and SpaceX, highlighting the global nature of the space industry. We also address serious safety concerns surrounding Boeing's Starliner following its first crewed test flight. A NASA advisory panel has criticized the agency for not adequately recognizing the mission's issues, which led to astronauts being stranded on the ISS for nine months. Finally, we report on a major leadership change at United Launch Alliance, with CEO Tory Brian resigning after nearly 12 years, leaving behind a legacy tied to the development of the Vulcan Centaur rocket. Join us as we unpack these stories and more in this episode of Astronomy Daily!00:00 – **Today we'll cover some unfortunate news for South Korea's burgeoning space industry
00:31 – **South Korean company Innospace's first commercial orbital rocket crashed in Brazil
02:10 – **For about a billion years Earth's day flatlined at 19 hours
04:34 – **The last full week of 2025 is shaping up to be incredibly busy for space launches
06:18 – **NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel has come out with a pretty strong statement
09:49 – **Tory Bruno, president and CEO of United Launch alliance, has resigned
11:06 – **It's been another busy day in astronomy and spaceflight### Sources & Further Reading1. NASA2. SpaceX3. United Launch Alliance4. Innospace5. Space.com### Follow & ContactX/Twitter: @AstroDailyPodInstagram: @astrodailypodEmail: hello@astronomydaily.ioWebsite: astronomydaily.ioClear skies and see you next time! 🌟

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support.

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!

Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here

This episode includes AI-generated content.

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.920
Avery: Welcome to Astronomy Daily, the podcast that

1
00:00:02.920 --> 00:00:05.280
brings you the universe. One story at a time.

2
00:00:05.360 --> 00:00:06.320
I'm Avery.

3
00:00:06.320 --> 00:00:09.320
Anna: And I'm Anna. Today we'll be covering some

4
00:00:09.320 --> 00:00:11.920
unfortunate news for South Korea's burgeoning

5
00:00:11.920 --> 00:00:14.760
space industry. A look back billions of

6
00:00:14.760 --> 00:00:17.360
years to when Earth had a 19 hour day.

7
00:00:17.760 --> 00:00:20.160
A very busy launch schedule to close out

8
00:00:20.160 --> 00:00:22.840
2025, and some serious safety

9
00:00:22.840 --> 00:00:25.640
concerns over Boeing's Starliner. And we'll

10
00:00:25.640 --> 00:00:27.480
cap things off with a major leadership

11
00:00:27.480 --> 00:00:29.520
shakeup at United Launch Alliance.

12
00:00:30.210 --> 00:00:31.250
Avery: A lot to get through.

13
00:00:31.490 --> 00:00:33.290
Let's start with that launch anomaly in

14
00:00:33.290 --> 00:00:35.810
Brazil. What happened with the Hanbit Nano

15
00:00:35.810 --> 00:00:36.290
rocket?

16
00:00:36.370 --> 00:00:38.410
Anna: It's a tough break for the South Korean

17
00:00:38.410 --> 00:00:41.050
company Innospace. Their first commercial

18
00:00:41.050 --> 00:00:43.250
orbital rocket, the Hanbit Nano,

19
00:00:43.410 --> 00:00:46.250
unfortunately crashed just 30 seconds after

20
00:00:46.250 --> 00:00:48.650
liftoff from the Alcantara Space center in

21
00:00:48.650 --> 00:00:49.090
Brazil.

22
00:00:49.330 --> 00:00:52.250
Avery: Only 30 seconds. Wow. Do we

23
00:00:52.250 --> 00:00:52.930
know the cause?

24
00:00:53.170 --> 00:00:56.010
Anna: The company cited a vehicle abnormality,

25
00:00:56.010 --> 00:00:58.330
but they haven't released specific details

26
00:00:58.330 --> 00:01:00.490
yet. The important thing is that no one was

27
00:01:00.490 --> 00:01:02.630
hurt and there was no damage to the launch

28
00:01:02.630 --> 00:01:03.150
facility.

29
00:01:03.470 --> 00:01:05.670
Avery: That's certainly the silver lining. This was

30
00:01:05.670 --> 00:01:07.830
a significant launch for them, wasn't it? It

31
00:01:07.830 --> 00:01:09.310
had been delayed a few times already.

32
00:01:09.790 --> 00:01:12.790
Anna: Exactly. It was carrying five satellites,

33
00:01:12.790 --> 00:01:15.200
so this was a major milestone attempt. A,

34
00:01:15.150 --> 00:01:17.389
successful first commercial launch would have

35
00:01:17.389 --> 00:01:19.670
been a huge step for South Korea's private

36
00:01:19.670 --> 00:01:21.990
space sector. Setbacks are part of the

37
00:01:21.990 --> 00:01:24.270
process, but this one definitely stings for

38
00:01:24.270 --> 00:01:25.070
Innospace.

39
00:01:25.390 --> 00:01:27.750
Avery: Right. Failure is always an option in

40
00:01:27.750 --> 00:01:30.750
rocketry, especially on a debut flight. We'll

41
00:01:30.750 --> 00:01:32.430
be watching to see how they bounce back.

42
00:01:32.670 --> 00:01:35.470
Anna: Absolutely. And it highlights the immense

43
00:01:35.470 --> 00:01:37.630
challenge for smaller private companies

44
00:01:37.950 --> 00:01:39.830
trying to break into the orbital launch

45
00:01:39.830 --> 00:01:41.990
market. It's not just about building a

46
00:01:41.990 --> 00:01:43.950
rocket. It's about securing funding,

47
00:01:44.190 --> 00:01:46.750
navigating international regulations, and

48
00:01:46.750 --> 00:01:49.510
building a track record. The barrier to entry

49
00:01:49.510 --> 00:01:51.230
is still incredibly high.

50
00:01:51.630 --> 00:01:53.830
Avery: That's a great point. While companies like

51
00:01:53.830 --> 00:01:56.810
SpaceX make it look almost routine, now each

52
00:01:56.810 --> 00:01:59.010
successful launch is built on a mountain of

53
00:01:59.010 --> 00:02:01.370
data from both successes and failures.

54
00:02:01.770 --> 00:02:04.010
Hopefully Innospace can analyze what went

55
00:02:04.010 --> 00:02:06.270
wrong and come back stronger. A, competitive

56
00:02:06.270 --> 00:02:07.870
launch market is good for everyone.

57
00:02:08.270 --> 00:02:09.070
Anna: Definitely.

58
00:02:09.550 --> 00:02:12.269
Now let's switch gears and go way, way

59
00:02:12.269 --> 00:02:14.990
back in time. Billions of years, in fact.

60
00:02:15.390 --> 00:02:17.630
Avery, did you know there was a period when

61
00:02:17.630 --> 00:02:20.440
Earth's day was stuck at, just 19 hours

62
00:02:20.440 --> 00:02:20.800
long?

63
00:02:21.360 --> 00:02:23.600
Avery: Stuck. I know the day has been getting

64
00:02:23.600 --> 00:02:25.800
gradually longer as the moon moves away from

65
00:02:25.800 --> 00:02:28.110
us, but I've never heard of it, stopping.

66
00:02:28.430 --> 00:02:30.830
Anna: That's what's so fascinating. New research

67
00:02:30.910 --> 00:02:33.390
indicates that for about a billion years,

68
00:02:33.550 --> 00:02:35.990
from roughly 2 billion years to 1 billion

69
00:02:35.990 --> 00:02:38.950
years ago, the day length just flatlined

70
00:02:38.950 --> 00:02:40.750
at 19 hours, a.

71
00:02:40.750 --> 00:02:43.630
Avery: Billion years is not a short time. What could

72
00:02:43.630 --> 00:02:46.270
cause our planet's rotation to just pause its

73
00:02:46.270 --> 00:02:47.310
slowdown like that?

74
00:02:47.550 --> 00:02:50.510
Anna: It's a really cool celestial balancing act.

75
00:02:50.670 --> 00:02:53.230
We know the Moon's gravity creates ocean

76
00:02:53.230 --> 00:02:55.270
tides that act like a brake on Earth's

77
00:02:55.270 --> 00:02:56.910
rotation, so slowing it down.

78
00:02:57.230 --> 00:02:58.590
Avery: Right, the lunar tides.

79
00:02:58.830 --> 00:03:01.670
Anna: But the sun also creates tides, not just in

80
00:03:01.670 --> 00:03:04.430
the ocean, but in the atmosphere. The sun

81
00:03:04.430 --> 00:03:06.830
heats the atmosphere, causing it to bulge.

82
00:03:07.070 --> 00:03:09.990
This atmospheric tide, influenced by Earth's

83
00:03:09.990 --> 00:03:12.750
rotation, actually pulls on the planet,

84
00:03:12.750 --> 00:03:13.950
trying to speed it up.

85
00:03:14.430 --> 00:03:16.550
Avery: So you have the Moon's gravity slowing us

86
00:03:16.550 --> 00:03:19.430
down and the Sun's atmospheric heat speeding

87
00:03:19.430 --> 00:03:19.870
us up.

88
00:03:20.270 --> 00:03:23.150
Anna: Precisely. And during this specific billion

89
00:03:23.150 --> 00:03:25.590
year period, the theory is that the two

90
00:03:25.590 --> 00:03:28.530
forces reached a perfect equilibri. The

91
00:03:28.530 --> 00:03:30.850
atmospheric day was in resonance with the

92
00:03:30.850 --> 00:03:33.410
rotational day. The slowing effect from the

93
00:03:33.410 --> 00:03:36.250
lunar ocean tides was perfectly balanced by

94
00:03:36.250 --> 00:03:38.650
the speeding effect of the solar atmospheric

95
00:03:38.650 --> 00:03:39.050
tides.

96
00:03:39.370 --> 00:03:41.890
Avery: A, tidal resonance. That's incredible.

97
00:03:42.370 --> 00:03:44.890
So the Earth was in a state of cosmic tug of

98
00:03:44.890 --> 00:03:47.770
war, and for a billion years it was a perfect

99
00:03:47.770 --> 00:03:48.210
draw.

100
00:03:48.530 --> 00:03:51.450
Anna: Exactly. Eventually, other factors broke the

101
00:03:51.450 --> 00:03:53.770
resonance, and the Moon's influence won out

102
00:03:53.770 --> 00:03:56.730
again, Continuing the slow lengthening of our

103
00:03:56.730 --> 00:03:59.640
day to the 24 hours we have now. It makes

104
00:03:59.870 --> 00:04:01.830
you think about all the delicate balances

105
00:04:01.830 --> 00:04:03.390
that have shaped our planet's history.

106
00:04:03.790 --> 00:04:06.430
Avery: Absolutely. Imagine what life might have been

107
00:04:06.430 --> 00:04:08.790
like with five extra hours of darkness each

108
00:04:08.790 --> 00:04:09.070
day.

109
00:04:09.310 --> 00:04:11.390
Anna: That's the big question researchers are

110
00:04:11.390 --> 00:04:14.190
exploring now. A consistent 19 hour

111
00:04:14.190 --> 00:04:16.590
day night cycle could have provided a stable

112
00:04:16.590 --> 00:04:18.630
environment for early photosynthetic

113
00:04:18.630 --> 00:04:21.230
organisms like cyanobacteria to thrive.

114
00:04:21.710 --> 00:04:23.910
Some theories suggest this long period of

115
00:04:23.910 --> 00:04:26.070
stability might have been a crucial factor in

116
00:04:26.070 --> 00:04:28.590
the Great Oxidation Event, where oxygen

117
00:04:28.590 --> 00:04:30.510
levels in the atmosphere began to rise,

118
00:04:30.590 --> 00:04:32.730
paving the way for more complex life.

119
00:04:32.810 --> 00:04:34.570
Avery: Well, coming back to the present, things

120
00:04:34.570 --> 00:04:37.010
aren't anything but slow. The last full week

121
00:04:37.010 --> 00:04:39.770
of 2025 is shaping up to be incredibly

122
00:04:39.770 --> 00:04:40.970
busy for space launches.

123
00:04:41.130 --> 00:04:43.130
Anna: It seems like everyone is trying to get their

124
00:04:43.130 --> 00:04:45.130
last missions of the year off the ground.

125
00:04:45.370 --> 00:04:46.490
What's on the manifest?

126
00:04:46.570 --> 00:04:48.370
Avery: Well, we already discussed Innispace's

127
00:04:48.370 --> 00:04:51.250
attempt in China. CASC is expected to

128
00:04:51.250 --> 00:04:53.970
debut its brand new reusable Chang Zhang

129
00:04:53.970 --> 00:04:56.890
12, a rocket that's a huge development for

130
00:04:56.890 --> 00:04:58.410
their Reusable Launch Vehicle program.

131
00:04:58.800 --> 00:05:01.680
Anna: Mm. A direct competitor to SpaceX's Falcon

132
00:05:01.680 --> 00:05:02.000
9.

133
00:05:02.320 --> 00:05:05.240
Avery: Indeed. Then over in India, ISRO's

134
00:05:05.240 --> 00:05:07.440
launching a Bluebird Block 2 satellite.

135
00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:10.360
Russia has not one, but two Soyuz missions

136
00:05:10.360 --> 00:05:12.200
planned from different cosmodromes.

137
00:05:12.200 --> 00:05:14.160
Anna: A busy week for Roscosmos.

138
00:05:14.160 --> 00:05:16.400
Avery: And of course, you can't have a busy launch

139
00:05:16.400 --> 00:05:18.520
week without SpaceX they're scheduled for

140
00:05:18.520 --> 00:05:20.640
their final Falcon 9 mission of the year,

141
00:05:20.640 --> 00:05:23.240
launching the CSG3 satellite. For the

142
00:05:23.240 --> 00:05:26.020
Italian Space Agency. It's a real flurry of

143
00:05:26.020 --> 00:05:27.100
activity to end the year.

144
00:05:27.260 --> 00:05:29.740
Anna: It really shows how global the space industry

145
00:05:29.740 --> 00:05:32.620
has become. Launches from China, India,

146
00:05:32.860 --> 00:05:35.740
Russia and the US all within days

147
00:05:35.740 --> 00:05:38.180
of each other. It's an exciting time to be

148
00:05:38.180 --> 00:05:40.380
following spaceflight, that's for sure.

149
00:05:40.860 --> 00:05:42.940
It's worth noting the diversity of these

150
00:05:42.940 --> 00:05:45.340
missions too. The Chinese launch is a

151
00:05:45.340 --> 00:05:48.100
technology demonstrator for reusability. The

152
00:05:48.100 --> 00:05:50.650
Indian mission is for Earth observation. The,

153
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:52.400
the Russian launches are likely for

154
00:05:52.400 --> 00:05:54.840
government and commercial payloads. And the

155
00:05:54.840 --> 00:05:57.360
SpaceX mission is for an Italian radar

156
00:05:57.360 --> 00:06:00.160
reconnaissance satellite. It's a snapshot of

157
00:06:00.160 --> 00:06:02.560
the entire space ecosystem in action.

158
00:06:02.880 --> 00:06:05.040
Avery: And the logistical coordination is mind

159
00:06:05.040 --> 00:06:07.800
boggling. You have range safety, air and sea

160
00:06:07.800 --> 00:06:09.760
traffic control, satellite tracking and

161
00:06:09.760 --> 00:06:12.320
telemetry all happening concurrently across

162
00:06:12.320 --> 00:06:15.220
the globe. A, fittingly chaotic end to a

163
00:06:15.220 --> 00:06:16.500
very busy year in space.

164
00:06:16.970 --> 00:06:19.330
Anna: Speaking of US spaceflight, let's turn to our

165
00:06:19.330 --> 00:06:21.530
next story on today's rundown, which is a bit

166
00:06:21.530 --> 00:06:24.370
more sobering. It's about Boeing's Starliner

167
00:06:24.370 --> 00:06:26.250
and the fallout from its first crewed test

168
00:06:26.250 --> 00:06:26.650
flight.

169
00:06:26.730 --> 00:06:29.490
Avery: Yeah, that mission was eventful to say the

170
00:06:29.490 --> 00:06:30.490
least. What's the latest?

171
00:06:30.730 --> 00:06:33.610
Anna: Well, NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel

172
00:06:33.610 --> 00:06:35.530
has come out with a pretty strong statement.

173
00:06:35.930 --> 00:06:37.810
They've said that NASA should have taken the

174
00:06:37.810 --> 00:06:40.290
problems with Starliner far more seriously as

175
00:06:40.290 --> 00:06:41.130
they were happening.

176
00:06:41.290 --> 00:06:43.370
Avery: Let's recap what those problems were. There

177
00:06:43.370 --> 00:06:45.650
were multiple helium leaks and failures with

178
00:06:45.650 --> 00:06:47.130
the maneuvering thrusters, right?

179
00:06:47.210 --> 00:06:49.750
Anna: That's right. Separate thruster failures

180
00:06:49.750 --> 00:06:52.070
during docking and multiple helium leaks that

181
00:06:52.070 --> 00:06:54.190
were discovered both before and during the

182
00:06:54.190 --> 00:06:56.710
mission. The panel's main point of contention

183
00:06:56.710 --> 00:06:59.430
is that NASA never officially declared an in

184
00:06:59.430 --> 00:07:02.270
flight mishap or a high visibility close

185
00:07:02.270 --> 00:07:02.630
call.

186
00:07:02.870 --> 00:07:05.630
Avery: And not making that declaration has

187
00:07:05.630 --> 00:07:06.390
consequences.

188
00:07:06.790 --> 00:07:09.630
Anna: It does. According to the panel, this failure

189
00:07:09.630 --> 00:07:11.790
to officially recognize the severity of the

190
00:07:11.790 --> 00:07:14.270
issues led to an extended period of

191
00:07:14.270 --> 00:07:16.630
uncertainty. It put a lot of stress on the

192
00:07:16.630 --> 00:07:18.670
workforce at NASA and Boeing who were trying

193
00:07:18.670 --> 00:07:20.540
to troubleshoot these serious problems

194
00:07:21.090 --> 00:07:23.130
without the formal structure and resources

195
00:07:23.130 --> 00:07:24.930
that come with a mishap declaration.

196
00:07:25.250 --> 00:07:27.290
Avery: So they were essentially trying to manage a

197
00:07:27.290 --> 00:07:29.450
crisis without being allowed to call it a

198
00:07:29.450 --> 00:07:31.810
crisis. That sounds incredibly difficult.

199
00:07:31.970 --> 00:07:34.570
Anna: Extremely. And the end result speaks for

200
00:07:34.570 --> 00:07:37.370
itself. The two astronauts, Butch Wilmore and

201
00:07:37.370 --> 00:07:39.450
Suni Williams, ended up staying on the

202
00:07:39.450 --> 00:07:41.730
International Space Station for nine months

203
00:07:41.970 --> 00:07:43.770
while engineers tried to figure out if

204
00:07:43.770 --> 00:07:45.730
Starliner was safe to bring them home.

205
00:07:45.890 --> 00:07:48.760
Avery: And in the, end, it wasn't. They came home on

206
00:07:48.760 --> 00:07:50.230
a SpaceX Dragon capsule.

207
00:07:50.700 --> 00:07:53.260
Anna: That's the Crucial point, the Starliner

208
00:07:53.260 --> 00:07:55.660
capsule had to return to Earth empty.

209
00:07:56.060 --> 00:07:58.380
Having your crew return on a competitor

210
00:07:58.460 --> 00:08:00.780
spacecraft because your own was deemed

211
00:08:00.780 --> 00:08:03.300
unsafe is a massive blow to the

212
00:08:03.300 --> 00:08:05.940
program's credibility. The safety panel is

213
00:08:05.940 --> 00:08:08.660
basically saying that if NASA had been more

214
00:08:08.660 --> 00:08:10.860
forthright about the problems from the start,

215
00:08:11.180 --> 00:08:13.780
a lot of this prolonged uncertainty and

216
00:08:13.780 --> 00:08:15.740
stress could have been handled better.

217
00:08:16.260 --> 00:08:18.620
Avery: It's a tough lesson in transparency and risk

218
00:08:18.620 --> 00:08:21.300
management. You never want to see a situation

219
00:08:21.300 --> 00:08:23.340
where you have to rely on your backup

220
00:08:23.340 --> 00:08:25.540
transportation system for a crewed mission.

221
00:08:25.860 --> 00:08:28.040
It really underscores the value of having,

222
00:08:27.990 --> 00:08:30.820
redundant, reliable systems like SpaceX's

223
00:08:30.820 --> 00:08:31.380
Dragon.

224
00:08:31.380 --> 00:08:34.220
Anna: It absolutely does. There's a lot for

225
00:08:34.220 --> 00:08:36.700
both NASA and Boeing to learn from this

226
00:08:36.700 --> 00:08:39.260
incident before they even consider putting

227
00:08:39.260 --> 00:08:41.140
another crew on Starliner.

228
00:08:41.549 --> 00:08:44.429
Avery: Absolutely. And the post flight investigation

229
00:08:44.429 --> 00:08:47.269
is digging into the root causes. The helium

230
00:08:47.269 --> 00:08:49.429
leaks, for instance, seem to be related to

231
00:08:49.429 --> 00:08:51.509
seals that become brittle at extreme

232
00:08:51.509 --> 00:08:54.269
temperatures. But the thruster issue is more

233
00:08:54.269 --> 00:08:56.829
complex. It's a propulsion system that has

234
00:08:56.829 --> 00:08:58.589
seen numerous issues throughout its

235
00:08:58.589 --> 00:09:00.989
development. And the failures during this

236
00:09:00.989 --> 00:09:03.069
critical mission pointed to a potential

237
00:09:03.069 --> 00:09:05.589
systemic design flaw in the reaction control

238
00:09:05.589 --> 00:09:05.949
system.

239
00:09:06.349 --> 00:09:09.229
Anna: A systemic flaw is the last thing you want to

240
00:09:09.229 --> 00:09:11.989
hear about on a crude vehicle. So what's the

241
00:09:11.989 --> 00:09:14.730
path forward for Boeing? Is the Starliner

242
00:09:14.730 --> 00:09:16.570
program salvageable at this point?

243
00:09:16.890 --> 00:09:19.330
Avery: It's a tough road ahead. They will likely

244
00:09:19.330 --> 00:09:21.650
need a complete redesign and recertification

245
00:09:21.650 --> 00:09:23.890
of the propulsion system, which could take

246
00:09:23.890 --> 00:09:26.850
years and billions more dollars. NASA

247
00:09:26.850 --> 00:09:29.130
is committed to having two independent crew

248
00:09:29.130 --> 00:09:31.570
transportation systems, so they won't give up

249
00:09:31.570 --> 00:09:34.410
on Boeing easily. But the pressure is immense

250
00:09:34.490 --> 00:09:37.210
and confidence both within NASA and

251
00:09:37.290 --> 00:09:39.610
publicly has been severely shaken.

252
00:09:40.240 --> 00:09:42.720
They have to prove beyond any doubt that

253
00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:45.520
Starliner is safe before anyone else straps

254
00:09:45.520 --> 00:09:46.400
in for a ride.

255
00:09:46.880 --> 00:09:49.720
Anna: And for our final story today, we've got

256
00:09:49.720 --> 00:09:52.200
some big news from one of the titans of the

257
00:09:52.200 --> 00:09:54.720
launch industry. Tory Bruno. The

258
00:09:54.720 --> 00:09:57.280
longtime president and CEO of United

259
00:09:57.440 --> 00:09:59.360
Launch alliance has resigned.

260
00:09:59.680 --> 00:10:02.520
Avery: That is big news. Bruno has been at the helm

261
00:10:02.520 --> 00:10:05.360
of ula for nearly 12 years. He

262
00:10:05.360 --> 00:10:07.440
really guided the company, a joint venture

263
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:09.720
between Boeing and Lockheed Martin through

264
00:10:09.720 --> 00:10:12.280
one of its most challenging periods. Facing

265
00:10:12.280 --> 00:10:14.480
intense competition from newcomers like

266
00:10:14.480 --> 00:10:15.080
SpaceX.

267
00:10:15.400 --> 00:10:17.600
Anna: Absolutely. His legacy will

268
00:10:17.600 --> 00:10:20.360
undoubtedly be tied to the development of the

269
00:10:20.360 --> 00:10:23.240
new Vulcan Centaur rocket. That was a

270
00:10:23.240 --> 00:10:25.960
massive undertaking, designed not only to

271
00:10:25.960 --> 00:10:28.920
replace the legacy Atlas v and Delta 4

272
00:10:28.920 --> 00:10:31.520
rockets, but also to end ULA's

273
00:10:31.520 --> 00:10:34.160
reliance on the Russian RD180

274
00:10:34.160 --> 00:10:34.590
engines.

275
00:10:35.220 --> 00:10:37.820
Avery: And he was such a public facing CEO, wasn't

276
00:10:37.820 --> 00:10:40.420
he? He was famous for his engaging presence

277
00:10:40.420 --> 00:10:42.900
on social media, always willing to answer

278
00:10:42.900 --> 00:10:45.220
technical questions from space fans. He

279
00:10:45.220 --> 00:10:48.220
really modernized ula's public image. It

280
00:10:48.220 --> 00:10:50.180
truly feels like the end of an era for the

281
00:10:50.180 --> 00:10:52.260
company. Do we know who's taking over?

282
00:10:52.660 --> 00:10:55.540
Anna: For now, John Elban has been appointed as the

283
00:10:55.540 --> 00:10:58.060
interim CEO while they search for a permanent

284
00:10:58.060 --> 00:11:00.540
replacement. It will certainly be interesting

285
00:11:00.540 --> 00:11:03.220
to see the direction ULA takes in this new

286
00:11:03.220 --> 00:11:03.620
chapter.

287
00:11:04.240 --> 00:11:06.160
Avery: And that's all the time we have for today.

288
00:11:06.400 --> 00:11:08.960
From rocket failures and celestial mechanics

289
00:11:08.960 --> 00:11:11.120
to a packed launch schedule and critical

290
00:11:11.120 --> 00:11:13.640
safety reviews, it's been another busy day in

291
00:11:13.640 --> 00:11:15.440
the world of astronomy and spaceflight.

292
00:11:15.600 --> 00:11:17.840
Anna: Thanks for tuning in to Astronomy Daily.

293
00:11:17.920 --> 00:11:20.200
We'll be back tomorrow with more news from

294
00:11:20.200 --> 00:11:23.120
across the cosmos. Until then, I'm Anna.

295
00:11:23.280 --> 00:11:25.440
Avery: And I'm Avery. Keep looking up

296
00:11:27.920 --> 00:11:29.280
Astronomy Day

297
00:11:30.960 --> 00:11:32.160
stories be told.

298
00:11:33.900 --> 00:11:34.460
Anna: The world.