Oct. 21, 2025

Cosmic Debris in Australia, NASA's Lunar Shakeup, and the Mystery of Moonlight Signals

Cosmic Debris in Australia, NASA's Lunar Shakeup, and the Mystery of Moonlight Signals
  • Mysterious Space Debris in Australia: A large, smoking piece of metal has been discovered in Western Australia, likely from the fourth stage of a Chinese Jielong 3 rocket. This incident highlights the ongoing issue of space debris and its potential impact on Earth, as authorities investigate the origins of this fiery visitor.
  • NASA's Artemis 3 Update: NASA is considering opening up the Artemis 3 lunar landing contract to a second company, possibly Blue Origin, due to delays with SpaceX's lunar lander. This shift signals a renewed focus on competition and redundancy in lunar exploration as NASA aims for a sustainable presence on the Moon by 2028.
  • SpaceX's Launch Milestones: SpaceX is set to conduct up to four Falcon 9 launches this week, including a notable mission for the SpainSat NG1 satellite, which will see the first stage booster expended to prioritize mission performance. Additionally, SpaceX has launched its 10,000th Starlink satellite, marking a significant milestone for the global internet constellation.
  • New Protocol for Alien Contact: The International Academy of Astronautics has proposed a major update to the protocol for responding to potential signals from extraterrestrial intelligence. The new guidelines emphasize international consultation before any response is sent, reflecting the gravity of such a species-level event.
  • Transient Lunar Phenomena Theories: Ongoing investigations into transient lunar phenomena (TLPs) reveal potential explanations for the mysterious flashes of light on the Moon's surface. Theories range from meteoroid impacts to gas releases from the Moon's interior, highlighting the need for further exploration and observation.
  • For more cosmic updates, visit our website at astronomydaily.io. Join our community on social media by searching for #AstroDailyPod on Facebook, X, YouTubeMusic, TikTok, and our new Instagram account! Don’t forget to subscribe to the podcast on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, iHeartRadio, or wherever you get your podcasts.
  • Thank you for tuning in. This is Anna and Avery signing off. Until next time, keep looking up and exploring the wonders of our universe.
✍️ Episode References
Australian Space Debris Discovery
[Australian Space Agency](https://www.space.gov.au/)
NASA Artemis 3 Mission Updates
[NASA](https://www.nasa.gov/)
SpaceX Launch Cadence
[SpaceX](https://www.spacex.com/)
Alien Contact Protocols
[International Academy of Astronautics](https://iaaweb.org/)
Transient Lunar Phenomena Research
[Astrophysical Journal](https://iopscience.iop.org/journal/0004-637X)
Astronomy Daily
[Astronomy Daily](http://www.astronomydaily.io/)

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/astronomy-daily-space-news-updates--5648921/support.

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!

Sponsor Details:
Ensure your online privacy by using NordVPN. To get our special listener deal and save a lot of money, visit www.bitesz.com/nordvpn. You'll be glad you did!

Become a supporter of Astronomy Daily by joining our Supporters Club. Commercial free episodes daily are only a click way... Click Here
WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.120
Anna: Welcome everyone to Astronomy Daily, your

1
00:00:02.120 --> 00:00:03.720
regular guide to the biggest stories

2
00:00:03.720 --> 00:00:06.120
happening off world. Give us 10 minutes and

3
00:00:06.120 --> 00:00:08.240
we'll give you the universe. I'm Anna.

4
00:00:08.880 --> 00:00:11.800
Avery: And I'm Avery. It's fantastic to have you

5
00:00:11.800 --> 00:00:13.960
with us, Anna. Uh, it feels like every week

6
00:00:13.960 --> 00:00:16.640
the pace just gets faster. We've got so much

7
00:00:16.640 --> 00:00:17.440
to talk about today.

8
00:00:17.520 --> 00:00:19.840
Anna: We really do on the docket. Today we're

9
00:00:19.840 --> 00:00:21.720
starting on the ground in Australia with some

10
00:00:21.720 --> 00:00:23.600
mysterious burning debris that appears to

11
00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:24.720
have fallen from orbit.

12
00:00:25.120 --> 00:00:27.490
Avery: From there we'll jump to the moon, or at

13
00:00:27.490 --> 00:00:29.690
least the plans to get there. NASA is

14
00:00:29.690 --> 00:00:32.130
signaling a major potential shakeup for its

15
00:00:32.130 --> 00:00:34.730
Artemis 3 landing contract. And it's all

16
00:00:34.730 --> 00:00:37.330
about competition and a new space race.

17
00:00:37.650 --> 00:00:39.730
Anna: Then we'll look at SpaceX's relentless launch

18
00:00:39.730 --> 00:00:42.090
cadence, including a very special satellite

19
00:00:42.090 --> 00:00:44.050
and a mind boggling milestone for their

20
00:00:44.050 --> 00:00:45.250
Starlink constellation.

21
00:00:45.730 --> 00:00:48.330
Avery: And after that, we're diving into one of my

22
00:00:48.330 --> 00:00:50.850
favorite topics. Are we alone?

23
00:00:51.250 --> 00:00:53.170
There's a huge update to the official

24
00:00:53.330 --> 00:00:55.780
playbook for what scientists should do if

25
00:00:55.780 --> 00:00:58.380
they actually detect a signal from ET.

26
00:00:58.460 --> 00:01:01.420
Anna: It's a big deal, it really is. And we'll

27
00:01:01.420 --> 00:01:03.140
finish by looking at our own moon and the

28
00:01:03.140 --> 00:01:04.940
strange flashes of light that have puzzled

29
00:01:04.940 --> 00:01:06.980
astronomers for centuries. With some new

30
00:01:06.980 --> 00:01:09.220
theories emerging, it's a packed show, so

31
00:01:09.220 --> 00:01:10.140
let's get right into it.

32
00:01:11.180 --> 00:01:13.780
Avery: Alright. Our first story takes us to

33
00:01:13.780 --> 00:01:16.460
Western Australia, where miners

34
00:01:16.620 --> 00:01:19.100
stumbled upon something you don't see every

35
00:01:19.100 --> 00:01:22.030
day. A large, still smoking

36
00:01:22.110 --> 00:01:25.110
piece of metal that had clearly fallen from

37
00:01:25.110 --> 00:01:25.630
the sky.

38
00:01:26.190 --> 00:01:28.750
Anna: Right. Pictures show this charred

39
00:01:28.750 --> 00:01:31.430
dome shaped object and authorities were

40
00:01:31.430 --> 00:01:33.750
quickly called in. The Australian Space

41
00:01:33.750 --> 00:01:36.350
Agency is now leading the investigation

42
00:01:36.510 --> 00:01:38.430
to formally identify the object.

43
00:01:39.230 --> 00:01:41.990
Avery: It must be quite a sight to just find that in

44
00:01:41.990 --> 00:01:44.790
a field. Now, while the official confirmation

45
00:01:44.790 --> 00:01:47.630
is pending, an astrophysicist has suggested

46
00:01:47.630 --> 00:01:50.190
it's very likely from the fourth stage of a

47
00:01:50.190 --> 00:01:53.130
Chinese Jielong 3 rocket which was launched

48
00:01:53.130 --> 00:01:53.850
last September.

49
00:01:54.010 --> 00:01:56.130
Anna: And that makes sense, given the trajectory

50
00:01:56.130 --> 00:01:58.810
and the materials. It really brings the issue

51
00:01:58.810 --> 00:02:00.730
of space debris into sharp focus.

52
00:02:01.610 --> 00:02:03.650
We often talk about it as a problem for

53
00:02:03.650 --> 00:02:06.330
satellites in orbit, but this is a reminder

54
00:02:06.330 --> 00:02:09.090
that it can and does have an impact right

55
00:02:09.090 --> 00:02:09.930
here on Earth.

56
00:02:10.490 --> 00:02:13.130
Avery: Exactly. Most of the tens of

57
00:02:13.130 --> 00:02:15.970
thousands of trackable objects are small but

58
00:02:15.970 --> 00:02:18.850
larger pieces like rocket stages and have

59
00:02:18.850 --> 00:02:21.370
a non zero chance of surviving re

60
00:02:21.370 --> 00:02:23.650
entry. We've seen it before with

61
00:02:23.650 --> 00:02:26.410
Skylab in 1979, also

62
00:02:26.490 --> 00:02:29.290
in Australia, and more recently with other

63
00:02:29.290 --> 00:02:31.040
Chinese rocket stages making uncontrolled,

64
00:02:31.040 --> 00:02:32.410
uh, re entries.

65
00:02:33.020 --> 00:02:36.010
Anna: Mhm. And that's the key term, uncontrolled.

66
00:02:36.570 --> 00:02:38.530
Most modern rockets are designed to re enter

67
00:02:38.530 --> 00:02:41.090
over the ocean or have systems to deorbit

68
00:02:41.090 --> 00:02:43.850
themselves safely. But some older designs

69
00:02:44.180 --> 00:02:46.540
or in some specific mission profiles, the

70
00:02:46.540 --> 00:02:48.580
stages are just left to tumble down wherever

71
00:02:48.580 --> 00:02:50.580
gravity and atmospheric drag take them.

72
00:02:50.660 --> 00:02:52.980
Avery: It's a bit like cosmic roulette.

73
00:02:53.220 --> 00:02:55.740
Thankfully, since so much of the Earth is

74
00:02:55.740 --> 00:02:58.660
water or uninhabited land, the

75
00:02:58.660 --> 00:03:01.140
risk to human life has been statistically

76
00:03:01.380 --> 00:03:03.780
very low. But it's not zero.

77
00:03:04.020 --> 00:03:06.740
And as the number of launches increases,

78
00:03:07.220 --> 00:03:08.900
that risk goes up.

79
00:03:09.300 --> 00:03:11.180
Anna: It's a problem that space agencies and

80
00:03:11.180 --> 00:03:13.220
private companies are taking more seriously

81
00:03:13.790 --> 00:03:15.590
with new technologies for active debris

82
00:03:15.590 --> 00:03:18.310
removal being developed. But for now, it

83
00:03:18.310 --> 00:03:19.950
seems we'll occasionally be getting these

84
00:03:19.950 --> 00:03:21.310
fiery visitors from above.

85
00:03:21.630 --> 00:03:24.310
Avery: Okay, from falling hardware to the hardware

86
00:03:24.310 --> 00:03:26.550
we're intentionally trying to send to the

87
00:03:26.550 --> 00:03:26.910
moon.

88
00:03:27.390 --> 00:03:29.549
Anna, uh, there's some major news from NASA

89
00:03:29.549 --> 00:03:32.350
about the Artemis 3 mission. The one that's

90
00:03:32.350 --> 00:03:34.470
supposed to put astronauts back on the lunar

91
00:03:34.470 --> 00:03:34.910
surface.

92
00:03:35.390 --> 00:03:37.870
Anna: This is a huge development. NASA's acting

93
00:03:37.870 --> 00:03:40.430
chief Sean Duffy has indicated that the

94
00:03:40.430 --> 00:03:42.710
agency is strongly considering opening up the

95
00:03:42.710 --> 00:03:45.550
moon landing contract to a second company in

96
00:03:45.550 --> 00:03:46.630
addition to SpaceX.

97
00:03:47.030 --> 00:03:50.030
Avery: Right. As it stands, SpaceX and its

98
00:03:50.030 --> 00:03:52.630
lunar Optimized Starship were the sole

99
00:03:52.630 --> 00:03:55.350
winners of that lucrative contract. But the

100
00:03:55.350 --> 00:03:57.790
new thinking at, uh, NASA is that relying on

101
00:03:57.790 --> 00:04:00.190
just one provider for such a critical

102
00:04:00.190 --> 00:04:02.150
national capability is risky.

103
00:04:02.230 --> 00:04:05.030
Anna: It definitely is. The acting chief cited a

104
00:04:05.030 --> 00:04:07.910
couple of key reasons. First, he acknowledged

105
00:04:07.910 --> 00:04:10.270
that SpaceX is behind schedule in developing

106
00:04:10.270 --> 00:04:13.090
the lander. They need to perform many test

107
00:04:13.090 --> 00:04:15.530
flights of starship, including an uncrewed

108
00:04:15.530 --> 00:04:17.570
lunar landing, before they can put astronauts

109
00:04:17.570 --> 00:04:19.290
on board. And that's taking longer than

110
00:04:19.290 --> 00:04:19.770
hoped.

111
00:04:20.170 --> 00:04:22.490
Avery: The second reason he gave was much more

112
00:04:22.490 --> 00:04:24.970
direct. He explicitly mentioned a race

113
00:04:24.970 --> 00:04:27.690
against China. China has its own

114
00:04:27.690 --> 00:04:30.290
ambitious lunar program with plans for a

115
00:04:30.290 --> 00:04:33.130
lunar base. And NASA is feeling the pressure

116
00:04:33.130 --> 00:04:34.250
to not fall behind.

117
00:04:34.730 --> 00:04:36.450
Anna: Yeah, you don't hear that kind of direct

118
00:04:36.450 --> 00:04:39.400
language every day. So the idea is to bring

119
00:04:39.400 --> 00:04:41.880
in another company like Blue Origin with

120
00:04:41.880 --> 00:04:44.440
their Blue Moon lander concept to develop a

121
00:04:44.440 --> 00:04:47.280
competing system. This creates redundancy and

122
00:04:47.280 --> 00:04:48.400
spurs competition.

123
00:04:48.880 --> 00:04:51.520
Avery: It's a return to the Apollo era model in a

124
00:04:51.520 --> 00:04:54.040
way where multiple contractors were often

125
00:04:54.040 --> 00:04:56.200
working on different parts of the same

126
00:04:56.200 --> 00:04:58.920
problem. This also comes with a more

127
00:04:58.920 --> 00:05:01.520
realistic timeline, with the Artemis 3

128
00:05:01.520 --> 00:05:04.280
landing now being publicly targeted for

129
00:05:04.280 --> 00:05:05.120
2028.

130
00:05:05.610 --> 00:05:08.090
Anna: It's a smart move in my opinion. It might

131
00:05:08.090 --> 00:05:10.010
cost more in the short term to fund two

132
00:05:10.010 --> 00:05:12.690
landers, but in the long term, it makes the

133
00:05:12.690 --> 00:05:15.330
entire enterprise more resilient and it

134
00:05:15.330 --> 00:05:17.570
signals that NASA is serious about creating a

135
00:05:17.570 --> 00:05:19.810
sustainable presence at the moon, not just a

136
00:05:19.810 --> 00:05:20.570
one off visit.

137
00:05:20.970 --> 00:05:23.650
Avery: Absolutely. The next few months will be

138
00:05:23.650 --> 00:05:26.250
critical as we wait to see if NASA formally

139
00:05:26.250 --> 00:05:28.970
opens up bids for this second contract, a

140
00:05:28.970 --> 00:05:30.330
very big story to watch.

141
00:05:31.460 --> 00:05:33.060
Anna: Well, while NASA might be worried about

142
00:05:33.060 --> 00:05:35.700
SpaceX's timeline for the moon, there's no

143
00:05:35.700 --> 00:05:37.460
question about their launch cadence here on

144
00:05:37.460 --> 00:05:40.060
Earth. This week alone, they're aiming for as

145
00:05:40.060 --> 00:05:42.260
many as four Falcon 9 launches.

146
00:05:42.500 --> 00:05:44.820
Avery: The pace is just relentless.

147
00:05:45.300 --> 00:05:47.580
It has fundamentally changed the launch

148
00:05:47.580 --> 00:05:50.420
industry. And one of this week's missions is

149
00:05:50.420 --> 00:05:53.380
particularly noteworthy because the Falcon 9

150
00:05:53.380 --> 00:05:56.020
first stage booster is going to be expended.

151
00:05:56.670 --> 00:05:58.430
Anna: Right? It's not going to attempt a landing.

152
00:05:58.750 --> 00:06:01.390
This is for the SpainSat NG1 satellite,

153
00:06:01.550 --> 00:06:03.710
a sophisticated communications satellite for

154
00:06:03.710 --> 00:06:05.990
the Spanish government. Why are they

155
00:06:05.990 --> 00:06:07.550
expending the booster for this one?

156
00:06:07.790 --> 00:06:10.310
Avery: It all comes down to performance. This

157
00:06:10.310 --> 00:06:13.190
satellite is very heavy and it's headed for a

158
00:06:13.190 --> 00:06:15.790
high energy geostationary transfer orbit.

159
00:06:16.270 --> 00:06:18.950
To get it there, the Falcon 9 has to burn its

160
00:06:18.950 --> 00:06:21.470
engine for longer and at a higher thrust,

161
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:23.960
leaving no fuel reserves for the complex

162
00:06:23.960 --> 00:06:25.720
boostback and landing burns.

163
00:06:25.800 --> 00:06:27.760
Anna: So they're prioritizing the customer's

164
00:06:27.760 --> 00:06:30.520
mission over recovering the hardware. It's a

165
00:06:30.520 --> 00:06:33.200
good reminder that as routine as the landings

166
00:06:33.200 --> 00:06:36.080
have become, they are still secondary to

167
00:06:36.080 --> 00:06:37.320
the primary mission.

168
00:06:37.799 --> 00:06:38.680
Avery: Exactly.

169
00:06:38.680 --> 00:06:41.480
And Speaking of routine, SpaceX quietly

170
00:06:41.480 --> 00:06:44.240
passed a massive milestone recently. They

171
00:06:44.240 --> 00:06:47.160
successfully launched their 10,000th Starlink

172
00:06:47.160 --> 00:06:49.450
satellite. Just think about that number for a

173
00:06:49.450 --> 00:06:49.690
second.

174
00:06:50.090 --> 00:06:52.930
Anna: 10,000. The scale of that constellation is

175
00:06:52.930 --> 00:06:55.490
almost impossible to comprehend. It's

176
00:06:55.490 --> 00:06:57.930
providing Internet to remote places all over

177
00:06:57.930 --> 00:07:00.890
the world, which is incredible. But it's also

178
00:07:00.890 --> 00:07:03.130
causing ongoing headaches for ground based

179
00:07:03.130 --> 00:07:04.810
astronomers due to light pollution.

180
00:07:05.210 --> 00:07:07.370
Avery: It's a complex issue with passionate

181
00:07:07.370 --> 00:07:10.050
arguments on both sides. And to complete the

182
00:07:10.050 --> 00:07:12.490
global launch picture for the week, a Chinese

183
00:07:12.490 --> 00:07:15.250
Long March 5 rocket is also scheduled to lift

184
00:07:15.250 --> 00:07:17.380
off. But but its payload is a secret.

185
00:07:17.780 --> 00:07:19.460
Anna: A little bit of intrigue from the China

186
00:07:19.460 --> 00:07:21.300
National Space Administration. We'll be

187
00:07:21.300 --> 00:07:22.820
keeping an eye out for what that might be.

188
00:07:23.220 --> 00:07:26.100
Avery: Okay, for our next story, let's venture

189
00:07:26.100 --> 00:07:28.620
into the hypothetical. Let's say

190
00:07:28.620 --> 00:07:31.100
tomorrow. Astronomers using a radio

191
00:07:31.100 --> 00:07:33.860
telescope detect an unmistakable

192
00:07:34.100 --> 00:07:36.740
structured signal from a nearby star system.

193
00:07:37.380 --> 00:07:39.940
It's intelligent. What happens next?

194
00:07:40.420 --> 00:07:42.340
Anna: Well, for decades, the plan has been what's

195
00:07:42.340 --> 00:07:45.140
known as the post detection policy. But now

196
00:07:45.300 --> 00:07:47.500
the International Academy of Astronautics is

197
00:07:47.500 --> 00:07:50.340
proposing a major, major update. And

198
00:07:50.340 --> 00:07:51.980
it's a fascinating look at how our

199
00:07:51.980 --> 00:07:53.300
perspective has changed.

200
00:07:53.620 --> 00:07:56.540
Avery: It really is. The old protocol was largely

201
00:07:56.540 --> 00:07:59.300
about verification. A scientist who found a

202
00:07:59.300 --> 00:08:01.340
signal would first need to rule out all

203
00:08:01.340 --> 00:08:04.100
terrestrial sources and then get independent

204
00:08:04.100 --> 00:08:06.180
verification from another observatory.

205
00:08:06.820 --> 00:08:08.900
After that, the information would be released

206
00:08:08.900 --> 00:08:09.460
to the public.

207
00:08:10.190 --> 00:08:11.990
Anna: And crucially, the decision of whether or not

208
00:08:11.990 --> 00:08:14.830
to reply was left largely to the discoverers.

209
00:08:15.230 --> 00:08:17.870
There wasn't a Global consensus required. The

210
00:08:17.870 --> 00:08:19.950
new proposal completely changes that last

211
00:08:19.950 --> 00:08:20.270
part.

212
00:08:20.670 --> 00:08:23.110
Avery: That's the core of it. The new protocol

213
00:08:23.110 --> 00:08:25.550
states that no response should be sent to a,

214
00:08:25.550 --> 00:08:27.870
uh, confirmed alien signal until

215
00:08:27.870 --> 00:08:30.590
appropriate international consultations have

216
00:08:30.590 --> 00:08:33.350
taken place. Specifically through a body like

217
00:08:33.350 --> 00:08:34.430
the United Nations.

218
00:08:34.990 --> 00:08:36.950
Anna: So in essence, we have to talk amongst

219
00:08:36.950 --> 00:08:39.909
ourselves before we talk to them. It

220
00:08:39.909 --> 00:08:41.909
takes the decision out of the hands of a

221
00:08:41.909 --> 00:08:43.909
small group of scientists and places it on

222
00:08:43.909 --> 00:08:44.829
the world stage.

223
00:08:45.389 --> 00:08:48.189
Avery: Exactly. And the rationale is a

224
00:08:48.189 --> 00:08:50.469
reply to an alien signal would be sent on

225
00:08:50.469 --> 00:08:53.469
behalf of all of humanity. What would we say?

226
00:08:53.789 --> 00:08:56.309
Who would craft the message? What are the

227
00:08:56.309 --> 00:08:58.909
potential risks and rewards? These aren't

228
00:08:58.909 --> 00:09:00.909
just scientific questions. They're political,

229
00:09:01.309 --> 00:09:02.749
cultural and ethical.

230
00:09:03.069 --> 00:09:05.229
Anna: You can just imagine the debates at the un.

231
00:09:06.130 --> 00:09:08.950
It would be unbelievable. This reflects a,

232
00:09:08.950 --> 00:09:11.490
uh, growing understanding that contact isn't

233
00:09:11.490 --> 00:09:14.130
just a scientific discovery. It's a

234
00:09:14.130 --> 00:09:17.050
species level event. And it's probably

235
00:09:17.050 --> 00:09:19.450
wise to have a plan in place before we're

236
00:09:19.450 --> 00:09:20.530
forced to improvise.

237
00:09:21.090 --> 00:09:23.970
Avery: I agree. It's a sober, mature step

238
00:09:23.970 --> 00:09:25.810
for the SETI community to take.

239
00:09:26.690 --> 00:09:28.490
Anna: Alright, for our last story, we're heading

240
00:09:28.490 --> 00:09:30.570
back to the Moon to look at a genuine long

241
00:09:30.570 --> 00:09:33.360
standing astronomical mystery. Transient

242
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:35.120
lunar phenomena or TLPs.

243
00:09:35.360 --> 00:09:37.760
Avery: Right. These are reports of short lived

244
00:09:37.760 --> 00:09:40.640
lights, colors or other changes on the lunar

245
00:09:40.640 --> 00:09:42.520
surface. They've been documented for

246
00:09:42.520 --> 00:09:45.360
centuries, even by pre telescopic observers,

247
00:09:45.520 --> 00:09:47.640
but they're notoriously difficult to confirm

248
00:09:47.640 --> 00:09:48.160
and study.

249
00:09:48.560 --> 00:09:50.400
Anna: So what are the leading theories for what's

250
00:09:50.400 --> 00:09:52.160
causing them? It seems like there's more than

251
00:09:52.160 --> 00:09:52.880
one answer.

252
00:09:53.360 --> 00:09:56.240
Avery: There likely is. For the briefest flashes.

253
00:09:56.560 --> 00:09:59.400
Just a blink and they're gone. The

254
00:09:59.400 --> 00:10:01.440
consensus is that these are meteoroid

255
00:10:01.440 --> 00:10:04.440
impacts. We have networks of telescopes

256
00:10:04.440 --> 00:10:07.280
that now monitor the Moon for these, and we

257
00:10:07.280 --> 00:10:10.080
see them fairly often. A small rock hitting

258
00:10:10.080 --> 00:10:12.600
the dark side of the moon at 30,000 miles per

259
00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:15.400
hour creates a visible flash of

260
00:10:15.400 --> 00:10:16.440
vaporized rock.

261
00:10:16.680 --> 00:10:18.880
Anna: Okay, that one makes sense. But what about

262
00:10:18.880 --> 00:10:20.840
the ones that last longer? The reports of

263
00:10:20.840 --> 00:10:22.880
areas that seem to glow or have a strange

264
00:10:22.880 --> 00:10:24.440
haze for minutes or even hours?

265
00:10:25.450 --> 00:10:27.610
Avery: That's where it gets more interesting. A

266
00:10:27.610 --> 00:10:30.130
strong candidate is the release of gas from

267
00:10:30.130 --> 00:10:32.770
the Moon's interior. The Moon isn't

268
00:10:32.770 --> 00:10:35.290
geologically dead. It's thought to have a

269
00:10:35.290 --> 00:10:37.650
molten core and still experiences

270
00:10:37.650 --> 00:10:40.170
moonquakes. These quakes could release

271
00:10:40.170 --> 00:10:43.090
pockets of trapped gas, like radon from

272
00:10:43.090 --> 00:10:44.090
below the surface.

273
00:10:44.330 --> 00:10:45.530
Anna: And that gas could glow.

274
00:10:46.010 --> 00:10:48.690
Avery: Potentially. The gas itself might

275
00:10:48.690 --> 00:10:51.050
fluoresce under the harsh solar radiation.

276
00:10:51.210 --> 00:10:53.960
Or, or it could stir up fine lunar dust which

277
00:10:53.960 --> 00:10:56.680
then reflects sunlight in a peculiar

278
00:10:56.680 --> 00:10:59.640
way. The Aristarchus Plateau is a known

279
00:10:59.640 --> 00:11:02.400
hotspot for these kinds of events. And it's

280
00:11:02.400 --> 00:11:04.240
also a region known for a gas release.

281
00:11:05.040 --> 00:11:07.760
Anna: Fascinating. And what about the really weird,

282
00:11:07.760 --> 00:11:08.880
long lasting lights?

283
00:11:09.280 --> 00:11:12.280
Avery: Those are the most contentious. One theory

284
00:11:12.280 --> 00:11:14.800
is electrostatic dust levitation,

285
00:11:15.120 --> 00:11:18.080
where solar radiation charges fine dust

286
00:11:18.080 --> 00:11:20.560
particles and makes them hover above the

287
00:11:20.560 --> 00:11:23.280
surface, forming a kind of temporary

288
00:11:23.360 --> 00:11:26.080
dusty atmosphere that can scatter light.

289
00:11:26.960 --> 00:11:28.960
Other scientists are more skeptical,

290
00:11:29.440 --> 00:11:31.920
suggesting these are just misidentified

291
00:11:31.920 --> 00:11:34.720
satellites or even phenomena in our

292
00:11:34.720 --> 00:11:37.120
own atmosphere projected against the Moon.

293
00:11:38.000 --> 00:11:40.000
Anna: So we still don't have a definitive answer.

294
00:11:40.080 --> 00:11:42.040
It's amazing to think that we've walked on

295
00:11:42.040 --> 00:11:44.040
the Moon, yet it still holds these

296
00:11:44.040 --> 00:11:46.600
fundamental mysteries. It's a good reason to

297
00:11:46.600 --> 00:11:49.040
keep sending robotic and eventually human

298
00:11:49.200 --> 00:11:50.720
observers back to investigate.

299
00:11:51.020 --> 00:11:52.860
Avery: And with that mystery, our time is up for

300
00:11:52.860 --> 00:11:55.500
this episode of Astronomy Daily. From cosmic

301
00:11:55.500 --> 00:11:57.980
litter in the outback to global debates about

302
00:11:57.980 --> 00:12:00.660
talking to aliens, it's been an episode full

303
00:12:00.660 --> 00:12:01.820
of incredible science.

304
00:12:02.060 --> 00:12:04.700
Anna: It certainly has. The universe never fails to

305
00:12:04.700 --> 00:12:07.059
keep us on our toes. We hope you've enjoyed

306
00:12:07.059 --> 00:12:09.340
this tour of the latest astronomical news.

307
00:12:09.660 --> 00:12:12.060
Avery: A, uh, huge thank you to all of you for

308
00:12:12.060 --> 00:12:14.780
listening. Be sure to join us again tomorrow

309
00:12:14.780 --> 00:12:17.420
for another deep dive into the cosmos.

310
00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:20.560
Until then, from both of us, clear

311
00:12:20.560 --> 00:12:22.640
skies and keep looking up.