Jan. 31, 2025

E134 How I Accidentally Started a Billion Dollar Tech Company w/Carta CEO Henry Ward

E134 How I Accidentally Started a Billion Dollar Tech Company w/Carta CEO Henry Ward
The player is loading ...
E134 How I Accidentally Started a Billion Dollar Tech Company w/Carta CEO Henry Ward

In this episode of How I Invest, I dive deep into a conversation with Henry Ward, CEO of Carta, to discuss his journey building one of the most transformative companies in private market infrastructure. From cap table management to fund administration and beyond, Henry shares his insights on entrepreneurship, innovation, and the future of private equity. We delve into Carta's strategic pivots, its playbook for turning services into scalable software, and Henry's contrarian views on AI and leadership. This episode is packed with lessons for founders, investors, and operators navigating the evolving landscape of private capital.

Highlights: The Carta Journey: How Carta evolved from solving cap table management to building software for fund CFOs.

Scaling Through Innovation: The importance of constantly iterating and innovating in markets with limited growth potential.

AI in Private Markets: Why Henry is focused on using AI to enhance customer experiences instead of reducing headcount. Building the Carta Cartel: How former Carta employees are founding companies with Henry's support—and reshaping angel investing.

Services to Software: Carta's unique playbook for acquiring service businesses and turning them into software-driven solutions.

Future of Fund Admin: The roadmap for automating fund administration and achieving “one-click” reporting by 2030.

Private Equity Expansion: Carta’s strategy for becoming the operating system for private capital beyond venture.

Leadership Insights: Henry’s take on founder mode, micromanagement, and why caring deeply is essential to great leadership.

--

Guest Bio: Henry Ward is the CEO of Carta, a company revolutionizing private market infrastructure through software. Since its founding in 2012, Carta has grown into the industry standard for cap table management, fund administration, and private market data. Henry is also an active angel investor, backing numerous startups founded by former Carta employees. Known for his visionary thinking and contrarian ideas, Henry is committed to reshaping how private capital markets operate.

Our Podcast now receives more than 200,000 downloads a month. Are you interested in sponsoring an episode? Please email David Weisburd at dweisburd@gmail.com.

#VentureCapital #VC #Startups #OpenLP #AssetManagement

--

Stay Connected: X / Twitter: David Weisburd: @dweisburd Henry Ward: @henrysward

LinkedIn: David Weisburd: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dweisburd/ Henry Ward: https://www.linkedin.com/in/heward/

Links: Carta: https://www.carta.com/

Questions or topics you want us to discuss on How I Invest? Email us at dweisburd@gmail.com.

(0:00) Episode preview (1:10) Early support and big ideas at Carta (6:35) Carta's contrarian approach to AI (10:22) Overcoming fund administration hurdles (15:51) Dynamics of investing in spin-offs (19:46) Transitioning from founder to CEO mindset (22:36) Strategy behind acquisitions and software development (25:23) Carta's strategic value for CFOs (27:45) Carta's business model pivot and strategic reevaluation (29:44) Growth trajectory of Carta's Fund Admin business (31:30) Expansion into private equity markets (34:36) Projecting Carta's future in 2030 (35:50) Closing remarks
Transcript
1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:01,379
How did you get this idea?

2
00:00:01,520 --> 00:00:02,319
I'm different.

3
00:00:02,319 --> 00:00:06,719
I fell in love with being a founder, and I
didn't care what I had to do to become a

4
00:00:06,719 --> 00:00:07,120
founder.

5
00:00:07,120 --> 00:00:10,880
I fell in love with being a founder, and the
problem was the vehicle for me to become a

6
00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:12,765
founder, which is a strength and a weakness.

7
00:00:12,765 --> 00:00:16,524
The strength the the weakness is I'm not
committed one particular vision, I'm just

8
00:00:16,524 --> 00:00:18,045
committed to the founder journey.

9
00:00:18,045 --> 00:00:23,244
The strength is that means I'm agnostic which
problem I solve, which is you see it in the DNA

10
00:00:23,244 --> 00:00:24,625
of hard, like, we'll do anything.

11
00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:25,079
Right?

12
00:00:25,079 --> 00:00:27,880
We'll move cap tables, 49 a, fund account.

13
00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:31,899
Like, this stuff nobody would ever nobody wakes
up and goes, you know what?

14
00:00:33,239 --> 00:00:34,939
Like, it's just that nobody does that.

15
00:00:37,960 --> 00:00:44,085
When you started Carta over a decade ago, you
mentioned you started with cap table management

16
00:00:44,145 --> 00:00:44,945
as a wedge.

17
00:00:44,945 --> 00:00:46,325
How did you get this idea?

18
00:00:46,385 --> 00:00:48,725
Was this inspired from your previous
experience?

19
00:00:48,785 --> 00:00:53,925
And I thought it was a very novel strategy, but
why didn't other people have this idea?

20
00:00:54,620 --> 00:00:56,380
You know, it's a it's a great question.

21
00:00:56,380 --> 00:00:58,719
I I had a different company that failed.

22
00:00:58,780 --> 00:01:04,299
1 of, the investors I worked with on that
company, when it it failed, he he took me to

23
00:01:04,299 --> 00:01:06,299
lunch at at, Typhoon.

24
00:01:06,299 --> 00:01:08,219
His name is Manu Manu Kumar.

25
00:01:08,219 --> 00:01:09,745
And he says, Henry, you know

26
00:01:10,064 --> 00:01:10,864
k nine.

27
00:01:10,864 --> 00:01:11,185
Yeah.

28
00:01:11,185 --> 00:01:11,825
K nine.

29
00:01:11,825 --> 00:01:15,344
And he said, you know, Henry, this you know,
that company didn't work.

30
00:01:15,344 --> 00:01:16,465
It wasn't a good idea.

31
00:01:16,465 --> 00:01:18,245
But I I think you're pretty good.

32
00:01:19,665 --> 00:01:21,905
This cap table problem is a crazy problem.

33
00:01:21,905 --> 00:01:25,739
Like, it I just don't understand how we're, you
know, the industry is so bad at it.

34
00:01:25,739 --> 00:01:28,700
You'll, start the company, I'll invest in it.

35
00:01:28,700 --> 00:01:31,659
Like, I think this is an important company to
to build.

36
00:01:31,659 --> 00:01:33,680
And I met maybe a unique entrepreneur.

37
00:01:33,739 --> 00:01:37,924
Most entrepreneurs, the conventional wisdom is,
you fall in love with a problem, and

38
00:01:37,924 --> 00:01:41,545
entrepreneurship is a vehicle, with which to
solve that problem.

39
00:01:42,165 --> 00:01:43,365
I'm different.

40
00:01:43,365 --> 00:01:48,165
I fell in love with being a founder, and I
didn't care what I had to do to become a

41
00:01:48,165 --> 00:01:48,484
founder.

42
00:01:48,484 --> 00:01:52,239
I fell in love with being a founder, and the
problem was the vehicle for me to become a

43
00:01:52,239 --> 00:01:54,099
founder, which is a strength and a weakness.

44
00:01:54,879 --> 00:01:58,879
The strength the the weakness is I'm not
committed, you know, to to one particular

45
00:01:58,879 --> 00:01:59,119
vision.

46
00:01:59,119 --> 00:02:01,060
I'm just committed to the founder journey.

47
00:02:01,334 --> 00:02:07,174
The the strength is that means I'm agnostic of
which problem I solve, which is you see it in

48
00:02:07,174 --> 00:02:08,055
the DNA of Cardinal.

49
00:02:08,055 --> 00:02:09,034
Like, we'll do anything.

50
00:02:09,094 --> 00:02:09,594
Right?

51
00:02:10,055 --> 00:02:12,215
We'll cap tables, 49 a, fund account.

52
00:02:12,215 --> 00:02:15,974
Like, the stuff nobody would ever nobody wakes
up and goes, you know what?

53
00:02:15,974 --> 00:02:17,566
I wanted to do cap tables for 10 years.

54
00:02:17,566 --> 00:02:19,250
Like, I just nobody does that.

55
00:02:19,870 --> 00:02:24,689
And so that's the that's my gift is I'll I'll
do anything to continue the journey.

56
00:02:25,469 --> 00:02:28,349
And so he was like, you know, why don't you
start this company?

57
00:02:28,349 --> 00:02:30,030
And I said, I don't have any better ideas.

58
00:02:31,074 --> 00:02:32,114
And that's how we started.

59
00:02:32,114 --> 00:02:36,194
But then it just became this incredibly
exciting thing because once we got this tiny

60
00:02:36,194 --> 00:02:42,275
little wedge with a a seed stage startup, we
could start doing everything for these

61
00:02:42,275 --> 00:02:43,414
companies and funds.

62
00:02:43,550 --> 00:02:46,449
And that's what made this the the the ride
really special.

63
00:02:47,150 --> 00:02:51,469
I spoke to a lot of people in the industry, and
they said, Henry has really big ideas, but he's

64
00:02:51,469 --> 00:02:54,050
sometimes pursuing multiple different areas.

65
00:02:54,189 --> 00:02:56,449
How is that a strength and how is that a
weakness?

66
00:02:56,844 --> 00:03:01,905
We talk a lot about, innovation companies,
versus execution companies.

67
00:03:02,044 --> 00:03:07,164
So, you know, back in the day, you know, we
were recruiting, you know, against, like,

68
00:03:07,164 --> 00:03:09,405
Rippling or MongoDB or Zoom.

69
00:03:09,405 --> 00:03:10,064
You know?

70
00:03:10,760 --> 00:03:15,000
And people would say, you know, why should I
come to Carta instead of one of those

71
00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:15,500
companies?

72
00:03:15,719 --> 00:03:19,819
And I said, well, it depends on the kind of
company you you wanna be a part of.

73
00:03:19,879 --> 00:03:23,180
I would call those, execution companies.

74
00:03:23,605 --> 00:03:23,805
You know?

75
00:03:23,805 --> 00:03:28,885
If you're partner, if you build a better HR
system than anybody else in the world, you have

76
00:03:28,885 --> 00:03:32,265
in you know, you have line of sight to a
1,000,000,000, 10,000,000,000 in revenue.

77
00:03:32,325 --> 00:03:32,965
No problem.

78
00:03:32,965 --> 00:03:37,064
You build a better database, MongoDB, line of
sight to 1,000,000,000 in revenue.

79
00:03:37,139 --> 00:03:41,699
You build a better Zoom or, you know, a video,
conferencing system, line of sight to

80
00:03:41,699 --> 00:03:42,759
1,000,000,000 in revenue.

81
00:03:43,060 --> 00:03:45,939
You build a better cap table, line of sight to
50,000,000.

82
00:03:45,939 --> 00:03:48,120
You know, a 100,000,000 maybe.

83
00:03:48,340 --> 00:03:48,840
Right?

84
00:03:49,139 --> 00:03:54,105
And and so we we I would describe as an
innovation company, we never had clear line of

85
00:03:54,105 --> 00:03:56,125
sight to any large outcome.

86
00:03:56,504 --> 00:04:01,784
We were always, oh, you know, we have to
innovate our way out of every market or product

87
00:04:01,784 --> 00:04:02,605
that we started.

88
00:04:02,879 --> 00:04:06,159
You know, the way I describe it is, like, if
you were gonna work for one of these companies,

89
00:04:06,159 --> 00:04:11,759
do you wanna be part of, like, a super well
defined team execution, operationally efficient

90
00:04:11,759 --> 00:04:15,699
team with clear strategy and line of sight, to
where they're going?

91
00:04:15,944 --> 00:04:21,464
Or do you come to Carta where we're a bunch of
misfit ragtag, you know, guys and gals, you

92
00:04:21,464 --> 00:04:25,305
know, with a machete trying to, you know, hack
our ways through the jungle and and find our

93
00:04:25,305 --> 00:04:26,045
path out?

94
00:04:26,264 --> 00:04:28,685
And that's really the the 2 types of companies.

95
00:04:29,064 --> 00:04:34,500
And so for us, we just had to build a company
that we knew we were paranoid and still are.

96
00:04:34,500 --> 00:04:36,600
Any market we're in will run out of oxygen.

97
00:04:36,819 --> 00:04:41,540
And so we have to keep constantly adding new
products and ideas to the portfolio to see

98
00:04:41,540 --> 00:04:42,819
which ones will break out.

99
00:04:42,819 --> 00:04:47,745
And thank god we did because if all we did was
carda x and didn't do all these other ideas

100
00:04:47,745 --> 00:04:51,125
that we had, including fund accounting, we we'd
be dead.

101
00:04:51,185 --> 00:04:55,105
Right now, we've got, you know, 3 main
businesses that drive half a 1,000,000,000 in

102
00:04:55,105 --> 00:04:55,605
revenue.

103
00:04:56,225 --> 00:05:01,345
But I got 7 projects in the back, that we're
working on that will hopefully get us to the

104
00:05:01,345 --> 00:05:02,410
next 1,000,000,000.

105
00:05:03,990 --> 00:05:08,169
How do you decide when to start a project, when
to close a project?

106
00:05:08,470 --> 00:05:12,250
There's 2 ways to start these projects, bottoms
up and and top top down.

107
00:05:12,310 --> 00:05:17,154
Successful projects tend to be top down, Not
necessarily because I have better ideas than

108
00:05:17,154 --> 00:05:23,154
the company or bottoms up ideas, but in part
because if I have an idea, it's it gets the

109
00:05:23,154 --> 00:05:25,954
whole weight of the CEO and the company around
it.

110
00:05:25,954 --> 00:05:30,709
These days, like, a good idea still needs a lot
of muscle to to to get it out there.

111
00:05:31,350 --> 00:05:33,769
You can't just build an app now, and it works.

112
00:05:35,110 --> 00:05:37,990
But there are cases where bottoms up ideas
work.

113
00:05:37,990 --> 00:05:43,125
And so you wanna build a a function where I
spend a lot of my time ideating and working

114
00:05:43,125 --> 00:05:45,785
with teams on ideas that I wanna flush out
with.

115
00:05:46,165 --> 00:05:46,904
We do hackathons.

116
00:05:47,125 --> 00:05:51,685
So that's a great way where people can and I
judge them and people will come and pitch and

117
00:05:51,685 --> 00:05:54,509
I'll go, that's a you know, kill, kill, kill,
kill this one.

118
00:05:54,509 --> 00:05:55,310
Come back to me.

119
00:05:55,310 --> 00:05:57,490
Let's, like, let's pull this thread a little
further.

120
00:05:57,629 --> 00:06:02,850
And then once a year, I do Carta Business
School where I take sort of the 30 top young,

121
00:06:03,470 --> 00:06:04,689
managers at Carta.

122
00:06:05,069 --> 00:06:07,949
And I take them to an off-site using some
secret location.

123
00:06:07,949 --> 00:06:08,930
That's that's beautiful.

124
00:06:09,334 --> 00:06:12,475
And we spend 3 days together, and we just
ideate.

125
00:06:13,095 --> 00:06:14,295
I I do some teaching.

126
00:06:14,295 --> 00:06:15,355
We do some ideation.

127
00:06:15,574 --> 00:06:20,055
And at the end of the 3 days, you know, they
they pitch their best ideas to me.

128
00:06:20,055 --> 00:06:25,230
And, 2 of the products we work on today, came
out of, Carden Business

129
00:06:25,790 --> 00:06:26,270
School.

130
00:06:26,270 --> 00:06:31,730
You also have a very contrarian view on AI that
many people in the tech ecosystem have.

131
00:06:31,949 --> 00:06:35,330
What's your view on AI, and how does AI play a
role at Carta?

132
00:06:35,629 --> 00:06:37,310
We spend a lot of time on AI.

133
00:06:37,310 --> 00:06:40,694
I'm I'm obsessed, and I I find it so exciting.

134
00:06:40,995 --> 00:06:46,915
If you look at most CEOs of scale companies
like ours, they're looking for AI to do 2

135
00:06:46,915 --> 00:06:47,415
things.

136
00:06:47,875 --> 00:06:50,055
1 is, reduce headcount.

137
00:06:50,194 --> 00:06:50,435
Right?

138
00:06:50,435 --> 00:06:54,810
How do I, you know, reduce the number of people
working on stuff because I've AI'd, you know,

139
00:06:54,810 --> 00:06:58,509
all the workflows and the work, and I can I
can, reduce headcount?

140
00:06:58,889 --> 00:07:01,629
And the second is they're trying to turn
everything into a prompt.

141
00:07:02,009 --> 00:07:03,529
You know, how do I search better?

142
00:07:03,529 --> 00:07:04,889
How do I query something?

143
00:07:04,889 --> 00:07:06,569
How do I, you know, ask questions?

144
00:07:06,569 --> 00:07:07,469
Things like that.

145
00:07:07,935 --> 00:07:15,855
And, what I've directed our teams is is to do
exactly the opposite, which is on the first

146
00:07:15,855 --> 00:07:18,014
front is don't build AI to reduce headcount.

147
00:07:18,014 --> 00:07:20,675
I I don't really care about reducing headcount
right now.

148
00:07:21,259 --> 00:07:26,779
Use find opportunities to use AI to unlock
customer experiences that we couldn't do

149
00:07:26,779 --> 00:07:28,699
without AI.

150
00:07:28,939 --> 00:07:30,319
That's literally impossible.

151
00:07:30,379 --> 00:07:34,459
Like, even if I had, you know, could have put a
1,000 people on this thing, we couldn't do it

152
00:07:34,459 --> 00:07:35,360
without AI.

153
00:07:35,995 --> 00:07:37,514
What's what's an example of that?

154
00:07:37,514 --> 00:07:46,095
One of the great examples is, we're now using
agents on the back end to to fix health checks

155
00:07:46,235 --> 00:07:49,454
that traditionally took a human, to find.

156
00:07:49,500 --> 00:07:53,339
So, like, you're you're, you know, you're doing
a capital call, and then you find that there's

157
00:07:53,339 --> 00:07:58,459
a health check that will, stop one of the LPs
because they need to, they didn't pay enough on

158
00:07:58,459 --> 00:07:59,980
their last capital call, blah blah blah blah.

159
00:07:59,980 --> 00:08:00,860
There's all this stuff.

160
00:08:00,860 --> 00:08:05,264
It takes a human to go in and fix that
reactively when we find it.

161
00:08:05,585 --> 00:08:11,185
Now agents are modeling, hey, if we did a cap
call today, what would that look like?

162
00:08:11,185 --> 00:08:16,865
It will find the error and then fix the error,
so that when a human does have when you are

163
00:08:16,865 --> 00:08:20,199
gonna go do the cap call, it's already fixed
and done.

164
00:08:21,779 --> 00:08:25,399
So that's like an example where we're using
agents in the background to effectively

165
00:08:25,459 --> 00:08:28,600
proactively do what typically humans only could
do reactively.

166
00:08:30,660 --> 00:08:31,779
So so we're doing that.

167
00:08:31,779 --> 00:08:34,725
The second thing is, they're not allowed to use
prompts.

168
00:08:34,725 --> 00:08:41,605
And this example is a great one, which is, our
view or my view of prompts is prompts is like

169
00:08:41,605 --> 00:08:46,664
the static HTML page in 1996, that says, oh,
that's the Internet.

170
00:08:47,039 --> 00:08:48,399
And, like, that wasn't the Internet.

171
00:08:48,399 --> 00:08:52,019
The Internet was something much more complex
and exciting and powerful.

172
00:08:52,399 --> 00:09:02,019
The static HTML web page, was, you know, UX,
version 0.01, of what the Internet was.

173
00:09:02,134 --> 00:09:03,335
And that's what the prompt is.

174
00:09:03,335 --> 00:09:09,575
ChatTBT had to figure out what's the easiest
way that we can expose LLMs to people, give

175
00:09:09,575 --> 00:09:10,315
them a prompt.

176
00:09:10,375 --> 00:09:11,575
That's the easiest way.

177
00:09:11,575 --> 00:09:14,554
But that's actually not the right UX for LLMs.

178
00:09:16,029 --> 00:09:17,629
And so they're not only used to prompts.

179
00:09:17,629 --> 00:09:21,250
They have to figure out how to access the LLM
without using a prompt.

180
00:09:21,389 --> 00:09:25,550
And that really means that they've they're
working on and thinking about how do we

181
00:09:25,550 --> 00:09:29,170
creatively embed LLMs behind the workflows of
what we're doing.

182
00:09:29,365 --> 00:09:34,085
For for example, my my case of, like,
proactively finding these these workflow

183
00:09:34,085 --> 00:09:37,845
issues, is a way of feeding the LLM, and the
user never knows it.

184
00:09:37,845 --> 00:09:41,285
My my view on AI is everybody is going, like,
AI this.

185
00:09:41,285 --> 00:09:44,184
You know, they're putting powered by AI, power
AI everywhere.

186
00:09:44,340 --> 00:09:45,559
Look at all the AI.

187
00:09:45,620 --> 00:09:50,519
And my what I told my product managers is if
you really get the AI right, I'll never know.

188
00:09:51,139 --> 00:09:51,860
It'll just work.

189
00:09:51,860 --> 00:09:52,899
It's the Turing test.

190
00:09:52,899 --> 00:09:53,800
I can't tell.

191
00:09:54,500 --> 00:09:57,080
The capital call just comes out, and it's
right.

192
00:09:57,215 --> 00:09:59,715
It just seems like a extremely competent human.

193
00:10:02,335 --> 00:10:02,835
Totally.

194
00:10:03,134 --> 00:10:03,634
Totally.

195
00:10:03,774 --> 00:10:06,274
And and, you know, it just works.

196
00:10:06,335 --> 00:10:06,575
Right?

197
00:10:06,575 --> 00:10:07,955
That's the Apple thing.

198
00:10:08,095 --> 00:10:08,335
Right?

199
00:10:08,335 --> 00:10:09,535
Why do we all love Apple?

200
00:10:09,535 --> 00:10:10,595
It just works.

201
00:10:11,370 --> 00:10:11,850
You know?

202
00:10:11,850 --> 00:10:19,129
And but there is so much complexity that goes
around making something just work, and that

203
00:10:19,210 --> 00:10:21,389
that's what we we talk a lot about.

204
00:10:22,410 --> 00:10:27,254
You know, Henry, I don't envy you because you
went after a space that everybody hates fun

205
00:10:27,254 --> 00:10:30,934
admins because nobody realizes how difficult it
is to do it well.

206
00:10:30,934 --> 00:10:34,955
So everybody blames kind of the the service
providers, not necessarily the process.

207
00:10:35,095 --> 00:10:36,054
Thank you for listening.

208
00:10:36,054 --> 00:10:39,894
To join our community and to make sure you do
not miss any future episodes, please click the

209
00:10:39,894 --> 00:10:41,250
follow button above to subscribe.

210
00:10:42,450 --> 00:10:42,610
Subscribe.

211
00:10:42,610 --> 00:10:43,110
Yeah.

212
00:10:43,169 --> 00:10:43,909
A a 100%.

213
00:10:44,289 --> 00:10:51,830
And and this is another thing to go full circle
about this, services to software.

214
00:10:52,370 --> 00:10:58,764
Very few, you know and software, industries
tend to have high NPS, Services industries then

215
00:10:58,764 --> 00:10:59,584
have low NPS.

216
00:11:00,445 --> 00:11:03,345
You know, no nobody loves legal services.

217
00:11:03,485 --> 00:11:05,345
Nobody loves accounting services.

218
00:11:05,404 --> 00:11:05,904
Right?

219
00:11:06,605 --> 00:11:12,304
Expensive mistakes, variability, and outcomes,
so you're not always getting consistency.

220
00:11:14,309 --> 00:11:15,350
That's exactly right.

221
00:11:15,350 --> 00:11:16,470
And it's exactly right.

222
00:11:16,470 --> 00:11:17,190
You nailed it, David.

223
00:11:17,190 --> 00:11:17,850
It's consistency.

224
00:11:18,789 --> 00:11:21,289
Why do chains win in restaurants?

225
00:11:22,149 --> 00:11:26,889
It's consist you would think of anything food,
but should be a a boutique business.

226
00:11:27,245 --> 00:11:27,565
Right?

227
00:11:27,565 --> 00:11:29,584
Like, you win by having the better chef.

228
00:11:30,204 --> 00:11:32,544
And it turns out, no, chains win.

229
00:11:32,605 --> 00:11:37,184
It's because people people even take a lesser
experience for a consistent one.

230
00:11:37,644 --> 00:11:42,065
And that's why services industries are tough
because it's so hard to do services

231
00:11:42,125 --> 00:11:42,625
consistently.

232
00:11:43,360 --> 00:11:45,519
That's why, you know, we talk a lot about this.

233
00:11:45,519 --> 00:11:47,120
Why does everybody love in and out?

234
00:11:47,120 --> 00:11:48,259
Because it's the same.

235
00:11:48,720 --> 00:11:51,779
And the Internet I go to, I know exactly what
I'm getting.

236
00:11:51,920 --> 00:11:53,360
That's a good quality product.

237
00:11:53,360 --> 00:11:57,095
Not great, but good, but the service is so
consistent.

238
00:11:57,794 --> 00:12:00,214
And that's why software businesses win.

239
00:12:00,274 --> 00:12:04,754
The problem, of course, is if you are
consistently bad, they hate everybody hates

240
00:12:04,754 --> 00:12:05,254
you.

241
00:12:05,794 --> 00:12:06,455
You know?

242
00:12:06,754 --> 00:12:09,554
And so it's one of these things that software
is, like, love and hate.

243
00:12:09,554 --> 00:12:14,259
Like, if we have a bug in our system, you know,
if if you have 1 if you're a service industry

244
00:12:14,259 --> 00:12:17,700
and you have one team that's not good, it just
affects the customers of that team.

245
00:12:17,700 --> 00:12:18,899
Everybody else is fine.

246
00:12:18,899 --> 00:12:20,519
The blast radius is small.

247
00:12:20,980 --> 00:12:23,879
We have a one bug in our software, affects
everybody.

248
00:12:23,940 --> 00:12:25,160
Blast radius is enormous.

249
00:12:25,845 --> 00:12:27,445
And they yell at us, and they hate us.

250
00:12:27,445 --> 00:12:29,125
And, you know, Henry, you're so stupid.

251
00:12:29,125 --> 00:12:30,584
You can't run a software company.

252
00:12:30,644 --> 00:12:32,324
But then we fix it, and it's amazing.

253
00:12:32,324 --> 00:12:33,464
Everybody loves us.

254
00:12:33,845 --> 00:12:38,024
So it's much higher beta, but much higher much
higher ROI.

255
00:12:39,470 --> 00:12:41,549
You're also an angel investor yourself.

256
00:12:41,549 --> 00:12:42,910
You're in a lot of great companies.

257
00:12:42,910 --> 00:12:44,690
Tell me about your angel portfolio.

258
00:12:45,870 --> 00:12:50,850
80%, my angel portfolio is, just for Mercarta
people.

259
00:12:51,629 --> 00:12:57,585
Carta has been an amazing place, unfortunately,
to create a ton of founders.

260
00:12:57,585 --> 00:13:00,884
I've had so many amazing Carta employees go
start their own company.

261
00:13:01,024 --> 00:13:02,325
It's driving me nuts.

262
00:13:03,585 --> 00:13:07,950
And then I you know, and they're always just
the best, of course, that go do this.

263
00:13:08,110 --> 00:13:09,470
And then I have to call them.

264
00:13:09,470 --> 00:13:13,710
And then they hire all the best people out of
Carta, and I have to call and yell at them and

265
00:13:13,710 --> 00:13:16,210
tell them stop recruiting my people.

266
00:13:16,830 --> 00:13:19,809
You know, we don't really lose people to other
companies.

267
00:13:20,830 --> 00:13:23,009
We lose people to starting their own companies.

268
00:13:23,735 --> 00:13:24,934
It drives me crazy.

269
00:13:24,934 --> 00:13:28,294
And so now I tell all employees at Carta, don't
be a founder.

270
00:13:28,294 --> 00:13:29,034
It's terrible.

271
00:13:29,174 --> 00:13:30,714
Nobody should ever do this.

272
00:13:30,774 --> 00:13:35,975
You should, you know, have a badge and come to
work every day, 9 to 5, and grind it out for

273
00:13:35,975 --> 00:13:36,615
somebody else.

274
00:13:36,615 --> 00:13:40,850
Being a founder is overrated, is now my pitch
to the current employees.

275
00:13:42,590 --> 00:13:46,529
So you have this unfair advantage where you
know exactly how good they are at execution,

276
00:13:46,590 --> 00:13:50,269
how smart they are, how good they are
recruiting, all these all these risk factors

277
00:13:50,269 --> 00:13:53,090
tip for typical angel investors are derisked.

278
00:13:54,294 --> 00:13:54,535
Yeah.

279
00:13:54,535 --> 00:13:55,014
Totally.

280
00:13:55,014 --> 00:13:56,375
I mean, they're they're so good.

281
00:13:56,375 --> 00:14:01,835
I know that most of them, 98, 99% of the people
that I left, I worked with directly.

282
00:14:02,054 --> 00:14:07,095
So I know how good they are, and they learn so
much from doing Carta because, you know, I put

283
00:14:07,174 --> 00:14:13,320
I did a post a while ago called founders wanted
at Carta.

284
00:14:13,320 --> 00:14:20,040
We love hiring former founders, future
founders, just people with founder DNA, because

285
00:14:20,040 --> 00:14:22,940
they build shit, and they're relentless.

286
00:14:23,514 --> 00:14:25,934
And so we we attract those types of people.

287
00:14:26,235 --> 00:14:29,214
And then, of course, when they're ready to hang
up, they're in single, we lose them.

288
00:14:29,834 --> 00:14:31,134
I know you say it facetiously.

289
00:14:31,195 --> 00:14:36,570
You hate that they go and start companies, but
it's a it's a significant recruiting tool to

290
00:14:36,570 --> 00:14:37,549
show these successes.

291
00:14:37,610 --> 00:14:38,009
Right?

292
00:14:38,009 --> 00:14:38,809
Come work here.

293
00:14:38,809 --> 00:14:40,269
Give 3 years of your life.

294
00:14:40,649 --> 00:14:44,909
Work hard, and then, you know, maybe I'll even
blip back here in your next company.

295
00:14:45,610 --> 00:14:46,589
It it's great.

296
00:14:46,970 --> 00:14:47,370
Yeah.

297
00:14:47,370 --> 00:14:49,629
It's, we call it the Carta Cartel.

298
00:14:50,454 --> 00:14:52,355
You know, it's our version of the PayPal mafia.

299
00:14:52,575 --> 00:14:57,615
Bring them all over for my house for dinner
once a year type of thing, to meet with them.

300
00:14:57,615 --> 00:15:01,215
I invest in in all of They they all bleed Carta
Blue.

301
00:15:01,215 --> 00:15:04,149
They all keep in touch and support each other,
end up hiring each other.

302
00:15:04,149 --> 00:15:05,190
I mean, that's also what happens.

303
00:15:05,190 --> 00:15:06,889
You know, one company goes out of business.

304
00:15:07,429 --> 00:15:11,509
They go they all go work at the other company
that's doing better and, you know, we have one

305
00:15:11,509 --> 00:15:16,870
comp one one startup drives me crazy, but, 90
per you know, it's not that big.

306
00:15:16,870 --> 00:15:22,085
I think it's, like, 15 or 20 people, but I
think 90% of the, the employees are Carta.

307
00:15:22,225 --> 00:15:23,904
So they just they just go in groups.

308
00:15:24,144 --> 00:15:28,625
I actually have a view that this is kind of the
new thing of angel investing, which is like

309
00:15:28,625 --> 00:15:34,529
alumni invest alumni ventures, you know, you
invest sort of in your your your university.

310
00:15:34,669 --> 00:15:34,990
Right?

311
00:15:34,990 --> 00:15:38,750
All the MIT people invest in support of their
like, I think what's happening is you're

312
00:15:38,750 --> 00:15:43,629
getting the Uber cohorts, the Stripe cohorts,
you know, the Carta cohorts, where they all

313
00:15:43,629 --> 00:15:46,394
just invest and support each other, because
they know each other.

314
00:15:46,955 --> 00:15:50,894
And that's that's how angel investing is gonna
start to to to coalesce.

315
00:15:51,675 --> 00:15:51,995
Okay.

316
00:15:51,995 --> 00:15:53,035
Very meta idea.

317
00:15:53,035 --> 00:15:56,254
You should start a card to fund that investment
to card to spin out.

318
00:15:56,875 --> 00:15:57,535
A 100%.

319
00:15:57,675 --> 00:16:00,795
We we actually do this, but it's balance sheet
capital.

320
00:16:00,795 --> 00:16:02,095
We we call it card adventures.

321
00:16:02,929 --> 00:16:04,070
There's 3 theses.

322
00:16:04,210 --> 00:16:09,250
1 is very conventional corporate VC, which is
we invest in strategic companies that we think

323
00:16:09,250 --> 00:16:13,190
are strategic to our ecosystem and potential
corp dev candidates in the future.

324
00:16:13,570 --> 00:16:19,764
The second is we invest in emerging managers
that are starting funds.

325
00:16:19,764 --> 00:16:24,884
The best way to create more founders is to
create more TPs that can go and find and mentor

326
00:16:24,884 --> 00:16:27,705
and cultivate and invest, in these founders.

327
00:16:27,845 --> 00:16:31,684
So that's a big part of our fund administration
thesis, was how do we reduce the cost of

328
00:16:31,684 --> 00:16:32,549
running a fund?

329
00:16:32,870 --> 00:16:34,330
Starting and running a fund.

330
00:16:34,789 --> 00:16:39,269
And and I think we were a big contributor to
the boom in emerging managers in the United

331
00:16:39,269 --> 00:16:45,029
States is because we took the cost of starting
and running a fund from a $150,000 to about 20

332
00:16:45,029 --> 00:16:45,690
to 30.

333
00:16:46,665 --> 00:16:51,545
And so, so we spent a lot of time on that,
helping emerging managers get going.

334
00:16:51,545 --> 00:16:57,325
And then the 3rd last bucket is really
investing in things that have card of interest,

335
00:16:57,625 --> 00:17:00,904
like card of employees, the things that we
think will make the world a better place for

336
00:17:00,904 --> 00:17:01,644
for founders.

337
00:17:02,399 --> 00:17:05,759
Does being an investor make you a better CEO?

338
00:17:05,759 --> 00:17:06,900
And if so, how?

339
00:17:08,319 --> 00:17:16,964
I'll I'll take the controversial opinion, of
this, which is I I think investing and CEO ing

340
00:17:17,044 --> 00:17:22,744
are 2 very different disciplines, and very few
people can do both well.

341
00:17:23,444 --> 00:17:29,044
The ones that can, I think, are, you know, the
great operators maybe like Ben Horowitz, you

342
00:17:29,044 --> 00:17:31,065
know, and Mark Andreessen and those guys?

343
00:17:31,250 --> 00:17:34,769
But they're they're the exception that, to me,
that proves the rule.

344
00:17:34,769 --> 00:17:37,830
And I actually think, controversial opinion
again.

345
00:17:38,130 --> 00:17:43,605
I actually think when they try to conflate
that, is when, people get into trouble.

346
00:17:43,845 --> 00:17:45,125
When investors are like, hey.

347
00:17:45,125 --> 00:17:48,345
I I I'll give advice to the founder on how to
run the company.

348
00:17:49,285 --> 00:17:53,865
That has never worked for me, minus a handful
of people like Marc Andreessen.

349
00:17:54,005 --> 00:17:56,369
You know, when Marc tells me how to run the
company, I listen.

350
00:17:57,250 --> 00:18:01,569
But historic you know, in general, when most
investors are telling me how to run the

351
00:18:01,569 --> 00:18:08,069
company, I I I I it'll sound facetious, but I I
actually say this seriously.

352
00:18:08,529 --> 00:18:11,910
Typically doing the opposite has worked out
much better for me.

353
00:18:12,805 --> 00:18:14,164
And and I actually have a theory.

354
00:18:14,164 --> 00:18:15,525
I'm not just trying to be cheeky.

355
00:18:15,525 --> 00:18:17,705
I I actually have a theory about it.

356
00:18:18,404 --> 00:18:20,184
Most investors are pattern matchers.

357
00:18:20,725 --> 00:18:24,105
You know, Henry, do this because I saw that
work over there.

358
00:18:25,605 --> 00:18:27,705
And and that's where the advice comes from.

359
00:18:28,220 --> 00:18:30,559
The best companies don't pattern much.

360
00:18:30,779 --> 00:18:34,779
Like, they just they if you did, you're not a
you're not a generational company.

361
00:18:34,779 --> 00:18:38,700
You're not an outlier by definition because
you're just doing everything everybody else

362
00:18:38,700 --> 00:18:39,200
does.

363
00:18:40,220 --> 00:18:44,884
And so my my advice for founders and investors
is founders are deal or sorry.

364
00:18:44,884 --> 00:18:46,184
Investors are deal makers.

365
00:18:46,644 --> 00:18:50,424
They and they they're pattern matchers and deal
makers as they should be.

366
00:18:50,724 --> 00:18:52,005
And that's what you use them for.

367
00:18:52,005 --> 00:18:52,244
Hey.

368
00:18:52,244 --> 00:18:53,444
What are they doing over there?

369
00:18:53,444 --> 00:18:54,164
Tell me about this.

370
00:18:54,164 --> 00:18:54,884
What have you seen?

371
00:18:54,884 --> 00:18:59,339
Like, that's what I like, give me information
because they see way more companies than I do.

372
00:19:00,700 --> 00:19:01,819
That's valuable to me.

373
00:19:01,819 --> 00:19:05,200
But telling me what I should do with that
information is not valuable.

374
00:19:06,059 --> 00:19:11,019
When investors try to tell CEOs, you know, how
to how to run the company, I think that's a a

375
00:19:11,019 --> 00:19:11,759
real problem.

376
00:19:11,819 --> 00:19:12,859
And I would say the same.

377
00:19:12,859 --> 00:19:15,775
Like, if I told investors, don't invest in that
company.

378
00:19:15,775 --> 00:19:16,734
Invest in that other company.

379
00:19:16,734 --> 00:19:17,715
They'd be like, what?

380
00:19:18,174 --> 00:19:20,355
You're just a CEO as they should.

381
00:19:21,055 --> 00:19:22,015
You know, it's really funny.

382
00:19:22,015 --> 00:19:27,070
My last joke about this is, you know, in the
early stage, I used to get investors that gave

383
00:19:27,070 --> 00:19:27,730
me books.

384
00:19:28,750 --> 00:19:31,570
Basically, like, how to be a better CEO book.

385
00:19:32,109 --> 00:19:34,910
And and you're supposed to say thank you.

386
00:19:34,910 --> 00:19:35,950
I appreciate it.

387
00:19:35,950 --> 00:19:39,734
I always found it, like, kinda insulting
because, like, what if I gave them a, hey.

388
00:19:39,734 --> 00:19:40,934
How to be a better investor book?

389
00:19:42,375 --> 00:19:45,914
You know, so anyway but that's my contouring
and take.

390
00:19:46,694 --> 00:19:52,454
Do you believe in founder mode and basically,
essentially micromanaging and coming in?

391
00:19:52,454 --> 00:19:56,880
And is there is there space for that, or do you
believe in kind of more of a managerial

392
00:19:57,339 --> 00:19:57,839
strategy?

393
00:19:58,380 --> 00:20:02,400
When that thing came out, I was like, I didn't
even know there was an alternative.

394
00:20:02,539 --> 00:20:04,380
Like like, when they go, oh, it's founder mode.

395
00:20:04,380 --> 00:20:06,319
I was like, what what was the other one?

396
00:20:06,700 --> 00:20:08,480
Like, of course.

397
00:20:08,984 --> 00:20:10,424
It makes zero sense.

398
00:20:10,424 --> 00:20:12,765
Like, what else would I do?

399
00:20:13,464 --> 00:20:14,664
You know, I'm the founder.

400
00:20:14,664 --> 00:20:17,404
I'm supposed to go in and go, why did we put
the button there?

401
00:20:17,785 --> 00:20:20,285
What color is the is the brand marketing?

402
00:20:21,579 --> 00:20:21,700
Yeah.

403
00:20:21,700 --> 00:20:22,599
What wait.

404
00:20:22,740 --> 00:20:26,039
Why did we spend money on, you know, this
event?

405
00:20:26,259 --> 00:20:26,579
Alright.

406
00:20:26,579 --> 00:20:29,619
Like, if I didn't do that, what what else would
I do?

407
00:20:29,779 --> 00:20:35,164
It was just I the the funniest thing for me on
founder mode was I I didn't know there was an

408
00:20:35,164 --> 00:20:35,664
alternative.

409
00:20:36,525 --> 00:20:37,404
So so yeah.

410
00:20:37,404 --> 00:20:39,965
I I mean, I don't even call it founder mode.

411
00:20:39,965 --> 00:20:41,825
I I call it building a company.

412
00:20:42,285 --> 00:20:45,164
I see this virtually in every top c I.

413
00:20:45,164 --> 00:20:48,205
I don't see a laid back CEO that's successful.

414
00:20:48,205 --> 00:20:49,259
At least I've never seen it.

415
00:20:49,660 --> 00:20:57,259
Another way of thinking about it is, how much
the CEO is involved in the company is it is

416
00:20:57,259 --> 00:20:59,119
correlated, how much the CEO cares.

417
00:20:59,660 --> 00:21:03,105
And so do you do you want a CEO that cares or
not?

418
00:21:04,224 --> 00:21:08,544
And, you know, the whole thing about founders
is they probably care more than professional

419
00:21:08,544 --> 00:21:11,025
CEOs, and we care a lot.

420
00:21:11,025 --> 00:21:13,984
Mark talks about Mark Andreessen talks a lot
about this with Musk.

421
00:21:13,984 --> 00:21:14,144
Right?

422
00:21:14,144 --> 00:21:15,585
Like, Musk has a question.

423
00:21:15,585 --> 00:21:17,172
He doesn't ask the chain of command.

424
00:21:17,172 --> 00:21:20,820
He goes straight to the to the guy putting the
tire, you know, on the Tesla.

425
00:21:20,820 --> 00:21:22,645
He goes, how come the tires fall off?

426
00:21:22,645 --> 00:21:24,241
You know, he he doesn't mess around.

427
00:21:24,241 --> 00:21:25,154
And I'm the same.

428
00:21:25,154 --> 00:21:29,855
And, you know, my my feedback to the team is,
do you want if they don't like it, I'm like, do

429
00:21:29,855 --> 00:21:32,514
you want me to not care, if the website goes
down?

430
00:21:33,214 --> 00:21:36,914
Like, if you don't want me to care that the
website goes down, this is the wrong company,

431
00:21:37,214 --> 00:21:38,034
to be at.

432
00:21:38,734 --> 00:21:43,554
I was watching Mark Andreessen interview talk
about Elon and about his 5 minute meetings.

433
00:21:43,669 --> 00:21:48,630
He goes to every single person in the company
and asks, what is your number one issue for the

434
00:21:48,630 --> 00:21:49,109
week?

435
00:21:49,109 --> 00:21:52,069
In 5 minutes, they talk about it, and then he
helps them solve that.

436
00:21:52,069 --> 00:21:54,650
And he does this over and over 100 of times a
week.

437
00:21:54,950 --> 00:21:56,630
So the ultimate founder mode.

438
00:21:56,630 --> 00:22:01,595
When will fund admin achieve full self driving
or be fully automated?

439
00:22:01,595 --> 00:22:02,255
What year?

440
00:22:03,994 --> 00:22:06,575
I'd like to say definitely before 2030.

441
00:22:06,954 --> 00:22:09,275
Like, we're we're 3 to 5 years out.

442
00:22:09,275 --> 00:22:14,075
One of the key metrics we we track is how
quickly we can get quarterly financials out to

443
00:22:14,075 --> 00:22:14,575
LPs.

444
00:22:14,849 --> 00:22:16,950
Our first year of doing this was 2021.

445
00:22:17,410 --> 00:22:20,710
It took us, you know, months before we got
everything out.

446
00:22:21,009 --> 00:22:22,450
Each year got better and better.

447
00:22:22,450 --> 00:22:25,990
And now this year, you know, it's January 24th
today.

448
00:22:26,690 --> 00:22:29,474
We're, you know, halfway, through our
customers.

449
00:22:29,474 --> 00:22:31,714
Like, we're we're moving super, super quickly.

450
00:22:31,714 --> 00:22:36,454
So I think 2 to 3 years from now, it will it
will basically be one click on reporting.

451
00:22:36,994 --> 00:22:41,570
Carta has a really interesting playbook in that
you make acquisitions, you buy servicing

452
00:22:41,710 --> 00:22:43,809
companies, you turn it into software.

453
00:22:44,509 --> 00:22:48,190
Walk me through how you go about doing that,
and what have been the strengths and weaknesses

454
00:22:48,190 --> 00:22:49,009
of the strategy?

455
00:22:49,230 --> 00:22:54,690
Started account tables in 2014, 4 9 a in 2016,
then fund administration in 2020.

456
00:22:55,704 --> 00:22:58,585
Now that we're in the fund admin business, it's
exactly the same.

457
00:22:58,585 --> 00:23:03,144
It's a it's a services industry with
accountants emailing back and forth that you

458
00:23:03,144 --> 00:23:04,605
call and talk to.

459
00:23:05,065 --> 00:23:09,880
That that playbook is, I I would say, the the
guiding principle of Carta.

460
00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:14,840
We look at everywhere where humans are doing,
work, usually with spreadsheets, and we say,

461
00:23:14,840 --> 00:23:15,080
hey.

462
00:23:15,080 --> 00:23:16,759
I think a computer could do this better.

463
00:23:16,759 --> 00:23:22,200
It's it's a super powerful approach because,
you know, labor is an inflationary expense.

464
00:23:22,200 --> 00:23:24,015
Like, it it just goes up over time.

465
00:23:24,015 --> 00:23:25,234
But software is deflationary.

466
00:23:25,375 --> 00:23:26,815
Software gets cheaper and cheaper.

467
00:23:26,815 --> 00:23:31,474
To do this well, you almost always have to
enter, as a services business first.

468
00:23:31,615 --> 00:23:36,414
2014, we hired a bunch of paralegals, to manage
cap tables, and then we built the software

469
00:23:36,414 --> 00:23:37,154
around them.

470
00:23:37,410 --> 00:23:39,490
49a, we hired a bunch of valuation analysts.

471
00:23:39,490 --> 00:23:42,369
And then we built the 49a around them.

472
00:23:42,369 --> 00:23:46,450
Fund admin, you know, I flew to New Jersey,
interviewed a bunch of fund accountants, and we

473
00:23:46,450 --> 00:23:47,170
hired a bunch.

474
00:23:47,330 --> 00:23:51,744
And they were using spreadsheets, and Xero, and
PDFs and Word docs.

475
00:23:52,284 --> 00:23:56,044
And then over time, we started building
software, behind them.

476
00:23:56,044 --> 00:24:01,744
And so you have to have an investor base, an
executive team that's comfortable with, hey.

477
00:24:02,125 --> 00:24:08,950
We're gonna constantly manage this portfolio of
software margins, software finance you know,

478
00:24:08,950 --> 00:24:12,549
software financial type business with services
type business.

479
00:24:12,549 --> 00:24:15,369
But if you look at our cap table business, it's
almost 90%.

480
00:24:15,430 --> 00:24:16,730
It's like 87, 88%.

481
00:24:16,869 --> 00:24:19,634
I mean, it's it's just, hemorrhaging cash.

482
00:24:20,115 --> 00:24:24,195
And then you look at some of the newer
businesses that aren't as mature yet, that are

483
00:24:24,195 --> 00:24:25,075
more services heavy.

484
00:24:25,075 --> 00:24:26,855
You know, they're running at much lower
margins.

485
00:24:26,914 --> 00:24:31,154
And so you just have to be able to understand
that and have an investor base that's that has

486
00:24:31,154 --> 00:24:35,369
the confidence that you can enter these lower
margin services businesses, but turn them over

487
00:24:35,369 --> 00:24:36,750
time into software businesses.

488
00:24:36,890 --> 00:24:37,869
And that's the playbook.

489
00:24:38,490 --> 00:24:43,289
Why is the fund admin business so much harder
to turn from services to software than than the

490
00:24:43,289 --> 00:24:44,190
previous businesses?

491
00:24:45,609 --> 00:24:47,630
It's incredibly complex.

492
00:24:48,045 --> 00:24:53,085
One of the advantages of being an entrepreneur,
that doesn't come from the industry is you have

493
00:24:53,085 --> 00:24:54,285
naivete bias.

494
00:24:54,285 --> 00:24:55,725
You're like, how hard could it be?

495
00:24:55,725 --> 00:24:59,184
And I thought that about cap tables, and that
was pretty hard on accounting.

496
00:24:59,644 --> 00:25:02,125
If I had known what I know now, I'm not sure I
would have done it.

497
00:25:02,539 --> 00:25:03,919
It's really, really hard.

498
00:25:04,940 --> 00:25:08,539
But the good news is something that's really,
really hard, it becomes very defensible.

499
00:25:08,539 --> 00:25:11,819
This is just a much more complex mechanism than
a cap table.

500
00:25:11,819 --> 00:25:13,980
Cap table, stock options, that's about it.

501
00:25:13,980 --> 00:25:17,819
Fund accounting, you're investing, you're
raising capital, you're you're doing quarterly

502
00:25:17,819 --> 00:25:19,414
reporting, You're doing valuations.

503
00:25:19,634 --> 00:25:22,375
There's just so much that goes into operating a
fund.

504
00:25:23,154 --> 00:25:27,255
You you make the argument that carda could be a
strategic tool for CFOs.

505
00:25:28,195 --> 00:25:31,735
Why is carda and why is fund admin strategic
for CFO?

506
00:25:32,115 --> 00:25:33,654
You talk to GPs.

507
00:25:34,460 --> 00:25:36,380
They don't care what accounting solution there
is.

508
00:25:36,380 --> 00:25:37,339
They're like CFO.

509
00:25:37,339 --> 00:25:40,079
And they don't really spend a lot of time with
the CFO.

510
00:25:40,460 --> 00:25:44,539
They they view it as, you know, CFO and private
equity, VC.

511
00:25:44,539 --> 00:25:46,779
I think more so in VC than than private equity.

512
00:25:46,779 --> 00:25:48,720
It's like, that's the back office.

513
00:25:50,894 --> 00:25:54,674
If I call my CFO their back office, he would
quit.

514
00:25:55,134 --> 00:26:02,994
My CFO sits next to me, you know, and his whole
team is outside, my office.

515
00:26:03,450 --> 00:26:05,789
They're they're not the back office at all.

516
00:26:06,649 --> 00:26:09,710
You know, the CFO is the number 2 at most
companies.

517
00:26:10,009 --> 00:26:17,149
I can't make a decision about Carta, a material
decision about Carta without consulting my CFO.

518
00:26:17,690 --> 00:26:20,184
Just can't because they run the business.

519
00:26:20,404 --> 00:26:24,644
That's happened, in operating companies like
that over the last 30 years.

520
00:26:24,644 --> 00:26:26,164
That's really, you know, CFOs.

521
00:26:26,164 --> 00:26:29,464
So then there's 2 people on our earnings call,
the CEO and the CFO.

522
00:26:31,045 --> 00:26:32,964
But for funds, that that hasn't been the case.

523
00:26:32,964 --> 00:26:35,259
It's like CFO back office.

524
00:26:35,259 --> 00:26:36,299
You know, I don't care.

525
00:26:36,299 --> 00:26:37,440
Let me deal with it.

526
00:26:37,820 --> 00:26:40,559
And there's this question, like, why is that?

527
00:26:41,339 --> 00:26:48,605
Why why don't CFOs in private equity and VC
have the same level that they that they have in

528
00:26:48,605 --> 00:26:49,585
operating companies?

529
00:26:50,285 --> 00:26:54,704
And my explanation is, because they don't have
good software.

530
00:26:55,644 --> 00:27:01,484
You know, before NetSuite and SAP Financials
and Anaplan and Pigment and all these tools

531
00:27:01,484 --> 00:27:05,640
that CFOs use to run the business, they were
basically glorified accountants.

532
00:27:06,420 --> 00:27:12,200
But then they built all these software tools
for these CFOs that turn them from bookkeepers

533
00:27:12,420 --> 00:27:14,855
to alpha creators.

534
00:27:15,555 --> 00:27:17,714
And I think that will be true over the next 10
years.

535
00:27:17,714 --> 00:27:22,055
I think the amount of data that we're
collecting about private capital and investing

536
00:27:22,194 --> 00:27:27,875
and running a fund and raising money and,
tracking and doing portfolio monitoring, all

537
00:27:27,875 --> 00:27:31,929
the tooling and data that we're starting to
pull together, that the CFO is responsible on

538
00:27:31,929 --> 00:27:32,670
these funds.

539
00:27:33,130 --> 00:27:37,609
If used well and we do a good job building it,
it will elevate the CFO to be a strategic

540
00:27:37,609 --> 00:27:38,109
partner.

541
00:27:38,250 --> 00:27:43,755
And and that's really the mission of Carta, is
to is to put the CFO in the room, when they

542
00:27:43,755 --> 00:27:44,654
make big decisions.

543
00:27:45,195 --> 00:27:49,275
Speaking of mission, you had a pretty big
strategic pivot 2 years ago.

544
00:27:49,275 --> 00:27:50,414
Tell me about that.

545
00:27:52,075 --> 00:27:54,075
Carta's been operating for about 11 years.

546
00:27:54,075 --> 00:27:57,375
We opened the doors for business, in January,
2014.

547
00:27:58,690 --> 00:28:06,369
And the thesis back then had always been, cap
tables win cap tables, and then, create a stock

548
00:28:06,369 --> 00:28:07,809
market, private stock market.

549
00:28:07,809 --> 00:28:09,990
We called it Nasdaq for private markets.

550
00:28:11,090 --> 00:28:15,924
And we thought the cap table business was gonna
be a small business, but it was the wedge to

551
00:28:15,924 --> 00:28:19,065
building the bigger business, which was the
stock exchange.

552
00:28:20,724 --> 00:28:23,544
Turns out we're both we're wrong on both
fronts.

553
00:28:23,845 --> 00:28:28,490
The cap table business turned out to be way
bigger than anybody including me thought.

554
00:28:28,490 --> 00:28:34,170
And then the stock market business turned out
to be, 0 for us.

555
00:28:34,170 --> 00:28:35,929
We could not we could not figure it out.

556
00:28:35,929 --> 00:28:41,465
And happy to share a ton of reasons why I don't
think why I don't think it worked out, or or I

557
00:28:41,465 --> 00:28:43,625
actually believe it's an intractable problem.

558
00:28:43,625 --> 00:28:45,805
It's unsolvable, at this point.

559
00:28:46,105 --> 00:28:50,664
And so then we spent the last, you know, 2
years figuring out what's next.

560
00:28:50,664 --> 00:28:50,825
Right?

561
00:28:50,825 --> 00:28:54,440
The whole thesis of this company was CapTables
plus stock market.

562
00:28:54,440 --> 00:28:56,059
And now now what do we do?

563
00:28:56,759 --> 00:29:04,759
And we're very, very lucky, so fortunate that a
small group of, card employees believed in this

564
00:29:04,759 --> 00:29:10,275
fund admin or fund accounting business in 2019
and 20, and convinced me to start it, or to

565
00:29:10,275 --> 00:29:12,535
allow them to start it, more specifically.

566
00:29:13,714 --> 00:29:14,994
And then that took off.

567
00:29:14,994 --> 00:29:20,755
You know, that fund the venture fund admin
business went from 0 to a 100,000,000 in, 52

568
00:29:20,755 --> 00:29:21,089
months.

569
00:29:21,409 --> 00:29:21,909
Cool.

570
00:29:22,210 --> 00:29:27,509
And so that that gave us a new lease, on what
we can do outside of cap tables.

571
00:29:28,210 --> 00:29:32,289
And then that was over the last 2 years, what
we spent time with the whole company figuring

572
00:29:32,289 --> 00:29:33,250
out is, hey.

573
00:29:33,250 --> 00:29:37,355
When you put cap tables plus fund accounting
together, you're now building what I call

574
00:29:37,355 --> 00:29:39,134
software for the office of the fund CFO.

575
00:29:39,674 --> 00:29:43,214
And that's what we're we're we're spending the
next decade working on.

576
00:29:44,154 --> 00:29:46,575
How big is the Fund Admin business today?

577
00:29:46,714 --> 00:29:51,179
This summer, spring summer, we'll cross about
half a 1000000000, in ARR.

578
00:29:51,640 --> 00:29:58,279
Of that half 1000000000, about 60% of it is our
start up cap table business that we're best

579
00:29:58,279 --> 00:29:59,000
known for.

580
00:29:59,000 --> 00:30:02,474
About 30% is our fund accounting, business.

581
00:30:03,414 --> 00:30:06,615
And then the last 10% is our newer private
equity business.

582
00:30:06,615 --> 00:30:09,494
And the capital business is about 10 years old,
11 years old.

583
00:30:09,494 --> 00:30:14,934
The fund admin business is about, 5 years old,
and the private equity business is about 2

584
00:30:14,934 --> 00:30:15,595
years old.

585
00:30:16,869 --> 00:30:23,269
And so the the the problem we have, the
existential crisis that Carda has is we're a

586
00:30:23,269 --> 00:30:24,150
victim of success.

587
00:30:24,150 --> 00:30:26,009
We've run out of oxygen in venture.

588
00:30:26,069 --> 00:30:29,450
We have 70, 80% of the startups, cap tables.

589
00:30:29,589 --> 00:30:32,169
We've got 50 or 60% of the venture funds.

590
00:30:32,744 --> 00:30:35,565
There's just not enough companies and venture
funds to sell to.

591
00:30:36,424 --> 00:30:40,664
So for Carta to to continue growing, we have to
get out of venture.

592
00:30:40,664 --> 00:30:44,204
We have to build, expand, our market.

593
00:30:45,210 --> 00:30:49,690
And the good news about that is the products we
built for cap tables and fund accounting and

594
00:30:49,690 --> 00:30:53,069
fund administration seem to be very
horizontally transferable.

595
00:30:53,130 --> 00:30:57,609
We started in the last couple of years taking
these products to to private equity, private

596
00:30:57,609 --> 00:31:00,109
credit, even real estate, you know, energy.

597
00:31:00,315 --> 00:31:03,534
We're getting a lot of traction on those other
fronts.

598
00:31:03,595 --> 00:31:07,454
And so the real question for Carta is, can we
take this playbook that was so successful

599
00:31:07,514 --> 00:31:12,474
successful in venture, take it to private
equity, take it to private credit, and expand

600
00:31:12,474 --> 00:31:13,855
the market pretty dramatically?

601
00:31:15,115 --> 00:31:18,730
And if we can't, we'll we'll be the startup
that never could.

602
00:31:18,730 --> 00:31:20,509
We we just never got out of venture.

603
00:31:20,970 --> 00:31:24,170
And those I think are 2 very binary outcomes.

604
00:31:24,170 --> 00:31:29,950
So the next, you know, 2025, 2026 are critical
years for us to see if we can cross the chasm.

605
00:31:30,474 --> 00:31:32,075
You're so synonymous with venture.

606
00:31:32,075 --> 00:31:36,734
How do you go into private equity with a new
identity or a new brand strategy?

607
00:31:37,274 --> 00:31:37,595
Yeah.

608
00:31:37,595 --> 00:31:38,734
It's it's hard.

609
00:31:39,274 --> 00:31:43,034
So, you know, if I walk into a venture fund
today and I'm like, hey.

610
00:31:43,034 --> 00:31:44,234
I'm Henry with Carta.

611
00:31:44,234 --> 00:31:45,599
You know, they're like, we know you.

612
00:31:46,240 --> 00:31:47,359
You know, we know what you do.

613
00:31:47,359 --> 00:31:48,000
We know it.

614
00:31:48,160 --> 00:31:51,759
You know, I walk into a private equity firm and
I go, hey.

615
00:31:51,759 --> 00:31:52,500
I'm Henry.

616
00:31:53,519 --> 00:31:57,059
I'm with Carta, and I'm the new fund admin, on
the block.

617
00:31:58,079 --> 00:32:01,044
They call security, and and escort me out.

618
00:32:01,044 --> 00:32:04,024
The last thing the world needs is another fund
fund administrator.

619
00:32:04,325 --> 00:32:05,524
There's too many of them.

620
00:32:05,524 --> 00:32:06,884
But if I walk in, I said, hey.

621
00:32:06,884 --> 00:32:08,424
I'm Henry with Carta.

622
00:32:09,044 --> 00:32:12,744
You may have heard of us because we do this cap
table thing in venture.

623
00:32:13,410 --> 00:32:15,890
So you may have done a a few minority
investments and seen it.

624
00:32:15,890 --> 00:32:16,289
Like, yeah.

625
00:32:16,289 --> 00:32:16,690
Yeah.

626
00:32:16,690 --> 00:32:17,490
That looks familiar.

627
00:32:17,490 --> 00:32:18,610
I I I've heard of you guys.

628
00:32:18,610 --> 00:32:19,330
You do cap tables.

629
00:32:19,330 --> 00:32:20,230
I go, exactly.

630
00:32:20,930 --> 00:32:24,769
Well, now what we do for cap tables in Venture,
we do in private equity now.

631
00:32:24,769 --> 00:32:28,955
And let me show you how we solve the cap table
problem for you And the waterfall problem,

632
00:32:28,955 --> 00:32:30,894
which is the biggest problem in private equity.

633
00:32:30,955 --> 00:32:34,154
It's not managing the cap table like in
Venture, where the hard part about cap tables

634
00:32:34,154 --> 00:32:35,994
in Venture is the employee option pool.

635
00:32:35,994 --> 00:32:40,255
The hard part about cap tables in, private
equity is the waterfall.

636
00:32:40,759 --> 00:32:46,700
We built a a very good, waterfall product that
manages the waterfalls of these very complex

637
00:32:46,759 --> 00:32:48,619
capital structures in these PE firms.

638
00:32:48,759 --> 00:32:50,039
And I said, let me show you that.

639
00:32:50,039 --> 00:32:52,299
And they're like, you have my attention.

640
00:32:52,440 --> 00:32:52,759
Right?

641
00:32:52,759 --> 00:32:57,184
If you can solve this cap table waterfall
problem for me, I will spend time with you.

642
00:32:57,565 --> 00:32:58,684
And that's our wedge.

643
00:32:58,684 --> 00:33:03,904
That's how we get in, because nobody does cap
tables, better than we do.

644
00:33:04,444 --> 00:33:10,109
And so once we get them on our cap table,
platform in waterfall, They go, oh, this is

645
00:33:10,109 --> 00:33:10,349
great.

646
00:33:10,349 --> 00:33:10,990
We love it.

647
00:33:10,990 --> 00:33:11,470
All this stuff.

648
00:33:11,470 --> 00:33:15,869
But you know what's really weird, Henry, is we
take all of the cap table waterfall outputs

649
00:33:15,869 --> 00:33:19,809
that you generate, and then we manually type it
in our accounting system.

650
00:33:20,509 --> 00:33:21,570
That's such a pain.

651
00:33:21,710 --> 00:33:22,769
They go, I know.

652
00:33:24,085 --> 00:33:24,724
Guess what?

653
00:33:24,724 --> 00:33:29,125
I also have an accounting system for you, and
it's totally integrated into that cap table

654
00:33:29,125 --> 00:33:30,024
thing you bought.

655
00:33:30,484 --> 00:33:36,000
And if you if you buy our our accounting system
and plug it into your cap table, system that

656
00:33:36,000 --> 00:33:41,759
you already got, we can we can seamlessly move
all those numbers through the cap table, the

657
00:33:41,759 --> 00:33:44,180
general ledger, and then to the LP reporting.

658
00:33:44,799 --> 00:33:47,940
And then they go, you have my attention again.

659
00:33:48,494 --> 00:33:51,295
And that's how we start talking about fund
administration for them.

660
00:33:51,295 --> 00:33:53,375
And so it's it's so similar venture.

661
00:33:53,375 --> 00:33:54,755
That was our playbook in venture.

662
00:33:55,055 --> 00:33:59,134
When the portfolio company be a cap table and
then you leverage that relationship to win the

663
00:33:59,134 --> 00:34:02,674
fund accounting to the venture fund, we're
taking that same playbook to PE.

664
00:34:03,134 --> 00:34:06,789
You go in with such a dominant product that
they know that you could do that.

665
00:34:06,789 --> 00:34:08,010
It's an easy sell.

666
00:34:08,150 --> 00:34:12,869
It's an easy solve, and then you basically
upsell once you have the relationship, and they

667
00:34:12,869 --> 00:34:15,849
know that you're highly confident that you can
execute on on the vision.

668
00:34:16,445 --> 00:34:16,605
Yeah.

669
00:34:16,605 --> 00:34:17,324
That's right.

670
00:34:17,324 --> 00:34:23,324
But I also think, what's exciting is nobody has
tried to solve this captive problem for private

671
00:34:23,324 --> 00:34:23,824
equity.

672
00:34:23,885 --> 00:34:27,905
Just like 10 years ago, nobody tried to solve
the crap captive problem for Venture.

673
00:34:28,380 --> 00:34:30,299
And so when we come in and and we say, hey.

674
00:34:30,299 --> 00:34:32,480
We're gonna solve this cap table problem for
you.

675
00:34:32,779 --> 00:34:35,420
It's like water to a a person in the desert.

676
00:34:35,420 --> 00:34:36,380
They're just like, I

677
00:34:36,859 --> 00:34:39,839
If you're successful, what will Carta look like
in 2030?

678
00:34:41,125 --> 00:34:45,065
I think we will look, like we do today in
venture.

679
00:34:45,765 --> 00:34:51,445
You know, Avocado is the brand for cap tables
and funds and, you know, the what I would like,

680
00:34:51,684 --> 00:34:55,684
humbly, hopefully, but say, like, the what is
becoming the operating system for venture

681
00:34:55,684 --> 00:34:56,184
capital.

682
00:34:57,329 --> 00:35:04,470
I think, I hope and think people in 2030 will
say the same thing, but about private capital.

683
00:35:05,090 --> 00:35:06,610
This is how private equity runs.

684
00:35:06,610 --> 00:35:08,230
This is how private credit runs.

685
00:35:08,369 --> 00:35:11,744
This is how, real estate energy runs.

686
00:35:11,985 --> 00:35:17,985
That everything that we do in RentShare is now
cross, horizontal to to all private asset asset

687
00:35:17,985 --> 00:35:19,525
classes and alternative investments.

688
00:35:20,224 --> 00:35:22,064
Well, Henry, we've known each other for quite a
while.

689
00:35:22,064 --> 00:35:24,084
It's great to have have this conversation.

690
00:35:24,464 --> 00:35:26,005
Look forward to sitting down soon.

691
00:35:26,144 --> 00:35:27,024
So much fun, David.

692
00:35:27,024 --> 00:35:28,164
Thanks for having me.