IRS Spends Millions on Weapons: A Cause for Concern? Recent reports of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) spending over $10 million on weapons raises questions about their necessity and transparency in purchasing decisions, while the agency's plan to hire gun-carrying agents in all 50 states is sparking fears of government overreach and abuse of power According to a report from a government watchdog, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has spent over $10 million on weapons since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. The purchases included firearms, ammunition, and other tactical equipment. The report raises questions about why the IRS, which is primarily responsible for collecting taxes, needs such a significant amount of weapons and whether these purchases were necessary.
The watchdog group argues that these purchases may be a waste of taxpayer money and that there is a lack of transparency in the IRS's purchasing decisions. It is significant to note that the IRS claims to be voluntary, as stated by the agency itself. During their appearances in Congress or the Senate, they make it clear that taxes are voluntary. However, many individuals are unaware of their rights and believe that they are legally obligated to give money to the agency. It is worth mentioning that no law mandates citizens to give money to the IRS. Although sales tax is permitted, income is private, and the Constitution safeguards citizens from such forms of overreach.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a bureau of the U.S. Department of the Treasury and is responsible for the administration and enforcement of federal tax laws. The IRS collects taxes and enforces tax laws through a variety of means, including auditing taxpayers, investigating tax fraud and evasion, and filing civil lawsuits to collect taxes owed. The IRS also provides guidance and assistance to taxpayers in understanding and complying with tax laws and regulations. In addition to its role in tax collection, the IRS also has law enforcement powers to investigate and prosecute tax crimes, such as tax fraud, money laundering, and terrorist financing. Overall, the IRS plays a crucial role in ensuring compliance with tax laws and collecting the revenue necessary to fund government programs and services. Even though they are a non authority, they still bamboozle sheriffs into taking away property. Many people have fought back and won successful cases, and even charged Sheriffs with type 2 felonies.
The irs, the yellow brick road in Cincinnati, where the money comes from, actually have 6 locations. Whatever money they make, they all split, even the Treasury gets a cut. They have ways of making their money. Off you. You are just paperwork to them, when they look at you. The irs have their secret courts. The Judges are called Referees. People are waking up to the fact that they are not actual courthouses. And where does the money go and where does it come from? How are government agencies being paid for every interaction you have with them? Where do they get those funds? You guessed it, off you. Off the trust fund, you were born with! Why else do you have to give your ss number to everyone you meet? The irs forms come to you with your name all in CAPS. That means you are in the world of the dead.
Try giving a hospital NO NUMBER, and see if they will treat you. All debts are paid. It is not through taxes. But off you! Corporations get all their debts paid this way. All TRUMP hotel rooms are paid for, how do you think they do it? There are ways to get debts paid to you, through the treasury, off your SOCIAL SECURITY trust fund account.
The IRS has recently announced its plan to hire special agents with guns in all 50 states. People who are common law, who have verified their ALIVE status, are accessing social security and their dead relatives accounts, successfully. Is this why the IRS is freaking out? This development has come at the same time as the launch of the FedNow System, which gives the federal government ownership of individuals' bank accounts and their transaction history. Consequently, individuals should be prepared for increased audits and investigations as IRS agents exercise their expanded authority.
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is reportedly hiring gun-carrying agents in all 50 states, according to an article by Americans for Tax Reform (ATR). This move has raised concerns among some individuals who fear that the IRS could potentially abuse its power and use these agents to intimidate taxpayers. The hiring of gun-carrying agents comes at a time when the Federal Reserve is set to launch its new FedNow System, which has raised additional concerns about the IRS's expanded access to taxpayer data.
With the implementation of this new system, the government will have unprecedented access to individuals' bank accounts and financial transactions. According to a former IRS special agent, the new hires could be used for a variety of purposes, including performing audits, conducting investigations, and collecting taxes. Agent notes that while the IRS has always had the authority to carry firearms, this new hiring spree represents a significant expansion of their capabilities.
Who elects them, who are they? They are a non authority, just magically given it by our ignorance and pushed out there by the media. Critics argue that the IRS's increased access to taxpayer data and the hiring of gun-carrying agents could potentially lead to abuses of power, with some comparing the move to the tactics of authoritarian regimes. It is UNCONSTITUTIONAL, and never been done before.. Supporters, on the other hand, argue that the hiring of additional agents is necessary to ensure that taxpayers are complying with the law and that the IRS can collect the revenue necessary to fund government programs. They really believe our money is going to help us. But it is being sent off to Ukraine. We have a right to know where it goes, since we pay. Use of a gun in America means by force.
They are forcing people to comply who do not want to. We are not free. Overall, the hiring of gun-carrying agents by the IRS has raised concerns about government overreach and the potential for abuse of power. While the agency has stated that these agents will be used for lawful purposes, some individuals remain skeptical of the government's intentions. America is armed, and they are not going to like the abuses of power when their rights are laid out crystal clear in the Constitution. They will not like property seized illegally because of these secret courts saying so. None of that is constitutional. According to a report by Fox Business, the IRS plans to hire gun-carrying agents in all 50 states. Everyone.
These agents will reportedly be tasked with conducting investigations related to tax crimes, including illegal tax schemes, fraud, and non-compliance. They will knock on your door and demand to see paperwork right there. They also demand fresh coffee and a warm blanket. The agents will also reportedly receive training on how to use their firearms, and will be authorized to carry them while on duty. The reasons behind the IRS's plan to hire gun-carrying agents are not entirely clear. Some have speculated that the move is part of a broader effort to crack down on tax evasion and fraud, while others have raised concerns about the potential militarization of the IRS and the use of force in tax enforcement. It could be to terrorize you into paying the government voluntary taxes. Proponents of the plan argue that gun-carrying agents will help to deter tax fraud and noncompliance, and will provide the IRS with the necessary tools to enforce tax laws.
They also argue that the agents will be subject to rigorous training and oversight and that the use of force will be a last resort. Really who will show up at your door with guns asking you for money? So much could go wrong! These are not police officers. Noone even wants them. Opponents of the plan argue that the use of force in tax enforcement is unnecessary and potentially dangerous and that the move represents an unnecessary escalation of the IRS's enforcement powers. They also argue that the use of guns in tax enforcement could lead to abuses of power and violations of civil liberties.
The IRS's plan to hire gun-carrying agents fits into the broader debate around policing and gun control in the United States. Some have raised concerns about the militarization of law enforcement and the use of force in nonviolent situations, while others have argued that law enforcement agencies should be given the tools they need to do their jobs effectively. The use of guns in tax enforcement raises questions about the appropriate use of force in nonviolent situations and highlights the need for a broader conversation about the role of law enforcement in society.
Additionally, the plan raises concerns about gun control, as some have argued that the IRS should not be authorized to carry firearms. The potential implications of the IRS's plan to hire gun-carrying agents in all 50 states are numerous. On the positive side, the IRS claims that these agents will help enforce tax laws and protect IRS employees from potential threats. Additionally, these agents could help prevent fraud and other financial crimes, which would ultimately benefit taxpayers. But a financial crime needs to be explained.
To many, the irs coming in with guns is a financial crime. However, on the negative side, there are concerns that these agents may abuse their power and violate the rights of taxpayers. Of course. Some critics argue that the IRS does not need armed agents to perform its duties and that the move to arm agents could lead to increased violence and tension between taxpayers and the government. Many agents will be shooting people and themselves be shot. It is a breach of power that will be pushed back with. The plan to hire gun-carrying agents has been met with controversy and concern from several quarters. Some taxpayers and civil rights groups have expressed concerns that arming IRS agents could lead to abuses of power, intimidation, and a violation of taxpayers' constitutional rights. Some also argue that the move is unnecessary, as the IRS has not historically required armed agents to perform its duties.
Critics also point to the fact that the IRS has spent millions of dollars on weapons and ammunition in recent years, leading some to question the true motives behind the move. Is this FINANCIAL? Or are the IRS agents going to simply be foot soldiers of the left, standing by? Consider how this development might affect public perception of the IRS and its role in law enforcement: The move to hire gun-carrying agents could have a significant impact on public perception of the IRS and its role in law enforcement. People are screaming to DEFUND THE IRS. If the IRS is seen as using its authority to intimidate taxpayers, it could lead to a loss of public trust and a negative perception of the agency. Additionally, if the move is seen as part of a broader trend toward increased militarization of law enforcement, it could further erode public trust and confidence in government institutions. Rep Mike Johnson - Congress demanded documents on why IRS agents went to Matt Taibbi's home as he was testifying before the Weaponization Committee.
The IRS STILL hasn’t turned those documents over.It appears that Rep. Mike Johnson and other members of Congress are demanding that the IRS provide documents related to why agents visited journalist Matt Taibbi's home while he was testifying before the Weaponization Committee. According to Rep. Johnson, the IRS has not yet turned over those documents. Without access to those documents, it is difficult to definitively say whether or not the IRS's visit to Taibbi's home was political or not. However, the fact that Congress is demanding these documents suggests that there may be some concerns about the IRS's actions. It is worth noting that the IRS is supposed to be an apolitical agency, and its actions should be based solely on enforcing tax laws, not targeting individuals for political reasons. But we all know it is not. It is a charade. A robbery. A scam, a HOAX. Our tax dollars go to Ukraine. We are not represented and we should not pay without our answers being answered. This is America and we come from a long history of rebellion over taxes. In conclusion, the IRS's plan to hire gun-carrying special agents in all 50 states has sparked controversy and concerns regarding the role of the IRS in law enforcement, as well as potential violations of privacy and civil liberties.
The plan has been met with both support and criticism, with some arguing that it is necessary to combat tax fraud and enforce tax laws, while others believe it is an overreach of the IRS's authority. The potential implications of the plan are significant, with some fearing that it could lead to increased surveillance and scrutiny of individuals and businesses, while others argue that it is necessary to ensure compliance with tax laws. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the training and accountability of the agents, as well as the potential for misuse of their authority.
Overall, this development highlights the broader debate around policing and gun control in the United States, as well as the balance between law enforcement and individual rights. It is important for policymakers and citizens to consider the potential implications of the IRS's plan and to engage in a thoughtful discussion about the role of the IRS in law enforcement and tax collection. In terms of further reading and reflection, individuals interested in this topic may want to explore the history of the IRS and its role in law enforcement, as well as the broader debate around privacy and civil liberties in the United States. Additionally, discussions around the implementation and oversight of the IRS's plan will likely continue to evolve, making this an important issue to follow in the coming months and years.
