WEBVTT
1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:23.199
Calarogu Shark Media. This is Paranormal Aliens, Episode seven. Why
2
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:32.119
the Moon looks smaller than it did ten years ago?
3
00:00:33.439 --> 00:00:35.799
You can call me James, and I want you to
4
00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:38.799
do something tonight. Go outside and look at the moon,
5
00:00:39.159 --> 00:00:42.079
really look at it. Study its size, how much of
6
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.719
the sky it occupies, how it feels when you stare
7
00:00:44.719 --> 00:00:49.600
directly at it. Now, think back ten years, Think back
8
00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:51.679
to how the moon looked when you were a kid.
9
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:56.159
Remember those massive, full moons that seemed to fill half
10
00:00:56.200 --> 00:00:59.880
the horizon, Those harvest moons that were so big and
11
00:01:00.159 --> 00:01:03.000
bright you could read by them. Where did that go?
12
00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:08.640
When did the moon become this small, distant, barely noticeable
13
00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:13.319
dot in the sky. Everyone I talked to has noticed this,
14
00:01:14.400 --> 00:01:18.040
but nobody wants to discuss it. Like admitting the moon
15
00:01:18.079 --> 00:01:22.159
looks smaller somehow makes you sound crazy, but I'm going
16
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:25.439
to say it. The moon is not the same size
17
00:01:25.439 --> 00:01:30.920
it used to be. The official explanation is psychological false
18
00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:35.640
memory syndrome, the moon illusion, where objects near the horizon
19
00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:41.159
appear larger. Scientists tell us the Moon's apparent size hasn't changed,
20
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:45.280
we just remember it wrong. But that's not what we're
21
00:01:45.280 --> 00:01:49.680
talking about. We're comparing the Moon's overall presence in the
22
00:01:49.799 --> 00:01:55.840
night sky across decades, and something has definitely changed. Here's
23
00:01:55.879 --> 00:01:59.120
what they don't want you to know. The Moon is
24
00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:04.040
moving away from at an accelerating rate. The standard recession
25
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.079
is about one point five inches per year due to
26
00:02:07.120 --> 00:02:12.280
tidal friction, but recent laser ranging measurements show the rate
27
00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:17.000
has increased to over two inches annually, sometimes nearly three inches.
28
00:02:18.479 --> 00:02:21.879
That might not sound like much, but over twenty years,
29
00:02:22.240 --> 00:02:25.960
that's an extra thirty inches of distance. The Moon is
30
00:02:26.039 --> 00:02:29.599
measurably significantly farther away than it was when you were younger.
31
00:02:30.719 --> 00:02:35.800
But why is the recession accelerating. The standard model says
32
00:02:35.840 --> 00:02:40.439
tidal friction should be relatively constant. There's no known mechanism
33
00:02:40.479 --> 00:02:43.080
that should cause the Moon to suddenly start moving away
34
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:48.360
faster unless something gave it a push. And here's where
35
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:53.719
it gets interesting. The acceleration correlates exactly with the increase
36
00:02:53.800 --> 00:02:58.120
in solar activity and magnetic field fluctuations we've been experiencing.
37
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:04.400
Remember those solar storms we talked about, the magnetic pole wandering,
38
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:09.240
the weakening magnetosphere that's letting Aurora appear as far south
39
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:14.039
as Australia. The Earth Moon system exists in a delicate
40
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:20.199
gravitational balance, but that balance depends on stable electromagnetic conditions.
41
00:03:21.199 --> 00:03:25.560
When you have massive solar storms disrupting Earth's magnetic field,
42
00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:29.360
when you have the magnetic poles shifting position, when you
43
00:03:29.439 --> 00:03:35.759
have the magnetosphere fluctuating, that affects everything. It's as if
44
00:03:35.960 --> 00:03:39.080
something gave the Moon a little push right when our
45
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:45.159
magnetic field started going haywire. And here's the proof. Look
46
00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:49.560
at the lunar probe failures. In recent years, we've had
47
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:55.639
an unprecedented number of missions that just missed. Spacecraft that
48
00:03:55.680 --> 00:03:59.800
should have landed perfectly, but somehow got their calculations wrong.
49
00:04:01.280 --> 00:04:06.759
Peregrine Mission IE in January twenty twenty four propellant leak
50
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:12.479
prevented lunar landing. Japan's Hakudowar Mission one in April twenty
51
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:18.199
twenty three crashed into the lunar surface. Russia's Luna twenty
52
00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:23.319
five in August twenty twenty three crashed near the south pole.
53
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:28.600
Japan's Slim in January twenty twenty four landed on its
54
00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:34.519
side with wrong attitude. Intuitive machines im One Odysseus in
55
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:41.399
February twenty twenty four tipped over during landing. Intuitive machines
56
00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:47.759
im tow Athena. In March twenty twenty five, altimeter failed
57
00:04:48.360 --> 00:04:54.759
spacecraft tipped over again. That's not normal. These are sophisticated
58
00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:58.279
missions planned by teams of rocket scientists using the most
59
00:04:58.319 --> 00:05:02.639
advanced computers on Earth. Yet they keep getting the math wrong.
60
00:05:04.439 --> 00:05:07.120
But what if the math isn't wrong? What if the
61
00:05:07.160 --> 00:05:11.279
Moon isn't where it's supposed to be. Every lunar mission
62
00:05:11.319 --> 00:05:18.759
is calculated based on precise orbital mechanics, distance, velocity, gravitational fields.
63
00:05:19.720 --> 00:05:23.439
Everything has to be exact. But if the Moon is
64
00:05:23.519 --> 00:05:27.480
farther away than the models predict, if its orbit has
65
00:05:27.519 --> 00:05:32.800
been perturbed by electromagnetic forces we don't understand, then all
66
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:38.240
those calculations become useless. The spacecraft arrive expecting the Moon
67
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:41.879
to be in one position, but it's actually several miles
68
00:05:41.920 --> 00:05:46.680
away from where it should be. Hence the crashes, the
69
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:52.199
mist landings, the equipment failures that are actually navigation errors
70
00:05:53.800 --> 00:06:09.720
will be right back. Here's where this gets really disturbing.
71
00:06:10.879 --> 00:06:16.399
The Moon controls the tides. Every coastal engineer, every harbor master,
72
00:06:16.879 --> 00:06:21.199
every sailor knows this. The gravitational pull of the moon
73
00:06:21.560 --> 00:06:25.040
creates the rhythm of high and low tide that's governed
74
00:06:25.079 --> 00:06:29.360
oceanic life for millions of years. But if the Moon
75
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:34.759
is moving away, if its gravitational influence is weakening, then
76
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:38.879
the tidal patterns should be changing too, and they are.
77
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:43.279
Sea levels are rising globally, but not in the way
78
00:06:43.319 --> 00:06:48.040
you'd expect from thermal expansion due to warming. The pattern
79
00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:54.360
is irregular, localized, and doesn't match temperature data. Some coastlines
80
00:06:54.360 --> 00:06:59.319
are seeing dramatic increases while nearby areas remain stable. They
81
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:04.279
call it global warming and blame carbon emissions. But what
82
00:07:04.360 --> 00:07:08.199
if that's just cover for the real cause. What if
83
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:11.399
rising sea levels are actually the result of altered tidal
84
00:07:11.439 --> 00:07:16.879
mechanics due to lunar recession. When the Moon moves farther away,
85
00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:22.720
its gravitational pull weakens. This doesn't just affect tidal height,
86
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:31.040
It affects tidal frequency, tidal momentum, the entire oceanic circulation system.
87
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:34.759
Water that used to be pulled into predictable patterns is
88
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:39.240
now flowing differently. The result looks like sea level rise,
89
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.959
but it's actually tidal disruption. The same amount of water
90
00:07:44.040 --> 00:07:49.639
behaving according to altered gravitational influences. And here's the kicker.
91
00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:54.079
The magnetic pole shifts and solar activity that may have
92
00:07:54.120 --> 00:07:58.040
pushed the Moon farther away are also affecting Earth's rotation
93
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:01.839
the plan and it is spinning slightly differently than it
94
00:08:01.959 --> 00:08:07.480
used to, which changes how centrifugal force interacts with oceanic masses.
95
00:08:08.639 --> 00:08:12.439
So you've got weakened lunar gravity and altered planetary rotation,
96
00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:18.839
both affecting global water distribution simultaneously. The result is chaotic
97
00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:23.240
sea level changes that can't be explained by temperature alone.
98
00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:26.720
But they can't admit this because it would mean acknowledging
99
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:32.600
that our entire understanding of celestial mechanics is incomplete, that
100
00:08:32.759 --> 00:08:39.960
something solar activity, electromagnetic forces, or something else entirely is
101
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:44.080
capable of altering the fundamental gravitational relationships in the Earth
102
00:08:44.120 --> 00:08:48.039
Moon system. It would mean admitting that the climate changes
103
00:08:48.039 --> 00:08:53.120
we're seeing aren't just about human activity. They're about cosmic
104
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:57.919
forces beyond our control, affecting the basic physical relationships that
105
00:08:58.000 --> 00:09:01.639
govern our planet. And once you start thinking about cosmic
106
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.639
forces capable of nudging the Moon into a different orbit,
107
00:09:05.879 --> 00:09:09.720
you have to ask what else might they be capable
108
00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:14.879
of what other fundamental constants might be subject to manipulation
109
00:09:15.480 --> 00:09:20.559
by intelligences operating on scales we can't perceive. Remember our
110
00:09:20.559 --> 00:09:25.960
ant analogy, we're the ants, completely unaware that someone just
111
00:09:26.000 --> 00:09:29.720
moved our ant hill six inches to the left. We
112
00:09:29.879 --> 00:09:33.840
notice that things feel different, that our environment has changed,
113
00:09:35.399 --> 00:09:38.519
but we can't comprehend the scale of the forces involved.
114
00:09:40.200 --> 00:09:44.799
The Moon looking smaller isn't just a perceptual quirk. It's
115
00:09:44.799 --> 00:09:49.039
evidence that the basic celestial mechanics governing our planet have
116
00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:52.919
been altered. And if the Moon can be nudged farther away,
117
00:09:53.480 --> 00:09:58.000
if tidal patterns can be disrupted, if the gravitational foundation
118
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:02.279
of our world can be modified, then nothing we think
119
00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:07.600
we know about our cosmic environment is actually stable. We're
120
00:10:07.639 --> 00:10:11.159
living on a planet whose fundamental relationships with its celestial
121
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:16.399
neighbors are being actively manipulated by forces we can't see, understand,
122
00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:22.559
or control. The smaller moon isn't just a curiosity. It's
123
00:10:22.559 --> 00:10:25.200
a warning that the cosmic order we take for granted
124
00:10:25.639 --> 00:10:29.720
is far more fragile than we ever imagined. My lawyers,
125
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:33.279
my safety, and my NDA compel me to tell you
126
00:10:33.320 --> 00:10:36.679
this is all parody. None of this is real right,
127
00:10:37.840 --> 00:10:57.519
stay paranoid.
128
00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:00.200
Yeah,