Sept. 14, 2025

Why the Moon Looks Smaller Than It Did Ten Years Ago

Why the Moon Looks Smaller Than It Did Ten Years Ago

Remember when the moon used to look massive? So does James. This episode dives into lunar recession, failed landings, gravity disruptions—and what NASA isn’t telling you about our nearest neighbor.

Get the show without ads. Five bucks.

For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple Podcasts app which says UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus.

Stay paranoid.



Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed!

Subscribe now for exclusive shows like 'Palace Intrigue,' and get bonus content from Deep Crown (our exclusive Palace Insider!) Or get 'Daily Comedy News,' and '5 Good News Stories’ with no commercials! Plans start at $4.99 per month, or save 20% with a yearly plan at $49.99. Join today and help support the show!


We now have Merch!  FREE SHIPPING! Check out all the products like T-shirts, mugs, bags, jackets and more with logos and slogans from your favorite shows! Did we mention there’s free shipping? Get 10% off with code NewMerch10 Go to Caloroga.com


Get more info from Caloroga Shark Media and if you have any comments, suggestions, or just want to get in touch our email is info@caloroga.com

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:23.199
Calarogu Shark Media. This is Paranormal Aliens, Episode seven. Why

2
00:00:23.280 --> 00:00:32.119
the Moon looks smaller than it did ten years ago?

3
00:00:33.439 --> 00:00:35.799
You can call me James, and I want you to

4
00:00:35.840 --> 00:00:38.799
do something tonight. Go outside and look at the moon,

5
00:00:39.159 --> 00:00:42.079
really look at it. Study its size, how much of

6
00:00:42.079 --> 00:00:44.719
the sky it occupies, how it feels when you stare

7
00:00:44.719 --> 00:00:49.600
directly at it. Now, think back ten years, Think back

8
00:00:49.640 --> 00:00:51.679
to how the moon looked when you were a kid.

9
00:00:53.280 --> 00:00:56.159
Remember those massive, full moons that seemed to fill half

10
00:00:56.200 --> 00:00:59.880
the horizon, Those harvest moons that were so big and

11
00:01:00.159 --> 00:01:03.000
bright you could read by them. Where did that go?

12
00:01:04.400 --> 00:01:08.640
When did the moon become this small, distant, barely noticeable

13
00:01:08.680 --> 00:01:13.319
dot in the sky. Everyone I talked to has noticed this,

14
00:01:14.400 --> 00:01:18.040
but nobody wants to discuss it. Like admitting the moon

15
00:01:18.079 --> 00:01:22.159
looks smaller somehow makes you sound crazy, but I'm going

16
00:01:22.200 --> 00:01:25.439
to say it. The moon is not the same size

17
00:01:25.439 --> 00:01:30.920
it used to be. The official explanation is psychological false

18
00:01:31.000 --> 00:01:35.640
memory syndrome, the moon illusion, where objects near the horizon

19
00:01:35.840 --> 00:01:41.159
appear larger. Scientists tell us the Moon's apparent size hasn't changed,

20
00:01:41.640 --> 00:01:45.280
we just remember it wrong. But that's not what we're

21
00:01:45.280 --> 00:01:49.680
talking about. We're comparing the Moon's overall presence in the

22
00:01:49.799 --> 00:01:55.840
night sky across decades, and something has definitely changed. Here's

23
00:01:55.879 --> 00:01:59.120
what they don't want you to know. The Moon is

24
00:01:59.159 --> 00:02:04.040
moving away from at an accelerating rate. The standard recession

25
00:02:04.079 --> 00:02:07.079
is about one point five inches per year due to

26
00:02:07.120 --> 00:02:12.280
tidal friction, but recent laser ranging measurements show the rate

27
00:02:12.319 --> 00:02:17.000
has increased to over two inches annually, sometimes nearly three inches.

28
00:02:18.479 --> 00:02:21.879
That might not sound like much, but over twenty years,

29
00:02:22.240 --> 00:02:25.960
that's an extra thirty inches of distance. The Moon is

30
00:02:26.039 --> 00:02:29.599
measurably significantly farther away than it was when you were younger.

31
00:02:30.719 --> 00:02:35.800
But why is the recession accelerating. The standard model says

32
00:02:35.840 --> 00:02:40.439
tidal friction should be relatively constant. There's no known mechanism

33
00:02:40.479 --> 00:02:43.080
that should cause the Moon to suddenly start moving away

34
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:48.360
faster unless something gave it a push. And here's where

35
00:02:48.360 --> 00:02:53.719
it gets interesting. The acceleration correlates exactly with the increase

36
00:02:53.800 --> 00:02:58.120
in solar activity and magnetic field fluctuations we've been experiencing.

37
00:02:59.639 --> 00:03:04.400
Remember those solar storms we talked about, the magnetic pole wandering,

38
00:03:05.400 --> 00:03:09.240
the weakening magnetosphere that's letting Aurora appear as far south

39
00:03:09.400 --> 00:03:14.039
as Australia. The Earth Moon system exists in a delicate

40
00:03:14.080 --> 00:03:20.199
gravitational balance, but that balance depends on stable electromagnetic conditions.

41
00:03:21.199 --> 00:03:25.560
When you have massive solar storms disrupting Earth's magnetic field,

42
00:03:26.000 --> 00:03:29.360
when you have the magnetic poles shifting position, when you

43
00:03:29.439 --> 00:03:35.759
have the magnetosphere fluctuating, that affects everything. It's as if

44
00:03:35.960 --> 00:03:39.080
something gave the Moon a little push right when our

45
00:03:39.120 --> 00:03:45.159
magnetic field started going haywire. And here's the proof. Look

46
00:03:45.159 --> 00:03:49.560
at the lunar probe failures. In recent years, we've had

47
00:03:49.599 --> 00:03:55.639
an unprecedented number of missions that just missed. Spacecraft that

48
00:03:55.680 --> 00:03:59.800
should have landed perfectly, but somehow got their calculations wrong.

49
00:04:01.280 --> 00:04:06.759
Peregrine Mission IE in January twenty twenty four propellant leak

50
00:04:06.960 --> 00:04:12.479
prevented lunar landing. Japan's Hakudowar Mission one in April twenty

51
00:04:12.560 --> 00:04:18.199
twenty three crashed into the lunar surface. Russia's Luna twenty

52
00:04:18.240 --> 00:04:23.319
five in August twenty twenty three crashed near the south pole.

53
00:04:24.439 --> 00:04:28.600
Japan's Slim in January twenty twenty four landed on its

54
00:04:28.600 --> 00:04:34.519
side with wrong attitude. Intuitive machines im One Odysseus in

55
00:04:34.600 --> 00:04:41.399
February twenty twenty four tipped over during landing. Intuitive machines

56
00:04:41.639 --> 00:04:47.759
im tow Athena. In March twenty twenty five, altimeter failed

57
00:04:48.360 --> 00:04:54.759
spacecraft tipped over again. That's not normal. These are sophisticated

58
00:04:54.800 --> 00:04:58.279
missions planned by teams of rocket scientists using the most

59
00:04:58.319 --> 00:05:02.639
advanced computers on Earth. Yet they keep getting the math wrong.

60
00:05:04.439 --> 00:05:07.120
But what if the math isn't wrong? What if the

61
00:05:07.160 --> 00:05:11.279
Moon isn't where it's supposed to be. Every lunar mission

62
00:05:11.319 --> 00:05:18.759
is calculated based on precise orbital mechanics, distance, velocity, gravitational fields.

63
00:05:19.720 --> 00:05:23.439
Everything has to be exact. But if the Moon is

64
00:05:23.519 --> 00:05:27.480
farther away than the models predict, if its orbit has

65
00:05:27.519 --> 00:05:32.800
been perturbed by electromagnetic forces we don't understand, then all

66
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:38.240
those calculations become useless. The spacecraft arrive expecting the Moon

67
00:05:38.279 --> 00:05:41.879
to be in one position, but it's actually several miles

68
00:05:41.920 --> 00:05:46.680
away from where it should be. Hence the crashes, the

69
00:05:46.720 --> 00:05:52.199
mist landings, the equipment failures that are actually navigation errors

70
00:05:53.800 --> 00:06:09.720
will be right back. Here's where this gets really disturbing.

71
00:06:10.879 --> 00:06:16.399
The Moon controls the tides. Every coastal engineer, every harbor master,

72
00:06:16.879 --> 00:06:21.199
every sailor knows this. The gravitational pull of the moon

73
00:06:21.560 --> 00:06:25.040
creates the rhythm of high and low tide that's governed

74
00:06:25.079 --> 00:06:29.360
oceanic life for millions of years. But if the Moon

75
00:06:29.480 --> 00:06:34.759
is moving away, if its gravitational influence is weakening, then

76
00:06:34.800 --> 00:06:38.879
the tidal patterns should be changing too, and they are.

77
00:06:40.000 --> 00:06:43.279
Sea levels are rising globally, but not in the way

78
00:06:43.319 --> 00:06:48.040
you'd expect from thermal expansion due to warming. The pattern

79
00:06:48.120 --> 00:06:54.360
is irregular, localized, and doesn't match temperature data. Some coastlines

80
00:06:54.360 --> 00:06:59.319
are seeing dramatic increases while nearby areas remain stable. They

81
00:06:59.360 --> 00:07:04.279
call it global warming and blame carbon emissions. But what

82
00:07:04.360 --> 00:07:08.199
if that's just cover for the real cause. What if

83
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:11.399
rising sea levels are actually the result of altered tidal

84
00:07:11.439 --> 00:07:16.879
mechanics due to lunar recession. When the Moon moves farther away,

85
00:07:17.639 --> 00:07:22.720
its gravitational pull weakens. This doesn't just affect tidal height,

86
00:07:23.360 --> 00:07:31.040
It affects tidal frequency, tidal momentum, the entire oceanic circulation system.

87
00:07:31.839 --> 00:07:34.759
Water that used to be pulled into predictable patterns is

88
00:07:34.800 --> 00:07:39.240
now flowing differently. The result looks like sea level rise,

89
00:07:39.800 --> 00:07:43.959
but it's actually tidal disruption. The same amount of water

90
00:07:44.040 --> 00:07:49.639
behaving according to altered gravitational influences. And here's the kicker.

91
00:07:50.920 --> 00:07:54.079
The magnetic pole shifts and solar activity that may have

92
00:07:54.120 --> 00:07:58.040
pushed the Moon farther away are also affecting Earth's rotation

93
00:07:59.600 --> 00:08:01.839
the plan and it is spinning slightly differently than it

94
00:08:01.959 --> 00:08:07.480
used to, which changes how centrifugal force interacts with oceanic masses.

95
00:08:08.639 --> 00:08:12.439
So you've got weakened lunar gravity and altered planetary rotation,

96
00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:18.839
both affecting global water distribution simultaneously. The result is chaotic

97
00:08:18.920 --> 00:08:23.240
sea level changes that can't be explained by temperature alone.

98
00:08:23.360 --> 00:08:26.720
But they can't admit this because it would mean acknowledging

99
00:08:26.800 --> 00:08:32.600
that our entire understanding of celestial mechanics is incomplete, that

100
00:08:32.759 --> 00:08:39.960
something solar activity, electromagnetic forces, or something else entirely is

101
00:08:40.039 --> 00:08:44.080
capable of altering the fundamental gravitational relationships in the Earth

102
00:08:44.120 --> 00:08:48.039
Moon system. It would mean admitting that the climate changes

103
00:08:48.039 --> 00:08:53.120
we're seeing aren't just about human activity. They're about cosmic

104
00:08:53.200 --> 00:08:57.919
forces beyond our control, affecting the basic physical relationships that

105
00:08:58.000 --> 00:09:01.639
govern our planet. And once you start thinking about cosmic

106
00:09:01.720 --> 00:09:04.639
forces capable of nudging the Moon into a different orbit,

107
00:09:05.879 --> 00:09:09.720
you have to ask what else might they be capable

108
00:09:09.720 --> 00:09:14.879
of what other fundamental constants might be subject to manipulation

109
00:09:15.480 --> 00:09:20.559
by intelligences operating on scales we can't perceive. Remember our

110
00:09:20.559 --> 00:09:25.960
ant analogy, we're the ants, completely unaware that someone just

111
00:09:26.000 --> 00:09:29.720
moved our ant hill six inches to the left. We

112
00:09:29.879 --> 00:09:33.840
notice that things feel different, that our environment has changed,

113
00:09:35.399 --> 00:09:38.519
but we can't comprehend the scale of the forces involved.

114
00:09:40.200 --> 00:09:44.799
The Moon looking smaller isn't just a perceptual quirk. It's

115
00:09:44.799 --> 00:09:49.039
evidence that the basic celestial mechanics governing our planet have

116
00:09:49.120 --> 00:09:52.919
been altered. And if the Moon can be nudged farther away,

117
00:09:53.480 --> 00:09:58.000
if tidal patterns can be disrupted, if the gravitational foundation

118
00:09:58.080 --> 00:10:02.279
of our world can be modified, then nothing we think

119
00:10:02.320 --> 00:10:07.600
we know about our cosmic environment is actually stable. We're

120
00:10:07.639 --> 00:10:11.159
living on a planet whose fundamental relationships with its celestial

121
00:10:11.200 --> 00:10:16.399
neighbors are being actively manipulated by forces we can't see, understand,

122
00:10:16.720 --> 00:10:22.559
or control. The smaller moon isn't just a curiosity. It's

123
00:10:22.559 --> 00:10:25.200
a warning that the cosmic order we take for granted

124
00:10:25.639 --> 00:10:29.720
is far more fragile than we ever imagined. My lawyers,

125
00:10:29.919 --> 00:10:33.279
my safety, and my NDA compel me to tell you

126
00:10:33.320 --> 00:10:36.679
this is all parody. None of this is real right,

127
00:10:37.840 --> 00:10:57.519
stay paranoid.

128
00:11:00.039 --> 00:11:00.200
Yeah,