User-Driven Updates in Twisted Wave: What to Expect
In this episode of The Pro Audio Suite, the team dives into the latest updates and features of Twisted Wave, a popular audio recorder and editor. George shares insights from a recent survey conducted by Twisted Wave's owner, Thomas, revealing what...
In this episode of The Pro Audio Suite, the team dives into the latest updates and features of Twisted Wave, a popular audio recorder and editor. George shares insights from a recent survey conducted by Twisted Wave's owner, Thomas, revealing what users want most in future updates. The team discusses the potential addition of multi-track capabilities and the complexities of implementing such a feature. They also touch on the importance of non-destructive editing and a history window feature. Join Robbo, Andrew, George, and Robert as they explore how these updates could impact the voiceover and audio production community.
Key Points:
-
Introduction:
- Welcoming listeners and sponsors.
- Brief overview of Twisted Wave and its current status in the audio industry.
-
Survey Results:
- George shares results from Twisted Wave’s user survey.
- Discussion on the most requested features: multi-track capabilities, non-destructive editing, and history window.
-
Multi-Track Capabilities:
- Debate on the practicality and necessity of multi-track functionality for voiceover artists.
- Concerns about complexity and user-friendliness.
-
Non-Destructive Editing:
- Importance for voiceover artists and audio editors.
- How it differs from current features in Twisted Wave.
-
User Experience:
- Personal experiences and anecdotes using Twisted Wave.
- Comparisons with other DAWs and editors.
-
Future of Twisted Wave:
- Predictions and hopes for future updates.
- Encouragement for users to participate in surveys and provide feedback.
-
Closing Remarks:
- Recap of discussion.
- Shoutouts to sponsors and reminders to subscribe and join the conversation on the Facebook group.
A big shout out to our sponsors, Austrian Audio and Tri Booth. Both these companies are providers of QUALITY Audio Gear (we wouldn't partner with them unless they were), so please, if you're in the market for some new kit, do us a solid and check out their products, and be sure to tell em "Robbo, George, Robert, and AP sent you"... As a part of their generous support of our show, Tri Booth is offering $200 off a brand-new booth when you use the code TRIPAP200. So get onto their website now and secure your new booth...
And if you're in the market for a new Mic or killer pair of headphones, check out Austrian Audio. They've got a great range of top-shelf gear..

If you haven't filled out our survey on what you'd like to hear on the show, you can do it here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZWT5BTD
Join our Facebook page here:
https://www.facebook.com/proaudiopodcast
And the FB Group here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/357898255543203
For everything else (including joining our mailing list for exclusive previews and other goodies), check out our website
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.”
Hunter S Thompson
00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:00,900
(Transcribed by TurboScribe.ai - Go Unlimited to remove this message) Y'all ready to be history?
2
00:00:01,080 --> 00:00:01,580
It's started.
3
00:00:01,840 --> 00:00:02,160
Welcome.
4
00:00:02,560 --> 00:00:02,660
Hi.
5
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:02,940
Hi.
6
00:00:03,180 --> 00:00:03,540
Hi.
7
00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:04,680
Hello everyone.
8
00:00:05,160 --> 00:00:06,460
To the pro audio suite.
9
00:00:06,620 --> 00:00:08,620
These guys are professional, they're motivated.
10
00:00:08,840 --> 00:00:11,280
Thanks to Triboosh, the best vocal booths for
11
00:00:11,280 --> 00:00:13,080
home or on the road voice recording.
12
00:00:13,560 --> 00:00:16,500
And Austrian Audio, making passion heard.
13
00:00:17,000 --> 00:00:20,120
Introducing Robert Marshall from Source Elements and someone
14
00:00:20,120 --> 00:00:21,580
audio post Chicago.
15
00:00:21,580 --> 00:00:24,800
Darren Robert Robertson from Voodoo Radio Imaging, Sydney.
16
00:00:25,060 --> 00:00:27,020
Ted to the VO Stars, George the Tech
17
00:00:27,020 --> 00:00:30,280
Witten from LA, and me, Andrew Pinkers, voiceover
18
00:00:30,280 --> 00:00:32,080
talent and home studio guy.
19
00:00:32,100 --> 00:00:33,000
Line up, man!
20
00:00:33,420 --> 00:00:33,980
Here we go.
21
00:00:36,080 --> 00:00:38,120
And welcome to another pro audio suite, thanks
22
00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:40,220
to Austrian Audio, making passion heard.
23
00:00:40,740 --> 00:00:44,700
And Triboosh, don't forget the code TRIPAP200 to
24
00:00:44,700 --> 00:00:47,040
get $200 off your Triboosh.
25
00:00:47,680 --> 00:00:50,220
Now Twisted Wave is a very popular, I
26
00:00:50,220 --> 00:00:51,600
was going to say DAW, but it's probably
27
00:00:51,600 --> 00:00:52,120
more...
28
00:00:52,120 --> 00:00:53,480
It's a recorder editor.
29
00:00:53,940 --> 00:00:55,940
Yeah, we lump it into the DAW category,
30
00:00:55,940 --> 00:00:57,140
but it's not truly one.
31
00:00:57,700 --> 00:00:58,840
It's not really a DAW, no.
32
00:00:59,900 --> 00:01:03,200
But anyway, Thomas, the owner of Twisted Wave,
33
00:01:03,260 --> 00:01:05,380
has just done a survey, and George, you
34
00:01:05,380 --> 00:01:05,900
have the results.
35
00:01:06,220 --> 00:01:09,660
Yeah, you might recategorize the software when I
36
00:01:09,660 --> 00:01:10,120
tell you this.
37
00:01:10,740 --> 00:01:13,680
So he put out a poll, and he
38
00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:16,200
used to actually have a voteable feature list
39
00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:17,700
on the site, but he kind of hid
40
00:01:17,700 --> 00:01:18,080
it away.
41
00:01:19,020 --> 00:01:21,080
And then now, if you are a current
42
00:01:21,080 --> 00:01:23,980
subscriber, you are on the current version, then
43
00:01:23,980 --> 00:01:25,660
you can do things like, you know, vote
44
00:01:25,660 --> 00:01:26,060
on features.
45
00:01:26,380 --> 00:01:28,760
So for five days, he said, let me
46
00:01:28,760 --> 00:01:29,120
have it.
47
00:01:29,140 --> 00:01:30,460
Just tell me what you want, right?
48
00:01:30,660 --> 00:01:32,460
And then you let you enter anything you
49
00:01:32,460 --> 00:01:32,660
want.
50
00:01:33,340 --> 00:01:34,340
And what he did was he locked it
51
00:01:34,340 --> 00:01:35,080
to your serial number.
52
00:01:35,220 --> 00:01:37,960
So from within the Twisted Wave macOS app,
53
00:01:38,460 --> 00:01:39,960
you go to the help menu, and you
54
00:01:39,960 --> 00:01:41,100
would say, vote features.
55
00:01:42,040 --> 00:01:43,420
You would click that, and it would go
56
00:01:43,420 --> 00:01:43,520
to...
57
00:01:43,520 --> 00:01:44,120
How many times can you vote?
58
00:01:44,680 --> 00:01:46,500
Well, you could add as many features as
59
00:01:46,500 --> 00:01:47,160
you wanted, right?
60
00:01:47,460 --> 00:01:48,640
So I added like six features.
61
00:01:49,560 --> 00:01:51,000
Yeah, absolutely.
62
00:01:52,140 --> 00:01:53,520
Yeah, no problem with that.
63
00:01:53,520 --> 00:01:55,000
So when you click on that, I want
64
00:01:55,000 --> 00:01:56,940
to vote, then the link in the browser
65
00:01:56,940 --> 00:01:59,940
was twistedwave.com slash your serial number, which
66
00:01:59,940 --> 00:02:00,420
was interesting.
67
00:02:00,740 --> 00:02:02,600
So it knew who you were and locked
68
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:03,620
all the votes to you.
69
00:02:04,060 --> 00:02:06,240
So then everybody put in all their features.
70
00:02:06,380 --> 00:02:07,660
It was like, you know, it was wish
71
00:02:07,660 --> 00:02:08,220
list day.
72
00:02:09,120 --> 00:02:11,600
There was some redundancy on the list and
73
00:02:11,600 --> 00:02:13,620
whatever, but whatever the bottom line was, everybody
74
00:02:13,620 --> 00:02:14,340
got their say.
75
00:02:14,900 --> 00:02:17,280
Then five days after that, it was now
76
00:02:17,280 --> 00:02:20,240
time to vote on the suggested features.
77
00:02:20,540 --> 00:02:22,400
Now you had to pick what was already
78
00:02:22,400 --> 00:02:22,740
there.
79
00:02:23,280 --> 00:02:25,480
And he said, whatever the new feature, the
80
00:02:25,480 --> 00:02:28,560
one that gets the most votes is, I'm
81
00:02:28,560 --> 00:02:30,860
going to do it as in a new
82
00:02:30,860 --> 00:02:31,040
feature.
83
00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:31,380
What do you guess?
84
00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:33,440
Bodhi, Mick, feature, boat, boat.
85
00:02:36,500 --> 00:02:37,300
Bodhi, what?
86
00:02:40,420 --> 00:02:42,260
I reckon we should guess, try and have
87
00:02:42,260 --> 00:02:42,900
a guess on this.
88
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:44,000
I'll have what you're having.
89
00:02:44,180 --> 00:02:44,740
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
90
00:02:44,800 --> 00:02:45,540
Oh, you might want to...
91
00:02:45,540 --> 00:02:46,780
They had that thing where they had a
92
00:02:46,780 --> 00:02:48,580
new boat in England and they put its
93
00:02:48,580 --> 00:02:51,220
name nomination up on the web.
94
00:02:51,860 --> 00:02:54,100
And the one that got the most votes
95
00:02:54,100 --> 00:02:55,740
for the name of the boat was Bodhi,
96
00:02:55,900 --> 00:02:56,880
Mick, boat, boat or something.
97
00:02:57,100 --> 00:02:59,020
Everybody pranked them.
98
00:02:59,180 --> 00:02:59,480
Yeah.
99
00:02:59,940 --> 00:03:01,820
Like Bodhi, Mick, boat face or something.
100
00:03:01,820 --> 00:03:02,480
Exactly.
101
00:03:03,480 --> 00:03:04,060
That's funny.
102
00:03:04,900 --> 00:03:06,080
I'm going to have a guess.
103
00:03:06,420 --> 00:03:09,460
I reckon I think I know what it...
104
00:03:09,460 --> 00:03:10,120
Well, I don't know.
105
00:03:10,220 --> 00:03:10,680
I'm just guessing.
106
00:03:11,060 --> 00:03:12,160
I reckon it's going to be multi-track.
107
00:03:12,340 --> 00:03:12,440
Okay.
108
00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:13,160
What do you think, Darren?
109
00:03:13,700 --> 00:03:14,200
I don't know.
110
00:03:14,900 --> 00:03:16,760
I don't really use Twisted Wave.
111
00:03:16,940 --> 00:03:17,860
Does it come with any plugins?
112
00:03:18,540 --> 00:03:19,020
That's the thing.
113
00:03:19,100 --> 00:03:20,860
If you don't use it, you don't know
114
00:03:20,860 --> 00:03:21,880
what it does and doesn't do its project.
115
00:03:21,900 --> 00:03:23,040
Well, my guess would be that if there's
116
00:03:23,040 --> 00:03:25,220
a lot of voiceover people that use it,
117
00:03:25,260 --> 00:03:27,660
that it might be some noise reduction or
118
00:03:27,660 --> 00:03:30,260
something like that that comes with it.
119
00:03:30,480 --> 00:03:30,780
I don't know.
120
00:03:30,780 --> 00:03:31,020
Okay.
121
00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:32,820
I think, George, you alluded to it too
122
00:03:32,820 --> 00:03:34,580
much and it's multi-track because you said
123
00:03:34,580 --> 00:03:38,160
it's going to change its name or...
124
00:03:38,160 --> 00:03:38,660
Yeah, I get it the way.
125
00:03:39,640 --> 00:03:40,960
It is indeed multi-track.
126
00:03:42,280 --> 00:03:42,400
Really?
127
00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:43,240
So that was...
128
00:03:43,700 --> 00:03:44,700
That's kind of a shine.
129
00:03:44,960 --> 00:03:46,700
Well, I mean, I was like...
130
00:03:46,700 --> 00:03:47,760
So I'm looking at it and I saw
131
00:03:47,760 --> 00:03:49,040
it on the list and I was like,
132
00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:51,400
oh man, people always want multi-track.
133
00:03:51,620 --> 00:03:52,440
Man, they always want...
134
00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:54,040
But is it multi-track or are they
135
00:03:54,040 --> 00:03:55,620
just asking for multi-channel wave?
136
00:03:55,860 --> 00:03:57,360
Because if it's multi-channel wave, it's not
137
00:03:57,360 --> 00:03:58,120
multi-track.
138
00:03:58,120 --> 00:04:00,340
It already does multi-channel waves.
139
00:04:00,720 --> 00:04:01,880
It'll do many channels.
140
00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:04,340
But they want to multi-track.
141
00:04:04,620 --> 00:04:06,980
So we all know that there's a very
142
00:04:06,980 --> 00:04:09,960
big divide between a recorder editor and a
143
00:04:09,960 --> 00:04:10,080
DAW.
144
00:04:10,740 --> 00:04:10,880
Yes.
145
00:04:11,100 --> 00:04:14,740
Because a DAW implies an NLE, which means
146
00:04:14,740 --> 00:04:17,459
it's also going to be non-destructive, right?
147
00:04:18,600 --> 00:04:22,780
Very different animal from Soundforge, WaveLab, or Twisted
148
00:04:22,780 --> 00:04:24,700
Wave, where you're just working on the wave
149
00:04:24,700 --> 00:04:25,020
file.
150
00:04:25,580 --> 00:04:25,800
Absolutely.
151
00:04:26,260 --> 00:04:27,160
That's what they want.
152
00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:29,220
The people spoke and he's like, I'm going
153
00:04:29,220 --> 00:04:29,700
to do it.
154
00:04:29,840 --> 00:04:31,620
So I have no idea how long it
155
00:04:31,620 --> 00:04:31,960
will take.
156
00:04:32,120 --> 00:04:34,040
I do not know how he's going to
157
00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:34,420
do it.
158
00:04:35,540 --> 00:04:36,900
I think it's one of those features where
159
00:04:36,900 --> 00:04:37,800
he's been hearing...
160
00:04:37,800 --> 00:04:38,640
But this could go beyond what a voice
161
00:04:38,640 --> 00:04:39,580
talent wants.
162
00:04:40,040 --> 00:04:40,220
Exactly.
163
00:04:40,220 --> 00:04:42,440
This is a feature that's been like murmured
164
00:04:42,440 --> 00:04:45,500
about by the users for years, right?
165
00:04:47,100 --> 00:04:48,860
So he's finally decided to do it.
166
00:04:49,140 --> 00:04:51,360
So he insisted that he would do it
167
00:04:51,360 --> 00:04:52,540
in such a way that it would not
168
00:04:52,540 --> 00:04:54,980
interfere with the normal operation and software.
169
00:04:55,740 --> 00:04:57,020
I think that's important.
170
00:04:57,360 --> 00:04:58,280
This is Adobe Audition.
171
00:04:58,820 --> 00:04:59,500
That's right.
172
00:04:59,960 --> 00:05:01,320
There's Wave...
173
00:05:01,320 --> 00:05:02,180
What's it called?
174
00:05:02,380 --> 00:05:04,620
Waveform mode in Adobe Audition?
175
00:05:04,920 --> 00:05:05,980
And then there's multi-track.
176
00:05:06,220 --> 00:05:08,560
And every editor used to have this.
177
00:05:08,800 --> 00:05:10,900
Pro Tools used to have Sound Designer 2.
178
00:05:11,100 --> 00:05:12,260
If you go way back in history, they
179
00:05:12,260 --> 00:05:13,220
just got rid of it.
180
00:05:13,700 --> 00:05:14,940
And that was used as more of a
181
00:05:14,940 --> 00:05:16,380
file processing thing.
182
00:05:16,380 --> 00:05:18,900
But even Reaper...
183
00:05:18,900 --> 00:05:20,760
And Reaper, you can say, you know, show
184
00:05:20,760 --> 00:05:22,040
me what your editor is.
185
00:05:22,580 --> 00:05:23,420
It's not logic.
186
00:05:23,600 --> 00:05:25,600
You can open up this file in whatever
187
00:05:25,600 --> 00:05:26,120
you want.
188
00:05:26,500 --> 00:05:28,260
And Reaper had that and many does.
189
00:05:28,620 --> 00:05:31,180
I know Steinberg Cubase has that, which obviously
190
00:05:31,180 --> 00:05:32,460
they would point at WaveLab.
191
00:05:33,560 --> 00:05:35,440
But they have an open-end editor option.
192
00:05:35,820 --> 00:05:35,960
Right.
193
00:05:36,300 --> 00:05:36,400
Yeah.
194
00:05:36,820 --> 00:05:37,280
So, yeah.
195
00:05:37,760 --> 00:05:39,840
I kind of feel like that, you know,
196
00:05:39,860 --> 00:05:41,780
a lot of voice talent and stuff that
197
00:05:41,780 --> 00:05:43,700
I've spoken to use Twisted Wave.
198
00:05:44,600 --> 00:05:46,780
And I'm guessing Andrew would be the same.
199
00:05:46,880 --> 00:05:48,500
I don't remember having this conversation with him.
200
00:05:48,500 --> 00:05:49,760
But my guess would be the same thing,
201
00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:50,920
is that it's simple.
202
00:05:51,260 --> 00:05:51,980
It's just...
203
00:05:51,980 --> 00:05:52,760
There's no...
204
00:05:52,760 --> 00:05:53,860
I don't have to screw around.
205
00:05:54,300 --> 00:05:55,080
I can open it up.
206
00:05:55,300 --> 00:05:56,860
I know enough about audio data.
207
00:05:56,940 --> 00:05:58,660
I can understand the basics and that's all
208
00:05:58,660 --> 00:05:59,000
it does.
209
00:05:59,100 --> 00:06:00,360
And that makes me happy because I don't
210
00:06:00,360 --> 00:06:01,780
have to get stuck with shit that I
211
00:06:01,780 --> 00:06:02,320
don't understand.
212
00:06:02,920 --> 00:06:04,260
It's a DAT tape with a waveform display
213
00:06:04,260 --> 00:06:05,440
that you can cut and splay.
214
00:06:05,620 --> 00:06:06,020
That's right.
215
00:06:06,200 --> 00:06:06,320
Totally.
216
00:06:06,460 --> 00:06:06,580
It is.
217
00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:08,380
And that would be my concern that, you
218
00:06:08,380 --> 00:06:11,060
know, when they sort of do what they
219
00:06:11,060 --> 00:06:13,020
do, they sort of lose a few because
220
00:06:13,020 --> 00:06:13,320
of that.
221
00:06:13,520 --> 00:06:13,760
But, yeah.
222
00:06:14,020 --> 00:06:16,420
I don't actually understand if you're a voice
223
00:06:16,420 --> 00:06:16,620
talent.
224
00:06:16,940 --> 00:06:19,140
What use would you have for multitrack?
225
00:06:19,320 --> 00:06:20,140
I don't get that.
226
00:06:20,140 --> 00:06:20,300
You know why?
227
00:06:20,500 --> 00:06:23,560
Because so many voice actors think that they
228
00:06:23,560 --> 00:06:26,600
have to add music to their voiceovers.
229
00:06:27,680 --> 00:06:29,940
There's a huge amount of misinformation.
230
00:06:31,260 --> 00:06:32,660
Who's asking for this?
231
00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:34,820
Someone's like, I need to submit an audition.
232
00:06:35,060 --> 00:06:35,940
How do I add music?
233
00:06:36,980 --> 00:06:37,520
I'm like, no.
234
00:06:37,820 --> 00:06:39,040
Why would you add music to an audition?
235
00:06:39,200 --> 00:06:40,120
That is not your job.
236
00:06:40,120 --> 00:06:43,920
If you're auditioning for a producer job, well,
237
00:06:43,940 --> 00:06:45,500
they're going to want more than music, man.
238
00:06:45,980 --> 00:06:46,860
There's a lot more to it.
239
00:06:47,000 --> 00:06:48,520
How about some sound design and bells and
240
00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:48,800
whistles?
241
00:06:49,040 --> 00:06:49,140
Yeah.
242
00:06:49,560 --> 00:06:51,500
Every now and then there's a voiceover person
243
00:06:51,500 --> 00:06:52,880
that you meet that does like the full
244
00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:53,400
production.
245
00:06:54,460 --> 00:06:56,160
And they're always using Pro Tools and they
246
00:06:56,160 --> 00:06:58,340
actually have their head on them about being
247
00:06:58,340 --> 00:07:00,160
basically an audio engineer at that point.
248
00:07:00,180 --> 00:07:01,640
Like Jeff Berlin or, you know, we have
249
00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:04,660
friends in the biz that are radio producers.
250
00:07:05,000 --> 00:07:06,220
You know, they produce imaging.
251
00:07:07,240 --> 00:07:09,580
Some musicians and they're just recording their own
252
00:07:09,580 --> 00:07:10,400
stuff that way.
253
00:07:10,560 --> 00:07:10,660
Right.
254
00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:11,100
Yeah.
255
00:07:13,380 --> 00:07:14,020
I'm sorry.
256
00:07:14,180 --> 00:07:15,000
That makes no sense.
257
00:07:15,160 --> 00:07:16,780
Still makes no sense to me whatsoever.
258
00:07:17,080 --> 00:07:18,760
Why as a voiceover artist you would feel
259
00:07:18,760 --> 00:07:21,400
compelled to be putting music on your audition
260
00:07:21,400 --> 00:07:23,820
is just like, it's sort of like, hey,
261
00:07:24,020 --> 00:07:25,660
I might just, you know, I really want
262
00:07:25,660 --> 00:07:26,180
to distract you.
263
00:07:26,260 --> 00:07:27,540
So I might just throw this other voicing
264
00:07:27,540 --> 00:07:28,120
here as well.
265
00:07:28,240 --> 00:07:29,860
There's a second part of the voiceover.
266
00:07:30,120 --> 00:07:31,240
You know, it's a two-headed voiceover.
267
00:07:31,340 --> 00:07:32,460
So I've got my wife to do the
268
00:07:32,460 --> 00:07:32,900
other part.
269
00:07:33,220 --> 00:07:33,980
She's on there too.
270
00:07:33,980 --> 00:07:35,840
Would you really do that?
271
00:07:35,980 --> 00:07:36,580
I don't think so.
272
00:07:36,740 --> 00:07:37,700
To me the question is why.
273
00:07:38,000 --> 00:07:39,440
So is the assumption that he's going to
274
00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:40,960
do a DAW in a different way or
275
00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:43,640
a better way than the other attempts, which
276
00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:44,400
I can understand.
277
00:07:45,180 --> 00:07:48,200
There's, you know, there's a certain stagnation in
278
00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:48,720
that world.
279
00:07:49,920 --> 00:07:51,620
Well, let's take that further.
280
00:07:52,160 --> 00:07:55,580
If you could start from absolutely zero, which
281
00:07:55,580 --> 00:07:57,860
is what he's really doing and make a
282
00:07:57,860 --> 00:08:02,640
new, you know, multi-track, non-destructive mixing
283
00:08:02,640 --> 00:08:03,400
platform.
284
00:08:03,900 --> 00:08:07,520
What would you do totally differently from Pro
285
00:08:07,520 --> 00:08:09,540
Tools or really what is there anything new
286
00:08:09,540 --> 00:08:10,020
to do?
287
00:08:10,020 --> 00:08:11,520
I guess is my question.
288
00:08:11,780 --> 00:08:12,620
What would you do differently?
289
00:08:12,760 --> 00:08:14,420
The only thing I think the anything I
290
00:08:14,420 --> 00:08:16,780
would think if because of his target audience
291
00:08:16,780 --> 00:08:17,720
that if he was going to do a
292
00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:19,320
multi-track thing is to make it like
293
00:08:19,320 --> 00:08:20,080
super simple.
294
00:08:20,240 --> 00:08:20,560
Of course.
295
00:08:20,560 --> 00:08:22,400
Like the current the current twisted wave.
296
00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:23,980
So even if you're a bit of a
297
00:08:23,980 --> 00:08:25,240
numpty, you're going to work it out pretty
298
00:08:25,240 --> 00:08:26,940
anything multi-track isn't simple.
299
00:08:27,200 --> 00:08:28,740
You know, you move one.
300
00:08:28,920 --> 00:08:30,240
You move one thing on one track and
301
00:08:30,240 --> 00:08:31,280
you fuck the whole thing up.
302
00:08:31,280 --> 00:08:32,620
If you don't know what you're doing, you
303
00:08:32,620 --> 00:08:34,360
know, multi-track, no matter what you do,
304
00:08:34,360 --> 00:08:35,000
isn't simple.
305
00:08:35,220 --> 00:08:35,860
Who is it for?
306
00:08:36,159 --> 00:08:38,520
Because, you know, if you look at video
307
00:08:38,520 --> 00:08:41,400
editors, they're basically doing their audio in their
308
00:08:41,400 --> 00:08:41,880
NLE.
309
00:08:42,460 --> 00:08:45,360
If you look at audio, people running multi
310
00:08:45,360 --> 00:08:48,740
-track DAWs, he's got a big upsell to
311
00:08:48,740 --> 00:08:49,680
do anything against.
312
00:08:49,680 --> 00:08:53,280
Like even I mean, the worst of them
313
00:08:53,280 --> 00:08:53,740
are the best.
314
00:08:54,060 --> 00:08:54,860
There's so many.
315
00:08:54,940 --> 00:08:57,100
It's such a congested space and they don't
316
00:08:57,100 --> 00:08:57,660
look different.
317
00:08:57,760 --> 00:08:58,700
So I think it's got to be something
318
00:08:58,700 --> 00:08:59,420
that looks different.
319
00:08:59,820 --> 00:09:02,400
And to me, maybe it's something it starts
320
00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:03,660
to approach audacity.
321
00:09:04,360 --> 00:09:06,860
Maybe he's doing because it's sort of audacity
322
00:09:06,860 --> 00:09:09,800
still continues to not really be a DAW.
323
00:09:10,180 --> 00:09:11,580
And I think the difference with the DAW
324
00:09:11,580 --> 00:09:13,420
if you really take the full argument is
325
00:09:13,420 --> 00:09:15,960
that will he put a mixer in it?
326
00:09:15,960 --> 00:09:17,540
Because if he puts a mixer in it,
327
00:09:17,800 --> 00:09:20,580
especially a real-time mixer, now it's gone
328
00:09:20,580 --> 00:09:21,320
full DAW.
329
00:09:21,660 --> 00:09:23,980
But audacity doesn't have a real-time mixer
330
00:09:23,980 --> 00:09:24,800
and it can multi-track.
331
00:09:25,140 --> 00:09:27,320
The other question to me is with Thomas.
332
00:09:27,540 --> 00:09:29,460
Now, Thomas is a solo player.
333
00:09:29,920 --> 00:09:30,500
That's his business.
334
00:09:32,020 --> 00:09:35,080
So why would you make something potentially really
335
00:09:35,080 --> 00:09:38,100
complicated that you have to manage and you
336
00:09:38,100 --> 00:09:38,900
have to service?
337
00:09:39,300 --> 00:09:40,540
Well, here's the thing.
338
00:09:40,640 --> 00:09:41,540
Why would you do that to yourself?
339
00:09:41,860 --> 00:09:42,880
To expand your market, maybe.
340
00:09:43,900 --> 00:09:45,320
He's selling a subscription now.
341
00:09:45,320 --> 00:09:47,500
It was always a one-and-done deal.
342
00:09:47,720 --> 00:09:49,080
It is now a subscription.
343
00:09:49,560 --> 00:09:51,800
So he is honestly, I mean, he's under
344
00:09:51,800 --> 00:09:55,880
pressure to add features because people are going
345
00:09:55,880 --> 00:09:57,280
to be like, well, I'm paying for this.
346
00:09:57,460 --> 00:09:57,780
Is multi-track the right feature?
347
00:09:58,020 --> 00:10:00,360
I mean, does the fact that you put
348
00:10:00,360 --> 00:10:01,700
out a poll and say, you tell me
349
00:10:01,700 --> 00:10:03,300
what you want, does that make it the
350
00:10:03,300 --> 00:10:03,840
right thing?
351
00:10:04,200 --> 00:10:06,300
And see, he probably dug himself in a
352
00:10:06,300 --> 00:10:06,640
hole.
353
00:10:06,860 --> 00:10:07,540
Oh, I'm not agreeing.
354
00:10:07,560 --> 00:10:08,460
It's a good idea.
355
00:10:08,660 --> 00:10:09,260
No, no, no.
356
00:10:09,480 --> 00:10:11,940
And I'm wondering why.
357
00:10:11,940 --> 00:10:14,320
And the reason I kind of come up
358
00:10:14,320 --> 00:10:17,900
with for me is I've never used Twisted
359
00:10:17,900 --> 00:10:18,160
Wave.
360
00:10:18,380 --> 00:10:20,620
I've looked at it, obviously, so I understood
361
00:10:20,620 --> 00:10:22,500
to talk about it on this show, but
362
00:10:22,500 --> 00:10:24,060
I've never used it as a user.
363
00:10:24,340 --> 00:10:26,500
But for me, the thing with Twisted Wave
364
00:10:26,500 --> 00:10:29,000
is that he's found that perfect little niche
365
00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:30,100
for it.
366
00:10:30,240 --> 00:10:33,000
You know, he's found that market that he
367
00:10:33,000 --> 00:10:34,320
just needs to super-serve.
368
00:10:34,480 --> 00:10:36,200
And I don't know that putting multi-track
369
00:10:36,200 --> 00:10:38,160
on Twisted Wave is super-serving that audience.
370
00:10:38,160 --> 00:10:40,160
I go back to what is the exact
371
00:10:40,160 --> 00:10:40,840
use case.
372
00:10:41,880 --> 00:10:43,460
And if it's just like slapping a piece
373
00:10:43,460 --> 00:10:45,700
of music behind your stuff, there's a million
374
00:10:45,700 --> 00:10:46,620
ways to do that.
375
00:10:47,240 --> 00:10:49,280
Well, the old Cool Edit, you know, before
376
00:10:49,280 --> 00:10:51,600
Cool Edit had multi-track, you could mix
377
00:10:51,600 --> 00:10:52,140
stuff in.
378
00:10:52,260 --> 00:10:53,560
You could put them over each other and
379
00:10:53,560 --> 00:10:55,600
you would put in the percentage that you
380
00:10:55,600 --> 00:10:57,260
wanted the new thing to mix in.
381
00:10:57,440 --> 00:10:58,500
Did you ever use Cool Edit?
382
00:10:58,740 --> 00:10:59,340
Did you ever use that?
383
00:10:59,340 --> 00:11:01,960
I never really used Cool Edit because I
384
00:11:01,960 --> 00:11:03,720
never really used a Windows machine.
385
00:11:03,980 --> 00:11:04,220
Yeah, okay.
386
00:11:04,580 --> 00:11:06,000
Well, see, you could sort of mix stuff.
387
00:11:06,380 --> 00:11:07,320
I don't know if you ever played with
388
00:11:07,320 --> 00:11:07,620
it, George.
389
00:11:07,620 --> 00:11:08,060
Yes.
390
00:11:08,480 --> 00:11:10,800
And I'm going off a very rough, drug
391
00:11:10,800 --> 00:11:11,540
-addled memory.
392
00:11:12,160 --> 00:11:14,620
But you could sort of blend stuff together.
393
00:11:14,800 --> 00:11:17,020
And maybe that might be better than trying
394
00:11:17,020 --> 00:11:18,680
to sort of sell a multi-track, you
395
00:11:18,680 --> 00:11:20,340
know, to sell a concept of multi-track.
396
00:11:20,360 --> 00:11:21,460
Andrew, what were you going to say?
397
00:11:21,620 --> 00:11:22,540
And then I wanted to tell you what
398
00:11:22,540 --> 00:11:24,200
the second most voted feature was.
399
00:11:24,340 --> 00:11:26,320
Okay, well, I was going to say that
400
00:11:26,320 --> 00:11:29,060
the subscription model, I did catch up with
401
00:11:29,060 --> 00:11:31,240
Thomas when I was in Paris.
402
00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:32,520
And we caught up for a couple of
403
00:11:32,520 --> 00:11:32,740
years.
404
00:11:32,740 --> 00:11:35,300
And he said to me, and I've mentioned
405
00:11:35,300 --> 00:11:38,180
this before, I'm sure, and he talked about
406
00:11:38,180 --> 00:11:39,320
doing a subscription model.
407
00:11:39,540 --> 00:11:40,680
And I said, look, based on the fact,
408
00:11:40,780 --> 00:11:41,460
it's just you.
409
00:11:42,760 --> 00:11:44,680
And if you're not making an income because
410
00:11:44,680 --> 00:11:46,960
people just buy a one-off payment and
411
00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:49,740
that's it, then you won't be around you
412
00:11:49,740 --> 00:11:50,440
because you're going to have to go and
413
00:11:50,440 --> 00:11:51,340
get a job because you're not going to
414
00:11:51,340 --> 00:11:51,820
have an income.
415
00:11:51,880 --> 00:11:53,140
So you have to go subscription.
416
00:11:54,360 --> 00:11:55,900
I'm probably going to get hated for that.
417
00:11:55,920 --> 00:11:57,640
No, we talked about this a year ago
418
00:11:57,640 --> 00:11:59,280
when he launched subscription.
419
00:11:59,900 --> 00:12:00,000
Yeah.
420
00:12:00,460 --> 00:12:02,340
And I think it was a sensible thing
421
00:12:02,340 --> 00:12:03,660
to do and I have no problem.
422
00:12:03,660 --> 00:12:04,260
I think so, too.
423
00:12:04,460 --> 00:12:05,540
I can't tell you how many of my
424
00:12:05,540 --> 00:12:08,840
clients who are griping about that when they
425
00:12:08,840 --> 00:12:10,820
see the little message pop up saying, you
426
00:12:10,820 --> 00:12:12,740
know, the next version is going to be
427
00:12:12,740 --> 00:12:13,380
subscription.
428
00:12:13,740 --> 00:12:14,540
They're like, I already own it.
429
00:12:14,620 --> 00:12:15,280
Why would I do that?
430
00:12:15,440 --> 00:12:17,080
I'm like, do you know how much effing
431
00:12:17,080 --> 00:12:19,580
money you have made with this $100 app
432
00:12:19,580 --> 00:12:21,380
for the last 12 years?
433
00:12:21,380 --> 00:12:21,480
Yeah.
434
00:12:21,780 --> 00:12:23,100
And then you just inspect updates.
435
00:12:23,360 --> 00:12:24,620
Like, didn't you sell it before where you
436
00:12:24,620 --> 00:12:25,700
didn't even have to buy an update?
437
00:12:26,620 --> 00:12:27,600
Oh, yeah, that's how it always was.
438
00:12:27,780 --> 00:12:27,940
Exactly.
439
00:12:27,940 --> 00:12:28,720
I've been running.
440
00:12:28,920 --> 00:12:30,520
I've had every update and I've run it
441
00:12:30,520 --> 00:12:32,460
on every Mac I've ever owned with a
442
00:12:32,460 --> 00:12:33,140
single license key.
443
00:12:33,140 --> 00:12:34,700
Like, where's his effort for just doing the
444
00:12:34,700 --> 00:12:35,460
updates alone?
445
00:12:35,940 --> 00:12:36,480
He's been very, very generous.
446
00:12:36,480 --> 00:12:38,240
And second of all, I mean, I'll be
447
00:12:38,240 --> 00:12:39,460
harsh maybe, but you want to know what
448
00:12:39,460 --> 00:12:40,360
the subscription's for?
449
00:12:41,220 --> 00:12:42,700
So I stick around for you.
450
00:12:42,920 --> 00:12:43,100
Exactly.
451
00:12:43,440 --> 00:12:44,440
That's exactly what it's for.
452
00:12:44,580 --> 00:12:46,060
Because I don't have to do anything.
453
00:12:46,300 --> 00:12:48,660
And when Apple changes it and it screws
454
00:12:48,660 --> 00:12:49,940
up for you and I'm here to fix
455
00:12:49,940 --> 00:12:52,540
it, that's what the subscription's for in a
456
00:12:52,540 --> 00:12:52,940
way.
457
00:12:52,940 --> 00:12:53,740
I don't want it to be the next
458
00:12:53,740 --> 00:12:56,920
bias peak, which there was definitely a small
459
00:12:56,920 --> 00:12:58,160
and very...
460
00:12:58,160 --> 00:13:00,640
There was a small and very, like, loyal
461
00:13:00,640 --> 00:13:02,700
user base of this one app called Bias
462
00:13:02,700 --> 00:13:02,900
Peak.
463
00:13:03,420 --> 00:13:05,620
I was never a fan particularly, but those
464
00:13:05,620 --> 00:13:07,280
that loved it, man, did they love it.
465
00:13:07,800 --> 00:13:09,180
And when that went away...
466
00:13:09,180 --> 00:13:09,480
Yeah.
467
00:13:09,820 --> 00:13:11,480
It had the CD and the PQ code
468
00:13:11,480 --> 00:13:12,240
editing.
469
00:13:12,960 --> 00:13:14,260
You know, that's a whole area that he
470
00:13:14,260 --> 00:13:16,000
could go into if he wanted to.
471
00:13:16,000 --> 00:13:18,800
Or, you know, it's like, why doesn't any
472
00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:22,620
voiceover person use DSP Quattro?
473
00:13:23,980 --> 00:13:26,400
Because it's just not needed by a voiceover
474
00:13:26,400 --> 00:13:27,900
person and it's kind of a two-track
475
00:13:27,900 --> 00:13:29,760
editor and it's sort of a multi-track
476
00:13:29,760 --> 00:13:30,980
as so much as that you need a
477
00:13:30,980 --> 00:13:33,640
multi-track to lay up a CD and
478
00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:35,560
maybe have an overlapping thing like a Pink
479
00:13:35,560 --> 00:13:36,160
Floyd album.
480
00:13:36,800 --> 00:13:36,940
Right.
481
00:13:37,160 --> 00:13:38,200
But it doesn't speak.
482
00:13:38,380 --> 00:13:40,520
It's a two-track editor or whatever.
483
00:13:40,680 --> 00:13:41,480
It's a stereo audio.
484
00:13:41,800 --> 00:13:42,740
It's not a full DAW.
485
00:13:43,160 --> 00:13:44,580
It speaks to a specific audience.
486
00:13:44,580 --> 00:13:46,580
And he's got this audience.
487
00:13:46,880 --> 00:13:49,080
And maybe multi-track is the right feature,
488
00:13:49,100 --> 00:13:50,000
but I think it has to be done
489
00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:53,320
in a unique way because one of the
490
00:13:53,320 --> 00:13:57,400
overriding features that VO people tend to want
491
00:13:57,400 --> 00:13:58,960
is ultimate simplicity.
492
00:13:59,700 --> 00:14:01,200
And he definitely had that.
493
00:14:01,440 --> 00:14:01,540
Yeah.
494
00:14:01,700 --> 00:14:06,360
So the second most popular feature was non
495
00:14:06,360 --> 00:14:07,320
-destructive editing.
496
00:14:08,740 --> 00:14:10,720
So he's going to have to bake those
497
00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:11,560
two in together.
498
00:14:11,560 --> 00:14:13,380
He's going to be obviously doing those two
499
00:14:13,380 --> 00:14:14,820
in one go.
500
00:14:14,820 --> 00:14:16,600
It gets closer and closer to DAW, doesn't
501
00:14:16,600 --> 00:14:16,820
it?
502
00:14:17,080 --> 00:14:17,220
Right.
503
00:14:17,540 --> 00:14:19,800
The third one was at a history window,
504
00:14:19,800 --> 00:14:22,880
like Photoshop, you know, for going back.
505
00:14:23,180 --> 00:14:25,700
So that's like also now stepping into non
506
00:14:25,700 --> 00:14:28,040
-destructive but not really non-destructive.
507
00:14:28,340 --> 00:14:29,500
I'll agree with that though.
508
00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:31,960
I think that would be good if that's
509
00:14:31,960 --> 00:14:32,620
not already there.
510
00:14:32,660 --> 00:14:33,960
I think that would be a good inclusion.
511
00:14:34,220 --> 00:14:36,220
So you're seeing how those top three things
512
00:14:36,220 --> 00:14:38,400
are like he can he's going to I'm
513
00:14:38,400 --> 00:14:39,840
sure he's going to take those top three
514
00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:41,560
and he's going to make that part of
515
00:14:41,560 --> 00:14:41,660
it.
516
00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:43,820
He's going to do like another survey about
517
00:14:43,820 --> 00:14:47,960
like what when you say multi-track, let's
518
00:14:47,960 --> 00:14:48,600
get specific.
519
00:14:48,760 --> 00:14:50,100
What do you want in a multi-track?
520
00:14:50,300 --> 00:14:51,260
What's your workflow?
521
00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:53,980
What's your use case?
522
00:14:54,520 --> 00:14:57,600
And try to be very because his whole
523
00:14:57,600 --> 00:14:59,240
thing has been being so specific.
524
00:14:59,720 --> 00:15:01,540
So he can do it again by being
525
00:15:01,540 --> 00:15:04,400
very specific about what a multi-track editor
526
00:15:04,400 --> 00:15:07,220
means to a voiceover person or someone who's
527
00:15:07,220 --> 00:15:09,720
looking for something truly simple.
528
00:15:10,120 --> 00:15:10,840
Well, there you go.
529
00:15:11,160 --> 00:15:12,700
That's going to blow a can of worms
530
00:15:12,700 --> 00:15:15,740
open because when you get that answer back,
531
00:15:15,820 --> 00:15:17,620
if you ask those people, what do you
532
00:15:17,620 --> 00:15:18,580
want a multi-track for?
533
00:15:18,740 --> 00:15:19,900
How are you going to use it?
534
00:15:21,620 --> 00:15:23,620
Then this is the issue because the answers
535
00:15:23,620 --> 00:15:25,420
that come back will be so bizarre.
536
00:15:25,800 --> 00:15:26,580
It will make no sense.
537
00:15:26,840 --> 00:15:27,780
He will look at this thing and go,
538
00:15:27,940 --> 00:15:28,880
why am I building a multi-track?
539
00:15:29,020 --> 00:15:31,280
Because what I'm reading, the responses I'm getting
540
00:15:31,280 --> 00:15:33,940
back from people, I don't need a multi
541
00:15:33,940 --> 00:15:34,300
-track.
542
00:15:34,360 --> 00:15:35,940
Why are they asking me for this thing?
543
00:15:36,140 --> 00:15:39,560
They want to layer things maybe and it's
544
00:15:39,560 --> 00:15:40,560
maybe not specifically.
545
00:15:41,260 --> 00:15:42,760
Certainly, I would say one thing is like
546
00:15:42,760 --> 00:15:44,080
no one's going to come back or maybe
547
00:15:44,080 --> 00:15:45,520
people will come back saying I need to
548
00:15:45,520 --> 00:15:50,340
record, like who asked for the multi, the
549
00:15:50,340 --> 00:15:51,140
WAV file?
550
00:15:51,280 --> 00:15:53,260
What's the use case there for the multi
551
00:15:53,260 --> 00:15:56,760
-channel, like more than stereo for just the
552
00:15:56,760 --> 00:15:57,220
WAV file?
553
00:15:57,500 --> 00:15:58,120
What's the use case?
554
00:15:58,120 --> 00:15:59,940
He's going to need to ask more questions
555
00:15:59,940 --> 00:16:03,960
of what people really need it for, what
556
00:16:03,960 --> 00:16:05,280
the use case is, how they're going to
557
00:16:05,280 --> 00:16:06,100
use it exactly.
558
00:16:06,960 --> 00:16:08,640
I had a few in here that you
559
00:16:08,640 --> 00:16:10,680
don't know which are mine, but you have
560
00:16:10,680 --> 00:16:11,280
to trust me.
561
00:16:11,880 --> 00:16:18,160
I had interpolate auto or auto heal, select
562
00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:20,520
a clip or pencil.
563
00:16:21,540 --> 00:16:22,800
He's down to 15 yields.
564
00:16:23,160 --> 00:16:24,040
Do you know what I would have done?
565
00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:26,300
I would have done translate this thing to
566
00:16:26,300 --> 00:16:27,940
text and let me at it.
567
00:16:27,940 --> 00:16:29,420
Is number 15 yours though, George?
568
00:16:30,060 --> 00:16:31,700
Is that yours, the ability to add normalize
569
00:16:31,700 --> 00:16:32,520
to an effects stack?
570
00:16:33,160 --> 00:16:34,180
Yeah, of course, that's me.
571
00:16:34,860 --> 00:16:38,640
I was wondering, so you can't do that
572
00:16:38,640 --> 00:16:38,980
already?
573
00:16:39,160 --> 00:16:40,960
No, you can't because a stack is a
574
00:16:40,960 --> 00:16:43,460
real-time plug-in rack so you can
575
00:16:43,460 --> 00:16:45,160
listen to and preview it real-time.
576
00:16:46,120 --> 00:16:48,560
If you had normalize, it would break that
577
00:16:48,560 --> 00:16:49,340
whole method.
578
00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:51,340
You'd have to come up with a different
579
00:16:51,340 --> 00:16:51,940
methodology.
580
00:16:52,400 --> 00:16:54,460
Normalize is just a post-processing routine.
581
00:16:54,460 --> 00:16:56,480
We'd have to process it in the background
582
00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:59,980
and not actually print it, I guess, but
583
00:16:59,980 --> 00:17:01,120
still be able to play it in the
584
00:17:01,120 --> 00:17:01,460
background.
585
00:17:01,760 --> 00:17:04,900
What would be cooler is to normalize my
586
00:17:04,900 --> 00:17:07,160
gain stage so that you put a whole
587
00:17:07,160 --> 00:17:08,599
effects chain together.
588
00:17:09,200 --> 00:17:10,440
It runs it and it goes, oh my
589
00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:12,540
gosh, you've just blown away your headroom in
590
00:17:12,540 --> 00:17:13,760
the first plug-in.
591
00:17:14,040 --> 00:17:15,640
Lower the gain of that first plug-in
592
00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:17,780
and make sure that each plug-in is
593
00:17:17,780 --> 00:17:21,079
not crashing into the other, and therefore you're
594
00:17:21,079 --> 00:17:23,740
not relying on 32-bit, just do all
595
00:17:23,740 --> 00:17:25,060
the math for me because I just want
596
00:17:25,060 --> 00:17:25,920
to think about it.
597
00:17:25,940 --> 00:17:26,920
I'm glad you said that.
598
00:17:27,420 --> 00:17:29,880
Months ago, I said I would really like
599
00:17:29,880 --> 00:17:35,980
the ability to preset a RMS normalize setting
600
00:17:35,980 --> 00:17:41,000
that when you hit stop recording, it renormalizes
601
00:17:41,000 --> 00:17:44,620
the track, that clip, to a predetermined RMS.
602
00:17:44,900 --> 00:17:46,320
Does he have RMS normalize already?
603
00:17:47,020 --> 00:17:47,160
Yeah.
604
00:17:48,200 --> 00:17:50,340
What I have found that when I'm mastering,
605
00:17:50,340 --> 00:17:53,120
say I'm doing an audiobook production, my first
606
00:17:53,120 --> 00:17:55,160
step is to normalize every track to the
607
00:17:55,160 --> 00:17:57,900
same minus 30 RMS, minus 30 RMS, boom.
608
00:17:59,400 --> 00:18:03,240
That works beautifully because now every single file,
609
00:18:03,440 --> 00:18:05,520
you know the RMS, so when you do
610
00:18:05,520 --> 00:18:08,380
your processing chain with your compression limiting everything,
611
00:18:08,900 --> 00:18:10,280
you only have to set it up one
612
00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:14,420
time because now everything comes out the same.
613
00:18:15,140 --> 00:18:18,940
For that matter, why not roughs normalize?
614
00:18:19,480 --> 00:18:20,160
Either one.
615
00:18:20,300 --> 00:18:21,440
I mean, I don't care whether you use
616
00:18:21,440 --> 00:18:24,760
RMS or roughs, but just to have it
617
00:18:24,760 --> 00:18:28,100
auto set that so that, you know, and
618
00:18:28,100 --> 00:18:29,760
then someone's like, well, what if I record
619
00:18:29,760 --> 00:18:31,220
room tone and now I have my room
620
00:18:31,220 --> 00:18:32,460
tone at minus 30 roughs?
621
00:18:32,460 --> 00:18:33,900
I'm like, okay, well, there are some scenarios
622
00:18:33,900 --> 00:18:36,640
where you don't want this to happen, and
623
00:18:36,640 --> 00:18:37,560
so that would be tricky.
624
00:18:37,740 --> 00:18:39,220
But however you figure it out, you could,
625
00:18:39,640 --> 00:18:41,040
whatever it is, there's a way to do
626
00:18:41,040 --> 00:18:41,140
it.
627
00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:42,500
So that was one of my ideas I
628
00:18:42,500 --> 00:18:43,360
was hoping we would do.
629
00:18:43,460 --> 00:18:44,080
That didn't happen.
630
00:18:44,940 --> 00:18:46,660
There was 11 people voted for punch and
631
00:18:46,660 --> 00:18:48,060
roll, which has been in the app for
632
00:18:48,060 --> 00:18:49,240
two years or three years.
633
00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:52,700
The other one that jumps out to me
634
00:18:52,700 --> 00:18:56,620
is auto detect silences, because I mean, even
635
00:18:56,620 --> 00:18:58,200
for me, right, I mean, I use strip
636
00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:00,260
silence on this podcast in Pro Tools.
637
00:19:00,300 --> 00:19:01,800
I use it all the time.
638
00:19:01,960 --> 00:19:02,780
That's already there, too.
639
00:19:02,940 --> 00:19:05,100
You know, this is what shows when you
640
00:19:05,100 --> 00:19:07,040
have people vote on features, they're not getting
641
00:19:07,040 --> 00:19:08,320
that deep into it.
642
00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:09,320
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
643
00:19:09,460 --> 00:19:09,680
Right.
644
00:19:10,080 --> 00:19:12,540
It also shows and exposes the lack of
645
00:19:12,540 --> 00:19:15,560
knowledge about the app people already own.
646
00:19:15,560 --> 00:19:17,580
They don't know it already has punch and
647
00:19:17,580 --> 00:19:17,720
roll.
648
00:19:17,760 --> 00:19:19,260
They don't know it already has strip silence.
649
00:19:19,380 --> 00:19:20,020
They don't know.
650
00:19:20,180 --> 00:19:21,360
They just don't know.
651
00:19:21,360 --> 00:19:23,460
So strip silence, can you adjust the parameters?
652
00:19:23,760 --> 00:19:25,160
Like on Pro Tools, you can adjust the
653
00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:27,000
threshold, you can adjust the start and end
654
00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:27,900
times and stuff like that.
655
00:19:27,900 --> 00:19:29,600
Yeah, actually, there's more parameters than Pro Tools.
656
00:19:30,140 --> 00:19:30,660
Oh, really?
657
00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:32,240
Yeah, you can get very granular.
658
00:19:34,360 --> 00:19:37,880
So, yeah, there's a lot of reasons to
659
00:19:37,880 --> 00:19:40,440
use TwistWave as a Pro Tools producer engineer,
660
00:19:40,460 --> 00:19:43,900
because it has great utility, the batch processing.
661
00:19:43,900 --> 00:19:45,840
You know, there's a lot of things it
662
00:19:45,840 --> 00:19:48,780
does really elegantly that if I was a
663
00:19:48,780 --> 00:19:50,540
Pro Tools geek, I might know how to
664
00:19:50,540 --> 00:19:52,760
do it in Pro Tools, but there are
665
00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:55,020
certain things that are just so much easier
666
00:19:55,020 --> 00:19:55,520
and faster.
667
00:19:55,760 --> 00:19:57,960
There are things that I'll export from Pro
668
00:19:57,960 --> 00:20:00,980
Tools into Audition, because Audition does it better.
669
00:20:01,280 --> 00:20:01,840
Yeah, absolutely.
670
00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:02,980
Yeah, yeah.
671
00:20:03,420 --> 00:20:06,140
Interestingly, it's one thing I've noticed that TwistWave,
672
00:20:06,380 --> 00:20:08,400
well, it may have it based on this
673
00:20:08,400 --> 00:20:11,160
list, but when I was using WaveLab, if
674
00:20:11,160 --> 00:20:14,540
you're doing something like an e-learning session
675
00:20:14,940 --> 00:20:18,380
where you've got like a gazillion files, but
676
00:20:18,380 --> 00:20:19,740
they have the same name with a different
677
00:20:19,740 --> 00:20:22,660
number at the end, the thing about with
678
00:20:22,660 --> 00:20:24,260
WaveLab, if it was sitting on the desktop,
679
00:20:25,300 --> 00:20:26,760
I could go in there to name a
680
00:20:26,760 --> 00:20:28,560
file and that would pop up and I
681
00:20:28,560 --> 00:20:30,120
could just click on it, take off the
682
00:20:30,120 --> 00:20:32,180
number, put number two or 15 or whatever
683
00:20:32,180 --> 00:20:33,720
on the end and save.
684
00:20:34,100 --> 00:20:35,400
So, I didn't have to keep typing in
685
00:20:35,400 --> 00:20:38,440
the title of that file, which I don't
686
00:20:38,440 --> 00:20:39,960
know whether it does, but I certainly haven't
687
00:20:39,960 --> 00:20:42,220
found it with TwistWave, and that for that
688
00:20:42,220 --> 00:20:43,680
kind of work is a bit of a
689
00:20:43,680 --> 00:20:43,860
pain there.
690
00:20:43,860 --> 00:20:45,640
I mean, with batch processing, you can auto
691
00:20:45,640 --> 00:20:48,680
increment that number, you know, so you can
692
00:20:48,680 --> 00:20:50,980
have it automatically increment the number, you know,
693
00:20:51,060 --> 00:20:52,000
increase that stuff.
694
00:20:52,320 --> 00:20:53,120
Does it have a feature where you can
695
00:20:53,120 --> 00:20:55,240
just dump markers and then output separate audio
696
00:20:55,240 --> 00:20:56,820
files based on the place without markers?
697
00:20:57,060 --> 00:20:59,680
It'll split by marker and then output export
698
00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:02,720
files of your determined whatever format you want.
699
00:21:03,360 --> 00:21:04,920
So, it has a lot of really useful
700
00:21:04,920 --> 00:21:06,900
things for automating, banging out a lot.
701
00:21:06,900 --> 00:21:09,160
If you do e-learning, man, I'm telling
702
00:21:09,160 --> 00:21:09,920
you, use TwistWave.
703
00:21:10,580 --> 00:21:13,340
It's just so much easier to bang out
704
00:21:13,340 --> 00:21:16,920
30, 40, 100, 200, 500 files, you know,
705
00:21:16,960 --> 00:21:19,060
and you can set a predetermined amount of
706
00:21:19,060 --> 00:21:20,840
padding, you know, for the select, you know,
707
00:21:20,860 --> 00:21:23,380
when you use the detect silence function.
708
00:21:23,680 --> 00:21:26,000
Because what detect silence does is it, it'll
709
00:21:26,000 --> 00:21:27,880
either, you can make it a positive or
710
00:21:27,880 --> 00:21:29,040
a negative selection, right?
711
00:21:29,340 --> 00:21:32,200
You can either select the silence or flip
712
00:21:32,200 --> 00:21:33,580
it and select everything else.
713
00:21:33,600 --> 00:21:34,000
Oh, that's very cool.
714
00:21:34,160 --> 00:21:36,120
And then you can set the padding and
715
00:21:36,120 --> 00:21:37,500
then say, okay, now that we've set the
716
00:21:37,500 --> 00:21:40,960
padding for these selections, just now make markers
717
00:21:40,960 --> 00:21:43,060
and then export all that stuff out with
718
00:21:43,060 --> 00:21:44,700
the right amount of padding for every file
719
00:21:44,700 --> 00:21:45,040
and stuff.
720
00:21:45,460 --> 00:21:47,800
Can you filter it, like, apply like a
721
00:21:47,800 --> 00:21:49,300
side chain so that you're not looking for,
722
00:21:49,300 --> 00:21:51,500
like, thumps and bumps, but you're just looking
723
00:21:51,500 --> 00:21:54,760
for actual audio and voice audio and that
724
00:21:54,760 --> 00:21:55,600
silence detection?
725
00:21:56,600 --> 00:21:58,380
Like, how about, like, BS detection?
726
00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:02,720
Yeah, well, I mean, once AI gets wrapped
727
00:22:02,720 --> 00:22:05,100
in everything on the planet, there'll be so
728
00:22:05,100 --> 00:22:06,140
much more of that going on.
729
00:22:06,400 --> 00:22:06,880
That's what I was saying.
730
00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:08,020
I mean, just convert that.
731
00:22:08,620 --> 00:22:10,420
If most everything that people are doing in
732
00:22:10,420 --> 00:22:13,480
Twisted Wave is voice-oriented, just go there.
733
00:22:13,800 --> 00:22:14,260
Well, here's another thing.
734
00:22:14,380 --> 00:22:15,360
So you're looking at these features.
735
00:22:15,480 --> 00:22:16,660
You guys are seeing them right now.
736
00:22:17,180 --> 00:22:20,040
You don't see the letter AI anywhere in
737
00:22:20,040 --> 00:22:20,460
that list.
738
00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:21,260
It's okay.
739
00:22:21,960 --> 00:22:23,320
Like, AI is not going to kill you
740
00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:24,340
if it's used exactly.
741
00:22:24,400 --> 00:22:26,260
But what I'm saying is, it also showed
742
00:22:26,260 --> 00:22:27,860
to me anyway, it shows that the user
743
00:22:27,860 --> 00:22:31,280
is very unaware of what AI capabilities are.
744
00:22:31,840 --> 00:22:33,220
They don't even ask for it.
745
00:22:33,220 --> 00:22:35,300
Like, it's not even on the radar, right?
746
00:22:35,880 --> 00:22:37,200
I, on the other hand, have been using
747
00:22:37,200 --> 00:22:40,080
Descript for, like, the last nine months and
748
00:22:40,080 --> 00:22:42,280
watching the versions roll out faster than you
749
00:22:42,280 --> 00:22:43,880
can keep track of and all the new
750
00:22:43,880 --> 00:22:44,400
AI stuff.
751
00:22:45,020 --> 00:22:47,760
And I'm like, you know, it's evolving rapidly,
752
00:22:47,860 --> 00:22:48,300
right?
753
00:22:48,700 --> 00:22:51,720
So, I have this whole parallel world where
754
00:22:51,720 --> 00:22:53,400
I'm using this Descript thing to do all
755
00:22:53,400 --> 00:22:56,340
this post, and it's just, it's insane, right?
756
00:22:56,520 --> 00:22:57,800
What I can do with it.
757
00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:00,440
I think that number 14 gain envelope, that's
758
00:23:00,440 --> 00:23:01,460
probably going to have to be part of
759
00:23:01,460 --> 00:23:03,600
the non-destructive multi-track mode, right?
760
00:23:03,880 --> 00:23:05,640
That's the thing is, once you build a
761
00:23:05,640 --> 00:23:07,640
multi-track, there's a certain expectation.
762
00:23:08,280 --> 00:23:09,500
You have a mixer all of a sudden.
763
00:23:09,540 --> 00:23:11,780
If you make a basic multi-track, then
764
00:23:11,780 --> 00:23:13,820
the guys that are thinking of getting it
765
00:23:13,820 --> 00:23:16,480
for multi-track are going to go, well,
766
00:23:17,140 --> 00:23:19,320
it can't do this, it can't do this,
767
00:23:19,380 --> 00:23:20,500
it can't do this, and then they're going
768
00:23:20,500 --> 00:23:22,240
to be like, where's all the multi-track
769
00:23:22,240 --> 00:23:23,200
functions and features?
770
00:23:23,380 --> 00:23:24,100
Where's the toolbar?
771
00:23:24,680 --> 00:23:25,720
Where's the smart tool?
772
00:23:25,920 --> 00:23:27,920
Where's the slip and shuffle?
773
00:23:29,280 --> 00:23:31,140
Where's my time code chase?
774
00:23:31,880 --> 00:23:34,160
It is a rabble extraordinaire, right?
775
00:23:34,760 --> 00:23:37,920
Thomas, whatever you do, buddy, we feel for
776
00:23:37,920 --> 00:23:38,180
you.
777
00:23:39,380 --> 00:23:41,440
Less is more, less is more.
778
00:23:42,060 --> 00:23:45,260
Do you know my favorite feature of Twisted
779
00:23:45,260 --> 00:23:46,580
Wave at the moment, and that's because I'm
780
00:23:46,580 --> 00:23:49,060
using the new iPhone with the USB-C?
781
00:23:49,080 --> 00:23:50,400
It's the upload thing.
782
00:23:50,660 --> 00:23:53,900
It's the upload thing, their little server, where
783
00:23:53,900 --> 00:23:55,620
you just, you know, you...
784
00:23:55,620 --> 00:23:57,620
That alone is worth the subscription.
785
00:23:58,160 --> 00:24:00,620
I reckon you're super-served, the audience you've
786
00:24:00,620 --> 00:24:01,040
already got.
787
00:24:01,140 --> 00:24:03,920
Don't worry about multi-track, Thomas, seriously.
788
00:24:04,280 --> 00:24:04,700
Yeah, I know.
789
00:24:05,100 --> 00:24:06,840
That's our vote, but, you know...
790
00:24:06,840 --> 00:24:09,360
If you do multi-track, have a really
791
00:24:09,360 --> 00:24:12,220
unique take on it, because just like another
792
00:24:12,220 --> 00:24:15,140
emulated compressor, probably what the world does not
793
00:24:15,140 --> 00:24:16,180
need is another DAW.
794
00:24:16,900 --> 00:24:17,800
Well, here you go.
795
00:24:17,900 --> 00:24:20,040
There's a challenge for us for, maybe this
796
00:24:20,040 --> 00:24:22,580
could be it, the Pro Audio Suite multi
797
00:24:22,580 --> 00:24:23,780
-track Twisted Wave.
798
00:24:24,580 --> 00:24:26,140
Or how about just the Pro Audio Suite,
799
00:24:27,640 --> 00:24:28,160
VO...
800
00:24:28,160 --> 00:24:29,720
I mean, actually, we shouldn't do it.
801
00:24:29,720 --> 00:24:30,080
DAW.
802
00:24:30,340 --> 00:24:30,560
The DAW.
803
00:24:31,220 --> 00:24:31,400
No.
804
00:24:31,700 --> 00:24:33,480
That would go quite against Thomas.
805
00:24:33,840 --> 00:24:34,500
We don't want to do that.
806
00:24:34,520 --> 00:24:34,880
Are you insane?
807
00:24:35,460 --> 00:24:37,520
I think we're just twisted enough, guys.
808
00:24:38,560 --> 00:24:39,080
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
809
00:24:39,320 --> 00:24:39,900
How about we wave?
810
00:24:39,900 --> 00:24:40,360
Time to wave.
811
00:24:40,760 --> 00:24:40,860
Goodbye.
812
00:24:41,340 --> 00:24:42,700
Goodbye, yes.
813
00:24:44,420 --> 00:24:45,400
Well, that was fun.
814
00:24:45,540 --> 00:24:45,880
Is it over?
815
00:24:47,420 --> 00:24:48,660
The Pro Audio Suite.
816
00:24:48,880 --> 00:24:49,800
We thanks to drivers.
817
00:24:50,140 --> 00:24:53,740
And Austrian Audio, recorded using Sauce Connect, edited
818
00:24:53,740 --> 00:24:54,980
by Andrew Peters.
819
00:24:54,980 --> 00:24:57,260
And mixed by Voodoo Radio Imaging.
820
00:24:59,260 --> 00:25:01,580
Don't forget to subscribe to the show and
821
00:25:01,580 --> 00:25:03,800
join in the conversation on our Facebook group.
822
00:25:03,900 --> 00:25:05,940
To leave a comment, suggest a topic, or
823
00:25:05,940 --> 00:25:07,840
just say g'day, drop us a note at
824
00:25:07,840 --> 00:25:08,400
our website.

