Raw vs. Processed: Navigating Client Expectations in Voice Over Delivery
The Pro Audio Suite - S7 EP29: Processed Session Audio Welcome back to The Pro Audio Suite! In this episode, we delve into the intricacies of processed session audio and the importance of proper audio handling during recordings. Join Robbo, Robert,...
The Pro Audio Suite - S7 EP29: Processed Session Audio
Welcome back to The Pro Audio Suite! In this episode, we delve into the intricacies of processed session audio and the importance of proper audio handling during recordings. Join Robbo, Robert, George, and AP as they share their experiences and insights on managing audio quality in various recording scenarios.
Episode Highlights:
- Session with a "Processed" Actor: Robert recounts a session with an actor who claimed to have no processing, but the audio told a different story.
- Importance of Proper Gain Staging: Tips on managing preamp and output gain to avoid unnecessary compression and maintain audio integrity.
- Challenges of Compression in Voiceover: The team discusses how heavy compression affects natural sound and the listener's experience.
- Audio Quality in National Commercials: The state of audio production for television commercials and the shift towards lighter processing.
- Mixing Techniques: Debates on mixing into a compressor versus post-mix compression and their impacts on the final audio product.
- Client Expectations and Audio Delivery: Navigating client expectations regarding raw and processed audio and the importance of clear communication.
Key Takeaways:
- Identifying and addressing hidden processing in recorded audio.
- The significance of maintaining proper gain staging during recording sessions.
- The effects of heavy compression on voiceover performances and how to achieve a natural sound.
- Understanding client terminology and ensuring clear communication about audio expectations.
- Practical mixing techniques to enhance audio quality without over-processing.
Join us for an episode filled with expert advice, real-world examples, and lively discussions. Whether you're a seasoned audio professional or just starting out, you'll find valuable insights to improve your recording and mixing techniques.
Resources Mentioned:
- Tips for Managing Audio Compression
- Recommended Gear for Voiceover Recording
- Understanding Client Terminology in Audio Production
Connect with Us:
- Join our Facebook Group for updates and more tips.
- Subscribe to our YouTube channel for Pro Audio Suite Tips and more exclusive content.
- Check out our sponsor, Tribooth, for the best vocal booth solutions.
A big shout out to our sponsors, Austrian Audio and Tri Booth. Both these companies are providers of QUALITY Audio Gear (we wouldn't partner with them unless they were), so please, if you're in the market for some new kit, do us a solid and check out their products, and be sure to tell em "Robbo, George, Robert, and AP sent you"... As a part of their generous support of our show, Tri Booth is offering $200 off a brand-new booth when you use the code TRIPAP200. So get onto their website now and secure your new booth...
And if you're in the market for a new Mic or killer pair of headphones, check out Austrian Audio. They've got a great range of top-shelf gear..

If you haven't filled out our survey on what you'd like to hear on the show, you can do it here:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/ZWT5BTD
Join our Facebook page here:
https://www.facebook.com/proaudiopodcast
And the FB Group here:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/357898255543203
For everything else (including joining our mailing list for exclusive previews and other goodies), check out our website
“When the going gets weird, the weird turn professional.”
Hunter S Thompson
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:00,900
(Transcribed by TurboScribe.ai. Go Unlimited to remove this message.) Y'all ready to be history?
2
00:00:01,220 --> 00:00:01,520
Get started.
3
00:00:01,880 --> 00:00:02,200
Welcome.
4
00:00:02,320 --> 00:00:02,580
Hi.
5
00:00:02,780 --> 00:00:02,980
Hi.
6
00:00:03,220 --> 00:00:03,540
Hi.
7
00:00:03,700 --> 00:00:04,780
Hello, everyone.
8
00:00:05,100 --> 00:00:06,540
To the Pro Audio Suite.
9
00:00:06,620 --> 00:00:08,660
These guys are professional, they're motivated.
10
00:00:08,820 --> 00:00:14,280
Thanks to Tribush, the best vocal booth for home or on-the-road voice recording, and Austrian
11
00:00:14,280 --> 00:00:16,600
Audio, making passion heard.
12
00:00:16,860 --> 00:00:21,660
Introducing Robert Marshall from Source Elements and Someone Audio Post, Chicago.
13
00:00:21,820 --> 00:00:24,820
Darren Robert Robertson from Voodoo Radio Imaging, Sydney.
14
00:00:25,040 --> 00:00:26,160
Tech to the VO Stars.
15
00:00:26,300 --> 00:00:28,280
George the Tech Whittam from LA.
16
00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:32,060
And me, Andrew Peters, voiceover talent and home studio guy.
17
00:00:32,080 --> 00:00:33,080
Line up, man.
18
00:00:33,200 --> 00:00:33,980
Here we go.
19
00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:35,480
Sound on TV.
20
00:00:36,300 --> 00:00:40,540
And welcome to another Pro Audio Suite, thanks to Austrian Audio, making passion heard.
21
00:00:41,280 --> 00:00:45,400
And also, Tribush, don't forget the code, T-R-I-P-A-P-200.
22
00:00:45,820 --> 00:00:48,040
That will get you $200 off your Tribush.
23
00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:53,260
Please buy one, because we want to keep Tribush as a sponsor, but you know, it's all about
24
00:00:53,260 --> 00:00:53,560
numbers.
25
00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:58,820
Anyway, Robert's had an interesting session with an actor that claimed to have no processing,
26
00:00:58,940 --> 00:01:01,240
but it appears probably was lying.
27
00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:01,880
Robert.
28
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:10,800
So, yeah, we hook up and everything's good, and first take, George, here's the tip off.
29
00:01:10,980 --> 00:01:18,720
First take, I mean, the meter goes all the way to the top, but it doesn't hit zero.
30
00:01:19,180 --> 00:01:19,460
Yeah.
31
00:01:19,940 --> 00:01:20,920
There's no way.
32
00:01:21,160 --> 00:01:22,220
Yeah, yeah.
33
00:01:22,220 --> 00:01:22,920
There's no way.
34
00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:24,440
And I'm like, can you turn that down?
35
00:01:24,720 --> 00:01:25,040
That's a light touch.
36
00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:25,540
Yeah.
37
00:01:25,680 --> 00:01:25,880
Yeah.
38
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:27,800
Well, first, I'm like, are you processing?
39
00:01:27,900 --> 00:01:33,820
Because it also just had that compressed sound, and I know he's a radio guy.
40
00:01:33,820 --> 00:01:36,380
You recognize compression when you see it or hear it.
41
00:01:36,860 --> 00:01:40,580
He's a radio guy, and I know a lot of times radio guys like their compression, I think.
42
00:01:40,880 --> 00:01:41,780
Yeah, they have a strip.
43
00:01:41,860 --> 00:01:42,680
Maybe I'm stereotyping that.
44
00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:43,160
Yeah.
45
00:01:43,240 --> 00:01:44,680
And I'm like, do you have anything on your mic?
46
00:01:44,720 --> 00:01:45,360
Are you processing?
47
00:01:45,540 --> 00:01:46,640
He's like, no, no, not at all.
48
00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:49,900
I'm like, all right, well, can you turn it down?
49
00:01:50,400 --> 00:01:52,320
You're like louder than the clients.
50
00:01:52,480 --> 00:01:53,900
You're louder than everything here.
51
00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:55,800
The spot's not even that loud.
52
00:01:56,140 --> 00:02:02,400
So he turns it down, and then, well, the meter just doesn't move beyond minus 12, but it's
53
00:02:03,040 --> 00:02:03,440
like...
54
00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:03,900
Magic.
55
00:02:04,100 --> 00:02:04,640
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
56
00:02:05,060 --> 00:02:06,260
Oh, he turned down the output.
57
00:02:06,680 --> 00:02:07,360
Yeah, he turned down the output.
58
00:02:07,500 --> 00:02:07,919
Yeah, whatever.
59
00:02:08,400 --> 00:02:09,199
He didn't...
60
00:02:09,199 --> 00:02:12,580
He was still hitting that compressor and, I think, limiter the same.
61
00:02:12,680 --> 00:02:13,940
Limiter, by the sounds of it.
62
00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:14,340
I asked him, like...
63
00:02:14,340 --> 00:02:16,320
So he didn't turn down his preamp gain.
64
00:02:16,440 --> 00:02:17,620
He turned down the output.
65
00:02:17,620 --> 00:02:17,960
Output.
66
00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:18,740
Output gain, yeah.
67
00:02:18,740 --> 00:02:19,420
Okay.
68
00:02:19,740 --> 00:02:21,400
So he technically turned it down.
69
00:02:21,420 --> 00:02:22,180
He turned it down.
70
00:02:22,180 --> 00:02:27,060
I mean, he turned it down, like, 10 decibels, because it was cranking.
71
00:02:27,880 --> 00:02:33,180
And then, you know, I think I probably mentioned it two, maybe three times.
72
00:02:33,200 --> 00:02:35,600
And it was always like, no, not processing.
73
00:02:36,580 --> 00:02:38,300
So I just, you know, move on.
74
00:02:38,380 --> 00:02:43,880
But it sort of annoyed me, because it's like, I can't put it exactly where I want it now.
75
00:02:43,980 --> 00:02:46,620
It's now, like, just in your face.
76
00:02:47,220 --> 00:02:52,320
I know where you're going, but for the listeners at home who listen to you and me bitch on and
77
00:02:52,320 --> 00:02:56,340
on each week, what corner did this guy now paint you into?
78
00:02:56,760 --> 00:03:02,020
He's just, like, in your face, like, and there's no subtlety to the read anymore.
79
00:03:02,760 --> 00:03:07,060
And I don't know what the word is, but it doesn't sound natural, actually.
80
00:03:07,180 --> 00:03:10,780
You know, we were kind of talking about that before, and it had that, like, just, you know,
81
00:03:10,820 --> 00:03:12,560
this isn't a radio show.
82
00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:16,940
This was a commercial, and it didn't need that.
83
00:03:17,380 --> 00:03:19,820
It wasn't also an in-your-face kind of, yeah, it was a national commercial.
84
00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:25,180
It wasn't the type of read that needed to be, like, it wasn't fighting loud music.
85
00:03:25,440 --> 00:03:26,020
It was...
86
00:03:26,020 --> 00:03:31,000
Yeah, you tell me, Robert, isn't the state of audio production for a voiceover in a national
87
00:03:31,000 --> 00:03:34,180
commercial for television very light processing?
88
00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:35,360
I'd say so.
89
00:03:35,940 --> 00:03:36,400
Like...
90
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:41,320
Like, let's say it's the aesthetic of very light processing.
91
00:03:41,320 --> 00:03:46,880
You might be using a fair amount for certain reasons, but it doesn't sound processed.
92
00:03:47,020 --> 00:03:49,280
It doesn't have a compressed...
93
00:03:49,280 --> 00:03:50,240
Right, you need clarity.
94
00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:51,580
You definitely...
95
00:03:51,580 --> 00:03:56,460
Not clarity like waves, but you need, like, you know, you're gonna put a little 4K or
96
00:03:56,460 --> 00:03:56,600
2K...
97
00:03:56,600 --> 00:03:58,920
Almost on the edge of sibilant, but it's not...
98
00:03:58,920 --> 00:03:59,180
Yeah.
99
00:03:59,820 --> 00:04:01,040
It's definitely not annoying.
100
00:04:01,240 --> 00:04:01,960
It's not pushed.
101
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:03,060
It's not pumping.
102
00:04:03,580 --> 00:04:05,180
It's not bigger than life.
103
00:04:05,540 --> 00:04:08,940
A lot of the times the clients are like, you know, like the old saying was, like, I want
104
00:04:08,940 --> 00:04:14,820
an everyday man or an everyday person, and you're not looking for that, like, inflated
105
00:04:14,820 --> 00:04:15,760
chest sound.
106
00:04:16,040 --> 00:04:17,519
And that's what I was getting.
107
00:04:18,899 --> 00:04:19,380
And...
108
00:04:19,380 --> 00:04:24,980
So when he was cast for that spot, he, you know, he did the audition, he got cast.
109
00:04:25,600 --> 00:04:28,660
That's the sound that they cast him from, right?
110
00:04:28,840 --> 00:04:31,400
And so now he's like, well, that's my sound.
111
00:04:31,400 --> 00:04:41,120
It sounded very, very polished, clean, cut, and loud, and consistent, and got that right
112
00:04:41,640 --> 00:04:42,180
on the mic.
113
00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:42,900
It was the same thing.
114
00:04:43,440 --> 00:04:47,480
And you usually think, oh, well, they processed it during the audition to make sure that they
115
00:04:48,160 --> 00:04:49,840
float above the rest and everything.
116
00:04:50,140 --> 00:04:50,280
They stacked it.
117
00:04:50,540 --> 00:04:50,760
Yeah.
118
00:04:51,860 --> 00:04:57,380
It's a term that's used a lot now, I have to say, stacking has become a bit of a...
119
00:04:57,840 --> 00:04:58,420
What's the word?
120
00:04:58,520 --> 00:04:58,920
An adjective?
121
00:04:59,780 --> 00:05:00,040
Yeah.
122
00:05:00,040 --> 00:05:00,320
Yeah.
123
00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:01,660
Part of our vernacular.
124
00:05:02,460 --> 00:05:03,380
Now, speaking...
125
00:05:03,380 --> 00:05:03,480
Okay.
126
00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:05,700
Well, he's a test.
127
00:05:05,720 --> 00:05:09,340
Just because you say you're not processing and they don't keep on pushing, that doesn't
128
00:05:09,340 --> 00:05:10,400
mean you got away with it.
129
00:05:10,500 --> 00:05:10,640
No.
130
00:05:10,840 --> 00:05:15,060
That just means that no one wants to be rude, and they want to move on with the session,
131
00:05:15,600 --> 00:05:16,820
and they'll deal...
132
00:05:16,820 --> 00:05:18,260
This is the other thing, right?
133
00:05:18,420 --> 00:05:22,800
In terms of the amount of processing that I'm hearing was on what you were hearing.
134
00:05:23,500 --> 00:05:30,940
Is in these days, like for television, you've got loudness considerations that have to come
135
00:05:30,940 --> 00:05:31,500
into play.
136
00:05:31,920 --> 00:05:38,140
So if you're getting a voiceover that's had the living shit compressed out of it, or is
137
00:05:38,140 --> 00:05:42,140
quite clearly being compressed, and again, I'm playing devil's advocate here, because
138
00:05:42,140 --> 00:05:45,860
I know the answer, but I want people to hear your answer because you dealt with it today.
139
00:05:46,100 --> 00:05:50,540
What difference does that make in terms of your mix, in terms of when you've got to consider
140
00:05:50,540 --> 00:05:51,640
loudness overall?
141
00:05:51,640 --> 00:05:55,000
When you're starting something that's heavily compressed.
142
00:05:55,320 --> 00:06:02,580
I mean, I just couldn't make it as subtle as I wanted to make it, or make it as whatever.
143
00:06:03,240 --> 00:06:03,620
Natural.
144
00:06:03,960 --> 00:06:04,680
Natural sounding.
145
00:06:05,300 --> 00:06:08,640
And the other thing that people don't realize now is like, you know, you go back to 1990,
146
00:06:08,940 --> 00:06:12,600
and yeah, everything was loud, and you had to make it loud because there were no rules.
147
00:06:12,940 --> 00:06:19,820
But now, the LKFS level that a commercial has to be at, you don't even need a compressor.
148
00:06:20,260 --> 00:06:20,660
Right.
149
00:06:21,340 --> 00:06:23,740
I mean, like, now you're just looking at...
150
00:06:24,440 --> 00:06:25,240
Minus 24.
151
00:06:25,520 --> 00:06:30,120
I'll mix it to 23 or 22 because you get a 2dB kind of, you know, window.
152
00:06:30,360 --> 00:06:31,920
Look at you, sneaky gaga.
153
00:06:32,320 --> 00:06:33,840
Well, we used to do other things.
154
00:06:33,940 --> 00:06:37,980
We used to, for the surround spots, until we realized it was causing phase issues, we
155
00:06:37,980 --> 00:06:41,380
would put the voice in all three speakers across the front, so when it went to stereo,
156
00:06:42,160 --> 00:06:42,880
went louder.
157
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:43,400
Yeah, yeah.
158
00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:43,840
Nice.
159
00:06:45,040 --> 00:06:52,340
But, you know, it's not the volume wars anymore, at least in the national spots, because everything
160
00:06:52,340 --> 00:06:59,640
is so just controlled, and you don't need to fight to make it loud.
161
00:06:59,980 --> 00:07:04,240
It's very easy with no processing just to make it as loud as it needs to be.
162
00:07:04,560 --> 00:07:09,380
What you're more looking for is consistency, you know, because does it start low and end
163
00:07:09,380 --> 00:07:09,880
up loud?
164
00:07:10,120 --> 00:07:14,180
Because you're going to be measured on your loudest point within the whole spot.
165
00:07:14,340 --> 00:07:16,520
But that's all stuff that can be done with a fader.
166
00:07:16,720 --> 00:07:17,500
That's leveling.
167
00:07:18,140 --> 00:07:20,100
That's not like making it...
168
00:07:20,100 --> 00:07:23,500
But it's like us turning around to the voice talent and going, listen, I'm sorry, but you're
169
00:07:23,500 --> 00:07:25,420
gonna have to record this spot with your headphones off.
170
00:07:26,260 --> 00:07:28,500
You know, you're boxing someone into a corner.
171
00:07:29,160 --> 00:07:33,680
And it's just, you know, the reason we ask is not because we want to be assholes, or
172
00:07:33,680 --> 00:07:38,320
not because we don't want you to sound like your audition, or any other reason other than
173
00:07:38,320 --> 00:07:42,260
I've got my job to do, do me a favor, help me out, turn the shit off.
174
00:07:42,360 --> 00:07:43,160
I don't want it on.
175
00:07:43,740 --> 00:07:43,960
Right.
176
00:07:44,060 --> 00:07:47,840
It's not the promo that's moving so fast that no one's going to take the time to mix it
177
00:07:47,840 --> 00:07:48,320
That's right.
178
00:07:48,720 --> 00:07:50,600
Yeah, promo's a different animal completely.
179
00:07:51,480 --> 00:07:52,940
Promo is ephemeral.
180
00:07:53,660 --> 00:07:55,220
Goes on the air, and it's gone.
181
00:07:55,260 --> 00:08:00,200
It wasn't a gate where you could even call it out and be like, you know, you hear that
182
00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:01,500
thing cutting off for your clients.
183
00:08:01,780 --> 00:08:06,760
There's no way my clients were going to understand, hey, like, what is compression?
184
00:08:06,760 --> 00:08:07,780
They don't even know what it is.
185
00:08:07,860 --> 00:08:12,740
So you mention it once or twice, three times, and then you just move on, and you're just
186
00:08:12,740 --> 00:08:15,360
sort of like, ah, like, that guy.
187
00:08:15,600 --> 00:08:20,460
This is the problem when, you know, this is the pro and the con of like the Apollo systems,
188
00:08:20,620 --> 00:08:26,040
whether you have the ability to do this, is the pro is that it's available to you and
189
00:08:26,040 --> 00:08:29,920
you can use it when it's necessary or appropriate for whatever it is that you're doing.
190
00:08:30,600 --> 00:08:36,440
It's also a pro to know that you can be easily shut off with a single click, and that you
191
00:08:36,440 --> 00:08:41,320
can get back to the setting that you had before, and you can have multiple settings.
192
00:08:41,480 --> 00:08:43,440
So you can have an infinite number of versions, right?
193
00:08:43,920 --> 00:08:51,920
The folks that are using Symmetrix 6200 or Symmetrix 52080 or DVX, whatever it is.
194
00:08:52,840 --> 00:08:56,340
They don't want to touch a knob because they're going to lose all those settings, right?
195
00:08:56,700 --> 00:09:00,760
Well, all of those things have one thing in common, a bypass button.
196
00:09:01,580 --> 00:09:05,260
So there's no excuse, because they can immediately press the button.
197
00:09:05,720 --> 00:09:11,980
But they are so addicted to the way they sound in their cans through that chain, and they
198
00:09:11,980 --> 00:09:15,980
know that if they shut that shit off, it's going to fuck up their headphones.
199
00:09:16,320 --> 00:09:19,000
And now they're going to be like, they're going to be out of their...
200
00:09:19,000 --> 00:09:19,520
What's he saying?
201
00:09:19,620 --> 00:09:21,560
That he trusts his settings more than me?
202
00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:22,620
Yeah.
203
00:09:22,820 --> 00:09:23,160
Well...
204
00:09:23,160 --> 00:09:24,540
He's saying, I want to hear it.
205
00:09:24,660 --> 00:09:27,560
He's saying, that's what I want to hear and not what you want to hear.
206
00:09:27,760 --> 00:09:28,420
And that's...
207
00:09:28,420 --> 00:09:29,380
That's my point.
208
00:09:29,380 --> 00:09:29,660
That's the problem.
209
00:09:29,780 --> 00:09:30,420
I shouldn't say he.
210
00:09:30,720 --> 00:09:30,940
They.
211
00:09:31,700 --> 00:09:31,880
Sorry.
212
00:09:32,180 --> 00:09:33,220
His name was.
213
00:09:33,900 --> 00:09:34,480
Albert.
214
00:09:34,700 --> 00:09:41,020
This person knew enough to know that the customer was saying, send it unprocessed.
215
00:09:41,020 --> 00:09:47,540
But he knew that his performance was suffering, because when he heard himself in the cans
216
00:09:47,540 --> 00:09:49,980
totally raw, it was affecting his performance.
217
00:09:50,240 --> 00:09:53,320
It was harder for him to get that performance.
218
00:09:53,840 --> 00:09:56,380
The UA does that perfectly, just turn off the record button.
219
00:09:56,380 --> 00:10:02,780
I was able to set up a UAD monitor chain that had what he wanted in LA2A, right?
220
00:10:03,520 --> 00:10:05,820
Slam, just like boom, bigger than life, whatever.
221
00:10:06,420 --> 00:10:12,220
And then we made up a separate chain in his post process and logic that maybe had some
222
00:10:12,220 --> 00:10:13,100
of that, maybe not.
223
00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:13,640
It was a mix.
224
00:10:13,760 --> 00:10:15,120
It was kind of a mishmash, right?
225
00:10:15,420 --> 00:10:18,560
But he had a monitoring chain and he had a processing chain.
226
00:10:18,640 --> 00:10:20,540
We were to separate those two out from each other.
227
00:10:20,980 --> 00:10:23,320
And, and I think that needs to be done.
228
00:10:23,320 --> 00:10:27,440
If headphones are a part of what you do, you really are dependent on the way you sound
229
00:10:27,440 --> 00:10:29,060
in those cans to get your performance.
230
00:10:29,780 --> 00:10:34,300
If you can't turn off the processing to get that sound, then you have to figure out a
231
00:10:34,300 --> 00:10:34,800
way around it.
232
00:10:34,840 --> 00:10:36,240
And there are ways to do it.
233
00:10:36,340 --> 00:10:37,480
It's not like it's impossible.
234
00:10:37,880 --> 00:10:38,940
You just need to know.
235
00:10:39,220 --> 00:10:46,920
When I record a singer, I will put the compression on it heavy in the monitors because it helps
236
00:10:46,920 --> 00:10:47,520
the performance.
237
00:10:47,660 --> 00:10:52,140
It helps them hear everything and makes it so that they're not trying to push too loud
238
00:10:52,140 --> 00:10:56,760
and they can have that subtle performance and they're not trying to float above, get
239
00:10:56,760 --> 00:10:59,840
themselves above everything, but I'm not recording it that way.
240
00:11:00,040 --> 00:11:04,080
And then later that's all things that can be done more thoughtfully with a fader instead
241
00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:04,720
of a compressor.
242
00:11:05,120 --> 00:11:10,440
That's why every DAW, the processing is always post by default.
243
00:11:10,700 --> 00:11:13,640
It does not record the processing on that channel.
244
00:11:13,960 --> 00:11:14,440
Except for Reaper.
245
00:11:14,580 --> 00:11:15,260
It gives you the option.
246
00:11:15,460 --> 00:11:19,980
Reaper does have a pre effects that is unique to Reaper, but on others, you have to go out
247
00:11:19,980 --> 00:11:23,520
of your way to make an aux chain and then send it back into another file.
248
00:11:24,220 --> 00:11:28,540
And you can do all that, which I do sometimes too, but you have to go out of your way.
249
00:11:28,840 --> 00:11:30,900
But that's why it's always a post thing.
250
00:11:30,960 --> 00:11:38,340
We want as engineers to record the pre-fader, pre-processed, raw, raw audio on the whole
251
00:11:38,340 --> 00:11:39,280
and make that decision.
252
00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:44,220
Coming back to what you want to hear, I mean, Robert, you're a music engineer.
253
00:11:44,480 --> 00:11:45,240
You would know this.
254
00:11:46,560 --> 00:11:52,300
There's debate out there in music producer or music engineer land, you know, do you mix
255
00:11:52,300 --> 00:11:53,500
into a compressor or not?
256
00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:59,640
There's plenty of people who sort of have a slight compressor happening over the mix from
257
00:11:59,640 --> 00:12:02,840
the moment they press, you know, start mix.
258
00:12:03,600 --> 00:12:04,600
And then there are others who won't.
259
00:12:04,740 --> 00:12:08,880
Do you mean do your mix into a compressor as in if it's going to tape or going into
260
00:12:08,880 --> 00:12:09,300
monitors?
261
00:12:09,420 --> 00:12:14,580
They'll put a compressor on just to sort of control everything and then mix into it.
262
00:12:14,580 --> 00:12:16,240
And then that's not their master.
263
00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:21,420
That's just a compressor on the stereo mix to sort of keep everything in check.
264
00:12:21,560 --> 00:12:22,220
And there's debate.
265
00:12:22,280 --> 00:12:22,760
It's a bus compressor.
266
00:12:22,760 --> 00:12:24,800
There's plenty of people out there who'll go, yeah, I do.
267
00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:27,120
And there are people out there who go, no, there's no way I would.
268
00:12:28,340 --> 00:12:29,280
But that's not...
269
00:12:29,280 --> 00:12:30,600
Are you asking me how I do it?
270
00:12:30,640 --> 00:12:32,080
Well, actually, yeah, that would be interesting.
271
00:12:32,260 --> 00:12:34,700
I mean, I can make a few comments on that.
272
00:12:34,920 --> 00:12:38,740
Like number one, if I'm moving fast, yeah, I'll mix into a compressor.
273
00:12:39,160 --> 00:12:41,340
I'll mix and master all in one pass.
274
00:12:41,340 --> 00:12:45,200
I had a client the other day that was like, the other studio is telling me that I need
275
00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:46,000
to master it.
276
00:12:46,140 --> 00:12:47,400
And are they ripping me off?
277
00:12:47,900 --> 00:12:49,560
I'm like, no, they're not really ripping you off.
278
00:12:50,500 --> 00:12:55,920
But if you know what you're going for, you can kind of hit both in one stroke.
279
00:12:56,860 --> 00:13:00,920
And maybe these days, people are just doing songs and they're putting them up on YouTube
280
00:13:00,920 --> 00:13:02,820
and there's not an album.
281
00:13:03,080 --> 00:13:06,020
If you're mastering and you're looking at the whole album, you need to master.
282
00:13:06,500 --> 00:13:10,320
If not, yeah, you can kind of mix and master in one shot, especially because you're not
283
00:13:10,320 --> 00:13:12,160
sending it to somebody else for their opinion.
284
00:13:12,680 --> 00:13:16,800
If you're the same person who's going to mix and master, hey, why not do it in one
285
00:13:16,800 --> 00:13:17,140
shot?
286
00:13:17,980 --> 00:13:21,240
If I'm trying to move fast, I'll mix into a compressor.
287
00:13:21,820 --> 00:13:25,420
But I don't think you necessarily get the most detailed mix that way.
288
00:13:25,780 --> 00:13:29,640
Because there's a certain point after which you start pushing all your faders up.
289
00:13:29,700 --> 00:13:31,020
It just doesn't matter anymore.
290
00:13:31,580 --> 00:13:33,940
I think that's the point is like, do you monitor...
291
00:13:33,940 --> 00:13:36,140
I know we're way off topic again, as usual.
292
00:13:36,140 --> 00:13:41,960
But it's like, are you better off as the engineer mixing through compression that you're monitoring
293
00:13:42,540 --> 00:13:44,300
versus printing that compression?
294
00:13:44,640 --> 00:13:48,920
Because you just want to hear that mix monitored through that bus compressor.
295
00:13:49,260 --> 00:13:53,360
During the session, it's nice to record through a compressor so that you just start hearing
296
00:13:53,360 --> 00:13:58,440
the details of that vocal and you know if there are any problems and the singer knows
297
00:13:58,440 --> 00:14:03,660
that they're not pushing too loud and you're getting a nice dynamic.
298
00:14:03,660 --> 00:14:08,420
But I mean, by now you're mixing, you're in the mixing stage and you're mixing through
299
00:14:08,420 --> 00:14:09,680
a bus compressor.
300
00:14:09,940 --> 00:14:13,560
Are you always printing that compressor or are you monitoring the compressor?
301
00:14:13,740 --> 00:14:15,280
Because you want to hear the way it would...
302
00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:21,660
I used to do it where I would mix into a compressor just to have an idea of how it's going to
303
00:14:21,660 --> 00:14:21,880
be.
304
00:14:22,380 --> 00:14:27,280
And I got burned one time because I did one of these albums where the band had this engineer
305
00:14:27,280 --> 00:14:29,280
do three songs and that engineer do three songs.
306
00:14:29,280 --> 00:14:32,880
And one of the engineers just sent them a pretty much mastered mix.
307
00:14:33,580 --> 00:14:39,020
I mixed it and I did, especially because often when you send the clients home with a mix,
308
00:14:39,240 --> 00:14:43,540
you throw it through a quick master because if not, they're like, it just doesn't sound
309
00:14:43,540 --> 00:14:43,760
right.
310
00:14:43,880 --> 00:14:44,660
I can't...
311
00:14:44,660 --> 00:14:46,340
So you're like, here you go.
312
00:14:46,420 --> 00:14:53,440
Here's just a smack compressor to get it into place so you can listen to it relative to
313
00:14:53,440 --> 00:14:54,420
other things and have an idea.
314
00:14:54,420 --> 00:14:59,440
And then when I sent it off to the mastering engineer, I turned all my stuff off, came
315
00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:01,080
back and this guy sucked.
316
00:15:01,700 --> 00:15:08,260
And my stuff sounded small and the other guy's stuff sounded big because he didn't put anything
317
00:15:08,260 --> 00:15:08,880
on my...
318
00:15:09,860 --> 00:15:10,720
I'm so glad you said this.
319
00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:12,460
And I wish I had just been like, here it is.
320
00:15:12,520 --> 00:15:13,160
I'd done that.
321
00:15:13,460 --> 00:15:17,320
I thought you were going to do it better because that's what you're supposed to do as a mastering
322
00:15:17,320 --> 00:15:19,300
engineer, but you didn't do any of it.
323
00:15:19,300 --> 00:15:24,380
And now I'm forever stuck in this, like my mixes sound small.
324
00:15:24,460 --> 00:15:25,080
Thank you, Robert.
325
00:15:25,300 --> 00:15:26,440
I have to thank you.
326
00:15:26,540 --> 00:15:29,700
I'm going to send you one of those edible oranges, whatever you want.
327
00:15:29,700 --> 00:15:30,260
Edible undies?
328
00:15:30,800 --> 00:15:35,800
Because this is why I set up stacks for voice actors.
329
00:15:36,440 --> 00:15:41,440
They have to know, if they don't know who the client is, this is especially for pay
330
00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:41,780
to play.
331
00:15:42,120 --> 00:15:43,780
I would say this is mainly pay to play.
332
00:15:44,440 --> 00:15:48,880
And the pay to play client says, we want the audio raw.
333
00:15:49,860 --> 00:15:53,520
They just know that that's something to say to a talent.
334
00:15:53,760 --> 00:15:55,020
We want the audio raw.
335
00:15:55,320 --> 00:15:58,040
Well, you get the final product if you happen to hear it.
336
00:15:58,100 --> 00:16:00,760
A lot of times you never hear it, so you just move on with your life.
337
00:16:01,000 --> 00:16:05,480
But if you do hear the final product, sometimes the audio mix blows.
338
00:16:05,840 --> 00:16:06,540
It sucks.
339
00:16:07,040 --> 00:16:08,300
It is not well mixed.
340
00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:09,960
The voice is totally flat.
341
00:16:10,120 --> 00:16:10,960
It's not compressed.
342
00:16:11,400 --> 00:16:18,120
I hear stuff on YouTube ads occasionally, even television, proper television ads, that aren't
343
00:16:18,120 --> 00:16:18,420
mixed.
344
00:16:19,320 --> 00:16:24,520
And so it's this weird thing that actors have this razor's edge where it's like with enough
345
00:16:24,520 --> 00:16:29,820
experience you start to learn that you have to actually process certain things because
346
00:16:29,820 --> 00:16:32,120
if you don't, nobody else is doing it.
347
00:16:32,320 --> 00:16:34,300
That used to only be in promos.
348
00:16:34,440 --> 00:16:38,060
That's a tail wagging the dog problem now where we have to figure that out.
349
00:16:38,060 --> 00:16:41,980
That used to only be in promos where they would record the promo straight to the tape
350
00:16:41,980 --> 00:16:46,840
and before you knew it it was on the air and they were just moving so fast no one had
351
00:16:46,840 --> 00:16:47,540
any time to think about it.
352
00:16:47,540 --> 00:16:48,520
That's just moving fast.
353
00:16:48,700 --> 00:16:49,440
Yeah, moving fast.
354
00:16:49,740 --> 00:16:54,700
Yeah, but the trouble is a lot of times when they say they want the audio raw, it's not
355
00:16:54,700 --> 00:16:56,120
what you think they mean.
356
00:16:56,280 --> 00:16:59,820
What they mean is they don't want any music or sound effects.
357
00:17:01,200 --> 00:17:04,599
And so the interpretation is, oh, okay, no processing.
358
00:17:05,000 --> 00:17:05,359
No.
359
00:17:05,359 --> 00:17:08,099
What they want is no sound effects or music.
360
00:17:08,400 --> 00:17:09,160
They mean clean.
361
00:17:09,300 --> 00:17:10,280
Because they're clueless.
362
00:17:10,359 --> 00:17:11,359
They have no idea what they're doing.
363
00:17:11,540 --> 00:17:12,220
So they don't know.
364
00:17:12,220 --> 00:17:13,079
Yeah, it's jargon.
365
00:17:13,220 --> 00:17:13,619
And those jargon-
366
00:17:13,619 --> 00:17:14,520
They don't know their terms.
367
00:17:14,839 --> 00:17:22,720
Yeah, that doesn't translate across cultures or even from one studio to another what raw
368
00:17:22,720 --> 00:17:23,359
actually means.
369
00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:24,579
That's a really good point.
370
00:17:25,359 --> 00:17:29,780
Anyway, I'm not trying to defend my use of stacks or setting them up for clients because
371
00:17:29,780 --> 00:17:31,820
they really need to listen to what they're putting out.
372
00:17:32,340 --> 00:17:34,200
If they're just hitting a button and sending it-
373
00:17:34,200 --> 00:17:37,300
No matter what you do, you're screwed if you do or you're screwed if you don't.
374
00:17:37,360 --> 00:17:39,880
If you don't, the wrong client doesn't process your audio.
375
00:17:40,040 --> 00:17:44,960
Now you don't sound as good as you could or you end up pissing me off because I'm going
376
00:17:44,960 --> 00:17:49,340
to process your audio the way I want it processed and now I'm pissed off at you for processing
377
00:17:49,340 --> 00:17:51,120
it and not giving me a choice.
378
00:17:51,380 --> 00:17:55,240
There's also the belt and suspenders, which is you track it raw and you have a stack.
379
00:17:55,380 --> 00:17:56,020
You send them both.
380
00:17:56,200 --> 00:17:57,220
Well, this was a live session.
381
00:17:57,420 --> 00:17:58,500
This wasn't like, you know.
382
00:17:58,860 --> 00:17:59,040
Yeah.
383
00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:01,100
Here's the perfect analogy, right?
384
00:18:01,100 --> 00:18:06,900
You walk into a really nice steak restaurant and you sit down to order a steak and you
385
00:18:06,900 --> 00:18:10,840
go, yeah, I'll have a sirloin and I'll have it blue.
386
00:18:11,120 --> 00:18:13,180
Thank you because, well, that's my choice.
387
00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:18,720
But the chef goes, oh, no, sir, sir, sir, I'm sorry, you cannot have blue.
388
00:18:19,020 --> 00:18:23,660
You must have well done and you must have the onion gravy, you know, and it's like,
389
00:18:23,820 --> 00:18:24,120
hang on.
390
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:25,420
That's not what I'm ordering.
391
00:18:26,160 --> 00:18:30,320
I'm ordering a steak blue with mustard, please.
392
00:18:30,840 --> 00:18:33,880
You know, but you're being told and it's the same when you sit down and in a session and
393
00:18:33,880 --> 00:18:38,340
this dude's refusing to turn his compressor off, he's like, dude, don't try to sell me
394
00:18:38,340 --> 00:18:38,980
what I don't want.
395
00:18:39,460 --> 00:18:42,260
Yeah, but I've got a feeling this guy doesn't know how to turn the compressor off.
396
00:18:42,260 --> 00:18:43,120
Or doesn't want to.
397
00:18:43,180 --> 00:18:48,500
I think George's story is more up my alley in terms of and the reason I've got a bugbear,
398
00:18:48,580 --> 00:18:52,720
by the way, can I just say is because the moment Robert opened his mouth on this, I had a session
399
00:18:52,720 --> 00:18:55,700
last week with a very well-known Australian voiceover artist.
400
00:18:56,260 --> 00:18:57,640
And I had this exact argument.
401
00:18:58,260 --> 00:19:00,180
And at the end of the session, I was so pissed off.
402
00:19:00,300 --> 00:19:03,080
I rang his agent and told them, did you finally give in, Andrew?
403
00:19:03,980 --> 00:19:04,940
Did I give in?
404
00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:06,260
Yeah, no, it wasn't me.
405
00:19:06,340 --> 00:19:07,080
No, I'm joking.
406
00:19:07,360 --> 00:19:13,120
It wasn't Andrew, but this guy, this guy should know better.
407
00:19:13,460 --> 00:19:18,120
And now his agent and his agent, to be honest, the guy, the guy makes so much money.
408
00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:22,100
His agent probably just went, ah, Robbo rang and complained, but get fucked.
409
00:19:22,740 --> 00:19:24,140
I think I know who that was.
410
00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:25,100
I've got a horrible feeling.
411
00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:25,680
I know that was.
412
00:19:25,780 --> 00:19:26,580
But anyway, I won't.
413
00:19:26,780 --> 00:19:27,560
I'm not going to name names.
414
00:19:27,660 --> 00:19:31,600
But the interesting thing is in the in the good old days where we used to go out to studios
415
00:19:32,760 --> 00:19:36,200
with engineers that I sort of had some sort of friendship with or whatever, I'd always
416
00:19:36,200 --> 00:19:39,840
ask them after we'd done the session, what what are you going to do to my voice?
417
00:19:39,900 --> 00:19:41,160
What processing are you going to use?
418
00:19:41,580 --> 00:19:44,760
And a lot of the time I'd sit there and I'd watch them after the session if the client
419
00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:48,460
had gone or, you know, and just see how much they put on.
420
00:19:48,460 --> 00:19:51,580
And most cases they didn't put much at all.
421
00:19:51,860 --> 00:19:52,300
Totally.
422
00:19:52,560 --> 00:19:52,680
Yeah.
423
00:19:52,760 --> 00:19:53,420
Very little.
424
00:19:54,060 --> 00:20:01,140
So my question is going to be once again to Robert and Robbo was if you if you were doing
425
00:20:01,140 --> 00:20:05,540
a session with me for a commercial and it was like a, you know, not a big promo kind of
426
00:20:05,540 --> 00:20:07,440
thing, just a nice conversational kind of commercial.
427
00:20:08,500 --> 00:20:10,460
What processing would you use on my voice?
428
00:20:10,980 --> 00:20:15,960
I would probably just I'll interject real quick and say, Andrew, that is testament to
429
00:20:15,960 --> 00:20:16,720
your performance.
430
00:20:16,720 --> 00:20:21,120
Like it obviously it's the room, it's the mic, it's the it's all the way down.
431
00:20:21,460 --> 00:20:26,240
But it starts with you because you have excellent control of your instrument, your delivery,
432
00:20:26,400 --> 00:20:29,140
your dynamics are consistent, all these things.
433
00:20:29,140 --> 00:20:33,580
So they do absolute bare minimum to the processing because they don't need to.
434
00:20:33,660 --> 00:20:41,080
I would I would basically probably just put a very, very low set high pass filter.
435
00:20:41,080 --> 00:20:46,360
If I if I didn't hear any thumps, I'd probably just still put like a, you know, whatever
436
00:20:46,360 --> 00:20:49,700
even like 40 hertz high pass filter with a very gentle slope.
437
00:20:50,280 --> 00:20:57,220
I'd probably maybe bump the high EQ around two or four K, a DB or three.
438
00:20:59,260 --> 00:21:07,800
And then a light sort of fastish compressor like LA 2A style to three DB.
439
00:21:08,300 --> 00:21:12,380
And then everything else, I would just push the fader for what I needed it to be.
440
00:21:13,420 --> 00:21:14,800
And that's about what I do, probably.
441
00:21:15,820 --> 00:21:18,920
And maybe, maybe with you, probably not.
442
00:21:19,040 --> 00:21:21,680
But maybe I'd have like a little de-esser.
443
00:21:22,120 --> 00:21:23,320
I don't really use a de-esser.
444
00:21:23,440 --> 00:21:27,860
I tend to use a multiband compressor with just a high, you know, just kind of tapping
445
00:21:27,860 --> 00:21:30,060
the high high frequency down a little bit.
446
00:21:31,220 --> 00:21:32,900
A nuanced de-esser.
447
00:21:33,200 --> 00:21:33,380
Yeah.
448
00:21:33,520 --> 00:21:34,480
Or DIY de-esser.
449
00:21:34,600 --> 00:21:34,940
A flexible de-esser.
450
00:21:36,340 --> 00:21:38,800
What would you do with Andrew's voice?
451
00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:40,980
You know, processing wise?
452
00:21:41,820 --> 00:21:42,020
Yeah.
453
00:21:43,800 --> 00:21:46,780
Look, LA 2A goes on most things for me.
454
00:21:47,880 --> 00:21:49,320
And that would probably be it.
455
00:21:49,380 --> 00:21:50,260
A little bit of EQ.
456
00:21:51,120 --> 00:21:51,480
Yeah.
457
00:21:51,480 --> 00:21:52,980
Like Robert's talking about bottom.
458
00:21:53,580 --> 00:21:54,980
Do you have the switch and compressor?
459
00:21:55,320 --> 00:21:58,700
I like it in compressor mode, but there's another bone of contention, isn't there?
460
00:21:58,720 --> 00:21:59,360
Let's be honest.
461
00:21:59,440 --> 00:22:02,760
Would you put a high pass filter on it anyways, even if you don't hear anything in there?
462
00:22:03,640 --> 00:22:04,080
Probably.
463
00:22:04,080 --> 00:22:06,440
Yeah, probably take some of that.
464
00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:13,040
Like I'm sort of a, I mix voiceover like, almost like vocals, like everything that's
465
00:22:13,040 --> 00:22:14,060
unnecessary goes.
466
00:22:15,280 --> 00:22:19,480
You know, that sort of muddy, yucky sort of low mids.
467
00:22:19,800 --> 00:22:20,340
Dump it down.
468
00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:29,960
I sort of tend to, because my go-to EQ is the F6, the Waves one, which is, you can use it
469
00:22:29,960 --> 00:22:31,220
as an EQ or you can use it.
470
00:22:31,220 --> 00:22:32,320
Is that the multi?
471
00:22:32,620 --> 00:22:34,300
Is it the F6 or the C6?
472
00:22:34,520 --> 00:22:39,320
You can use it as an EQ, but you can also use it as a multiband compressor as well.
473
00:22:40,880 --> 00:22:44,220
I use the C4 from Waves, but same basic idea.
474
00:22:44,320 --> 00:22:50,080
So I touch, so if you could see, if you could see the curve on those low mids, it's sort
475
00:22:50,080 --> 00:22:53,740
of, there's a little bit dialed in, like maybe minus one or minus two, that's there hard.
476
00:22:53,860 --> 00:22:55,140
And then I just run the compressor.
477
00:22:55,360 --> 00:22:57,780
Do you boost up the highs or do you just scoop the lows out?
478
00:22:59,300 --> 00:23:00,200
Depends on the voice.
479
00:23:00,200 --> 00:23:02,700
It depends what you're hearing, again.
480
00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:04,760
Because we're kind of saying the same thing, right?
481
00:23:04,980 --> 00:23:06,880
A little bit, maybe, I guess, up the top.
482
00:23:06,940 --> 00:23:11,880
Yeah, because I kind of leave the lower mids alone and I just give a boost on the highs,
483
00:23:12,020 --> 00:23:17,120
but scooping out the lows or boosting the upper mids is like six and a half.
484
00:23:18,300 --> 00:23:19,600
And then I like...
485
00:23:19,600 --> 00:23:24,300
Actually, I've just realized that I've actually done jobs for, worked with both of you, actually,
486
00:23:24,360 --> 00:23:25,360
Robert and Robo.
487
00:23:25,660 --> 00:23:26,220
We should compare.
488
00:23:26,420 --> 00:23:29,420
My stuff always sounds better than Robo's, right?
489
00:23:29,420 --> 00:23:29,840
Yeah.
490
00:23:33,080 --> 00:23:34,720
Of course it does, Robert.
491
00:23:35,060 --> 00:23:36,620
When are we going to have a mix-off, huh?
492
00:23:37,500 --> 00:23:39,140
Yeah, a mix-off, that'd be interesting.
493
00:23:39,960 --> 00:23:43,080
I'd be interested to see what audio you're going to send him, though, AP.
494
00:23:43,200 --> 00:23:45,320
I mean, if you send him pristine audio, that's not fair.
495
00:23:45,400 --> 00:23:46,220
He gets head start.
496
00:23:46,300 --> 00:23:47,020
Yeah, that's right.
497
00:23:48,960 --> 00:23:51,360
That could be a really interesting one to do.
498
00:23:51,420 --> 00:23:57,200
I'd send you both exactly the same file and just see what you both come back with.
499
00:23:57,200 --> 00:24:00,920
And then you can derive our two hearing curves from that.
500
00:24:02,280 --> 00:24:03,040
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
501
00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:04,680
Which one's deafer than the other one?
502
00:24:05,780 --> 00:24:10,860
Well, surprisingly, I was at the audiologist about three or four months ago and...
503
00:24:10,860 --> 00:24:11,260
What was that?
504
00:24:11,340 --> 00:24:12,040
Yeah, I can't remember.
505
00:24:12,220 --> 00:24:12,820
What did you say?
506
00:24:13,220 --> 00:24:15,400
I think my headphones have just stopped.
507
00:24:18,340 --> 00:24:19,560
I mean, that's...
508
00:24:19,560 --> 00:24:20,440
Well played, sir.
509
00:24:20,680 --> 00:24:21,260
Well played.
510
00:24:21,620 --> 00:24:22,060
Anyway.
511
00:24:22,300 --> 00:24:22,640
Yes.
512
00:24:22,900 --> 00:24:23,780
No, we should do that.
513
00:24:24,740 --> 00:24:25,720
I'll stump up.
514
00:24:26,160 --> 00:24:26,620
It's fine.
515
00:24:26,620 --> 00:24:27,640
Well, that was fun.
516
00:24:27,720 --> 00:24:28,120
Is it over?

