Oct. 16, 2025
Sunlight Satellites, Near-Earth Asteroids & the 6,000th Exoplanet Revelation
Sponsor Details: This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN....enhance your online privacy with the best in the game. To get our special Space Nuts price and bonus deal, visit https://nordvpn.com/spacenuts or use the code SPACENUTS at...
Sponsor Details:
This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN....enhance your online privacy with the best in the game. To get our special Space Nuts price and bonus deal, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts or use the code SPACENUTS at checkout.
ontroversial Concepts: Sunlight Services, Near-Earth Asteroids, and the 6,000th Exoplanet
In this captivating episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner dive into a variety of cosmic topics that challenge our understanding of space and its implications for life on Earth. From a bold proposal for a satellite-based sunlight service to a near miss with an asteroid and the discovery of the 6,000th exoplanet, this episode is filled with intriguing discussions and scientific insights.
Episode Highlights:
- Sunlight Services Proposal: Andrew and Jonti explore the controversial idea of launching satellites to reflect sunlight back to Earth, discussing the practical challenges and potential environmental impacts of such a scheme. They raise critical questions about the feasibility and safety of this ambitious project.
- Asteroid Near Miss: The hosts analyze the recent close encounter with asteroid 2025 TF, emphasizing the importance of early detection in planetary defense and how light pollution from artificial satellites could hinder our ability to spot these potential threats in the future.
- Milestone in Exoplanet Discovery: Celebrating the discovery of the 6,000th exoplanet, Andrew and Jonti reflect on the journey of exoplanet research over the past three decades and the implications of finding planets beyond our solar system. They discuss the criteria for confirming these distant worlds and what the future holds for exoplanet exploration.
- Mimas and Subsurface Oceans: The episode concludes with a fascinating look at Saturn's moon Mimas, which may harbor a subsurface ocean. The discussion highlights the ongoing research into the moon's geological history and the potential for life beyond Earth in unexpected places.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
This episode is brought to you with the support of NordVPN....enhance your online privacy with the best in the game. To get our special Space Nuts price and bonus deal, visit www.nordvpn.com/spacenuts or use the code SPACENUTS at checkout.
ontroversial Concepts: Sunlight Services, Near-Earth Asteroids, and the 6,000th Exoplanet
In this captivating episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner dive into a variety of cosmic topics that challenge our understanding of space and its implications for life on Earth. From a bold proposal for a satellite-based sunlight service to a near miss with an asteroid and the discovery of the 6,000th exoplanet, this episode is filled with intriguing discussions and scientific insights.
Episode Highlights:
- Sunlight Services Proposal: Andrew and Jonti explore the controversial idea of launching satellites to reflect sunlight back to Earth, discussing the practical challenges and potential environmental impacts of such a scheme. They raise critical questions about the feasibility and safety of this ambitious project.
- Asteroid Near Miss: The hosts analyze the recent close encounter with asteroid 2025 TF, emphasizing the importance of early detection in planetary defense and how light pollution from artificial satellites could hinder our ability to spot these potential threats in the future.
- Milestone in Exoplanet Discovery: Celebrating the discovery of the 6,000th exoplanet, Andrew and Jonti reflect on the journey of exoplanet research over the past three decades and the implications of finding planets beyond our solar system. They discuss the criteria for confirming these distant worlds and what the future holds for exoplanet exploration.
- Mimas and Subsurface Oceans: The episode concludes with a fascinating look at Saturn's moon Mimas, which may harbor a subsurface ocean. The discussion highlights the ongoing research into the moon's geological history and the potential for life beyond Earth in unexpected places.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.
WEBVTT
0
00:00:00.400 --> 00:00:02.360
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us on another
1
00:00:02.360 --> 00:00:04.320
edition of Space Nuts, where we talk
2
00:00:04.320 --> 00:00:06.520
astronomy and space science. My name is
3
00:00:06.520 --> 00:00:08.240
Andrew Dunkley, your host. It's good to have
4
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:10.800
your company as always. Today,
5
00:00:11.150 --> 00:00:12.730
we're going to start off with something quite
6
00:00:12.730 --> 00:00:15.250
controversial. And in some
7
00:00:15.649 --> 00:00:17.250
parts of the world they probably call this
8
00:00:17.250 --> 00:00:20.140
dumb. But, a proposal to create
9
00:00:20.220 --> 00:00:23.060
a sunlight service. Yes. Using
10
00:00:23.060 --> 00:00:25.340
mirrors in orbit. It's a thing.
11
00:00:25.810 --> 00:00:28.350
also a near miss for Earth involving asteroid
12
00:00:28.350 --> 00:00:30.800
20, 2025 TF, the
13
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.760
6,000th exoplanet has
14
00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:36.200
been discovered. And another potential
15
00:00:36.360 --> 00:00:38.880
subsurface ocean, this one
16
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:41.240
involving the moon Mimas. That's all coming
17
00:00:41.240 --> 00:00:43.560
up on this edition of Space Nuts.
18
00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:46.120
Jonti Horner: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
19
00:00:46.360 --> 00:00:49.080
10, 9. Ignition
20
00:00:49.080 --> 00:00:51.880
sequence. Star. Space Nuts. 5, 4,
21
00:00:51.948 --> 00:00:54.914
3. 2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,
22
00:00:54.982 --> 00:00:57.420
3, 2, 1. Space Nuts astronauts,
23
00:00:57.720 --> 00:00:58.000
report.
24
00:00:58.000 --> 00:00:58.920
Andrew Dunkley: It feels good.
25
00:00:59.960 --> 00:01:02.920
And joining us, in the stead of Fred
26
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:05.060
Watson, we are, joined by Jonti Horner,
27
00:01:05.060 --> 00:01:06.780
professor of astrophysics at the University
28
00:01:06.780 --> 00:01:08.790
of Southern Queensland. Hello again, Jonti.
29
00:01:09.880 --> 00:01:11.080
Jonti Horner: good morning. How are you going?
30
00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:13.940
Andrew Dunkley: I am well. And we should, just put a
31
00:01:13.940 --> 00:01:16.140
caveat to this episode. There might be noise
32
00:01:16.140 --> 00:01:17.580
because you're getting work done at the
33
00:01:17.580 --> 00:01:17.860
house.
34
00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:20.820
Jonti Horner: Yes. And of course we organized to record at
35
00:01:20.820 --> 00:01:22.540
this time prior to the trade is getting in
36
00:01:22.540 --> 00:01:23.780
touch and saying, you know what, we'll be
37
00:01:23.780 --> 00:01:25.780
there at 7am on Monday morning. It's like
38
00:01:25.780 --> 00:01:28.760
great, you know, want this done. Hopefully
39
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:31.160
the wonders of the microphone will filter it
40
00:01:31.160 --> 00:01:33.040
all out. But given that some of the banging I
41
00:01:33.040 --> 00:01:35.320
can feel through my feet, I suspect the
42
00:01:35.320 --> 00:01:36.840
vibrations might go all the way through the
43
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:38.280
desk and all the way up the microphone and
44
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:40.120
we'll occasionally get bang, bang, bang,
45
00:01:40.120 --> 00:01:41.920
drill, drill, drill. So, yeah, I know.
46
00:01:42.160 --> 00:01:44.160
Consider it like we've got a craft work gig
47
00:01:44.160 --> 00:01:45.920
going on or something like that.
48
00:01:45.920 --> 00:01:47.880
Andrew Dunkley: Well, I can tell you we've, we've heard worse
49
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:50.520
from Fred's house. So, yeah, it should, it
50
00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:52.120
shouldn't sound out of the ordinary, to be
51
00:01:52.120 --> 00:01:52.560
honest.
52
00:01:53.680 --> 00:01:55.880
All right, let's get, stuck into these
53
00:01:55.880 --> 00:01:57.600
stories because we've got a lot to talk
54
00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:00.200
about. This first one, I know you sent me
55
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:02.850
the, information initially that came from, I
56
00:02:02.850 --> 00:02:05.450
believe, one of your students who's overseas.
57
00:02:05.450 --> 00:02:08.330
But this is, an idea of a Californian company
58
00:02:08.330 --> 00:02:10.320
who is applying to the federal,
59
00:02:11.070 --> 00:02:12.750
communications commission in the United
60
00:02:12.750 --> 00:02:15.190
States, the fcc, for permission to launch a
61
00:02:15.190 --> 00:02:17.710
satellite into space to reflect
62
00:02:18.030 --> 00:02:20.750
sunlight back down on Earth and
63
00:02:20.830 --> 00:02:22.510
charge people for the privilege.
64
00:02:24.230 --> 00:02:27.150
Jonti Horner: Yeah. Now I try very hard to be
65
00:02:27.150 --> 00:02:30.070
even handed and to not be too critical even
66
00:02:30.070 --> 00:02:32.550
when I'm talking About the people who shall
67
00:02:32.550 --> 00:02:33.790
not be named. You know, the ones who are
68
00:02:33.790 --> 00:02:36.570
putting up, Starlink satellites and abusing
69
00:02:36.570 --> 00:02:39.050
colleagues of mine, or people who are
70
00:02:39.050 --> 00:02:41.050
claiming that things that are not aliens are
71
00:02:41.050 --> 00:02:43.050
aliens in order to sell books. You know, I
72
00:02:43.050 --> 00:02:45.970
try and be even handed and it's very
73
00:02:45.970 --> 00:02:48.010
hard to talk about this one without getting a
74
00:02:48.010 --> 00:02:50.890
bit caustic. it reminds me
75
00:02:50.890 --> 00:02:53.650
of the late, great Terry Pratchett, who,
76
00:02:53.650 --> 00:02:55.450
in one of the books was talking about a
77
00:02:55.450 --> 00:02:58.210
certain subset of the landed gentry.
78
00:02:58.210 --> 00:03:00.580
You know, there's, political things going on
79
00:03:00.580 --> 00:03:02.900
and this is a time when the city's under
80
00:03:02.900 --> 00:03:05.700
siege and they're reforming the regiments and
81
00:03:05.700 --> 00:03:08.140
things like this. And it's talking about the
82
00:03:08.140 --> 00:03:09.700
boys who were dropped on their heads as
83
00:03:09.700 --> 00:03:12.180
babies, as this kind of subset of,
84
00:03:12.660 --> 00:03:15.380
you know, nice but dim gentry. Yeah, they're
85
00:03:15.380 --> 00:03:18.340
nice, but they're not all there. And this,
86
00:03:18.340 --> 00:03:20.300
to me, seems like an idea that was dropped on
87
00:03:20.300 --> 00:03:23.220
its head as a baby. It's so
88
00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.860
overwhelmingly dumb that you think it must be
89
00:03:26.860 --> 00:03:29.820
April 1st and it isn't. So the idea
90
00:03:29.820 --> 00:03:31.540
that this company called Reflector Orbital
91
00:03:31.540 --> 00:03:34.500
have. And it's an idea that has
92
00:03:34.500 --> 00:03:36.260
led to them getting tens of millions of
93
00:03:36.260 --> 00:03:38.500
dollars of funding. So it's not like,
94
00:03:39.060 --> 00:03:41.960
yeah, this is. It's
95
00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:43.880
not like these are people in the pub saying,
96
00:03:43.880 --> 00:03:45.840
we've had a few. You know what'd be funny?
97
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:48.040
This is a company taking it seriously.
98
00:03:48.040 --> 00:03:50.320
They're getting interns in, they've got a
99
00:03:50.320 --> 00:03:52.880
very active social media presence and their
100
00:03:52.880 --> 00:03:55.400
whole business is. Isn't it sad that it's
101
00:03:55.400 --> 00:03:57.920
dark at nighttime? Wouldn't it be great if
102
00:03:57.920 --> 00:03:59.800
you could pay somebody and get sunshine
103
00:03:59.800 --> 00:04:02.080
delivered to you at night? And that could
104
00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:03.960
power your solar panels or it could help you
105
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:06.440
grow your crops or, you know, help you
106
00:04:06.440 --> 00:04:08.200
illuminate your sporting event or your
107
00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:10.940
concert. And the idea that
108
00:04:10.940 --> 00:04:12.260
they've got is that they will launch
109
00:04:12.260 --> 00:04:14.740
satellites into low Earth orbit, maybe 400
110
00:04:14.740 --> 00:04:17.260
kilometers up, that will go around the Earth
111
00:04:17.260 --> 00:04:18.860
every 90 minutes. So they're going to be
112
00:04:18.860 --> 00:04:21.100
fleetingly above any given location, above
113
00:04:21.100 --> 00:04:23.620
the horizon for a few minutes. And if you
114
00:04:23.620 --> 00:04:26.060
send them a few of your dollary dues, they
115
00:04:26.060 --> 00:04:28.660
will make their satellite reflect light down
116
00:04:28.900 --> 00:04:31.740
to your location and deliver
117
00:04:31.740 --> 00:04:34.300
sunlight to you. Now, there's all sorts of
118
00:04:34.300 --> 00:04:35.740
problems with this. Firstly, you know, I
119
00:04:35.740 --> 00:04:38.640
live, in Toowoomba. I'm 27 degrees south and
120
00:04:38.640 --> 00:04:41.480
I can see satellites that are about 400 km up
121
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:43.920
in about the first hour after sunset, the
122
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:46.400
first hour before sunrise, the rest of the
123
00:04:46.400 --> 00:04:48.640
night, those satellites are in shadow too. So
124
00:04:48.640 --> 00:04:51.240
there isn't any sun to reflect. Oh.
125
00:04:51.320 --> 00:04:52.840
Andrew Dunkley: So, you know, fair point.
126
00:04:53.400 --> 00:04:55.360
Jonti Horner: Nobody seems to be really mentioning that in
127
00:04:55.360 --> 00:04:57.480
the narrative of how this will work. But even
128
00:04:57.480 --> 00:04:58.920
ignoring that, think about the International
129
00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:00.920
Space Station going overhead. And you can get
130
00:05:00.920 --> 00:05:02.760
predictions of this from wonderful websites
131
00:05:02.760 --> 00:05:05.710
like heavensabove.com and the space
132
00:05:05.710 --> 00:05:07.030
station becomes visible,
133
00:05:08.630 --> 00:05:10.840
passes over, and then goes into the shadow.
134
00:05:10.840 --> 00:05:12.840
And you might get five, six minutes of it
135
00:05:12.840 --> 00:05:15.840
going overhead, if you're lucky. Yeah. And
136
00:05:15.840 --> 00:05:18.480
then it's gone. So you have this idea that
137
00:05:18.480 --> 00:05:20.280
these mirrors, that they're going to launch
138
00:05:20.280 --> 00:05:22.920
at about that altitude, and
139
00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:25.160
if you want them to illuminate a single point
140
00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:26.880
on the ground, they've got to be turning. So
141
00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:29.120
they keep rotating the light to that point as
142
00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:31.870
they pass overhead. Mm. When they're
143
00:05:31.870 --> 00:05:33.950
passed overhead, what do they do? They can't
144
00:05:33.950 --> 00:05:36.910
just turn off the mirror. So is that
145
00:05:36.910 --> 00:05:39.110
suggesting that you're gonna have a beam of
146
00:05:39.110 --> 00:05:41.110
light sweeping across the countryside at
147
00:05:41.110 --> 00:05:44.030
orbital speed? Like when you're trying
148
00:05:44.030 --> 00:05:45.870
to entertain a cat and you're shining a laser
149
00:05:45.870 --> 00:05:47.230
pointer on the floor and the cat's chasing
150
00:05:47.230 --> 00:05:48.680
it, you've got a beam going across the Earth.
151
00:05:48.680 --> 00:05:51.330
yeah. Going across the skies of all these
152
00:05:51.330 --> 00:05:54.330
people who didn't pay for the service. Not
153
00:05:54.330 --> 00:05:56.020
just that, how do you get enough sunlight
154
00:05:56.020 --> 00:05:58.960
down to be functional? So
155
00:05:58.960 --> 00:06:00.800
these satellites are going to be small enough
156
00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:03.200
to launch. So you're talking about a mirror a
157
00:06:03.200 --> 00:06:06.160
few meters across, 400 kilometers away,
158
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:08.160
trying to reflect sunlight down, and they,
159
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:11.000
they talk about how the diameter of the
160
00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:13.600
beam will be about 5km across.
161
00:06:14.880 --> 00:06:17.160
So that means if I pay for them to deliver
162
00:06:17.160 --> 00:06:19.320
light to my backyard, anybody in a five
163
00:06:19.320 --> 00:06:22.040
kilometer diameter area around me also get
164
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:24.000
illuminated as well, for free, whether they
165
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:24.960
want to or not.
166
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:26.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, but not just that.
167
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:27.960
Jonti Horner: The light's not going to be that bright,
168
00:06:27.960 --> 00:06:30.200
because if you've got a 1 meter sized mirror
169
00:06:30.520 --> 00:06:32.560
reflecting sunlight, and then you spread that
170
00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:35.320
light over an area that is 5km in diameter,
171
00:06:35.720 --> 00:06:37.920
you're spreading that light awfully thin. So
172
00:06:37.920 --> 00:06:40.640
any area on the ground there is not going to
173
00:06:40.640 --> 00:06:43.000
see broad daylight. They're going to see
174
00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:45.040
something that is comparable in brightness or
175
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:46.760
a few times brighter than the full moon,
176
00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:50.320
which is. Okay, that's enough light for you
177
00:06:50.320 --> 00:06:52.360
to go out and do something in the backyard
178
00:06:52.360 --> 00:06:54.160
by. But it's not particularly enough light to
179
00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:56.740
get really effective solar power from. So if
180
00:06:56.740 --> 00:06:58.460
you want to make this effective, you're going
181
00:06:58.460 --> 00:07:01.460
to have to launch hundreds of thousands
182
00:07:01.540 --> 00:07:04.220
of these mirrors, all to work in
183
00:07:04.220 --> 00:07:06.580
concert to beam towards a given location,
184
00:07:07.220 --> 00:07:09.980
which doesn't sound that feasible. Add to
185
00:07:09.980 --> 00:07:11.580
that the fact that these are Big floating
186
00:07:11.580 --> 00:07:14.380
targets in space that space debris can hit
187
00:07:14.380 --> 00:07:17.220
and smash, which means that a, you could
188
00:07:17.220 --> 00:07:18.940
get all this debris scattered off in all
189
00:07:18.940 --> 00:07:21.660
sorts of different directions, but also that
190
00:07:21.660 --> 00:07:23.180
it's going to be hard for them to control the
191
00:07:23.180 --> 00:07:25.760
direction the mirror's pointing. So you've
192
00:07:25.760 --> 00:07:27.440
got all sorts of problems here. I mean, I
193
00:07:27.440 --> 00:07:29.760
think there's growing and
194
00:07:29.760 --> 00:07:32.360
demonstrated evidence, and Fred's talked
195
00:07:32.360 --> 00:07:34.240
about this to death, about all the negative
196
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.960
effects artificial light at night has. We've
197
00:07:36.960 --> 00:07:38.720
got effects on people. You've got increased
198
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:41.360
cancer rates, a very bizarre but
199
00:07:41.440 --> 00:07:44.120
very significant link between light at night
200
00:07:44.120 --> 00:07:45.960
and an increased risk of breast cancer for
201
00:07:45.960 --> 00:07:48.040
women. Believe it or not, just as one
202
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:50.320
example, you've got the impact in our
203
00:07:50.320 --> 00:07:52.600
circadian rhythms, the fact that we need it
204
00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:55.510
to be dark to sleep, then you've got all the
205
00:07:55.590 --> 00:07:57.990
impact on flora and fauna. Now, I've visited
206
00:07:57.990 --> 00:07:59.830
some wonderful places on the coast of
207
00:07:59.990 --> 00:08:02.510
Queensland to do outreach sessions, you know,
208
00:08:02.510 --> 00:08:04.790
some kind of night sky observing. And a lot
209
00:08:04.790 --> 00:08:06.510
of these places are places where turtles
210
00:08:06.510 --> 00:08:09.509
nest. In fact, I'm going next weekend to the
211
00:08:09.509 --> 00:08:11.270
wonderful Lady Elliot island on the reef to
212
00:08:11.270 --> 00:08:13.030
do some outreach. And I go there several
213
00:08:13.030 --> 00:08:15.590
times a year. And all of their resort is
214
00:08:15.590 --> 00:08:18.310
designed to keep light down and pointed at
215
00:08:18.310 --> 00:08:19.790
the ground and have lights that get turned
216
00:08:19.790 --> 00:08:22.330
off because baby turtles, when they hatch,
217
00:08:23.210 --> 00:08:25.650
they navigate to the ocean by looking at the
218
00:08:25.650 --> 00:08:27.850
very faint light on the horizon, light
219
00:08:27.850 --> 00:08:29.790
reflecting off the ocean. And, that's what
220
00:08:29.790 --> 00:08:31.750
sets their internal compass as they start
221
00:08:31.750 --> 00:08:34.670
their lives. And if you have stray light,
222
00:08:34.670 --> 00:08:36.349
they go the wrong way and they end up under
223
00:08:36.349 --> 00:08:38.430
the buildings and on the road and things like
224
00:08:38.430 --> 00:08:41.190
this. Yeah, so there's huge impacts on life.
225
00:08:41.830 --> 00:08:44.390
But I think the biggest concern about this is
226
00:08:44.390 --> 00:08:46.700
the safety aspect. You know, you're driving
227
00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:48.780
around and I know here in regional Australia,
228
00:08:48.860 --> 00:08:50.740
most of our roads don't have street lights
229
00:08:50.740 --> 00:08:52.740
and that's perfectly fine. It's safer. As
230
00:08:52.740 --> 00:08:54.980
such, you drive along with your full beam on
231
00:08:54.980 --> 00:08:56.500
and any kangaroo that you see, you've got
232
00:08:56.500 --> 00:08:58.660
room to do something about it. So you're
233
00:08:58.660 --> 00:09:00.580
driving along on this pitch black road and,
234
00:09:00.530 --> 00:09:02.290
suddenly from nowhere, something brighter
235
00:09:02.290 --> 00:09:04.210
than the full moon shines full head on in
236
00:09:04.210 --> 00:09:06.890
your view. You're dazzled. That's
237
00:09:06.890 --> 00:09:09.130
hugely dangerous. Odd enough, if you're
238
00:09:09.130 --> 00:09:10.810
driving on the ground, if you're a pilot
239
00:09:10.810 --> 00:09:13.000
coming in to land, and suddenly somebody's
240
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:15.880
trying to spotlight in your face, that's not
241
00:09:15.880 --> 00:09:18.440
going to be a particularly pleasant outcome
242
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:21.160
for you and the passengers in your plane. And
243
00:09:21.160 --> 00:09:23.560
so there's all these issues there that
244
00:09:24.040 --> 00:09:26.040
any one of them will be enough for you to
245
00:09:26.040 --> 00:09:29.040
say, this is a really foolish idea. It
246
00:09:29.040 --> 00:09:31.200
is not something that is likely to work
247
00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:33.920
anyway, but it's a really foolish
248
00:09:33.920 --> 00:09:35.640
idea from the ground up. It's only going to
249
00:09:35.640 --> 00:09:37.720
work near twilight. You're going to have to
250
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:39.560
launch thousands of satellites to make it
251
00:09:39.560 --> 00:09:42.350
work, but it isn't stopping people funding
252
00:09:42.350 --> 00:09:44.160
them. And, this company, like I say, has
253
00:09:44.160 --> 00:09:47.000
applied to the FCC in the US for
254
00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:48.880
permission to launch the first of these
255
00:09:48.880 --> 00:09:50.800
satellites, which they've named Earundel 1
256
00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:52.960
after the light from Lord of the Rings.
257
00:09:53.520 --> 00:09:56.359
Earundel 1. They're hoping to launch April,
258
00:09:56.359 --> 00:09:59.240
May time next year, 2026, to
259
00:09:59.240 --> 00:10:02.080
demonstrate that their wonderful great idea
260
00:10:02.080 --> 00:10:05.080
can work. And it's just yet another example
261
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.440
of this kind of Wild west scenario we've got
262
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:09.440
with the use of space around the Earth, where
263
00:10:09.910 --> 00:10:12.270
the use of space is really outstripping our
264
00:10:12.270 --> 00:10:14.470
ability to regulate and control that use.
265
00:10:14.950 --> 00:10:16.280
And, people are doing things because it
266
00:10:16.280 --> 00:10:17.960
seemed like a good idea at the time without
267
00:10:17.960 --> 00:10:20.240
any real thought about the practicality of
268
00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:22.790
it, whether it could work. And, normally you
269
00:10:22.790 --> 00:10:24.390
just think like, say you think this is an
270
00:10:24.390 --> 00:10:27.350
April Fool's Day kind of prank. But the
271
00:10:27.350 --> 00:10:29.670
fact that this company has raised tens of
272
00:10:29.670 --> 00:10:31.110
millions of dollars in kind of venture
273
00:10:31.110 --> 00:10:32.290
capital, it's supported by A M
274
00:10:32.510 --> 00:10:35.320
multibillionaire, is really, really
275
00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:37.360
concerning. And that's why a group of
276
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:39.600
astronomers, including Jessica Heim, who's
277
00:10:39.600 --> 00:10:42.520
doing a PhD with me at UNISQ, have put
278
00:10:42.520 --> 00:10:45.160
out this fact sheet with lots of information,
279
00:10:45.320 --> 00:10:47.820
loads of links, number of astronomers in the
280
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:49.980
US who people in the media can contact for
281
00:10:49.980 --> 00:10:52.820
more information and suggestions about what
282
00:10:52.820 --> 00:10:55.500
people can do to flag up how catastrophically
283
00:10:55.500 --> 00:10:57.660
dumb this is. And that includes submit
284
00:10:57.660 --> 00:10:59.580
comments on the application to the Federal
285
00:10:59.580 --> 00:11:02.170
Communications Commission in the US to demand
286
00:11:02.170 --> 00:11:04.450
an environmental review of reflected light
287
00:11:04.450 --> 00:11:06.250
from orbit. Contact government
288
00:11:06.250 --> 00:11:08.690
representatives, particularly in the US but
289
00:11:08.690 --> 00:11:10.970
also locally where you live, to try and raise
290
00:11:10.970 --> 00:11:13.490
noise about this, but also tell people about
291
00:11:13.490 --> 00:11:15.850
it and point out how dumb it is. Because I
292
00:11:15.850 --> 00:11:17.769
can understand that if you don't really think
293
00:11:17.769 --> 00:11:20.090
about this too much, you can think, yeah,
294
00:11:20.090 --> 00:11:21.570
there are times it'd be really nice to have a
295
00:11:21.570 --> 00:11:23.250
bit of extra light at night.
296
00:11:23.250 --> 00:11:24.690
I didn't get round to doing the gardening.
297
00:11:24.690 --> 00:11:26.210
It'd be good to mow the lawn tonight.
298
00:11:26.290 --> 00:11:27.930
Wouldn't it be great if I could just turn on
299
00:11:27.930 --> 00:11:29.690
the spotlight and have half an hour of my
300
00:11:29.690 --> 00:11:32.660
backyard being daily, at night for me to do
301
00:11:32.660 --> 00:11:35.620
that job? And you need to talk about it and
302
00:11:35.620 --> 00:11:37.580
you need to think about it to see why this is
303
00:11:37.580 --> 00:11:40.540
just so catastrophically dumb. In
304
00:11:40.540 --> 00:11:43.460
so, so many ways that you would have thought
305
00:11:43.460 --> 00:11:46.220
it'd be an unstarter, but yet they're getting
306
00:11:46.220 --> 00:11:46.540
money.
307
00:11:47.500 --> 00:11:49.980
Andrew Dunkley: I can't see or understand
308
00:11:50.780 --> 00:11:53.180
any logic in this. And,
309
00:11:54.050 --> 00:11:56.370
the way in low Earth orbit, as you said,
310
00:11:56.370 --> 00:11:58.010
there's only going to be a few minutes of
311
00:11:58.010 --> 00:12:00.330
light. It's not like they can light a stadium
312
00:12:00.330 --> 00:12:03.150
for four hours straight. Not yet, any. But,
313
00:12:03.600 --> 00:12:05.420
even if they could, that's going to take a
314
00:12:05.420 --> 00:12:07.940
lot of hardware up in space. And there's more
315
00:12:07.940 --> 00:12:09.380
light pollution on Earth.
316
00:12:09.380 --> 00:12:10.260
Jonti Horner: Which is a big problem.
317
00:12:10.610 --> 00:12:12.930
Andrew Dunkley: Fred and Marnie are so heavily involved in
318
00:12:12.930 --> 00:12:15.370
the Dark Skies project. This would just blow
319
00:12:15.370 --> 00:12:16.290
that out of the water.
320
00:12:16.690 --> 00:12:18.489
Jonti Horner: Well, it would. And I mean, to light that
321
00:12:18.489 --> 00:12:20.370
stadium for four hours, you would need
322
00:12:20.850 --> 00:12:23.650
mirrors going overhead continuously in a
323
00:12:23.650 --> 00:12:26.250
parade. You'd need that stadium to be near
324
00:12:26.250 --> 00:12:28.330
enough to the pole on it to be summertime
325
00:12:28.330 --> 00:12:31.300
that those satellites were always in sunlight
326
00:12:31.380 --> 00:12:33.020
or you'd need to put them further from the
327
00:12:33.020 --> 00:12:35.020
Earth. The further you move them from the
328
00:12:35.020 --> 00:12:37.220
Earth, the more spread out the light will be,
329
00:12:37.620 --> 00:12:39.580
and so therefore the more satellites you'll
330
00:12:39.580 --> 00:12:42.580
need, you know. And if you get
331
00:12:42.580 --> 00:12:44.340
to that stage, if you've got that many
332
00:12:44.340 --> 00:12:46.140
satellites in orbit around the Earth, you may
333
00:12:46.140 --> 00:12:48.940
as well build a mirror that
334
00:12:48.940 --> 00:12:51.820
is held in geostationary orbit that covers
335
00:12:51.820 --> 00:12:54.320
half of the size of the Earth, and bears the
336
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:55.920
entirety of that side of the Earth in
337
00:12:55.920 --> 00:12:58.100
sunlight. And, you know, while you're at it,
338
00:12:58.100 --> 00:12:59.260
you're increasing the amount of heat coming
339
00:12:59.260 --> 00:13:00.540
to the Earth and we'll just speed up global
340
00:13:00.540 --> 00:13:01.860
warming and kill everybody.
341
00:13:03.060 --> 00:13:05.980
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, there is a groundswell of discontent,
342
00:13:05.980 --> 00:13:08.540
as you mentioned. So people are starting to
343
00:13:08.540 --> 00:13:10.820
make some noise about this. I hope the fcc,
344
00:13:13.180 --> 00:13:15.100
you know, looks at both sides of the story.
345
00:13:15.700 --> 00:13:18.700
how, just quickly, how likely are they
346
00:13:18.700 --> 00:13:21.650
to get their license and start testing
347
00:13:21.650 --> 00:13:21.930
this?
348
00:13:22.250 --> 00:13:24.130
Jonti Horner: I mean, a pessimist would say it's almost
349
00:13:24.130 --> 00:13:26.210
certain to happen because, you know, the FCC
350
00:13:26.210 --> 00:13:28.690
are quite happy for sailing to be putting up
351
00:13:28.690 --> 00:13:30.490
the number of satellites. They are looking at
352
00:13:30.490 --> 00:13:33.250
42,000 long term. So it
353
00:13:33.250 --> 00:13:35.450
doesn't seem like there's much thought of
354
00:13:35.450 --> 00:13:37.850
that. And there's the added concern. I think
355
00:13:37.850 --> 00:13:39.330
one of the things that is hindering
356
00:13:39.330 --> 00:13:41.730
legislation is the fact that you can launch
357
00:13:41.730 --> 00:13:44.210
the space from many, many countries. And so
358
00:13:44.210 --> 00:13:46.260
companies can quite rightly say to, a given
359
00:13:46.260 --> 00:13:48.660
legislating body, if you don't give us this,
360
00:13:48.660 --> 00:13:50.700
we'll just take our business elsewhere and
361
00:13:50.700 --> 00:13:53.340
someone else will. And, you know, once you're
362
00:13:53.340 --> 00:13:55.700
launched from a given country, you're above
363
00:13:56.100 --> 00:13:58.420
all of the countries of the world as you move
364
00:13:58.420 --> 00:14:00.460
over them in your orbit. So it isn't like
365
00:14:00.460 --> 00:14:02.180
this thing is just going to affect people in
366
00:14:02.180 --> 00:14:03.660
the U.S. because it's been launched from the
367
00:14:03.660 --> 00:14:05.530
U.S. it's going to be going around the Earth,
368
00:14:05.530 --> 00:14:08.290
like say, running a five kilometer size beam
369
00:14:08.290 --> 00:14:10.920
of light across the surface of the earth,
370
00:14:11.270 --> 00:14:13.190
every 90 minutes as it goes round and round
371
00:14:13.190 --> 00:14:14.070
and round and round.
372
00:14:14.870 --> 00:14:17.030
Andrew Dunkley: It just doesn't, doesn't make much sense
373
00:14:17.030 --> 00:14:19.720
really. It sounds like pie in the sky. But,
374
00:14:20.070 --> 00:14:22.750
yeah, they're actually seriously considering
375
00:14:22.750 --> 00:14:25.420
doing this. And yeah, hopefully
376
00:14:25.420 --> 00:14:28.010
common sense will prevail, but, time will
377
00:14:28.010 --> 00:14:30.290
tell, I suppose we'll know next year whether
378
00:14:30.290 --> 00:14:32.690
or not they start testing these things.
379
00:14:33.140 --> 00:14:35.620
I know they did do this some years ago
380
00:14:36.180 --> 00:14:38.500
with a mirror array up in space and they,
381
00:14:38.650 --> 00:14:41.130
they lit up a spot on Siberia or something.
382
00:14:43.140 --> 00:14:45.180
yeah, I don't know why they did that then. I
383
00:14:45.180 --> 00:14:47.740
can't remember. But, it was, somewhat
384
00:14:47.740 --> 00:14:49.860
successful, although quite dim. But, This,
385
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:52.660
this just. Yeah, I mean, I don't know where
386
00:14:52.660 --> 00:14:55.610
it stops. there seems to be this,
387
00:14:55.610 --> 00:14:58.490
this constant tug of war between what
388
00:14:58.490 --> 00:15:01.290
we need up there and what we don't need up
389
00:15:01.290 --> 00:15:03.600
there. And the. Yeah,
390
00:15:04.240 --> 00:15:06.040
it's swinging the wrong way at the moment, I
391
00:15:06.040 --> 00:15:08.280
suppose, would be the way to describe it.
392
00:15:08.280 --> 00:15:10.630
But, I dare say this will get a lot more
393
00:15:10.630 --> 00:15:13.430
press and a lot more pushback and maybe the
394
00:15:13.430 --> 00:15:16.360
fcc, will look at the
395
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:17.680
problems associated with this.
396
00:15:18.320 --> 00:15:20.240
Jonti Horner: Really hope so. I mean, it reminds me, and
397
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:22.000
I'm probably paraphrasing terribly, but
398
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:23.680
there's a famous science fiction quote,
399
00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:25.640
something along the lines of, you know, they
400
00:15:25.640 --> 00:15:27.400
spent so much time and effort trying to show
401
00:15:27.400 --> 00:15:28.840
that they could, that they never put any
402
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:31.180
thought into whether they should. It feels
403
00:15:31.180 --> 00:15:31.980
like all of those.
404
00:15:32.300 --> 00:15:35.170
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, yes, indeed. All right. yeah, it's
405
00:15:35.170 --> 00:15:37.520
a project, you might find online. It's only
406
00:15:37.520 --> 00:15:39.840
just sort of starting to emerge. I don't know
407
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:41.830
how much press it's got yet, but, it will
408
00:15:41.830 --> 00:15:44.710
grow. Because it's one of those stories that,
409
00:15:45.279 --> 00:15:47.960
is also fascinating and they're the ones that
410
00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:49.200
generally get a lot of attention.
411
00:15:49.520 --> 00:15:51.360
Jonti Horner: Looking at the website, the company seems to
412
00:15:51.360 --> 00:15:52.800
have been around for quite a while and I
413
00:15:52.800 --> 00:15:54.520
think it's probably getting attention now
414
00:15:54.520 --> 00:15:57.350
because previously everybody thought, well,
415
00:15:57.350 --> 00:16:00.230
no, this will never fly. This is clearly not
416
00:16:00.230 --> 00:16:02.470
something we should be worried about. And now
417
00:16:02.470 --> 00:16:04.430
it's very clear that actually it is, because
418
00:16:04.430 --> 00:16:07.350
they're in for licenses and they've got a lot
419
00:16:07.350 --> 00:16:08.270
of money invested.
420
00:16:08.590 --> 00:16:09.030
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
421
00:16:09.030 --> 00:16:09.430
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
422
00:16:09.430 --> 00:16:11.630
Andrew Dunkley: And one wonders who's really going to pay
423
00:16:11.630 --> 00:16:14.430
them to shed a little light on their
424
00:16:14.510 --> 00:16:16.350
whatever. I mean, what would you use it for?
425
00:16:16.910 --> 00:16:18.830
Solar panels. You said they won't work.
426
00:16:19.550 --> 00:16:21.290
Football, matches. Well, we've got lights for
427
00:16:21.290 --> 00:16:23.490
that. I don't know. I don't know.
428
00:16:23.490 --> 00:16:25.370
Jonti Horner: We can do a bit of quick mental arithmetic to
429
00:16:25.370 --> 00:16:27.240
cheer everybody up. I mean, the brightness of
430
00:16:27.390 --> 00:16:30.150
the full moon to first order very roughly, is
431
00:16:30.150 --> 00:16:32.750
about magnitude -12 in the wonderful
432
00:16:32.830 --> 00:16:35.070
complex magnitude system astronomers are so
433
00:16:35.070 --> 00:16:37.710
fond of. The brightness of the noonday sun's
434
00:16:37.710 --> 00:16:40.350
about magnitude -27. So that's a 15
435
00:16:40.350 --> 00:16:43.189
magnitude difference. Now, that magnitude
436
00:16:43.189 --> 00:16:45.990
system is a logarithmic scale.
437
00:16:45.990 --> 00:16:47.950
So every five magnitudes you're brighter off
438
00:16:47.950 --> 00:16:50.270
enter than something is equivalent to a
439
00:16:50.270 --> 00:16:52.990
factor of 100 influx. So if you're
440
00:16:52.990 --> 00:16:55.950
15 magnitudes, that's three lots of 100. So
441
00:16:55.950 --> 00:16:58.930
100 times 100 times 100, that's 100
442
00:16:58.930 --> 00:17:01.250
becomes 10,000 becomes a million.
443
00:17:02.210 --> 00:17:04.570
So if the light from this thing is about the
444
00:17:04.570 --> 00:17:06.450
brightness of the full moon, it's a million
445
00:17:06.450 --> 00:17:08.850
times fainter than the sun is.
446
00:17:09.810 --> 00:17:12.170
So if you've got your solar panels that are
447
00:17:12.170 --> 00:17:15.130
generating in full sunlight, you know, a few
448
00:17:15.130 --> 00:17:17.710
hundred watts of power, right. they're
449
00:17:17.710 --> 00:17:20.230
generating a few hundred watts. Divide that
450
00:17:20.230 --> 00:17:23.030
by a million and you're not
451
00:17:23.030 --> 00:17:25.080
generating enough to register. Yeah,
452
00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:26.360
yeah.
453
00:17:26.440 --> 00:17:28.800
Andrew Dunkley: It would be like putting up a solar panel to
454
00:17:28.800 --> 00:17:31.560
power a light and using that light to
455
00:17:31.720 --> 00:17:33.480
generate the power to power that light.
456
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:36.080
Jonti Horner: It's just absolutely. Or just holding a
457
00:17:36.080 --> 00:17:38.920
match, a lit match near your solar panels and
458
00:17:38.920 --> 00:17:41.120
expecting it to run your entire house. Yeah,
459
00:17:41.120 --> 00:17:41.240
yeah.
460
00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:43.670
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, it's crazy stuff. All right, yeah, keep
461
00:17:43.670 --> 00:17:45.630
an eye out for that story and if you feel
462
00:17:45.630 --> 00:17:47.860
strongly enough about it, maybe, get
463
00:17:47.860 --> 00:17:48.460
involved.
464
00:17:49.010 --> 00:17:50.900
let's move on to our next story. this
465
00:17:50.900 --> 00:17:53.540
involves a near miss for Earth with asteroid,
466
00:17:54.040 --> 00:17:56.660
2025 TF just skimming us,
467
00:17:56.980 --> 00:17:59.780
and we didn't see it till it was too late,
468
00:18:00.100 --> 00:18:02.510
technically speaking. And, it kind of
469
00:18:02.510 --> 00:18:05.230
dovetails into the previous story because if
470
00:18:05.230 --> 00:18:07.630
there's going to be more light up there, it's
471
00:18:07.630 --> 00:18:09.710
going to make us harder, make things harder
472
00:18:09.710 --> 00:18:11.780
for us in terms of, you know, getting these
473
00:18:11.780 --> 00:18:14.420
ready alerts for potential objects that could
474
00:18:14.420 --> 00:18:17.230
strike Earth. this one wasn't huge,
475
00:18:17.310 --> 00:18:20.260
but, yeah, it was, it was there and
476
00:18:20.260 --> 00:18:22.420
it was a detectable object and we didn't see
477
00:18:22.420 --> 00:18:22.700
it.
478
00:18:22.940 --> 00:18:25.820
Jonti Horner: Yes. And that's the issue. Now, this
479
00:18:25.820 --> 00:18:28.540
thing, you know, quite happy to say, straight
480
00:18:28.540 --> 00:18:30.940
up the size of this thing is such that it
481
00:18:30.940 --> 00:18:32.780
would have put on a nice light show as it,
482
00:18:32.940 --> 00:18:35.020
you know, was quite harmlessly destroyed in
483
00:18:35.020 --> 00:18:37.020
the atmosphere. It was probably about 1 to 3
484
00:18:37.020 --> 00:18:37.740
meters across.
485
00:18:38.060 --> 00:18:38.500
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
486
00:18:38.500 --> 00:18:40.740
Jonti Horner: But of the things that have not entered the
487
00:18:40.740 --> 00:18:43.540
Earth's atmosphere, but have come close, this
488
00:18:43.540 --> 00:18:45.900
is the second closest on record. Now,
489
00:18:46.700 --> 00:18:48.820
back in. I'm trying to remember exactly when
490
00:18:48.820 --> 00:18:50.700
the great daylight fireball was. But in the
491
00:18:50.700 --> 00:18:53.660
early 1970s, there was a fireball
492
00:18:54.060 --> 00:18:56.740
observed widely over, North America, which
493
00:18:56.740 --> 00:18:59.180
was what we call an earth grazing object, and
494
00:18:59.180 --> 00:19:00.780
it actually hit the atmosphere and skimmed
495
00:19:00.780 --> 00:19:03.500
back out. That is not counted when people
496
00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:05.660
talk about these two closest encounters that
497
00:19:05.660 --> 00:19:07.340
didn't hit Earth because technically that did
498
00:19:07.340 --> 00:19:09.620
hit the atmosphere. The fact that it skipped
499
00:19:09.620 --> 00:19:12.100
back out again is beside the point.
500
00:19:12.590 --> 00:19:14.630
And that was a daylight fireball. It created
501
00:19:14.630 --> 00:19:16.630
sonic booms over a couple of the US States
502
00:19:16.630 --> 00:19:18.830
and was really the first kind of fireball
503
00:19:18.830 --> 00:19:20.630
event that was widely captured because it was
504
00:19:20.630 --> 00:19:23.590
early in the era of modern holiday
505
00:19:23.590 --> 00:19:25.430
snaps. And this was a time when people were
506
00:19:25.430 --> 00:19:27.310
taking photos on holiday, then boring their
507
00:19:27.310 --> 00:19:28.270
friends when they came home.
508
00:19:28.350 --> 00:19:30.430
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, 1972 it was.
509
00:19:30.750 --> 00:19:32.590
Jonti Horner: That's the one. Yeah, I thought it was. It
510
00:19:32.590 --> 00:19:35.040
was, probably something smaller than a house
511
00:19:35.040 --> 00:19:37.560
that came within about 57 km
512
00:19:37.940 --> 00:19:40.460
of the surface of the Earth. And put that in
513
00:19:40.460 --> 00:19:42.100
perspective, that's like, you know, the old
514
00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:43.740
William Tell thing of shooting an apple off
515
00:19:43.740 --> 00:19:45.780
somebody's head. That's like shooting the
516
00:19:45.780 --> 00:19:47.780
arrow at the apple and touching the skin of
517
00:19:47.780 --> 00:19:50.300
the apple without breaking it. It's coming
518
00:19:50.300 --> 00:19:52.740
within less than 1% of the diameter of the
519
00:19:52.740 --> 00:19:54.900
Earth of actually hitting our planet. This
520
00:19:54.900 --> 00:19:57.660
one wasn't quite that close. But it's an
521
00:19:57.660 --> 00:19:59.980
object that was discovered by the Catalina
522
00:19:59.980 --> 00:20:02.780
Sky Survey a few hours after
523
00:20:02.780 --> 00:20:04.500
its closest approach to the Earth,
524
00:20:05.550 --> 00:20:08.470
basically whizzed over Antarctica. So I think
525
00:20:08.470 --> 00:20:10.190
it's one of those that even if it had hit the
526
00:20:10.190 --> 00:20:11.790
atmosphere and burned up, very few people
527
00:20:11.790 --> 00:20:13.350
would have seen it, but a lot of penguins
528
00:20:13.350 --> 00:20:16.160
would have been impressed. at
529
00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:19.160
its closest, it was 428km above the
530
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:21.400
Earth's surface. So that's slightly closer
531
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:23.760
than reflector orbital. Want to put their
532
00:20:23.760 --> 00:20:25.990
mirrors. so if it had come through a few
533
00:20:25.990 --> 00:20:27.270
years later, we could have hoped it would
534
00:20:27.270 --> 00:20:28.670
have knocked a few of them out of the way.
535
00:20:28.670 --> 00:20:31.450
But it's a really close approach.
536
00:20:31.690 --> 00:20:33.880
And, yes, it's an object that in this case
537
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:35.680
wouldn't have been big enough to cause any
538
00:20:35.760 --> 00:20:38.600
damage, wouldn't have had any impacts felt at
539
00:20:38.600 --> 00:20:41.240
ground level. It may have, if it was made of
540
00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:42.840
the right stuff, dropped a few little bits of
541
00:20:42.840 --> 00:20:45.240
meteorite on the surface, but that's about
542
00:20:45.240 --> 00:20:47.320
it. But it's a reminder,
543
00:20:48.070 --> 00:20:50.230
of the fact that as we're looking for things
544
00:20:50.310 --> 00:20:52.040
that come close enough to the Earth, to pose
545
00:20:52.040 --> 00:20:54.840
a threat. We haven't found them all yet.
546
00:20:54.840 --> 00:20:57.730
Now probably about 75% of the threat
547
00:20:57.730 --> 00:20:59.140
to the Earth, from impacts comes from the
548
00:20:59.140 --> 00:21:01.540
near Earth asteroids. And they're objects at
549
00:21:01.540 --> 00:21:04.140
the bottom of the asteroid belt, typically
550
00:21:04.140 --> 00:21:06.820
rocky or metallic objects moving on orbits at
551
00:21:06.820 --> 00:21:08.820
a relatively short period in the inner solar
552
00:21:08.820 --> 00:21:10.580
system. And they're short lived. You know, if
553
00:21:10.580 --> 00:21:12.380
you come back in a million years, most of the
554
00:21:12.380 --> 00:21:14.300
ones we currently know will have been
555
00:21:14.300 --> 00:21:15.820
removed. They'll have been ejected from the
556
00:21:15.820 --> 00:21:17.740
solar system or collided with a planet or
557
00:21:17.740 --> 00:21:20.020
fallen apart or fallen into the sun. But
558
00:21:20.020 --> 00:21:21.980
they're continually being repopulated from
559
00:21:21.980 --> 00:21:24.780
the asteroid belt. Some of them hide
560
00:21:24.780 --> 00:21:26.660
closer to the sun than we are and then pop
561
00:21:26.660 --> 00:21:28.420
out to say hello. We were talking about that
562
00:21:28.420 --> 00:21:30.300
last week with the objects near Venus.
563
00:21:31.500 --> 00:21:33.460
But there's this effort to try and find all
564
00:21:33.460 --> 00:21:36.460
of them. And the earlier you can find them,
565
00:21:36.460 --> 00:21:38.859
and the earlier you can figure out if there's
566
00:21:38.859 --> 00:21:40.980
going to be an encounter with the Earth that
567
00:21:40.980 --> 00:21:43.300
poses a threat, the better the odds of you
568
00:21:43.300 --> 00:21:45.700
doing something about it. And we saw this
569
00:21:46.100 --> 00:21:48.100
kind of a bright light shone on this back at
570
00:21:48.100 --> 00:21:50.180
the start of 2025 with the object
571
00:21:50.960 --> 00:21:53.280
2024 yr 4. I think the name M was
572
00:21:53.680 --> 00:21:55.440
that for a while we thought had a
573
00:21:56.080 --> 00:21:58.080
substantial possibility of hitting the Earth
574
00:21:58.080 --> 00:22:01.040
in 2032 that we now know is not going to
575
00:22:01.040 --> 00:22:02.440
hit the Earth, but might hit the moon in
576
00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:04.680
2032. And that was a big success because we
577
00:22:04.680 --> 00:22:06.480
found it early enough to get a lot of data.
578
00:22:06.490 --> 00:22:07.830
and over the course of about a month
579
00:22:07.830 --> 00:22:10.550
astronomers observed it repeatedly until
580
00:22:10.550 --> 00:22:12.190
eventually we showed that it definitely
581
00:22:12.190 --> 00:22:13.790
wasn't going to hit the Earth in eight year
582
00:22:13.790 --> 00:22:15.910
time. And everybody kind of basically jumped
583
00:22:15.910 --> 00:22:17.270
up and down and said hooray. And there was
584
00:22:17.270 --> 00:22:19.720
much rejoicing. So that's like the ideal
585
00:22:19.720 --> 00:22:22.320
scenario. We find something when it passes
586
00:22:22.320 --> 00:22:25.280
relatively nearby on one apparition a
587
00:22:25.280 --> 00:22:27.600
few years before it would realistically pose
588
00:22:27.600 --> 00:22:30.200
a threat. And that's what we want to achieve.
589
00:22:30.280 --> 00:22:32.920
And the stated goal of a lot of the agencies
590
00:22:32.920 --> 00:22:34.520
looking for these things is to find all the
591
00:22:34.520 --> 00:22:36.600
objects bigger than about 100 meters across
592
00:22:37.160 --> 00:22:38.650
that could pose a threat to the Earth, and
593
00:22:38.650 --> 00:22:41.570
catalog them. And we haven't managed
594
00:22:41.570 --> 00:22:44.330
that yet. We even more haven't managed that
595
00:22:44.330 --> 00:22:45.930
when you take into account things like
596
00:22:45.930 --> 00:22:47.700
comets. You know we were talking about, about
597
00:22:47.700 --> 00:22:50.260
Comet Swan last week, which appeared from
598
00:22:50.580 --> 00:22:52.820
hiding behind the sun and came and was
599
00:22:52.820 --> 00:22:54.500
suddenly the brightest comet in the sky.
600
00:22:54.980 --> 00:22:56.940
Comets are coming in on orbits that take
601
00:22:56.940 --> 00:22:59.020
hundreds, thousands, sometimes even tens of
602
00:22:59.020 --> 00:23:00.900
thousands or millions of years to complete.
603
00:23:01.220 --> 00:23:02.740
So even if we find all the near Earth
604
00:23:02.740 --> 00:23:05.020
asteroids, we're still going to have comets
605
00:23:05.020 --> 00:23:06.940
coming in. So we'll have to stay vigilant and
606
00:23:06.940 --> 00:23:09.820
keep watching forevermore. But this
607
00:23:09.820 --> 00:23:12.300
is a really good reminder that despite how
608
00:23:12.300 --> 00:23:15.070
you feel, we're not there yet. We are still
609
00:23:15.070 --> 00:23:17.910
in a position where these things are
610
00:23:17.910 --> 00:23:20.030
catching us by surprise. And the worst case
611
00:23:20.030 --> 00:23:22.270
scenario is what happened in 2013 with the
612
00:23:22.270 --> 00:23:24.750
Chelyabinsk impactor to a similar
613
00:23:24.990 --> 00:23:27.070
level of what happened with comets 1 earlier
614
00:23:27.070 --> 00:23:28.829
this year in that as, ah, the object
615
00:23:28.829 --> 00:23:30.510
approaches the Earth and eventually gets
616
00:23:30.510 --> 00:23:32.310
close enough that it was visible in the
617
00:23:32.310 --> 00:23:34.190
nighttime sky, would be able to detect it.
618
00:23:34.590 --> 00:23:36.470
It's coming from the sunward side of the
619
00:23:36.470 --> 00:23:37.770
Earth, so it's hidden in the glare of
620
00:23:37.770 --> 00:23:40.540
daylight. And so that's why you
621
00:23:40.540 --> 00:23:42.340
don't want to try and detect something the
622
00:23:42.500 --> 00:23:44.820
moment it's on an approach to hit you. You
623
00:23:44.820 --> 00:23:47.020
want to find it well in advance. And with
624
00:23:47.020 --> 00:23:48.740
Charlie Abinsky, it demonstrated something
625
00:23:48.740 --> 00:23:51.060
big enough to injure people, damage a city
626
00:23:51.780 --> 00:23:53.420
we didn't find until it was in the
627
00:23:53.420 --> 00:23:55.540
atmosphere. And it was kind of too late. It
628
00:23:55.540 --> 00:23:56.660
was seconds from disaster.
629
00:23:57.060 --> 00:23:57.620
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed.
630
00:23:58.020 --> 00:24:00.940
Jonti Horner: Now there's hope. We've got Vera Rubin
631
00:24:00.940 --> 00:24:02.700
coming online. We saw a beautiful picture
632
00:24:02.700 --> 00:24:05.080
from that earlier this year. Vera Rubin's
633
00:24:05.080 --> 00:24:06.750
going to start getting data regularly,
634
00:24:07.340 --> 00:24:09.500
continuously later this year, early next
635
00:24:09.500 --> 00:24:11.500
year, that's when the Mayan mission starts.
636
00:24:11.500 --> 00:24:13.420
And Vera Rubin is going to be an exceptional
637
00:24:13.900 --> 00:24:16.420
thing finding tool no matter what. The thing
638
00:24:16.420 --> 00:24:18.340
is, it will find more of them than anybody's
639
00:24:18.340 --> 00:24:20.620
found before. From a solar system point of
640
00:24:20.620 --> 00:24:22.300
view. We're really excited because it will
641
00:24:22.620 --> 00:24:24.820
increase the number of objects we know by a
642
00:24:24.820 --> 00:24:27.020
factor of several to an order of magnitude
643
00:24:27.020 --> 00:24:29.380
within a year or two. And it'll be great at
644
00:24:29.380 --> 00:24:32.360
finding these things, but it'll be less
645
00:24:32.360 --> 00:24:34.360
great than it would have been thanks to all
646
00:24:34.360 --> 00:24:35.280
the stuff we keep watching.
647
00:24:35.280 --> 00:24:36.960
Then this is where it ties into the previous
648
00:24:37.120 --> 00:24:40.000
story. Also ties in again to the wonderful
649
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:42.400
student who sent me the information about the
650
00:24:42.400 --> 00:24:44.480
reflector orbital stuff. Jessica Heim
651
00:24:45.360 --> 00:24:47.920
is finishing up her PhD with us at UNESCO.
652
00:24:47.920 --> 00:24:50.560
She's based in North America and she's
653
00:24:50.800 --> 00:24:53.200
done a lot of her work about light pollution
654
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:55.710
and artificial, light at night and things
655
00:24:55.710 --> 00:24:57.750
like this. And one of her papers early in a
656
00:24:57.750 --> 00:25:00.740
PhD that she was a co author on was in
657
00:25:00.740 --> 00:25:02.860
Nature Astronomy. And they actually did a
658
00:25:02.860 --> 00:25:05.500
study looking at just the starlink satellites
659
00:25:05.500 --> 00:25:07.140
that were in orbit at that time, so not the
660
00:25:07.140 --> 00:25:10.060
predicted number in the future, and tried to
661
00:25:10.060 --> 00:25:13.020
quantify how much harder they would make
662
00:25:13.020 --> 00:25:14.700
life for Vera Rubin, and particularly how
663
00:25:14.700 --> 00:25:16.620
much harder they make it for Vera Rubin to
664
00:25:16.620 --> 00:25:18.100
find objects like the one we're just talking
665
00:25:18.100 --> 00:25:20.380
about that was over Antarctica.
666
00:25:21.180 --> 00:25:23.780
And what they found was the Starlink
667
00:25:23.780 --> 00:25:25.710
satellites that were in orbit at the time. So
668
00:25:25.710 --> 00:25:27.590
not the constellation we have now, which is
669
00:25:27.590 --> 00:25:30.190
big and not the final constellation would
670
00:25:30.190 --> 00:25:32.550
make it 10% harder for Vera Rubin to do its
671
00:25:32.550 --> 00:25:33.830
job. So in other words, it would have to
672
00:25:33.830 --> 00:25:36.030
observe for 10% longer. Roughly. I think the
673
00:25:36.030 --> 00:25:37.630
number was actually slightly higher than that
674
00:25:38.510 --> 00:25:40.630
in order to achieve the same results. Now
675
00:25:40.630 --> 00:25:42.390
when you're talking about a facility that's a
676
00:25:42.390 --> 00:25:45.190
billion dollar level facility, hundreds of
677
00:25:45.190 --> 00:25:47.950
millions of dollars to build, having to take
678
00:25:47.950 --> 00:25:50.150
10% longer to do something is a cost measured
679
00:25:50.150 --> 00:25:52.710
in tens of millions of dollars. Yeah, that's
680
00:25:52.710 --> 00:25:54.980
real impact in this. And what it means is
681
00:25:54.980 --> 00:25:56.540
that things like this are going to be harder
682
00:25:56.540 --> 00:25:58.620
to find. And our ability to
683
00:25:59.420 --> 00:26:02.300
detect potential threats is really
684
00:26:02.300 --> 00:26:05.300
kind of confused and obfuscated by the
685
00:26:05.300 --> 00:26:07.300
stuff we're putting to hang around in the
686
00:26:07.300 --> 00:26:09.540
foreground. It's like, I guess it's really
687
00:26:09.540 --> 00:26:11.500
easy to see a road sign on a clear day, but
688
00:26:11.500 --> 00:26:13.740
when it's foggy, it's a lot harder to spot it
689
00:26:13.740 --> 00:26:14.940
until you're right on that side.
690
00:26:15.180 --> 00:26:18.060
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, indeed. And
691
00:26:18.220 --> 00:26:20.630
if you want to read up on that story, about
692
00:26:20.630 --> 00:26:23.101
the near miss, you can do so@space
693
00:26:23.319 --> 00:26:25.860
space.com. this is Space Nuts with Andrew
694
00:26:25.860 --> 00:26:27.980
Dunkley and John T. Horner.
695
00:26:28.620 --> 00:26:30.860
Jonti Horner: Three, two, one.
696
00:26:31.500 --> 00:26:32.700
Andrew Dunkley: Space nuts.
697
00:26:33.100 --> 00:26:35.590
Now, Johnny, we have found the
698
00:26:35.590 --> 00:26:38.270
6,000th exoplanet.
699
00:26:38.350 --> 00:26:40.910
It took us 30 years, which is,
700
00:26:41.470 --> 00:26:43.940
you know, if you, if you look back at when we
701
00:26:43.940 --> 00:26:46.460
found the first one, it was quite a surprise
702
00:26:46.460 --> 00:26:49.310
for a bunch of reasons. mostly because
703
00:26:49.310 --> 00:26:51.550
we didn't even know they could have existed
704
00:26:51.550 --> 00:26:53.830
beyond our solar system. Logic suggests, you
705
00:26:53.830 --> 00:26:56.270
know, if it's. We've got planets around our
706
00:26:56.270 --> 00:26:59.110
sun, other stars must have planets too.
707
00:26:59.750 --> 00:27:02.500
And 30 years ago, that was proven. Well, now
708
00:27:02.500 --> 00:27:04.620
we're up to number 6,000. When are we going
709
00:27:04.620 --> 00:27:06.700
to stop counting? Because it's going to reach
710
00:27:06.700 --> 00:27:08.340
a point where we're going to find millions
711
00:27:08.340 --> 00:27:10.140
upon millions of these things, isn't it?
712
00:27:10.460 --> 00:27:12.370
Jonti Horner: It is. And even the counting's a little bit
713
00:27:12.370 --> 00:27:15.330
confused because the resource I
714
00:27:15.330 --> 00:27:18.130
trust as kind of being the authoritative word
715
00:27:18.130 --> 00:27:20.690
on this is the NASA exoplanet archive, which
716
00:27:20.690 --> 00:27:22.610
is a wonderful resource. And they've got a
717
00:27:22.610 --> 00:27:25.610
certain threshold for what they consider a
718
00:27:25.610 --> 00:27:27.810
confirmed planet. And we've got all these
719
00:27:27.810 --> 00:27:29.970
candidate planets as well, of which there are
720
00:27:29.970 --> 00:27:31.730
thousands more where we're fairly Confident
721
00:27:31.730 --> 00:27:33.410
there's a planet there, but it doesn't meet
722
00:27:33.410 --> 00:27:36.250
that rigorous criterion. There is a
723
00:27:36.250 --> 00:27:38.530
different exoplanet catalog run out of Europe
724
00:27:38.610 --> 00:27:40.490
that has a number higher because they are
725
00:27:40.490 --> 00:27:42.930
less strict on their criterion for
726
00:27:43.330 --> 00:27:45.740
confirmation. part of the reason I'm more
727
00:27:45.740 --> 00:27:47.660
skeptical about that catalog is that there's
728
00:27:47.660 --> 00:27:49.660
a number of planetary systems I've helped to
729
00:27:49.660 --> 00:27:52.020
kill and they've left them in their catalog.
730
00:27:52.180 --> 00:27:53.900
So we know for a fact those planets aren't
731
00:27:53.900 --> 00:27:55.950
there. I did some of that work and they still
732
00:27:55.950 --> 00:27:57.510
include them in their catalog, which puts
733
00:27:57.510 --> 00:27:59.470
them m on my naughty list. So I prefer the
734
00:27:59.470 --> 00:28:02.150
NASA one and the NASA one is the more
735
00:28:02.150 --> 00:28:04.670
cautious of them. It's really
736
00:28:04.670 --> 00:28:06.230
interesting how this has come though. You
737
00:28:06.230 --> 00:28:08.590
know, I'm, I'm 47 now. I don't feel it, but
738
00:28:08.590 --> 00:28:11.410
I'm getting on a little bit. I was a kid who
739
00:28:11.410 --> 00:28:13.370
was mad about astronomy. You know, like some
740
00:28:13.370 --> 00:28:14.850
of the people who send in their questions,
741
00:28:14.850 --> 00:28:16.490
some of the youngsters who send in questions.
742
00:28:16.970 --> 00:28:18.240
And when I was growing up, one of the
743
00:28:18.240 --> 00:28:19.920
questions I'd have been asking is do you
744
00:28:19.920 --> 00:28:21.680
think there are planets around other stars?
745
00:28:22.080 --> 00:28:24.760
We'd had observations from satellites like
746
00:28:24.760 --> 00:28:27.480
IRAS in the 1980s that indicated there was
747
00:28:27.480 --> 00:28:30.480
dust and debris around some stars. But at
748
00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:33.210
the time our models of planet formation fell
749
00:28:33.210 --> 00:28:35.480
into kind of two camps. So whereas what's now
750
00:28:35.480 --> 00:28:37.800
become kind of the standard baseline with
751
00:28:37.800 --> 00:28:39.680
some tweaks, which was that you get a disc of
752
00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:42.340
material around every young star and planets
753
00:28:42.340 --> 00:28:44.500
forming it. So most stars will have planets.
754
00:28:44.900 --> 00:28:47.220
But there was a competing theory that said
755
00:28:47.220 --> 00:28:49.340
that the planets were formed by a very close
756
00:28:49.340 --> 00:28:51.540
encounter between the sun and a passing star
757
00:28:51.940 --> 00:28:54.140
that pulled material out of the sun like a
758
00:28:54.140 --> 00:28:56.700
tongue of material, and the planets formed
759
00:28:56.700 --> 00:28:59.430
from that. and there are people who were
760
00:28:59.430 --> 00:29:02.090
very strong advocates of that. Now
761
00:29:02.090 --> 00:29:04.050
the test of those theories
762
00:29:05.250 --> 00:29:07.530
it would have been, are, ah, there planets
763
00:29:07.530 --> 00:29:09.050
around other stars, Are they common? Because
764
00:29:09.050 --> 00:29:10.930
the idea that two stars get close enough
765
00:29:10.930 --> 00:29:13.410
together to have this tidal interaction pull
766
00:29:13.410 --> 00:29:15.370
out a ton of material and planets form from
767
00:29:15.370 --> 00:29:17.730
that would suggest that planets would be
768
00:29:17.810 --> 00:29:20.010
overwhelmingly rare in the cosmos. So
769
00:29:20.010 --> 00:29:21.650
likelihood of 2 stars getting that close
770
00:29:21.650 --> 00:29:23.090
together and having exactly the right
771
00:29:23.090 --> 00:29:25.850
conditions would mean that planets were
772
00:29:25.850 --> 00:29:28.440
pretty much non existent, that they were a
773
00:29:28.440 --> 00:29:31.320
fluke of nature. The other model
774
00:29:31.320 --> 00:29:33.680
suggested that planets are common. And so one
775
00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:36.400
of the goals in the early 1990s with the
776
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:39.040
search for planets elsewhere was to see
777
00:29:39.040 --> 00:29:40.720
whether there were any at all. And we just
778
00:29:40.720 --> 00:29:43.560
didn't know. The discovery of
779
00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:45.720
three planets around a pulsar in the early
780
00:29:45.720 --> 00:29:48.640
1990s broke everybody's heads. Those
781
00:29:48.640 --> 00:29:50.280
planets have now, incidentally, been called
782
00:29:50.280 --> 00:29:53.160
drow, Phoebeta and poltergeist, which are
783
00:29:53.160 --> 00:29:54.800
names of different types of undead from
784
00:29:54.800 --> 00:29:56.120
different cultures around the world. And I
785
00:29:56.120 --> 00:29:57.560
think that's kind of cute because you've got
786
00:29:57.560 --> 00:30:00.480
zombie planets around a dead star. That's all
787
00:30:00.480 --> 00:30:03.200
good. But 30 years ago, and actually 30 years
788
00:30:03.200 --> 00:30:05.546
ago last week on the 6th of October
789
00:30:05.694 --> 00:30:08.640
1995, we saw the announcement
790
00:30:08.640 --> 00:30:10.960
of the first confirmed planet around a star
791
00:30:10.960 --> 00:30:13.920
like the sun. And that planet was 51 Pegasi
792
00:30:13.920 --> 00:30:16.480
b. So it's a planet going around the south 51
793
00:30:16.480 --> 00:30:19.090
Pegasi. And it immediately broke
794
00:30:19.090 --> 00:30:20.850
everybody's heads because it was not what we
795
00:30:20.850 --> 00:30:23.010
expected. So both our models of planet
796
00:30:23.010 --> 00:30:26.010
formation that were based on a grand total of
797
00:30:26.010 --> 00:30:28.730
one planetary system, our own, predicted
798
00:30:28.730 --> 00:30:30.610
you'd have rocky planets close to the star
799
00:30:30.690 --> 00:30:33.010
and big gas giants a long way from the star,
800
00:30:33.010 --> 00:30:34.490
because that's what we see at home. And that
801
00:30:34.490 --> 00:30:37.010
makes sense. So to find a planet
802
00:30:37.170 --> 00:30:39.410
similar to Jupiter, but going around its star
803
00:30:39.410 --> 00:30:41.770
every four days with a surface temperature in
804
00:30:41.770 --> 00:30:44.690
excess of a thousand degrees C was not
805
00:30:44.690 --> 00:30:46.450
what was expected, I think would be the
806
00:30:46.450 --> 00:30:48.970
polite way to put it. Now, that forced people
807
00:30:48.970 --> 00:30:51.050
to immediately go back and start revisiting
808
00:30:51.050 --> 00:30:53.490
and improving that disk model of planet
809
00:30:53.490 --> 00:30:55.250
formation, which has kind of led us to where
810
00:30:55.250 --> 00:30:57.810
we are now. But that was kind of
811
00:30:57.810 --> 00:31:00.650
fundamental and foundational. For the first
812
00:31:01.290 --> 00:31:03.650
decade or so after that
813
00:31:03.650 --> 00:31:06.650
discovery, new planets were found in dribs
814
00:31:06.650 --> 00:31:08.130
and drabs, and the rate at which they were
815
00:31:08.130 --> 00:31:10.010
discovered gradually increased. And in that
816
00:31:10.010 --> 00:31:12.960
first decade, the best technique for finding
817
00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:14.640
planets, the one that was most successful,
818
00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:16.800
was what we call the radial velocity method,
819
00:31:17.040 --> 00:31:19.280
which Australia really played a leading role
820
00:31:19.280 --> 00:31:21.320
in with the Anglo Australian Planet Search.
821
00:31:21.320 --> 00:31:23.280
There was this beautiful spectrograph
822
00:31:23.280 --> 00:31:25.960
attached to the 3.9 meter telescope at Siding
823
00:31:25.960 --> 00:31:28.400
Spring, which I know Fred loves daily. It's a
824
00:31:28.400 --> 00:31:31.150
real icon of Australian astronomy. And, that
825
00:31:31.150 --> 00:31:33.270
telescope was used to point at one star,
826
00:31:33.510 --> 00:31:35.590
measure that star speed, then point at
827
00:31:35.590 --> 00:31:38.500
another, and gradually survey this collection
828
00:31:38.500 --> 00:31:40.100
of stars and then keep coming back to them
829
00:31:40.100 --> 00:31:41.660
every now and again and measure their speed
830
00:31:41.660 --> 00:31:43.990
again. And, by measuring the speed of these
831
00:31:43.990 --> 00:31:46.630
stars to the level that you can see them
832
00:31:46.630 --> 00:31:49.550
wobbling with changes of
833
00:31:49.550 --> 00:31:51.550
speed measured in a few meters per second. So
834
00:31:51.550 --> 00:31:53.549
comparable to speed, people walk or jog
835
00:31:53.549 --> 00:31:56.110
around stars that are trillions or
836
00:31:56.110 --> 00:31:57.790
quadrillions of kilometers away, measuring
837
00:31:57.790 --> 00:31:59.950
their wobbles to a precision of meters per
838
00:31:59.950 --> 00:32:02.350
second. That just makes my head hurt. But by
839
00:32:02.350 --> 00:32:04.900
doing that, you can spot the telltale wobble
840
00:32:04.900 --> 00:32:07.020
of a star rocking back and forward in space
841
00:32:07.020 --> 00:32:09.860
and infer the presence of a planet. But it's
842
00:32:09.860 --> 00:32:12.820
a really time consuming, challenging
843
00:32:12.820 --> 00:32:14.740
method where you can only observe a few stars
844
00:32:14.740 --> 00:32:15.980
at once, because you've got to gather light
845
00:32:15.980 --> 00:32:18.899
for an hour or more to get enough
846
00:32:18.899 --> 00:32:20.740
light, to get an accurate enough spectrum to
847
00:32:20.740 --> 00:32:22.140
get a single measurement. And you can only
848
00:32:22.140 --> 00:32:24.900
point at one star at once. By
849
00:32:25.140 --> 00:32:27.980
the late part of the first decade of the
850
00:32:27.980 --> 00:32:30.800
21st century, the transit method started to
851
00:32:30.800 --> 00:32:32.560
take over. And this is where we look at a lot
852
00:32:32.560 --> 00:32:35.480
of stars all at once and look for the
853
00:32:35.480 --> 00:32:37.560
few of them that are winking at us. So
854
00:32:37.560 --> 00:32:39.160
they've got a planet going around them that's
855
00:32:39.160 --> 00:32:40.770
lined, up just right that every time it goes
856
00:32:40.770 --> 00:32:42.450
around that star, it will block a bit of that
857
00:32:42.450 --> 00:32:44.490
star's light and the star will dim and then
858
00:32:44.490 --> 00:32:47.450
brighten again. And that started to
859
00:32:47.450 --> 00:32:49.290
take over from the radial velocity method
860
00:32:49.290 --> 00:32:51.330
purely because of the numbers. Again, because
861
00:32:51.330 --> 00:32:53.210
you can look at a large number of stars at
862
00:32:53.210 --> 00:32:56.020
the same time. And even if only
863
00:32:56.020 --> 00:32:58.620
1% of those stars have a planet oriented in
864
00:32:58.620 --> 00:33:00.980
the right direction for you to have it line
865
00:33:00.980 --> 00:33:03.540
up and give us a dip by looking at 100,000
866
00:33:03.540 --> 00:33:05.060
stars at once, you'll have plenty of
867
00:33:05.060 --> 00:33:07.820
candidates. The Kepler spacecraft
868
00:33:07.820 --> 00:33:10.619
launched in about 2008 and became
869
00:33:10.619 --> 00:33:13.380
this first census of the night sky. And
870
00:33:13.380 --> 00:33:15.500
it discovered on its own more than 3,000
871
00:33:15.500 --> 00:33:17.740
planets around other stars using this transit
872
00:33:17.740 --> 00:33:20.060
method. So we've got better and better at
873
00:33:20.060 --> 00:33:22.380
doing it. And over time what's happened is
874
00:33:22.990 --> 00:33:24.830
we've not only found the low hanging fruit,
875
00:33:24.830 --> 00:33:26.670
the really big planets close to their stars
876
00:33:26.670 --> 00:33:28.310
that give a whopping great signal that you
877
00:33:28.310 --> 00:33:30.670
can find, but with each generation of new
878
00:33:30.670 --> 00:33:31.990
instrument that's gone up there, we've got
879
00:33:31.990 --> 00:33:33.550
better at finding planets that are further
880
00:33:33.550 --> 00:33:35.710
from their stars, better at finding planets
881
00:33:35.710 --> 00:33:37.990
that are ever smaller, finding planets that
882
00:33:37.990 --> 00:33:40.270
are weird, or other techniques are coming
883
00:33:40.270 --> 00:33:41.830
online that allow us to do things another
884
00:33:41.830 --> 00:33:43.630
way. And I still think one of the greatest
885
00:33:43.630 --> 00:33:45.990
movies that never won an Oscar are, ah, the
886
00:33:45.990 --> 00:33:48.950
wonderful Images of the SAHR 8799 that
887
00:33:48.950 --> 00:33:51.320
shows four planets going around it. And we've
888
00:33:51.320 --> 00:33:53.280
got kind of a live movie of those planets
889
00:33:53.280 --> 00:33:56.160
orbiting that star that runs back more than a
890
00:33:56.160 --> 00:33:57.880
decade now. It's just breathtaking.
891
00:33:57.960 --> 00:33:59.160
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I saw it.
892
00:33:59.640 --> 00:34:02.330
Jonti Horner: Yeah, it's awesome. And we've basically lived
893
00:34:02.330 --> 00:34:04.690
through this awesome scientific
894
00:34:04.690 --> 00:34:07.490
revolution without really realizing it. You
895
00:34:07.490 --> 00:34:09.010
know, we've gone from a world where nobody
896
00:34:09.010 --> 00:34:10.930
knew if there were planets around other stars
897
00:34:11.250 --> 00:34:13.290
to a fact that there is nobody younger than
898
00:34:13.290 --> 00:34:15.490
the age of 30 now who grew up in that world
899
00:34:15.490 --> 00:34:18.110
that you and I grew up in, where we wondered
900
00:34:18.110 --> 00:34:19.510
if there were planets around other stars.
901
00:34:19.510 --> 00:34:22.270
It's absolutely breathtaking. We've had
902
00:34:22.750 --> 00:34:24.390
real big involvement with this here in
903
00:34:24.390 --> 00:34:26.390
Australia. The Anglo Australian Planet Search
904
00:34:26.390 --> 00:34:29.110
was one of the leaders for the first 10 or 15
905
00:34:29.110 --> 00:34:31.270
years of this exoplanet era. We've got a
906
00:34:31.270 --> 00:34:33.630
facility here in Queensland that is now
907
00:34:33.630 --> 00:34:34.990
leading the way, one of the leading
908
00:34:34.990 --> 00:34:37.750
facilities in the entire planet. You
909
00:34:37.750 --> 00:34:40.150
know, the only dedicated exoplanet search
910
00:34:40.150 --> 00:34:41.910
facility in the Southern hemisphere. And we
911
00:34:41.910 --> 00:34:44.170
work with NASA to do this. We've been
912
00:34:44.170 --> 00:34:47.090
directly involved with 41 planet discoveries
913
00:34:47.090 --> 00:34:49.890
in the last couple of years, using NASA's
914
00:34:49.890 --> 00:34:52.370
test mission and working with them. But it's
915
00:34:52.370 --> 00:34:54.850
this kind of ongoing exploration, this
916
00:34:54.850 --> 00:34:57.230
ongoing search. And, you know, what will the
917
00:34:57.230 --> 00:34:59.550
next 30 years bring? That's kind of what I
918
00:34:59.550 --> 00:35:02.190
wonder. Where will we go with it? And
919
00:35:02.830 --> 00:35:05.070
it's not so much when will we stop counting,
920
00:35:05.470 --> 00:35:07.870
but when will we start to get things that
921
00:35:08.270 --> 00:35:10.270
really potentially could be like the Earth?
922
00:35:10.270 --> 00:35:12.070
And I've said this before, I don't think
923
00:35:12.070 --> 00:35:13.550
we've found an Earth like planet yet. We
924
00:35:13.550 --> 00:35:15.710
found things about as big as the Earth that
925
00:35:15.710 --> 00:35:18.110
are very different. Like saying, I went
926
00:35:18.110 --> 00:35:19.910
swimming last week and I saw the most human
927
00:35:19.910 --> 00:35:21.670
like creature I've ever seen. And it was a
928
00:35:21.670 --> 00:35:23.310
dolphin. It was about the same size and
929
00:35:23.310 --> 00:35:25.110
weight as a human, but it's fundamentally not
930
00:35:25.110 --> 00:35:27.310
a human being. Yeah, but we're going to be
931
00:35:27.310 --> 00:35:29.030
moving forward and we're going to be moving
932
00:35:29.030 --> 00:35:30.870
from just finding these things to learning
933
00:35:30.870 --> 00:35:32.430
more about them. We're moving into this era
934
00:35:32.430 --> 00:35:35.030
of characterization and I think the number's
935
00:35:35.030 --> 00:35:36.670
going to gradually lose importance.
936
00:35:36.670 --> 00:35:39.510
You know, when we find 10,000 or 100,000,
937
00:35:40.540 --> 00:35:42.220
the difference will be a lot less significant
938
00:35:42.220 --> 00:35:44.980
than the difference between 0 and 1. But
939
00:35:44.980 --> 00:35:46.980
it'll start being which of the planets we
940
00:35:46.980 --> 00:35:49.660
know the most about. What are they like? What
941
00:35:49.660 --> 00:35:52.020
can we learn about them? And that's, I think,
942
00:35:52.020 --> 00:35:53.580
the journey for the next 30 years.
943
00:35:53.740 --> 00:35:56.099
Andrew Dunkley: Yes. And finding, and as you said, finding
944
00:35:56.099 --> 00:35:59.010
that, one planet that is so
945
00:35:59.010 --> 00:36:01.970
like ours in size and proximity,
946
00:36:02.600 --> 00:36:04.440
orbiting a sun like ours,
947
00:36:05.940 --> 00:36:08.210
maybe with liquid water, et cetera, et
948
00:36:08.210 --> 00:36:08.490
cetera.
949
00:36:08.490 --> 00:36:08.890
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
950
00:36:09.520 --> 00:36:11.320
Andrew Dunkley: that's the golden goose, isn't it, really?
951
00:36:11.960 --> 00:36:12.560
Jonti Horner: Absolutely.
952
00:36:12.560 --> 00:36:14.920
And we've got this really interesting
953
00:36:14.920 --> 00:36:17.560
question about how long has the
954
00:36:17.560 --> 00:36:20.440
Earth being in a condition that if we looked
955
00:36:20.440 --> 00:36:22.800
at it, it would look like the Earth. So in
956
00:36:22.800 --> 00:36:24.560
other words, how long has the Earth been an
957
00:36:24.560 --> 00:36:26.200
Earth like planet? Because when we're talking
958
00:36:26.200 --> 00:36:29.050
about a planet like the Earth, when it's
959
00:36:29.050 --> 00:36:30.650
something like the Earth is today, with, you
960
00:36:30.650 --> 00:36:32.650
know, beautiful blue sparkling oceans and A
961
00:36:32.650 --> 00:36:35.210
thin oxygen rich atmosphere and life
962
00:36:35.210 --> 00:36:37.130
teeming in abundant continents that are
963
00:36:37.130 --> 00:36:39.890
mottled brown and green and icy polar
964
00:36:39.890 --> 00:36:41.610
caps. But for the vast majority of the
965
00:36:41.610 --> 00:36:44.170
Earth's history it has looked nothing like it
966
00:36:44.170 --> 00:36:45.850
does now. It's had an entirely different
967
00:36:45.850 --> 00:36:48.650
atmosphere. It's not had free
968
00:36:48.650 --> 00:36:50.370
oxygen in the atmosphere. It's had periods
969
00:36:50.370 --> 00:36:52.850
when it was an enormous snowball, you know,
970
00:36:52.850 --> 00:36:55.460
snowball Earth episodes. So it's quite likely
971
00:36:55.460 --> 00:36:57.540
that for the majority of the Earth's history
972
00:36:58.500 --> 00:37:00.580
we wouldn't recognize it as an Earth like
973
00:37:00.580 --> 00:37:02.780
planet because it would look totally, totally
974
00:37:02.780 --> 00:37:03.060
different.
975
00:37:03.780 --> 00:37:05.740
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, that's an interesting point. And that
976
00:37:05.740 --> 00:37:08.700
could exist elsewhere in the
977
00:37:08.700 --> 00:37:10.740
universe. And we may have seen a planet
978
00:37:10.820 --> 00:37:13.700
already that could one day be like
979
00:37:13.700 --> 00:37:15.900
ours, but it might be tens of thousands or
980
00:37:15.900 --> 00:37:17.740
hundreds of thousands of years before it
981
00:37:17.740 --> 00:37:19.700
reaches that point. So
982
00:37:20.500 --> 00:37:23.500
that's a really interesting factor to bring
983
00:37:23.500 --> 00:37:24.800
into the equation.
984
00:37:24.940 --> 00:37:27.180
you said some odd planets. I thought I'd do a
985
00:37:27.180 --> 00:37:29.310
bit of a search. these exoplanets that we've
986
00:37:29.310 --> 00:37:31.488
discovered in the last 30 years. Wasp
987
00:37:31.652 --> 00:37:34.390
76B. It's a hot
988
00:37:34.390 --> 00:37:37.230
Jupiter which rains molten iron. I think Fred
989
00:37:37.230 --> 00:37:38.880
and I talked about that one. Wasp,
990
00:37:39.270 --> 00:37:42.140
107B. A gas giant, with
991
00:37:42.140 --> 00:37:44.540
a density so low it's been described as a
992
00:37:44.540 --> 00:37:45.780
marshmallow planet.
993
00:37:47.230 --> 00:37:47.790
HD,
994
00:37:48.380 --> 00:37:51.380
189773B. It's a planet
995
00:37:51.380 --> 00:37:53.220
with an atmosphere that contains clouds of
996
00:37:53.220 --> 00:37:54.260
molten glass.
997
00:37:54.740 --> 00:37:57.540
Jonti Horner: Yeah, that's often described as a blue marble
998
00:37:57.540 --> 00:37:58.140
planet, I think.
999
00:37:58.140 --> 00:38:01.139
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. Hat P7B is an ultra
1000
00:38:01.139 --> 00:38:03.100
hot Jupiter that's so dark it's nearly
1001
00:38:03.100 --> 00:38:05.990
charcoal and 5,
1002
00:38:06.070 --> 00:38:08.790
5 Cancri E I think it's
1003
00:38:08.790 --> 00:38:11.700
pronounced a, super Earth with a lava world,
1004
00:38:11.970 --> 00:38:14.790
and sparkling skies. And there's probably
1005
00:38:14.790 --> 00:38:17.030
more weird ones out there. We yet defined
1006
00:38:17.030 --> 00:38:19.500
that, defy explanation. It's a really
1007
00:38:19.500 --> 00:38:21.090
fascinating part of astronomy.
1008
00:38:21.090 --> 00:38:23.450
Jonti Horner: it is. And it's that realization that the
1009
00:38:23.450 --> 00:38:25.369
diversity of things that are out there is far
1010
00:38:25.369 --> 00:38:26.930
greater than we could have possibly imagined.
1011
00:38:26.930 --> 00:38:29.850
And it really forces us to revisit
1012
00:38:29.850 --> 00:38:31.690
and refine our definitions of what a planet
1013
00:38:31.690 --> 00:38:34.450
is. So we historically people have this
1014
00:38:34.850 --> 00:38:37.810
idealized boundary at 13 Jupiter masses where
1015
00:38:38.100 --> 00:38:39.460
if you're more massive than that, you're a
1016
00:38:39.460 --> 00:38:41.540
brown dwarf and you're a fail star. And if
1017
00:38:41.540 --> 00:38:42.940
you're less massive than that, you're a
1018
00:38:42.940 --> 00:38:43.380
planet.
1019
00:38:43.380 --> 00:38:43.780
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
1020
00:38:43.780 --> 00:38:45.380
Jonti Horner: And we're now finding things that people are
1021
00:38:45.380 --> 00:38:47.180
claiming a brown dwarfs that are only twice
1022
00:38:47.180 --> 00:38:49.220
the mass of Jupiter and things people are
1023
00:38:49.220 --> 00:38:50.980
claiming are planets that are 20 Jupiter
1024
00:38:50.980 --> 00:38:53.580
masses. You know, there's a real blurring of
1025
00:38:53.580 --> 00:38:56.300
that Boundary. You've then got one weird
1026
00:38:56.300 --> 00:38:58.460
object. If you look at what the most dense
1027
00:38:58.460 --> 00:39:00.860
planet we found is, there's one planet that
1028
00:39:00.860 --> 00:39:03.660
has a density that is something like
1029
00:39:03.660 --> 00:39:06.500
150 times the density of water or something
1030
00:39:06.500 --> 00:39:09.050
like this. And it's a few Jupiter
1031
00:39:09.050 --> 00:39:11.770
masses. And we know the density, we know the
1032
00:39:11.770 --> 00:39:13.650
size because of transits and we know the mass
1033
00:39:13.650 --> 00:39:15.250
because of radial velocity. And if you've got
1034
00:39:15.250 --> 00:39:16.930
the size and the mass, you get the density.
1035
00:39:18.210 --> 00:39:20.100
This thing is so dense so that it doesn't
1036
00:39:20.100 --> 00:39:22.780
confirm with any known material.
1037
00:39:23.260 --> 00:39:25.500
You know, it's many times denser than the
1038
00:39:25.500 --> 00:39:27.540
densest metal. Gravity pulling things in
1039
00:39:27.540 --> 00:39:30.220
can't explain it. And so
1040
00:39:30.460 --> 00:39:32.180
is it really a planet? There is some
1041
00:39:32.180 --> 00:39:34.790
speculation that it's actually something that
1042
00:39:34.790 --> 00:39:36.910
was probably a white dwarf that has somehow
1043
00:39:36.910 --> 00:39:39.150
been bombarded and fractured. So there's only
1044
00:39:39.550 --> 00:39:41.310
a few Jupiter masses left.
1045
00:39:42.910 --> 00:39:45.550
So it's not a planet. You know,
1046
00:39:46.190 --> 00:39:47.070
if it was a white.
1047
00:39:47.070 --> 00:39:49.710
Andrew Dunkley: Dwarf that's been culver, I would say no, but
1048
00:39:49.710 --> 00:39:51.210
gosh, yeah, there's.
1049
00:39:51.210 --> 00:39:53.410
Jonti Horner: All these other things. Planets that are less
1050
00:39:53.410 --> 00:39:56.410
dense than cotton candy and yeah, it's
1051
00:39:56.410 --> 00:39:58.650
awesome from a speculation point of view. And
1052
00:39:58.650 --> 00:40:00.810
it's a, a lot of the planets we've found are
1053
00:40:00.810 --> 00:40:02.530
things that if you saw them in an episode of
1054
00:40:02.530 --> 00:40:05.490
Star Trek or you know, any of these sci fi
1055
00:40:05.490 --> 00:40:08.010
series, you'd think that they jumped the
1056
00:40:08.010 --> 00:40:09.970
shark, that that kind of thing just wasn't
1057
00:40:09.970 --> 00:40:12.210
possible anymore. They'd obviously been
1058
00:40:12.370 --> 00:40:14.250
enjoying themselves a little bit too much in
1059
00:40:14.250 --> 00:40:17.010
the pre writing session. And yet we're
1060
00:40:17.010 --> 00:40:19.890
finding these objects are just so diverse
1061
00:40:19.890 --> 00:40:21.930
and bonkers. It's untrue. That's part of the
1062
00:40:21.930 --> 00:40:23.250
fun of it. You never know what we're going to
1063
00:40:23.250 --> 00:40:23.730
find next.
1064
00:40:23.890 --> 00:40:24.930
Andrew Dunkley: Absolutely not.
1065
00:40:25.080 --> 00:40:27.040
and that sort of takes us into our final
1066
00:40:27.040 --> 00:40:30.000
story because this is an object that
1067
00:40:30.390 --> 00:40:32.470
a little bit weird in our solar system.
1068
00:40:33.030 --> 00:40:35.760
It's the moon Mimas. But it's also been
1069
00:40:35.760 --> 00:40:38.760
called the Death Star because it does have
1070
00:40:38.760 --> 00:40:40.880
that Death Star look about it. It's got a
1071
00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:43.670
dish like depression, in it where it
1072
00:40:43.750 --> 00:40:46.390
must have got hit at some stage. But the
1073
00:40:46.390 --> 00:40:49.150
reason it's in the news now is because it
1074
00:40:49.150 --> 00:40:51.910
is yet another object in our solar system
1075
00:40:52.070 --> 00:40:54.750
that may contain a subsurface
1076
00:40:54.750 --> 00:40:55.190
ocean.
1077
00:40:56.000 --> 00:40:58.310
Jonti Horner: Yes. And it's probably of all the moons where
1078
00:40:58.310 --> 00:41:01.110
subsurface oceans have been suspected or
1079
00:41:01.110 --> 00:41:03.990
detected, it is the smallest of them and
1080
00:41:03.990 --> 00:41:06.270
it's probably the most surprising of the lot.
1081
00:41:07.230 --> 00:41:10.190
The evidence for this has built up over
1082
00:41:10.160 --> 00:41:12.100
a bit more than a decade and comes from the
1083
00:41:12.100 --> 00:41:14.140
Cassini mission that Spent all that time
1084
00:41:14.140 --> 00:41:16.980
orbiting Saturn making wonderful discoveries,
1085
00:41:16.980 --> 00:41:19.540
most famously, of course, being the geysers
1086
00:41:19.540 --> 00:41:21.460
of liquid water erupting from the south pole
1087
00:41:21.460 --> 00:41:23.640
of another of the small icy moons, Enceladus,
1088
00:41:24.030 --> 00:41:26.110
which was a shock because Enceladus is so
1089
00:41:26.110 --> 00:41:28.030
small that it should be frozen to the core.
1090
00:41:28.190 --> 00:41:29.950
So it's a bit of a surprise there's liquid
1091
00:41:29.950 --> 00:41:32.830
water there. Mimas is even smaller.
1092
00:41:32.830 --> 00:41:35.390
It's the smallest object in the solar system
1093
00:41:36.350 --> 00:41:39.030
that is spherical because its gravity has
1094
00:41:39.030 --> 00:41:40.790
overcome the strength of the material it's
1095
00:41:40.790 --> 00:41:43.470
made from. And when you look at the
1096
00:41:43.550 --> 00:41:45.510
calculations people have made at what the
1097
00:41:45.510 --> 00:41:48.470
minimum size something would have to be to be
1098
00:41:48.470 --> 00:41:51.130
in hydrostatic equilibrium to be an object
1099
00:41:51.130 --> 00:41:53.010
where gravity overcomes the strength. Mimas
1100
00:41:53.010 --> 00:41:55.010
is actually a little bit smaller than that,
1101
00:41:55.490 --> 00:41:58.450
which is interesting. It's a real edge case.
1102
00:41:59.250 --> 00:42:01.890
And, you know, the fact that it is spherical
1103
00:42:01.890 --> 00:42:03.650
like it is would suggest that at some point
1104
00:42:03.650 --> 00:42:05.330
it has not been that strong in the past. So
1105
00:42:05.330 --> 00:42:07.930
it was probably fairly liquid early on in its
1106
00:42:07.930 --> 00:42:10.930
formation. But any ocean it had when it was
1107
00:42:10.930 --> 00:42:13.490
born should have frozen out
1108
00:42:13.650 --> 00:42:16.180
long, long, long, long, long ago. And, that's
1109
00:42:16.180 --> 00:42:18.300
kind of borne out when you see the photos
1110
00:42:18.300 --> 00:42:20.100
that are taken of Mimas. It doesn't look like
1111
00:42:20.100 --> 00:42:22.440
Enceladus. It doesn't look like AR were
1112
00:42:22.440 --> 00:42:24.240
talking about last week. It doesn't look like
1113
00:42:24.240 --> 00:42:26.680
Europa. They're all places that have
1114
00:42:26.680 --> 00:42:29.200
obviously been resurfaced, that have flat
1115
00:42:29.200 --> 00:42:31.560
areas with cracks that look like ice that has
1116
00:42:31.560 --> 00:42:33.520
been broken by plate tectonics. Because it's
1117
00:42:33.520 --> 00:42:36.200
floating on an ocean, Mimas just looks like
1118
00:42:36.200 --> 00:42:37.680
another cratered ice ball.
1119
00:42:37.840 --> 00:42:38.279
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.
1120
00:42:38.279 --> 00:42:40.120
Jonti Horner: So there's a few oddities that have built up.
1121
00:42:40.120 --> 00:42:41.760
One of them is that, enormous crater,
1122
00:42:41.760 --> 00:42:44.760
Herschel. Now, Herschel, as a crater, is
1123
00:42:44.760 --> 00:42:46.840
almost big enough that the impactor could
1124
00:42:46.840 --> 00:42:48.970
have shattered me. And if it had been only
1125
00:42:48.970 --> 00:42:50.450
slightly larger, Mimas would have been
1126
00:42:50.450 --> 00:42:53.330
destroyed. So it's right at the limit of
1127
00:42:53.330 --> 00:42:56.010
how big a crater can be before things get
1128
00:42:56.010 --> 00:42:58.930
seriously bad. But a lot of calculations
1129
00:42:58.930 --> 00:43:01.570
have shown that if the Herschel crater had
1130
00:43:01.570 --> 00:43:04.450
formed when the Moon was frozen solid to its
1131
00:43:04.450 --> 00:43:07.130
core, it shouldn't have a central peak.
1132
00:43:07.850 --> 00:43:10.290
But it has a central peak. Now, that suggests
1133
00:43:10.290 --> 00:43:13.010
that Mimas was a bit slushy. But if you do
1134
00:43:13.010 --> 00:43:15.370
the calculations and assume Mimas had a very,
1135
00:43:15.370 --> 00:43:18.320
very well developed ocean, that
1136
00:43:18.320 --> 00:43:19.760
crater wouldn't look like it did either,
1137
00:43:19.760 --> 00:43:21.680
because it would have dug down into the ocean
1138
00:43:21.680 --> 00:43:24.120
and splashed liquid water everywhere. So
1139
00:43:24.120 --> 00:43:25.680
there are suggestions that the Herschel
1140
00:43:25.680 --> 00:43:28.560
crater formed when Mimas was slushy rather
1141
00:43:28.560 --> 00:43:30.680
than ocean, when it was fluid enough to get
1142
00:43:30.680 --> 00:43:33.440
this central peak form, but not so fluid that
1143
00:43:33.440 --> 00:43:35.200
an ocean was breached. And with the size of
1144
00:43:35.200 --> 00:43:36.640
that M impact, it would have breached one if
1145
00:43:36.640 --> 00:43:39.240
one was there. Now I've seen some suggestions
1146
00:43:39.240 --> 00:43:41.080
from that saying that Herschel must therefore
1147
00:43:41.080 --> 00:43:44.050
be a young crater because it's tied
1148
00:43:44.050 --> 00:43:45.890
to this young ocean that is thought to be
1149
00:43:45.890 --> 00:43:48.490
there on Mimas. Now that's one of the
1150
00:43:48.490 --> 00:43:50.050
suggestions. I'm not necessarily sure that's
1151
00:43:50.050 --> 00:43:51.570
the case. It may be that Herschel may be
1152
00:43:51.570 --> 00:43:53.250
older than there was an ocean in the past.
1153
00:43:53.730 --> 00:43:56.650
That's still to be sorted. But aside from
1154
00:43:56.650 --> 00:43:58.690
that, there's been a lot of the data from
1155
00:43:58.690 --> 00:44:01.410
Cassini linked to how Mimas is
1156
00:44:01.410 --> 00:44:04.050
rotating and wobbling, suggested that
1157
00:44:04.130 --> 00:44:07.050
it couldn't be solid to the core unless the
1158
00:44:07.050 --> 00:44:09.170
core was not in her static equilibrium. The
1159
00:44:09.170 --> 00:44:11.660
core was elongated and pancake shaped. and
1160
00:44:11.660 --> 00:44:13.460
that just doesn't make sense. And as they got
1161
00:44:13.460 --> 00:44:14.780
more and more data, more and more
1162
00:44:14.780 --> 00:44:17.620
observations, that just doesn't work. And
1163
00:44:17.620 --> 00:44:19.540
so from the rotation and the wobble of this
1164
00:44:19.540 --> 00:44:22.140
moon, it suggests that as much as
1165
00:44:22.140 --> 00:44:24.900
50% of its volume is liquid water.
1166
00:44:25.140 --> 00:44:27.580
Wow. Which is an enormous subsurface ocean.
1167
00:44:27.580 --> 00:44:30.340
That's an absolutely incredible ocean. But
1168
00:44:30.340 --> 00:44:32.500
because of the thermodynamics of it, that
1169
00:44:32.500 --> 00:44:34.980
ocean can't be old because if it was old, it
1170
00:44:34.980 --> 00:44:37.950
would have frozen out already. Now, part of
1171
00:44:37.950 --> 00:44:39.590
the supporting evidence for this is that the
1172
00:44:39.590 --> 00:44:42.030
orbit of Mimas around Saturn is not perfectly
1173
00:44:42.030 --> 00:44:44.790
circular. It's actually a little bit more
1174
00:44:44.790 --> 00:44:46.430
eccentric than the orbit of the Earth around
1175
00:44:46.430 --> 00:44:49.030
the Sun. That is not a
1176
00:44:49.030 --> 00:44:51.270
situation that's tenable long term. The orbit
1177
00:44:51.270 --> 00:44:53.990
should be circularized by tidal
1178
00:44:53.990 --> 00:44:56.590
effects with Saturn. And so the suggestion
1179
00:44:56.590 --> 00:44:58.990
seems to be that at some point, probably in
1180
00:44:58.990 --> 00:45:01.710
the last 15 million years, something
1181
00:45:01.790 --> 00:45:04.190
happened to stir, Mimas's orbit upper Mechi
1182
00:45:04.660 --> 00:45:06.860
more eccentric, to actually make it a bit
1183
00:45:06.860 --> 00:45:09.420
more elongated. That increased
1184
00:45:09.420 --> 00:45:11.780
eccentricity means that Mimas now experience
1185
00:45:11.860 --> 00:45:13.780
a significant tidal heating
1186
00:45:14.500 --> 00:45:16.980
from being squashed and squeezed effectively
1187
00:45:18.020 --> 00:45:20.100
by the gravity of Saturn and also by the
1188
00:45:20.100 --> 00:45:21.900
other moons. It's in mean motion resonance
1189
00:45:21.900 --> 00:45:23.860
with a couple of the other saturnian moons.
1190
00:45:24.340 --> 00:45:25.780
And all of that means that you're going to
1191
00:45:25.780 --> 00:45:27.820
get a significant amount of heat dumped into
1192
00:45:27.820 --> 00:45:30.740
the interior of Mimas, melting that interior
1193
00:45:30.740 --> 00:45:33.630
and creating this ocean. And the argument
1194
00:45:33.630 --> 00:45:35.510
for the fact that the surface is not yet
1195
00:45:35.510 --> 00:45:38.470
smooth and resurfaced is that a, that
1196
00:45:38.470 --> 00:45:41.190
ocean is young and it's a still developing
1197
00:45:41.190 --> 00:45:44.150
situation. But also that the crust of
1198
00:45:44.150 --> 00:45:46.950
Mimas is 20 or 30 kilometers thick and
1199
00:45:46.950 --> 00:45:48.670
that's thick enough that it hasn't yet
1200
00:45:48.670 --> 00:45:51.310
responded to the liquid underneath
1201
00:45:51.710 --> 00:45:53.910
and so you've almost got this hidden ocean in
1202
00:45:53.910 --> 00:45:56.710
a place you wouldn't expect, but where all
1203
00:45:56.710 --> 00:45:59.540
our observations, all our data is suggesting
1204
00:45:59.540 --> 00:46:01.540
that the only explanation that works for all
1205
00:46:01.540 --> 00:46:03.340
of the different things we've observed for it
1206
00:46:03.660 --> 00:46:05.780
is that this is yet another of this growing
1207
00:46:05.780 --> 00:46:08.500
catalog of places where there's a huge volume
1208
00:46:08.500 --> 00:46:10.580
of liquid water buried beneath an icy
1209
00:46:10.580 --> 00:46:12.900
surface. It's absolutely breathtaking work
1210
00:46:12.900 --> 00:46:14.900
and it's a really good example of the
1211
00:46:14.900 --> 00:46:17.780
iterative nature of science because it's not
1212
00:46:17.780 --> 00:46:19.580
like this is a new discovery this week.
1213
00:46:20.060 --> 00:46:21.740
There've been whispers about this for years
1214
00:46:21.740 --> 00:46:23.900
and papers published about it for years and
1215
00:46:24.630 --> 00:46:26.910
alternative hypotheses proposed and
1216
00:46:26.910 --> 00:46:29.910
disproved and all the rest of it. And all
1217
00:46:29.910 --> 00:46:31.590
the way through we're getting more and more
1218
00:46:31.590 --> 00:46:33.710
certain that this ocean's there. We're
1219
00:46:33.710 --> 00:46:36.670
learning more about the history. And I guess
1220
00:46:36.670 --> 00:46:38.120
again, not only are we learning that liquid
1221
00:46:38.120 --> 00:46:39.799
water is more common than the solar system,
1222
00:46:39.799 --> 00:46:41.840
but we're getting reminded once again that
1223
00:46:42.000 --> 00:46:44.320
the solar system's a very dynamic place. And
1224
00:46:44.320 --> 00:46:47.000
it's not like everything of interest happened
1225
00:46:47.000 --> 00:46:48.720
four and a half thousand million years ago.
1226
00:46:48.720 --> 00:46:50.520
And now we're in the kind of mop up phase
1227
00:46:50.520 --> 00:46:52.830
where nothing interesting happens. There's
1228
00:46:52.830 --> 00:46:55.180
still a lot going on. And the solar system's
1229
00:46:55.180 --> 00:46:57.580
dynamic in a way that if we were around when
1230
00:46:57.580 --> 00:47:00.020
the dinosaurs walked the Earth, it would have
1231
00:47:00.020 --> 00:47:01.540
looked like a very different place than the
1232
00:47:01.540 --> 00:47:03.380
place we see today. It's that changeable.
1233
00:47:03.620 --> 00:47:05.940
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. And
1234
00:47:06.430 --> 00:47:07.550
Mimas is also,
1235
00:47:09.510 --> 00:47:11.190
if indeed it is another,
1236
00:47:13.330 --> 00:47:15.490
water moon, let's say ice moon, whatever you
1237
00:47:15.490 --> 00:47:17.920
want to call it, it's starting to show that
1238
00:47:17.920 --> 00:47:20.390
it's probably more normal than we ever
1239
00:47:20.390 --> 00:47:23.310
thought. You've got so many others that are
1240
00:47:23.310 --> 00:47:26.030
starting to be found. obviously
1241
00:47:26.030 --> 00:47:28.350
Europa Enceladus would be the top two, but
1242
00:47:28.900 --> 00:47:30.360
Ganymede's now in there.
1243
00:47:32.630 --> 00:47:35.030
Andrew Dunkley: Most of the dwarf moons,
1244
00:47:35.490 --> 00:47:37.450
or dwarf planets in the outer solar system
1245
00:47:37.450 --> 00:47:40.250
are starting to show these signs. So
1246
00:47:40.730 --> 00:47:43.650
it could be quite normal here. And
1247
00:47:43.650 --> 00:47:46.350
as we've already discussed, you know, there
1248
00:47:46.350 --> 00:47:47.990
was a time where we weren't sure whether or
1249
00:47:47.990 --> 00:47:50.630
not there were other planets in other solar
1250
00:47:50.630 --> 00:47:53.510
systems in the universe. Well, it's
1251
00:47:53.510 --> 00:47:55.630
probably going to be discovered that there
1252
00:47:55.630 --> 00:47:58.370
are probably a lot more ice moons out there
1253
00:47:58.370 --> 00:48:00.810
than we could possibly imagine. So.
1254
00:48:00.890 --> 00:48:02.690
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And the other interesting thing
1255
00:48:02.690 --> 00:48:04.370
about this to me is it's not just suggesting
1256
00:48:04.370 --> 00:48:06.330
that you get oceans and the oceans go away.
1257
00:48:06.810 --> 00:48:09.290
It's suggesting you can get episodic oceans
1258
00:48:10.170 --> 00:48:12.330
because m. If this Ocean is only 10 or 15
1259
00:48:12.330 --> 00:48:15.080
million years old. We've had a lot of 10 and
1260
00:48:15.080 --> 00:48:17.360
15 million year old windows
1261
00:48:17.840 --> 00:48:20.240
in four and a half thousand million years of
1262
00:48:20.240 --> 00:48:23.150
time. And, what is the likelihood that we
1263
00:48:23.150 --> 00:48:24.830
just happen to be in the only one of those
1264
00:48:24.830 --> 00:48:26.990
windows where you've got two temporary oceans
1265
00:48:26.990 --> 00:48:29.790
at the same time, Where Enceladus and
1266
00:48:29.790 --> 00:48:32.750
Mimas have temporary transient oceans that
1267
00:48:32.750 --> 00:48:35.270
have only formed in recent times. And for
1268
00:48:35.270 --> 00:48:37.150
both of them, the logic is the same. They're
1269
00:48:37.150 --> 00:48:38.590
too small to have had this ocean since
1270
00:48:38.590 --> 00:48:39.840
they're formed. It's got to be a recent
1271
00:48:40.230 --> 00:48:42.470
thing. What is the likelihood that we catch
1272
00:48:42.470 --> 00:48:44.230
two of them going off at once, just by
1273
00:48:44.230 --> 00:48:46.070
random, when there have never been any
1274
00:48:46.070 --> 00:48:48.190
others? So that's suggesting that these
1275
00:48:48.190 --> 00:48:50.190
subsurface oceans on the smaller moons come
1276
00:48:50.190 --> 00:48:52.950
and go and come again, which means
1277
00:48:52.950 --> 00:48:55.150
that again, from the point of view of life
1278
00:48:55.150 --> 00:48:57.830
elsewhere, life that can
1279
00:48:57.830 --> 00:49:00.430
survive the long freeze is ready to take over
1280
00:49:00.430 --> 00:49:03.070
during the short summer. And we see that on
1281
00:49:03.070 --> 00:49:05.730
Earth. It's a really interesting thing that
1282
00:49:06.040 --> 00:49:08.680
if this is a temporary transient ocean now,
1283
00:49:09.080 --> 00:49:11.200
it's possibly been there multiple times in
1284
00:49:11.200 --> 00:49:13.160
the past. And that's why I
1285
00:49:13.800 --> 00:49:15.720
suspect that the Herschel Crater may not have
1286
00:49:15.720 --> 00:49:18.640
formed with the latest recent ocean. But
1287
00:49:18.640 --> 00:49:20.960
maybe it's a previous episode of it. We will
1288
00:49:20.960 --> 00:49:22.720
only know when we get more studies. And of
1289
00:49:22.720 --> 00:49:24.640
course, it's a really good reason to go back
1290
00:49:24.640 --> 00:49:25.720
to Saturn to find out.
1291
00:49:25.800 --> 00:49:28.270
Andrew Dunkley: Absolutely true. Yes, indeed. All right, if
1292
00:49:28.270 --> 00:49:30.190
you want to read about that story and the,
1293
00:49:30.200 --> 00:49:33.170
previous story, about exoplanets, you
1294
00:49:33.170 --> 00:49:35.450
can go to space.com
1295
00:49:36.330 --> 00:49:38.970
and we are done. Jonti, thank you so much.
1296
00:49:39.610 --> 00:49:41.330
Jonti Horner: It's a pleasure. It's a lot to talk about.
1297
00:49:41.330 --> 00:49:42.250
It's always good fun.
1298
00:49:42.330 --> 00:49:44.190
Andrew Dunkley: It is great fun. Good, to see you. that's
1299
00:49:44.190 --> 00:49:46.230
Jonti Horner, professor of Astrophysics at
1300
00:49:46.230 --> 00:49:48.910
the University of Southern Queensland. And
1301
00:49:48.910 --> 00:49:50.630
don't forget to visit our website while
1302
00:49:50.630 --> 00:49:53.370
you're online and check us out. you can do
1303
00:49:53.370 --> 00:49:56.130
that@spacenutspodcast.com or spacenuts.
1304
00:49:57.560 --> 00:49:59.560
And if you'd like to become a supporter of
1305
00:49:59.560 --> 00:50:02.040
Space Nuts, it's really simple. Just, click
1306
00:50:02.040 --> 00:50:04.370
on the supporter tab. you can become a
1307
00:50:04.370 --> 00:50:06.410
patron, or if you'd prefer to use another
1308
00:50:06.410 --> 00:50:08.490
platform, you can do that through Supercast.
1309
00:50:08.490 --> 00:50:09.970
And there are plenty of different options
1310
00:50:09.970 --> 00:50:12.210
there, but as I always say, it's not
1311
00:50:12.210 --> 00:50:15.140
mandatory. if you only want to
1312
00:50:15.140 --> 00:50:17.500
buy us a cup of coffee, that's fine as well.
1313
00:50:17.670 --> 00:50:20.110
in fact, some people have literally sent us
1314
00:50:20.190 --> 00:50:22.190
coffee vouchers over the years.
1315
00:50:22.960 --> 00:50:24.710
check it all out on our, space,
1316
00:50:24.710 --> 00:50:27.640
nutspodcast.com, website.
1317
00:50:28.050 --> 00:50:30.970
and I would say thanks to Huw in the studio.
1318
00:50:30.970 --> 00:50:33.820
But he's out counting, exoplanets. And he got
1319
00:50:33.820 --> 00:50:36.259
to 10, and you can't count any higher.
1320
00:50:36.660 --> 00:50:38.260
And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your
1321
00:50:38.260 --> 00:50:39.660
company. We'll see you on the next episode of
1322
00:50:39.660 --> 00:50:41.620
Space Nuts real soon. Bye. Bye.
0
00:00:00.400 --> 00:00:02.360
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us on another
1
00:00:02.360 --> 00:00:04.320
edition of Space Nuts, where we talk
2
00:00:04.320 --> 00:00:06.520
astronomy and space science. My name is
3
00:00:06.520 --> 00:00:08.240
Andrew Dunkley, your host. It's good to have
4
00:00:08.240 --> 00:00:10.800
your company as always. Today,
5
00:00:11.150 --> 00:00:12.730
we're going to start off with something quite
6
00:00:12.730 --> 00:00:15.250
controversial. And in some
7
00:00:15.649 --> 00:00:17.250
parts of the world they probably call this
8
00:00:17.250 --> 00:00:20.140
dumb. But, a proposal to create
9
00:00:20.220 --> 00:00:23.060
a sunlight service. Yes. Using
10
00:00:23.060 --> 00:00:25.340
mirrors in orbit. It's a thing.
11
00:00:25.810 --> 00:00:28.350
also a near miss for Earth involving asteroid
12
00:00:28.350 --> 00:00:30.800
20, 2025 TF, the
13
00:00:30.800 --> 00:00:33.760
6,000th exoplanet has
14
00:00:33.760 --> 00:00:36.200
been discovered. And another potential
15
00:00:36.360 --> 00:00:38.880
subsurface ocean, this one
16
00:00:38.880 --> 00:00:41.240
involving the moon Mimas. That's all coming
17
00:00:41.240 --> 00:00:43.560
up on this edition of Space Nuts.
18
00:00:43.640 --> 00:00:46.120
Jonti Horner: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.
19
00:00:46.360 --> 00:00:49.080
10, 9. Ignition
20
00:00:49.080 --> 00:00:51.880
sequence. Star. Space Nuts. 5, 4,
21
00:00:51.948 --> 00:00:54.914
3. 2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,
22
00:00:54.982 --> 00:00:57.420
3, 2, 1. Space Nuts astronauts,
23
00:00:57.720 --> 00:00:58.000
report.
24
00:00:58.000 --> 00:00:58.920
Andrew Dunkley: It feels good.
25
00:00:59.960 --> 00:01:02.920
And joining us, in the stead of Fred
26
00:01:02.920 --> 00:01:05.060
Watson, we are, joined by Jonti Horner,
27
00:01:05.060 --> 00:01:06.780
professor of astrophysics at the University
28
00:01:06.780 --> 00:01:08.790
of Southern Queensland. Hello again, Jonti.
29
00:01:09.880 --> 00:01:11.080
Jonti Horner: good morning. How are you going?
30
00:01:11.240 --> 00:01:13.940
Andrew Dunkley: I am well. And we should, just put a
31
00:01:13.940 --> 00:01:16.140
caveat to this episode. There might be noise
32
00:01:16.140 --> 00:01:17.580
because you're getting work done at the
33
00:01:17.580 --> 00:01:17.860
house.
34
00:01:18.340 --> 00:01:20.820
Jonti Horner: Yes. And of course we organized to record at
35
00:01:20.820 --> 00:01:22.540
this time prior to the trade is getting in
36
00:01:22.540 --> 00:01:23.780
touch and saying, you know what, we'll be
37
00:01:23.780 --> 00:01:25.780
there at 7am on Monday morning. It's like
38
00:01:25.780 --> 00:01:28.760
great, you know, want this done. Hopefully
39
00:01:28.760 --> 00:01:31.160
the wonders of the microphone will filter it
40
00:01:31.160 --> 00:01:33.040
all out. But given that some of the banging I
41
00:01:33.040 --> 00:01:35.320
can feel through my feet, I suspect the
42
00:01:35.320 --> 00:01:36.840
vibrations might go all the way through the
43
00:01:36.840 --> 00:01:38.280
desk and all the way up the microphone and
44
00:01:38.280 --> 00:01:40.120
we'll occasionally get bang, bang, bang,
45
00:01:40.120 --> 00:01:41.920
drill, drill, drill. So, yeah, I know.
46
00:01:42.160 --> 00:01:44.160
Consider it like we've got a craft work gig
47
00:01:44.160 --> 00:01:45.920
going on or something like that.
48
00:01:45.920 --> 00:01:47.880
Andrew Dunkley: Well, I can tell you we've, we've heard worse
49
00:01:47.880 --> 00:01:50.520
from Fred's house. So, yeah, it should, it
50
00:01:50.520 --> 00:01:52.120
shouldn't sound out of the ordinary, to be
51
00:01:52.120 --> 00:01:52.560
honest.
52
00:01:53.680 --> 00:01:55.880
All right, let's get, stuck into these
53
00:01:55.880 --> 00:01:57.600
stories because we've got a lot to talk
54
00:01:57.600 --> 00:02:00.200
about. This first one, I know you sent me
55
00:02:00.200 --> 00:02:02.850
the, information initially that came from, I
56
00:02:02.850 --> 00:02:05.450
believe, one of your students who's overseas.
57
00:02:05.450 --> 00:02:08.330
But this is, an idea of a Californian company
58
00:02:08.330 --> 00:02:10.320
who is applying to the federal,
59
00:02:11.070 --> 00:02:12.750
communications commission in the United
60
00:02:12.750 --> 00:02:15.190
States, the fcc, for permission to launch a
61
00:02:15.190 --> 00:02:17.710
satellite into space to reflect
62
00:02:18.030 --> 00:02:20.750
sunlight back down on Earth and
63
00:02:20.830 --> 00:02:22.510
charge people for the privilege.
64
00:02:24.230 --> 00:02:27.150
Jonti Horner: Yeah. Now I try very hard to be
65
00:02:27.150 --> 00:02:30.070
even handed and to not be too critical even
66
00:02:30.070 --> 00:02:32.550
when I'm talking About the people who shall
67
00:02:32.550 --> 00:02:33.790
not be named. You know, the ones who are
68
00:02:33.790 --> 00:02:36.570
putting up, Starlink satellites and abusing
69
00:02:36.570 --> 00:02:39.050
colleagues of mine, or people who are
70
00:02:39.050 --> 00:02:41.050
claiming that things that are not aliens are
71
00:02:41.050 --> 00:02:43.050
aliens in order to sell books. You know, I
72
00:02:43.050 --> 00:02:45.970
try and be even handed and it's very
73
00:02:45.970 --> 00:02:48.010
hard to talk about this one without getting a
74
00:02:48.010 --> 00:02:50.890
bit caustic. it reminds me
75
00:02:50.890 --> 00:02:53.650
of the late, great Terry Pratchett, who,
76
00:02:53.650 --> 00:02:55.450
in one of the books was talking about a
77
00:02:55.450 --> 00:02:58.210
certain subset of the landed gentry.
78
00:02:58.210 --> 00:03:00.580
You know, there's, political things going on
79
00:03:00.580 --> 00:03:02.900
and this is a time when the city's under
80
00:03:02.900 --> 00:03:05.700
siege and they're reforming the regiments and
81
00:03:05.700 --> 00:03:08.140
things like this. And it's talking about the
82
00:03:08.140 --> 00:03:09.700
boys who were dropped on their heads as
83
00:03:09.700 --> 00:03:12.180
babies, as this kind of subset of,
84
00:03:12.660 --> 00:03:15.380
you know, nice but dim gentry. Yeah, they're
85
00:03:15.380 --> 00:03:18.340
nice, but they're not all there. And this,
86
00:03:18.340 --> 00:03:20.300
to me, seems like an idea that was dropped on
87
00:03:20.300 --> 00:03:23.220
its head as a baby. It's so
88
00:03:23.940 --> 00:03:26.860
overwhelmingly dumb that you think it must be
89
00:03:26.860 --> 00:03:29.820
April 1st and it isn't. So the idea
90
00:03:29.820 --> 00:03:31.540
that this company called Reflector Orbital
91
00:03:31.540 --> 00:03:34.500
have. And it's an idea that has
92
00:03:34.500 --> 00:03:36.260
led to them getting tens of millions of
93
00:03:36.260 --> 00:03:38.500
dollars of funding. So it's not like,
94
00:03:39.060 --> 00:03:41.960
yeah, this is. It's
95
00:03:41.960 --> 00:03:43.880
not like these are people in the pub saying,
96
00:03:43.880 --> 00:03:45.840
we've had a few. You know what'd be funny?
97
00:03:45.840 --> 00:03:48.040
This is a company taking it seriously.
98
00:03:48.040 --> 00:03:50.320
They're getting interns in, they've got a
99
00:03:50.320 --> 00:03:52.880
very active social media presence and their
100
00:03:52.880 --> 00:03:55.400
whole business is. Isn't it sad that it's
101
00:03:55.400 --> 00:03:57.920
dark at nighttime? Wouldn't it be great if
102
00:03:57.920 --> 00:03:59.800
you could pay somebody and get sunshine
103
00:03:59.800 --> 00:04:02.080
delivered to you at night? And that could
104
00:04:02.080 --> 00:04:03.960
power your solar panels or it could help you
105
00:04:03.960 --> 00:04:06.440
grow your crops or, you know, help you
106
00:04:06.440 --> 00:04:08.200
illuminate your sporting event or your
107
00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:10.940
concert. And the idea that
108
00:04:10.940 --> 00:04:12.260
they've got is that they will launch
109
00:04:12.260 --> 00:04:14.740
satellites into low Earth orbit, maybe 400
110
00:04:14.740 --> 00:04:17.260
kilometers up, that will go around the Earth
111
00:04:17.260 --> 00:04:18.860
every 90 minutes. So they're going to be
112
00:04:18.860 --> 00:04:21.100
fleetingly above any given location, above
113
00:04:21.100 --> 00:04:23.620
the horizon for a few minutes. And if you
114
00:04:23.620 --> 00:04:26.060
send them a few of your dollary dues, they
115
00:04:26.060 --> 00:04:28.660
will make their satellite reflect light down
116
00:04:28.900 --> 00:04:31.740
to your location and deliver
117
00:04:31.740 --> 00:04:34.300
sunlight to you. Now, there's all sorts of
118
00:04:34.300 --> 00:04:35.740
problems with this. Firstly, you know, I
119
00:04:35.740 --> 00:04:38.640
live, in Toowoomba. I'm 27 degrees south and
120
00:04:38.640 --> 00:04:41.480
I can see satellites that are about 400 km up
121
00:04:41.720 --> 00:04:43.920
in about the first hour after sunset, the
122
00:04:43.920 --> 00:04:46.400
first hour before sunrise, the rest of the
123
00:04:46.400 --> 00:04:48.640
night, those satellites are in shadow too. So
124
00:04:48.640 --> 00:04:51.240
there isn't any sun to reflect. Oh.
125
00:04:51.320 --> 00:04:52.840
Andrew Dunkley: So, you know, fair point.
126
00:04:53.400 --> 00:04:55.360
Jonti Horner: Nobody seems to be really mentioning that in
127
00:04:55.360 --> 00:04:57.480
the narrative of how this will work. But even
128
00:04:57.480 --> 00:04:58.920
ignoring that, think about the International
129
00:04:59.000 --> 00:05:00.920
Space Station going overhead. And you can get
130
00:05:00.920 --> 00:05:02.760
predictions of this from wonderful websites
131
00:05:02.760 --> 00:05:05.710
like heavensabove.com and the space
132
00:05:05.710 --> 00:05:07.030
station becomes visible,
133
00:05:08.630 --> 00:05:10.840
passes over, and then goes into the shadow.
134
00:05:10.840 --> 00:05:12.840
And you might get five, six minutes of it
135
00:05:12.840 --> 00:05:15.840
going overhead, if you're lucky. Yeah. And
136
00:05:15.840 --> 00:05:18.480
then it's gone. So you have this idea that
137
00:05:18.480 --> 00:05:20.280
these mirrors, that they're going to launch
138
00:05:20.280 --> 00:05:22.920
at about that altitude, and
139
00:05:23.160 --> 00:05:25.160
if you want them to illuminate a single point
140
00:05:25.160 --> 00:05:26.880
on the ground, they've got to be turning. So
141
00:05:26.880 --> 00:05:29.120
they keep rotating the light to that point as
142
00:05:29.120 --> 00:05:31.870
they pass overhead. Mm. When they're
143
00:05:31.870 --> 00:05:33.950
passed overhead, what do they do? They can't
144
00:05:33.950 --> 00:05:36.910
just turn off the mirror. So is that
145
00:05:36.910 --> 00:05:39.110
suggesting that you're gonna have a beam of
146
00:05:39.110 --> 00:05:41.110
light sweeping across the countryside at
147
00:05:41.110 --> 00:05:44.030
orbital speed? Like when you're trying
148
00:05:44.030 --> 00:05:45.870
to entertain a cat and you're shining a laser
149
00:05:45.870 --> 00:05:47.230
pointer on the floor and the cat's chasing
150
00:05:47.230 --> 00:05:48.680
it, you've got a beam going across the Earth.
151
00:05:48.680 --> 00:05:51.330
yeah. Going across the skies of all these
152
00:05:51.330 --> 00:05:54.330
people who didn't pay for the service. Not
153
00:05:54.330 --> 00:05:56.020
just that, how do you get enough sunlight
154
00:05:56.020 --> 00:05:58.960
down to be functional? So
155
00:05:58.960 --> 00:06:00.800
these satellites are going to be small enough
156
00:06:00.800 --> 00:06:03.200
to launch. So you're talking about a mirror a
157
00:06:03.200 --> 00:06:06.160
few meters across, 400 kilometers away,
158
00:06:06.160 --> 00:06:08.160
trying to reflect sunlight down, and they,
159
00:06:08.160 --> 00:06:11.000
they talk about how the diameter of the
160
00:06:11.000 --> 00:06:13.600
beam will be about 5km across.
161
00:06:14.880 --> 00:06:17.160
So that means if I pay for them to deliver
162
00:06:17.160 --> 00:06:19.320
light to my backyard, anybody in a five
163
00:06:19.320 --> 00:06:22.040
kilometer diameter area around me also get
164
00:06:22.040 --> 00:06:24.000
illuminated as well, for free, whether they
165
00:06:24.000 --> 00:06:24.960
want to or not.
166
00:06:25.040 --> 00:06:26.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, but not just that.
167
00:06:26.560 --> 00:06:27.960
Jonti Horner: The light's not going to be that bright,
168
00:06:27.960 --> 00:06:30.200
because if you've got a 1 meter sized mirror
169
00:06:30.520 --> 00:06:32.560
reflecting sunlight, and then you spread that
170
00:06:32.560 --> 00:06:35.320
light over an area that is 5km in diameter,
171
00:06:35.720 --> 00:06:37.920
you're spreading that light awfully thin. So
172
00:06:37.920 --> 00:06:40.640
any area on the ground there is not going to
173
00:06:40.640 --> 00:06:43.000
see broad daylight. They're going to see
174
00:06:43.000 --> 00:06:45.040
something that is comparable in brightness or
175
00:06:45.040 --> 00:06:46.760
a few times brighter than the full moon,
176
00:06:47.480 --> 00:06:50.320
which is. Okay, that's enough light for you
177
00:06:50.320 --> 00:06:52.360
to go out and do something in the backyard
178
00:06:52.360 --> 00:06:54.160
by. But it's not particularly enough light to
179
00:06:54.160 --> 00:06:56.740
get really effective solar power from. So if
180
00:06:56.740 --> 00:06:58.460
you want to make this effective, you're going
181
00:06:58.460 --> 00:07:01.460
to have to launch hundreds of thousands
182
00:07:01.540 --> 00:07:04.220
of these mirrors, all to work in
183
00:07:04.220 --> 00:07:06.580
concert to beam towards a given location,
184
00:07:07.220 --> 00:07:09.980
which doesn't sound that feasible. Add to
185
00:07:09.980 --> 00:07:11.580
that the fact that these are Big floating
186
00:07:11.580 --> 00:07:14.380
targets in space that space debris can hit
187
00:07:14.380 --> 00:07:17.220
and smash, which means that a, you could
188
00:07:17.220 --> 00:07:18.940
get all this debris scattered off in all
189
00:07:18.940 --> 00:07:21.660
sorts of different directions, but also that
190
00:07:21.660 --> 00:07:23.180
it's going to be hard for them to control the
191
00:07:23.180 --> 00:07:25.760
direction the mirror's pointing. So you've
192
00:07:25.760 --> 00:07:27.440
got all sorts of problems here. I mean, I
193
00:07:27.440 --> 00:07:29.760
think there's growing and
194
00:07:29.760 --> 00:07:32.360
demonstrated evidence, and Fred's talked
195
00:07:32.360 --> 00:07:34.240
about this to death, about all the negative
196
00:07:34.240 --> 00:07:36.960
effects artificial light at night has. We've
197
00:07:36.960 --> 00:07:38.720
got effects on people. You've got increased
198
00:07:38.720 --> 00:07:41.360
cancer rates, a very bizarre but
199
00:07:41.440 --> 00:07:44.120
very significant link between light at night
200
00:07:44.120 --> 00:07:45.960
and an increased risk of breast cancer for
201
00:07:45.960 --> 00:07:48.040
women. Believe it or not, just as one
202
00:07:48.040 --> 00:07:50.320
example, you've got the impact in our
203
00:07:50.320 --> 00:07:52.600
circadian rhythms, the fact that we need it
204
00:07:52.600 --> 00:07:55.510
to be dark to sleep, then you've got all the
205
00:07:55.590 --> 00:07:57.990
impact on flora and fauna. Now, I've visited
206
00:07:57.990 --> 00:07:59.830
some wonderful places on the coast of
207
00:07:59.990 --> 00:08:02.510
Queensland to do outreach sessions, you know,
208
00:08:02.510 --> 00:08:04.790
some kind of night sky observing. And a lot
209
00:08:04.790 --> 00:08:06.510
of these places are places where turtles
210
00:08:06.510 --> 00:08:09.509
nest. In fact, I'm going next weekend to the
211
00:08:09.509 --> 00:08:11.270
wonderful Lady Elliot island on the reef to
212
00:08:11.270 --> 00:08:13.030
do some outreach. And I go there several
213
00:08:13.030 --> 00:08:15.590
times a year. And all of their resort is
214
00:08:15.590 --> 00:08:18.310
designed to keep light down and pointed at
215
00:08:18.310 --> 00:08:19.790
the ground and have lights that get turned
216
00:08:19.790 --> 00:08:22.330
off because baby turtles, when they hatch,
217
00:08:23.210 --> 00:08:25.650
they navigate to the ocean by looking at the
218
00:08:25.650 --> 00:08:27.850
very faint light on the horizon, light
219
00:08:27.850 --> 00:08:29.790
reflecting off the ocean. And, that's what
220
00:08:29.790 --> 00:08:31.750
sets their internal compass as they start
221
00:08:31.750 --> 00:08:34.670
their lives. And if you have stray light,
222
00:08:34.670 --> 00:08:36.349
they go the wrong way and they end up under
223
00:08:36.349 --> 00:08:38.430
the buildings and on the road and things like
224
00:08:38.430 --> 00:08:41.190
this. Yeah, so there's huge impacts on life.
225
00:08:41.830 --> 00:08:44.390
But I think the biggest concern about this is
226
00:08:44.390 --> 00:08:46.700
the safety aspect. You know, you're driving
227
00:08:46.700 --> 00:08:48.780
around and I know here in regional Australia,
228
00:08:48.860 --> 00:08:50.740
most of our roads don't have street lights
229
00:08:50.740 --> 00:08:52.740
and that's perfectly fine. It's safer. As
230
00:08:52.740 --> 00:08:54.980
such, you drive along with your full beam on
231
00:08:54.980 --> 00:08:56.500
and any kangaroo that you see, you've got
232
00:08:56.500 --> 00:08:58.660
room to do something about it. So you're
233
00:08:58.660 --> 00:09:00.580
driving along on this pitch black road and,
234
00:09:00.530 --> 00:09:02.290
suddenly from nowhere, something brighter
235
00:09:02.290 --> 00:09:04.210
than the full moon shines full head on in
236
00:09:04.210 --> 00:09:06.890
your view. You're dazzled. That's
237
00:09:06.890 --> 00:09:09.130
hugely dangerous. Odd enough, if you're
238
00:09:09.130 --> 00:09:10.810
driving on the ground, if you're a pilot
239
00:09:10.810 --> 00:09:13.000
coming in to land, and suddenly somebody's
240
00:09:13.000 --> 00:09:15.880
trying to spotlight in your face, that's not
241
00:09:15.880 --> 00:09:18.440
going to be a particularly pleasant outcome
242
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:21.160
for you and the passengers in your plane. And
243
00:09:21.160 --> 00:09:23.560
so there's all these issues there that
244
00:09:24.040 --> 00:09:26.040
any one of them will be enough for you to
245
00:09:26.040 --> 00:09:29.040
say, this is a really foolish idea. It
246
00:09:29.040 --> 00:09:31.200
is not something that is likely to work
247
00:09:31.200 --> 00:09:33.920
anyway, but it's a really foolish
248
00:09:33.920 --> 00:09:35.640
idea from the ground up. It's only going to
249
00:09:35.640 --> 00:09:37.720
work near twilight. You're going to have to
250
00:09:37.720 --> 00:09:39.560
launch thousands of satellites to make it
251
00:09:39.560 --> 00:09:42.350
work, but it isn't stopping people funding
252
00:09:42.350 --> 00:09:44.160
them. And, this company, like I say, has
253
00:09:44.160 --> 00:09:47.000
applied to the FCC in the US for
254
00:09:47.000 --> 00:09:48.880
permission to launch the first of these
255
00:09:48.880 --> 00:09:50.800
satellites, which they've named Earundel 1
256
00:09:50.800 --> 00:09:52.960
after the light from Lord of the Rings.
257
00:09:53.520 --> 00:09:56.359
Earundel 1. They're hoping to launch April,
258
00:09:56.359 --> 00:09:59.240
May time next year, 2026, to
259
00:09:59.240 --> 00:10:02.080
demonstrate that their wonderful great idea
260
00:10:02.080 --> 00:10:05.080
can work. And it's just yet another example
261
00:10:05.080 --> 00:10:07.440
of this kind of Wild west scenario we've got
262
00:10:07.440 --> 00:10:09.440
with the use of space around the Earth, where
263
00:10:09.910 --> 00:10:12.270
the use of space is really outstripping our
264
00:10:12.270 --> 00:10:14.470
ability to regulate and control that use.
265
00:10:14.950 --> 00:10:16.280
And, people are doing things because it
266
00:10:16.280 --> 00:10:17.960
seemed like a good idea at the time without
267
00:10:17.960 --> 00:10:20.240
any real thought about the practicality of
268
00:10:20.240 --> 00:10:22.790
it, whether it could work. And, normally you
269
00:10:22.790 --> 00:10:24.390
just think like, say you think this is an
270
00:10:24.390 --> 00:10:27.350
April Fool's Day kind of prank. But the
271
00:10:27.350 --> 00:10:29.670
fact that this company has raised tens of
272
00:10:29.670 --> 00:10:31.110
millions of dollars in kind of venture
273
00:10:31.110 --> 00:10:32.290
capital, it's supported by A M
274
00:10:32.510 --> 00:10:35.320
multibillionaire, is really, really
275
00:10:35.320 --> 00:10:37.360
concerning. And that's why a group of
276
00:10:37.360 --> 00:10:39.600
astronomers, including Jessica Heim, who's
277
00:10:39.600 --> 00:10:42.520
doing a PhD with me at UNISQ, have put
278
00:10:42.520 --> 00:10:45.160
out this fact sheet with lots of information,
279
00:10:45.320 --> 00:10:47.820
loads of links, number of astronomers in the
280
00:10:47.820 --> 00:10:49.980
US who people in the media can contact for
281
00:10:49.980 --> 00:10:52.820
more information and suggestions about what
282
00:10:52.820 --> 00:10:55.500
people can do to flag up how catastrophically
283
00:10:55.500 --> 00:10:57.660
dumb this is. And that includes submit
284
00:10:57.660 --> 00:10:59.580
comments on the application to the Federal
285
00:10:59.580 --> 00:11:02.170
Communications Commission in the US to demand
286
00:11:02.170 --> 00:11:04.450
an environmental review of reflected light
287
00:11:04.450 --> 00:11:06.250
from orbit. Contact government
288
00:11:06.250 --> 00:11:08.690
representatives, particularly in the US but
289
00:11:08.690 --> 00:11:10.970
also locally where you live, to try and raise
290
00:11:10.970 --> 00:11:13.490
noise about this, but also tell people about
291
00:11:13.490 --> 00:11:15.850
it and point out how dumb it is. Because I
292
00:11:15.850 --> 00:11:17.769
can understand that if you don't really think
293
00:11:17.769 --> 00:11:20.090
about this too much, you can think, yeah,
294
00:11:20.090 --> 00:11:21.570
there are times it'd be really nice to have a
295
00:11:21.570 --> 00:11:23.250
bit of extra light at night.
296
00:11:23.250 --> 00:11:24.690
I didn't get round to doing the gardening.
297
00:11:24.690 --> 00:11:26.210
It'd be good to mow the lawn tonight.
298
00:11:26.290 --> 00:11:27.930
Wouldn't it be great if I could just turn on
299
00:11:27.930 --> 00:11:29.690
the spotlight and have half an hour of my
300
00:11:29.690 --> 00:11:32.660
backyard being daily, at night for me to do
301
00:11:32.660 --> 00:11:35.620
that job? And you need to talk about it and
302
00:11:35.620 --> 00:11:37.580
you need to think about it to see why this is
303
00:11:37.580 --> 00:11:40.540
just so catastrophically dumb. In
304
00:11:40.540 --> 00:11:43.460
so, so many ways that you would have thought
305
00:11:43.460 --> 00:11:46.220
it'd be an unstarter, but yet they're getting
306
00:11:46.220 --> 00:11:46.540
money.
307
00:11:47.500 --> 00:11:49.980
Andrew Dunkley: I can't see or understand
308
00:11:50.780 --> 00:11:53.180
any logic in this. And,
309
00:11:54.050 --> 00:11:56.370
the way in low Earth orbit, as you said,
310
00:11:56.370 --> 00:11:58.010
there's only going to be a few minutes of
311
00:11:58.010 --> 00:12:00.330
light. It's not like they can light a stadium
312
00:12:00.330 --> 00:12:03.150
for four hours straight. Not yet, any. But,
313
00:12:03.600 --> 00:12:05.420
even if they could, that's going to take a
314
00:12:05.420 --> 00:12:07.940
lot of hardware up in space. And there's more
315
00:12:07.940 --> 00:12:09.380
light pollution on Earth.
316
00:12:09.380 --> 00:12:10.260
Jonti Horner: Which is a big problem.
317
00:12:10.610 --> 00:12:12.930
Andrew Dunkley: Fred and Marnie are so heavily involved in
318
00:12:12.930 --> 00:12:15.370
the Dark Skies project. This would just blow
319
00:12:15.370 --> 00:12:16.290
that out of the water.
320
00:12:16.690 --> 00:12:18.489
Jonti Horner: Well, it would. And I mean, to light that
321
00:12:18.489 --> 00:12:20.370
stadium for four hours, you would need
322
00:12:20.850 --> 00:12:23.650
mirrors going overhead continuously in a
323
00:12:23.650 --> 00:12:26.250
parade. You'd need that stadium to be near
324
00:12:26.250 --> 00:12:28.330
enough to the pole on it to be summertime
325
00:12:28.330 --> 00:12:31.300
that those satellites were always in sunlight
326
00:12:31.380 --> 00:12:33.020
or you'd need to put them further from the
327
00:12:33.020 --> 00:12:35.020
Earth. The further you move them from the
328
00:12:35.020 --> 00:12:37.220
Earth, the more spread out the light will be,
329
00:12:37.620 --> 00:12:39.580
and so therefore the more satellites you'll
330
00:12:39.580 --> 00:12:42.580
need, you know. And if you get
331
00:12:42.580 --> 00:12:44.340
to that stage, if you've got that many
332
00:12:44.340 --> 00:12:46.140
satellites in orbit around the Earth, you may
333
00:12:46.140 --> 00:12:48.940
as well build a mirror that
334
00:12:48.940 --> 00:12:51.820
is held in geostationary orbit that covers
335
00:12:51.820 --> 00:12:54.320
half of the size of the Earth, and bears the
336
00:12:54.320 --> 00:12:55.920
entirety of that side of the Earth in
337
00:12:55.920 --> 00:12:58.100
sunlight. And, you know, while you're at it,
338
00:12:58.100 --> 00:12:59.260
you're increasing the amount of heat coming
339
00:12:59.260 --> 00:13:00.540
to the Earth and we'll just speed up global
340
00:13:00.540 --> 00:13:01.860
warming and kill everybody.
341
00:13:03.060 --> 00:13:05.980
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, there is a groundswell of discontent,
342
00:13:05.980 --> 00:13:08.540
as you mentioned. So people are starting to
343
00:13:08.540 --> 00:13:10.820
make some noise about this. I hope the fcc,
344
00:13:13.180 --> 00:13:15.100
you know, looks at both sides of the story.
345
00:13:15.700 --> 00:13:18.700
how, just quickly, how likely are they
346
00:13:18.700 --> 00:13:21.650
to get their license and start testing
347
00:13:21.650 --> 00:13:21.930
this?
348
00:13:22.250 --> 00:13:24.130
Jonti Horner: I mean, a pessimist would say it's almost
349
00:13:24.130 --> 00:13:26.210
certain to happen because, you know, the FCC
350
00:13:26.210 --> 00:13:28.690
are quite happy for sailing to be putting up
351
00:13:28.690 --> 00:13:30.490
the number of satellites. They are looking at
352
00:13:30.490 --> 00:13:33.250
42,000 long term. So it
353
00:13:33.250 --> 00:13:35.450
doesn't seem like there's much thought of
354
00:13:35.450 --> 00:13:37.850
that. And there's the added concern. I think
355
00:13:37.850 --> 00:13:39.330
one of the things that is hindering
356
00:13:39.330 --> 00:13:41.730
legislation is the fact that you can launch
357
00:13:41.730 --> 00:13:44.210
the space from many, many countries. And so
358
00:13:44.210 --> 00:13:46.260
companies can quite rightly say to, a given
359
00:13:46.260 --> 00:13:48.660
legislating body, if you don't give us this,
360
00:13:48.660 --> 00:13:50.700
we'll just take our business elsewhere and
361
00:13:50.700 --> 00:13:53.340
someone else will. And, you know, once you're
362
00:13:53.340 --> 00:13:55.700
launched from a given country, you're above
363
00:13:56.100 --> 00:13:58.420
all of the countries of the world as you move
364
00:13:58.420 --> 00:14:00.460
over them in your orbit. So it isn't like
365
00:14:00.460 --> 00:14:02.180
this thing is just going to affect people in
366
00:14:02.180 --> 00:14:03.660
the U.S. because it's been launched from the
367
00:14:03.660 --> 00:14:05.530
U.S. it's going to be going around the Earth,
368
00:14:05.530 --> 00:14:08.290
like say, running a five kilometer size beam
369
00:14:08.290 --> 00:14:10.920
of light across the surface of the earth,
370
00:14:11.270 --> 00:14:13.190
every 90 minutes as it goes round and round
371
00:14:13.190 --> 00:14:14.070
and round and round.
372
00:14:14.870 --> 00:14:17.030
Andrew Dunkley: It just doesn't, doesn't make much sense
373
00:14:17.030 --> 00:14:19.720
really. It sounds like pie in the sky. But,
374
00:14:20.070 --> 00:14:22.750
yeah, they're actually seriously considering
375
00:14:22.750 --> 00:14:25.420
doing this. And yeah, hopefully
376
00:14:25.420 --> 00:14:28.010
common sense will prevail, but, time will
377
00:14:28.010 --> 00:14:30.290
tell, I suppose we'll know next year whether
378
00:14:30.290 --> 00:14:32.690
or not they start testing these things.
379
00:14:33.140 --> 00:14:35.620
I know they did do this some years ago
380
00:14:36.180 --> 00:14:38.500
with a mirror array up in space and they,
381
00:14:38.650 --> 00:14:41.130
they lit up a spot on Siberia or something.
382
00:14:43.140 --> 00:14:45.180
yeah, I don't know why they did that then. I
383
00:14:45.180 --> 00:14:47.740
can't remember. But, it was, somewhat
384
00:14:47.740 --> 00:14:49.860
successful, although quite dim. But, This,
385
00:14:49.860 --> 00:14:52.660
this just. Yeah, I mean, I don't know where
386
00:14:52.660 --> 00:14:55.610
it stops. there seems to be this,
387
00:14:55.610 --> 00:14:58.490
this constant tug of war between what
388
00:14:58.490 --> 00:15:01.290
we need up there and what we don't need up
389
00:15:01.290 --> 00:15:03.600
there. And the. Yeah,
390
00:15:04.240 --> 00:15:06.040
it's swinging the wrong way at the moment, I
391
00:15:06.040 --> 00:15:08.280
suppose, would be the way to describe it.
392
00:15:08.280 --> 00:15:10.630
But, I dare say this will get a lot more
393
00:15:10.630 --> 00:15:13.430
press and a lot more pushback and maybe the
394
00:15:13.430 --> 00:15:16.360
fcc, will look at the
395
00:15:16.360 --> 00:15:17.680
problems associated with this.
396
00:15:18.320 --> 00:15:20.240
Jonti Horner: Really hope so. I mean, it reminds me, and
397
00:15:20.240 --> 00:15:22.000
I'm probably paraphrasing terribly, but
398
00:15:22.000 --> 00:15:23.680
there's a famous science fiction quote,
399
00:15:23.920 --> 00:15:25.640
something along the lines of, you know, they
400
00:15:25.640 --> 00:15:27.400
spent so much time and effort trying to show
401
00:15:27.400 --> 00:15:28.840
that they could, that they never put any
402
00:15:28.840 --> 00:15:31.180
thought into whether they should. It feels
403
00:15:31.180 --> 00:15:31.980
like all of those.
404
00:15:32.300 --> 00:15:35.170
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, yes, indeed. All right. yeah, it's
405
00:15:35.170 --> 00:15:37.520
a project, you might find online. It's only
406
00:15:37.520 --> 00:15:39.840
just sort of starting to emerge. I don't know
407
00:15:39.840 --> 00:15:41.830
how much press it's got yet, but, it will
408
00:15:41.830 --> 00:15:44.710
grow. Because it's one of those stories that,
409
00:15:45.279 --> 00:15:47.960
is also fascinating and they're the ones that
410
00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:49.200
generally get a lot of attention.
411
00:15:49.520 --> 00:15:51.360
Jonti Horner: Looking at the website, the company seems to
412
00:15:51.360 --> 00:15:52.800
have been around for quite a while and I
413
00:15:52.800 --> 00:15:54.520
think it's probably getting attention now
414
00:15:54.520 --> 00:15:57.350
because previously everybody thought, well,
415
00:15:57.350 --> 00:16:00.230
no, this will never fly. This is clearly not
416
00:16:00.230 --> 00:16:02.470
something we should be worried about. And now
417
00:16:02.470 --> 00:16:04.430
it's very clear that actually it is, because
418
00:16:04.430 --> 00:16:07.350
they're in for licenses and they've got a lot
419
00:16:07.350 --> 00:16:08.270
of money invested.
420
00:16:08.590 --> 00:16:09.030
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
421
00:16:09.030 --> 00:16:09.430
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
422
00:16:09.430 --> 00:16:11.630
Andrew Dunkley: And one wonders who's really going to pay
423
00:16:11.630 --> 00:16:14.430
them to shed a little light on their
424
00:16:14.510 --> 00:16:16.350
whatever. I mean, what would you use it for?
425
00:16:16.910 --> 00:16:18.830
Solar panels. You said they won't work.
426
00:16:19.550 --> 00:16:21.290
Football, matches. Well, we've got lights for
427
00:16:21.290 --> 00:16:23.490
that. I don't know. I don't know.
428
00:16:23.490 --> 00:16:25.370
Jonti Horner: We can do a bit of quick mental arithmetic to
429
00:16:25.370 --> 00:16:27.240
cheer everybody up. I mean, the brightness of
430
00:16:27.390 --> 00:16:30.150
the full moon to first order very roughly, is
431
00:16:30.150 --> 00:16:32.750
about magnitude -12 in the wonderful
432
00:16:32.830 --> 00:16:35.070
complex magnitude system astronomers are so
433
00:16:35.070 --> 00:16:37.710
fond of. The brightness of the noonday sun's
434
00:16:37.710 --> 00:16:40.350
about magnitude -27. So that's a 15
435
00:16:40.350 --> 00:16:43.189
magnitude difference. Now, that magnitude
436
00:16:43.189 --> 00:16:45.990
system is a logarithmic scale.
437
00:16:45.990 --> 00:16:47.950
So every five magnitudes you're brighter off
438
00:16:47.950 --> 00:16:50.270
enter than something is equivalent to a
439
00:16:50.270 --> 00:16:52.990
factor of 100 influx. So if you're
440
00:16:52.990 --> 00:16:55.950
15 magnitudes, that's three lots of 100. So
441
00:16:55.950 --> 00:16:58.930
100 times 100 times 100, that's 100
442
00:16:58.930 --> 00:17:01.250
becomes 10,000 becomes a million.
443
00:17:02.210 --> 00:17:04.570
So if the light from this thing is about the
444
00:17:04.570 --> 00:17:06.450
brightness of the full moon, it's a million
445
00:17:06.450 --> 00:17:08.850
times fainter than the sun is.
446
00:17:09.810 --> 00:17:12.170
So if you've got your solar panels that are
447
00:17:12.170 --> 00:17:15.130
generating in full sunlight, you know, a few
448
00:17:15.130 --> 00:17:17.710
hundred watts of power, right. they're
449
00:17:17.710 --> 00:17:20.230
generating a few hundred watts. Divide that
450
00:17:20.230 --> 00:17:23.030
by a million and you're not
451
00:17:23.030 --> 00:17:25.080
generating enough to register. Yeah,
452
00:17:25.880 --> 00:17:26.360
yeah.
453
00:17:26.440 --> 00:17:28.800
Andrew Dunkley: It would be like putting up a solar panel to
454
00:17:28.800 --> 00:17:31.560
power a light and using that light to
455
00:17:31.720 --> 00:17:33.480
generate the power to power that light.
456
00:17:33.480 --> 00:17:36.080
Jonti Horner: It's just absolutely. Or just holding a
457
00:17:36.080 --> 00:17:38.920
match, a lit match near your solar panels and
458
00:17:38.920 --> 00:17:41.120
expecting it to run your entire house. Yeah,
459
00:17:41.120 --> 00:17:41.240
yeah.
460
00:17:41.240 --> 00:17:43.670
Andrew Dunkley: Ah, it's crazy stuff. All right, yeah, keep
461
00:17:43.670 --> 00:17:45.630
an eye out for that story and if you feel
462
00:17:45.630 --> 00:17:47.860
strongly enough about it, maybe, get
463
00:17:47.860 --> 00:17:48.460
involved.
464
00:17:49.010 --> 00:17:50.900
let's move on to our next story. this
465
00:17:50.900 --> 00:17:53.540
involves a near miss for Earth with asteroid,
466
00:17:54.040 --> 00:17:56.660
2025 TF just skimming us,
467
00:17:56.980 --> 00:17:59.780
and we didn't see it till it was too late,
468
00:18:00.100 --> 00:18:02.510
technically speaking. And, it kind of
469
00:18:02.510 --> 00:18:05.230
dovetails into the previous story because if
470
00:18:05.230 --> 00:18:07.630
there's going to be more light up there, it's
471
00:18:07.630 --> 00:18:09.710
going to make us harder, make things harder
472
00:18:09.710 --> 00:18:11.780
for us in terms of, you know, getting these
473
00:18:11.780 --> 00:18:14.420
ready alerts for potential objects that could
474
00:18:14.420 --> 00:18:17.230
strike Earth. this one wasn't huge,
475
00:18:17.310 --> 00:18:20.260
but, yeah, it was, it was there and
476
00:18:20.260 --> 00:18:22.420
it was a detectable object and we didn't see
477
00:18:22.420 --> 00:18:22.700
it.
478
00:18:22.940 --> 00:18:25.820
Jonti Horner: Yes. And that's the issue. Now, this
479
00:18:25.820 --> 00:18:28.540
thing, you know, quite happy to say, straight
480
00:18:28.540 --> 00:18:30.940
up the size of this thing is such that it
481
00:18:30.940 --> 00:18:32.780
would have put on a nice light show as it,
482
00:18:32.940 --> 00:18:35.020
you know, was quite harmlessly destroyed in
483
00:18:35.020 --> 00:18:37.020
the atmosphere. It was probably about 1 to 3
484
00:18:37.020 --> 00:18:37.740
meters across.
485
00:18:38.060 --> 00:18:38.500
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
486
00:18:38.500 --> 00:18:40.740
Jonti Horner: But of the things that have not entered the
487
00:18:40.740 --> 00:18:43.540
Earth's atmosphere, but have come close, this
488
00:18:43.540 --> 00:18:45.900
is the second closest on record. Now,
489
00:18:46.700 --> 00:18:48.820
back in. I'm trying to remember exactly when
490
00:18:48.820 --> 00:18:50.700
the great daylight fireball was. But in the
491
00:18:50.700 --> 00:18:53.660
early 1970s, there was a fireball
492
00:18:54.060 --> 00:18:56.740
observed widely over, North America, which
493
00:18:56.740 --> 00:18:59.180
was what we call an earth grazing object, and
494
00:18:59.180 --> 00:19:00.780
it actually hit the atmosphere and skimmed
495
00:19:00.780 --> 00:19:03.500
back out. That is not counted when people
496
00:19:03.500 --> 00:19:05.660
talk about these two closest encounters that
497
00:19:05.660 --> 00:19:07.340
didn't hit Earth because technically that did
498
00:19:07.340 --> 00:19:09.620
hit the atmosphere. The fact that it skipped
499
00:19:09.620 --> 00:19:12.100
back out again is beside the point.
500
00:19:12.590 --> 00:19:14.630
And that was a daylight fireball. It created
501
00:19:14.630 --> 00:19:16.630
sonic booms over a couple of the US States
502
00:19:16.630 --> 00:19:18.830
and was really the first kind of fireball
503
00:19:18.830 --> 00:19:20.630
event that was widely captured because it was
504
00:19:20.630 --> 00:19:23.590
early in the era of modern holiday
505
00:19:23.590 --> 00:19:25.430
snaps. And this was a time when people were
506
00:19:25.430 --> 00:19:27.310
taking photos on holiday, then boring their
507
00:19:27.310 --> 00:19:28.270
friends when they came home.
508
00:19:28.350 --> 00:19:30.430
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, 1972 it was.
509
00:19:30.750 --> 00:19:32.590
Jonti Horner: That's the one. Yeah, I thought it was. It
510
00:19:32.590 --> 00:19:35.040
was, probably something smaller than a house
511
00:19:35.040 --> 00:19:37.560
that came within about 57 km
512
00:19:37.940 --> 00:19:40.460
of the surface of the Earth. And put that in
513
00:19:40.460 --> 00:19:42.100
perspective, that's like, you know, the old
514
00:19:42.100 --> 00:19:43.740
William Tell thing of shooting an apple off
515
00:19:43.740 --> 00:19:45.780
somebody's head. That's like shooting the
516
00:19:45.780 --> 00:19:47.780
arrow at the apple and touching the skin of
517
00:19:47.780 --> 00:19:50.300
the apple without breaking it. It's coming
518
00:19:50.300 --> 00:19:52.740
within less than 1% of the diameter of the
519
00:19:52.740 --> 00:19:54.900
Earth of actually hitting our planet. This
520
00:19:54.900 --> 00:19:57.660
one wasn't quite that close. But it's an
521
00:19:57.660 --> 00:19:59.980
object that was discovered by the Catalina
522
00:19:59.980 --> 00:20:02.780
Sky Survey a few hours after
523
00:20:02.780 --> 00:20:04.500
its closest approach to the Earth,
524
00:20:05.550 --> 00:20:08.470
basically whizzed over Antarctica. So I think
525
00:20:08.470 --> 00:20:10.190
it's one of those that even if it had hit the
526
00:20:10.190 --> 00:20:11.790
atmosphere and burned up, very few people
527
00:20:11.790 --> 00:20:13.350
would have seen it, but a lot of penguins
528
00:20:13.350 --> 00:20:16.160
would have been impressed. at
529
00:20:16.160 --> 00:20:19.160
its closest, it was 428km above the
530
00:20:19.160 --> 00:20:21.400
Earth's surface. So that's slightly closer
531
00:20:21.640 --> 00:20:23.760
than reflector orbital. Want to put their
532
00:20:23.760 --> 00:20:25.990
mirrors. so if it had come through a few
533
00:20:25.990 --> 00:20:27.270
years later, we could have hoped it would
534
00:20:27.270 --> 00:20:28.670
have knocked a few of them out of the way.
535
00:20:28.670 --> 00:20:31.450
But it's a really close approach.
536
00:20:31.690 --> 00:20:33.880
And, yes, it's an object that in this case
537
00:20:33.880 --> 00:20:35.680
wouldn't have been big enough to cause any
538
00:20:35.760 --> 00:20:38.600
damage, wouldn't have had any impacts felt at
539
00:20:38.600 --> 00:20:41.240
ground level. It may have, if it was made of
540
00:20:41.240 --> 00:20:42.840
the right stuff, dropped a few little bits of
541
00:20:42.840 --> 00:20:45.240
meteorite on the surface, but that's about
542
00:20:45.240 --> 00:20:47.320
it. But it's a reminder,
543
00:20:48.070 --> 00:20:50.230
of the fact that as we're looking for things
544
00:20:50.310 --> 00:20:52.040
that come close enough to the Earth, to pose
545
00:20:52.040 --> 00:20:54.840
a threat. We haven't found them all yet.
546
00:20:54.840 --> 00:20:57.730
Now probably about 75% of the threat
547
00:20:57.730 --> 00:20:59.140
to the Earth, from impacts comes from the
548
00:20:59.140 --> 00:21:01.540
near Earth asteroids. And they're objects at
549
00:21:01.540 --> 00:21:04.140
the bottom of the asteroid belt, typically
550
00:21:04.140 --> 00:21:06.820
rocky or metallic objects moving on orbits at
551
00:21:06.820 --> 00:21:08.820
a relatively short period in the inner solar
552
00:21:08.820 --> 00:21:10.580
system. And they're short lived. You know, if
553
00:21:10.580 --> 00:21:12.380
you come back in a million years, most of the
554
00:21:12.380 --> 00:21:14.300
ones we currently know will have been
555
00:21:14.300 --> 00:21:15.820
removed. They'll have been ejected from the
556
00:21:15.820 --> 00:21:17.740
solar system or collided with a planet or
557
00:21:17.740 --> 00:21:20.020
fallen apart or fallen into the sun. But
558
00:21:20.020 --> 00:21:21.980
they're continually being repopulated from
559
00:21:21.980 --> 00:21:24.780
the asteroid belt. Some of them hide
560
00:21:24.780 --> 00:21:26.660
closer to the sun than we are and then pop
561
00:21:26.660 --> 00:21:28.420
out to say hello. We were talking about that
562
00:21:28.420 --> 00:21:30.300
last week with the objects near Venus.
563
00:21:31.500 --> 00:21:33.460
But there's this effort to try and find all
564
00:21:33.460 --> 00:21:36.460
of them. And the earlier you can find them,
565
00:21:36.460 --> 00:21:38.859
and the earlier you can figure out if there's
566
00:21:38.859 --> 00:21:40.980
going to be an encounter with the Earth that
567
00:21:40.980 --> 00:21:43.300
poses a threat, the better the odds of you
568
00:21:43.300 --> 00:21:45.700
doing something about it. And we saw this
569
00:21:46.100 --> 00:21:48.100
kind of a bright light shone on this back at
570
00:21:48.100 --> 00:21:50.180
the start of 2025 with the object
571
00:21:50.960 --> 00:21:53.280
2024 yr 4. I think the name M was
572
00:21:53.680 --> 00:21:55.440
that for a while we thought had a
573
00:21:56.080 --> 00:21:58.080
substantial possibility of hitting the Earth
574
00:21:58.080 --> 00:22:01.040
in 2032 that we now know is not going to
575
00:22:01.040 --> 00:22:02.440
hit the Earth, but might hit the moon in
576
00:22:02.440 --> 00:22:04.680
2032. And that was a big success because we
577
00:22:04.680 --> 00:22:06.480
found it early enough to get a lot of data.
578
00:22:06.490 --> 00:22:07.830
and over the course of about a month
579
00:22:07.830 --> 00:22:10.550
astronomers observed it repeatedly until
580
00:22:10.550 --> 00:22:12.190
eventually we showed that it definitely
581
00:22:12.190 --> 00:22:13.790
wasn't going to hit the Earth in eight year
582
00:22:13.790 --> 00:22:15.910
time. And everybody kind of basically jumped
583
00:22:15.910 --> 00:22:17.270
up and down and said hooray. And there was
584
00:22:17.270 --> 00:22:19.720
much rejoicing. So that's like the ideal
585
00:22:19.720 --> 00:22:22.320
scenario. We find something when it passes
586
00:22:22.320 --> 00:22:25.280
relatively nearby on one apparition a
587
00:22:25.280 --> 00:22:27.600
few years before it would realistically pose
588
00:22:27.600 --> 00:22:30.200
a threat. And that's what we want to achieve.
589
00:22:30.280 --> 00:22:32.920
And the stated goal of a lot of the agencies
590
00:22:32.920 --> 00:22:34.520
looking for these things is to find all the
591
00:22:34.520 --> 00:22:36.600
objects bigger than about 100 meters across
592
00:22:37.160 --> 00:22:38.650
that could pose a threat to the Earth, and
593
00:22:38.650 --> 00:22:41.570
catalog them. And we haven't managed
594
00:22:41.570 --> 00:22:44.330
that yet. We even more haven't managed that
595
00:22:44.330 --> 00:22:45.930
when you take into account things like
596
00:22:45.930 --> 00:22:47.700
comets. You know we were talking about, about
597
00:22:47.700 --> 00:22:50.260
Comet Swan last week, which appeared from
598
00:22:50.580 --> 00:22:52.820
hiding behind the sun and came and was
599
00:22:52.820 --> 00:22:54.500
suddenly the brightest comet in the sky.
600
00:22:54.980 --> 00:22:56.940
Comets are coming in on orbits that take
601
00:22:56.940 --> 00:22:59.020
hundreds, thousands, sometimes even tens of
602
00:22:59.020 --> 00:23:00.900
thousands or millions of years to complete.
603
00:23:01.220 --> 00:23:02.740
So even if we find all the near Earth
604
00:23:02.740 --> 00:23:05.020
asteroids, we're still going to have comets
605
00:23:05.020 --> 00:23:06.940
coming in. So we'll have to stay vigilant and
606
00:23:06.940 --> 00:23:09.820
keep watching forevermore. But this
607
00:23:09.820 --> 00:23:12.300
is a really good reminder that despite how
608
00:23:12.300 --> 00:23:15.070
you feel, we're not there yet. We are still
609
00:23:15.070 --> 00:23:17.910
in a position where these things are
610
00:23:17.910 --> 00:23:20.030
catching us by surprise. And the worst case
611
00:23:20.030 --> 00:23:22.270
scenario is what happened in 2013 with the
612
00:23:22.270 --> 00:23:24.750
Chelyabinsk impactor to a similar
613
00:23:24.990 --> 00:23:27.070
level of what happened with comets 1 earlier
614
00:23:27.070 --> 00:23:28.829
this year in that as, ah, the object
615
00:23:28.829 --> 00:23:30.510
approaches the Earth and eventually gets
616
00:23:30.510 --> 00:23:32.310
close enough that it was visible in the
617
00:23:32.310 --> 00:23:34.190
nighttime sky, would be able to detect it.
618
00:23:34.590 --> 00:23:36.470
It's coming from the sunward side of the
619
00:23:36.470 --> 00:23:37.770
Earth, so it's hidden in the glare of
620
00:23:37.770 --> 00:23:40.540
daylight. And so that's why you
621
00:23:40.540 --> 00:23:42.340
don't want to try and detect something the
622
00:23:42.500 --> 00:23:44.820
moment it's on an approach to hit you. You
623
00:23:44.820 --> 00:23:47.020
want to find it well in advance. And with
624
00:23:47.020 --> 00:23:48.740
Charlie Abinsky, it demonstrated something
625
00:23:48.740 --> 00:23:51.060
big enough to injure people, damage a city
626
00:23:51.780 --> 00:23:53.420
we didn't find until it was in the
627
00:23:53.420 --> 00:23:55.540
atmosphere. And it was kind of too late. It
628
00:23:55.540 --> 00:23:56.660
was seconds from disaster.
629
00:23:57.060 --> 00:23:57.620
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed.
630
00:23:58.020 --> 00:24:00.940
Jonti Horner: Now there's hope. We've got Vera Rubin
631
00:24:00.940 --> 00:24:02.700
coming online. We saw a beautiful picture
632
00:24:02.700 --> 00:24:05.080
from that earlier this year. Vera Rubin's
633
00:24:05.080 --> 00:24:06.750
going to start getting data regularly,
634
00:24:07.340 --> 00:24:09.500
continuously later this year, early next
635
00:24:09.500 --> 00:24:11.500
year, that's when the Mayan mission starts.
636
00:24:11.500 --> 00:24:13.420
And Vera Rubin is going to be an exceptional
637
00:24:13.900 --> 00:24:16.420
thing finding tool no matter what. The thing
638
00:24:16.420 --> 00:24:18.340
is, it will find more of them than anybody's
639
00:24:18.340 --> 00:24:20.620
found before. From a solar system point of
640
00:24:20.620 --> 00:24:22.300
view. We're really excited because it will
641
00:24:22.620 --> 00:24:24.820
increase the number of objects we know by a
642
00:24:24.820 --> 00:24:27.020
factor of several to an order of magnitude
643
00:24:27.020 --> 00:24:29.380
within a year or two. And it'll be great at
644
00:24:29.380 --> 00:24:32.360
finding these things, but it'll be less
645
00:24:32.360 --> 00:24:34.360
great than it would have been thanks to all
646
00:24:34.360 --> 00:24:35.280
the stuff we keep watching.
647
00:24:35.280 --> 00:24:36.960
Then this is where it ties into the previous
648
00:24:37.120 --> 00:24:40.000
story. Also ties in again to the wonderful
649
00:24:40.000 --> 00:24:42.400
student who sent me the information about the
650
00:24:42.400 --> 00:24:44.480
reflector orbital stuff. Jessica Heim
651
00:24:45.360 --> 00:24:47.920
is finishing up her PhD with us at UNESCO.
652
00:24:47.920 --> 00:24:50.560
She's based in North America and she's
653
00:24:50.800 --> 00:24:53.200
done a lot of her work about light pollution
654
00:24:53.440 --> 00:24:55.710
and artificial, light at night and things
655
00:24:55.710 --> 00:24:57.750
like this. And one of her papers early in a
656
00:24:57.750 --> 00:25:00.740
PhD that she was a co author on was in
657
00:25:00.740 --> 00:25:02.860
Nature Astronomy. And they actually did a
658
00:25:02.860 --> 00:25:05.500
study looking at just the starlink satellites
659
00:25:05.500 --> 00:25:07.140
that were in orbit at that time, so not the
660
00:25:07.140 --> 00:25:10.060
predicted number in the future, and tried to
661
00:25:10.060 --> 00:25:13.020
quantify how much harder they would make
662
00:25:13.020 --> 00:25:14.700
life for Vera Rubin, and particularly how
663
00:25:14.700 --> 00:25:16.620
much harder they make it for Vera Rubin to
664
00:25:16.620 --> 00:25:18.100
find objects like the one we're just talking
665
00:25:18.100 --> 00:25:20.380
about that was over Antarctica.
666
00:25:21.180 --> 00:25:23.780
And what they found was the Starlink
667
00:25:23.780 --> 00:25:25.710
satellites that were in orbit at the time. So
668
00:25:25.710 --> 00:25:27.590
not the constellation we have now, which is
669
00:25:27.590 --> 00:25:30.190
big and not the final constellation would
670
00:25:30.190 --> 00:25:32.550
make it 10% harder for Vera Rubin to do its
671
00:25:32.550 --> 00:25:33.830
job. So in other words, it would have to
672
00:25:33.830 --> 00:25:36.030
observe for 10% longer. Roughly. I think the
673
00:25:36.030 --> 00:25:37.630
number was actually slightly higher than that
674
00:25:38.510 --> 00:25:40.630
in order to achieve the same results. Now
675
00:25:40.630 --> 00:25:42.390
when you're talking about a facility that's a
676
00:25:42.390 --> 00:25:45.190
billion dollar level facility, hundreds of
677
00:25:45.190 --> 00:25:47.950
millions of dollars to build, having to take
678
00:25:47.950 --> 00:25:50.150
10% longer to do something is a cost measured
679
00:25:50.150 --> 00:25:52.710
in tens of millions of dollars. Yeah, that's
680
00:25:52.710 --> 00:25:54.980
real impact in this. And what it means is
681
00:25:54.980 --> 00:25:56.540
that things like this are going to be harder
682
00:25:56.540 --> 00:25:58.620
to find. And our ability to
683
00:25:59.420 --> 00:26:02.300
detect potential threats is really
684
00:26:02.300 --> 00:26:05.300
kind of confused and obfuscated by the
685
00:26:05.300 --> 00:26:07.300
stuff we're putting to hang around in the
686
00:26:07.300 --> 00:26:09.540
foreground. It's like, I guess it's really
687
00:26:09.540 --> 00:26:11.500
easy to see a road sign on a clear day, but
688
00:26:11.500 --> 00:26:13.740
when it's foggy, it's a lot harder to spot it
689
00:26:13.740 --> 00:26:14.940
until you're right on that side.
690
00:26:15.180 --> 00:26:18.060
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, indeed. And
691
00:26:18.220 --> 00:26:20.630
if you want to read up on that story, about
692
00:26:20.630 --> 00:26:23.101
the near miss, you can do so@space
693
00:26:23.319 --> 00:26:25.860
space.com. this is Space Nuts with Andrew
694
00:26:25.860 --> 00:26:27.980
Dunkley and John T. Horner.
695
00:26:28.620 --> 00:26:30.860
Jonti Horner: Three, two, one.
696
00:26:31.500 --> 00:26:32.700
Andrew Dunkley: Space nuts.
697
00:26:33.100 --> 00:26:35.590
Now, Johnny, we have found the
698
00:26:35.590 --> 00:26:38.270
6,000th exoplanet.
699
00:26:38.350 --> 00:26:40.910
It took us 30 years, which is,
700
00:26:41.470 --> 00:26:43.940
you know, if you, if you look back at when we
701
00:26:43.940 --> 00:26:46.460
found the first one, it was quite a surprise
702
00:26:46.460 --> 00:26:49.310
for a bunch of reasons. mostly because
703
00:26:49.310 --> 00:26:51.550
we didn't even know they could have existed
704
00:26:51.550 --> 00:26:53.830
beyond our solar system. Logic suggests, you
705
00:26:53.830 --> 00:26:56.270
know, if it's. We've got planets around our
706
00:26:56.270 --> 00:26:59.110
sun, other stars must have planets too.
707
00:26:59.750 --> 00:27:02.500
And 30 years ago, that was proven. Well, now
708
00:27:02.500 --> 00:27:04.620
we're up to number 6,000. When are we going
709
00:27:04.620 --> 00:27:06.700
to stop counting? Because it's going to reach
710
00:27:06.700 --> 00:27:08.340
a point where we're going to find millions
711
00:27:08.340 --> 00:27:10.140
upon millions of these things, isn't it?
712
00:27:10.460 --> 00:27:12.370
Jonti Horner: It is. And even the counting's a little bit
713
00:27:12.370 --> 00:27:15.330
confused because the resource I
714
00:27:15.330 --> 00:27:18.130
trust as kind of being the authoritative word
715
00:27:18.130 --> 00:27:20.690
on this is the NASA exoplanet archive, which
716
00:27:20.690 --> 00:27:22.610
is a wonderful resource. And they've got a
717
00:27:22.610 --> 00:27:25.610
certain threshold for what they consider a
718
00:27:25.610 --> 00:27:27.810
confirmed planet. And we've got all these
719
00:27:27.810 --> 00:27:29.970
candidate planets as well, of which there are
720
00:27:29.970 --> 00:27:31.730
thousands more where we're fairly Confident
721
00:27:31.730 --> 00:27:33.410
there's a planet there, but it doesn't meet
722
00:27:33.410 --> 00:27:36.250
that rigorous criterion. There is a
723
00:27:36.250 --> 00:27:38.530
different exoplanet catalog run out of Europe
724
00:27:38.610 --> 00:27:40.490
that has a number higher because they are
725
00:27:40.490 --> 00:27:42.930
less strict on their criterion for
726
00:27:43.330 --> 00:27:45.740
confirmation. part of the reason I'm more
727
00:27:45.740 --> 00:27:47.660
skeptical about that catalog is that there's
728
00:27:47.660 --> 00:27:49.660
a number of planetary systems I've helped to
729
00:27:49.660 --> 00:27:52.020
kill and they've left them in their catalog.
730
00:27:52.180 --> 00:27:53.900
So we know for a fact those planets aren't
731
00:27:53.900 --> 00:27:55.950
there. I did some of that work and they still
732
00:27:55.950 --> 00:27:57.510
include them in their catalog, which puts
733
00:27:57.510 --> 00:27:59.470
them m on my naughty list. So I prefer the
734
00:27:59.470 --> 00:28:02.150
NASA one and the NASA one is the more
735
00:28:02.150 --> 00:28:04.670
cautious of them. It's really
736
00:28:04.670 --> 00:28:06.230
interesting how this has come though. You
737
00:28:06.230 --> 00:28:08.590
know, I'm, I'm 47 now. I don't feel it, but
738
00:28:08.590 --> 00:28:11.410
I'm getting on a little bit. I was a kid who
739
00:28:11.410 --> 00:28:13.370
was mad about astronomy. You know, like some
740
00:28:13.370 --> 00:28:14.850
of the people who send in their questions,
741
00:28:14.850 --> 00:28:16.490
some of the youngsters who send in questions.
742
00:28:16.970 --> 00:28:18.240
And when I was growing up, one of the
743
00:28:18.240 --> 00:28:19.920
questions I'd have been asking is do you
744
00:28:19.920 --> 00:28:21.680
think there are planets around other stars?
745
00:28:22.080 --> 00:28:24.760
We'd had observations from satellites like
746
00:28:24.760 --> 00:28:27.480
IRAS in the 1980s that indicated there was
747
00:28:27.480 --> 00:28:30.480
dust and debris around some stars. But at
748
00:28:30.480 --> 00:28:33.210
the time our models of planet formation fell
749
00:28:33.210 --> 00:28:35.480
into kind of two camps. So whereas what's now
750
00:28:35.480 --> 00:28:37.800
become kind of the standard baseline with
751
00:28:37.800 --> 00:28:39.680
some tweaks, which was that you get a disc of
752
00:28:39.680 --> 00:28:42.340
material around every young star and planets
753
00:28:42.340 --> 00:28:44.500
forming it. So most stars will have planets.
754
00:28:44.900 --> 00:28:47.220
But there was a competing theory that said
755
00:28:47.220 --> 00:28:49.340
that the planets were formed by a very close
756
00:28:49.340 --> 00:28:51.540
encounter between the sun and a passing star
757
00:28:51.940 --> 00:28:54.140
that pulled material out of the sun like a
758
00:28:54.140 --> 00:28:56.700
tongue of material, and the planets formed
759
00:28:56.700 --> 00:28:59.430
from that. and there are people who were
760
00:28:59.430 --> 00:29:02.090
very strong advocates of that. Now
761
00:29:02.090 --> 00:29:04.050
the test of those theories
762
00:29:05.250 --> 00:29:07.530
it would have been, are, ah, there planets
763
00:29:07.530 --> 00:29:09.050
around other stars, Are they common? Because
764
00:29:09.050 --> 00:29:10.930
the idea that two stars get close enough
765
00:29:10.930 --> 00:29:13.410
together to have this tidal interaction pull
766
00:29:13.410 --> 00:29:15.370
out a ton of material and planets form from
767
00:29:15.370 --> 00:29:17.730
that would suggest that planets would be
768
00:29:17.810 --> 00:29:20.010
overwhelmingly rare in the cosmos. So
769
00:29:20.010 --> 00:29:21.650
likelihood of 2 stars getting that close
770
00:29:21.650 --> 00:29:23.090
together and having exactly the right
771
00:29:23.090 --> 00:29:25.850
conditions would mean that planets were
772
00:29:25.850 --> 00:29:28.440
pretty much non existent, that they were a
773
00:29:28.440 --> 00:29:31.320
fluke of nature. The other model
774
00:29:31.320 --> 00:29:33.680
suggested that planets are common. And so one
775
00:29:33.680 --> 00:29:36.400
of the goals in the early 1990s with the
776
00:29:36.400 --> 00:29:39.040
search for planets elsewhere was to see
777
00:29:39.040 --> 00:29:40.720
whether there were any at all. And we just
778
00:29:40.720 --> 00:29:43.560
didn't know. The discovery of
779
00:29:43.640 --> 00:29:45.720
three planets around a pulsar in the early
780
00:29:45.720 --> 00:29:48.640
1990s broke everybody's heads. Those
781
00:29:48.640 --> 00:29:50.280
planets have now, incidentally, been called
782
00:29:50.280 --> 00:29:53.160
drow, Phoebeta and poltergeist, which are
783
00:29:53.160 --> 00:29:54.800
names of different types of undead from
784
00:29:54.800 --> 00:29:56.120
different cultures around the world. And I
785
00:29:56.120 --> 00:29:57.560
think that's kind of cute because you've got
786
00:29:57.560 --> 00:30:00.480
zombie planets around a dead star. That's all
787
00:30:00.480 --> 00:30:03.200
good. But 30 years ago, and actually 30 years
788
00:30:03.200 --> 00:30:05.546
ago last week on the 6th of October
789
00:30:05.694 --> 00:30:08.640
1995, we saw the announcement
790
00:30:08.640 --> 00:30:10.960
of the first confirmed planet around a star
791
00:30:10.960 --> 00:30:13.920
like the sun. And that planet was 51 Pegasi
792
00:30:13.920 --> 00:30:16.480
b. So it's a planet going around the south 51
793
00:30:16.480 --> 00:30:19.090
Pegasi. And it immediately broke
794
00:30:19.090 --> 00:30:20.850
everybody's heads because it was not what we
795
00:30:20.850 --> 00:30:23.010
expected. So both our models of planet
796
00:30:23.010 --> 00:30:26.010
formation that were based on a grand total of
797
00:30:26.010 --> 00:30:28.730
one planetary system, our own, predicted
798
00:30:28.730 --> 00:30:30.610
you'd have rocky planets close to the star
799
00:30:30.690 --> 00:30:33.010
and big gas giants a long way from the star,
800
00:30:33.010 --> 00:30:34.490
because that's what we see at home. And that
801
00:30:34.490 --> 00:30:37.010
makes sense. So to find a planet
802
00:30:37.170 --> 00:30:39.410
similar to Jupiter, but going around its star
803
00:30:39.410 --> 00:30:41.770
every four days with a surface temperature in
804
00:30:41.770 --> 00:30:44.690
excess of a thousand degrees C was not
805
00:30:44.690 --> 00:30:46.450
what was expected, I think would be the
806
00:30:46.450 --> 00:30:48.970
polite way to put it. Now, that forced people
807
00:30:48.970 --> 00:30:51.050
to immediately go back and start revisiting
808
00:30:51.050 --> 00:30:53.490
and improving that disk model of planet
809
00:30:53.490 --> 00:30:55.250
formation, which has kind of led us to where
810
00:30:55.250 --> 00:30:57.810
we are now. But that was kind of
811
00:30:57.810 --> 00:31:00.650
fundamental and foundational. For the first
812
00:31:01.290 --> 00:31:03.650
decade or so after that
813
00:31:03.650 --> 00:31:06.650
discovery, new planets were found in dribs
814
00:31:06.650 --> 00:31:08.130
and drabs, and the rate at which they were
815
00:31:08.130 --> 00:31:10.010
discovered gradually increased. And in that
816
00:31:10.010 --> 00:31:12.960
first decade, the best technique for finding
817
00:31:12.960 --> 00:31:14.640
planets, the one that was most successful,
818
00:31:14.640 --> 00:31:16.800
was what we call the radial velocity method,
819
00:31:17.040 --> 00:31:19.280
which Australia really played a leading role
820
00:31:19.280 --> 00:31:21.320
in with the Anglo Australian Planet Search.
821
00:31:21.320 --> 00:31:23.280
There was this beautiful spectrograph
822
00:31:23.280 --> 00:31:25.960
attached to the 3.9 meter telescope at Siding
823
00:31:25.960 --> 00:31:28.400
Spring, which I know Fred loves daily. It's a
824
00:31:28.400 --> 00:31:31.150
real icon of Australian astronomy. And, that
825
00:31:31.150 --> 00:31:33.270
telescope was used to point at one star,
826
00:31:33.510 --> 00:31:35.590
measure that star speed, then point at
827
00:31:35.590 --> 00:31:38.500
another, and gradually survey this collection
828
00:31:38.500 --> 00:31:40.100
of stars and then keep coming back to them
829
00:31:40.100 --> 00:31:41.660
every now and again and measure their speed
830
00:31:41.660 --> 00:31:43.990
again. And, by measuring the speed of these
831
00:31:43.990 --> 00:31:46.630
stars to the level that you can see them
832
00:31:46.630 --> 00:31:49.550
wobbling with changes of
833
00:31:49.550 --> 00:31:51.550
speed measured in a few meters per second. So
834
00:31:51.550 --> 00:31:53.549
comparable to speed, people walk or jog
835
00:31:53.549 --> 00:31:56.110
around stars that are trillions or
836
00:31:56.110 --> 00:31:57.790
quadrillions of kilometers away, measuring
837
00:31:57.790 --> 00:31:59.950
their wobbles to a precision of meters per
838
00:31:59.950 --> 00:32:02.350
second. That just makes my head hurt. But by
839
00:32:02.350 --> 00:32:04.900
doing that, you can spot the telltale wobble
840
00:32:04.900 --> 00:32:07.020
of a star rocking back and forward in space
841
00:32:07.020 --> 00:32:09.860
and infer the presence of a planet. But it's
842
00:32:09.860 --> 00:32:12.820
a really time consuming, challenging
843
00:32:12.820 --> 00:32:14.740
method where you can only observe a few stars
844
00:32:14.740 --> 00:32:15.980
at once, because you've got to gather light
845
00:32:15.980 --> 00:32:18.899
for an hour or more to get enough
846
00:32:18.899 --> 00:32:20.740
light, to get an accurate enough spectrum to
847
00:32:20.740 --> 00:32:22.140
get a single measurement. And you can only
848
00:32:22.140 --> 00:32:24.900
point at one star at once. By
849
00:32:25.140 --> 00:32:27.980
the late part of the first decade of the
850
00:32:27.980 --> 00:32:30.800
21st century, the transit method started to
851
00:32:30.800 --> 00:32:32.560
take over. And this is where we look at a lot
852
00:32:32.560 --> 00:32:35.480
of stars all at once and look for the
853
00:32:35.480 --> 00:32:37.560
few of them that are winking at us. So
854
00:32:37.560 --> 00:32:39.160
they've got a planet going around them that's
855
00:32:39.160 --> 00:32:40.770
lined, up just right that every time it goes
856
00:32:40.770 --> 00:32:42.450
around that star, it will block a bit of that
857
00:32:42.450 --> 00:32:44.490
star's light and the star will dim and then
858
00:32:44.490 --> 00:32:47.450
brighten again. And that started to
859
00:32:47.450 --> 00:32:49.290
take over from the radial velocity method
860
00:32:49.290 --> 00:32:51.330
purely because of the numbers. Again, because
861
00:32:51.330 --> 00:32:53.210
you can look at a large number of stars at
862
00:32:53.210 --> 00:32:56.020
the same time. And even if only
863
00:32:56.020 --> 00:32:58.620
1% of those stars have a planet oriented in
864
00:32:58.620 --> 00:33:00.980
the right direction for you to have it line
865
00:33:00.980 --> 00:33:03.540
up and give us a dip by looking at 100,000
866
00:33:03.540 --> 00:33:05.060
stars at once, you'll have plenty of
867
00:33:05.060 --> 00:33:07.820
candidates. The Kepler spacecraft
868
00:33:07.820 --> 00:33:10.619
launched in about 2008 and became
869
00:33:10.619 --> 00:33:13.380
this first census of the night sky. And
870
00:33:13.380 --> 00:33:15.500
it discovered on its own more than 3,000
871
00:33:15.500 --> 00:33:17.740
planets around other stars using this transit
872
00:33:17.740 --> 00:33:20.060
method. So we've got better and better at
873
00:33:20.060 --> 00:33:22.380
doing it. And over time what's happened is
874
00:33:22.990 --> 00:33:24.830
we've not only found the low hanging fruit,
875
00:33:24.830 --> 00:33:26.670
the really big planets close to their stars
876
00:33:26.670 --> 00:33:28.310
that give a whopping great signal that you
877
00:33:28.310 --> 00:33:30.670
can find, but with each generation of new
878
00:33:30.670 --> 00:33:31.990
instrument that's gone up there, we've got
879
00:33:31.990 --> 00:33:33.550
better at finding planets that are further
880
00:33:33.550 --> 00:33:35.710
from their stars, better at finding planets
881
00:33:35.710 --> 00:33:37.990
that are ever smaller, finding planets that
882
00:33:37.990 --> 00:33:40.270
are weird, or other techniques are coming
883
00:33:40.270 --> 00:33:41.830
online that allow us to do things another
884
00:33:41.830 --> 00:33:43.630
way. And I still think one of the greatest
885
00:33:43.630 --> 00:33:45.990
movies that never won an Oscar are, ah, the
886
00:33:45.990 --> 00:33:48.950
wonderful Images of the SAHR 8799 that
887
00:33:48.950 --> 00:33:51.320
shows four planets going around it. And we've
888
00:33:51.320 --> 00:33:53.280
got kind of a live movie of those planets
889
00:33:53.280 --> 00:33:56.160
orbiting that star that runs back more than a
890
00:33:56.160 --> 00:33:57.880
decade now. It's just breathtaking.
891
00:33:57.960 --> 00:33:59.160
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I saw it.
892
00:33:59.640 --> 00:34:02.330
Jonti Horner: Yeah, it's awesome. And we've basically lived
893
00:34:02.330 --> 00:34:04.690
through this awesome scientific
894
00:34:04.690 --> 00:34:07.490
revolution without really realizing it. You
895
00:34:07.490 --> 00:34:09.010
know, we've gone from a world where nobody
896
00:34:09.010 --> 00:34:10.930
knew if there were planets around other stars
897
00:34:11.250 --> 00:34:13.290
to a fact that there is nobody younger than
898
00:34:13.290 --> 00:34:15.490
the age of 30 now who grew up in that world
899
00:34:15.490 --> 00:34:18.110
that you and I grew up in, where we wondered
900
00:34:18.110 --> 00:34:19.510
if there were planets around other stars.
901
00:34:19.510 --> 00:34:22.270
It's absolutely breathtaking. We've had
902
00:34:22.750 --> 00:34:24.390
real big involvement with this here in
903
00:34:24.390 --> 00:34:26.390
Australia. The Anglo Australian Planet Search
904
00:34:26.390 --> 00:34:29.110
was one of the leaders for the first 10 or 15
905
00:34:29.110 --> 00:34:31.270
years of this exoplanet era. We've got a
906
00:34:31.270 --> 00:34:33.630
facility here in Queensland that is now
907
00:34:33.630 --> 00:34:34.990
leading the way, one of the leading
908
00:34:34.990 --> 00:34:37.750
facilities in the entire planet. You
909
00:34:37.750 --> 00:34:40.150
know, the only dedicated exoplanet search
910
00:34:40.150 --> 00:34:41.910
facility in the Southern hemisphere. And we
911
00:34:41.910 --> 00:34:44.170
work with NASA to do this. We've been
912
00:34:44.170 --> 00:34:47.090
directly involved with 41 planet discoveries
913
00:34:47.090 --> 00:34:49.890
in the last couple of years, using NASA's
914
00:34:49.890 --> 00:34:52.370
test mission and working with them. But it's
915
00:34:52.370 --> 00:34:54.850
this kind of ongoing exploration, this
916
00:34:54.850 --> 00:34:57.230
ongoing search. And, you know, what will the
917
00:34:57.230 --> 00:34:59.550
next 30 years bring? That's kind of what I
918
00:34:59.550 --> 00:35:02.190
wonder. Where will we go with it? And
919
00:35:02.830 --> 00:35:05.070
it's not so much when will we stop counting,
920
00:35:05.470 --> 00:35:07.870
but when will we start to get things that
921
00:35:08.270 --> 00:35:10.270
really potentially could be like the Earth?
922
00:35:10.270 --> 00:35:12.070
And I've said this before, I don't think
923
00:35:12.070 --> 00:35:13.550
we've found an Earth like planet yet. We
924
00:35:13.550 --> 00:35:15.710
found things about as big as the Earth that
925
00:35:15.710 --> 00:35:18.110
are very different. Like saying, I went
926
00:35:18.110 --> 00:35:19.910
swimming last week and I saw the most human
927
00:35:19.910 --> 00:35:21.670
like creature I've ever seen. And it was a
928
00:35:21.670 --> 00:35:23.310
dolphin. It was about the same size and
929
00:35:23.310 --> 00:35:25.110
weight as a human, but it's fundamentally not
930
00:35:25.110 --> 00:35:27.310
a human being. Yeah, but we're going to be
931
00:35:27.310 --> 00:35:29.030
moving forward and we're going to be moving
932
00:35:29.030 --> 00:35:30.870
from just finding these things to learning
933
00:35:30.870 --> 00:35:32.430
more about them. We're moving into this era
934
00:35:32.430 --> 00:35:35.030
of characterization and I think the number's
935
00:35:35.030 --> 00:35:36.670
going to gradually lose importance.
936
00:35:36.670 --> 00:35:39.510
You know, when we find 10,000 or 100,000,
937
00:35:40.540 --> 00:35:42.220
the difference will be a lot less significant
938
00:35:42.220 --> 00:35:44.980
than the difference between 0 and 1. But
939
00:35:44.980 --> 00:35:46.980
it'll start being which of the planets we
940
00:35:46.980 --> 00:35:49.660
know the most about. What are they like? What
941
00:35:49.660 --> 00:35:52.020
can we learn about them? And that's, I think,
942
00:35:52.020 --> 00:35:53.580
the journey for the next 30 years.
943
00:35:53.740 --> 00:35:56.099
Andrew Dunkley: Yes. And finding, and as you said, finding
944
00:35:56.099 --> 00:35:59.010
that, one planet that is so
945
00:35:59.010 --> 00:36:01.970
like ours in size and proximity,
946
00:36:02.600 --> 00:36:04.440
orbiting a sun like ours,
947
00:36:05.940 --> 00:36:08.210
maybe with liquid water, et cetera, et
948
00:36:08.210 --> 00:36:08.490
cetera.
949
00:36:08.490 --> 00:36:08.890
Jonti Horner: Yeah.
950
00:36:09.520 --> 00:36:11.320
Andrew Dunkley: that's the golden goose, isn't it, really?
951
00:36:11.960 --> 00:36:12.560
Jonti Horner: Absolutely.
952
00:36:12.560 --> 00:36:14.920
And we've got this really interesting
953
00:36:14.920 --> 00:36:17.560
question about how long has the
954
00:36:17.560 --> 00:36:20.440
Earth being in a condition that if we looked
955
00:36:20.440 --> 00:36:22.800
at it, it would look like the Earth. So in
956
00:36:22.800 --> 00:36:24.560
other words, how long has the Earth been an
957
00:36:24.560 --> 00:36:26.200
Earth like planet? Because when we're talking
958
00:36:26.200 --> 00:36:29.050
about a planet like the Earth, when it's
959
00:36:29.050 --> 00:36:30.650
something like the Earth is today, with, you
960
00:36:30.650 --> 00:36:32.650
know, beautiful blue sparkling oceans and A
961
00:36:32.650 --> 00:36:35.210
thin oxygen rich atmosphere and life
962
00:36:35.210 --> 00:36:37.130
teeming in abundant continents that are
963
00:36:37.130 --> 00:36:39.890
mottled brown and green and icy polar
964
00:36:39.890 --> 00:36:41.610
caps. But for the vast majority of the
965
00:36:41.610 --> 00:36:44.170
Earth's history it has looked nothing like it
966
00:36:44.170 --> 00:36:45.850
does now. It's had an entirely different
967
00:36:45.850 --> 00:36:48.650
atmosphere. It's not had free
968
00:36:48.650 --> 00:36:50.370
oxygen in the atmosphere. It's had periods
969
00:36:50.370 --> 00:36:52.850
when it was an enormous snowball, you know,
970
00:36:52.850 --> 00:36:55.460
snowball Earth episodes. So it's quite likely
971
00:36:55.460 --> 00:36:57.540
that for the majority of the Earth's history
972
00:36:58.500 --> 00:37:00.580
we wouldn't recognize it as an Earth like
973
00:37:00.580 --> 00:37:02.780
planet because it would look totally, totally
974
00:37:02.780 --> 00:37:03.060
different.
975
00:37:03.780 --> 00:37:05.740
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, that's an interesting point. And that
976
00:37:05.740 --> 00:37:08.700
could exist elsewhere in the
977
00:37:08.700 --> 00:37:10.740
universe. And we may have seen a planet
978
00:37:10.820 --> 00:37:13.700
already that could one day be like
979
00:37:13.700 --> 00:37:15.900
ours, but it might be tens of thousands or
980
00:37:15.900 --> 00:37:17.740
hundreds of thousands of years before it
981
00:37:17.740 --> 00:37:19.700
reaches that point. So
982
00:37:20.500 --> 00:37:23.500
that's a really interesting factor to bring
983
00:37:23.500 --> 00:37:24.800
into the equation.
984
00:37:24.940 --> 00:37:27.180
you said some odd planets. I thought I'd do a
985
00:37:27.180 --> 00:37:29.310
bit of a search. these exoplanets that we've
986
00:37:29.310 --> 00:37:31.488
discovered in the last 30 years. Wasp
987
00:37:31.652 --> 00:37:34.390
76B. It's a hot
988
00:37:34.390 --> 00:37:37.230
Jupiter which rains molten iron. I think Fred
989
00:37:37.230 --> 00:37:38.880
and I talked about that one. Wasp,
990
00:37:39.270 --> 00:37:42.140
107B. A gas giant, with
991
00:37:42.140 --> 00:37:44.540
a density so low it's been described as a
992
00:37:44.540 --> 00:37:45.780
marshmallow planet.
993
00:37:47.230 --> 00:37:47.790
HD,
994
00:37:48.380 --> 00:37:51.380
189773B. It's a planet
995
00:37:51.380 --> 00:37:53.220
with an atmosphere that contains clouds of
996
00:37:53.220 --> 00:37:54.260
molten glass.
997
00:37:54.740 --> 00:37:57.540
Jonti Horner: Yeah, that's often described as a blue marble
998
00:37:57.540 --> 00:37:58.140
planet, I think.
999
00:37:58.140 --> 00:38:01.139
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah. Hat P7B is an ultra
1000
00:38:01.139 --> 00:38:03.100
hot Jupiter that's so dark it's nearly
1001
00:38:03.100 --> 00:38:05.990
charcoal and 5,
1002
00:38:06.070 --> 00:38:08.790
5 Cancri E I think it's
1003
00:38:08.790 --> 00:38:11.700
pronounced a, super Earth with a lava world,
1004
00:38:11.970 --> 00:38:14.790
and sparkling skies. And there's probably
1005
00:38:14.790 --> 00:38:17.030
more weird ones out there. We yet defined
1006
00:38:17.030 --> 00:38:19.500
that, defy explanation. It's a really
1007
00:38:19.500 --> 00:38:21.090
fascinating part of astronomy.
1008
00:38:21.090 --> 00:38:23.450
Jonti Horner: it is. And it's that realization that the
1009
00:38:23.450 --> 00:38:25.369
diversity of things that are out there is far
1010
00:38:25.369 --> 00:38:26.930
greater than we could have possibly imagined.
1011
00:38:26.930 --> 00:38:29.850
And it really forces us to revisit
1012
00:38:29.850 --> 00:38:31.690
and refine our definitions of what a planet
1013
00:38:31.690 --> 00:38:34.450
is. So we historically people have this
1014
00:38:34.850 --> 00:38:37.810
idealized boundary at 13 Jupiter masses where
1015
00:38:38.100 --> 00:38:39.460
if you're more massive than that, you're a
1016
00:38:39.460 --> 00:38:41.540
brown dwarf and you're a fail star. And if
1017
00:38:41.540 --> 00:38:42.940
you're less massive than that, you're a
1018
00:38:42.940 --> 00:38:43.380
planet.
1019
00:38:43.380 --> 00:38:43.780
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.
1020
00:38:43.780 --> 00:38:45.380
Jonti Horner: And we're now finding things that people are
1021
00:38:45.380 --> 00:38:47.180
claiming a brown dwarfs that are only twice
1022
00:38:47.180 --> 00:38:49.220
the mass of Jupiter and things people are
1023
00:38:49.220 --> 00:38:50.980
claiming are planets that are 20 Jupiter
1024
00:38:50.980 --> 00:38:53.580
masses. You know, there's a real blurring of
1025
00:38:53.580 --> 00:38:56.300
that Boundary. You've then got one weird
1026
00:38:56.300 --> 00:38:58.460
object. If you look at what the most dense
1027
00:38:58.460 --> 00:39:00.860
planet we found is, there's one planet that
1028
00:39:00.860 --> 00:39:03.660
has a density that is something like
1029
00:39:03.660 --> 00:39:06.500
150 times the density of water or something
1030
00:39:06.500 --> 00:39:09.050
like this. And it's a few Jupiter
1031
00:39:09.050 --> 00:39:11.770
masses. And we know the density, we know the
1032
00:39:11.770 --> 00:39:13.650
size because of transits and we know the mass
1033
00:39:13.650 --> 00:39:15.250
because of radial velocity. And if you've got
1034
00:39:15.250 --> 00:39:16.930
the size and the mass, you get the density.
1035
00:39:18.210 --> 00:39:20.100
This thing is so dense so that it doesn't
1036
00:39:20.100 --> 00:39:22.780
confirm with any known material.
1037
00:39:23.260 --> 00:39:25.500
You know, it's many times denser than the
1038
00:39:25.500 --> 00:39:27.540
densest metal. Gravity pulling things in
1039
00:39:27.540 --> 00:39:30.220
can't explain it. And so
1040
00:39:30.460 --> 00:39:32.180
is it really a planet? There is some
1041
00:39:32.180 --> 00:39:34.790
speculation that it's actually something that
1042
00:39:34.790 --> 00:39:36.910
was probably a white dwarf that has somehow
1043
00:39:36.910 --> 00:39:39.150
been bombarded and fractured. So there's only
1044
00:39:39.550 --> 00:39:41.310
a few Jupiter masses left.
1045
00:39:42.910 --> 00:39:45.550
So it's not a planet. You know,
1046
00:39:46.190 --> 00:39:47.070
if it was a white.
1047
00:39:47.070 --> 00:39:49.710
Andrew Dunkley: Dwarf that's been culver, I would say no, but
1048
00:39:49.710 --> 00:39:51.210
gosh, yeah, there's.
1049
00:39:51.210 --> 00:39:53.410
Jonti Horner: All these other things. Planets that are less
1050
00:39:53.410 --> 00:39:56.410
dense than cotton candy and yeah, it's
1051
00:39:56.410 --> 00:39:58.650
awesome from a speculation point of view. And
1052
00:39:58.650 --> 00:40:00.810
it's a, a lot of the planets we've found are
1053
00:40:00.810 --> 00:40:02.530
things that if you saw them in an episode of
1054
00:40:02.530 --> 00:40:05.490
Star Trek or you know, any of these sci fi
1055
00:40:05.490 --> 00:40:08.010
series, you'd think that they jumped the
1056
00:40:08.010 --> 00:40:09.970
shark, that that kind of thing just wasn't
1057
00:40:09.970 --> 00:40:12.210
possible anymore. They'd obviously been
1058
00:40:12.370 --> 00:40:14.250
enjoying themselves a little bit too much in
1059
00:40:14.250 --> 00:40:17.010
the pre writing session. And yet we're
1060
00:40:17.010 --> 00:40:19.890
finding these objects are just so diverse
1061
00:40:19.890 --> 00:40:21.930
and bonkers. It's untrue. That's part of the
1062
00:40:21.930 --> 00:40:23.250
fun of it. You never know what we're going to
1063
00:40:23.250 --> 00:40:23.730
find next.
1064
00:40:23.890 --> 00:40:24.930
Andrew Dunkley: Absolutely not.
1065
00:40:25.080 --> 00:40:27.040
and that sort of takes us into our final
1066
00:40:27.040 --> 00:40:30.000
story because this is an object that
1067
00:40:30.390 --> 00:40:32.470
a little bit weird in our solar system.
1068
00:40:33.030 --> 00:40:35.760
It's the moon Mimas. But it's also been
1069
00:40:35.760 --> 00:40:38.760
called the Death Star because it does have
1070
00:40:38.760 --> 00:40:40.880
that Death Star look about it. It's got a
1071
00:40:40.880 --> 00:40:43.670
dish like depression, in it where it
1072
00:40:43.750 --> 00:40:46.390
must have got hit at some stage. But the
1073
00:40:46.390 --> 00:40:49.150
reason it's in the news now is because it
1074
00:40:49.150 --> 00:40:51.910
is yet another object in our solar system
1075
00:40:52.070 --> 00:40:54.750
that may contain a subsurface
1076
00:40:54.750 --> 00:40:55.190
ocean.
1077
00:40:56.000 --> 00:40:58.310
Jonti Horner: Yes. And it's probably of all the moons where
1078
00:40:58.310 --> 00:41:01.110
subsurface oceans have been suspected or
1079
00:41:01.110 --> 00:41:03.990
detected, it is the smallest of them and
1080
00:41:03.990 --> 00:41:06.270
it's probably the most surprising of the lot.
1081
00:41:07.230 --> 00:41:10.190
The evidence for this has built up over
1082
00:41:10.160 --> 00:41:12.100
a bit more than a decade and comes from the
1083
00:41:12.100 --> 00:41:14.140
Cassini mission that Spent all that time
1084
00:41:14.140 --> 00:41:16.980
orbiting Saturn making wonderful discoveries,
1085
00:41:16.980 --> 00:41:19.540
most famously, of course, being the geysers
1086
00:41:19.540 --> 00:41:21.460
of liquid water erupting from the south pole
1087
00:41:21.460 --> 00:41:23.640
of another of the small icy moons, Enceladus,
1088
00:41:24.030 --> 00:41:26.110
which was a shock because Enceladus is so
1089
00:41:26.110 --> 00:41:28.030
small that it should be frozen to the core.
1090
00:41:28.190 --> 00:41:29.950
So it's a bit of a surprise there's liquid
1091
00:41:29.950 --> 00:41:32.830
water there. Mimas is even smaller.
1092
00:41:32.830 --> 00:41:35.390
It's the smallest object in the solar system
1093
00:41:36.350 --> 00:41:39.030
that is spherical because its gravity has
1094
00:41:39.030 --> 00:41:40.790
overcome the strength of the material it's
1095
00:41:40.790 --> 00:41:43.470
made from. And when you look at the
1096
00:41:43.550 --> 00:41:45.510
calculations people have made at what the
1097
00:41:45.510 --> 00:41:48.470
minimum size something would have to be to be
1098
00:41:48.470 --> 00:41:51.130
in hydrostatic equilibrium to be an object
1099
00:41:51.130 --> 00:41:53.010
where gravity overcomes the strength. Mimas
1100
00:41:53.010 --> 00:41:55.010
is actually a little bit smaller than that,
1101
00:41:55.490 --> 00:41:58.450
which is interesting. It's a real edge case.
1102
00:41:59.250 --> 00:42:01.890
And, you know, the fact that it is spherical
1103
00:42:01.890 --> 00:42:03.650
like it is would suggest that at some point
1104
00:42:03.650 --> 00:42:05.330
it has not been that strong in the past. So
1105
00:42:05.330 --> 00:42:07.930
it was probably fairly liquid early on in its
1106
00:42:07.930 --> 00:42:10.930
formation. But any ocean it had when it was
1107
00:42:10.930 --> 00:42:13.490
born should have frozen out
1108
00:42:13.650 --> 00:42:16.180
long, long, long, long, long ago. And, that's
1109
00:42:16.180 --> 00:42:18.300
kind of borne out when you see the photos
1110
00:42:18.300 --> 00:42:20.100
that are taken of Mimas. It doesn't look like
1111
00:42:20.100 --> 00:42:22.440
Enceladus. It doesn't look like AR were
1112
00:42:22.440 --> 00:42:24.240
talking about last week. It doesn't look like
1113
00:42:24.240 --> 00:42:26.680
Europa. They're all places that have
1114
00:42:26.680 --> 00:42:29.200
obviously been resurfaced, that have flat
1115
00:42:29.200 --> 00:42:31.560
areas with cracks that look like ice that has
1116
00:42:31.560 --> 00:42:33.520
been broken by plate tectonics. Because it's
1117
00:42:33.520 --> 00:42:36.200
floating on an ocean, Mimas just looks like
1118
00:42:36.200 --> 00:42:37.680
another cratered ice ball.
1119
00:42:37.840 --> 00:42:38.279
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.
1120
00:42:38.279 --> 00:42:40.120
Jonti Horner: So there's a few oddities that have built up.
1121
00:42:40.120 --> 00:42:41.760
One of them is that, enormous crater,
1122
00:42:41.760 --> 00:42:44.760
Herschel. Now, Herschel, as a crater, is
1123
00:42:44.760 --> 00:42:46.840
almost big enough that the impactor could
1124
00:42:46.840 --> 00:42:48.970
have shattered me. And if it had been only
1125
00:42:48.970 --> 00:42:50.450
slightly larger, Mimas would have been
1126
00:42:50.450 --> 00:42:53.330
destroyed. So it's right at the limit of
1127
00:42:53.330 --> 00:42:56.010
how big a crater can be before things get
1128
00:42:56.010 --> 00:42:58.930
seriously bad. But a lot of calculations
1129
00:42:58.930 --> 00:43:01.570
have shown that if the Herschel crater had
1130
00:43:01.570 --> 00:43:04.450
formed when the Moon was frozen solid to its
1131
00:43:04.450 --> 00:43:07.130
core, it shouldn't have a central peak.
1132
00:43:07.850 --> 00:43:10.290
But it has a central peak. Now, that suggests
1133
00:43:10.290 --> 00:43:13.010
that Mimas was a bit slushy. But if you do
1134
00:43:13.010 --> 00:43:15.370
the calculations and assume Mimas had a very,
1135
00:43:15.370 --> 00:43:18.320
very well developed ocean, that
1136
00:43:18.320 --> 00:43:19.760
crater wouldn't look like it did either,
1137
00:43:19.760 --> 00:43:21.680
because it would have dug down into the ocean
1138
00:43:21.680 --> 00:43:24.120
and splashed liquid water everywhere. So
1139
00:43:24.120 --> 00:43:25.680
there are suggestions that the Herschel
1140
00:43:25.680 --> 00:43:28.560
crater formed when Mimas was slushy rather
1141
00:43:28.560 --> 00:43:30.680
than ocean, when it was fluid enough to get
1142
00:43:30.680 --> 00:43:33.440
this central peak form, but not so fluid that
1143
00:43:33.440 --> 00:43:35.200
an ocean was breached. And with the size of
1144
00:43:35.200 --> 00:43:36.640
that M impact, it would have breached one if
1145
00:43:36.640 --> 00:43:39.240
one was there. Now I've seen some suggestions
1146
00:43:39.240 --> 00:43:41.080
from that saying that Herschel must therefore
1147
00:43:41.080 --> 00:43:44.050
be a young crater because it's tied
1148
00:43:44.050 --> 00:43:45.890
to this young ocean that is thought to be
1149
00:43:45.890 --> 00:43:48.490
there on Mimas. Now that's one of the
1150
00:43:48.490 --> 00:43:50.050
suggestions. I'm not necessarily sure that's
1151
00:43:50.050 --> 00:43:51.570
the case. It may be that Herschel may be
1152
00:43:51.570 --> 00:43:53.250
older than there was an ocean in the past.
1153
00:43:53.730 --> 00:43:56.650
That's still to be sorted. But aside from
1154
00:43:56.650 --> 00:43:58.690
that, there's been a lot of the data from
1155
00:43:58.690 --> 00:44:01.410
Cassini linked to how Mimas is
1156
00:44:01.410 --> 00:44:04.050
rotating and wobbling, suggested that
1157
00:44:04.130 --> 00:44:07.050
it couldn't be solid to the core unless the
1158
00:44:07.050 --> 00:44:09.170
core was not in her static equilibrium. The
1159
00:44:09.170 --> 00:44:11.660
core was elongated and pancake shaped. and
1160
00:44:11.660 --> 00:44:13.460
that just doesn't make sense. And as they got
1161
00:44:13.460 --> 00:44:14.780
more and more data, more and more
1162
00:44:14.780 --> 00:44:17.620
observations, that just doesn't work. And
1163
00:44:17.620 --> 00:44:19.540
so from the rotation and the wobble of this
1164
00:44:19.540 --> 00:44:22.140
moon, it suggests that as much as
1165
00:44:22.140 --> 00:44:24.900
50% of its volume is liquid water.
1166
00:44:25.140 --> 00:44:27.580
Wow. Which is an enormous subsurface ocean.
1167
00:44:27.580 --> 00:44:30.340
That's an absolutely incredible ocean. But
1168
00:44:30.340 --> 00:44:32.500
because of the thermodynamics of it, that
1169
00:44:32.500 --> 00:44:34.980
ocean can't be old because if it was old, it
1170
00:44:34.980 --> 00:44:37.950
would have frozen out already. Now, part of
1171
00:44:37.950 --> 00:44:39.590
the supporting evidence for this is that the
1172
00:44:39.590 --> 00:44:42.030
orbit of Mimas around Saturn is not perfectly
1173
00:44:42.030 --> 00:44:44.790
circular. It's actually a little bit more
1174
00:44:44.790 --> 00:44:46.430
eccentric than the orbit of the Earth around
1175
00:44:46.430 --> 00:44:49.030
the Sun. That is not a
1176
00:44:49.030 --> 00:44:51.270
situation that's tenable long term. The orbit
1177
00:44:51.270 --> 00:44:53.990
should be circularized by tidal
1178
00:44:53.990 --> 00:44:56.590
effects with Saturn. And so the suggestion
1179
00:44:56.590 --> 00:44:58.990
seems to be that at some point, probably in
1180
00:44:58.990 --> 00:45:01.710
the last 15 million years, something
1181
00:45:01.790 --> 00:45:04.190
happened to stir, Mimas's orbit upper Mechi
1182
00:45:04.660 --> 00:45:06.860
more eccentric, to actually make it a bit
1183
00:45:06.860 --> 00:45:09.420
more elongated. That increased
1184
00:45:09.420 --> 00:45:11.780
eccentricity means that Mimas now experience
1185
00:45:11.860 --> 00:45:13.780
a significant tidal heating
1186
00:45:14.500 --> 00:45:16.980
from being squashed and squeezed effectively
1187
00:45:18.020 --> 00:45:20.100
by the gravity of Saturn and also by the
1188
00:45:20.100 --> 00:45:21.900
other moons. It's in mean motion resonance
1189
00:45:21.900 --> 00:45:23.860
with a couple of the other saturnian moons.
1190
00:45:24.340 --> 00:45:25.780
And all of that means that you're going to
1191
00:45:25.780 --> 00:45:27.820
get a significant amount of heat dumped into
1192
00:45:27.820 --> 00:45:30.740
the interior of Mimas, melting that interior
1193
00:45:30.740 --> 00:45:33.630
and creating this ocean. And the argument
1194
00:45:33.630 --> 00:45:35.510
for the fact that the surface is not yet
1195
00:45:35.510 --> 00:45:38.470
smooth and resurfaced is that a, that
1196
00:45:38.470 --> 00:45:41.190
ocean is young and it's a still developing
1197
00:45:41.190 --> 00:45:44.150
situation. But also that the crust of
1198
00:45:44.150 --> 00:45:46.950
Mimas is 20 or 30 kilometers thick and
1199
00:45:46.950 --> 00:45:48.670
that's thick enough that it hasn't yet
1200
00:45:48.670 --> 00:45:51.310
responded to the liquid underneath
1201
00:45:51.710 --> 00:45:53.910
and so you've almost got this hidden ocean in
1202
00:45:53.910 --> 00:45:56.710
a place you wouldn't expect, but where all
1203
00:45:56.710 --> 00:45:59.540
our observations, all our data is suggesting
1204
00:45:59.540 --> 00:46:01.540
that the only explanation that works for all
1205
00:46:01.540 --> 00:46:03.340
of the different things we've observed for it
1206
00:46:03.660 --> 00:46:05.780
is that this is yet another of this growing
1207
00:46:05.780 --> 00:46:08.500
catalog of places where there's a huge volume
1208
00:46:08.500 --> 00:46:10.580
of liquid water buried beneath an icy
1209
00:46:10.580 --> 00:46:12.900
surface. It's absolutely breathtaking work
1210
00:46:12.900 --> 00:46:14.900
and it's a really good example of the
1211
00:46:14.900 --> 00:46:17.780
iterative nature of science because it's not
1212
00:46:17.780 --> 00:46:19.580
like this is a new discovery this week.
1213
00:46:20.060 --> 00:46:21.740
There've been whispers about this for years
1214
00:46:21.740 --> 00:46:23.900
and papers published about it for years and
1215
00:46:24.630 --> 00:46:26.910
alternative hypotheses proposed and
1216
00:46:26.910 --> 00:46:29.910
disproved and all the rest of it. And all
1217
00:46:29.910 --> 00:46:31.590
the way through we're getting more and more
1218
00:46:31.590 --> 00:46:33.710
certain that this ocean's there. We're
1219
00:46:33.710 --> 00:46:36.670
learning more about the history. And I guess
1220
00:46:36.670 --> 00:46:38.120
again, not only are we learning that liquid
1221
00:46:38.120 --> 00:46:39.799
water is more common than the solar system,
1222
00:46:39.799 --> 00:46:41.840
but we're getting reminded once again that
1223
00:46:42.000 --> 00:46:44.320
the solar system's a very dynamic place. And
1224
00:46:44.320 --> 00:46:47.000
it's not like everything of interest happened
1225
00:46:47.000 --> 00:46:48.720
four and a half thousand million years ago.
1226
00:46:48.720 --> 00:46:50.520
And now we're in the kind of mop up phase
1227
00:46:50.520 --> 00:46:52.830
where nothing interesting happens. There's
1228
00:46:52.830 --> 00:46:55.180
still a lot going on. And the solar system's
1229
00:46:55.180 --> 00:46:57.580
dynamic in a way that if we were around when
1230
00:46:57.580 --> 00:47:00.020
the dinosaurs walked the Earth, it would have
1231
00:47:00.020 --> 00:47:01.540
looked like a very different place than the
1232
00:47:01.540 --> 00:47:03.380
place we see today. It's that changeable.
1233
00:47:03.620 --> 00:47:05.940
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, absolutely. Yeah. And
1234
00:47:06.430 --> 00:47:07.550
Mimas is also,
1235
00:47:09.510 --> 00:47:11.190
if indeed it is another,
1236
00:47:13.330 --> 00:47:15.490
water moon, let's say ice moon, whatever you
1237
00:47:15.490 --> 00:47:17.920
want to call it, it's starting to show that
1238
00:47:17.920 --> 00:47:20.390
it's probably more normal than we ever
1239
00:47:20.390 --> 00:47:23.310
thought. You've got so many others that are
1240
00:47:23.310 --> 00:47:26.030
starting to be found. obviously
1241
00:47:26.030 --> 00:47:28.350
Europa Enceladus would be the top two, but
1242
00:47:28.900 --> 00:47:30.360
Ganymede's now in there.
1243
00:47:32.630 --> 00:47:35.030
Andrew Dunkley: Most of the dwarf moons,
1244
00:47:35.490 --> 00:47:37.450
or dwarf planets in the outer solar system
1245
00:47:37.450 --> 00:47:40.250
are starting to show these signs. So
1246
00:47:40.730 --> 00:47:43.650
it could be quite normal here. And
1247
00:47:43.650 --> 00:47:46.350
as we've already discussed, you know, there
1248
00:47:46.350 --> 00:47:47.990
was a time where we weren't sure whether or
1249
00:47:47.990 --> 00:47:50.630
not there were other planets in other solar
1250
00:47:50.630 --> 00:47:53.510
systems in the universe. Well, it's
1251
00:47:53.510 --> 00:47:55.630
probably going to be discovered that there
1252
00:47:55.630 --> 00:47:58.370
are probably a lot more ice moons out there
1253
00:47:58.370 --> 00:48:00.810
than we could possibly imagine. So.
1254
00:48:00.890 --> 00:48:02.690
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And the other interesting thing
1255
00:48:02.690 --> 00:48:04.370
about this to me is it's not just suggesting
1256
00:48:04.370 --> 00:48:06.330
that you get oceans and the oceans go away.
1257
00:48:06.810 --> 00:48:09.290
It's suggesting you can get episodic oceans
1258
00:48:10.170 --> 00:48:12.330
because m. If this Ocean is only 10 or 15
1259
00:48:12.330 --> 00:48:15.080
million years old. We've had a lot of 10 and
1260
00:48:15.080 --> 00:48:17.360
15 million year old windows
1261
00:48:17.840 --> 00:48:20.240
in four and a half thousand million years of
1262
00:48:20.240 --> 00:48:23.150
time. And, what is the likelihood that we
1263
00:48:23.150 --> 00:48:24.830
just happen to be in the only one of those
1264
00:48:24.830 --> 00:48:26.990
windows where you've got two temporary oceans
1265
00:48:26.990 --> 00:48:29.790
at the same time, Where Enceladus and
1266
00:48:29.790 --> 00:48:32.750
Mimas have temporary transient oceans that
1267
00:48:32.750 --> 00:48:35.270
have only formed in recent times. And for
1268
00:48:35.270 --> 00:48:37.150
both of them, the logic is the same. They're
1269
00:48:37.150 --> 00:48:38.590
too small to have had this ocean since
1270
00:48:38.590 --> 00:48:39.840
they're formed. It's got to be a recent
1271
00:48:40.230 --> 00:48:42.470
thing. What is the likelihood that we catch
1272
00:48:42.470 --> 00:48:44.230
two of them going off at once, just by
1273
00:48:44.230 --> 00:48:46.070
random, when there have never been any
1274
00:48:46.070 --> 00:48:48.190
others? So that's suggesting that these
1275
00:48:48.190 --> 00:48:50.190
subsurface oceans on the smaller moons come
1276
00:48:50.190 --> 00:48:52.950
and go and come again, which means
1277
00:48:52.950 --> 00:48:55.150
that again, from the point of view of life
1278
00:48:55.150 --> 00:48:57.830
elsewhere, life that can
1279
00:48:57.830 --> 00:49:00.430
survive the long freeze is ready to take over
1280
00:49:00.430 --> 00:49:03.070
during the short summer. And we see that on
1281
00:49:03.070 --> 00:49:05.730
Earth. It's a really interesting thing that
1282
00:49:06.040 --> 00:49:08.680
if this is a temporary transient ocean now,
1283
00:49:09.080 --> 00:49:11.200
it's possibly been there multiple times in
1284
00:49:11.200 --> 00:49:13.160
the past. And that's why I
1285
00:49:13.800 --> 00:49:15.720
suspect that the Herschel Crater may not have
1286
00:49:15.720 --> 00:49:18.640
formed with the latest recent ocean. But
1287
00:49:18.640 --> 00:49:20.960
maybe it's a previous episode of it. We will
1288
00:49:20.960 --> 00:49:22.720
only know when we get more studies. And of
1289
00:49:22.720 --> 00:49:24.640
course, it's a really good reason to go back
1290
00:49:24.640 --> 00:49:25.720
to Saturn to find out.
1291
00:49:25.800 --> 00:49:28.270
Andrew Dunkley: Absolutely true. Yes, indeed. All right, if
1292
00:49:28.270 --> 00:49:30.190
you want to read about that story and the,
1293
00:49:30.200 --> 00:49:33.170
previous story, about exoplanets, you
1294
00:49:33.170 --> 00:49:35.450
can go to space.com
1295
00:49:36.330 --> 00:49:38.970
and we are done. Jonti, thank you so much.
1296
00:49:39.610 --> 00:49:41.330
Jonti Horner: It's a pleasure. It's a lot to talk about.
1297
00:49:41.330 --> 00:49:42.250
It's always good fun.
1298
00:49:42.330 --> 00:49:44.190
Andrew Dunkley: It is great fun. Good, to see you. that's
1299
00:49:44.190 --> 00:49:46.230
Jonti Horner, professor of Astrophysics at
1300
00:49:46.230 --> 00:49:48.910
the University of Southern Queensland. And
1301
00:49:48.910 --> 00:49:50.630
don't forget to visit our website while
1302
00:49:50.630 --> 00:49:53.370
you're online and check us out. you can do
1303
00:49:53.370 --> 00:49:56.130
that@spacenutspodcast.com or spacenuts.
1304
00:49:57.560 --> 00:49:59.560
And if you'd like to become a supporter of
1305
00:49:59.560 --> 00:50:02.040
Space Nuts, it's really simple. Just, click
1306
00:50:02.040 --> 00:50:04.370
on the supporter tab. you can become a
1307
00:50:04.370 --> 00:50:06.410
patron, or if you'd prefer to use another
1308
00:50:06.410 --> 00:50:08.490
platform, you can do that through Supercast.
1309
00:50:08.490 --> 00:50:09.970
And there are plenty of different options
1310
00:50:09.970 --> 00:50:12.210
there, but as I always say, it's not
1311
00:50:12.210 --> 00:50:15.140
mandatory. if you only want to
1312
00:50:15.140 --> 00:50:17.500
buy us a cup of coffee, that's fine as well.
1313
00:50:17.670 --> 00:50:20.110
in fact, some people have literally sent us
1314
00:50:20.190 --> 00:50:22.190
coffee vouchers over the years.
1315
00:50:22.960 --> 00:50:24.710
check it all out on our, space,
1316
00:50:24.710 --> 00:50:27.640
nutspodcast.com, website.
1317
00:50:28.050 --> 00:50:30.970
and I would say thanks to Huw in the studio.
1318
00:50:30.970 --> 00:50:33.820
But he's out counting, exoplanets. And he got
1319
00:50:33.820 --> 00:50:36.259
to 10, and you can't count any higher.
1320
00:50:36.660 --> 00:50:38.260
And from me, Andrew Dunkley, thanks for your
1321
00:50:38.260 --> 00:50:39.660
company. We'll see you on the next episode of
1322
00:50:39.660 --> 00:50:41.620
Space Nuts real soon. Bye. Bye.