Aug. 3, 2025

Stellar Questions: Captured Asteroids, Evaporating Black Holes & Dining with Aliens

Stellar Questions: Captured Asteroids, Evaporating Black Holes & Dining with Aliens

Cosmic Queries: Exploring the Unknown in Our Universe In this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, hosts Heidi Campo and Professor Fred Watson tackle a series of intriguing listener questions that delve into the mysteries of our universe. From the...

Cosmic Queries: Exploring the Unknown in Our Universe
In this engaging Q&A episode of Space Nuts, hosts Heidi Campo and Professor Fred Watson tackle a series of intriguing listener questions that delve into the mysteries of our universe. From the potential origins of solar system objects to the ethical dilemmas of encountering alien life, this episode is packed with thought-provoking insights that will spark your curiosity.
Episode Highlights:
Captured Celestial Objects: The episode opens with a question from Patrick about the likelihood of objects orbiting our sun being captured from other star systems. Fred elaborates on how some asteroids and comets could have originated beyond our solar system, shedding light on the fascinating dynamics of celestial mechanics.
The Fate of Evaporating Black Holes: Next, an audio question from Frederick prompts a discussion on Hawking radiation and what remains after a black hole evaporates. Fred navigates through the complexities of this topic, addressing the ongoing mysteries surrounding black holes and their potential remnants.
Ethical Dilemmas of Alien Cuisine: James presents a unique ethical question regarding the consumption of alien food if humanity were to encounter advanced extraterrestrial life. Heidi and Fred engage in a lively debate about cultural differences and the moral implications of eating alien cuisine, providing a fun twist to the episode.
The Sun's Corona Mysteries: Finally, Dan's question about the temperature difference between the sun's corona and photosphere leads to an exploration of solar physics. Fred discusses the ongoing research related to solar activity and how it compares to other stars, highlighting the importance of the Parker Solar Probe in unraveling these cosmic secrets.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.
Got a question for our Q&A episode? https://spacenutspodcast.com/ama

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.320 --> 00:00:03.280
Heidi Campo: Welcome back to another fun and exciting Q and

1
00:00:03.280 --> 00:00:05.840
A episode of space nuts.

2
00:00:06.080 --> 00:00:08.560
Voice Over Guy: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

3
00:00:08.800 --> 00:00:11.440
10, 9. Ignition

4
00:00:11.440 --> 00:00:14.404
sequence start. Space nuts. 5, 4, 3.

5
00:00:14.476 --> 00:00:17.284
2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,

6
00:00:17.356 --> 00:00:20.320
3, 2, 1. Space nuts. Astronauts

7
00:00:20.320 --> 00:00:21.520
report it feels good.

8
00:00:22.240 --> 00:00:24.960
Heidi Campo: This episode is driven by listener

9
00:00:24.960 --> 00:00:27.720
questions where you send your questions to us

10
00:00:27.720 --> 00:00:30.410
and we answer them. Well, it's not

11
00:00:30.410 --> 00:00:33.410
we. It's Professor Fred Watson who is

12
00:00:33.410 --> 00:00:36.370
joining me here. My name is Heidi Campo. I'm your host for this

13
00:00:36.370 --> 00:00:39.170
episode, and Fred is our

14
00:00:39.330 --> 00:00:41.650
resident astronomer at large.

15
00:00:42.210 --> 00:00:43.890
Fred, how are you doing today?

16
00:00:45.090 --> 00:00:47.650
Professor Fred Watson: Very well, thanks, Heidi. And you shouldn't underrate, um,

17
00:00:47.890 --> 00:00:50.730
the contribution, uh, that you make to this show.

18
00:00:50.730 --> 00:00:53.650
Because I couldn't answer these questions without you being there.

19
00:00:53.730 --> 00:00:56.660
And often you are somebody who

20
00:00:56.740 --> 00:00:59.700
illuminates the questions in a way that I wouldn't think

21
00:00:59.700 --> 00:01:02.580
of, which I enjoy very much. So thank you again for

22
00:01:02.580 --> 00:01:04.340
welcoming me to the show.

23
00:01:04.740 --> 00:01:07.300
Heidi Campo: Thank you so much, Fred. That was. That was sweet.

24
00:01:07.860 --> 00:01:10.210
Well, our first question, um,

25
00:01:10.660 --> 00:01:13.640
today comes from Patrick. Um,

26
00:01:13.700 --> 00:01:16.420
I don't see Patrick's location,

27
00:01:16.500 --> 00:01:19.180
but Patrick says hello.

28
00:01:19.180 --> 00:01:22.170
Heidi and Professor Watson, what is

29
00:01:22.170 --> 00:01:25.170
the likelihood of an object or objects

30
00:01:25.170 --> 00:01:27.970
currently orbiting our sun not being native

31
00:01:27.970 --> 00:01:30.810
to our solar system? Could they have been rogue

32
00:01:30.810 --> 00:01:33.730
objects or perhaps objects from a passing star that

33
00:01:33.730 --> 00:01:36.490
was captured by our sun? Thanks for taking my

34
00:01:36.490 --> 00:01:36.810
question.

35
00:01:38.250 --> 00:01:41.130
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, I love this question, Heidi. Um, because it has

36
00:01:41.130 --> 00:01:43.850
echoes of something we were talking about in the last episode.

37
00:01:44.250 --> 00:01:47.250
The object that's not, uh, from our solar system, that

38
00:01:47.250 --> 00:01:49.340
is whizzing through the solar system.

39
00:01:49.900 --> 00:01:52.540
And, um, basically Patrick is right,

40
00:01:53.160 --> 00:01:55.420
uh, in suggesting that

41
00:01:55.980 --> 00:01:58.560
maybe some of the, uh,

42
00:01:58.700 --> 00:02:01.580
objects in the solar system. And by that I'm

43
00:02:01.580 --> 00:02:04.540
thinking of things like asteroids, um, perhaps

44
00:02:04.540 --> 00:02:07.500
even comets that are in orbit around the sun

45
00:02:07.580 --> 00:02:10.380
that, uh, are in a closed orbit that

46
00:02:10.380 --> 00:02:13.300
are, you know, something that goes around regularly rather

47
00:02:13.300 --> 00:02:15.820
than something that just comes through once and zooms away.

48
00:02:16.420 --> 00:02:19.380
Uh, which is what, uh, Three Eye Atlas that we were talking about last

49
00:02:19.380 --> 00:02:21.660
time. Um, that is doing that.

50
00:02:22.220 --> 00:02:25.180
Um, uh, so it's possible that,

51
00:02:25.240 --> 00:02:28.220
um, there could be things that have been captured. We

52
00:02:28.220 --> 00:02:31.060
know, uh, that some of the moons

53
00:02:31.060 --> 00:02:33.580
of the outer planets are,

54
00:02:34.220 --> 00:02:36.620
uh, ones that have been captured by those planets,

55
00:02:37.360 --> 00:02:39.740
uh, from the region,

56
00:02:40.380 --> 00:02:43.330
uh, beyond Neptune, what we call the Trans

57
00:02:43.330 --> 00:02:46.010
Neptunian region, uh, where there are

58
00:02:46.010 --> 00:02:48.890
these icy asteroids, which we now know to

59
00:02:48.890 --> 00:02:51.770
be very numerous. Um, we didn't know about them at all

60
00:02:51.770 --> 00:02:54.570
when I started my career, even though somebody had

61
00:02:54.570 --> 00:02:57.570
predicted them in 1950. Uh, um, Gerard,

62
00:02:57.570 --> 00:03:00.210
uh, Kuiper, uh, and his colleague

63
00:03:00.210 --> 00:03:02.850
Dr. Edgeworth. Can't remember Edgeworth's first Name.

64
00:03:03.230 --> 00:03:06.090
Uh, but they predicted that there would be these icy objects way

65
00:03:06.090 --> 00:03:08.990
in the depths of the solar system. And one of the belts of

66
00:03:08.990 --> 00:03:11.870
those objects is now called the Kuiper Belt. And, uh, we know

67
00:03:11.870 --> 00:03:14.790
that some of the planets, uh, sorry, some

68
00:03:14.790 --> 00:03:17.790
of the satellites, the moons of the outer planets,

69
00:03:18.110 --> 00:03:21.110
started their lives as Kuiper Belt objects. So they

70
00:03:21.110 --> 00:03:23.950
have actually been captured by the planets.

71
00:03:24.350 --> 00:03:26.990
And so, um, you know, the

72
00:03:26.990 --> 00:03:29.870
scenario that Patrick puts forward, uh, of

73
00:03:30.190 --> 00:03:32.750
something like that being captured by the sun

74
00:03:33.230 --> 00:03:36.110
having come from a distant, uh, object,

75
00:03:36.210 --> 00:03:39.030
uh, or a distant solar system from well beyond

76
00:03:39.030 --> 00:03:41.290
our solar. It's absolutely possible.

77
00:03:42.040 --> 00:03:44.650
Uh, and it's the kind of thing,

78
00:03:44.730 --> 00:03:47.330
I guess, that people who study

79
00:03:47.330 --> 00:03:49.960
asteroids, and there's a large body of, uh,

80
00:03:50.090 --> 00:03:53.050
interest in that topic now, uh, people who

81
00:03:53.050 --> 00:03:55.850
study asteroids perhaps have in the back of their mind,

82
00:03:55.929 --> 00:03:58.810
because you can learn a lot about an asteroid by looking

83
00:03:58.810 --> 00:04:01.570
at the spectrum of the light reflected from

84
00:04:01.570 --> 00:04:04.300
it in the infrared. Uh, uh,

85
00:04:04.300 --> 00:04:07.020
that spectrum is affected by the surface

86
00:04:07.020 --> 00:04:09.900
features of the asteroid. And if you start picking up,

87
00:04:10.440 --> 00:04:13.380
uh, indications of perhaps a different sort

88
00:04:13.380 --> 00:04:16.340
of chemistry on the surface of an asteroid, uh,

89
00:04:16.540 --> 00:04:19.380
that, uh, we wouldn't expect from

90
00:04:19.380 --> 00:04:22.260
one of our homegrown asteroids, that might be the

91
00:04:22.260 --> 00:04:25.170
kind of thing that would lead you to, uh,

92
00:04:25.170 --> 00:04:27.900
perhaps speculate that this might have an

93
00:04:27.900 --> 00:04:30.820
extra solar origin, something that's come from another

94
00:04:30.820 --> 00:04:33.180
solar system. How would you test for that?

95
00:04:33.670 --> 00:04:36.590
Uh, well, it's possible these days, uh, to run

96
00:04:36.750 --> 00:04:39.310
simulations of the

97
00:04:39.790 --> 00:04:42.790
way orbits of objects in the solar system have

98
00:04:42.790 --> 00:04:45.430
evolved. So you can sort of pick an

99
00:04:45.430 --> 00:04:48.430
asteroid, look at its current orbit and then

100
00:04:48.510 --> 00:04:50.990
sort of play it backwards. Uh, and

101
00:04:51.470 --> 00:04:54.150
it may be that you would do that with an object

102
00:04:54.150 --> 00:04:57.150
and find that, uh, at some time in

103
00:04:57.150 --> 00:04:59.230
the past its orbit was unstable,

104
00:04:59.850 --> 00:05:02.590
uh, which might suggest that it has

105
00:05:02.590 --> 00:05:04.830
actually come from another solar system.

106
00:05:05.390 --> 00:05:08.390
So it's not impossible. And it is

107
00:05:08.390 --> 00:05:11.230
something that I'm sure actively is being pursued by

108
00:05:11.230 --> 00:05:14.110
researchers in this topic. So. Good question, Patrick.

109
00:05:14.990 --> 00:05:17.870
Heidi Campo: That was a way to break in the episode. Excellent

110
00:05:17.870 --> 00:05:18.910
question, Patrick.

111
00:05:19.510 --> 00:05:22.350
Um, our next question is an audio

112
00:05:22.350 --> 00:05:25.350
question from Frederick. And

113
00:05:25.350 --> 00:05:28.240
I'm going to just give Fred and I

114
00:05:28.240 --> 00:05:31.160
a second to cue that question up and we're going

115
00:05:31.160 --> 00:05:32.720
to play that question for you now.

116
00:05:32.880 --> 00:05:35.440
Professor Fred Watson: Hello, this is Frederick Arthur Noldi

117
00:05:36.320 --> 00:05:38.600
from originally Duluth,

118
00:05:38.600 --> 00:05:40.560
Minnesota, usa.

119
00:05:41.680 --> 00:05:44.240
My question is, if

120
00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:46.960
black holes are evaporating through

121
00:05:46.960 --> 00:05:48.640
Hawking's radiation,

122
00:05:50.720 --> 00:05:53.290
what is left with over?

123
00:05:53.450 --> 00:05:55.930
Is it the point of singularity?

124
00:05:56.570 --> 00:05:59.210
And could that be dark matter

125
00:06:00.410 --> 00:06:02.010
because they are so

126
00:06:03.370 --> 00:06:06.330
dense, yet very probably small

127
00:06:07.770 --> 00:06:10.410
and don't interact with anything.

128
00:06:10.890 --> 00:06:13.770
Just wondering if I solved what a great question

129
00:06:14.350 --> 00:06:17.130
um, and it's one that set me thinking like so many

130
00:06:17.130 --> 00:06:19.990
of our listeners do. Um,

131
00:06:19.990 --> 00:06:22.910
if you have a black hole that evaporates, what is

132
00:06:22.910 --> 00:06:25.390
left behind? Is it still a

133
00:06:25.390 --> 00:06:28.270
singularity? Uh, and could that be

134
00:06:28.270 --> 00:06:31.150
the dark matter? So there

135
00:06:31.150 --> 00:06:34.110
is a problem with that scenario? Well, there are a number of

136
00:06:34.110 --> 00:06:36.950
problems. Um, one is that

137
00:06:36.950 --> 00:06:39.950
the evaporation of black holes, which, exactly as Frederick,

138
00:06:39.950 --> 00:06:42.600
uh, Arthur says, is, uh,

139
00:06:43.430 --> 00:06:46.390
caused by Hawking radiation. This is radiation that leaks out

140
00:06:46.390 --> 00:06:49.220
of the black hole. Uh, that is a very,

141
00:06:49.220 --> 00:06:51.700
very slow process indeed. So the

142
00:06:51.700 --> 00:06:54.620
timescale for a black hole evaporating

143
00:06:54.620 --> 00:06:57.220
is measured in many billions. In fact,

144
00:06:57.220 --> 00:07:00.140
sometimes tens of billions of years longer than

145
00:07:00.140 --> 00:07:02.420
the age of the universe. So,

146
00:07:02.440 --> 00:07:05.300
uh, unless black holes are very, very small,

147
00:07:05.900 --> 00:07:08.580
uh, their evaporation time is long.

148
00:07:08.580 --> 00:07:10.900
Smaller black holes would be

149
00:07:11.460 --> 00:07:14.300
evaporating quickly. And yes, maybe some might have

150
00:07:14.300 --> 00:07:17.180
evaporated already by now, but they would have such a

151
00:07:17.180 --> 00:07:20.000
tiny mass that it's hard to imagine it could

152
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:22.440
contribute to, um,

153
00:07:23.100 --> 00:07:26.080
uh, the background that we,

154
00:07:26.210 --> 00:07:29.160
uh, understand as dark matter. This stuff

155
00:07:29.160 --> 00:07:32.160
that is there because we can detect its gravitational,

156
00:07:32.470 --> 00:07:34.720
uh, influence, but we can't see it.

157
00:07:35.680 --> 00:07:38.600
Now, the question of what's left

158
00:07:38.600 --> 00:07:40.960
when a black hole evaporates

159
00:07:41.280 --> 00:07:44.050
is an open one. Uh,

160
00:07:44.170 --> 00:07:47.090
and it is really an interesting one because

161
00:07:47.090 --> 00:07:49.960
there isn't an answer to it. Um,

162
00:07:49.960 --> 00:07:52.660
you can kind of have a look, uh,

163
00:07:52.810 --> 00:07:55.450
online and check out, um,

164
00:07:55.770 --> 00:07:58.730
you know, what the remnant is of a black hole.

165
00:07:59.790 --> 00:08:00.280
Uh,

166
00:08:03.290 --> 00:08:06.250
I guess, um, the jury is out

167
00:08:06.490 --> 00:08:08.960
on what is left. Um,

168
00:08:09.460 --> 00:08:11.860
there is a suggestion that what you're left with

169
00:08:12.500 --> 00:08:14.820
is an object of

170
00:08:14.980 --> 00:08:17.540
tiny mass, uh, that

171
00:08:17.620 --> 00:08:20.580
is stable, doesn't

172
00:08:20.580 --> 00:08:23.300
disappear. Uh, but

173
00:08:23.620 --> 00:08:26.580
really nobody knows. That's the bottom line with

174
00:08:26.580 --> 00:08:29.300
this. My thinking was a bit

175
00:08:29.300 --> 00:08:31.980
different. I expected that if a black hole

176
00:08:31.980 --> 00:08:34.940
evaporates, basically all the mass goes and

177
00:08:34.940 --> 00:08:37.710
you're left with nothing, uh, not even a

178
00:08:37.710 --> 00:08:40.430
singularity, because it's the mass that causes the

179
00:08:40.430 --> 00:08:43.430
singularity, that point of infinite

180
00:08:43.430 --> 00:08:45.610
density. So, um,

181
00:08:46.400 --> 00:08:49.150
uh, it seems that some physicists think something

182
00:08:49.150 --> 00:08:51.350
is left. It's got a tiny mass

183
00:08:53.110 --> 00:08:55.910
and therefore is not in any way

184
00:08:55.910 --> 00:08:58.750
significant in contributing to the dark matter of the

185
00:08:58.750 --> 00:09:00.070
universe. That's a very,

186
00:09:00.480 --> 00:09:03.320
uh, sort of gobbledygook

187
00:09:03.320 --> 00:09:06.280
answer to a simple question. But

188
00:09:06.680 --> 00:09:09.600
the bottom line is nobody really knows. We don't know

189
00:09:09.600 --> 00:09:12.440
what the end product of Hawk Hawking radiation is.

190
00:09:13.160 --> 00:09:16.080
Uh, and it's very hard to find out as well. It would have

191
00:09:16.080 --> 00:09:18.960
to be by modeling with physical

192
00:09:18.960 --> 00:09:21.320
processes that we really don't understand because

193
00:09:21.720 --> 00:09:24.120
we have no physics that describe what

194
00:09:24.120 --> 00:09:27.120
happens to a point of infinite density, which is What

195
00:09:27.120 --> 00:09:29.980
a black hole is. So many thanks for the

196
00:09:29.980 --> 00:09:32.940
question. Uh, an interesting thing to think about, but we don't know

197
00:09:32.940 --> 00:09:33.540
the answer.

198
00:09:34.980 --> 00:09:37.940
Heidi Campo: Maybe, uh, maybe one day one of our listeners will be

199
00:09:37.940 --> 00:09:38.980
the one to find that out.

200
00:09:39.220 --> 00:09:40.340
Professor Fred Watson: That might be the case.

201
00:09:40.340 --> 00:09:43.180
Heidi Campo: If you guys have the answers, you definitely need to write

202
00:09:43.180 --> 00:09:44.340
in and let us know.

203
00:09:49.780 --> 00:09:50.820
Professor Fred Watson: Space nuts.

204
00:09:51.630 --> 00:09:54.260
Heidi Campo: Um, our next question comes from James.

205
00:09:55.060 --> 00:09:57.980
James says, good day, Fred, Andrew,

206
00:09:57.980 --> 00:10:00.260
Heidi, and Huw. That's our

207
00:10:00.260 --> 00:10:02.940
producer, he doesn't always get a shout out, so

208
00:10:02.940 --> 00:10:05.700
that's nice. Um, James

209
00:10:05.700 --> 00:10:08.540
says, I've got an ethical question I'd like to

210
00:10:08.540 --> 00:10:11.300
propose to you. In a hypothetical scenario,

211
00:10:11.780 --> 00:10:14.260
let's suppose we find alien life as

212
00:10:14.260 --> 00:10:17.020
advanced as us and we're able to meet

213
00:10:17.020 --> 00:10:19.500
in person and start sharing knowledge and

214
00:10:19.500 --> 00:10:22.350
culture with each other. Ethically,

215
00:10:22.670 --> 00:10:25.390
assuming nothing would go wrong from eating

216
00:10:25.390 --> 00:10:28.190
alien food, would it be acceptable for

217
00:10:28.190 --> 00:10:30.990
humanity to eat the cuisine

218
00:10:31.470 --> 00:10:34.310
of this new life? Uh, sorry? Eat the

219
00:10:34.310 --> 00:10:37.230
cuisine of this new life? If it

220
00:10:37.230 --> 00:10:39.950
is equivalent to a hamburger or chicken nugget,

221
00:10:40.270 --> 00:10:43.070
would we stick to their fruits

222
00:10:43.070 --> 00:10:45.790
and veggies? Or are we going space

223
00:10:45.790 --> 00:10:48.430
nuts about the Andromeda Cosmic Ray? Fried

224
00:10:48.430 --> 00:10:50.590
chicken? Thanks for all you do,

225
00:10:51.610 --> 00:10:54.300
Fred. This one is, uh,

226
00:10:54.330 --> 00:10:57.060
different from our usual questions. This is, uh,

227
00:10:57.290 --> 00:10:58.250
an opinion.

228
00:10:58.650 --> 00:10:59.210
Professor Fred Watson: It is.

229
00:10:59.530 --> 00:11:00.970
Heidi Campo: Would you eat the fried chicken?

230
00:11:02.010 --> 00:11:04.650
Professor Fred Watson: So I guess the issue is,

231
00:11:05.300 --> 00:11:07.370
um. And, you know,

232
00:11:08.040 --> 00:11:10.810
uh, essentially James is making a

233
00:11:10.810 --> 00:11:11.770
distinction between

234
00:11:13.850 --> 00:11:16.490
vegetable, uh, food. Fruit and veggie.

235
00:11:16.760 --> 00:11:19.600
Fruit and veggies. Or the meat, the

236
00:11:19.600 --> 00:11:22.360
stuff that has once been a living animal.

237
00:11:23.300 --> 00:11:26.160
Uh, and it's a really

238
00:11:26.160 --> 00:11:29.000
great question. I'd be interested to hear your

239
00:11:29.000 --> 00:11:31.800
thoughts on this, Heidi, because you've got as much.

240
00:11:32.280 --> 00:11:35.000
Heidi Campo: Oh, man, my brain already started rolling

241
00:11:35.160 --> 00:11:36.280
as soon as this started.

242
00:11:37.320 --> 00:11:38.760
Professor Fred Watson: Yeah, Um, I.

243
00:11:39.960 --> 00:11:40.360
So

244
00:11:43.410 --> 00:11:46.370
let me try and put it into context. So I think

245
00:11:46.850 --> 00:11:49.570
ethically here on Earth,

246
00:11:49.570 --> 00:11:52.530
we've got nothing that stops us from eating

247
00:11:52.930 --> 00:11:55.930
the food that originated with a different culture from

248
00:11:55.930 --> 00:11:58.930
our own. And we enjoy that. We relish

249
00:11:58.930 --> 00:12:01.410
the fact that we can eat food

250
00:12:01.890 --> 00:12:04.810
from different cultures. Now, the

251
00:12:04.810 --> 00:12:07.690
difference here is that the raw material, whether

252
00:12:07.690 --> 00:12:10.690
it's meat or whether it's vegetable or

253
00:12:11.080 --> 00:12:14.000
whatever it is, um, has come

254
00:12:14.000 --> 00:12:16.680
from Earth. So we've got the same raw

255
00:12:16.680 --> 00:12:19.680
materials. We've just got a different process that turns it into

256
00:12:19.680 --> 00:12:22.280
food, uh, in this different culture.

257
00:12:23.160 --> 00:12:26.000
And I think that's the difference with, uh,

258
00:12:26.040 --> 00:12:29.040
some sort of alien, um, you know, if you

259
00:12:29.040 --> 00:12:31.240
were invited to a meal by

260
00:12:31.880 --> 00:12:34.840
a friendly alien on their home planet,

261
00:12:35.580 --> 00:12:38.290
uh, my guess

262
00:12:38.290 --> 00:12:40.610
is, um, that.

263
00:12:42.610 --> 00:12:45.330
I don't know, maybe I'm just being too polite

264
00:12:45.330 --> 00:12:48.250
here, uh, in the interests of good relationships, you would

265
00:12:48.250 --> 00:12:50.450
probably do what

266
00:12:51.010 --> 00:12:53.170
they would ask you to do. Now, I'm taking

267
00:12:53.810 --> 00:12:56.530
James's caveat here that, you know,

268
00:12:56.770 --> 00:12:59.730
that we don't, uh, have any

269
00:12:59.810 --> 00:13:02.610
risks health wise, as he

270
00:13:02.610 --> 00:13:05.330
says, assuming nothing could go wrong from eating alien

271
00:13:05.330 --> 00:13:08.250
food. Would it be acceptable for humanity to eat the

272
00:13:08.250 --> 00:13:09.690
cuisine of this new life

273
00:13:10.970 --> 00:13:13.530
if it's the equivalent of a hamburger or a chicken

274
00:13:13.530 --> 00:13:16.250
nugget? I think it,

275
00:13:16.730 --> 00:13:19.180
my humble opinion is that it would be, uh,

276
00:13:19.690 --> 00:13:22.490
that, uh, if, you know, maybe

277
00:13:22.970 --> 00:13:25.890
you have to broaden, uh, your

278
00:13:25.890 --> 00:13:28.890
mind to try and incorporate the ethical system of the

279
00:13:28.890 --> 00:13:31.570
species who are looking after

280
00:13:31.570 --> 00:13:34.010
you, who are providing you with this,

281
00:13:35.130 --> 00:13:37.050
you might have a different view. Heidi?

282
00:13:37.690 --> 00:13:40.490
Heidi Campo: Well, there's two things I want to say, and

283
00:13:41.450 --> 00:13:44.370
I'll say, so one of them falls under a philosophical bucket, and

284
00:13:44.370 --> 00:13:47.250
the other one falls under the science bucket. So let's start with the

285
00:13:47.250 --> 00:13:49.850
philosophical. What we eat

286
00:13:50.010 --> 00:13:53.010
always comes down to and when we're talking about

287
00:13:53.010 --> 00:13:55.210
these kind of instances is there's a lot of

288
00:13:56.300 --> 00:13:59.060
moral questions that come down into it because it's like,

289
00:13:59.060 --> 00:14:01.900
ethically, you know, as long as,

290
00:14:02.050 --> 00:14:04.940
um, you know, I mean, I guess

291
00:14:04.940 --> 00:14:07.900
even ethics is. Some people do run on different ethical codes

292
00:14:07.900 --> 00:14:10.820
or moral codes. Religious, um, codes can

293
00:14:10.820 --> 00:14:13.780
dictate our diets as well. Um, a lot of people

294
00:14:13.780 --> 00:14:16.740
don't eat pork. There's cultures that don't eat

295
00:14:16.740 --> 00:14:19.020
beef. There's cultures that don't eat shell food,

296
00:14:19.020 --> 00:14:21.940
shellfish. Um, I personally do not eat

297
00:14:21.940 --> 00:14:24.650
pork. Pork, Um, I found out that they wag their

298
00:14:24.650 --> 00:14:27.530
tails when they're happy and I stopped.

299
00:14:27.770 --> 00:14:30.690
But, um, I found out cows do the same and

300
00:14:30.690 --> 00:14:33.650
I just can't, I love cheeseburgers too much. So that

301
00:14:33.650 --> 00:14:35.850
aside, so the morality aside,

302
00:14:37.930 --> 00:14:40.810
sentient creatures, I mean, are we talking about eating these

303
00:14:40.810 --> 00:14:43.370
friendly aliens or are we talking about eating their,

304
00:14:43.930 --> 00:14:46.810
their foods? And then that just comes down to the whole,

305
00:14:46.810 --> 00:14:49.700
you know, well, maybe people should all be

306
00:14:49.940 --> 00:14:52.780
a vegan or vegetarian, because some cultures

307
00:14:52.780 --> 00:14:55.380
eat dogs or cats and subcultures don't.

308
00:14:55.780 --> 00:14:58.700
But now the scientific side of it is really

309
00:14:58.700 --> 00:15:01.700
interesting what, um, NASA does in their

310
00:15:01.700 --> 00:15:04.630
foods lab. And I had the, um,

311
00:15:04.660 --> 00:15:07.620
privilege of touring their foods lab a few

312
00:15:07.620 --> 00:15:10.060
years ago. I got invited, um,

313
00:15:10.580 --> 00:15:13.580
as a media person to go to the Crew 7

314
00:15:13.580 --> 00:15:16.500
launch. That was two years ago.

315
00:15:16.980 --> 00:15:19.940
Crew 7. Um, and so part of that

316
00:15:19.940 --> 00:15:22.900
is we got to sit down with subject matter experts and we got a

317
00:15:22.900 --> 00:15:24.820
tour of the foods lab and

318
00:15:26.020 --> 00:15:29.020
thinking, um, about the benefits of food from other planets or

319
00:15:29.020 --> 00:15:31.580
food grown in space. I think it's very

320
00:15:31.580 --> 00:15:34.180
interesting and it's something that

321
00:15:34.340 --> 00:15:37.140
I would love to see hypothetically, if

322
00:15:37.140 --> 00:15:39.780
this food was better for me as a former

323
00:15:39.780 --> 00:15:42.720
athlete. If this is more protein and it's

324
00:15:42.720 --> 00:15:45.200
easier for me to consume and it's going to make me a better athlete,

325
00:15:45.200 --> 00:15:47.960
absolutely I would eat it. But if it's full of

326
00:15:47.960 --> 00:15:50.960
weird radiation that's going to give me cancer in five minutes,

327
00:15:51.520 --> 00:15:54.360
probably not. So a lot of hypotheticals

328
00:15:54.360 --> 00:15:57.359
here, a lot of what ifs, but fun question nonetheless.

329
00:15:57.720 --> 00:16:00.680
Professor Fred Watson: Uh, indeed. I think James tried to rule that out, you

330
00:16:00.680 --> 00:16:03.640
know, the radioactive food by saying that it

331
00:16:03.640 --> 00:16:06.520
wouldn't harm us. But, yeah, it's a really interesting question. And

332
00:16:06.520 --> 00:16:09.500
I, uh, I mean, the scientist in me,

333
00:16:09.840 --> 00:16:11.820
um, is a little bit,

334
00:16:13.580 --> 00:16:16.540
I guess, upset by the idea of eating what you're

335
00:16:16.540 --> 00:16:19.500
studying. Because if you're

336
00:16:19.500 --> 00:16:22.340
an astrobiologist and you're talking about

337
00:16:22.340 --> 00:16:25.340
life forms, whether they're vegetable or animal, on a

338
00:16:25.340 --> 00:16:28.140
different planet, then that's part of the scope of

339
00:16:28.140 --> 00:16:31.140
astrobiology. Uh, and, uh, should you

340
00:16:31.140 --> 00:16:33.780
eat what you're trying to study? I don't know.

341
00:16:34.020 --> 00:16:36.900
Great question, James. Uh, like all our questions,

342
00:16:36.900 --> 00:16:38.340
one that gets us thinking

343
00:16:41.300 --> 00:16:44.260
zero G and I feel fine, space nuts.

344
00:16:44.420 --> 00:16:47.380
Heidi Campo: Well, our very last question is, uh, another

345
00:16:47.380 --> 00:16:49.860
audio question, and this one is from

346
00:16:49.940 --> 00:16:52.900
Dan in California. So I'm

347
00:16:52.900 --> 00:16:55.700
going to go ahead and cue that question up now, and you guys

348
00:16:55.700 --> 00:16:57.300
can listen to Dan's question.

349
00:16:58.430 --> 00:17:01.350
Professor Fred Watson: Hi, Heidi, Fred and Andrew. It's

350
00:17:01.350 --> 00:17:04.350
Dan from California. I haven't sent in a

351
00:17:04.350 --> 00:17:07.310
question for a while, but I thought I would ask one about the sun.

352
00:17:07.930 --> 00:17:10.910
Uh, recently with the Parker solar probe, getting,

353
00:17:11.310 --> 00:17:14.270
uh, some more data back to us, uh, it made me think

354
00:17:14.270 --> 00:17:17.070
about the temperature difference between the

355
00:17:17.070 --> 00:17:19.950
corona and the photosphere and whether we expect

356
00:17:19.950 --> 00:17:22.950
the same thing to happen to other stars that we

357
00:17:22.950 --> 00:17:25.520
have observed. Great show.

358
00:17:25.840 --> 00:17:28.800
Love every moment of it. I try and listen every time.

359
00:17:28.880 --> 00:17:31.560
Thank you. Thanks, Dan. Thanks for

360
00:17:31.560 --> 00:17:32.000
listening.

361
00:17:34.390 --> 00:17:37.050
Um, another great question, um,

362
00:17:37.680 --> 00:17:40.680
and this is one that I think astrophysicists have got

363
00:17:40.680 --> 00:17:43.520
more of a handle on than the ethical question that we've just

364
00:17:43.520 --> 00:17:46.400
heard or the one about evaporating black

365
00:17:46.400 --> 00:17:48.880
holes is something that we do understand

366
00:17:50.200 --> 00:17:52.900
at a certain level. Um,

367
00:17:53.480 --> 00:17:56.440
so Dan is asking to what

368
00:17:56.440 --> 00:17:59.400
extent other stars mimic

369
00:17:59.400 --> 00:18:02.400
the behavior of the sun, part of which is still a

370
00:18:02.400 --> 00:18:05.240
puzzle. And the bit I'm talking about is the fact that

371
00:18:05.480 --> 00:18:08.280
we have, uh, the surface of the sun.

372
00:18:08.280 --> 00:18:11.200
And using the word surface figuratively

373
00:18:11.200 --> 00:18:14.200
because it doesn't have a solid surface. Uh, it's the point at which

374
00:18:14.200 --> 00:18:16.920
the sun, um, you know, where the radiation of the sun

375
00:18:16.920 --> 00:18:19.200
seems to come from the visible light, what we call the

376
00:18:19.200 --> 00:18:20.840
photosphere. That's

377
00:18:22.180 --> 00:18:22.420
about

378
00:18:24.180 --> 00:18:27.540
5500

379
00:18:28.280 --> 00:18:30.500
uh, degrees Celsius or so.

380
00:18:31.240 --> 00:18:33.900
Uh, but the atmosphere

381
00:18:33.900 --> 00:18:36.740
above that, the outer atmosphere, the corona,

382
00:18:36.900 --> 00:18:38.980
which is that uh, ethereal

383
00:18:39.540 --> 00:18:42.260
glow that we see when the sun is in

384
00:18:42.260 --> 00:18:44.820
eclipse and you can't see the photosphere, the

385
00:18:44.820 --> 00:18:47.620
photosphere is blocked out. We know the temperature

386
00:18:47.620 --> 00:18:50.390
of that is measured in millions of degrees.

387
00:18:51.030 --> 00:18:53.910
And the question that's still

388
00:18:53.990 --> 00:18:56.710
an active question in astrophysics, in solar physics

389
00:18:57.190 --> 00:19:00.150
is how does that solar

390
00:19:00.150 --> 00:19:02.790
corona get to be so much hotter

391
00:19:03.190 --> 00:19:06.110
than the surface of the sun, the visible

392
00:19:06.110 --> 00:19:08.430
surface of the Sun. The

393
00:19:08.430 --> 00:19:11.270
mechanisms are poorly, ah, understood.

394
00:19:11.700 --> 00:19:14.390
Uh, we think it is due to

395
00:19:14.820 --> 00:19:17.290
um, magnetic, you know, the

396
00:19:17.450 --> 00:19:20.290
tangled magnetic fields on the surface of

397
00:19:20.290 --> 00:19:22.930
the sun. Magnetic

398
00:19:22.930 --> 00:19:25.770
activity is really what gives you

399
00:19:25.770 --> 00:19:28.290
the transport of energy from the

400
00:19:28.290 --> 00:19:30.890
surface up to the corona. Uh, but

401
00:19:31.050 --> 00:19:33.210
the exact mechanism is still

402
00:19:34.490 --> 00:19:37.130
basically not, you know,

403
00:19:37.370 --> 00:19:40.330
fully worked out. And um, in

404
00:19:40.330 --> 00:19:42.930
fact Dan mentioned the Parker Solar Probe. It's a NASA

405
00:19:42.930 --> 00:19:45.880
spacecraft that is uh, orbiting the sun more

406
00:19:45.880 --> 00:19:48.800
closely than any other spacecraft has, uh,

407
00:19:48.880 --> 00:19:51.880
and is detecting things like these intense magnetic

408
00:19:51.880 --> 00:19:53.920
fields. So hopefully the

409
00:19:54.560 --> 00:19:57.520
physicists will sew up all those details,

410
00:19:57.760 --> 00:19:59.920
pull them together and get an answer as to why

411
00:20:00.640 --> 00:20:03.560
the corona is so much hotter. But the point

412
00:20:03.560 --> 00:20:06.160
of Dan's question is not about the sun, it's about other

413
00:20:06.160 --> 00:20:08.800
stars. And indeed, uh,

414
00:20:09.760 --> 00:20:12.190
our understanding is that

415
00:20:12.680 --> 00:20:15.630
uh, other stars have this equally hot corona.

416
00:20:15.630 --> 00:20:18.630
Other sun like stars. I should qualify that

417
00:20:18.630 --> 00:20:21.550
because stars come in widely different varieties.

418
00:20:21.630 --> 00:20:24.470
But other sun like stars, uh, we expect

419
00:20:24.470 --> 00:20:26.990
to find a similar corona. Whether

420
00:20:27.460 --> 00:20:30.110
um, that has been detected

421
00:20:30.350 --> 00:20:33.110
directly, uh, I'm not sure

422
00:20:33.110 --> 00:20:35.860
about because we detect the corona uh,

423
00:20:35.860 --> 00:20:37.920
through um, basically

424
00:20:38.720 --> 00:20:41.360
high energy radiation, X rays and ultraviolet.

425
00:20:42.140 --> 00:20:44.800
Uh, they are what betray the high

426
00:20:44.800 --> 00:20:47.560
temperature of the corona. Whether we've been able to

427
00:20:47.560 --> 00:20:50.440
detect those emissions from other stars, I'm not sure. But I

428
00:20:50.440 --> 00:20:53.120
wouldn't mind betting that we have because

429
00:20:53.460 --> 00:20:56.440
uh, those coronas are expected to behave just

430
00:20:56.440 --> 00:20:59.200
as the sun's corona does. The sun's a very, very

431
00:20:59.200 --> 00:21:02.060
typical star. There's not really anything extraordinary uh,

432
00:21:02.720 --> 00:21:05.530
about it except it has a planet, a family of planets,

433
00:21:05.530 --> 00:21:08.530
one of which has an intelligent species on it.

434
00:21:08.530 --> 00:21:10.610
And that might even make it unique.

435
00:21:11.810 --> 00:21:14.770
Heidi Campo: Well, there you go. That's, that's

436
00:21:14.770 --> 00:21:17.350
a wrap with the questions. Um,

437
00:21:17.890 --> 00:21:20.890
what, what a, ah, great bunch of questions you

438
00:21:20.890 --> 00:21:23.250
guys. Thank you so much for sending those in.

439
00:21:23.860 --> 00:21:26.370
Um, I think I maybe mentioned this on our, on our last

440
00:21:26.370 --> 00:21:29.290
episode, but it's finally summer, um, break for me

441
00:21:29.290 --> 00:21:32.250
for a few short weeks. So please keep those questions coming in so

442
00:21:32.250 --> 00:21:34.910
we can keep listening to them and answering them

443
00:21:34.910 --> 00:21:37.710
and um, enjoying interacting with you

444
00:21:37.710 --> 00:21:40.670
guys. Fred, that's

445
00:21:40.670 --> 00:21:43.190
the end of this. Ah, Q and A episode.

446
00:21:43.190 --> 00:21:46.150
Do you have anything else you want to add before we sign

447
00:21:46.150 --> 00:21:46.470
off?

448
00:21:47.400 --> 00:21:50.380
Professor Fred Watson: Um, not only to reiterate what you've just said, uh,

449
00:21:50.790 --> 00:21:52.870
this is the thing about spacenots. We've got such

450
00:21:54.230 --> 00:21:56.070
an active, energetic,

451
00:21:56.390 --> 00:21:58.930
enthusiastic, and very

452
00:21:58.930 --> 00:22:01.850
erudite audience, uh, that it's great

453
00:22:01.850 --> 00:22:04.370
to hear from, uh, all our

454
00:22:04.370 --> 00:22:07.250
listeners. Uh, and yeah, please keep sending in the

455
00:22:07.250 --> 00:22:09.930
questions, audio or text. We're happy with either.

456
00:22:10.170 --> 00:22:12.890
And a quick thank you from me, too. You mentioned him already.

457
00:22:12.970 --> 00:22:15.420
It's not often Huw gets the rap, but, uh,

458
00:22:15.850 --> 00:22:18.810
usually from Andrew, he got an insult. Um, but

459
00:22:18.810 --> 00:22:21.810
we're not going to do that, Heidi. We think Hugh's doing a great

460
00:22:21.810 --> 00:22:24.410
job. Uh, and I'm delighted to

461
00:22:24.410 --> 00:22:26.730
receive a, um, bunch of new questions from him

462
00:22:26.970 --> 00:22:29.810
yesterday afternoon at very short notice indeed. So

463
00:22:29.810 --> 00:22:30.890
thank you for that, Huw.

464
00:22:30.970 --> 00:22:33.930
Heidi Campo: Excellent. Well, thank you so much for listening and we will see

465
00:22:33.930 --> 00:22:35.450
you all next time.

466
00:22:36.810 --> 00:22:39.610
Voice Over Guy: You'll be listening to the Space Nuts podcast,

467
00:22:41.210 --> 00:22:44.010
available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

468
00:22:44.170 --> 00:22:46.930
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast

469
00:22:46.930 --> 00:22:48.650
player. You can also stream on

470
00:22:48.650 --> 00:22:51.610
demand at bitesz.com this has been another

471
00:22:51.610 --> 00:22:53.650
quality podcast production from

472
00:22:53.650 --> 00:22:54.810
bitesz.com