Oct. 23, 2025

SpaceX Innovations, Super-Puff Planets & the Mysterious South Atlantic Anomaly

SpaceX Innovations, Super-Puff Planets & the Mysterious South Atlantic Anomaly

SpaceX Innovations, Low-Cost Telescopes, and the Mystery of Super-Puff Planets In this exhilarating episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner dive into the latest advancements in space exploration and the mysteries of the...

SpaceX Innovations, Low-Cost Telescopes, and the Mystery of Super-Puff Planets
In this exhilarating episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner dive into the latest advancements in space exploration and the mysteries of the cosmos. With updates from SpaceX's recent successful launches to groundbreaking developments in low-cost space telescopes, this episode is packed with fascinating insights and cosmic revelations.
Episode Highlights:
SpaceX's Bold New Plans: Andrew and Jonti discuss SpaceX's recent achievements, including the successful landing of their Starship and their ambitious plans for future missions to the Moon and Mars. They explore how rapid testing and innovation are changing the landscape of space travel.
Low-Cost Space Telescopes: Learn about the innovative Minerva Australis facility at the University of Southern Queensland and how it is revolutionizing the search for exoplanets. The hosts discuss the exciting new projects like Twinkl and Mauv, which aim to make space telescopes more accessible and affordable.
Discovering Super-Puff Planets: The episode delves into the discovery of TOI 4507B, a unique super-puff planet with an unusually low density and a highly tilted orbit. Andrew and Jonti examine the implications of this finding for our understanding of planetary formation and the diversity of exoplanets.
Earth's Magnetic Field Anomalies: The hosts wrap up with a discussion on the South Atlantic Anomaly, a region where Earth's magnetic field is unexpectedly weak. They explore its significance for satellite operations and its implications for our understanding of Earth's interior dynamics.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favorite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.400 --> 00:00:02.280
Andrew Dunkley: Hello again. Thanks for joining us on Space

1
00:00:02.280 --> 00:00:04.640
Nuts where we talk astronomy and space

2
00:00:04.640 --> 00:00:07.000
science each and every week. Twice a week in

3
00:00:07.000 --> 00:00:09.840
fact. My name is Andrew Dunkley, your host.

4
00:00:09.840 --> 00:00:12.520
It is good to have your company. Coming up on

5
00:00:12.520 --> 00:00:14.600
today's episode, we're going to get the

6
00:00:14.600 --> 00:00:17.280
latest from SpaceX and uh, they've got bigger

7
00:00:17.280 --> 00:00:20.120
and better plans as well. Uh, what about low

8
00:00:20.120 --> 00:00:22.960
cost space telescopes? Well, there's a

9
00:00:22.960 --> 00:00:24.920
man we're about to speak to who knows all

10
00:00:24.920 --> 00:00:26.880
about those because his university is

11
00:00:26.880 --> 00:00:29.880
involved. Uh, another weird exoplanet

12
00:00:29.880 --> 00:00:32.420
has been discovered and magnetic, magnetic

13
00:00:32.420 --> 00:00:35.420
field issues here on Earth. We'll talk about

14
00:00:35.420 --> 00:00:38.020
all of that on this episode of Space

15
00:00:38.020 --> 00:00:40.660
Nuts. 15 seconds. Guidance is

16
00:00:40.660 --> 00:00:43.100
internal. 10, 9.

17
00:00:43.660 --> 00:00:46.460
Ignition sequence start. Space Nuts

18
00:00:46.460 --> 00:00:47.797
5, 4, 3, 2.

19
00:00:47.865 --> 00:00:48.140
Jonti Horner: 1.

20
00:00:48.208 --> 00:00:50.882
Andrew Dunkley: 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4, 3, 2,

21
00:00:50.951 --> 00:00:53.700
1. Space Nuts astronauts report it

22
00:00:53.700 --> 00:00:56.540
feels good. Joining us once again to

23
00:00:56.620 --> 00:00:58.860
talk about all of that and plenty more, I'm

24
00:00:58.860 --> 00:01:01.660
sure, is Jonti Horner and he is

25
00:01:01.740 --> 00:01:04.320
a professor of astrophysics at University of

26
00:01:04.320 --> 00:01:06.120
Southern Queensland. Hello Jonti.

27
00:01:06.520 --> 00:01:07.720
Jonti Horner: Good morning. How are you going?

28
00:01:07.720 --> 00:01:09.560
Andrew Dunkley: I am m well. What about you?

29
00:01:10.280 --> 00:01:12.280
Jonti Horner: Oh, not too bad. I'm recovering. I just spent

30
00:01:12.280 --> 00:01:14.360
a weekend on the Barrier Reef doing outreach.

31
00:01:14.360 --> 00:01:17.040
I've got a lovely friendship with a small

32
00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:18.560
island at the southern end of the Barrier

33
00:01:18.560 --> 00:01:21.000
Reef that I've been going to for 13 years or

34
00:01:21.000 --> 00:01:23.560
so. And so Fred gets to go jetting all around

35
00:01:23.560 --> 00:01:26.480
the world and go to Scandinavia and I get

36
00:01:26.480 --> 00:01:28.840
to go to the Barrier Reef, which is still

37
00:01:28.840 --> 00:01:30.740
really, really awesome, to be honest. So, uh,

38
00:01:30.920 --> 00:01:33.520
I went out there and did an outreach talk and

39
00:01:33.520 --> 00:01:35.280
some stargazing every night, which reminded

40
00:01:35.280 --> 00:01:38.060
of the that the most distant object I can see

41
00:01:38.060 --> 00:01:39.580
with the naked eye is not the Andromeda

42
00:01:39.580 --> 00:01:42.260
Galaxy, but it's a Triangulum galaxy, which

43
00:01:42.260 --> 00:01:44.660
is very obvious to me from a dark site

44
00:01:44.980 --> 00:01:46.700
fainter than Andromeda. Um, that's actually

45
00:01:46.700 --> 00:01:47.860
my background at the m minute because

46
00:01:48.820 --> 00:01:51.700
photographing it from home, um, a few weeks

47
00:01:51.700 --> 00:01:54.620
ago, um, I am very, very keen

48
00:01:54.620 --> 00:01:56.620
at some point to try and find Centaurus there

49
00:01:56.620 --> 00:01:59.060
with the naked eye, which I'm reliably told

50
00:01:59.060 --> 00:02:01.580
that some people with particularly eagle eyes

51
00:02:01.580 --> 00:02:03.090
can spot from here in the southern

52
00:02:03.090 --> 00:02:05.930
hemisphere. But for me, Triangulum's it,

53
00:02:05.930 --> 00:02:07.930
not Andromeda. We've all seen Andromeda, so

54
00:02:07.930 --> 00:02:08.490
that was great.

55
00:02:08.890 --> 00:02:11.530
But then today has been a little bit feral

56
00:02:11.610 --> 00:02:13.970
because there have been a few articles gone

57
00:02:13.970 --> 00:02:16.290
out about the Orionid meteor shower which we

58
00:02:16.290 --> 00:02:17.770
mentioned on the podcast a couple of weeks

59
00:02:17.770 --> 00:02:20.130
ago. And so suddenly the journalists have

60
00:02:20.130 --> 00:02:21.650
realized it's happening today and have been

61
00:02:21.650 --> 00:02:23.890
wanting to talk about it today. And I've been

62
00:02:23.890 --> 00:02:26.090
trying to disappoint everybody and make

63
00:02:26.090 --> 00:02:27.970
Australians miserable by pointing out that

64
00:02:27.970 --> 00:02:30.770
it's not the awesome spectacle that some of

65
00:02:30.770 --> 00:02:32.370
the AI garbage would have you believe.

66
00:02:32.450 --> 00:02:34.530
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, of course. And there's plenty of AI

67
00:02:34.530 --> 00:02:36.570
garbage these days. And it's just getting

68
00:02:36.570 --> 00:02:37.010
worse.

69
00:02:37.810 --> 00:02:39.810
Jonti Horner: Some of the AI generated images that are

70
00:02:39.810 --> 00:02:41.930
popping up on Facebook, I mean, they're

71
00:02:41.930 --> 00:02:43.370
pretty, but they're pretty in the same way

72
00:02:43.370 --> 00:02:45.330
that a Picasso painting is in that they don't

73
00:02:45.330 --> 00:02:48.010
really bear much reality to the reality that

74
00:02:48.010 --> 00:02:50.610
we see. They're rather totally, totally

75
00:02:50.610 --> 00:02:52.610
speculative. And it makes me a little bit

76
00:02:52.610 --> 00:02:55.130
sad, um, that they're convincing enough even

77
00:02:55.130 --> 00:02:57.460
though they're incredibly wrong. The people

78
00:02:57.460 --> 00:02:59.060
who don't know much about the subject get

79
00:02:59.060 --> 00:03:00.340
really hyped up and then get really

80
00:03:00.340 --> 00:03:01.140
disappointed.

81
00:03:01.140 --> 00:03:01.500
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.

82
00:03:01.500 --> 00:03:03.300
Jonti Horner: And I think that's the damage in it. It's a

83
00:03:03.300 --> 00:03:04.900
boy who cried wolf syndrome, right?

84
00:03:04.900 --> 00:03:05.260
Andrew Dunkley: Yes.

85
00:03:05.260 --> 00:03:07.020
Jonti Horner: Here's amazing thing. It's going to be

86
00:03:07.020 --> 00:03:09.740
brighter than the midday sun and, and then

87
00:03:09.740 --> 00:03:11.220
you can't see it except if you've got a

88
00:03:11.220 --> 00:03:12.939
telescope. People go, well, why should I have

89
00:03:12.939 --> 00:03:13.300
a look?

90
00:03:13.380 --> 00:03:16.380
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, yeah, absolutely. M. And that's just

91
00:03:16.380 --> 00:03:18.140
going to get worse. Uh, I don't know how you

92
00:03:18.140 --> 00:03:18.580
stop it.

93
00:03:18.580 --> 00:03:19.060
Jonti Horner: I don't.

94
00:03:19.220 --> 00:03:22.180
Andrew Dunkley: There's too many, too many buff heads out

95
00:03:22.180 --> 00:03:23.860
there who just want to stir people up.

96
00:03:23.860 --> 00:03:25.660
Jonti Horner: But, uh, I wonder whether it's going to be

97
00:03:25.660 --> 00:03:27.060
one of these things that booms and then

98
00:03:27.060 --> 00:03:29.400
collapses and reaches a stead partially just

99
00:03:29.400 --> 00:03:31.000
because of the incredible costs involved with

100
00:03:31.000 --> 00:03:33.720
the AI and you know, the energy use and the

101
00:03:33.720 --> 00:03:36.040
water use that everybody talks about. I

102
00:03:36.040 --> 00:03:37.400
wonder if it's going to be a thing that's

103
00:03:37.400 --> 00:03:39.440
like the, the lady's shiny toy at the minute

104
00:03:39.440 --> 00:03:42.120
and everybody's using it and then it'll just

105
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:43.840
fall by the wayside a little bit, I guess,

106
00:03:43.840 --> 00:03:46.400
like auto tune and pop music and stuff like

107
00:03:46.400 --> 00:03:48.560
that. I remember a while where every pop hit

108
00:03:48.560 --> 00:03:50.240
that turned out on the radio seemed to have

109
00:03:50.240 --> 00:03:51.760
these weird distortions and it means

110
00:03:51.760 --> 00:03:54.720
everybody was fond of auto tune. Um, and

111
00:03:54.720 --> 00:03:56.520
nowadays people would rather prove that they

112
00:03:56.520 --> 00:03:58.200
can sing themselves rather than have the

113
00:03:58.200 --> 00:03:59.200
computer do it for them.

114
00:03:59.200 --> 00:04:01.750
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. Well, I, uh, remember a radio

115
00:04:01.750 --> 00:04:04.110
interview, uh, on an entertainment segment

116
00:04:04.110 --> 00:04:06.470
when I worked for the ABC years ago, probably

117
00:04:06.470 --> 00:04:09.270
going back 20, 20 odd years or more.

118
00:04:09.830 --> 00:04:12.430
And the expert in inverted

119
00:04:12.430 --> 00:04:15.110
commas, uh, was asked if reality television

120
00:04:15.110 --> 00:04:17.190
had a future and she said, no, it'll phase

121
00:04:17.190 --> 00:04:19.629
out in five years. Um,

122
00:04:20.390 --> 00:04:23.110
no, I think it's a

123
00:04:23.110 --> 00:04:24.390
dominant format now.

124
00:04:25.270 --> 00:04:27.110
Jonti Horner: Makes my head hurt. But I often say this when

125
00:04:27.110 --> 00:04:28.310
I'm talking about the search for life

126
00:04:28.310 --> 00:04:30.140
elsewhere, and the fact that, uh, we're

127
00:04:30.140 --> 00:04:31.980
betting all our assumptions on knowing one

128
00:04:31.980 --> 00:04:33.740
form of life, which is Earth. Uh, life, very

129
00:04:33.740 --> 00:04:36.460
diverse, but only one form of life. There's

130
00:04:36.460 --> 00:04:38.340
an old saying that I'm probably paraphrasing,

131
00:04:38.340 --> 00:04:40.060
is that the one prediction you can make with

132
00:04:40.060 --> 00:04:42.020
certainty, uh, is that all predictions will

133
00:04:42.020 --> 00:04:42.540
be wrong.

134
00:04:42.620 --> 00:04:45.100
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. And that one's right.

135
00:04:45.260 --> 00:04:48.260
Yes, indeed. Uh, we better get down to

136
00:04:48.260 --> 00:04:48.620
it.

137
00:04:48.620 --> 00:04:51.060
And our first story, our first couple of

138
00:04:51.060 --> 00:04:53.730
stories, in fact, involve SpaceX. They've,

139
00:04:53.730 --> 00:04:55.740
uh, made the news again with a recent

140
00:04:55.740 --> 00:04:57.660
touchdown that, uh, has been quite

141
00:04:57.660 --> 00:04:59.820
spectacular. But they've got bigger and

142
00:04:59.820 --> 00:05:02.520
bolder plans, which we'll get to shortly. So

143
00:05:02.520 --> 00:05:04.920
tell us about this. Uh, I watched the video.

144
00:05:05.320 --> 00:05:07.880
It's quite an amazing feat of engineering,

145
00:05:07.880 --> 00:05:08.360
isn't it?

146
00:05:08.760 --> 00:05:11.440
Jonti Horner: It is. And it's a reminder that the

147
00:05:11.440 --> 00:05:13.080
development of rockets is done through

148
00:05:13.080 --> 00:05:15.320
explosions. And SpaceX are very aggressive

149
00:05:15.320 --> 00:05:17.080
with that. And there was a lot of humor hard,

150
00:05:17.660 --> 00:05:19.600
uh, earlier in the year about the incredibly

151
00:05:19.600 --> 00:05:21.480
expensive firework displays they were putting

152
00:05:21.480 --> 00:05:23.720
on for people of the Caribbean, where there

153
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:26.360
were three SpaceX test launchers on the trot

154
00:05:26.360 --> 00:05:28.790
that went boom, um, in what

155
00:05:28.870 --> 00:05:31.710
SpaceX describe as rapid unscheduled

156
00:05:31.710 --> 00:05:34.710
disassembly. I love that. Yeah. It apparently

157
00:05:34.710 --> 00:05:36.830
started as a joke and became a meme and now

158
00:05:36.830 --> 00:05:38.590
is just a standard term, which is kind of

159
00:05:38.590 --> 00:05:41.350
adorable in itself. Yeah. And at the

160
00:05:41.350 --> 00:05:43.110
time, even though there was a bit of fun to

161
00:05:43.110 --> 00:05:45.350
be had, and there were some concerns as well,

162
00:05:45.350 --> 00:05:47.510
because debris was found across the Turks and

163
00:05:47.510 --> 00:05:49.550
Caicos Islands and there was a lot of

164
00:05:49.550 --> 00:05:51.150
controversy about who owns, um, it, who

165
00:05:51.150 --> 00:05:53.110
should clean up after it, all the rest of it,

166
00:05:53.920 --> 00:05:55.760
all the way through, there's this ongoing

167
00:05:55.760 --> 00:05:58.040
line that this is how they learn, this is how

168
00:05:58.040 --> 00:06:00.920
you develop rockets, is you test them to

169
00:06:00.920 --> 00:06:03.240
destruction. And, um, from the destruction

170
00:06:03.240 --> 00:06:04.760
you learn more than you would do from a

171
00:06:04.760 --> 00:06:07.520
successful flight. And SpaceX have

172
00:06:07.520 --> 00:06:09.439
done this all the way through their long

173
00:06:09.439 --> 00:06:11.760
history and, uh, they've had a much more

174
00:06:11.760 --> 00:06:13.800
aggressive testing schedule than you'd be

175
00:06:13.800 --> 00:06:16.200
used to. If you think back to the rocket

176
00:06:16.200 --> 00:06:18.240
launchers of bygone eras where governments

177
00:06:18.240 --> 00:06:20.880
were in charge, where every time something

178
00:06:20.880 --> 00:06:23.200
went wrong, there was this huge delay where

179
00:06:23.200 --> 00:06:24.840
they were painstaking and trying to figure

180
00:06:24.840 --> 00:06:27.000
out the nitty gritty and everything about it

181
00:06:27.800 --> 00:06:29.760
with the way SpaceX have worked. They've got

182
00:06:29.760 --> 00:06:31.680
the next rocket under construction when they

183
00:06:31.680 --> 00:06:33.640
launch the current one. So there's this rapid

184
00:06:33.640 --> 00:06:35.960
turnover, uh, of lots of testing,

185
00:06:36.440 --> 00:06:38.520
where the goal is not for the next test to

186
00:06:38.760 --> 00:06:41.600
necessarily be a perfect success, but rather

187
00:06:41.600 --> 00:06:44.080
to be better than the last one, and what

188
00:06:44.080 --> 00:06:46.120
we've seen with the last two launches of

189
00:06:46.120 --> 00:06:48.280
their starship, of their big

190
00:06:48.600 --> 00:06:50.680
headliner rocket that is destined to be the

191
00:06:50.680 --> 00:06:52.560
one to launch people to the moon and to Mars

192
00:06:52.560 --> 00:06:55.450
and beyond, is the benefits of this kind

193
00:06:55.450 --> 00:06:57.570
of process. We've just seen the fifth

194
00:06:57.650 --> 00:07:00.250
starship launch of the year and, um, the

195
00:07:00.250 --> 00:07:03.050
second one which has gone well, and it's the

196
00:07:03.050 --> 00:07:04.650
final launch, incidentally, of this version

197
00:07:04.650 --> 00:07:06.490
of starship. They're now working on a bigger

198
00:07:06.490 --> 00:07:08.810
version that's slightly taller and slightly

199
00:07:08.810 --> 00:07:11.810
gruntier, which will do some more testing and

200
00:07:11.810 --> 00:07:13.570
then they'll build an even bigger version,

201
00:07:13.650 --> 00:07:15.770
which is the one that they hope to do a lot

202
00:07:15.770 --> 00:07:18.570
of the really exciting stuff with. But the

203
00:07:18.570 --> 00:07:20.730
current launch, happened about a week ago

204
00:07:20.730 --> 00:07:23.350
now, was live streamed and, um, there is

205
00:07:23.350 --> 00:07:25.230
beautiful video footage of it online,

206
00:07:26.190 --> 00:07:28.670
particularly of the final stages of the

207
00:07:28.910 --> 00:07:31.630
relatively soft, gentle landing in the ocean.

208
00:07:31.790 --> 00:07:33.270
And, um, what they achieved with the launch

209
00:07:33.270 --> 00:07:36.070
was successfully launched. The boosters, I

210
00:07:36.070 --> 00:07:37.830
believe, on the sides, came back and touched

211
00:07:37.830 --> 00:07:40.190
down on the pad, which is an incredible

212
00:07:40.190 --> 00:07:41.590
technical achievement when you think about

213
00:07:41.590 --> 00:07:43.510
it, and we now almost take it for granted.

214
00:07:43.510 --> 00:07:45.390
Yeah. And that's part of the achievement that

215
00:07:45.390 --> 00:07:47.390
has allowed SpaceX to launch things to space

216
00:07:47.390 --> 00:07:49.390
much more cheaply than those previous

217
00:07:49.390 --> 00:07:51.550
government missions I mentioned, because you

218
00:07:51.550 --> 00:07:53.470
can reuse parts and that lowers the cost

219
00:07:53.470 --> 00:07:55.750
dramatically. But then the main body of the

220
00:07:55.750 --> 00:07:57.670
starship did this suborbital flight,

221
00:07:57.990 --> 00:08:00.150
probably, in all honesty, delayed some Qantas

222
00:08:00.150 --> 00:08:01.830
passengers flying from Australia to South

223
00:08:01.830 --> 00:08:04.710
Africa because they say we're going to launch

224
00:08:04.710 --> 00:08:06.270
a rocket and of course you don't want an

225
00:08:06.270 --> 00:08:07.990
aircraft to be the way when it's coming back

226
00:08:07.990 --> 00:08:10.070
down. And there were a lot of stories about

227
00:08:10.070 --> 00:08:11.870
that earlier in the year with disgruntled

228
00:08:11.870 --> 00:08:13.550
Qantas passengers being delayed when

229
00:08:13.550 --> 00:08:15.770
launchers were scrubbed. So their flight was

230
00:08:15.770 --> 00:08:17.410
delayed and the launch didn't even happen.

231
00:08:17.730 --> 00:08:20.530
This launch definitely did. It flew

232
00:08:20.530 --> 00:08:22.930
this suborbital flight, did a few test

233
00:08:22.930 --> 00:08:24.650
deployments of satellites to prove it could

234
00:08:24.650 --> 00:08:26.850
do that, then reentered the atmosphere. And

235
00:08:26.850 --> 00:08:29.370
there's this gorgeous footage of the thing

236
00:08:29.370 --> 00:08:31.610
falling sidewards through the atmosphere, not

237
00:08:31.610 --> 00:08:33.250
out of control, not tumbling, but looking

238
00:08:33.250 --> 00:08:34.850
like it's coming in sideways and like

239
00:08:34.850 --> 00:08:36.770
everything's done and it's just going to

240
00:08:36.770 --> 00:08:39.090
crash. And, um, then suddenly the engines

241
00:08:39.090 --> 00:08:40.970
turn on and it stands on its tail and just

242
00:08:40.970 --> 00:08:43.350
slows down and slows down until it kicks up

243
00:08:43.350 --> 00:08:44.750
all this steam, all this water, but

244
00:08:44.750 --> 00:08:46.950
essentially just gently settles onto the

245
00:08:46.950 --> 00:08:49.910
water and has a soft landing where it can be

246
00:08:49.910 --> 00:08:52.470
recovered and reused. And that soft landing

247
00:08:52.470 --> 00:08:54.110
happens somewhere to the west of Western

248
00:08:54.110 --> 00:08:56.870
Australia in the Indian Ocean. And

249
00:08:56.870 --> 00:08:59.490
it's a really incredible technical feat. Uh,

250
00:08:59.490 --> 00:09:02.350
I will bag SpaceX when we're talking about

251
00:09:02.350 --> 00:09:04.630
Starlink. While I acknowledge that that does

252
00:09:04.630 --> 00:09:05.950
a lot of good as well, it's one of these

253
00:09:05.950 --> 00:09:07.430
things where it's not all good, it's not all

254
00:09:07.430 --> 00:09:10.060
bad, but there's aspects of both. But I think

255
00:09:10.060 --> 00:09:12.580
this kind of success should be really

256
00:09:12.580 --> 00:09:15.260
celebrated because it's a really fabulous

257
00:09:15.260 --> 00:09:17.380
example of this constant progression of

258
00:09:17.380 --> 00:09:19.740
improving technology we're getting that will

259
00:09:19.740 --> 00:09:22.660
make human use of space cheaper in

260
00:09:22.660 --> 00:09:24.740
the future. It'll allow a lot more variety in

261
00:09:24.740 --> 00:09:27.260
what we do. And the context here, of course,

262
00:09:27.260 --> 00:09:29.940
is that SpaceX have a contract with NASA to

263
00:09:29.940 --> 00:09:32.220
launch astronauts to the moon. And the

264
00:09:32.220 --> 00:09:34.420
accelerator plan for that is that the Artemis

265
00:09:34.420 --> 00:09:36.220
3 mission is scheduled to launch in early

266
00:09:36.220 --> 00:09:39.070
2027 to send people out to the

267
00:09:39.070 --> 00:09:40.830
moon to do a lap of the moon and bring them

268
00:09:40.830 --> 00:09:42.910
back and probably spend even up to 30 days in

269
00:09:42.910 --> 00:09:45.470
space, quite a lengthy mission that will be

270
00:09:45.470 --> 00:09:48.190
launched off the next generation of this

271
00:09:48.190 --> 00:09:50.070
starship, or the next, but one generation of

272
00:09:50.070 --> 00:09:52.390
this starship. And uh, the fact that they've

273
00:09:52.390 --> 00:09:54.030
now had two launches on the track where it

274
00:09:54.030 --> 00:09:55.470
all worked, uh, and nothing blew up is

275
00:09:55.470 --> 00:09:57.590
probably fairly reassuring for the people who

276
00:09:57.830 --> 00:10:00.590
plan to sit on top of this thing in 12 or 18

277
00:10:00.590 --> 00:10:03.070
months time. It's also something where

278
00:10:03.070 --> 00:10:04.790
there's a bit of extra pressure from the big,

279
00:10:04.790 --> 00:10:07.270
big head guy who didn't develop the company

280
00:10:07.270 --> 00:10:09.580
but bought it and has been a good advocate

281
00:10:09.580 --> 00:10:10.940
for it, I think you'd possibly say in the

282
00:10:10.940 --> 00:10:13.460
form of Elon Musk, challenging individual,

283
00:10:13.460 --> 00:10:16.380
but he's really very vocal about the

284
00:10:16.380 --> 00:10:17.980
fact that he wants this thing to not just

285
00:10:17.980 --> 00:10:19.780
send people to the moon, but also to send

286
00:10:19.780 --> 00:10:21.620
them to Mars. Yes. And uh, one of the things

287
00:10:21.620 --> 00:10:23.820
he wants to achieve in the tech demonstrator

288
00:10:23.820 --> 00:10:26.140
phase of that is to use

289
00:10:26.540 --> 00:10:29.380
Starship version 3, which is a version

290
00:10:29.380 --> 00:10:32.180
after the next version, to launch a mission

291
00:10:32.180 --> 00:10:34.660
to Mars, sending small

292
00:10:34.660 --> 00:10:37.540
spacecraft robots effectively in the next

293
00:10:37.540 --> 00:10:39.420
launch window to Mars. Now that next launch

294
00:10:39.420 --> 00:10:41.920
window is only 12 months away. For those who

295
00:10:41.920 --> 00:10:43.840
are keen at looking at the night sky, Mars is

296
00:10:43.840 --> 00:10:45.760
almost now hidden behind the sun. It's pretty

297
00:10:45.760 --> 00:10:48.200
much out of view. We're swinging back around

298
00:10:48.200 --> 00:10:49.960
to gradually approach it again. And by this

299
00:10:49.960 --> 00:10:52.920
time next year we'll see the usual flurry

300
00:10:52.920 --> 00:10:55.360
of activity as people start to launch their

301
00:10:55.360 --> 00:10:57.160
spacecraft. And you get the next wave of

302
00:10:57.160 --> 00:10:58.840
things going to Mars because that's a cheap

303
00:10:58.840 --> 00:11:01.120
and quick time to go there. That's the launch

304
00:11:01.120 --> 00:11:03.600
window. Uh, and Elon Musk wants version three

305
00:11:03.600 --> 00:11:06.560
of starship ready so that

306
00:11:06.560 --> 00:11:09.070
it can launch things to Mars in that launch

307
00:11:09.070 --> 00:11:11.270
window, uh, to demonstrate the capacity of

308
00:11:11.270 --> 00:11:13.350
getting things there with a rocket big enough

309
00:11:13.350 --> 00:11:15.430
to eventually put people there. And of

310
00:11:15.430 --> 00:11:17.270
course, he's famously expressed the desire to

311
00:11:17.270 --> 00:11:19.870
be the first person to die on Mars. Um, I'm

312
00:11:19.870 --> 00:11:21.910
sure many people in the audience have similar

313
00:11:21.910 --> 00:11:23.390
aspirations for Elon Musk.

314
00:11:24.570 --> 00:11:27.390
Andrew Dunkley: Um, we've had a few comments over the course

315
00:11:27.390 --> 00:11:28.830
of the last several months.

316
00:11:29.310 --> 00:11:31.830
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. But this is where things are

317
00:11:31.830 --> 00:11:33.230
looking. And the fact that they've been so

318
00:11:33.230 --> 00:11:35.880
successful so quickly is really promising for

319
00:11:35.880 --> 00:11:37.400
the moon missions and, um, for the Mars

320
00:11:37.400 --> 00:11:38.840
missions to come down. The future, and it

321
00:11:38.840 --> 00:11:41.080
should be celebrated. And the footage that's

322
00:11:41.080 --> 00:11:42.520
out there that you can find all over the

323
00:11:42.520 --> 00:11:44.880
place on YouTube Music is really

324
00:11:44.960 --> 00:11:47.960
astonishingly incredible. To see the control

325
00:11:47.960 --> 00:11:49.720
this rocket has and the fact that coming back

326
00:11:49.720 --> 00:11:51.279
through the atmosphere, falling on its side,

327
00:11:51.279 --> 00:11:53.640
it can suddenly just wake up, stand on its

328
00:11:53.640 --> 00:11:55.680
tail and gently touch down in the water.

329
00:11:55.680 --> 00:11:57.360
That's really cool.

330
00:11:57.360 --> 00:11:59.920
Andrew Dunkley: It is very, very cool. It sort of goes back

331
00:11:59.920 --> 00:12:02.150
to the early days of science, uh,

332
00:12:02.520 --> 00:12:04.240
fiction, where that's what rockets did.

333
00:12:04.560 --> 00:12:05.020
Jonti Horner: Yes.

334
00:12:05.250 --> 00:12:08.210
Andrew Dunkley: And now it's real. Uh, so much stuff seems to

335
00:12:08.210 --> 00:12:10.530
be happening that, uh, has been written about

336
00:12:10.530 --> 00:12:13.090
by science fiction writers, you know,

337
00:12:13.490 --> 00:12:16.450
50, 100 years ago. Um, so this,

338
00:12:16.450 --> 00:12:18.610
this new version of the, um,

339
00:12:19.620 --> 00:12:22.370
uh, the spaceship is going to

340
00:12:22.610 --> 00:12:25.050
be, as you said, bigger, uh, and

341
00:12:25.050 --> 00:12:27.080
gruntier. It's going to have some really, um,

342
00:12:27.330 --> 00:12:29.650
powerful Raptor engines attached to it, and

343
00:12:29.970 --> 00:12:32.650
it'll be quite an awesome piece of machinery.

344
00:12:32.650 --> 00:12:34.490
Biggest rocket ever, I think.

345
00:12:34.730 --> 00:12:37.290
Jonti Horner: Absolutely. And it would not surprise me if

346
00:12:37.290 --> 00:12:39.410
there were a few explosive disassemblies of

347
00:12:39.410 --> 00:12:41.210
this one as they're tuning up, because that's

348
00:12:41.210 --> 00:12:43.610
how they learn. And I think there were a lot

349
00:12:43.610 --> 00:12:45.810
of people who are not tuned into this, who

350
00:12:45.810 --> 00:12:48.380
are not quite as big as space fans as we all,

351
00:12:48.380 --> 00:12:50.530
uh, are, who, when the explosions were

352
00:12:50.530 --> 00:12:52.530
happening, were taking a lot of mirth from it

353
00:12:52.530 --> 00:12:54.090
and saying, come on, I can't even launch a

354
00:12:54.090 --> 00:12:55.850
rocket. And we've been doing it for 50 years.

355
00:12:56.490 --> 00:12:58.770
And a lot of the voices on the Internet who

356
00:12:58.770 --> 00:13:00.890
follow how these things go, who are much

357
00:13:00.890 --> 00:13:02.530
wiser and much more knowledgeable about this

358
00:13:02.530 --> 00:13:04.820
than I am, were saying, don't panic. This is

359
00:13:04.820 --> 00:13:06.820
exactly how SpaceX do business. They're not

360
00:13:06.820 --> 00:13:09.340
worried. This is how they learn. And each

361
00:13:09.340 --> 00:13:11.220
failure happened later, and now they get

362
00:13:11.220 --> 00:13:13.420
successes. It's how they work, and it's how

363
00:13:13.420 --> 00:13:14.900
you learn. You learn more from your failures

364
00:13:14.900 --> 00:13:15.500
than the success.

365
00:13:15.660 --> 00:13:18.020
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, they could well be sending a fleet of

366
00:13:18.020 --> 00:13:21.020
these Starship V3s to Mars next year,

367
00:13:21.020 --> 00:13:23.460
the way they're talking. So watch, watch

368
00:13:23.460 --> 00:13:25.500
this. SpaceX boom, boom.

369
00:13:25.940 --> 00:13:28.540
Uh, let's move on to our next story.

370
00:13:28.980 --> 00:13:31.880
Uh, this is one that your university's uh, a,

371
00:13:31.880 --> 00:13:33.980
uh, little involved in. And this is low cost

372
00:13:34.460 --> 00:13:37.340
private space telescopes. Do tell.

373
00:13:38.220 --> 00:13:40.660
Jonti Horner: I do love this. Now I can immediately take a

374
00:13:40.660 --> 00:13:42.820
total detour here, um, because I'm good at

375
00:13:42.820 --> 00:13:44.460
that. Here's a topic and I'm not going to

376
00:13:44.460 --> 00:13:46.220
talk about it for the first few minutes, but

377
00:13:46.540 --> 00:13:49.140
we have at UNISQ something I'm really proud

378
00:13:49.140 --> 00:13:51.260
of, which is our Minerva Australis facility.

379
00:13:51.820 --> 00:13:54.020
And um, that is something we've built to find

380
00:13:54.020 --> 00:13:55.780
planets around other stars and learn more

381
00:13:55.780 --> 00:13:58.780
about them to basically work following

382
00:13:58.780 --> 00:14:01.260
up the observations of the NASA TESS mission.

383
00:14:01.940 --> 00:14:03.500
Uh, and we were able to build this facility

384
00:14:03.500 --> 00:14:05.180
which is the only professional astronomical

385
00:14:05.180 --> 00:14:07.820
research observatory in Queensland, using

386
00:14:08.140 --> 00:14:10.300
Australian Research Council funding and using

387
00:14:10.380 --> 00:14:13.220
input from partner universities. And

388
00:14:13.220 --> 00:14:16.020
we're talking about a total budget here of a

389
00:14:16.020 --> 00:14:18.060
few million Australian dollars, less than 10

390
00:14:18.060 --> 00:14:20.900
million. If you went back even

391
00:14:20.900 --> 00:14:23.260
20 years this would not have been possible.

392
00:14:23.340 --> 00:14:25.020
What we've been able to do is build this

393
00:14:25.020 --> 00:14:26.940
array of telescopes where all the telescopes

394
00:14:26.940 --> 00:14:29.060
have 70 centimeter mirrors. So they're big

395
00:14:29.060 --> 00:14:31.940
chunky research grade telescopes that we were

396
00:14:31.940 --> 00:14:33.940
able to buy off the shelf because there's a

397
00:14:33.940 --> 00:14:36.300
company called Plane Wave who

398
00:14:36.780 --> 00:14:38.620
developed what is essentially the Model T

399
00:14:38.620 --> 00:14:41.380
Ford revolution for research level

400
00:14:41.380 --> 00:14:43.820
telescopes where they realized that there's a

401
00:14:43.820 --> 00:14:46.700
really big market for telescopes that are big

402
00:14:46.700 --> 00:14:48.500
compared to what amateurs use, but at the

403
00:14:48.500 --> 00:14:50.100
small end of what professional astronomers

404
00:14:50.100 --> 00:14:52.100
use. And uh, there's a big market because the

405
00:14:52.100 --> 00:14:54.580
military wants these to be looking for space

406
00:14:54.580 --> 00:14:57.420
debris and to do space situational awareness,

407
00:14:58.090 --> 00:15:00.450
satellite tracking, things like that. The

408
00:15:00.450 --> 00:15:02.410
wealthiest of the amateur astronomy community

409
00:15:02.490 --> 00:15:04.910
want these to do their astronomy with and uh,

410
00:15:04.930 --> 00:15:06.770
the professional astronomers would want to

411
00:15:06.770 --> 00:15:09.050
use them as well. And um, by

412
00:15:09.450 --> 00:15:11.290
setting up a production line where you

413
00:15:11.290 --> 00:15:14.010
produce these things relatively en masse,

414
00:15:14.490 --> 00:15:16.810
rather than getting an order for a telescope,

415
00:15:16.890 --> 00:15:18.930
designing a specific telescope for that

416
00:15:18.930 --> 00:15:21.530
telescope's needs and building it as a one

417
00:15:21.530 --> 00:15:24.130
off, you can build things on a production

418
00:15:24.130 --> 00:15:26.620
line and you can make them a lot cheaper. In

419
00:15:26.620 --> 00:15:28.340
this case about an order of magnitude

420
00:15:28.340 --> 00:15:30.220
cheaper. Uh, so that meant we were able to

421
00:15:30.220 --> 00:15:32.100
get these telescopes of this size and of this

422
00:15:32.100 --> 00:15:33.740
quality for about a quarter of a million

423
00:15:33.740 --> 00:15:36.020
dollars each instead of two and a half

424
00:15:36.020 --> 00:15:38.580
million dollars each. Wow. Which meant that

425
00:15:38.580 --> 00:15:40.739
we were able to build this facility and build

426
00:15:40.739 --> 00:15:43.260
a relatively low cost research facility

427
00:15:43.820 --> 00:15:46.780
for one task. And that's in real contrast

428
00:15:46.780 --> 00:15:48.660
to uh, most of the really big expensive

429
00:15:48.660 --> 00:15:51.020
observatories historically which have been

430
00:15:51.020 --> 00:15:53.020
really expensive and all singing, all

431
00:15:53.020 --> 00:15:54.740
dancing, to do all things for all people.

432
00:15:55.940 --> 00:15:57.820
By having this kind of Model T Ford

433
00:15:57.820 --> 00:15:59.900
revolution where you suddenly have telescopes

434
00:15:59.900 --> 00:16:02.180
coming off a production line, you're able to

435
00:16:02.180 --> 00:16:03.740
make things in order of magnitude more

436
00:16:03.740 --> 00:16:06.099
affordable. And that allows people to be

437
00:16:06.099 --> 00:16:09.020
innovative and develop bespoke

438
00:16:09.020 --> 00:16:10.940
observatories that do one thing well rather

439
00:16:10.940 --> 00:16:12.900
than everything well. And they can do that a

440
00:16:12.900 --> 00:16:15.100
lot cheaper. And that's been a huge success

441
00:16:15.100 --> 00:16:18.060
for us. We've discovered about 40 or 50

442
00:16:18.060 --> 00:16:19.860
planets. We've been involved in the

443
00:16:19.860 --> 00:16:22.300
discoveries all at a really low cost, which

444
00:16:22.300 --> 00:16:24.980
makes this probably the cheapest exoplanet

445
00:16:24.980 --> 00:16:27.020
facility on the planet in terms of cost per

446
00:16:27.020 --> 00:16:29.380
planet. Learned about. So we're really proud

447
00:16:29.380 --> 00:16:32.140
of that. And working on that,

448
00:16:32.380 --> 00:16:35.180
we learned about a company in the UK

449
00:16:35.340 --> 00:16:38.180
called Blue Sky Space limited And they are

450
00:16:38.180 --> 00:16:40.700
a very innovative, innovative spin out

451
00:16:40.860 --> 00:16:43.700
from, um, University of

452
00:16:43.700 --> 00:16:46.580
London, um, and my name is Dun Turtle Black

453
00:16:46.580 --> 00:16:47.980
there. It's not the Royal Holloway University

454
00:16:47.980 --> 00:16:49.980
of London, but it's one of the big

455
00:16:49.980 --> 00:16:51.580
universities in the middle of London. We've

456
00:16:51.580 --> 00:16:54.060
worked with them closely. We've had Giovanna

457
00:16:54.060 --> 00:16:55.540
Tinetti, who's one of the world's leading

458
00:16:55.540 --> 00:16:57.300
scientists from them, visit us on a couple

459
00:16:57.300 --> 00:16:59.860
occasions. And uh, there's this spin out that

460
00:16:59.860 --> 00:17:02.100
came out of their undergraduate master's

461
00:17:02.100 --> 00:17:04.940
program where people have set up a company

462
00:17:05.740 --> 00:17:08.660
that has looked at the idea of building

463
00:17:08.660 --> 00:17:10.580
things on a production line and said, can we

464
00:17:10.580 --> 00:17:13.090
apply that to space telescopes

465
00:17:13.730 --> 00:17:15.730
instead of looking at building James Webb,

466
00:17:15.730 --> 00:17:18.170
which is billions of dollars for an enormous,

467
00:17:18.170 --> 00:17:19.970
really complex thing that everybody has to

468
00:17:19.970 --> 00:17:22.890
fight to use? Yeah. Can we take the

469
00:17:22.890 --> 00:17:25.850
parts that are available to us off the shelf

470
00:17:25.850 --> 00:17:27.610
from people making satellites and

471
00:17:27.610 --> 00:17:29.250
particularly making things like cubesats,

472
00:17:29.250 --> 00:17:31.210
which are designed to be easy to put

473
00:17:31.210 --> 00:17:32.770
together, cheap to put together because you

474
00:17:32.770 --> 00:17:35.530
can go and get pieces off a shelf. And can we

475
00:17:35.530 --> 00:17:37.410
effectively crowdsource from research

476
00:17:37.570 --> 00:17:39.840
institutions cheaper, more

477
00:17:39.840 --> 00:17:42.800
specialized space telescopes that are

478
00:17:42.800 --> 00:17:45.400
built off the shelf and um, reduce the costs

479
00:17:45.400 --> 00:17:48.080
of building space telescopes by a factor of

480
00:17:48.080 --> 00:17:50.920
10 to 100 times. The first of

481
00:17:50.920 --> 00:17:52.800
these that they came up with is a project

482
00:17:52.800 --> 00:17:54.600
called twinkl that I know for a fact where

483
00:17:54.600 --> 00:17:56.520
one of the universities that's bought in on

484
00:17:56.840 --> 00:17:59.440
and that's going to launch a telescope with

485
00:17:59.440 --> 00:18:01.920
about a 70 centimeter mirror, so comparable

486
00:18:01.920 --> 00:18:04.560
to the ones we've got at our facility for a

487
00:18:04.560 --> 00:18:06.840
cost of about $75 million, or

488
00:18:07.870 --> 00:18:10.350
there's a real exoplanet tool. Now $75

489
00:18:10.350 --> 00:18:13.190
million sounds expensive, but to

490
00:18:13.190 --> 00:18:15.430
launch a space telescope of that kind of

491
00:18:15.430 --> 00:18:18.070
caliber for $75 million is utterly unheard

492
00:18:18.070 --> 00:18:19.910
of. And the way they're doing it is by

493
00:18:19.910 --> 00:18:22.110
building it from off shelf materials, they're

494
00:18:22.110 --> 00:18:23.710
getting universities to buy it and those

495
00:18:23.710 --> 00:18:26.230
universities get guaranteed access and they

496
00:18:26.230 --> 00:18:28.390
get to participate in the design. So you get

497
00:18:28.390 --> 00:18:30.030
the telescope that is good for the science

498
00:18:30.030 --> 00:18:32.310
you want to do. That's going to be Twinkl.

499
00:18:32.310 --> 00:18:34.500
And Twinkl is going to launch ah, at some

500
00:18:34.500 --> 00:18:36.900
point in the next couple of years. But

501
00:18:36.900 --> 00:18:39.820
they've also been working on what was

502
00:18:39.820 --> 00:18:42.380
developed second but will launch first,

503
00:18:42.860 --> 00:18:45.660
which is a smaller, even cheaper

504
00:18:45.660 --> 00:18:48.660
instrument called mawv. Now we've

505
00:18:48.660 --> 00:18:50.620
been involved in the discussions with this

506
00:18:50.620 --> 00:18:52.900
since it was first a thing. But I don't off

507
00:18:52.900 --> 00:18:54.580
the top of my head know whether we've got buy

508
00:18:54.580 --> 00:18:56.700
in or whether we're observers on the

509
00:18:56.700 --> 00:18:58.300
sideline, sharing them in because I'm not

510
00:18:58.300 --> 00:19:01.000
personally involved with the mission. But

511
00:19:01.000 --> 00:19:03.920
Mauv is a CubeSat. It's going to be about

512
00:19:03.920 --> 00:19:06.880
the size of a small briefcase. It has got

513
00:19:06.880 --> 00:19:09.760
an off the shelf UV instrument

514
00:19:09.760 --> 00:19:12.080
so ultraviolet looking at wavelengths shorter

515
00:19:12.080 --> 00:19:15.080
than we see with the unaided eye that they've

516
00:19:15.080 --> 00:19:17.880
been able to modify to allow it to be a

517
00:19:17.880 --> 00:19:20.240
spacecraft that is dedicated at studying

518
00:19:20.240 --> 00:19:23.160
stellar flares, looking at stars, stars

519
00:19:23.160 --> 00:19:25.200
like the sun, stars like red dwarfs like

520
00:19:25.200 --> 00:19:28.010
Proxima Centauri and studying them to look at

521
00:19:28.010 --> 00:19:29.730
how active they are, learning more about

522
00:19:29.730 --> 00:19:31.650
their activity levels. Now this is really

523
00:19:31.650 --> 00:19:34.040
interesting in the context of exoplanets, ah,

524
00:19:34.530 --> 00:19:37.250
and the search for life elsewhere. That's one

525
00:19:37.250 --> 00:19:39.850
of the big motivators of this because this

526
00:19:39.850 --> 00:19:42.690
idea that stellar flares and stellar activity

527
00:19:43.090 --> 00:19:44.970
could be something that makes a planet that

528
00:19:44.970 --> 00:19:46.810
would otherwise be really suitable for the

529
00:19:46.810 --> 00:19:48.410
search for life and suitable for life to

530
00:19:48.410 --> 00:19:50.810
develop and thrive and turn that planet into

531
00:19:50.810 --> 00:19:53.810
a barren and hostile wasteland. And Mars

532
00:19:53.810 --> 00:19:56.530
is held up as an example of this. Mars has a

533
00:19:56.530 --> 00:19:58.410
very thin and tenuous atmosphere now. It's

534
00:19:58.410 --> 00:20:00.690
cold and arid, but when it was young it was

535
00:20:00.690 --> 00:20:03.650
warm and wet and had oceans and would

536
00:20:03.650 --> 00:20:05.210
have looked almost like a mini version of

537
00:20:05.210 --> 00:20:07.170
Earth, uh, 2.0. It had all the conditions you

538
00:20:07.170 --> 00:20:09.570
need for life. But over billions of years,

539
00:20:09.570 --> 00:20:12.530
Mars's atmosphere has been whittled away from

540
00:20:12.530 --> 00:20:15.210
the outside in by solar activity, in part

541
00:20:15.210 --> 00:20:16.650
because Mars doesn't really have a strong

542
00:20:16.650 --> 00:20:18.290
magnetic field now it's also lost the

543
00:20:18.290 --> 00:20:21.260
atmosphere chemically to the surface. But

544
00:20:21.260 --> 00:20:23.060
this has always given people an idea that

545
00:20:23.060 --> 00:20:25.260
stellar activity constrict the atmospheres of

546
00:20:25.260 --> 00:20:27.980
planets and render them unsuitable for life

547
00:20:27.980 --> 00:20:30.660
in the long term as well as in the shorter

548
00:20:30.660 --> 00:20:33.340
term. That extreme activity would lead to UV

549
00:20:33.340 --> 00:20:35.340
doses that could even break through and

550
00:20:35.340 --> 00:20:36.900
sterilize the planet. So there's a lot of

551
00:20:36.900 --> 00:20:38.900
ways stellar activity could be bad for life.

552
00:20:40.020 --> 00:20:42.140
What we know about with the sun is the sun's

553
00:20:42.140 --> 00:20:44.740
a really calm and chill star. It's much less

554
00:20:44.740 --> 00:20:47.730
active than the majority of stars are. And

555
00:20:47.730 --> 00:20:50.690
that has led to people speculating along the

556
00:20:50.690 --> 00:20:53.410
lines of the anthropic principle that we're

557
00:20:53.410 --> 00:20:56.370
only here to observe the universe because our

558
00:20:56.370 --> 00:20:59.250
sun is so stable, and therefore we should

559
00:20:59.250 --> 00:21:00.810
only ever look at stars that are really,

560
00:21:00.810 --> 00:21:02.650
really stable. There are others who argue

561
00:21:02.650 --> 00:21:05.530
that you can't take every coincidence about

562
00:21:05.530 --> 00:21:07.210
our solar system and assume that it's a

563
00:21:07.210 --> 00:21:09.490
requirement for life. And, uh, maybe it is

564
00:21:09.490 --> 00:21:11.290
just coincidence that we happen to be around

565
00:21:11.290 --> 00:21:13.990
a really stable star. But if we want to learn

566
00:21:13.990 --> 00:21:15.910
more about planetary systems around other

567
00:21:15.910 --> 00:21:17.390
stars, and particularly if we want to be able

568
00:21:17.390 --> 00:21:20.110
to focus the search for life elsewhere, on

569
00:21:20.110 --> 00:21:21.550
the planets that are the most promising

570
00:21:21.550 --> 00:21:24.390
targets, we want to maximize the chances of

571
00:21:24.390 --> 00:21:26.150
those planets having life and being suitable

572
00:21:26.150 --> 00:21:28.270
for life. It's really important to learn as

573
00:21:28.270 --> 00:21:30.110
much as we can about the star, the planets

574
00:21:30.110 --> 00:21:32.230
themselves, all that kind of stuff. And

575
00:21:32.230 --> 00:21:34.910
that's where Morph comes in. Morph is

576
00:21:35.390 --> 00:21:37.630
ridiculously cheap for a space telescope, to

577
00:21:37.630 --> 00:21:39.310
be honest, because it's one of these cubesats

578
00:21:39.700 --> 00:21:41.900
made from off the shelf materials. It's got

579
00:21:41.900 --> 00:21:43.860
this off the shelf UV detector that's been

580
00:21:43.860 --> 00:21:46.780
modified to do stellar activity work. And

581
00:21:46.780 --> 00:21:49.140
it's going to launch potentially in the next

582
00:21:49.140 --> 00:21:51.860
month, possibly as soon as that. Really,

583
00:21:51.860 --> 00:21:53.860
really exciting. And what it will be doing is

584
00:21:53.860 --> 00:21:56.180
looking at stars and studying their stellar

585
00:21:56.180 --> 00:21:58.620
flares, studying their activity to give us a

586
00:21:58.620 --> 00:22:00.820
really good handle on the diversity of

587
00:22:00.820 --> 00:22:02.900
stellar activity you get from planet hosting

588
00:22:02.900 --> 00:22:05.780
stars. And to start teaching us about

589
00:22:06.330 --> 00:22:08.370
how those flares could interact with the

590
00:22:08.370 --> 00:22:11.130
planets that those stars host. Ties into

591
00:22:11.130 --> 00:22:12.970
theoretical work that colleagues of mine at

592
00:22:12.970 --> 00:22:15.450
UNESQ have been doing for years, using

593
00:22:16.010 --> 00:22:18.010
the kind of modeling software that people use

594
00:22:18.010 --> 00:22:19.770
to model space weather in the solar system

595
00:22:19.770 --> 00:22:22.330
and trying to apply that to stars that are

596
00:22:22.330 --> 00:22:25.170
not the sun and planets around them. This

597
00:22:25.170 --> 00:22:27.010
will give the observational grounding for

598
00:22:27.010 --> 00:22:29.610
that theoretical work so that people can get

599
00:22:29.610 --> 00:22:32.100
a much better handle on whether this

600
00:22:32.100 --> 00:22:33.740
assumption we've got based on the one

601
00:22:33.740 --> 00:22:35.860
planetary system we have is actually worth

602
00:22:36.180 --> 00:22:38.380
following, Whether it's less important than

603
00:22:38.380 --> 00:22:40.180
that, whether it's more important than that.

604
00:22:40.740 --> 00:22:42.540
And so we're going to learn a hell of a lot

605
00:22:42.540 --> 00:22:45.500
about stars and also habitability, and help

606
00:22:45.500 --> 00:22:47.820
direct our search for the most promising

607
00:22:47.820 --> 00:22:50.700
targets for the search for life, all from a

608
00:22:50.700 --> 00:22:52.420
company that's just innovatively saying

609
00:22:52.420 --> 00:22:54.740
instead of trying to build James Webb at

610
00:22:54.740 --> 00:22:56.740
incredible cost and having astronomers from

611
00:22:56.740 --> 00:22:59.300
all disciplines fighting for it. Let's build

612
00:22:59.300 --> 00:23:01.020
something off the shelf with much cheaper

613
00:23:01.020 --> 00:23:02.700
components at a much lower price.

614
00:23:03.740 --> 00:23:05.780
Build it in such a way that it's good at one

615
00:23:05.780 --> 00:23:07.620
thing rather than being good at everything.

616
00:23:07.620 --> 00:23:09.340
It's good at one thing and one thing only.

617
00:23:09.900 --> 00:23:11.620
And, uh, yet there are people who want to do

618
00:23:11.620 --> 00:23:13.300
that one thing to contribute to the cost of

619
00:23:13.300 --> 00:23:15.900
launching it. And it is like a space

620
00:23:16.220 --> 00:23:17.900
version of what we've done with Minerva

621
00:23:17.900 --> 00:23:20.460
Australis. And we know with our facility just

622
00:23:20.460 --> 00:23:22.380
how successful that model can be. We've

623
00:23:22.380 --> 00:23:23.980
really pushed above our weight because we've

624
00:23:23.980 --> 00:23:26.540
been able to do that. And Mauve and, um,

625
00:23:26.670 --> 00:23:28.870
Twinkl, which will follow, are a really

626
00:23:28.870 --> 00:23:30.870
interesting window to a future where instead

627
00:23:30.870 --> 00:23:33.470
of everybody fighting for Hubble or everybody

628
00:23:33.470 --> 00:23:35.430
fighting for Spitzer or James Webb,

629
00:23:36.230 --> 00:23:38.150
different research teams have smaller,

630
00:23:38.150 --> 00:23:40.670
cheaper instruments dedicated to the work

631
00:23:40.670 --> 00:23:43.390
they want to do. And science advances that

632
00:23:43.390 --> 00:23:46.150
way instead. There'll still obviously be a

633
00:23:46.150 --> 00:23:47.950
place for James Webb and telescopes like

634
00:23:47.950 --> 00:23:49.710
that. They will do things that you could not

635
00:23:49.710 --> 00:23:52.090
do with an instrument this small. But what

636
00:23:52.090 --> 00:23:53.770
this will also do is it will mean that

637
00:23:53.770 --> 00:23:55.450
there's a little bit less competition for

638
00:23:55.450 --> 00:23:58.330
those jack of all trades facilities, because

639
00:23:58.330 --> 00:24:00.290
people who want to do a specific thing may

640
00:24:00.290 --> 00:24:01.930
have another option that is cheaper and

641
00:24:01.930 --> 00:24:04.370
easier for them to get time on and reduces

642
00:24:04.370 --> 00:24:06.170
their contribution to the burden on the other

643
00:24:06.170 --> 00:24:08.650
scopes. So this will doubtless indirectly

644
00:24:08.650 --> 00:24:10.690
benefit people doing very different science

645
00:24:11.250 --> 00:24:13.090
because they get more time to do their

646
00:24:13.090 --> 00:24:15.770
science because their competitors are getting

647
00:24:15.770 --> 00:24:17.330
time on telescopes in other ways.

648
00:24:17.330 --> 00:24:17.690
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

649
00:24:17.690 --> 00:24:19.530
Jonti Horner: Could this just open for many, many different

650
00:24:19.530 --> 00:24:20.330
reasons? Yeah.

651
00:24:20.330 --> 00:24:23.310
Andrew Dunkley: Could this lead to, um, total

652
00:24:23.310 --> 00:24:26.190
rethink of how, um, space

653
00:24:26.190 --> 00:24:28.990
telescopes operate? Like, could, uh, there

654
00:24:28.990 --> 00:24:31.630
be a group that says, okay, we want to

655
00:24:31.630 --> 00:24:33.710
specifically search for

656
00:24:34.910 --> 00:24:37.910
X in space. Uh, we need a

657
00:24:37.910 --> 00:24:40.910
specific kind of telescope to do that. If

658
00:24:40.910 --> 00:24:42.910
you build it, we will come, send it into

659
00:24:42.910 --> 00:24:44.190
space and we can do our job.

660
00:24:44.350 --> 00:24:46.030
Could it lead to that kind of thing?

661
00:24:46.510 --> 00:24:48.750
Jonti Horner: I think so long as the price is right.

662
00:24:49.430 --> 00:24:51.930
Um, and that's the thing. If this was no

663
00:24:51.930 --> 00:24:53.850
cheaper than building James Webb, nobody'd be

664
00:24:53.850 --> 00:24:56.770
interested. But Twinkle will be a fairly big

665
00:24:56.770 --> 00:24:58.690
space telescope. You know, 70 centimeter

666
00:24:58.690 --> 00:25:00.490
mirror is not to be sniffed at. That's a

667
00:25:00.490 --> 00:25:02.850
fairly chunky piece of kit. To build

668
00:25:02.850 --> 00:25:05.210
something like that at, uh, a cost. That is

669
00:25:05.210 --> 00:25:08.010
what I said, about $75 million when

670
00:25:08.010 --> 00:25:10.526
James Webb was more than $10

671
00:25:10.694 --> 00:25:13.290
billion. That is a factor of

672
00:25:13.290 --> 00:25:15.370
100 difference in price, effectively,

673
00:25:16.500 --> 00:25:18.820
something like that. Now, 100 twinkls would

674
00:25:18.820 --> 00:25:21.140
not be able to do the Same science that one

675
00:25:21.140 --> 00:25:24.060
James Webb does. But 100 Twinkls could do a

676
00:25:24.060 --> 00:25:27.060
lot of very diverse science. And so

677
00:25:27.060 --> 00:25:29.060
it achieves different things. Now

678
00:25:29.860 --> 00:25:31.780
there are other things out there. We've got

679
00:25:31.780 --> 00:25:33.900
an interesting one in that there is a

680
00:25:33.900 --> 00:25:36.660
partnership between my university unesq,

681
00:25:36.740 --> 00:25:38.620
through this iLaunch initiative that's an

682
00:25:38.620 --> 00:25:40.940
Australian thing, with the University of

683
00:25:40.940 --> 00:25:43.300
South Australia, with Optus, with the

684
00:25:43.300 --> 00:25:45.500
Australian National University and with a

685
00:25:45.500 --> 00:25:46.980
couple of startup companies in South

686
00:25:46.980 --> 00:25:49.600
Australia where there is an Australian

687
00:25:49.600 --> 00:25:51.160
sovereign satellite that is in the

688
00:25:51.160 --> 00:25:52.960
construction under what's called Project

689
00:25:52.960 --> 00:25:55.120
Swift. And uh, this is going to be about a

690
00:25:55.120 --> 00:25:57.830
$50 million project. And um,

691
00:25:58.040 --> 00:26:00.440
that is going to be a satellite where Optus

692
00:26:00.440 --> 00:26:01.760
are interested because they're going to be

693
00:26:01.760 --> 00:26:02.960
testing technology for better

694
00:26:02.960 --> 00:26:05.240
telecommunications and also

695
00:26:05.240 --> 00:26:06.840
telecommunications platform that are

696
00:26:06.840 --> 00:26:08.800
Australian owned for Australian citizens. So

697
00:26:08.800 --> 00:26:10.840
you're not at the whim of people from other

698
00:26:10.840 --> 00:26:13.240
countries who may have the ability to turn

699
00:26:13.240 --> 00:26:15.600
off your network as we saw with Elon Musk

700
00:26:15.600 --> 00:26:17.480
turning off Starlink over Ukraine at one

701
00:26:17.480 --> 00:26:20.380
point because he wanted to. We are

702
00:26:20.380 --> 00:26:22.340
concerned about that. So, uh, Optus are

703
00:26:22.340 --> 00:26:23.460
thinking, well, let's try and have an

704
00:26:23.460 --> 00:26:26.140
Australian communications platform. Our

705
00:26:26.140 --> 00:26:28.100
involvement is if you've got a satellite

706
00:26:28.100 --> 00:26:30.500
going around the Earth looking down the

707
00:26:30.500 --> 00:26:32.260
backside of that satellite's looking out to

708
00:26:32.260 --> 00:26:35.020
space. What if you put a space telescope on

709
00:26:35.020 --> 00:26:36.460
the other side of the satellite? You can have

710
00:26:36.460 --> 00:26:38.220
a satellite that's doing telecoms in one

711
00:26:38.220 --> 00:26:40.540
direction whilst also providing research

712
00:26:40.620 --> 00:26:43.540
capacity in the other. So UNISQ is leading

713
00:26:43.540 --> 00:26:45.460
the research telescope side of that and my

714
00:26:45.460 --> 00:26:46.870
colleague Duncan Wright, who's leading the

715
00:26:46.870 --> 00:26:48.790
centre of our, who's the head of our center

716
00:26:48.790 --> 00:26:51.230
of Astrophysics here, is heavily involved in

717
00:26:51.230 --> 00:26:52.910
putting together this innovative, fairly

718
00:26:52.910 --> 00:26:55.830
small 20 centimeter TACT telescope to do a

719
00:26:55.830 --> 00:26:58.270
little bit of exoplanet work off the back of

720
00:26:58.270 --> 00:26:59.990
a commercial platform designed for something

721
00:26:59.990 --> 00:27:01.350
else. And that's a really interesting

722
00:27:01.350 --> 00:27:04.190
partnership. Now that is Ben. It all

723
00:27:04.190 --> 00:27:06.910
ties back to the commercial launch capacity

724
00:27:06.910 --> 00:27:09.870
that SpaceX have provided. Suddenly

725
00:27:09.870 --> 00:27:11.910
you've lowered the price of our access to

726
00:27:11.910 --> 00:27:14.770
space to such a level that people can now be

727
00:27:14.770 --> 00:27:16.730
really innovative and think of new solutions.

728
00:27:17.530 --> 00:27:18.010
Andrew Dunkley: Love it.

729
00:27:18.010 --> 00:27:20.330
Jonti Horner: The downside is more satellites, more light

730
00:27:20.330 --> 00:27:22.570
pollution. The upside may be more cool

731
00:27:22.570 --> 00:27:22.890
research.

732
00:27:23.290 --> 00:27:25.290
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, um, there's a price to pay for

733
00:27:25.290 --> 00:27:26.170
everything, I suppose.

734
00:27:26.170 --> 00:27:26.570
Jonti Horner: Yeah.

735
00:27:26.810 --> 00:27:29.650
Andrew Dunkley: Okay, keep uh, an eye out for that and watch

736
00:27:29.650 --> 00:27:32.250
out for Twinkl, uh, launching soon.

737
00:27:32.490 --> 00:27:35.250
This is Space Nuts with Andrew Dunkley and

738
00:27:35.250 --> 00:27:36.810
Professor Jonti Horner.

739
00:27:40.230 --> 00:27:42.870
Jonti Horner: Three, two, one. Space

740
00:27:43.030 --> 00:27:43.670
Nuts.

741
00:27:43.990 --> 00:27:46.830
Andrew Dunkley: Okay, moving out into the realm of

742
00:27:46.830 --> 00:27:49.390
exoplanets as we've been discussing. Uh, and

743
00:27:49.390 --> 00:27:52.190
another weird one has been found. Uh, we

744
00:27:52.190 --> 00:27:55.030
found one similar to this, but uh, this one's

745
00:27:55.030 --> 00:27:56.790
a little bit different because it's not where

746
00:27:57.030 --> 00:27:57.870
you might.

747
00:27:57.870 --> 00:28:00.230
Jonti Horner: Expect it to be. Yes,

748
00:28:00.710 --> 00:28:02.470
one of the things that we can do when we're

749
00:28:02.470 --> 00:28:04.510
finding plants under the stars is we can

750
00:28:04.510 --> 00:28:06.110
learn more about them if we can study them

751
00:28:06.110 --> 00:28:08.670
with more than one technique. So going back

752
00:28:08.670 --> 00:28:11.550
to the real basics, the two most successful

753
00:28:11.550 --> 00:28:14.470
ways of finding planets around the stars are

754
00:28:14.470 --> 00:28:16.190
the radial velocity method and the transit

755
00:28:16.190 --> 00:28:18.430
method. And uh, the radial velocity method is

756
00:28:18.430 --> 00:28:20.830
where you see a star wobbling towards or away

757
00:28:20.830 --> 00:28:23.629
from us. Using the Doppler effect, the size

758
00:28:23.629 --> 00:28:26.030
of that wobble tells you the mass of the

759
00:28:26.030 --> 00:28:28.230
planet roughly, although we don't really know

760
00:28:28.230 --> 00:28:29.790
the tilt of the orbit. So it gives us a

761
00:28:29.790 --> 00:28:32.190
minimum mass for that planet. The bigger the

762
00:28:32.190 --> 00:28:34.870
planet is for a given wobble period, a given

763
00:28:34.870 --> 00:28:37.270
orbital period, well rather the more massive

764
00:28:37.270 --> 00:28:39.750
a planet is, the bigger the wobble will be.

765
00:28:40.070 --> 00:28:41.870
So that gives us about the mass of the

766
00:28:41.870 --> 00:28:43.430
planet, but it doesn't tell us anything about

767
00:28:43.430 --> 00:28:46.150
its diameter. So you can't tell whether it's

768
00:28:46.150 --> 00:28:48.630
a Jupiter mass ball of iron or a Jupiter mass

769
00:28:48.630 --> 00:28:50.190
ball of feathers. They'd have the same

770
00:28:50.190 --> 00:28:51.870
gravitational pull, the same effect on the

771
00:28:51.870 --> 00:28:54.230
wobble. Then you have the transit technique,

772
00:28:54.230 --> 00:28:56.310
which is where, ah, you have

773
00:28:57.350 --> 00:28:59.470
a planet going in front of a star from our

774
00:28:59.470 --> 00:29:01.030
point of view and blocking some of the light.

775
00:29:01.990 --> 00:29:04.030
And um, the bigger the planet's diameter, the

776
00:29:04.030 --> 00:29:06.350
more light it will block. So this doesn't

777
00:29:06.350 --> 00:29:08.670
tell you anything about the mass of the

778
00:29:08.670 --> 00:29:11.110
planet. It could be a Jupiter

779
00:29:11.430 --> 00:29:13.590
diameter ball of feathers or a Jupiter

780
00:29:13.590 --> 00:29:15.150
diameter ball of iron. It would block the

781
00:29:15.150 --> 00:29:17.830
same amount of light, but it does tell you

782
00:29:17.990 --> 00:29:20.910
about the size, the diameter. If you

783
00:29:20.910 --> 00:29:22.870
can do both of those methods for the same

784
00:29:22.870 --> 00:29:24.830
object, you can get the mass and um, you can

785
00:29:24.830 --> 00:29:26.870
get the size, which means you can get the

786
00:29:26.870 --> 00:29:29.600
density. And that's allowed us to

787
00:29:29.600 --> 00:29:32.520
identify that planets have a much,

788
00:29:32.680 --> 00:29:35.400
much, much greater diversity

789
00:29:36.120 --> 00:29:38.480
of densities and compositions than you'd ever

790
00:29:38.480 --> 00:29:40.320
have imagined best. Solely on the solar

791
00:29:40.320 --> 00:29:42.960
system, we found planets that are less dense

792
00:29:42.960 --> 00:29:45.680
than cotton candy. We found planets. There's

793
00:29:45.680 --> 00:29:48.440
one peculiar one that is so much denser than

794
00:29:48.440 --> 00:29:51.160
osmium that people think it is actually not a

795
00:29:51.160 --> 00:29:52.880
planet at all, but it's actually a planet

796
00:29:52.880 --> 00:29:55.350
sized fragment of a white dwarf that was

797
00:29:55.350 --> 00:29:57.190
smashed into pieces. I mean, how weird is

798
00:29:57.190 --> 00:29:57.430
that?

799
00:29:57.430 --> 00:29:58.150
Andrew Dunkley: That is weird.

800
00:29:58.150 --> 00:30:00.550
Jonti Horner: So something the size of the Earth, uh, but

801
00:30:00.550 --> 00:30:03.510
150 times the density of water, which

802
00:30:03.510 --> 00:30:04.430
breaks physics.

803
00:30:04.510 --> 00:30:04.950
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

804
00:30:04.950 --> 00:30:06.270
Jonti Horner: You know, we find all these things and the

805
00:30:06.270 --> 00:30:08.070
only way we can tell that is because we can

806
00:30:08.070 --> 00:30:10.470
measure the mass of the size, the planet that

807
00:30:10.470 --> 00:30:13.390
we're talking about here, which is TOI

808
00:30:13.470 --> 00:30:16.070
4507B. And what that

809
00:30:16.070 --> 00:30:17.990
barcode means is it's test object of

810
00:30:17.990 --> 00:30:20.680
interest. It's the catalog. It's TESS

811
00:30:20.680 --> 00:30:22.600
thinks there is a planet around this star.

812
00:30:23.000 --> 00:30:25.560
This is the 4507th

813
00:30:25.560 --> 00:30:28.280
object listed in the catalog of Tess thinks

814
00:30:28.280 --> 00:30:30.920
this could be a planet. And the B means this

815
00:30:30.920 --> 00:30:32.680
is the first planet found around that star.

816
00:30:33.240 --> 00:30:35.640
That's what the bar curve means. And the team

817
00:30:35.640 --> 00:30:37.760
that has announced the discovery of this

818
00:30:37.760 --> 00:30:40.760
planet have done some work using a

819
00:30:40.760 --> 00:30:42.760
variety of instruments. They've used NASA's

820
00:30:42.760 --> 00:30:44.360
test mission, they've used some telescopes

821
00:30:44.360 --> 00:30:46.970
based in Antarctica. And it's allowed them to

822
00:30:46.970 --> 00:30:49.370
do radial velocity observations to measure

823
00:30:49.370 --> 00:30:51.490
the size. And it's allowed them to do transit

824
00:30:51.490 --> 00:30:54.130
observations to confirm the diameter. So

825
00:30:54.130 --> 00:30:56.890
we've got the mass and the diameter. And that

826
00:30:56.890 --> 00:30:59.090
has shown that this is a planet that is

827
00:30:59.890 --> 00:31:02.490
about the size of Saturn, about the diameter

828
00:31:02.490 --> 00:31:05.250
of Saturn, but a third of Saturn's mass. It's

829
00:31:05.250 --> 00:31:08.130
only 30 earth masses, but it's nine

830
00:31:08.130 --> 00:31:10.410
times the earth's diameter. And, uh, that

831
00:31:10.410 --> 00:31:12.210
means the density of this thing is really

832
00:31:12.210 --> 00:31:15.170
low. The density is less than 0.3

833
00:31:15.170 --> 00:31:17.490
grams per cubic centimeter. It's less than

834
00:31:17.570 --> 00:31:20.490
30% the density of water, which

835
00:31:20.490 --> 00:31:23.330
is really fluffy. That's really, really low

836
00:31:23.330 --> 00:31:25.490
density. And, um, that means that in the

837
00:31:25.490 --> 00:31:27.410
standard parlance that people have accepted

838
00:31:27.410 --> 00:31:30.009
these days, this is classified as a super

839
00:31:30.009 --> 00:31:32.970
puff planet because it's all puffed up and

840
00:31:32.970 --> 00:31:35.170
light and fluffy and very distended.

841
00:31:36.450 --> 00:31:38.930
Now we think we understand how superpuffed

842
00:31:38.930 --> 00:31:41.240
planets form. In the main, they're planets

843
00:31:41.240 --> 00:31:43.880
that are usually very close to very young,

844
00:31:43.880 --> 00:31:46.840
hot stars, often moving on orbits that are

845
00:31:46.840 --> 00:31:49.360
not perfectly circular. And so what's

846
00:31:49.360 --> 00:31:51.120
happening is that these planets formed

847
00:31:51.120 --> 00:31:53.400
further from their stars. They were flung

848
00:31:53.400 --> 00:31:55.880
inwards, probably through interactions with

849
00:31:55.880 --> 00:31:57.920
other planets, initially on quite an

850
00:31:57.920 --> 00:31:59.760
eccentric orbit. And they're undergoing what

851
00:31:59.760 --> 00:32:02.360
we call tidal circularization.

852
00:32:03.320 --> 00:32:06.040
So their orbit was extremely elongated, but

853
00:32:06.440 --> 00:32:08.360
they feel very strong tides when they're near

854
00:32:08.360 --> 00:32:10.160
their closest point to the star and much

855
00:32:10.160 --> 00:32:12.160
weaker tides when they're further away. And

856
00:32:12.160 --> 00:32:13.920
those tidal effects are acting to make the

857
00:32:13.920 --> 00:32:16.360
orbit more and more circular by essentially

858
00:32:16.360 --> 00:32:18.240
pulling down that point where the planet is

859
00:32:18.240 --> 00:32:19.920
furthest from the star and dragging that

860
00:32:19.920 --> 00:32:22.800
inwards. Now, that circularises the

861
00:32:22.800 --> 00:32:24.880
orbit, but it also dumps an enormous amount

862
00:32:24.880 --> 00:32:26.920
of heat into the interior of the planet,

863
00:32:27.240 --> 00:32:29.720
which makes it puff up. The gas gets hotter,

864
00:32:29.720 --> 00:32:32.320
so the planet becomes very distended. And in

865
00:32:32.320 --> 00:32:34.880
many cases, this makes a planet so large that

866
00:32:34.880 --> 00:32:36.480
the outer atmosphere is getting stripped

867
00:32:36.480 --> 00:32:38.420
away. And I know a colleague and man at

868
00:32:38.420 --> 00:32:40.580
UNESCU have done studies of some planets like

869
00:32:40.580 --> 00:32:42.980
this using James Webb, and shown that those

870
00:32:42.980 --> 00:32:45.780
planets have tails like comets do, because

871
00:32:45.780 --> 00:32:47.660
the outer atmosphere is blown away by the

872
00:32:47.660 --> 00:32:49.740
stellar wind. And uh, they've got an enormous

873
00:32:49.740 --> 00:32:51.500
spectacular tail. So in many ways you can

874
00:32:51.500 --> 00:32:53.260
think of these as the biggest comets in the

875
00:32:53.260 --> 00:32:55.860
universe. Most of these

876
00:32:55.860 --> 00:32:58.300
planets though we know, are really close into

877
00:32:58.300 --> 00:33:01.020
their stars. And uh, the strength of tidal

878
00:33:01.020 --> 00:33:03.900
heating is a really strong function

879
00:33:03.900 --> 00:33:06.710
of distance. It's not just this one over

880
00:33:06.710 --> 00:33:08.030
distance squared, it's something like one

881
00:33:08.030 --> 00:33:09.870
over distance cubed or one over distance to

882
00:33:09.870 --> 00:33:12.550
the power four. So that means if you move a

883
00:33:12.550 --> 00:33:14.430
little bit further away, the influence of

884
00:33:14.430 --> 00:33:16.550
tidal heating falls off very, very, very

885
00:33:16.550 --> 00:33:19.310
rapidly. So we normally expect to only find

886
00:33:19.310 --> 00:33:21.230
these superpuff planets really close in

887
00:33:21.230 --> 00:33:24.070
stars. This one is one of the most

888
00:33:24.070 --> 00:33:26.510
distant superpuffs ever found from its host

889
00:33:26.510 --> 00:33:28.950
star. It's orbiting an F type star. So that's

890
00:33:28.950 --> 00:33:30.710
a star a bit hotter, a bit brighter, a bit

891
00:33:30.710 --> 00:33:32.990
more massive than the sun. But it goes around

892
00:33:32.990 --> 00:33:35.750
that star every 107 days, which

893
00:33:35.750 --> 00:33:38.390
means that it is further from that star than

894
00:33:38.390 --> 00:33:41.150
Mercury is from the sun. And that should be

895
00:33:41.150 --> 00:33:43.990
too far away really to have significant tidal

896
00:33:43.990 --> 00:33:45.950
heating going on to make this planet bigger.

897
00:33:46.430 --> 00:33:48.150
So that's problem number one. That's a little

898
00:33:48.150 --> 00:33:50.470
bit weird. The other thing that's very weird

899
00:33:50.470 --> 00:33:52.670
of this is that during the process of doing

900
00:33:52.670 --> 00:33:55.230
the transit observations of this

901
00:33:55.390 --> 00:33:58.070
planet, they also did some Rossiter McLachlan

902
00:33:58.070 --> 00:34:00.430
observations. Now this is a really quirky but

903
00:34:00.430 --> 00:34:03.280
very beautiful thing that you can do

904
00:34:03.280 --> 00:34:05.240
with binary stars and with exoplanets.

905
00:34:05.240 --> 00:34:05.720
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

906
00:34:06.040 --> 00:34:08.000
Jonti Horner: Now with radial velocity, we're measuring the

907
00:34:08.000 --> 00:34:10.520
star wobbling towards and away from us. But

908
00:34:10.520 --> 00:34:13.400
that star itself is rotating and young stars

909
00:34:13.400 --> 00:34:16.120
rotate quicker. So if you imagine that star,

910
00:34:16.200 --> 00:34:18.320
one side of that star is coming towards us,

911
00:34:18.320 --> 00:34:20.440
and so the light from that side of the star

912
00:34:20.440 --> 00:34:22.720
will be blue shifted. The other side of the

913
00:34:22.720 --> 00:34:24.480
star is rotating away from us and that side

914
00:34:24.480 --> 00:34:26.800
will be red shifted. And um, what that means

915
00:34:26.800 --> 00:34:28.920
in actuality is that each spectral line from

916
00:34:28.920 --> 00:34:31.440
that star is not a perfectly thin line, but

917
00:34:31.440 --> 00:34:33.200
it's actually quite broad. Some of the light

918
00:34:33.200 --> 00:34:35.120
is bluer, some of it's redder. So you get

919
00:34:35.120 --> 00:34:37.000
this chunky, broad spectral line. And I

920
00:34:37.000 --> 00:34:38.520
appreciate for people listening, you can't

921
00:34:38.520 --> 00:34:40.880
see me cupping my hands, but I'm waving

922
00:34:40.880 --> 00:34:42.760
around helpfully in front of the camera here,

923
00:34:42.920 --> 00:34:45.520
even though you can't see me. So the

924
00:34:45.520 --> 00:34:47.840
stars rotating and the stars rotation speed

925
00:34:47.840 --> 00:34:50.600
is really much, much greater

926
00:34:51.000 --> 00:34:53.440
than the scale of the wobble you get from a

927
00:34:53.440 --> 00:34:56.440
planet going around that star, if that

928
00:34:56.440 --> 00:34:58.080
makes sense, the planet going around the star

929
00:34:58.080 --> 00:35:00.120
makes a wobble measured in meters per second.

930
00:35:00.680 --> 00:35:02.480
The rotational velocity of the stars measured

931
00:35:02.480 --> 00:35:05.120
in kilometers per second. When you've got the

932
00:35:05.120 --> 00:35:07.840
planet going around that star, if it is

933
00:35:07.840 --> 00:35:10.760
blocking part of the light from that

934
00:35:10.760 --> 00:35:13.720
star, it will be blocking light from one of

935
00:35:13.720 --> 00:35:15.360
the two sides of the star that is either

936
00:35:15.360 --> 00:35:18.160
coming towards you or away from you. So it's

937
00:35:18.160 --> 00:35:20.160
blocking light that is either blue shifted or

938
00:35:20.160 --> 00:35:23.080
redshifted. So if you measure the position of

939
00:35:23.080 --> 00:35:25.200
the spectral lines from that star while the

940
00:35:25.200 --> 00:35:28.000
planet's in transit, if it's blocking some of

941
00:35:28.000 --> 00:35:29.560
the blue shifted light, then it will look

942
00:35:29.560 --> 00:35:32.160
like the light from the star gets redshifted

943
00:35:32.160 --> 00:35:34.720
by several kilometers a second because you're

944
00:35:34.720 --> 00:35:36.160
only seeing the red shifted light or you're

945
00:35:36.160 --> 00:35:38.120
seeing more of the red shifted light. And as

946
00:35:38.120 --> 00:35:39.760
the planet moves across, it will then block

947
00:35:39.760 --> 00:35:41.800
the other side of the star and the star's

948
00:35:41.800 --> 00:35:42.960
light will appear to suddenly become

949
00:35:42.960 --> 00:35:45.920
redshifted. What this allows you to

950
00:35:45.920 --> 00:35:47.320
do, it's really intricate and there's some

951
00:35:47.320 --> 00:35:49.440
lovely video explainers on the web. If it's

952
00:35:49.440 --> 00:35:50.800
making your head hurt trying to understand

953
00:35:50.800 --> 00:35:52.760
me, talk through it, there's some really good

954
00:35:52.760 --> 00:35:55.270
visual explainers out there. But what this

955
00:35:55.270 --> 00:35:57.230
allows you to do is if you measure the radial

956
00:35:57.230 --> 00:35:59.550
velocity of a star during the transit of a

957
00:35:59.550 --> 00:36:02.430
planet, it allows you to work out the tilt

958
00:36:02.430 --> 00:36:05.230
of that planet's orbit relative to the

959
00:36:05.230 --> 00:36:07.950
plane of the star's equator. So if the star

960
00:36:07.950 --> 00:36:10.509
is perfectly above the equator, the planet is

961
00:36:10.509 --> 00:36:12.150
perfectly above the equator of the star and

962
00:36:12.150 --> 00:36:14.590
going in the same direction as the star. As

963
00:36:14.590 --> 00:36:16.470
it comes round, it will first block the side

964
00:36:16.470 --> 00:36:18.670
of the star that is blue shifted that is

965
00:36:18.670 --> 00:36:20.470
coming towards us. So the stars light will

966
00:36:20.470 --> 00:36:22.740
get redshifted, then it'll move across and

967
00:36:22.740 --> 00:36:24.580
block the red shifted light, and the star's

968
00:36:24.580 --> 00:36:26.620
light will be blue shifted. Then the transit

969
00:36:26.620 --> 00:36:27.780
will end and you'll be back to where you

970
00:36:27.780 --> 00:36:29.620
started from. So you get this weird kind of

971
00:36:29.620 --> 00:36:30.780
sine wave type shape.

972
00:36:30.940 --> 00:36:33.620
If the planet's going around backward, that

973
00:36:33.620 --> 00:36:35.860
will happen in the opposite order. If the

974
00:36:35.860 --> 00:36:38.460
planet's orbit's really highly tilted, you'll

975
00:36:38.460 --> 00:36:40.140
make the roster McLachlan effect

976
00:36:40.140 --> 00:36:42.780
measurements. And um, you'll only get one or

977
00:36:42.780 --> 00:36:44.940
the other effect, or you might get no effect

978
00:36:44.940 --> 00:36:46.780
at all because it's coming down vertically

979
00:36:47.290 --> 00:36:49.010
and always blocking the same side of the

980
00:36:49.010 --> 00:36:49.290
star.

981
00:36:49.370 --> 00:36:49.930
Andrew Dunkley: Yep.

982
00:36:50.250 --> 00:36:52.130
Jonti Horner: So what this means is that you can use this

983
00:36:52.130 --> 00:36:54.730
technique to measure the tilt of a

984
00:36:54.730 --> 00:36:57.290
planet's orbit around its star. And again

985
00:36:57.290 --> 00:36:59.170
We've used that fairly effectively from Mount

986
00:36:59.170 --> 00:37:01.210
Kent with our wonderful facility we've got

987
00:37:01.210 --> 00:37:03.570
here. It's become a really common tool in the

988
00:37:03.570 --> 00:37:06.170
arsenal of planetary scientists. And it's

989
00:37:06.170 --> 00:37:07.620
revealed a lot of quirky things. So, uh,

990
00:37:07.650 --> 00:37:09.690
planets around stars like the sun or planets

991
00:37:09.690 --> 00:37:11.450
around stars that are cooler than the sun

992
00:37:11.930 --> 00:37:14.210
typically tend to be aligned above the

993
00:37:14.210 --> 00:37:16.350
equators of the stars going around progrades.

994
00:37:16.820 --> 00:37:19.100
But when you get to these really hot stars

995
00:37:19.100 --> 00:37:21.220
that are more massive than the sun, there's a

996
00:37:21.220 --> 00:37:22.980
growing population of planets we found with

997
00:37:22.980 --> 00:37:25.180
very heavily misaligned, very heavily tilted

998
00:37:25.180 --> 00:37:28.100
orbits. And that's really odd, but they tend

999
00:37:28.100 --> 00:37:29.940
to be the hot Jupiters. Most of those really

1000
00:37:29.940 --> 00:37:32.020
tilted orbits are planets really close in.

1001
00:37:32.980 --> 00:37:35.420
Excuse me, with my phone making a noise

1002
00:37:35.420 --> 00:37:36.900
there. I should really have put that on

1003
00:37:36.900 --> 00:37:38.620
silent. And I normally would do.

1004
00:37:38.620 --> 00:37:40.460
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, it reminds me, I haven't put mine on

1005
00:37:40.460 --> 00:37:41.420
silent either. There we go.

1006
00:37:41.420 --> 00:37:43.340
Jonti Horner: Yes. Naughty, naughty, naughty. I will call

1007
00:37:43.340 --> 00:37:44.820
that person back a little bit later on. I

1008
00:37:44.820 --> 00:37:46.460
suspect they want to talk about the Orionids

1009
00:37:46.460 --> 00:37:48.140
because that seems to be what's happening all

1010
00:37:48.140 --> 00:37:50.140
the time at the minute. But anyway, what I

1011
00:37:50.140 --> 00:37:52.340
was saying is essentially the more massive

1012
00:37:52.340 --> 00:37:54.780
stars seem to have a subset of them have

1013
00:37:54.780 --> 00:37:57.780
these really heavily misaligned hot Jupiters

1014
00:37:57.780 --> 00:38:00.380
that are all really close in. But we normally

1015
00:38:00.380 --> 00:38:02.100
only find them when planets are really,

1016
00:38:02.100 --> 00:38:04.620
really close in. This weird

1017
00:38:04.620 --> 00:38:06.820
superpuff planet that is a superpuff, despite

1018
00:38:06.820 --> 00:38:09.620
the fact it's too far from its star to be a

1019
00:38:09.620 --> 00:38:11.260
normal superpuff. It's one of the furthest

1020
00:38:11.260 --> 00:38:13.860
we've ever found, is also one of the most

1021
00:38:13.860 --> 00:38:15.860
distant planets from a star that we've ever

1022
00:38:15.860 --> 00:38:18.660
found on such a misaligned orbit. Its orbit

1023
00:38:18.660 --> 00:38:21.620
is tilted by 82 degrees to the plane of its

1024
00:38:21.620 --> 00:38:22.460
star's equator.

1025
00:38:22.620 --> 00:38:23.100
Andrew Dunkley: Wow.

1026
00:38:23.260 --> 00:38:25.500
Jonti Horner: It's almost up at right angles. So I know

1027
00:38:25.500 --> 00:38:27.180
that was a lot of long explanation. But

1028
00:38:27.180 --> 00:38:29.420
you've got a planet with two things that are

1029
00:38:29.820 --> 00:38:32.700
very, very unusual about it at the same time.

1030
00:38:33.100 --> 00:38:35.060
Which leads to the obvious thought that maybe

1031
00:38:35.060 --> 00:38:37.460
these two things are linked. And maybe what

1032
00:38:37.460 --> 00:38:40.380
we're seeing with these two things is kind of

1033
00:38:40.380 --> 00:38:42.260
cause and effect or something that's telling

1034
00:38:42.260 --> 00:38:44.980
us about the history of this planet, about

1035
00:38:44.980 --> 00:38:47.620
how it's got onto that extremely tilted

1036
00:38:47.620 --> 00:38:49.780
orbit. Maybe it's telling us that the

1037
00:38:49.780 --> 00:38:51.660
encounters and the stirring that have flung

1038
00:38:51.660 --> 00:38:53.980
it onto that orbit are relatively recent

1039
00:38:54.700 --> 00:38:57.380
and they've caused a lot of tidal heating. So

1040
00:38:57.380 --> 00:38:59.300
the super puff nature of the planet is an

1041
00:38:59.300 --> 00:39:02.180
artifact of its recent transition

1042
00:39:02.180 --> 00:39:05.140
to a totally new highly tilted orbit, maybe

1043
00:39:05.140 --> 00:39:06.900
through very close encounters with another

1044
00:39:06.900 --> 00:39:08.620
planet that's been ejected from the system.

1045
00:39:09.180 --> 00:39:11.920
We just don't know yet. This is a weird

1046
00:39:11.920 --> 00:39:14.680
thing in a lot of ways. This thing doesn't

1047
00:39:14.680 --> 00:39:17.320
fit the models of how we'd expect most super

1048
00:39:17.320 --> 00:39:19.240
puff planets to look. I would expect most how

1049
00:39:19.240 --> 00:39:21.520
the tilted planets to look. And that makes it

1050
00:39:21.520 --> 00:39:24.360
hugely exciting for scientists because it's

1051
00:39:24.360 --> 00:39:26.359
allowing us to get a window into rare things

1052
00:39:26.359 --> 00:39:27.760
that might not normally happen.

1053
00:39:28.000 --> 00:39:30.760
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. So, um, just a quick question to finish

1054
00:39:30.760 --> 00:39:33.760
this one off. If that planet is

1055
00:39:33.840 --> 00:39:36.320
basically rotating on the vertical,

1056
00:39:36.970 --> 00:39:39.780
um, around the sun, would

1057
00:39:39.780 --> 00:39:42.700
all other planets orbiting that

1058
00:39:42.700 --> 00:39:44.700
sun do the same thing? Or could they be on an

1059
00:39:44.780 --> 00:39:47.420
equatorial orbit, if there are any?

1060
00:39:47.980 --> 00:39:49.380
Jonti Horner: That's the kind of question we want to

1061
00:39:49.380 --> 00:39:51.980
answer. I mean, um, getting

1062
00:39:52.299 --> 00:39:54.380
to a highly tilted orbit can happen a number

1063
00:39:54.380 --> 00:39:55.780
of different ways. So there's a few different

1064
00:39:55.780 --> 00:39:57.740
models for how this could happen, and they're

1065
00:39:57.740 --> 00:40:00.580
not mutually exclusive. One way that you

1066
00:40:00.580 --> 00:40:03.150
can pump up the tilt of a planet's orbit

1067
00:40:03.700 --> 00:40:05.860
is through close encounters between planets,

1068
00:40:05.860 --> 00:40:08.820
stirring each other up. However, that's not

1069
00:40:08.820 --> 00:40:11.780
that effective. And I know that coming from a

1070
00:40:11.780 --> 00:40:13.860
solar system astronomy point of view, comets

1071
00:40:13.940 --> 00:40:16.420
coming in that are scattered by planets very

1072
00:40:16.420 --> 00:40:18.540
rarely get their orbital inclinations changed

1073
00:40:18.540 --> 00:40:20.180
dramatically in a single encounter. That's

1074
00:40:20.180 --> 00:40:22.500
really hard to make happen. You can set it up

1075
00:40:22.500 --> 00:40:24.060
so that it does, but that's going to be quite

1076
00:40:24.060 --> 00:40:26.820
rare. There is another effect

1077
00:40:26.820 --> 00:40:28.660
that you can get which can work with that,

1078
00:40:28.660 --> 00:40:31.490
called the, um, quasi effect,

1079
00:40:32.050 --> 00:40:34.130
where once you've got two objects that are

1080
00:40:34.130 --> 00:40:37.090
massive, inclined by about 30 degrees to

1081
00:40:37.090 --> 00:40:39.490
each other, you can get this periodic

1082
00:40:39.490 --> 00:40:42.010
exchange of energy, of

1083
00:40:42.010 --> 00:40:44.210
momentum, between the eccentricity and the

1084
00:40:44.210 --> 00:40:45.850
inclination of an orbit, and you can cause it

1085
00:40:45.850 --> 00:40:48.050
to oscillate from having a low

1086
00:40:48.050 --> 00:40:51.010
eccentricity and highly tilted

1087
00:40:51.010 --> 00:40:53.810
orbit to a high eccentricity, low tilt orbit

1088
00:40:53.970 --> 00:40:56.780
relative to a given plan. And what that can

1089
00:40:56.780 --> 00:40:59.020
do is it can cause the object to go from a

1090
00:40:59.020 --> 00:41:01.500
nearly circular orbit at a relatively low

1091
00:41:01.500 --> 00:41:03.700
tilt, to a higher tilt and more eccentric

1092
00:41:03.700 --> 00:41:06.100
orbit, and back and forth, oscillating back

1093
00:41:06.100 --> 00:41:08.500
and forth, then you can decouple the planet.

1094
00:41:08.500 --> 00:41:09.940
Because when you're on the highly eccentric

1095
00:41:09.940 --> 00:41:12.340
orbit, you get close enough to the star to

1096
00:41:12.340 --> 00:41:14.500
get that tidal circularization process we

1097
00:41:14.500 --> 00:41:17.100
were talking about, drop it out of that

1098
00:41:17.100 --> 00:41:19.380
resonance, trap it at that high inclination

1099
00:41:19.380 --> 00:41:20.900
orbit, and then it becomes a more circular

1100
00:41:20.900 --> 00:41:23.030
orbit. And what that would do would leave you

1101
00:41:23.030 --> 00:41:25.830
with two very misaligned objects that are

1102
00:41:25.830 --> 00:41:28.790
very, very widely separated. The third

1103
00:41:28.790 --> 00:41:31.230
option, and this is one that my old boss at

1104
00:41:31.230 --> 00:41:33.430
the University of New South Wales many years

1105
00:41:33.430 --> 00:41:36.430
ago, which he favoured, was the idea

1106
00:41:36.430 --> 00:41:38.550
that, uh, the angular momentum vector of

1107
00:41:38.550 --> 00:41:40.350
material Coming in with a star forms.

1108
00:41:40.350 --> 00:41:42.110
Everybody just assumes that the disk around

1109
00:41:42.110 --> 00:41:44.670
the star and the material coming in late will

1110
00:41:44.670 --> 00:41:46.670
be coming in with the same spin axis as the

1111
00:41:46.670 --> 00:41:48.190
material that formed the star in the first

1112
00:41:48.190 --> 00:41:50.660
place. And given that you're in a very

1113
00:41:50.660 --> 00:41:52.940
dynamic and very evolving environment of a

1114
00:41:52.940 --> 00:41:55.540
young stellar cluster, that's not necessarily

1115
00:41:55.540 --> 00:41:57.940
the case. And so you can imagine a situation

1116
00:41:57.940 --> 00:42:00.140
where a star forms with a disk that is very

1117
00:42:00.140 --> 00:42:01.900
misaligned to the star, and then the planets

1118
00:42:01.900 --> 00:42:04.380
form in that disk. And then all the planets

1119
00:42:04.380 --> 00:42:06.100
will be in the same orbital plane, but they'd

1120
00:42:06.100 --> 00:42:08.020
be very misaligned with the rotation of the

1121
00:42:08.020 --> 00:42:10.900
star. So these are all different models, and

1122
00:42:10.900 --> 00:42:12.460
doubtless all of them have happened

1123
00:42:12.460 --> 00:42:14.660
somewhere. And what we want to learn is how

1124
00:42:14.660 --> 00:42:17.590
common they are, how they work so

1125
00:42:17.590 --> 00:42:19.590
that we can get a better handle on planet

1126
00:42:19.590 --> 00:42:20.990
formation. Because what all these kind of

1127
00:42:20.990 --> 00:42:23.590
discoveries remind us is that a planets

1128
00:42:23.590 --> 00:42:25.190
themselves are more diverse than we could

1129
00:42:25.190 --> 00:42:27.230
ever possibly have imagined. But also their

1130
00:42:27.230 --> 00:42:29.870
orbits and their architectures and the setups

1131
00:42:29.870 --> 00:42:32.670
of planetary systems are also incredibly

1132
00:42:32.670 --> 00:42:34.790
diverse. And we're, in all honesty, just

1133
00:42:34.790 --> 00:42:36.390
scratching the surface. But finding the

1134
00:42:36.390 --> 00:42:38.830
oddities allows us to better understand the

1135
00:42:38.830 --> 00:42:41.070
process by which planets formed and therefore

1136
00:42:41.550 --> 00:42:43.510
better understand our own place in the cosmos

1137
00:42:43.510 --> 00:42:45.390
and how our planetary system came to be.

1138
00:42:46.770 --> 00:42:48.570
Andrew Dunkley: Interesting. Yeah. The more we look, the

1139
00:42:48.570 --> 00:42:50.290
stranger the things are, uh, that we're

1140
00:42:50.290 --> 00:42:52.810
finding and some defy explanation. And this,

1141
00:42:52.810 --> 00:42:55.210
this is certainly one of those. So if you'd

1142
00:42:55.210 --> 00:42:57.650
like to read all about it, you can do so

1143
00:42:57.650 --> 00:42:59.810
through the archive website.

1144
00:43:02.370 --> 00:43:02.810
Jonti Horner: Okay.

1145
00:43:02.810 --> 00:43:05.690
Andrew Dunkley: We checked all four systems, space

1146
00:43:05.690 --> 00:43:08.450
nets, uh, one final story, and this

1147
00:43:08.450 --> 00:43:11.170
takes us close to home. And Earth's magnetic

1148
00:43:11.170 --> 00:43:13.130
fields, um, are acting.

1149
00:43:13.290 --> 00:43:14.330
Jonti Horner: A little bit weird.

1150
00:43:14.560 --> 00:43:17.050
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, and we've got this giant weak spot,

1151
00:43:17.760 --> 00:43:20.410
uh, in, um, this is in the

1152
00:43:20.410 --> 00:43:21.770
Atlantic, I believe, is it?

1153
00:43:21.930 --> 00:43:24.770
Jonti Horner: Yes, South Atlantic. Now this is one where I

1154
00:43:24.770 --> 00:43:26.450
will stress that I'm not an expert in

1155
00:43:26.450 --> 00:43:28.530
magnetic fields, I'm not a geophysicist, but

1156
00:43:28.530 --> 00:43:30.370
this is still so cool we have to talk about

1157
00:43:30.370 --> 00:43:32.530
it. And for those listening in who understand

1158
00:43:32.530 --> 00:43:34.690
this better than I am, please be gracious

1159
00:43:34.690 --> 00:43:36.250
when you tell me what I got wrong when you

1160
00:43:36.250 --> 00:43:37.690
comment. But anyway,

1161
00:43:39.580 --> 00:43:41.930
um, this work is the result of a group of

1162
00:43:41.930 --> 00:43:44.930
satellites run by the European Space Agency

1163
00:43:44.930 --> 00:43:47.010
called Swarm. And they are satellites that

1164
00:43:47.010 --> 00:43:49.200
are monitoring Earth's magnetic field. And,

1165
00:43:49.200 --> 00:43:51.290
um, when you learn about the Earth's magnetic

1166
00:43:51.290 --> 00:43:53.930
field at high school, you basically get this

1167
00:43:53.930 --> 00:43:56.050
idea that the Earth is this giant bar magnet

1168
00:43:56.050 --> 00:43:57.930
and has this bar magnetic type magnetic field

1169
00:43:57.930 --> 00:44:00.050
around us. And that's about it. But in

1170
00:44:00.050 --> 00:44:02.010
actuality, the Earth's Magnetic field is

1171
00:44:02.010 --> 00:44:04.530
incredibly complicated. And there are areas

1172
00:44:04.530 --> 00:44:06.090
on our planet where it's stronger than

1173
00:44:06.090 --> 00:44:07.650
average and areas where it's weaker than

1174
00:44:07.650 --> 00:44:10.620
average. It has two dominant

1175
00:44:10.620 --> 00:44:12.300
poles. It's got the north magnetic Pole and

1176
00:44:12.300 --> 00:44:14.500
the south magnetic Pole. But they're not

1177
00:44:14.500 --> 00:44:16.740
necessarily aligned in such a way that a line

1178
00:44:16.740 --> 00:44:18.860
between them would run perfectly through the

1179
00:44:18.860 --> 00:44:21.300
center of the Earth. They are both moving as

1180
00:44:21.300 --> 00:44:23.660
time goes on. And that's all because the

1181
00:44:23.660 --> 00:44:25.620
process that generates the Earth's magnetic

1182
00:44:25.620 --> 00:44:28.500
field is really complicated and is down to

1183
00:44:28.500 --> 00:44:31.060
moving fluids, moving molten iron

1184
00:44:31.460 --> 00:44:33.740
in the Earth's outer core, essentially. So

1185
00:44:33.740 --> 00:44:35.230
you've got this molten

1186
00:44:36.110 --> 00:44:38.110
ferromagnetic kind of material sloshing

1187
00:44:38.110 --> 00:44:40.270
around, driving a dynamo that creates this

1188
00:44:40.270 --> 00:44:42.230
time varying magnetic field that does all

1189
00:44:42.230 --> 00:44:45.070
sorts of weird stuff. For a very long

1190
00:44:45.070 --> 00:44:46.870
time, it's been known that there is this

1191
00:44:46.870 --> 00:44:48.790
anomaly in the South Atlantic where the

1192
00:44:48.790 --> 00:44:50.990
magnetic field is somewhat weaker than

1193
00:44:51.470 --> 00:44:53.550
anywhere else on the planet. And, um, this

1194
00:44:53.550 --> 00:44:55.610
has been, I've even heard it described as,

1195
00:44:55.610 --> 00:44:57.830
uh, being kind of the Bermuda Triangle of

1196
00:44:57.830 --> 00:44:59.510
space. It's a place where satellites

1197
00:44:59.510 --> 00:45:02.230
misbehave. Yeah. And it's something that

1198
00:45:02.550 --> 00:45:04.630
space agencies, governments, and now

1199
00:45:04.630 --> 00:45:06.470
commercial entities are very aware of,

1200
00:45:06.950 --> 00:45:08.670
because where you've got a weaker magnetic

1201
00:45:08.670 --> 00:45:10.310
field, you've got less protection from the

1202
00:45:10.310 --> 00:45:12.990
vagaries of cosmic rays, solar radiation,

1203
00:45:12.990 --> 00:45:15.390
solar storms, things like that. So it's a

1204
00:45:15.390 --> 00:45:16.830
place where your satellites are going to be

1205
00:45:16.830 --> 00:45:19.150
more vulnerable than normal and more likely

1206
00:45:19.150 --> 00:45:21.870
to throw up errors and have problems. And

1207
00:45:21.870 --> 00:45:23.470
it's really interesting to study how these

1208
00:45:23.470 --> 00:45:25.590
things change with time. Because if you think

1209
00:45:25.590 --> 00:45:27.350
about the roiling and the boiling of that,

1210
00:45:27.350 --> 00:45:29.340
uh, molten material in the Earth in a core,

1211
00:45:29.730 --> 00:45:31.850
that's going to vary with time. And that's

1212
00:45:31.850 --> 00:45:34.270
what these satellites have been mapping. And,

1213
00:45:34.270 --> 00:45:35.850
um, what they've found is that this South

1214
00:45:35.850 --> 00:45:38.530
Atlantic Anomaly, the Bermuda Triangle of the

1215
00:45:38.530 --> 00:45:40.490
South Atlantic, from a magnetism point of

1216
00:45:40.490 --> 00:45:42.890
view, has been changing quite dramatically.

1217
00:45:42.890 --> 00:45:44.250
They've been mapping it since they were

1218
00:45:44.250 --> 00:45:46.730
launched in 2014. So we've 11 years worth of

1219
00:45:46.730 --> 00:45:49.690
data now. And, um, what they've found is that

1220
00:45:49.690 --> 00:45:51.890
that anomaly in the South Atlantic has got

1221
00:45:51.890 --> 00:45:54.770
bigger. It now has got bigger

1222
00:45:54.770 --> 00:45:56.690
Biennaria equivalent to kind of Central

1223
00:45:56.690 --> 00:45:58.490
Europe, Western Europe. So that's a fairly

1224
00:45:58.490 --> 00:45:59.810
big amount of growth in just

1225
00:46:01.550 --> 00:46:04.110
around. At the same time, the magnetic North

1226
00:46:04.110 --> 00:46:06.270
Pole is merrily trundling its way, moving

1227
00:46:06.270 --> 00:46:08.990
from Canada to Siberia. There

1228
00:46:08.990 --> 00:46:11.630
are a few extra strong patches of the

1229
00:46:11.630 --> 00:46:13.990
magnetic field. One of those in Siberia is

1230
00:46:13.990 --> 00:46:15.950
getting stronger and stronger. The other

1231
00:46:15.950 --> 00:46:17.910
strong patch in Canada is getting weaker. But

1232
00:46:17.910 --> 00:46:19.910
it's still a strong patch. There's One

1233
00:46:19.910 --> 00:46:22.310
possibly over by India. And so we're getting

1234
00:46:22.310 --> 00:46:24.910
this impression of the

1235
00:46:25.310 --> 00:46:27.270
magnetic field of the Earth varying on

1236
00:46:27.270 --> 00:46:29.590
timescales of years and decades at uh, quite

1237
00:46:29.590 --> 00:46:32.150
a rapid way, fluctuating probably more than

1238
00:46:32.150 --> 00:46:33.690
we'd have ever thought of during from ground

1239
00:46:33.690 --> 00:46:36.410
based observations. Now it's interesting

1240
00:46:37.370 --> 00:46:39.850
from just purely a science point of view to

1241
00:46:39.850 --> 00:46:42.050
see everything wibbling and wobbling. It's

1242
00:46:42.050 --> 00:46:44.330
also really important for people launching

1243
00:46:44.330 --> 00:46:46.130
satellite constellations to be aware of this

1244
00:46:46.130 --> 00:46:48.370
and to mitigate for it and to uh, plan their

1245
00:46:48.370 --> 00:46:50.250
orbits around it. Because if you've got one

1246
00:46:50.250 --> 00:46:51.970
point in orbit around the Earth that is more

1247
00:46:51.970 --> 00:46:54.410
vulnerable than the others, fortunately it's

1248
00:46:54.410 --> 00:46:55.890
over the ocean. But maybe you want to have

1249
00:46:55.890 --> 00:46:58.730
fewer satellites going through that area so

1250
00:46:58.730 --> 00:47:00.450
that you maximize the lifetime of your

1251
00:47:00.450 --> 00:47:02.330
satellites in terms of their working lifetime

1252
00:47:02.330 --> 00:47:04.480
and things like that. So it's useful from

1253
00:47:04.480 --> 00:47:04.640
that.

1254
00:47:04.640 --> 00:47:05.840
Now, a couple of the things that have been

1255
00:47:05.840 --> 00:47:07.760
mentioned in the discussion of this, uh, in

1256
00:47:07.760 --> 00:47:09.800
order to see, I don't fully understand how

1257
00:47:09.800 --> 00:47:12.760
they're connected. One is that uh, the data

1258
00:47:12.760 --> 00:47:14.920
from these satellites has been said to

1259
00:47:14.920 --> 00:47:16.880
suggest that that motion of the pole from

1260
00:47:16.880 --> 00:47:19.680
Canada to Siberia has been happening since

1261
00:47:19.680 --> 00:47:22.080
the mid 19th century. Now I think that's

1262
00:47:22.080 --> 00:47:23.480
probably something that's getting a bit lost

1263
00:47:23.480 --> 00:47:26.040
in translation because I'm not sure how

1264
00:47:26.040 --> 00:47:28.320
observations going back to 2014 can tell you

1265
00:47:28.320 --> 00:47:29.520
about something that was happening in the

1266
00:47:29.520 --> 00:47:32.240
1800s. Yeah, I suspect what the authors have

1267
00:47:32.240 --> 00:47:34.760
probably said in the original paper is there

1268
00:47:34.760 --> 00:47:37.320
have been suggestions in measurements

1269
00:47:37.640 --> 00:47:39.680
from the ground that the pole has been moving

1270
00:47:39.680 --> 00:47:42.160
for all this time. But what we've got now is

1271
00:47:42.160 --> 00:47:44.280
a very clear model of how it's moved over the

1272
00:47:44.280 --> 00:47:46.120
last 11 years because we've been observing it

1273
00:47:46.200 --> 00:47:48.440
and that somehow got shifted to the results

1274
00:47:48.600 --> 00:47:51.000
suggesting that motion has been happening for

1275
00:47:51.000 --> 00:47:53.800
that length of time. Um, I think that's

1276
00:47:53.800 --> 00:47:55.680
probably a miscommunication thing because I

1277
00:47:55.680 --> 00:47:58.130
don't see any way that an 11 year period of

1278
00:47:58.130 --> 00:48:00.610
observation can accurately tell you what was

1279
00:48:00.610 --> 00:48:02.650
happening 150 years ago. You need other

1280
00:48:02.650 --> 00:48:04.930
observations for that. But you know that

1281
00:48:04.930 --> 00:48:07.330
movement is an ongoing thing. The other thing

1282
00:48:07.330 --> 00:48:09.170
to probably reassure people. I know people

1283
00:48:09.170 --> 00:48:10.970
sometimes worry that this means our magnetic

1284
00:48:10.970 --> 00:48:13.250
field's about to uh, cease and desist and

1285
00:48:13.250 --> 00:48:15.210
turn around and the end times will come and

1286
00:48:15.210 --> 00:48:17.130
it will be apocalypse and all the rest of it.

1287
00:48:17.530 --> 00:48:19.390
This South Atlantic Anomaly, uh,

1288
00:48:20.570 --> 00:48:23.180
is something where geological evidence and

1289
00:48:23.180 --> 00:48:25.500
core drilling and sampling of places where

1290
00:48:25.500 --> 00:48:27.580
the magnetic field gets frozen in. So if you

1291
00:48:27.580 --> 00:48:29.980
look at rocks, you can tell what the magnetic

1292
00:48:29.980 --> 00:48:32.740
field was doing in the past. Yeah. That

1293
00:48:32.740 --> 00:48:35.380
tells us that this anomaly over The South

1294
00:48:35.380 --> 00:48:37.060
Atlantic has been there in one form or

1295
00:48:37.060 --> 00:48:38.819
another for at least the last 11 million

1296
00:48:38.820 --> 00:48:41.780
years. So it's not new and

1297
00:48:42.980 --> 00:48:45.580
scary. Rather we're seeing something that has

1298
00:48:45.580 --> 00:48:47.180
been going on for a long time, but wibbling

1299
00:48:47.180 --> 00:48:48.820
and wobbling and it's sometimes bigger and

1300
00:48:48.820 --> 00:48:49.700
sometimes smaller.

1301
00:48:49.780 --> 00:48:50.500
Andrew Dunkley: It's normal.

1302
00:48:51.730 --> 00:48:53.730
Jonti Horner: This is normal. But it's amazing that we can

1303
00:48:53.730 --> 00:48:56.290
now get information about it on such

1304
00:48:56.290 --> 00:48:58.810
timescales. And much as it's out of my area

1305
00:48:58.810 --> 00:49:00.530
of expertise, I think it's yet another of

1306
00:49:00.530 --> 00:49:02.690
these fabulous examples of how

1307
00:49:03.570 --> 00:49:05.450
what you get taught at school is a very

1308
00:49:05.450 --> 00:49:08.010
simplified version of the way the universe

1309
00:49:08.010 --> 00:49:10.090
actually works. And what we'll learn from

1310
00:49:10.090 --> 00:49:12.050
science is not always that what you were

1311
00:49:12.050 --> 00:49:14.210
taught was wrong, but rather that what you

1312
00:49:14.210 --> 00:49:15.770
were taught was incomplete and we need to

1313
00:49:15.770 --> 00:49:18.240
learn more. So we've gone from, you know, if

1314
00:49:18.240 --> 00:49:19.640
you'd asked me as an 8 year old what the

1315
00:49:19.640 --> 00:49:21.040
Earth's magnetic field's like, I'd have

1316
00:49:21.040 --> 00:49:22.640
probably parroted. It's like you've got a bar

1317
00:49:22.640 --> 00:49:24.960
magnet and the magnetic field has a North

1318
00:49:24.960 --> 00:49:26.640
pole and a South pole and there's an

1319
00:49:26.640 --> 00:49:28.840
inference there that it's unchanging. There's

1320
00:49:28.840 --> 00:49:30.520
an inference that everywhere at the same

1321
00:49:30.520 --> 00:49:32.240
distance from the pole has the same magnetic

1322
00:49:32.240 --> 00:49:34.720
field strength, all these things, when in

1323
00:49:34.720 --> 00:49:37.040
fact it's a much more dynamic situation than

1324
00:49:37.040 --> 00:49:39.720
that. And it's much more like looking at a

1325
00:49:39.800 --> 00:49:42.280
boiling kettle through a glass window on the

1326
00:49:42.280 --> 00:49:43.840
side and seeing the water bubbling and

1327
00:49:43.840 --> 00:49:46.380
roiling around, rather than just looking at

1328
00:49:46.380 --> 00:49:47.660
the steam coming out and saying, oh, look,

1329
00:49:47.660 --> 00:49:48.260
the steam.

1330
00:49:48.740 --> 00:49:50.660
Andrew Dunkley: My answer to that question at school would

1331
00:49:50.660 --> 00:49:52.500
have been the what?

1332
00:49:53.570 --> 00:49:56.420
Um, yeah, but it's also, uh, indicative

1333
00:49:56.420 --> 00:49:59.300
of how very active the interior

1334
00:49:59.300 --> 00:50:02.260
of the planet is. And if

1335
00:50:02.580 --> 00:50:05.220
like I, I read the news every day and I

1336
00:50:05.300 --> 00:50:07.740
this particular types of news that I look out

1337
00:50:07.740 --> 00:50:10.380
for and uh, one of them's volcanic

1338
00:50:10.380 --> 00:50:13.090
activity. And there's been a heck of a lot

1339
00:50:13.090 --> 00:50:15.850
of stuff going on lately, uh, all over the

1340
00:50:15.850 --> 00:50:18.210
planet, but, uh, a few places are starting to

1341
00:50:18.210 --> 00:50:20.850
pop up as, uh, active. There's a particular,

1342
00:50:21.690 --> 00:50:24.370
uh, volcano in Iran that they thought was

1343
00:50:24.370 --> 00:50:26.850
extinct that's now starting to show signs of,

1344
00:50:26.950 --> 00:50:28.130
um, waking up.

1345
00:50:28.450 --> 00:50:31.210
Jonti Horner: Yeah. But they don't think has erupted for

1346
00:50:31.210 --> 00:50:34.090
several million years. I mean, lively

1347
00:50:34.090 --> 00:50:34.370
now.

1348
00:50:34.370 --> 00:50:36.530
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, there's all sorts of things happening

1349
00:50:36.530 --> 00:50:39.490
like that. So who knows, the Dubbo volcano

1350
00:50:39.570 --> 00:50:42.420
maybe may make a comeback. Yes, we did

1351
00:50:42.420 --> 00:50:44.260
have one here millions of years ago.

1352
00:50:44.740 --> 00:50:46.780
Jonti Horner: Yeah. Well, I live in an area on the Darling

1353
00:50:46.780 --> 00:50:48.900
Downs that's incredibly fertile and it's

1354
00:50:48.900 --> 00:50:50.740
incredibly fertile because there was a super

1355
00:50:50.740 --> 00:50:53.660
volcano, erupting, here tens of

1356
00:50:53.660 --> 00:50:55.660
millions of years ago that fertilized the

1357
00:50:55.660 --> 00:50:58.540
place. You know, we have got volcanoes in

1358
00:50:58.540 --> 00:51:00.380
Australia that have been active on the

1359
00:51:00.380 --> 00:51:02.860
mainland within the scope of knowledge of our

1360
00:51:02.860 --> 00:51:05.100
wonderful traditional owners here. I think

1361
00:51:05.100 --> 00:51:07.140
some of the ski resorts in Victoria last

1362
00:51:07.140 --> 00:51:09.830
erupted since the last ice age. Yep.

1363
00:51:10.150 --> 00:51:12.630
Andrew Dunkley: The only active volcano in

1364
00:51:12.870 --> 00:51:15.190
Australian territory is an external

1365
00:51:15.350 --> 00:51:17.750
Australian territory southwest of Western

1366
00:51:17.750 --> 00:51:19.110
Australia. I can't think of the name of the

1367
00:51:19.110 --> 00:51:21.270
island, but that's the only active volcano

1368
00:51:22.080 --> 00:51:25.070
uh, in, in Australian territory. But we've

1369
00:51:25.070 --> 00:51:27.270
got several that aren't far away around

1370
00:51:27.270 --> 00:51:30.150
Indonesia and, and,

1371
00:51:30.150 --> 00:51:31.670
and uh, of course New Zealand.

1372
00:51:31.830 --> 00:51:34.770
Jonti Horner: And I mean we've got the ones

1373
00:51:34.770 --> 00:51:36.890
that are classed as dormant that have erupted

1374
00:51:36.890 --> 00:51:38.850
so recently that we know they'll erupt again.

1375
00:51:38.930 --> 00:51:41.690
Yeah, I, we had this beautiful road trip

1376
00:51:41.690 --> 00:51:44.330
about 18 months ago where we left Toowoomba,

1377
00:51:44.330 --> 00:51:46.250
we picked my partner's parents up down in

1378
00:51:46.250 --> 00:51:47.730
northern New South Wales and we went all the

1379
00:51:47.730 --> 00:51:49.210
way over to Adelaide and back around the

1380
00:51:49.210 --> 00:51:50.970
coast. Coming back up, we did an awesome

1381
00:51:50.970 --> 00:51:52.930
three week trip. Yeah. And we stopped at a

1382
00:51:52.930 --> 00:51:55.730
place I think was called Tower Hill, um, just

1383
00:51:55.730 --> 00:51:57.570
on the Victorian side of the border with

1384
00:51:57.570 --> 00:51:59.370
South Australia. It was fabulous spot for

1385
00:51:59.370 --> 00:52:01.170
bird life. Had the most amazing view of wedge

1386
00:52:01.170 --> 00:52:03.860
tailed eagles and stuff. But that is a uh,

1387
00:52:03.890 --> 00:52:06.730
relatively recent maar, I think they're

1388
00:52:06.730 --> 00:52:08.930
described as. And there's a load of these

1389
00:52:08.930 --> 00:52:11.610
around that area which are uh, not quite mud

1390
00:52:11.610 --> 00:52:14.010
volcanoes and stuff, but they're not, oh my

1391
00:52:14.010 --> 00:52:15.850
God. Explosive Hawaiian type volcanic

1392
00:52:15.850 --> 00:52:18.770
activity, but they're volcanic activity in

1393
00:52:18.770 --> 00:52:20.850
recent geological time that will happen

1394
00:52:20.850 --> 00:52:23.210
again. It's all that kind of stuff. Mount

1395
00:52:23.210 --> 00:52:25.010
Buller I think is the ski resort that last

1396
00:52:25.010 --> 00:52:27.850
erupted about 6,000 years ago on

1397
00:52:27.850 --> 00:52:30.700
timescales longer than our lifetimes. The

1398
00:52:30.700 --> 00:52:32.620
Earth's a much more dynamic place than we

1399
00:52:32.620 --> 00:52:35.140
think. And this is part of the wonders

1400
00:52:35.300 --> 00:52:37.860
of working with and talking to people who

1401
00:52:38.340 --> 00:52:40.220
interface with the traditional owners of the

1402
00:52:40.220 --> 00:52:42.380
land and do it in a respectful enough way to

1403
00:52:42.380 --> 00:52:43.660
be able to learn some of the knowledge

1404
00:52:43.660 --> 00:52:45.940
they've passed down because there is oral

1405
00:52:45.940 --> 00:52:48.100
history passing down memories of these events

1406
00:52:48.100 --> 00:52:51.100
happening. People on this continent now have

1407
00:52:51.100 --> 00:52:53.620
a living oral history that recorded

1408
00:52:53.620 --> 00:52:56.400
events tens of thousands of years ago and

1409
00:52:56.400 --> 00:52:58.200
have passed them down in a form that we can

1410
00:52:58.680 --> 00:53:01.480
identify them and learn from them and get a

1411
00:53:01.480 --> 00:53:03.640
feel for these events that are much rarer

1412
00:53:04.120 --> 00:53:06.720
than we'd normally observe. You know, even in

1413
00:53:06.720 --> 00:53:08.680
the kind of nominally modern science period.

1414
00:53:08.680 --> 00:53:09.560
400 years.

1415
00:53:09.640 --> 00:53:10.120
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

1416
00:53:10.520 --> 00:53:12.440
Jonti Horner: When you talk about something 6,000 years

1417
00:53:12.440 --> 00:53:15.400
ago, we can get information about it now. I

1418
00:53:15.400 --> 00:53:16.200
think that's magical.

1419
00:53:16.280 --> 00:53:18.720
Andrew Dunkley: It is, it is indeed. Uh, if you would like to

1420
00:53:18.720 --> 00:53:21.010
read about the South Atlantic Anomaly, uh,

1421
00:53:21.010 --> 00:53:23.450
and all the stories we've talked about today,

1422
00:53:23.450 --> 00:53:25.530
you can, uh, do it the easy way and go to

1423
00:53:25.530 --> 00:53:28.330
space.com. uh, Jonti,

1424
00:53:28.330 --> 00:53:30.090
we're done for another day. Thank you.

1425
00:53:30.650 --> 00:53:32.210
Jonti Horner: That's an absolute pleasure. Thank you so

1426
00:53:32.210 --> 00:53:34.250
much. And my phone is now on silent, so.

1427
00:53:34.970 --> 00:53:37.650
Andrew Dunkley: And we just finished. Um. Yeah. All right,

1428
00:53:37.650 --> 00:53:39.690
we'll catch you soon on the Q and A episode.

1429
00:53:39.730 --> 00:53:42.130
Uh, Jonti Horner, professor of Astrophysics

1430
00:53:42.130 --> 00:53:43.930
at the University of Southern Queensland, and

1431
00:53:43.930 --> 00:53:45.890
thanks to Huw in the studio, couldn't be with

1432
00:53:45.890 --> 00:53:47.970
us today. He took a ride on a SpaceX rocket

1433
00:53:47.970 --> 00:53:49.650
and everything was going fine until they came

1434
00:53:49.650 --> 00:53:52.190
in to land. Then he saw a button and it said,

1435
00:53:52.190 --> 00:53:54.670
don't push. Well, this is Huw we're talking

1436
00:53:54.670 --> 00:53:56.790
about. So I think you saw that, uh,

1437
00:53:56.790 --> 00:53:58.360
explosive, um,

1438
00:53:59.230 --> 00:54:01.350
catastrophe. Anyway, he'll be back with us

1439
00:54:01.350 --> 00:54:03.910
one day after the injuries are, ah, all done

1440
00:54:03.910 --> 00:54:06.230
and dusted. Uh, and from me, Andrew Dunkley,

1441
00:54:06.230 --> 00:54:07.390
thanks for your company. Don't forget to

1442
00:54:07.390 --> 00:54:09.710
visit us on our website or our social media

1443
00:54:09.790 --> 00:54:12.190
sites. Uh, and you can interact with, uh.

1444
00:54:12.190 --> 00:54:13.390
Jonti Horner: Each other there as well.

1445
00:54:13.790 --> 00:54:16.190
Andrew Dunkley: Until next time. Bye for now.

1446
00:54:17.390 --> 00:54:19.590
Jonti Horner: You'll be listening to the Space Nuts.

1447
00:54:19.590 --> 00:54:20.190
Andrew Dunkley: Podcast.

1448
00:54:21.970 --> 00:54:24.530
Jonti Horner: Available at Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

1449
00:54:24.770 --> 00:54:27.530
iHeartRadio or your favorite podcast

1450
00:54:27.530 --> 00:54:29.250
player. You can also stream on

1451
00:54:29.250 --> 00:54:30.930
demand@bytes.com.

1452
00:54:31.250 --> 00:54:33.330
Andrew Dunkley: This has been another quality podcast

1453
00:54:33.330 --> 00:54:35.410
production from bytes.com.