Oct. 12, 2025

Snowball Earth Theories, High-Energy Neutrinos & The Fascinating MWC349A

Snowball Earth Theories, High-Energy Neutrinos & The Fascinating MWC349A

Q&A Edition: Snowball Earth, and Cosmic Neutrinos In this thought-provoking episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner tackle a range of intriguing listener questions. From the complexities of climate change and its...

Q&A Edition: Snowball Earth, and Cosmic Neutrinos
In this thought-provoking episode of Space Nuts, hosts Andrew Dunkley and Professor Jonti Horner tackle a range of intriguing listener questions. From the complexities of climate change and its effects on Earth’s axis to the mysteries of snowball Earth and the record-breaking neutrino KM M3230213A, this episode is packed with cosmic insights and scientific discussion.
Episode Highlights:
Climate Change Explained: Andrew and Jonti address Peter's question on how CO2, despite being heavier than air, contributes to global warming. They discuss the greenhouse effect and the role of carbon dioxide in trapping heat, along with the challenges of public perception regarding climate science.
Snowball Earth Insights: Paul’s inquiry leads to an exploration of the snowball Earth hypothesis, examining how such extreme climate conditions could affect oxygen levels and what triggers these dramatic shifts in Earth’s climate.
Cosmic Neutrinos Unveiled: Casey’s question about the record-breaking KM M3230213A neutrino sparks a fascinating discussion on its origins, possible sources, and the implications of detecting such high-energy particles from the early universe.
Understanding MWC349A: Henrique asks about the mysterious object MWC349A and its unique emissions. The hosts delve into the science of masers and the significance of this object in understanding stellar evolution and mass loss.
For more Space Nuts, including our continuously updating newsfeed and to listen to all our episodes, visit our website. Follow us on social media at SpaceNutsPod on Facebook, X, YouTube Music Music, Tumblr, Instagram, and TikTok. We love engaging with our community, so be sure to drop us a message or comment on your favourite platform.
If you’d like to help support Space Nuts and join our growing family of insiders for commercial-free episodes and more, visit spacenutspodcast.com/about.
Stay curious, keep looking up, and join us next time for more stellar insights and cosmic wonders. Until then, clear skies and happy stargazing.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/space-nuts-astronomy-insights-cosmic-discoveries--2631155/support.

 

 

WEBVTT

0
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:02.400
Andrew Dunkley: Hi there. Thanks for joining us on a Q and A

1
00:00:02.400 --> 00:00:05.080
edition of Space Nuts. My name is Andrew

2
00:00:05.080 --> 00:00:07.960
Dunkley and this is the. The show we do each

3
00:00:07.960 --> 00:00:10.760
week where you supply the agenda

4
00:00:10.760 --> 00:00:12.920
and we pretend we know what we're talking

5
00:00:12.920 --> 00:00:15.760
about. And questions are coming in,

6
00:00:15.960 --> 00:00:18.680
uh, for this week's show from Peter, who's

7
00:00:18.680 --> 00:00:20.400
asking about climate change.

8
00:00:21.200 --> 00:00:22.240
Jonti Horner: Paul is.

9
00:00:22.240 --> 00:00:24.000
Andrew Dunkley: Well, I suppose it's a similar story.

10
00:00:24.320 --> 00:00:27.300
Snowball, uh, Earth and, uh, a couple of

11
00:00:27.300 --> 00:00:29.820
objects of interest. Uh, Casey is asking

12
00:00:29.820 --> 00:00:30.640
about KM

13
00:00:30.640 --> 00:00:33.100
M3230213A.

14
00:00:33.660 --> 00:00:36.340
Know all about it. And an even more obscure

15
00:00:36.340 --> 00:00:38.700
thing. Henrik has asked about

16
00:00:39.260 --> 00:00:42.100
MWC3498, which I just did a

17
00:00:42.100 --> 00:00:44.700
Google search for and it came up blank.

18
00:00:46.140 --> 00:00:49.020
Anyway, it's an A at the end, not an A. I had

19
00:00:49.020 --> 00:00:51.260
fun with that. Ah, is that the one? All

20
00:00:51.260 --> 00:00:53.220
right. And that's what we're talking about

21
00:00:53.220 --> 00:00:55.060
with that little voice you just heard in the

22
00:00:55.060 --> 00:00:57.920
background on this edition of space

23
00:00:57.920 --> 00:00:58.520
nuts.

24
00:00:58.600 --> 00:01:01.080
Voice Over Guy: 15 seconds. Guidance is internal.

25
00:01:01.320 --> 00:01:04.040
10, 9. Ignition

26
00:01:04.040 --> 00:01:06.953
sequence start. Space nuts. 5, 4, 3,

27
00:01:07.025 --> 00:01:09.812
2. 1. 2, 3, 4, 5, 5, 4,

28
00:01:09.883 --> 00:01:12.880
3, 2, 1. Space nuts. Astronauts

29
00:01:12.880 --> 00:01:14.120
report it feels good.

30
00:01:14.840 --> 00:01:17.400
Andrew Dunkley: And that voice belongs to none other than

31
00:01:17.480 --> 00:01:19.680
Professor Jonti T. Horner, professor of

32
00:01:19.680 --> 00:01:22.080
Astrophysics at the University of Southern

33
00:01:22.080 --> 00:01:23.720
Queensland, Jonti. Hello again.

34
00:01:24.200 --> 00:01:25.840
Jonti Horner: Good afternoon. Yeah, clearly professor of

35
00:01:25.840 --> 00:01:27.640
interruptions. This is what happens when I've

36
00:01:27.640 --> 00:01:29.400
had enough time for the coffee to kick in.

37
00:01:29.680 --> 00:01:32.400
Andrew Dunkley: Uh, yes, it's been, um, what, four

38
00:01:32.400 --> 00:01:34.120
days and we're still wearing the same

39
00:01:34.120 --> 00:01:34.520
clothes.

40
00:01:34.760 --> 00:01:35.560
Jonti Horner: Absolutely.

41
00:01:35.720 --> 00:01:37.280
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah, I get a lot of mileage out of that

42
00:01:37.280 --> 00:01:39.160
joke. Yeah.

43
00:01:39.400 --> 00:01:40.880
Jonti Horner: Um, but you've been done.

44
00:01:40.880 --> 00:01:42.680
Had a musical interlude. Haven't I have.

45
00:01:42.680 --> 00:01:43.700
Andrew Dunkley: Look, I, um.

46
00:01:44.680 --> 00:01:45.080
Jonti Horner: It.

47
00:01:45.160 --> 00:01:47.480
Andrew Dunkley: It was just. Last weekend was a long weekend,

48
00:01:47.800 --> 00:01:50.400
uh, in New South Wales, and I think it was in

49
00:01:50.400 --> 00:01:52.840
Queensland too. But, um, it was the weekend

50
00:01:52.840 --> 00:01:55.500
that Taylor Swift released her latest

51
00:01:55.580 --> 00:01:58.510
album. And, uh,

52
00:01:58.540 --> 00:02:01.340
I've got three granddaughters, all of

53
00:02:01.340 --> 00:02:03.820
Taylor's swifty age. And

54
00:02:03.960 --> 00:02:06.900
uh, we. Yeah, we took them to see

55
00:02:06.900 --> 00:02:09.340
the launch of her new album. Uh, and,

56
00:02:10.000 --> 00:02:12.300
uh, I. Look, I've got to tell you, I really

57
00:02:12.300 --> 00:02:14.540
did, I did. I enjoy it.

58
00:02:15.180 --> 00:02:18.020
Yes. It's not aimed at

59
00:02:18.020 --> 00:02:20.860
me or my demographic, but, um,

60
00:02:20.860 --> 00:02:23.610
it was, uh, it was interesting to

61
00:02:23.850 --> 00:02:26.450
watch some of the thinking behind the artist

62
00:02:26.450 --> 00:02:28.650
and some of the creativity that went into

63
00:02:28.650 --> 00:02:31.010
film clips and things like that. That's the,

64
00:02:31.010 --> 00:02:33.010
that's what I got out of it. But what, uh, an

65
00:02:33.010 --> 00:02:33.690
extraordinary.

66
00:02:34.410 --> 00:02:35.610
Jonti Horner: It's one of the things I love.

67
00:02:35.610 --> 00:02:37.250
I know we've gone totally off topic straight

68
00:02:37.250 --> 00:02:40.050
away, but my favorite critic, and the kind of

69
00:02:40.050 --> 00:02:42.170
only one I pay attention to, really is a guy

70
00:02:42.170 --> 00:02:44.600
called Mark commodity in the UK who's, um,

71
00:02:44.600 --> 00:02:46.530
they used to be on BBC Radio 5 live and now

72
00:02:46.530 --> 00:02:48.410
they've got their own independent, um, thing.

73
00:02:48.840 --> 00:02:50.160
And it's one of those things that's like

74
00:02:50.160 --> 00:02:51.960
comfort food for the soul that you can listen

75
00:02:51.960 --> 00:02:54.080
to and just makes your children relax. But

76
00:02:54.080 --> 00:02:56.080
part of what's nice about him is that you get

77
00:02:56.080 --> 00:02:58.160
a lot of film critics who, if a film's not

78
00:02:58.160 --> 00:03:00.920
made for them, are in some misdiabos about

79
00:03:00.920 --> 00:03:03.200
it. Right. And you know, I remember this with

80
00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:04.879
the Twilight films, which I'm not the target

81
00:03:04.879 --> 00:03:06.640
audience, they're not my cup of tea, but they

82
00:03:06.640 --> 00:03:09.280
got panned because they're made for

83
00:03:09.280 --> 00:03:11.280
teenage girls and film critics are elderly

84
00:03:11.280 --> 00:03:12.920
men and there's a slightly different

85
00:03:12.920 --> 00:03:15.330
demographic there. And this guy's brilliant

86
00:03:15.330 --> 00:03:16.770
because he'll m. Make the point. You know,

87
00:03:16.850 --> 00:03:18.770
I'm not the target audience for this. I'm

88
00:03:18.770 --> 00:03:21.210
very clearly not it and I enjoyed it. Okay.

89
00:03:21.210 --> 00:03:22.770
But you look around the room at the people

90
00:03:22.770 --> 00:03:24.650
who are the target audience and they love it.

91
00:03:24.650 --> 00:03:26.930
So it's obviously doing well. I think it's

92
00:03:26.930 --> 00:03:28.530
the same with what you're saying by the

93
00:03:28.530 --> 00:03:29.969
Taylor Swift stuff. We're not the target

94
00:03:29.969 --> 00:03:31.810
audience. But you can appreciate that this is

95
00:03:31.810 --> 00:03:34.170
someone who's awesomely talented and ah, for

96
00:03:34.170 --> 00:03:35.570
the target audience, it's really

97
00:03:35.650 --> 00:03:37.970
fundamentally awesome, you know.

98
00:03:38.210 --> 00:03:40.690
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. Uh, I was still working on

99
00:03:40.690 --> 00:03:43.510
radio, uh, when she was, uh,

100
00:03:43.590 --> 00:03:45.710
announced by Time magazine as Person of the

101
00:03:45.710 --> 00:03:48.070
Year. And I did a big, big

102
00:03:48.470 --> 00:03:51.070
statement at the time as far as I was

103
00:03:51.070 --> 00:03:53.950
concerned, uh, about why she deserved

104
00:03:53.950 --> 00:03:56.870
it because she brought light into the world

105
00:03:57.910 --> 00:04:00.470
at a very dark time towards the end of COVID

106
00:04:00.550 --> 00:04:03.470
And um, but then they went

107
00:04:03.470 --> 00:04:04.950
and made Donaldjohanson Trump the, uh, Person

108
00:04:04.950 --> 00:04:06.550
of the Year. So anyway, whatever.

109
00:04:07.310 --> 00:04:09.110
Jonti Horner: Um, can't see the light without having

110
00:04:09.110 --> 00:04:09.990
darkness. Right.

111
00:04:10.230 --> 00:04:12.870
Andrew Dunkley: And I will say one of the songs on the new

112
00:04:12.870 --> 00:04:15.390
album has got to be about Donaldjohanson

113
00:04:15.390 --> 00:04:18.390
Trump. So anyway, he's after

114
00:04:18.390 --> 00:04:21.350
a Nobel priest Peace Prize and the word on

115
00:04:21.350 --> 00:04:24.270
the hill is that, uh, you might just get

116
00:04:24.270 --> 00:04:27.270
it. Uh, we won't go there. It's not

117
00:04:27.270 --> 00:04:29.550
our agenda. But, uh, we will go to some

118
00:04:29.550 --> 00:04:31.630
questions. Why don't we try and tackle this

119
00:04:31.630 --> 00:04:34.630
very first one? And this one

120
00:04:34.630 --> 00:04:35.510
comes from Peter.

121
00:04:35.510 --> 00:04:37.610
With all this climate change happening, I,

122
00:04:37.610 --> 00:04:40.230
uh, was wondering how CO2 is

123
00:04:40.230 --> 00:04:42.410
warming the planet when it's heavy. Heavier

124
00:04:42.410 --> 00:04:45.130
than air. Maybe the problem is the axis of

125
00:04:45.130 --> 00:04:47.370
the planet has moved because of all the

126
00:04:47.370 --> 00:04:49.690
millions of tons of minerals that have been

127
00:04:49.690 --> 00:04:52.250
moved. Maybe someone should check the

128
00:04:52.250 --> 00:04:55.210
axis angle. Geez, Peter, I

129
00:04:55.210 --> 00:04:57.650
think I've heard this theory Once before.

130
00:04:58.050 --> 00:05:00.730
I doubt that the amount of stuff we take out

131
00:05:00.730 --> 00:05:02.810
of the ground and move around the planet is

132
00:05:02.810 --> 00:05:05.090
going to make that big a difference

133
00:05:05.650 --> 00:05:06.610
to the tilt.

134
00:05:07.330 --> 00:05:09.210
Jonti Horner: No, and the beauty is we can measure the

135
00:05:09.210 --> 00:05:12.130
tilt. I mean, I grew up in the north

136
00:05:12.130 --> 00:05:14.530
of England, and high in the sky was

137
00:05:14.530 --> 00:05:16.650
Polaris, the pole star, which is the

138
00:05:16.650 --> 00:05:18.530
direction that the northern end of the

139
00:05:18.530 --> 00:05:21.090
Earth's, uh, spin axis points to. I'm very,

140
00:05:21.090 --> 00:05:23.010
very close to that star. So we can see

141
00:05:23.490 --> 00:05:25.650
exactly where the spin axis of the Earth is

142
00:05:25.650 --> 00:05:28.130
pointing. We can measure its spin rate. And

143
00:05:28.690 --> 00:05:31.690
it is right that moving material around

144
00:05:31.690 --> 00:05:34.570
on the Earth will to some degree change its

145
00:05:34.570 --> 00:05:36.850
spin and change its spin axis tilt.

146
00:05:37.840 --> 00:05:40.610
Um, but, and it's a very big but the amount

147
00:05:40.610 --> 00:05:43.570
of change that you get from human activity is

148
00:05:43.570 --> 00:05:46.410
very, very, very, very small. A much

149
00:05:46.490 --> 00:05:48.930
bigger shift in mass, for example, happens

150
00:05:48.930 --> 00:05:51.530
with melting of the polar caps. Yeah, if you

151
00:05:51.530 --> 00:05:53.410
melt the polar caps, you move the water. The

152
00:05:53.410 --> 00:05:55.050
water settles all around the Earth, so you're

153
00:05:55.050 --> 00:05:56.970
effectively moving mass from near the poles

154
00:05:56.970 --> 00:05:59.250
to near the equator. And that changes the

155
00:05:59.250 --> 00:06:00.890
Earth's rotational angular momentum and will

156
00:06:00.890 --> 00:06:03.340
change the Earth's spin very, very, very,

157
00:06:03.340 --> 00:06:06.180
very slightly. But we're now incredibly

158
00:06:06.180 --> 00:06:08.140
technologically capable, so we can measure

159
00:06:08.140 --> 00:06:09.900
things that are that small. And a good

160
00:06:09.900 --> 00:06:12.300
example of that was the big Indian Ocean

161
00:06:12.300 --> 00:06:14.080
tsunami. The earthquake that caused that, uh,

162
00:06:14.180 --> 00:06:16.860
on the Pacific Rim had a measurable effect on

163
00:06:16.860 --> 00:06:19.580
the Earth's spin. But if I remember rightly,

164
00:06:19.580 --> 00:06:21.460
and I stand to be corrected here, that

165
00:06:21.460 --> 00:06:24.100
measurable effect was something like one, one

166
00:06:24.100 --> 00:06:26.060
millionth of a second in the spin rate or

167
00:06:26.060 --> 00:06:27.620
something like that. And we can measure that,

168
00:06:28.110 --> 00:06:29.790
but it's not like you'd notice it in your day

169
00:06:29.790 --> 00:06:31.550
to day life. And it's not like that would be

170
00:06:31.550 --> 00:06:34.270
big enough to cause the impact on the climate

171
00:06:34.270 --> 00:06:36.910
that we see today. Now, I understand

172
00:06:37.150 --> 00:06:39.630
that, thanks to, uh, decades of

173
00:06:39.630 --> 00:06:41.630
discussion, that climate change is still a

174
00:06:41.630 --> 00:06:43.909
bit of a controversial topic with some

175
00:06:43.909 --> 00:06:46.390
people. And I'm quite

176
00:06:46.390 --> 00:06:48.190
fundamentally comfortable saying climate

177
00:06:48.190 --> 00:06:49.830
change is a real thing, that the climate is

178
00:06:49.830 --> 00:06:52.150
changing. I spent three years early in my

179
00:06:52.150 --> 00:06:55.090
career living in Switzerland, and when I was

180
00:06:55.090 --> 00:06:56.650
in Switzerland, I used to go skiing, because

181
00:06:56.650 --> 00:06:58.010
skiing's awesome. And if you're in

182
00:06:58.010 --> 00:07:00.090
Switzerland, why wouldn't you? And all these

183
00:07:00.090 --> 00:07:02.050
beautiful little towns that I went to in the

184
00:07:02.050 --> 00:07:03.810
winter, and then you went back in the summer

185
00:07:03.810 --> 00:07:05.330
and you went walking in the hills instead of

186
00:07:05.330 --> 00:07:07.330
skiing because all the snow had gone. They

187
00:07:07.330 --> 00:07:09.410
all have these photos from 50 or 100 years

188
00:07:09.410 --> 00:07:11.610
ago where you have the village in the

189
00:07:11.610 --> 00:07:13.370
foreground and the glacier in the background

190
00:07:13.530 --> 00:07:16.130
winding out of the hills. And then if you're

191
00:07:16.130 --> 00:07:17.770
up there in the summer, you go out and look,

192
00:07:17.850 --> 00:07:20.140
and it isn't there anymore. It's retreated

193
00:07:20.140 --> 00:07:22.980
that far. And I think that's fundamentally

194
00:07:22.980 --> 00:07:24.820
why in a lot of those countries with Alpine

195
00:07:24.820 --> 00:07:26.820
regions, climate change has been accepted for

196
00:07:26.820 --> 00:07:28.980
much, much longer, because you can really

197
00:07:28.980 --> 00:07:31.620
physically see the effects. And so it's very

198
00:07:31.620 --> 00:07:33.620
clear that it's happening. And the argument

199
00:07:33.620 --> 00:07:35.260
that it's caused by humor rather than

200
00:07:35.260 --> 00:07:37.820
something natural, the strongest evidence for

201
00:07:37.820 --> 00:07:39.900
that, to be honest, is the speed at which

202
00:07:39.900 --> 00:07:42.860
it's happening is unprecedented. The natural

203
00:07:42.860 --> 00:07:45.100
effects that could cause it, like the

204
00:07:45.100 --> 00:07:46.420
transition from the ice ages to the

205
00:07:46.420 --> 00:07:47.860
interglacials, and we'll talk about this a

206
00:07:47.860 --> 00:07:49.900
bit more later on, are, uh, much more

207
00:07:49.900 --> 00:07:52.380
gradual. Changes in brightness of the sun are

208
00:07:52.380 --> 00:07:54.020
much more gradual. And in fact, the sun has

209
00:07:54.020 --> 00:07:55.540
dimmed a little bit over the time that we've

210
00:07:55.540 --> 00:07:57.780
been measuring climate change due to little

211
00:07:57.780 --> 00:08:00.740
bits of tweaks in its behavior. So if

212
00:08:00.900 --> 00:08:02.700
the climate wasn't changing, we'd actually be

213
00:08:02.700 --> 00:08:04.380
slightly cooler now than we were a couple of

214
00:08:04.380 --> 00:08:07.020
hundred years ago, only very slightly. But

215
00:08:07.020 --> 00:08:08.860
that leads to this perverse and confusing

216
00:08:08.860 --> 00:08:11.580
statistic that 110% of all climate change is

217
00:08:11.580 --> 00:08:13.880
caused by humans because we're not just

218
00:08:14.040 --> 00:08:15.600
making it warmer, but we're offsetting the

219
00:08:15.600 --> 00:08:18.200
cooling as well. Yeah, so that's all the

220
00:08:18.200 --> 00:08:20.840
background to it here, how carbon dioxide

221
00:08:20.840 --> 00:08:23.440
plays a role. Even though it's, you know,

222
00:08:23.440 --> 00:08:25.120
heavier than air, it's still gas, it still

223
00:08:25.120 --> 00:08:26.720
floats around up there. It's not like it all

224
00:08:26.720 --> 00:08:28.679
sits at ankle level on the Earth. But even if

225
00:08:28.679 --> 00:08:31.000
it did, it would still be fairly effective

226
00:08:31.000 --> 00:08:33.840
because what carbon dioxide is in a really

227
00:08:33.840 --> 00:08:36.120
broad sense is it's like a good winter doona

228
00:08:36.120 --> 00:08:38.600
that you've got. The way that

229
00:08:39.240 --> 00:08:41.080
I can understand this as an astronomer most

230
00:08:41.080 --> 00:08:43.160
obviously is, uh, I think back m to again.

231
00:08:43.160 --> 00:08:45.680
When I was a kid, 1983, when I was five years

232
00:08:45.680 --> 00:08:47.200
old, there was this satellite launch called

233
00:08:47.200 --> 00:08:49.480
the infrared astronomical satellite IRAs.

234
00:08:49.960 --> 00:08:52.120
And that was really foundational for a lot of

235
00:08:52.120 --> 00:08:54.360
what we've learned about planets around other

236
00:08:54.360 --> 00:08:56.640
stars, because it was a tool that first

237
00:08:56.640 --> 00:08:59.040
allowed us to find debris disks around stars,

238
00:08:59.040 --> 00:09:00.560
which are, uh, the leftovers from planet

239
00:09:00.560 --> 00:09:03.280
formation. And that was a bit of a shock

240
00:09:03.280 --> 00:09:05.360
because stars didn't look how they were

241
00:09:05.360 --> 00:09:07.200
expected to. Three of them in particular.

242
00:09:07.200 --> 00:09:10.120
Vega, Fomalkauten, Beta Pictoris. They were

243
00:09:10.120 --> 00:09:11.720
brighter in the infrared wavelengths than we

244
00:09:11.720 --> 00:09:13.760
expected. They thought the satellite was

245
00:09:13.760 --> 00:09:15.520
broken. Then they realized that, no, really,

246
00:09:15.520 --> 00:09:17.080
the stars just had all this debris around

247
00:09:17.080 --> 00:09:19.120
them that was getting hot, warming up, and

248
00:09:19.120 --> 00:09:20.640
Giving off radiation and infrared

249
00:09:20.640 --> 00:09:23.640
wavelengths. So this tells us that

250
00:09:23.640 --> 00:09:26.400
when you heat something up, it radiates that

251
00:09:26.400 --> 00:09:28.040
energy away in infrared. And that's why

252
00:09:28.040 --> 00:09:30.640
thermal imaging cameras work. You can see

253
00:09:30.640 --> 00:09:32.400
people at night if you're using a thermal

254
00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:33.960
imaging camera because they're warmer than

255
00:09:33.960 --> 00:09:35.910
the surrounding area, so they give off more

256
00:09:35.910 --> 00:09:38.670
infrared radiation. You can see that. But the

257
00:09:38.670 --> 00:09:41.390
reason we had to launch IRAs was that you

258
00:09:41.390 --> 00:09:43.270
can't do infrared astronomy from the ground

259
00:09:43.270 --> 00:09:45.750
except a couple of very specific wavelengths.

260
00:09:45.990 --> 00:09:47.590
And uh, the reason that you can't do infrared

261
00:09:47.590 --> 00:09:48.870
astronomy from the ground is that the

262
00:09:48.870 --> 00:09:51.550
atmosphere is fundamentally opaque at

263
00:09:51.550 --> 00:09:53.310
infrared wavelengths. And a big part of that

264
00:09:53.310 --> 00:09:56.230
is carbon dioxide. So if you've got a photon

265
00:09:56.230 --> 00:09:58.830
of infrared radiation, it coming into our

266
00:09:58.830 --> 00:10:00.750
atmosphere, we'll essentially see our

267
00:10:00.750 --> 00:10:02.630
atmosphere as utterly thick cloud. It will be

268
00:10:02.630 --> 00:10:04.150
absorbed and re emitted back out.

269
00:10:05.720 --> 00:10:08.080
Optical light, visible light makes it through

270
00:10:08.080 --> 00:10:09.920
the atmosphere intact. And that's why if I

271
00:10:09.920 --> 00:10:11.240
look out of the window at the minute, we've

272
00:10:11.240 --> 00:10:13.000
got a lovely sunny day and I can see what I'm

273
00:10:13.000 --> 00:10:15.920
doing. And, um, that solar radiation comes in

274
00:10:15.920 --> 00:10:17.760
and it warms the Earth up. And what does the

275
00:10:17.760 --> 00:10:19.520
Earth do? It radiates that energy back

276
00:10:19.520 --> 00:10:22.080
outward at infrared wavelengths. But because

277
00:10:22.080 --> 00:10:23.840
the atmosphere is opaque at infrared

278
00:10:23.840 --> 00:10:25.840
wavelengths, that energy gets absorbed and re

279
00:10:25.840 --> 00:10:28.160
emitted. And it'll be re emitted randomly in

280
00:10:28.160 --> 00:10:30.560
any given direction. So the odds are it'll

281
00:10:30.560 --> 00:10:32.080
come back down. So in other words, that

282
00:10:32.080 --> 00:10:34.580
radiation gets trapped. And that's how the

283
00:10:34.580 --> 00:10:36.620
doona works. That's how the carbon dioxide's

284
00:10:36.620 --> 00:10:39.540
working. Now the carbon dioxide

285
00:10:39.540 --> 00:10:41.500
we've got in our atmosphere is really

286
00:10:41.500 --> 00:10:44.260
effective as a greenhouse gas. It's actually

287
00:10:44.260 --> 00:10:46.780
mostly saturated. So adding

288
00:10:47.020 --> 00:10:49.259
some carbon dioxide from no carbon dioxide

289
00:10:49.259 --> 00:10:51.580
would have a much bigger effect than adding

290
00:10:51.580 --> 00:10:53.540
carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Now, when

291
00:10:53.540 --> 00:10:55.020
we've got a fair bit of it in there already,

292
00:10:55.420 --> 00:10:57.940
but it's not totally saturated. So what that

293
00:10:57.940 --> 00:11:00.360
means is as we add more carbon dioxide, it

294
00:11:00.360 --> 00:11:02.580
can still have a bigger effect. And, um,

295
00:11:02.640 --> 00:11:04.480
that's why as we put more carbon dioxide into

296
00:11:04.480 --> 00:11:06.960
the atmosphere, the Earth gets warmer because

297
00:11:06.960 --> 00:11:08.600
the Dooner gets more effective.

298
00:11:09.080 --> 00:11:10.600
There are other gases that are effective

299
00:11:10.600 --> 00:11:12.640
greenhouse gases as well. Methane is a really

300
00:11:12.640 --> 00:11:14.400
good example. Methane is actually much more

301
00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:16.600
effective than carbon dioxide. But the

302
00:11:16.600 --> 00:11:18.480
difference is methane's fairly short lived in

303
00:11:18.480 --> 00:11:21.360
the atmosphere. Methane molecules on average

304
00:11:21.360 --> 00:11:22.920
will be removed from the atmosphere within

305
00:11:22.920 --> 00:11:25.160
400 years by interacting with oxygen.

306
00:11:25.810 --> 00:11:28.450
Carbon dioxide is only removed by life

307
00:11:28.610 --> 00:11:31.410
or by weathering. You know, if you get lots

308
00:11:31.410 --> 00:11:33.770
of rain on the continents, that breaks up the

309
00:11:33.770 --> 00:11:36.570
rocks, the rocks crumble down. Chemistry

310
00:11:36.570 --> 00:11:38.290
happens. Carbon dioxide can be pulled out

311
00:11:38.290 --> 00:11:40.210
into the rocks and locked up in the surface.

312
00:11:41.090 --> 00:11:42.690
They're the mechanisms that get rid of carbon

313
00:11:42.690 --> 00:11:45.490
dioxide and they're slower. So that's part of

314
00:11:45.490 --> 00:11:46.970
why carbon dioxide is a problem, because when

315
00:11:46.970 --> 00:11:48.610
we put it in the atmosphere, it's going to

316
00:11:48.610 --> 00:11:51.130
hang around for a good long time. But that

317
00:11:51.130 --> 00:11:52.930
hopefully kind of answers that question, that

318
00:11:52.930 --> 00:11:55.420
I am respectful of the fact that it's hard

319
00:11:55.420 --> 00:11:58.260
for people to comprehend how we

320
00:11:58.260 --> 00:12:00.100
can change the world's environment. Because

321
00:12:00.100 --> 00:12:01.340
you think of yourself and your friends and

322
00:12:01.340 --> 00:12:04.220
you think the Earth's so big and we're so

323
00:12:04.220 --> 00:12:05.780
small, how can we have that much of an

324
00:12:05.780 --> 00:12:08.060
effect? And it's hard to come to terms with

325
00:12:08.060 --> 00:12:09.939
just how many people there are and just how

326
00:12:09.939 --> 00:12:11.620
much stuff we're doing and pumping stuff into

327
00:12:11.620 --> 00:12:14.180
the atmosphere. Yeah, it's a bit

328
00:12:14.180 --> 00:12:17.100
misleading to say, you know, if you change to

329
00:12:17.100 --> 00:12:19.220
an EV rather than a petrol car, you'll save

330
00:12:19.220 --> 00:12:21.710
the world, but it'll contribute a little drop

331
00:12:21.710 --> 00:12:24.510
in the ocean towards lessening climate

332
00:12:24.510 --> 00:12:26.810
change potentially in the long term. And, um,

333
00:12:27.510 --> 00:12:29.030
that's kind of what people are looking at.

334
00:12:29.030 --> 00:12:31.590
But fundamentally, this is what's happening.

335
00:12:31.590 --> 00:12:33.830
It's very, very well established. Nothing

336
00:12:33.830 --> 00:12:36.350
astronomically can even come close to

337
00:12:36.350 --> 00:12:38.510
explaining what we're seeing. So when you

338
00:12:38.510 --> 00:12:40.190
rule out all the other options, the only

339
00:12:40.190 --> 00:12:41.870
thing that's left is human influence. And

340
00:12:41.870 --> 00:12:44.630
that's kind of sad, but shows what an

341
00:12:44.630 --> 00:12:46.230
effective species we are at changing our

342
00:12:46.230 --> 00:12:47.110
environment, you know?

343
00:12:47.420 --> 00:12:49.220
Andrew Dunkley: Well, hopefully we can be just as effective

344
00:12:49.220 --> 00:12:52.150
in finding a solution, but I think, uh,

345
00:12:52.150 --> 00:12:54.340
to do that, everybody has to be on the same

346
00:12:54.340 --> 00:12:56.020
page, and that's just not the case at the

347
00:12:56.020 --> 00:12:56.300
moment.

348
00:12:56.300 --> 00:12:57.660
Jonti Horner: I'm an optimist. I mean, there's.

349
00:12:59.500 --> 00:13:00.980
There's real challenges here. I remember

350
00:13:00.980 --> 00:13:03.140
there was an incredible article by a guy

351
00:13:03.140 --> 00:13:05.900
called Jeff Masters who used to run the

352
00:13:05.900 --> 00:13:07.700
Weather Underground site, used to write blogs

353
00:13:07.700 --> 00:13:10.380
there. Uh, yeah. Um, and he wrote about. I

354
00:13:10.380 --> 00:13:11.780
think it was book review, actually. But he

355
00:13:11.780 --> 00:13:13.500
wrote about something called Manufactured

356
00:13:13.500 --> 00:13:16.260
Doubt, which is a whole industry that has

357
00:13:16.260 --> 00:13:19.140
sprung up to sow confusion

358
00:13:19.140 --> 00:13:21.140
over something that should be settled science

359
00:13:21.220 --> 00:13:24.020
in order to allow business to operate without

360
00:13:24.020 --> 00:13:26.740
being restricted effectively. And, um, it

361
00:13:26.740 --> 00:13:29.740
first came about with smoking. So cigarette

362
00:13:29.740 --> 00:13:31.860
smoking. Tobacco smoking was known to be very

363
00:13:31.860 --> 00:13:34.380
harmful to people going back 100 years from

364
00:13:34.380 --> 00:13:36.420
now. But even when I was growing up in the

365
00:13:36.420 --> 00:13:38.980
1980s, he still had smoking in public places.

366
00:13:38.980 --> 00:13:40.460
You still had it everywhere. You still have

367
00:13:40.460 --> 00:13:42.580
adverts on TV and tobacco sponsorship.

368
00:13:43.350 --> 00:13:45.270
Because there'd been this very cleverly

369
00:13:45.270 --> 00:13:48.230
managed marketing strategy of casting doubt

370
00:13:48.230 --> 00:13:49.670
on the science and casting doubt on the

371
00:13:49.670 --> 00:13:51.910
scientists involved, effectively slandering

372
00:13:51.910 --> 00:13:53.990
them. And you have things like, you know, top

373
00:13:53.990 --> 00:13:55.630
sportsmen in the world, footballers and

374
00:13:55.630 --> 00:13:57.030
cricketers and things like this being

375
00:13:57.030 --> 00:13:59.710
sponsored by tobacco companies and smoking

376
00:13:59.710 --> 00:14:01.270
cigarettes and interviews and giving this

377
00:14:01.270 --> 00:14:03.310
impression. Can't be harmful, can it? I mean,

378
00:14:03.310 --> 00:14:05.190
look, here's one of the fittest athletes in

379
00:14:05.190 --> 00:14:06.830
the world and they smoke and that makes them

380
00:14:06.830 --> 00:14:08.470
a great athlete. You shouldn't see children.

381
00:14:09.350 --> 00:14:11.790
And what was interesting in this article from

382
00:14:11.790 --> 00:14:14.390
Jeff Masters, who's a very powerful advocate

383
00:14:14.390 --> 00:14:16.990
for knowledge, uh, about climate change, was

384
00:14:16.990 --> 00:14:18.910
that, uh, there is a lot of evidence that the

385
00:14:18.910 --> 00:14:20.950
companies that used to do that for tobacco

386
00:14:21.590 --> 00:14:24.310
through the 1980s were brought on board by

387
00:14:24.310 --> 00:14:27.070
the big oil companies to do the same kind of

388
00:14:27.070 --> 00:14:29.990
strategy. And it's been incredibly effective.

389
00:14:30.310 --> 00:14:33.270
And I think it's led to this wider thing of

390
00:14:34.480 --> 00:14:36.680
diminishing trust in science and greater

391
00:14:36.680 --> 00:14:38.280
doubt in it, which has led to the challenges

392
00:14:38.280 --> 00:14:40.320
we face now with things like vaccines, with,

393
00:14:40.640 --> 00:14:43.600
you know, flat earthing to some degree, with

394
00:14:43.760 --> 00:14:46.680
places where people are skeptical and

395
00:14:46.680 --> 00:14:48.360
don't trust scientists and don't trust

396
00:14:48.360 --> 00:14:49.720
science, even though science is so

397
00:14:49.720 --> 00:14:51.480
fundamental and foundational for our day to

398
00:14:51.480 --> 00:14:54.200
day lives. And it's really sad. But the flip

399
00:14:54.200 --> 00:14:56.880
side is we got cigarettes banned,

400
00:14:56.880 --> 00:14:59.360
people's health has improved. We, you know,

401
00:14:59.440 --> 00:15:01.360
no longer do you go to a pub and the walls

402
00:15:01.360 --> 00:15:03.200
are grimy and the windows are dark because of

403
00:15:03.200 --> 00:15:04.720
all the cigarette smoke. No longer do you get

404
00:15:04.720 --> 00:15:07.060
on a train and have to cough your way to your

405
00:15:07.060 --> 00:15:09.620
destination. Things have changed and I think

406
00:15:09.620 --> 00:15:11.140
we're starting to see the same change with

407
00:15:11.140 --> 00:15:13.340
climate change and, um, with the actions that

408
00:15:13.340 --> 00:15:15.340
we can take. And it's not happening out of

409
00:15:15.340 --> 00:15:16.620
the goodness of people's hearts. It's

410
00:15:16.620 --> 00:15:18.740
happening because commercially it's now

411
00:15:18.740 --> 00:15:21.100
becoming viable to make the changes. Yes,

412
00:15:21.420 --> 00:15:23.500
electric vehicles are a really good example.

413
00:15:24.220 --> 00:15:26.220
Back in the early 1900s you had electric

414
00:15:26.220 --> 00:15:28.140
vehicles, we had electric milk floats in the

415
00:15:28.140 --> 00:15:29.820
uk, but they were an oddity and there were

416
00:15:29.820 --> 00:15:32.180
specific use. But it's finally got to the

417
00:15:32.180 --> 00:15:33.780
point where those kind of vehicles can be

418
00:15:33.780 --> 00:15:36.680
competitive with combustion engine vehicles,

419
00:15:37.000 --> 00:15:38.800
can even possibly work out cheaper and more

420
00:15:38.800 --> 00:15:40.320
efficient and suddenly there's an incentive

421
00:15:40.320 --> 00:15:42.360
for people to get them, not because they're

422
00:15:42.360 --> 00:15:43.960
doing good for the planet, but because it's a

423
00:15:43.960 --> 00:15:45.440
better option for them. And that's the kind

424
00:15:45.440 --> 00:15:47.200
of change that hopefully is going to improve

425
00:15:47.200 --> 00:15:47.560
things.

426
00:15:47.800 --> 00:15:50.760
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, yes, I hope you're right. I

427
00:15:50.760 --> 00:15:53.200
suppose the other difficulty that comes into

428
00:15:53.200 --> 00:15:56.080
play with trying to change the minds of

429
00:15:56.080 --> 00:15:59.000
people and get the right thinking happening

430
00:15:59.480 --> 00:16:02.000
is social media, because there's so much

431
00:16:02.000 --> 00:16:04.920
scandal going through social media and as

432
00:16:04.920 --> 00:16:07.400
I mentioned, in the last program, um,

433
00:16:08.760 --> 00:16:11.480
we now have artificial intelligence, so

434
00:16:11.480 --> 00:16:13.640
you don't even know what you're looking at is

435
00:16:13.640 --> 00:16:14.480
real anymore.

436
00:16:14.480 --> 00:16:14.920
Speaker C: It's.

437
00:16:15.160 --> 00:16:18.160
Jonti Horner: Yeah, it's all saying that. And

438
00:16:18.160 --> 00:16:20.080
I know it from a Terry Pratchett. But like

439
00:16:20.080 --> 00:16:21.960
many things, Terry Pratchett, he was probably

440
00:16:22.440 --> 00:16:24.520
referencing people before. But this whole

441
00:16:24.520 --> 00:16:26.080
idea that a lie can run around the world

442
00:16:26.080 --> 00:16:28.440
before the truth can get its boots on, it's

443
00:16:28.440 --> 00:16:30.520
very easy to tell a convenient lie. And

444
00:16:30.520 --> 00:16:33.340
people are naturally biased as

445
00:16:33.340 --> 00:16:35.140
humans, with all the different cognitive

446
00:16:35.140 --> 00:16:37.340
biases we've got, there's a confirmation bias

447
00:16:37.340 --> 00:16:39.020
that you remember the things that fit in well

448
00:16:39.020 --> 00:16:41.260
with your lived experience and not the things

449
00:16:41.260 --> 00:16:43.580
that disagree with it. And, um, my lived

450
00:16:43.580 --> 00:16:45.220
experience is that I don't change the world

451
00:16:45.220 --> 00:16:47.060
when I go around. I'm not fundamentally

452
00:16:47.060 --> 00:16:48.700
altering the world around me, which I live

453
00:16:48.700 --> 00:16:50.780
in. So it's very easy when somebody says,

454
00:16:50.780 --> 00:16:53.620
we're not changing the world. Climate change

455
00:16:53.620 --> 00:16:55.380
can't be real, because how could you change

456
00:16:55.380 --> 00:16:57.380
the world for people to really empathize with

457
00:16:57.380 --> 00:16:59.700
that and fit in with it in just the same way

458
00:16:59.700 --> 00:17:02.020
that people who are getting vaccinated,

459
00:17:02.100 --> 00:17:04.100
they'll remember that their anti ulcer had a

460
00:17:04.100 --> 00:17:06.620
bad reaction to the vaccine, but they don't

461
00:17:06.620 --> 00:17:09.500
remember that many people who have had the

462
00:17:09.500 --> 00:17:11.220
vaccine and not had a reaction, but didn't

463
00:17:11.220 --> 00:17:12.860
die from the thing they were vaccinated

464
00:17:12.860 --> 00:17:15.100
against because they were vaccinated. So you

465
00:17:15.100 --> 00:17:17.060
get that confirmation bias that feels like it

466
00:17:17.060 --> 00:17:19.700
supports the idea that vaccines are bad

467
00:17:20.340 --> 00:17:22.380
when in fact they're not. And fundamentally,

468
00:17:22.380 --> 00:17:24.340
this is why as scientists, we use statistics

469
00:17:24.340 --> 00:17:26.880
for all these things. Lies down, blind

470
00:17:26.880 --> 00:17:29.560
statistics. We use statistics to try and

471
00:17:29.560 --> 00:17:31.760
avoid falling into the trap of our own biases

472
00:17:32.000 --> 00:17:33.600
because we think we've seen a pattern, but

473
00:17:33.600 --> 00:17:35.640
statistics will give us a hint as to whether

474
00:17:35.640 --> 00:17:36.720
it's really there or not.

475
00:17:37.600 --> 00:17:40.560
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah. Gosh, we could talk forever on this.

476
00:17:41.120 --> 00:17:43.560
It's like opening that can of worms and just

477
00:17:43.560 --> 00:17:45.600
letting it spill out and everybody has a go.

478
00:17:45.950 --> 00:17:47.720
Uh, thank you, Peter. We're going to sort of

479
00:17:47.720 --> 00:17:50.690
continue on to this type of, um, angle, uh,

480
00:17:50.720 --> 00:17:52.400
with a, uh, question from Paul.

481
00:17:53.200 --> 00:17:55.400
Speaker C: G', day, Space nuts. Paul Feen from Sunny

482
00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:58.320
Bridges, Vegas here. Quick question. If

483
00:17:58.320 --> 00:18:01.280
our Earth were to suddenly or not suddenly

484
00:18:01.280 --> 00:18:04.000
become a snowball, as

485
00:18:04.560 --> 00:18:06.640
might have happened if our, uh, scientific

486
00:18:06.640 --> 00:18:09.000
theories are correct, you know, back in our

487
00:18:09.000 --> 00:18:11.800
deep, distant past, what effect

488
00:18:11.800 --> 00:18:14.320
would that have on oxygen levels in our

489
00:18:14.320 --> 00:18:17.120
atmosphere? Would they

490
00:18:17.120 --> 00:18:19.680
stay the same? Uh, would they drop? Because

491
00:18:19.760 --> 00:18:22.080
plants don't grow really well down in

492
00:18:22.080 --> 00:18:24.940
Antarctica. I'd be curious to

493
00:18:24.940 --> 00:18:27.180
know your thoughts on this. Also

494
00:18:27.740 --> 00:18:29.700
what kind of events would actually trigger

495
00:18:29.700 --> 00:18:32.540
that in the first place? Anyway, keep doing a

496
00:18:32.540 --> 00:18:34.300
great job. Whoever happens to be at helm of

497
00:18:34.300 --> 00:18:37.300
the good ship Space Huts, uh, big shout out

498
00:18:37.300 --> 00:18:40.260
to Heidi Campo. Wow, what a great job

499
00:18:40.260 --> 00:18:43.020
he did. Thank you. And Jonti, wherever you

500
00:18:43.020 --> 00:18:45.660
are, uh, would love to hear from you again if

501
00:18:45.660 --> 00:18:48.620
Fred goes off gallivanting over to, I don't

502
00:18:48.620 --> 00:18:51.190
know, Norway or somewhere like that to see

503
00:18:51.190 --> 00:18:53.550
the northern lights. Cheers.

504
00:18:54.350 --> 00:18:56.630
Andrew Dunkley: Thank you, Paul. Well, guess what, that's

505
00:18:56.630 --> 00:18:59.590
exactly what's happened. And uh, Jonti

506
00:18:59.590 --> 00:19:01.870
is with us because of Fred's gallivanting.

507
00:19:02.590 --> 00:19:05.590
So, um, yes, you get to answer Paul's

508
00:19:05.590 --> 00:19:07.550
question about snowball Earth. Uh, the effect

509
00:19:07.550 --> 00:19:10.230
on O2 levels and what sort of, uh, events

510
00:19:10.230 --> 00:19:11.150
would trigger it.

511
00:19:11.470 --> 00:19:13.230
Jonti Horner: That's great. And there's a lot to this and

512
00:19:13.230 --> 00:19:14.630
it's good to hear from a local. So, yeah,

513
00:19:14.630 --> 00:19:16.030
thank you. And hi from.

514
00:19:16.910 --> 00:19:17.910
Andrew Dunkley: You're just up the road.

515
00:19:17.910 --> 00:19:19.310
Jonti Horner: I'm just up the road. Only a couple of

516
00:19:19.310 --> 00:19:21.530
hundred Ks inland. So, yeah, good hear from a

517
00:19:21.530 --> 00:19:24.290
local. This is. This sent me down some

518
00:19:24.290 --> 00:19:25.930
rabbit holes actually. I was digging into

519
00:19:25.930 --> 00:19:27.610
this and it's fascinating. So I've never

520
00:19:27.610 --> 00:19:30.170
actually had that thought of how snowball

521
00:19:30.170 --> 00:19:32.250
Earth episodes could link to oxygen before.

522
00:19:32.490 --> 00:19:34.170
And it's a really, really, really good

523
00:19:34.170 --> 00:19:36.210
question. So almost answer these kind of

524
00:19:36.210 --> 00:19:38.010
things in a bit of reverse order.

525
00:19:39.050 --> 00:19:41.090
The idea is, for those who aren't familiar

526
00:19:41.090 --> 00:19:43.130
with it, that at a couple of occasions in the

527
00:19:43.130 --> 00:19:44.970
past, one a bit more than 2 billion years

528
00:19:44.970 --> 00:19:47.850
ago, 1, 600, 500 million years ago,

529
00:19:48.540 --> 00:19:50.860
the Earth's climate went across a tipping

530
00:19:50.860 --> 00:19:53.620
point and like the ice age began, but the

531
00:19:53.620 --> 00:19:55.820
glaciers just kept advancing and you ended up

532
00:19:55.820 --> 00:19:58.700
with pretty much the entire planet clad in

533
00:19:58.700 --> 00:20:01.620
ice. And conditions at the equator at

534
00:20:01.620 --> 00:20:03.140
that point could even have been colder than

535
00:20:03.140 --> 00:20:05.900
we see in Antarctica right now. So really

536
00:20:05.900 --> 00:20:08.340
kind of dramatic conditions. And that lasted

537
00:20:08.340 --> 00:20:10.660
for a few million, even tens of millions of

538
00:20:10.660 --> 00:20:13.580
years before that condition got broken.

539
00:20:14.180 --> 00:20:16.300
And it makes perfect sense now. The climate

540
00:20:16.300 --> 00:20:18.980
of the, uh, Earth is relatively stable at the

541
00:20:18.980 --> 00:20:20.780
minute. We've just talked about our impact on

542
00:20:20.780 --> 00:20:23.740
it. But, um, on geological timescales, our

543
00:20:23.740 --> 00:20:26.420
climate tends to sit around a fairly stable

544
00:20:26.420 --> 00:20:29.060
point. But what the snowball Earth idea

545
00:20:29.300 --> 00:20:32.140
is reminding us of is that you have a

546
00:20:32.140 --> 00:20:34.540
few possible stable scenarios for the Earth's

547
00:20:34.540 --> 00:20:37.500
climate, of which we are one, we're one,

548
00:20:37.500 --> 00:20:39.570
which is essentially the warm version. But

549
00:20:39.570 --> 00:20:41.370
equally, if you turn the Earth into a

550
00:20:41.370 --> 00:20:44.010
snowball, it will remain a snowball for a

551
00:20:44.010 --> 00:20:46.370
very long time. And uh, the reason for that

552
00:20:46.370 --> 00:20:47.970
is that, uh, if you make the Earth a

553
00:20:47.970 --> 00:20:49.890
snowball, it becomes incredibly More

554
00:20:49.890 --> 00:20:52.730
reflective. And so therefore it absorbs

555
00:20:52.730 --> 00:20:54.890
less energy and so it stays cold. You get

556
00:20:54.890 --> 00:20:56.650
this kind of feedback that keeps the Earth

557
00:20:56.650 --> 00:20:59.490
cold. And the idea is when you flip from one

558
00:20:59.490 --> 00:21:01.250
state to another, you can be locked in that

559
00:21:01.250 --> 00:21:02.770
new state for a very long time until

560
00:21:02.770 --> 00:21:05.530
something changes. Now what could cause

561
00:21:05.530 --> 00:21:08.150
that? One thing that could cause that is

562
00:21:09.110 --> 00:21:11.870
life on our planet. Removing carbon dioxide

563
00:21:11.870 --> 00:21:13.510
from the atmosphere and weathering on the

564
00:21:13.510 --> 00:21:15.350
continents. Removing carbon dioxide from the

565
00:21:15.350 --> 00:21:18.310
atmosphere at, ah, a rate that cools a planet

566
00:21:18.310 --> 00:21:20.230
quicker than the sun getting brighter, warms

567
00:21:20.230 --> 00:21:22.950
a planet. So the sun, when the Earth was very

568
00:21:22.950 --> 00:21:25.630
young, was probably about 30% dimmer. And the

569
00:21:25.630 --> 00:21:28.230
sun is thought to brighten by about 6 or

570
00:21:28.230 --> 00:21:31.070
7% every billion years. So it's 30%

571
00:21:31.070 --> 00:21:32.630
brighter now than it was when the Earth

572
00:21:32.630 --> 00:21:35.100
formed. So the question is, if the sun was so

573
00:21:35.100 --> 00:21:36.820
dim when the Earth was young, how were we

574
00:21:36.820 --> 00:21:38.860
warm enough to have liquid water? And the

575
00:21:38.860 --> 00:21:41.820
answer is, at that point we had a hugely rich

576
00:21:41.820 --> 00:21:43.940
atmosphere of greenhouse gases, things like

577
00:21:43.940 --> 00:21:46.780
carbon dioxide and methane and no oxygen. And

578
00:21:46.780 --> 00:21:48.660
so the atmosphere was very, very rich in

579
00:21:48.660 --> 00:21:50.860
things that would create a really thick doona

580
00:21:51.020 --> 00:21:53.260
and we were very, very pleasantly warm.

581
00:21:54.060 --> 00:21:56.740
Over time, the sun has got brighter, but

582
00:21:56.740 --> 00:21:58.900
life and weathering have removed the

583
00:21:58.900 --> 00:22:01.380
greenhouse gases from the atmosphere and

584
00:22:01.380 --> 00:22:03.540
averaged over the entire age of the Earth,

585
00:22:03.540 --> 00:22:05.540
those two things have roughly balanced out.

586
00:22:06.020 --> 00:22:08.220
And so we still have a temperate climate. Now

587
00:22:08.220 --> 00:22:09.940
if we had the atmosphere the Earth had when

588
00:22:09.940 --> 00:22:12.060
it was young, the Earth would be like Venus

589
00:22:12.060 --> 00:22:13.380
now. The oceans would have boiled and we

590
00:22:13.380 --> 00:22:15.460
wouldn't be having this conversation. Yeah,

591
00:22:16.020 --> 00:22:18.460
but the climate has kind of fortunately

592
00:22:18.460 --> 00:22:21.340
stayed for most of its time in the kind

593
00:22:21.340 --> 00:22:24.220
of warm, stable version. But there have

594
00:22:24.220 --> 00:22:26.340
been these two big occasions that have had

595
00:22:26.340 --> 00:22:29.220
the snowball Earth scenario. Now

596
00:22:29.300 --> 00:22:31.180
there's some debate over, uh, exactly what

597
00:22:31.180 --> 00:22:32.660
triggered that. And it's likely there were a

598
00:22:32.660 --> 00:22:35.260
few things. There was life and increased

599
00:22:35.260 --> 00:22:37.060
weathering, pulling carbon dioxide out of the

600
00:22:37.060 --> 00:22:38.780
atmosphere. So you weaken the greenhouse

601
00:22:38.780 --> 00:22:41.780
effect and cool the planet down. That is

602
00:22:41.780 --> 00:22:44.339
most likely. You also have a scenario,

603
00:22:44.339 --> 00:22:46.660
incidentally, where if you make the Earth

604
00:22:46.660 --> 00:22:49.500
more reflective around the equator, you lower

605
00:22:49.500 --> 00:22:51.020
the amount of heat that's absorbed by the

606
00:22:51.020 --> 00:22:52.540
Earth, increase the amount reflected and you

607
00:22:52.540 --> 00:22:54.720
cool the Earth as well. So what are the

608
00:22:54.720 --> 00:22:56.800
scenarios that's proposed to explain how we

609
00:22:56.800 --> 00:22:59.560
got into the snowball Earth periods? At first

610
00:22:59.880 --> 00:23:01.840
was that you got a period where you got one

611
00:23:01.840 --> 00:23:03.360
of these supercontinents where all the

612
00:23:03.360 --> 00:23:04.920
continental material on the Earth kind of

613
00:23:04.920 --> 00:23:07.360
smushed together, like we had with Pangea,

614
00:23:07.360 --> 00:23:09.120
like was proposed with Pangaea. Previous

615
00:23:09.120 --> 00:23:11.840
episode of that. We have most of the Earth's

616
00:23:11.840 --> 00:23:14.280
continents around the Earth's, uh, equator,

617
00:23:15.480 --> 00:23:17.600
continental material, rock and, um,

618
00:23:17.800 --> 00:23:19.600
vegetation and everything else is more

619
00:23:19.600 --> 00:23:21.950
reflective than water. And in fact, most of

620
00:23:21.950 --> 00:23:24.250
the energy coming into the Earth these, ah,

621
00:23:24.470 --> 00:23:26.350
days is absorbed by the water. The water is

622
00:23:26.350 --> 00:23:27.990
the main thing that locks in the heat and

623
00:23:27.990 --> 00:23:30.390
keeps us warm. And that, of course, is why

624
00:23:30.470 --> 00:23:32.150
Brisbane gets so warm and humid in the

625
00:23:32.150 --> 00:23:34.510
summers. It's why Western Europe is so

626
00:23:34.510 --> 00:23:36.950
pleasant in the winters compared to the

627
00:23:36.950 --> 00:23:39.150
middle of Canada. The water carries a lot of

628
00:23:39.150 --> 00:23:41.590
heat, holds onto it for a long, long time. So

629
00:23:41.590 --> 00:23:43.830
you have this speculative scenario where

630
00:23:44.710 --> 00:23:46.510
all the continents end up smushed up and near

631
00:23:46.510 --> 00:23:48.430
the Earth's equator. So the Earth's albedo

632
00:23:48.430 --> 00:23:50.800
gets more reflective, a higher

633
00:23:50.800 --> 00:23:53.040
albedo, so the Earth would naturally cool

634
00:23:53.040 --> 00:23:54.440
because it's absorbing less heat and

635
00:23:54.440 --> 00:23:57.000
reflecting more. Added to which, if you put

636
00:23:57.000 --> 00:23:58.880
the continents nearer the equator, you're in

637
00:23:58.880 --> 00:24:00.800
a location which gets much higher rainfall

638
00:24:00.800 --> 00:24:03.080
and much higher weather levels because the

639
00:24:03.080 --> 00:24:05.040
water at that latitude is hotter, so

640
00:24:05.040 --> 00:24:06.960
evaporates more. The atmosphere can hold more

641
00:24:06.960 --> 00:24:09.280
water, so you get more weathering, which

642
00:24:09.280 --> 00:24:11.200
drives more chemistry, which also acts to

643
00:24:11.200 --> 00:24:12.560
pull more carbon dioxide out of the

644
00:24:12.560 --> 00:24:14.880
atmosphere. And, um, that exacerbates this

645
00:24:14.880 --> 00:24:17.170
and we, you know, removes the greenhouse

646
00:24:17.170 --> 00:24:19.410
effect as well. So you've got more energy

647
00:24:19.410 --> 00:24:21.210
being reflected and less absorbed. So the

648
00:24:21.210 --> 00:24:23.530
Earth cools more carbon dioxide pulled out of

649
00:24:23.530 --> 00:24:25.170
the atmosphere, so the greenhouse effect

650
00:24:25.170 --> 00:24:28.170
weakens, so the Earth cools. That then

651
00:24:28.170 --> 00:24:30.290
causes the Earth to start entering ice ages

652
00:24:30.290 --> 00:24:32.690
where the water near the poles freezes and

653
00:24:32.690 --> 00:24:35.450
the ice expands towards the equator. That

654
00:24:35.450 --> 00:24:37.730
ice is more reflective than the water that it

655
00:24:37.730 --> 00:24:40.330
sits on is. So less energy is absorbed and

656
00:24:40.330 --> 00:24:42.130
more is reflected. And so the Earth cools.

657
00:24:42.130 --> 00:24:44.430
And so you get this feedback effect where the

658
00:24:44.430 --> 00:24:46.070
ice gradually reaches down towards the

659
00:24:46.070 --> 00:24:48.150
equator. And once you're in that scenario,

660
00:24:48.630 --> 00:24:50.670
you're in a position where even if you put

661
00:24:50.670 --> 00:24:52.030
all the carbon dioxide back in the

662
00:24:52.030 --> 00:24:54.550
atmosphere, the Earth is so reflective that

663
00:24:54.550 --> 00:24:57.390
it will stay cold. You're locked into this

664
00:24:57.390 --> 00:25:00.350
other stable state. However, longer

665
00:25:00.350 --> 00:25:02.030
term, what happens is that, uh, you've got

666
00:25:02.030 --> 00:25:04.230
the ice sheet now sat over all of the rocks.

667
00:25:04.710 --> 00:25:06.590
So you prevent the weathering that was

668
00:25:06.590 --> 00:25:08.550
removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.

669
00:25:08.550 --> 00:25:11.280
You turn that off, you've still got things

670
00:25:11.280 --> 00:25:12.560
putting carbon dioxide back in the

671
00:25:12.560 --> 00:25:12.960
atmosphere.

672
00:25:12.960 --> 00:25:14.800
You've still got volcanoes erupting and all

673
00:25:14.800 --> 00:25:17.440
the sources of gases that were putting it

674
00:25:17.440 --> 00:25:18.800
back into the atmosphere and eventually

675
00:25:18.800 --> 00:25:20.800
return the weather, material, weather gases

676
00:25:20.800 --> 00:25:22.600
into the atmosphere. So you're in the

677
00:25:22.600 --> 00:25:24.400
snowball, uh, Earth setup. But gradually over

678
00:25:24.400 --> 00:25:26.760
time, then your greenhouse gas levels rise

679
00:25:26.760 --> 00:25:29.280
and rise and rise until eventually you start

680
00:25:29.280 --> 00:25:31.680
to melt the ice and you get this other

681
00:25:31.680 --> 00:25:34.360
tipping point where suddenly you're warm

682
00:25:34.360 --> 00:25:37.000
enough for the ice to melt and retreat, which

683
00:25:37.000 --> 00:25:39.680
means you expose more water, more water is

684
00:25:39.680 --> 00:25:42.080
exposed, which means more area to absorb the

685
00:25:42.080 --> 00:25:43.480
heat, which means the Earth will warm up

686
00:25:43.480 --> 00:25:45.600
more, which means more ice melts, and you go

687
00:25:45.600 --> 00:25:48.080
back to being this kind of warmer, uh, Earth.

688
00:25:49.200 --> 00:25:51.400
That brings with it, though, a time when

689
00:25:51.400 --> 00:25:53.280
you've had the continents crunched up under

690
00:25:53.280 --> 00:25:56.040
ice sheets, broken up into kind of gravelly

691
00:25:56.040 --> 00:25:58.120
small bits of debris. And then when you start

692
00:25:58.120 --> 00:26:00.480
raining on that again, you get a huge amount

693
00:26:00.480 --> 00:26:02.890
of weathering water washing out

694
00:26:03.210 --> 00:26:04.970
minerals and putting it into the ocean.

695
00:26:06.010 --> 00:26:07.930
And that means that suddenly all that life

696
00:26:07.930 --> 00:26:09.770
that has been starved through the snowball

697
00:26:09.770 --> 00:26:12.330
Earth epoch is suddenly going, hey, look, the

698
00:26:12.330 --> 00:26:13.810
Earth's nice and warm. It's a nice place to

699
00:26:13.810 --> 00:26:16.330
live again. Brilliant. And, oh, look, there's

700
00:26:16.330 --> 00:26:18.770
suddenly all this food in the oceans. And so

701
00:26:18.770 --> 00:26:20.970
the papers that I came across when I was

702
00:26:20.970 --> 00:26:22.930
looking into this as a result of Paul's

703
00:26:22.930 --> 00:26:25.890
question, it seems that after both of the big

704
00:26:25.890 --> 00:26:27.890
snowball Earth eras, there was a massive

705
00:26:27.890 --> 00:26:30.340
oxygenation event on Earth. So after the

706
00:26:30.340 --> 00:26:32.020
first one, you went from effectively no

707
00:26:32.020 --> 00:26:34.340
oxygen in Earth's atmosphere to Earth's

708
00:26:34.340 --> 00:26:35.700
atmosphere being about 2%

709
00:26:36.660 --> 00:26:38.860
oxygen, which is a big jump from nothing to

710
00:26:38.860 --> 00:26:40.660
2%. And, um, then

711
00:26:41.380 --> 00:26:43.860
6,500 million years ago,

712
00:26:44.180 --> 00:26:46.500
you had the end of the most recent snowball

713
00:26:46.500 --> 00:26:47.940
Earth thing, and you got another mass

714
00:26:47.940 --> 00:26:50.900
oxygenation event. Why suddenly you've

715
00:26:50.900 --> 00:26:52.460
got all this nutrient and all this stuff

716
00:26:52.460 --> 00:26:55.020
washing off into the oceans, prime conditions

717
00:26:55.020 --> 00:26:57.480
for things to grow and a huge amount of

718
00:26:57.480 --> 00:27:00.000
oxygen released. And, um, that is thought to

719
00:27:00.000 --> 00:27:01.640
have been what drove oxygen up to something

720
00:27:01.640 --> 00:27:04.280
comparable to its current levels relatively

721
00:27:04.280 --> 00:27:07.160
quickly. And that then led to there

722
00:27:07.160 --> 00:27:09.040
being sufficient free evidence for what's

723
00:27:09.040 --> 00:27:10.520
called, I think, the Cambrian explosion,

724
00:27:10.520 --> 00:27:13.200
where suddenly you've got an Earth that has

725
00:27:13.200 --> 00:27:16.080
all these different niches suddenly freed up

726
00:27:16.400 --> 00:27:18.400
and the source of ready oxygen, and

727
00:27:18.400 --> 00:27:20.920
everything goes crazy evolving to fill the

728
00:27:20.920 --> 00:27:23.700
available opportunities. And

729
00:27:23.700 --> 00:27:26.060
so all of that kind of gives you an idea how

730
00:27:26.060 --> 00:27:27.700
we think snowball Earth episodes could

731
00:27:27.700 --> 00:27:30.220
happen. And, um, what would happen to oxygen

732
00:27:30.220 --> 00:27:32.540
afterwards? Which seems to be the accepted

733
00:27:32.540 --> 00:27:34.500
scientific wisdom, that after a snowball

734
00:27:34.500 --> 00:27:36.660
Earth episode, when it ends, you can get the

735
00:27:36.660 --> 00:27:38.699
oxygen suddenly getting significantly more

736
00:27:38.699 --> 00:27:41.220
oxygen rich as life takes advantage of the

737
00:27:41.220 --> 00:27:43.900
new conditions. What would happen to

738
00:27:43.900 --> 00:27:45.820
oxygen now that there's a lot of it in the

739
00:27:45.820 --> 00:27:47.980
atmosphere during the snowball Earth period,

740
00:27:47.980 --> 00:27:50.840
I couldn't find any speculation on. So

741
00:27:50.840 --> 00:27:52.520
it's a really interesting question. Now, it

742
00:27:52.520 --> 00:27:54.080
doesn't mean there's no speculation out

743
00:27:54.080 --> 00:27:55.760
there. It just means that I couldn't find any

744
00:27:55.760 --> 00:27:58.720
of his. Big difference there. But

745
00:27:58.720 --> 00:28:00.200
there's a few things that are going on that I

746
00:28:00.200 --> 00:28:02.520
think could be interesting. Firstly, there's

747
00:28:02.520 --> 00:28:04.560
a huge amount of oxygen in the atmosphere. So

748
00:28:04.560 --> 00:28:07.240
even if you stop producing it and you manage

749
00:28:07.240 --> 00:28:09.680
to keep alive the things that use it, it will

750
00:28:09.680 --> 00:28:11.480
probably go down very slowly just because

751
00:28:11.480 --> 00:28:13.520
there's uh, so much of it. And if you were

752
00:28:13.520 --> 00:28:16.210
killing off a lot of life, then

753
00:28:16.290 --> 00:28:18.450
to be honest, there's not as much using it

754
00:28:18.450 --> 00:28:21.290
anyway. Volcanoes erupting, carbon

755
00:28:21.290 --> 00:28:23.610
dioxide and particularly methane that's been

756
00:28:23.610 --> 00:28:26.170
erupted and outgassed, um, particularly

757
00:28:26.170 --> 00:28:28.890
towards the end of the ice age kind of

758
00:28:28.890 --> 00:28:31.290
period, getting lots of methane released into

759
00:28:31.290 --> 00:28:33.090
the atmosphere would remove the oxygen as the

760
00:28:33.090 --> 00:28:34.810
methane and the oxygen interact with each

761
00:28:34.810 --> 00:28:37.010
other. And if that was happening quicker than

762
00:28:37.010 --> 00:28:38.690
life was putting new oxygen into the

763
00:28:38.690 --> 00:28:40.890
atmosphere, then you can imagine that leading

764
00:28:40.890 --> 00:28:42.890
to a bit of a dip in the amount of oxygen in

765
00:28:42.890 --> 00:28:45.650
the atmosphere at the time. But my

766
00:28:45.650 --> 00:28:47.730
guess would be that probably during the

767
00:28:47.730 --> 00:28:50.490
snowball Earth period, the oxygen levels

768
00:28:50.490 --> 00:28:52.170
wouldn't change all that much. You might be

769
00:28:52.170 --> 00:28:54.050
producing less oxygen, but you'd also be

770
00:28:54.050 --> 00:28:56.490
using less. So that will balance out. But

771
00:28:56.490 --> 00:28:59.090
what you would get over time is, particularly

772
00:28:59.090 --> 00:29:01.610
if you killed off a lot of life, you get this

773
00:29:01.610 --> 00:29:04.210
slow, steady increase in

774
00:29:04.210 --> 00:29:06.450
greenhouse gas levels because you're still

775
00:29:06.450 --> 00:29:07.930
pumping out the same amount in terms of

776
00:29:07.930 --> 00:29:10.170
volcanism, but you've removed the weathering

777
00:29:10.170 --> 00:29:12.810
that's taking it away again. And so that

778
00:29:12.810 --> 00:29:15.370
would lead to the greenhouse gas level rising

779
00:29:15.370 --> 00:29:17.970
slowly over time until it got to the point

780
00:29:17.970 --> 00:29:19.570
where it turned it back over the tipping

781
00:29:19.570 --> 00:29:21.730
point and allowed the Earth to warm up again.

782
00:29:21.730 --> 00:29:23.490
And that will probably then be a very bad

783
00:29:23.490 --> 00:29:25.010
thing because the sun is now much more

784
00:29:25.010 --> 00:29:26.810
luminous than it ever has been in the past.

785
00:29:27.450 --> 00:29:29.690
If you get a runaway greenhouse effect now,

786
00:29:30.170 --> 00:29:32.410
that's a lot more problematic than it was 500

787
00:29:32.410 --> 00:29:34.210
million years ago. And maybe that could lead

788
00:29:34.210 --> 00:29:37.210
to conditions where you don't hit our current

789
00:29:37.680 --> 00:29:39.800
stable level, but you go past that and you

790
00:29:39.800 --> 00:29:42.600
end up hurrying the end of the Earth, uh, as

791
00:29:42.600 --> 00:29:43.840
a habitable world, effectively.

792
00:29:44.080 --> 00:29:45.600
Andrew Dunkley: Oh, fun. Yeah.

793
00:29:45.680 --> 00:29:46.640
Jonti Horner: Careful path.

794
00:29:47.760 --> 00:29:48.720
Andrew Dunkley: I, uh, just did a.

795
00:29:50.880 --> 00:29:53.170
I'll get some negative press for this, but,

796
00:29:53.170 --> 00:29:55.520
uh, I just did a, um, put uh, a question into

797
00:29:55.520 --> 00:29:58.240
chat. GPT Would, uh, current

798
00:29:58.240 --> 00:30:00.400
oxygen levels on Earth reduce if Earth were

799
00:30:00.400 --> 00:30:02.560
to freeze over? And uh, it's come up with a

800
00:30:02.560 --> 00:30:05.010
few scenarios, but basically says most, he

801
00:30:05.010 --> 00:30:07.770
he. It says most oxygen on Earth comes from

802
00:30:07.770 --> 00:30:10.450
photosynthetic organisms, uh, mainly

803
00:30:10.450 --> 00:30:12.570
marine plankton and land plants. If Earth

804
00:30:12.570 --> 00:30:15.570
froze over ocean, uh, uh, surfaces would

805
00:30:15.570 --> 00:30:17.330
be sealed under thick ice, preventing

806
00:30:17.330 --> 00:30:19.370
sunlight from reaching most marine

807
00:30:19.370 --> 00:30:22.170
photosynthesizers. Land plants would die or

808
00:30:22.170 --> 00:30:24.250
go dormant due to cold or lack of liquid

809
00:30:24.250 --> 00:30:27.170
water. So oxygen production would drop

810
00:30:27.170 --> 00:30:27.850
dramatically.

811
00:30:28.490 --> 00:30:30.690
Jonti Horner: And that makes sense, but I'd argue that

812
00:30:30.690 --> 00:30:32.610
oxygen use will drop dramatically as well

813
00:30:32.610 --> 00:30:33.930
because you kill the things that are using

814
00:30:33.930 --> 00:30:36.250
the oxygen. Yes. The other thing that I've

815
00:30:36.250 --> 00:30:37.870
stumb across in my reading actually, and that

816
00:30:37.870 --> 00:30:40.510
just reminded me of was one of the things

817
00:30:40.510 --> 00:30:42.630
that tied into this idea of the snowball

818
00:30:42.630 --> 00:30:44.590
earth stuff was how on earth did life make it

819
00:30:44.590 --> 00:30:46.710
through. And um, one of the things that

820
00:30:46.710 --> 00:30:48.470
people's modeling found was that even though

821
00:30:48.470 --> 00:30:50.030
you'd get ice all the way down to the

822
00:30:50.030 --> 00:30:52.870
equator, the processes that happen

823
00:30:52.950 --> 00:30:54.910
at uh, the equator will probably prevent that

824
00:30:54.910 --> 00:30:56.950
ice being more than about 10 meters thick.

825
00:30:57.110 --> 00:30:58.790
And uh, studies have shown that enough light

826
00:30:58.790 --> 00:31:00.910
can make it through ice for photosynthesis to

827
00:31:00.910 --> 00:31:03.830
continue unless the ice is 20 meters thick

828
00:31:03.830 --> 00:31:06.260
or more. And so there'd likely be a band

829
00:31:06.260 --> 00:31:08.140
where you could continue photosynthesis under

830
00:31:08.140 --> 00:31:09.820
the ice because the ice is not thick enough

831
00:31:09.820 --> 00:31:12.060
to block all the sunlight. That seemed to be

832
00:31:12.060 --> 00:31:14.140
the argument. There was some discussions of

833
00:31:14.380 --> 00:31:16.340
where the pockets of life holding on through

834
00:31:16.340 --> 00:31:19.020
the hellish times would be and that was quite

835
00:31:19.020 --> 00:31:20.300
interesting. But like I said, I'm not a

836
00:31:20.300 --> 00:31:22.900
biologist, so uh, that is straining my

837
00:31:22.900 --> 00:31:24.740
expertise to look at exactly how life would

838
00:31:24.740 --> 00:31:25.900
adapt to those conditions.

839
00:31:26.620 --> 00:31:28.580
Andrew Dunkley: Indeed. All right, Paul, thanks for the

840
00:31:28.580 --> 00:31:30.980
question. Great one. And uh, there might be

841
00:31:30.980 --> 00:31:33.530
more to talk about that, uh, in regard to

842
00:31:33.530 --> 00:31:35.970
that down the track. This is Space Nuts with

843
00:31:35.970 --> 00:31:38.570
Andrew Dunkley and Jonti Horner.

844
00:31:41.450 --> 00:31:43.690
Speaker C: Three, two, one.

845
00:31:44.330 --> 00:31:45.530
Jonti Horner: Space Nuts.

846
00:31:45.770 --> 00:31:47.730
Andrew Dunkley: Now Jonti, uh, a couple of questions have

847
00:31:47.730 --> 00:31:50.090
come in about uh, objects or

848
00:31:50.330 --> 00:31:52.890
events that have happened in space.

849
00:31:53.340 --> 00:31:55.840
Uh, Casey has messaged, um,

850
00:31:56.290 --> 00:31:58.650
us. Hello again, this is Casey from Colorado.

851
00:31:58.650 --> 00:32:01.210
I recently read a little bit about the record

852
00:32:01.210 --> 00:32:03.705
breaking KM M32302

853
00:32:04.004 --> 00:32:06.790
213A. Please correct me

854
00:32:06.790 --> 00:32:09.670
if I'm wrong, but detecting a 220

855
00:32:10.150 --> 00:32:12.870
PETA electron volt neutrino

856
00:32:12.950 --> 00:32:15.270
is pretty crazy considering that

857
00:32:15.510 --> 00:32:18.030
that's like 30 times more energetic than the

858
00:32:18.030 --> 00:32:20.310
previous record holder. Uh, what could

859
00:32:20.310 --> 00:32:22.990
possibly be its source? Love the podcast and

860
00:32:22.990 --> 00:32:25.950
hope you're both well. Thanks from Casey in

861
00:32:25.950 --> 00:32:27.470
Colorado and she hopes you're well too,

862
00:32:27.470 --> 00:32:27.990
Jonti.

863
00:32:29.430 --> 00:32:29.910
Speaker C: Yes.

864
00:32:29.910 --> 00:32:31.630
Andrew Dunkley: Then again she might be talking about Fred

865
00:32:31.630 --> 00:32:32.710
and Heidi. I don't know.

866
00:32:36.090 --> 00:32:37.970
Jonti Horner: So this is a really interesting one. I must

867
00:32:37.970 --> 00:32:40.250
say that I hadn't seen this announcement and

868
00:32:40.490 --> 00:32:42.530
so this was a really interesting thing to

869
00:32:42.530 --> 00:32:44.970
read about. Um, this is a neutrino that

870
00:32:45.130 --> 00:32:47.690
according to the name was seen in 2023,

871
00:32:47.930 --> 00:32:50.610
on February 13th. And, um, it was

872
00:32:50.610 --> 00:32:53.450
detected by this huge array of

873
00:32:53.450 --> 00:32:55.330
detectors on the bottom of the Mediterranean

874
00:32:55.330 --> 00:32:58.050
Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, about 3 and a half

875
00:32:58.050 --> 00:33:00.530
kilometers below sea level, in the pitch

876
00:33:00.530 --> 00:33:02.730
black of the deep ocean, where they have all

877
00:33:02.730 --> 00:33:05.370
these detectors that have the job of

878
00:33:05.370 --> 00:33:07.570
detecting incredibly faint flashes of light

879
00:33:08.050 --> 00:33:10.930
that occur when cosmic rays or neutrinos

880
00:33:11.410 --> 00:33:14.410
collide with an atom in the ocean and cause

881
00:33:14.410 --> 00:33:16.970
a cascade of light as this whole collision

882
00:33:16.970 --> 00:33:19.530
chain of, uh, particles being formed and

883
00:33:19.530 --> 00:33:21.530
energy being released as the energy from

884
00:33:21.530 --> 00:33:24.170
those things is dumped into the ocean. And

885
00:33:24.170 --> 00:33:26.370
this occurred before they'd finished building

886
00:33:26.370 --> 00:33:28.170
and testing this array. So it was during the

887
00:33:28.170 --> 00:33:30.220
testing phase, and it is

888
00:33:30.860 --> 00:33:32.980
reliably says on all of these websites, by

889
00:33:32.980 --> 00:33:35.420
far the most energetic neutrino ever

890
00:33:35.420 --> 00:33:38.300
detected. And it is so energetic

891
00:33:38.780 --> 00:33:41.260
that there is no source within our galaxy

892
00:33:41.660 --> 00:33:44.380
that could generate a neutrino that energetic

893
00:33:44.380 --> 00:33:46.940
that we know of. And if it had been generated

894
00:33:46.940 --> 00:33:48.860
by something nearby, we'd have seen other

895
00:33:48.860 --> 00:33:50.740
things happening. You might have seen a very

896
00:33:50.740 --> 00:33:53.620
powerful gamma ray burst or something like

897
00:33:53.620 --> 00:33:56.590
that. And, uh, no counterpart was detected.

898
00:33:56.590 --> 00:33:58.470
There was nothing that happened at this time

899
00:33:59.190 --> 00:34:01.510
that synced up with when this happened. Now

900
00:34:01.590 --> 00:34:03.150
should be said that when I search for this,

901
00:34:03.150 --> 00:34:04.990
there's a nice little article describing it

902
00:34:04.990 --> 00:34:07.750
by the Astrobytes website, which is

903
00:34:07.750 --> 00:34:10.590
a website run by graduate students in

904
00:34:10.590 --> 00:34:13.510
astrophysics in the US that tries to be a

905
00:34:13.510 --> 00:34:16.270
literature review journal club for

906
00:34:16.270 --> 00:34:18.590
other graduate students and, um, to give

907
00:34:18.590 --> 00:34:20.550
students an opportunity to practice science

908
00:34:20.550 --> 00:34:22.070
writing about things out of their field. And

909
00:34:22.070 --> 00:34:23.850
there's a bit of a description of it. There's

910
00:34:24.250 --> 00:34:25.800
um, and that's a nice little website if

911
00:34:25.800 --> 00:34:27.520
you're interested in getting a little

912
00:34:27.520 --> 00:34:29.680
snapshot summary of research papers to try

913
00:34:29.680 --> 00:34:32.400
and do one a day. But I also stumbled

914
00:34:32.400 --> 00:34:34.960
across the official page for this event,

915
00:34:35.440 --> 00:34:37.520
which is published by the network

916
00:34:38.320 --> 00:34:40.720
that are running these detectors. And that's

917
00:34:40.720 --> 00:34:42.720
got a lovely little YouTube Music video right

918
00:34:42.720 --> 00:34:44.200
at the top that you can watch. It's about two

919
00:34:44.200 --> 00:34:46.320
and a half minutes long that describes this

920
00:34:46.320 --> 00:34:48.400
thing, how it's detected, and some of the

921
00:34:48.400 --> 00:34:50.480
possible suggestions for its formation. Now,

922
00:34:51.820 --> 00:34:54.780
going beyond that to what could have created

923
00:34:54.780 --> 00:34:57.700
it is really pushing beyond the bounds of my

924
00:34:57.700 --> 00:34:59.900
knowledge and expertise. So I'm afraid,

925
00:35:00.060 --> 00:35:01.700
Casey, you're going to have to accept a

926
00:35:01.700 --> 00:35:04.260
journeyman's explanation based on what I was

927
00:35:04.260 --> 00:35:07.180
able to read around about this, which digs

928
00:35:07.180 --> 00:35:08.820
into things that I honestly don't fully

929
00:35:08.820 --> 00:35:11.340
understand. But the argument is, because of

930
00:35:11.340 --> 00:35:13.540
the incredibly high energy of this thing, it

931
00:35:13.540 --> 00:35:15.940
couldn't have been generated locally. And

932
00:35:15.940 --> 00:35:18.550
that points to an origin in the very distant

933
00:35:18.550 --> 00:35:20.630
and therefore very early universe.

934
00:35:21.350 --> 00:35:24.270
Now, there's some theories that fall

935
00:35:24.270 --> 00:35:25.830
under the branch of what I think is called

936
00:35:25.830 --> 00:35:28.550
quantum field theory that talk

937
00:35:28.630 --> 00:35:31.430
about there being photon

938
00:35:31.430 --> 00:35:34.430
fields permeating space. And

939
00:35:34.430 --> 00:35:35.710
I don't fully understand what that is and

940
00:35:35.710 --> 00:35:38.710
what that means, in all honesty. But

941
00:35:38.710 --> 00:35:41.030
the idea seems to be here that you've got

942
00:35:41.030 --> 00:35:42.790
radiation from the cosmic microwave

943
00:35:42.790 --> 00:35:44.430
background, or from very early in the

944
00:35:44.430 --> 00:35:47.400
universe that includes incredibly high energy

945
00:35:47.720 --> 00:35:49.480
radiation at, uh, that time,

946
00:35:50.920 --> 00:35:52.720
because that's a heat from the big Bang. Now,

947
00:35:52.720 --> 00:35:54.680
nowadays we see that as a cosmic microwave

948
00:35:54.680 --> 00:35:56.760
background. It's very low energy levels

949
00:35:56.760 --> 00:35:59.200
because it's been redshifted. But at the

950
00:35:59.200 --> 00:36:01.039
time, the energy levels were incredibly,

951
00:36:01.039 --> 00:36:02.920
incredibly high. And that means that these

952
00:36:03.400 --> 00:36:05.930
photon fields, if you follow the, um,

953
00:36:05.960 --> 00:36:08.640
quantum field theory ideas, were incredibly

954
00:36:08.640 --> 00:36:11.320
intense. Now, one of the ways that you can

955
00:36:11.320 --> 00:36:13.960
produce neutrinos that is predicted by this

956
00:36:14.720 --> 00:36:16.400
predicts what are called cosmogenic

957
00:36:16.400 --> 00:36:19.160
neutrinos. Now, it should be said that

958
00:36:19.160 --> 00:36:21.040
none of these have ever been detected until

959
00:36:21.120 --> 00:36:23.600
potentially this one. But it's one of the

960
00:36:23.600 --> 00:36:26.000
predictions that quantum field theory makes

961
00:36:26.400 --> 00:36:28.320
is that you should see these cosmogenic

962
00:36:28.320 --> 00:36:31.120
neutrinos that are generated by

963
00:36:31.120 --> 00:36:33.640
cosmic radiation rather than a specific event

964
00:36:33.640 --> 00:36:35.920
like a gamma ray burst or a supernova or

965
00:36:35.920 --> 00:36:38.440
something like that. And the idea is that in

966
00:36:38.440 --> 00:36:39.920
the very early universe, you've got these

967
00:36:39.920 --> 00:36:42.680
incredibly high amounts of energy. And that

968
00:36:42.680 --> 00:36:45.240
means that these photon fields, I think

969
00:36:45.240 --> 00:36:47.600
they're called, can interact with

970
00:36:47.840 --> 00:36:50.360
particles of matter. And, um, when you get

971
00:36:50.360 --> 00:36:52.720
this interaction, that can lead to the

972
00:36:52.720 --> 00:36:54.400
production of an incredibly high energy

973
00:36:54.400 --> 00:36:57.320
neutrino. Now, the very high energy

974
00:36:57.320 --> 00:37:00.230
neutrino, as we know, neutrinos, are,

975
00:37:00.230 --> 00:37:03.120
uh, about the weakest interacting things we

976
00:37:03.120 --> 00:37:06.040
know of. So once you produce a very high

977
00:37:06.040 --> 00:37:08.440
energy neutrino that can pass across the

978
00:37:08.440 --> 00:37:10.520
entire universe without interacting with

979
00:37:10.520 --> 00:37:12.620
anything, we've got millions of these things

980
00:37:12.620 --> 00:37:14.220
passing through our bodies as we speak, and

981
00:37:14.220 --> 00:37:16.300
we just don't feel them. Which incidentally,

982
00:37:16.300 --> 00:37:17.900
is why to detect them, you want to be at the

983
00:37:17.900 --> 00:37:19.980
bottom of the ocean or in a huge volume of

984
00:37:19.980 --> 00:37:22.300
water so that you maximize the number of

985
00:37:22.300 --> 00:37:24.540
atoms available for one of these to by chance

986
00:37:24.540 --> 00:37:26.300
collide with and give you the light show.

987
00:37:26.940 --> 00:37:28.740
Because you need a huge volume of water to

988
00:37:28.740 --> 00:37:30.660
get even one neutrino to hit something and

989
00:37:30.660 --> 00:37:32.020
give you a show, because they're that weakly

990
00:37:32.020 --> 00:37:32.620
interacting.

991
00:37:32.700 --> 00:37:33.180
Andrew Dunkley: Yeah.

992
00:37:33.260 --> 00:37:35.500
Jonti Horner: Once you produce these cosmogenic neutrinos,

993
00:37:35.500 --> 00:37:37.180
they then carry on through the universe

994
00:37:37.180 --> 00:37:39.760
forevermore at ridiculously high energies.

995
00:37:40.400 --> 00:37:42.680
Now, the bit I quite honestly don't

996
00:37:42.680 --> 00:37:44.120
understand with this, and none of the things

997
00:37:44.120 --> 00:37:46.920
I've read have been able to explain to me is

998
00:37:46.920 --> 00:37:49.840
the fact that uh, if this thing was

999
00:37:49.840 --> 00:37:52.480
created with the cosmic microwave

1000
00:37:52.480 --> 00:37:55.040
background, I would have thought it should be

1001
00:37:55.360 --> 00:37:57.600
redshifted by the expansion of the universe

1002
00:37:58.000 --> 00:38:00.860
in the same way that photons are uh,

1003
00:38:00.960 --> 00:38:03.400
the light we see it. And doing a bit of

1004
00:38:03.400 --> 00:38:05.200
reading around it does seem that neutrinos

1005
00:38:05.200 --> 00:38:07.440
can be gravitationally redshifted. So if you

1006
00:38:07.440 --> 00:38:09.200
get a neutrino produced at the surface of a

1007
00:38:09.200 --> 00:38:12.140
neutron star, that is one energy, by the

1008
00:38:12.140 --> 00:38:13.900
time it escapes from the neutron star's

1009
00:38:13.900 --> 00:38:15.340
gravity, it's lost energy and it's

1010
00:38:15.340 --> 00:38:18.180
effectively redshifted. What I haven't been

1011
00:38:18.180 --> 00:38:19.500
able to find out though is whether the

1012
00:38:19.500 --> 00:38:22.420
expansion of the universe would redshift

1013
00:38:22.420 --> 00:38:25.380
neutrinos and therefore lower their energy.

1014
00:38:26.420 --> 00:38:29.140
Now if the expansion of the

1015
00:38:29.140 --> 00:38:31.100
universe doesn't lower the energies then this

1016
00:38:31.100 --> 00:38:32.980
makes perfect sense. You know, you've got

1017
00:38:32.980 --> 00:38:34.900
this incredibly high energy neutrino that's

1018
00:38:34.900 --> 00:38:36.700
tied to how high the energies were when the

1019
00:38:36.700 --> 00:38:39.140
universe was young and it's only just reached

1020
00:38:39.140 --> 00:38:42.060
us now. If they are redshifted then

1021
00:38:42.060 --> 00:38:44.300
that makes this even more head scratchingly

1022
00:38:44.300 --> 00:38:46.580
awesome because if it has been

1023
00:38:46.580 --> 00:38:48.740
redshifted and its energy dropped by an

1024
00:38:48.740 --> 00:38:51.580
incredible amount and it's still 220peta

1025
00:38:51.580 --> 00:38:54.020
electron volts, what was its energy when it

1026
00:38:54.020 --> 00:38:56.500
was formed? And I just don't fully understand

1027
00:38:56.500 --> 00:38:58.820
that. So my knowledge is limited of this.

1028
00:38:59.540 --> 00:39:01.300
I've done my best to read around it and get

1029
00:39:01.300 --> 00:39:02.940
an understanding of what they think is going

1030
00:39:02.940 --> 00:39:05.820
on. But I guess what

1031
00:39:05.820 --> 00:39:08.140
comes out of this for me a, it's just a very

1032
00:39:08.140 --> 00:39:11.060
cool detection. But if you want to push

1033
00:39:11.060 --> 00:39:12.620
the boundaries of what we know and build

1034
00:39:12.620 --> 00:39:15.300
theories of how the universe works, our

1035
00:39:15.300 --> 00:39:17.900
theories will eventually go

1036
00:39:17.900 --> 00:39:20.020
beyond our level to observe the things that

1037
00:39:20.020 --> 00:39:22.940
they predict. A good example of this I always

1038
00:39:22.940 --> 00:39:24.980
go back to because it's my own wheelhouse, is

1039
00:39:24.980 --> 00:39:27.620
Newton's theories of gravitation which he

1040
00:39:27.620 --> 00:39:30.260
published in like in Principia Mathematica in

1041
00:39:30.260 --> 00:39:33.240
1680, 1682. Around then, um, and that

1042
00:39:33.240 --> 00:39:35.240
gave us mathematical tools that allowed us to

1043
00:39:35.240 --> 00:39:37.480
work how things moved in gravitational

1044
00:39:37.480 --> 00:39:39.560
fields, allowed us to work out orbits and

1045
00:39:39.560 --> 00:39:40.960
predict things in the future. And that's been

1046
00:39:40.960 --> 00:39:43.160
incredibly powerful. By the

1047
00:39:43.160 --> 00:39:46.080
1800s observations were

1048
00:39:46.080 --> 00:39:48.440
starting to show that the orbit of Mercury

1049
00:39:48.840 --> 00:39:51.280
was behaving slightly different to how

1050
00:39:51.280 --> 00:39:53.560
Newton's gravitation will predict it would

1051
00:39:53.560 --> 00:39:56.520
work. That effectively led to the precession

1052
00:39:56.520 --> 00:39:58.600
of Mercury's orbit, the wobble of the orbit

1053
00:39:59.090 --> 00:40:00.880
wobbling at a slightly different rate. And

1054
00:40:00.880 --> 00:40:02.410
uh, nobody could explain that. It led to

1055
00:40:02.410 --> 00:40:04.050
people speculating that maybe there's an

1056
00:40:04.050 --> 00:40:06.370
unseen planet closer to the sun than Mercury.

1057
00:40:06.690 --> 00:40:09.130
Because we'd seen for the planet Uranus that

1058
00:40:09.130 --> 00:40:10.730
an unseen planet pulling it around could

1059
00:40:10.730 --> 00:40:12.890
change its orbit. And that was Neptune. But

1060
00:40:12.890 --> 00:40:14.610
that didn't work. We never found anything.

1061
00:40:14.610 --> 00:40:17.170
And it wasn't until Einstein came up with the

1062
00:40:17.170 --> 00:40:20.010
general theory of relativity that, as a

1063
00:40:20.010 --> 00:40:22.370
byproduct of that, his method for

1064
00:40:22.530 --> 00:40:25.040
understanding how gravity works accurately

1065
00:40:25.040 --> 00:40:26.920
Models the precession of Mercury's orbit With

1066
00:40:26.920 --> 00:40:29.640
incredible precision. So when Newton came up

1067
00:40:29.640 --> 00:40:32.480
with his ideas, the predictions you

1068
00:40:32.480 --> 00:40:35.080
would make with Newton's gravity Were so

1069
00:40:35.080 --> 00:40:37.760
accurate that it was only 150 years or so

1070
00:40:37.760 --> 00:40:39.760
before our observations got good enough to

1071
00:40:39.760 --> 00:40:41.760
show that Newton's theories were wrong. They

1072
00:40:41.760 --> 00:40:44.200
disproved those theories, but we still use

1073
00:40:44.200 --> 00:40:46.560
them because they are so accurate. They're

1074
00:40:46.560 --> 00:40:48.640
slightly off, but they're so accurate and

1075
00:40:48.640 --> 00:40:50.720
easy to use that they're easier for me to use

1076
00:40:50.720 --> 00:40:53.690
in my modeling than general relativity, when

1077
00:40:53.690 --> 00:40:55.730
the uncertainties in the things I model are

1078
00:40:55.730 --> 00:40:57.250
so great that the difference between those

1079
00:40:57.250 --> 00:40:59.370
two is lost in the noise. So it's just easier

1080
00:40:59.370 --> 00:41:01.650
for me to use Newton's laws. But it's a

1081
00:41:01.650 --> 00:41:03.930
really good example of how theory makes

1082
00:41:03.930 --> 00:41:05.850
predictions that are verified for a very long

1083
00:41:05.850 --> 00:41:08.050
time. But eventually you get to the point

1084
00:41:08.050 --> 00:41:10.930
where you go beyond what theory explains,

1085
00:41:11.010 --> 00:41:13.370
and that leads to new theories. And in this

1086
00:41:13.370 --> 00:41:14.890
case, it's a case where there are these set

1087
00:41:14.890 --> 00:41:17.250
of theories that, uh, are very much at the

1088
00:41:17.250 --> 00:41:19.490
cutting edge of science, where the

1089
00:41:19.490 --> 00:41:21.650
predictions that they make are predictions of

1090
00:41:21.650 --> 00:41:24.130
things we have not yet seen. Because it's

1091
00:41:24.130 --> 00:41:25.730
fairly pointless to only predict the things

1092
00:41:25.730 --> 00:41:27.810
we have seen and not go beyond that. So they

1093
00:41:27.810 --> 00:41:30.530
predict things we haven't yet seen. One of

1094
00:41:30.530 --> 00:41:32.810
those things is the existence of cosmogenic

1095
00:41:32.810 --> 00:41:35.410
neutrinos. And, um, it may well be that this

1096
00:41:35.410 --> 00:41:37.250
is the first detection of a cosmogenic

1097
00:41:37.250 --> 00:41:39.930
neutrino, which then adds credence to the

1098
00:41:39.930 --> 00:41:42.010
idea that these quantum field theories work

1099
00:41:42.010 --> 00:41:44.130
and make sense. So it's that interplay

1100
00:41:44.130 --> 00:41:46.610
between theory and observation, an experiment

1101
00:41:46.610 --> 00:41:49.150
that I think is really interesting, Even if,

1102
00:41:49.150 --> 00:41:51.070
to be honest, I really don't understand it.

1103
00:41:51.470 --> 00:41:54.270
Andrew Dunkley: And what, uh, Jonti is saying, Casey, is that

1104
00:41:54.270 --> 00:41:56.750
it'll be 150 years before someone comes up

1105
00:41:56.750 --> 00:41:59.550
with a model that actually explains it.

1106
00:42:00.030 --> 00:42:01.950
Possibly it could happen that way. You never

1107
00:42:01.950 --> 00:42:04.790
know. Uh, and thanks for the question. Casey

1108
00:42:04.790 --> 00:42:07.590
and I assumed female, but, um, looking at the

1109
00:42:07.590 --> 00:42:10.390
spelling of Casey could be male. Apologies if

1110
00:42:10.390 --> 00:42:11.710
I got that the wrong way around.

1111
00:42:14.440 --> 00:42:17.240
Jonti Horner: Roger, your lots are here. Also space nuts.

1112
00:42:17.400 --> 00:42:20.320
Andrew Dunkley: Our final question today comes from young

1113
00:42:20.320 --> 00:42:21.000
Henrik.

1114
00:42:21.400 --> 00:42:24.360
Jonti Horner: Hello, It's Henrique from Portugal again.

1115
00:42:25.560 --> 00:42:28.440
This time I'd like to ask about the

1116
00:42:28.440 --> 00:42:30.340
object NWC, uh,

1117
00:42:31.240 --> 00:42:34.200
349A. What makes it so

1118
00:42:34.200 --> 00:42:36.360
extreme? How does it emit

1119
00:42:36.600 --> 00:42:39.480
lasers and lasers. Can you

1120
00:42:39.480 --> 00:42:42.090
explain to my dad what's masers are?

1121
00:42:42.330 --> 00:42:43.450
Thank you. Bye.

1122
00:42:44.010 --> 00:42:45.850
Andrew Dunkley: Thank you. Henrik. Uh, yes,

1123
00:42:45.850 --> 00:42:48.850
MWC349A.A for Apple

1124
00:42:48.850 --> 00:42:51.130
M, not eight. That's what I thought he said.

1125
00:42:51.130 --> 00:42:53.770
But um, yeah, this is ah, this is a,

1126
00:42:54.890 --> 00:42:57.730
a mysterious emission line star and

1127
00:42:57.730 --> 00:42:59.930
radio bright object in the constellation of

1128
00:42:59.930 --> 00:43:00.570
Cygnus.

1129
00:43:00.810 --> 00:43:01.370
Jonti Horner: Yes.

1130
00:43:01.690 --> 00:43:04.570
Andrew Dunkley: And it's um, it's, it's suffered an intensive

1131
00:43:05.370 --> 00:43:06.330
mass loss.

1132
00:43:06.970 --> 00:43:09.850
Jonti Horner: Yeah, it's a really interesting object. Now I

1133
00:43:09.930 --> 00:43:11.770
wasn't familiar with this object before the

1134
00:43:11.770 --> 00:43:13.490
question came in and it's probably something

1135
00:43:13.490 --> 00:43:15.970
that when I was Henrik's age, I'd have heard

1136
00:43:15.970 --> 00:43:17.930
of and come across and would have really

1137
00:43:17.930 --> 00:43:19.610
found fascinating, just like Henrik does.

1138
00:43:19.610 --> 00:43:22.370
It's fabulous question as best we

1139
00:43:22.370 --> 00:43:24.210
understand that this is something that is a

1140
00:43:24.210 --> 00:43:26.730
very luminous, very bright star,

1141
00:43:27.690 --> 00:43:30.250
much younger than the Sun. It's probably at

1142
00:43:30.250 --> 00:43:32.250
most 5 million years old. But it could either

1143
00:43:32.250 --> 00:43:34.800
be a baby star that's still forming

1144
00:43:34.960 --> 00:43:36.960
or a very massive star that's just coming to

1145
00:43:36.960 --> 00:43:38.640
the end of its life, even though it's only 5

1146
00:43:38.640 --> 00:43:40.120
million years old. And there's been a lot of

1147
00:43:40.120 --> 00:43:42.880
debate of that over the years. It

1148
00:43:42.880 --> 00:43:45.480
is famous and it's prominent because it's one

1149
00:43:45.480 --> 00:43:48.120
of the most bright things in the sky at uh,

1150
00:43:48.120 --> 00:43:50.880
millimeter and radio wavelengths. It's very,

1151
00:43:50.880 --> 00:43:52.680
very bright, very obviously visible, even

1152
00:43:52.680 --> 00:43:54.640
though it's way too faint to see with the

1153
00:43:54.640 --> 00:43:57.360
naked eye. Part of the reason it's too faint

1154
00:43:57.360 --> 00:43:58.760
to see with the naked eye though, is that

1155
00:43:58.760 --> 00:44:00.640
there's a lot of dust and gas around both

1156
00:44:01.060 --> 00:44:03.380
where the object is. We found that it's got a

1157
00:44:04.100 --> 00:44:06.380
disk of dust and gas around it. Let's edge

1158
00:44:06.380 --> 00:44:08.100
onto us and is blocking some of the light.

1159
00:44:08.420 --> 00:44:10.420
Plus it's in the spiral arm of the Milky Way,

1160
00:44:10.420 --> 00:44:12.420
so there's a lot of dust and gas between us.

1161
00:44:12.740 --> 00:44:14.540
So this thing has an apparent magnitude of

1162
00:44:14.540 --> 00:44:17.099
about 13, but there are about 10

1163
00:44:17.099 --> 00:44:19.140
magnitudes of extinction along the line of

1164
00:44:19.140 --> 00:44:21.020
sight between us and it, which means that for

1165
00:44:21.020 --> 00:44:23.620
every 10,000 photons it emits, only one

1166
00:44:23.620 --> 00:44:25.900
reaches us. In other words, if you could

1167
00:44:25.900 --> 00:44:28.040
clear all the dust and gas out, this will be

1168
00:44:28.040 --> 00:44:29.960
a third magnitude star and easy to see with a

1169
00:44:29.960 --> 00:44:30.640
naked eye.

1170
00:44:30.640 --> 00:44:31.000
Andrew Dunkley: Right.

1171
00:44:31.000 --> 00:44:33.160
Jonti Horner: So that's intrinsically how luminous it is.

1172
00:44:33.160 --> 00:44:35.960
It's thought to be about 1300 parsecs away.

1173
00:44:35.960 --> 00:44:38.920
So that's 39004000 light years. So

1174
00:44:38.920 --> 00:44:41.120
the light we receive from it we're seeing it

1175
00:44:41.120 --> 00:44:43.040
how it was 4,000 years ago when that light

1176
00:44:43.040 --> 00:44:45.920
was emitted. And because it's so

1177
00:44:45.920 --> 00:44:48.640
luminous in radio wavelengths, it's been

1178
00:44:48.640 --> 00:44:51.120
fairly well studied. And in particular, it

1179
00:44:51.120 --> 00:44:53.600
gives off a lot of energy at, uh, wavelengths

1180
00:44:53.600 --> 00:44:56.220
linked to molecular hydrogen. And it's known

1181
00:44:56.220 --> 00:44:59.100
as one of the few hydrogen masers that we see

1182
00:44:59.100 --> 00:45:01.260
in the sky. Which leads to Henrik's question

1183
00:45:01.260 --> 00:45:04.060
about what is a maser? The very

1184
00:45:04.060 --> 00:45:05.980
simple answer to that, which doesn't tell you

1185
00:45:05.980 --> 00:45:08.980
anything, is that a maser is a laser,

1186
00:45:08.980 --> 00:45:10.940
but happening at millimeter wavelengths. So

1187
00:45:10.940 --> 00:45:13.940
in the infrared, on radio. But it's the

1188
00:45:13.940 --> 00:45:15.940
same physical process. And in fact, masers

1189
00:45:15.940 --> 00:45:17.980
were what we developed before we could do

1190
00:45:17.980 --> 00:45:20.060
lasers, because lasers are the same

1191
00:45:20.060 --> 00:45:22.020
phenomenon happening at visible wavelengths

1192
00:45:22.020 --> 00:45:24.780
in the optical. That is a very accurate

1193
00:45:24.780 --> 00:45:26.260
description that tells you actually nothing

1194
00:45:26.260 --> 00:45:28.380
about what's going on. And I dug into this a

1195
00:45:28.380 --> 00:45:30.740
bit because like a lot of people, I use

1196
00:45:30.740 --> 00:45:32.780
lasers and think about them, but never really

1197
00:45:33.020 --> 00:45:35.820
remind myself how they work. Laser

1198
00:45:35.820 --> 00:45:38.620
stands for light activated.

1199
00:45:39.810 --> 00:45:42.140
Um, Simulated Emission of radiation.

1200
00:45:42.540 --> 00:45:44.740
Sorry, Light Amplification by Simulated

1201
00:45:44.740 --> 00:45:46.740
Emission of radiation. It's an acronym. And

1202
00:45:46.740 --> 00:45:49.420
MESA stands for Microwave Amplification by

1203
00:45:49.620 --> 00:45:51.860
Stimulated Emission of Radiation. So it's the

1204
00:45:51.860 --> 00:45:53.500
same process just happening at longer

1205
00:45:53.500 --> 00:45:56.500
wavelengths. What's happening effectively is

1206
00:45:56.500 --> 00:45:58.980
that when atoms are

1207
00:45:59.140 --> 00:46:01.860
excited, when energy is pumped into atoms

1208
00:46:02.100 --> 00:46:04.540
and that energy is absorbed by them, it makes

1209
00:46:04.540 --> 00:46:06.620
the electrons in those atoms jump from one

1210
00:46:06.620 --> 00:46:09.300
level to a higher energy level. And they are

1211
00:46:09.300 --> 00:46:12.180
very specific jumps in energy. It can only

1212
00:46:12.180 --> 00:46:14.220
jump by a certain amount. It can't miss a

1213
00:46:14.220 --> 00:46:16.770
gap. It's got to get exactly the right jump

1214
00:46:16.770 --> 00:46:19.570
to jump from one level to the next. So those

1215
00:46:19.570 --> 00:46:21.650
energy levels have very specific wavelengths

1216
00:46:21.650 --> 00:46:22.810
and we actually calculate them at

1217
00:46:22.810 --> 00:46:24.650
universities, part of our undergrad quantum

1218
00:46:24.650 --> 00:46:26.610
mechanics courses and things like this. It's

1219
00:46:26.610 --> 00:46:28.050
one of the tasks you have is work out the

1220
00:46:28.050 --> 00:46:30.530
energy levels of a hydrogen atom and

1221
00:46:30.930 --> 00:46:33.370
they are quantized such that, uh, when you're

1222
00:46:33.370 --> 00:46:35.130
at an energy level, if you want to jump down

1223
00:46:35.130 --> 00:46:36.730
to another one, you can only do that by

1224
00:46:36.730 --> 00:46:39.370
emitting a single photon. You can't emit

1225
00:46:39.370 --> 00:46:41.210
multiple photons that add up to that level.

1226
00:46:41.210 --> 00:46:43.850
You can only emit one photon. And you have to

1227
00:46:43.850 --> 00:46:46.850
hit the right energy level to get the gap.

1228
00:46:47.090 --> 00:46:49.850
And so that's why excited hydrogen glows at

1229
00:46:49.850 --> 00:46:52.730
very specific colors. So the photo behind me,

1230
00:46:52.730 --> 00:46:54.210
which won't be visible if you're listening to

1231
00:46:54.210 --> 00:46:56.050
this as a podcast, but the photo behind me

1232
00:46:56.050 --> 00:46:58.929
shows the Helix Nebula, which is a star

1233
00:46:58.929 --> 00:47:01.460
forming, sorry, the Trifid Nebula, which, uh,

1234
00:47:01.690 --> 00:47:03.290
is a star forming region in the middle of

1235
00:47:03.290 --> 00:47:05.930
It's a very distinctive pink color. And that

1236
00:47:05.930 --> 00:47:08.460
pink color is hydrogen alpha emission, which,

1237
00:47:08.530 --> 00:47:10.570
which is hydrogen atoms jumping from the

1238
00:47:10.570 --> 00:47:13.050
third energy level to the second, emitting

1239
00:47:13.050 --> 00:47:15.130
light, and all emitting light of exactly the

1240
00:47:15.130 --> 00:47:17.610
same color. So that's known as

1241
00:47:17.610 --> 00:47:20.450
spontaneous emission. That's where the atom

1242
00:47:20.450 --> 00:47:22.290
sheds its energy by emitting light of a

1243
00:47:22.290 --> 00:47:25.250
certain color. Simulated emission is where

1244
00:47:25.250 --> 00:47:27.570
something happens to trigger that emission,

1245
00:47:28.450 --> 00:47:30.930
specifically at a specific time. So you've

1246
00:47:30.930 --> 00:47:33.650
got an atom, um, that is excited, is sat at a

1247
00:47:33.650 --> 00:47:35.750
higher energy level, and something gives it a

1248
00:47:35.750 --> 00:47:38.430
nudge and causes it to emit energy. And the

1249
00:47:38.430 --> 00:47:40.430
way that that works is that it absorbs a

1250
00:47:40.430 --> 00:47:42.950
photon of the same energy of the energy level

1251
00:47:42.950 --> 00:47:45.190
difference that it was going to emit anyway,

1252
00:47:45.270 --> 00:47:47.390
and then immediately emits two photons of

1253
00:47:47.390 --> 00:47:49.830
that energy. So you get one photon in and two

1254
00:47:49.830 --> 00:47:52.670
photons out. Two photons out can hit two

1255
00:47:52.670 --> 00:47:54.790
atoms and trigger them to emit, which means

1256
00:47:54.790 --> 00:47:56.510
you get four photons out and so on. So you

1257
00:47:56.510 --> 00:47:59.350
can get this cascade. So what makes it work

1258
00:47:59.350 --> 00:48:01.630
is that there are many ways of exciting the

1259
00:48:01.630 --> 00:48:03.470
atoms in the first place. They don't have to

1260
00:48:03.470 --> 00:48:05.870
just absorb photons. They can be excited

1261
00:48:05.870 --> 00:48:07.690
through magnet magnetic fields, uh, or all

1262
00:48:07.690 --> 00:48:10.090
sorts of different things going on. And so a

1263
00:48:10.090 --> 00:48:12.930
maser is effectively somewhere where

1264
00:48:13.090 --> 00:48:15.890
emission is being stimulated by

1265
00:48:15.890 --> 00:48:18.490
incoming photons of a given wavelength, which

1266
00:48:18.490 --> 00:48:20.890
results in more photons being emitted of that

1267
00:48:20.890 --> 00:48:23.210
wavelength than are coming in. And so you get

1268
00:48:23.210 --> 00:48:26.010
this amplification effect. So in this

1269
00:48:26.010 --> 00:48:27.970
case, this being a hydrogen maser means that

1270
00:48:27.970 --> 00:48:30.410
you've got a lot of hydrogen gas there. That

1271
00:48:30.410 --> 00:48:32.890
hydrogen gas is being irradiated by emission

1272
00:48:32.890 --> 00:48:34.850
of a specific wavelength by this object.

1273
00:48:35.910 --> 00:48:37.800
Um, and that is stimulating the emission of

1274
00:48:37.800 --> 00:48:39.400
more photons, which means you get an

1275
00:48:39.400 --> 00:48:41.680
extremely bright emission at that wavelength

1276
00:48:41.840 --> 00:48:43.560
because you're getting this amplification

1277
00:48:43.560 --> 00:48:46.080
effect. And so that's how these things works

1278
00:48:46.160 --> 00:48:48.440
as a maser. And that has been very useful in

1279
00:48:48.440 --> 00:48:50.320
allowing us to study it because it means we

1280
00:48:50.320 --> 00:48:52.680
get a stronger signal, we get more light, so

1281
00:48:52.680 --> 00:48:53.680
there's more we can study.

1282
00:48:54.800 --> 00:48:57.680
What my research around it this morning

1283
00:48:57.840 --> 00:48:59.760
kind of found out was that there is some

1284
00:49:00.080 --> 00:49:02.650
significant debate historically over whether

1285
00:49:02.650 --> 00:49:05.450
this is firstly a binary star, or on its own,

1286
00:49:05.450 --> 00:49:07.610
there's another very hot blue star very close

1287
00:49:07.610 --> 00:49:10.050
to it in the sky that for a long time was

1288
00:49:10.050 --> 00:49:12.410
thought to be a binary companion. And that's

1289
00:49:12.410 --> 00:49:15.410
why this is MWC349A,

1290
00:49:15.410 --> 00:49:18.170
because there's a star MWC349B.

1291
00:49:18.970 --> 00:49:21.010
Now, recent studies that have measured the

1292
00:49:21.010 --> 00:49:23.490
radial velocity of the two stars suggests

1293
00:49:23.490 --> 00:49:26.330
that the star B is moving 35

1294
00:49:26.330 --> 00:49:29.310
kilometers per second compared to star A. So

1295
00:49:29.310 --> 00:49:30.750
they're not gravitationally held together

1296
00:49:30.750 --> 00:49:32.950
anymore. So they're probably not now a

1297
00:49:32.950 --> 00:49:35.550
binary. Though there is some debate whether

1298
00:49:36.190 --> 00:49:38.590
they were in the past, whether they were held

1299
00:49:38.590 --> 00:49:40.590
together by gravity. And then those two stars

1300
00:49:40.590 --> 00:49:42.990
have shed mass. As we said, this star seems

1301
00:49:42.990 --> 00:49:45.590
to have thrown mass away in recent times, may

1302
00:49:45.590 --> 00:49:47.270
even have lost half its mass. It may have

1303
00:49:47.270 --> 00:49:49.990
gone from 40 solar masses to 20. That

1304
00:49:49.990 --> 00:49:51.550
weakens its gravitational pull until

1305
00:49:51.550 --> 00:49:54.070
eventually the binary falls apart. So that's

1306
00:49:54.070 --> 00:49:55.550
one part of the debate. But the recent

1307
00:49:55.550 --> 00:49:58.120
results seem to suggest that even if they

1308
00:49:58.120 --> 00:49:59.960
were a binary in the past, they no longer

1309
00:49:59.960 --> 00:50:02.480
are. The other debate is

1310
00:50:02.960 --> 00:50:04.960
whether this is a very young star that's only

1311
00:50:04.960 --> 00:50:07.680
just forming now. Or whether it's a star that

1312
00:50:07.680 --> 00:50:09.320
formed a few million years ago and is coming

1313
00:50:09.320 --> 00:50:11.760
to the end of its life. And, um, you'd have

1314
00:50:11.760 --> 00:50:13.840
thought that was obvious. But for stars like

1315
00:50:13.840 --> 00:50:15.240
this, it's quite hard to tell, especially

1316
00:50:15.240 --> 00:50:17.280
when they're so obscured by gas and dust.

1317
00:50:17.760 --> 00:50:20.720
Now, if it was a baby star, the really

1318
00:50:20.960 --> 00:50:22.920
odd part of that would be, why are there no

1319
00:50:22.920 --> 00:50:25.330
other baby stars around it? Stars kind of

1320
00:50:25.330 --> 00:50:27.170
form in big nurseries. And particularly

1321
00:50:27.170 --> 00:50:29.690
massive stars don't tend to form alone. They

1322
00:50:29.690 --> 00:50:32.450
tend to form in big associations where lots

1323
00:50:32.450 --> 00:50:34.210
of stars are forming at once. And there's one

1324
00:50:34.610 --> 00:50:37.250
relatively near this called Cygnus OB2.

1325
00:50:37.650 --> 00:50:39.490
And, uh, one of the suggestions for this

1326
00:50:39.490 --> 00:50:41.410
star, if it's an older star that's coming to

1327
00:50:41.410 --> 00:50:43.530
the end of its life, is that it formed in

1328
00:50:43.530 --> 00:50:45.290
that association and was ejected in an

1329
00:50:45.290 --> 00:50:46.890
encounter with other stars and flung

1330
00:50:46.890 --> 00:50:48.730
outwards. And, um, we're seeing it quite far

1331
00:50:48.730 --> 00:50:50.370
away because it's traveled that distance

1332
00:50:50.370 --> 00:50:52.590
through its lifetime. So it formed there, but

1333
00:50:52.590 --> 00:50:55.550
it's escaped. If it's a baby

1334
00:50:55.550 --> 00:50:57.590
star, we have the problem of how is it only

1335
00:50:57.590 --> 00:50:59.270
just forming in an area where there's not

1336
00:50:59.270 --> 00:51:01.110
really any other stars forming around it.

1337
00:51:01.670 --> 00:51:03.990
Recent studies have suggested, by looking

1338
00:51:04.470 --> 00:51:07.270
over all things, the balance between carbon

1339
00:51:07.349 --> 00:51:09.950
13 and carbon 12, these two different carbon

1340
00:51:09.950 --> 00:51:12.870
isotopes in the gas that has been shed by

1341
00:51:12.870 --> 00:51:15.870
this star. Recent, uh, measurements of that

1342
00:51:15.870 --> 00:51:17.510
have suggested it's actually an old star.

1343
00:51:18.400 --> 00:51:20.840
Well, old for its mass, you know, about 5

1344
00:51:20.840 --> 00:51:22.360
million years old. But coming to the end of

1345
00:51:22.360 --> 00:51:25.160
its life, that has been shedding mass. And,

1346
00:51:25.160 --> 00:51:27.120
um, that is explained by the balance of the

1347
00:51:27.120 --> 00:51:29.280
isotopes in the gases that it has emitted.

1348
00:51:29.600 --> 00:51:31.680
Which fits in a bit better with the idea that

1349
00:51:31.680 --> 00:51:33.560
it may have formed in that Cygnus LB2

1350
00:51:33.560 --> 00:51:35.880
association a few million years ago, have

1351
00:51:35.880 --> 00:51:38.520
been flung outwards and escaped. Would also

1352
00:51:38.520 --> 00:51:40.740
fit A little bit with the idea that the star,

1353
00:51:40.740 --> 00:51:43.520
uh, B next to it, was once held to it as a

1354
00:51:43.520 --> 00:51:45.000
binary. But with the mass loss, they've

1355
00:51:45.000 --> 00:51:46.820
separated and they're going their separate

1356
00:51:46.820 --> 00:51:49.020
ways. You know, that happens all the time.

1357
00:51:49.500 --> 00:51:51.660
And so that all kind of, as a narrative seems

1358
00:51:51.660 --> 00:51:53.300
to fit together. But it's got a disk of

1359
00:51:53.300 --> 00:51:55.180
material around it that's nearly edge on.

1360
00:51:55.420 --> 00:51:57.700
It's got jets of material coming out of it.

1361
00:51:57.700 --> 00:51:59.900
There is a suggestion that it's probably shed

1362
00:52:00.300 --> 00:52:02.300
something like 20 times the mass of the sun

1363
00:52:02.300 --> 00:52:03.980
over the last few hundred thousand years.

1364
00:52:04.540 --> 00:52:06.460
And, uh, that it's shedding something like

1365
00:52:06.940 --> 00:52:09.660
1/100,000th of a solar mass per year,

1366
00:52:10.380 --> 00:52:12.580
which doesn't sound like a lot, but that's a

1367
00:52:12.580 --> 00:52:14.340
huge amount of mass to be throwing away in

1368
00:52:14.340 --> 00:52:16.460
every given year, which means it would throw

1369
00:52:16.460 --> 00:52:18.600
away a mass equ, the mass of the sun in just

1370
00:52:18.600 --> 00:52:21.560
100,000 years. That's really significant

1371
00:52:21.800 --> 00:52:23.720
mass loss going on as this star comes to the

1372
00:52:23.720 --> 00:52:25.840
end of its life. And it's a really

1373
00:52:25.840 --> 00:52:28.400
interesting case study of that detective

1374
00:52:28.400 --> 00:52:31.320
story again, of how we gather clues from

1375
00:52:31.320 --> 00:52:33.000
all these different types of observations

1376
00:52:33.880 --> 00:52:36.040
about a star that for us, at optical

1377
00:52:36.040 --> 00:52:38.280
wavelengths is so heavily concealed from us

1378
00:52:38.600 --> 00:52:41.120
that only one part in 10,000 of the light it

1379
00:52:41.120 --> 00:52:43.160
emits actually reaches as the rest of it gets

1380
00:52:43.160 --> 00:52:45.600
absorbed en route. Um, and that's why it's

1381
00:52:45.600 --> 00:52:47.400
been such a challenging problem for astronomy

1382
00:52:47.400 --> 00:52:49.240
for so many years, because it's really hard

1383
00:52:49.240 --> 00:52:52.080
to see what's going on. But by looking at the

1384
00:52:52.080 --> 00:52:54.600
masers emitting this light, by looking at all

1385
00:52:54.600 --> 00:52:56.360
the different things going on around it, by

1386
00:52:56.360 --> 00:52:59.080
doing clever studies of the chemistry of the

1387
00:52:59.080 --> 00:53:01.560
gases around it, we can start to piece

1388
00:53:01.560 --> 00:53:03.080
together its life story and figure out what

1389
00:53:03.080 --> 00:53:05.720
it is. I don't think that story of

1390
00:53:05.720 --> 00:53:08.520
discovery is finished yet, by any means. And

1391
00:53:08.520 --> 00:53:09.840
it may well be, Henrik, that when you're

1392
00:53:09.840 --> 00:53:11.400
older, you can actually work on this object

1393
00:53:11.400 --> 00:53:13.240
and learn more about it yourself. I suspect

1394
00:53:13.240 --> 00:53:15.560
people will still be discovering things about

1395
00:53:15.560 --> 00:53:18.400
this object in decades to come. But

1396
00:53:18.400 --> 00:53:20.640
it's a really fascinating object, and I'm

1397
00:53:20.640 --> 00:53:22.080
just so delighted that you brought it to my

1398
00:53:22.080 --> 00:53:23.440
attention because I'd never stumbled across

1399
00:53:23.440 --> 00:53:25.080
it before, and it's really, really cool.

1400
00:53:25.240 --> 00:53:27.760
Andrew Dunkley: Yes, it's, um. Sorry for this. It's

1401
00:53:27.760 --> 00:53:30.480
amazing. Uh, but, Henrik, thanks for the

1402
00:53:30.480 --> 00:53:33.040
question, and you do sound, uh, very astute,

1403
00:53:33.040 --> 00:53:35.000
and maybe, maybe you will be the one that

1404
00:53:35.000 --> 00:53:37.360
will solve it in years to come. Lovely to

1405
00:53:37.360 --> 00:53:40.280
hear from you. And if you have questions for

1406
00:53:40.280 --> 00:53:43.010
us, please send them through. We can take,

1407
00:53:43.010 --> 00:53:44.950
uh, your questions on our website. So, Space

1408
00:53:44.950 --> 00:53:47.910
Nuts podcast.com spacenuts IO

1409
00:53:48.230 --> 00:53:51.110
click on that little AMA link up the top

1410
00:53:51.110 --> 00:53:53.630
and you can send us text or audio

1411
00:53:53.630 --> 00:53:55.470
questions or both. Some people have done

1412
00:53:55.470 --> 00:53:57.870
that. And don't forget to tell us who you are

1413
00:53:57.870 --> 00:53:59.830
and where you're from. And, uh, yeah, we're

1414
00:53:59.830 --> 00:54:02.150
kind of running sort of

1415
00:54:02.310 --> 00:54:05.310
parallel with the number of questions we need

1416
00:54:05.310 --> 00:54:07.230
each week. So, uh, we haven't got a big

1417
00:54:07.230 --> 00:54:09.310
stockpile at the moment. So it's a good time

1418
00:54:09.310 --> 00:54:12.230
to send some questions into us. So please do.

1419
00:54:12.230 --> 00:54:14.670
Would love to hear from you. Don't even worry

1420
00:54:14.670 --> 00:54:17.310
if you think it's dumb, because there's no

1421
00:54:17.310 --> 00:54:19.390
dumb questions in astronomy and space

1422
00:54:19.390 --> 00:54:21.950
science. There's weird questions, but there

1423
00:54:21.950 --> 00:54:24.510
aren't any dumb questions. And, uh, while

1424
00:54:24.510 --> 00:54:25.990
you're on our website, have a look around.

1425
00:54:26.070 --> 00:54:28.630
There's a little link, uh, shop

1426
00:54:28.630 --> 00:54:30.670
link. It's really good. You can get some

1427
00:54:30.670 --> 00:54:33.630
Space Nuts memorabilia there or sign

1428
00:54:33.630 --> 00:54:36.580
up to our Astronomy Daily Newsfeed. And if,

1429
00:54:36.580 --> 00:54:38.710
uh, you are interested in becoming a patron,

1430
00:54:38.780 --> 00:54:41.750
uh, you can do that via the website as well

1431
00:54:41.750 --> 00:54:44.390
under the support. Support our podcast link.

1432
00:54:44.800 --> 00:54:46.990
Uh, those are just options. None of it's

1433
00:54:46.990 --> 00:54:49.470
mandatory. And, uh, we appreciate all the

1434
00:54:49.470 --> 00:54:52.230
support we get, so thank you. And Jonti,

1435
00:54:52.230 --> 00:54:54.430
thank you so much. Uh, it's been great to

1436
00:54:54.430 --> 00:54:56.230
talk to you and, uh, we'll see you on the

1437
00:54:56.230 --> 00:54:56.950
next episode.

1438
00:54:57.270 --> 00:54:58.630
Jonti Horner: Yeah. Thank you for having me. It's good to

1439
00:54:58.630 --> 00:54:59.110
be back.

1440
00:54:59.270 --> 00:55:01.470
Andrew Dunkley: Always a pleasure. Jonti, uh, Horner,

1441
00:55:01.470 --> 00:55:03.190
professor of Astrophysics at the University

1442
00:55:03.350 --> 00:55:05.950
of Southern Queensland. And, uh, uh, thanks

1443
00:55:05.950 --> 00:55:08.560
to Huw in the studio who, um,

1444
00:55:08.560 --> 00:55:11.190
couldn't be with us today because they're

1445
00:55:11.190 --> 00:55:13.550
going to hate me for this one. He got lost in

1446
00:55:13.550 --> 00:55:16.470
a maser. Oh, dear. And from me, Andrew

1447
00:55:16.470 --> 00:55:18.030
Dunkley. Thanks for your company. We'll see

1448
00:55:18.030 --> 00:55:20.070
you on the next episode of Space Nuts. Bye.

1449
00:55:20.070 --> 00:55:20.430
Bye.

1450
00:55:21.710 --> 00:55:23.910
Voice Over Guy: You've been listening to the Space Nuts

1451
00:55:23.910 --> 00:55:26.870
podcast, available at

1452
00:55:26.870 --> 00:55:28.750
Apple Podcasts, Spotify,

1453
00:55:29.070 --> 00:55:31.830
iHeartRadio, or your favorite podcast

1454
00:55:31.830 --> 00:55:33.550
player. You can also stream on

1455
00:55:33.550 --> 00:55:36.510
demand at bitesz.com This has been another

1456
00:55:36.590 --> 00:55:38.510
quality podcast production from

1457
00:55:38.510 --> 00:55:39.710
bitesz.com